Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Armatix iP1


The Armatix iP1 is a semi-automatic pistol chambered in .22 Long Rifle with a capacity of ten rounds plus one in the chamber, manufactured by the German firm Armatix GmbH and featuring integrated smart gun technology that electronically prevents firing unless unlocked by a paired RFID wristwatch transponder.
Designed by former Heckler & Koch engineer Ernst Mauch starting around 2006, the iP1 relies on active near-field RFID communication requiring the authorized iW1 watch to be within approximately ten inches, along with a user-entered PIN, and is powered by two AAA batteries rated for about 5,000 shots.
Intended to reduce unauthorized use such as by children or thieves, the pistol retailed for around $1,800 including the watch and became commercially available in the United States in 2014, but faced immediate backlash from firearm owners concerned about potential state mandates triggering broader handgun restrictions.
Independent testing exposed severe reliability shortcomings, including frequent misfires—often three to four per magazine—and an exceptionally heavy double-action trigger pull described as the worst encountered by evaluators, undermining its practical viability despite manufacturer assertions of environmental durability after over 250,000 rounds fired.
These technical deficiencies, combined with the high cost and activation delays, led to negligible sales and the iP1's status as a commercial failure, exemplifying challenges in implementing biometric or electronic safeguards on firearms without compromising core functionality.

Development and History

Origins and Design

Armatix , a German company based in Unterföhring near , was established in by locksmith Karl Dietel as a focused initially on electromechanical locks before expanding into integrated safety systems. The firm's early work emphasized adapting existing (RFID) technology—commonly used in and inventory systems—to enable user-specific for handguns, targeting civilian applications to prevent unauthorized use by children or thieves. This approach stemmed from a design philosophy prioritizing mechanical reliability combined with electronic verification, drawing on proven non- RFID implementations to ensure activation only by authorized wearers of a compatible token, such as a wristwatch. In 2006, Ernst Mauch, a veteran firearms engineer who had spent over 30 years at Heckler & Koch designing influential models like the USP pistol and G36 rifle, joined Armatix after leaving H&K's technical operations division. Mauch invested personal funds into the venture and assumed a leadership role in developing the iP1, a .22-caliber semi-automatic pistol intended as the company's flagship product for demonstrating practical smart gun feasibility in everyday civilian carry scenarios. His engineering decisions centered on embedding the RFID receiver directly into the firearm's internals, requiring proximity to a paired electronic watch to unlock the firing mechanism, thereby enforcing a causal link between verified ownership and operational readiness without relying on external modifications. The iP1's foundational design evolved through iterative prototyping in the mid-2000s, with Mauch's team aiming to minimize points of electronic failure by integrating the system into the gun's core mechanics, such as the trigger mechanism, while leveraging off-the-shelf RFID components for cost efficiency and scalability. This German-led initiative reflected a broader interest in technology-driven restrictions, positioning the iP1 as an attempt to reconcile traditional handgun with mandatory to address accidental discharges and theft-related misuse in non-professional settings.

Launch and Commercial Attempts

The Armatix iP1 entered the U.S. market in late 2013, with initial sales commencing in early 2014 primarily in . The retailed for $1,399, while the required iWL1 watch for cost an additional $399, resulting in a combined price of approximately $1,800. Distribution efforts targeted limited channels, including select authorized dealers such as Engage Armament in , which announced intentions to stock the iP1 in spring 2014. Production volumes remained constrained, with Armatix focusing on controlled rollout rather than mass availability. In October 2016, Armatix revealed plans to expand its lineup with a 9mm variant, designated the iP9, slated for U.S. market entry in 2017 at a projected price of around $1,365. This announcement aimed to address caliber limitations of the original model and broaden commercial appeal through enhanced features like directional firing restrictions.

Technical Specifications and Design

Physical and Mechanical Features

The Armatix iP1 is a utilizing a blowback-operated and -fired . It features a double- system, with the double- pull requiring substantial force—estimated at around 25 pounds—intended to enhance by preventing unintended discharge, though the can be manually cocked for single- operation with a comparatively lighter pull. The design incorporates internal mechanical safeties, including a block, which physically prevents the from moving forward absent proper actuation. Physically, the iP1 has a compact form factor suited to its .22 LR chambering, with a barrel length of 3.5 inches and an overall of approximately 175 millimeters. Unloaded weight, excluding the , measures about 518 grams (18.3 ounces), contributing to its lightweight profile compared to many centerfire handguns. It employs a detachable box with a capacity of 10 rounds, facilitating standard semi-automatic cycling via energy from the rimfire cartridge. The polymer frame and simple construction reflect efforts to minimize mass while integrating the mechanical components necessary for reliable blowback function.

Caliber and Ammunition

The Armatix iP1 pistol is chambered exclusively for the (.22 LR) rimfire cartridge and feeds from a 10-round detachable box magazine. This low-powered rimfire round, producing muzzle energies typically under 150 foot-pounds, was selected for its minimal , which reduces mechanical stress on the electronic firing lock and associated components during operation. The accommodates standard .22 LR ammunition without specialized loadings, though reliability testing revealed frequent malfunctions, including failures to feed and eject even with this relatively forgiving cartridge. Critics in firearms evaluations have highlighted the .22 LR's limited as a significant drawback for applications, noting its marginal against human threats compared to centerfire calibers like 9mm or , which deliver substantially higher energy transfer. Developer Ernst Mauch, formerly of , defended the caliber choice as sufficient for the pistol's intended civilian and training roles, emphasizing controllability over raw power. However, the iP1 model never supported higher-power chamberings, despite early indications from Armatix of potential expansions to calibers like 9mm for broader market appeal; these variants remained unrealized amid commercial challenges.

Smart Technology Implementation

RFID Authentication System

The Armatix iP1 incorporates an active RFID authentication system designed to authorize firing only upon detection of a paired , such as the iW1 wristwatch, which transmits a radio-frequency signal to the pistol's internal . This communication establishes user verification before enabling the weapon's mechanical operation, preventing the trigger mechanism from functioning without the signal. The pistol's electronic chip, powered by an internal , interrogates the via near-field active RFID when the grip is squeezed, requiring proximity within approximately 10 inches for signal detection and . Upon successful of the unique token, the system energizes an to retract an internal block, permitting the or to contact the pin and initiate . The in the pistol supports this , ensuring the block remains engaged by default in the absence of the authorized signal. This implementation aims to restrict operation to the token holder through the specificity of the RFID protocol, which pairs the devices during setup to recognize only the designated transponder's response. An indicator light on the illuminates green to confirm once the signal is validated, providing visual feedback on readiness.

Associated Accessories

The iW1 active RFID wristwatch serves as the mandatory authentication accessory for the Armatix iP1, enabling the to fire only when the watch is detected within an operational distance of up to 10 inches via radio-frequency communication. The watch includes features such as time display, charge level indication, and a code-based or time-controlled deactivation function to secure the remotely. It is waterproof, equipped with interchangeable straps, and powered by a replaceable rated for up to 5,000 rounds of use. Sales packages for the iP1 typically bundled the pistol with the iW1 wristwatch, such as in the limited edition set, which elevated the effective purchase cost beyond the base firearm price of approximately $1,000–$1,400 plus $300–$400 for the watch. Optional accessories included holsters and storage cases designed for compatibility with the iP1's form factor, though specific integrations like RFID signal blocking for enhanced transport security were not standard across all variants.

Intended Benefits and Safety Claims

Accident Prevention Rationale

The Armatix iP1's RFID-based authorization system requires proximity to a user-worn , such as a wristwatch, to deactivate an internal on the firing mechanism, thereby preventing discharge by individuals lacking the token. This theoretically addresses unauthorized , particularly by children, which has been linked to a portion of unintentional fatalities; proponents contend that such establishes a causal barrier to negligent use by restricting operability to verified owners. Empirical data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention indicate approximately 430–500 unintentional deaths per year during the mid-2000s to early , with children aged 0–14 accounting for a notable share often involving unsecured household firearms. Safety advocates, including those focused on pediatric , have highlighted the iP1's mechanism as aligned with objectives to mitigate child-accessible guns, arguing that personalized technology could reduce incidents where minors mishandle stored weapons without direct supervision. For instance, the system's requirement for token proximity—typically within 1–2 inches—ensures that even if a is handled by an unauthorized user, the internal remains engaged, blocking the from impacting the primer. This approach draws on first-principles to enforce user-specific control, potentially lowering rates of accidental discharges rooted in exploratory or impulsive handling by non-owners. Proponents from gun safety organizations have cited broader statistics on firearm storage practices, noting that inadequate securing contributes to over 80% of unintentional child-involved shootings occurring in homes, positioning RFID-locked designs like the iP1 as a technological complement to voluntary safe storage. Such claims emphasize the preventive potential against scenarios where children access loaded handguns, though they rely on consistent token usage by adults to realize the intended safeguards.

Theft Deterrence Arguments

The Armatix iP1's RFID-based authorization system requires the paired watch to be worn within roughly 10 inches of the for it to function, rendering the mechanically locked and unable to discharge without the . Proponents of personalized handguns argue this post-theft disablement reduces the weapon's attractiveness to criminals, as it cannot be readily used or resold intact for purposes without overcoming the safeguard. By limiting operability to the original owner, the design aims to disrupt the flow of stolen s into criminal hands, where such guns might otherwise be employed in offenses due to their immediate availability. Empirical data underscores the potential scope of this rationale, with hundreds of thousands of firearms stolen annually from residences, vehicles, and retailers , contributing to the supply of weapons accessed by offenders through illegal channels. surveys of prison inmates have identified stolen guns as a key sourcing mechanism for criminals, alongside street-level acquisitions, highlighting how enables the diversion of legally owned firearms into prohibited uses. In this context, a non-functional stolen iP1 would hold diminished value compared to conventional pistols, potentially discouraging thefts motivated by resale or personal criminal utility. Armatix positioned the iP1's as a enhancement against unauthorized handling, including scenarios involving loss or , thereby aligning with broader discussions on incentivizing such technologies. Related proposals have suggested premium discounts for owners, predicated on the reduced risk from misuse after theft, as the interlock minimizes the chances of the weapon being operationalized by non-owners. This economic mechanism could theoretically amplify deterrence by tying adoption to tangible cost savings, though it presumes the system's reliability in preventing access absent the authorizing device.

Reception and Market Response

Initial Media and Proponent Views

In the aftermath of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting on December 14, 2012, which claimed 26 lives including 20 children, media outlets increasingly spotlighted smart gun technologies as innovative approaches to firearm safety, with President Obama's January 2013 task force recommending federal research into personalized handguns to prevent unauthorized access. The Armatix iP1, a .22-caliber pistol developed by German firm Armatix GmbH and first offered for sale in the United States in early 2014 at a price of approximately $1,800 including the required watch, was portrayed in initial coverage as a breakthrough in this domain, utilizing RFID technology to activate only when paired with the owner's electronic wristwatch. Contemporary reports emphasized the iP1's potential to address accidental shootings and theft, framing it as a high-tech solution aligned with post-Sandy Hook calls for enhanced safety measures without restricting lawful ownership. A March 26, 2014, article highlighted "high-tech guns that know who is firing them," detailing the iP1's electronic interlock as a means to restrict firing to authorized users via proximity-based . Similarly, a May 22, 2014, feature declared "The Future is Here: Smart Guns," praising the iP1's design to ensure "only the gun's owner may fire it" through integrated safety protocols. Gun control organizations and technology advocates welcomed the iP1's market entry as progress toward reducing , citing its alignment with longstanding research into user-specific dating back to U.S. Department of Justice initiatives in the 1990s. Sales announcements, including Armatix's February 2014 partnership with California's Gun Club to distribute the pistol, sparked optimism among proponents who viewed it as the realization of decades-delayed R&D efforts in controls. A December 2014 overview positioned smart guns like the iP1 as tools "that could prevent future tragedies" by enabling precise access restrictions.

Gun Community and Industry Reaction

The (NRA) and affiliated gun rights organizations expressed strong opposition to the Armatix iP1, viewing it as a potential precursor to mandatory technologies that could impose electronic dependencies on all firearms and infringe on user autonomy. In May 2014, a , dealer announced plans to sell the iP1, prompting immediate backlash including protests, online harassment, and death threats from gun rights activists, leading the dealer to abandon the plan within a day. Similar pressure forced a dealer to back away from stocking the after receiving and threats, reflecting broader community efforts to deter market introduction through organized boycotts. Surveys of U.S. gun owners indicated limited enthusiasm for smart guns like the iP1, citing concerns over added mechanical complexity, higher costs, and potential interference with reliable operation in defensive scenarios. A 2019 (NSSF) survey found that while gun owners were not inherently opposed to authorized-user technology, only 5 percent reported being very likely to purchase such firearms. A contemporaneous study of gun owners showed 79 percent supported retailers offering smart guns alongside conventional models, but just 18 percent were likely to buy one themselves, with awareness of the technology at 48 percent. These findings underscored a preference for traditional designs among owners, prioritizing simplicity and affordability over electronic safeguards. Firearm manufacturers demonstrated reluctance to invest in or adopt iP1-style technology, fearing it could invite regulatory mandates or alienate core customers reliant on proven mechanical systems. Major producers like Smith & Wesson and Sturm, Ruger & Co. rejected activist shareholder proposals in 2019 to develop smart gun features, emphasizing market-driven innovation over unproven electronics. This stance echoed earlier industry boycotts, such as the NRA-led campaign against Smith & Wesson in 2000 following its smart gun concessions, which resulted in significant revenue losses and a retreat from such initiatives. Overall, the sector prioritized compatibility with existing user practices and avoided technologies perceived as introducing unnecessary failure points or dependency on batteries and chips.

Controversies and Criticisms

Reliability and Testing Failures

In 2015, testing conducted by (NRA) experts exposed substantial mechanical unreliability in the Armatix iP1 pistol. Range evaluations revealed frequent failures to fire, with three to four misfires occurring per 11-round magazine despite using from various manufacturers, such as CCI, , and . The longest sequence of uninterrupted successful shots achieved was only nine rounds, indicating inconsistent ignition and ejection mechanics inherent to the design. The iP1's double-action trigger pull demanded exceptionally high force—described by testers as the heaviest encountered in any evaluated —resulting in shooter fatigue and probable accuracy degradation, as excessive pull weight disrupts sight alignment and follow-through during rapid or stressed firing. This issue compounded the challenges of the caliber, where rimfire primers are susceptible to light strikes and variability under mechanical stress, further elevating malfunction risks compared to non-smart .22 pistols like the Ruger Mark series, which typically sustain far lower failure rates with comparable ammunition. Overall, these tests documented malfunction rates approaching 30-40% in practical use, starkly contrasting manufacturer claims of fewer than 10 failures per 10,000 rounds and highlighting causal deficiencies in the iP1's blowback-operated mechanism and assembly, which failed to deliver reliable energy transfer for consistent primer ignition.

Hacking Vulnerabilities and Security Risks

Security researcher "Plore" demonstrated critical vulnerabilities in the Armatix iP1's RFID-based locking system at 25 in July 2017. By amplifying the RFID signal, Plore defeated the system's proximity restriction, enabling activation from distances far exceeding the intended one-meter range, which undermines the claimed theft deterrence by allowing unauthorized remote enabling. Additionally, Plore executed a that prevented the gun from firing even with the authorized watch present, exploiting weaknesses in the process. Most alarmingly, Plore bypassed the RFID requirement entirely using inexpensive magnets costing approximately $15, which manipulated the internal lock to unlock and fire the without any signal or watch in under 10 seconds. This physical exploit targets the electromechanical interface directly, rendering the RFID safeguards ineffective against basic tools and highlighting how the system's reliance on a defeatable introduces a readily exploitable weakness absent in purely mechanical firearms. Beyond deliberate hacks, the iP1's electronic dependencies pose inherent risks of authorized-user lockout. The pistol requires two AAA batteries to power its RFID reader and solenoid, providing roughly 5,000 firings before depletion, after which the gun remains locked and inoperable until battery replacement. The accompanying watch similarly depends on its own battery for signal transmission; failure in either component prevents authentication, creating single points of failure that could render the firearm useless in emergencies, a vulnerability not present in battery-independent mechanical handguns. This over-reliance on electronics thus trades operational simplicity for potential systemic brittleness, where environmental factors like moisture in the unsealed battery compartment exacerbate failure risks.

Legal and Regulatory Context

New Jersey Childproof Handgun Law Impact

The Childproof Handgun Law, enacted on December 23, 2002, as P.L. 2002, c. 130, established a conditional mandate requiring that, once a qualifying "personalized handgun" incorporating childproofing technology becomes available for retail sale anywhere , all s sold or manufactured in the state must integrate comparable technology to prevent unauthorized users, including children, from firing the weapon. This trigger mechanism was designed to activate only after a viable entered the broader market, but it effectively created a deterrent against introducing such firearms nationally, as compliance would compel traditional handgun manufacturers to adopt unproven technology for New Jersey sales. In the case of the Armatix iP1, released for sale in in 2014, the law posed a direct barrier to U.S. market entry; Armatix explicitly chose not to offer the for sale in to avoid activating the mandate, which would have required all handguns sold in the state to feature RFID-based authorization or equivalent safeguards. This decision stemmed from concerns that triggering the law could disrupt the firearms industry, as manufacturers would face retrofitting costs and regulatory hurdles without , amplifying a nationwide where developers hesitated to sell anywhere to prevent inadvertent activation in . Consequently, the iP1 achieved zero retail sales from its 2014 debut through at least 2023, despite its development for civilian markets and availability overseas, as the law's structure discouraged U.S. distribution to evade the mandate's ripple effects. Although New Jersey's later determined in 2014 that the iP1 did not fully qualify under the law's criteria—lacking features like a loaded-chamber indicator—this ruling did not reverse the preemptive avoidance strategy, perpetuating the absence of commercialization in the U.S.

Second Amendment and Mandate Concerns

Opponents of smart gun mandates argue that requiring firearms like the Armatix iP1, which incorporate unproven electronic authorization technologies, would violate the Second Amendment by restricting access to reliable arms in common use for self-defense, as affirmed in (2008), where the held that the right extends to weapons "typically possessed by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes," emphasizing those in widespread, non-dangerous use. Mandating such devices could effectively prohibit traditional handguns, which dominate the market and meet the "common use" criterion due to their proven functionality and adoption by millions, potentially enabling de facto bans under the guise of safety enhancements. Legal analyses contend that this approach echoes historical tech-forcing regulations rejected for imposing burdensome, experimental requirements that undermine the core purpose of bearing effective arms, drawing parallels to failed mandates in other regulated industries where reliability trumps novelty. Critics further assert that smart gun mandates represent backdoor infringements, as the Armatix iP1's limited —evidenced by its high cost exceeding $1,800 including the required watch and negligible sales volumes post-2014 launch—demonstrates a lack of voluntary acceptance, suggesting would prioritize hypothetical gains over empirical viability. rights advocates, including the NRA, have historically resisted such pushes, viewing them as preludes to broader restrictions, a stance reinforced by dealer boycotts and threats against outlets attempting to stock the iP1 to preempt triggers. Originalist interpretations prioritize the Amendment's of suitable for immediate, dependable use against tyranny or intrusion, cautioning that glitch-prone , as seen in iP1 field tests, could render mandated guns inoperable in critical scenarios, thus failing constitutional muster. Proponents of development counter that voluntary adoption, without mandates, aligns with Second Amendment rights by offering optional safety features like RFID-based user authentication in the iP1, purportedly reducing unauthorized access while preserving choice. However, contradicts widespread appeal, with surveys indicating lower interest among current owners compared to non-owners, and the iP1's commercial flop—leading to Armatix's pivot away from civilian sales—highlighting that perceived reliability deficits and added costs deter uptake, undermining claims of seamless integration into common use. This empirical resistance suggests mandates would not foster but instead coerce acceptance of suboptimal technology, echoing Second Amendment scholarship warning against regulations that burden core rights without commensurate public safety benefits.

Legacy and Subsequent Developments

Commercial Failure and Discontinuation

The Armatix iP1, priced at approximately $1,399 for the plus $399 for the required enabling watch, totaling around $1,800, failed to achieve significant despite initial availability at a handful of U.S. retailers in 2014. Only two stores in and one in briefly offered it for sale, but all quickly discontinued stocking due to customer backlash and low demand. Armatix did not publicly disclose exact sales figures, but the pistol's high cost—more than double that of comparable conventional .22-caliber handguns—deterred potential buyers amid the absence of widespread distribution. By 2015, Armatix faced financial difficulties, entering restructuring proceedings akin to Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in , which signaled a scaling back of operations and the departure of key personnel, including its top designer. This followed the iP1's post-launch hype, with no evidence of sustained production or expanded sales channels. The company shifted focus away from the iP1 model, as subsequent efforts to develop variants, such as a planned 9mm iP9 announced for potential U.S. release in 2017 at a similar $1,395 price point, did not result in commercial availability. Production of the iP1 effectively ceased, marking the end of its short-lived market presence without achieving viability as a consumer product.

Influence on Smart Gun Debates

The Armatix iP1's commercial failure and technical shortcomings amplified opposition to mandates by demonstrating the technology's immaturity, prompting gun rights advocates to argue that regulatory coercion could impose unreliable systems on users without proven benefits. In 2014, the mere prospect of iP1 sales in the U.S. triggered widespread boycotts and threats against retailers, as groups like the warned that any viable would activate New Jersey's 2002 Childproof Handgun Law, mandating a phase-out of non-personalized handguns statewide and potentially nationwide. This backlash reinforced preferences for market-driven development over government mandates, with surveys indicating that even non-gun owners favored traditional firearms when costs and reliability were factored in. Analyses from 2018 to 2020 frequently referenced the iP1 as evidence against portraying smart guns as an immediate solution to misuse, highlighting persistent issues like high rates, to circumvention, and incompatibility with needs. For instance, a noted the iP1's RFID system could be defeated with inexpensive magnets, underscoring broader unreadiness for widespread adoption and debunking claims of foolproof personalization. Similarly, a 2020 legal examination cited the iP1's hacking susceptibility and withdrawal from markets as illustrative of technological barriers, arguing that mandates risked burdening lawful owners with unproven tech amid Second Amendment protections for reliable arms. These critiques shifted policy discourse toward voluntary innovation, cautioning that forced implementation could stifle competition and exacerbate divides between safety proponents and rights defenders. The iP1's legacy spurred second-generation smart gun initiatives, such as those by Biofire and , which incorporated lessons like stronger calibers and enhanced to address prior deficiencies, yet it established benchmarks for reliability that remain unmet for broad acceptance. Entrepreneurs in acknowledged the iP1's flop as a , emphasizing the need to overcome consumer distrust through rigorous, independent testing rather than regulatory shortcuts. This evolution underscored a that smart gun viability hinges on empirical proof of durability in real-world scenarios, influencing ongoing debates to prioritize technological maturation over premature policy interventions.

References

  1. [1]
    Smart Gun Technology - HDIAC
    Armatix Smart System. Armatix developed the iP1 pistol from the ground up as a smart gun. It is not available as a standard mechanical operating gun. The ...Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
  2. [2]
    Exclusive: We Test The Armatix iP1, The Not-So-Smart Gun
    Nov 12, 2015 · NRA staffers secretly tested the Armatix iP1, the so-called “smart gun” that at the time was causing a furor among both media and gun owners nationwide.Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
  3. [3]
    Smart guns: They're ready. Are we? - Fortune
    Apr 22, 2015 · The iP1 takes two AAA batteries, which will power about 5,000 firings, according to Armatix. An indicator light begins flashing when the ...Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
  4. [4]
    The high-tech guns that know who is firing them | CNN Business
    Mar 26, 2014 · The Armatix iP1 pistol uses a radio frequency identification (RFID) chip activated by the owner's watch. courtesy Armatix. The Smart Tech ...Missing: specifications controversies<|separator|>
  5. [5]
    Ernst Mauch: The man making guns smarter | The Independent
    Aug 8, 2014 · In 2006, Mr Mauch joined Armatix, a spin-out from the lock firm, investing his own money and leading the development of the .22-calibre iP1 ...Missing: origins | Show results with:origins
  6. [6]
    German gun designer's quest for a smarter weapon infuriates U.S. ...
    Aug 6, 2014 · In 2006, Mauch joined Armatix, a spin out from the lock firm, investing his own money and leading the development of the .22-caliber iP1, ...Missing: origins | Show results with:origins
  7. [7]
    Smart Gun Pioneer Ernst Mauch Says Hacking the ... - The Trace
    Feb 25, 2016 · Mauch left the company in 2005 to join Armatix, another German company, where he led the team that designed the iP1 pistol. The gun will ...Missing: origins | Show results with:origins
  8. [8]
    Armatix iP1 Is The First 'Smart Gun' Sold In USA [VIDEO] | IBTimes
    Feb 21, 2014 · Armatix,” a German company, has released the first “smart pistol” in the U.S., on sale in California.
  9. [9]
    Armatix iP1: The Infamous German “Smart Gun” - Forgotten Weapons
    Sep 23, 2022 · The Armatix iP1 is a pistol created by former H&K designer Ernst Mauch that was released – or almost released – in the US in late 2013 and early 2014.Missing: GmbH | Show results with:GmbH
  10. [10]
    New iP1 Pistol May Trigger Old Gun Law in New Jersey - WSJ
    Nov 20, 2013 · The iP1 Pistol will cost $1,399 and the watch an additional $399, Armatix said. That is a significant premium over a Glock or Smith & Wesson ...
  11. [11]
    Happiness is a warm iGun: Dumb gun requires smart watch to shoot
    Feb 19, 2014 · The Armatix iP1 sells for $1,399 and the watch sells for $399. That $1,800 tag is a tall asking price for a gun that could arguably not be ...Missing: 2013 | Show results with:2013<|separator|>
  12. [12]
    Under Fire, Maryland Dealer Drops Plans To Sell Smart Gun - WYPR
    May 4, 2014 · KEYES: Raymond was planning to sell the Armatix iP1. Electronic chips in the gun communicate with a watch that could be bought separately. The ...
  13. [13]
    A New Generation of Entrepreneurs Thinks It Can Revive the Smart ...
    Jan 21, 2019 · The Armatix iP1, a sleek .22-caliber pistol, was designed to work only if its user was wearing a wristwatch with a radio-frequency ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
  14. [14]
    German arms maker Armatix to release second smart gun in U.S.
    Oct 19, 2016 · German firearms manufacturer Armatix LLC is planning to release its second smart gun in the U.S. next year after sales of its first model ...Missing: GmbH | Show results with:GmbH
  15. [15]
    Armatix IP9 Smart Handgun Plans Revealed For U.S. Market
    Oct 22, 2016 · On Wednesday, a report revealed that gun maker Armatix plans to bring the 9mm, Armatix IP9 Smart Handgun , to the U.S. market in 2017.
  16. [16]
    Armatix Plans 9mm 'Smart Gun' Over New (And Old) Concerns
    Oct 25, 2016 · Critics argue that smart gun tech adds reliability issues ... The Armatix iP1 is the gun that may enact New Jersey's ridiculous gun restrictions.
  17. [17]
    What's So Smart About This Gun? | An Official Journal Of The NRA
    We test the Armatix iP1—a so-called “smart gun” touted by some to be the end-all answer to gun safety—and find it to be lacking in nearly every respect.
  18. [18]
    Armatix IP1 "Smart" Semi-Automatic Pistol with Case and Watch
    Armatix IP1 "Smart" Semi-Automatic Pistol with Case and WatchArmatix ... Barrel3 1/2 inch round. Finishblack. Grippolymer. Bore conditionBright - Shows ...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] A Review of Gun Safety Technologies - Office of Justice Programs
    The iP1 is a .22 caliber double action pistol with a 10-round magazine, as shown in Figure 11. Armatix designed the gun in order to fully integrate.
  20. [20]
    With New Smart Gun, Industry Pioneer Bets Bigger Is Better
    Mar 2, 2017 · But the iP1 could chamber only a . 22 round, the smallest caliber available, and cost $1,375 for both the gun and watch.
  21. [21]
    What you need to know about smart guns - Engadget
    May 12, 2014 · The safety mechanism on this . 22-caliber pistol is built around a watch that unlocks the gun by broadcasting a wireless signal (RFID).
  22. [22]
    This smart pistol only fires when in proximity to a RFID wristwatch
    Feb 22, 2014 · Utilizing a RFID chip with a proximity of about ten inches, a light just above the grip will turn green when the gun is ready to fire. When the ...
  23. [23]
    Armatix Smart System for Firearms | DudeIWantThat.com
    The package includes the company's iP1 Pistol, iW1 wristwatch, and Quicklock mechatronic blocking device with digital key. The .22 caliber iP1 Pistol will fire ...
  24. [24]
    The NRA's Next Battleground ... Smart Guns - Forbes
    Jan 11, 2016 · The Armatix iP1 requires the shooter to wear a watch containing an active RFID tag. In order to activate and deactivate the weapon, a code ...Missing: holster | Show results with:holster
  25. [25]
    ANSCHUTZ Armatix | PDF - Scribd
    the watch, time-controlled rifle deactivation, extensive watch functions, waterproof, interchangeable straps, battery for up to 5,000 rounds. TARGET CONTROL ...<|separator|>
  26. [26]
    A look inside a "smart" gun. The Armatix iP1 | Glock Talk
    Apr 19, 2021 · Another thing that stood out to me is I'm not too sure about their decision to use a torsion spring as the hammer spring. ... firing grip while ...
  27. [27]
    Engage Armament Co-Owner: The Truth About the Armatix iP1 ...
    May 25, 2014 · My name is Andrew Raymond and I am the co-owner of Engage Armament. I am the guy who agreed to sell the Armatix pistol and all that madness. I' ...
  28. [28]
    Unintentional firearm deaths in the United States 2005–2015
    Oct 14, 2019 · We estimate 430 unintentional firearm fatalities in the United States per year. The rate is highest for older children to young adults, ages 10 ...
  29. [29]
    Renewed push for smart guns could trigger a new furor over the ...
    Oct 22, 2015 · Proponents of smart guns say the weapons can reduce street violence with stolen firearms, prevent children from using their parents' guns in ...
  30. [30]
    Comment: Guns kill children | SBS News
    Jun 18, 2014 · The overwhelming empirical evidence indicates that the presence of a gun makes children less safe; that programs such as Eddie Eagle are ...
  31. [31]
    'James Bond Smart Gun' Only The Owner Can Fire | US News
    Feb 22, 2014 · He said: "No one wants children to get access to a handgun and hurt themselves or others. "This is the type of gun safety legislation that ...
  32. [32]
    13. Personalized Guns: Using Technology to Save Lives
    Armatix GmbH, a German company, has produced the iP1 Pistol, which is a personalized .22 caliber handgun that works like a conventional pistol except that it is ...
  33. [33]
    [PDF] Guns Used in Crime - Bureau of Justice Statistics
    25 caliber pistols (13%) .50 caliber pistols (8%). Stolen guns are a source of weapons for criminals. All stolen guns are available to crimi-.
  34. [34]
    [PDF] STOLEN GUNS POSE A TREMENDOUS RISK TO PUBLIC SAFETY
    Gun thefts occur in staggering numbers. Hundreds of thousands of guns are stolen every year, taken from houses, vehicles, and stores.
  35. [35]
    [PDF] Smart Gun Technology Project Final Report - UNT Digital Library
    which would mandate the use of smart guns, could receive a reduced premium for liability insurance. Requirement: The additional production cost to ...
  36. [36]
    Gun advocate Larry Pratt says 'smart guns' fail 20 percent of the time
    May 20, 2014 · The German-made Armatix iP1 .22 caliber pistol was expected to ... after the Sandy Hook Elementary School shootings. This research is ...
  37. [37]
    After Sandy Hook, a call for smart guns - Greenwich Time
    Dec 9, 2013 · A year since Sandy Hook, the debate over how to reduce gun violence remains unsettled. Though legislation to strengthen gun regulation failed in ...<|separator|>
  38. [38]
    The Future is Here: Smart Guns - Stories by Williams
    May 22, 2014 · Not long ago, designer Ernst Mauch unveiled a revolutionary new handgun that grew out of a desire to merge digital technology with firearm ...Missing: origins | Show results with:origins
  39. [39]
    Smart guns: How smart are they? - BBC News
    May 23, 2014 · If the biometric data isn't recognised, the gun will not fire. The company claims it will allow for the recognition of a number of different ...
  40. [40]
    A Look the "Smart Guns" That Could Prevent Future Tragedies
    Dec 14, 2014 · Just earlier this month, however, the New Jersey Attorney General's office ruled out of the "personalized handgun" designation the Armatix ...Missing: portrayal | Show results with:portrayal
  41. [41]
    The Truth About “Smart Guns” | An Official Journal Of The NRA
    Jul 29, 2019 · The Armatix iP1 (pictured above) tested by NRA staff in 2014 wasn't a particularly compelling firearm. Even beyond problems with its “smart” ...Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
  42. [42]
    Maryland dealer, under pressure from gun-rights activists, drops ...
    May 2, 2014 · Rockville gun dealer backed down late Thursday after enduring a day of protests and death threats.
  43. [43]
    Death threats stop gun store from selling 'smart' gun. Why?
    May 5, 2014 · The German-made Armatix iP1 won't fire unless it's in proximity of a special watch, thus making it useless if stolen. Gun control advocates, ...
  44. [44]
    Opinion | The Messy World of Smart Guns - The New York Times
    Jul 7, 2014 · Instead, both Engage Armament and Oak Tree, a California-based gun dealer, backed away after receiving a torrent of hate mail and death threats ...
  45. [45]
    New Smart Gun Survey Confirms NSSF Findings
    Jun 13, 2019 · A newly released survey shows gun owners aren't opposed to the idea of authorized user technology in firearms. But only 5 percent would be very likely to ...
  46. [46]
    Survey: Most gun owners support sale of 'smart' guns but aren't likely ...
    Jun 10, 2019 · Survey finds that while 79% of gun owners support the sale of personalized weapons, only 18% are likely to buy them.
  47. [47]
    Very Few Gun Owners Want To Buy A Smart Gun | WAMU
    Aug 13, 2019 · Smart guns, use technology like fingerprint readers or RFID to let only authorized users unlock the gun and fire it.
  48. [48]
    Is the U.S. ready for smart guns? - CBS News
    Jun 19, 2016 · The gun lobby organized a boycott against Smith & Wesson -- seeing smart guns and other concessions in the deal as part of the gun control ...
  49. [49]
    3 Reasons a Smart Gun Will Never Sell | Fox Business
    Jul 19, 2015 · One certain problem with the iP1 system is the fact that both the handgun and the smartwatch that unlocks it need batteries to operate. Should ...Missing: response | Show results with:response
  50. [50]
    What To Know About The NRA And Smart Guns | Media Matters for ...
    ... failure rate in many consumer side-arms.” [Facebook.com, 5/7/14]. The NRA Claimed It Secretly Tested The Armatix IP1 And Found A Failure Rate Of Up To 40 ...
  51. [51]
    Anybody Can Fire This 'Locked' Smart Gun With $15 Worth of Magnets
    Jul 24, 2017 · When the shooter squeezes the gun's handle, it sends out an RFID signal to check if the watch is present. But Plore showed he could place one of ...
  52. [52]
    How a Hacker Fired a Locked Smart Gun Using Only Magnets
    Jul 24, 2017 · The Armatix iP1 pistol and its RFID watch, are sold as one of the most secure firearm systems available. But a hacker, who goes by 'Plore', ...
  53. [53]
    Wired Mag Hacks A 'Smart Gun' Using Magnets | thefirearmblog.com
    Jul 28, 2017 · All of which suggests that Armatix's IP1 is already a lost cause for gun-safety advocates. But Plore reasons that perhaps demonstrating its ...
  54. [54]
    New Jersey Library of Gun Control Legislation and Significant Events
    Sep 12, 2024 · NJ State Law | 12-23-2002. The New Jersey Childproof Handgun Law of 2002, also known as P.L. 2002, c. 130, mandated that once smart gun ...
  55. [55]
    A New Jersey Law That's Kept Smart Guns Off Shelves Nationwide
    Jun 24, 2014 · The Childproof Handgun Law of 2002 says that once "personalized handguns are available" anywhere in the country, all handguns sold in New Jersey must be smart ...
  56. [56]
    N.J. lawmakers may scrap controversial 'smart gun' law - nj.com
    May 13, 2015 · Passed in 2002 to respond to accidental child deaths from guns, the law's mandates for gun sales were supposed to kick in three years after the ...Missing: impact | Show results with:impact<|separator|>
  57. [57]
    What Went Wrong With New Jersey's Smart Gun Law? - The Trace
    May 31, 2023 · (The gun, the iP1 from the gunmaker Armatix, was also an unmitigated failure: its RFID-controlled safety could be disabled with magnets). ...
  58. [58]
    COMMENTARY: Smart gun mandate should be repealed
    May 15, 2015 · ... New Jersey Childproof Handgun Law has had a profound effect on the issue. ... Armatix iP1 handgun has been available worldwide since 2014.
  59. [59]
    [PDF] Smart Guns, the Law, and the Second Amendment
    This proposal triggered massive boycotts of certain manufacturers and dealers and a subsequent abandonment of the project by the gun industry overall.Missing: discounts | Show results with:discounts
  60. [60]
    [PDF] Constitutional Law—Shooting Blanks: Smart Gun Mandates and ...
    Aug 11, 2014 · Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, and the Second Amendment Commons ... Godbold IV, Constitutional Law—Shooting Blanks: Smart Gun Mandates ...
  61. [61]
    [PDF] HALF-COCKED: “SMART GUN” MANDATES ARE PREMATURE ...
    Oct 3, 2018 · Some devices are more sophisticated than others, and thus may be more or less reliable depending on the quality of the materials used or the ...
  62. [62]
    Smart guns exist. Why aren't they on the market? | PBS News
    May 24, 2018 · The study, Webster said, showed two things: that the willingness to buy a smart gun was lower among gun owners than those that don't own guns ...
  63. [63]
    Even 'Smart Gun' Maker Knows Mandates Are a Dumb Idea - NSSF
    Apr 15, 2025 · Our goal is to work alongside the firearms community and policymakers to ensure this technology is adopted voluntarily because it proves its ...Missing: uptake | Show results with:uptake
  64. [64]
    [PDF] A Higher Caliber of Regulation: Is Making Smart-Gun Technology ...
    it impermissibly infringes upon Second Amendment rights. ... First, a court would consider whether a smart gun affects a right within the scope of the Second ...
  65. [65]
    Smart Gun Maker Armatix Hits The Skids | Shooting Sports Retailer
    Armatix also reportedly lost its top designer, Ernst Mauch, in April. Mauch previously spent 30 years with Heckler & Koch and was seen as a major plus for a ...
  66. [66]
    [PDF] PERSONAL FIREARMS Programs that Promote Safe Storage ... - GAO
    Sep 19, 2017 · Armatix iP1, a .22 caliber pistol) was sold at two firearms retailers in California and one in. Maryland in 2014. However, these retailers ...
  67. [67]
    "Smart Gun" Manufacturer Undergoes Corporate Restructuring, Top ...
    May 28, 2015 · Armatix, the German technology firm behind the controversial iP1 pistol, indicated that it has entered Chapter 11-style restructuring proceedings.
  68. [68]
    Smart Gun Makers To Silicon Valley VCs: Fund Us - Forbes
    Feb 24, 2016 · When Armatix reached agreements with a handful of gun stores to sell the iP1, the dealers received an onslaught of threats from gun rights ...
  69. [69]
    American preferences for “smart” guns versus traditional weapons
    The study finds that, among non-owners, older respondents and those with pro-gun attitudes are less likely to prefer smart guns to traditional firearms.
  70. [70]
    Is the U.S. ready for smart guns? - CBS News
    Nov 1, 2015 · Smart-gun technology is not new, yet these guns are not mass ... "If you believe in the Second Amendment, and the Second Amendment is ...<|separator|>