Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

NED

The National Endowment for Democracy (NED) is a private, nonprofit grantmaking foundation established by an Act of Congress in 1983 to advance democratic institutions worldwide through funding for non-governmental organizations and initiatives.^[1]^[2] Funded almost entirely by annual appropriations from the U.S. Congress, NED operates independently with a bipartisan board and provides more than 2,000 grants each year to support efforts in electoral processes, civil society development, human rights advocacy, and government accountability in over 100 countries.^[2]^[3]^[4] Key activities include backing projects that foster free and fair elections, independent media, and citizen engagement, with a focus on regions facing authoritarian challenges or democratic backsliding.^[4]^[5] Since its inception amid Cold War efforts to counter communist expansion, NED has positioned itself as a nongovernmental channel for promoting political pluralism and rule of law, often through partnerships with local civil society groups rather than direct government-to-government aid.^[1]^[6] Proponents credit it with contributing to democratic transitions in Eastern Europe and elsewhere by incubating innovations in political participation and transparency.^[7] The organization has encountered significant controversies, particularly over accusations of functioning as a proxy for U.S. foreign policy intervention by financing opposition movements and activities that align with American strategic interests, sometimes leading to perceptions of undue influence in sovereign elections or internal politics.^[8]^[9] Critics from both ideological spectrums have highlighted its origins in intelligence community proposals and its role in events labeled as "color revolutions," arguing that such grants can exacerbate instability or prioritize geopolitical aims over genuine grassroots democracy.^[9]^[8] Domestically, NED has been faulted for partisan imbalances, including resistance to conservative or populist figures, as evidenced by legal disputes over withheld funding and calls for reform or defunding under skeptical U.S. administrations.^[10]^[8]^[11] These debates underscore ongoing scrutiny of its accountability, transparency in grant allocation, and alignment with the statutory mandate for nonpartisan democracy promotion.^[8]^[12]

History

Founding and early years (1980s)

The National Endowment for Democracy (NED) was authorized by an act of Congress on November 22, 1983, as Title V of the Department of State Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1984 (Public Law 98-164).^[13] This legislation, part of H.R. 2915, created NED as a private, nonprofit grantmaking organization tasked with strengthening democratic institutions worldwide through support for nongovernmental efforts, including free elections, labor rights, and civic education.^[14] The initiative emerged amid Cold War concerns over Soviet influence, aiming to institutionalize U.S. promotion of democracy via transparent, bipartisan mechanisms rather than solely executive-branch operations.^[1] NED was incorporated as a 501(c)(3) entity on November 18, 1983, governed by an independent board of directors.^[1] Historian Allen Weinstein, who contributed to drafting the enabling legislation, served as its initial acting president. In 1991, Weinstein reflected that "a lot of what we do today was done covertly 25 years ago by the CIA," underscoring NED's function as a public successor to prior intelligence-led democracy promotion activities that had faced scrutiny following congressional investigations in the 1970s.^[15] In fiscal year 1984, following the appointment of Carl Gershman as permanent president in April, NED disbursed its first grants totaling approximately $18 million in congressional funds.^[16] These allocations prioritized support for independent trade unions, human rights monitoring organizations, and democratic political groups, particularly in Latin America and Eastern Europe, to foster civil society resilience against authoritarianism.^[17] Early programming emphasized practical assistance such as leadership training and media development, establishing a model of indirect U.S. engagement through domestic partners like labor federations.^[6]

Expansion during the Cold War (1980s–1991)

The National Endowment for Democracy's activities intensified in the late 1980s amid heightened U.S.-Soviet rivalry, with grants targeting communist bloc dissidents and apartheid-era opposition to foster nonviolent democratic transitions. By fiscal year 1987–1989, annual congressional funding stabilized at around $15 million, rising to $25–30 million annually from 1991 onward, which supported expanded programming in over 75 countries by 1989, including direct aid to civil society groups resisting authoritarianism.^[18] In Eastern Europe, NED channeled resources to underground networks, such as grants facilitating the operations of the Charter 77 Foundation in Czechoslovakia, which documented human rights abuses and sustained intellectual resistance against the Husák regime.^[19] Similar support extended to Polish Solidarity affiliates and Hungarian reform advocates, helping maintain dissident cohesion through training, publications, and communication tools amid regime crackdowns.^[20] These targeted interventions, totaling millions in core grantee disbursements, amplified internal pressures that culminated in the 1989 velvet revolutions, where empowered civic actors negotiated power transfers without widespread violence.^[21] In South Africa, NED funded civic education and labor organizing efforts opposing apartheid structures, complementing broader U.S. sanctions by building parallel democratic institutions among black townships and unions. Bipartisan backing grew under President George H.W. Bush's administration, which in 1989 launched the Support for East European Democracy (SEED) initiative to coordinate aid, including NED grants, for regime change in Warsaw Pact states.^[22] This period also saw the institutionalization of NED's four core grantees—established post-1983 as affiliated entities: the National Democratic Institute for International Affairs (NDI), International Republican Institute (IRI), Center for International Private Enterprise (CIPE), and American Center for International Labor Solidarity (predecessor to the Solidarity Center)—which handled specialized programming in elections, governance, business advocacy, and worker rights, respectively, streamlining anti-communist outreach.^[23]^[24] By 1991, these mechanisms had demonstrably linked U.S. funding to verifiable gains, such as the proliferation of independent media and parties in post-revolutionary polities.

Post-Cold War adaptation (1990s–2000s)

In the aftermath of the Soviet Union's dissolution in 1991, the National Endowment for Democracy shifted its focus from countering communism to fostering democratic institutions in post-communist transitions, while addressing emerging challenges in unstable regions. This adaptation involved expanding grant-making to civil society organizations in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet periphery, emphasizing electoral monitoring, independent media, and youth activism to consolidate reforms amid economic turmoil and authoritarian backsliding.^[25] NED's engagement intensified in the Balkans during the 1990s, supporting democratic rebuilding after the Yugoslav conflicts. In Serbia, NED channeled funds through core grantees like the International Republican Institute to bolster opposition networks, including the Otpor! student movement formed in 1998. In 2000, IRI received $74,735 from NED to help Otpor establish a central office in Belgrade and coordinate nonviolent protests against Slobodan Milošević's regime following rigged elections, contributing to the mass demonstrations that led to his resignation on October 5. Otpor's tactics, such as satirical campaigns and grassroots mobilization, drew on models refined in earlier NED-supported initiatives, though critics, including Serbian authorities, alleged foreign orchestration despite the movement's domestic origins.^[26]^[27] The early 2000s saw NED grants underpin similar civic efforts during the so-called color revolutions, providing training in nonviolent resistance and election oversight. In Georgia, following the 2003 parliamentary vote disputes, NED-funded groups like the Liberty Institute and Kmara—explicitly inspired by Otpor—mobilized protests that ousted President Eduard Shevardnadze in the Rose Revolution on November 23. Analogous support extended to Ukraine's Pora movement amid the 2004 Orange Revolution, where contested results sparked widespread demonstrations resolved by a Supreme Court-mandated rerun, and to Kyrgyzstan's KelKel youth network during the 2005 Tulip Revolution, which toppled Askar Akayev after parliamentary election irregularities on March 13. These programs totaled millions in annual grants, prioritizing transparency in voting processes over direct regime change, though Russian officials and some analysts attributed the uprisings partly to U.S. financing, viewing NED's role through a lens of geopolitical rivalry rather than organic discontent.^[25] As global threats evolved, including Islamic extremism exemplified by al-Qaeda's 1998 U.S. embassy bombings and rising instability in failed states like Afghanistan post-Soviet withdrawal, NED pivoted resources toward countering radical ideologies via civil society empowerment in the Middle East, North Africa, and sub-Saharan Africa. By the late 1990s and 2000s, grants increasingly targeted regions prone to authoritarianism and extremism, such as Sudan and Yemen, to build resilient institutions against non-state actors exploiting governance vacuums— a strategy rooted in the view that democratic deficits enable radical recruitment, though empirical outcomes varied amid local resistance and post-9/11 scrutiny. Concurrently, NED's congressional appropriations grew from about $30–35 million annually in the mid-1990s to roughly $80–100 million by the mid-2000s, fueling program expansion but igniting congressional debates on the costs and unintended consequences of "exporting democracy," with skeptics citing sovereignty concerns and mixed success rates in sustaining reforms.^[18]^[28]

21st-century operations (2010s–present)

In the 2010s, the National Endowment for Democracy adapted its grant-making to address the resurgence of authoritarian influences in a multipolar geopolitical landscape, prioritizing support for civil society organizations confronting hybrid threats from regimes like Russia and China. This included funding programs to bolster democratic resilience against disinformation, election interference, and transnational repression, with a strategic focus on six key areas such as defending human rights and countering authoritarian narratives.^[29] By emphasizing non-governmental actors, NED aimed to foster independent institutions capable of sustaining democratic progress amid declining U.S. bilateral engagement in some regions.^[30] A notable example involved grants to pro-democracy groups in Hong Kong amid escalating tensions from 2014 to 2019, including support for civic education and advocacy during the Umbrella Movement and subsequent electoral reform debates, which Chinese authorities have described as subversive funding exceeding $2 million annually in related programs by the late 2010s.^[31] Similarly, in Belarus, NED provided assistance to opposition networks ahead of and following the 2020 presidential election, enabling monitoring of electoral irregularities and rapid response to crackdowns, though such efforts drew accusations of foreign meddling from Minsk. These initiatives underscored NED's role in amplifying local voices against centralized control, distinct from direct government aid.^[32] Reflecting on the Arab Spring's mixed outcomes, NED increased allocations for media freedom and anti-corruption efforts, recognizing that popular uprisings often faltered without robust institutional safeguards against elite capture and censorship. Grants supported independent journalism training and transparency mechanisms in transitional contexts, such as post-2011 Tunisia, where programs addressed judicial reforms and public accountability to prevent democratic backsliding.^[33] Pre-2020 adaptations also targeted digital authoritarianism, with funding for tools enabling secure online organizing and fact-checking to counter state-sponsored narratives, as authoritarian regimes exported surveillance technologies and propaganda models.^[34] By the late 2010s, NED's operational scale had expanded significantly, awarding a record 1,684 grants across 97 countries in 2019 alone, with congressional appropriations supporting disbursements exceeding $300 million annually to sustain these multifaceted responses.^[35]^[36] This maturity positioned NED as a flexible instrument for democracy assistance, prioritizing empirical outcomes like strengthened civil society networks over ideological confrontation.

Organizational Structure and Leadership

Governance and bipartisan mandate

The National Endowment for Democracy (NED) operates under a statutory mandate for nonpartisan governance, established by the National Endowment for Democracy Act of 1983, which designates it as an independent, nonprofit corporation tasked with advancing democratic institutions worldwide through private efforts.^[1] This framework requires a bipartisan Board of Directors comprising 13 to 25 members, appointed to reflect a balance between Republican and Democratic perspectives, as well as broader diversity in American society including factors of race, religion, and national origin.^[37] Appointments are structured to involve input from congressional leaders of both parties, ensuring the board's composition aligns with the legislative intent for equitable representation and impartial support of democratic goals, free from direct governmental control.^[12] In practice, adherence to this bipartisan mandate has faced scrutiny for potential deviations, particularly in grant distribution and programmatic priorities. A 2024 analysis by the Heritage Foundation documented patterns of underrepresentation of conservative and Republican-aligned initiatives in NED funding, events, and forums, arguing that such imbalances contravene the legal requirement for political neutrality despite the organization's claims of balanced oversight.^[8] These empirical observations, drawn from reviews of grant listings and participant compositions, suggest that while the board structure nominally enforces bipartisanship, operational decisions may tilt toward prevailing institutional preferences, prompting calls for enhanced verification of grant criteria to prevent ideological skew.^[8] Congressional oversight mechanisms reinforce the mandate through mandatory annual reporting to relevant committees, detailing strategic priorities and financial allocations, alongside periodic audits by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) to evaluate grant management efficacy and compliance.^[12] Historical GAO examinations, such as the 1986 review of NED's initial grant processes, have informed congressional assessments of fiscal accountability, though subsequent evaluations continue to monitor for alignment with nonpartisan principles amid evolving geopolitical demands.^[38]

Core grantee institutes

The National Endowment for Democracy allocates a substantial portion of its grant funding—approximately 60% of its annual budget—to its four core institutes through non-competitive sub-grants, enabling them to implement democracy-assistance programs aligned with NED's objectives.^[39] These institutes, founded in the 1980s as affiliates, embody a bipartisan framework by drawing on expertise from U.S. political parties, labor unions, and business chambers, though their leadership and priorities reflect distinct ideological orientations: center-left for the National Democratic Institute (NDI) and Solidarity Center, center-right for the International Republican Institute (IRI), and pro-market for the Center for International Private Enterprise (CIPE).^[40] In fiscal year 2022, NED distributed $294 million in total grants across 1,865 projects, with the core institutes receiving the largest shares to support their specialized initiatives.^[41] The National Democratic Institute (NDI), closely affiliated with the Democratic Party and founded by figures like former Vice President Walter Mondale, concentrates on electoral integrity, voter education, and expanding participation among marginalized groups such as women and youth.^[42] NDI conducts training in campaign management, legislative strengthening, and civil society mobilization, operating in over 50 countries to foster inclusive democratic processes. Its approach prioritizes nonpartisan civic engagement while addressing barriers to women's political involvement, including through targeted programs on gender quotas and leadership development. The International Republican Institute (IRI), linked to the Republican Party and established with input from figures like Senator John McCain, emphasizes political party development, governance accountability, and adherence to the rule of law.^[43] IRI provides capacity-building for emerging parties, including strategic planning, internal democracy, and anti-corruption measures, to promote competitive multiparty systems.^[44] Its work extends to judicial reform and civic advocacy, helping local actors challenge authoritarian practices and build transparent institutions.^[43] The Center for International Private Enterprise (CIPE), affiliated with the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, advances economic freedom by promoting market-oriented reforms, private sector advocacy, and anti-corruption frameworks essential for sustainable democracy.^[45] CIPE supports business associations in policy advocacy, entrepreneurship training, and regulatory improvements, viewing economic liberalization as intertwined with political pluralism.^[46] Programs target inclusive growth, such as enabling small enterprises in informal economies to formalize and influence pro-market policies.^[45] The Solidarity Center, tied to the AFL-CIO labor federation, focuses on labor rights by building independent unions, improving workplace standards, and empowering workers against exploitation.^[47] It trains union leaders in collective bargaining, occupational safety, and freedom of association, often in high-risk environments where labor organizing intersects with democratic transitions. The Center's efforts underscore workers' roles in civil society, including combating forced labor and advocating for fair wages as bulwarks against authoritarian control.^[47]

Key leadership figures

Carl Gershman served as the founding president of the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) from 1984 to 2021, a tenure spanning 37 years during which he expanded the organization's operations from initial Cold War-era grants to a global network supporting over 1,900 projects annually in more than 100 countries by the early 2020s.^[1]^[48] Under Gershman's leadership, NED shifted from ad hoc support for anti-communist movements—such as funding for Poland's Solidarity in the 1980s, totaling $2.6 million by 1989—to institutionalized programs fostering civil society, independent media, and electoral reforms worldwide, including in post-Soviet states and Latin America.^[49]^[50] Allen Weinstein, who acted as NED's early president following the directing of its foundational research study, provided a notable perspective on the organization's mission in a 1991 Washington Post interview, stating, "A lot of what we do today was done covertly 25 years ago by the CIA," underscoring NED's overt approach to activities previously conducted through intelligence channels.^[51]^[52] This remark, from a historian instrumental in NED's conception via a 1982-1984 congressional study that recommended its creation with an initial $18 million appropriation, reflected the causal continuity between U.S. covert operations and NED's public grant-making model.^[16] Damon Wilson succeeded Gershman as president and CEO in July 2021, leading NED through intensified great-power competition, including a surge in grants to Ukraine—exceeding $20 million annually post-2022 Russian invasion—to bolster civil society resilience and counter disinformation, alongside heightened focus on countering Chinese influence in Asia and the Indo-Pacific.^[53]^[54] Wilson's prior roles, including as special assistant to President George W. Bush and executive vice president at the Atlantic Council, informed NED's strategic pivot toward integrating democracy assistance with U.S. national security priorities amid authoritarian resurgence.^[55]

Funding Mechanisms

Congressional appropriations

The National Endowment for Democracy (NED) receives the majority of its funding through annual congressional appropriations, primarily channeled via the U.S. Department of State budget under the National Endowment for Democracy Act of 1983, which established a framework for nongovernmental operations subject to congressional oversight and audits.^[1]^[51] Appropriations began with $18 million for fiscal year 1984, reflecting initial support for democracy promotion amid Cold War dynamics.^[56] Funding remained in the $15–18 million range annually through 1990, then increased to $25–30 million from 1991 to 1993 as global democratic transitions accelerated.^[32] By fiscal year 2023, appropriations peaked at $315 million, supporting expanded grant-making worldwide.^[57]^[58] Congressional authorizations, including those in the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), routinely incorporate NED funding as part of broader democracy assistance programs, with specific earmarks directing resources to priority regions such as Cuba under acts like the Cuban Liberty and Solidarity (LIBERTAD) Act of 1996.^[59]^[60] In fiscal years 2024 and 2025, appropriations faced disruptions when the U.S. government withheld $167 million in already obligated funds starting January 28, 2025, prompting NED to file a lawsuit on March 5, 2025, alleging unlawful denial of congressionally appropriated resources.^[61]^[62] Partial reinstatement occurred in March 2025, enabling limited program resumption, though full access remained contested until a federal court issued a preliminary injunction on August 11, 2025, prohibiting further withholding of fiscal year 2025 funds.^[63]^[64]

Budget allocation and oversight

The National Endowment for Democracy (NED) allocates its budget through a combination of pass-through funding to its four core grantee institutes—the International Republican Institute (IRI), National Democratic Institute (NDI), Center for International Private Enterprise (CIPE), and American Center for International Labor Solidarity (ACILS)—which receive the bulk of resources to execute democracy-promotion programs, supplemented by direct grants to independent non-governmental organizations. The NED Board of Directors establishes annual priorities during the budgeting process, directing resources toward thematic areas such as bolstering democratic governance, civil society organizations, independent media, and rule-of-law initiatives, with allocations adjusted based on global strategic assessments rather than fixed percentages.^[37]^[5] Oversight mechanisms include internal governance by the bipartisan Board of Directors, which enforces ethical standards and operational accountability, alongside external audits by the U.S. Department of State's Office of Inspector General (OIG). State Department OIG audits, such as the 2018 review of NED and its core grantees, have affirmed compliance with the NED Act, federal regulations, and grant terms in financial transactions and operations, though earlier reports like the 2015 audit recommended enhanced monitoring of sub-grants to NED affiliates.^[65]^[66] Congressional oversight involves appropriations reviews and targeted inquiries; for example, in October 2024, the House Committee on Small Business demanded documents from NED concerning its past associations with the Global Disinformation Index amid concerns over funding priorities.^[67] Financial transparency is mandated by Congress, with NED maintaining a public listing of active grants updated semiannually to detail recipients, project descriptions, and funding amounts, a practice formalized in the 2010s to enable public scrutiny. Funding disruptions in early 2025 temporarily halted some disclosures, but listings for fiscal year 2024 grants—totaling over 1,800 projects—were resumed and published in April 2025, reflecting ongoing efforts to balance operational needs with accountability requirements.^[68]^[69]

Financial transparency and audits

The National Endowment for Democracy publishes annual financial statements audited by independent certified public accountants, which include detailed breakdowns of revenues, primarily from congressional appropriations, and expenditures on grants and operations. These statements, along with annual reports, list grant awards by recipient, amount, and purpose, enabling public scrutiny of fund allocation; for instance, the fiscal year 2023 statements reported total assets of approximately $200 million and grant expenditures exceeding $250 million.^[70]^[71] Critics, including congressional oversight bodies, have noted that while grant details are transparent, annual reports emphasize inputs such as funding volumes over rigorous outcome metrics, limiting verifiable assessments of program efficacy; a 1991 GAO review specifically recommended improvements in evaluating grant effectiveness beyond descriptive narratives.^[72] NED undergoes mandatory audits by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) and the Department of State Office of Inspector General (OIG), in addition to annual independent financial audits, which have consistently yielded unqualified opinions since at least 2014, affirming compliance with federal grant requirements and absence of material financial misstatements.^[12]^[73] A 2018 OIG audit of NED and its core grantees confirmed general adherence to the NED Act and regulations, though it identified minor procedural gaps in documentation for certain sub-grants.^[65] In operating within high-corruption environments, audits have highlighted elevated risks of fund diversion and inadequate sub-recipient monitoring, with OIG reports from 2015 recommending that the State Department enforce annual transaction audits to mitigate such vulnerabilities; NED has since implemented enhanced internal controls, including risk-based grant reviews.^[66]^[74] Administrative overhead, covering staff and operational costs, typically ranges from 10 to 15 percent of total appropriations, as reflected in audited statements where grant-making constitutes the bulk of disbursements.^[70] In 2024, amid a temporary funding freeze and subsequent reinstatement, external analyses and OIG oversight revealed instances of grants to partners with potential ties to politically sensitive activities, underscoring ongoing challenges in pre-award due diligence despite NED's vetting protocols; these findings prompted internal reviews but did not result in audit qualifications.^[75]^[8]

Programs and Activities

Grant-making processes

The National Endowment for Democracy (NED) conducts a competitive grant-making process focused on nongovernmental organizations advancing democratic goals abroad, with applications submitted electronically or by mail to regional program offices. Proposals must include an organizational profile, narrative detailing project objectives and methodology, and a budget, evaluated for alignment with NED's priorities such as strengthening civil society, independent media, and rule of law. NED staff conduct initial reviews to gauge feasibility, local relevance, and the applicant's track record in nonpartisan democratic work, prioritizing initiatives led by indigenous partners to ensure contextual fit and ownership.^[3]^[76] Final selections occur through decisions by the bipartisan Board of Directors, which convenes three times per year—typically in January, May, and September—to approve funding based on strategic country assessments and empirical indicators of potential impact, such as capacity-building outcomes and sustainability potential. This process emphasizes grants to local civic groups, media outlets, and networks over international intermediaries, fostering direct support for reformers in challenging environments like repressive regimes or transitional societies. Over 2,000 such grants are awarded annually across more than 100 countries, reflecting a targeted approach informed by on-the-ground democratic trends rather than broad programmatic quotas.^[3]^[76] NED explicitly prohibits grants supporting violence, extremism, or any unlawful activities, with grant agreements barring the use or promotion of violent tactics as antithetical to democratic principles. Funding is ineligible for individuals, governmental entities, state-supported institutions, or projects advancing foreign government agendas, ensuring independence from official apparatuses and alignment with nonviolent civic engagement. These restrictions are enforced through rigorous vetting, including monitoring of grantee activities to prevent diversion to prohibited ends.^[7]^[77]^[3] Grants vary in scale to match project needs, typically averaging around $50,000 for one-year terms, though larger awards up to several hundred thousand dollars and multi-year structures spanning fiscal years are possible to build enduring institutional capacity and sustainability. This modular approach allows for sequential funding based on demonstrated progress, with periodic reporting required to verify outcomes like enhanced organizational resilience or policy influence. In fiscal year 2024, NED's grant approvals emphasized such flexible mechanisms to adapt to evolving threats while maintaining fiscal discipline.^[78]^[79]^[76]

Regional initiatives (Asia, Europe, Latin America, Middle East, Africa)

The National Endowment for Democracy (NED) prioritizes grant-making in Asia to bolster civil society and democratic norms amid geopolitical pressures from authoritarian regimes, particularly China, with initiatives targeting human rights advocacy in Xinjiang and support for self-governance in Taiwan.^[80]^[81] In fiscal year 2024, NED approved projects across 16 Asian countries plus regional Indo-Pacific programs emphasizing democratic solidarity against expansionist influences.^[80] These efforts, driven by U.S. strategic interests in countering Beijing's regional dominance, include funding for independent media, labor rights, and anti-corruption training to foster resilience in contested areas.^[82] In Europe, NED's initiatives intensified following Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine, channeling grants to support civil society reforms, media independence, and democratic transitions in Eastern Europe and candidate states like Ukraine and Moldova.^[20] This post-2022 emphasis reflects causal responses to hybrid threats and authoritarian aggression, with funding aiding oversight of EU integration amid wartime challenges.^[20] Programs focus on countering disinformation and strengthening institutions in frontline nations, aligning with broader transatlantic goals of containing Russian influence through non-governmental channels.^[9] Latin American programs target entrenched authoritarianism in countries such as Nicaragua, Cuba, and Venezuela, with NED grants emphasizing governance accountability and opposition capacity-building to resist populist consolidation.^[83] In 2024, Cuba received the region's highest allocation of $6.6 million across 46 projects, the most for any Latin American country, aimed at sustaining dissident networks and information flows under repressive conditions.^[84] These initiatives, spanning 16 countries and regional efforts, are motivated by hemispheric stability concerns, prioritizing anti-authoritarian civil society over accommodation of leftist regimes.^[83]^[85] In the Middle East and North Africa, NED sustains post-Arab Spring engagements by funding civil society voices in transition and post-conflict settings, including democratic dialogue and rights advocacy amid authoritarian backsliding.^[86] Grants support non-state actors in informing reconstruction and countering extremism, with historical ties to 2011 uprisings where NED enabled activist training and networking in Egypt, Libya, and Syria.^[87] Geopolitically, these programs address instability from failed transitions and Iranian/Sunni rivalries, prioritizing grassroots empowerment over top-down state reforms.^[33] African initiatives center on election integrity and civic participation, with grants for monitoring and advocacy in nations like Zimbabwe to combat electoral manipulation and foster transparent processes.^[88] In fiscal year 2024, NED funded projects enhancing free expression, religious freedoms, and independent media across the continent, including support for groups like the Zimbabwe Election Support Network.^[88]^[89] Driven by countering kleptocratic governance and resource-driven authoritarianism, these efforts emphasize local monitoring to build electoral credibility without direct intervention.^[90]

Targeted campaigns (e.g., against authoritarian regimes)

The Reagan-Fascell Democracy Fellows Program, administered by the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), offers five-month fellowships to democracy activists, scholars, and journalists from countries under authoritarian rule, enabling them to develop practical strategies for advancing democratic practices and countering repressive governance.^[91] Launched in the early 2000s and named after President Ronald Reagan and Representative Dante Fascell, the program emphasizes practitioner tracks focused on refining techniques for nonviolent advocacy, institution-building, and resilience against state control, with fellows often originating from closed societies to exchange insights on sustaining civil society amid restrictions.^[92]^[93] NED has pursued thematic initiatives against disinformation tactics employed by authoritarian entities, including post-2016 partnerships to monitor and innovate responses to state-sponsored misinformation campaigns that undermine democratic discourse.^[94] Through entities like the Center for International Media Assistance, NED supports research on legislation curbing free expression under the guise of combating "fake news," highlighting how such laws in authoritarian contexts enable censorship rather than genuine information integrity.^[95] Recent emphases include digital tools for countering propaganda, with explorations of AI applications in media literacy and ethical tech deployment to detect and mitigate coordinated influence operations without infringing on open debate.^[96] In parallel, NED facilitates programs empowering labor organizations and youth networks within repressive environments, providing grants for training in collective bargaining, independent union formation, and youth-led civic engagement to challenge state monopolies on association and expression.^[97] These efforts target building autonomous worker voices and generational leadership capable of organizing against elite capture and suppression, often through skill-building in negotiation tactics and digital mobilization suited to surveillance-heavy settings.^[98] Anti-corruption drives represent another cross-cutting campaign, where NED funds investigative capacities and transparency mechanisms to expose elite malfeasance in systems lacking accountability, fostering public demand for rule-of-law reforms independent of regime narratives.^[99] Digital rights advocacy complements this by backing technologies and protocols for secure information flows, such as encrypted platforms and data verification methods, aimed at preserving uncensored access in the face of algorithmic and infrastructural controls by authoritarian actors.^[100]

Achievements and Impacts

Contributions to democratic transitions

The National Endowment for Democracy (NED) provided grants to dissident networks in Czechoslovakia during the 1980s, supporting independent publications and civic initiatives that fostered opposition to communist rule prior to the Velvet Revolution of November 1989, which ended one-party governance without direct attribution of the uprising's success solely to external funding.^[19] In the post-Soviet era, NED allocated approximately $3 million in grants to Serbian civil society organizations between September 1998 and October 2000, with a significant portion channeled to the youth movement Otpor!, which mobilized mass protests against electoral fraud and contributed to the overthrow of President Slobodan Milošević on October 5, 2000, during the Bulldozer Revolution.^[101] Otpor!'s nonviolent tactics, including public demonstrations and voter education campaigns funded through NED-affiliated entities like the National Democratic Institute and International Republican Institute, helped coalesce opposition forces and pressure security apparatuses to defect, enabling a peaceful transfer of power.^[102]^[26] In Ukraine, NED granted over $240,000 from 2001 to 2004 to programs aimed at mobilizing youth for political participation, directly supporting the Pora movement's efforts in voter outreach and anti-corruption advocacy that amplified protests following the disputed presidential election of November 2004.^[103] These initiatives, alongside broader U.S. assistance, contributed to the Orange Revolution's success in annulling rigged results through sustained encampments in Kyiv's Independence Square, culminating in a court-ordered revote on December 26, 2004, that installed Viktor Yushchenko as president and advanced democratic norms.^[104] Similarly, during the 2013–2014 Euromaidan protests, NED's early-stage grants to civil society groups enhanced monitoring of electoral irregularities and human rights documentation, bolstering the momentum that led to President Viktor Yanukovych's flight on February 22, 2014, and the subsequent parliamentary vote to remove him, marking a shift toward Euro-Atlantic integration. Empirical assessments link NED's targeted support in such cases to measurable upticks in democratic indicators; for instance, Serbia's Freedom House political rights score improved from 5/7 in 2000 to 2/7 by 2001 post-transition, while Ukraine's score rose from 5/7 in 2004 to 3/7 in 2005 following the Orange Revolution, correlating with heightened civic engagement in NED-backed regions though broader geopolitical pressures also factored in causality. These outcomes underscore NED's role in amplifying local agency for regime shifts, with grants totaling millions annually to youth and opposition networks in high-risk autocracies, facilitating transitions without military intervention.^[105]

Support for human rights and civil society

The National Endowment for Democracy (NED) allocates grants to civil society organizations worldwide for human rights advocacy, documentation of abuses, and capacity-building for activists and independent media, emphasizing non-governmental efforts to foster accountability and free expression independent of state control. These initiatives target regions with severe restrictions on assembly and speech, supporting networks that monitor violations, provide legal aid, and amplify dissident voices through journalism and digital platforms.^[106]^[80] In Hong Kong, NED funded civil society groups during the 2019 protests to bolster independent media and logistical support for demonstrators, including grants totaling over $445,000 to organizations like the Solidarity Center and National Democratic Institute for advocacy and training amid escalating government crackdowns on press freedom. These efforts enabled sustained reporting and coordination by pro-democracy networks, countering censorship and surveillance tactics.^[107]^[80] For Cuba, NED approved $6.6 million across 46 projects in 2024, prioritizing independent media and dissident training to circumvent regime-imposed information blockades; these outlets disseminated news bulletins and human rights reports, reaching over 10 million individuals, including half inside Cuba, thereby sustaining underground advocacy networks despite arrests and asset freezes targeting recipients.^[108]^[84] NED has also backed Uyghur-led initiatives for human rights documentation, awarding $8.7 million in grants by 2020 to exile organizations compiling evidence of mass detentions, forced labor, and cultural erasure in Xinjiang, which informed international policy responses like the Uyghur Human Rights Policy Act while building diaspora advocacy capacities. In Africa, grants support Sahel-based civil society to advocate against abuses, including training for defenders pressing for accountability in conflict zones.^[109]^[88]

Empirical outcomes in specific cases (e.g., Eastern Europe, Hong Kong)

In Poland, the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) provided grants to Solidarity-affiliated groups and labor organizations starting in the mid-1980s, channeling support through entities like the AFL-CIO to sustain underground activities amid martial law repression from 1981 to 1983. These efforts correlated with Solidarity's legalization in April 1989 following Round Table negotiations, enabling participation in semi-free parliamentary elections on June 4, 1989, where Solidarity candidates secured 99 of 100 contested Senate seats and 299 of 460 Sejm seats, precipitating the collapse of communist governance by December 1989. Pre-1989, Poland registered as "Not Free" under Freedom House assessments due to one-party rule and suppressed civil liberties; post-transition, it achieved "Free" status by 1990, with civil society organizations proliferating from near-zero independent entities to over 10,000 registered NGOs by the mid-1990s, reflecting heightened associational density verified by post-communist sustainability indices.^[110]^[111]^[112]^[113]^[114]^[115] In Hong Kong, NED allocated approximately $643,000 in 2019 to projects strengthening civil society and human rights defenders, including training for pro-democracy activists amid protests against extradition legislation that escalated into widespread demonstrations involving up to 2 million participants. These grants supported sustained mobilization through 2019, contributing to electoral gains for pro-democracy parties in November local council elections, where they captured 388 of 452 seats. However, the imposition of the National Security Law on June 30, 2020, triggered a comprehensive crackdown, resulting in the dissolution or self-censorship of over 50 major civil society groups by mid-2022, including labor unions and advocacy NGOs; Freedom House downgraded Hong Kong from "Partly Free" (score 60/100 in 2019) to "Not Free" (42/100 by 2025), with civil society participation indices declining from 0.43 in 2022 to 0.409 in 2023 per Varieties of Democracy data.^[31]^[116]^[117]^[118]^[119]

Controversies and Criticisms

Accusations of foreign interference and regime change

Governments of adversarial states, including China, Russia, and Venezuela, have accused the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) of functioning as a U.S. instrument for foreign interference aimed at regime change, alleging that its grants to civil society groups in target countries finance opposition movements and destabilize incumbent governments.^[32] Chinese officials, for instance, have described NED as the U.S. government's "white gloves" for subversion, citing its support for anti-Beijing activities in Hong Kong and separatist elements in Taiwan as evidence of ideological infiltration and electoral manipulation abroad.^[120] ^[32] Similarly, Venezuelan authorities have pointed to NED funding for civic organizations opposing Hugo Chávez and Nicolás Maduro, interpreting such support as direct meddling in sovereign elections.^[121] A prominent example invoked by critics is NED's involvement in Ukraine's color revolutions. During the 2004 Orange Revolution, NED reportedly channeled approximately $65 million to Ukrainian opposition groups, according to analyses from Chinese state sources, which frame this as orchestrated U.S. backing for electoral challenges against pro-Russian leadership.^[32] ^[122] Prior to the 2013–2014 Euromaidan protests, NED funded up to 65 non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in Ukraine, with grants totaling over $22 million between 2014 and subsequent years directed toward media and activist networks promoting anti-Russian narratives, as documented in NED's own expenditure reports cited by detractors.^[123] These funds supported training in civic organizing and media independence, but opponents argue they aligned with U.S. State Department objectives for geopolitical realignment, evidenced by NED's historical ties to congressional appropriations and its focus on regions contested by authoritarian powers.^[124] NED has consistently rejected these charges, asserting that its charter—established by Congress in 1983—mandates non-partisan, transparent support for democratic capacity-building through grants to independent NGOs, explicitly prohibiting direct involvement in partisan activities or coups.^[2] The organization maintains that its annual allocation of over 1,700 grants worldwide, averaging $50,000–$100,000 each, empowers local actors in authoritarian contexts to advocate for human rights and electoral integrity without U.S. government orchestration, as detailed in its public grant databases.^[125] Critics' claims, NED contends, often emanate from regimes seeking to discredit legitimate dissent by conflating foreign assistance with interference, though empirical alignment between NED priorities and U.S. foreign policy goals—such as countering influence from Russia and China—lends partial credence to perceptions of strategic coordination.^[125] No declassified U.S. documents have publicly confirmed covert regime-change directives, but NED's reliance on federal funding underscores its role within broader American democracy promotion efforts.^[2]

Domestic partisan biases and oversight issues

Critics, particularly from conservative perspectives, have argued that the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) maintains a facade of bipartisanship while exhibiting systemic Democratic Party influence in its leadership, staffing, and operations. As of 2024, NED's board of directors consists of 18 Democrats and 12 Republicans, with senior staff positions showing 93% alignment with Democratic-leaning affiliations and 98% of regular staff political donations directed to Democrats between 2019 and 2022. U.S.-based events hosted by NED from January to December 2023 featured 41 Democratic speakers out of 51 total American participants, further underscoring perceived imbalances in ideological representation.^[8] Oversight deficiencies have compounded these concerns, including a lack of mandatory audits evaluating program success or statutory compliance, which has allowed for mission expansion into areas like domestic censorship initiatives. NED ceased publicly posting detailed grant information after 2021 and has not issued a printable annual report since 2017, reducing transparency for congressional funders. A 2015 State Department Inspector General review found that the U.S. Agency for International Development disbursed $963 million to NED without required financial audits, heightening risks of unmonitored fund use. This absence of rigorous, outcome-based evaluations has enabled what detractors describe as mission creep, such as grants totaling $545,750 between 2020 and 2021 to the Global Disinformation Index, an entity accused of targeting conservative U.S. media outlets.^[8]^[66] Reform advocates, including the Heritage Foundation, have proposed enhanced congressional oversight to address alleged employment discrimination against Republicans and conservatives, recommending Government Accountability Office audits for bipartisanship compliance and integration of NED's budget into the State Department or USAID for stricter controls. These suggestions aim to realign NED with its founding bipartisan mandate under the National Endowment for Democracy Act of 1983, preventing partisan capture while curbing unchecked expansion.^[8]

Responses from adversarial governments (e.g., Russia, China, Cuba)

Russia enacted Federal Law No. 121-FZ on July 20, 2012, mandating that non-governmental organizations (NGOs) receiving foreign funding and engaging in "political activity" register as "foreign agents" with the Ministry of Justice, subjecting them to heightened scrutiny and labeling requirements.^[126] This legislation directly targeted recipients of grants from entities like the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), which had supported Russian civil society initiatives on transparency and electoral monitoring, prompting closures or re-registrations of numerous NED grantees such as the Moscow Helsinki Group.^[127] In July 2015, Russia expanded restrictions by designating the NED itself an "undesirable organization" under a new law, effectively banning its operations and funding within the country, citing it as a threat to national security due to alleged interference in domestic politics.^[128]^[129] The People's Republic of China has repeatedly condemned the NED for financing programs perceived as undermining state sovereignty, particularly in Xinjiang, Hong Kong, and Tibet, where grants supported advocacy for human rights and autonomy movements.^[31] Chinese officials linked these activities to NED's annual investments exceeding millions in "anti-China" efforts, including training for activists amid 2019 Hong Kong protests and documentation of Uyghur detention conditions, framing them as covert support for separatism.^[31] In response, China imposed countermeasures in 2020–2021, including adding NED-affiliated individuals and partner organizations to sanctions lists prohibiting entry and asset freezes, while state media and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs accused the NED of orchestrating "color revolutions" analogous to U.S.-backed transitions elsewhere.^[130] These actions coincided with U.S. sanctions on Chinese entities over Xinjiang, escalating reciprocal rhetoric tying NED grants to foreign meddling. Cuba's government has portrayed NED grants as instruments of subversion, especially following the approval of $6.6 million for 46 projects in 2024–2025 targeting independent media, dissident networks, and youth activism amid economic hardships and protests.^[131] Cuban state outlets and officials, including in August 2024 statements, highlighted NED funding to 54 anti-Cuba groups since 2017—such as the Cuban Democratic Directorate receiving over $1 million—as fueling unrest and violating sovereignty, linking it to U.S. policy under laws like the Helms-Burton Act.^[132] In July 2025, amid renewed bilateral tensions, Havana denounced these allocations as deliberate attempts to incite internal destabilization, prompting tightened controls on recipient networks and diplomatic protests asserting that NED activities exacerbate the U.S. embargo's effects rather than promote genuine civil society.^[133]

Recent Developments (2020s)

Funding disruptions and legal challenges (2024–2025)

In January 2025, shortly after President Donald Trump's inauguration on January 20, the Trump administration, via the newly established Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), blocked disbursement from the Treasury of the National Endowment for Democracy's (NED) congressionally appropriated funds, totaling approximately $167 million in already obligated grants and an additional $72 million in appropriations.^[61]^[134] This freeze, initiated around January 22, disrupted NED's core operations, forcing the suspension of regular grantmaking cycles scheduled for May and September 2025 and threatening organizational collapse.^[135]^[136] Administration officials framed the action as part of a broader review to curb perceived wasteful spending on foreign policy tools accused by critics of enabling regime-change activities abroad, though NED contended the funds were statutorily mandated and independent of executive discretion.^[137]^[134] On March 5, 2025, NED filed a federal lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia against executive branch agencies and officials, including Treasury and State Department entities, alleging unlawful withholding in violation of congressional appropriations and the Administrative Procedure Act.^[61]^[10]^[138] The suit sought immediate access to the frozen funds, emphasizing NED's bipartisan mandate since its 1983 founding to support non-governmental democratic initiatives. By March 10, the State Department partially restored funding, enabling NED to stabilize operations and resume limited grantmaking, though full access remained contested.^[63] Legal proceedings culminated on August 11, 2025, when a Trump-appointed federal judge issued a preliminary injunction ruling the withholding illegal, prohibiting the administration from blocking $95 million in specific grant funds and ordering their release to comply with congressional intent.^[139]^[140]^[141] The decision rejected the government's arguments for fiscal-year reprogramming needs, highlighting separation-of-powers concerns over executive impoundment of appropriated monies, and aligned with precedents protecting quasi-independent entities like NED from partisan interference.^[142] This resolution mitigated immediate existential threats to NED but underscored ongoing tensions between executive efficiency drives and statutory funding protections amid debates over the organization's role in global democracy promotion.^[143]

Continued grants amid geopolitical tensions

In its 2024 annual report, the National Endowment for Democracy documented $286 million allocated to 1,905 grants spanning 91 countries, emphasizing sustained support for democratic actors confronting authoritarian repression amid intensifying global rivalries between democratic and autocratic powers.^[71] This funding reflected a strategic persistence in high-risk environments, with NED President Damon Wilson affirming the organization's resolve to back frontline partners advancing freedoms of speech, association, and assembly against systemic threats from regimes in countries including China, Russia, and Cuba.^[71] Targeted grants continued in geopolitically sensitive areas, such as $6.6 million disbursed for 46 projects in Cuba—ranking fifth globally and the highest in Latin America—aimed at bolstering civil society and information access in a repressive communist state.^[84]^[144] In China, funding supported human rights initiatives, including efforts to document religious persecution and hold entities accountable for forced labor practices, conducted through secure channels to evade state controls.^[108] These allocations underscored NED's operational continuity despite adversarial countermeasures, prioritizing empirical documentation and advocacy over direct confrontation.^[83]^[80] To counter escalating restrictions, NED adapted by curtailing on-the-ground operations in severely constrained authoritarian zones and reallocating resources to diaspora networks and exiled advocates, enabling sustained pressure through external documentation and global mobilization as exemplified in support for communities from Venezuela, Syria, and similar contexts.^[71] This pivot preserved grant efficacy by leveraging safer, transnational channels while maintaining focus on causal drivers of democratic erosion, such as censorship and transnational repression.^[71]

Adaptations to emerging threats (e.g., disinformation, AI)

In early 2025, the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) hosted a forum and released associated resources emphasizing the dual-use potential of artificial intelligence (AI) in democratic contexts, contrasting its application for civic innovation against authoritarian exploitation for surveillance and propaganda. The January forum, titled "Leveraging AI for Democracy: Civic Innovation on the Digital Playing Field," built on a October 2024 report co-authored by Beth Kerley, Carl Miller, and Fernanda Campagnucci, which outlined strategies for pro-democracy actors to deploy AI in areas such as real-time election monitoring, automated content verification, and amplifying marginalized voices via generative tools, while addressing risks like AI-driven deepfakes that could undermine trust in institutions.^[145]^[146] The report highlighted empirical examples from civil society pilots, including AI-assisted analysis of online harassment patterns in hybrid regimes, arguing that democratic adaptation requires open-source AI development to counter closed systems favored by entities like China's state apparatus.^[145] To combat disinformation amplified by AI and social media algorithms, NED allocated grants in 2023–2025 for technology literacy programs targeting vulnerable populations in Eastern Europe, sub-Saharan Africa, and Southeast Asia, focusing on training in source verification, algorithmic bias detection, and community-led fact-checking networks. These initiatives, such as support for coalitions building information integrity tools, aimed to foster resilience against state-sponsored narratives, with documented outcomes including reduced susceptibility to foreign influence operations in pilot regions like Taiwan and Georgia.^[147]^[148] However, NED's disinformation efforts drew domestic scrutiny in 2024, particularly over prior grants totaling hundreds of thousands of dollars to the Global Disinformation Index (GDI), an organization criticized by U.S. congressional investigators for ideologically skewed risk ratings that penalized conservative-leaning media while overlooking left-leaning outlets, potentially influencing ad revenue and platform visibility.^[149]^[67] In adaptation, NED severed ties with GDI by mid-2024 following demands for documentation from House committees, shifting emphasis toward transparent, evidence-based partnerships that prioritize empirical metrics over narrative-driven indexing.^[67] This recalibration, detailed in NED's May 2025 fact-sheet, underscores a commitment to non-partisan tools amid accusations of enabling censorship-adjacent activities, with new grants vetted for neutrality to sustain credibility in countering AI-supercharged manipulation like generative propaganda.^[150] Such measures align with broader 2020s trends, where NED's $300 million annual budget increasingly funds digital forensics training to detect synthetic media, as evidenced by June 2024 analyses of AI's role in escalating information warfare.^[151]

Other Uses of NED

Medical terminology

In oncology, NED is the acronym for "no evidence of disease," a clinical status indicating that no detectable cancer remains based on physical examinations, imaging modalities such as CT or PET scans, laboratory tests including tumor markers, and absence of symptoms.^[152]^[153] This determination follows treatment completion, where initial tumor burden has regressed sufficiently to evade current detection thresholds, often signaling effective response to therapies like chemotherapy, radiation, or surgery.^[154] Distinct from a cure—which implies permanent eradication with negligible recurrence risk—NED acknowledges potential persistence of microscopic or dormant cancer cells below imaging resolution, necessitating indefinite monitoring to detect relapse.^[155]^[156] Complete remission and NED are frequently used interchangeably in practice, both denoting maximal treatment efficacy without implying disease elimination, as validated by standardized response criteria like RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors).^[153]^[157] This terminology underscores diagnostic limitations, where sensitivity improvements have refined but not eliminated uncertainty in assessing true negativity.^[154]

Scientific databases

The NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED) serves as a centralized repository for astronomical data on extragalactic objects, including galaxies, quasars, active galactic nuclei, and clusters, compiling multi-wavelength observations from published literature and surveys.^[158] It integrates cross-identifications, accurate positions, redshifts, photometric measurements, and spectral data to enable researchers to query and analyze unified object profiles.^[159] Operational since the early 1990s, NED has evolved from a basic catalog into a data mining tool supporting discovery in extragalactic astrophysics, with ongoing updates incorporating new sources such as those from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey and other telescopes.^[160] ^[161] Maintained by the Infrared Processing and Analysis Center (IPAC) at the California Institute of Technology under NASA funding, NED processes and curates data to ensure reliability, prioritizing peer-reviewed publications and resolving discrepancies through expert review.^[159] As of recent releases, it encompasses millions of objects, with over 2 million sources cross-identified from literature and hundreds of thousands of new entries added periodically, facilitating studies on cosmic evolution, large-scale structure, and black hole demographics.^[162] Researchers utilize NED for tasks like target selection in observations, statistical analyses of quasar populations, and federated searches linking to archives such as SIMBAD or the Astrophysics Data System, enhancing efficiency in handling heterogeneous datasets.^[163] NED's architecture supports advanced queries by object type, proximity, or properties like luminosity, making it indispensable for extragalactic research despite challenges in completeness for faint or distant objects, as evidenced by dedicated subsets like the NED Local Volume Sample extending to 1000 Mpc.^[164] Its role underscores the importance of sustained curation in astronomy, where automated ingestion from surveys is balanced against manual validation to mitigate biases in source selection and measurement errors.^[165]

Geographical and personal names

North East Derbyshire is a parliamentary constituency in the East Midlands region of England, encompassing parts of Derbyshire including towns such as Clay Cross, Eckington, and areas around Chesterfield. Established in 1885, it returns one member to the House of Commons.^[166]^[167] Ned serves as a diminutive or nickname for the masculine given name Edward, with roots in medieval English affectionate phrasing such as "mine Ed," which evolved into "my Ned." Documented since the 14th century, it remains in use in English-speaking cultures, occasionally as an independent given name or variant of Edmund and Edgar.^[168]^[169]

References

[1]
History - NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR DEMOCRACY
In 1983, the National Endowment for Democracy was mandated by an Act of Congress as an independent, nonprofit, nongovernmental grantmaking organization.
[2]
About the National Endowment for Democracy
The National Endowment for Democracy (NED) is an independent, nonprofit foundation dedicated to the growth and strengthening of democratic institutions ...
[3]
English - NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR DEMOCRACY
Each year, the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) makes more than 2,000 grants to support the projects of nongovernmental groups abroad who are working to ...<|separator|>
[4]
How We Work - NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR DEMOCRACY
NED focuses its support on two objectives: strengthening the institutions and procedures of electoral democracy to ensure free and fair elections.
[5]
Thematic Priorities - NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR DEMOCRACY
NED supports multiregional initiatives that enable democrats to incubate new ideas and learn from the best practices in political innovation to deepen citizen ...
[6]
Founding Statement of Principles and Objectives, 1984
The National Endowment for Democracy is a US initiative to strengthen democratic institutions throughout the world through private, non-governmental efforts.
[7]
Investing in Freedom: An Introduction to the National Endowment for ...
Feb 2, 2025 · The National Endowment for Democracy (NED) has been instrumental in supporting freedom and democracy around the world since its founding in 1983.
[8]
The Undemocratic National Endowment for Democracy Needs ...
Aug 6, 2024 · The National Endowment for Democracy (NED) is an institution established and funded by Congress to promote democracy abroad.
[9]
Primer: The National Endowment for Democracy and an NGO ...
Feb 7, 2025 · Created in 1983 at the height of the Cold War, NED was conceived by former CIA Director William Casey and former CIA operative Walter Raymond Jr ...<|separator|>
[10]
National Endowment for Democracy sues Trump administration - NPR
Mar 6, 2025 · The National Endowment for Democracy (NED) is suing the Trump administration for denying it access to nearly $240 million in congressionally approved funding.
[11]
The DOGE team zeroes out the National Endowment for Democracy
Feb 13, 2025 · The NED 's attacks on populists and nationalists abroad undermine that claim, as do its attacks on Donald Trump and the Republican Party, and ...
[12]
Governance and Accountability - National Endowment for Democracy
Dec 23, 2024 · The National Endowment for Democracy (NED) is a nonprofit foundation with the singular mission to advance democracy and freedom around the ...
[13]
H.R.2915 - 98th Congress (1983-1984): A bill to authorize ...
Title V: National Endowment for Democracy - National Endowment for Democracy Act - Requires the Director of the USIA and the Secretary of Labor to make grants ...
[14]
[PDF] PUBLIC LAW 98-164—NOV. 22, 1983 97 STAT. 1017 ... - GovInfo
Nov 22, 1983 · Of the funds authorized to be appropriated for the fiscal year 1984 under paragraph (2) of section 102, $2,000,000 shall be used to modernize ...
[15]
INNOCENCE ABROAD: THE NEW WORLD OF SPYLESS COUPS
Sep 21, 1991 · "A lot of what we do today was done covertly 25 years ago by the CIA," agrees Weinstein. The biggest difference is that when such activities ...Missing: quote | Show results with:quote
[16]
[PDF] annual report 1984 - National Endowment for Democracy
FISCAL YEAR 1984 PROGRAMS. INTRODUCTION. For the purpose of this report, the National Endowment for. Democracy's grants in fiscal year 1984 have been divided ...
[17]
US: overt and covert destabilisation - Le Monde diplomatique - English
Aug 4, 2007 · In 1991 its first president, the historian Allen Weinstein, confessed to The Washington Post: “A lot of what we do today was done covertly 25 ...
[18]
National Endowment for Democracy: Policy and Funding Issues
Aug 16, 1999 · Throughout its 16-year history, NED's budget has ranged from a low of $15 million in FY1987 and FY1989 to a high of $35 million in FY1994.Missing: 1980s | Show results with:1980s
[19]
Czechoslovakia: “If the Culture Survives….”
Oct 13, 2011 · The Center worked closely with other NED grantees, helping democrats in Czechoslovakia, such as the Charter 77 Foundation and the Jan Hus ...
[20]
Europe - NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR DEMOCRACY
Since the late 1980s, NED has helped to empower generations of Ukrainians to build their country's sovereign state and democracy, including through some ...
[21]
Democracy in Central Europe after Thirty Years
Nov 14, 2019 · Thirty years later, NED was delighted to have ... 1989, and was a catalyst to the collapse of communist rule in the whole of Eastern Europe.
[22]
A Policy in Tension: The National Endowment for Democracy ... - jstor
May 2, 2018 · Administration initiatives caused the NED's role in Eastern Europe to grow. Bush initiated the Support for East European Democracy program ...<|separator|>
[23]
Idea to Reality: NED at 30 - National Endowment for Democracy
The National Endowment for Democracy (NED) was launched in the early 1980s, premised on the idea that American assistance on behalf of democracy efforts abroad ...
[24]
[PDF] National Endowment for Democracy - State.gov
The four institutes embedded in the core of NED's work – the American Center for ... Solidarity (ACILS), the Center for International Private Enterprise (CIPE),.
[25]
[PDF] 20th Program/final - National Endowment for Democracy
Nov 6, 2003 · Throughout these years, the political support for the NED in the U.S. Congress, and its stature at home and abroad, con- tinued to grow.Missing: Balkans | Show results with:Balkans
[26]
East: Regime Change On The Cheap - RFE/RL
Apr 19, 2005 · Also in 2000, the International Republican Institute received $74,735 from NED to assist Otpor in establishing a central office in Belgrade and ...
[27]
Otpor and the Struggle for Democracy in Serbia (1998-2000) | ICNC
Otpor used its growing legitimacy as a popular grassroots movement to shame the fractured coalition parties into uniting behind a single opposition candidate to ...
[28]
[PDF] Annual Report - National Endowment for Democracy
NED's Africa Program moved forward on the front lines of democratic political development on the continent throughout 1998 not only through its grants program, ...
[29]
Annual Reports - NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR DEMOCRACY
2017 Annual Report For the second consecutive year, NED has funded programs in six strategic areas that help democrats respond to the threat posed by resurgent ...Missing: late | Show results with:late
[30]
[PDF] National Endowment for Democracy - State.gov
The National Endowment for Democracy (NED) is a non-profit organization created in 1983 to strengthen democratic institutions around the world.
[31]
Fact Sheet on the National Endowment for Democracy_Ministry of ...
May 7, 2022 · NED's spending on interference activities in Venezuela rose year by year. It was 257,800 US dollars in 1999, the largest in Latin American ...Missing: budget | Show results with:budget
[32]
The National Endowment for Democracy:What It Is and What It ...
Aug 9, 2024 · 1. Cultivating pro-US forces in target countries · 2. Misrepresenting the human rights situation in other countries · 3. Manipulating and ...
[33]
The Future of Islam and Democracy After the Arab Spring
Apr 25, 2016 · A democratic government has to govern effectively, and in Tunisia that means providing employment, fighting corruption, and reforming the courts ...Missing: anti- | Show results with:anti-
[34]
Media Reform in Tunisia: A Volatile Process
Oct 5, 2022 · ... anti-corruption policies. While the 2014 constitution would appear to protect speech such as Mansour's, the government's failure to create a ...
[35]
2019 Annual Report - NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR DEMOCRACY
In 2019, the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) awarded a record 1,684 grants in 97 countries. NED complemented this robust program with an exciting array ...
[36]
National Endowment for Democracy, State | Spending Profile
They carried over a balance of $861k from last year, were given $315M in new appropriations, and have authority to use $0 of other budgetary resources.Missing: late | Show results with:late
[37]
part 67—organization of the national endowment for democracy
(a) The National Endowment for Democracy (hereinafter “NED”) was created in 1983 to stregthen democratic values and institutions around the world through ...
[38]
[PDF] The National Endowment for Democracy's Management of Grants ...
Sep 24, 1986 · such an audit is necessary to provide a basis for congressional assessment of NED. We hope that an audit could be begun shortly which would.
[39]
Frequently Asked Questions - National Endowment for Democracy
NED gives grants to these groups for programs that promote pluralism and free and fair elections (IRI and NDI), free markets and economic reforms (CIPE), and ...Missing: distribution | Show results with:distribution
[40]
National Endowment for Democracy (NED), NDI, IRI, CIPE and ...
Dec 21, 2019 · These groups are working to protect and advance democratic values, institutions, and processes, including credible and fair elections, ...Missing: roles | Show results with:roles
[41]
National Endowment for Democracy 2023 Annual Report
In 2022, the National Endowment for Democracy made $294 million in grants for 1865 projects in 101 countries.Missing: allocation percentage
[42]
National Democratic Institute - KeyWiki
Jun 15, 2024 · National Democratic Institute is listed as an associate organization of the Socialist International. Affiliates. NDI is one of four core ...Missing: ideological | Show results with:ideological
[43]
What We Do | International Republican Institute
Today, perhaps more than ever before, Transatlantic solidarity remains crucial to defending the tenets of democratic governance and safeguarding the rule of law ...
[44]
Political Parties | International Republican Institute
IRI programming strengthens party development of competent and responsive political leaders through knowledge and capacity building trainings; support for ...Missing: law | Show results with:law
[45]
We Are CIPE - Center for International Private Enterprise
Our programs provide models for catalyzing economic growth and raising the voice of local business as a constituency. A wide range of donors directly support ...Who We Are · Staff Positions & Internships · The Center for International... · Africa
[46]
FEDN - Center for International Private Enterprise - CIPE
The network provides a mechanism for private sector leaders and advocates of economic freedom across the world to exchange ideas and support, and make the case ...
[47]
The Solidarity Center - Promoting Worker Rights Worldwide
Our programs focus on worker rights and freedoms, union skills, workplace safety, economic security, combating forced labor and supporting workers in a rapidly ...Contact Us · What Solidarity Means and... · Statements & Advisories · Take Action
[48]
Carl Gershman and the Struggle for Democracy
Carl Gershman, the founding president of the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), retired in July 2021 after 37 years at the helm.Missing: tenure | Show results with:tenure
[49]
The world is a freer place thanks to Carl Gershman - The Hill
Jul 7, 2021 · This summer, Carl Gershman, the founding president of the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), will retire from his post after almost ...
[50]
[PDF] From the Chairman - National Endowment for Democracy
NED President Carl Gershman addresses those gathered to celebrate NED's 30 anniversary.Missing: tenure | Show results with:tenure<|separator|>
[51]
[PDF] National Endowment for Democracy Records
Apr 16, 2023 · Initially funded as part of the State Department Authorization. Act (H.R. 2915) in 1983, NED was the product of the Democracy Program, a study ...
[52]
National Endowment for Democracy goes dark
May 1, 2025 · The overt replacement for the CIA's foreign political action funding has transitioned back to covert funding, using 'duty of care' as a rationale.
[53]
National Endowment for Democracy Names Damon Wilson as New ...
Jun 2, 2021 · Wilson succeeds Carl Gershman, who has led the Endowment since its founding in 1983. He will officially join the Endowment later this summer.
[54]
Meet Damon Wilson, NED's New President and CEO
Jul 28, 2021 · Mr. Wilson succeeds founding president Carl Gershman, who led NED since its establishment in 1984. “Following in the wake of an iconic leader, ...
[55]
Damon Wilson - NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR DEMOCRACY
Damon Wilson is President and CEO of the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), an independent, nonprofit, grant-making foundation supporting freedom around ...
[56]
National Endowment for Democracy: Policy and Funding Issues
NED has come under attack from a few Members of Congress for several reasons: its cost; its distribution of noncompetitive grants to four core political, ...<|separator|>
[57]
The National Endowment for Democracy: What It Is and What It Does
According to data from USAspending.gov, NED received an appropriation of $315 million in FY2023. As a report of the Carnegie Endowment for. International Peace ...
[58]
GRANT to NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR DEMOCRACY
View a summary page of this 2023 GRANT to NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR DEMOCRACY from the National Science Foundation.
[59]
[PDF] HMKP-119-AP00-20250723-SD002.pdf - R E P O R T
Jul 18, 2025 · tutes of the NED in implementing programs in Cuba. Cuban Liberty and Solidarity (LIBERTAD) Act of 1996.—The. Committee directs that funds ...
[60]
[PDF] GAO-25-107712 Highlights, CUBA DEMOCRACY ASSISTANCE
The U.S. provides Cuba democracy assistance through USAID, State, and grant funding to NED, which in turn make awards to implementing partners. However, the ...
[61]
National Endowment for Democracy Files Lawsuit Seeking Access ...
Mar 5, 2025 · The lawsuit states that the government has wrongfully denied NED access to $167 million in already obligated funds and refused to release an additional $72 ...Missing: budget disputes
[62]
[PDF] Case 1:25-cv-00648 Document 5-1 Filed 03/06/25 Page 1 of 51
Mar 6, 2025 · drawdown attempts on January 28 and 30, 2025, the Endowment ... Department of State to the National Endowment for Democracy, as authorized by the ...Missing: disputes | Show results with:disputes
[63]
NED Welcomes State Department's Initial Steps Towards Restoring ...
Mar 10, 2025 · “These are important steps toward fully restoring our ability to support frontline defenders of democracy in repressive regimes including Cuba, ...
[64]
NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR DEMOCRACY v. UNITED STATES ...
Aug 11, 2025 · Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION regarding the plaintiff's 40 Motion for a Preliminary Injunction. See text for details.
[65]
Audit of the National Endowment for Democracy and Its Core ...
Jan 1, 2018 · Kearney found that NED's financial transactions and operations generally complied with the NED Act, Federal regulations, and grant agreements.
[66]
[PDF] Oversight of Grants to the National Endowment for Democracy
Jun 8, 2015 · Therefore, OIG is recommending that the Department take actions to conduct required audits of NED financial transactions and amend its grant ...
[67]
ICYMI: Chairman Williams Demands Documents from NED on Links ...
Oct 2, 2024 · The leader of the NED, which sits on roughly $126 million in assets, emphasized how the group cut ties with the Global Disinformation Index ...Missing: hearings | Show results with:hearings
[68]
2024 Grants Listings - NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR DEMOCRACY
Apr 28, 2025 · NED is resuming with a new, responsibly curated public listing of grants that reflects the projects approved for funding in fiscal year 2024.
[69]
Active Grant Listing - NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR DEMOCRACY
This page hosts the National Endowment for Democracy's (NED) active grants listing, updated twice a year. As a congressionally funded institution, ...Missing: database | Show results with:database
[70]
[PDF] Financial Statements and Report of Independent Certified Public ...
Mar 3, 2025 · The financial statements of the Endowment as of and for the year ended September 30, 2023 were audited by other auditors who expressed an ...Missing: GAO IG
[71]
National Endowment for Democracy 2024 Annual Report
NED partners are at the cutting edge of the fight for democratic principles. In 2024, NED made over 1,900 grants across 91 countries, totaling $286 million, ...
[72]
National Endowment for Democracy's Management of Grants Needs ...
GAO reviewed the National Endowment for Democracy's programs and operations, focusing on the Endowment's: (1) evaluations and reports of program effectiveness ...
[73]
NED Achieves More Than Ten Years of Consecutive Clean Audits
Mar 31, 2025 · NED is pleased to announce no audit findings, continuing a record of more than ten years of clean audits.Missing: high- corruption environments overhead
[74]
[PDF] Standard Report Example - Oversight.gov
What OIG Found. Congress recognized and authorized funding for NED in 1983 through the National Endowment for Democracy Act (the Act). NED is a private, ...
[75]
U.S. reinstates funding to propaganda outlet NED - MR Online
May 24, 2025 · The brief freeze and rapid partial reinstatement of National Endowment for Democracy (NED) funding in early 2025 helped expose it as a US regime-change tool.
[76]
Grantmaking - NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR DEMOCRACY
NED's grantmaking extends to over 100 countries in all regions of the world. Our teams analyze and respond to democratic trends, and work with our Core I ...Missing: process | Show results with:process
[77]
NED Response to Assertions at House Oversight Committee Hearing
Mar 1, 2025 · NED does not support groups engaged in violence, extremism, or militant activity. Our rigorous vetting process screens all potential ...
[78]
National Endowment for Democracy (NED) Grants Program | GFMD
Eligibility Criteria: Nongovernmental organisations, which may include civic organisations, associations, independent media, and other similar organisations ...<|separator|>
[79]
[PDF] GLOBAL - National Endowment for Democracy
NED administers grants through multiple award mechanisms and timelines crossing over fiscal years. Each grant undergoes rigorous internal review to ensure ...
[80]
Asia - NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR DEMOCRACY
NED and its core institutes work in 16 countries in Asia, in addition to regional programming, which focuses on building democratic unity in the Indo-Pacific.
[81]
NED unveiled as main supporter of farce, disinformation, rumors ...
May 13, 2022 · The Xinjiang regional government held a press conference on Friday in which analysts noted the US National Endowment for Democracy (NED) has ...Missing: Taiwan | Show results with:Taiwan
[82]
[PDF] ASIA - National Endowment for Democracy
NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR DEMOCRACY | Projects Approved & Obligated in FY2024. 1. Page 2. ASIA | PROGRAM SPENDING OVERVIEW. NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR DEMOCRACY ...Missing: Taiwan | Show results with:Taiwan
[83]
Latin America and Caribbean - National Endowment for Democracy
NED and its core institutes work across LAC, with projects in 16countries as well as regional initiatives, focusing on areas such as democratic governance, ...
[84]
US National Endowment for Democracy Targets Cuba With $6.6 ...
May 14, 2025 · According to its website, the NED approved funding for 46 projects in Cuba—amounting to $6.6 million approved in 2024—the highest total for ...
[85]
[PDF] LATIN AMERICA & CARIBBEAN - National Endowment for Democracy
This public grant listing reflects projects approved by NED in FY2024 with active grant agreements as of January 15, 2025. LATIN AMERICA & CARIBBEAN. This ...
[86]
Middle East and North Africa - National Endowment for Democracy
NED supports initiatives that facilitate and strengthen the engagement of civil society and democratic voices to inform post-conflict scenarios and transitions.
[87]
U.S. Groups Helped Nurture Arab Uprisings - The New York Times
Apr 14, 2011 · They were created by Congress and are financed through the National Endowment for Democracy, which was set up in 1983 to channel grants for ...
[88]
Africa - NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR DEMOCRACY
The NED program supports courageous civil society and independent media groups, freedom of expression and religion, rights for all people, free elections, and ...
[89]
National Endowment for Democracy Grants - Powerbase.info
This page contains a comprehensive breakdown of grants disbursed by the National Endowment for Democracy. Where individual organisations aren't disclosed, the ...
[90]
[PDF] AFRICA - National Endowment for Democracy
This public grant listing reflects projects approved by the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) in Fiscal Year 2024 with active grant agreements as of ...
[91]
Reagan-Fascell Democracy Fellows Program
The Reagan-Fascell Democracy Fellows Program hosts democracy activists, scholars, and journalists for five-month fellowships.How to Apply for a FellowshipThe Two Tracks and Eligibility ...Fellowship Project and ...About UsApply for a Reagan-Fascell ...
[92]
Fellowships - NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR DEMOCRACY
In the spirit of international exchange, the Reagan-Fascell Democracy Fellows Program, based at the International Forum for Democratic Studies, supports ...
[93]
Celebrating 20 Years of the Reagan-Fascell Democracy Fellows
Oct 3, 2022 · For 20 years, the Reagan-Fascell Fellows Program has welcomed democracy activists, human rights defenders, civil society leaders, scholars, ...
[94]
[PDF] Innovation in Counter-Disinformation: Toward Globally Networked ...
Dec 4, 2021 · , efforts to understand and address misinformation or “fake news” have been at the forefront of the public agenda. Research and reporting have ...
[95]
Chilling Legislation: Tracking the Impact of “Fake News” Laws on ...
Jul 19, 2023 · As an increasing number of countries have passed legislation meant to combat the spread of misinformation, disinformation, ...
[96]
[PDF] THE DIGITALIZATION OF DEMOCRACY
For example, we launched a campaign on “Innovative (Digital) Technologies to Prevent Corruption: Opportunities and Needs for Cooperation.” Ultimately, three ...Missing: targeted thematic
[97]
NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR DEMOCRACY - Supporting ...
The National Endowment for Democracy (NED) is a private, nonprofit foundation dedicated to the growth and strengthening of democratic institutions around the ...About the National... · Careers · Apply for NED Grants · Staff
[98]
NED Impact Report: Protecting Free Speech and Countering ...
Sep 10, 2025 · NED provides support that helps them both break censorship and build resilient, self-reliant institutions. Their work equips people to make ...
[99]
In 2024, our partners broke through censorship, exposed corruption ...
May 20, 2025 · In 2024, our partners broke through censorship, exposed corruption, fostered public engagement, and drove international accountability.
[100]
EVENT RECAP: Breaking Through: How Citizens Are Fighting ...
Oct 2, 2025 · Authoritarian regimes worldwide are intensifying their crackdown on independent voices—silencing dissent, restricting access to information, ...
[101]
[DOC] The Rise and Disappearance of Otpor: Nonviolent Movement in the ...
Secondly, after Otpor succeeded in overthrowing the dictator Milosevic, its influence and members seemed to magically disappear: What happened to Otpor? This ...
[102]
Serbians overthrow Milosevic (Bulldozer Revolution), 2000
Sep 8, 2011 · Otpor received outside funding from the National Democratic Institute. The Center for Civic Initiatives distributed copies of Gene Sharp's ...
[103]
[PDF] Ukraine's Orange Revolution, NGOs and the Role of the West*
In Ukraine a year later, 'the NED provided more than $240,000 for projects “to mobilize Ukrainian youth to greater political participation” from 2001–04, ...
[104]
US campaign behind the turmoil in Kiev | World news - The Guardian
Nov 25, 2004 · But while the gains of the orange-bedecked "chestnut revolution" are Ukraine's, the campaign is an American creation, a sophisticated and ...
[105]
[PDF] THE NEXT GENERATION IN UKRAINE
and in 2004, the youth of Ukraine played an important role in launching the Orange Revolution, thereby ensuring that the phrase “color revolution” would ...
[106]
Civil Society Strengthening - National Endowment for Democracy
Since 2001, CCD has devoted itself to advocating for democratic change and international cooperation by working with civil society and governments around the ...
[107]
The cost of the Hong Kong protests: The Star columnist
Aug 5, 2019 · The report said in 2018, NED granted US$155, 000 (S$214,286) to SC and US$200, 000 (S$276,499) to NDI for work in Hong Kong, and US$90, 000 (S$ ...<|separator|>
[108]
Game-Changing Grants in 2024 - National Endowment for Democracy
Apr 29, 2025 · In 2024, our partners broke through censorship, exposed corruption, galvanized mass movements, and helped deliver international accountability— ...Missing: questionable | Show results with:questionable
[109]
Uyghur Human Rights Policy Act Builds on Work of NED Grantees
May 29, 2020 · To further human rights and human dignity for all people in China, the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) has awarded $8,758,300 to Uyghur ...
[110]
Thirty years after 1989, the National Endowment for Democracy ...
Nov 25, 2019 · “The victory of Solidarity was a monumental achievement that brought communism to an end in Poland and the rest of Central Europe and changed ...Missing: outcomes | Show results with:outcomes
[111]
Opinion | HOW WE HELPED SOLIDARITY WIN - The Washington Post
Aug 26, 1989 · We helped solidarity win for nearly a decade, the AFL-CIO quietly aided the outlawed Polish trade union.
[112]
Archive, 1989: Poland holds first free elections in more than 40 years
Oct 11, 2023 · Solidarity wins an overwhelming victory in two rounds of parliamentary elections, paving the way to the end of communist rule in Poland.
[113]
[PDF] Freedom in the World Political Rights & Civil Liberties 1989-1990
Feb 25, 2020 · The Library of Congress has cataloged this serial title as follows: Freedom in the world / —1978. New York : Freedom House, 1978 v. : map ; 25 ...
[114]
Poland: Country Profile | Freedom House
Poland's democratic institutions took root at the start of its transition from communist rule in 1989. Rapid economic growth and other societal changesPoland · Freedom in the World 2025 · 2024 · Nations in Transit 2024
[115]
[PDF] Civil Society and Three Dimensions of Inequality in Post-1989 Poland
The goal of this study is to present the condition of civil society in post-communist. Poland and to provide a preliminary assessment of its role in ...Missing: NED | Show results with:NED
[116]
The Future of Nonviolent Resistance | Journal of Democracy
In Hong Kong, the leaderless movement that emerged ... crackdown, propelling prodemocracy parties to victory in November 2019 local-government elections.<|separator|>
[117]
https://www.cecc.gov/publications/commission-analysis/hong-kong%25E2%2580%2599s-civil-society-from-an-open-city-to-a-city-of-fear
[118]
Hong Kong: Freedom in the World 2025 Country Report
Freedom in the World reports assess the level of political rights and civil liberties in a given geographical area, regardless of whether they are affected ...Missing: verified indices
[119]
Hong Kong Civil society participation index - data, chart
Hong Kong: Civil society participation index: The latest value from 2023 is 0.409 index points, a decline from 0.43 index points in 2022.Missing: density NED reports verified
[120]
China accuses US group National Endowment for Democracy of ...
Aug 10, 2024 · China has accused a US-based group of “ideological infiltration”, including funding anti-Beijing forces in Hong Kong and supporting separatist forces in Taiwan.
[121]
What is the NED up to? | News - Al Jazeera
May 3, 2004 · While its supporters outnumber its detractors, recent allegations that NED gave money to civic groups in Venezuela that oppose the government of ...
[122]
Fact Sheet on the National Endowment for Democracy
May 7, 2022 · In 1983 and with the efforts of the then US President and some other people, NED was founded as a bipartisan, non-profit institution. NED is ...Missing: CIPE | Show results with:CIPE
[123]
Documents Reveal US Gov't Spent $22M Promoting Anti-Russia ...
Feb 22, 2022 · The National Endowment for Democracy (NED), has spent $22.4 million on operations inside the country since 2014, when democratically-elected President Viktor ...
[124]
Long-Term Investments Pay Dividends in Ukraine
Oct 5, 2022 · The legislation passed and implemented after the 2014 revolution has profoundly changed Ukraine's media environment.
[125]
[PDF] Sharp Power: Rising Authoritarian Influence
Each year, NED makes more than 1,700 grants to support the projects of non-governmental groups abroad who are working for democratic goals in more than 90 ...
[126]
Russia plans to register 'foreign agent' NGOs - The Guardian
Jul 2, 2012 · Russian NGOs that receive funding from abroad will have to register as "foreign agents" and undergo extra checks under a new bill that critics warn is part of ...
[127]
Foreign Agents Laws - NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR DEMOCRACY
Nov 1, 2024 · Since Russia adopted its law regulating the activities of “foreign agents” in 2012, a growing number of countries in the region have followed suit.
[128]
Russia warns US as NGO blacklisted as 'undesirable' - BBC News
Jul 30, 2015 · NGOs linked to politics in Russia already face restrictions under a 2012 law requiring them to register as "foreign agents". President Vladimir ...Missing: targeting grantees
[129]
Russia begins blacklisting 'undesirable' organizations
Jul 28, 2015 · Russian authorities today used a draconian new law on “undesirable” foreign organizations for the first time to blacklist the US-based charity ...Missing: grantees | Show results with:grantees
[130]
Treasury Sanctions Chinese Entity and Officials Pursuant to Global ...
Jul 31, 2020 · The US Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctioned one Chinese government entity and two current or former government ...Missing: Hong Kong
[131]
NED targets Cuba with $6.6 million in 2025 - Kawsachun News
May 12, 2025 · According to its website, the NED approved funding for 46 projects in Cuba—amounting to $6.6 million approved in 2024—the highest total for ...Missing: subversion | Show results with:subversion
[132]
Cuba criticizes US-funded subversive actions - Prensa Latina
Aug 27, 2024 · ... NED's subversive actions. The text reveals that since 2017, NED has financed 54 anti-Cuba organizations. It reported that in 2018, the Cuban ...Missing: response | Show results with:response
[133]
Cuba denounces US funding to generate subversion on the island
Jul 17, 2025 · The criticism comes amid a new wave of bilateral tension, after the Cuban Parliament rejected a Trump administration memorandum reinforcing the ...
[134]
DOGE Cut Off Funds to NED. Now They're Suing. - by Eli Lake
Mar 5, 2025 · Since Elon Musk's DOGE froze its funding on January 22, the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) is nearing complete collapse.<|control11|><|separator|>
[135]
Statement on NED's Funding Disruption and Program Suspensions
Feb 25, 2025 · Ninety-five percent of NED's funding is directly appropriated by Congress and is not considered foreign assistance. This funding therefore was ...
[136]
[PDF] EXHIBIT A - National Endowment for Democracy
Mar 6, 2025 · The Department of State Office of Inspector General determined that NED used funds in compliance with applicable laws and regulations; that NED ...
[137]
Trump's Cuts to Democracy Promotion Like the NED Already Hit ...
Mar 3, 2025 · The Trump administration has significantly reduced US foreign assistance for democracy promotion, weakening critical support structures in regions like ...
[138]
National Endowment for Democracy Sues Top Trump Aides Over ...
Mar 5, 2025 · National Endowment for Democracy Sues Top Trump Aides Over Funding Freeze. The nonprofit has enjoyed bipartisan support since its founding in ...
[139]
Trump-backed judge rules administration's withholding of funds illegal
Aug 11, 2025 · A federal judge ruled Monday that the administration appears to be illegally withholding funds previously approved by Congress for the National ...
[140]
Treasury Must Unfreeze Nonprofit's $95 Million in Grant Funds
Aug 11, 2025 · A federal judge blocked President Donald Trump from withholding $95 million in grant funding to The National Endowment for Democracy on Monday.
[141]
Judge orders Trump to restore funding to National Endowment for ...
Aug 11, 2025 · A federal judge ordered the administration Monday to turn back on the pipeline of money to the National Endowment for Democracy, ...<|separator|>
[142]
Trump-Appointed Judge Deals Legal Blow To The White House
Aug 11, 2025 · NED sued the Trump administration over the funds in March, accusing it of illegally withholding the money in violation of the Administrative ...
[143]
Preliminary Injunction Prohibits Federal Government from ...
Aug 14, 2025 · MTO sued on behalf of the Endowment to enjoin the federal government from unlawfully withholding the Endowment's funding. On August 11, 2025, ...Missing: budget 2024
[144]
Belly - Facebook
May 14, 2025 · The U.S.-government funded National Endowment for Democracy (NED) distributed $6.6 million to Cuba projects in 2024. Cuba grants were the fifth
[145]
Leveraging AI for Democracy: Civic Innovation on the New Digital ...
Oct 2, 2024 · “Leveraging AI for Democracy: Civic Innovation on the New Digital Playing Field” by Beth Kerley, Carl Miller, and Fernanda Campagnucci is a ...
[146]
Forum Focus: January 2025 - National Endowment for Democracy
Jan 15, 2025 · Report/Event | Leveraging AI for Democracy: Civic Innovation on the Digital Playing Field. While civil society actors may face an uphill ...
[147]
Stronger Together: Coalitions as a Catalyst for Information Integrity
Nov 12, 2024 · Puma Shen, New Variants of COVID-19 Disinformation in Taiwan, National Democratic Institute, May 2022, www.ndi.org/sites/default/files ...
[148]
“Politicians across Africa use social media to target their critics ...
Jul 27, 2023 · Our current project was supported by the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) and was geared towards combating dis- and misinformation about ...
[149]
[PDF] Grassley to NED - GDI Grant Funding
Apr 12, 2023 · 2. Recently NED dispensed hundreds of thousands of dollars in grants to the Global Disinformation ... Those big tech companies and ad firms ...Missing: literacy | Show results with:literacy
[150]
Fact-Sheet: NED and the 2026 Discretionary Budget Request
May 2, 2025 · “In March 2025, it was discovered that NED funded the Ukraine disinformation organization that doxed U.S. journalists called for prosecutions ...Missing: disputes | Show results with:disputes<|separator|>
[151]
Manufacturing Deceit: How Generative AI Supercharges Information ...
Jun 18, 2024 · ... disinformation-and-propaganda-freedom-house/. 5 Morgan Meaker ... AI-Generated Fake News,” arXiv, 12 February 2024, https://arxiv.org ...Missing: congressional hearings
[152]
NED Cancer: What It Means, When It's Used & Other Terminology
Jun 15, 2021 · NED is an acronym that stands for “no evidence of disease.” Doctors use the term NED when all signs and symptoms of your cancer are gone.
[153]
Remission, cancer-free, no evidence of disease: What's the ...
May 12, 2021 · “Remission” and “no evidence of disease” (also known as NEOD or NED) are probably the closest by definition. Officially, both mean that no cancer is currently ...
[154]
Cancer Remission, NED, Cancer-Free: What the Terms Mean
Apr 25, 2023 · No evidence of disease—often referred to as NED—means exactly that: At present, no signs of disease have been found on any tests. A subtle ...What phrases like “cancer... · When do cancer patients...Missing: history | Show results with:history
[155]
Remission: What Does It Mean? - WebMD
Nov 23, 2023 · Some doctors also refer to complete remission as “no evidence of disease,” or NED. That doesn't mean you are cured. For both types of ...
[156]
How Is Remission Different Than A Cure? | SERO
Mar 8, 2019 · This implies that though there is currently no evidence of disease there is still a real risk of recurrence. Cure on the other hand implies ...
[157]
Understanding Terms like Cancer-Free and Remission | Banner
Apr 19, 2024 · No evidence of disease (NED) is similar to complete remission, and the two terms are often used interchangeably. It means that there are no ...
[158]
About NED | NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database - Caltech
Apr 14, 2025 · The NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED) aims to capture the most reliable census of extragalactic objects and provide essential data and tools.Missing: history maintenance
[159]
NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database - Caltech
These data were recently ingested into NED and cover 25 deg2 accounting for only 5% of the targeted total survey area. The NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED) ...Classic Home Page · Database · Articles about NED · Acknowledging NEDMissing: usage | Show results with:usage
[160]
The NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database - Astrophysics Data System
It will be completely retired in October 2019. This page will automatically redirect to the new ADS interface at that point. SAO/NASA ADS Astronomy Abstract ...
[161]
[PDF] Evolution of the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED) into a ...
Recent advances have been made in evolving the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic. Database (NED) into a data mining discovery engine. Infrastructure changes and data.Missing: history maintenance
[162]
Archived Release Notes - NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database
2,005,819 sources from the literature cross-identified with NED objects; 639,294 new NED objects including galaxies, quasars, clusters of galaxies ...
[163]
Using the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED) and Federated ...
The foundation of NED is a growing database of galaxies, quasars and all ... Project activities revolve around an ongoing fusion of data from sky survey catalogs ...
[164]
Completeness of the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED ...
Aug 23, 2023 · We introduce the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED) Local Volume Sample (NED-LVS), a subset of ∼1.9 million objects with distances out to 1000 Mpc.
[165]
Evolution of the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED) into a ...
May 30, 2017 · We review recent advances and ongoing work in evolving the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED) beyond an object reference database into a ...
[166]
MPS representing North East Derbyshire (Constituency)
North East Derbyshire is a constituency in the East Midlands region of England. The seat has been held by Louise Sandher-Jones (Labour) since July 2024.
[167]
North East Derbyshire (E14001391) - ONS
Find facts and figures from across the ONS on North East Derbyshire (parliamentary constituency).
[168]
Meaning, origin and history of the name Ned
Diminutive of Edward or Edmund. It has been used since the 14th century, and may have had root in the medieval affectionate phrase mine Ed.
[169]
Ned : Meaning and Origin of First Name - Ancestry
In history, the name Ned can be traced back to the medieval era when it was primarily used as a diminutive or nickname for the name Edward. Edward the ...