Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Genetic variability

Genetic variability refers to the differences in the genetic composition among individuals within a population or species, encompassing variations in alleles, genes, genotypes, and overall DNA sequences that contribute to phenotypic diversity.^[1]^[2] This diversity is fundamental to biology, serving as the substrate for evolutionary processes and enabling populations to adapt to changing environments.^[3]^[4] Genetic variability arises primarily from three mechanisms: mutations, which introduce novel genetic changes such as single-nucleotide variants (SNVs), insertions, deletions (indels), and structural rearrangements in DNA; sexual reproduction, which generates new combinations of existing genes through recombination and independent assortment during meiosis; and gene flow, the transfer of genetic material between populations via migration or interbreeding.^[1]^[2]^[4] For example, genetic variation between any two humans differs at about one base pair per 1,000 nucleotides, with most variants neutral, while others can be beneficial or deleterious depending on context.^[2] In a typical human genome, for example, an individual carries approximately 5 million SNVs, 600,000 indels, and 25,000 structural variants compared to a reference sequence, illustrating the scale of variability even within one species.^[4] The significance of genetic variability lies in its role as the raw material for natural selection, genetic drift, and adaptation, allowing species to respond to selective pressures like pathogens, climate shifts, or habitat changes.^[1]^[3] Beneficial variants, such as those conferring resistance to diseases like malaria, can increase in frequency over generations, enhancing population resilience and potentially leading to speciation.^[3] Conversely, low genetic variability, as seen in small or isolated populations, heightens vulnerability to extinction by reducing adaptive potential.^[2] Overall, it underpins biodiversity, influencing everything from individual health to ecosystem stability.^[4]

Fundamentals

Definition

Genetic variability refers to the total genetic differences among individuals within a population, encompassing variations in alleles, genotypes, and measures such as heterozygosity that reflect the diversity of genetic material available for inheritance.^[5] This diversity arises from differences in DNA sequences and allele frequencies, providing the raw material for evolutionary processes by allowing populations to adapt to changing environments.^[2] Unlike phenotypic variability, which includes observable traits influenced by both genetic and environmental factors, genetic variability specifically pertains to heritable differences encoded in the genome, forming the basis for traits that can be passed to subsequent generations.^[2] Phenotypic variation may not always reflect underlying genetic differences, as environmental effects can mask or modify gene expression, but genetic variability ensures the potential for long-term evolutionary change through inheritance.^[6] The concept of genetic variability gained prominence in population genetics during the 1930s, particularly through the work of Theodosius Dobzhansky, whose 1937 book Genetics and the Origin of Species synthesized Mendelian genetics with Darwinian evolution, emphasizing the role of genetic variation in natural populations.^[7] Dobzhansky's analysis of genetic differences in species like Drosophila demonstrated that natural populations harbor substantial heritable variation, challenging earlier views of uniformity and establishing variability as central to speciation and adaptation.^[8] A foundational measure of genetic variability is expected heterozygosity, denoted as H_e, calculated as

H_e = 1 - \sum p_i^2,

where p_i represents the frequency of the i-th allele at a locus; this metric quantifies the probability that two randomly drawn alleles are different, serving as a key indicator of allelic diversity without assuming specific population structures.^[9]

Types

Genetic variability manifests in several distinct forms, each reflecting different levels of diversity within populations. At the molecular level, nucleotide variability encompasses variations in the DNA sequence itself, primarily through single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), where a single base pair differs among individuals, and insertions/deletions (indels), which involve the addition or removal of one or more nucleotides. SNPs are the most common type of genomic variation, accounting for the majority of sequence differences between individuals, while indels contribute to structural changes that can affect gene function and regulation.^[4]^[10] Allelic variability refers to the presence of multiple alleles—alternative forms of a gene—at a single locus within a population, enabling diversity in traits influenced by that gene. This type of variability is often quantified by the number of alleles (A) per locus and the polymorphism information content (PIC), which measures a marker's informativeness in detecting polymorphisms. The PIC is calculated as
\text{PIC} = 1 - \sum p_i^2 - \sum_{i \neq j} p_i^2 p_j^2
where p_i and p_j are the frequencies of the i-th and j-th alleles, respectively; the first sum is over all alleles, and the second is over pairs where i \neq j. A classic example is the ABO blood group system in humans, where three main alleles (A, B, and O) at the ABO locus produce four blood types (A, B, AB, and O), influencing transfusion compatibility and disease susceptibility.^[11] Genotypic variability arises from the combinations of alleles at one or more loci, resulting in homozygous (identical alleles) or heterozygous (different alleles) states that determine an individual's overall genetic makeup. This form of diversity is crucial for phenotypic variation and adaptation, as heterozygous genotypes can provide functional advantages, such as hybrid vigor. In the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) genes, high genotypic diversity enables varied immune responses by allowing different individuals to recognize and combat a broader range of pathogens, thereby enhancing population-level resistance to infections.^[2]^[12]

Origins

Mutation

Mutation represents the ultimate source of new genetic variants, defined as heritable changes in the DNA sequence that occur in germline cells and can be passed to subsequent generations. These alterations introduce novel alleles, serving as the raw material for genetic variability and evolutionary change. At the molecular level, mutations arise from errors in DNA replication or damage to the genetic material, with cellular repair mechanisms mitigating but not eliminating them.^[13]^[14] Mutations are classified by their scale and nature, including point mutations, frameshifts, and chromosomal mutations. Point mutations involve the substitution of a single nucleotide base, categorized as transitions (purine to purine or pyrimidine to pyrimidine, such as A to G) or transversions (purine to pyrimidine or vice versa, such as A to C). Frameshift mutations result from the insertion or deletion of nucleotides not in multiples of three, altering the reading frame of the genetic code and often leading to nonfunctional proteins. Chromosomal mutations encompass larger structural changes, such as inversions, translocations, deletions, or duplications of chromosome segments, which can disrupt gene function or regulation on a broader scale.^[13]^[14] Mutations occur spontaneously through endogenous processes or are induced by external agents. Spontaneous mutations include biochemical errors like deamination, where cytosine spontaneously converts to uracil, potentially leading to a C-to-T transition if unrepaired. Induced mutations are triggered by environmental factors, such as ultraviolet (UV) radiation, which forms thymine dimers that distort DNA structure and, if not repaired, cause substitutions during replication. Both types contribute to the creation of novel alleles by generating sequence variations that may confer new traits.^[13]^[14] The frequency of mutations is quantified by the mutation rate \mu, typically ranging from $10^{-8} to $10^{-9} per base pair per generation in eukaryotes, reflecting the balance between error-prone replication and DNA repair fidelity.^[15] Under neutral evolution, the accumulation of such mutations over time follows the equation k = \mu t, where k represents the number of substitutions per site and t is the number of generations, assuming no selective pressure removes or fixes variants. A well-known example is sickle cell anemia, caused by a single nucleotide substitution (an A-to-T transversion) in the sixth codon of the HBB gene, which encodes the beta-globin subunit of hemoglobin and alters its structure, leading to red blood cell sickling.^[16]^[17]^[18]

Recombination and Gene Flow

Recombination during meiosis plays a central role in reshuffling genetic material within populations, primarily through the process of crossing over. This occurs when homologous chromosomes pair during prophase I, forming structures called chiasmata where segments of DNA are exchanged between non-sister chromatids.^[19] Such exchanges generate novel haplotypes by combining alleles from different parental chromosomes, thereby increasing genetic variability without introducing new mutations.^[19] In sexually reproducing organisms, this mechanism ensures that gametes contain unique combinations of genetic material, contributing to the diversity observed in offspring.^[20] The frequency of recombination is quantified by the recombination rate r, typically measured in morgans (cM), where 1 morgan corresponds to an expected one crossover per meiosis between two loci.^[21] Recombination breaks down linkage disequilibrium (LD), the non-random association of alleles at different loci, over generations. The decay of standardized LD (D') follows the equation D'_t = D'_0 (1 - r)^t, where t is the number of generations; higher r accelerates this decay, promoting greater haplotype diversity.^[21] Sexual reproduction further amplifies genetic variability through independent assortment of chromosomes. During metaphase I of meiosis, homologous pairs align randomly at the equator, leading to the segregation of maternal and paternal chromosomes into gametes independently of one another.^[22] For a species with n chromosome pairs, this process can generate up to $2^n unique gamete types, vastly expanding the potential combinations in zygotes and enhancing overall population-level diversity.^[22] Gene flow introduces genetic variants from one population to another via the migration of individuals carrying those variants, counteracting differentiation and increasing variability across metapopulations. The migration rate m represents the proportion of the recipient population's gene pool replaced by migrants each generation.^[23] High gene flow reduces population structure, as measured by the fixation index F_{ST}, which quantifies differentiation based on allele frequency variance; under an island model of neutral evolution, F_{ST} \approx \frac{1}{4Nm + 1}, where N is the effective population size—thus, larger Nm values (indicating substantial gene flow) yield lower F_{ST} and greater homogeneity.^[24] A notable example of gene flow enhancing variability occurs in hybrid zones of wild sunflowers (Helianthus spp.), such as those between H. annuus and H. petiolaris in the central United States. These zones, formed where parental species meet on contrasting soils (e.g., clay versus sand), facilitate interspecific hybridization and backcrossing, producing recombinant genotypes with elevated phenotypic variance and marker polymorphism.^[25] This influx of alleles from divergent parental lineages has led to the evolution of novel hybrid species like H. anomalus and H. paradoxus, adapted to extreme habitats, demonstrating how gene flow can generate adaptive genetic diversity.^[25]

Reduction Mechanisms

Genetic Drift

Genetic drift refers to the random fluctuations in allele frequencies within a population arising from sampling error during reproduction, particularly pronounced in small populations where the effective population size N_e limits the number of individuals contributing gametes to the next generation. This stochastic process leads to unpredictable changes in genetic composition over time, independent of the alleles' effects on fitness, and can result in the gradual loss of genetic variability as alleles become fixed or lost by chance. The concept was formalized by population geneticists Sewall Wright and Ronald A. Fisher in the early 20th century as a key mechanism of evolution alongside natural selection.^[26] The Wright-Fisher model provides a foundational mathematical framework for understanding genetic drift, assuming a diploid population of fixed size $2N (or effective size $2N_e) where alleles are sampled binomially to form the next generation, mimicking random union of gametes without overlap between generations. In this model, for a biallelic locus with initial frequency p for one allele, the expected change in frequency is zero, but the variance of the change \Delta p per generation is given by

\mathrm{Var}(\Delta p) = \frac{p(1-p)}{2N_e},

highlighting how smaller N_e amplifies drift's impact, increasing the likelihood of rapid allele frequency shifts. This binomial sampling underlies predictions of eventual fixation (frequency reaching 1) or loss (frequency reaching 0) for neutral alleles, with the probability of fixation equal to the initial frequency p.^[26] In island populations, genetic drift often manifests through founder effects or isolation, leading to allele fixation or loss and reduced variability compared to mainland source populations. For instance, on Pingelap Atoll in Micronesia, a typhoon in 1775 reduced the population to about 20 survivors, one of whom carried a recessive mutation for achromatopsia (complete color blindness); subsequent drift in this small, isolated group elevated the allele frequency, resulting in approximately 10% of modern inhabitants affected—a stark contrast to the global rate of less than 0.01%. Such examples illustrate drift's role in shaping unique genetic profiles in small, insular groups, where random sampling dominates over other evolutionary forces.^[27]^[28] Unlike natural selection, which systematically favors alleles conferring higher fitness and thus directs evolutionary change, genetic drift is non-adaptive and directionless, operating solely through chance and capable of fixing deleterious alleles or eliminating beneficial ones in finite populations. This randomness underscores drift's potential to counteract adaptive processes in small groups, though its effects diminish in large populations where sampling error is negligible.^[29]

Selection and Inbreeding

Natural selection acts as a systematic force that reduces genetic variability by favoring individuals with advantageous traits, leading to the fixation of beneficial alleles and the elimination of less favorable ones in a population. This process occurs through different modes, including directional selection, which shifts the population toward one extreme of a trait distribution; stabilizing selection, which favors intermediate phenotypes and suppresses extremes; and disruptive selection, which promotes both extremes at the expense of intermediates. In each case, selection diminishes allelic diversity as it increases the frequency of adaptive variants, ultimately homogenizing the gene pool over generations.^[30] A key insight into this reduction comes from J.B.S. Haldane's analysis of the "cost of natural selection," which quantifies the reproductive cost to the population as deleterious alleles are purged and advantageous ones substituted, limiting the rate at which variability can be maintained under strong selective pressure.^[31] Inbreeding further contributes to the loss of genetic variability by promoting mating between closely related individuals, which increases the probability of homozygous genotypes and exposes recessive alleles that would otherwise remain hidden in heterozygotes. The extent of inbreeding in a population is often measured by the inbreeding coefficient F, defined as F = \frac{H_e - H_o}{H_e}, where H_e is the expected heterozygosity under random mating and H_o is the observed heterozygosity; values of F approaching 1 indicate near-complete homozygosity and severe reduction in variability.^[32] This heightened homozygosity diminishes overall genetic diversity, as fewer unique allele combinations are transmitted to offspring, effectively narrowing the population's adaptive potential.^[33] A major consequence of inbreeding is inbreeding depression, characterized by reduced fitness due to the increased expression of deleterious recessive alleles that impair survival, reproduction, or other traits. These alleles, often maintained at low frequencies in outbred populations, become homozygous in inbred lineages, leading to cumulative fitness costs such as lower fertility or higher susceptibility to disease.^[34] In extreme cases, this manifests in wild populations like the cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus), where historical population bottlenecks and subsequent inbreeding have resulted in exceptionally low genetic variability, contributing to high cub mortality rates and overall vulnerability to environmental stresses.^[35]

Quantification

Diversity Metrics

Genetic variability in populations is quantified using several key metrics that capture different aspects of diversity at the allelic, genotypic, and sequence levels. These measures allow researchers to compare genetic variation across populations, accounting for factors like sample size and locus type. Common metrics include allele richness, heterozygosity, and nucleotide diversity, each providing insights into the extent and distribution of genetic differences. Allele richness (A_R) measures the number of alleles observed at a locus, standardized to account for differences in sample size across populations through rarefaction methods, which estimate the expected number of alleles in a subsample of fixed size. This adjustment prevents bias in comparisons where larger samples naturally detect more alleles due to sampling effects alone. A_R is particularly useful in conservation genetics for assessing rare alleles lost in small populations. Heterozygosity quantifies the proportion of individuals carrying two different alleles at a locus. The observed heterozygosity (H_o) is directly calculated as the fraction of heterozygous individuals in the sample, while the expected heterozygosity (H_e) assumes Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium and, for a biallelic locus, is given by H_e = 2pq, where p and q are the frequencies of the two alleles (p + q = 1). For loci with multiple alleles, H_e = 1 - \sum p_i^2, where p_i are allele frequencies. Another related measure is the percentage of polymorphic loci, defined as the proportion of loci exhibiting more than one allele (typically with the minor allele frequency above 0.01 or 0.05). Discrepancies between H_o and H_e can indicate deviations from equilibrium, such as inbreeding or selection. These metrics are widely applied to codominant markers like microsatellites. Nucleotide diversity (π) assesses variation at the DNA sequence level as the average number of nucleotide differences per site between all pairs of sequences in a population. It is formally defined as \hat{\pi} = \frac{n}{n-1} \sum_i \sum_j x_i x_j \pi_{ij}, where x_i and x_j are the frequencies of the i-th and j-th sequences, \pi_{ij} is the proportion of differing sites between them, and n is the number of sequences (noting that for large n, the correction factor \frac{n}{n-1} \approx 1). This metric is independent of sample size for large populations and is commonly estimated from aligned sequences using models of nucleotide substitution. In the human genome, π is approximately 0.001, reflecting about one difference per 1,000 base pairs on average; this value is notably lower in isolated founder populations such as the Amish, where genetic drift has reduced overall variation to roughly 14% of that in broader European samples.^[36]^[37]

Analytical Methods

Molecular techniques such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis, often visualized via gel electrophoresis, have been foundational for detecting genetic variability at specific loci. PCR amplifies targeted DNA segments, enabling the identification of polymorphisms, while RFLP involves digesting DNA with restriction enzymes to reveal variations in fragment lengths based on sequence differences; these fragments are separated by size using agarose or polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, producing band patterns that indicate allelic diversity.^[38]^[39] Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies have revolutionized the assessment of whole-genome genetic variability by enabling high-throughput, cost-effective sequencing of entire genomes or targeted regions across populations. Platforms like Illumina's sequencing-by-synthesis allow simultaneous analysis of millions of DNA fragments, detecting single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), insertions, deletions, and structural variants that quantify variability at a genome-wide scale; this approach surpasses earlier methods by providing comprehensive data for diversity estimation, such as expected heterozygosity (H_e).^[40] Computational tools in population genetics facilitate the analysis of genetic data to infer variability patterns. The STRUCTURE software employs Bayesian clustering to detect population substructure and admixture by modeling allele frequencies across multilocus genotypes, assigning individuals probabilistically to ancestral populations based on genetic similarity. Arlequin integrates methods for computing F-statistics, which measure deviations from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium due to population differentiation, using inputs like allele frequencies from SNPs or microsatellites to evaluate variability within and between groups. Pedigree analysis remains essential for quantifying inbreeding and relatedness in captive populations, where complete genealogical records track inheritance patterns. This method calculates inbreeding coefficients (F) from parent-offspring relationships, identifying mean kinship and effective population size (N_e) to guide breeding strategies that maintain genetic variability; software like SPARKS or PEDIG processes pedigree files to generate these metrics, revealing losses due to matings between close relatives.^[41]^[42] Advances since 2012, particularly CRISPR-Cas9-based genome editing, have enabled functional studies of genetic variability by precisely introducing or correcting variants to assess their phenotypic effects. This technology targets specific loci using guide RNAs and Cas9 nuclease, allowing researchers to model variable alleles in cell lines or organisms and observe impacts on traits like fitness or adaptation; for instance, CRISPR screens in diverse genetic backgrounds have quantified how variants influence gene drive efficacy and population-level variability.^[43]^[44]

Significance

Evolutionary Implications

Genetic variability serves as the raw material for natural selection, enabling populations to adapt to changing environments through heritable differences in fitness. According to Fisher's fundamental theorem of natural selection, the rate of increase in mean fitness of a population is equal to its additive genetic variance in fitness at that time, underscoring how variation provides the substrate for evolutionary change without environmental influences.^[45] This theorem highlights that higher genetic variance accelerates fitness improvements, as selection acts on existing allelic diversity to favor advantageous traits. In speciation, genetic variability facilitates divergent evolution by allowing populations to accumulate differences that lead to reproductive isolation. In allopatric speciation, geographic barriers reduce gene flow, permitting genetic drift and selection to drive divergence from standing variation or new mutations in isolated populations.^[46] Sympatric speciation, by contrast, occurs without physical separation, relying on genetic variation to enable ecological or behavioral divergence within the same habitat, often through disruptive selection on traits like mating preferences or resource use.^[47] Overall, sufficient variability ensures that populations can respond to selective pressures, promoting the formation of new species. Low genetic variability heightens extinction risk by limiting a population's adaptive potential and increasing susceptibility to inbreeding depression and environmental stochasticity. The 50/500 rule, proposed by Franklin (1980), posits that an effective population size (Ne) of at least 50 is needed short-term to avoid immediate inbreeding effects, while Ne of 500 is required long-term to maintain evolutionary potential through sufficient genetic diversity.^[48] However, subsequent analyses have suggested upward revisions to Ne of 100 short-term and 1,000 long-term to better account for mutation rates and ensure long-term viability.^[49] Empirical studies confirm that species with reduced variability, such as fragmented populations, face elevated extinction probabilities due to diminished capacity to evolve in response to threats like habitat loss or disease.^[50] A classic example is Darwin's finches on the Galápagos Islands, where genetic variability in beak morphology has driven adaptive radiation to diverse food sources. During droughts, selection favored deeper beaks for cracking hard seeds in species like the medium ground finch (Geospiza fortis), while wet periods promoted smaller beaks for softer foods, demonstrating how variation enables rapid evolutionary responses to ecological shifts.^[51] This variability, maintained across the finch radiation, has allowed speciation and persistence amid fluctuating conditions.^[52]

Applications in Biology and Medicine

In conservation biology, genetic variability plays a crucial role in restoring endangered species through captive breeding programs, which aim to counteract the loss of diversity from population bottlenecks. The California condor (Gymnogyps californianus) exemplifies this approach; in 1987, with only 22 individuals remaining, the entire wild population was captured to initiate a captive breeding effort managed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and partners.^[53] This program has successfully increased the population to over 560 birds as of 2025, with total population growth rates of 10-15% per year since 1987, while retaining approximately 91% of the founders' heterozygosity as of 2011 through strategic pairing based on mean kinship to minimize inbreeding and distribute alleles across facilities.^[54]^[55] Challenges such as elevated frequencies of deleterious alleles like chondrodystrophy have been managed, demonstrating how maintaining genetic diversity enhances long-term viability and reintroduction success.^[53] In agriculture, genetic variability is harnessed to improve crop resilience and productivity, but its reduction in monocultures can lead to catastrophic vulnerabilities. Hybrid vigor, or heterosis, arises from crossing genetically diverse lines, resulting in superior yields and disease resistance in crops like maize and wheat, as breeders select for complementary alleles to boost performance.^[56] Conversely, the Irish Potato Famine of the 1840s illustrates the perils of low variability; Ireland's reliance on the genetically uniform "lumper" potato variety, propagated clonally, left fields susceptible to the pathogen Phytophthora infestans, causing widespread crop failure, famine, and over one million deaths.^[57] This historical event underscores the need for diverse germplasm in modern breeding to mitigate risks from pests and environmental stresses, informing policies like seed banks that preserve varietal diversity.^[57] In medicine, genetic variability informs pharmacogenomics, enabling personalized treatments by accounting for interindividual differences in drug metabolism and efficacy. Polymorphisms in genes such as CYP2C9 and VKORC1 explain up to 60% of variability in warfarin dosing, allowing genotype-guided adjustments to prevent bleeding or clotting risks.^[58] Similarly, genome-wide association studies (GWAS) leverage population-level variability to identify risk variants for diseases; a large-scale meta-analysis identified 143 common variants associated with type 2 diabetes susceptibility, explaining about 10% of heritability and highlighting genes involved in insulin secretion and beta-cell function.^[59] These insights guide targeted therapies, such as ivacaftor for cystic fibrosis patients with specific CFTR mutations, improving outcomes by matching treatments to genetic profiles.^[58] A notable application in human health is the influence of genetic variability on vaccine responses, as seen with COVID-19 vaccines. Diversity in human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genes, particularly HLA-DP, affects immune efficacy; in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients vaccinated with the Pfizer BNT162b2 vaccine, donor HLA-DP homozygosity was linked to non-response rates of 50%, compared to 20.3% in diverse responders, with lower homozygosity expression diversity (HED) scores correlating to weaker antibody production (mean HED 1.4 vs. 4.0).^[60] This variability, driven by HLA alleles' role in antigen presentation, explains differential T-cell and antibody responses, informing strategies to enhance vaccine effectiveness in immunocompromised populations.^[60]

References

[1]
Genetic variation - Understanding Evolution
Genetic variation is essential for evolution. It arises from mutations, gene flow, and sex, which introduces new gene combinations.
[2]
Understanding Human Genetic Variation - NCBI - NIH
Some variation (for example, a neutral mutation) alters the amino acid sequence of the resulting protein but produces no detectable change in its function.How Do Scientists Study... · What Is the Significance of...
[3]
How are gene variants involved in evolution?: MedlinePlus Genetics
Aug 5, 2021 · Genetic variations that alter gene activity or protein function can introduce different traits in an organism.
[4]
Human Genomic Variation
Feb 1, 2023 · Genomic variation reflects the differences in a person's DNA compared to other peoples' DNA. There are multiple types of variants in human ...
[5]
The Genetic Variation in a Population Is Caused by Multiple Factors
Genetic variation describes naturally occurring genetic differences among individuals of the same species. This variation permits flexibility and survival ...
[6]
Population Genetics - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Sep 22, 2006 · Mutation is the ultimate source of genetic variation, preventing populations from becoming genetically homogeneous. Once mutation is taken into ...<|separator|>
[7]
Genetics and the origin of species: An introduction - PMC - NIH
Genetic Variation and Its Origins. In 1937, when Dobzhansky published Genetics and the Origin of Species (1), the DNA structure was not yet discovered, nor ...
[8]
Theodosius Dobzhansky: Integrating Genetics and Evolution - PBS
Dobzhansky's work with Drosophila, or fruit flies, provided new evidence that supported Darwin's theory that natural selection, acting on genetic variation in ...
[9]
Analysis of Gene Diversity in Subdivided Populations | PNAS
- **Confirmation**: Yes, this is Nei's 1973 paper on analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations.
[10]
Relative impact of indels versus SNPs on complex disease - NIH
By definition, an SNP changes a single nucleotide in the DNA sequence, whereas an indel incorporates or removes one or more nucleotides (Loewe, 2008). SNPs in ...Missing: variability | Show results with:variability
[11]
Allelic variance among ABO blood group genotypes in a population ...
Our allele distribution consisted of A101 (N=7), A102 (N=38), B101 (N=34), O01 (N=58), and O02 (N=77). We found that O02 was the most abundant allele in our ...
[12]
The importance of immune gene variability (MHC) in evolutionary ...
MHC variants influence many important biological traits, including immune recognition, susceptibility to infectious and autoimmune diseases, individual odours, ...
[13]
https://www.nature.com/scitable/topicpage/genetic-mutation-1127
[14]
Mutation, Repair and Recombination - Genomes - NCBI Bookshelf
A mutation (Section 14.1) is a change in the nucleotide sequence of a short region of a genome (Figure 14.1A). Many mutations are point mutations that replace ...
[15]
Mutation rate per base pair per replication - Human Homo sapiens
This gives about 2×10^-8 per b per generation (Crow 1993, 1995). [Researchers] take 10^-8 as a representative value. However, because the overwhelming majority ...
[16]
Rates of spontaneous mutation - PMC - NIH
Mutation rates in higher eukaryotes are roughly 0.1-100 per genome per sexual generation but are currently indistinguishable from 1/300 per cell division per ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[17]
Neutral Evolution - PMC - NIH
The total number of mutations accumulated during time T is μT. Therefore, the evolutionary rate, λ, of gene substitutions per generation should be μT/T = μ.
[18]
Sickle cell disease: MedlinePlus Genetics
Mar 14, 2024 · Variants (also called mutations) in the HBB gene cause sickle cell disease. The HBB gene provides instructions for making one part of hemoglobin ...
[19]
Meiotic Recombination: The Essence of Heredity - PMC
On the contrary, meiotic recombination is relatively conservative and as many as half of all chromatids can emerge from meiosis with parental haplotypes.
[20]
Enhancing local meiotic crossovers in Arabidopsis and maize ...
Sep 2, 2025 · Meiotic crossovers, which exchange DNA between homologous chromosomes, are vital for accurate segregation and generate genetic diversity.
[21]
The Lowdown on Linkage Disequilibrium - PMC - NIH
where c is the recombination rate in morgans between the two markers and N is the effective population size. This equation illustrates two important properties ...
[22]
Genetics, Meiosis - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf - NIH
Genomic diversity and genetic variation is produced through the process of meiosis due to chromosomal recombination and independent assortment. Each ...Introduction · Cellular · Function · Mechanism
[23]
Gene Flow - Basicmedical Key
Apr 2, 2017 · The amount of one-way gene flow per generation (the migration rate) is m = 0.05. Over time, the island will become increasingly similar to the ...Missing: variability | Show results with:variability
[24]
Indirect measures of gene flow and migration: F ST ≠1/(4Nm+1)
Feb 1, 1999 · These measures are variants of F ST , a standardized measure of the genetic variance among populations, and are used to solve for Nm, the number of migrants ...Missing: variability | Show results with:variability
[25]
Hybrid zones as a tool for identifying adaptive genetic variation in ...
Hybrid zones as a tool for identifying adaptive genetic variation in outbreeding forest trees: lessons from wild annual sunflowers (Helianthus spp.).
[26]
The genetical theory of natural selection : Fisher, Ronald Aylmer, Sir ...
Nov 2, 2007 · The genetical theory of natural selection. by: Fisher ... DOWNLOAD OPTIONS. download 1 file · ABBYY GZ download · download 1 file · B/W PDF ...
[27]
Genetic Drift and Founder Effects: Implications for Population ...
Mar 17, 2024 · Island populations provide classic examples of the interplay between genetic drift, founder effects, and evolutionary divergence. Islands are ...
[28]
Achromatopsia in Pingelap Islanders. Study of a genetic isolate
Achromatopsia in Pingelap Islanders. Study of a genetic isolate. Am J Ophthalmol. 1971 Oct;72(4):746-56. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(71)90013-4. Authors. R E Carr ...Missing: drift scientific paper
[29]
Natural Selection, Genetic Drift, and Gene Flow Do Not Act in ...
Natural selection, genetic drift, and gene flow are the mechanisms that cause changes in allele frequencies over time.
[30]
Evidence of directional and stabilizing selection in contemporary ...
Dec 18, 2017 · The key distinction between stabilizing and disruptive selection is whether the relationship between fitness and a phenotype is concave down or ...Missing: cost | Show results with:cost
[31]
[PDF] The cost of natural selection - University of Hawaii System
This supplements my earlier calculation (Haldane, 1937) as to the effect of variation on fitness. I pointed out that, in a stable population, genetic variation ...Missing: variability | Show results with:variability
[32]
Coefficients of Inbreeding and Relationship | The American Naturalist
Next article. Free. Coefficients of Inbreeding and Relationship. Sewall Wright. Sewall Wright. Search for more articles by this author.
[33]
[PDF] Wright, S. 1922. Coefficients of inbreeding and relationship. The ...
Wright, S. 1922. Coefficients of inbreeding and relationship. The American Naturalist 56:330-338. Page 2. Page 3. Page 4. Page 5. Page 6. Page 7. Page 8 ...
[34]
The genetic basis of inbreeding depression - PubMed
Deleterious mutations probably play a major role in causing inbreeding depression. ... Recessive or partially recessive deleterious effects of alleles, some ...
[35]
Low nucleotide diversity in man. | Genetics | Oxford Academic
The pi values estimated are, respectively, 0.03 and 0.04% for the 5' and 3' UT regions, and 0.03, 0.06 and 0.11% for nondegenerate, twofold degenerate and ...Missing: source | Show results with:source
[36]
Population Genetics - Clinic for Special Children
Exome sequences of 7221 Amish contained only 14% as many variants as the same number of UKB participants. This reduced genetic diversity has substantial ...
[37]
Molecular Genetic Techniques and Markers for Ecological Research
Traditionally, MSATs and RFLPs were visualized as discrete bands revealed by agarose gel electrophoresis. The nucleotides comprising DNA sequences, however ...
[38]
The discovery of human genetic variations and their use as disease ...
May 20, 2010 · With the invention of the molecular technique PCR, alleles of RFLPs are usually determined by PCR-based methods, such as PCR–RFLP. In PCR ...Missing: variability | Show results with:variability
[39]
Next-Generation Sequencing Technology: Current Trends ... - PMC
NGS allows for the rapid sequencing of millions of DNA fragments simultaneously, providing comprehensive insights into genome structure, genetic variations, ...
[40]
Pedigree analysis for the genetic management of group‐living species
Apr 2, 2016 · Pedigree analysis methods generally require complete information about the parents of every captive‐born individual. There are many species that ...
[41]
Methods and Prospects for Using Molecular Data in Captive ...
Because captive breeding programs rely on pedigree analyses for developing breeding recommendations, captive population management is hampered if a population's ...
[42]
CRISPR/Cas9 gene drives in genetically variable and nonrandomly ...
We have modeled the effects of standing genetic variation and inbreeding on CRISPR/Cas9-based gene drives using T. castaneum as a model. Our results suggest ...
[43]
Multiparametric and accurate functional analysis of genetic ... - Nature
Dec 5, 2022 · Altogether, CRISPR-Select can determine variant effects on essentially any cell parameter and in any cell type. The method is fast, quantitative ...Missing: papers | Show results with:papers<|control11|><|separator|>
[44]
The Genetical Theory Of Natural Selection : Fisher, R. A
Nov 12, 2006 · The Genetical Theory Of Natural Selection. by: Fisher, R. A ... PDF download · download 1 file · SINGLE PAGE PROCESSED TIFF ZIP download.
[45]
Speciation: The Origin of New Species | Learn Science at Scitable
The central idea here is that when populations are geographically separated, they will diverge from one another, both in the way they look and genetically.Darwin's ``mystery Of... · The Modern Synthesis · Genetics/genomics: New...Missing: variability | Show results with:variability
[46]
Genetics and ecological speciation - PNAS
Jun 16, 2009 · Speciation occurs from standing genetic variation when reproductive isolation between 2 or more populations evolves from alleles already present ...
[47]
Most species are not driven to extinction before genetic factors ...
However, reduced genetic diversity is a marker indicating that their reproductive fitness is already compromised and that their subsequent extinction risk is ...
[48]
Beaks, Adaptation, and Vocal Evolution in Darwin's Finches
Field studies have shown that beaks evolve by natural selection in response to variation in local ecological conditions.
[49]
Darwin's Galápagos finches in modern biology - PMC - NIH
While differently shaped beaks allow for a more efficient (and safe) handling of different types of food sources by Darwin's finches, one remarkable and often ...
[50]
[PDF] GENETIC STATUS AND MANAGEMENT OF CALIFORNIA CONDORS
Captive breeding was successful and reintroduction efforts began in 1992. The current population is descended from 14 individuals belonging to three genetic " ...
[51]
Monoculture and the Irish Potato Famine: cases of missing genetic ...
The lack of genetic variation in "lumper" potatoes, which were clones, made them susceptible to disease, leading to the Irish potato famine.Missing: uniformity | Show results with:uniformity
[52]
CHAPTER 1: The Irish Potato Famine: The Birth of Plant Pathology
Aug 2, 2017 · It introduces many of the ideas to be presented in this book, including the political aspects of food supply, the risks of genetic uniformity ...Missing: vulnerability | Show results with:vulnerability
[53]
Pharmacogenomics: a key component of personalized therapy
Nov 29, 2012 · Pharmacogenomics is one of the core elements in personalized medicine. The basic concept is that interindividual variability in drug response is a consequence ...
[54]
Genome-wide association analyses identify 143 risk variants and ...
Jul 27, 2018 · Here we conduct a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) with ~16 million genetic variants in 62,892 T2D cases and 596,424 ...
[55]
https://ecos.fws.gov/docs/five_year_review/doc4163.pdf