Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant

The Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant is a two-unit pressurized water reactor facility situated near Lusby in Calvert County, Maryland, on the western shore of the Chesapeake Bay, and serves as the state's sole nuclear power station. Operated by Constellation Energy, its reactors generate up to 1,790 megawatts of carbon-free electricity, accounting for approximately 40 percent of Maryland's total power production. Construction of the plant began in 1968, with Unit 1 achieving commercial operation in 1975 and Unit 2 in 1977, each initially rated at around 850 megawatts net but later uprated to over 900 megawatts per unit through engineering improvements. The facility has demonstrated exceptional operational reliability, with Unit 1 recording the highest net capacity factor among U.S. reactors in recent Nuclear News rankings, reflecting efficient maintenance and minimal unplanned outages. In early 2025, Constellation announced a $100 million investment to upgrade equipment at Calvert Cliffs, aiming to boost overall output by about 10 percent while enhancing safety and supporting regional energy demands amid growing electrification. This initiative underscores the plant's role in providing stable baseload power, contrasting with intermittent renewables and contributing to grid resilience without fossil fuel emissions.

History

Construction and Early Operations

The site for the Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant was selected by Baltimore Gas and Electric Company (BGE) in the mid-1960s on the western shore of the Chesapeake Bay in Calvert County, Maryland, near Lusby, due to its geological stability, proximity to transmission infrastructure, and availability of cooling water from the Bay. Preliminary engineering and environmental assessments conducted in the late 1960s evaluated seismic risks, groundwater conditions, and potential ecological impacts, concluding that the location supported safe construction and operation without significant disruption to local marine ecosystems. These studies emphasized the site's flat terrain and distance from fault lines, facilitating efficient foundation work for the reactor structures. Construction commenced on June 1, 1968, under BGE's direction, with the project involving two pressurized water reactors (PWRs) designed by Combustion Engineering. Unit 1 achieved first criticality on October 7, 1974, connected to the grid on January 3, 1975, and entered commercial operation on May 8, 1975; Unit 2 followed with commercial operation on April 1, 1977. Each unit was initially rated at approximately 845 megawatts electrical (MWe) net capacity, providing baseload power to address growing demand in the Mid-Atlantic region. During the 1970s energy crises, including the 1973 oil embargo, the plant's early operations contributed to grid reliability by delivering consistent, low-cost electricity independent of fossil fuel imports, helping Maryland utilities mitigate supply shortages and price volatility. Initial performance data indicated reliable startup sequences and thermal efficiencies typical of Combustion Engineering PWRs, with minimal unplanned outages in the first years, validating the design's robustness for sustained output.

License Renewals and Extensions

In March 2000, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) granted the first license renewal for a commercial nuclear power plant in the United States to Calvert Cliffs Units 1 and 2, extending Unit 1's operating license from July 31, 2014, to July 31, 2034, and Unit 2's from August 13, 2016, to August 13, 2036. This approval followed submission of the renewal application on April 10, 1998, and was predicated on NRC reviews confirming the effectiveness of aging management programs, including empirical assessments of component integrity through nondestructive testing, material surveillance, and historical performance data demonstrating minimal degradation rates under operational stresses. The process established precedents for subsequent renewals nationwide, emphasizing causal mechanisms like corrosion-resistant alloys and predictive maintenance that sustain structural and functional reliability beyond initial design lives. Subsequent regulatory actions have included exemption requests to address specific compliance elements while upholding safety margins. On December 7, 2023, operator Constellation Energy Generation, LLC, sought NRC exemptions from select technical specifications tied to environmental qualifications and review requirements, which were granted on November 12, 2024, after evaluations verified no adverse impacts on reactor coolant system integrity or radiological barriers. These approvals underscored direct links between enhanced qualification testing of electrical equipment under harsh conditions and reduced failure probabilities, with data from accelerated aging simulations showing extended usability without heightened risks. The renewals have preserved Calvert Cliffs' contribution to baseload electricity generation in the PJM Interconnection region, where nuclear output averaged capacity factors exceeding 90% from 2022 to 2024, countering grid volatility from intermittent renewables and gas price swings that reached peaks of over $9 per million BTU in 2022. By maintaining dispatchable, low-emission power equivalent to approximately 1,700 megawatts, the extensions have empirically supported frequency stability and avoided blackouts projected in scenarios without such firm capacity, as modeled in regional reliability assessments.

Recent Upgrades and Future Prospects

In 2021, Calvert Cliffs Unit 2 became the site of the nuclear industry's first complete accident-tolerant fuel (ATF) assembly in commercial operation, supplied by Framatome and featuring chromium-coated zirconium alloy cladding and advanced fuel pellets designed to enhance performance under accident conditions. This lead test assembly, the first 100% ATF configuration deployed in a U.S. reactor, successfully completed its initial operating cycle in 2023, demonstrating improved safety margins such as extended coping time during loss-of-coolant accidents, as validated by the U.S. Department of Energy. In February 2025, Constellation Energy announced an investment of approximately $100 million in upgrades to critical electrical systems and plant equipment at Calvert Cliffs, aimed at enhancing operational reliability and supporting future license renewal applications. Preliminary engineering assessments indicate these modifications could enable a power uprate of roughly 10% from the plant's current net capacity of 1,756 megawatts, potentially increasing output to support relicensing processes anticipated in the early 2030s for Units 1 and 2, whose current licenses extend to 2034 and 2036, respectively. Maryland state legislation in 2025 has increasingly emphasized nuclear power's role in achieving clean energy goals, with measures such as Senate Bill 716 integrating nuclear into renewable energy incentives and a March resolution endorsing federal license extensions for Calvert Cliffs to maintain baseload capacity amid growing demand and the limitations of intermittent renewables. Governor Wes Moore highlighted the plant's strategic importance in August 2025, signaling potential for operations beyond 2050 through subsequent license renewals if regulatory approvals are secured, thereby positioning it as a dispatchable alternative in the state's energy transition.

Technical Design and Operations

Reactor Units and Specifications

The Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant operates two pressurized water reactor (PWR) units manufactured by Combustion Engineering. Each unit employs a reactor core containing 217 fuel assemblies, consisting of Zircaloy or ZIRLO fuel rods arranged in a matrix with guide tubes for control rods. The cores are supported by a reactor coolant system (RCS) featuring four primary loops, each equipped with two reactor coolant pumps and one U-tube vertical steam generator to transfer heat from the primary coolant to secondary steam. A pressurizer maintains RCS pressure, while 77 control rods, composed of neutron-absorbing materials, enable rapid reactivity control and scram insertion to halt fission chain reactions. Both units share a combined gross electrical generating capacity of 1,756 MW, with each rated at approximately 2,737 MW thermal power. The dry, ambient-pressure containment structures encase the reactors, designed to withstand seismic accelerations including an operating basis earthquake of 0.15g and a safe shutdown earthquake providing redundancy against ground motion-induced failures. Safety systems incorporate multiple trains of emergency core cooling, including high- and low-pressure injection pumps that deliver borated water to mitigate loss-of-coolant accidents by reflooding the core and limiting fuel damage through independent, seismically qualified redundancies. The plant site includes independent dry cask storage facilities for spent nuclear fuel assemblies, enabling long-term on-site management post-pool discharge in accordance with NRC design-basis requirements. Cooling water is drawn from and discharged to the Chesapeake Bay via an open-cycle system, with intake structures screened to minimize entrainment of aquatic life and outfall diffusers designed for thermal plume dispersion, as verified in NRC-approved environmental and safety analyses. These hardware elements prioritize causal redundancy, such as diverse ECCS paths and control rod clusters, to ensure core integrity under postulated accident scenarios without reliance on active power sources.

Fuel Technology and Innovations

Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant has pioneered the adoption of accident tolerant fuel (ATF) technology, with the first complete ATF assembly in the United States becoming operational in Unit 2 in November 2021. This Framatome PROtect ATF features chromium-coated zircaloy cladding and chromia-enhanced uranium dioxide pellets, designed to enhance performance under extreme conditions by reducing oxidation rates and hydrogen generation during loss-of-coolant accidents, as validated through post-Fukushima testing protocols. The assembly completed its initial operating cycle in July 2023, marking the first such full lead test assembly (LTA) to integrate improvements in both cladding and pellet materials, thereby demonstrating empirical reductions in beyond-design-basis event risks without compromising normal operational efficiency. The plant's fuel employs standard enriched uranium dioxide (UO2) pellets, dished and chamfered to manage thermal expansion and swelling, housed in upgraded zircaloy cladding optimized for higher burnup levels. These enhancements support extended fuel cycles, typically up to 24 months, minimizing refueling outages and improving operational resilience, as evidenced by the plant's sustained high-capacity factors. The ATF variants further enable higher burnup through chromia additives in pellets, which mitigate fission gas release and pellet-cladding interaction at elevated exposures, corroborated by radiochemical assays of high-burnup spent fuel from the site. Integration of ATF with advanced monitoring aligns fuel performance data with digital instrumentation and control upgrades, facilitating real-time assessment of material integrity and failure precursors. This approach empirically lowers failure probabilities by enabling predictive analytics on cladding degradation and burnup progression, distinct from baseline zircaloy designs prone to accelerated hydrogen pickup at high exposures.

Electricity Production and Performance Metrics

The Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, consisting of two pressurized water reactors with a combined net capacity of 1,756 MW, has consistently generated between 13 and 15 TWh of electricity annually in recent years, representing approximately 40% of Maryland's total in-state net generation as of 2023. This output underscores its role as the state's sole nuclear facility, delivering dispatchable baseload power that operates continuously to meet demand fluctuations. Operational performance metrics demonstrate high reliability, with capacity factors frequently exceeding 90% in recent periods, enabling the plant to achieve near-maximal utilization of its design capacity. For instance, Unit 1 recorded a capacity factor of over 100% in 2017 due to efficient power uprates and minimal unplanned downtime. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) data places the plant in the top quartile for unplanned capability loss indicators, reflecting robust maintenance practices that minimize forced outages. Refueling outages, conducted every 18-24 months per unit, are typically completed in under 30 days, with recent examples including an 18-day duration for planned maintenance and refueling, allowing swift return to full power output. In supporting Maryland's grid stability, Calvert Cliffs provides firm, carbon-free capacity that contrasts with intermittent renewables, contributing to peak demand fulfillment and avoiding reliability shortfalls during high-load events such as summer heatwaves. Its consistent operation aligns with regional transmission organization assessments emphasizing nuclear's value in maintaining reserve margins and voltage support.

Economic Contributions

Employment and Local Economy

The Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant sustains approximately 747 full-time employees, with roles concentrated in specialized STEM disciplines including nuclear engineering, reactor operations, and technical maintenance, which command above-average wages in the region. These positions anchor economic stability for communities in Lusby and Calvert County, Maryland, where the plant's operations correlate with sustained local labor demand and household incomes exceeding state medians due to the high-skill, high-compensation nature of nuclear employment. Periodic refueling outages augment the workforce with hundreds of contractors, injecting short-term boosts to regional spending and service sectors. Constellation Energy, the plant operator, maintains dedicated training initiatives such as the Nuclear Maintenance Training Program for electrical, mechanical, and instrumentation personnel, alongside reactor operator trainee pathways that build certified expertise through structured, performance-based curricula. These programs cultivate a pipeline of skilled workers, empirically linking plant presence to lower structural unemployment in Calvert County by prioritizing local hires and upskilling initiatives that retain talent and reduce turnover in technical trades. Beyond direct payroll, the facility drives supplier chain effects via local and in-state procurement for equipment, parts, and services during maintenance and upgrades, fostering indirect employment in manufacturing and logistics. Economic input-output modeling indicates these activities yield multiplier benefits, supporting a total of roughly 4,760 jobs annually across direct, indirect, and induced categories in Maryland, with reduced out-of-state sourcing amplifying local retention of economic value.

Energy Reliability and Cost Savings

The operation of Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant averts approximately $47 million in annual electricity cost increases for Maryland consumers by displacing higher-cost generation alternatives, primarily natural gas-fired plants, according to simulations modeling the PJM Interconnection grid from 2025 to 2040. This estimate derives from GridSIM power system modeling that compares scenarios with and without the plant's 1,768 MW of capacity, which operates at over 90% capacity factor to produce about 15 terawatt-hours annually; retirement would elevate wholesale prices by roughly $0.71 per megawatt-hour due to reliance on more expensive marginal resources. The plant's consistent output has maintained grid stability in the PJM region for over 50 years since commercial operation began in 1975, minimizing disruptions from fuel supply variability inherent in fossil alternatives. As a baseload provider, Calvert Cliffs facilitates greater renewable energy integration by supplying firm, dispatchable power that offsets intermittency, reducing curtailments and the need for fossil fuel backups during low wind or solar periods. Grid models indicate its round-the-clock generation complements variable renewables, which currently constitute only 6% of PJM's energy mix despite policy mandates, by aligning better with overall load profiles than peak-limited solar output. This role enhances system reliability amid decarbonization efforts, as evidenced by the plant's contribution to Maryland's clean energy goals without substituting for renewables but enabling their scaled deployment. Long-term operational commitments, supported by Maryland's Zero Emission Credits program since 2017, ensure predictable revenue streams for Constellation Energy, the plant's owner, insulating against natural gas market volatility that has driven wholesale price swings in PJM. Nuclear fuel costs remain stable over multi-year contracts, contrasting with gas's exposure to global supply shocks, thereby stabilizing end-user rates over decades of output consistency. Recent $100 million investments in equipment upgrades as of February 2025 further secure this reliability for license renewal prospects beyond 2036.

Tax Revenues and Broader Impacts

The Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant contributes approximately $23 million annually in property taxes to Calvert County, Maryland, which funds essential public services including schools, road maintenance, infrastructure improvements, and emergency response operations. These payments represent a stable revenue stream derived from the plant's assessed property value, providing fiscal predictability for county budgeting amid fluctuating economic conditions. Beyond local taxes, the facility exerts influence on Maryland's energy policy framework by demonstrating the viability of nuclear power within clean energy mandates, where it accounts for about 40% of the state's electricity generation and supports greenhouse gas reduction targets without relying on intermittent renewables. This role has informed state-level mechanisms, such as zero-emission credits established under the Clean Energy Jobs Act, which compensate nuclear plants for avoided carbon emissions and encourage their integration into decarbonization strategies. Economically, operations at Calvert Cliffs add roughly $397 million to Maryland's gross domestic product through direct output, supply chain effects, and induced spending. Nationally, Calvert Cliffs serves as an early model for license renewal processes, having received the first 20-year extension from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission in 2000, which has facilitated subsequent relicensings and informed policies for extending the operational life of aging reactors to enhance energy security. By utilizing a primarily domestic fuel cycle with uranium sourced from stable allies, the plant contributes to U.S. energy independence, reducing vulnerability to imported fossil fuels and aligning with broader goals of reliable baseload power amid rising demand.

Environmental Profile

Carbon Emission Reductions

The Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, with a combined capacity of approximately 1,790 megawatts from its two pressurized water reactors, avoids significant carbon dioxide emissions through its generation of dispatchable, zero-emission electricity. Lifecycle analyses indicate that the plant prevents roughly 4 million metric tons of CO2-equivalent emissions annually by displacing fossil fuel-based generation, a figure derived from comparisons to marginal grid alternatives like natural gas combined-cycle plants. This avoidance equates to the emissions profile of removing approximately 800,000 passenger vehicles from Maryland's roads for a year, based on standard EPA equivalency calculations for average vehicle emissions. Nuclear power's low lifecycle greenhouse gas intensity—around 12 grams of CO2-equivalent per kilowatt-hour—stems primarily from fuel mining, enrichment, and construction, far below fossil fuels such as coal (approximately 820 g CO2/kWh) or natural gas (490 g CO2/kWh). This profile arises from nuclear fuel's exceptional energy density, which enables high-capacity-factor operation (typically over 90%) and minimizes material throughput relative to combustion-based sources, allowing scalable decarbonization without reliance on weather-dependent intermittency. In contrast to gas peaker plants or coal units, which emit during operation, nuclear's emissions are front-loaded and orders of magnitude lower per unit energy, supporting causal displacement of fossil generation on the grid. Calvert Cliffs supplies over 35% of Maryland's total electricity and up to 80% of its carbon-free power, providing baseload reliability essential for the state's Climate Solutions Now Act targets of 60% emissions reduction from 2006 levels by 2030 and net-zero economy-wide by 2045. Without such nuclear capacity, Maryland's grid would require increased fossil imports or unproven scaling of variable renewables, potentially undermining progress toward these goals due to intermittency and land-use constraints.

Thermal Effluents and Aquatic Ecosystems

The Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant operates Units 1 and 2 with a once-through cooling system, drawing approximately 3.5 billion gallons of Chesapeake Bay water per day through intakes and discharging it after a temperature increase of about 6.7°C. The resulting thermal plumes mix rapidly with ambient tidal currents via subsurface diffusers, limiting their spatial extent and influence on broader bay circulation. Regulatory compliance under the NPDES permit mandates continuous thermal monitoring at Outfall 001, with Section 316(a) demonstrations confirming no appreciable harm to indigenous aquatic populations from the thermal component, accounting for discharge interactions with receiving water characteristics. Studies of macrobenthic communities near discharge sites reveal no significant reductions in species richness, individual abundances, or community structure attributable to elevated temperatures, indicating localized adaptation or dilution effects. Intake structures incorporate screening and velocity controls to curb entrainment of ichthyoplankton and impingement of juveniles and adults, with through-screen velocities maintained below thresholds that minimize organism adhesion or stress. Monitoring data from 1982–1986 document impingement trends for species including blue crabs (Callinectes sapidus), showing episodic peaks but no sustained population-level declines linked to plant operations; regional Chesapeake Bay crab stocks have fluctuated primarily due to harvesting, habitat loss, and disease rather than cooling system withdrawals representing under 1% of local flow. In comparison to fossil fuel plants, nuclear facilities like Calvert Cliffs impose a comparatively restrained aquatic burden per megawatt-hour generated, as thermal discharges predominate without ancillary chemical effluents from fuel combustion—such as mercury, selenium, or scrubber byproducts—that characterize coal and gas operations and persist in sediments or bioaccumulate in fisheries. Long-term empirical observations affirm ecosystem resilience, with no evidence of fishery disruptions propagating beyond immediate mixing zones.

Waste Management Practices

Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant manages spent nuclear fuel through an on-site Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) licensed by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) under 10 CFR Part 72, utilizing dry cask storage systems such as the HI-STORM FW MPC configuration. Spent fuel assemblies, initially cooled in wet storage pools for several years post-irradiation, are transferred to sealed, stainless-steel multi-purpose canisters encased in concrete-overpacked horizontal modules, enabling passive air cooling without reliance on active systems. The ISFSI license, originally issued to Exelon Generation (now Constellation Energy), was renewed in 2014 for an additional 40 years, extending operations through approximately 2054, following NRC verification of structural integrity and radiological shielding efficacy. Low-level radioactive waste (LLRW) streams, including contaminated equipment, resins, and filters, undergo volume reduction via segregation, compaction, and decontamination processes to minimize off-site shipments, with residuals processed at NRC- or agreement-state-licensed disposal facilities. High-level waste remains confined to spent fuel casks, producing no routine radioactive effluents or off-gas, as confirmed in annual NRC inspections demonstrating compliance with dose limits under 10 CFR Part 20. Over decades of ISFSI operation since initial dry storage implementation in the early 2010s, no verified releases of radioactive material from containment have occurred, with public radiation doses from plant effluents and storage calculated at levels far below regulatory limits—typically less than 1 millirem per year—and comparable to or below natural background radiation variations. Nuclear waste management at Calvert Cliffs contrasts with fossil fuel alternatives in its concentrated, retrievable form, facilitating potential future recycling of uranium and plutonium isotopes, which comprise over 95% of spent fuel's recoverable energy content, though U.S. policy has deferred reprocessing amid proliferation concerns and the stalled Yucca Mountain repository project. Empirical data from NRC-monitored dry cask systems nationwide, including Calvert Cliffs, affirm containment reliability, with degradation rates negligible under environmental monitoring, underscoring radiological risks as orders of magnitude lower than diffuse airborne or ash-borne pollutants from coal combustion.

Safety and Risk Management

Operational Safety Record

The Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant has demonstrated consistent regulatory compliance through the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC) Reactor Oversight Process, with safety performance indicators across cornerstone areas—such as initiating events, mitigating systems, and barrier integrity—rated green, signifying very low risk significance. Inspection findings have similarly been classified as green, as evidenced in the third-quarter 2024 report documenting a single non-cited violation of very low safety significance related to preventive maintenance on a containment isolation valve, which was addressed during a subsequent refueling outage. These ratings reflect effective implementation of probabilistic risk assessments (PRAs), operator training, and maintenance protocols that maintain core damage frequencies below the NRC's acceptability threshold of 10^{-4} per reactor-year. Operational reliability metrics underscore this performance, with recent capacity factors exceeding 90%, implying forced outage rates under 1% attributable to proactive equipment reliability programs and human performance initiatives. The Institute of Nuclear Power Operations (INPO) evaluations have historically aligned with these outcomes, highlighting strengths in maintenance and operational discipline, though detailed scores remain proprietary. Post-September 11, 2001, security enhancements mandated by the NRC—including deployment of armed guards, augmented physical barriers, and aircraft impact mitigation strategies—have been integrated into Calvert Cliffs' defense-in-depth posture, with effectiveness confirmed via periodic force-on-force exercises and regulatory audits. These measures, combined with ongoing insider threat monitoring, contribute to a baseline safety profile prioritizing causal risk reduction over nominal compliance.

Incident History and Resolutions

In 1997, an NRC inspection at Calvert Cliffs Units 1 and 2, conducted from March 2 to April 12, identified multiple violations of technical specifications and quality assurance requirements, including failures in procedural adherence during maintenance activities. Among these was an incident where a diver entered potentially contaminated water without adequate radiation monitoring, prompting a proposed civil penalty. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission imposed a $176,000 fine on Baltimore Gas & Electric, the then-operator, which was paid following the identification and correction of root causes through enhanced training and procedural revisions under the plant's Corrective Action Program (CAP). These measures prevented recurrence, with no radiological release or public impact reported. In December 2015, electrical fluctuations on transmission lines supplying the plant led to a temporary loss of offsite power, prompting an NRC special inspection team to assess grid-related stability and plant response. The investigation attributed the event to external grid dynamics rather than internal plant deficiencies, with operators successfully maintaining safe shutdown conditions using onsite power sources. Resolutions included reinforced coordination protocols with grid operators and validation of emergency power systems via CAP-driven testing, confirming no equipment failures or safety boundary breaches. During 2017, maintenance personnel installed instrument wiring on the U-4000-22 service transformer voltage regulator with insufficient clearance to an energized conductor, violating work control procedures. This non-compliance, identified in subsequent audits, posed no actual safety risk as it did not result in arcing or power loss. The issue was resolved through CAP-initiated actions, including retraining on clearance standards, procedural updates to incorporate double-verification checks, and physical reconfiguration of the wiring to ensure compliance, with follow-up inspections verifying effectiveness. Calvert Cliffs has recorded no incidents rated Level 4 or higher on the International Nuclear and Radiological Event Scale (INES), which denotes events with localized consequences or significant safety impacts; all documented occurrences have been below Level 3, typically involving procedural deviations resolved onsite without offsite effects. Root cause analyses via CAP have consistently driven adaptive improvements, such as in 2023 when a backup diesel generator's week-long outage triggered NRC review but was addressed through accelerated repairs and redundancy validations, underscoring the plant's capacity for rapid resolution over systemic vulnerabilities. In context, such events occur at a fraction of the frequency of comparable chemical industry accidents, where U.S. data from 2000–2020 logs over 1,000 major releases versus fewer than 50 reportable nuclear procedural issues annually across all plants, highlighting nuclear operations' lower incident severity profile.

Seismic, Proximity, and Hazard Mitigations

The Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant incorporates seismic design features tailored to the region's low earthquake probability, with structures, systems, and components engineered to maintain safe shutdown capabilities under a design basis earthquake characterized by peak ground accelerations of up to 0.15g horizontally for the safe shutdown earthquake level. This basis, established through site-specific probabilistic seismic hazard assessments, accounts for Eastern U.S. tectonics including distant intraplate events, and has been validated via soil-structure interaction analyses confirming no amplification beyond design margins during simulated low-frequency ground motions typical of the area. Empirical evidence supports efficacy, as the plant has sustained no seismic-induced damage throughout its operational history despite minor regional tremors, underscoring the conservatism of retrofits implemented under post-Fukushima regulatory reviews. Proximity to the Cove Point LNG terminal, situated approximately 5 miles southward along Chesapeake Bay, is managed through hazard reevaluations ensuring no credible domino effects from potential LNG releases or explosions impact plant safety functions. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has affirmed that LNG facility modifications do not alter Calvert Cliffs' licensing basis for external hazards, with mitigations including reinforced containment isolation protocols and coordinated offsite emergency response plans that prioritize independent shutdown sequences over interdependent fuel supply disruptions. This separation exceeds typical urban fossil-nuclear co-locations, where historical data indicate higher cascading failure rates from proximate industrial accidents, rendering the configuration empirically resilient absent verified breach pathways. Flood and hurricane hazards are addressed via site-grade elevations above probable maximum storm surge levels, supplemented by post-Hurricane Sandy engineering enhancements such as watertight barriers and flexible piping to accommodate surge differentials modeled at over 20 feet. Updated hydrodynamic simulations, incorporating worst-case tropical cyclone parameters like those from Sandy (which the plant weathered without flood-related shutdowns beyond precautionary measures), confirm protective features exceed licensing flood-of-record by margins derived from causal frequency-severity analyses. Critical components, including diesel generators, are housed in elevated, missile-resistant structures designed against hurricane-force winds up to 170 mph, with no post-event failures observed in analogous East Coast facilities during Sandy, validating the deterministic-probabilistic hybrid approach.

Controversies and Debates

Expansion Proposals

In September 2007, UniStar Nuclear Energy selected the Calvert Cliffs site for a combined operating license application to construct and operate a third reactor unit featuring AREVA's US Evolutionary Power Reactor (EPR) design, with a planned capacity exceeding 1,600 megawatts electrical (MWe). The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) received the formal application in 2008 from Calvert Cliffs 3 Nuclear Project, LLC and UniStar Nuclear Operating Services, LLC, initiating reviews that included an environmental impact statement completed in 2011. Contracts for detailed design engineering and engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) terms were awarded to consortia involving AREVA and Bechtel in 2008 and 2009, respectively, advancing pre-construction planning. The project faced delays from regulatory proceedings, including challenges over foreign ownership by Électricité de France (EDF), which held a significant stake in UniStar. Adjudicatory termination occurred in November 2012 amid difficulties securing US financing partners, exacerbated by heightened investor caution following the 2011 Fukushima Daiichi accident. The combined license application was formally withdrawn by UniStar in July 2015, effectively halting the third-unit initiative without construction commencement. More recently, discussions have shifted toward power uprates and small modular reactors (SMRs) at the site, influenced by Maryland state policies and federal incentives. In February 2025, owner Constellation Energy announced a $100 million investment in upgrades at Calvert Cliffs Units 1 and 2, targeting a potential 10% increase in electricity output through extended operations and efficiency enhancements, preliminarily analyzed as feasible under Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) tax credits for nuclear uprates. Maryland legislation in 2025, including bills to classify new nuclear generation—including SMRs—as Tier 1 renewables eligible for incentives, has encouraged exploration of SMR deployment at Calvert Cliffs to supplement baseload capacity. Economic assessments underscore the feasibility of nuclear capacity additions at Calvert Cliffs for reliable baseload power, contrasting with the intermittency challenges of renewables that necessitate costly storage solutions to achieve equivalent dispatchability. State-commissioned analyses project that integrating additional nuclear output, such as via uprates or SMRs, enhances grid stability and cost-effectiveness over expanded wind and solar portfolios requiring battery backups, with nuclear's levelized costs remaining competitive when factoring full-system reliability.

Public and Regulatory Concerns

Public opposition to expansions at the Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant has been voiced by environmental organizations, including the Sierra Club, which has argued against a proposed third unit on grounds of health risks from potential accidents and environmental damage. In 1998, the Sierra Club sought to block license renewal for Units 1 and 2, claiming inadequate consideration of aging effects and safety. During 2007 discussions of a new reactor, anti-nuclear groups raised alarms over evacuation feasibility, asserting that congested roadways in the surrounding area could result in thousands of fatalities in a meltdown scenario due to delayed clearances. Probabilistic risk assessments for pressurized water reactors, such as those at Calvert Cliffs, yield core damage frequencies typically below 10^{-5} per reactor-year, orders of magnitude lower than the 0.01% threshold invoked in some critiques and reflecting empirical data on component failures and redundancies rather than unquantified hypotheticals. These models, validated against historical operating experience across U.S. fleets, underscore that severe accident probabilities remain remote despite advocacy emphasizing outlier events. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has subjected the plant's aging components—Units 1 and 2 having operated for over 49 and 47 years as of 2025—to rigorous oversight, including dedicated age-related degradation inspections that identified no unacceptable vulnerabilities in 2024. Subsequent license renewals have hinged on verified programs demonstrating material integrity surpassing initial 40-year design bases through nondestructive testing and targeted replacements. Coverage of isolated events, such as equipment malfunctions, has at times overshadowed the absence of significant radiological releases over five decades of operation, per annual effluent monitoring. This pattern illustrates coverage biases favoring anomalies over baseline performance metrics upheld by regulatory audits.

Balanced Perspectives on Risks vs. Benefits

The operation of Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant demonstrates empirical advantages in safety and environmental impact, with its two units providing baseload electricity at a high capacity factor averaging over 90% in recent years, contributing to Maryland's grid stability without major radiation releases over five decades of service. Lifecycle analyses indicate nuclear power's death rate at approximately 0.03 per terawatt-hour (TWh), far below coal's 24.6 and oil's 18.4, and comparable to or lower than wind (0.04) and solar (0.02) when accounting for full supply chain fatalities like mining and installation accidents. These metrics underscore that normalized risks from nuclear operations, including potential accidents, are outweighed by benefits such as avoided air pollution deaths from fossil fuel displacement, with Calvert Cliffs alone averting millions of metric tons of CO2 emissions annually. Comparisons to alternative energy sources reveal nuclear's superior energy density and dispatchability, generating over 15 billion kWh yearly from a compact footprint, in contrast to renewables' intermittency requiring fossil backups or storage that inflate system costs and emissions variability. In the PJM Interconnection region encompassing Maryland, premature retirements of reliable thermal resources—including nuclear—have heightened blackout risks amid rising demand, as evidenced by capacity shortfalls prompting emergency measures and delayed coal plant shutdowns to maintain reliability. Subsidized renewables, while low in direct emissions, impose hidden externalities like land use and grid upgrades, whereas nuclear's consistent output minimizes these, supporting causal assessments that favor retaining plants like Calvert Cliffs over accelerated phase-outs. License extensions for facilities such as Calvert Cliffs, renewed in 2000 and under investment for further prolongation, align with evidence-based policy prioritizing high-reliability, low-externality sources to avert supply gaps observed in regions like California during 2020s shortages tied to renewable over-reliance and nuclear curtailments. Such decisions reflect first-principles evaluation of nuclear's capacity to deliver dense, on-demand power with minimal societal costs, countering narratives amplified by biased advocacy that undervalue these attributes relative to intermittent alternatives' unproven scalability at grid levels.

References

  1. [1]
    Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1
    Alert. Due to a lapse in appropriations, the NRC has ceased normal operations. However, excepted and exempted activities necessary to maintain critical health ...
  2. [2]
    Calvert Cliffs Clean Energy Center
    Located in Lusby, Maryland, Calvert Cliffs Clean Energy Center's two nuclear reactors can produce up to 1,790 megawatts (MW) of clean, carbon-free energy, ...
  3. [3]
    Calvert Cliffs nuclear power plant - Global Energy Monitor - GEM.wiki
    Aug 25, 2025 · Table 1: Unit-level project details for Calvert Cliffs nuclear power plant ; 1, Operating · 1975 · –, 918 MW ; 2, Operating · 1977 · –, 911 MW ...
  4. [4]
    Constellation to invest $100M in Maryland nuclear plant
    Feb 12, 2025 · Preliminary analysis indicates that upgrades to Calvert Cliffs could increase electricity production by roughly 10 percent at the 1,756-megawatt ...
  5. [5]
    Behind the blast doors: A look inside Maryland's only nuclear power ...
    Apr 8, 2025 · Phillip told Spotlight on Maryland that each reactor generates over 900 megawatts, equivalent to 900 million watts of electricity per unit.
  6. [6]
    A Half-Century of Reliability: Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant
    Nov 1, 2022 · Baltimore Gas & Electric set out to build the 1.8-GW Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant in 1967 because fossil energy was becoming expensive and controversial.
  7. [7]
    Constellation Makes Big Investment in Calvert Cliffs to Power ...
    Feb 11, 2025 · Preliminary analysis indicates that further upgrades at Calvert Cliffs could increase electricity production by roughly 10 percent. This would ...
  8. [8]
    Constellation to upgrade Maryland nuclear power station
    Feb 12, 2025 · Calvert Cliffs - comprising two pressurised water reactors which produce about 860 MWe each - is Maryland's only nuclear power plant. It ...
  9. [9]
    [PDF] Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2
    Apr 1, 2011 · This report covers the plant site, reactor, reactor coolant system, containment, engineered safety features, and reactor plant protection, ...
  10. [10]
    calvert cliffs-1 - PRIS - Reactor Details
    Reference Unit Power (Net Capacity), Design Net Capacity, Gross Capacity ; 877 MW · 845 MW · 918 MW ; Construction Start Date, First Criticality Date ; 01 Jun, 1968 ...Missing: Nuclear | Show results with:Nuclear
  11. [11]
    Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 & 2 - License Renewal ...
    The NRC staff reviewed the Calvert Cliffs license renewal application for compliance with the requirements of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part ...
  12. [12]
    Initial License Renewal Application Updates for U.S. Nuclear Power ...
    Approved License Renewals. Reactor Name, Application Submittal, Extension Approved. Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, April 1998, March 23, 2000.
  13. [13]
    Status of Initial License Renewal Applications and Industry Initiatives
    Date Entering Extended Operation. Calvert Cliffs 1 & 2. 04/10/98. 03/23/00 ... 07/30/24. 02/08/30 (Unit 1) 02/02/33 (Unit 2). Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1.
  14. [14]
    Constellation Energy Generation, LLC; Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power ...
    Nov 19, 2024 · The US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has issued exemptions in response to a December 7, 2023, request from Constellation Energy Generation, LLC ( ...Missing: extension | Show results with:extension
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Calvert Exemption Issuance Letter - NRC
    Oct 23, 2024 · In response to your letter dated December 7, 2023, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. (NRC) has granted the enclosed exemptions from a ...Missing: requests fire protection environmental
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2, Request for ... - NRC
    Dec 7, 2023 · CEG requests approval of the proposed exemption by December 7, 2024. ... full and adequate safety and environmental reviews of the CCNPP, Units 1 ...Missing: fire | Show results with:fire
  17. [17]
    U.S. nuclear capacity factors: Stability and energy dominance
    May 2, 2025 · The median DER net capacity factor of the 92 reactors included in this survey for the three-year period 2022–2024 is 90.96 percent.
  18. [18]
    Nuclear Power in the USA
    In an historic move, the NRC in March 2000 renewed the operating licences of the two-unit Calvert Cliffs nuclear power plant for an additional 20 years. In ...Missing: license | Show results with:license
  19. [19]
    Industry's First Complete Accident Tolerant Fuel Assembly in ...
    Nov 8, 2021 · Framatome's first complete accident tolerant fuel assembly is in operation at the Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant in Maryland.Missing: ATF | Show results with:ATF
  20. [20]
    Framatome ATF assembly completes first cycle at Calvert Cliffs
    Jul 27, 2023 · The nuclear industry's first 100 percent accident tolerant fuel assembly has successfully completed its initial cycle of operation at a US nuclear power plant.Missing: deployment | Show results with:deployment
  21. [21]
    [PDF] TESTIMONY IN SUPPORT OF SB 716 Nuclear Energy - Maryland
    Mar 6, 2025 · The purpose of this bill is to supercharge our state's transition to clean energy by integrating nuclear energy into Maryland's Tier 1 Renewable.
  22. [22]
    Maryland General Assembly endorses Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Plant ...
    Mar 31, 2025 · Introduced on March 31, 2025, the bill explicitly supports the extension or renewal of the Federal Nuclear Regulatory Commission license for the ...
  23. [23]
    Maryland governor speaks on the state's nuclear future
    Aug 20, 2025 · One section of the new bill formally opens applications for any projects “to upgrade the generation capabilities of an existing nuclear energy ...
  24. [24]
    [PDF] License Pages and Technical Specifications, Calvert Cliffs Units 1 & 2.
    The licensee is authorized to operate the facility at steady-state reactor core power levels not in excess of 2700 megawatts-thermal in accordance with the ...
  25. [25]
    Table 2. Nuclear power plant data as of December 31, 2017 - EIA
    Note: PWR = Pressurized-water reactor; BWR = Boiling-water reactor; and N/A = Not applicable. a Vendor codes are as follows: AC=Allis Chalmers; B&W=Babcock & ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
  26. [26]
    Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant - Maryland
    Jan 11, 2006 · Each reactor coolant loop has 1 U-tube vertical steam generator and 2 reactor coolant pumps. Each unit has a pressurizer connected to one of the ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
  27. [27]
    Control rod problem shuts down Calvert Cliffs reactor - Baltimore Sun
    Sep 6, 2013 · The plant's 77 control rods, made of materials that can absorb neutrons, are used to control or halt the fissioning of atoms. If the mechanism ...
  28. [28]
    [PDF] survey of aseismic design data - for nuclear power plants
    The basic seismic criteria used in the design of nuclear power plants all ... Calvert Cliffs Nuclear. Maryland. 0.15. 0.08. 67. 1. Power Plant Units 1 and 2.
  29. [29]
    [PDF] Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 & 2, Revision 52 to ...
    The SI system injects borated water into the Reactor Coolant System (RCS). The system supplies emergency core cooling to limit fuel rod damage and fission ...
  30. [30]
    Industry's First Complete Accident-Tolerant Nuclear Assembly in ...
    Nov 11, 2021 · The first complete accident-tolerant fuel (ATF) assembly is now operational at Exelon's Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant Unit 2 in Maryland.Missing: deployment | Show results with:deployment<|separator|>
  31. [31]
    [PDF] Framatome delivers industry's first complete accident tolerant fuel ...
    Nov 2, 2021 · Framatome's PROtect ATF chromium-coated cladding and chromia-enhanced pellets are more tolerant to changes in reactor core temperatures ...
  32. [32]
    Framatome EATF completes first cycle in US reactor
    Jul 26, 2023 · A lead assembly of Framatome's 100% Enhanced Accident Tolerant Fuel has successfully completed its first cycle of operation at a US nuclear power plant.Missing: deployment | Show results with:deployment
  33. [33]
    [PDF] Calvert Cliffs, Unit 1, License Amendment Request
    Feb 27, 2007 · The uranium dioxide pellets are dished and chamfered on both ends to accommodate thermal expansion and swelling. The LFAs contain advanced ...
  34. [34]
    [PDF] Top Innovative Practice - Delivering the Nuclear Promise
    The nuclear promise is improved safety, lower costs, and operating margin using Accident Tolerant Fuel (ATF) with features like increased coping time and ...
  35. [35]
    [PDF] Analysis of new measurements of Calvert Cliffs spent fuel samples ...
    Results from this work show that the new ORNL measurements provide a good quality radiochemical assay data set for spent fuel with relatively high burnup and ...Missing: dioxide | Show results with:dioxide
  36. [36]
    [PDF] Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2 - NRC
    Jan 26, 2021 · These amendments permit the use of accident tolerant fuel lead test assemblies and make an administrative change to the technical specifications ...
  37. [37]
    Maryland Maryland Profile - EIA
    In 2023, Maryland's only nuclear power plant--the Calvert Cliffs power station--accounted for 40% of the state's total electricity net generation. Maryland ...State Energy Profile Analysis · Maryland State Energy Profile · Rankings · Menu
  38. [38]
    Maryland Nuclear Profile 2010 Maryland profile - EIA
    Apr 26, 2012 · Location and Service Territory: Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant is located in Lusby on the western shore of Chesapeake Bay. Construction Cost ...
  39. [39]
    [PDF] Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant Earns a Place in History.
    The Constellation Energy team operates two nuclear reactors at Calvert Cliffs, generating about 1,700 megawatts of electricity each day – enough power for a ...
  40. [40]
    [PDF] Calvert Cliffs Clean Energy Center
    Number of Employees. 747. Annual Property Tax Payments. Approximately $22.9 million. Generation. Number of Units. 2 operating units. Total Site Net MW ...
  41. [41]
    Constellation Announces 100 Million Dollar Investment in Calvert ...
    Feb 13, 2025 · Preliminary analysis suggests that additional improvements at Calvert Cliffs could increase electricity production by roughly 10 percent, ...
  42. [42]
    Constellation's Nuclear Maintenance Training Program provides ...
    Apr 30, 2025 · Constellation's Nuclear Maintenance Training Program provides essential job training to our electrical, mechanical and instrumentation and control maintenance ...
  43. [43]
    Constellation Energy Generation, Llc. Sr Ops Training Instructor Job ...
    Sep 11, 2025 · Coordinates, and conducts performance-based operations Reactor Operator (RO)/Non-Licensed Operator (NLO) training programs as required by user ...
  44. [44]
    Workforce Development - Constellation Energy
    Constellation engages in outreach through various community training, high school, and pre-apprenticeship programs to provide awareness and exposure and help ...Missing: Calvert | Show results with:Calvert
  45. [45]
    [PDF] Environmental and Economic Impacts of the Calvert Cliffs Nuclear ...
    We analyze the environmental and economic impacts of Calvert Cliffs over the period 2025 to 2040, considering the hypothetical shutdown of the plant in 2025. ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  46. [46]
    Constellation makes $100M investment to extend life of Calvert Cliffs ...
    Feb 13, 2025 · These upgrades are meant to enable a potential renewal of the plant's operating licenses and a future increase in power output.
  47. [47]
    Calvert Cliffs 1 & 2 - Nuclear Decommissioning Collaborative
    Construction began in 1968 (Units 1 & 2) with licensed operations commencing in 1975 and 1977 respectively.Missing: selection | Show results with:selection
  48. [48]
    Maryland State Energy Profile - EIA
    In 2023, Maryland's only nuclear power plant--the Calvert Cliffs power station--accounted for 40% of the state's total electricity net generation. Maryland ...
  49. [49]
    [PDF] Environmental and Economic Impacts of the Calvert Cliffs Nuclear ...
    This makes it by far the largest electricity producer in Maryland. Brattle has been asked to characterize the impacts of Calvert Cliffs on Maryland's greenhouse ...
  50. [50]
    Maryland Nuclear Power Plant's Contribution to the State Economy
    The Brattle Group has determined that Calvert Cliffs, the only nuclear plant in Maryland, contributes approximately $397 million to state gross domestic ...
  51. [51]
    Press Releases - Nuclear Powers Maryland
    The report found that Calvert Cliffs prevents 4 million tons of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and keeps electricity prices $47 million lower for Maryland ...Missing: savings | Show results with:savings
  52. [52]
    Carol M. Browner: Nuclear power can help Maryland reach net-zero ...
    that's the emissions equivalent of about 800,000 cars ...<|separator|>
  53. [53]
    Carbon Dioxide Emissions From Electricity
    Sep 3, 2024 · Over its life-cycle, nuclear produces about the same amount of CO2-equivalent emissions per unit of electricity as wind, and about one-third ...
  54. [54]
    Maryland's Climate Change Pathway | Gordon Feinblatt LLC
    Jul 7, 2023 · The 60% reduction goal requires a reduction of the equivalent of 72.3 million metric tons of carbon dioxide. Thirty-six and seven tenths of ...
  55. [55]
    With decarbonization, advocates see a bright future for nuclear after ...
    Apr 26, 2023 · In Maryland, the Calvert Cliffs nuclear plant in Lusby provides 37% of all electricity generated in the state, according to a November 2022 ...
  56. [56]
    http://dnr.maryland.gov/pprp/documents/316a-paper.pdf
  57. [57]
    Thermal and Other Discharge-Related Effects on the Bay Ecosystem
    The Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant has several effects on the Bay resulting from its cooling-water discharge. Bay water is heated 6.7°C as it passes ...Missing: effluent | Show results with:effluent
  58. [58]
    [PDF] Calvert Cliffs, Unit 3 - Environmental Report Chapter 4.0 - Table 4.6-20
    impact of the thermal plume as it enters the Chesapeake Bay. The subsurface diffusers create rapid mixing of the thermal effluent with ambient tidal flows.
  59. [59]
    Unistar Nuclear - Calvert Cliffs Power Plant Unit 3 COLA ...
    The National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit for CCNPP. Units 1 and 2 requires thermal monitoring of plant discharges via Outfall 001,.
  60. [60]
    Macroinfaunal structure and effects of thermal discharges in a ...
    The soft-bottom macroinfauna of the Chesapeake Bay near the Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Maryland, USA, was studied quarterly in 1977.Missing: aquatic | Show results with:aquatic
  61. [61]
    [PDF] Calvert Cliffs, Units 1 and 2, Technical Specifications 3.1 and 3.2 ...
    Apr 25, 2007 · Trends in impingement of fish and blue crabs at the Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant. 1982 -1986. Report No. 89-12. Academy of Natural ...
  62. [62]
    Historical overview of the efficacy of two decades of power plant ...
    Extensive public debate regarding the potential effects the Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant might have on the Chesapeake Bay arose in the late 1960s.
  63. [63]
    Thermal Water Pollution from Nuclear Power Plants - Stanford
    Feb 28, 2019 · For example, both nuclear and fossil fuel plants produce significant thermal pollution to bodies of water.
  64. [64]
    Nuclear power and the environment - U.S. Energy Information ... - EIA
    Some nuclear power plants use water from lakes, rivers, or the ocean for cooling. Nuclear power reactors do not produce direct carbon dioxide emissions.
  65. [65]
    Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2 ... - Regulations.gov
    The HI-STORM FW MPC Storage System CoC provides the requirements, conditions, and operating limits necessary for use of the system to store spent fuel. Holtec ...
  66. [66]
    [PDF] Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant - Independent Spent Fuel Storage ...
    Jan 13, 2022 · On December 9, 2021, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection of the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation ( ...
  67. [67]
    [PDF] NRC Renews License for Dry Spent Fuel Storage Facility at Calvert ...
    Oct 23, 2014 · The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has approved a 40-year license renewal for Exelon. Generation's dry-cask independent spent fuel storage ...
  68. [68]
    Dry cask nuclear spent fuel storage facility in Maryland granted ...
    Oct 23, 2014 · A dry-cask spent fuel storage facility at the Calvert Cliffs nuclear power plant in Maryland was given a 40-year license renewal from the ...
  69. [69]
    [PDF] Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant - Effluent and Waste Disposal ...
    Jul 8, 2009 · CCNPP, methods of waste and materials segregation are used to reduce the volume of solid waste shipped offsite for processing, volume ...Missing: management practices
  70. [70]
    [PDF] Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant Independent Spent Fuel Storage ...
    No radioactive off-gas is produced at the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI). Potentially contaminated air, nitrogen, and helium purged from ...
  71. [71]
    [PDF] Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant
    Jun 9, 2024 · The low calculated doses due to plant effluents, along with REMP results, serve to provide assurance that the site is not having a negative ...Missing: aquatic ecosystems studies
  72. [72]
    Exelon Generation Company, LLC; Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant
    Jun 1, 2020 · The Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant has been storing PWR spent fuel in its specific licensed independent spent fuel storage installation ( ...
  73. [73]
    [PDF] Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2
    Oct 22, 2024 · 2024 Unit 1 refueling outage scope, due to not making outage scopes, realignment with long term strategies, or other work brought into outage ...
  74. [74]
    [PDF] Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2, Response to ...
    Feb 17, 2015 · For risk evaluation purposes, these five total corrosion events occurring in 66 operating plants with steel containment liners over a 17.1 year ...
  75. [75]
    [PDF] Driving Performance Improvements with the use of ... - ISOE Network
    The Institute for Nuclear Power Operators (INPO) developed the earliest plant performance indicators to strengthen and support utility efforts in attaining high ...
  76. [76]
    Nuclear Power Plant Security and Vulnerabilities - Congress.gov
    Since the 9/11 attacks, NRC and Congress have taken action to increase nuclear power plant security. NRC issued a series of security measures beginning in ...
  77. [77]
    EA-97-192 - Calvert Cliffs 1 & 2 (Baltimore Gas & Electric Company)
    This letter refers to the NRC inspection conducted at the Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant from March 2, 1997 to April 12, 1997 and on April 24, 1997, the ...
  78. [78]
    NRC FINES OPERATOR OF CALVERT CLIFFS - The Washington Post
    Aug 13, 1997 · The operator of Calvert Cliffs, Maryland's only nuclear power plant, was fined $176,000 yesterday for allowing a diver to enter a potentially ...Missing: QA findings
  79. [79]
    UTILITY MAY BE FINED - The Washington Post
    Jun 12, 1997 · Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. likely will be fined for safety lapses at its Calvert Cliffs nuclear power plant, including an incident in ...
  80. [80]
    Near Miss at Calvert Cliffs - Union of Concerned Scientists
    Dec 10, 2015 · The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) sent a special inspection team to Calvert Cliffs (Lusby, Maryland) to investigate electrical fluctuations on the ...
  81. [81]
    [PDF] Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2
    May 7, 2024 · On. February 12, 2024, operators shutdown the unit, from 81 percent power, for a planned refueling outage. ... BI02: RCS Leak Rate Sample (IP ...
  82. [82]
    The Terrible 13: The Worst Safety and Security Violators in the US ...
    May 27, 2025 · Workers at the Calvert Cliffs plant in Maryland failed to follow procedures in 2017 and installed instrument wiring on a transformer too ...<|separator|>
  83. [83]
    Backup generator at Calvert Cliffs nuclear plant fails, triggering ...
    May 3, 2023 · Last September, the NRC finalized a report on a problem that it determined to be of low to moderate safety significance associated with a ...
  84. [84]
    Near Misses at U.S. Nuclear Power Plants in 2015
    Feb 9, 2016 · In 2015, there were 10 near misses at US reactors, or nearly half the number of incidents reported in 2010 and 2011.
  85. [85]
    [PDF] Calvert Cliffs, Units 1 and 2 - Seismic Mitigating Strategies ... - NRC
    Aug 31, 2017 · The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of the assessment for Calvert Cliffs Nuclear. Power Plant Units 1 and 2 to demonstrate ...
  86. [86]
    [PDF] Calvert Cliffs, Unit 2, Attachment (1) Seismic Walkdown Report ...
    Nov 27, 2012 · The Seismic Licensing Basis for CCNPP Unit 2 is briefly described in Section 2 of this report. Detailed information regarding site seismology ...
  87. [87]
    [PDF] Safety Evaluation Regarding Effect of Modification of Liquified ...
    Jan 20, 2004 · REGARDING THE EFFECT OF MODIFICATION OF THE LIQUEFIED NATURAL GAS. FACILITY ON SAFETY AT CALVERT CLIFFS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT NOS. 1 AND ...
  88. [88]
    [PDF] Calvert Cliffs, Units 1 and 2, Safety Evaluation Regarding Revisions ...
    By letter dated February 20, 2008, Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Inc. submitted a revision to the hazards analysis associated with the operations at ...Missing: protocols | Show results with:protocols
  89. [89]
    [PDF] Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 And 2, Flood ... - NRC
    Dec 20, 2017 · They performed an updated storm surge modeling designed to more accurately characterize the storm surge hazard compared to the surge analysis in ...Missing: Sandy upgrades
  90. [90]
    History of U.S. Nuclear Plants Responding to Extreme Natural Events
    Oct 10, 2018 · Hurricane Irene affected 24 nuclear energy plants along the East Coast. Eighteen reactors remained at or near full power throughout the storm.Missing: defenses upgrades<|separator|>
  91. [91]
    https://www.world-nuclear-news.org/articles/unistar-selects-calvert-cliffs-for-col
  92. [92]
    Calvert Cliffs, Unit 3 Application - Nuclear Regulatory Commission
    Who: Calvert Cliffs 3 Nuclear Project, LLC. and UniStar Nuclear Operating Services, LLC. ; What: Application for a combined license (COL) for an AREVA U.S. ...
  93. [93]
    Federal Register :: Calvert Cliffs 3 Nuclear Project, LLC and Unistar ...
    May 20, 2011 · The purpose of this notice is to inform the public that NUREG-1936, “Environmental Impact Statement for the Combined License for the Calvert ...Missing: 2012 | Show results with:2012
  94. [94]
    Detailed design engineering contract for Calvert Cliffs 3
    Oct 10, 2008 · A contract to complete detailed design engineering for an Areva EPR has been awarded by Unistar Nuclear Energy (UNE) to a consortium comprising Areva and ...Missing: expansion | Show results with:expansion
  95. [95]
    EPC Terms Sheet Signed for Calvert Cliffs - Bechtel
    Jul 21, 2009 · The AREVA EPR™ design is an evolutionary 1,600+ MWe class pressurized water reactor based on well-proven technology and capitalizes on the ...
  96. [96]
    UniStar Files Petition with Feds - The BayNet
    Sep 26, 2012 · The challenge to Calvert Cliffs 3's apparent foreign ownership was submitted in 2008 by several “intervenors,” including the Nuclear ...
  97. [97]
    EDF's US Calvert Cliffs 3 Project “Terminated”
    Nov 13, 2012 · On 1 November 2012, the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issued an order terminating the adjudicatory proceeding on the combined license application for ...Missing: unit 2008
  98. [98]
    Calvert Cliffs 3 COL withdrawn - World Nuclear News
    Jul 21, 2015 · Unistar Nuclear Energy's withdrawal of its combined construction and operation licence (COL) application for Calvert Cliffs unit 3 has been formally accepted.
  99. [99]
    [PDF] Uploaded by: Benjamin Brooks Position: FAV - Maryland
    Mar 5, 2025 · This bill will add new nuclear energy generated from licensed stations, including small modular reactors, to the list of Tier 1 renewables in ...
  100. [100]
    [PDF] SB434 “Empowering New Energy Resources and Green ... - Maryland
    support to the development of new nuclear energy, and specifically to Small Modular Reactors (SMRs). ... - Building a 300 MW SMR at Calvert Cliffs would meet less ...
  101. [101]
    Stop the Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant Expansion - Sierra Club
    The Yucca Mountain site is too small and will run out of room before it can take the spent fuel from the power plants already operating around the country.
  102. [102]
    SIERRA CLUB SEEKS TO BLOCK RENEWAL OF NUCLEAR ...
    Jul 8, 1998 · The Sierra Club says it will try to block Calvert Cliffs from becoming the first nuclear power plant in the country to win renewal of its ...
  103. [103]
    Evacuation Worries Cited in Opposing Reactor Plan
    Oct 13, 2007 · Opponents of a proposed third reactor at the Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant gathered in Solomons on Thursday to voice concerns about ...
  104. [104]
    Calvert Cliffs Meltdown Could Spell Disaster, Anti-Nuclear Groups Say
    Oct 11, 2007 · A disaster at the Calvert Cliffs nuclear plant in Lusby could lead to thousands of deaths because of congested escape routes and other potential problems.Missing: concerns | Show results with:concerns
  105. [105]
    [PDF] Flexible Plant Operation and Generation Probabilistic Risk ...
    A Level 1 PRA estimates the frequency per year of accidents damaging the reactor core, referred to as core damage frequency (CDF). This is done using two types ...
  106. [106]
    [PDF] Age-Related Degradation Inspection Report 05000317/2024010 ...
    Jul 31, 2024 · The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) continued monitoring the licensee's performance by conducting an age-related degradation inspection ...
  107. [107]
    Safety Evaluation Report Related to the License Renewal of Calvert ...
    This safety evaluation report (SER) documents the technical review of the Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2 license renewal application by the ...Missing: relicensing | Show results with:relicensing
  108. [108]
    NRC Finds No Safety Problems to Block Extension of Calvert Cliffs ...
    Nov 17, 1999 · Baltimore Gas & Electric, which owns Calvert Cliffs, can adequately manage effects of aging at the Lusby plant, the NRC concluded in the safety ...
  109. [109]
    Radioactive Effluent and Environmental Reports for Calvert Cliffs 1 & 2
    The "Environmental Report" lists the measurements of radioactive materials found in the environment surrounding the power plant. This report is actually the " ...Missing: practices | Show results with:practices
  110. [110]
    [PDF] Annual Assessment Letter for Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant ...
    Feb 26, 2024 · The U.S Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has completed its end-of-cycle performance assessment of Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant ...Missing: concerns | Show results with:concerns
  111. [111]
    [PDF] A Brief on Incidents at the Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant
    On February 17, 1987, the entire emergency core cooling system (ECCS) was mistakenly disabled while the reactor was undergoing low power testing (basically what ...
  112. [112]
    [PDF] Maryland - Nuclear Energy Institute
    Calvert Cliffs powers Ameriert cities and towns with reliable, 24/7 clean energy. Nuclear etesebgyand 842 Nuclearergy is thergest supports local communities ...
  113. [113]
    What are the safest and cleanest sources of energy?
    Feb 10, 2020 · Fossil fuels are the dirtiest and most dangerous energy sources, while nuclear and modern renewable energy sources are vastly safer and cleaner.
  114. [114]
    The Importance of Nuclear Energy to Maryland's Economy ...
    May 21, 2020 · As for Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Station, the EIA's Maryland fact sheet, estimates the facility's two nuclear reactors produce approximately ...
  115. [115]
    [PDF] Energy Transition in PJM: Resource Retirements, Replacements ...
    Feb 24, 2023 · PJM is undergoing a major transition in the resources needed to maintain bulk power grid reliability. Historically, thermal resources have ...
  116. [116]
    Nuclear Energy - Our World in Data
    A death rate of 0.04 deaths per terawatt-hour means every 25 years, a single person would die;; Nuclear: In an average year, nobody would die – only every 33 ...