Blake Masters
Blake Gates Masters (born August 5, 1986) is an American venture capitalist, author, and political candidate associated with entrepreneur Peter Thiel.[1][2] Masters graduated from Stanford University with a bachelor's degree in political science in 2008 and earned a J.D. from Stanford Law School in 2012.[3][4] While at Stanford Law, he compiled notes from Thiel's startup course, which formed the basis for their co-authored book Zero to One: Notes on Startups, or How to Build the Future, published in 2014 and emphasizing innovation over competition.[5][6] He subsequently worked as chief operating officer at Thiel Capital, a venture capital firm, and as president of the Thiel Fellowship, which provides funding to young entrepreneurs to skip traditional college.[2] In politics, Masters ran as a Republican for the U.S. Senate seat in Arizona in 2022, securing the primary with endorsement from former President Donald Trump before losing the general election to Democrat Mark Kelly.[7][8] He launched another campaign in 2024 for Arizona's 8th congressional district but was defeated in the Republican primary.[3] Masters' campaigns highlighted opposition to unrestricted immigration, criticism of big tech monopolies, and advocacy for domestic manufacturing, drawing significant financial support from Thiel, who contributed over $15 million to his 2022 effort.[9][10]Early Life and Education
Family Background and Upbringing
Blake Gates Masters was born on August 5, 1986, in Denver, Colorado, to parents Scott and Marilyn Masters.[1] His father worked in the software industry, and his mother operated an academic tutoring center.[1] The Masters family relocated to Tucson, Arizona, sometime after his birth, where Blake spent the majority of his childhood.[1] He attended private schools in the area, graduating from Green Fields Country Day School in 2004 as part of a class of 24 students.[11]Academic Achievements
Masters earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in political science from Stanford University in 2008.[1][12] He subsequently attended Stanford Law School, receiving a Juris Doctor in 2012.[1][13] During his final year of law school in spring 2012, Masters enrolled in Peter Thiel's course "CS 183: Startup," cross-listed in computer science despite lacking a technical background.[14] His comprehensive, synthesized notes from the lectures gained widespread online attention after being posted publicly, amassing hundreds of thousands of views and influencing discussions on entrepreneurship and innovation.[15] These notes formed the basis for the 2014 book Zero to One, co-authored with Thiel, which became a New York Times bestseller.[15] No records indicate additional academic honors, such as departmental awards or distinctions, during his undergraduate or graduate studies.[13]Early Writings and Blog Posts
During his undergraduate years at Stanford University, Masters maintained a LiveJournal blog under the username "kinggps," where he expressed libertarian-leaning views skeptical of state power. In a 2005 post, he argued that "illegal immigration is an ethical contradiction in terms, with regards to nation-states" and advocated "'unrestricted' immigration is the only choice," positing that borders are arbitrary constructs that should yield to private property rights.[16] In another 2005 entry, Masters praised participants in a U.S. military-linked cocaine trafficking operation (Operation Lively Green) as "heroes" for "seeking a profit while conducting trade between groups of consenting adults," framing their actions as resistance to government overreach.[16] In 2006, Masters contributed an essay to an obscure libertarian publication criticizing U.S. involvement in the Iraq War, quoting Nazi official Hermann Goering and French collaborator Robert Brasillach to underscore the perils of foreign entanglements and propaganda-driven conflicts.[17] The following year, as a Stanford junior, he posted in a CrossFit online forum advocating isolationist foreign policy, opposing American entry into both World Wars—conceding World War II was "harder to argue" due to the Holocaust but noting that Stalin "murdered over twice as many as Hitler" and questioning why schools "gloss over that." He further contended that Iraq and al-Qaeda "did not 'constitute substantial threats to Americans'" and suggested the U.S. adopt Switzerland's model of decentralized, defensive governance.[18] While attending Stanford Law School in 2012, Masters documented Peter Thiel's CS183: Startup course through detailed essay-formatted notes posted on Tumblr under the handle "blakemasters." These writings, covering topics like innovation, competition, and the "challenge of the future," attracted significant online readership and served as the foundation for the 2014 book Zero to One, co-authored with Thiel.[19] Masters described the notes as his interpretive summaries, acknowledging potential "errors and omissions" as his own.[19]Professional Career
Association with Peter Thiel
Blake Masters first collaborated with Peter Thiel during his time as a student at Stanford University, where he took detailed notes on Thiel's course titled "CS 183: Startup."[15] These notes, edited and expanded, formed the foundation for the 2014 book Zero to One: Notes on Startups, or How to Build the Future, published under Thiel's name with Masters as co-author. The book emphasizes creating innovative monopolies over incremental improvements, drawing directly from Thiel's lectures on contrarian thinking and technological progress.[15] After graduating from Stanford Law School in 2012, Masters joined Thiel Capital, the investment firm founded by Thiel to manage his personal and philanthropic investments.[2] He served as Chief Operating Officer, overseeing operations in areas such as venture investments and alternative assets, during which he earned substantial compensation from the firm, including nearly $1 million in 2021 alone.[10] This role solidified Masters' position as a key associate in Thiel's network, often described in professional profiles as Thiel's protégé.[20] Masters' tenure at Thiel Capital extended until March 2022, when he announced his resignation from Thiel Capital and the Thiel Foundation. This came after he had announced his candidacy for the U.S. Senate in Arizona in July 2021, and committed to resigning from the firm prior to the August 2022 Republican primary to avoid conflicts of interest.[21][22][23] Their professional relationship also intersected with policy efforts, such as Masters' involvement in the Trump administration's transition team in late 2016, where he advocated for reforms at the Food and Drug Administration aligned with Thiel's interests in accelerating medical innovation.[24]Venture Capital and Entrepreneurship
Masters co-founded Judicata, a software startup specializing in legal research tools, in 2012 shortly after graduating from Stanford Law School. The company developed platforms to enhance case law discovery and analysis for legal professionals, raising seed funding and achieving operational success before its acquisition by Thomson Reuters in 2017.[25] From 2018 to 2022, Masters served as Chief Operating Officer of Thiel Capital, Peter Thiel's investment firm managing venture capital, hedge fund, and credit strategies with a focus on technology and innovation sectors. In this role, he contributed to the firm's operational oversight amid investments in areas such as biotechnology and software, including multiple rounds in Beijing-based pharmaceutical ventures, though individual deal attributions remain limited in public records.[25][2][26] Concurrently, as President of the Thiel Foundation—a nonprofit advancing scientific progress and contrarian thinking—Masters supported entrepreneurial initiatives, notably the Thiel Fellowship, which awards $100,000 stipends to under-20-year-olds forgoing traditional college to build startups or pursue high-impact projects, having funded over 200 fellows since 2011.[25]Authorship of Zero to One
Blake Masters co-authored Zero to One: Notes on Startups, or How to Build the Future with Peter Thiel, with Crown Currency publishing the book on September 16, 2014.[27] [28] The work distills Thiel's lectures from his Stanford University course CS183: Startup, taught in spring 2012, emphasizing vertical progress through innovation over horizontal replication of existing ideas.[15] Masters, then a Stanford Law School student, compiled comprehensive essay-style notes from the 19 class sessions, capturing Thiel's discussions on topics such as definite optimism, the pitfalls of competition, and the mechanics of building monopoly-like businesses.[15] He posted these notes sequentially on his Tumblr blog starting in April 2012, where they rapidly circulated online, attracting significant engagement on platforms like Hacker News due to their accessible synthesis of Thiel's unorthodox perspectives on entrepreneurship.[15] [29] The notes' viral reception—fueled by their detailed yet readable format—prompted Thiel and Masters to collaborate on transforming them into a full manuscript over several months in 2012 and 2013.[15] Masters handled substantial editing, polishing the prose for clarity, adding structural elements like graphics, and ensuring the content's logical flow, while Thiel reviewed and refined the ideas to align with his foundational principles drawn from experiences at PayPal, Palantir, and as an early Facebook investor.[15] This process elevated the raw class material into a more cohesive narrative, with the book retaining the subtitle "Notes on Startups" to acknowledge its origins.[6] Masters' contribution extended beyond transcription; his prior exposure to Thiel— including a 2011 seminar and summer internship at Founders Fund—enabled him to interpret and expand on the lectures effectively, bridging Thiel's abstract concepts with practical examples.[15] The final 224-page volume critiques globalization's emphasis on incremental improvements, advocating instead for "zero to one" breakthroughs that create new markets, a thesis rooted in Thiel's observation that true progress demands escaping competition's zero-sum dynamics.[27]Political Emergence
Initial Political Engagement
Blake Masters announced his candidacy for the U.S. Senate from Arizona on July 12, 2021, marking his entry into electoral politics as a Republican challenger to incumbent Democrat Mark Kelly.[30][31] A Tucson native who had relocated back to southern Arizona in 2018 after years in Silicon Valley, Masters described the run as his first foray into public office, transitioning from his role as chief operating officer at Thiel Capital and president of the Thiel Foundation.[31] In his launch, Masters articulated motivations rooted in national decline, pledging to complete the U.S.-Mexico border wall, enforce immigration laws, and foster an economy enabling single-income family households.[31] He voiced apprehension that America risked becoming unrecognizable to future generations, including his own children, amid unchecked immigration and economic stagnation.[31] Positioning himself as an outsider unbound by Washington influence, Masters highlighted his business background—co-authoring the 2014 book Zero to One with Peter Thiel—and rejected special-interest beholdenness.[31] Early backing came from Thiel, Masters' longtime mentor, who committed to funding via a super PAC without dictating policy.[31] This alliance leveraged Thiel's financial resources and ideological alignment on innovation, nationalism, and skepticism of establishment institutions, though Masters stressed autonomy in decision-making.[31] Prior to the announcement, Masters had no record of elected office or formal party roles, with his public commentary limited to student-era writings critiquing foreign interventions and domestic policies.[18]Endorsements and Alliances
Masters' political emergence was bolstered by significant endorsements from prominent Republican figures. On June 2, 2022, former President Donald Trump endorsed Masters in the Arizona U.S. Senate Republican primary, praising him as a "strong America First candidate" capable of securing the border and fighting election integrity issues.[32] [33] This endorsement, coming amid a crowded primary field, positioned Masters as Trump's preferred choice and contributed to his victory on August 2, 2022.[7] A key alliance formed through Masters' long-standing professional ties to billionaire investor Peter Thiel, who provided substantial financial backing for his Senate bid. Thiel, Masters' former employer and mentor at Thiel Capital, directed over $15 million in support by July 2022 via personal contributions and aligned super PACs, making it one of the largest individual donor efforts in the race.[9] This funding underscored Thiel's influence in promoting candidates aligned with his views on technological innovation, nationalism, and skepticism of establishment institutions. Masters also secured endorsements from Trump-aligned senators, including Missouri's Josh Hawley on April 25, 2022, who highlighted Masters' potential to advance populist priorities in the Senate alongside figures like J.D. Vance.[34] These alliances reflected Masters' integration into a network of Republican insurgents challenging traditional party leadership, though they drew opposition from establishment donors like Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell's aligned PAC, which withheld support.[35] In October 2022, Trump further amplified Masters' campaign through a super PAC ad buy targeting key demographics.[36]2022 U.S. Senate Campaign
Republican Primary
Blake Masters announced his candidacy for the U.S. Senate in Arizona on January 11, 2022, positioning himself as a conservative outsider focused on economic nationalism, border security, and opposition to big tech censorship.[3] The Republican primary featured a crowded field of five major candidates, including state Attorney General Mark Brnovich, solar energy executive Jim Lamon, former state legislator Justin Olson, and businessman Michael McGuire, with Brnovich and Lamon emerging as Masters' primary challengers due to their established profiles and self-funding capabilities.[7][37] Masters secured key endorsements that bolstered his campaign, most notably from former President Donald Trump on June 2, 2022, who praised him as a "smart, tough, and proven WINNER" aligned with America First policies.[7] Billionaire Peter Thiel, Masters' former employer and co-author on Zero to One, provided substantial financial support, contributing approximately $15 million through direct donations and aligned super PACs by the primary's end, enabling aggressive advertising on issues like immigration and election integrity.[9] In contrast, Brnovich received backing from establishment figures like Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell's PAC, while Lamon self-funded over $10 million but lacked comparable grassroots momentum.[37] Masters' strategy emphasized digital outreach and Trump-style rallies, criticizing opponents as insufficiently committed to overturning perceived 2020 election irregularities, though he clarified he would not have refused to certify Biden's win despite doubts about the process.[38] The primary election occurred on August 2, 2022, with Masters declared the winner shortly after polls closed as results showed him leading decisively.[39] He received 40.0% of the vote (approximately 327,198 votes), ahead of Brnovich's 28.5% (231,469 votes), Lamon's 16.3% (132,593 votes), Olson's 7.0%, McGuire's 5.2%, and write-ins at 3.0%, in a field where no candidate achieved a majority amid a turnout of about 25% of registered Republicans.[40]General Election Against Mark Kelly
Following his victory in the Republican primary on August 2, 2022, Blake Masters advanced to the general election against incumbent Democratic Senator Mark Kelly, who had previously won a special election in 2020. The contest was one of the most expensive Senate races of the cycle, with total spending exceeding $230 million, including substantial outside expenditures from both parties.[41] Kelly significantly outraised Masters, collecting $89.2 million in contributions compared to Masters' $14.8 million, enabling a dominant advertising presence that emphasized Masters' past statements on social issues and ties to Peter Thiel.[42] The candidates participated in a single debate on October 6, 2022, hosted by Arizona PBS and moderated for the Citizens Clean Elections Commission, featuring Libertarian candidate Marc Victor as well.[43] During the 90-minute event, Masters pressed Kelly on border security, accusing him of supporting lax immigration policies, while Kelly defended his record on veteran affairs and gun safety, distancing himself from national Democratic leadership.[44] Masters also affirmed his support for auditing the 2020 presidential election results in Arizona, contrasting with Kelly's rejection of election denialism.[45] Polls throughout the race showed Kelly maintaining a consistent lead, though Masters narrowed the gap in the final weeks amid increased Republican spending and national focus on inflation and migration.[46] On November 8, 2022, Kelly secured reelection with 1,322,027 votes (51.4%), defeating Masters who received 1,196,308 votes (46.5%); Victor garnered 53,762 votes (2.1%).[47] The results were certified by Arizona election officials, and Masters conceded to Kelly on November 15, 2022, without contesting the outcome.[48]Campaign Strategies and Fundraising
Masters' general election campaign against incumbent Democrat Mark Kelly emphasized linking Kelly to President Joe Biden's unpopular policies, particularly on inflation, border security, and crime, positioning Masters as an outsider aligned with former President Donald Trump's "America First" agenda.[49] The campaign ran ads highlighting Kelly's Senate voting record, which aligned with Biden over 95% of the time, and criticized Kelly's support for what Masters described as open-border policies amid record migrant encounters at the U.S.-Mexico border.[49] [50] Masters also stressed economic populism, advocating for tariffs on China, domestic manufacturing revival, and opposition to "woke" corporate influences, drawing from his Thiel-associated background in tech and venture capital.[51] Digital and television advertising formed a core component, with Masters' team deploying targeted ads on platforms like Meta and Google to reach conservative voters, focusing on immigration enforcement and election integrity concerns following the 2020 Arizona audit.[52] However, the campaign faced setbacks when the National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC) canceled over $2 million in planned TV ads in August 2022, citing strategic reallocations amid Masters' polling deficits.[53] Ground efforts included rallies in rural and suburban areas, bolstered by Trump's endorsement, but were hampered by limited volunteer mobilization compared to Kelly's operation, which benefited from Democratic infrastructure advantages.[54] Fundraising for Masters totaled $14.8 million through the cycle, significantly trailing Kelly's $89.2 million, reflecting a reliance on elite donors rather than broad grassroots support.[42]| Category | Amount Raised | Percentage of Total |
|---|---|---|
| Small Individual Contributions (≤ $200) | $3,776,129 | 25.5% |
| Large Individual Contributions | $8,862,048 | 59.8% |
| PAC Contributions | $379,887 | 2.6% |
| Candidate Self-Financing | $725,248 | 4.9% |
Political Philosophy and Positions
Economic and Technological Innovation
Blake Masters has advocated for economic policies that prioritize domestic manufacturing and technological self-sufficiency to foster innovation and protect national interests. He supports onshoring critical industries such as semiconductor production, citing investments like Intel and TSMC facilities in Arizona as models for reversing job losses and enhancing security.[58] Masters proposes penalizing companies that relocate production overseas, favoring targeted industrial policies over unrestricted free trade to rebuild American industrial capacity.[58] In energy policy, Masters has called for reallocating federal funds—such as half of the $740 billion from the Inflation Reduction Act—to construct 50 new 1,000-megawatt nuclear power plants, arguing this would drive technological advancement and energy independence.[59] He critiques excessive regulation and offshoring as barriers to private-sector innovation, urging the use of modern technologies for large-scale infrastructure projects akin to historical feats like the Hoover Dam.[58] On technological innovation, Masters emphasizes curbing Big Tech monopolies to promote competition and prevent stagnation. He supports breaking up firms like Google, Amazon, and Apple, enforcing antitrust laws aggressively, and banning predatory practices such as targeted advertising based on extensive data mining.[60] Masters argues that social media platforms, which treat users as the product, require rewritten antitrust frameworks to address their unique models, including addictive algorithms that harm users, particularly youth.[60] He advocates opt-in data privacy rules and regulation of censorship, viewing Big Tech's ideological biases and lack of ongoing innovation—relying instead on network effects—as drags on economic dynamism.[61][58] Masters' approach seeks "smart" regulation to unleash new tech startups by enforcing competition in sectors like social media, while expressing concerns over foreign threats such as TikTok's ties to the Chinese Communist Party.[61][59] This stance aligns with his venture capital background, where he co-founded a software startup and worked at Thiel Capital, prioritizing policies that enable breakthrough innovations over permissive treatment of entrenched giants.[25]Social and Cultural Issues
Masters identifies as "100 percent pro-life," advocating for federal legislation to restrict abortions after 15 weeks of gestation and supporting the repeal of Roe v. Wade.[62][63] During his 2022 Senate campaign, his website initially outlined support for the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act, which bans abortions after 20 weeks without exceptions for rape or incest, though he later removed such details and aligned with Arizona's 15-week ban that permits exceptions for the mother's life or health risks.[64][65] In 2024, amid his congressional bid, Masters reaffirmed his unyielding conservative stance on abortion without retreat from prior positions.[66] On firearms and public safety, Masters defends robust Second Amendment rights, opposing restrictions like assault weapon bans and criticizing Democrats for undermining gun ownership while failing to address crime's root causes.[67][65] He attributes mass shootings and urban violence not to gun prevalence but to familial disintegration, particularly the high rates of father absence—citing over 70% in some demographics—which he links empirically to elevated crime, poverty, and social dysfunction.[67][68] Masters argues that restoring traditional family structures, including paternal responsibility, would yield greater reductions in violence than disarmament policies, drawing on data showing correlations between single-parent households and criminal outcomes.[69] In cultural matters, Masters rejects critical race theory (CRT) as a divisive ideology that fosters racial antagonism in schools by framing institutions as inherently oppressive, preferring curricula emphasizing individual merit and national unity.[70][68] He critiques broader "woke" influences, such as diversity initiatives in institutions like the Federal Reserve, sarcastically tying them to policy failures while advocating merit-based selection over identity quotas.[62] Masters promotes school choice to empower parents against public education's ideological tilts, aligning with conservative efforts to counter progressive cultural shifts in youth instruction.[71] His views prioritize causal factors like family stability and cultural cohesion over identity politics, consistent with his 2022 and 2024 campaigns' emphasis on traditional values.[72][66]Foreign Policy and National Security
Masters advocates a restrained foreign policy emphasizing national sovereignty and limiting U.S. military engagements to direct threats or defense of key allies, rejecting involvement in distant conflicts that do not serve American interests.[71] In a 2021 interview, he criticized "stupid foreign wars" and the expenditure of trillions in the Middle East, arguing resources should prioritize domestic challenges.[58] His early writings reflect this skepticism; as a Stanford student in 2007, Masters opposed U.S. involvement in Iraq, posting in an online forum that the war exemplified misguided interventionism.[18] On great power competition, Masters identifies the Chinese Communist Party as a profound threat across military, cyber, intellectual property, and economic domains, warning that U.S. dependence on Taiwan for semiconductor production—accounting for half of global chips—poses a critical vulnerability should China act aggressively.[71][58] He has campaigned against perceived U.S. corporate complicity with China, including Big Tech firms willing to censor content for market access.[58] Regarding Ukraine, Masters expressed reservations about ongoing U.S. aid during his 2022 Senate campaign, aligning with Republican critics wary of open-ended commitments amid domestic priorities.[73] In contrast, he staunchly supports Israel as a vital ally, endorsing the $38 billion in U.S. aid, the Abraham Accords, and opposition to the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions movement, while decrying congressional "zealots" for eroding bipartisan backing and rejecting any Iran nuclear deal revival as naive.[74] In national security matters, Masters calls for military reform, lambasting top generals as "woke corporate bozos" unfit for leadership and advocating replacement with conservative officers to restore effectiveness, a stance that provoked backlash from veterans and figures like Rep. Ruben Gallego.[75] He has promoted advanced border security technologies, including AI-driven surveillance, as essential to countering transnational threats, though such advocacy intersected with his professional ties to investor Peter Thiel.[76] Overall, his framework prioritizes deterrence against peer competitors like China over peripheral engagements, informed by a realist assessment of limited U.S. resources.[74]Election Integrity and Governance
Blake Masters has consistently supported measures to enhance election security, emphasizing the need for voter identification requirements on every ballot, including mail-in votes, and an end to the widespread distribution of unsolicited absentee ballots. In a September 2021 statement, he argued that prioritizing election security is essential to prevent fraud, stating, "We simply must [implement voter ID for every ballot, mail-in or in person], or the U.S.A. will be a third-world country."[77] His 2022 campaign platform echoed this, affirming that election integrity begins with halting "indiscriminate mass mailing of mail-in ballots" and mandating ID verification universally.[78] Masters expressed skepticism regarding the 2020 presidential election outcome in Arizona, initially including on his campaign website the assertion that it involved "widespread fraud and abuse" leading to a stolen result, language that was removed following his Republican primary victory on August 2, 2022.[79] During the general election campaign, former President Donald Trump urged him to affirm stronger claims of a "rigged and stolen" election, amid ongoing state-level audits and litigation over voting procedures.[80] In November 2022, as ballot tabulation delays occurred in Maricopa County due to printer malfunctions, Masters highlighted potential vulnerabilities, questioning the process's reliability without alleging outright fraud.[81] His campaign also employed individuals involved in Arizona's alternate elector efforts supporting Trump, reflecting alignment with Republican challenges to certification protocols.[82] Regarding broader governance, Masters advocates for streamlining federal bureaucracy to promote efficiency, influenced by his venture capital background and association with Peter Thiel. During the 2016-2017 Trump transition, he contributed to efforts aimed at restructuring the Food and Drug Administration, focusing on reducing regulatory hurdles to accelerate approvals for innovative therapies.[24] His "Masters Plan" outlined ambitions for privatizing select public services—such as water utilities and aspects of Social Security—to leverage market incentives over government monopoly, though he later clarified opposition to immediate privatization of entitlements for current retirees.[83] These positions prioritize causal mechanisms like competition and accountability to counter perceived inefficiencies in entrenched administrative structures, critiquing expansive federal overreach as a barrier to national prosperity.[84]Controversies and Public Scrutiny
Endorsement of Unabomber Ideas
In a March 16, 2022, podcast interview on the "Subversive" program hosted by Alex Kaschuta, Blake Masters identified Ted Kaczynski, known as the Unabomber, as an "underrated subversive thinker" when asked to recommend figures whose ideas could positively influence others.[85] Masters prefaced his response by acknowledging the potential controversy, stating, "I’ll probably get in trouble for saying this," and explicitly condemned Kaczynski's actions, noting, "he’s a terrorist you shouldn’t hurt people obviously of course."[85] He clarified that his comment was "not an endorsement" and that he disagreed with much of Kaczynski's work, but argued the manifesto contained "a lot of insight" and elements that were "correct."[85] Masters specifically praised Kaczynski's analysis in Industrial Society and Its Future for critiquing industrial society as a "disaster" that degrades human life through technological advancement, predating widespread social networking and its associated connectivity.[85] He highlighted the manifesto's prescience in identifying technology's "degrading and debasing" effects on society, as well as its portrayal of left-wing politics as driven by "inferiority complexes," envy, and resentment toward "goodness, truth, beauty, justice."[85] Masters encouraged critical engagement, urging listeners: "Everybody should read it and what do you agree with what do you disagree with."[85] This echoed his broader concerns, shared with mentor Peter Thiel, about technology's role in eroding human agency and fostering dependency, though Masters advocated innovation over Kaczynski's proposed rejection of modernity.[86] The remarks drew criticism from Democratic opponents and media outlets during Masters' 2022 Arizona Senate campaign, who portrayed them as sympathy for a domestic terrorist responsible for three deaths and 23 injuries via mail bombs from 1978 to 1995.[54] Masters did not retract the assessment of the manifesto's intellectual merits but maintained the distinction between ideas and violence, consistent with his emphasis on first-principles evaluation of arguments irrespective of their source.[85] Kaczynski's manifesto, published in 1995 after his brother recognized its authorship and alerted authorities, argued that technological progress inherently undermines human freedom and autonomy, a thesis Masters viewed as partially valid despite rejecting its radical prescriptions.[85]Statements on Race, Crime, and Culture
In April 2022, during an interview on the Bongino Report podcast, Blake Masters described the primary driver of urban gun violence in the United States as gang-related activity concentrated in cities like Chicago and St. Louis, stating, "It's gangs. It's people in Chicago, St. Louis shooting each other. Very often, you know, Black people, frankly."[67][87] He argued that this constitutes "a Black problem" tied to inner-city cultural dynamics rather than firearm availability, criticizing Democrats for avoiding such discussions in favor of broader gun control measures.[67] Masters' campaign defended the remarks as highlighting empirical patterns in crime data, where Federal Bureau of Investigation statistics from 2021 showed that Black individuals, comprising about 13% of the population, accounted for over 50% of homicide offenders in reported cases. Masters has linked elevated crime rates in certain communities to breakdowns in family structure and social norms, advocating for policies that promote stable two-parent households as a means to reduce violence. In campaign materials and speeches, he emphasized economic conditions enabling fathers to support families full-time, positioning this as part of an "America First" approach to cultural renewal over reliance on welfare incentives that he claims exacerbate dependency.[88] This perspective aligns with conservative analyses citing data from the U.S. Census Bureau, which reported that approximately 72% of Black children were born to unmarried mothers in 2020, correlating with higher rates of juvenile delinquency in longitudinal studies by the Department of Justice. Regarding broader racial dynamics, Masters has opposed elements of contemporary cultural discourse, including critical race theory, which he characterizes as fostering division by prioritizing racial identity over individual merit. In June 2022 public statements, he decried the left's "obsession" with race as insincere, particularly when it deflects from accountability for community-specific violence.[68] He has also highlighted what he terms "anti-white racism," citing examples such as affirmative action policies and educational curricula like the 1619 Project, which he argues promote resentment and undermine national cohesion. At an August 2021 conservative event, Masters called for confronting such biases explicitly, stating that Americans should reject narratives framing whiteness as inherently problematic.[89] Masters has expressed skepticism toward diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives in institutions, suggesting they prioritize demographic representation over competence. In an August 29, 2022, tweet, he sarcastically attributed economic inflation and policy missteps at the Federal Reserve to an overemphasis on appointing women, Black individuals, and LGBTQ+ officials, implying a causal link between identity-focused hiring and institutional underperformance.[90][62] Similarly, he has questioned Vice President Kamala Harris's qualifications, attributing her rise partly to racial and gender preferences rather than substantive expertise. These views reflect Masters' advocacy for meritocracy, drawing on critiques of disparate impact in hiring data from sources like the Government Accountability Office reports on federal workforce demographics.[69]Abortion and Related Backlash
Masters advocated for Arizona enforcing its pre-Roe v. Wade territorial law, which bans nearly all abortions except those necessary to save the life of the mother, without exceptions for rape, incest, or fetal abnormalities.[63] In a September 2022 PolitiFact review of a Democratic ad, Masters confirmed his support for this position, rejecting broader exceptions as unnecessary and emphasizing prevention of unwanted pregnancies through cultural and policy changes rather than legal carve-outs.[63] Prior to the August 2022 Republican primary, Masters' campaign website outlined a federal "personhood" amendment to protect unborn life from conception and criticized Roe for lacking exceptions even in dire cases, while supporting state-level restrictions post-Dobbs.[64] Following his primary victory over Jim Lamon on August 2, 2022, the campaign removed detailed abortion policy language from the site, with Masters stating in an August 25 interview that Arizona's existing 15-week ban—enacted in 2021 and upheld after Dobbs—provided sufficient protection without needing federal overrides or additional exceptions.[91] He affirmed opposition to a national ban but endorsed Lindsey Graham's proposed 15-week federal limit, provided it aligned with state authority.[92] This stance drew significant criticism from Democrats and abortion-rights advocates, who launched ads accusing Masters of extremism for rejecting rape and incest exceptions, framing it as out of step with Arizona voters amid post-Dobbs backlash.[93] The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee spent over $10 million on abortion-focused attacks in the race, including spots highlighting his pre-primary writings and linking them to potential enforcement of the 1864 ban reinstated by Arizona courts in 2022.[94] Arizona Democratic leaders, such as Governor Katie Hobbs, publicly condemned Masters' position as enabling a "total ban," prompting calls for him to clarify amid fears of legal uncertainty before the law's full implementation.[95] During the October 6, 2022, general election debate against incumbent Mark Kelly, Masters defended his views by arguing abortion rates had declined under restrictive policies without exceptions, attributing societal progress to adoption incentives and contraception access rather than permissive laws; Kelly countered by labeling the position a threat to women's health.[96] Polling showed abortion as a top issue for 20-25% of Arizona voters, with Masters trailing Kelly by 5-7 points in late surveys partly due to gender gaps among women, though exit polls indicated economic concerns dominated.[97] Masters' campaign responded by airing ads emphasizing exceptions for maternal health and accusing opponents of fearmongering, consistent with broader Republican efforts to mitigate Dobbs-related losses in competitive races.[97] Sources amplifying the backlash, including outlets like MSNBC and CNN, often emphasized "hiding" or "backtracking" narratives, reflecting partisan incentives post-primary rather than shifts in Masters' substantive opposition to elective abortions.[98]Media Portrayals and Defenses
Mainstream media outlets during Masters' 2022 U.S. Senate campaign frequently highlighted statements from his podcasts and past writings as evidence of extreme or inflammatory views. For example, in June 2022, NBC News and MSNBC reported on his April podcast appearance where he attributed the core of America's gun violence epidemic to gang-related activities "very often, you know, Black people, frankly," citing urban crime patterns in cities like Chicago, with MSNBC characterizing the remarks as advancing a "racist line."[67][99] The Washington Post described this approach as "perfecting the right's approach to racial politics" by linking crime discussions to critiques of progressive race-focused policies, while Rolling Stone portrayed it as directly blaming Black people for gun violence.[68][100] Such coverage often emphasized the demographic framing over FBI Uniform Crime Reports data showing disproportionate involvement in certain violent crimes by young Black males in urban areas, with outlets like these, known for left-leaning editorial slants, amplifying the statements as divisive without equivalent scrutiny of supporting statistical evidence.[101] Masters' 2019 podcast discussion of Ted Kaczynski's manifesto drew similar scrutiny, where he expressed partial agreement with its critique of technology's dehumanizing effects on society and independence, while explicitly rejecting Kaczynski's violent methods. Media reactions, including from Vanity Fair in an April 2022 profile of Peter Thiel's intellectual circle and MSNBC social media posts, framed this as outright "praising the Unabomber" and associating Masters with terrorist ideology, often eliding the nuanced endorsement of anti-modernist arguments shared by thinkers like Thiel.[86][102] The New York Times, in a July 2022 article, further resurfaced his early 2000s online posts expressing skepticism of U.S. interventions abroad and cultural critiques, portraying them as "strident" relics hindering his viability, amid broader narratives in outlets like Vanity Fair linking him to "white extremists" online.[18][103] Defenses of Masters against these portrayals appeared in conservative media, which argued that mainstream coverage distorted context to undermine non-interventionist or data-driven conservative positions. National Review, in an August 2022 piece, dismissed interpretations of his lighthearted social media posts as "silly media hits," contending they ignored obvious intent and overreached in politicizing innocuous content.[104] A May 2022 Politico profile noted Tucker Carlson's endorsement of Masters as emblematic of the GOP's future, praising his nationalist agenda against media-driven narratives of extremism, while framing his Thiel-backed worldview as innovative rather than fringe.[72] Supporters contended that empirical realities, such as crime victimization surveys and arrest demographics, validated Masters' gun violence observations, accusing left-biased outlets of prioritizing narrative over verifiable public safety data to shield failing urban policies.[105]2024 U.S. House Campaign
Republican Primary in Arizona's 8th District
Blake Masters entered the Republican primary for Arizona's 8th Congressional District, an open seat vacated by incumbent Debbie Lesko who opted not to seek re-election, positioning himself as a continuation of his 2022 Senate campaign themes of economic nationalism and cultural conservatism.[3] The district, encompassing suburbs northwest of Phoenix including Peoria and Glendale, attracted a crowded field of over 10 candidates, with Masters leveraging his prior statewide name recognition and ties to figures like Peter Thiel and JD Vance to raise significant funds, reporting over $1.5 million in contributions by mid-2024.[106] The primary campaign intensified into mutual personal attacks, particularly between Masters and leading rival Abraham Hamadeh, a 2022 attorney general candidate and Army veteran. Masters' advertisements accused Hamadeh of dishonesty, dubbing him "Dishonest Abe," and highlighted purported "Islamic connections" through donations from groups like the Islamic Society of North America, which Masters' team framed as evidence of questionable associations potentially influencing policy on issues like Israel and terrorism; Hamadeh, who is Muslim, rejected these as smears and emphasized his pro-Israel stance and military service.[107] [108] [109] Critics, including some conservative outlets, labeled Masters' tactics xenophobic, while his supporters argued they exposed legitimate concerns about foreign influence in a national security-focused race; Hamadeh responded with ads portraying Masters as unprincipled and funded by out-of-state elites.[110] [111] Masters stressed border security and election integrity in debates and messaging, aligning with district priorities in a conservative-leaning area where immigration polled as a top voter concern, and claimed early polling leads from groups like the American Principles Project showing him ahead by double digits in June 2024.[112] [113] Former President Donald Trump publicly praised Masters as a "fantastic candidate" while also expressing support for Hamadeh, creating a rare dual endorsement dynamic that Masters highlighted on social media as backing for his bid.[114] [115] The contest, held on July 30, 2024, drew national attention as a proxy for MAGA infighting, with outside spending exceeding $5 million amid the acrimony.[116][117]Key Competitors and Outcome
In the Republican primary for Arizona's 8th congressional district held on July 30, 2024, Blake Masters faced competition from a crowded field of six other candidates seeking the nomination for the open seat vacated by retiring incumbent Debbie Lesko. Key rivals included Abraham Hamadeh, a former U.S. Army officer and 2022 Republican nominee for Arizona attorney general who received endorsements from Donald Trump and Kari Lake; Ben Toma, the Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives; and Trent Franks, a former U.S. Representative who resigned in 2017 amid ethics investigations but mounted a comeback.[118] Other contenders were state Senator Anthony Kern and businessman Patrick Briody, though they garnered minimal support. The primary drew over 102,000 votes, reflecting intense competition in the reliably Republican district spanning Maricopa and Yavapai counties. Hamadeh emerged victorious, securing the nomination with a plurality but no majority, as no candidate reached 50% in the multi-candidate race. Masters finished a close second, trailing by approximately 4,200 votes, in what was his second consecutive primary defeat following his 2022 U.S. Senate bid.[118]| Candidate | Votes | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Abraham Hamadeh | 30,686 | 29.9% |
| Blake Masters | 26,422 | 25.7% |
| Ben Toma | 21,549 | 21.0% |
| Trent Franks | 16,714 | 16.3% |
| Anthony Kern | 4,922 | 4.8% |
| Patrick Briody | 2,336 | 2.3% |