Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

GEDmatch

GEDmatch is a free online genetic genealogy platform founded in 2010 by Curtis Rogers and John Olson that enables users to upload raw autosomal DNA data files from direct-to-consumer testing companies such as 23andMe or AncestryDNA for advanced comparative analysis and ancestry estimation. The service provides specialized tools, including one-to-many matching, chromosome segment triangulation, and admixture calculators, fostering a collaborative database exceeding one million kits for identifying biological relatives and tracing paternal or maternal lineages beyond proprietary company limits. In 2019, GEDmatch was acquired by Verogen, a forensic genomics firm, which has supported its expansion while maintaining core functionalities for amateur and professional researchers. GEDmatch gained prominence for enabling forensic genetic genealogy, where law enforcement uploads crime scene DNA to match distant relatives in the public database, contributing to resolutions of cold cases through empirical kinship inference rather than direct offender profiles. This application prompted debates on genetic privacy, leading to a 2019 policy shift requiring explicit user opt-in for law enforcement searches to mitigate unauthorized familial implications while preserving investigative efficacy grounded in probabilistic DNA sharing. Despite such adjustments, the platform's open architecture underscores causal linkages between voluntary data aggregation and breakthroughs in both personal heritage reconstruction and criminal identification, prioritizing verifiable genetic evidence over restrictive consent paradigms.

History

Founding and Early Years

GEDmatch was established in 2010 by Curtis Rogers, a retired businessman and genetic genealogy enthusiast in his seventies at the time, and John Olson, a transportation engineer, with operations based in Lake Worth, Florida. The platform began as a volunteer-driven initiative to address limitations in commercial direct-to-consumer DNA testing services, which produced incompatible raw data files from companies like 23andMe and AncestryDNA. Rogers and Olson developed basic algorithms to enable users to upload and compare autosomal DNA kits for relative matching, starting with simple one-to-one comparisons that revealed shared genetic segments indicating common ancestry. In its inaugural years, GEDmatch operated as a free, non-commercial service sustained by the founders' personal resources and a small group of volunteer contributors, without formal funding or institutional backing. The site's growth coincided with the expansion of consumer DNA testing in the early 2010s, as testing companies reported millions of kits sold annually; by 2012–2013, GEDmatch's database had accumulated thousands of user uploads, primarily from hobbyist genealogists seeking to triangulate matches across testing platforms. Early features focused on core utilities like chromosome browsers for visualizing shared DNA and basic admixture estimates using reference populations, which users could run without proprietary software from testing firms. The platform's development emphasized open access and community input, with Rogers handling much of the initial coding and Olson contributing to infrastructure amid their full-time professional commitments. By 2014, as server demands increased due to rising uploads—reaching tens of thousands of kits—preliminary monetization discussions emerged to cover operational costs, though basic matching remained gratis. This period solidified GEDmatch's role as an independent hub for cross-platform analysis, distinct from vendor-locked ecosystems, fostering advancements like early integrations for ancient DNA comparisons that drew academic and enthusiast interest.

Rise to Prominence and Key Milestones

GEDmatch, initially developed as a volunteer-driven platform for genetic genealogy enthusiasts, experienced gradual growth in the early 2010s by offering free tools to compare autosomal DNA data uploaded from commercial testing companies like AncestryDNA and 23andMe, which lacked such interoperability. Founded in 2010 by Curtis Rogers and John Olson as an extension of surname DNA projects, it attracted users seeking advanced matching algorithms and admixture calculators beyond proprietary vendor limitations. By 2014, facing sustainability challenges, the site introduced optional paid tiers for enhanced utilities while maintaining core features gratis, underscoring its community-oriented ethos. The platform's prominence surged in April 2018 when investigators uploaded crime-scene DNA from the Golden State Killer case—linked to over 50 rapes and 13 murders—to GEDmatch, yielding matches to distant relatives that enabled genealogical triangulation and the arrest of Joseph James DeAngelo. This breakthrough popularized investigative genetic genealogy (IGG), with GEDmatch's open database of over 1 million kits at the time facilitating rapid adoption by law enforcement for cold cases, though it exposed tensions over privacy as users had not explicitly consented to forensic queries. Subsequent milestones included a May 2019 policy shift mandating explicit opt-in for law enforcement access following a Utah assault case where GEDmatch data aided identification without prior user-wide notification, aiming to balance utility with consent amid ethical debates. In December 2019, Verogen—a forensics-focused firm—acquired GEDmatch to professionalize operations and integrate IGG tools, prompting assurances from Rogers that genealogical privacy would persist. By late 2020, the launch of GEDmatch Pro provided dedicated portals for law enforcement uploads, expanding to over 1.4 million users by 2021 and solidifying its dual role in ancestry research and criminal investigations.

Technical Features

Data Upload and Processing

Users upload raw autosomal DNA data files obtained from commercial genetic testing companies such as AncestryDNA, 23andMe, or FamilyTreeDNA to GEDmatch, typically in text formats containing single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotypes. The platform supports generic uploads for most providers, where users log in, select the testing company, provide details like haplogroups and required biological sex (which should match the genetic data to avoid error messages), choose a privacy level, and select the file for upload. Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and Y-chromosome data can also be uploaded separately for specialized analysis, though autosomal data forms the core for relative matching. Upon submission, GEDmatch validates the file format and integrity before processing, which normalizes SNP positions to a standard reference genome build, such as hg19, to align data from diverse microarray chips used by different vendors. This step accounts for variations in SNP coverage and strand orientation across platforms, enabling cross-compatibility. Processing generates a unique kit number (e.g., prefixed with "A" for autosomal or "F" for full) and integrates the data into GEDmatch's database of over 1.5 million profiles. Initial computations during processing include one-to-many comparisons against existing kits to identify shared DNA segments, using algorithms that detect identical-by-descent regions based on total shared centimorgans and segment thresholds. Full tool access typically becomes available after 24 hours, though some sources report 24-48 hours depending on server load and file size. Users must select opt-in privacy settings during upload to control visibility, such as restricting matches to genealogical research or allowing law enforcement access via specific consents. No personal identifying information beyond the uploaded genetic data and user-provided metadata is required, emphasizing GEDmatch's focus on anonymous kit-based analysis.

Core Matching and Analysis Tools

GEDmatch's core matching tools facilitate the identification of genetic relatives through comparisons of autosomal DNA data uploaded from various commercial testing companies, such as AncestryDNA and 23andMe, against a database exceeding 1.5 million user kits. The platform's free Tier 1 utilities emphasize shared DNA segments measured in centimorgans (cM), enabling users to detect both close and distant relatives without reliance on proprietary algorithms from testing providers. These tools prioritize raw data interoperability, allowing cross-company matches that reveal connections obscured by siloed databases. The flagship One-to-Many DNA Comparison tool scans a user's kit against all public profiles, producing a sortable list of matches based on total shared DNA, the largest segment, and estimated relationships. Matches typically require a minimum of 7 cM to appear, though users can adjust thresholds for broader or narrower results, with contact emails provided for direct outreach to potential relatives. This utility supports genealogical breakthroughs by aggregating data from diverse sources, often uncovering matches absent from origin platforms. Complementing this, the One-to-One Autosomal DNA Comparison examines pairwise kits, detailing shared segments across 22 autosomes and the X chromosome, including start/end positions, lengths, and overlap quality. It employs algorithms to assess segment reliability, distinguishing identical-by-descent (IBD) from identical-by-state (IBS) sharing, which aids in validating biological relationships amid potential false positives from population-level similarities. Users can visualize results via integrated chromosome browsers, highlighting matched regions to infer inheritance patterns from common ancestors. Advanced segment-focused analysis, such as the Matching Segment Search, allows querying for kits sharing DNA on specific chromosomal regions, useful for endogamous populations or targeted relative hunting. Triangulation within these tools confirms shared segments among three or more kits, strengthening evidence for recent common ancestry by reducing noise from ancient or coincidental matches. While free access democratizes these features, limitations like unphased data can introduce ambiguity, necessitating corroboration with family trees or additional testing.

Advanced and Tiered Utilities

GEDmatch provides a tiered access model to its utilities, with basic features available for free and advanced tools accessible via a paid Tier 1 subscription costing $10 per month. The free tier includes core functions such as one-to-many DNA comparisons limited to 2,000 matches, basic one-to-one comparisons, and standard admixture calculators, enabling users to identify potential relatives and estimate ethnic origins. Tier 1 unlocks enhanced capabilities, including access to over 14 additional tools designed for deeper analysis, such as segment-level matching and automated clustering, which require greater computational resources. This structure allows casual users free entry while incentivizing serious genealogists to subscribe for precision-oriented features. Among the advanced utilities in Tier 1, the Clusters tool (formerly AutoCluster) automatically groups DNA matches into visual clusters based on shared segments, facilitating the identification of common ancestors by revealing patterns of relatedness across multiple individuals. Users can customize parameters like minimum shared DNA (e.g., 7 centimorgans) and maximum generations to refine clusters, often producing chromosome maps that highlight triangulated segments. Similarly, Segment Search and Matching Segment Search enable queries for specific chromosomal regions shared among kits, allowing users to isolate endogamous or rare matches by filtering on segment size, position, and overlap. These tools support "phased" kits, where parental data refines matches to maternal or paternal sides, reducing false positives from uniparental inheritance. Tier 1 also includes Q-Matching Enhanced One-to-One, which applies quality-based weighting to SNPs for more accurate pairwise comparisons, particularly useful for low-coverage or noisy uploads from older tests. Additional utilities encompass Admixture Chromosome Painting, which visualizes ethnic components along chromosomes, and Archaic Matches, scanning for potential Neanderthal or other archaic human DNA segments using reference panels. For research projects, tools like Matrix generate pairwise shared DNA matrices exportable to spreadsheets, aiding hypothesis testing in inheritance patterns. Subscriptions are monthly or annual, with data processing times varying by queue length, emphasizing GEDmatch's focus on utility depth over real-time speed.

Applications in Genetic Genealogy

Relative Matching and Tree Building

GEDmatch's relative matching tools enable users to identify potential genetic relatives by comparing autosomal DNA data across uploaded kits in its database, which exceeds 1.5 million profiles as of 2025. The primary mechanism, one-to-many matching, scans a user's kit against all public kits, reporting matches based on shared centimorgans (cM) of DNA—typically 7 cM or greater—and specific chromosomal segments, with larger shared amounts indicating closer relatedness, such as over 2,000 cM for parent-child pairs. One-to-one comparisons provide granular details, including visualized segment alignments and total shared DNA, allowing verification of hypothesized relationships. Triangulation refines these matches by identifying groups where three or more individuals share identical DNA segments on the same chromosome, confirming inheritance from a common ancestor and reducing false positives from identical-by-state segments unrelated to recent genealogy. Clustering tools, both manual and automated via utilities like multiple kit analysis, organize matches into clusters representing endogamous groups or distinct ancestral lines, with users selecting thresholds (e.g., 7-15 cM) to balance sensitivity and accuracy. Segment overlap analysis further supports relative identification by highlighting shared chromosomal regions among matches, often pinpointing the originating ancestor. These matching capabilities facilitate family tree construction by integrating DNA evidence with traditional genealogy. Users upload GEDCOM files containing pedigree data, which GEDmatch processes to enable tree comparisons against matches, revealing shared surnames or locations that corroborate DNA links. For instance, close matches (e.g., 200-400 cM for first cousins) prompt building or extending trees for those individuals using public records, identifying lowest common ancestors through converging evidence like shared segments and documentary overlaps. Recent enhancements include a family tree visualizer offering pedigree and descendant views, allowing interactive exploration of connections derived from match data. This process iteratively refines trees, as triangulated clusters guide targeted research into specific branches, though users must account for potential endogamy or non-paternity events inflating distant matches.

Admixture and Population Analysis

GEDmatch's Admixture Heritage tool facilitates the estimation of biogeographical ancestry by analyzing uploaded autosomal DNA against reference panels derived from diverse global populations. Users select from predefined projects, such as Eurogenes K36 for detailed European components or EthioHelix for African-focused models, each employing specific calculators like Jtest for Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry or K10 Africa Only. The process generates percentage breakdowns of ancestral components—ranging from modern groups like Baltic or West Asian to ancient ones such as Neolithic or Steppe—displayed in a pie chart and exportable spreadsheet that includes per-chromosome distributions when selected. The Oracle utility then interprets these proportions by computing genetic distances to reference populations, offering single-population matches (e.g., closest fit to a specific ethnicity) or mixed-mode predictions combining multiple populations for better approximation, with lower distance values indicating stronger fits. These tools operate on principles of unsupervised genetic clustering, akin to ADMIXTURE software, where single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are compared to clustered reference samples to infer admixture proportions. However, results exhibit variability across calculators due to differences in reference datasets and modeling parameters; continental-scale estimates, such as European versus African, tend to align reliably with commercial tests, but sub-continental or trace components often capture shared ancient signals rather than recent ancestry, potentially inflating minor percentages from noise or limited reference diversity. Population analysis via Oracle aids in hypothesizing origins by ranking matches to sampled groups, but its utility is constrained by the age of many calculators—some over a decade old—and uneven reference coverage, which favors well-sampled populations like Europeans over others, leading to less precise fits for admixed or underrepresented ancestries. Validation requires integration with relative DNA matches and documentary evidence, as admixture models cannot reliably time admixtures or distinguish population structure from individual history.

Forensic and Law Enforcement Applications

Breakthrough Investigations

The identification of Joseph James DeAngelo as the Golden State Killer in April 2018 marked the first major forensic breakthrough using GEDmatch, where investigators from the Sacramento County Sheriff's Department uploaded crime scene DNA from one of DeAngelo's 1970s-1980s attacks into the site's public database, yielding matches to distant relatives whose profiles had been voluntarily uploaded by users. By cross-referencing these matches with public records and family trees, a team led by genetic genealogist Barbara Rae-Venter narrowed suspects to DeAngelo, whose direct DNA sample from trash confirmed the link; DeAngelo, a former police officer linked to at least 13 murders and 50 rapes, was arrested on April 25, 2018. This case demonstrated GEDmatch's utility in leveraging autosomal DNA for third- to fifth-degree relative matches in open-source databases, bypassing traditional CODIS limitations for unidentified perpetrators. Following this, GEDmatch facilitated rapid expansion in solved cases; by October 2018, at least 15 U.S. murder and sexual assault investigations had been resolved using the platform, often through collaborations with independent genealogists like CeCe Moore of Parabon NanoLabs, who has contributed to over 270 identifications via investigative genetic genealogy, many involving GEDmatch uploads. Notable examples include the 1972 murder of Anita Louise Piteau in Orange County, California, where GEDmatch matches in 2022 identified the perpetrator after 50 years, enabling the case's closure without a living suspect. In Norway, investigative genetic genealogy via GEDmatch and similar tools identified donors in two cold criminal cases from the 1980s and 1990s, as detailed in a 2024 forensic study. By January 2025, genetic genealogy methods, prominently featuring GEDmatch, had resolved over 600 cold cases across the United States, spanning homicides, sexual assaults, and unidentified remains, with success rates improving due to increased public database sizes—GEDmatch hosts millions of profiles—and refined protocols for phenotyping and kinship analysis. These investigations typically involve uploading low-coverage crime scene DNA, generating SNP arrays, and iteratively building genealogical trees from partial matches, though outcomes depend on the perpetrator's family participation in consumer testing, which covers an estimated 20-30% of U.S. adults by ancestry or similar services.

Specialized Organizations and Partnerships

In December 2019, GEDmatch was acquired by Verogen, Inc., a forensic genomics company specializing in next-generation sequencing for law enforcement applications, which integrated GEDmatch's database with advanced forensic tools to facilitate investigative genetic genealogy (IGG). This acquisition enabled Verogen to develop GEDmatch PRO, a dedicated portal for law enforcement uploads of crime scene DNA, restricted to comparisons against user kits opted into forensic matching. In August 2022, Verogen formed a partnership with Gene by Gene, a genetic testing firm, to expand access to IGG resources, including GEDmatch data, for public agencies and forensic practitioners, aiming to standardize workflows and increase case resolution rates through shared technological infrastructure. QIAGEN completed its acquisition of Verogen in January 2023, incorporating GEDmatch into its human identification and forensics portfolio, which emphasizes high-throughput sequencing and database interoperability for global law enforcement. In September 2024, QIAGEN designated Bode Technology as the exclusive global commercial partner for GEDmatch PRO, leveraging Bode's expertise in forensic DNA analysis to train investigators, process uploads, and conduct genealogical research under strict chain-of-custody protocols. Nonprofit organizations such as the DNA Doe Project, founded in 2017, specialize in utilizing GEDmatch for identifying unidentified human remains in cold cases, having resolved over 130 identifications by cross-referencing forensic profiles with public uploads via volunteer genealogists. The project adheres to GEDmatch's opt-in requirements and collaborates indirectly through the platform's tools, often partnering with local coroners and law enforcement for case submissions, as demonstrated in rapid identifications like the 1985 Jane Doe case in April 2024. These entities prioritize humanitarian outcomes while navigating privacy constraints, with GEDmatch's structure enabling such specialized applications without direct financial ties.

Protocols and Success Metrics

Law enforcement agencies access GEDmatch through the dedicated GEDmatch PRO portal, where they upload DNA profiles derived from crime scene evidence or unidentified remains for comparison against user-submitted kits that have explicitly opted in for such matching. This process is restricted to investigations involving violent crimes—defined as murder, nonnegligent manslaughter, aggravated rape, robbery, or aggravated assault—or the identification of human remains, with agencies required to self-identify and adhere to these forensic purposes only. Upon a match, agencies receive limited information from opted-in kits, including the associated name or alias and email address, but not the raw genetic data, prompting subsequent genealogical research such as constructing family trees from public records and contacting potential relatives to narrow down suspects. User participation is governed by privacy settings selectable at upload or via account adjustments: "Opt-in" enables full matching for violent crime investigations, while "Opt-out" excludes kits from perpetrator identification searches but permits use in human remains cases; "Private" kits are entirely excluded from all comparisons. These opt-in mechanisms, implemented following policy updates in 2019, ensure that only consenting users' data contributes to law enforcement queries, though agencies must obtain judicial authorization for DNA uploads in compliance with jurisdictional standards, such as search warrants in the United States. Success in GEDmatch-assisted investigations is primarily measured by case resolutions, with the platform contributing to over 400 such outcomes since its forensic adoption in 2018, predominantly involving cold cases of violent crimes that had remained unsolved for years or decades. These resolutions often culminate in suspect identifications leading to arrests or confirmations of perpetrators, as exemplified by the 2018 resolution of the Golden State Killer case, which pioneered the method and spurred broader adoption. Broader forensic genetic genealogy efforts, heavily reliant on GEDmatch, have yielded success rates where matches lead to identifications in approximately 50-70% of queried violent crime cases, depending on database size and profile quality, though exact GEDmatch-specific rates vary by jurisdiction and are not publicly aggregated beyond resolution counts. Metrics emphasize efficiency in cold case revival, with genealogy supplementing traditional DNA databases like CODIS, which alone resolve fewer than 10% of qualifying cases annually due to limited profiles.

Privacy Policies

Initial Approach and Evolution

GEDmatch initially operated with a fully open database model following its launch in 2013, where users uploaded raw DNA data for public matching without tiered privacy controls or restrictions on third-party access, including law enforcement. This approach prioritized accessibility for genetic genealogy research, allowing any registered user or authorized searcher to compare kits against the entire dataset, as the platform was designed as a free, community-driven tool for autosomal DNA analysis. Privacy protections were minimal, relying on users' voluntary uploads and basic terms that did not explicitly prohibit forensic use, which aligned with the site's ethos of maximizing matches for relative-finding but exposed data to unintended applications. Public revelation of law enforcement's use of GEDmatch in the April 2018 arrest of the Golden State Killer, via matches from crime scene DNA against user kits, triggered widespread privacy concerns and prompted a policy shift. On May 19, 2019, GEDmatch revised its terms of service to implement an opt-in requirement for law enforcement searches, defaulting all existing and new kits to opt-out status unless users explicitly consented via a checkbox during login. This change limited forensic access to profiles where owners affirmed willingness for matches in investigations of homicide or sexual assault, aiming to balance user autonomy with prior investigative successes; however, adoption was low, with only about 19% of 1.4 million users opting in by May 2020. Following Verogen's acquisition of GEDmatch in December 2019, policies evolved toward a multi-tiered system to enhance granularity in data sharing. By 2021, options expanded to include "Private" (no comparisons), "Research" (limited to academic or non-commercial matches, excluding law enforcement), "Military" (for Department of Defense cases), and "Public" (full database comparisons with opt-in for violent crime investigations). This framework, refined in subsequent updates like the May 2023 terms, allowed users to adjust settings dynamically but maintained default opt-out for sensitive forensic uses unless specified, reflecting ongoing tensions between privacy safeguards and utility for public safety after the ownership shift to a forensics-oriented company.

Opt-in Mechanisms and User Options

GEDmatch provides users with four distinct privacy tiers for their uploaded DNA kits, allowing granular control over data visibility and matching. These options, selectable during kit upload or via account settings, include Private, which prevents any matching or visibility to other users or third parties; Research (or Personal Research), which permits matching solely with other research-designated kits for genealogical or academic purposes but excludes law enforcement access; Public + Opt-in, enabling full public matching and explicit consent for law enforcement queries related to violent crimes; and Public + Opt-out, allowing public matching while prohibiting law enforcement access unless the user later changes settings. Since a policy update on May 19, 2019, law enforcement access requires affirmative opt-in by the user, shifting from prior defaults that permitted broader sharing without explicit consent; users logging in post-update were prompted to select preferences, with opt-out as the baseline for forensic matching. This change followed public scrutiny after investigative uses, such as in the Golden State Killer case, aiming to enhance user autonomy while maintaining utility for consented forensic genealogy. Users can join the Genetic Witness Program to opt-in specifically for law enforcement matching, which targets violent crimes and exonerations, but this remains voluntary and revocable at any time through kit settings. GEDmatch's October 21, 2025, privacy policy reaffirms that personal data, including DNA profiles, is processed for law enforcement only upon express opt-in, with no default sharing. Kit owners retain options to edit privacy levels, delete data, or restrict GEDCOM tree visibility, which defaults to private for non-consented individuals upon upload review.
  • Private: Kit invisible for all comparisons, ideal for non-sharing users.
  • Research: Limited to peer research matches, excluding commercial or forensic tools.
  • Public + Opt-in: Broadest access, including the opt-in for qualified law enforcement uploads from accredited genealogists.
  • Public + Opt-out: Public genealogy matching without forensic eligibility.
These mechanisms prioritize user choice, though reports indicate occasional forensic workarounds via non-opted kits in aggregated searches, underscoring the limits of self-selected options in open databases.

Security Incidents

Major Breaches and Vulnerabilities

On July 19, 2020, GEDmatch suffered a security breach initiated through a compromised existing user account, which temporarily altered database settings and made all user DNA profiles visible to anyone accessing the site for approximately three hours. The incident, described by GEDmatch's parent company Verogen as a sophisticated server attack, did not result in confirmed data exfiltration or downloads of genetic information, but it exposed profiles containing sensitive autosomal DNA data from around 1.4 million users. In response, the site was taken offline immediately, and Verogen engaged a cybersecurity firm for forensic analysis and enhanced security measures. A subsequent incident on July 21, 2020, involved another breach that reset user privacy filters, inadvertently enabling law enforcement access to DNA profiles of over 1.2 million users by defaulting settings to permit forensic matching, contrary to individual opt-in preferences. This exposure stemmed from unauthorized manipulation of permission controls, allowing unrestricted queries that could link genetic data to criminal investigations without user consent. Following the event, GEDmatch issued warnings to users and implemented stricter opt-in protocols for law enforcement use, though phishing campaigns targeting user emails—likely sourced from the breaches—emerged shortly after, tricking at least 16 individuals into disclosing credentials from linked services like MyHeritage. Beyond these hacks, GEDmatch has exhibited inherent vulnerabilities to non-invasive attacks exploiting its matching algorithms. Research demonstrated that adversaries could extract full genotypes from victim kits by uploading crafted query files and analyzing match outputs, effectively stealing genetic data without altering site permissions or requiring elevated access. Similarly, false relative attacks allow malicious uploads to fabricate kinship ties, potentially misleading genealogical or forensic analyses by injecting deceptive DNA segments. These flaws, identified through experimental validation on GEDmatch's public interface, highlight risks of health-related inferences from reconstructed genotypes, such as predispositions to diseases, and underscore the platform's limited safeguards against algorithmic manipulation prior to post-2020 fortifications.

Responses and Mitigations

Following the detection of the July 19, 2020, security breach, which exposed all user profiles publicly for approximately three hours due to unauthorized access via an existing user account, GEDmatch immediately took the website offline to halt further exposure. All user permissions were reset as an initial containment measure, ensuring that opt-out profiles and law enforcement kits were no longer visible indiscriminately. The operators reported the incident to relevant authorities and retained the site offline upon identifying an ongoing vulnerability, preventing potential additional exploits. GEDmatch, under Verogen's management, engaged a cybersecurity firm to perform a thorough forensic investigation into the breach, which confirmed no user data was downloaded or exfiltrated. This review informed the implementation of enhanced security protocols, including fortified server protections against account-based attacks, though specific technical details of the upgrades were not publicly disclosed. A parallel investigation sought to identify the perpetrators, underscoring a commitment to accountability amid the platform's role in handling sensitive genetic data. In addressing pre-breach vulnerabilities, such as those demonstrated by University of Washington researchers in October 2019—including risks of genotype theft, falsified relations, and impersonation via compromised credentials—GEDmatch collaborated with the disclosing team to develop targeted mitigations, with active remediation efforts reported as of early 2020. For the January 14, 2021, technical error that inadvertently restored some previously deleted kits for two days, GEDmatch notified affected users via email, confirming the issue's temporary nature and no evidence of external compromise or data loss. This response emphasized internal system corrections to prevent recurrence, aligning with broader post-acquisition priorities under Verogen to counter threats like fake kit uploads.

Controversies and Criticisms

Alleged Policy Circumventions

In November 2023, Verogen, the parent company of GEDmatch, publicly announced an investigation revealing that a small number of forensic investigative genetic genealogy (FIGG) practitioners had circumvented site settings to access DNA profiles from users who had explicitly opted out of law enforcement matching. These practitioners, often contracted by police agencies, exploited loopholes in GEDmatch's visibility categories—such as designating their accounts for "research" or general genealogy purposes rather than law enforcement—to query profiles marked as private or non-LE accessible. This method allowed indirect matching and tree-building for criminal investigations, violating GEDmatch's terms of service which prohibit using non-LE accounts for official forensic work. The circumvention relied on GEDmatch's tiered opt-in system, implemented in 2019, where users could select visibility for law enforcement only, research only, or both, with a default "no sharing" option for new uploads. FIGG users allegedly created multiple accounts or adjusted settings to perform searches under the research guise, enabling access to over 1 million opted-out profiles that would otherwise be unavailable for policing. Verogen's response included terminating the involved accounts, notifying affected law enforcement partners, and updating protocols to restrict research-category searches from yielding forensic-level matches, such as closing gaps in kit comparison visibility. No specific number of cases or agencies was disclosed, but the incident prompted GEDmatch to enhance monitoring and require explicit FIGG certification for relevant accounts. Earlier precedents include the 2018 Golden State Killer investigation, where GEDmatch's founder acknowledged post-arrest that initial uploads by a retired detective had bypassed emerging privacy guidelines, as the site lacked formal LE opt-ins at the time. This led to the site's policy overhaul, but critics argued it highlighted vulnerabilities to informal workarounds by investigators. Verogen emphasized that such actions undermined user trust, though proponents of FIGG maintain that targeted circumventions were rare and justified for public safety in cold cases. No criminal charges resulted from the 2023 probe, but it fueled ongoing debates over enforcement rigor in third-party genealogy services. GEDmatch faced significant legal scrutiny following its role in identifying Joseph James DeAngelo as the Golden State Killer in April 2018, when law enforcement uploaded crime scene DNA to the platform without explicit user opt-in requirements, prompting debates over consent and database terms. This usage highlighted tensions between investigative utility and user privacy, as initial terms allowed broad access but lacked mandatory disclosure of potential forensic applications. In response to public backlash, GEDmatch implemented an opt-in policy for law enforcement matching on May 18, 2019, requiring users to explicitly enable their profiles for such searches; this change rendered approximately 90% of profiles unavailable to investigators. However, enforcement challenges emerged, including instances where forensic genetic genealogists circumvented opt-out settings by indirectly accessing data, leading Verogen—the platform's parent company since its 2019 acquisition—to investigate and restrict violating practitioners in November 2023. Legal actions have intensified, with class-action lawsuits filed in 2024 alleging violations of state privacy laws. In Curley v. Verogen (filed August 2024 in California) and a parallel Illinois suit, plaintiffs claim GEDmatch shared users' genetic data with third parties like Facebook via tracking pixels without consent, breaching assurances of data security and state statutes such as Illinois' Genetic Information Privacy Act. These suits argue that such disclosures undermine user trust, especially given GEDmatch's marketing emphasis on privacy controls. Ethically, disputes center on the implications for non-consenting relatives whose DNA inferences are generated from uploads, raising concerns about familial privacy erosion without direct authorization, even as opt-in mechanisms aim to mitigate this. Critics, including privacy advocates, contend that investigative genetic genealogy risks normalizing warrantless genetic surveillance, while proponents emphasize its role in resolving over 100 cold cases by 2021, underscoring a core tension between individual data autonomy and public safety imperatives. In one notable instance, a Maryland judge in 2019 compelled GEDmatch to permit a full-database search despite opt-in limits, testing the platform's policy enforceability against judicial warrants.

Trade-offs Between Privacy and Public Safety

The use of GEDmatch by law enforcement for investigative genetic genealogy has enabled the resolution of numerous violent crimes, including the April 2018 identification of Joseph James DeAngelo as the Golden State Killer through matches to distant relatives' uploaded profiles. By 2019, GEDmatch contributed to solving more than 50 rapes and homicides across 29 U.S. states, demonstrating its utility in cracking cold cases where traditional DNA databases like CODIS failed due to lack of direct matches. Proponents argue this approach enhances public safety by identifying perpetrators of serious offenses, such as serial murders and sexual assaults, without requiring warrants for publicly accessible data, as familial DNA inferences do not constitute a direct search of individuals' private information. However, these investigations implicate the genetic privacy of non-consenting relatives, whose DNA profiles indirectly reveal sensitive traits like disease predispositions or ethnic origins through kinship matches, potentially exposing them to stigma or discrimination without their knowledge or consent. Critics, including civil liberties organizations, contend that uploading crime-scene DNA to open platforms like GEDmatch circumvents Fourth Amendment protections, treating aggregated consumer data as a de facto surveillance tool that erodes expectations of privacy in hereditary information. Empirical risks include data breaches; a 2019 analysis highlighted GEDmatch's vulnerability to nation-state hacking, potentially compromising up to 1 million profiles and enabling mass genetic surveillance. In response to these tensions, GEDmatch evolved its policies post-2018: initially permissive for law enforcement uploads in serious cases, it shifted in May 2019 to require explicit user opt-in for such matches, with over 200,000 profiles consenting by early 2020. The current October 2025 policy maintains opt-in requirements for law enforcement and research access, categorizing kits into privacy tiers like "Public" (fully searchable) or "Personal Research" (limited to user-initiated matches), aiming to balance utility with consent while acknowledging that opt-outs reduce the database's effectiveness for genealogy and forensics. Despite these measures, instances of policy circumvention—such as forensic genealogists accessing opted-out data via indirect methods—have persisted, underscoring ongoing challenges in enforcing boundaries between voluntary sharing and investigative overreach. This framework reflects a causal trade-off: opt-in restrictions preserve user autonomy but constrain law enforcement's ability to close cases, as evidenced by reliance on a shrinking pool of consenting profiles amid privacy advocacy.

References

  1. [1]
    Community Genetic Genealogy Research | About - GEDmatch
    Curtis Rogers founded GEDmatch in 2010 with his co-founder John Olson and a small group of volunteers. Verogen purchased GEDmatch in 2019, continuing the ...
  2. [2]
    Verogen CEO: 'GEDmatch Will Be Improved, Not Changed' - Forensic
    Dec 20, 2019 · Nearly 10 years ago, Curtis Rogers and John Olson founded GEDmatch, a website for amateur and professional researchers and genealogists with ...
  3. [3]
    GEDmatch: DNA and Genealogy Tools to Grow Your Family Tree
    GEDmatch offers a free DNA site built for genetic genealogy research. With a global database of autosomal DNA data and unmatched utility, we make this data ...Applications · How it Works · Ancestry DNA · MyHeritage
  4. [4]
    The Magic Within Your DNA | How it Works - GEDmatch
    GEDmatch offers a free DNA site built for genetic genealogy research. With a global database of autosomal DNA data and unmatched utility, we make this data ...Missing: official | Show results with:official
  5. [5]
    GEDmatch acquired by forensic firm - The Legal Genealogist
    Dec 10, 2019 · GEDmatch, a pioneer in consumer genealogy, today announced that it has joined with forensic genomics firm Verogen, Inc. in a move that allows the company to ...
  6. [6]
    Forensic genealogy, bioethics and the Golden State Killer case - PMC
    Upon learning of the Golden State Killer case, GEDMatch updated their confidentiality statement to include information that genetic information can be searched ...
  7. [7]
    How Genetic Genealogy Helped Catch The Golden State Killer
    Jun 30, 2020 · The perpetrator's sequence is added to a public database of DNA sequences, such as the genealogy website GEDmatch, which you can search to find ...
  8. [8]
    Terms of Service - GEDmatch
    Nov 22, 2024 · There are 4 classes of privacy options for the DNA kit on this Site: 'Private', 'Personal Research, 'Opt-in' and 'Opt-out'. You will be asked to ...
  9. [9]
    Is Law Enforcement Access to Commercial DNA Databases a ...
    Mar 3, 2020 · GEDmatch changed its policy, asking users to opt-in to share their genetic profiles with law enforcement. As a result of the new policy ...
  10. [10]
  11. [11]
    How an Unlikely Family History Website Transformed Cold Case ...
    Curtis Rogers, 80, a retired businessman who could be easily mistaken for ...
  12. [12]
    A DNA Firm That Caters to Police Just Bought a Genealogy Site
    Dec 9, 2019 · (Curtis Rogers, 81, and John Olson, 68, launched GEDmatch in 2010.) “Having Verogen buy it takes some of the concerns about the future of ...
  13. [13]
  14. [14]
    Who Owns GEDmatch? (All The Facts) - Data Mining DNA
    Mar 7, 2021 · GEDmatch was launched in 2010 by Curtis Rogers, a businessman, and John Olson, an engineer. Rogers was a hobby genealogist looking for automated ...
  15. [15]
    Finally! GEDmatch Announces a Monetization Strategy (and a Way ...
    Oct 20, 2014 · However, since GEDmatch is run by two incredible volunteers (Curtis Rogers and John Olson) with full-time jobs, the site has experienced ...Missing: background | Show results with:background
  16. [16]
    What is GEDmatch Pro? - Bode Technology
    Founded in 2010 by Curtis Rogers and John Olson and purchased by Verogen in 2019, GEDmatch is a free website for genetic genealogy research where individuals ...
  17. [17]
    Utilizing Ancient DNA at GedMatch
    Sep 22, 2014 · Utilizing Ancient DNA at GedMatch · Anzick – about 12,500 years old · Paleo-Eskimo – about 4,000 years old · Altai Neanderthal – about 50,000 years ...
  18. [18]
    GEDmatch - ISOGG Wiki
    History. GEDmatch was founded by Curtis Rogers and John Olson in 2010 as an outgrowth of the Rogers surname DNA project..
  19. [19]
    A Really Basic Approach to Using GEDmatch | Kitty Cooper's Blog
    Feb 18, 2021 · It's a free 3rd party site of tools where you can upload your DNA test results and compare them with those from people who have tested at other companies.
  20. [20]
    How a Tiny Website Became the Police's Go-To Genealogy Database
    Jun 1, 2018 · GEDmatch grew out of Rogers' own interest in genealogy, which began as a teenager. On vacations, he would visit cemeteries and courthouse to ...
  21. [21]
    The brave new world of genetic genealogy - MIT Technology Review
    Apr 28, 2018 · I woke up yesterday morning to the news that GEDmatch, the open-source genetic genealogy website, was instrumental in identifying Joseph James ...
  22. [22]
    What the Golden State Killer Tells Us About Forensic Genetics
    Apr 24, 2019 · To aid her searches, she regularly logged on to GEDmatch, a public database where hobbyists upload results from consumer genetic testing ...
  23. [23]
    We will find you: DNA search used to nab Golden State Killer can ...
    Searching GEDMatch's nearly 1 million profiles revealed several relatives who were the equivalent to third cousins to the crime scene DNA linked to the ...Missing: impact | Show results with:impact
  24. [24]
    How a Utah assault case upended the website that caught ... - CNN
    May 27, 2019 · Curtis Rogers, the founder of the free DNA website GEDMatch, wanted to do all he could to help police solve a disturbing assault case out of Utah.<|separator|>
  25. [25]
    The Emergence of Forensic Genetic Genealogy - PubMed Central
    Aug 1, 2022 · Curtis Rogers released a letter to all GEDmatch users affirming that Verogen's acquisition of GEDmatch was a positive step forward for the ...
  26. [26]
    GEDmatch: A Platform for Data Driven Forensic Intelligence
    Mar 15, 2021 · GEDmatch is a genetic genealogy website with over 1.4M users who want to learn more about their genetic roots. It was set up in 2010 with ...
  27. [27]
    Developmental validation of the ForenSeq® Kintelligence kit, MiSeq ...
    Briefly, these SNPs are biallelic, present with AA/BB/AB genotypes in the GEDmatch database (build hg19) and overlap with relevant markers in the Illumina ...
  28. [28]
    How to Use One-to-Many Matching - GEDmatch
    Usually, when a kit is upload it's going to be compared during processing to all of the other kits as far as finding its matches. So in some of these cases you ...
  29. [29]
    How to Upload DNA Data from 23andMe, Ancestry and ... - GEDmatch
    Feb 13, 2025 · How long does DNA data processing take? Processing times differ depending on the platform: Platform, Processing Time. GEDmatch, 24-48 hours.
  30. [30]
    Discover Genetic Matches | Applications by GEDmatch
    Discover matches, compare with your relatives, uncover your biogeographical ancestry, and more with GEDmatch genealogical solutions.Admixture (Heritage) Tool · One-to-Many DNA Comparison · How it Works
  31. [31]
  32. [32]
    DNA Match Analysis: A Step-by-Step Guide for Beginners - GEDmatch
    Aug 26, 2025 · This guide simplifies the process into 5 key steps: Understand genetic concepts: Learn about centimorgans, DNA match types (autosomal, Y-DNA, ...Dna Match Core Concepts · Visualizing Dna With... · Dna Analysis ToolsMissing: milestones timeline
  33. [33]
    Understanding Segment Overlap in Genetic Genealogy - GEDmatch
    Apr 16, 2025 · GEDmatch comparison tools can display match patterns across multiple individuals, helping refine your analysis of genetic connections. GEDmatch ...Common Segment Overlap... · Gedmatch Segment Analysis... · Related Posts
  34. [34]
    Chromosome and Segment Tools for Multiple Kit Analysis - GEDmatch
    The compact segment mapper allows you to see multiple people's matches and all the segments for it in a really compact spot.
  35. [35]
    Searching for Segments on GEDmatch
    So that is the first tool, the tier one segment search. It allows you to see which segments you match with your matches rather than just seeing that you match ...
  36. [36]
    Common Questions About Genetic Match Accuracy Answered
    Jul 15, 2025 · How to verify matches? Use tools like triangulation, segment analysis, and family tree integration to confirm relationships. Platforms like ...Checking Match Accuracy · Dna Match Analysis Tools · Dna Match Confidence Levels
  37. [37]
    Manual DNA Clustering: Step-by-Step Guide - GEDmatch
    Aug 12, 2025 · The One-to-One Autosomal DNA Comparison tool allows you to analyze shared DNA segments between two individuals, confirming genetic relationships ...Advanced Clustering Methods · Using Cluster Results · Gedmatch Tools For...
  38. [38]
    AutoSegment Triangulation Cluster Tool at GEDmatch
    Oct 18, 2021 · At GEDmatch, matching plus a dozen tools are free, but the Tier 1 plan for $10 per month provides users with another 14 advanced tools, ...
  39. [39]
    How to Take Advantage of the Tools at GEDmatch: A Basic Primer
    Apr 3, 2024 · Many of the tools are free and available nowhere else. Only the more advanced tools require a monthly subscription. Some of the unique ...
  40. [40]
    Gedmatch review: what to know before you start - Genomelink
    Feb 13, 2023 · Another feature is the subscription “Tier 1” that they offer for $10/month. The subscription opens up additional tools within GEDmatch that ...
  41. [41]
    Using GEDmatch DNA Segment Tools in a Research Project
    Apr 8, 2024 · Using DNA evidence and documentary research, this project aims to test the hypothesis that John C. Cline was the biological father of Clemsy (Cline) ...
  42. [42]
    [PDF] FIRST LOOK: GEDMATCH CONTENTS - DNA Adoption
    Jul 17, 2021 · Kit – Your matches' GEDmatch kit numbers consist of a letter or two followed by 6 or 7 numerals. If the kit is NOT available to law.
  43. [43]
    How To Find Your Biological Family With DNA Testing - GEDmatch
    Nov 18, 2022 · The information One-To-One GEDmatch tool helps you learn just how closely related you are to your matches and demystify family tree questions!Missing: explained | Show results with:explained
  44. [44]
    How to Triangulate your Matches - GEDmatch
    Triangulation is a way that we can group a set of matches and know that they are related through a common ancestor.Missing: explained | Show results with:explained
  45. [45]
    How to Compare Family Trees on GEDmatch
    Do you have a GEDcom file on GEDmatch? If so, then you can use some of the tools that help you find other people and progress your genealogy.
  46. [46]
    Building Family Trees with DNA Evidence: Beginner's Guide
    Jul 29, 2025 · Key tools include: One-to-Many DNA Comparison: Discover matches from various testing companies. One-to-One Autosomal Comparison: Pinpoint the ...Reading Your Dna Results · Gedmatch: Dna Analysis Tools · Common Dna Research Problems
  47. [47]
    New GEDmatch Features: Notes, Family Tree
    Feb 25, 2025 · Explore your family tree in two distinct ways. The pedigree view reveals ancestral lines and connections, while the descendant view maps out ...Missing: building | Show results with:building
  48. [48]
    Admixture Heritage Tool I Genetic Matches I GEDmatch
    Discover your ethnic background, gain an understanding of your DNA, and download a comprehensive spreadsheet breakdown with our Admixture Heritage tool.
  49. [49]
    GEDmatch Oracle Explained (For Beginners) - Data Mining DNA
    Jan 23, 2021 · The GEDmatch Oracle compares your DNA kit to all the reference populations within an Admixture Project. It measures how closely your admixture percentages are ...GEDmatch Admixture... · How Do You Access the... · Launching The GEDmatch...
  50. [50]
    Finally! A Gedmatch Admixture Guide! - Genealogical Musings
    Apr 6, 2017 · This guide is useful to helping people understand the different interpretations of their DNA available on Gedmatch.
  51. [51]
    Best Gedmatch Calculator for Admixture - Genealogy Explained
    Dec 23, 2022 · One of it's best tools which, in all honesty, is better than AncestryDNA, 23andMe, MyHeritage, and FtDNA is GEDmatch's admixture calculators.
  52. [52]
    How reliable is this tool? - Admixture/Oracle W/Pop - GEDmatch
    Mar 18, 2025 · I tried to compare my Ancestry results to the Admixture ones here and I noticed that the Oracle reports stated that they were last updated quite a few years ...Missing: utility | Show results with:utility
  53. [53]
    In Hunt For Golden State Killer, Investigators Uploaded His DNA To ...
    Apr 27, 2018 · "We understand that the GEDmatch database was used to help identify the Golden State Killer. Although we were not approached by law ...
  54. [54]
    CeCe Moore Cracks Cold Cases with Genealogy - Unsung Science
    Aug 4, 2023 · CeCe Moore almost single-handedly invented genetic genealogy. She's used it to solve over 270 cold cases...and hot ones.
  55. [55]
    Orange County's Oldest Case Solved Using DNA - GEDmatch
    After a half-century, the Orange County police department was able to identify the killer of Anita Louise Piteau, a 26-year-old woman who left Maine for a ...Missing: breakthrough | Show results with:breakthrough
  56. [56]
    Heating up three cold cases in Norway using investigative genetic ...
    Here, we apply IGG to three cold criminal cases and successfully identify the donor of the DNA in two of these cases.
  57. [57]
    Cold Cases: Genetic Genealogy making breakthroughs with ...
    Jan 3, 2025 · Over 600 cases across the U.S. have been solved using genetic genealogy and DNA sequencing.
  58. [58]
    GEDmatch Partners with Genomics Firm - Verogen
    Dec 9, 2019 · GEDMatch, a pioneer in consumer genealogy, today announced that it has paired with forensic genomics firm Verogen, Inc., to enhance customer ...Missing: specialized organizations
  59. [59]
    Verogen and Gene by Gene Form Groundbreaking Partnership to ...
    Aug 15, 2022 · Verogen, Inc. and Gene by Gene today announced a partnership to accelerate the adoption of forensic investigative genetic genealogy.
  60. [60]
    QIAGEN completes acquisition of Verogen, strengthening ...
    Jan 9, 2023 · GEDmatch PRO™ is designed to support police and forensic teams with investigative comparisons to data uploaded by consenting GEDmatch users.Missing: specialized organizations
  61. [61]
    QIAGEN and Bode Technology partner to advance use of ...
    Sep 23, 2024 · QIAGEN chooses Bode Technology as its exclusive global commercial partner to accelerate use of GEDmatch PRO genealogy database in law ...
  62. [62]
    5 Questions with Margaret Press | GEDmatch blog
    Jan 23, 2023 · 5 Questions with Margaret Press, CEO & Co-Founder of the DNA DOE Project. What made you decide to become a genealogist and what inspired you to start the DNA ...<|separator|>
  63. [63]
    DNA Doe Project Names 1985 Jane Doe Hours after DNA Analysis
    Apr 17, 2024 · The DNA Doe Project, a national nonprofit organization, worked with ... GEDmatch Pro and FTDNA - two consumer websites that allow law enforcement ...
  64. [64]
    Community Safety | GEDmatch
    Orange County. Jane Doe and Violent Crime. Orange County's Oldest Case Solved Using DNA ; Highway killer victim John Ingram Brandenburg Jr. Jane and John Doe ...Missing: famous | Show results with:famous
  65. [65]
    Should the police use genetic genealogy databases to assist in ...
    Third party databases such as GEDmatch, founded in 2010, allow DNA profiles to be uploaded from several sources including DTC databases and law enforcement ...Missing: protocols | Show results with:protocols<|separator|>
  66. [66]
    GEDmatch reverses course - The Legal Genealogist
    Private, Research, Public ...Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
  67. [67]
    The DNA database used to find the Golden State Killer is a national ...
    Oct 30, 2019 · Since then, dozens of murderers and rapists have been identified using GEDmatch. But a privacy debate erupted as well, partly because police had ...
  68. [68]
    Sociotechnical safeguards for genomic data privacy - PMC
    Mar 24, 2022 · By May 2020, most (81%) of GEDmatch's 1.4 million users still have not opted in69, and users concerned about privacy did delete their data70.
  69. [69]
    Genetic Genealogy Company GEDmatch Acquired by Company ...
    Dec 10, 2019 · Genetic genealogy searches by law enforcement invade our privacy in unique ways—they allow law enforcement to access information about us that ...
  70. [70]
    Terms of Service & Privacy Policy May 31, 2023 - GEDmatch
    May 31, 2023 · GEDmatch offers a free DNA site built for genetic genealogy research. With a global database of autosomal DNA data and unmatched utility, we make this data ...
  71. [71]
    Verogen's purchase of GEDmatch could change everything with law ...
    Dec 19, 2019 · Another policy change occurred when GEDmatch was criticized for sharing information with law enforcement without users' explicit consent. So in ...
  72. [72]
    DNA Privacy Settings: Essential Checklist for Genealogists
    Jul 7, 2025 · GEDmatch offers a free DNA site built for genetic genealogy research. With a global database of autosomal DNA data and unmatched utility, we ...Dna Privacy Settings... · Privacy Tools By Dna... · Advanced Dna Privacy Topics<|control11|><|separator|>
  73. [73]
    GedMatch Implements Required Opt-In for Law Enforcement Matching
    May 19, 2019 · GedMatch has provided an autosomal suite of tools for genealogists that isn't offered elsewhere for several years now.
  74. [74]
    Protect Your Information | Privacy and Security - GEDmatch
    Here at GEDmatch, we have taken steps to protect user privacy, and data security, including offering the option to opt-out of law enforcement comparisons. When ...
  75. [75]
    Join the Genetic Witness Program - GEDmatch
    Since 2018, over 1000 cases have been solved thanks to people who have uploaded their genealogical data to GEDmatch and chosen to be a genetic witness.
  76. [76]
    Terms of Service & Privacy Policy - GEDmatch
    GEDmatch offers a free DNA site built for genetic genealogy research. With a global database of autosomal DNA data and unmatched utility, we make this data ...
  77. [77]
    Police Are Getting DNA Data From People Who Think They Opted Out
    Aug 18, 2023 · Forensic genetic genealogists skirted GEDmatch privacy rules by searching users who explicitly opted out of sharing DNA with law enforcement.
  78. [78]
    GEDmatch Incident Response | Verogen - a QIAGEN company
    GEDmatch had a security breach on July 19, 2020, making all profiles visible for 3 hours. No user data was compromised, but the site was taken down again due ...
  79. [79]
    Why a Data Breach at a Genealogy Site Has Privacy Experts Worried
    Aug 1, 2020 · GEDmatch, a longstanding family history site containing around 1.4 million people's genetic information, had experienced a data breach.
  80. [80]
    Massive GEDmatch Security Breach Exposes 1.2 Million Users' DNA ...
    Jul 22, 2020 · A massive security breach forced GEDmatch to shut down its site and exposed the DNA profiles of more than a million people who use the online service to law ...
  81. [81]
    Two Security Breaches at GEDmatch Open All Users' Profiles to Law ...
    Jul 23, 2020 · Verogen confirmed GEDmatch was the target of a second breach in which all user permissions were set to opt-out of law enforcement matching.
  82. [82]
    Hackers Attacked Two Leading Genetic Genealogy Websites
    Jul 22, 2020 · GEDmatch, the DNA database that helped identify the Golden State Killer, was hacked. Then email addresses from its users were used in a phishing attack.
  83. [83]
    What's the Fallout from the GEDMatch Genealogy Database Breach?
    Sep 4, 2020 · As of July 21, 2020, 16 users had fallen victim to this scam, unwittingly providing their MyHeritage login information to a malicious party.
  84. [84]
    Genotype Extraction and False Relative Attacks: Security Risks to ...
    We experimentally demonstrate that GEDmatch is vulnerable to a number of attacks by an adversary that only uploads normally formatted genetic data files and ...
  85. [85]
    Popular third-party genetic genealogy site is vulnerable to ...
    Oct 29, 2019 · Researchers at the University of Washington have found that GEDmatch is vulnerable to multiple kinds of security risks.<|separator|>
  86. [86]
    [PDF] Security Risks to Third-Party Genetic Genealogy Services Beyond ...
    Feb 23, 2020 · Vulnerabilities we uncovered have been disclosed to GED- match who is actively developing mitigations to these prob- lems. We also reached ...
  87. [87]
    'Deleted' DNA Data Just Reappeared on a Popular Database
    Jan 21, 2021 · On January 14, a technical snafu at GEDmatch caused previously deleted user data to be restored for two days. It's the second security incident ...
  88. [88]
    The Era of DNA Database Hacks Is Here | by Emily Mullin - OneZero
    Jul 29, 2020 · ... hackers appeared to have retrieved user emails from GEDmatch to orchestrate another attack. ... cybersecurity firm that will provide ...
  89. [89]
    Notice regarding investigations into FIGG practitioners ... - Verogen
    Nov 13, 2023 · We recently learned that a small number of forensic genetic genealogy practitioners had circumvented GEDmatch settings in violation of our Terms of Use.<|control11|><|separator|>
  90. [90]
    The Genealogy Site That Helped Catch the Golden State Killer Is ...
    May 29, 2019 · Only after an arrest was announced did GEDmatch acknowledge that its operator had circumvented his site's policies. Advertisement.<|separator|>
  91. [91]
    Four misconceptions about investigative genetic genealogy - NIH
    Apr 13, 2021 · Individuals joining GEDmatch after May 18, 2019 are required to decide at the time of registration whether they will opt in to or out of law ...Ii. Igg Step By Step · Iii. Four Aspects Of Igg... · FootnotesMissing: protocols | Show results with:protocols
  92. [92]
    [PDF] Curley v Verogen - Class Action Lawsuits
    Aug 30, 2024 · 19. GEDmatch tells its users that "your privacy and security are paramount. reassure users about the privacy of information submitted on its ...
  93. [93]
    GEDmatch Illegally Sends Illinois Users' Genetic Data to Facebook ...
    Sep 11, 2024 · A class action claims the operator of GEDmatch.com has violated an Illinois privacy law by secretly sharing users' genetic information with Facebook.
  94. [94]
    Of money and chances | The Legal Genealogist
    Nov 22, 2024 · In the wake of two class-action lawsuits alleging violations of user privacy, the DNA website GEDmatch has announced changes to its terms of use ...
  95. [95]
    The controversial company using DNA to sketch the faces of criminals
    Sep 9, 2020 · That triggered an immediate backlash from genealogists, privacy experts and the wider public at the violation of GEDMatch's agreement with its ...Missing: disputes | Show results with:disputes
  96. [96]
    Ethical Concerns of DNA Databases used for Crime Control
    Jan 14, 2019 · By Aziza Ahmed. Genetic databases for crime control have become a national topic for debate after the arrest of the Golden State Killer, ...Missing: disputes | Show results with:disputes
  97. [97]
    A judge said police can search the DNA of 1 million Americans ...
    For the first time, a state judge has forced a public genealogy site, GEDmatch, to allow police to search its entire database of DNA profiles.
  98. [98]
    Police were cracking cold cases with a DNA website. Then the fine ...
    Oct 25, 2019 · The announcement kindled a revolution in forensics that has since helped solve more than 50 rapes and homicides in 29 states. But earlier this ...
  99. [99]
    GEDMatch and the Fourth Amendment: No Warrant Required
    May 13, 2021 · The case stalled for over 17 years until it was finally solved three years ago, after DNA that had been provided to AncestryDNA and GEDMatch by ...
  100. [100]
    Why the Golden State Killer Investigation Is Cause for Concern | ACLU
    May 11, 2018 · Investigators' decision to upload a detailed genetic profile generated from crime-scene DNA to a public website likely violated the alleged perpetrator's ...Missing: impact | Show results with:impact
  101. [101]
    DNA Databases Are Boon to Police But Menace to Privacy, Critics Say
    Feb 20, 2020 · GEDmatch faced criticism last year when a BuzzFeed investigation revealed the company allowed police to upload a DNA profile to investigate an ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  102. [102]
    AncestryDNA upload issue - DNA File Diagnostics
    GEDmatch forum discussion of warning messages when the specified kit sex does not align with the genetic data.