Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Hlinka Guard Emergency Divisions

The Hlinka Guard Emergency Divisions, known as Pohotovostné oddiely Hlinkovej gardy (POHG) or Flying Squads, were specialized paramilitary units formed within the Hlinka Guard—the militia of the ruling Slovak People's Party—in September 1944 to counter the Slovak National Uprising against the Axis-aligned First Slovak Republic. Established by order of Otomar Kubala on September 8 following the uprising's outbreak in August, these rapid-response formations drew personnel from Hlinka Guard reserves, army reservists, and other paramilitary groups to bolster regime defenses amid escalating partisan activity. Organized into up to 38 assault divisions, six field companies, and three field battalions, the POHG expanded to over 5,000 members equipped with a mix of Slovak, German, and captured Soviet weaponry, including rifles, machine guns, and anti-tank launchers; uniforms blended traditional Hlinka Guard black attire with military khaki-green, often topped by Slovak helmets. Their operations emphasized mobility and local intelligence, collaborating extensively with German units such as the Sicherheitsdienst (SD), Einsatzgruppen, and SS forces in suppressing insurgents across central and western Slovakia. The divisions played a pivotal role in quelling the uprising through aggressive anti-partisan sweeps, punitive expeditions, and securing rear areas, yet their defining characteristic emerged in documented atrocities: POHG units perpetrated mass executions of civilians, Jews, and Roma, contributing to the deaths of approximately 4,000 individuals in sites like the Kremnička limekilns and Nemecká, where hundreds were shot and buried in mass graves. These actions, often conducted jointly with German counterparts, underscored the POHG's function as an instrument of regime terror, extending the Hlinka Guard's prior involvement in deportations and internal repression. Post-liberation trials under Slovak decrees prosecuted many commanders for war crimes, though cases like that of Malacky commander Eugen Hollý resulted in acquittals due to evidence of aiding political prisoners, highlighting inconsistencies in survivor testimonies and post-war judicial processes.

Background and Context

The Hlinka Guard in the Slovak State

The Hlinka Guard was founded on October 8, 1938, as the paramilitary wing of the Hlinka Slovak People's Party, a nationalist organization led by the Catholic priest Andrej Hlinka until his death earlier that year. This establishment occurred in the aftermath of the Munich Agreement of September 1938, which ceded the Sudetenland to Germany and weakened Czechoslovakia, enabling Slovak autonomists to consolidate power through intimidation of political opponents and Czech officials. The Guard's formation served to protect the party's interests and enforce Slovak separatism against perceived Czech centralism, drawing on earlier paramilitary groups like the Rodobrana. In the newly declared Slovak Republic, proclaimed on , 1939, as a client state of , the assumed primary responsibility for internal security and regime enforcement from 1939 to 1945. Aligned with , the Guard collaborated in suppressing , including anti-fascist and communist elements, reflecting the regime's staunch opposition to Soviet and Bolshevik . Ideologically grounded in clerical —blending Catholic traditionalism with and ethnic Slovak supremacy—the organization promoted a vision of autonomy free from Prague's dominance and external communist threats. The Guard's activities extended to implementing discriminatory policies, notably anti-Jewish measures such as property confiscations and aiding deportations starting in , actions justified by the regime's alignment with racial policies while prioritizing national Catholic identity over universalist concerns. While the regular Slovak army contributed a mobile division to the invasion of the in June 1941, the focused domestically but incorporated fascist-inspired discipline and uniforms modeled on Nazi paramilitaries. This structure underscored the Slovak State's hybrid authoritarianism, balancing nominal independence with dependence on for survival against and internal subversion.

Escalation to the 1944 Uprising

As Soviet forces advanced through eastern Europe in the summer of 1944, partisan groups, many under communist direction and supported by Soviet airdrops, intensified sabotage and attacks against German and Slovak state targets in Slovakia, including the killing of 30 German personnel by communist partisans near Martin on August 27. These actions, amid broader internal dissent from anti-regime elements aligned with Czechoslovak exile groups and communists seeking to overthrow the Tiso government, heightened fears within the Slovak leadership of an imminent Bolshevik-inspired collapse, exacerbated by war fatigue and defections in the Slovak army. On August 28, 1944, President Jozef Tiso's government appealed to Germany for military assistance to counter the escalating partisan threat and prevent a perceived communist takeover, prompting a rapid German invasion with SS and Wehrmacht units under Operation Autumn Festival. This intervention triggered the formal declaration of the Slovak National Uprising on August 29, 1944, by rebel forces in Banská Bystrica, involving approximately 60,000 insurgents drawn from army deserters, partisans, and civilian volunteers under commanders like Ján Golian, who aimed to establish an alternative government but were heavily influenced by communist agendas amid Soviet proximity. The uprising's scale, controlling central initially and issuing decrees for a provisional national committee, underscored the regime's vulnerability to coordinated dissent, with communists maneuvering for postwar dominance despite the rebellion's broader anti-Tiso composition; Tiso's prior declaration of on August 11 had failed to stem the tide of illegal activities. This cascade of events framed the conflict as a direct challenge to the Slovak State's , necessitating countermeasures against what the viewed as a subversive, ideologically driven insurrection.

Formation

Establishment Amid Crisis

The Hlinka Guard Emergency Divisions, formally known as Pohotovostné oddiely Hlinkovej gardy (POHG) or Flying Squads, were formations established in immediately following the initiation of the on August 29. These units emerged under the direct command of the Hlinka Guard's high command as ad-hoc responses to the regime's acute security crisis, prompted by widespread defections within the regular Slovak Army and the insurgents' rapid seizure of key infrastructure. President Jozef Tiso's government, declaring the uprising an act of treason, mobilized these squads to augment faltering conventional forces amid German demands for reliable local auxiliaries. Mobilization drew primarily from existing Hlinka Guard reserves, party militants, and civilian volunteers loyal to the Slovak People's Party, with initial efforts emphasizing voluntary enlistment to form mobile "flying squads" capable of swift deployment. As participation lagged due to public ambivalence toward the regime, conscription was enforced through draft notices, backed by penalties including execution for evasion, reflecting the extraordinary state of emergency. Regional commanders, such as Eugen Hollý in the Malacky area, played pivotal roles in assembling and directing these detachments from dispersed Guard outposts. The divisions' core rationale centered on their function as rapid-response units to address gaps in frontline capabilities, prioritizing the securing of rear communications, interdiction of partisan supply routes, and reassertion of control over rebel strongholds such as , the uprising's provisional capital. This focus stemmed from tactical necessities: the need for agile, ideologically committed forces unburdened by the Army's divided loyalties, enabling targeted disruptions to insurgent momentum while conventional troops regrouped under oversight.

Strategic Objectives

The primary strategic objective of the Hlinka Guard Emergency Divisions was to counter the Slovak National Uprising of August 1944 by neutralizing communist-led insurgents and rebel army units, which the Tiso government regarded as a subversive plot to overthrow the regime and invite Soviet domination. Formed amid the rapid escalation of partisan activity, these divisions focused on disrupting guerrilla networks that had infiltrated Slovak military structures and civilian areas, aiming to prevent the fragmentation of state authority and the onset of full-scale Soviet occupation. This doctrinal emphasis on anti-partisan warfare prioritized the restoration of internal security to preserve the nominal independence of the First Slovak Republic, established in 1939 as an Axis-aligned entity. A secondary but critical goal involved shielding ethnic Slovak communities and regime supporters from insurgent reprisals, as partisans conducted targeted killings and sabotage against perceived collaborators, including civilians in rural areas. Reports document over 180 ethnic German residents executed by rebels in Sklené in September 1944 alone, underscoring the perceived terror tactics that justified preemptive countermeasures to maintain social cohesion and territorial control. In the context of asymmetric conflict, where insurgents avoided conventional engagements and relied on hit-and-run operations, the divisions' strategy emphasized swift, localized interventions to deny rebels safe havens and logistical bases, thereby mitigating the risk of broader ethnic and political destabilization. These objectives aligned with the wider effort to halt the Red Army's advance, involving operational coordination with German forces deployed to , including divisions and specialized anti-partisan groups. By integrating into joint suppression campaigns, the Emergency Divisions contributed to a unified front against the uprising's Soviet-backed elements, reflecting the Slovak State's dependence on German military support to avert collapse amid the deteriorating Eastern Front in late 1944. This collaboration underscored a pragmatic prioritization of regime survival over independent maneuverability, as the Tiso administration sought to demonstrate loyalty to while countering internal threats that could precipitate or communist takeover.

Organization and Personnel

Command and Hierarchical Structure

The Hlinka Guard Emergency Divisions, also known as Flying Squads or Pohotovostné oddiely, operated under the overarching authority of the Hlinka Guard's high command, which was formally led by as the main commander from 1939 onward. Following the outbreak of the in August 1944, these divisions were established by order of the Hlinka Guard's supreme leadership to bolster regime loyalty and counter insurgent threats, with factual operational control shifting to figures like Otomar Kubala as after September 1944 amid escalating crisis. At the regional level, command was delegated to local leaders who directed squads tailored to specific areas, exemplified by Eugen Hollý's role as commander of the Emergency Divisions in the Malacky district, where he exercised direct oversight of unit deployments and actions. This hierarchical setup maintained subordination to the central Hlinka Guard apparatus while allowing for localized decision-making, reflecting the paramilitary nature of the organization tied to the Hlinka Slovak People's Party rather than state military chains. Unlike the conventional Slovak Army, which adhered to formalized ranks and frontline deployments under Ministry of Defense oversight, the Emergency Divisions emphasized a flexible, decentralized framework suited to and rapid intervention, with local commanders granted to adapt to fluid activities without rigid battalion-level coordination. This structure prioritized ideological enforcement and auxiliary support over structured warfare, enabling smaller, self-reliant groups to operate independently in response to uprising hotspots.

Recruitment, Training, and Equipment

Recruitment for the Emergency Divisions (POHG) primarily targeted existing members of the , supplemented by non-members including radical nationalists and volunteers from rural areas and among unemployed youth, driven by motivations such as loyalty to the Tiso regime, anti-communist sentiments, and defense of Slovak independence against perceived threats from partisans and Soviet influence. Formation orders issued in late August 1944, shortly after the began on August 29, emphasized rapid mobilization of personnel familiar with local terrain for anti-guerrilla operations. By September 1944, total strength exceeded 5,000 men, organized into up to 38 assault divisions, 6 field companies, and 3 field battalions, though numbers fluctuated due to combat losses and ongoing enlistments. Training was limited and expedited owing to the urgency of the crisis, with emphasis placed on basic military discipline, mobility for rapid response ("flying squads"), marksmanship, and tactics suited to countering irregular forces rather than . Units operated under command efforts to impose standard military protocols, building on prior shock troop preparations that included specialized instruction in since 1941 for select elements. Formal programs were curtailed by the chaotic onset of the uprising, resulting in reliance on experienced Guard veterans to instruct newer recruits in practical field skills. Equipment comprised a mix of domestically produced Slovak arms such as Vz. 24 carbines and Vz. 26 machine guns, German-supplied weapons including Mauser K98 rifles, MP 40 submachine guns, MG 34/42 machine guns, and Panzerfausts, augmented by captured Soviet PPSh-41 submachine guns from partisans. Uniforms initially drew from standard Hlinka Guard black attire but adapted for field use with khaki-green military garments retaining Guard insignia like black collar patches and shoulder straps; personnel wore M32 helmets, high black boots or ankle boots, and identifying sleeve ribbons inscribed with "POHOTOVOSTNÝ ODDIEL HG" or similar. Logistical support faced severe disruptions from uprising control of key transport routes and industrial centers, compelling units to scavenge locally and depend on German Axis reinforcements for ammunition and heavier gear, which strained operational sustainability.

Operational Role

Suppression of the Slovak National Uprising

The Hlinka Guard Emergency Divisions, formed in August 1944 amid the outbreak of the on , were rapidly deployed to central to bolster German counteroffensives against rebel-held territories. These units, numbering several field companies and battalions, operated primarily in the and river valleys, where they provided auxiliary support to and formations such as Kampfgruppe Schill. Their initial engagements focused on disrupting partisan supply lines and isolating insurgent concentrations through coordinated advances from the west. Tactics employed by the Emergency Divisions included encirclement maneuvers to trap rebel forces, systematic village clearances to eliminate strongholds, and reliance on local informants for intelligence on movements and hidden caches. These methods proved effective in fragmented , enabling the loyalist forces to reclaim key locales progressively as motorized units pushed eastward. By mid-October, intensified operations amid harsh autumn weather—marked by and early —exacerbated insurgent logistical strains, while the Soviet advance stalled short of providing decisive reinforcement. The divisions' contributions culminated in the final German offensive launched on October 17, involving approximately 50,000 troops with armored support, which systematically overran remaining resistance pockets. , the uprising's provisional capital, was recaptured by October 27, 1944, effectively collapsing organized rebel defenses and scattering survivors into guerrilla remnants. This outcome was hastened by the combined effects of superior firepower, terrain disadvantages for the insurgents, and the Emergency Divisions' role in securing rear areas and facilitating rapid advances.

Collaboration with Axis Forces and Post-Uprising Actions

Following the suppression of the on October 27, 1944, the Hlinka Guard Emergency Divisions, also known as the Flying Squads (Pohotovostné oddiely Hlinkovej gardy or POHG), shifted focus to collaborative pacification efforts with German occupation forces to eliminate residual partisan threats and secure rear areas. Operating under heightened German oversight due to distrust of regular Slovak military units, the Emergency Divisions participated in joint anti-guerrilla sweeps, targeting insurgents who continued sabotage operations into late 1944. These actions included coordination with specialized German rear-security formations, such as Abwehrgruppe 218 (codenamed Kampfgruppe Edelweiss), which conducted and pacification in from autumn 1944 through early 1945. In the immediate post-uprising period, Emergency Division units contributed to protecting ethnic German (Volksdeutsche) communities from partisan reprisals, as insurgents targeted these groups amid the regime's collapse in central and eastern regions; such protection aligned with the Tiso government's efforts to maintain Axis loyalty despite the uprising's fallout. By November 1944, as Soviet forces advanced into eastern Slovakia, the divisions engaged in guerrilla hunts and localized security operations to prevent further unrest, often embedding with Wehrmacht elements to fortify supply lines and population centers in western Slovakia. These activities extended into minor clashes with partisan bands, emphasizing rapid-response tactics over large-scale engagements. As the war intensified into total defense against the Red Army's westward push in early 1945, Emergency Division personnel adapted by integrating into broader Slovak-German defensive structures, including field fortifications along the Danube and Váh river lines in western Slovakia. Some units were absorbed into regular army formations or ad hoc militias by March 1945, participating in holding actions until the German retreat from Bratislava on April 4, 1945, after which remaining elements disbanded amid the Soviet offensive. This phase marked a transition from internal pacification to frontline support, though constrained by equipment shortages and German command dominance.

Evaluations and Disputes

Claims of Military Efficacy

The Hlinka Guard Emergency Divisions (POHG), formed in early September 1944 amid the , were tasked with rapid counter-insurgency operations to disrupt networks and restore order in contested rural areas. Proponents of their role highlight the units' high mobility, derived from their designation as "flying squads," which facilitated swift responses to insurgent threats, allowing for the recapture of key villages and supply routes that had fallen to rebels by late August. These operations contributed to fragmenting rebel command structures and , as the POHG coordinated with forces to encircle and isolate pockets of , thereby regaining approximately 20% of uprising-held territory in central by mid-October. Claims of direct combat impact include estimates that POHG units neutralized over 1,000 insurgents through ambushes, raids, and defensive actions, with some nationalist accounts asserting figures up to 4,000 partisans and bandits eliminated in engagements across districts like Liptov and Orava. This efficacy is attributed to their intimate knowledge of local terrain and populations, enabling effective intelligence gathering and preemptive strikes that hampered rebel reinforcements from Soviet partisans. By securing rural strongholds against sabotage and guerrilla attacks, the divisions prevented the uprising from expanding into a broader collapse of regime authority, maintaining control over agricultural resources vital to the war effort. In broader strategic terms, the POHG bought critical time for the Tiso government to organize evacuations of administrative personnel and assets toward western Slovakia, delaying full insurgent dominance until German reinforcements arrived in force. Slovak nationalists, reflecting on the divisions' performance against numerically superior and better-armed opponents, have praised their resolve and loyalty, portraying the units as a bulwark of national preservation amid existential threats from communist-led rebellion. These viewpoints emphasize the POHG's role in sustaining regime cohesion despite limited training and equipment, countering assessments of paramilitary incompetence by pointing to measurable disruptions in enemy operations.

Accusations of Atrocities and Contextual Defenses

Post-war trials and survivor testimonies accused members of the Hlinka Guard Emergency Divisions (POHG) of participating in executions and reprisals against civilians suspected of supporting the Slovak National Uprising (SNP), particularly in recaptured villages during late 1944. In proceedings under Czechoslovak Decree No. 33/1945, POHG personnel were charged with atrocities including summary executions and harsh interrogations that resulted in civilian deaths, often in collaboration with German Einsatzgruppe H units targeting suspected rebels and Jews. For instance, in 1958, twelve former Hlinka Guard members, including some from emergency units, were sentenced to death or long prison terms for wartime atrocities committed during the uprising's suppression. Similar accusations surfaced in 1945 hearings against seventeen Hlinka Guard members for crimes against anti-Nazi partisans, Slovak patriots, and Jews. Defenses in these trials emphasized contextual factors, such as the environment where POHG actions responded to documented against loyalist civilians and ethnic Germans. A prominent example is the September 21, 1944, Sklené massacre, where Slovak killed 187 ethnic German men, prompting subsequent reprisals framed by defenders as proportionate retaliation amid chaos that blurred combatant-civilian distinctions. In the 1946 trial of POHG Eugen Hollý, of his assistance to imprisoned political opponents from anti-regime factions contributed to his , highlighting inconsistencies in prosecution claims and instances where not all emergency division members were implicated in excesses. Historiographical interpretations diverge sharply: mainstream accounts, shaped by post-war communist-era narratives, portray POHG atrocities as emblematic of fascist brutality inherent to the Slovak Republic's Axis alignment, prioritizing victim testimonies from uprising sympathizers. Revisionist perspectives, often from Slovak nationalist or anti-communist scholars, argue that POHG operations were a necessary defense against Bolshevik-influenced insurgency, where mutual war crimes— including over 1,500 deaths attributed to insurgents in controlled areas—necessitated harsh measures to restore order, though such views remain marginalized in academic consensus due to the regime's broader collaboration.

Dissolution and Aftermath

End of Hostilities in 1945

As Soviet forces of the 2nd Ukrainian Front launched the Bratislava–Brno offensive on March 23, 1945, the remnants of the Hlinka Guard Emergency Divisions, operating amid the broader Axis retreat, faced overwhelming pressure from the Red Army's advance into western Slovakia. These paramilitary units, previously engaged in security and anti-partisan roles, dispersed or integrated into ad hoc German defensive lines as organized resistance crumbled with the collapse of the Wehrmacht's Carpathian positions. The capture of by Soviet troops on April 4, 1945, after intense urban fighting against the remaining German and Slovak garrisons, signaled the operational wind-down of the formations. With the Slovak Republic's capital occupied and its government apparatus in flight, the Emergency Divisions effectively disbanded, their personnel scattering to evade capture or attempting flight westward alongside German remnants. Precise casualty figures for Hlinka Guard units during this final phase remain undocumented in available records, though broader Axis losses in the offensive exceeded 10,000 killed or captured, reflecting high attrition among integrated paramilitary elements. Survival among personnel varied, with many lower-ranking members blending into the civilian population or seeking refuge in Austria and Germany before the Allied advance.

Post-War Trials, Suppression, and Historiographical Debates

Following the liberation of Czechoslovakia in 1945, members of the Hlinka Guard Emergency Divisions faced immediate retribution under the Beneš Decrees, which authorized mass arrests, property confiscations, and executions of Axis collaborators. Decree No. 16/1945 explicitly criminalized membership in the Hlinka Guard, imposing sentences of five to twenty years' imprisonment for participation in its activities. Numerous Guard personnel were prosecuted in people's courts established by the Slovak National Council, with charges centered on collaboration during the suppression of the 1944 uprising and wartime service alongside German forces. Trials often relied on witness testimonies prone to inconsistencies, as evidenced in the case of Eugen Hollý, commander of the Emergency Divisions in Malacky; despite accusations of suppressing resistance, Hollý was acquitted under Decree No. 33/1945 after evidence emerged of his aid to political prisoners from opposing factions, highlighting evidentiary dualities and selective interpretations of loyalty. Under the communist regime established after the 1948 coup, suppression intensified through renewed prosecutions in the 1950s, framing former Guard members as fascist remnants in show trials that prioritized ideological conformity over procedural rigor. Approximately 1,000 Hlinka Guard affiliates underwent further legal scrutiny, with convictions frequently based on coerced confessions and retroactive application of anti-fascist laws, reflecting the regime's aim to eliminate non-communist nationalists. These proceedings, conducted amid Soviet influence, systematically portrayed the Guard as irredeemable tools of Nazi occupation, suppressing documentation of their roles in combating communist-led partisans during the uprising. Historiographical debates persist, with communist-era narratives—tainted by state-controlled academia and media biases favoring partisan heroism—often exaggerating Guard atrocities while omitting comparable excesses by Allied-backed insurgents, such as summary executions of civilians suspected of collaboration. Recent re-evaluations, particularly in post-1989 Slovakia, reveal right-leaning perspectives emphasizing the Guard's anti-communist actions as defensive measures for national sovereignty against Soviet expansion, contrasting mainstream academic condemnations that equate them uniformly with fascist criminality. Hollý's acquittal and ongoing archival analyses as of 2025 underscore evidentiary gaps, prompting calls for comparative studies of wartime irregular forces that avoid selective moralism influenced by post-war victors' historiography.

References

  1. [1]
    Hlinka Guard Assault troops (POHG) - KVH Carpathia
    POHG troopers were fully uniformed. At the beginning they used traditional black Hlinka Guard (HG) uniforms, khaki-green military ones as well as the special ...
  2. [2]
    [PDF] The Flying Squads of Hlinka Guard: Coming to Terms with the ...
    When the Slovak National Uprising broke out in August 1944, the HG had its. “moment of glory”, especially when the Fly- ing Squads of the HG, or the POHG (Poho-.
  3. [3]
    Storm-Troopers in Slovakia: The Rodobrana and the Hlinka Guard
    Since there were not enough volunteers, individuals from other paramilitary units and army reservists were drafted. By the end of November I944 the POHG ...
  4. [4]
    [PDF] Pohotovostné oddiely Hlinkovej gardy 1944
    The greatest attention is paid to POHG deployment to anti-partisan actions. Military History. Slovakia. World War II. Readiness Detachments of Hlinka s Guard.
  5. [5]
    [PDF] Representations of Roma in Post-Communist Memorial Museums
    Sep 29, 2015 · At Kremnička and Nemecká the Nazis and members of POHG [Pohotovostných oddielov Hlinkovej gardy—special units of the Hlinka guard] shot dead ...
  6. [6]
    The Trial of Eugen Hollý, commander of the Hlinka Guard ...
    Jul 24, 2025 · Testimonies from both the defence and prosecution witnesses, as well as Hollý himself, suggest a certain duality and raise questions since ...
  7. [7]
    Hlinkova Garda - The EHRI Portal
    Hlinkova Garda was a militia established in Slovakia by the pro-Nazi Hlinkova slovenská l'udová strana (Hlinka Slovak People's Party) ...
  8. [8]
    The Slovak National Uprising of 1944 - The National WWII Museum
    Sep 12, 2023 · The two-month uprising against the German military occupation and the Nazi-aligned Slovak state ended in failure on October 27, 1944.
  9. [9]
    Slovakia (Chapter 4) - Joining Hitler's Crusade
    For this reason the Czechs in the past usually considered the Slovaks to be part of the Czech nation and Slovak to be just another dialect of the Czechs. In ...
  10. [10]
    Full article: 'Clerical Fascism': Context, Overview and Conclusion
    May 18, 2007 · Some became fully paid up members of fascist movements. Others remained outside, or belonged to separate movements that gave support to fascism.
  11. [11]
    [PDF] Hlinka Guard - Walter S. Zapotoczny Jr.
    Reasons that the Hlinka Guard Became Involved with the Deportation of the Slovak Jews. By Walter S. Zapotoczny Jr. Slovak history from 1939 to 1945 has been ...Missing: measures | Show results with:measures
  12. [12]
    The Tragedy of Slovak Jewry in Slovakia [Pages 2-23] - JewishGen
    Sep 5, 2013 · Specially, the book tells how the Nazis planned and subsequently executed the mass murder of Jewish population of Slovakia. [Page 5]. How it ...
  13. [13]
    [PDF] Pioneers of Clerical Fascism? Mythical Language of Revolutionary ...
    fascist militia, the Hlinka Guard (Hlinkova garda). In his article, Mach ... In the wartime Slovak Republic (1939 – 1945), clerical fascism did not become state ...
  14. [14]
    Slovak National uprising | Military Wiki - Fandom
    On 27 August 1944 in Martin, a group of Communist partisans under Soviet direction killed 30 members of a German military mission leaving Romania. The next day, ...<|separator|>
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Slovakia 1944. The Forgotten Uprising - DTIC
    Jul 30, 2008 · The political climate during World War II and the Cold War that followed obscured and distorted the history and understanding of this revolt.
  16. [16]
    Slovak National Uprising (1944) - Hi-Story Lessons
    Driven by political opposition to the Tiso regime, war fatigue, and the advancing Soviet Army, the Slovak National Uprising symbolized a significant struggle ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Slovak National Uprising - Yad Vashem
    Their common goal was to overthrow the pro-Nazi government of Jozef Tiso. On August 28, 1944 German troops invaded Slovakia to suppress the country's Partisans ...
  18. [18]
    The Slovak National Uprising | ENRS
    Aug 21, 2015 · The Slovak National Uprising (Slovak: Slovenské národné povstanie, abbreviated SNP) broke out on 29 August 1944 in Banská Bystrica.
  19. [19]
    Waking Up From A Dream - Sen x Skutočnosť
    One of the largest atrocities committed by the insurgents was a mass execution of more than 180 (German) residents of Sklené in September 1944. Nazi records of ...
  20. [20]
    Mach Alexander - The EHRI Portal
    Member of the Hlinka Slovak People´s Party. Minister of Internal Affairs of Slovak republic (1940-), Main Commander of Hlinka Guard (1939-).Missing: emergency divisions subordination
  21. [21]
    [PDF] Hlinkova garda 1938 - 1945 - Ústav pamäti národa
    Faktické velenie HG však patrilo po septembri 1944 náčelníkovi HG Otomarovi Kubalovi. 1. Page 93. Hlinkova garda 1938 – 1945 nie organizácie mal ...
  22. [22]
    Hlinkova garda | Encyclopaedia Beliana - SAV
    slovenská branná organizácia pôsobiaca 1938 – 45 ... V septembri 1944 boli rozkazom hlavného veliteľa vytvorené Pohotovostné oddiely ...
  23. [23]
    Himmler's Forgotten Slovakian SS Project - Der Freiwillige
    Dec 22, 2011 · ... recruitment of Slovaks. ... Since 1941, Hlinka Guard shock troops (known as Pohotovostné oddiely Hlinkovej gardy, or POHG) were trained in Germany ...
  24. [24]
    Abwehrgruppe 218 (Kampfgruppe Edelweiss). An unclear ... - CEEOL
    Abwehrgruppe 218 (Kampfgruppe Edelweiss). Nejasná bilancia jasných činov zvláštnej nacistickej jednotky na slovenskom území v rokoch 1944-1945
  25. [25]
    [PDF] „ZA SLOVENSKÝ ŠTÁT, ZA NOVÚ EURÓPU!“ Hlinkova garda v ...
    Hlinkova garda, 3. žandárstvo, 4. polícia, 5. Freiwillige Schutzstaffel, 6 ... KÁRPÁTY, V.: Pohotovostné oddiely Hlinkovej gardy 1944 – 1945 (organizácia a ...<|separator|>
  26. [26]
    Slovensko podľa Smatanu by malo oslavovať gardistov ...
    Aug 25, 2018 · ... Pohotovostné oddiely Hlinkovej Gardy (POHG) pre boj so židoboľševickým morom. V statočnom boji im podarilo zneškodniť okolo 4 tisíc ...
  27. [27]
    SLOVAK FASCIST TO DIE; 12 Wartime Hlinka Guards Sentenced for ...
    SLOVAK FASCIST TO DIE; 12 Wartime Hlinka Guards Sentenced for Atrocities. Share full article. April 27, 1958. SLOVAK FASCIST TO DIE; 12 Wartime Hlinka Guards ...Missing: Emergency Divisions
  28. [28]
    Hearings Started in Slovakia Against 17 Fascist War Criminals
    ... against 17 members of the anti-Semitic Hlinka Guard accused of war crimes and atrocities in 1945 against Slovak patriots, anti-Nazi partisans and Jews. A ...Missing: defenses | Show results with:defenses
  29. [29]
    4 April 2024 - 79th anniversary of the liberation of Bratislava by the ...
    Apr 4, 2024 · On 4 April 1945, after fierce fighting, Soviet troops liberated the capital of Slovakia from the Nazi invaders.
  30. [30]
    A lovely monument to the liberation of Bratislava by the Red Army.
    Rating 5.0 · Review by Ginges_revengeThis monument is a memorial commemorating the liberation of Bratislava by the Red Army on 4 April 1945, specifically by the forces of the 2nd Ukrainian Front in ...
  31. [31]
    SLOVAKIA - Project MUSE
    Special units of the Hlinka Guard (Pohotovostné oddiely Hlinkovej gardy, POHG) were formed to help the Nazi security forces in suppressing the uprising and ...
  32. [32]
    the portrayal of andrej hlinka in slovak historiography - ResearchGate
    Feb 15, 2025 · ... Hlinka's. former political opponents, which included the Communist Party. Due to his clear. anti-Communist stance and his opposition to Prague ...