Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Forecheck

In ice hockey, the forecheck is a defensive strategy employed by the attacking team to apply pressure on opponents in the defensive zone or neutral zone, aiming to regain puck possession through turnovers and disruption of breakouts.^[1]^[2] Forechecking is essential for controlling the pace of the game, as it limits the opposing team's time and space while building momentum and creating scoring opportunities for the pressuring team.^[2] Effective execution requires discipline, anticipation, and clear role assignment among players, particularly forwards who lead the pressure.^[1] Common forechecking systems include the 1-2-2, where one forward aggressively pressures the puck carrier while two support and two defensemen cover; the 2-1-2, featuring two forwards applying initial pressure supported by one trailing forward; and more aggressive variants like the 2-3 crash and bang, which emphasizes physicality to force errors.^[2]^[3] These strategies are tailored to team strengths, opponent speed, and game situations, such as using the 1-2-2 to protect the middle of the ice against faster teams or the 2-1-2 stack for early-game dominance.^[3] Notable NHL implementations highlight forechecking's impact, including the Carolina Hurricanes' 2-1-2 under coach Rod Brind’Amour, which fueled sustained success through relentless pressure.^[2] The neutral-zone trap, a passive forecheck variant popularized by the New Jersey Devils in the mid-1990s, led to multiple Stanley Cups by intercepting passes and slowing transitions.^[2] Overall, forechecking remains a cornerstone of modern hockey tactics, influencing team performance across all levels.^[1]

Introduction

Definition

Forechecking is a defensive tactic in ice hockey employed primarily in the offensive zone, where the attacking team applies pressure to the opponents to disrupt their puck retrieval and breakout attempts.^[4] It functions as a coordinated team system involving forwards who enter the zone to challenge the defending team immediately after losing possession or upon entering the offensive end.^[5] The primary objective of forechecking is to force turnovers, thereby regaining puck possession in the opponent's defensive end or the adjacent neutral zone, which allows for quick offensive transitions and sustained pressure.^[1] Unlike backchecking, which involves offensive players retreating to support their own defensive zone during a transition to prevent counterattacks, forechecking focuses on aggressive pursuit in the opponent's territory to prevent clean breakouts.^[6] It also differs from passive forechecking strategies such as the neutral zone trap, which emphasize clogging the middle of the ice in the neutral zone to limit the opponent's speed and options without deep offensive zone penetration.^[7] In its basic mechanics, forechecking typically activates after a dump-in, where the puck is shot into the offensive zone to force the opposing defenders to retrieve it under duress, or following a carry-in, where a player transports the puck across the blue line before the team loses control and shifts to pressure mode. Forwards use skating, stick checks, and body positioning to close gaps and disrupt puck movement, aiming to create chaos and exploit retrieval errors.^[8] This pressure application sets the foundation for regaining control without venturing into more detailed formations.^[4]

Purpose

The primary goal of forechecking in ice hockey is to regain puck possession as quickly as possible in the offensive zone, thereby sustaining offensive pressure on the defending team and restricting their ability to initiate effective transitions to counterattacks.^[9]^[10] By applying immediate pressure following a dump-in or zone entry, the forechecking team disrupts the opponent's breakout attempts, forcing rushed passes or turnovers that allow for rapid puck recovery.^[11] This approach minimizes the defending team's time to organize, preventing clean exits and maintaining the attacking team's territorial dominance.^[12] Beyond immediate possession recovery, forechecking yields secondary benefits that enhance overall team performance, including building offensive momentum through sustained zone time and physically wearing down defenders via relentless pursuit and body contact.^[13]^[14] It also creates opportunities for odd-man rushes by capitalizing on turnovers, which can lead to high-danger scoring chances, and increases overall scoring probabilities by forcing errors in high-pressure situations.^[12]^[10] In terms of game flow, effective forechecking helps control key puck possession statistics, such as reducing opponents' controlled zone exits by up to 15 percentage points with aggressive pressure, thereby shifting territorial advantage toward the forechecking team and extending offensive zone residency.^[11]^[10] Analytics from NHL play reveal a strong correlation between forechecking intensity and higher shot attempts, with aggressive systems generating approximately 0.51 shots per forecheck event compared to 0.29 for passive ones, alongside improved goals from offensive zone starts due to increased territorial control.^[12]^[11] This underscores forechecking's role in offensive output.^[11]

History

Origins

The forecheck emerged in the 1930s in the National Hockey League (NHL) as a response to rule changes permitting forward passing in all three zones of the ice. In the 1929-30 season, the NHL revised its offside and passing rules to allow forward passes within the defensive, neutral, and offensive zones (though not across the blue lines), aiming to increase scoring and open up the game after years of low-offense play. This adjustment, effective from December 21, 1929, enabled faster puck transitions and more offensive opportunities, fundamentally altering how teams approached zone entries and defensive coverage.^[15]^[16] The new rules prompted defenses to pack near the blue line to intercept passes and contain breakouts, leading NHL teams to adopt forechecking as a counter-strategy. Initially, it served as a simple containment tactic to limit opponent movement, but it soon evolved into an active pursuit system, where forwards aggressively pressured puck carriers in the offensive zone to force turnovers.^[15] This formalization marked the forecheck's transition into a core tactical element, laying the groundwork for its evolution into more sophisticated forms.^[17]

Evolution

During the 1950s and 1970s, forechecking evolved toward more aggressive systems as international competitions highlighted contrasting styles, particularly the Soviet Union's emphasis on speed, precise passing, and coordinated pressure. The Soviet Red Army team's possession-based approach, featuring fluid five-man units where defensemen joined rushes and forwards applied relentless zone pressure, influenced North American teams to adopt similar aggressive tactics to counter fast breakouts. This shift was facilitated by rule refinements, such as the 1943 introduction of the red line to reduce offside calls and accelerate play, alongside advancements in skating equipment that enabled quicker transitions and sustained forechecking intensity. A key 1969 IIHF rule change further permitted aggressive forechecking deeper into the offensive zone, amplifying these developments in global play.^[18]^[19]^[15]^[20] In the 1980s and 1990s, forechecking adapted to the "dead puck" era's defensive emphasis, with teams prioritizing neutral zone control to stifle transitions and limit scoring chances. The neutral zone trap, a conservative forechecking variant, gained prominence as coaches like Jacques Lemaire implemented it to force turnovers without overcommitting in the offensive end. A notable milestone was the New Jersey Devils' adoption of the neutral zone trap in the mid-1990s under Lemaire, contributing to their 1995 Stanley Cup win and inspiring hybrid systems. Modifications emerged for power plays, adjusting forechecker positioning to exploit numerical advantages while maintaining neutral zone integrity.^[21]^[22]^[23] From the 2000s onward, forechecking has been reshaped by analytics and post-lockout rule changes, fostering high-event, possession-oriented systems focused on small-area battles. The 2004-05 NHL lockout led to reforms reducing clutching and grabbing—such as stricter obstruction penalties and the elimination of the two-line offside—enabling more dynamic, aggressive forechecks that prioritize speed and zone entries over conservative traps. Data-driven insights, emerging in the late 2000s, emphasized metrics like forecheck-generated shots and entry denial rates, promoting strategies that create turnovers in confined spaces to boost scoring efficiency. This evolution has sustained higher-paced play, with teams blending traditional dump-and-chase with controlled retrievals for adaptable hybrids.^[24]^[12]^[25]^[26]

Principles

Key Elements

Effective forechecking relies on several foundational components that ensure coordinated disruption of the opponent's puck possession in their defensive or neutral zone. Central to this is pressure, which involves the timing and intensity of applying force to the puck carrier to limit decision-making time and force errors. The nearest forechecker, often designated as F1, initiates pressure by pursuing the puck carrier at full speed upon zone entry, using an inside-out angle to direct play toward the boards. Timing is critical: immediate pressure upon puck retrieval prevents clean breakouts, while delayed pressure allows opponents to establish control. Intensity varies between low pressure, which contains the carrier without direct confrontation to maintain structure, and high pressure, an aggressive approach that closes space rapidly to induce turnovers, as seen in systems emphasizing relentless pursuit.^[27]^[28]^[10] Gap control complements pressure by maintaining an optimal distance—typically one to two stick lengths—between the forechecker and the puck carrier, forcing directional choices without overcommitting and exposing the defense. This technique uses body angling and stick positioning to funnel the carrier toward less dangerous areas, such as the corners, reducing passing and skating lanes. Effective gap control minimizes the opponent's time and space, enhancing turnover probability; for instance, defensemen or secondary forecheckers apply it during rushes to contain threats before they reach the neutral zone.^[27]^[28] Communication among forecheckers is essential for synchronization, employing verbal cues like "over" or "up" to signal positioning and non-verbal reads of body language to anticipate plays. This coordination prevents gaps in coverage, ensures rotational support, and allows real-time adjustments to opponent movements, fostering team cohesion during high-speed transitions.^[27]^[28]^[2] Finally, puck support involves strategic positioning by secondary forecheckers to retrieve loose pucks, intercept passes, or provide outlets immediately following initial pressure, creating numerical advantages near the puck. This element sustains offensive zone time by covering potential breakout paths and enabling quick recoveries, with forecheckers reading the play to fill support roles dynamically. These components are typically assigned to specific players like F1 for primary pressure and F2/F3 for support, though details vary by system.^[27]^[28]^[2]

Player Responsibilities

In the forecheck, forwards are assigned sequential roles as F1, F2, and F3 based on the order they enter the offensive zone, with each contributing to pressure application and puck recovery while maintaining defensive structure. The first forechecker (F1) leads the pursuit by aggressively closing on the puck carrier with speed, forcing them toward the boards or corners to eliminate time and space, and aiming to establish contact for a potential turnover or to direct play into a controlled area.^[27]^[29]^[30] This role demands discipline to avoid overcommitment, as F1 sets the tone for the entire unit by signaling intent early.^[29] The second forechecker (F2) provides immediate support to F1, focusing on sealing off outlet passes and reading the play to intercept potential outlets or apply secondary pressure if the puck carrier evades the initial chase.^[31]^[27] F2 maintains a controlled gap to react flexibly—such as jumping into corners on turnovers or covering lanes—ensuring the forecheck remains cohesive without leaving gaps for breakouts.^[29]^[30] The third forechecker (F3) operates higher in the zone, covering the point or weak side to disrupt opposing defensemen and prevent clean breakouts, while staying positioned for recovery support or to receive a chip pass if needed.^[31]^[29] This role emphasizes patience and coverage, allowing F3 to backcheck aggressively if a defenseman is beaten or to activate offensively once possession is secured.^[27]^[30] Although the forecheck is primarily a forward-driven tactic, defensemen can contribute by pinching at the blue line or joining the pressure in aggressive setups, provided forward support is in place to cover any risks.^[31]^[27]^[29]

Strategies

2-1-2 Strategy

The 2-1-2 forecheck is a balanced aggressive system in ice hockey where two forwards, designated as F1 and F2, enter deep into the offensive zone to apply immediate pressure on the puck carrier and primary passing options following a dump-in.^[32]^[33] The third forward, F3, positions higher in the neutral zone or slot area to provide support, read the play, and cover potential passing lanes or loose pucks, while the two defensemen remain high near the blue line for backchecking coverage and to pinch down the boards if the puck stays along the walls.^[27]^[32] In execution, F1 targets the puck carrier to force a quick decision or turnover, often using body checks to disrupt control, while F2 seals off secondary passing lanes and pursues loose pucks in the corners or along the boards.^[32]^[33] F3 selectively joins the pressure if the puck moves predictably, such as switching sides, but primarily maintains a high position to intercept central passes or support the defensemen in preventing breakouts; if the puck is cleared, the defensemen ensure no odd-man rushes develop by covering the blue line.^[27]^[32] This setup allows for controlled aggression, with the high support from F3 and the defensemen enabling quick transitions back to defense. The strategy's strengths lie in its ability to generate turnovers deep in the zone through dual pressure, disrupting opponent breakouts and creating scoring opportunities, particularly for teams with fast-skating forwards capable of sustaining pursuit.^[27]^[33] It balances offensive commitment with defensive structure, minimizing the risk of odd-man rushes against compared to more aggressive systems.^[32] However, the 2-1-2 can be vulnerable to quick breakouts if the initial pressure from F1 and F2 fails to connect or if F3's support lags, potentially exposing the defense to counterattacks, making it less ideal for teams lacking speed or in low-scoring, conservative situations.^[27]

1-2-2 Strategy

The 1-2-2 forecheck is an aggressive offensive zone strategy in ice hockey that positions one forward (F1) as the deep forechecker to apply immediate pressure on the puck carrier, two supporting forwards (F2 and F3) in the mid-zone to read and react to the play, and two defensemen (D1 and D2) positioned high near the blue line to maintain defensive structure.^[34] This formation creates a layered pressure system designed to trap the puck deep in the opponent's zone and force turnovers.^[35] In execution, F1 aggressively angles the puck carrier toward the boards to pin it and disrupt retrievals, while using an active stick to block cross-ice or defensive-to-defensive passes.^[34] F2 and F3 then collapse toward the puck side for support, with F2 covering the strong side and F3 sealing the weak side to pursue loose pucks or steals, often forming a supportive triangle to maintain possession pressure.^[35] The high defensemen pinch selectively on loose pucks to join the forecheck but avoid simultaneous advances that could expose the slot, instead focusing on preventing icings, chip-outs, or clean breakouts by blocking central lanes.^[34] This dynamic allows for quick transitions if the pressure succeeds, aligning with broader player responsibilities for support and puck pursuit as outlined in forechecking principles.^[34] The strategy's strengths lie in its ability to generate high turnover rates, particularly in corner battles, by suffocating breakout attempts and capitalizing on errors from skilled puck-moving defensemen.^[34] It is particularly effective for fast, agile teams that can force rushed plays and convert turnovers into scoring chances, as evidenced by its use in NHL contexts like the Carolina Hurricanes' high-pressure system and the Seattle Kraken's neutral zone adaptations for entry denial.^[36]^[37] However, the 1-2-2 carries weaknesses, including vulnerability to exposure on 3-on-2 rushes if F1 is evaded through a quick pass or carry, potentially leaving gaps for counterattacks.^[34] It demands skilled puck retrieval and decision-making from forecheckers to mitigate risks from cross-zone passes or rotations, making it less ideal for teams lacking speed or coordination in the deep zone.^[35]

2-3 Strategy

The 2-3 forecheck is a defensive-oriented strategy in ice hockey that employs a formation with two forwards positioned low in the opponent's defensive zone to apply initial pressure, while the third forward and two defensemen stack high near the blue line or in the neutral zone to form a containment layer. This setup, often associated with the left wing lock variant, positions the left winger (F3) to shadow the strong-side defenseman and block point shots or passes, creating a structured barrier that prioritizes puck denial over deep penetration.^[38]^[39] In execution, the two low forecheckers—typically the center (F1) and right winger (F2)—disrupt the puck retrieval by the opposing defensemen, forcing plays toward the boards or creating loose pucks through body checks and stick pressure. The high trio then funnels the play into traps, using gap control to compress the ice and induce turnovers in the mid-zone rather than allowing clean breakouts; if the puck carrier evades the low pressure, the back three slide laterally to seal lanes without overcommitting. This approach maintains high support, as outlined in broader forechecking principles, to limit transitional threats.^[40]^[41] The primary strengths of the 2-3 forecheck lie in its ability to minimize counterattack risks by providing an immediate defensive shell, making it ideal for protecting leads, facing superior skating teams, or deploying with fatigued lines in low-event games where possession control trumps aggressive retrieval. It excels in containing skilled opponents through layered pressure, often resulting in sustained zone time without exposing the net.^[39]^[38] However, its conservative design presents weaknesses, including reduced aggressiveness that can permit easier zone exits via quick passes or wheels if the low forecheckers fail to disrupt effectively, potentially leading to odd-man rushes. This formation may also limit offensive opportunities in high-tempo scenarios, as the high stack prioritizes safety over full-zone commitment.^[40]^[39]

Applications

Modifications

Modifications to forechecking strategies allow teams to adapt to specific game contexts, enhancing effectiveness without altering core structures like the 1-2-2 or 2-1-2 systems. Conversely, when protecting a lead late in periods, teams may employ a more passive approach, such as the 1-3-1 trap, to prioritize puck control and minimize transition risks.^[42] Hybrid systems blend elements of multiple forechecks to counter opponent tendencies identified through scouting. For instance, coaches like David Quinn have implemented a 2-1-2 variant that combines aggressive deep pressure from the first two forecheckers (F1 and F2) with passive options for the third (F3), allowing flexibility to disrupt breakouts or retreat based on play development. Teams may also merge 1-2-2 aggression with 2-3 containment for versatile application, particularly against skilled defenses. Analytics platforms enable real-time adjustments.^[43]^[44] Coaching decisions play a pivotal role in customizing forechecks, including line matching to deploy defensive specialists against key opponents and fatigue management through optimal shift lengths of 40-45 seconds for most players. Video analysis further refines these adaptations by reviewing opponent breakouts to tailor pressure points. In the 2-1-2 forecheck, for example, the strong-side defenseman (D1) may join the attack by pinching down the boards to support F1, forcing turnovers while F3 covers the blue line to maintain structure. Similarly, an F1 hesitation tactic in controlled trap setups, such as a passive 1-2-2, involves the first forechecker engaging at moderated speed to steer puck carriers into neutral-zone congestion rather than committing fully deep.^[45]^[32]^[46]

Countering Breakouts

Teams counter incoming forechecks by executing structured breakouts from their defensive zone, emphasizing rapid puck possession and transition to the neutral zone. Primary breakout tactics include the quick up-pass to the center, where the retrieving defenseman angles the puck retrieval and delivers a tape-to-tape pass to the center positioned low for support, allowing immediate forward momentum.^[47] Wheel plays involve the defenseman carrying the puck behind the net before passing to a winger curling toward the boards, maintaining speed and creating separation from forecheckers.^[48] Strong-side dumps, such as rimming the puck hard along the boards to the winger, are employed against aggressive pressure to force opponents into a retrieval battle while preserving possession options.^[47] Defensive reads are crucial for successful execution, with the goaltender providing initial support by playing the puck to the nearest defenseman or center when safe, reducing retrieval time under duress.^[48] Defensemen cover forecheckers by using deception, such as head fakes or quick D-to-D passes, to evade pressure and maintain control.^[47] Forwards contribute by chipping the puck over advancing forecheckers if pinched, positioning along the wall to contest loose pucks and support the carrier.^[48] Specific counters target common forecheck formations; against the 1-2-2, teams utilize stretch passes from defensemen to wingers filling lanes, exploiting gaps created by lateral puck movement and player rotation in the neutral zone.^[49] Versus the 2-3, breakouts focus on exploiting high gaps with speed, where forwards drive outside lanes while defensemen execute quick up-passes or hard rims to bypass the layered pressure.^[50] These counters rely on structured support, such as the center filling middle ice and wingers providing seam options.^[51] Success in countering breakouts hinges on puck retrieval speed, where defensemen prioritize angled approaches to the puck for efficient possession, and clear communication among players to call options like "up" or "wheel," minimizing turnovers under pressure.^[47] Effective teams practice these elements in progressive drills, ensuring seamless transitions that disrupt the opponent's forecheck momentum.^[51]

References

[1]
Hockey Forecheck Explained with Examples | Ice Hockey Systems Inc.
A forecheck in ice hockey is a strategy designed to regain possession of the puck in the opponent's defensive end of the rink or the neutral zone.
[2]
What Is Forechecking in Hockey? Strategies Explained
Jul 31, 2025 · Forechecking refers to the strategy used by a team to pressure the opposition in their defensive zone or neutral zone, particularly after losing ...
[3]
What OZ Forecheck Should Your Team Use? - The Coaches Site
Nov 11, 2024 · The goal of any forecheck is simply to work to gain possession of the puck while protecting the middle of the ice. I think the key to this is ...
[4]
[PDF] Player Development - Hockey Canada
A collective action of two or more players using technical skills and / or individual tactics in order to create an advantage or take away the advantage of an ...
[5]
Analytics with Alison: Understanding Forechecking Performance
Nov 18, 2021 · It's worth noting that in its broadest sense, forechecking also refers to any system that is designed to apply pressure in the offensive zone ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[6]
How to Forecheck in Hockey
Forechecking is the process of pressuring the other team when they have the puck in their own end or in the neutral zone, with the goal of stealing the puck.<|control11|><|separator|>
[7]
Explained: 1-3-1 Neutral Zone Forecheck - The Coaches Site
Feb 11, 2025 · The 1-3-1 neutral zone forecheck is a defensive-minded system that creates a web-like structure to trap opponents in the neutral zone.
[8]
Dump and Chase: What is It, and How Do You Use it in Hockey?
May 2, 2022 · The dump and chase in ice hockey is when the puck-possessing team crosses the red line and dumps the puck deep into the opposing teams' zone.Missing: mechanics | Show results with:mechanics
[9]
'A Hunter Mentality': Kiefer Sherwood Chronicles his Love of ...
Oct 18, 2024 · Ultimately, forechecking is about getting the puck back or eliminating guys in position. If you can do those two things over the course of the ...
[10]
The Importance of Pressure for a Successful Forecheck
Sep 12, 2019 · Carry outs and dump outs take a slight hit, but not nearly enough to explain the effects of pressure. Pressure works by forcing opponents ...
[11]
How well does each team forecheck? - The Athletic
Aug 16, 2018 · ... offensive zone, which is commonly done with possession as a carry in or without possession as a dump in. An exit is much the same process ...
[12]
An Aggressive Forecheck is Best | All About The Jersey
Feb 24, 2017 · Being aggressive in going after pucks following rebounds, lost faceoffs, and offensive zone turnovers generates almost as many shots as entering ...
[13]
Hurricanes' forecheck key part of their identity, success | NHL.com
Feb 14, 2023 · The Hurricanes' forecheck is two players coming hard and more pinching down the walls. Their defensemen have to work hard to get up in the zone.
[14]
Friday Forecheck: November 3, 2023 | Philadelphia Flyers - NHL.com
Nov 3, 2023 · The process -- establishing a forecheck, generally playing with good pace, generating a healthy volume of scoring chances, being more aggressive ...
[15]
Historical Rule Changes | NHL Records
1927-28To further encourage offense, forward passes allowed in defending and neutral zones and goaltender's pads reduced in width from 12 to 10 inches. Game ...
[16]
Rules that changed the game - The Hockey News
Aug 18, 2010 · 1. Forward passing permitted, 1929 ... To promote offense, the NHL had experimented earlier in the decade by allowing forward passing in the ...
[17]
What Is the Dump and Chase in Hockey?
In the 1930s and '40s, after the introduction of forward passing and the offside rule, the dump and chase took on its modern form.Missing: origins | Show results with:origins
[18]
The Blueprint of Soviet Hockey
Sep 14, 2021 · The English traditionally preferred to “kick and rush” after the ball (not entirely unlike the “dump and chase” game that appeared in Canadian ...
[19]
How the Soviet Red Army Team Changed Global Hockey
Oct 27, 2025 · The Soviet Red Army team revolutionized hockey with speed, skill, and strategy - forever changing how the sport is played, coached, ...Missing: forechecking 1950s
[20]
Full Tilt: How Skating Has Changed the Game - Minnesota Hockey
Oct 10, 2023 · The game is faster, but is full-tilt speed the most important factor? “If you look at the analytics at the highest levels of hockey, there is a ...
[21]
Soviet Recap of 1970 World Championship | HFBoards - HFBoards
Jan 10, 2016 · 1970 would represent the first WHC after the 1969 IIHF rule change that allowed the aggressive forecheck in the offensive zone. First game ...
[22]
The Neutral Zone Trap & the New Jersey Devils
Sep 6, 2011 · Overall, the Devils' success with the neutral zone trap in the mid-1990s ensured that Devils hockey would always be about being responsible on ...Missing: chase | Show results with:chase
[23]
1–3–1 Neutral Zone Trap: Hockey Systems & Strategies for the ...
Jul 19, 2017 · Soft puck dumps into the restricted area allows the attackers to mount a forecheck and potentially force a turnover in the offensive zone.
[24]
How Barry Smith's Left Wing Lock Changed Hockey Forever
May 24, 2024 · ... dump and chase. “Teams in Sweden,” Smith says, “were playing a ... New Jersey Devils. The left wing lock, despite the major shift in ...
[25]
NHL's 2004-05 Lockout Still Affecting League - The Hockey Writers
Jul 8, 2020 · Although it's been 15 years, the NHLs 2004-05 lockout continues to affect the league and how the game is played on the ice.
[26]
The impact of how well each team attacks and defends the blueline
Aug 31, 2018 · A few weeks ago, I introduced some analysis on forechecking metrics and a different way we could evaluate how that relates to team scoring.
[27]
'Open people's eyes': How the NHL's evolved in the decade of data
Mar 14, 2024 · Below is the story of Tulsky's evolution from outsider to insider, as well as the rise of statistical analysis within NHL teams and the greater ...
[28]
Mastering the Hockey Forecheck: 6 Keys and Strategies - CoachTube
The forecheck starts after your team loses possession in the offensive zone or when attempting to regain possession of a dumped puck. There are a variety of ...
[29]
[PDF] Developing Defensive Tactics - Red Gendron - Ngin
Space: Limit the space or deny use of the best space (middle of the ice) until there's enough support to pressure the puck and thereby eliminate time. Support.
[30]
What Is Forechecking? And What Are The Keys For Each ...
Sep 11, 2022 · These roles are usually labeled as F1, F2, and F3 after which player enters the offensive zone first, second, and third. F1 = Forechecker #1. F2 ...
[31]
[PDF] Hockey Terminology - Ngin
F1 will hunt the puck, coming inside out and forcing the puck carrier to the boards. F2 will help F1 right away if he successfully establishes contact. F3 will ...
[32]
2-1-2 Forecheck Explained | Ice Hockey Systems Inc.
The second player (F2) first has to recognize that they are the second player on the forecheck and cheat to the weak side of the ice. The third forward has ...
[33]
2-1-2 Forecheck (Strong Side Support) - Ice Hockey Systems
The 2-1-2 Forecheck is one of the most common forecheck used. The idea is to always pressure the puck with two players until possesion is gained.
[34]
The Art of the Forecheck: A WBS Penguins Tactical Guide
Sep 15, 2025 · The 2-1-2 Forecheck. The 2-1-2 is a more aggressive system designed to create immediate turnovers deep in the offensive zone. It involves ...Missing: explanation | Show results with:explanation<|control11|><|separator|>
[35]
Explained: 1-2-2 Offensive Zone Forecheck - The Coaches Site
Feb 6, 2025 · The key to executing this forecheck effectively is communication and quick rotation. When executed properly, the 1-2-2 creates a suffocating ...
[36]
1-2-2 Forecheck - The Copper & Blue - Edmonton Oilers
Nov 30, 2011 · The basic premise behind the 1-2-2 is that you are trying to apply pressure with your first forward and cut off outlets outside the zone with the 2 high ...Missing: coaching | Show results with:coaching
[37]
3 Keys to the Series | FEATURE | New Jersey Devils - NHL.com
Apr 20, 2025 · The Hurricanes implement a high-pressure forecheck – sometimes 1-2-2 and sometimes a 2-1-2 – where the forwards will pressure both the ...Missing: explanation | Show results with:explanation
[38]
Kraken coach Dave Hakstol's scheme: the neutral zone forecheck ...
Feb 16, 2022 · In hockey, the term “forecheck” indicates the approach or strategy to regaining control of the puck, either by winning a loose puck or ...
[39]
Hockey Systems 101: 5v5 Play - The Athletic - The New York Times
Aug 22, 2018 · A 2-3 forecheck is often referred to as a Left Wing Lock system as this system was created using the left winger to lock up the left side in ...
[40]
An In-Depth Forechecking Guide - Big Shot Hockey
The 1-4 and 1-3-1 forechecks are often called the left wing lock or the neutral zone trap. ... The 2-3 forecheck. 2-3 Forecheck. The 2-3 forecheck is more ...<|separator|>
[41]
What is Forechecking in Ice Hockey: Top Strategies Explained
Oct 3, 2023 · The 2-3 strategy is a defensive formation where you have two forwards up close, pressuring the opposing team's puck carrier. These forwards aim ...Missing: explanation | Show results with:explanation<|control11|><|separator|>
[42]
2-3 Forecheck or Left Lane Lock - Leslie Global Sports
The 2-3 forecheck is conservative in the sense that we have dedicated a forward very often the LW to act like a D along the blue line in the offensive zone.Missing: strategy explanation
[43]
What is a Forecheck in Hockey? Forechecking Explained - XN Sports
### Summary of Forecheck Modifications for Power Plays and Situational Tweaks
[44]
David Quinn's forechecking system: An aggressive/passive hybrid
Oct 5, 2018 · 1-2-2 forecheck – This is what Alain Vigneault used. It is designed to clog the neutral zone and force turnovers for transition and counter ...
[45]
Deep-Diving the Devils' Offensive Zone Tactics
New Jersey is dumping and chasing much, much more. They've relied much more on the forecheck and much less on the rush ...Missing: 1990s | Show results with:1990s
[46]
The AI Coach: How Artificial Intelligence is Changing NHL Tactics in Real-Time
### Summary of AI/Analytics Examples for Real-Time Forecheck Adjustments and Fatigue Management
[47]
The strategies and subtleties of coaching in the NHL - ESPN
Feb 11, 2025 · Line changes. There is sort of a game of chess that goes on between the coaches when you have a game where you're trying to match lines.Missing: fatigue | Show results with:fatigue
[48]
Controlled Deep Trap and Swing with Speed - Leslie Global Sports
In this post we explore a controlled forecheck for a 1-2-2 that's quite passive. In a game if the other team has stopped and set up behind the net maybe ...
[49]
Tips & Drills To Improve Your Defensive Zone Breakout
We dive into tips for centers, wingers and defencemen to keep in mind when breaking the puck out of the defensive zone, along with drills to help you practice.
[50]
Five Breakout Plays Every Hockey Player Should Know
The RIM breakout is used when the other team is forechecking hard and the best option is to send the puck hard around the boards to the winger. D1 gets the puck ...
[51]
How to Break the 1-2-2 Trap Forecheck by Denis Savard
Oct 1, 2016 · Hi, this is Denis Savard here with Ice Hockey Systems. We're going to talk about breaking the trap or breaking the 1-2-2, whatever language you guys use; ...
[52]
[PDF] OFF ATTACK - BREAKOUTS - 2 OF 3 - Ngin
This three(3)-part series presents Breakout Options against various forecheck situations. It is key to remember that breakouts are an offensive system or ...
[53]
Breakouts to 3 Forecheckers | Ice Hockey Systems Inc.
The drill involves structured breakouts against 3 forecheckers, starting with a 5-on-1, progressing to 5-on-2 and 5-on-3 as forecheckers are activated.<|control11|><|separator|>