Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Buried Pyramid

The Buried Pyramid, formally known as the Pyramid of , is an unfinished ancient Egyptian located in the necropolis south of , constructed around 2645 BC for , the second ruler of the Third Dynasty. Intended as a seven-tiered structure surpassing the nearby of in scale, it was abandoned early in construction, reaching only about 7 meters in height with a square base measuring approximately 115 meters on each side, likely due to 's premature death after a short reign of roughly six years. The pyramid's core consists of local limestone blocks, and its associated mortuary complex includes an enclosure wall, subsidiary structures, and a subterranean burial chamber containing an empty , reflecting early royal funerary practices. Archaeological evidence indicates the pyramid was built on uneven terrain, with embankments and rubble walls used for leveling, and its design echoes Djoser's complex about 400 meters to the north, including dummy doors on a wall and larger blocks in courses of 50-52 cm. The site remained buried and unknown for over 3,000 years until its rediscovery in 1951 by Egyptian archaeologist Zakaria Goneim during excavations near the Pyramid causeway, with major work continuing until 1954-1955. Goneim's team uncovered the pyramid's superstructure and entered the sealed burial chamber on May 31, 1954, revealing an intact alabaster . The was ceremonially opened on June 26, 1954, in the presence of officials but was found to be empty, yielding no royal remains. The complex's historical significance lies in its role as a transitional in pyramid evolution, bridging the tombs of earlier dynasties to more advanced step pyramids, and it provides insights into Third Dynasty and kingship, though much of the site remains unexcavated and partially covered by sand. In , Egyptologist Jean-Philippe Lauer discovered a secondary south within the enclosure containing the mummified remains of a young child, possibly a royal heir, adding to the site's enigmatic status. Despite its incomplete state, the Buried Pyramid underscores the rapid development of monumental funerary in and continues to attract scholarly interest for further exploration.

Historical Context

Pharaoh Sekhemkhet

, also known as Djoserty or -tety, was the third of Egypt's Third Dynasty during , succeeding and reigning for approximately six to seven years around 2648–2641 BCE. The order of early Third Dynasty rulers is debated, with some evidence placing () before . His rule marked a continuation of the centralized authority and monumental building projects initiated under , though evidence for specific administrative or military activities remains limited. Attestations of Sekhemkhet's reign come primarily from ancient king lists and contemporary inscriptions. The records him as Djoserty with a regnal length of six years, aligning with Manetho's later account of seven years under the name Tyris. Further evidence includes an ivory label discovered in his pyramid complex at , inscribed with his Nebty name Djoserty Ankh, as well as seal impressions bearing his Sekhemkhet. These artifacts confirm his royal status and titulary, with variations in later lists such as Djosertety in the Saqqara King List and Teti in the , likely due to scribal interpretations. Sekhemkhet's family ties link him closely to the preceding ruler, possibly as the son or brother of , though the exact relationship remains uncertain, based on chronological proximity and shared Memphite affiliations. , the renowned and architect of Djoser's , is believed to have continued in a similar role under Sekhemkhet, overseeing the design of his successor's funerary monument. His royal titles reinforced the ideology of divine kingship; the Sekhemkhet translates to "Horus, Powerful of Body," symbolizing the 's physical vigor as an embodiment of the falcon god and protector of the Two Lands. The Nebty name Djoserty, meaning "Sacred of Body," further evoked the protective embrace of the goddesses and , affirming his sacred authority over . The brevity of Sekhemkhet's reign is reflected in the incomplete construction of his pyramid at .

Third Dynasty Pyramid Evolution

The pyramid-building tradition in the Third Dynasty of marked a pivotal evolution from the earlier tombs, which were flat-roofed, rectangular structures primarily constructed of mudbrick, to the first large-scale stone pyramids. This shift began under Pharaoh Djoser (c. 2670 BCE), whose at represented the inaugural major stone pyramid, transforming stacked mastaba-like layers into a monumental six-step form that reached approximately 62 meters in height. The key innovations of this period are attributed to , Djoser's vizier and architect, who pioneered the use of cut stone masonry on a grand scale, moving away from perishable to durable for both structural and aesthetic purposes. Imhotep's design incorporated six distinct steps, each diminishing in size, supported by innovative internal corridors and chambers, and featured an outer casing of fine limestone to create a polished appearance. This complex not only elevated royal burial architecture but also integrated surrounding structures like courtyards and temples, symbolizing a comprehensive funerary landscape. Building on Djoser's model, the Third Dynasty saw a transitional push toward true, smooth-sided , exemplified by Sekhemkhet's unfinished pyramid at , which retained a step form but incorporated steeper angles and casing preparations indicative of an intent to achieve a sloped, unified surface—a design refined in the Fourth Dynasty by pharaohs like Snefru. Materials in these Third Dynasty consistently emphasized local quarried from nearby sites such as for the core masonry, providing a readily available, workable medium, while higher-quality Tura limestone from across the was employed for the outer casing to ensure a gleaming, protective finish.

Discovery and Excavation

Early Observations

The site of the Buried Pyramid in South remained largely obscured by millennia of sand accumulation during the pre-20th century period, appearing only as a low, unremarkable mound amid the landscape. 19th-century European explorations of , part of a broader wave of interest in ancient Egyptian monuments, included systematic surveys by Karl Richard Lepsius during the Prussian expedition of 1842–1845, which documented 17 and numerous in the area but did not identify the mound as a structure due to its heavily buried condition and lack of visible features. Local Egyptian communities possessed traditional knowledge of the plateau as a sacred ground, with the mound occasionally regarded as a possible ancient site, though its absence of prominent superstructure led to its dismissal as insignificant compared to nearby visible monuments. The pyramid's buried status stemmed from geological processes inherent to the desert environment, including persistent wind erosion that stripped away surface materials and facilitated the gradual deposition of and over the unfinished core, a phenomenon observed across the plateau where unprotected structures succumbed to aeolian accumulation. This contrasts with the better-preserved of nearby, whose more complete enclosure and casing resisted such burial. Early cartographic efforts, such as the maps produced during the Napoleonic expedition of 1798–1801 and published in , depicted the broader terrain with vague notations of topographic anomalies and low elevations in the southern sector, though without specific recognition of the mound as an artificial feature.

1951 Rediscovery and Initial Digs

In 1951, Zakaria Goneim, an archaeologist with the Egyptian Antiquities Service, initiated excavations at a site adjacent to Djoser's complex at , uncovering the remains of an previously unknown pyramid structure buried under layers of sand and debris. His work began following observations of anomalous surface features, marking the first systematic modern exploration of the site. The excavations exposed the pyramid's core as an unfinished step-like structure, rising to a maximum height of approximately 7 meters and consisting of only the lower portions of what was planned as a multi-tiered monument. Further clearing revealed the substructure, including a descending corridor leading to a rectangular chamber hewn from the , which was first entered on May 31, 1954. Within this chamber, excavators discovered an intact , complete with a sliding lid and original seals; an bearing the name of , found in the chamber, confirmed the pyramid's attribution to this pharaoh. Upon opening the on June 26, 1954, it was found to be empty, containing no goods or remains, which suggested the had never been used. Initial findings also indicated a sudden halt in construction, with evidence of rushed abandonment evident around the level of the third step, including scattered tools and incomplete masonry. The digs faced significant challenges, particularly from rising that flooded the subterranean passages and chamber, complicating access and preservation efforts during the 1951-1955 seasons. Despite these obstacles, Goneim's team documented the core features, providing the first detailed insights into the pyramid's incomplete state.

Later Investigations

Following the initial excavations of 1951, French Egyptologist Jean-Philippe Lauer resumed work at the pyramid complex in the 1960s, focusing on mapping the enclosure wall and excavating the south tomb, where in 1963 he discovered a subsidiary burial containing the mummified remains of a young child approximately three years old, possibly a royal heir, along with pottery vessels and fragments of gold foil. His investigations revealed structural parallels with the nearby complex of , including similar tomb orientations and enclosure designs, underscoring the continuity of Third Dynasty architectural traditions. Lauer's efforts extended into the 1980s, contributing to a broader understanding of the site's layout through detailed architectural documentation and comparisons to contemporary monuments. In the 2000s, geophysical surveys employing (GPR) were conducted in the to probe unexcavated sectors near the pyramid, identifying potential subsurface anomalies such as additional shafts and voids. These non-invasive techniques, part of wider regional studies, highlighted buried features without disturbing the site, aiding in the prioritization of future digs. Preservation initiatives at the site have included sand stabilization measures to mitigate ongoing burial by drifting dunes, ensuring the exposed remains accessible for study. Complementing these efforts, digital reconstructions utilizing technology have been developed as part of the Constructing the Sacred project, providing three-dimensional models of the pyramid complex to visualize its original form and ritual landscape. Post-2020 discussions within Egyptological communities have emphasized the need for renewed investigations into the pyramid's incomplete state, citing persistent funding constraints as a barrier to comprehensive exploration.

Architectural Features

Superstructure Design

The of the Buried Pyramid, attributed to , was designed as an unfinished with a square base measuring approximately 119 meters on each side. If completed, it would have risen to a height of about 70 meters in seven steps, but construction halted early, leaving only the lowest step visible and a maximum height of roughly 8 meters. This incomplete form reveals the foundational layers of the core masonry, constructed using an accretion method where successive layers of relatively small blocks were laid in sloping courses inclined inward at about 15 degrees, to the face angle. The core consisted of rough-hewn local blocks, intended to support a smooth outer casing of fine Tura that was never applied to the itself due to the project's abandonment. Evidence from the site, including remnants of construction ramps and patterns of accumulated debris, suggests the use of internal or wrapping ramps to haul materials upward during building, a technique consistent with Third Dynasty practices. The step-like profile represents a transitional design, bridging the more pronounced mastaba-stacked form of Djoser's and the smoother true pyramids of later dynasties. The pyramid's orientation is precisely aligned to the cardinal directions, with its sides and central axis deviating minimally from , achieved through astronomical observations such as stellar alignments or solar sightings common in architecture. This alignment underscores the monument's integration into the broader necropolis layout, emphasizing ritual and cosmic precision in its planning.

Subterranean Complex

The subterranean complex of the Buried Pyramid, located beneath the unfinished at , features a network of corridors, shafts, and chambers designed for the pharaoh's and of funerary goods, though much of it remains incomplete due to the project's early abandonment. of this structure preceded the building of the pyramid's , allowing the core to be laid directly over access points such as the vertical connecting to the area. This is evident from the way the pyramid's lowest courses incorporate and cover elements of the substructure, a common practice in Third Dynasty pyramid building to conceal and protect the . Access to the complex begins with a descending passage, approximately 61 meters long, cut into the bedrock from an entrance on the pyramid's north face. The passage is secured by three massive granite portcullis stones, each weighing several tons, which were found in position when excavated in the 1950s; a fourth blocking stone remains unfinished nearby, underscoring the rushed halt in work. At the end of the passage lies the main burial chamber, measuring approximately 8.9 meters by 5.22 meters with a height of 4.55 meters, roofed by heavy granite beams intended to support the overlying pyramid mass. Inside, an empty alabaster sarcophagus stands against one wall, its lid sealed in place but showing no signs of use, as no royal remains or grave goods were present. Surrounding the burial area are additional vertical shafts, including a wide one used to lower the blocks into position, and a series of magazine chambers extending around the 's base. These storage galleries, arranged in a U-shaped pattern along the north, east, and west sides, were meant to hold provisions and offerings but were left rough-hewn and incomplete, with only portions excavated revealing their intended function. Evidence of hurried construction appears in the uneven tool marks and irregular surfaces within the chambers and passages, indicating that work accelerated or stopped suddenly before full finishing. Overall, the subterranean layout echoes the more elaborate design of Djoser's nearby but on a simpler scale, highlighting evolutionary aspects of early architecture.

Associated Surface Structures

The funerary complex of Sekhemkhet's Buried Pyramid featured several associated surface structures that defined its ritual perimeter and supported ceremonial functions. These elements, though largely unfinished due to the project's abrupt abandonment, reflect a design influenced by the nearby complex of but executed on a more modest scale. The wall formed the primary boundary, measuring approximately 262 by 189 meters in its initial configuration and later extended to about 545 by 182 meters along the north-south axis. Constructed from local blocks averaging 50-52 cm in height—larger than those in Djoser's —it included rubble-filled bastions and a partial facing of fine Tura , with a planned height of around 10.5 meters but only reaching 3 meters in preserved sections. The wall's unfinished state is evident in undressed upper courses and partial paneling with the palace façade , indicating construction halted midway. A prominent subsidiary feature was the south tomb, a square structure with a base roughly 20 by 20 meters, positioned south of the to parallel Djoser's own south . It incorporated a rudimentary substructure accessed via a western entrance and a vertical shaft leading to a simple chamber, likely intended for a royal family member or a symbolic ka statue of the . Excavations uncovered a wooden , stone vases, jewelry fragments, and the mummified remains of a two-year-old boy, suggesting use for a high-status despite the complex's incompletion. Archaeological surveys have yielded minimal evidence for a valley , implying that a planned for access—standard in later complexes—remained unbuilt, with the entire layout confined to the plateau. The overall arrangement centered the within open courts enclosed by the wall, designed for royal rituals such as the Heb-Sed festival, but simplified without the elaborate faux structures of Djoser's monument.

Significance and Interpretations

Innovations and Comparisons

The Buried Pyramid of exemplifies a transitional phase in Third Dynasty pyramid architecture, demonstrating a shift toward the true form through the application of accretion layers intended to approximate smooth sides. These layers, constructed from , were built in successive steps that could have been filled and cased to create a more angular, sloping profile, foreshadowing the experimental designs of Sneferu's in the Fourth Dynasty. This approach built on the precedent established earlier in the dynasty, reflecting ongoing refinements in monumental stone construction. A notable innovation in the substructure is the system, consisting of three large slabs designed to slide down and seal the horizontal corridor leading to the burial chamber, providing enhanced security against intrusion. This mechanism represents an advancement over the simpler blocking plugs of employed in Djoser's , which offered less robust protection and were more susceptible to removal or bypass. The use of durable for these slabs highlights improved material selection and precision in tomb design. In terms of scale and ambition, the pyramid's base measures approximately 120 meters square—larger than the 109 by 121 meters of Djoser's —indicating a bold in despite the structure's early abandonment after reaching only about 6 meters in . This larger footprint, combined with the planned seven-step elevation, underscores rapid technological progress in quarrying, transportation, and assembly techniques within a short , even as the project remained incomplete. Comparisons with contemporary structures reveal shared experimental traits, such as the nearby Layer Pyramid of Khaba at Zawiyet el-Aryan, which also features unfinished layered steps on a smaller base of about 85 meters and similar Third Dynasty proportions, suggesting parallel efforts in architectural prototyping. In contrast to the refined true pyramids of the Fourth Dynasty, like Sneferu's with its 188-meter base and angle adjustments for stability, Sekhemkhet's design retains step-like elements but anticipates the smoother, geometrically precise forms that became standard, marking it as a pivotal link in the progression from stepped to true pyramids.

Theories on Abandonment

The primary theory for the abandonment of the Buried Pyramid attributes it to the premature death of its commissioner, , whose reign lasted approximately six to seven years according to the and supporting archaeological evidence from contemporary inscriptions. This short duration insufficiently allowed for the completion of the extensive funerary complex, which was initiated shortly after his accession but halted before significant progress on the superstructure or associated features. The absence of a in the pyramid's subterranean chamber—where an empty, sealed alabaster was found—further supports this interpretation, indicating that died before the monument could serve its intended purpose. The unfinished substructure, including incomplete galleries and the burial chamber, underscores the sudden cessation of work, consistent with a royal death interrupting state-sponsored projects during the Third Dynasty. While the core masonry reached only a few courses high without casing stones, the project's early-stage halt aligns with the limited time available under Sekhemkhet's rule, as no evidence of resumed construction appears in later dynastic records. Some scholars suggest additional factors may have contributed, such as potential resource constraints evidenced by the modest scale and basic materials used in the initial phases compared to nearby complex. However, these are secondary to the reign-length explanation and lack direct attestation in primary sources. Political shifts within the , including possible succession uncertainties following , could have diverted labor and resources to other initiatives, though the period is generally characterized by relative stability rather than overt instability. Alternative hypotheses, such as intentional partial burial for symbolic or purposes or interruption by environmental events like flooding, remain speculative and unsupported by archaeological from the , with the early prevailing in Egyptological .

Modern Research Gaps

Despite the foundational excavations beginning in 1951 under Zakaria Goneim and continued by Jean-Philippe Lauer until 1963, significant gaps persist in understanding the Buried Pyramid's purpose and completion status. A primary unresolved issue is the absence of burial evidence, as the alabaster in the subterranean chamber—found sealed but empty, with Sekhemkhet's identity confirmed by inscriptions on and pottery from the complex—was empty upon opening in 1954, containing no , funerary goods, or inscriptions confirming interment. This has fueled debates among Egyptologists about whether was ever buried there, possibly due to the unfinished state of the substructure or alternative tomb use elsewhere. Further exploration of potential hidden chambers remains limited, with non-invasive technologies like —successfully applied at to detect voids—yet to be implemented at the Buried Pyramid site. Such methods could reveal undiscovered subterranean features without excavation, addressing the incomplete mapping of the complex's internal layout. Recent excavations at (as of 2025) have uncovered additional Third Dynasty tombs, offering comparative insights into burial practices, though the Buried Pyramid's enclosure and potential hidden features await further non-invasive study. These efforts highlight ongoing interest in the site amid broader investigations. Looking ahead, bioarchaeological analyses of adjacent Third Dynasty tombs could provide comparative insights into burial practices and health profiles, potentially clarifying Sekhemkhet's case. Additionally, climate modeling of Valley conditions during the early might elucidate environmental influences on construction interruptions and burial feasibility.

References

  1. [1]
    Pyramid of Sekhemkhet: a Pleiades place resource
    Nov 20, 2023 · The Pyramid of Sekhemkhet, also known as "The Buried Pyramid", is an unfinished step pyramid at Saqqara that was begun ca. 2645 B.C. for ...
  2. [2]
    [PDF] The Stones of The Pyramids - Harvard University
    The "Buried Pyramid" of Sekhemkhet. 27. III. The Pyramids of Zawiyet el-Aryan ... The petrographical study shows that Maasara is a less like ly source.
  3. [3]
    Sekhemkhet's Pyramid Complex A Layman"s guide - ResearchGate
    1 Horus Sekhem-Khet, Volume I, plate IV. · 2 The Buried Pyramid, Z. · 3 Ibid, page 30 · 4 Egyptian Pyramids, Leslie Grinsell, 1947 · 5 The Antiquaries Journal, Vol ...
  4. [4]
    PHARAOH'S COFFIN OPENED, IS EMPTY; Officials Secretly Inspect ...
    The unfinished burial chamber containing the sarcophagus was found in the step pyramid May 31 by Dr. Mohammed Zakaria Ghoneim, an Egyptologist in the Department ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  5. [5]
    Sekhemkhet in hieroglyphs - Pharaoh.se
    The birth name of Horus Sekhemkhet is just like his father Djoser uncertain. The Saqqara king list use the name Djosertety, while the Abydos list simply use ...
  6. [6]
    Sekhemkhet - Djosertety - Djeserty Ankh - Francesco Raffaele
    We can tentatively guess that the great Imhotep survived to Djoser and was again the mind behind the funerary complex works; the project is by far a more ...
  7. [7]
    Turin King List: column 4 - Pharaoh.se
    King: Sekhemkhet (20th king) ... The entire name is lost, and the singular year stroke is in accord with the contemporary evidence that his reign lasted only a ...Missing: ivory label scholarly
  8. [8]
    Buried Pyramid of Sekhemkhet - The Ancient Egypt Site
    A glimpse of the burial chamber reveals its unfinished state. The white, rectangular block almost in the centre of the picture is Sekhemkhet's unique ...
  9. [9]
    [PDF] Structure and Significance: Thoughts on Ancient Egyptian Architecture
    The development of pyramid complexes actually begins with the Third Dynasty pharaoh. Djoser. Although the centerpiece of his complex at Saqqara is not a true ...
  10. [10]
    Old Kingdom and First Intermediate Period, an introduction
    Often considered to begin with the Third Dynasty and Netjerikhet (Djoser), whose famous Step Pyramid complex initiated the massive stone royal mortuary ...
  11. [11]
    Development of pyramids in the Old Kingdom Egypt - Academia.edu
    The paper discusses the evolution of pyramid construction in Old Kingdom Egypt, highlighting the transition from mastabas to the iconic pyramids at Giza.
  12. [12]
    [PDF] UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology - eScholarship
    May 31, 2012 · Limestone and sandstone were the principal building stones employed by the Egyptians, while anhydrite and gypsum were also used along the Red ...
  13. [13]
    [PDF] The Saqqara Necropolis through the New Kingdom - OAPEN Library
    Title: The Saqqara necropolis through the New Kingdom : biography of an ancient. Egyptian cultural landscape / by Nico Staring. Description: Leiden ; Boston : ...
  14. [14]
    Archeological exploration via integrated shallow geophysical methods
    Mar 1, 2025 · The Saqqara necropolis, a paramount archeological site in Egypt, has functioned as a burial ground for millennia, featuring monuments and tombs ...
  15. [15]
  16. [16]
    Egypt's Buried & Layer Pyramids: Unsolved Homicide & Hidden ...
    Dec 29, 2020 · Why are authorities keeping certain pyramids under wraps and how does the suspicious death of Egyptologist Zakaria Goneim fit into the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  17. [17]
    The pyramids of the Old Kingdom - Heritage - Al-Ahram Weekly
    Jun 25, 2024 · Between 1951 and 1955, Egyptian archaeologist Zakaria Goneim excavated a second huge step pyramid complex at Saqqara. Work was continued ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  18. [18]
    Sekhemkhet's Pyramid Complex, A Layman's Guide - Academia.edu
    The pyramid of Sekhemkhet is a relatively modern discovery, having been discovered in the 1950's. It was largely lost to history as it was a building ...
  19. [19]
    Goneim Zacharia - Lost Pyramid | PDF - Scribd
    Rating 5.0 (1) Some of the objects found in the Lost Pyramid. 23, M. Zakaria Goneim at the entrance of the pyramid. At his tight is Hussein Ibrahim, at his left is Hofni ...Missing: geophysical | Show results with:geophysical
  20. [20]
    Pyramid Complex of Sekhemkhet - Egyptian Monuments
    Feb 18, 2009 · In 1963, Jean-Philippe Lauer took up the excavation of Sekhemkhet's monument by investigating the possibility of a south tomb, a feature ...Missing: 1960s | Show results with:1960s
  21. [21]
    Documentation - Constructing the Sacred
    The superstructure of the Dynasty 1 mastaba tomb #3505 was textured using images from Walter Emery, Great Tombs of the First Dynasty: Excavations at Saqqara.
  22. [22]
    King Sekhemkhet and his Pyramid at Saqqara - Tour Egypt
    Since the pyramid was unfinished, there was never any casing applied. The pyramid probably had a square floor plan, with sides about 119 meters in length.
  23. [23]
    Lifting Material to Build the Pyramids of Egypt Ramps and Other ...
    His model assumes four large frontal ramps, one running vertically up each side of the pyramid. A final ramp would have run, in the case of the Great Pyramid, ...
  24. [24]
    Sekhemkhet Funerary Complex | The Ancient Egypt Site
    Sep 21, 2014 · Sekhemkhet started his pyramid complex at Saqqara to the north-west of that of his predecessor, Netjerikhet, and to the east of the so-called Great Enclosure.Missing: rushed Goneim<|control11|><|separator|>
  25. [25]
    [PDF] Origin of the Geometrical Pattern in the Royal Architecture of Ancient ...
    The architects of Sekhemkhet placed his pyramid, the pyramid temple, its entrance and the south tomb inside an R.α rectangle with a length of 448 cubits.
  26. [26]
    [PDF] Location of the Old Kingdom Pyramids in Egypt - Harvard University
    In this study, the reasons that may have played a decisive role in the spatial distribution of the Old Kingdom pyramids. (built during the 27th-22nd century BC, ...
  27. [27]
    Sekhemkhet: Pharaoh of the Third Dynasty of Egypt
    Jan 24, 2025 · Sekhemkhet, also known as Sechemchet, was a pharaoh of the 3rd Dynasty during Egypt's Old Kingdom, reigning from approximately 2648 BC to 2640 BC.Missing: Djoserty | Show results with:Djoserty
  28. [28]
    Unraveling the Third Dynasty of Egypt: A Defining Chapter in History
    Additionally, political shifts and succession disputes might have tested the dynasty's stability. However, these obstacles did not overshadow the Third ...
  29. [29]
    Su | Egyptian Monuments | Page 28
    Feb 18, 2009 · The name of Sekhemkhet was found on seal impressions on vessels in the corridor which gave the identification of the pyramid's owner.
  30. [30]
    King Sekhemkhet and his Pyramid at Saqqara - Tour Egypt
    Sekhemkhet's step pyramid was perhaps first noticed by a young Egyptian archaeologist named Zakaria Goneim while he was working at Saqqara excavating the ...Missing: survey | Show results with:survey
  31. [31]
    Egypt grand museum delay puts tourism hopes on hold
    Jul 15, 2025 · Still, signs of recovery have emerged: Egypt welcomed 3.9 million tourists in the first quarter of 2025, up 25 percent from the same period last ...<|separator|>
  32. [32]
    [PDF] ABUSIR AND SAQQARA IN THE YEAR 2025
    Mar 10, 2025 · The main aim of this paper is to present the mathema cal journey that unfolds behind this complex Egyptological problem, making it accessible to ...Missing: funding | Show results with:funding
  33. [33]
    New Perspectives in the Study of ancient Egyptian Bioarchaeology
    Aug 6, 2025 · Abstract. This paper presents a summary of the current 'state of the art' in bioarchaeology in Ancient Egypt.<|control11|><|separator|>
  34. [34]
    On the possible use of hydraulic force to assist with building the step ...
    Aug 5, 2024 · This work opens a new line of research: the use of hydraulic force to erect the massive structures built by Pharaohs.