Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

IATA airport code

An IATA airport code is a three-letter code assigned by the (IATA) to identify airports, cities, or other locations worldwide that serve as origins, destinations, or stops in commercial air transportation. These codes facilitate standardized communication among airlines, travel agencies, and computer reservation systems for ticketing, baggage handling, cargo routing, and scheduling. Primarily used in the sector, they apply to approximately 11,300 locations (as of 2024), including major international hubs and smaller regional facilities with scheduled passenger or cargo services. The system originated in the late 1930s when two-letter weather station codes proved insufficient for the growing number of airports, leading to the adoption of three-letter formats by the late 1940s as global expanded post-World War II. IATA formalized and standardized the assignment process in the to ensure uniqueness and efficiency, drawing from airport or city names where possible—such as JFK for in or LHR for London Heathrow—while avoiding duplicates between similarly named places, like BHM for (USA) and BHX for Birmingham, UK. Codes are requested through IATA's Customer Portal and granted only to eligible sites based on operational criteria outlined in official requirements, with no inherent geographic or directional meaning embedded in the letters. Beyond airports, IATA location codes extend to intermodal points like bus or ferry terminals connected to airline itineraries, supporting seamless travel. They differ from ICAO's four-letter codes, which are used for and , highlighting IATA's focus on commercial operations rather than regulatory or technical functions. With 17,576 possible combinations (26 letters cubed), the system accommodates ongoing growth while maintaining global interoperability.

Fundamentals

Definition and Purpose

IATA airport codes, formally known as IATA location codes, are three-letter alphabetic identifiers assigned by the (IATA) to approximately 11,300 locations worldwide, encompassing airports, cities, heliports, railway stations, and ferry terminals involved in and intermodal transport. These codes provide a unique and standardized system for referencing aviation-related sites, enabling precise identification across global operations. The primary purposes of IATA airport codes are to standardize processes in airline reservations, ticketing, baggage handling, flight schedules, and intermodal journeys, thereby facilitating efficient communication and coordination among airlines, travel agents, passengers, and other industry stakeholders. By serving as a common language for activities, these codes minimize errors in documentation and operations, supporting the seamless movement of passengers and cargo on an international scale. A key distinction exists between city codes, which represent metropolitan areas with multiple entry points, and airport-specific codes that identify individual facilities. For instance, the city code NYC denotes the , aggregating airports such as International (JFK), LaGuardia (LGA), and Newark Liberty International (EWR), while JFK refers exclusively to the latter airport. This differentiation allows for flexible routing in multi-airport regions while maintaining specificity where needed. The , established in 1945 as the global trade association representing around 350 airlines and over 80% of international air traffic, oversees the assignment and maintenance of these codes through its official directory, ensuring consistency and relevance to industry demands.

Comparison with ICAO and Other Codes

The (ICAO) assigns four-letter location indicators to airports and other aviation facilities worldwide, primarily for , , and international flight purposes. These codes begin with a one- or two-letter prefix denoting the region or country (e.g., "K" for the , "EG" for the ), followed by letters specific to the location, such as KJFK for in . In contrast, IATA airport codes use a three-letter format designed for brevity in commercial operations, such as ticketing, baggage handling, and passenger reservations, whereas ICAO codes prioritize global uniqueness and regulatory compliance in operational safety. IATA codes focus on passenger-facing and airline commercial activities, often incorporating elements of the airport or city name (e.g., for International), while ICAO codes emphasize systematic regional prefixes to avoid ambiguity in international contexts. This distinction ensures IATA codes are concise for everyday commercial use, but ICAO's additional letter allows for a larger pool of unique identifiers across all aviation facilities, including non-commercial ones. Other coding systems include the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Location Identifiers (LIDs), which are three- or four-letter codes used domestically in the United States for identifying airports, navigational aids, and weather stations in air traffic communications and flight planning. For major U.S. airports, FAA LIDs often match IATA codes (e.g., ORD for Chicago O'Hare), but they can include numbers for smaller facilities and are prefixed with "K" to align with ICAO formats internationally. Historically, in the 1930s, two-letter telegraphic codes were used by weather services and early airlines to identify reporting stations and airports, serving as precursors to modern systems before the shift to three letters for expanded capacity. While overlaps exist, such as in the United States where IATA codes frequently correspond to the last three letters of the ICAO code (e.g., from KLAX), the systems are not interchangeable; for instance, London Heathrow is LHR in IATA but EGLL in ICAO, reflecting the former's name-based brevity and the latter's regional structure. Mappings between IATA and ICAO are common but require lookup tools for conversion, as direct derivation rules vary by region. A key limitation of IATA codes is their exclusion from air traffic control (ATC) communications, where ICAO codes are mandatory to ensure precise, unambiguous identification during flight operations and safety protocols.

Historical Development

Origins and Early Use

The rapid expansion of in the United States during the 1930s, spurred by post-World War I innovations and economic growth, necessitated efficient airport identification systems for pilots navigating by maps and radio communications. To address this, the U.S. Department of Commerce's Aeronautics Branch adopted two-letter telegraphic codes derived from the National Weather Service's city abbreviations, enabling quick transmission and reference during flights. For instance, was initially coded as "LA," reflecting the city's name in a concise format suitable for early radio . As the number of airports proliferated with increasing air traffic, the two-letter system proved insufficient, particularly given the constraints of radio communications that prioritized brevity but required uniqueness to avoid errors. This shift was driven by the need to support growing commercial routes while maintaining compatibility with existing practices. Standardization initiatives in , amid the surge in domestic , laid the for these codes. However, early adoption faced challenges from inconsistent practices, as individual airlines often selected their own identifiers, resulting in overlaps and communication confusion that jeopardized navigation safety. This variability prompted urgent advocacy for a centralized, unified coding framework to streamline operations across the burgeoning industry. By the late , as the number of airports continued to grow, the system transitioned to three-letter codes to accommodate more unique identifiers. For example, Chicago's Orchard Field (later ) received the code "ORD" in 1945 based on its original name.

Formalization and Global Adoption

The (IATA) was established on April 19, 1945, in , , succeeding the pre-war International Air Traffic Association and uniting 57 airlines from 31 countries to foster cooperation in the post-World War II industry. Amid the of global air networks, IATA addressed the need for standardized airport identification to facilitate international operations, drawing on existing U.S. practices of two-letter codes that had evolved into three-letter formats by adding an 'X' for clarity, as seen with changing from "" to "" in 1947. This formalization aligned closely with the 1944 , which entered into force in 1947 and established ICAO to oversee technical standards, while IATA handled commercial standardization including location codes. IATA took over the standardization and assignment of three-letter codes in the , ensuring uniqueness and efficiency for global use in ticketing, baggage handling, and scheduling. The global rollout accelerated in the as IATA assigned codes to non-U.S. airports, supporting the rapid expansion of international routes in , , and beyond, with the system reaching thousands of assignments by the amid surging demand. Maintenance evolved through IATA's Location Identifier Directory, initially manual but shifting to computerized processes in the to manage updates efficiently during the aviation boom, ensuring the codes remained a reliable tool for the industry's growth.

Code Structure and Assignment

Format and Composition

The IATA airport code adheres to a standardized three-letter format, utilizing uppercase letters from the (A-Z) exclusively, with no inclusion of numbers or other characters to maintain uniformity in global aviation operations. This alphabetic structure facilitates quick recognition and integration into ticketing, baggage handling, and reservation systems worldwide. In terms of composition, IATA codes are logically derived from the name of the associated city or to promote intuitiveness. The primary approach selects the first three letters of the location's name, such as GVA for , which directly reflects "." When this is unavailable due to prior assignment, an alternative unassigned combination starting with the initial letter of the name is chosen, ensuring relevance while avoiding duplication. For instance, for , which was formed by extending the original two-letter city code "" with an "X". No letters are formally reserved from the first position to prevent confusion with numerals, allowing full use of the alphabet; examples include ORD for Chicago O'Hare International Airport (beginning with "O") and IAD for Washington Dulles International Airport (beginning with "I"). The format yields a total of 17,576 possible combinations (26³), sufficient for the world's airports, though only about 11,300 are actively assigned, with roughly 40–50 new codes issued annually. Variations from the three-letter standard are limited in current practice, primarily extending to non-airport locations like or terminals that support intermodal , which receive the same alphabetic three-letter treatment upon request. While early systems employed two-letter city codes for smaller locations before the 1947 shift to three letters, such formats are not part of contemporary IATA standards.

Assignment Criteria and Process

The assignment of IATA airport codes follows a structured application initiated by authorities, governments, or on behalf of new or expanding facilities. Requests are submitted through the IATA Customer Portal, where applicants provide detailed documentation including proof of operational readiness, such as signage, commercial scheduled flights, and approvals if the airport is not yet open. These submissions are reviewed by IATA under the Passenger Standards Conference to ensure compliance with Resolution 763, the governing document for location identifiers. The emphasizes eligibility for supporting intermodal travel or scheduled commercial operations, with a non-refundable fee of USD 7,520 for non-IATA members as of 2025. Key criteria for code assignment include uniqueness across the global system, relevance to the airport's geographic or name, and avoidance of terms that could be deemed offensive or misleading in major languages. Priority is given to major international hubs due to the finite pool of approximately 17,600 possible three-letter combinations, with only about 11,300 currently assigned to prevent exhaustion amid growing demand in emerging markets. For instance, codes aim to derive from the city's name where possible, but adjustments are made to meet these standards, as seen in recent assignments like DXN for in (2023) and VLO for in (2025). Maintenance of the code directory involves annual reviews and updates published in IATA's Location Identifier Code Directory, with codes deactivated upon closure or cessation of commercial operations to free resources. Deactivated codes become eligible for reuse after a period, typically allowing reassignment over time to support industry growth, though exact timelines vary based on historical usage to minimize confusion. IATA holds non-regulatory authority over this system, coordinating informally with the (ICAO) for consistency in global identifiers while maintaining independence as an industry association.

Naming Conventions

General Principles

The (IATA) derives airport codes primarily from abbreviations of the associated city or airport names, favoring the first three letters where possible to ensure simplicity and recognizability. For instance, Kingsford Smith Airport is assigned SYD, directly from the city's name, while Logan International Airport uses BOS. This approach prioritizes phonetic familiarity and ease of use in global aviation communications. When direct abbreviations risk overlap or lack distinctiveness, IATA employs additional letters drawn from the name's phonetic sounds or key elements for disambiguation, maintaining clarity without altering the core identity. Bangkok's , for example, receives BKK to evoke the city's common pronunciation, avoiding less distinctive options like BNG. Similarly, hub airports often secure prominent codes that align closely with their operational significance, such as DXB for , where "X" is a filler letter because the preferred "DUB" was already assigned to (DUB). These methods ensure codes are intuitive yet precise. To prevent confusion in international travel, IATA strictly avoids reusing codes for active locations, enforcing uniqueness through its assignment process. This principle extends to a preference for English-based transliterations of non-Latin names, facilitating universal accessibility while respecting local nomenclature. No code is reassigned to another operational site, safeguarding reliability across the network of over 11,000 airports.

National and Regional Variations

In the United States, IATA airport codes are typically assigned in close coordination with the (FAA), which manages the underlying location identifiers for domestic . These codes often derive directly from or names, such as LGA for in , reflecting a preference for concise English abbreviations that align with operational familiarity. This collaboration ensures consistency between IATA's three-letter codes and the FAA's system, where major receive prominent identifiers to facilitate . Canada's approach incorporates bilingual considerations due to its English and linguistic context, with many codes prefixed by "Y" from early 20th-century weather station designations established by . For instance, YUL for combines the "Y" prefix with "UL," originally a radio identifier for the area, creating a hybrid that nods to Quebec's heritage while adhering to IATA standards. This influences code assignments nationwide, prioritizing historical and regional identifiers over purely phonetic representations. In , IATA codes generally favor English place names or straightforward abbreviations, with limited direct incorporation of terms despite cultural emphasis on in operations. The code AKL for exemplifies this, using the initial letters of the English city name rather than its equivalent, , to maintain international usability. countries adapt IATA codes to local languages, often using Romanized forms of native names for clarity. Germany's FRA for draws from the "Frankfurt am Main," prioritizing the phonetic essence of the city's name in its primary language. Similarly, in , codes reflect Romanized transliterations, such as PEK for , based on the historical Wade-Giles romanization "Peking" rather than the modern "," to preserve established usage despite linguistic shifts. In Latin America, Portuguese and Spanish influences shape codes to align with regional nomenclature, as seen in Brazil's GRU for São Paulo–Guarulhos International Airport, abbreviating the Portuguese "Guarulhos" to emphasize the facility's location. This approach ensures codes resonate with local speakers while meeting IATA's uniqueness requirements.

Special Cases and Exceptions

Multiple Airports in One City

In metropolitan areas served by multiple airports, IATA distinguishes between city or metropolitan area codes, which are used primarily for ticketing and fare calculations to represent the entire urban region, and individual airport codes, which specify the exact facility for operational purposes. For instance, the city code LON encompasses London's airports such as Heathrow (LHR), Gatwick (LGW), London City (LCY), Luton (LTN), and Stansted (STN), allowing passengers to book flights to "London" without selecting a specific airport initially. Similarly, NYC serves New York City for ticketing, covering John F. Kennedy (JFK) and LaGuardia (LGA), while Newark (EWR) operates as a standalone code following its removal from the metropolitan grouping in 2022. For cities with multiple airports, IATA assigns unique three-letter codes to each facility following Resolution 763, prioritizing combinations derived from the airport's name to ensure differentiation, such as the first letters of key identifiers when the city's initial code is already in use. This process often results in descriptive codes like HND for Tokyo's Haneda (from its ) and NRT for Narita, or sequential adaptations in densely served areas, with most metropolitan regions limited to three or four primary codes to maintain manageability. The code itself may be a dedicated three-letter identifier or borrowed from the dominant airport, determined through an industry poll among airlines to reflect common usage. These arrangements, while facilitating efficient routing, present challenges including passenger confusion over which airport serves their itinerary, exacerbated by proximity and similar , prompting IATA to regulate codes specifically to minimize duplication in multi-airport cities. To address such issues and streamline logistics, airlines frequently adopt hub-and-spoke models that concentrate operations at a single primary airport within the city, reducing the need for dispersed passenger handling. Notable global examples include , where PAR covers (CDG) as the main international hub and (ORY) for regional flights; and , where functions as both the city code and primary airport, with secondary facilities like Burbank () assigned independent codes for specialized roles.

Code Changes Due to Renaming

When an airport or the city it serves undergoes a renaming, the IATA code may be reassigned, though such changes are exceptionally rare to maintain global consistency in aviation systems. Renamings of airports or cities serve as primary triggers for potential code adjustments, often driven by political, cultural, or administrative shifts, but IATA prioritizes retention of existing codes to avoid widespread disruptions in booking, scheduling, and navigation databases. For instance, Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport in Mumbai, formerly known as Bombay, has retained its IATA code BOM since its assignment, ensuring seamless continuity despite the city's official name change in 1995. Similarly, Istanbul Airport's code IST has remained unchanged through historical and political evolutions, including the city's transition from Constantinople, as the code was established in 1971 and reflects the modern Turkish name without necessitating alteration. The process for code changes requires formal IATA approval, typically initiated by the airport authority or national aviation body submitting evidence of the renaming through IATA's customer portal. Assigned three-letter codes are deemed permanent and altered only in cases of major political transformations or significant errors, with IATA emphasizing minimal changes to preserve operational stability. During transitions, especially involving new facilities replacing older ones, dual codes may be used temporarily to facilitate the shift; however, for pure renamings, retention is the norm unless the change warrants a full reassignment. In legacy scenarios, codes frequently persist despite name updates, as seen with Paris Airport's ORY, derived from the longstanding suburban name "Orly" established since the airport's commercial opening in 1932, avoiding any code modification. For example, when Williams Gateway Airport was renamed Phoenix-Mesa Gateway Airport in 2011, its code shifted from IWA to AZA, necessitating adjustments but without major disruptions due to proactive IATA coordination. In December 2024, Phoenix-Mesa Gateway Airport was renamed , but its IATA code AZA was retained to maintain continuity. The impacts of code changes due to renaming are generally minimal for passengers, as global reservation systems and travel databases are updated promptly by IATA and airlines to redirect bookings automatically. However, airlines face logistical challenges, including reprogramming flight schedules, updating operational software, and coordinating with international partners, which can require several months of preparation to mitigate errors in routing and ticketing.

Code Scarcity and Alternatives

The three-letter format of IATA airport codes limits the total number of viable combinations to over 17,000, of which approximately 11,300 have been assigned as of 2023. With 40 to 50 new codes assigned annually to accommodate growing demands, the finite pool raises concerns about future exhaustion, particularly in densely populated and rapidly expanding regions such as where development outpaces code availability. This scarcity has led to selective assignment processes, prioritizing with scheduled commercial passenger or cargo services while deferring or denying requests for smaller facilities. Many small, private, or low-traffic airports worldwide, including those in remote or underdeveloped areas, remain unassigned IATA codes because they lack regular scheduled commercial operations. These locations often rely on the IATA code of the nearest major city or airport for ticketing and reservations, or operate without a specific code in non-commercial contexts. For instance, minor airstrips on remote Pacific islands may use a parent island's code until they qualify for independent assignment, as seen with facilities near Tonga's (TBU), which serves as the primary for the archipelago. Alternatives to IATA codes include the four-letter ICAO identifiers, which support broader and operational needs beyond commercial ticketing and are assigned to nearly all global aerodromes regardless of size or volume. Provisional placeholders like "" are used informally or in specific regulatory contexts for unassigned or nondesignated areas, such as remote Alaskan sites without formal . While proposals for expanding IATA to four-letter codes have been discussed to mirror ICAO's capacity, no such changes have been adopted, maintaining the three-letter standard for .

Usage and Cultural Impact

Applications in Aviation and Travel

IATA airport codes play a central role in flight reservations and ticketing systems worldwide. These three-letter identifiers, such as for in or for , are embedded in booking processes to specify departure and arrival points, enabling accurate itinerary creation. For instance, a flight booking from to would be denoted as JFK-LHR, facilitating seamless integration with global distribution systems (GDS) like , , and Galileo. These systems rely on IATA codes to standardize data exchange among airlines, travel agencies, and online platforms, ensuring that reservations are processed efficiently across international networks. In baggage handling and operational contexts, IATA codes are essential for tracking and routing globally. Baggage tags incorporate the destination code alongside a unique issued under IATA's Baggage Tag Issuer Code (BTIC) system, forming a "license plate" that identifies each piece throughout its journey from to delivery. This standardization supports operations, including interline agreements and alliances like or , where codes define routing sequences for connecting flights—such as a bag traveling via (Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International) on a codeshare itinerary. Compliance with IATA Resolution 753 further mandates tracking using these codes to minimize mishandling and enhance recovery rates. Within the broader travel industry, IATA codes underpin digital tools and regulatory frameworks. Travel apps, websites, and flight status boards display code pairs (e.g., SFO-NRT for to Tokyo Narita) to provide real-time schedules and updates, aiding passengers in and . ticketing (e-tickets) mandates the use of these codes for under IATA standards, ensuring verifiable for and customs. During the , IATA codes featured in passenger manifests and efforts, where flight itineraries identified by origin-destination pairs helped authorities locate exposed individuals on international routes. For complex international journeys, sequences like BOS-FRA-CPH illustrate how codes sequence multi-leg trips, supporting efficient operations and passenger connectivity.

Colloquial and Non-Aviation Uses

IATA airport codes have become embedded in everyday language as concise shorthand for cities and destinations, particularly among travelers and in informal communication. For example, phrases like "flying into SFO" commonly refer to , while "JFK" serves as a for in casual conversation and writing about urban travel. This usage stems from the codes' widespread recognition in booking and itinerary discussions, extending beyond formal contexts into general . In popular culture, IATA codes inspire artistic references, notably in music where they evoke themes of travel and transience. The 1981 instrumental track "YYZ" by the rock band derives its title and opening Morse code rhythm directly from the code for , reflecting the band's local ties and fascination with signals. Similarly, Aubrey Logan's 2019 song "Airport Codes" uses the three-letter identifiers metaphorically in its to explore personal journeys and promises, highlighting their rhythmic and mnemonic appeal. Travel blogs and media often employ codes like "LAX" as evocative shorthand for lifestyles, reinforcing their cultural shorthand in narratives about relocation and adventure. Beyond aviation, IATA codes find application in logistics for standardizing cargo routing and documentation in international shipping, where they identify endpoints for air freight without ambiguity. In gaming, flight simulation titles such as incorporate IATA codes alongside ICAO identifiers to enable precise navigation and airport selection, allowing players to simulate real-world routes. Marketing efforts by airports and airlines leverage codes for branding; for instance, St. Petersburg-Clearwater International Airport () promotes itself as "Fly2PIE" across communications to create memorable, code-centric identities. Consumer merchandise, including custom apparel, luggage tags, and home goods emblazoned with personal favorite codes, has also emerged as a , often tied to souvenirs. Some travelers incorporate airport codes into tattoos as minimalist symbols of cherished destinations.

References

  1. [1]
    IATA Airline and Location Codes
    IATA codes identify airlines, destinations, and traffic documents. Types include airline designator, accounting, baggage tag issuer, and location codes.Airline and Airport Codes Search · City Code Directory (CCD)
  2. [2]
    Airport Codes Explained (FAA, ICAO, IATA) - Pilot Institute
    Feb 7, 2024 · Airport codes include ICAO (four-letter, global), IATA (three-letter, for ticketing), and FAA LIDs (three/four letters, US domestic).The History of Airport Codes · Airport Codes in the United... · What are IATA Codes?
  3. [3]
    Airport Codes: How Official Names Are Assigned
    Aug 31, 2017 · ICAO assigns four-letter codes, and IATA assigns three-letter codes. IATA codes are based on airport/city names, ensuring uniqueness.
  4. [4]
    [PDF] IATA Location Codes
    IATA (3-letter) location codes are used for strictly commercial airline purposes and are issued at the request of an airline(s). IATA will also issue codes (at ...
  5. [5]
    Airline and Airport Codes Search - IATA
    This airline and airport code search engine provides an official source for codes assigned by IATA. Find out the 2-letter code of an airline or identify to ...IATA Codes · Airline Coding Directory · Ticketing Handbook
  6. [6]
    About Us - IATA
    IATA is the trade association for the world's airlines, representing some 350 airlines over 80% of global air traffic.IATA Management · IATA by Region · IATA membership benefits · Vision & Mission
  7. [7]
    History - IATA
    IATA was founded in Havana, Cuba, on 19 April 1945. It is the prime vehicle for inter-airline cooperation in promoting safe, reliable, secure and economical ...The Early Days · From a New Trade Association... · IATA's Leaders since 1945
  8. [8]
    [PDF] Order JO 7350.9GG - Federal Aviation Administration
    Jan 25, 2024 · The FAA location identifier is an assigned code used to simplify the identification of a landing facility, navigational aid, weather station or ...
  9. [9]
    IATA and ICAO: a guide to airline and airport codes - AeroTime
    Dec 13, 2023 · IATA codes are used by airlines and travel agents, while ICAO codes are used by air traffic control for operational and safety purposes. IATA ...
  10. [10]
    How are airport codes decided? - General Aviation News
    Apr 4, 2023 · Airports began to choose their own three letter identities, which allowed for a total of 17,576 permutations, but it wasn't until the 1960s that ...
  11. [11]
    All About Airport Codes - Everything Everywhere Daily
    May 18, 2021 · When commercial aviation developed in the United States in the 1930s, pilots began to use the National Weather Service codes to identify the ...
  12. [12]
    A Brief History of the FAA | Federal Aviation Administration
    The legislation also expanded the government's role in civil aviation by giving CAA power to regulate airline fares and determine the routes individual carriers ...
  13. [13]
    Analysis: How And Why IATA & ICAO Airport Codes Differ
    Dec 16, 2023 · ICAO and the FAA prefer HEF for government planning. Pilots who adhere to government regulations and use government infrastructure are also more ...
  14. [14]
    ORD, FRU, MSY: how odd airport codes came to be
    Oct 9, 2020 · “ORD” is a nod to the airfield's history, which started its life as Orchard Field Airport (OrchaRD) in 1945, at the site where Douglas ...
  15. [15]
    Why don't airport codes match their names? - Scripps News
    Mar 20, 2023 · In the early days of commercial aviation, pilots used two-letter codes ... airport sharing the same code that could be confused," Flint said.
  16. [16]
    The Early Days - IATA
    IATA helped to mesh international conventions, developed through ICAO, with US air transport law which had developed in isolation prior to World War Two. The ...
  17. [17]
    How Do Airports Get Their 3-Letter Codes? - AFAR
    May 20, 2024 · The first choice of IATA is to create an airport code using the first three letters of the city's name, such as LAS for Las Vegas or BOS for Boston.Missing: format composition
  18. [18]
    [PDF] Location Code Requirements - IATA
    According to the IATA Provisions of the Passenger Services Conference Resolution 763, in order to apply for a Location Code, the following must be provided:.Missing: identifier rules
  19. [19]
    Here's How Airports Get Their Three-Letter IATA Codes - Simple Flying
    Oct 16, 2024 · The first choice for the IATA for most airports is to use the first three letters of a city's name for an airport. However, if there is more ...
  20. [20]
    Access Our Directory of Airport Code Data - OAG
    What Are Airport Codes? Every airport in the world has its own unique 3 letter code, used everywhere from booking sites and boarding passes to departure ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  21. [21]
    UP's Noida Int'l Airport Gets the New IATA Code 'DXN' - Aviation A2Z
    Sep 30, 2023 · The Noida International Airport (DXN) in Jewar has officially revealed its International Air Transport Association (IATA) code, which is DXN.
  22. [22]
    Vlora International Airport has officially been assigned its IATA code
    Apr 27, 2025 · Vlora International Airport has officially been assigned its IATA code: VLO. Set to open in 2025, this new airport near the beautiful ...
  23. [23]
    Will IATA codes run out? - Aviation Stack Exchange
    Sep 30, 2015 · Three letter combinations gives 263=17576 possible codes. Some airports have multiple codes (ARN = STO, for example). I'm just going to guess ...
  24. [24]
    How Airports Are Given 3 Letter Codes - Simple Flying
    Sep 8, 2023 · The origin of the three-letter codes are known as IATA airport codes (since they are defined by the International Air Transport Association).
  25. [25]
    Understanding IATA Codes: Why do Airports Have Three-Letter ...
    Sep 27, 2023 · The history of IATA codes goes back to the 1930s when ... It is key to note that IATA codes differ from ICAO (International Civil Aviation ...
  26. [26]
    A Closer Look At How Airfields And Airports Are Designated In The ...
    Aug 6, 2024 · Airfields in the contiguous 48 United States have their four-letter codes starting with a "K": KJFK, KMIA, and KLAS.
  27. [27]
    The hidden history of quirky airport codes - The Points Guy
    Sep 24, 2022 · In the 1930s, Canada built a nationwide network of weather reporting stations, which were each given a two-letter radio calling code. As air ...
  28. [28]
    Auckland Airport | Auckland Airport
    Auckland Airport is a major airline hub in New Zealand and there are many domestic and international destinations for visitors to continue on to.
  29. [29]
    Frankfurt Airport
    Select language; Deutsch · 中文. English ... FRA SmartWay · Facilities & Services. Airport news. Terminal 3 at Frankfurt ...
  30. [30]
    Home | Directorate General of Civil Aviation | Government of India
    DGCA in India is the regulatory body in the field of Civil Aviation primarily dealing with safety issues ... DGCA grants Aerodrome License to Navi Mumbai ...eGCA Login · Drone Rules, 2021 · A-Z Index · Drone Training Circulars
  31. [31]
    [PDF] Airline Distribution Standards - IATA
    Ensure there is a fare record for each city (or airport) code. Example: A fare record with NYC will match to LGA and JFK flights only. A fare record with EWR ...
  32. [32]
    IATA Explained: The Role of International Air Transport Asso
    Oct 31, 2025 · IATA regularly assigns, updates, and regulates these codes to avoid duplication and confusion – especially in cities with multiple airports.What Is Iata? · Iata Programs And Policy... · Iata's Services: Products...
  33. [33]
    Multiple Airports For One City – What Are The Benefits?
    Jan 3, 2021 · Having multiple airports means more room for airlines to operate more flights. This means more nonstop, more competition, and more options to find a lower fare.
  34. [34]
    Explained: The Most Obscure Airport Codes In The US & How They ...
    Nov 25, 2024 · From two to three letters​​ Airport coding first started in the 1930s, and at that time, airlines typically chose their own two-letter codes. ...
  35. [35]
    How do I change the name of an existing airport?
    To change an airport name, IATA needs confirmation from the airport authority with evidence of the new name, and the request must be logged on the IATA portal.
  36. [36]
    Brief History of Paris Orly Airport.
    Feb 22, 2023 · Originally built in 1909 as an airfield for military purposes, Orly Airport began commercial operations in 1932 as a small domestic airport.
  37. [37]
    The Surprising Stories Behind 10 Famous Airport Codes
    Oct 9, 2025 · As the aviation industry took off, airports switched to the three-letter IATA ... letter codes assigned by the ICAO (International Civil Aviation ...
  38. [38]
    Designating Airport Codes - Advanced Aircrew Academy
    Jul 12, 2022 · Initially, airports were given a two-letter code that corresponded with the National Weather Service coding system, but as more and more ...
  39. [39]
    A Guide to Understanding Airport Codes: IATA, ICAO, and LID
    Mar 31, 2021 · The three main types of airport codes are IATA, ICAO, and LID. IATA is for airline travel, ICAO for international flights, and LID is local.
  40. [40]
    Number 186 - Codes For Nondesignated Alaska Airports
    Aug 7, 2024 · This Accounting and Reporting Directives directs small certificated and commuter air carriers to use the airport code ZZZ for landing areas in AlaskaMissing: provisional | Show results with:provisional<|separator|>
  41. [41]
    IATA Numbers and Codes Explained - AltexSoft
    Jul 7, 2023 · We discuss IATA numbers and what they mean to travel agents and also explore the main codes that standardize the aviation industry.<|control11|><|separator|>
  42. [42]
    [PDF] Partnering for Success: Interline, Code Share, and Alliances - IATA
    This checklist guides data coding for interline and code share agreements, including reservation designators, fares, routings, stopovers, transfers, and ...
  43. [43]
    Baggage Operations - IATA
    IATA drives baggage innovation, develops standards, enables baggage tracking, and provides training courses for baggage handling.
  44. [44]
    [PDF] GAO-22-105018, CONTACT TRACING FOR AIR TRAVEL: CDC's ...
    Jul 11, 2022 · 17 An airline manifest would include additional information necessary to identify potentially exposed passengers, such as seat assignments. For ...
  45. [45]
    Unraveling Airport IDs | Business Jet Traveler
    The JFK code is nearly self-explanatory and even non-pilots can easily surmise that KJFK or JFK is New York's Kennedy Airport. The fun begins when ...Missing: colloquial | Show results with:colloquial<|control11|><|separator|>
  46. [46]
    Airport Codes - Rick Steves Travel Forum
    Sep 27, 2025 · I don't often use IATA codes when talking about airports verbally, but when writing they are a lot simpler. But yeah, the vernacular often wins ...Missing: colloquial | Show results with:colloquial
  47. [47]
    YYZ by Rush - Songfacts
    YYZ is the 3 letter IATA code for Toronto Pearson airport. The ICAO code which is used now is CYYZ. YYZ is also the code for the VOR.
  48. [48]
    Airport Codes - song and lyrics by Aubrey Logan, Hagelslag | Spotify
    Lyrics. Nobody told me it'd be easy. Nobody told me everything would be just fine. I don't know where or when I pulled these promises out of thin air.Missing: culture movies
  49. [49]
    How Airport Codes Work Around the World - Airways Magazine
    Nov 23, 2023 · The practice of assigning codes to airports originated in the 1930s. Back then, airport codes consisted of a combination of two letters.
  50. [50]
    IATA Airport Codes: How They Simplify International Logistics
    Jun 18, 2025 · IATA codes are 3-letter codes set by the International Air Transport Association to identify airports, simplifying communication and logistics.
  51. [51]
    List of Microsoft Flight Simulator airports | Windows Central
    Jul 28, 2021 · List of Microsoft Flight Simulator airports ; KMCO, Orlando International Airport, USA ; LFPG, Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport, France ; VQPR, Paro ...
  52. [52]
    How do airport IATA codes work: North America
    Feb 16, 2022 · Once assigned, IATA location codes cannot be changed – they are permanent in nature. There are a select few examples where location codes ...
  53. [53]
    https://airportag.com/pages/airport-codes
  54. [54]
    Airport Code Tattoo - Pinterest
    “YYJ - YVR - LAX” Airport Code Tattoo Design. Airport codes | Wrist band tattoo, Barcode tattoo, Band tattoo · Airport Code Tattoo · Airport Tattoo Ideas.