Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Henry Cort

Henry Cort (c. 1740–1800) was an English ironmaster and inventor renowned for patenting the grooved rolling mill in 1783 and an improved puddling process in 1784, innovations that enabled the efficient conversion of pig iron into high-quality wrought iron using coke fuel instead of scarce charcoal.^[1]^[2] Born in Lancaster to a builder's family, Cort initially worked as a naval agent in London from a young age, marrying Elizabeth Heysham in 1768 and fathering 13 children.^[3]^[1] In 1775, he left his naval role to enter the iron trade, establishing an ironworks at Fontley near Gosport in 1779 to supply the Royal Navy with anchors, cannons, and other iron goods.^[3]^[1] Cort's experiments addressed Britain's iron shortage during wartime, as traditional charcoal-based methods could not meet demand; his 1783 patent for grooved rollers allowed for faster, more uniform production of iron bars by mechanically shaping heated blooms, while the 1784 puddling patent introduced a reverberatory furnace where pig iron was stirred and oxidized to remove impurities, producing malleable wrought iron on a larger scale.^[1]^[2] These processes, first commercially implemented at Cyfarthfa Ironworks in 1786, dramatically increased British iron output from about 68,000 tons in 1788 to over 250,000 tons by 1806, fueling the Industrial Revolution through applications in machinery, railways, and shipbuilding.^[1]^[3] Despite their success, Cort faced financial ruin when the Admiralty delayed payments for naval supplies, leading to bankruptcy in 1789 and the seizure of his patents; he received a government pension of £500 annually from 1794 but died in relative poverty in 1800, buried in Hampstead Churchyard.^[1]^[3] His family later petitioned for compensation, and ironmasters contributed to their support, recognizing the processes' enduring global impact until the rise of steel production in the mid-19th century.^[1]^[2]

Early Life and Career

Family Background and Birth

Henry Cort was born around 1740 in Lancaster, England, though the exact date and precise circumstances of his birth remain uncertain.^[4]^[5]^[6] His family originated from Lancaster, where his father worked as a mason and brickmaker, a trade that placed the household in the middling sort of society.^[4]^[5]^[6] This background provided Cort with a modest socioeconomic foundation, fostering practical skills in construction and commerce that would later influence his professional path.^[4] Little is documented about Cort's immediate family beyond his father, with no reliable records of his mother or siblings.^[1] The family's involvement in the building trade likely exposed young Cort to materials like iron and basic metallurgy from an early age, though he received no formal higher education.^[5] By his own efforts, Cort advanced from these humble origins to establish himself in business, reflecting the opportunities available to those of middle-class standing in 18th-century England.^[4]^[6] Extended family connections may have included ties to trade networks, potentially reaching overseas, such as Jamaica through a distant relative, John Cort, who operated as a shipmaster there in the 1780s.^[7] However, these links did not directly shape his birth or upbringing in Lancaster.^[1]

Naval Service and Early Business Ventures

Henry Cort began his professional career in the mid-18th century as an agent handling financial affairs for the Royal Navy, a role that involved disbursing pay, pensions, and prize money to officers, crews, and their families. By the early 1760s, he had established himself in London as a navy pay agent, succeeding earlier partnerships such as Batty & Cort and managing a growing clientele of naval personnel, including figures like Lieutenant John Becher and purser Thomas Morgan. His duties encompassed collecting half-pay remittances twice yearly and widows' pensions annually, drawing on records from the Admiralty such as muster books and pay ledgers, which honed his expertise in naval logistics.^[8] In 1768, Cort married Elizabeth Heysham, the daughter of a Romsey solicitor, in a union that connected him to influential circles, including the Attwick family involved in naval supply businesses.^[3] The couple settled in Gosport, Hampshire, near the naval base at Portsmouth, where they raised a large family amid the bustling port community; this period marked the start of his domestic life alongside his professional commitments.^[9] Cort's work as a navy agent cultivated significant financial acumen, as he operated akin to a banker by honoring bills of exchange, charging interest on overdrafts, and investing surplus funds from client accounts, which reportedly yielded him a respectable income through commissions.^[10] This included advancing funds to officers for immediate needs, such as prize money distributions following captures like the 1762 Ermiona haul, and occasionally extending personal loans to clients like Thomas Morgan to support related ventures.^[11] These practices positioned him to extend credit in broader commercial contexts, including potential advances aligned with government naval expenditures during peacetime expansions post-Seven Years' War.^[12] Around 1775, seeking new opportunities in the iron trade, Cort relocated from London to Funtley, near Fareham in Hampshire, where he established initial dealings in ironmongery and supply contracts, leveraging his naval connections to pivot toward industrial pursuits.^[13] This move, prompted by the Attwick family's iron business in Gosport, marked the transition from his naval agency role, which he gradually relinquished over the following years.^[14]

Innovations in Iron Production

Partnership with the Jellicoes and Fontley Works

In 1779, Henry Cort formed a partnership with Samuel Jellicoe, the son of Adam Jellicoe, a prominent naval supplier and deputy-paymaster of seamen's wages, to expand his iron production ventures.^[3] This alliance was facilitated by Cort's prior experience as a navy agent, which provided him with connections in naval supply networks essential for securing contracts and funding. The partnership marked Cort's deeper entry into the iron trade, leveraging the Jellicoes' financial resources and naval ties to support industrial experimentation. Adam Jellicoe provided substantial financial backing, advancing approximately £27,000 in loans to fund the development of ironworks, secured against Cort's future patent rights in exchange for half the profits. These funds enabled Cort to lease and adapt the existing Fontley Ironworks in 1775 near Fareham in Hampshire, a site specifically chosen for its water power and proximity to Portsmouth's naval facilities, serving as Cort's primary base for testing new production methods.^[3]^[15] At Fontley, initial operations centered on refining imported pig iron into wrought iron using traditional finery processes, where the pig iron was melted in hearths with charcoal to remove impurities before further working. Samuel Jellicoe handled day-to-day management and administrative duties, including oversight of labor and supply chains, while Cort focused on innovation and process improvements to enhance efficiency.^[3] This division allowed the partnership to fulfill early naval contracts for iron products, such as anchors and barrel hoops, while laying the groundwork for Cort's later advancements.^[3]

Development of Puddling and Rolling Processes

Henry Cort began experimenting with iron production techniques at his Fontley works in Hampshire around 1781, seeking to overcome the inefficiencies of traditional finery forges, which relied on charcoal and produced limited quantities of wrought iron. These experiments, conducted over the next three years, focused on developing a more efficient method to convert pig iron—produced in blast furnaces—into malleable wrought iron suitable for industrial applications. By addressing the limitations of charcoal-based refining, Cort's work laid the foundation for scalable iron manufacturing during the Industrial Revolution.^[16] In 1784, Cort patented an improved puddling process using a reverberatory furnace, building on earlier techniques such as Peter Onions' 1783 method.^[17] This furnace used coke as fuel, with flames directed over the charge rather than through it, preventing contamination from the fuel while allowing oxidation of impurities. The process involved melting pig iron in the furnace and manually stirring it with long iron rods to expose the molten metal to air, promoting the oxidation and removal of carbon, silicon, and other impurities. This decarburization resulted in a pasty, semi-solid mass of wrought iron that could be gathered into balls for further processing.^[16] Complementing the puddling process, Cort secured a patent in 1783 for grooved rolling mills, which mechanized the shaping of the puddled iron into uniform bars.^[1] Heated blooms or balls of wrought iron from puddling were passed between pairs of grooved rollers, which gradually elongated and shaped the material into consistent bars, plates, or rods, eliminating the need for laborious manual hammering under heavy sledges. This rolling method not only increased production speed but also ensured uniformity in dimensions and strength, making it ideal for large-scale output. The integration of puddling and rolling enabled the mass production of wrought iron, transforming it from a craft-based material into an industrial staple.^[18] These innovations were enabled by Cort's partnership with the Jellicoe family, which provided the resources necessary for conducting the experiments at Fontley. By 1785, initial testing of the combined processes demonstrated success, with Cort producing high-quality wrought iron bars suitable for naval applications, such as anchors and ship fittings, on a commercial scale. This early validation highlighted the processes' potential to meet the British Navy's growing demand for reliable iron components.^[2]

Patents, Commercialization, and Financial Challenges

Securing Patents and Royalties

In 1783, Henry Cort secured a patent for an innovative grooved rolling mill designed to produce uniform iron bars from heated scrap or pig iron, significantly improving efficiency over traditional hammering methods.^[1] This was followed in 1784 by a second patent for a reverberatory puddling furnace, which enabled the conversion of pig iron into wrought iron through stirring to remove impurities, combined with the rolling process for shaping. These patents protected the core technologies of puddling and rolling, allowing Cort to pursue commercialization through licensing agreements with ironmasters.^[19] A key early licensing deal came in May 1787 with Richard Crawshay, manager of Cyfarthfa Ironworks in South Wales, who agreed to pay Cort a royalty of 10 shillings per ton of bar iron produced using the patented processes. This partnership marked one of the first major adoptions of Cort's methods, with Cyfarthfa installing puddling furnaces and rolling mills to implement the technology.^[19] By July 1788, production at Cyfarthfa had scaled to 20 tons of bar iron per week from eight furnaces, equating to approximately 1,000 tons annually and demonstrating the processes' viability for large-scale output.^[19] Government interest further supported Cort's efforts, as the Admiralty tested and approved his iron for naval applications in 1787, replacing imported Swedish Oregrounds iron after successful trials for anchors and other fittings.^[5] Initial contracts for supplying iron hoops and bar iron to the Royal Navy, stemming from Cort's earlier role as a naval agent, promised ongoing royalties through expanded licensing to meet military demands.^[1] However, enforcement proved challenging, as some licensees modified the puddling process to circumvent royalty obligations while still benefiting from Cort's core innovations. These alterations allowed ironmasters to claim independence from the patents, reducing Cort's revenue despite the widespread adoption of his methods.^[19]

Bankruptcy and Government Involvement

The sudden death of Adam Jellicoe on August 30, 1789, exposed his embezzlement of naval funds, including approximately £27,500 that had been diverted from public monies to finance loans for Henry Cort's iron production ventures starting around 1780.^[5] This revelation, detailed in Jellicoe's own memorandum from November 1782, triggered immediate legal actions by the Crown, as the misappropriated funds had supported Cort's operations at Fontley and related partnerships.^[20] The total shortfall in Jellicoe's accounts reached £39,676, with Cort's firm liable for £54,853 in outstanding debts to the estate.^[5] These developments precipitated Cort's bankruptcy declaration in late 1789, amid liabilities exceeding £50,000, prompting the seizure of his assets, including the Fontley ironworks and associated equipment, by the Crown to recover the embezzled sums.^[5] Exchequer extents were issued immediately after Jellicoe's death on August 31 and September 1, 1789, targeting the partnership for £9,000 and Cort personally for £27,500, freezing operations and leading to detailed inventories of the sites.^[20] Samuel Jellicoe, Adam's son and Cort's partner, retained control of the properties for 14 years to settle claims, while the government prioritized recovery over Cort's ongoing concerns.^[5] Parliamentary inquiries followed, including examinations in 1800 and 1805 by the Commission of Naval Enquiry, which scrutinized Jellicoe's fraud and assessed Cort's potential liability despite his lack of direct involvement in the misappropriation.^[5] Evidence from these probes, drawn from National Archives records such as TS11/386, confirmed the embezzlement's scope but cleared Cort of complicity.^[20] In response, the government granted Cort an annual pension of £200 in 1794, following a 1791 petition to Prime Minister William Pitt demonstrating his innocence, though deductions reduced the effective amount to about £160.^[5] The fallout permanently sidelined Cort from the iron trade, as the seizure of his patents—originally the basis for expected royalty claims—prevented any further commercialization or income from his innovations, leaving him without compensation despite their widespread adoption.^[5] By 1800, the Crown had recovered only £2,654 from the patents, valued at a mere £100 during the 1805 inquiry, underscoring the profound financial and professional exclusion Cort endured.^[5]

Later Life, Personal Details, and Death

Family and Residences

Henry Cort married Elizabeth Heysham, daughter of a Romsey solicitor, on 16 March 1768 at St Thomas the Apostle in London.^[21] The couple settled initially in the Gosport area during the late 1760s and 1770s, where Cort managed his naval agent business and early iron ventures, establishing a family home amid the Hampshire naval community.^[3] Elizabeth and Henry had twelve children baptized between 1769 and 1790, including sons Henry Bell Cort, William Thomas Cort, Frederick John Cort, and Richard Cort, as well as daughters such as Elizabeth Jane, Harriet Ann, and Catherine Frampton.^[22] The children were primarily raised in Hampshire, with several baptized at Gosport's Holy Trinity Church, reflecting the family's ties to the region's maritime and industrial circles.^[22] As the family grew, some children, including William and Coningsby Francis, assisted in Cort's ironworks operations at nearby Funtley, while others pursued trade or overseas opportunities in India and Guiana during the 1790s.^[22] Family dynamics centered on mutual support amid Cort's ambitious pursuits, with Elizabeth managing household affairs as the family navigated financial pressures from his business expansions.^[22] During the 1789 bankruptcy, which stemmed from partner Adam Jellicoe's embezzlement, the family played a key role in handling legal matters; sons William and Coningsby helped compile evidence for later parliamentary claims, while Richard Cort, the youngest son, became involved in subsequent family advocacy efforts into the 1850s.^[22] Some children entered trade independently, such as Harriet Ann marrying naval captain Thomas Dowell and Coningsby engaging in property and legal dealings.^[22] The family's residences shifted with Cort's career: from Gosport in the 1760s–1770s, to Funtley near Fareham in the 1780s, where they lived close to the iron mill during its peak operations.^[22] Post-bankruptcy in 1790, the family relocated to the London area, settling at Devonshire Street in the parish of St George the Martyr, Queen Square, a modest urban home supported by friends' aid and a small government allowance.^[23] In daily life, the Corts maintained a modest lifestyle despite Henry's industrial ambitions, with interests in the local Hampshire community through naval and trade networks; Elizabeth's connections via her uncle's ironmongery in Gosport aided early stability, fostering a household focused on education and practical skills for the children.^[3] This unassuming routine persisted in London, emphasizing family resilience over extravagance.^[23]

Final Years and Passing

Following his bankruptcy in 1789, Henry Cort lived in relative obscurity and financial dependence on a government pension of £200 per year, granted in 1794 after persistent appeals by supporters including Members of Parliament, though deductions reduced the net amount to approximately £160 annually.^[24] This allowance sustained his semi-retired existence in London during the 1790s, marked by limited public engagement as he withdrew from active business pursuits.^[5] Cort's health began to decline in the 1790s, with chronic illnesses likely worsened by the prolonged stress of financial ruin, legal battles, and personal hardships, leaving him broken in both body and spirit.^[24]^[5] He made occasional efforts to seek further compensation through writings and representations to authorities, though these yielded little beyond the existing pension arrangements. Cort died on 23 May 1800 at his lodgings in Devonshire Street, London, aged about 60, and was buried in the churchyard of St John-at-Hampstead.^[25] His passing was unceremonious, with no grand funeral, reflecting the family's ongoing poverty despite the pension; his widow and ten children were left in distressed circumstances, later receiving modest additional support of around £100 annually.^[24]

Legacy and Recognition

Impact on British Industry

Cort's puddling and rolling processes facilitated the rapid diffusion of wrought iron production across the United Kingdom, with adoption accelerating in the 1790s as ironmasters integrated the technology into existing operations. By 1820, approximately 8,200 puddling furnaces based on Cort's design were operational, marking a shift from labor-intensive charcoal-based methods to scalable coal-fired refining.^[26] This widespread implementation supported the conversion of pig iron into high-quality wrought iron without reliance on imported bar iron, transforming regional forges into national production hubs.^[27] The economic effects were profound, as the processes drastically reduced production costs for wrought iron—reportedly halving expenses compared to prior finery methods—while enabling mass output using domestic resources like coke and scrap iron. This cost efficiency spurred growth in downstream industries such as shipbuilding and machinery manufacturing, where affordable wrought iron became essential for structural components and engines. Factories like Cyfarthfa Ironworks exemplified this scale, reaching about 6,000 tons annually by the mid-1790s through integrated puddling and rolling operations.^[28] Over the long term, Cort's innovations underpinned Britain's dominance in global iron markets until the 1850s, fueling the expansion of steam engines and railways that defined the Industrial Revolution. The increased availability of wrought iron facilitated the construction of iron-framed machinery and rail infrastructure, with Britain's pig iron output surging from 68,300 tons in 1788 to 258,000 tons in 1806 as a direct result of enhanced refining capacity.^[29] This quantitative leap not only solidified Britain's export leadership but also integrated iron production into broader mechanized economies.^[26]

Historical Assessment and Controversies

Henry Cort has traditionally been celebrated in historical accounts as the primary inventor of the puddling and rolling processes that transformed wrought iron production during the Industrial Revolution. Biographies from the 19th century, such as Samuel Smiles' Industrial Biography: Iron Workers and Tool Makers (written in the 1860s), portray Cort as a self-reliant innovator whose patents of 1783 and 1784 revolutionized Britain's iron industry, enabling massive scale-up in output and laying the groundwork for economic dominance in global trade.^[30] These narratives emphasize his solo genius, crediting him with overcoming technical challenges through personal ingenuity, despite building on earlier experiments like those of Peter Onions.^[30] This acclaim stands in stark irony to Cort's personal fate, as he died in relative poverty in 1800, his health and fortunes ruined by financial mismanagement from his business partner Adam Jellicoe, who embezzled over £39,000.^[30] Despite his contributions adding immense wealth to the British economy—estimated by contemporaries like Lord Sheffield in 1786 as securing control of the iron trade—Cort received no royalties from his patents, which expired in 1797–1798 without compensation.^[30] Partial official recognition came in 1794, when Prime Minister William Pitt secured him a government pension of £200 per annum from the Treasury, reduced by fees to about £160 annually, which supported him until his death but did little to alleviate his destitution amid a family of twelve children. Recent scholarship has challenged this traditional attribution, proposing that Cort's techniques derived from knowledge developed by enslaved African metallurgists in Jamaica. In a 2023 article published in History and Technology, Jenny Bulstrode argues that the puddling process—patented by Cort in 1784 for converting scrap iron into wrought iron using reverberatory furnaces and grooved rollers—originated at John Reeder's foundry in Morant Bay, Jamaica, where 76 enslaved Black workers, trafficked from West and Central African ironworking traditions, adapted the method for producing iron components like sugar mill parts.^[7] Evidence includes 18th-century Jamaican House of Assembly records, shipping manifests, and newspapers documenting the foundry's operations from 1775 onward, as well as baptism and valuation documents (e.g., Reeder's 1782 petition valuing the workers' labor at £7,000 sterling).^[7] Bulstrode links this knowledge to Cort via his cousin, shipmaster John Cort, who visited Jamaica in 1781 and reportedly shared details of the process with Henry upon returning to Portsmouth, evidenced by trade records connecting Jamaican iron exports to British ports.^[7] Named workers such as Devonshire (baptized William Baillie), Mingo (Malcolm Laing), and Kwasi (John Reeder) exemplify these innovators, whose techniques were appropriated amid colonial enslavement.^[7] Bulstrode's analysis implies a need to credit these Black metallurgists as the true originators, reframing Cort's role as one of dissemination rather than invention and highlighting how British industrial progress relied on exploited colonial knowledge.^[7] This perspective has sparked scholarly debate, with critics in outlets like Annals of Science questioning the evidential links, such as the accuracy of John Cort's itinerary and the direct transmission to Henry, arguing it overstates colonial ties without conclusive proof.^[13] Nonetheless, Cort's broader contributions to the Industrial Revolution remain affirmed, as his commercialization scaled these processes to industrial levels, though modern assessments nuance his legacy by underscoring the intertwined histories of innovation and imperial exploitation.^[7]

References

[1]
Henry Cort (c.1741–1800) - Biography – ERIH
His second patent, the next year, was for 'puddling'. This used a reverberatory furnace to convert pig iron to wrought iron by stirring it and turning it to ...
[2]
Henry Cort
The puddling process converted pig iron into wrought iron by subjecting it to heat and stirring it in a furnace, without using charcoal. It was the first method ...Missing: biography | Show results with:biography
[3]
Henry Cort - Graces Guide
Dec 17, 2014 · In 1782 he patented the puddling process for refining iron ore. The son of a builder, Cort was born in Lancaster in 1740. As a young man, he ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[4]
Dictionary of National Biography, 1885-1900/Cort, Henry - Wikisource
Dec 28, 2020 · CORT, HENRY (1740–1800), ironmaster, was born at Lancaster in 1740, where his father carried on the trade of a mason and brickmaker.Missing: background parents
[5]
Henry Cort by Samuel Smiles - Graces Guide
May 20, 2013 · Henry Cort was born in 1740 at Lancaster, where his father carried on the trade of a builder and brickmaker. Nothing is known as to Henry's early history.Missing: background parents
[6]
Henry Cort | Encyclopedia.com
By 1784 Cort worked out a process of pudding, whereby molten pig iron was stirred in a reverberatory furnace. As the iron was decarbonized by air, it became ...
[7]
Black metallurgists and the making of the industrial revolution
This paper shows how the myth of Henry Cort must be revised with the practices and purposes of Black metallurgists in Jamaica, who developed one of the most ...
[8]
Navy sources - Henry Cort
Payment twice a year. You can trace how clients of Thomas Bell proceed via Thomas Batty (1761) to Henry Cort (1763). Note how the half-pay roll expands ...
[9]
Early life of Henry Cort - salthistory - Yola
The early life and times of Henry Cort. As previously shown, details of Henry Cort's birth and parentage have been deliberately withheld by the family.Missing: background parents
[10]
Henry Cort (abt.1740-1800) | WikiTree FREE Family Tree
Jun 10, 2016 · Henry Cort was born about 1740 in Lancaster of unknown parentage [1] and made his way to London. He married Elizabeth Brown at Crowhurst in Surrey on the 21st ...Missing: background | Show results with:background
[11]
Navy agent's business - Henry Cort
The navy agent's finances. It is clear that Cort receives a respectable income as a navy agent, although there are few clues about its sources.Missing: service | Show results with:service
[12]
HENRY CORT, NAVY AGENT - Taylor & Francis Online
After his discharge from the Ambuscade in May 1761 he was on half pay until November 1776. Cort acted for Lieutenant Becher throughout his time as a navy agent ...
[13]
[PDF] the case of the ordnance factories - Open Research Online
"Henry Cort, who revolutionised iron manufacture, began in the 1760s ... with the Armstrong guns manufactured at Elswick and in service with the Royal Navy,.
[14]
Full article: Henry Cort and the 'Black metallurgists': on the accuracy ...
123 The Weale documents state that Cort took over management of the Fontley ironworks in 1775; NCC, Weale MS/0371, fol. 198. 124 Mott, Henry Cort, pp. 92–97 ...Missing: relocation Funtley
[15]
Henry Cort
### Timeline of Henry Cort's Life
[16]
Historic England Research Records - Heritage Gateway - Results
Cort's puddling and rolling experiments led to manufacturing patents in 1784 and 1783 respectively. Later, there is evidence that gunnery experiments with ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[17]
[PDF] Puddling - Historical Metallurgy
In dry puddling, wrought iron is produced from cast iron by decarburization in a reverberatory furnace fired with coke. The process in- volves constant stirring ...
[18]
[PDF] IllSTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD - Loc
Henry Cort revolutionized the production of malleable iron with his invention of the rolling mill, patented in 1784. Three years later John "Iron Mad ...
[19]
https://www.hmsjournal.org/index.php/home/article/download/132/129
[20]
Adam Jellicoe's death - Henry Cort
... Jellicoe partnership (£9,000), and from Cort personally (£27,500). I did not conceive that there was any of Mr Jellicoe's property that could be recovered.
[21]
"Cortship" of second wife - Henry Cort
The wedding of Henry Cort (widower) to Elizabeth Haysham (spinster) on 16 March 1768 is recorded in the register of St Thomas The Apostle, London. A Haysham ...
[22]
Henry Cort's children
Parliamentary records state that all these children are under 73, so they ought to be Richard and his sisters Caroline, Louisa and Catherine. Subsequently, ...
[23]
Cort's twilight years - Henry Cort
After Adam Jellicoe's death, an "inquisition" into the resulting debt is held on 1st September 1789. This finds that the partnership of Cort & Jellicoe owes ...
[24]
The Project Gutenberg eBook of Memoirs of the Distinguished Men ...
... royalties estimated to yield 27,500l. to the owners of the patent. ... a-year was granted by the Crown to Richard Cort, the sole surviving son of Henry Cort.
[25]
Cort Improves Iron Processing | Research Starters - EBSCO
Henry Cort developed an economical and quick method for making bar iron (wrought iron) that allowed Britain to go from being an importer to an exporter of this ...Missing: relocation | Show results with:relocation
[26]
Iron in 1790: production statistics 1787-96 and the arrival of puddling
However, involved in a process making iron from scrap wrought Richard Reynolds regarded Cort's and Onions' processes iron. Several travellers visited John ...
[27]
Cyfarthfa Ironworks in Merthyr (Established 1765) - Swansea History
Sep 24, 2023 · By the end of the 1780s, Cyfarthfa was producing over 2000 tons of bar iron annually, and this figure was to triple within five years. The ...
[28]
[PDF] growth of the british iron industry. - Census.gov
In 1783 Henry Cort, of Gosport, England, obtained a patent for rolling iron ... wrought iron by the direct process. The word. "bloomary" is of Anglo-Saxon ...Missing: biography | Show results with:biography
[29]
Industrial Biography: Iron Workers and Tool Makers
Jan 1, 2021 · INDUSTRIAL BIOGRAPHY. Iron Workers and Tool Makers. by Samuel Smiles ... Henry Cort and David Mushet have been supplied by the sons of those ...