Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Analisa Torres

Analisa Nadine Torres is a district judge for the for the Southern District of , to which she was appointed in 2013. Torres received an A.B. from in 1981 and a J.D. from in 1984. Following law school, she worked in private practice in from 1984 to 1992 and then as an assistant corporation counsel in the appeals division of the Law Department from 1992 to 1999. From 1999 to 2013, she served as an acting justice of the of for the First Judicial District. Nominated by President in 2011 and confirmed by the in 2013, Torres has handled a range of civil and criminal matters, including securities litigation and cryptocurrency cases. She presided over the high-profile Securities and Exchange Commission v. case, ruling in 2023 that XRP sales on public exchanges did not qualify as securities offerings under , though institutional sales did violate securities s; in , she imposed a $125 million on . Torres also oversaw compliance monitoring in Department stop-and-frisk reform efforts and gender discrimination litigation against . The third generation in her family to serve as a , Torres descends from Puerto Rican jurists including her grandfather, N. Torres.

Early life and family background

Puerto Rican heritage and upbringing

Analisa Nadine Torres was born in 1959 in to parents of Puerto Rican descent. Her paternal grandfather, Felipe N. Torres, was born in 1897 on a farm in , and later migrated to , where he became a pioneering Afro-Latino judge and assemblyman representing Puerto Rican communities in the . Her paternal grandmother, Censita Torres, was born in 1904 in , and immigrated to in 1922 with her family. Torres's father, Frank Torres, was born in 1928 in to these Puerto Rican immigrant parents and followed in his father's footsteps as a judge and state assemblyman focused on representation. Torres grew up in amid a family legacy emphasizing public service and community upliftment for Puerto Ricans and Latinos. Her grandfather instilled in her father the principle that those granted educational and professional opportunities had a duty to advance Latino interests, a value Torres has described as central to her family's ethos. This intergenerational commitment, rooted in the challenges faced by early Puerto Rican migrants in , shaped her early exposure to ideals of civic responsibility within Puerto Rican legal and political circles, though specific details of her childhood residence remain undocumented in public records. The family's judicial lineage—spanning three generations of Puerto Rican descent—highlighted a focus on breaking barriers in institutions traditionally dominated by non-Hispanics.

Judicial family legacy

Felipe N. Torres, Analisa Torres's grandfather, was appointed in 1963 as the first Puerto Rican judge on the New York State Family Court, serving until his mandatory retirement in 1977. Born in Puerto Rico on May 26, 1897, and dying on April 3, 1994, he had previously become the first Puerto Rican elected to the New York State Assembly from the Bronx, representing the district from 1953 to 1962. As a pioneering Afro-Latino jurist, Felipe Torres advocated for greater Hispanic participation in the judiciary, co-founding organizations like the Harlem Lawyers Association to promote minority legal professionals. Frank Torres, Analisa's father and Felipe's son, extended this tradition as a second-generation judge, serving as a justice on the New York State Supreme Court after earlier terms as a state assemblyman succeeding his father in the Bronx district. Born to Puerto Rican parents and dying at age 93 in August 2021, Frank Torres emphasized public service and expanded legal access for minority communities, actively campaigning for increased Latino appointments to the bench during his tenure. His efforts built on familial precedents of judicial involvement, focusing on representation in New York's courts amid limited Hispanic presence at the time. Analisa Torres represents the third generation in this Puerto Rican judicial lineage, following her grandfather and father's paths into state and federal benches, forming what is documented as the only known three-generation line of Puerto Rican judges in U.S. courts. This progression provided a direct familial model of legal , rooted in advocacy for ethnic minority advancement within the judiciary, without reliance on unsubstantiated external influences.

Education

Undergraduate education

Analisa Torres attended Harvard College, graduating with an A.B. degree magna cum laude in 1981. Her undergraduate studies at Harvard provided a foundation in liberal arts, emphasizing analytical rigor characteristic of the institution's curriculum during that era. No specific major or extracurricular involvements from her time at Harvard are detailed in official judicial biographies.

Legal education

Torres attended , where she earned her degree in 1984. During her studies, she received the Charles Evans Hughes Fellowship in 1983, as well as the S.K. Yee Scholarship in 1982 and support from the Puerto Rican Legal Defense & Education Fund. Columbia's curriculum at the time provided foundational training in federal , , and advocacy skills, aligning with the demands of public prosecution in an era marked by escalating urban crime rates in , which peaked in the mid-1980s with over 2,000 homicides annually by 1990. This prosecutorial-oriented education equipped students with analytical rigor for handling complex federal cases, though specific course selections by Torres remain undocumented in .

Pre-federal judicial career

Prosecutorial roles

Torres served as an Assistant United States Attorney in the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York from 1985 to 1994. In this role, she participated in federal prosecutions within one of the nation's busiest U.S. Attorney's Offices, which handled a high volume of cases during that era, including over 2,000 indictments annually in the late 1980s and early 1990s focused on financial crimes, racketeering, and narcotics trafficking under RICO statutes. Her work built foundational expertise in federal evidentiary standards, grand jury proceedings, and the prosecution of complex multi-defendant conspiracies, emphasizing thorough investigation and adherence to due process requirements under the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Specific case attributions from her tenure are limited in public records, reflecting the collaborative nature of U.S. Attorney's Office litigation teams, though the SDNY achieved conviction rates exceeding 95% in criminal trials during this period through rigorous case preparation.

Private practice experience

Torres commenced her private practice career shortly after graduating from in 1984, serving as a associate in firms until 1992. Her initial role was at Kaye Scholer from 1984 to 1985, followed by Coudert Brothers from 1985 to 1987, and Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler from 1988 to 1992. This seven-year tenure emphasized transactions and related civil matters, reflecting the transactional focus typical of such positions in major practices. Specific case outcomes from this period remain undocumented in , but her work contributed to the firms' handling of commercial deals amid New York City's property market dynamics of the late 1980s and early 1990s. No evidence indicates involvement in criminal defense, securities litigation, or complex corporate disputes during these years, aligning instead with the specialization noted in nomination materials.

Entry into federal judiciary

Magistrate judge appointment

Analisa Torres did not serve as a U.S. magistrate . Her entry into the federal judiciary occurred directly via to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of , following nearly a decade as a justice on the , Criminal Term. Prior to that, from 2003 to 2004, she had been a on the Civil Court of the City of , handling preliminary matters in civil and small claims cases, but this state-level role did not involve federal magistrate duties such as pretrial supervision in SDNY cases. No records indicate involvement in the federal magistrate selection process, which typically involves merit panel recommendations to district for by consensus.

District judge nomination and confirmation

President nominated Analisa Torres on November 14, 2012, to the for the Southern District of , filling the vacancy created by Naomi Reice Buchwald's assumption of on June 1, 2011. The Southern District of , handling a high volume of federal cases including securities, , and matters, had faced delays in filling judicial vacancies amid broader gridlock on Obama-era nominations. Torres's selection emphasized her extensive prosecutorial and judicial experience, alongside the administration's priority of enhancing demographic on the federal bench, where Latinas remained underrepresented. The initial nomination lapsed with the end of the 112th Congress, prompting renomination on January 4, 2013. The Senate Judiciary Committee advanced the nomination following a hearing on January 23, 2013, where Torres testified on her background and approach to judging; the committee reported it favorably by voice vote on February 14, 2013. In her written questionnaire responses, Torres articulated a philosophy grounded in fidelity to precedent, stating that lower court judges must "faithfully apply controlling Supreme Court and Second Circuit authority" and adhere to circuit precedent absent en banc reconsideration or higher court intervention, reflecting a conventional commitment to stare decisis as a stabilizing force in jurisprudence. The full confirmed Torres on April 18, 2013, by , indicating broad bipartisan consensus without recorded opposition, amid a period of relatively smoother processing for district court nominees compared to circuit courts. She received her judicial commission on April 23, 2013, enabling her to assume the bench. The process underscored the role of home-state senators, with New York's advocating for Torres based on recommendations from legal stakeholders emphasizing her qualifications for the district's demanding docket.

Federal district judgeship

Overview of tenure

Analisa Torres was sworn in as a District Judge for the Southern District of New York on , 2013, following her confirmation by the U.S. Senate on April 18, 2013. In this capacity, she assumed responsibility for adjudicating a broad spectrum of federal cases, including civil disputes, criminal prosecutions, and proceedings ancillary to matters, within one of the busiest judicial s in the , which encompasses , , and surrounding counties. Her docket reflects the district's prominence in handling complex commercial litigation, , and regulatory enforcement actions tied to New York's role as a global financial hub. During her tenure, Torres has managed hundreds of cases, issuing detailed opinions on motions, summary judgments, and trial outcomes, while overseeing both bench trials—where the serves as fact-finder—and jury trials involving diverse litigants from corporations to individuals. judicial statistics indicate her involvement in terminating civil cases at rates consistent with district norms, such as 27 terminations in a recent reporting period, underscoring efficient case resolution amid high-volume filings. Appeals from her decisions have proceeded to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, with outcomes varying based on the legal issues presented, though comprehensive reversal rates for individual judges in the district remain unpublished in aggregated form. Torres's caseload has evolved from predominantly routine federal matters in the mid-2010s to increasingly prominent disputes amid the district's expansion in specialized litigation, including surges in and securities enforcement following market developments post-2013. This progression aligns with broader trends in the Southern District, where annual civil filings exceeded in recent years, necessitating adaptive management of high-stakes, precedent-setting dockets while maintaining procedural rigor.

Notable rulings in securities and financial cases

In v. , Inc., filed in December 2020, Judge Torres granted partial on July 13, 2023, ruling that Ripple's programmatic sales of XRP tokens on public exchanges—totaling over 8.4 billion XRP for $757 million—did not constitute unregistered securities offerings under the , as they failed the third prong of the Howey test by lacking a reasonable expectation of profits derived solely from Ripple's efforts, given the arm's-length, decentralized nature of transactions. In contrast, she held that Ripple's direct institutional sales of 300 million XRP for $728 million to sophisticated investors satisfied all Howey prongs, including common enterprise and reliance on Ripple's promotional efforts, thus violating Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Act. This application of the Howey test from first principles, without deference to the 's expansive interpretive stance, narrowed the agency's enforcement scope in cryptocurrency markets and prompted an immediate 70% surge in XRP's price from $0.47 to $0.80. On August 7, 2024, Torres entered final judgment imposing a $125 million on —far below the SEC's $2 billion demand—while permanently enjoining future violations but rejecting of $729 million in institutional sales proceeds, as the SEC failed to prove net investor harm or under 15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)(7). In May and June 2025, she denied the parties' joint motions for indicative rulings to dissolve the and halve the penalty to $50 million, citing the need for appellate resolution amid shifting enforcement priorities under new leadership, thereby upholding the 2023 liability findings and 2024 remedies. The decision's emphasis on transactional facts over regulatory labels established precedent constraining overreach in digital assets, influencing subsequent cases like SEC v. by clarifying exemptions. In Chen-Oster v. Goldman, Sachs & Co., a long-running suit against the investment bank, Torres denied ' motion to decertify the on March 17, 2022, preserving claims by approximately 2,000 female associates and vice presidents alleging systemic pay and promotion disparities in violation of Title VII, based on evidence of common statistical patterns and policies. She further rejected the firm's bid to dismiss most claims on August 22, 2022, advancing the case toward trial by upholding and impact theories tied to performance evaluations in roles. The matter resolved via a $215 million settlement for affected employees, approved by Torres on November 7, 2023, without admission of liability.

Notable rulings in civil rights and policing cases

Torres has overseen compliance with remedial orders in Floyd v. City of New York, a class action challenging the New York Police Department's (NYPD) stop-and-frisk practices as unconstitutional under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments, since the case's reassignment to her in 2013 following an appellate stay of the original 2013 liability finding. Under her supervision, independent monitors have submitted periodic reports analyzing NYPD stop data, revealing persistent racial disparities—for instance, Black and Latino individuals comprising over 80% of stops in certain periods despite lower contraband yield rates compared to whites—and low rates of documented justifications for suspicion. These reports, filed with Torres, have informed court-ordered reforms, including enhanced training on constitutional stops and supervisory reviews, though compliance assessments have noted incomplete implementation, such as inconsistent use of body-worn cameras during stops. In September 2024, Torres ordered the public release of a report by retired James E. Yates examining the NYPD's disciplinary system for stop-and-frisk violations, which documented systemic failures in : from 2014 to 2022, fewer than 1% of over 100,000 audited stops resulted in discipline for constitutional breaches, despite monitors identifying patterns of "undisciplined" practices like stops lacking in 20-30% of reviewed cases. The Yates report criticized the NYPD's internal processes for routinely downgrading or rejecting substantiated violations, attributing this to inadequate investigative rigor and command discretion, leading Torres to direct further monitoring without immediate additional remedies. This oversight has contributed to a sustained decline in total stops—from peaks of 685,000 annually pre-2013 to under 100,000 in recent years—though data indicate a rebound to 97,000 stops in 2023 with disproportionate impacts on minority neighborhoods. In related policing litigation, such as Ligon v. City of , Torres issued orders in 2018 requiring the NYPD to improve documentation of police-citizen encounters to facilitate compliance tracking with stop-and-frisk reforms, emphasizing verifiable grounds for intrusions to prevent unchecked authority. She has also adjudicated individual excessive force claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983; for example, in Diaz v. Mercurio (2019), she denied in part a motion to dismiss an excessive force allegation against officers, permitting the claim to advance based on disputed facts about use of force during an arrest. Conversely, in Fox v. Doe (2019), she dismissed a pro se civil rights complaint for failure to state plausible claims against officers, reflecting scrutiny of unsubstantiated allegations. Torres' rulings in prisoner rights intersect with policing through conditions-of-confinement challenges tied to arrests; in Bush v. City of New York (2021), she dismissed as injunctive relief claims against individual officers after the plaintiff's release, applying precedents limiting post-deprivation remedies while upholding where force was deemed reasonable. In Holland v. City of New York, she referenced Sandin v. Conner to constrain claims by incarcerated plaintiffs, requiring atypical hardship for cognizable deprivations beyond routine custody, thus narrowing avenues for relief in routine jail conditions disputes. These decisions balance empirical review of incident specifics against doctrinal limits on municipal liability, consistent with her prior prosecutorial experience evaluating evidence in criminal matters.

Other significant decisions

In October 2025, Torres dismissed a $1 billion lawsuit filed by Israeli victims of the October 7, 2023, attacks against the , ruling that the agency possesses under the ' privileges and immunities convention. The plaintiffs alleged that UNRWA aided by permitting weapons storage and deployment in its schools, employing individuals involved in the attacks, and funneling over $1 billion in U.S. aid that indirectly supported , but Torres rejected these claims on jurisdictional grounds, deeming a U.S. Department of Justice statement denying immunity non-binding and insufficient to override international treaty obligations. In the employment discrimination context, Torres denied a motion to dismiss in Mehta v. DLA Piper LLP on September 29, 2025, allowing a former associate's claims of pregnancy bias to advance under Title VII, New York State Human Rights Law, and New York City Human Rights Law. The ruling rejected the firm's arguments for dismissal, finding sufficient allegations that the associate's maternity leave and childcare requests led to adverse actions, including and termination, thereby emphasizing evidentiary thresholds for inferring discriminatory intent in settings. Similarly, in Bethea v. Columbia University on May 29, 2024, Torres addressed claims by denying where evidence suggested retaliatory denial of accommodations post-miscarriage. Torres has consistently enforced arbitration agreements in procedural rulings during 2024 and 2025, granting stays in cases such as Manjarres v. Solar Mosaic, LLC on October 15, 2024, where she compelled for consumer finance disputes, prioritizing contractual mandates under the over preliminary injunctive requests. In Ventura et al. v. PJ National , LLC (stayed April 2024), she upheld stays pending in wage-and-hour litigation, underscoring rigorous application of the Act's pro- policy absent or . In a high-profile criminal matter, Torres dismissed charges against two Metropolitan Correctional Center guards, Tova Noel and Michael Thomas, on January 3, 2022, for falsifying records on the night of Jeffrey Epstein's death in August 2019, after both completed a six-month agreement involving and forfeiture. The decision followed guilty pleas to lesser falsification counts, with prosecutors confirming compliance, thereby closing accountability for lapses in monitoring the detained financier amid broader scrutiny of jail protocols.

Controversies and criticisms

Criticisms of anti-police stance

Critics, including law enforcement advocates, have accused U.S. District Judge Analisa Torres of exhibiting an anti-police bias through her oversight of reforms stemming from the 2013 Floyd v. City of New York ruling, which curtailed the New York Police Department's (NYPD) stop-and-frisk practices. Prior to her 2013 assignment to the case, Torres, then a magistrate judge, issued a 2010 opinion criticizing NYPD tactics in developments as involving "random, unjustified questioning" without , such as merely citing a location as "drug-prone," which she deemed insufficient under the Fourth Amendment. Police unions, such as the Patrolmen's Benevolent Association (PBA), argued that her rulings and orders exacerbate operational challenges for officers, with PBA President Patrick Lynch stating in 2018 that her directive requiring detailed tracking of potential illegal stops would "make it harder for cops to do their jobs" by imposing burdensome administrative requirements amid ongoing compliance monitoring. Right-leaning commentators and former law enforcement officials have linked Torres' of stop-and-frisk restrictions to broader undermining of , correlating with empirical rises in following the sharp decline in stops—from 685,000 in 2011 to under 20,000 annually by 2023—amid City's post-2013 reforms. NYPD stops plummeted after the Floyd remedies, which Torres has overseen, including her 2018 call for scrutiny of departmental policies on and her 2024-ordered report documenting insufficient NYPD discipline for unconstitutional frisks, prompting accusations from critics that such interventions prioritize procedural constraints over tactics empirically associated with crime reductions during the 1990s-2000s "broken windows" era. For instance, murders increased from 333 in 2013 to 468 in 2020 and 438 in 2022, with analysts attributing part of the spike to diminished deterrent effects of street-level , as stop-and-frisk had yielded thousands of weapons and narcotics seizures annually prior to curbs. These critiques contend that Torres' skepticism toward the practice, evident in rejecting police unions' 2014 motions to intervene against reform overhauls, normalizes left-leaning constitutional arguments that overlook causal evidence from high-stop periods when fell 80% citywide from 1990 peaks, potentially enabling unchecked criminal activity through "undisciplined" streets lacking routine interventions.

Debates over SEC v. Ripple ruling

In her July 13, 2023, summary judgment ruling in SEC v. , Inc., Judge Torres applied the Howey test to determine that XRP tokens sold programmatically on public exchanges did not constitute securities, as buyers lacked a reasonable expectation of profits derived from Ripple's efforts, whereas direct institutional sales did meet the test due to contractual investment understandings. Pro-crypto advocates, including industry analysts, hailed the decision as a rejection of the 's expansive interpretation of securities laws, establishing that secondary market trading of digital assets like XRP falls outside Howey prongs absent centralized promoter efforts, thereby curbing regulatory overreach and providing clarity for decentralized tokens. officials and enforcement proponents criticized the ruling for creating loopholes that could enable evasion of registration requirements, arguing it undermined investor protections by bifurcating sales based on context rather than the asset's inherent utility or promoter conduct. Subsequent remedies proceedings amplified debates, with Torres imposing a $125,035,150 on in August 2024 for institutional violations and a permanent barring future unregistered institutional XRP offerings, which some viewed as a balanced enforcement outcome preserving the 2023 distinctions. In 2025, joint settlement proposals by and the to vacate the , reduce the fine, and dismiss cross-appeals were rejected by Torres on May 8 and June 26, citing unchanged facts and law, leading critics to argue the 's permanence entrenches restrictions on institutional adoption without broader regulatory reform. The case concluded on August 8, 2025, with appeals dismissed and the $125 million fine upheld, prompting praise from executives for affirming non-security status in programmatic sales while drawing commissioner ire for forgoing stricter remedies amid shifting enforcement priorities. Empirically, the 2023 ruling correlated with a surge in XRP's price from approximately $0.47 to over $0.80 within days, reflecting market relief from delisting fears and perceived clarity on exchange trading, though prolonged appeals suppressed gains until the 2025 resolution, after which XRP exceeded $3.30 amid optimism for institutional inflows despite the injunction's limits on direct sales. Detractors contend the partial victory sustains litigation burdens across , as contextual Howey applications invite case-by-case uncertainty rather than comprehensive rules, while supporters emphasize its causal grounding in sale-specific expectations, influencing precedents in cases like ongoing actions against other platforms.

Perceptions of political bias in high-profile cases

Critics from conservative perspectives have accused Judge Analisa Torres of exhibiting left-leaning bias in high-profile cases, particularly those involving national security and discrimination claims, attributing this to her appointment by President Barack Obama in 2013. In a notable example, on October 2, 2025, Torres dismissed a civil lawsuit filed by victims and families of the October 7, 2023, Hamas attacks against the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA), ruling that the agency enjoyed immunity as a specialized organ of the United Nations despite the U.S. Department of Justice's assertion that it lacked such protection. This decision rejected the Trump administration's prior position on UNRWA's status and has been viewed by conservative and pro-Israel advocates as shielding an entity accused of diverting funds to Hamas infrastructure, potentially prioritizing international bureaucratic immunity over accountability for terrorism facilitation. In litigation, Torres's rulings have similarly fueled perceptions of ideological favoritism toward plaintiff-friendly outcomes aligned with progressive priorities. For instance, in a 12-year against alleging systemic sex bias, she denied the firm's motion to dismiss core claims in March 2022 and granted final approval to a $215 million on November 7, 2023, benefiting approximately 2,800 female employees. Conservative commentators interpret such allowances for broad class certifications and substantial payouts as indicative of a pattern among Democratic appointees to expand civil rights interpretations at the expense of employer defenses, though Torres's opinions emphasize adherence to statutory standards under Title VII. Further amplifying claims, Torres's local courtroom rule encouraging parties to include attorneys from underrepresented groups—intended to promote —drew sharp rebukes from conservative legal firms in 2025. In a suit, lawyers from Consovoy McCarthy argued the policy created an appearance of partiality favoring minority litigants, prompting Torres to recuse herself in February 2025 after initially standing by the guideline. This episode exemplifies broader conservative concerns over judicial DEI initiatives as injecting identity-based considerations into , contrasting with Torres's defense of during her 2013 . Countervailing views from regulatory perspectives, often aligned with stricter enforcement, have critiqued Torres for perceived leniency in financial oversight cases, such as her July 2023 partial in v. , which exempted secondary XRP sales from securities registration requirements—a stance some proponents argue undermines investor protections. However, these left-leaning reservations are outnumbered by right-wing allegations, which emphasize Torres's low documented reversal rate on appeal as masking substantive ideological tilts rather than affirming , amid patterns of amicus participation skewed toward intervenors in civil rights appeals. Empirical data on influences in her docket remains sparse, with analyses of Obama-era appointees generally showing alignment with appointing president's ideology in politically salient disputes.

References

  1. [1]
    Torres, Analisa Nadine | Federal Judicial Center
    Torres, Analisa Nadine · Federal Judicial Service: Judge, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York · Education: Harvard University, A.B., 1981
  2. [2]
    Hon. Analisa Torres | U.S District Court - Southern District of New York
    District Judge Hon. Analisa Torres ; Courtroom: 15D ; Chambers Email: Torres_NYSDChambers@nysd.uscourts.gov ; Chambers Phone: (212) 805-0292.
  3. [3]
    Analisa Torres - Ballotpedia
    Analisa Torres is a judge for the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. She joined the court in 2013 after a nomination from ...Professional career · Judicial career · Noteworthy cases
  4. [4]
    Hon. Analisa Torres - Practising Law Institute
    Analisa Torres was appointed United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York on April 23, 2013. She served on the New York State bench, ...
  5. [5]
    [PDF] SEC vs Ripple 7/13/23 - Southern District of New York
    Jul 13, 2023 · UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. ANALISA TORRES, District Judge: Plaintiff, the Securities and Exchange Commission ...
  6. [6]
    Ripple Labs Ordered to Pay $125 Million Civil Fine, Potentially ...
    Aug 11, 2024 · Judge Analisa Torres of the US District Court for the Southern District of New York issued a significant ruling in the long running legal battle.
  7. [7]
    UNDISCIPLINED, UNPUNISHED - Center for Constitutional Rights
    Nov 11, 2024 · Analisa Torres, a federal court judge in the NYPD stop-and-frisk cases, published an unprecedented and detailed report reviewing the NYPD's ...Missing: notable | Show results with:notable
  8. [8]
    District Court Rejects Goldman Sachs' Last-Ditch Attempt to Stop ...
    Mar 18, 2022 · On March 17, 2022, District Court Judge Analisa Torres issued an Order in the ongoing Goldman Sachs gender discrimination case (originally ...Missing: notable | Show results with:notable
  9. [9]
    Judge Felipe N. Torres '26 Honored for His Trailblazing Career as a ...
    Dec 4, 2023 · Torres '26 was remembered by his granddaughter Judge Analisa Torres as “a democratizing force in New York” who “believed lawyers should use ...
  10. [10]
    family judges, third generation judge, Puerto Rican public service ...
    Justice Frank Torres and Justice Analisa Torres represent the second and third generations of judges in the Puerto Rican family of the late Judge Felipe Torres.<|separator|>
  11. [11]
    District Judge Analisa Torres - PlainSite
    Securities and Exchange Commission v. Ripple Labs, Inc. et a... ... FTC Capital GMBH v. CBOE Exchange, Inc. ... Carter v. Rudinplay, Inc. ... District Council 9, ...Missing: notable | Show results with:notable
  12. [12]
    Felipe N. Torres | Fordham School of Law
    A pathbreaking Afro-Latino leader and legal trailblazer, Felipe N. Torres led a life of “firsts.” He was born on a farm in 1897, in the town of Salinas on the ...Missing: early heritage upbringing
  13. [13]
    Hispanic Heritage Month: Frank Torres - BTW
    Sep 16, 2021 · Torres was born in January 1928, in New York City. His parents were from Puerto Rico. His father, Felipe Torres, was also a judge, as well as ...Missing: early upbringing
  14. [14]
    Frank Torres, Judge Who Sought More Latinos on the Bench, Dies ...
    Aug 12, 2021 · Judge Analisa Torres said that her grandfather “imprinted upon my father the principle that Latinos who have been afforded the opportunity to ...Missing: childhood | Show results with:childhood
  15. [15]
    'Uplift Our Community': Veteran Criminal Judge Frank Torres ...
    Aug 19, 2021 · She, her late father, and her late grandfather, are believed to be the only three-generation line of Puerto Rican judges to have served on U.S. ...Missing: life heritage upbringing<|separator|>
  16. [16]
    Felipe N. Torres, 96, Former Legislator And Retired Judge
    Apr 5, 1994 · Felipe Neri Torres, a retired Judge of the Family Court and a former Democratic assemblyman, died on Sunday in White Plains Hospital.
  17. [17]
    President Obama Nominates Seven to the United States District Courts
    Nov 14, 2012 · Judge Torres received her J.D. in 1984 from Columbia Law School and her A.B. magna cum laude in 1981 from Harvard College. Derrick Kahala Watson ...Missing: undergraduate | Show results with:undergraduate<|separator|>
  18. [18]
    [PDF] questionnaire for judicial nominees - Senate Judiciary Committee
    February 16, 2012: I expressed my gratitude to the Puerto Rican Bar Association at a reception honoring four judges, including myself (Brooklyn, New York).Missing: early upbringing
  19. [19]
    [PDF] I join you in welcoming the nominees, their families, friends, and ...
    Judge Torres received her A.B. from Harvard University in 1981 and her. J.D. from Columbia Law School in 1984. For the first seven years of law practice, she ...
  20. [20]
    Anallisa Torres &mdash East Harlem.com
    Ms. Torres attended Harvard College, and graduated with high honors, receiving an A.B. in 1981. Analisa then attended Columbia Law School under a Charles Evens ...
  21. [21]
    [PDF] Response of Analisa Torres - Senate Judiciary Committee
    Response: During my 13 years as a New York State judge, I have treated all litigants with fairness and impartiality, without regard to their political beliefs, ...Missing: white- organized
  22. [22]
    Senate Confirms Gillibrand Recommended Judge Analisa Torres to ...
    Apr 18, 2013 · Senate Confirms Gillibrand Recommended Judge Analisa Torres to Sit on Federal Bench. Apr 18, 2013. Washington, D.C. – U.S. Senator Kirsten ...Missing: vote | Show results with:vote
  23. [23]
    United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
    Analisa Torres · Barack Obama (D). April 23, 2013 -. Harvard, 1981. Columbia Law ... The specific duties of a magistrate judge vary from district to district ...Active judges · Caseloads · History · Noteworthy cases
  24. [24]
    [PDF] CJRA Appendix A U.S. District Courts—Report on Civil Cases ...
    TORRES, ANALISA. 27. 0. 0. 0. 0. ROMAN, NELSON STEPHEN. 75. 23. 0. 2. 0. SEIBEL, CATHY ... jury) decides the facts of the case. A bench trial is considered to be ...
  25. [25]
    SEC v. Ripple Labs: The SEC Suffers a Partial Reverse in its ...
    U.S. District Judge Analisa Torres issued her landmark ruling on July 13, 2023, holding that programmatic (open market) sales of XRP tokens did not require ...
  26. [26]
    The Ripple Case Concludes as Predicted - The National Law Review
    Aug 20, 2025 · Judge Analisa Torres' July 2023 ruling found that only a narrow set of institutional sales constituted unregistered securities offerings ...Missing: v details
  27. [27]
    SEC vs. Ripple: A Turning Point for US Crypto Regulation?
    ... 2023 when Judge Analisa Torres ruled that XRP itself is not a security. However, the ruling distinguished between Ripple's institutional and programmatic sales.Missing: details | Show results with:details
  28. [28]
    SDNY Issues Final Ruling on SEC v. Ripple
    Aug 27, 2024 · Judge Analisa Torres found that the SEC failed to show that any investor was harmed by Ripple's sales of the crypto asset XRP, rejecting the SEC's disgorgement ...
  29. [29]
    Securities and Exchange Commission v. Ripple Labs Inc. et al., No ...
    Aug 7, 2024 · (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 8/7/2024) (vfr). Download PDF. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Ripple Labs Inc. et al. UNITED STATES ...
  30. [30]
    [PDF] Case 1:20-cv-10832-AT-SN Document 984 Filed 05/15/25 Page 1 of 2
    May 15, 2025 · The parties' request that the Court absolve Ripple of its obligation to (1) cease its illegal offer and sale of securities and (2) pay the full ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
  31. [31]
    [PDF] Case 1:20-cv-10832-AT-SN Document 989 Filed 06/26/25 Page 1 of 5
    Jun 26, 2025 · On July 13, 2023, the. Court agreed in part with the SEC, finding that Ripple offered XRP as a security without registration, in violation of ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
  32. [32]
    Changing Tides or a Ripple in Still Water? Examining the SEC v ...
    Jul 25, 2023 · Judge Torres' ruling that Other Distributions of XRP to employees and third parties did not satisfy the first prong of Howey because they did ...Missing: notable | Show results with:notable
  33. [33]
    Chen-Oster et al v. Goldman, Sachs & Co. et al, No. 1:2010cv06950
    (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 3/17/2022) (kv). Download PDF. Chen-Oster et al v. Goldman, Sachs & Co. et al Doc. 1337 Case 1:10-cv-06950-AT-RWL Document ...
  34. [34]
    Goldman Sachs' long-running gender bias lawsuit set for June 2023 ...
    Aug 23, 2022 · A U.S. federal judge on Monday rejected Goldman Sachs Group Inc's bid to dismiss most of a 12-year-old class action alleging widespread bias ...
  35. [35]
    Despite Historic Pay Discrimination Settlement, Little Has Changed ...
    Dec 18, 2023 · As part of the $215 million deal, approved on Nov. 7 by U.S. District Court Judge Analisa Torres, the firm will pay about 2,800 women who worked ...
  36. [36]
    https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4339720/floyd-v-the-city-of-new-york/
  37. [37]
    [PDF] February 22, 2024 VIA ECF Honorable Analisa Torres United States ...
    Feb 22, 2024 · The report broadly analyzes stop-and-frisk data to determine whether the. NYPD's policies and practices are compliant with the Court's orders, ...
  38. [38]
    [PDF] March 7, 2024 VIA ECF The Honorable Analisa Torres United States ...
    Mar 7, 2024 · ○ Component II focuses on community education about the issues included in the ... She holds a JD from Syracuse University College of Law.Missing: curriculum | Show results with:curriculum
  39. [39]
    NYPD Unwilling to Impose Discipline for Stop and Frisk, Report Says
    Sep 23, 2024 · Judge Torres, who has overseen the case since 2013, had not said in public filings why she wanted further study of the department's disciplinary ...
  40. [40]
    Case: Ligon v. City of New York - Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse
    ... Judge Analisa Torres. On November 13 ... On July 19, 2018, Judge Torres issued an order about the recommendation to document police-citizen encounters.
  41. [41]
    Diaz v. Mercurio, No. 1:2019cv01319 - Document 17 ... - Justia Law
    Court Description: ORDER denying 14 Motion to Dismiss. For the foregoing reasons, Defendant's motion to dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
  42. [42]
    Fox v. Doe et al, No. 1:2018cv09661 - Document 26 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)
    Jul 10, 2019 · 942615 and Officer John Doe #2 are DISMISSED s ua sponte, and the complaint is DISMISSED. ... (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 7/10/2019) (cf) ...
  43. [43]
    Bush v. City of New York, No. 1:2019cv05319 ... - Justia Law
    Accordingly, the Court holds that his claims for injunctive relief against the individual defendants are moot. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 3/30/2021) ...
  44. [44]
    https://content.next.westlaw.com/Document/Ic904d400451711e687dda03c2315206d/View/FullText.html
  45. [45]
    US judge dismisses lawsuit accusing UN agency of aiding Hamas ...
    Oct 3, 2025 · A U.S. judge dismissed a lawsuit by dozens of Israelis who accused the United Nations agency for Palestinian refugees of funneling more than ...
  46. [46]
    Judge dismisses lawsuit against UN agency over Hamas attack
    Oct 3, 2025 · The lawsuit alleges that UNRWA had aided Hamas by, among other things, permitting weapons storage and deployment centers in its schools and ...
  47. [47]
    US judge dismisses Oct. 7 victims' $1B suit against UNRWA ...
    Oct 2, 2025 · A US judge has dismissed a lawsuit against the UN agency for the Palestinians, UNRWA, saying that UNRWA has immunity.
  48. [48]
    Law firm DLA Piper must face lawsuit over pregnancy bias, judge rules
    Sep 29, 2025 · Torres denied DLA Piper's request to dismiss Mehta's discrimination claims under New York city and state and federal law, as well as her claims ...
  49. [49]
    [PDF] Plaintiff, Diamin Bethea, brings preg - A Better Balance
    May 29, 2024 · UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. ANALISA TORRES, District Judge: Plaintiff, Diamin Bethea, brings pregnancy ...
  50. [50]
    Manjarres v. Solar Mosaic, LLC, 1:24-cv-07714 – CourtListener.com
    (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 10/15/2024) (vfr) ... 2024, Defendant Mpower Energy LLC also requested that the Court compel arbitration. ... stay the ...Missing: rulings | Show results with:rulings
  51. [51]
    Ventura et al v. PJ National New York, LLC et al (1:23-cv-10787 ...
    LETTER MOTION to Compel Arbitration (premotion Letter) addressed to Judge Analisa Torres from Michael Yim dated 2/9/2024. Document filed by PJ National ...Missing: rulings | Show results with:rulings
  52. [52]
    U.S. judge dismisses case against Jeffrey Epstein's jail guards
    Jan 3, 2022 · U.S. District Judge Analisa Torres in Manhattan dismissed claims against Tova Noel and Michael Thomas, after prosecutors said both complied ...
  53. [53]
    Jeffrey Epstein: Federal judge dismisses charges against guards ...
    Jan 4, 2022 · A jury in New York last week found her guilty on five of six counts related to her role in Epstein's sexual abuse of minor girls between 1994 ...
  54. [54]
    Judge Criticizes Stop-and-Frisk Police Tactics in Housing Projects
    Dec 22, 2010 · The judge wrote that officers had to have a legally meaningful reason for the stop, such as the site being drug- prone.
  55. [55]
    New NYPD stop-and-frisk judge ripped policy before
    Nov 1, 2013 · Torres earned her way up the judicial ranks, graduating magna cum laude from Harvard and then Columbia Law School. Shira Scheindlin leaving ...Missing: curriculum focus
  56. [56]
    Judge gives de Blasio go-ahead to overhaul stop-and-frisk
    Jul 30, 2014 · In her 108-page ruling, Manhattan federal Judge Analisa Torres rejected motions to intervene in the longstanding litigation by the Patrolmen's ...
  57. [57]
    Police unions' stop-and-frisk claims rejected | Crain's New York ...
    Jul 30, 2014 · Judge Analisa Torres issued the decision Wednesday. The unions had sued to get the ruling overturned after the city decided to settle the case.Missing: criticism | Show results with:criticism
  58. [58]
    SDNY Issues Split Decision in SEC v Ripple Labs, Potentially ...
    Jul 17, 2023 · Judge Torres' ruling focused on several key issues: (1) whether Ripple's XRP token was inherently a security; (2) whether Ripple's ...Missing: praises | Show results with:praises<|separator|>
  59. [59]
    SEC v. Ripple Labs: A Critical Industry Win | BCLP
    Jul 14, 2023 · Judge Torres' Order signals a landmark victory for the cryptocurrency industry, as it demonstrates that cryptocurrencies themselves are not securities.Missing: criticisms praises
  60. [60]
    SEC v. Ripple Labs, Inc., et al.: A Turning Point in Cryptocurrency ...
    Jul 17, 2023 · Although Judge Torres's ruling granted relief to both sides, the Court's decision has been viewed as a victory for Ripple by several members of ...Missing: debates praises
  61. [61]
    Ripple Labs, Inc., Bradley Garlinghouse, and Christian Larsen
    SEC Announces Settlement Agreement to Resolve Civil Enforcement Action Against Ripple and Two of Its Executives. The Securities and Exchange ...Missing: developments | Show results with:developments
  62. [62]
    Statement on the Agency's Settlement with Ripple Labs, Inc. - SEC.gov
    May 8, 2025 · The court ordered that Ripple be permanently restrained and enjoined from future violations of Section 5 and ordered it to pay a civil penalty ...Missing: developments | Show results with:developments
  63. [63]
    SEC, Ripple wants to settle crypto lawsuit, but US judge rebuffs them
    Jun 26, 2025 · Ripple and the SEC appealed, but agreed to settle if Torres set aside her injunction and approved lowering the $125 million fine she imposed ...Missing: debates criticisms praises
  64. [64]
    SEC ends lawsuit against Ripple, company to pay $125 million fine
    Aug 8, 2025 · Ripple and the SEC agreed on Thursday to dismiss their appeals of the fine imposed by U.S. District Judge Analisa Torres in Manhattan and her ...Missing: developments | Show results with:developments
  65. [65]
    XRP Investors Have Waited 7 Years for This Moment. Here's What ...
    Jul 23, 2025 · The SEC's 2020 lawsuit threatened to derail Ripple's business model, which zapped investors' confidence in XRP and depressed its price for the ...Missing: impact | Show results with:impact
  66. [66]
    Ripple vs. SEC ends with $125M fine! - Here's how XRP prices reacted
    Aug 8, 2025 · Ripple and the SEC have officially ended their legal battle, locking in a $125 million penalty and banning certain institutional XRP sales.
  67. [67]
    XRP Price After Ripple vs SEC Lawsuit – Impact & Market Outlook
    Aug 29, 2025 · Ripple settles SEC case with a $125M fine, XRP jumps above $3.30 as investors weigh regulatory clarity, institutional adoption, and future ...Missing: ruling | Show results with:ruling<|control11|><|separator|>
  68. [68]
    https://www.coincub.com/ripple-vs-sec/
  69. [69]
    SEC appeals lower court decision in Ripple, but outcome may hinge ...
    Jan 22, 2025 · On Wednesday, January 15, the SEC appealed a decision by District Judge Analisa Torres in the SEC's civil case against Ripple Labs, Inc.Missing: notable | Show results with:notable
  70. [70]
    Judge Rejects Trump's Argument and Throws Out Suit Against U.N. ...
    Oct 2, 2025 · A federal judge, rejecting the Trump administration's position, has dismissed a lawsuit accusing a United Nations agency of providing more ...
  71. [71]
    Court Rejects Trump Administration's Immunity Statement in ...
    Oct 9, 2025 · Judge Analisa Torres recently dismissed the case, holding – contrary to the position of the Trump Administration – that UNRWA is a ...
  72. [72]
    NY judge won't nix long-running Goldman Sachs sex bias claims
    Mar 18, 2022 · A federal judge in Manhattan has rejected Goldman Sachs & Co's bid to toss out the bulk of a 12-year-old class action alleging widespread bias against female ...Missing: profile | Show results with:profile
  73. [73]
    Court Grants Final Approval to Historic $215 Million Settlement in 13 ...
    Nov 7, 2023 · US District Judge Analisa Torres granted final approval to a proposed $215 million settlement in a sex bias/gender discrimination case against Goldman Sachs ...Missing: profile | Show results with:profile
  74. [74]
    Conservatives Single Out Judges Over DEI Courtroom Policies (1)
    Mar 13, 2025 · ... US magistrate judge. Colorado US District Judge Kato Crews declined ... US District Judge Analisa Torres backed off a racial ...
  75. [75]
    Judge Recuses Over Policy Encouraging Underrepresented Lawyers
    Feb 24, 2025 · Dale Ho's policies give preferences to minority lawyers, attorneys say · Judge Analisa Torres also told to recuse.Missing: caseload statistics
  76. [76]
    [PDF] What Torres v. Madrid Reveals about Fact Bias in Civil Rights Cases
    May 1, 2023 · 2" Torres sued, claiming the officers violated her constitutional right against unreasonable seizure by using excessive force against her. 24 ...