Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Citizens' assembly

A citizens' assembly is a temporary deliberative institution comprising a stratified random sample of 50 to 150 ordinary citizens, selected via sortition to represent the broader population demographically, who convene over several weekends to receive expert briefings, engage in facilitated discussions, and formulate non-binding recommendations on predefined policy topics such as constitutional reform or climate action.^[1]^[2]^[3] Rooted in ancient Athenian practices of sortition—where devices like the kleroterion randomly allocated citizens to councils and juries to curb aristocratic influence and promote egalitarian participation—modern citizens' assemblies emerged in the early 2000s as experimental supplements to representative democracy, aiming to counter perceived elitism and polarization through inclusive, informed deliberation.^[4]^[5]^[6] Prominent examples include the 2004 British Columbia Citizens' Assembly on electoral reform, which proposed a single transferable vote system later rejected in a referendum, and Ireland's 2016–2018 assemblies, whose recommendations spurred referendums that repealed the Eighth Amendment on abortion in 2018, though subsequent 2024 proposals on family and care amendments failed at the polls despite assembly endorsement.^[7]^[8]^[9] While empirical studies indicate that participation boosts individuals' political trust, efficacy, and knowledge, the assemblies' broader effectiveness remains contested, with critics highlighting inconsistent governmental uptake of recommendations, risks of facilitation bias influencing outcomes, and doubts about scaling mini-publics to achieve systemic democratic renewal amid entrenched representative institutions.^[10]^[11]^[12]

Core Definition and Mechanisms

Selection Methods and Representativeness

Selection methods in citizens' assemblies primarily rely on sortition, a form of random selection designed to produce a microcosm of the broader population rather than relying on elections or self-nomination.^[13] This approach draws from electoral registers, census data, or similar databases to invite a large initial pool—typically around 13,000 individuals—followed by stratified sampling to match predefined demographic quotas such as gender, age groups, socioeconomic class, region, and sometimes education or ethnicity.^[13] The final panel, often comprising 70 to 100 members for national assemblies, is then finalized using computational algorithms that balance quota adherence with equitable selection probabilities across invitees.^[14] Stratification counters inherent biases in random draws, such as underrepresentation of minorities, by oversampling underrepresented strata during invitations and applying optimization techniques like greedy algorithms, simulated annealing, or fairest distribution methods in 15 documented cases.^[13] For example, the 2016–2018 Irish Citizens' Assembly selected 99 members through a two-stage process managed by market research firm RED C: random invitations stratified by sex, age, social class, and region to align with national census demographics, ensuring broad proportionality despite exclusions like non-residents.^[15]^[16] Algorithms such as LEXIMIN, deployed by groups like the Sortition Foundation, further refine this by maximizing the minimum probability of selection (e.g., 26–65% of the ideal rate in tested datasets), reducing inequality metrics like the Gini coefficient by 5–16 points compared to prior methods across 10 real-world applications involving panels of 20–170 members.^[14] Representativeness is gauged by post-selection alignment with population benchmarks on stratified variables, with empirical reviews of multiple assemblies showing 100% achievement of demographic mirroring, albeit with small deviations such as regional overrepresentation.^[13] Compliance with sortition principles—randomness (96.55% in invitation stages) and equality (77.78%)—supports claims of fairness, enhancing perceived legitimacy over voluntary recruitment.^[13] However, low conversion rates from invitations, frequently under 10% and as low as 23.1% in cases like the 2017 UK Brexit assembly, introduce self-selection biases favoring more engaged or available demographics, such as overrepresentation of higher-education holders.^[17] Critiques highlight structural limits: small panel sizes (rarely exceeding 200) yield high sampling error, requiring thousands for precision in diverse populations (e.g., 370 for 5% margin in communities of 20,000, scaling to 16,000 for 1% in millions), and incomplete frames like electoral rolls exclude non-voters or recent migrants.^[17] Studies document participant divergences from population norms in engagement levels and views, with little empirical edge over open recruitment in inclusivity, underscoring that demographic matching does not fully proxy attitudinal or experiential diversity.^[17] Despite these, stratified sortition outperforms alternatives in audited cases for descriptive fidelity, though scalability constraints persist for capturing fringe perspectives.^[13]

Deliberative Procedures

Deliberative procedures in citizens' assemblies typically unfold over multiple sessions spanning several weeks or months, averaging nine meeting days and 17 weeks from first to last session across observed cases.^[18] These processes emphasize structured, facilitated dialogue among randomly selected participants to foster informed reasoning, mutual understanding, and collective judgment on complex policy issues.^[19] The procedures generally divide into three sequential phases: learning, deliberation, and decision-making. In the learning phase, participants receive balanced information through expert presentations, Q&A sessions, interactive lectures, and preparatory materials, enabling them to grasp technical details and diverse perspectives without advocacy bias.^[19] ^[3] For instance, the British Columbia Citizens' Assembly on Electoral Reform in 2004 included approximately 400 public testimonies alongside expert inputs to build foundational knowledge over an initial period.^[19] This phase prioritizes factual education over persuasion, often lasting from four weeks to three months depending on assembly scale.^[19] During the deliberation phase, participants engage in small-group discussions and plenary sessions, facilitated to encourage weighing trade-offs, scenario exploration, and respectful exchange of views.^[20] ^[19] Neutral facilitators, trained in managing group dynamics and ensuring inclusivity, rotate seating and intervene to prevent dominance by any viewpoint, as seen in the UK's 2017 Citizens' Assembly on Social Care, which used diverse small groups for iterative dialogue.^[3] Techniques such as role-playing or pros-and-cons tabling promote causal analysis of options, with assemblies like Ontario's 2006 Electoral Reform process allocating 48 plenary and 15 small-group sessions over six weeks to refine ideas collaboratively.^[19] Decision-making culminates in forming recommendations, often via consensus-seeking or supermajority voting to reflect collective deliberation rather than simple majorities.^[3] ^[20] Outputs may include ranked policy options or principles, as in the UK Climate Assembly's 2020 voting on mitigation strategies after months of phased sessions.^[3] Follow-up mechanisms, such as monitoring implementation, ensure accountability, though efficacy varies by institutional commitment.^[20] Variations exist, with shorter assemblies favoring voting and longer ones consensus, but all aim to mitigate polarization through evidence-based reasoning.^[19]

Scope of Authority and Outputs

Citizens' assemblies generally operate with advisory authority, lacking the power to enact binding decisions independently. Their outputs typically consist of formal reports containing policy recommendations, drafted collectively by participants after deliberation, which are then submitted to the commissioning body such as a government, parliament, or local authority.^[21]^[22] This advisory scope ensures that elected representatives retain ultimate decision-making control, though recommendations may influence subsequent legislative or referendum processes.^[23] In practice, implementation of outputs varies, with empirical assessments showing that while assemblies can shape public discourse and policy agendas, uptake is not guaranteed and often requires political will. For instance, Ireland's 2016-2018 Citizens' Assembly on the Eighth Amendment produced a recommendation to repeal the constitutional ban on abortion, which the government translated into a 2018 referendum that passed with 66.4% approval on May 25, 2018, leading to legislative change.^[24] Similarly, Jersey's 2021 Citizens' Assembly on climate change recommended a plan for carbon neutrality by 2030, prompting the States Assembly to commit to public-led strategies, though binding enforcement remained with elected officials.^[25] These cases illustrate how advisory outputs can catalyze action, but causal evidence links success to alignment with prevailing political priorities rather than inherent assembly authority.^[26] Binding authority is rare and confined to experimental or local contexts, where assemblies may directly inform ballot measures or ordinances, but even then, outputs like voter information statements (e.g., Oregon's Citizens' Initiative Review since 2010) serve advisory functions to enhance informed voting without overriding electoral outcomes.^[27] Broader reviews indicate that while some designs aspire to binding recommendations for greater legitimacy, systemic reliance on advisory models persists due to concerns over democratic accountability, with no large-scale empirical precedent for fully sovereign citizens' assemblies supplanting representative institutions.^[28]^[29]

Historical Origins

Ancient and Pre-Modern Precursors

In classical Athens, following Cleisthenes' reforms around 508 BCE, sortition became a cornerstone of democratic governance, selecting citizens for bodies that deliberated on policy and justice. The Boule, a council of 500 members drawn annually by lot from adult male citizens across demes, prepared legislative agendas for the Ecclesia, supervised magistrates, and conducted foreign policy deliberations, embodying random representation in executive and preparatory roles.^[30]^[31] This mechanism ensured rotation, with no immediate re-eligibility, distributing power to prevent elite dominance.^[31] Judicial panels, known as dikasteria, further exemplified sortition's deliberative application. Each year, 6,000 citizens over age 30 were selected by lot to form a juror pool, from which panels of 201 to 1,501 were randomly assigned to hear cases, deliberating verdicts without professional judges.^[31]^[32] These large citizen groups weighed evidence and arguments on public and private disputes, fostering collective judgment as a check on power.^[33] While the Ecclesia involved mass participation, the sortition-based Boule and dikasteria provided structured deliberation among randomly chosen subsets, prefiguring mini-publics.^[30] In the Roman Republic (509–27 BCE), sortition played a subsidiary role, primarily allotting administrative tasks like provincial assignments to elected magistrates rather than forming core deliberative assemblies.^[31] Assemblies such as the Comitia Centuriata operated on weighted voting by classes, emphasizing election over lot.^[31] Pre-modern Europe saw sortition revived in Italian republics to counter factionalism. In Venice from the 13th century, the Great Council used lots to form committees electing the Doge and officials, randomizing selection among patricians to symbolize equality and reduce intrigue.^[34]^[31] Florence similarly applied sortition for magistracies in the 14th–15th centuries, enabling rotation among guildsmen and mitigating violent conflicts between factions.^[35]^[36] These systems, though restricted to elites or guilds, highlighted lot-drawing's utility for fair deliberation and power diffusion, influencing later republican thought.^[34]

20th-Century Foundations

The foundations of modern citizens' assemblies were laid in the 1970s through experimental deliberative mini-publics, which sought to counter perceived deficits in representative democracy by incorporating randomly selected lay citizens into structured policy deliberation. These innovations emerged amid post-1960s demands for greater public participation, influenced by critiques of technocratic decision-making and elite capture in complex policy domains like technology assessment and urban planning. Unlike ancient sortition, which focused on direct governance roles, 20th-century models emphasized advisory outputs from small, stratified random samples, facilitated discussions with experts, and reports to influence authorities, prioritizing informed judgment over mere aggregation of preferences.^[37] A pivotal development was the Planungszelle, or planning cell, devised by German sociologist Peter C. Dienel in 1972 during a pilot in Schwelm, Germany, to bridge citizen-government gaps on local issues. Each cell comprised 25 randomly selected participants, divided into subgroups for phased deliberation: initial information sessions with experts, value prioritization and recommendation voting in small groups of five, and synthesis into a collective report presented to decision-makers. By the late 1980s, over 170 planning cells had been conducted across more than 40 German sites, including a 1982 initiative involving 24 cells across seven communities to evaluate energy policy options, yielding thousands of citizen statements that informed regional planning without binding authority. These processes demonstrated feasibility of scaling citizen input while mitigating dominance by vocal minorities through randomization and facilitation.^[38]^[39] Concurrently, in the United States, political scientist Ned Crosby developed the Citizens' Jury model in 1971, with its first application in 1974 addressing healthcare policy through a panel of randomly selected citizens questioning witnesses and deliberating toward non-binding recommendations. Typically involving 12 to 18 participants over several days, the format stressed ethical deliberation grounded in fairness and evidence, as Crosby argued it could produce wiser outcomes than polls or elections by fostering perspective-taking. Over 30 such juries were held by the Jefferson Center by the 1990s, influencing topics from neighborhood redevelopment to electoral reform, though empirical evaluations noted variable uptake by officials, often limited to advisory roles.^[40]^[41] In Denmark, the consensus conference format originated in the mid-1980s under the Danish Board of Technology, adapting medical consensus methods to include lay panels of 12 to 15 randomly chosen citizens deliberating on technological risks, such as genetic engineering or environmental impacts, over multiple weekends. The first national conference occurred around 1987, producing reports that shaped parliamentary debates, exemplifying how mini-publics could democratize expert-heavy fields. These early models collectively established core mechanisms—sortition for representativeness, expert testimony for informativeness, and moderated discourse for rationality—providing empirical prototypes that later scaled into fuller citizens' assemblies, despite persistent challenges in ensuring implementation fidelity.^[42]^[43]

Global Implementations

European Cases

Ireland's Citizens' Assembly, convened from 2016 to 2018, consisted of 99 randomly selected citizens plus a chairperson, tasked with deliberating on issues including the Eighth Amendment of the Constitution, which restricted abortion.^[44] The assembly recommended repealing the amendment and allowing unrestricted abortion up to 12 weeks' gestation, with 64% of members supporting no restrictions in early pregnancy.^[45] This recommendation prompted a 2018 referendum, where 66.4% of voters approved repeal, leading to legislative changes legalizing abortion services.^[46] The process demonstrated citizens' assemblies' potential to break political deadlocks on divisive issues, though outcomes depended on subsequent parliamentary and public endorsement.^[47] France's Citizens' Convention for Climate, held from 2019 to 2020, involved 150 randomly selected citizens aiming to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by at least 40% from 1990 levels by 2030, emphasizing social justice.^[48] After nine weekends of deliberation with experts, the assembly produced 149 proposals across sectors like transport, housing, and agriculture, including a 15% tax on high-emission aviation tickets and incentives for sustainable diets.^[49] President Macron pledged to submit 40% of proposals to referendum, Parliament, or decree, but by 2021, only about 10% were fully adopted without modification, with others diluted or rejected amid lobbying and fiscal constraints, highlighting implementation challenges in non-binding assemblies.^[50] In the United Kingdom, Climate Assembly UK operated from 2019 to 2020 with 108 randomly selected members, commissioned by six parliamentary select committees to explore pathways to net-zero emissions by 2050.^[51] Participants, after hearing evidence from over 60 experts, endorsed ambitious measures by supermajorities, such as 80% support for substantial carbon pricing on high emitters and 76% for insulating 19 million homes by 2030.^[52] The final report influenced policy debates but lacked binding authority, with subsequent government responses incorporating select recommendations like expanded renewables while deferring others due to economic priorities.^[53] Other European instances include Scotland's Citizens' Assembly of Scotland (2019–2021), which advised on constitutional futures and economic recovery post-COVID, producing reports on social renewal that informed parliamentary strategy.^[54] At the EU level, the Conference on the Future of Europe (2021–2022) incorporated citizens' panels alongside assemblies, yielding over 300 proposals on topics from climate to digital governance, though adoption varied by member state consensus.^[55] These cases illustrate assemblies' role in agenda-setting and policy refinement across Europe, often yielding consensus on complex issues but facing hurdles in enforcement and elite buy-in.^[56]

North American Cases

The British Columbia Citizens' Assembly on Electoral Reform, established in 2004, represented the first modern implementation of a citizens' assembly in North America, comprising 160 randomly selected residents tasked with evaluating the province's first-past-the-post electoral system.^[57] Over 11 months, members received expert briefings, conducted public consultations across 50 communities involving over 15,000 submissions, and deliberated to recommend the single transferable vote (STV) system by a vote of 146 to 7, citing its potential to better reflect voter preferences and reduce wasted votes.^[58] The assembly's final report, submitted in October 2004, proposed STV with multi-member districts averaging 7 seats, open-list candidate selection, and a 102-seat legislature.^[59] This recommendation proceeded to a referendum in May 2005, where it garnered 57.4% support but failed to meet the legislated 60% supermajority threshold required in 90% of ridings; a second referendum in 2009 received only 39.9% approval. Following British Columbia's model, the Ontario Citizens' Assembly on Electoral Reform convened from 2006 to 2007 with 103 randomly selected members (plus 52 alternates) to assess alternatives to the province's first-past-the-post system amid public dissatisfaction post-2003 election distortions.^[60] After eight months of learning sessions, public hearings with over 3,000 participants, and analysis of international systems, the assembly unanimously recommended a mixed-member proportional (MMP) system in May 2007, featuring 90 local ridings and 39 province-wide list seats allocated proportionally, with a 3% threshold for list eligibility to curb fragmentation.^[61] The proposal aimed to balance local representation with overall proportionality, addressing vote-seat disparities where parties had won majorities with under 45% popular support.^[62] In the October 2007 referendum, MMP received 36.9% support against 63.1% for the status quo, attributed to limited campaign resources, voter inertia favoring familiarity, and elite cues from major parties opposing change despite the assembly's independent process.^[63] In the United States, citizens' assemblies have been applied on a smaller scale, often as advisory panels rather than binding processes with referenda, with Oregon's Citizens' Initiative Review (CIR) since 2010 serving as a key example where randomly selected groups of 24 citizens review ballot initiatives, producing "citizens' statements" distributed to voters.^[64] Adopted in 20 jurisdictions by 2024, the CIR has informed over 100 initiatives, with evaluations showing it increases voter knowledge without biasing outcomes, though participation rates remain low at around 0.5% of eligible voters.^[65] Other instances include state-level climate or housing assemblies, such as Massachusetts' 2020-2022 assembly of 140 members recommending net-zero emissions policies, but these lack the electoral reform focus or ratification mechanisms of Canadian precedents, reflecting decentralized experimentation amid federalism constraints.^[66] Mexico's Citizen Assemblies in Mexico City, formalized under the 2017 Organic Law of the Mexico City Human Rights Commission, enable neighborhood-level deliberations on local issues like urban planning, with random selection from registered residents to propose non-binding recommendations to authorities.^[67] These assemblies, numbering over 100 by 2023, emphasize participatory budgeting and service improvements but operate without the scale or policy impact of Canadian electoral assemblies, constrained by limited authority and variable implementation fidelity.^[67] Empirical reviews indicate modest enhancements in civic engagement but persistent challenges from elite capture and low turnout, underscoring causal limits in non-deliberative institutional contexts.

Other Regions and International Efforts

In Australia, the Australian Citizens' Parliament convened in 2009 as a pioneering deliberative body, involving 150 randomly selected citizens from across the country who deliberated over two weekends on reforming parliamentary processes, producing recommendations for enhanced democratic practices. More recently, the Western Sydney Citizens' Assembly was launched in July 2024 as a permanent model, comprising 50 randomly selected residents to advise on regional priorities like housing and transport.^[68] In New Zealand, Wellington City Council established a citizens' assembly in 2023 with 40 randomly selected participants to deliberate on service levels and long-term planning, emphasizing collaborative decision-making reflective of community diversity.^[69] In Asia, adoption remains limited but includes experimental efforts focused on climate issues; Japan's first citizens' assembly on climate change, held in Sapporo in 2020, gathered 24 randomly selected participants over multiple sessions to discuss local emission reductions, yielding recommendations for policy integration.^[70] Proposals for national-scale assemblies in Japan continue, aiming to address policy gridlocks on net-zero transitions through inclusive deliberation.^[71] In Latin America, Chile's citizens' assemblies emerged post-2019 social unrest, functioning as deliberative forums where randomly selected groups addressed constitutional reforms and social demands, influencing subsequent plebiscites.^[72] Colombia's Bogotá implemented the Itinerant Citizens' Assembly in 2020, a sequential model involving rotating random selections across neighborhoods to deliberate on urban policy, with resolutions binding local committees.^[20] African examples are emerging but sparse, often tied to specific crises; Kenya hosted a Citizens' Assembly on Corruption and Economic Governance in 2023, convened by civil society with randomly selected participants to recommend anti-corruption measures, highlighting governance challenges.^[73] In South Africa, a climate assembly planned for 2026 by the Citizens' Assembly Working Group at Stellenbosch University will involve random selection to deliberate on energy transitions, building on advocacy for broader citizen engagement amid trust deficits in institutions.^[74] Internationally, networks like the Global Citizens' Assembly Network (GloCAN) facilitate cross-border assemblies, convening randomly selected delegates from multiple countries to deliberate on global issues such as pandemic preparedness, with events held since 2021 emphasizing transnational recommendations.^[75] Proposals for a permanent global citizens' assembly on transition issues, including climate and inequality, gained traction in 2024, with calls for establishment by 2025 to integrate citizen input into UN processes, though implementation remains advisory and faces logistical hurdles.^[76] These efforts underscore growing interest in sortition for supranational challenges, yet their binding authority is constrained by national sovereignty.^[77]

Empirical Assessments

Evidence of Positive Effects

Empirical studies of citizens' assemblies, often termed mini-publics, indicate that participation fosters measurable improvements in participants' knowledge and cognitive capacities. A meta-analysis of 100 quantitative studies spanning 1980 to 2020 found that mini-publics significantly enhance participants' policy knowledge and reasoning skills, with highly significant positive effects on internal political efficacy—the belief in one's ability to understand and engage in politics.^[10] Deliberation in these assemblies also shifts policy attitudes toward more nuanced positions, reducing extremes often seen in mass opinion. The same meta-analysis confirmed significant changes in policy preferences among participants, attributing this to structured exposure to diverse evidence and arguments, while positively influencing broader political attitudes such as support for democratic processes.^[10] In Ireland's 2016–2018 Citizens' Assembly on the Eighth Amendment, participants' views evolved substantially after deliberation, with 70% ultimately recommending repeal of the abortion ban, contributing to a successful 2018 referendum where 66.4% voted in favor—marking a breakthrough on a long-stalled issue.^[78] Assemblies demonstrate potential to mitigate affective polarization, where participants develop warmer views of political out-groups. A 2025 field experiment in Austria involving a citizens' assembly on immigration found participants exhibited significantly lower affective polarization compared to controls across multiple follow-up periods, with no rebound effect observed, alongside sustained increases in institutional trust.^[79] Similarly, interventions simulating assembly processes have shown reduced receptivity to conspiracy theories and heightened democratic resilience among participants.^[11] On policy outputs, assemblies yield recommendations that prioritize long-term societal benefits over short-term gains. Ireland's 2019–2020 Citizens' Assembly on Climate Change proposed a carbon tax rising to €100 per ton by 2030, influencing the 2021 Climate Action and Low Carbon Development Bill, which embedded ambitious targets into law.^[26] The 2004 British Columbia Citizens' Assembly on Electoral Reform, despite its STV proposal failing a 2005 referendum (58% support), educated participants and the public on systemic alternatives, with post-process surveys indicating heightened awareness and efficacy without exacerbating divisions.^[80] These effects extend to civic engagement, with evidence of boosted political participation intentions post-deliberation. The meta-analysis noted preliminary positive impacts on civic behaviors, corroborated by studies showing assemblies increase participants' sense of empowerment and future involvement in public life.^[10]^[81] However, such gains are primarily observed among participants, with spillover to wider publics varying by implementation and media coverage.

Documented Shortcomings and Inefficiencies

The recommendations emerging from citizens' assemblies frequently encounter rejection or dilution in subsequent referendums or legislative processes, limiting their practical efficacy. In British Columbia, the 2004-2005 Citizens' Assembly on Electoral Reform, comprising 160 randomly selected members who deliberated over 11 months, unanimously recommended adopting the single transferable vote system; however, the 2005 provincial referendum yielded 57.7% support, failing to meet the government's 60% threshold for approval.^[58] A follow-up 2009 referendum on the same proposal received even lower backing at 39.9% approval.^[82] Similarly, Ontario's 2006 Citizens' Assembly endorsed mixed-member proportional representation after comparable deliberation, but the 2007 referendum rejected it with 63% voting no. These outcomes illustrate a pattern where assembly proposals, despite structured evidence presentation, diverge from broader voter preferences, often due to entrenched political interests or public skepticism toward systemic overhauls.^[83] Implementation shortfalls are evident in advisory assemblies without binding mechanisms, where governments selectively adopt or ignore outputs. France's 2019-2020 Citizens' Convention for Climate, involving 150 citizens, generated 149 proposals targeting a 40% emissions reduction by 2030 relative to 1990 levels, including ecocide criminalization and regulatory measures; yet, by 2022, only about 10% were enacted in full, with many others significantly watered down or shelved amid executive resistance and fiscal constraints.^[84] In Ireland, the 2022-2023 Citizens' Assembly on Care and Gender Equality recommended constitutional expansions for family definitions and caregiving rights, influencing March 2024 referendums; both amendments were resoundingly defeated, with 73% and 71% voting against, highlighting failures in translating deliberative consensus into electorally viable policy amid perceived overreach or poor framing.^[85] High operational costs and temporal demands further underscore inefficiencies, constraining scalability and return on investment. British Columbia's assembly incurred costs of approximately CAD 5.3 million for participant stipends, expert consultations, and logistics, yielding non-binding advice ultimately discarded.^[86] In the United Kingdom, assemblies typically range from £150,000 to £750,000, factoring in recruitment, facilitation, and venue expenses for groups of 50-100 over several weekends, yet their advisory status often results in marginal policy influence relative to expenditure.^[87] Empirical reviews note that such resource intensity, combined with variable participant retention and expertise gaps—where lay members rely heavily on curated inputs—can amplify inefficiencies, particularly in complex domains like climate or constitutional reform, without guaranteed alignment to implementable outcomes.^[64]

Key Criticisms and Debates

Challenges to Legitimacy and Accountability

Citizens' assemblies derive their legitimacy primarily from sortition, a process of random selection designed to mirror demographic proportions of the broader population, yet this approach has been critiqued for failing to provide the robust democratic mandate inherent in electoral systems. Unlike elected representatives, who secure authority through competitive voting reflecting public preferences, assembly members lack retrospective accountability to voters, raising questions about whether statistical representation alone suffices for policy influence. Political theorists argue that this "descriptive legitimacy" is vulnerable to sampling errors in small groups—often 100 to 500 participants—potentially leading to outcomes that diverge from majority views, especially in unstratified or poorly designed lotteries.^[13]^[17] Accountability challenges compound these legitimacy concerns, as assembly participants face no direct mechanisms for public sanction, such as recall or re-election, once deliberations conclude. Proponents counter with concepts like "deliberative accountability," emphasizing internal justification among members and transparency in proceedings, alongside non-electoral sanctions such as reputational costs or organizer oversight. However, empirical reviews highlight that such internal dynamics often prove insufficient for external enforcement, with power imbalances favoring facilitators, experts, or sponsoring institutions that may prioritize predefined agendas over participant input.^[88]^[89] In practice, these deficits manifest in limited uptake of recommendations, as seen in cases where governments impose restrictive remits or economic constraints, resulting in ambiguous policy impacts and diminished perceived legitimacy among skeptics. For instance, analyses of governance risks in deliberative processes identify poor implementation as a recurring issue, where assemblies' advisory outputs are sidelined by elected bodies without avenues for citizen recourse, potentially reinforcing elite control rather than enhancing democratic responsiveness. Academic sources, while often sympathetic to deliberative innovations, acknowledge these structural weaknesses, attributing them to the absence of binding enforcement tied to electoral cycles.^[90]^[91]

Issues of Expertise and Cognitive Biases

Critics of citizens' assemblies contend that the random selection of lay participants introduces an epistemic deficit, as ordinary citizens typically lack the specialized knowledge required to evaluate complex policy issues effectively. Unlike elected representatives or technocratic experts, assembly members often enter deliberations with limited domain-specific expertise, relying heavily on curated briefings from invited specialists, which may present unbalanced or simplified information. This vulnerability can result in recommendations prioritizing intuitive moral judgments or short-term preferences over rigorous, evidence-based analysis, as evidenced by philosophical critiques tracing back to Socrates, who argued against entrusting governance to the uninformed masses.^[92] ^[93] Empirical instances underscore these concerns. The 2004 British Columbia Citizens' Assembly on Electoral Reform, comprising 160 randomly selected residents, proposed adopting the single transferable vote system after months of deliberation and expert input; however, provincial voters rejected the recommendation in a 2005 referendum by a 57.7% to 42.3% margin, with a subsequent 2009 vote yielding an even wider 61.3% opposition. Observers have attributed the defeats partly to the assembly's output reflecting novice interpretations of electoral mechanics rather than deeply informed trade-offs, highlighting how brief exposure to technical details fails to replicate professional scrutiny. Similar outcomes occurred in Ontario's 2006 assembly, where its mixed-member proportional system proposal was rejected by 63.1% of voters, suggesting assemblies may generate proposals misaligned with broader public or expert consensus on feasibility.^[94] ^[59] Cognitive biases further complicate assembly dynamics, potentially undermining the quality of deliberations despite structured formats. Group polarization, where collective discussion amplifies pre-existing views toward extremes, has been observed in deliberative settings, as participants conform to emerging group norms or reinforce shared heuristics rather than challenge them through adversarial expertise. Confirmation bias can manifest when members selectively credit expert testimonies aligning with initial inclinations, while availability bias favors vivid anecdotes over statistical data, especially in time-constrained sessions. Multi-disciplinary reviews indicate that while deliberation can mitigate some biases under ideal conditions, real-world mini-publics often fail to fully counteract them, particularly if facilitator influence or homogeneous subgroup formation skews outcomes. For instance, analyses of polarization in deliberative forums reveal that affective divides persist or intensify without robust mechanisms for diverse, expert-mediated counterarguments, contrasting claims of inherent bias reduction.^[95] ^[79] These issues are compounded in high-stakes domains like climate policy, where assemblies such as France's 2019-2020 Citizens' Convention have proposed ambitious measures (e.g., carbon taxes and legal entrenchment of emissions targets) that critics argue overlook economic modeling and implementation costs due to participants' non-expert status. Academic assessments emphasize that such epistemic shortcomings risk legitimizing suboptimal policies, as assemblies' advisory outputs gain traction without sufficient safeguards against biased information processing. Proponents counter that learning effects and diverse perspectives compensate, but empirical rejections and theoretical critiques from deliberative skeptics underscore the causal link between lay involvement and decision fragility.^[96] ^[97]

Risks to Representative Institutions

Critics contend that citizens' assemblies pose risks to representative institutions by introducing unaccountable deliberative bodies that parallel or circumvent elected parliaments, thereby diluting the mandate derived from electoral accountability. Elected representatives are chosen by voters to deliberate and decide on policy, with mechanisms for removal via elections if they fail; in contrast, assembly members, selected by lot, lack such direct accountability, potentially allowing recommendations to gain undue influence without voter recourse. This dynamic can erode parliamentary sovereignty, as governments may invoke assemblies to legitimize decisions that evade rigorous legislative scrutiny or public electoral judgment.^[3]^[98] In the United Kingdom, such concerns have arisen in proposals to use assemblies for contentious issues, where they could bypass Parliament and empower unelected processes. For instance, a 2019 analysis warned that deploying assemblies to resolve Brexit-related impasses tempts politicians to undermine parliamentary sovereignty, the foundational principle that the elected legislature holds ultimate authority. Similarly, Labour Party suggestions in 2024 for assemblies on public spending or planning reforms drew rebukes for abnegating elected politicians' responsibility, with critics like Luke Akehurst arguing that voters already select representatives for tough decisions. The Climate and Nature Assembly Bill, introduced in 2025, faced opposition for potentially allowing an assembly—perceived as susceptible to stacked composition—to dictate net zero policies, sidestepping elected oversight.^[99]^[100]^[101] When paired with referendums, assemblies amplify these risks by furnishing an alternative source of democratic legitimacy, challenging the representative system's core. Niall Gooch observed that watering down Parliament's authority in this manner undermines accountability, central to constitutional traditions like Britain's. Even advisory assemblies can pressure legislatures into adopting recommendations, fostering a hybrid system where sortition rivals election, potentially fragmenting sovereignty and complicating causal chains of responsibility from voter to policy outcome. Proponents counter that assemblies complement rather than supplant representatives, but empirical instances of implementation, such as France's 2019-2020 Citizens' Convention on Climate—where recommendations sparked constitutional amendment debates yet faced partial rejection and public discontent—illustrate tensions without resolving accountability deficits.^[102]^[98]

Theoretical Underpinnings

Sortition in Democratic Theory

Sortition, the random selection of individuals for political roles, forms a cornerstone of classical democratic theory, particularly as practiced in ancient Athens from the fifth century BCE onward. In Athenian democracy, sortition was used to fill most public offices, including the Council of 500 and jurors, comprising the majority of governmental positions beyond a small fraction filled by election. This method embodied the democratic ideal of isonomia (equality under the law), ensuring that political power was not concentrated among the wealthy or eloquent but distributed equally among eligible male citizens through chance, thereby preventing oligarchic capture. Aristotle, in Politics Book IV, explicitly linked sortition to democracy's essence, stating that "it is accepted as democratic when public offices are allocated by lot; and as oligarchic when they are filled by election," as elections tend to favor those with resources and ambition, introducing aristocratic elements into governance.^[103] Theoretically, sortition contrasts with election by prioritizing descriptive representation over competitive selection, aiming to mirror the populace's composition rather than rewarding performative skills. Proponents argue it upholds equality by granting each citizen an equal probability of selection, mitigating systemic exclusions inherent in electoral processes where voter turnout and campaign financing disproportionately benefit elites and organized interests. This random mechanism theoretically fosters legitimacy through statistical microcosms, where deliberative bodies approximate the diverse views of the broader population without the distortions of partisan mobilization or rhetorical dominance. In contrast, elections are critiqued for incentivizing short-term populism and corruption, as candidates must appeal to median voters or donors, often sidelining long-term public goods.^[13] Modern democratic theorists revive sortition as a corrective to representative democracy's failings, integrating it with deliberative practices to enhance epistemic quality while preserving equality. Thinkers like James Fishkin advocate for "deliberative polling" via sortition to simulate informed public judgment, arguing that random selection followed by facilitated discussion yields outcomes superior to uninformed voting or elite-driven elections. However, theorists such as Keith Sutherland caution that sortition excels in aggregative roles—like judging proposals—but falters in active representation, such as policy initiation, where descriptive passivity conflicts with the need for substantive advocacy and expertise. This limitation underscores sortition's theoretical role as a supplement rather than wholesale replacement for elections, balancing democratic equality against the causal risks of uninformed or unaccountable decision-making in large-scale polities.^[104]^[13]

Integration with Electoral Systems

Citizens' assemblies integrate with electoral systems mainly as advisory mechanisms that support or propose changes to voting processes, often culminating in referendums or voter guides rather than direct replacement of elected representation. In the Canadian province of British Columbia, the 2004 Citizens' Assembly on Electoral Reform comprised 160 randomly selected residents who, after ten months of deliberation supported by expert testimony, unanimously recommended adopting the single transferable vote system over the existing first-past-the-post method; this proposal advanced to a 2005 referendum, where 57.7% of voters rejected it.^[58] A follow-up assembly in 2008 led to a similar recommendation, defeated again in a 2009 referendum by 61.3% opposition.^[105] These cases demonstrate sortition's use to generate reform options for electoral validation, though outcomes highlight voter resistance to systemic shifts despite assembly consensus.^[80] In direct democracy contexts, assemblies enhance electoral decision-making by informing voters on complex ballot measures. Oregon's Citizens' Initiative Review, launched in 2010, convenes panels of 24 randomly selected registered voters to evaluate statewide initiatives over four days, producing a 1,500-word "citizens' statement" of pros and cons that appears in official voters' pamphlets alongside campaign arguments.^[106] This integration has been credited with increasing voter confidence in ballot choices, as evidenced by post-review surveys showing participants' improved understanding and reduced polarization.^[107] Similar processes in Massachusetts (2016 pilot) and Arizona (proposed expansions) aim to counter misinformation in initiative-heavy electoral environments.^[108] Theoretical proposals for closer integration advocate hybrid models, such as bicameral legislatures pairing elected lower houses with sortition-selected upper chambers to balance responsiveness and deliberation.^[109] However, political theorist Terrill Bouricius critiques this approach, arguing that elected politicians' incentives for power and partisanship would subordinate sortition bodies, eroding their impartiality and turning them into reactive veto points rather than proactive deliberators; he posits sortition thrives in specialized, multi-body systems for policy review, not general legislation.^[110] Empirical attitudes align with cautious complementarity: surveys in the US, Ireland, and Finland indicate public preference for assemblies advising elected institutions over granting them binding authority, viewing pure sortition as undermining accountability while hybrids risk elite capture.^[111] Permanent advisory assemblies in regions like East Belgium (since 2019) and Paris (since 2019) exemplify ongoing integration, where sortition panels review policies or budgets before elected councils act, fostering legitimacy without supplanting elections.^[112] Such models prioritize empirical testing of deliberation's additive value, though documented implementation gaps—such as ignored recommendations—underscore challenges in ensuring electoral follow-through.^[2]

References

[1]
What is a citizens' assembly? | UCL Faculty of Social & Historical ...
A citizens' assembly is a group of members of the public brought together to deliberate on issues related to policy.Missing: empirical evidence
[2]
https://oxfordre.com/politics/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e-1975
[3]
Citizens' assemblies | Institute for Government
Mar 27, 2024 · A citizens' assembly is a broadly representative group of around 50 – 150 members of the public who are chosen, by lottery, to discuss and make recommendations.Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
[4]
Sortition | Random Selection, Democracy & Citizen Participation
Sortition, election by lot, a method of choosing public officials in some ancient Greek city-states. It was used especially in the Athenian democracy.
[5]
Sortition - Participedia
Sortition is the selection of candidates by lot, and was used in ancient Athenian democracy. When selecting participants for citizens' assemblies, ...
[6]
[PDF] INTRODUCTION. THE HISTORY OF SORTITION IN POLITICS - HAL
Apr 7, 2024 · Being based, procedurally speaking, on rotating mandates, random selection and a full citizen assembly, Athenian radical democracy has no ...
[7]
Citizens' assemblies, a new form of democratic representation? - Cairn
A first example of quasi-legislative work done by a citizens' assembly is the citizens' assembly of British Columbia in Canada, whose 160 members drafted an ...Missing: empirical evidence
[8]
Citizens' Assemblies for Referendums and Constitutional Reforms
Ireland is the first country in the world where four nation-wide citizens' assemblies were held successively, and the first country were some propositions ...
[9]
Citizens' assemblies: not made to legislate
May 9, 2023 · Since 2012, four recommendations made by citizens' assemblies have resulted in referenda being approved by parliament, and in three cases, ...
[10]
A meta‐analysis of the effects of democratic innovations on ...
Sep 17, 2024 · The aim of this paper is to systematically evaluate what we know and what we do not know yet about the effects of democratic innovations on citizens who ...
[11]
The Impact of Citizens' Assemblies on Democratic Resilience - OSF
Jul 25, 2024 · We find that citi- zens' assemblies have a substantial positive effect on political trust, political efficacy and political participation among ...Missing: controversies peer-
[12]
Empowered Mini-Publics: A Shortcut or Democratically Legitimate?
May 17, 2024 · This paper aims to serve as a nuanced defense of empowered mini-publics against Lafont's claims. I argue against her claims by explicating how participants of ...
[13]
Sortition and its Principles: Evaluation of the Selection Processes of ...
Jan 16, 2023 · The aims of the paper are to investigate what selection methods are used in the citizens' assemblies and to evaluate the processes of selection of assembly ...Sortition and Its Principles · Methods · Methods of Selection... · Main Findings
[14]
Fair algorithms for selecting citizens' assemblies - Nature
Aug 4, 2021 · Our selection algorithms choose representative panels while selecting individuals with probabilities as close to equal as mathematically possible.
[15]
Selection of Members | Citizens' Assembly
Members were chosen at random to represent the views of the people of Ireland, and were broadly representative of society as reflected in the Census.
[16]
Irish Citizens' Assembly: Challenges and Opportunities of an Ageing ...
The selection process, conducted by the market research company RED C (RTE, 2016), was stratified across four demographic categories: sex, age, social class, ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[17]
Reflections on the representativeness of citizens' assemblies and ...
Feb 22, 2023 · Proponents of citizens' assemblies put representativeness at the core of their definition. In fact, it is one of their main selling points.
[18]
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/sites/339306da-en/index.html?itemId=/content/publication/339306da-en
[19]
Citizens' Assembly - Participedia
A Citizens' Assembly is a body of citizens who come together to deliberate on a given issue and provide a set of recommendations, options, or a collective ...Missing: empirical evidence
[20]
[PDF] Citizens' assembly & deliberative processes
Deliberative Process: Central to the functioning of citizens' assemblies is the deliberative process, wherein participants engage in informed and respectful ...
[21]
[PDF] Citizens' Assemblies: An Introduction to Definitions & Guidelines
The good news is that you can still incorporate many deliberative principles into your engagement efforts, even if you can't implement a full citizens' assembly ...
[22]
[PDF] Citizens Assemblies: Guide to democracy that works
It is ideal when the recommendations of the citizens' assembly in a given matter are treated as binding and are implemented. A decision to that effect should ...
[23]
Citizens' Assembly of Scotland: research report - gov.scot
Jan 25, 2022 · This report presents the findings of a collaborative research project led by a team of Scottish Government Social Researchers and ...
[24]
Citizens' Assemblies: participatory democracy in action - ECNL.org
Nov 19, 2024 · Research has shown that participation in deliberative processes can have lasting effects on political engagement. Key considerations when ...
[25]
Report of Jersey's Citizens' Assembly on Climate Change
The States Assembly asked for a plan to aim to achieve carbon neutrality by 2030. In a bold and ambitious move, the States Assembly committed to a people- ...
[26]
Full article: A review of National Citizens' Climate Assemblies
Citizen's Climate Assemblies (CCA) have been hailed by academics and non-academics as initiatives to improve the legitimacy and efficacy of climate policy ...
[27]
Putting the Initiative Back Together - Harvard Law Review
Expanding assembly authority means ensuring its power is more than advisory.
[28]
[PDF] De Gruyter Handbook of Citizens' Assemblies
The open access publication of this Handbook has been made possible thanks to the generous support of the COST Action 'Constitution-making and deliberative ...
[29]
Public support for deliberative citizens' assemblies selected through ...
May 28, 2022 · Most often, such representativeness is achieved through sortition, that is the selection of group citizens at random in the population at large.
[30]
[PDF] Democracy Through Multi-Body Sortition: Athenian Lessons for the ...
Apr 30, 2013 · In Athens, self-selected citizens (ho boulomenos) could propose laws or decrees, but these generally had to pass through multiple self-selected ...
[31]
Sortition in politics: from history to contemporary democracy
Jun 30, 2025 · The Athenian polis and the Florentine Republic diverged in the role of the citizen assembly. In Athens, the assembly functioned as a safeguard ...
[32]
Criminal Procedure in Ancient Athens and in the Trial of Socrates
The jury consisted of 500 male citizens over the age of thirty, chosen by lot from among volunteers. Athens used very large numbers of jurors, from 500 to as ...
[33]
FROM ATHENS to AMERICA: Our Legal Roots | Illinois State Bar ...
Juries were the decision makers. Every year, a pool of 6,000 citizens, chosen by lot, served as jurors. A hefty pool of 501 or more jurors would hear public ...
[34]
Sortition's Second Birth in the Middle Ages and the Early Modern ...
The sortition of electoral committees in the Great Council ensured the symbolic equality of all its members, and the elections of officeholders by these ...<|separator|>
[35]
[PDF] Random Selection, Republican Self-Government, and Deliberative ...
In Florence, as in Athens, sortition and a rapid rotation of the offices enabled citizens to govern and be governed in turn. This is why one can speak of self- ...
[36]
[PDF] Direct Democracy and Sortition - Portail HAL Sciences Po
Sep 9, 2022 · Moreover, in Florence, more positions were filled through election. Sortition was adopted to solve the endless and often violent conflicts ...<|separator|>
[37]
[PDF] from deliberative to radical democracy? sortition
From citizen assemblies to Oregon citizens' initiative, from the Students'. Association of Lausanne University to the Left-wing party Morena in Mexico, from the ...Missing: pre- precursors
[38]
Planning Cells - Participedia
Planning cells are a deliberative method where randomly-selected, diverse participants collaborate on developing solutions to a given issue.
[39]
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1986.tb00831.x
[40]
Citizens' Jury - Participedia
Its founder, Ned Crosby, developed the model and it was first used in 1974 on the issue of healthcare. Around 1/3 of the 30+ Citizens' Juries held by the ...
[41]
Our History - Center for New Democratic Processes
The Citizens Jury process was developed by our founder, political scientist Ned Crosby, in 1971 while writing a doctoral dissertation on social ethics.
[42]
Consensus Conferences as Deliberative Democracy - ResearchGate
Aug 7, 2025 · ... Consensus conferences are an example of this modality. First conducted in the 1980s in Denmark, but widely adapted by other countries as ...
[43]
Sage Reference - Consensus Conference
This process was adapted in Denmark by the Danish Board of Technology in the 1980s, introducing the use of a citizens' panel to the process ...
[44]
The Irish Citizens' Assembly - Observatory of Public Sector Innovation
The Citizens' Assembly was an exercise in deliberative democracy, placing the citizen at the heart of important legal and policy issues facing Irish society.Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
[45]
Irish abortion law: Citizens' Assembly recommends unrestricted ...
Apr 23, 2017 · The Citizens' Assembly voted 64% to 36% in favour of having no restrictions in early pregnancy. Anti-abortion groups have condemned the result ...
[46]
The Citizens' Assembly Behind The Irish Abortion Referendum
May 30, 2018 · In the referendum, 66.4% voted in favour of repealing the eighth amendment, effectively legalising abortion in Ireland. That the referendum ...
[47]
The Irish abortion referendum: How a Citizens' Assembly helped to ...
May 29, 2018 · A majority of members (56%) recommended amending or replacing article 40.3.3, and 57% of members recommended that it should be replaced with a ...
[48]
Home - Convention Citoyenne pour le Climat
The Citizen's Convention on Climate, an unprecedented democratic experiment in France ... results. Scroll down the results.
[49]
[PDF] Citizens' Convention on Climate report | Summary
In order to reduce GHG emissions by at least 40% by 2030, it appears inevitable that we must revisit our way of living, consuming, producing and working, of ...
[50]
French Citizens' Convention on the Climate - National Assembly
The 460-page report containing 149 measures was adopted on 21 June 2020. A summary of proposals in English is available. An interim communication was issued on ...
[51]
Report - Climate Assembly UK
Climate Assembly UK's final report sets out a clear, internally consistent and timely path for reaching the UK's target of net zero emissions by 2050.
[52]
Findings of the Report of Climate Assembly UK - Committees
Climate Assembly UK's report showed how a representative sample of the population believe the UK should meet its net zero emissions commitment with detailed ...
[53]
Climate Assembly UK: Where are we now? - Shorthandstories.com
Jul 8, 2021 · We explore how the Government has responded to the UK's first citizens' assembly on climate change.
[54]
Citizens' Assemblies - an international comparison
Feb 1, 2022 · The briefing also explores examples of citizens' assemblies, including climate assemblies ... official-report/what-was-said-in-parliament/meeting- ...
[55]
Citizens' Assemblies and the International Response on Climate ...
May 4, 2022 · One prominent example is the Conference on the Future of Europe ('Conference'), organized by the European Parliament, the European Commission, ...Missing: "official | Show results with:"official
[56]
[PDF] CITIZENS' CLIMATE ASSEMBLIES - -ORCA - Cardiff University
recommendations being emphasised over others in the CAUK's official report. By contrast, the CCC aimed to generate and finalize policy proposals through ...<|separator|>
[57]
How a Canadian Innovation Sparked Global Democratic Change
Sep 10, 2024 · When 160 randomly-selected B.C. residents gathered 20 years ago for the BC Citizens' Assembly, they were not only considering significant ...
[58]
British Columbia Citizens' Assembly on Electoral Reform - Participedia
An independent, non-partisan assembly of 160 randomly selected BC residents, mandated to examine the current provincial election system and suggested ...
[59]
5 When Citizens Choose to Reform SMP: the British Columbia ...
During the subsequent legislative debate on the proposal to establish a Citizens' Assembly on Electoral Reform, neither the Premier nor the leader of the ...<|separator|>
[60]
Ontario Citizens' Assembly on Electoral Reform - Participedia
Ontario's Citizens' Assembly was charged with examining the current electoral system, learning about alternative models and determining which is best suited ...
[61]
https://www.revparl.ca/english/issue.asp?param=182&art=1251
[62]
Ontario's Referendum on Proportional Representation
There was no history of mobilization by high-profile political actors in support of a more proportional electoral system, and Ontario had not experienced a ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[63]
View of Why Electoral Reform Failed in Ontario
Why Electoral Reform Failed in Ontario?W I L L I A M K U C H A P S K In November 18, 2004Dalton McGuinty, Premier of Ontario fulfilled a ...
[64]
Comparing Citizens' Assemblies across the United States
Jun 27, 2024 · Hollie Russon Gilman and Sarah Jacob examine the cases of citizens' assemblies across the United States.Missing: peer- | Show results with:peer-<|control11|><|separator|>
[65]
Citizen assemblies: An idea whose time has come (again)
Oct 10, 2023 · To take another example, the nonprofit Healthy Democracy has pioneered the use of citizens' assemblies to help voters better understand ballot ...<|separator|>
[66]
Can Citizens' Assemblies Help Restore Trust in Government?
Nov 20, 2023 · A growing experiment in what are known as citizens' assemblies, deliberative bodies in which randomly selected people gather to assist in policymaking ...
[67]
Citizen Assemblies | LATINNO
The Citizen Assemblies of Mexico City are an instrument for citizen participation through which the inhabitants meet to discuss matters related to their ...Missing: North excluding Canada
[68]
Launch of the Western Sydney Citizens' Assembly - WentWest
Last Wednesday 17 July 2024, we are proud to have officially launched Western Sydney Citizens' Assembly as a permanent model in our region.<|control11|><|separator|>
[69]
What is a citizens' assembly and why is Wellington City Council ...
Jul 17, 2023 · Citizens' Assemblies are a form of deliberative democracy. They focus on collaborative decision-making by bringing a diverse and representative group together.
[70]
Climate Assembly Sapporo 2020: Japan's first citizens' assembly on ...
The initial objective was to convene the first citizens' assembly on climate change in Japan. By doing so, we aimed to apply the citizens' assembly model for ...
[71]
Citizens' assemblies can help Japan to realise effective climate action
Apr 24, 2025 · Citizens' Climate Assemblies in Japan can help improve social decision-making and promote an inclusive net-zero transition.
[72]
Citizen Assemblies - LATINNO
The citizen assemblies are a deliberative forum that emerged in the context of the so-called "social explosion" in Chile.
[73]
Kenya Citizens' Assembly on Corruption and Economic Governance
Jason highlights the urgent issues of corruption and economic governance highlighted during the Citizens' Assembly in Kenya, organised by the Okoa Uchumi ...
[74]
An interview with Kira Alberts on planning the first climate assembly ...
Jul 10, 2025 · The climate assembly organized by CREDO's Citizens' Assembly Working Group is planned to take place in 2026 in Cape Town, South Africa. Follow ...
[75]
Global Citizens' Assembly Network: GloCAN
Global citizens' assemblies bring together everyday people from around the world to learn, deliberate, and make judgments or recommendations on a topical ...Missing: international | Show results with:international
[76]
A global and permanent citizens' assembly on transition issues ...
Mar 26, 2024 · The aim is to announce, next September, the creation of an international citizens' assembly, whose work would begin in January 2025, before ...
[77]
Global Citizens Assemblies Global Citizens Assembly
The Global Citizens' Assembly brings people together to build trust, deliberate on shared challenges, and find common ground.Missing: international | Show results with:international
[78]
(PDF) When do deliberative citizens change their opinions ...
Aug 5, 2025 · We find some evidence that the 'deliberative' citizen, or at least the citizen most likely to shift opinion following deliberation, is under 65, with median ...
[79]
Can Citizens' Assemblies Reduce Polarization? Evidence From A ...
Oct 11, 2025 · Results show that affective polarization was significantly lower among participants compared to controls at all time points, with no evidence of ...
[80]
Citizens' assemblies: Pioneered in B.C. 20 years ago, they're a ...
Sep 15, 2024 · A citizens' assembly in progress. The B.C. Citizens' Assembly on Electoral Reform holds discussions at the Asia Pacific Hall at Simon Fraser ...
[81]
Deliberative mini-publics as learning schools for democracy ...
This study assesses the impact of a mini-public in Poland, focusing on the Citizens' Assembly on Energy Poverty, the country's first national-level ...Missing: origins | Show results with:origins
[82]
https://www.elections.bc.ca/docs/rpt/2018-CEO-2018-Referendum-Report.pdf
[83]
The myth of the citizens' assembly - Politico.eu
Jun 18, 2019 · Similarly, the electoral reform recommendations of a 2006 Dutch citizens' assembly were first ignored, and then rejected by the government. A ...
[84]
[PDF] Lessons from the French Citizens' Convention for Climate
May 20, 2022 · When surveyed in. Session 1, 72 citizens out of 136 respondents (hence at least 45% of the 159 participants) supported an increase in the carbon ...
[85]
Irish referendum fiasco puts future of lauded citizens' assemblies in ...
Mar 20, 2024 · ... citizens' assembly. Ninety-nine randomly selected people, who are ... Dozens of recommendations from other assemblies have been ignored or ...
[86]
https://www.aceproject.org/ero-en/topics/electoral-systems/dmaclachlan-3_0412181253-524.pdf/view
[87]
How much does a citizens' assembly cost? - Involve
Citizen assemblies require an investment of £150,000 - £750,000 depending on the size of the group, the amount of deliberation time, the balance of face-to- ...Missing: inefficiencies | Show results with:inefficiencies
[88]
(PDF) Citizens' Assemblies and Accountability - ResearchGate
May 24, 2023 · It explores the notion of deliberative or discursive accountability, which can apply to CAs, and different forms of non-electoral sanctions that ...
[89]
Accountability Relations in Minipublics and Organizers
Apr 4, 2022 · This paper aims to understand accountability relations in minipublics. It shows that accountability might be weak for their participants, but not for their ...Missing: evidence | Show results with:evidence
[90]
New report examines risks to the governance of deliberative ...
Mar 27, 2025 · It highlights challenges like economic pressures, restrictive remits, poor governance, and ambiguous impact while offering strategies to ...
[91]
Dealing with the challenges of legitimacy, values, and politics in ...
Aug 31, 2023 · As the “legitimacy” of knowledge and the authority of advisors have been challenged, the notions of fact-based or evidence-based policymaking ...
[92]
Citizens' assemblies: are they the future of democracy? - The Guardian
Feb 1, 2023 · Citizens' assemblies date back to ancient Athens, where councils were chosen via random selection in a practice known as sortition. Citizens ...
[93]
How can we accept 'our' decisions?: an experimental study on ...
Oct 14, 2024 · ... lack of expertise to pertinently evaluate political deeds. Even when ... citizens' assembly on climate change? Involve. 2 March 2020 ...
[94]
[PDF] The British Columbia Citizens' Assembly
May 13, 2008 · The collected essays in Designing Deliberative Democracy provide the definitive analysis of the British. Columbia Citizens' Assembly ...Missing: opinion | Show results with:opinion
[95]
Deliberation and polarization: a multi-disciplinary review - Frontiers
In recent years, deliberative democracy has drawn attention as a potential way of fighting polarization. Allowing citizens to exchange arguments and ...Research design, data, and... · The importance of deliberative... · Discussion
[96]
Democracy, Agony, and Rupture: A Critique of Climate Citizens ...
Mar 7, 2023 · The demos means the majority and not the assembly, the assembly and not the community, the poor in the name of the city, clapping their ...
[97]
Fit to govern? Comparing citizen and policymaker perceptions of ...
Aug 10, 2025 · Simultaneously, technocrats have called for an even narrower role for ordinary citizens, as their lack of expertise may jeopardize the ...
[98]
https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/say-no-to-labours-citizens-assembly/
[99]
A Citizens' Assembly could undermine parliament - reaction
Jun 21, 2019 · In looking for a new answer to an intractable problem politicians are in danger of undermining the Parliamentary Sovereignty which they are ...
[100]
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2024/02/19/labour-backtracks-sue-gray-citizen-assembly-whitehall-keir/
[101]
Taking net zero policies out of the hands of elected officials is a ...
Jan 21, 2025 · ... bypass parliament and our elected representatives. This bill ... By appointing a citizens' assembly, no doubt stuffed with like-minded ...
[102]
Answering tricky questions: Labour and Citizens' Assemblies
Mar 13, 2024 · Some critics offer a principled rejection, arguing that Citizens' Assemblies abnegate the responsibility of Parliament. As Akehurst said, “We ...
[103]
Quote by Aristotle: “It is accepted as democratic when public office...”
It is accepted as democratic when public offices are allocated by lot; and as oligarchic when they are filled by election. -- Aristotle, Politics, Book IV.
[104]
None
### Abstract
[105]
Citizens' Assembly on Electoral Reform - IMPROVING ...
The Citizens' Assembly on Electoral Reform is an independent, non-partisan assembly established by the Government of British Columbia to examine BC's ...
[106]
Citizens Initiative Reviews (CIR) - Healthy Democracy
Citizens' Initiative Reviews are a randomly selected representative group of voters who thoroughly and fairly evaluate ballot measures and write a Citizen's ...Missing: integration | Show results with:integration
[107]
Vicarious Deliberation: How the Oregon Citizens' Initiative Review ...
The state of Oregon established the Citizens' Initiative Review (CIR) to improve the quality of public deliberation during direct elections.Missing: integration | Show results with:integration
[108]
Oregon Citizens' Initiative Review - Participedia
The Oregon Citizens' Initiative Review (CIR) is a randomly-selected Citizens' Jury whose participants deliberate about a ballot initiative.Missing: integration | Show results with:integration
[109]
Introduction to the Use of Random Selection in Politics | Lottocracy
Sep 19, 2024 · The chapter discusses concerns about systems that retain a substantial role for elections and argues that “hybrid” systems might actually ...
[110]
Why Hybrid Bicameralism Is Not Right for Sortition - Sage Journals
Aug 13, 2018 · It is argued that an all-purpose legislative chamber modeled on existing elected chambers is a mismatch for sortition and that purported ...
[111]
Citizens' assemblies can work together with electoral institutions to ...
Mar 14, 2025 · To date, empirical research on citizens' views of minipublics has been sparse, scattered and limited to specific country contexts. Some ...
[112]
https://oidp.net/en/practice.php?id=1237