Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

ClickHouse

ClickHouse is an open-source, column-oriented database management system (DBMS) optimized for online analytical processing (OLAP), enabling real-time generation of analytical reports from large-scale data using SQL queries. It excels in handling massive datasets—such as billions or trillions of rows—by leveraging columnar storage to achieve query speeds up to 1 billion rows per second, making it ideal for applications requiring sub-second response times on petabyte-scale volumes. Originally developed by Yandex in 2009 for web analytics and open-sourced in 2016, ClickHouse spun out as an independent company, ClickHouse, Inc., in 2021, supported by initial funding including a $50 million Series A and subsequent rounds such as a $350 million Series C in 2025. Key to its performance are architectural choices like vectorized query execution, adaptive data compression, and support for distributed processing across clusters, allowing it to ingest and query hundreds of billions of records daily in production environments. It adheres to ANSI SQL standards while extending with OLAP-specific optimizations, such as efficient GROUP BY operations and JOINs on large tables, and integrates seamlessly with tools like Apache Kafka for real-time data ingestion. Widely used by organizations including Cloudflare for processing over 10 million records per second in observability and analytics, ClickHouse powers diverse sectors from web metrics to machine learning feature stores and IoT data analysis. It has an active open-source community on GitHub contributing to ongoing enhancements, solidifying its role as a leading solution for real-time data warehousing.

History and Development

Origins and Founding

ClickHouse originated in 2009 as an internal experimental project at Yandex, Russia's leading technology company, aimed at addressing the challenges of real-time analytical reporting on vast, continuously incoming non-aggregated data. The initiative was driven by the need to process web analytics data at unprecedented scale for Yandex.Metrica, Yandex's web analytics platform, which handles billions of events daily and accumulates petabytes of data. The project was spearheaded by Alexey Milovidov, a key engineer on Yandex's Metrica team, along with collaborators such as Yury Izrailevsky, who contributed to product and engineering leadership. Motivated by limitations in existing databases that could not deliver the required speed and efficiency for online analytical processing (OLAP) workloads, the team sought to build a system capable of generating reports in real time from petabyte-scale datasets. Early development focused on creating prototypes to validate the feasibility of high-performance analytics, drawing inspirations from log-structured merge (LSM) tree concepts for efficient data handling. Over the next three years, these efforts evolved into a robust, general-purpose database management system, which entered production for Yandex.Metrica in 2012. By 2014, it was processing approximately 12 billion events per day across a cluster holding over 20 trillion rows and more than 2 petabytes of compressed data. This foundational work laid the groundwork for ClickHouse's emphasis on speed and scalability in analytical applications.

Key Milestones and Releases

ClickHouse was open-sourced by Yandex on June 15, 2016, under the Apache 2.0 license, marking its transition from an internal tool to a publicly available project that rapidly gained adoption in the analytics community. The initial open-source release included version 1.0, which established the foundation for its column-oriented architecture and high-performance querying capabilities. Following open-sourcing, ClickHouse saw rapid adoption, with production deployments outside Yandex beginning in late 2016 and the project accumulating thousands of contributors by 2019. In 2019, the 19.x series of releases introduced significant enhancements, including materialized views in version 19.8, enabling automatic data transformation and aggregation for improved query efficiency. These updates solidified ClickHouse's position as a leading OLAP database, with subsequent minor versions in the series addressing scalability and integration improvements. The project evolved further with the formation of ClickHouse, Inc. in September 2021, a U.S.-based company spun off from Yandex to provide commercial support, cloud services, and dedicated development for the open-source project. As of 2025, key milestones include expanded cloud integrations, such as the general availability of ClickHouse Cloud on Microsoft Azure in early 2024 and enhanced AWS competencies for advertising and marketing technologies in August 2025. Versions 24.x and 25.x have incorporated AI/ML extensions, such as support for real-time observability in AI workloads and features like the QBit data type for machine learning applications, enabling faster feature engineering and vector operations.

Architecture and Design

Column-Oriented Storage

ClickHouse employs a column-oriented storage model, where data in tables is organized as a collection of columns rather than rows, with the values of each column stored contiguously and sequentially on disk. This approach contrasts with row-oriented systems by aligning data access patterns with analytical workloads, allowing queries to load only the specific columns required, thereby minimizing I/O overhead and accelerating operations like filtering and aggregation. For instance, in analytical queries processing large datasets, this selective reading can achieve throughputs exceeding 1 billion rows per second on suitable hardware. The primary storage mechanism in ClickHouse is the MergeTree family of table engines, which underpins most high-volume data ingestion and querying scenarios. Data is inserted into immutable parts—self-contained column files sorted by a primary key—without immediate modifications, ensuring consistency and enabling efficient background operations. These parts are periodically merged in the background to consolidate data, reduce fragmentation, and apply optimizations like deduplication in variants such as ReplacingMergeTree, while maintaining immutability to avoid locking during reads or writes. Compression is integral to ClickHouse's columnar design, leveraging algorithms that exploit the similarity and sorted order of values within columns for high ratios. By default, ClickHouse uses LZ4 for fast compression and decompression with low CPU overhead, and ZSTD (at level 1) as the preferred option in ClickHouse Cloud for superior space savings, often achieving 2-10x reductions in storage footprint depending on data patterns. Additional low-level encodings, such as Delta for integers, are applied before general-purpose compression to further enhance efficiency in columnar blocks, typically sized from 64 KB to 1 MB uncompressed. To facilitate rapid data skipping, ClickHouse implements sparse primary indexes in MergeTree engines, where index marks are generated every 8192 rows (configurable via index_granularity) to approximate row ranges without storing full offsets for every entry. These indexes, stored in .idx files for the primary key and .mrk files for columns, enable the query engine to bypass irrelevant data blocks during scans, significantly boosting performance on sorted, partitioned datasets. ClickHouse optimizes complex data types for its columnar format, supporting arrays, maps, and nested structures with memory-efficient representations. Arrays are stored using two contiguous vectors—one for offsets and one for elements—allowing vectorized operations across variable-length sequences without row reconstruction. Maps store keys and values in separate columnar vectors, preserving order and enabling efficient lookups, while nested structures treat sub-elements as multiple parallel columns (e.g., as arrays of equal length), facilitating denormalized analytics without performance penalties from joins.

Distributed Processing

ClickHouse implements distributed processing through sharding, where data is partitioned across multiple nodes in a cluster to enable horizontal scaling and parallel query execution. Sharding divides the dataset into independent subsets stored on separate servers, with the partitioning determined by a sharding key specified in the Distributed table engine configuration, such as a hash function like intHash64(UserID) or a simple rand() for even distribution. This approach ensures that large datasets exceeding single-node capacity are handled efficiently, as each shard processes only its portion of the data. Coordination among nodes, including shard assignment and metadata management, relies on ClickHouse Keeper—a built-in coordination service compatible with Apache ZooKeeper—or ZooKeeper itself, which maintains cluster topology, facilitates leader election, and ensures consistency during operations like data replication and distributed DDL queries. The query execution pipeline in distributed setups operates without a global query plan; instead, each node executes a local plan for its shard. When a query targets a Distributed table, the initiating server sends subqueries to all relevant shards in parallel, leveraging the cluster configuration defined in the server's XML settings under <remote_servers>. Each shard performs local processing, including data reading from columnar storage, filtering, and partial aggregations using intermediaries like the AggregatingTransform operator to compute intermediate results efficiently. These partial results are then returned to the initiator, which merges them into the final output, minimizing network overhead through one-pass communication. Parallelism within shards is further enhanced by dividing processing into multiple "lanes" (typically matching CPU cores), allowing concurrent handling of data blocks. Distributed tables are created using the Distributed engine via SQL statements like CREATE TABLE distributed_table ENGINE = Distributed(cluster_name, database, local_table, sharding_key), which acts as a proxy without storing data locally but routing operations to underlying shards. Table functions such as remote or remoteSecure provide similar functionality for ad-hoc distributed queries, enabling seamless access to remote data without permanent table creation. Inserts into Distributed tables are routed to shards based on the sharding key, with background asynchronous processing to buffer and distribute data, configurable via settings like distributed_background_insert_sleep_time_ms. Fault recovery in distributed environments is supported through asynchronous replication in ReplicatedMergeTree-family engines, where changes are propagated to replicas with some latency, ensuring eventual consistency across the cluster. If a replica fails, other replicas continue serving queries, and recovery occurs by fetching missing parts from peers coordinated via ClickHouse Keeper. For enhanced durability during writes, the insert_quorum setting requires acknowledgment from a specified number of replicas (e.g., majority) before confirming the insert, preventing data loss in case of partial failures. Reads typically access local data for speed, but consistency can be managed by directing queries to specific replicas or using distributed aggregation to combine results from multiple nodes.

Core Features

Query Language and SQL Support

ClickHouse employs a declarative query language that is largely compliant with the ANSI SQL standard, enabling users to execute standard SQL queries such as SELECT and INSERT, with support for UPDATE and DELETE via asynchronous mutations (ALTER TABLE UPDATE/DELETE), while supporting OLAP-specific workloads. This dialect adheres to ANSI SQL in many aspects, including support for GROUP BY, ORDER BY, and subqueries, but includes deviations optimized for analytical processing, such as relaxed rules for certain clauses to enhance performance. An optional ANSI SQL mode can be enabled to increase compatibility with standard SQL behaviors, though it may impact query speed. To address OLAP requirements, ClickHouse extends standard SQL with features like the ARRAY JOIN clause, which unrolls arrays into separate rows, facilitating efficient processing of nested or semi-structured data common in analytics. For example, the query SELECT * FROM table ARRAY JOIN arr_column AS item duplicates non-array columns for each array element, excluding empty arrays by default, thus enabling complex aggregations over array data without explicit loops. This extension, along with support for array functions and nested data types, distinguishes ClickHouse's dialect for handling high-volume, denormalized datasets in real-time analytics. ClickHouse provides a extensive library of built-in functions, exceeding 1,000 in total, categorized into types such as aggregate functions (e.g., sum, avg, uniqExact for cardinality estimation), string manipulation (e.g., substring, replaceRegexp), date/time operations (e.g., toDate, dateDiff), and higher-order functions for array and lambda processing. These functions are designed for row-wise or aggregate computations, with aggregate variants accumulating values across rows to support efficient OLAP queries; for instance, sumMap(key, value) computes weighted sums over key-value pairs. The functions landing page organizes them into over 20 categories, allowing developers to perform complex transformations directly in SQL without external scripting. The query optimizer in ClickHouse is primarily rule-based, applying transformations like predicate pushdown and projection pruning to minimize data scanned during execution. It incorporates basic cost estimation for selecting join algorithms and orders, such as choosing between hash joins and merges based on data distribution and memory availability, though it lacks a full cost-based optimizer for arbitrary reordering in complex multi-table joins. Users can influence optimization via settings like join_use_nulls or by using EXPLAIN to inspect plans, ensuring queries leverage column-oriented storage for sub-second response times on large datasets. Materialized views in ClickHouse accelerate queries by storing pre-computed results from a SELECT statement as a physical table, shifting computation from query time to data insertion. Created with CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW view_name ENGINE = SummingMergeTree() AS SELECT ... FROM source_table, they act as insert triggers: new data inserted into the source is automatically transformed and appended to the view, supporting incremental aggregation without reprocessing historical data. For example, a view aggregating daily metrics can use GROUP BY and aggregate functions to maintain summarized tables, dramatically reducing query latency for frequent reports; however, they require specifying an engine like MergeTree for storage and do not support updates to existing rows.

Data Ingestion and Compression

ClickHouse supports efficient data ingestion through several mechanisms designed to handle both batch and streaming workloads at scale. The primary method is the INSERT query, which allows users to load data directly into tables using SQL syntax, supporting formats such as CSV, JSON, and the native binary format for optimal performance. This approach is particularly effective for appending data to MergeTree-family tables, which are append-only and ensure eventual consistency without immediate locking. For streaming ingestion, ClickHouse integrates with Apache Kafka via the Kafka table engine, enabling real-time data consumption from Kafka topics. This engine acts as a consumer, polling messages from specified topics and inserting them into ClickHouse tables, often in conjunction with materialized views to persist and transform the data for analytical use. It supports fault-tolerant storage and allows configuration of consumer groups, offsets, and message formats like JSON or Avro to facilitate seamless pipeline integration. Integration with object storage such as Amazon S3 is achieved through table functions like s3(), which enable direct ingestion of data files without intermediate staging. Users can query S3 buckets as virtual tables and insert the results into persistent ClickHouse tables, supporting large-scale bulk loads from compressed files in formats like Parquet or ORC. ClickHouse is optimized for batch processing, where bulk inserts of 1,000 to 100,000 rows per operation minimize overhead and maximize throughput, outperforming single-row inserts by orders of magnitude. Asynchronous inserts further enhance this by buffering smaller batches server-side before merging, reducing latency in high-velocity environments. On the compression front, ClickHouse employs column-oriented storage with per-column codecs to achieve high compression ratios while preserving query speed. General-purpose algorithms like ZSTD (default at level 1) and LZ4 are applied after specialized encodings, reducing I/O and storage costs; for instance, applying ZSTD to a delta-encoded integer column can halve the compressed size compared to uncompressed data. For low-cardinality data, such as categorical fields with few unique values, dictionary encoding via the LowCardinality type replaces repeated strings with integer indices mapped to a dictionary, yielding compression ratios up to 26:1 in datasets like content licenses. This technique is automatically applied during ingestion and decompression is transparent during queries. Time-series data benefits from double-delta encoding, which stores the second differences of monotonically increasing sequences like timestamps, further compressed with ZSTD to exploit small delta patterns. In optimized schemas, this contributes to overall ratios of 2.7:1 or better for large datasets, such as reducing 68.87 GiB uncompressed to 25.15 GiB.

Advanced Capabilities

Replication and Fault Tolerance

ClickHouse implements replication primarily through the ReplicatedMergeTree engine family, which extends the core MergeTree storage to support asynchronous multi-master replication across multiple replicas for high availability and data durability. This mechanism operates at the table level, allowing individual tables to be replicated independently while non-replicated tables coexist on the same server. Coordination for replication is managed via ClickHouse Keeper or ZooKeeper (version 3.4.5 or higher), which stores metadata such as replica states, log entries for inserts and mutations, and queue information to ensure eventual consistency. Inserts are performed on any replica, with data blocks asynchronously propagated to other replicas in compressed form, while background merges occur locally on each node to maintain the MergeTree structure. Replication operates in a multi-master asynchronous manner without a dedicated leader election for merges or mutations; coordination relies on ClickHouse Keeper or ZooKeeper for metadata consistency across replicas. To enhance insert durability, ClickHouse supports quorum writes via the insert_quorum setting, which requires acknowledgment from a majority of replicas (typically at least half plus one) before confirming the insert operation. This ensures that data survives the failure of a minority of nodes, as each data block is written atomically and deduplicated using a unique log entry in ZooKeeper. For example, in a three-replica setup with insert_quorum=2, an insert succeeds only if at least two replicas persist the data, preventing loss from single-node failures. Backup strategies in ClickHouse leverage native snapshotting through the ALTER TABLE ... FREEZE PARTITION command, which creates instantaneous, space-efficient snapshots by using hard links to existing data parts without blocking reads or writes. These snapshots can be stored locally or exported to object storage like S3, forming the basis for full and incremental backups. Additionally, Time-to-Live (TTL) expressions on tables or columns automate data expiration by deleting, grouping, or moving rows after a specified interval during background merges, helping manage storage growth and compliance without manual intervention. For instance, a TTL like TTL date + INTERVAL 30 DAY DELETE removes rows older than 30 days automatically. As of 2025, ClickHouse supports lightweight updates for ReplicatedMergeTree tables, allowing efficient, replicated modifications via UPDATE and DELETE statements that propagate asynchronously across replicas. Fault tolerance is achieved through automatic recovery mechanisms, where failed replicas resynchronize missing data parts from active peers upon restart by consulting ZooKeeper's replication log. For operations like distributed mutations, replicas coordinate asynchronously via ClickHouse Keeper or ZooKeeper; failed replicas recover by syncing from peers, with dynamic failover based on metadata availability rather than leader election. For shard-level imbalances or expansions, resharding is manual, involving adjustments to Distributed table configurations and data movement via INSERT INTO ... SELECT queries, as automatic rebalancing is not natively supported to avoid performance overhead. This design prioritizes query performance and simplicity, with replication ensuring no single point of failure for data access.

Integration and Extensibility

ClickHouse provides robust integration capabilities through standardized connectors, enabling seamless connectivity with a wide array of external applications and services. The official JDBC driver allows Java-based applications to interact with ClickHouse databases using the standard JDBC API, supporting operations such as querying and updating data via a connection URL like jdbc:clickhouse://host:port. Similarly, the ODBC driver facilitates access from ODBC-compliant tools, enabling ClickHouse to serve as a data source for various analytics platforms by implementing the ODBC interface for read and write operations. For business intelligence (BI) tools, ClickHouse integrates directly with platforms like Tableau through dedicated connectors that leverage the JDBC or ODBC drivers. The Tableau connector, available via Tableau Exchange, simplifies setup by requiring the installation of the ClickHouse JDBC driver (version 0.9.2 or later) in the appropriate directory, followed by configuring connection parameters such as host, port (typically 8443 for secure connections), database, username, and password. This allows users to visualize ClickHouse data within Tableau Desktop or Server, supporting live queries and extract-based analysis for interactive dashboards. ClickHouse extends its functionality via user-defined functions (UDFs), which permit the implementation of custom logic in languages such as C++ or Python. Executable UDFs are configured through XML files specifying the function name, command, input/output formats (e.g., TabSeparated or JSONEachRow), and return types, with scripts placed in a designated user directory like /var/lib/clickhouse/user_scripts/. These UDFs process data via standard input/output streams, enabling complex computations—such as array manipulations or datetime operations in Python—that are not natively available, and can be invoked directly in SQL queries like SELECT my_udf_function(input). Additionally, SQL-based UDFs can be created using the CREATE FUNCTION statement with lambda expressions for simpler custom expressions. To support federated queries across heterogeneous data sources, ClickHouse offers external table engines, notably the JDBC table engine, which connects to remote databases like MySQL or PostgreSQL. This engine uses the clickhouse-jdbc-bridge program (run as a daemon) to bridge connections, allowing tables to be defined with ENGINE = JDBC(datasource, external_database, external_table), where the datasource is a JDBC URI including credentials. Queries against these tables enable data ingestion or analysis from external systems without full replication, supporting Nullable types and operations like SELECT for federated access. ClickHouse also supports integration with Apache Iceberg (as of early 2025), allowing direct querying and ingestion of Iceberg tables via dedicated table engines and catalog connectors for hybrid analytical workloads. In cloud environments, ClickHouse is available as a fully managed service through ClickHouse Cloud, which deploys on AWS, GCP, and Azure with serverless architecture and automatic scaling. On AWS, users can opt for Bring Your Own Cloud (BYOC) deployments via AWS Marketplace, where clusters auto-scale vertically based on workload demands in Scale and Enterprise plans, handling resource provisioning without manual intervention. Similarly, GCP integrations provide managed instances with consumption-based pricing and built-in auto-scaling to ensure performance for analytical workloads across regions. These services eliminate infrastructure management, including backups and monitoring, while maintaining high availability.

Limitations and Challenges

Scalability Constraints

ClickHouse deployments face practical limits on cluster size, primarily due to coordination overhead from components like ZooKeeper or its alternative, ClickHouse Keeper. While there is no hard-coded maximum, real-world implementations typically scale to hundreds of nodes, with the largest reported clusters exceeding a thousand nodes. Beyond this, ZooKeeper's metadata synchronization and coordination traffic can introduce significant latency and resource strain, particularly in environments with high replication factors or real-time inserts, making further expansion challenging without custom optimizations. Memory consumption poses another key constraint, especially for operations like joins and sorts that build large in-memory structures such as hash tables or sorted buffers. Joins on high-cardinality datasets can exceed available RAM, triggering out-of-memory errors or fallback to slower disk-based processing, while sorts via ORDER BY may require buffering substantial portions of result sets in memory before external sorting kicks in. To mitigate this, ClickHouse provides settings like max_memory_usage to cap per-query allocation, but deployments often need ample RAM—typically 64 GB or more per node—to handle complex analytics without degradation. For storage, official guidelines strongly recommend SSDs over HDDs for primary data volumes, as SSDs deliver superior random read/write performance critical for merge operations and query execution; HDDs suffice only for archival or cold storage tiers but can bottleneck I/O-intensive workloads. Vertical scaling, by upgrading individual node resources like CPU and RAM, offers simplicity and efficiency for many ClickHouse workloads, enabling single-node throughput in the terabytes without distributed coordination overhead. However, it has limits tied to hardware availability and cost, beyond which horizontal scaling—adding shards and replicas—becomes necessary for fault tolerance and parallel query distribution across nodes. The trade-off lies in increased complexity: horizontal setups enhance resilience and handle massive concurrency but introduce network latency for cross-shard operations, potentially reducing overall efficiency if not balanced properly. ClickHouse documentation advises prioritizing vertical scaling for most use cases before expanding horizontally. Configuration choices can exacerbate scalability issues, notably over-sharding, where excessive shards lead to fragmented data distribution and heightened network traffic during query coordination and replication. The number of shards should be limited; while dozens are typically acceptable, excessive sharding can increase ZooKeeper coordination overhead, especially with frequent inserts and high replication, leading to synchronization delays and potential bottlenecks in distributed environments. Proper sharding—aligning with query patterns and data volume—avoids these pitfalls, ensuring balanced load without unnecessary inter-node communication overhead.

Operational Overhead

ClickHouse provides built-in mechanisms for monitoring its operational state through system tables such as system.metrics, system.events, system.asynchronous_metrics, and system.dimensional_metrics, which offer real-time and historical data on server performance, query execution, and resource usage. These tables allow administrators to query metrics like query throughput, memory consumption, and disk I/O directly via SQL, enabling proactive issue detection without external tools. For enhanced observability in distributed environments, ClickHouse integrates natively with Prometheus by exposing metrics in the Prometheus exposition format through HTTP endpoints, facilitating collection and alerting via tools like Grafana. Maintenance tasks in ClickHouse require periodic intervention to ensure optimal performance and data integrity. Background merges in MergeTree-family tables occur automatically, but manual merges can be triggered using the OPTIMIZE TABLE statement, particularly with the FINAL clause to consolidate parts and remove duplicates in ReplacingMergeTree tables, though this is resource-intensive and should be used sparingly. External dictionaries, used for enriching queries with static or semi-static data, support automatic updates based on the LIFETIME parameter or manual reloading via the SYSTEM RELOAD DICTIONARIES command to refresh data from sources like HTTP or databases. Log rotation is configured in the server's config.xml file under the <logger> section, where parameters such as <size> (maximum file size, e.g., 1000M) and <count> (number of archived files) prevent disk overflow from growing log files like clickhouse-server.log. Security in ClickHouse is managed through a SQL-based access control system that supports creating users and roles with granular privileges, including CREATE ROLE for defining permission sets and GRANT statements to assign them to users or other roles, enforcing least-privilege principles across databases, tables, and even rows via row policies. Connections are secured in transit using TLS/SSL encryption, configurable via server settings for certificate validation and cipher suites to protect data during client-server communication. For data at rest, while ClickHouse Cloud employs default AES-256 encryption managed by the cloud provider, self-hosted deployments rely on underlying filesystem or storage-level encryption to safeguard persisted data. Upgrading ClickHouse in production environments, especially clusters, follows a rolling update strategy to minimize downtime. Administrators upgrade replicas sequentially—stopping one node, installing the new binary, restarting, and waiting for data synchronization via the ReplicatedMergeTree engine—before proceeding to the next, ensuring continuous availability without full cluster shutdown. This process is supported by compatibility guarantees in release notes, allowing minor version upgrades without data migration, though major upgrades may require reviewing changelog for breaking changes.

Applications and Use Cases

Online Analytical Processing

ClickHouse supports ad-hoc querying in online analytical processing (OLAP) workloads by enabling rapid aggregations and complex SQL operations on vast historical datasets, often processing billions of rows in seconds. Its columnar storage architecture minimizes I/O by reading only relevant columns, allowing users to perform flexible, exploratory analyses such as GROUP BY aggregations, JOINs, and subqueries without predefined schemas. For reporting purposes, this facilitates quick generation of insights from terabyte-scale tables, with query speeds exceeding 1 billion rows per second in optimized scenarios, making it suitable for business intelligence tasks on archived data. As a data warehousing solution, ClickHouse provides a cost-effective alternative to traditional systems like Hadoop and Spark, offering high-compression storage and sub-second query latency for batch-oriented analytical processing. Organizations leverage its distributed architecture to consolidate petabytes of historical data at lower infrastructure costs compared to Hadoop's ecosystem, which requires extensive setup for MapReduce jobs, or Spark's resource-intensive in-memory processing. This shift enables scalable data lakes or warehouses focused on OLAP, where ClickHouse handles ingestion of transformed batches efficiently while reducing total cost of ownership through open-source deployment and minimal hardware needs. A prominent case study is Yandex.Metrica, Russia's leading web analytics platform, which uses ClickHouse to analyze billions of daily web traffic events, including user interactions, page views, and session data. Originally developed at Yandex for this purpose, ClickHouse stores and queries anonymized hit and visit logs in MergeTree tables, supporting aggregations over months of historical data to generate reports on traffic sources, user behavior, and conversion metrics. This implementation has enabled Yandex.Metrica to scale to trillions of rows while delivering interactive dashboards and custom queries for site owners, demonstrating ClickHouse's efficacy in high-volume OLAP for web analytics. In ETL pipelines, ClickHouse serves as an ideal target for batch-transformed data, where tools extract raw logs or streams, apply transformations like filtering and aggregation, and load optimized inserts into its tables for subsequent OLAP querying. This setup supports scheduled jobs that prepare historical datasets for reporting, with ClickHouse's asynchronous inserts and materialized views automating further refinements during merges. For instance, internal pipelines at ClickHouse itself use staging tables to validate and insert transformed results, ensuring data quality for downstream analytical workloads.

Real-Time Analytics

ClickHouse excels in real-time analytics by supporting high-velocity data ingestion and low-latency querying, enabling organizations to process and analyze streaming data as it arrives. This capability is particularly valuable for applications requiring immediate insights, such as dynamic dashboards and interactive reports, where query response times can reach sub-second levels even on terabyte-scale datasets. One key aspect is streaming ingestion through integration with Apache Kafka, which allows ClickHouse to consume events in real time for near-instantaneous dashboard updates. Using the Kafka table engine or the official ClickHouse Kafka Connect Sink connector, data can be streamed directly into ClickHouse tables, supporting sub-second end-to-end latency from event production to visualization. For instance, companies like Lyft leverage this setup to ingest data from Kafka alongside other sources, powering real-time analytics pipelines that handle millions of events per second without buffering delays. In monitoring and alerting scenarios, ClickHouse processes time-series data from sources like IoT devices and application logs, facilitating anomaly detection and proactive notifications. It efficiently stores and queries high-cardinality metrics—such as CPU usage, response times, or sensor readings—with compression ratios exceeding 10x, allowing retention of raw data for weeks or months while enabling real-time aggregations. Tekion, for example, uses ClickHouse Cloud to ingest over 1.2 million metrics per minute from containerized applications, computing custom alerts with query latencies reduced by more than 10x compared to prior systems, thus supporting rapid issue resolution in production environments. For IoT, ClickHouse handles frequent sensor streams, like weather data updated every 10 seconds, to track trends and trigger alerts on thresholds. Similarly, in log analysis, it parses irregular event logs for security monitoring, integrating with tools for real-time threat detection. ClickHouse also supports machine learning feature stores, enabling efficient storage, retrieval, and serving of features for model training and inference at scale. Its columnar format and fast vector search capabilities allow for real-time feature engineering on large datasets, integrating with ML workflows for online serving. For example, ad-tech company Cognitiv uses ClickHouse to build and optimize machine learning models by processing vast amounts of behavioral data for targeted advertising, achieving faster model training and better performance through aggregations and joins on petabyte-scale volumes. ClickStream analysis in ClickHouse enables real-time tracking of user behavior across web and mobile interactions, capturing events like page views and clicks to derive immediate insights into engagement patterns. By denormalizing event data into efficient schemas, ClickHouse supports SQL queries that analyze user journeys with sub-second response times on billions of rows, aiding A/B testing and personalization. Kami, an edtech platform, ingests clickstream data from 45 million users—reaching 300 GB daily—into ClickHouse for real-time behavioral analytics, demonstrating scalability for high-volume tracking without performance degradation. Hybrid workloads benefit from ClickHouse's ability to combine OLTP-sourced data with OLAP-style queries, blending transactional streams from operational databases with analytical processing. Change Data Capture (CDC) tools can pipe updates from OLTP systems like PostgreSQL into ClickHouse via Kafka, allowing unified real-time analysis without separate silos. Lyft exemplifies this by merging real-time feeds from Kafka and Kinesis with batch data from S3, enabling hybrid queries that support both streaming dashboards and historical reporting in a single platform.

Performance Evaluation

Benchmark Methodologies

Benchmark methodologies for evaluating ClickHouse performance typically employ standardized analytical workloads to assess query throughput, latency, and resource efficiency in online analytical processing (OLAP) scenarios. Common benchmarks include TPC-H and TPC-DS, which are industry-standard suites designed to test decision support systems. TPC-H models a wholesale supplier's data warehouse with 22 queries on a normalized schema (3rd normal form), focusing on ad-hoc queries involving joins, aggregations, and scans across scales from 1GB to terabytes. TPC-DS extends this with 99 queries on a complex snowflake schema incorporating 24 tables, emphasizing retail sales analysis with skewed data distributions (e.g., normal and Poisson) to simulate real-world variability, and supports scale factors like 1GB for initial testing. Additionally, ClickBench provides a ClickHouse-specific benchmark derived from anonymized production data of a web analytics platform, featuring a single flat table with approximately 100 million rows and 43 SQL queries targeting clickstream analysis, logs, and events. Test setups vary to capture both isolated and distributed performance. Single-node configurations often use commodity hardware such as AWS c6a.4xlarge instances with 16 vCPUs, 32GB RAM, and 500GB SSD storage to evaluate baseline capabilities without network overhead. Cluster setups scale to multiple nodes (e.g., 3-10 replicas) with replicated MergeTree tables for fault tolerance, incorporating sharding for data distribution and ZooKeeper coordination, while hardware specs emphasize high-core CPUs (e.g., Intel Xeon or AMD EPYC) and ample RAM (64GB+) to handle in-memory operations. Data loading involves generating synthetic datasets via tools like dsdgen for TPC-DS or provided scripts for ClickBench, followed by INSERT operations in CSV or Parquet formats to populate tables with optimized engines like MergeTree. Key metrics focus on throughput and responsiveness rather than transactional speed. Queries per second (QPS) measures execution rate under concurrency (e.g., 1-16 threads), while latency captures individual query times, often reported as percentiles (50th, 95th) or geometric means across cold (initial load) and hot (cached) runs. Throughput is quantified in GB/s or MiB/s for data scanned or processed, highlighting compression and scan efficiency in columnar storage. These metrics are derived from repeated executions to ensure statistical validity, such as using t-tests for comparisons. For reproducible testing, the open-source clickhouse-benchmark utility is widely adopted, allowing scripted query submission to local or remote servers with parameters for iterations, time limits, and concurrency. It outputs detailed logs including rows per second (RPS), result sizes, and latency distributions, facilitating automated runs on TPC-H/TPC-DS queries or custom workloads like ClickBench's script, which completes in about 20 minutes on standard hardware. This tool ensures consistency by fixing seeds for data generation and query randomization, enabling fair cross-system evaluations.

Comparative Results

ClickHouse demonstrates significant performance advantages in analytical workloads compared to traditional relational databases like PostgreSQL. Benchmarks from 2023 to 2025 indicate that ClickHouse executes aggregation queries 10 to 100 times faster than PostgreSQL on large datasets, such as those involving millions of rows in OLAP-style operations. For instance, in tests aggregating event data, ClickHouse completed complex GROUP BY queries in seconds, while PostgreSQL required minutes on equivalent hardware. Against columnar competitors like Apache Druid, ClickHouse excels in data compression, particularly for high-cardinality datasets. Recent evaluations show ClickHouse achieving superior storage efficiency through per-column compression algorithms like ZSTD in real-time analytics scenarios. This leads to lower operational costs and faster query latencies, with ClickHouse handling complex OLAP queries at 110ms versus Druid's higher overhead for similar workloads. In comparisons with cloud-native warehouses like Snowflake, ClickHouse offers better cost efficiency, especially in on-premises deployments where it avoids vendor lock-in and subscription fees. A 2023 production benchmark revealed ClickHouse Cloud to be 3 to 5 times more cost-effective than Snowflake for real-time analytics, with query speeds over 2 times faster and 38% better compression ratios. On-premises setups further amplify this by leveraging open-source licensing, resulting in up to 5 times lower total ownership costs for sustained high-ingestion workloads. As of October 2025, ClickHouse continues to show 38% better compression than Snowflake for time-series data. Emerging 2025 cloud benchmarks highlight ClickHouse's edge in vector search extensions, powered by innovations like the QBit data type. Tests on datasets with 29 million Float32 embeddings showed a 2 times speedup in search latency compared to brute-force methods, with adjustable precision enabling efficient cloud resource utilization without fixed indexing trade-offs. However, recent TPC-H benchmarks from November 2025 indicate that Exasol can achieve up to 10.7 times higher median performance than ClickHouse. Similarly, a September 2025 TPC-DS evaluation found Apache Doris outperforming ClickHouse by up to 40 times across 97 of 99 queries. However, benchmarks reveal limitations in transactional workloads, where ClickHouse does not always outperform row-oriented databases. It lacks full ACID transaction support and is optimized primarily for read-heavy analytics, making it slower than PostgreSQL or MySQL for high-concurrency OLTP operations involving frequent updates or joins. In such scenarios, ClickHouse's asynchronous mutations can introduce delays, underscoring its focus on OLAP over mixed workloads.

References

  1. [1]
    What is ClickHouse?
    ClickHouse is a high-performance, column-oriented SQL database management system (DBMS) for online analytical processing (OLAP).What Are Analytics? ​ · Row-Oriented Vs... · Data Replication And...
  2. [2]
    Introducing ClickHouse, Inc.
    Sep 20, 2021 · History of ClickHouse # ... The idea of ClickHouse came up while I was working in Yandex as a developer of a real-time web analytics system.History Of Clickhouse # · Clickhouse In Open Source # · Technical Advantage #Missing: origin | Show results with:origin
  3. [3]
    ClickHouse History
    ClickHouse was initially developed to power Yandex. Metrica, the second largest web analytics platform in the world, and continues to be its core component.
  4. [4]
    ClickHouse® is a real-time analytics database management system
    ClickHouse is an open-source column-oriented database management system that allows generating analytical data reports in real-time.ClickHouse · Issues · Pull requests · Releases 682<|control11|><|separator|>
  5. [5]
    Why Lightspeed invested in ClickHouse: a database built for speed
    Oct 28, 2021 · In 2009, Alexey Milovidov, a brilliant engineer on the Metrica team, was looking for a database that could create reports on metrics like the ...
  6. [6]
    Architecture Overview | ClickHouse Docs
    Its storage layer combines a data format based on traditional log-structured merge (LSM) trees with novel techniques for continuous transformation (e.g. ...Missing: prototypes | Show results with:prototypes
  7. [7]
    high-performance open-source distributed column-oriented DBMS
    Jun 15, 2016 · This page seems to cover most of the prerequisites, and some other advice: https://github.com/yandex/ClickHouse/blob/master/doc/build.m...
  8. [8]
    2019 Changelog | ClickHouse Docs
    ClickHouse Release 19.14.3.3, 2019-09-10​ · New Feature​ · Experimental Feature​ · Bug Fix​ · Security Fix​ · Improvement​ · Performance Improvement​ · Build/Testing/ ...
  9. [9]
    Cloud Changelog | ClickHouse Docs
    ClickHouse Cloud changelog providing descriptions of what is new in each ClickHouse Cloud release.Missing: milestones | Show results with:milestones
  10. [10]
    ClickHouse Release 24.10
    Nov 6, 2024 · ClickHouse version 24.10 contains 25 new features, 15 performance optimizations, 60 bug fixes. In this release, clickhouse-local gets even more useful.
  11. [11]
    How Anthropic is using ClickHouse to scale observability for the AI era
    Jul 7, 2025 · With the release of Claude Opus 4 in May 2025, the company activated AI Safety Level 3 precautions, a set of internal guardrails designed to ...With Great Power Comes Great... · Choosing Clickhouse To Scale... · Deploying Clickhouse, The...Missing: milestones | Show results with:milestones
  12. [12]
    What is a columnar database? | ClickHouse Docs
    A columnar database stores the data of each column independently. This allows reading data from disk only for those columns that are used in any given query.Missing: documentation | Show results with:documentation
  13. [13]
    Architecture Overview | ClickHouse Docs
    ClickHouse Server is based on POCO C++ Libraries and uses Poco::Util::AbstractConfiguration to represent its configuration. ... MergeTree is not an LSM tree ...
  14. [14]
    Compression in ClickHouse
    One of the secrets to ClickHouse query performance is compression. Less data on disk means less I/O and faster queries and inserts.
  15. [15]
    Nested | ClickHouse Docs
    A nested data structure is like a table inside a cell. The parameters of a nested data structure – the column names and types – are specified the same way as ...
  16. [16]
  17. [17]
  18. [18]
  19. [19]
  20. [20]
  21. [21]
  22. [22]
    ANSI SQL mode | Altinity® Knowledge Base for ClickHouse®
    Sep 19, 2024 · ANSI SQL mode in ClickHouse makes it more compatible with ANSI SQL standards, potentially slowing down query performance. It can be enabled ...
  23. [23]
    None
    Nothing is retrieved...<|separator|>
  24. [24]
    ClickHouse vs StarRocks vs Presto vs Trino vs Apache Spark
    Apr 17, 2025 · ClickHouse has a rules-based optimizer and has a config to autoselect join strategies. It compensates for lack of cost-based optimizer through ...
  25. [25]
    Inserting ClickHouse data
    This can then be inserted into ClickHouse from either local files or via object storage using table functions.
  26. [26]
    Kafka table engine | ClickHouse Docs
    The Kafka Table Engine can be used to publish works with Apache Kafka and lets you publish or subscribe to data flows, organize fault-tolerant storage, ...
  27. [27]
    Using the Kafka table engine | ClickHouse Docs
    The Kafka table engine in ClickHouse reads/writes data to Kafka, inserts data from Kafka, and uses materialized views to persist data. It allows one-time ...Kafka To Clickhouse​ · Common Operations​ · Clickhouse To Kafka​
  28. [28]
    Replicated* table engines | ClickHouse Docs
    We use the term MergeTree to refer to all table engines in the MergeTree family , the same as for ReplicatedMergeTree . If you had a MergeTree table that ...
  29. [29]
    Replicating data | ClickHouse Docs
    In this example, you'll learn how to set up a simple ClickHouse cluster which replicates the data. There are five servers configured.Missing: asynchronous | Show results with:asynchronous
  30. [30]
    Backup and restore | ClickHouse Docs
    Guide to backing up and restoring ClickHouse databases and tables.Missing: TTL | Show results with:TTL
  31. [31]
    Manipulations with Table TTL | ClickHouse Docs
    The docs below demonstrate how to alter or remove an existing TTL rule. MODIFY TTL You can change table TTL with a request of the following form.
  32. [32]
    Rebalancing Data | ClickHouse Docs
    ClickHouse does not support automatic shard rebalancing, so we provide some best practices for how to rebalance shards.
  33. [33]
    JDBC Driver | ClickHouse Docs
    Use the official JDBC driver (and Java client) to access ClickHouse from your Java applications. Previous. Native interface (TCP) · Next. MySQL Interface.
  34. [34]
    ODBC Driver | ClickHouse Docs
    Documentation for the ClickHouse ODBC driver. ... Use the official ODBC driver for accessing ClickHouse as a data source.
  35. [35]
    Connecting Tableau to ClickHouse
    You can connect Tableau to ClickHouse using the generic ODBC/JDBC ClickHouse driver. However, this connector streamlines the connection setup process.
  36. [36]
    UDFs User Defined Functions | ClickHouse Docs
    The configuration of executable user defined functions can be located in one or more xml-files. The path to the configuration is specified in the ...
  37. [37]
    CREATE FUNCTION -user defined function (UDF) | ClickHouse Docs
    Creates a user defined function (UDF) from a lambda expression. The expression must consist of function parameters, constants, operators, or other function ...
  38. [38]
    JDBC | ClickHouse Docs
    To implement the JDBC connection, ClickHouse uses the separate program clickhouse-jdbc-bridge that should run as a daemon. This engine supports the Nullable ...
  39. [39]
    ClickHouse Cloud | Cloud Based DBMS
    ClickHouse Cloud offers a serverless hosted DBMS solution. Automatic scaling and no infrastructure to manage at consumption-based pricing.Bring Your Own Cloud · ClickPipes · クラウド
  40. [40]
    Automatic Scaling | ClickHouse Docs
    Automatic vertical scaling is available in the Scale and Enterprise plans. To upgrade, visit the Plans page in the cloud console.
  41. [41]
    ClickHouse Cloud on AWS
    Experience ClickHouse, the fastest analytical database, as a fully managed service on AWS. Get unmatched speed and scalability without infrastructure management ...Pay As You Go · Commited Contract · Available On Aws Marketplace
  42. [42]
    Real-Time Data Analytics Platform - ClickHouse
    There are many ClickHouse clusters consisting of multiple hundreds of nodes, while the largest known ClickHouse cluster is well over a thousand nodes. There are ...
  43. [43]
    ClickHouse® limitations
    In most of the cases ClickHouse® doesn't have any hard limits. But obviously there there are some practical limitation / barriers for different things.Missing: scalability constraints
  44. [44]
    Memory limit exceeded for query | ClickHouse Docs
    Jul 25, 2025 · For memory-intensive aggregations or sorting scenarios, users can use the settings max_bytes_before_external_group_by and ...
  45. [45]
    Restrictions on query complexity | ClickHouse Docs
    Almost all the restrictions only apply to SELECT queries, and for distributed query processing, restrictions are applied on each server separately.
  46. [46]
    Make Before Break - Faster Scaling Mechanics for ClickHouse Cloud
    Apr 2, 2025 · The majority of ClickHouse workloads are better served with scaling up (vertically) rather than scaling out (horizontally).Make Before Break # · Live Migrations # · Migration Challenges #Missing: trade- | Show results with:trade-
  47. [47]
    Sizing and hardware recommendations | ClickHouse Docs
    This guide discusses our general recommendations regarding hardware, compute, memory, and disk configurations for open-source users.
  48. [48]
    System Tables | ClickHouse Docs
    System table containing information about threads that execute queries, for example, thread name, thread start time, duration of query processing. system.System.query_log · System.query_views_log · Tables · System.processes<|separator|>
  49. [49]
    Monitoring | ClickHouse Docs
    ClickHouse server has embedded instruments for self-state monitoring. To track server events use server logs. See the logger section of the configuration file.
  50. [50]
    OPTIMIZE Statement | ClickHouse Docs
    When OPTIMIZE is used with the ReplicatedMergeTree family of table engines, ClickHouse creates a task for merging and waits for execution on all replicas (if ...
  51. [51]
    SYSTEM Statements | ClickHouse Docs
    By default, internal dictionaries are disabled. Always returns Ok. regardless of the result of the internal dictionary update. SYSTEM RELOAD DICTIONARIES​.
  52. [52]
    2020 Changelog | ClickHouse Docs
    ... dictionary updates are performed using malformed queries and/or cause crashes. ... When server log rotation was configured using logger.size parameter with ...Missing: maintenance | Show results with:maintenance
  53. [53]
    Access Control and Account Management | ClickHouse Docs
    This article shows the basics of defining SQL users and roles and applying those privileges and permissions to databases, tables, rows, and columns.User account · Row Policy
  54. [54]
    Configuring SSL-TLS | ClickHouse Docs
    This guide provides simple and minimal settings to configure ClickHouse to use OpenSSL certificates to validate connections.Missing: rest | Show results with:rest<|control11|><|separator|>
  55. [55]
    Data encryption | ClickHouse Docs
    ClickHouse Cloud is configured with encryption at rest by default utilizing cloud provider-managed AES 256 keys. For more information review: AWS server-side ...
  56. [56]
    Self-managed Upgrade | ClickHouse Docs
    Self-managed Upgrade. ClickHouse upgrade overview​. This document contains: general guidelines; a recommended plan; specifics for upgrading the binaries on ...General guidelines · Multiple ClickHouse server...
  57. [57]
    Changelog 2025 | ClickHouse Docs
    Changelog 2025. Table of Contents​. ClickHouse release v25.10, 2025-10-30 ClickHouse release v25.9, 2025-09-25 ClickHouse release v25.8 LTS, 2025-08-282024 · 2020 · 2025 Changelog · 2021Missing: milestones | Show results with:milestones
  58. [58]
    User stories - ClickHouse
    "Since adopting ClickHouse, we've been able to iterate on ML workloads 5-10x faster than with Spark or Teradata-based solutions, thanks to the faster compute ...
  59. [59]
    Evolution of Data Structures in Yandex.Metrica - ClickHouse
    Dec 13, 2016 · Using OLAPServer, we developed an understanding of how well column-oriented DBMS's handle ad-hoc analytics tasks with non-aggregated data. If ...Missing: OLAP | Show results with:OLAP
  60. [60]
    How we built the Internal Data Warehouse at ClickHouse
    Jul 19, 2023 · In fact, most of the transformed results are at first written to a staging table, and only then are they inserted into the target table. Though ...
  61. [61]
    Real-time Analytics with ClickHouse
    Learn about Real-time Analytics and how companies are using ClickHouse for their real-time analytics applications.The Real-Time Database That... · Real-Time Applications And... · Clickhouse For Real-Time...
  62. [62]
    Building a product analytics solution with ClickHouse
    Dec 5, 2024 · ClickHouse's high-performance aggregation capabilities enable users to answer complex questions in real-time, significantly enhancing ...Denormalized Events # · Common Queries # · Measuring Time Between...
  63. [63]
    Integrating Kafka with ClickHouse
    To get started using ClickPipes for Kafka, see the reference documentation or navigate to the Data Sources tab in the ClickHouse Cloud UI. Kafka Connect Sink​.Using the Kafka table engine · ClickHouse Kafka Connect Sink · Vector
  64. [64]
    Real-time Event Streaming with ClickHouse, Kafka Connect and ...
    Jun 22, 2023 · Learn how to deploy the new official ClickHouse Kafka connector in Confluent Cloud, enabling the delivery of real-time events to ClickHouse.
  65. [65]
    How Lyft powers batch and real-time analytics with ClickHouse Cloud
    Sep 10, 2025 · Today, ClickHouse's managed service powers both batch and real-time pipelines, pulling data from S3 (via Trino), Kafka, and Kinesis. It serves ...
  66. [66]
    An intro to time-series databases | ClickHouse Engineering Resources
    Sep 10, 2025 · In this guide, we'll learn all about time-series data and its use cases, time-series databases, and how to query time-series data.What Is Time-Series Data? # · What Are Good Use Cases For... · Is Clickhouse A Time-Series...
  67. [67]
    Log monitoring | ClickHouse Engineering Resources
    Apr 10, 2025 · This guide will cover practical techniques for managing logs and the tools that simplify this essential task.What Are Logs? # · Log Formats # · Types Of Logs #Missing: IoT | Show results with:IoT
  68. [68]
    Tekion adopts ClickHouse Cloud to power application performance ...
    Jun 26, 2024 · ClickHouse Cloud streamlines the ingestion process and enables computation of metrics and alerts, including custom metrics tailored to Tekion's ...
  69. [69]
    Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) - ClickHouse
    Apr 10, 2025 · The engine combines real-time analysis with historical data to identify security incidents and potential threats. Alerts #. The alerting ...Missing: clickstream | Show results with:clickstream
  70. [70]
    Ingesting clickstream data from 45M users into ClickHouse
    Mar 1, 2025 · Jordan Thoms, CTO and Co-Founder at Kami. Kami's in-house analytics system collects clickstream data for 45 million users, reaching 300 GB per day and over 200 ...
  71. [71]
    Columnar databases explained | ClickHouse Resource Hub
    Sep 16, 2025 · Designed for the Hadoop ecosystem - efficient storage for Hive and Spark workloads. Hadoop/Hive environments, legacy big data pipelines.Row-Based Vs. Column-Based # · When Should I Use A Column... · What Are The Challenges Of...
  72. [72]
    TPC-H (1999) | ClickHouse Docs
    A popular benchmark which models the internal data warehouse of a wholesale supplier. The data is stored into a 3rd normal form representation.
  73. [73]
    TPC-DS (2012) | ClickHouse Docs
    TPC-DS is based on TPC-H, but it took the opposite route, ie it expanded the number of joins needed by storing the data in a complex snowflake schema.
  74. [74]
    ClickBench: a Benchmark For Analytical Databases - GitHub
    This benchmark represents typical workload in the following areas: clickstream and traffic analysis, web analytics, machine-generated data, structured logs, ...
  75. [75]
    clickhouse-benchmark | ClickHouse Docs
    clickhouse-benchmark can compare performances for two running ClickHouse servers. To use the comparison mode, specify endpoints of both servers by two pairs of ...
  76. [76]
    ClickHouse vs PostgreSQL for Analytics Workloads - OctaByte Blog
    Sep 7, 2025 · ClickHouse consistently outperforms PostgreSQL in OLAP-style queries, often returning results 10–100x faster on aggregation workloads.Missing: 2023-2025 | Show results with:2023-2025
  77. [77]
    ClickHouse vs Aurora PostgreSQL: Performance Guide - Tinybird
    Rating 5.0 (10) Oct 21, 2025 · For analytical queries that aggregate millions of rows, ClickHouse typically runs 10x to 100x faster than Aurora PostgreSQL. Check out the ...Missing: 2023-2025 | Show results with:2023-2025
  78. [78]
    PostgreSQL vs ClickHouse - evaluating the best fit for data analytics
    Its performance is up to 100 times faster than Postgres. ClickHouse's built-in compression ensures efficient utilization of storage space, further enhancing ...Missing: 2023-2025 | Show results with:2023-2025
  79. [79]
    ClickHouse vs Apache Druid: Real-Time Analytics for Big Data
    Jun 13, 2025 · Side-by-side bar charts comparing ClickHouse and Apache Druid performance in latency (ms) and throughput (queries/sec) across Complex OLAP.
  80. [80]
    ClickHouse vs Druid: A Decisive Comparison | DoubleCloud - Medium
    Jan 25, 2024 · ClickHouse is mainly used for ad-hoc querying, data warehousing, and real-time analytics, while Druid is commonly utilized for exploring event-driven datasets.
  81. [81]
    ClickHouse® vs Druid: A battle between two solid real-time analytics ...
    Rating 5.0 (10) Oct 14, 2025 · Compare ClickHouse and Druid across architecture, ingestion patterns, query performance, and scaling models ... Indexing and compression schemes.Missing: 2023-2025 | Show results with:2023-2025
  82. [82]
    ClickHouse vs Snowflake for Real-Time Analytics - Comparing and ...
    Sep 6, 2023 · ClickHouse Cloud is 3-5x more cost-effective than Snowflake in production. ClickHouse Cloud querying speeds are over 2x faster compared to ...Clickhouse Vs Snowflake # · Clustering Vs Ordering # · Migrating Data #Missing: 2024-2025 | Show results with:2024-2025
  83. [83]
    ClickHouse vs Snowflake for Real-Time Analytics - Benchmarks and ...
    Sep 6, 2023 · We believe ClickHouse can provide significant performance and cost improvements compared to Snowflake for real-time analytics use cases.
  84. [84]
    We built a vector search engine that lets you choose precision at ...
    Oct 28, 2025 · We added QBit to ClickHouse, a column type that stores floats as bit planes. It lets you choose how many bits to read during vector search, ...Vector Search Primer # · Qbit Deepdive # · Let's Vectorise #
  85. [85]
    ClickHouse vs PostgreSQL: Detailed Analysis - RisingWave
    Jun 25, 2024 · ClickHouse's Limitations: Transactional Support: ClickHouse is optimized for analytical workloads rather than transactional processing.<|control11|><|separator|>
  86. [86]
    ClickHouse® vs MySQL for analytics - Tinybird
    Rating 5.0 (10) Oct 17, 2025 · ClickHouse is not designed for transactional workloads and lacks full ACID transaction support. The database doesn't support multi-row ...
  87. [87]
    ClickHouse vs. Postgres: 5 key differences and how to choose
    Workload type: ClickHouse is optimized for analytical workloads with fast read performance, while PostgreSQL is better suited for transactional applications ...Missing: limitations | Show results with:limitations