Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Integrated delivery system

An integrated delivery system (IDS) is a networked healthcare organization that coordinates multiple providers—including hospitals, physicians, outpatient clinics, and sometimes insurers—under unified governance, contracts, or ownership to deliver continuum-of-care services from prevention to post-acute treatment. IDSs developed in the United States amid a fragmented healthcare landscape, aiming to enhance care coordination, reduce redundancies, and align financial incentives for efficiency, with prominent examples including Kaiser Permanente, Mayo Clinic, and Cleveland Clinic, which integrate hospitals, primary care, and specialized services across regions. Systems like Kaiser have demonstrated empirical success in achieving above-average quality outcomes at costs equal to or below national averages through vertical integration and capitated payment models. However, broader evidence on hospital-physician integrations reveals mixed results, with some analyses indicating increased physician costs, higher hospital prices, and elevated per capita spending without commensurate quality gains. Proponents highlight advantages such as streamlined regulatory compliance and improved population health management, yet critics note potential drawbacks like reduced competition and barriers to independent providers. Many IDSs participate in value-based programs like Medicare Accountable Care Organizations, where larger systems often outperform smaller ones in cost savings and quality metrics, though systemic biases in academic and policy evaluations—favoring integration models aligned with institutional preferences—warrant scrutiny of source claims.

Definition and Core Features

Definition and Objectives

An integrated delivery system (IDS), also referred to as an integrated delivery network (IDN), constitutes an organized network of healthcare providers—including hospitals, physician groups, outpatient clinics, and post-acute care facilities—that collaborates to furnish a continuum of services from prevention through acute and chronic care management. This structure emphasizes vertical integration across care settings to enable seamless transitions and shared accountability among participants. Payer integration, while not universal, may occur to unify financing with delivery, allowing capitation or risk-sharing arrangements that incentivize efficiency. The core objectives of IDSs derive from addressing the causal inefficiencies of fragmented US healthcare, where independent providers often duplicate services—such as diagnostic tests—due to lack of information sharing, contributing to unnecessary expenditures estimated at 10-30% for laboratory testing alone and broader systemic waste approximating 25% of total spending. Through coordinated delivery and aligned financial mechanisms, IDSs seek to minimize such redundancies by fostering data interoperability and standardized protocols, thereby enhancing care continuity without reliance on external mandates. Ultimately, IDS objectives prioritize patient-centric alignment by restructuring incentives to reward value over volume, aiming to lower per-capita costs via economies of scale and integrated resource utilization while improving clinical outcomes through proactive, multidisciplinary interventions tailored to population needs. This approach counters the volume-driven fee-for-service model prevalent in non-integrated systems, promoting empirical efficiency gains observable in coordinated environments.

Key Components and Structure

Integrated delivery systems (IDS) fundamentally comprise hospitals as central anchor institutions, which provide inpatient care and serve as hubs for specialized services. These are complemented by physician groups, often through direct employment or alignment mechanisms such as joint ventures, alongside ambulatory clinics for primary and outpatient care. Ancillary services, including diagnostic laboratories, radiology and imaging centers, and rehabilitation facilities, form essential building blocks to support comprehensive service delivery. In some configurations, IDS extend to post-acute care providers like skilled nursing facilities or even vertically integrated pharmacies and insurance arms to broaden the scope of coordinated resources. Organizationally, IDS are typically structured under parent holding companies or corporations that oversee a portfolio of subsidiary entities, including owned hospitals and affiliated practices, allowing for centralized strategic oversight while permitting operational autonomy at the affiliate level. Governance is managed through boards of directors that incorporate representation from key stakeholders, such as hospital administrators, physicians, and community members, to facilitate consensus-driven decision-making and alignment across components. Legal and contractual frameworks, including affiliation agreements and shared services contracts, enable the incorporation of non-owned providers, fostering network cohesion without necessitating full mergers. Scale among IDS varies significantly, ranging from smaller regional entities operating 1 to 5 hospitals and serving localized populations to expansive national networks encompassing dozens of facilities and thousands of providers. Empirical data indicate that while many IDS maintain regional footprints, the largest systems dominate market concentrations; for example, by 2017, a single hospital system exceeded 50% market share of discharges in most U.S. metropolitan areas, reflecting consolidation trends that enhance bargaining power but raise antitrust considerations. Top-tier IDS, such as those with net patient revenues exceeding $50 billion annually, illustrate this upper scale, often spanning multiple states.

Types and Models of Integration

Integrated delivery systems (IDS) can be classified by the depth of integration, particularly in terms of ownership structures that determine the degree of control and risk-sharing among participating entities. Closed systems feature full ownership of providers and often include captive insurance mechanisms, as exemplified by staff-model health maintenance organizations (HMOs) where physicians are salaried employees of the system. This structure allows for centralized decision-making and direct assumption of financial risk across the care continuum. In contrast, open systems rely on loose contractual affiliations between independent providers and a coordinating entity, preserving autonomy but constraining unified risk distribution through negotiated agreements rather than ownership ties. Hybrid models incorporate partial ownership, such as joint ventures or minority stakes in provider entities, blending elements of control from closed systems with the flexibility of open networks. Models of integration further delineate IDS based on the scope of consolidation. Vertical integration emphasizes alignment along the care delivery chain, linking primary care, specialty services, hospitals, and post-acute care under a single governance to streamline transitions and resource allocation. Horizontal integration focuses on consolidating entities at the same care level, such as mergers among multiple hospitals or physician groups within a region, to achieve economies of scale in operations and purchasing. Payer-provider models, often termed "payviders," integrate financing with delivery by combining insurance operations with owned or affiliated provider networks, as seen in UnitedHealth Group's Optum division, which manages both reimbursement and clinical services to align incentives across payment and provision. These models differ empirically in their mechanisms for risk-sharing: vertical and closed structures enable tighter coordination through direct oversight, while horizontal and open approaches depend on alliances that may yield shallower integration depths.

Historical Development

Early Origins and Precedents

The roots of integrated delivery systems lie in the prepaid group practices that developed in the United States during the 1930s and 1940s, primarily as private sector innovations to counter the fragmentation and cost inflation inherent in fee-for-service medicine. These early models combined health financing with direct provision of care through salaried physicians and owned facilities, aiming to capture economies of scale via vertical integration of primary, specialty, and hospital services. Unlike traditional indemnity insurance, which reimbursed providers post hoc and encouraged volume over efficiency, prepaid plans used capitation to align incentives toward preventive care and resource coordination. Kaiser Permanente exemplifies this approach, originating as an industrial health plan in 1945 when industrialist Henry J. Kaiser partnered with physician Sidney R. Garfield to deliver prepaid care to over 90,000 shipyard workers in California and Oregon amid World War II labor demands. Building on Garfield's earlier 1930s desert aqueduct project that served workers via a single integrated clinic and hospital, the system emphasized evidence-based protocols and group practice to minimize waste, with premiums covering comprehensive services at fixed rates. By the early 1950s, it transitioned to a nonprofit open-panel model accessible to the public, prefiguring modern IDS by owning hospitals, employing physicians, and managing insurance risks internally. Another precedent is Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound, established in 1947 as a consumer-owned nonprofit in Seattle, which acquired a clinic and hospital to provide prepaid group practice to union members and others seeking alternatives to rising out-of-pocket costs. This cooperative model responded to post-war healthcare dynamics, where employer-sponsored indemnity plans proliferated due to wartime wage freezes but exacerbated fee-for-service inefficiencies like overtreatment. Such initiatives arose from voluntary private efforts—driven by industrialists, labor groups, and physicians confronting per capita spending increases from expanded access—rather than regulatory mandates, fostering integration for causal efficiencies in care delivery. Early outcomes from these plans highlighted market-driven cost containment, with prepaid groups achieving lower per-enrollee expenditures through reduced hospitalizations and administrative overhead compared to fragmented fee-for-service systems, as evidenced by sustained operations amid broader cost pressures. For instance, Kaiser's wartime model maintained care for massive workforces at predictable premiums, demonstrating scalable integration's viability before widespread policy interventions.

Expansion During Managed Care Era (1980s–1990s)

During the 1980s, escalating health care costs driven by fee-for-service reimbursement prompted large employers to prioritize cost containment, fostering rapid proliferation of health maintenance organizations (HMOs) as alternatives to traditional indemnity plans. This shift pressured providers to form integrated delivery systems (IDS) to secure contracts with managed care entities, integrate care delivery, and counter insurers' leverage through vertical alignment of hospitals and physicians. Into the 1990s, IDS expansion accelerated amid intensifying managed care penetration, with hospitals pursuing mergers and forming physician-hospital organizations (PHOs) to achieve scale and negotiate capitation rates effectively. Hospital mergers peaked at 152 in 1996, reflecting a broader wave of consolidations that reduced the number of independent facilities by about 9% from 1985 to 1995 while aligning roughly 55% of hospitals with physicians via PHOs or similar structures by mid-decade. Managed care's utilization review tactics, perceived by physicians as intrusive "doctor bashing," sparked widespread backlash by the late 1990s, eroding support for tight integrations. Many PHOs dissolved as anticipated efficiencies failed to materialize, with hospital acquisitions of practices often yielding physician productivity declines rather than sustained cost savings or coordinated care improvements. This unraveling highlighted the challenges of achieving true integration under market-driven pressures, as fragmented incentives undermined long-term viability.

Revival and Evolution Post-2010

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), enacted in 2010, spurred renewed interest in integrated delivery systems (IDS) through the establishment of the Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP), which incentivized the formation of accountable care organizations (ACOs) as mechanisms for coordinated care across providers. ACOs, often structured as precursors or components of full IDS, aimed to tie provider reimbursements to quality metrics and cost containment rather than fee-for-service volume; the MSSP launched in 2012 with initial participants and expanded rapidly, reaching 561 ACOs by 2018 serving over 10.5 million Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) beneficiaries. By 2020, Medicare ACOs encompassed approximately 558 entities covering more than 12 million beneficiaries, representing roughly 20% of the Medicare FFS population eligible for assignment. These developments reflected policy-driven integration, with ACO participation frequently involving hospitals, physician groups, and post-acute providers in shared risk arrangements, though empirical analyses indicate that savings generated were modest and often attributable to participant selection rather than systemic efficiencies. Concurrent market forces amplified IDS formation via widespread hospital consolidations, with 1,537 ownership changes involving acute care hospitals recorded from 2010 to 2019, averaging over 150 deals annually as systems sought scale for negotiating leverage with payers. Such mergers enabled IDS to internalize physician practices and expand networks, ostensibly to support value-based contracting, yet evidence suggests motivations included pricing power gains, as consolidated entities commanded higher reimbursements without proportional quality improvements. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) antitrust scrutiny highlighted risks, challenging only 13 hospital transactions from 2002 to 2020 amid over 1,000 mergers, with predictably anticompetitive deals from 2010 to 2015 linked to price increases exceeding 5%. State-level interventions complemented federal efforts, contesting about 5% of 862 proposed mergers in the 2010s, underscoring persistent competition concerns despite pro-integration rationales. The post-2010 evolution toward value-based care within IDS and ACO frameworks relied heavily on government subsidies, such as shared savings bonuses, which masked underlying inefficiencies by rewarding participation over verifiable causal reductions in utilization. While ACA incentives facilitated risk-sharing models, causal analysis reveals distortions: subsidies propped up consolidations that prioritized administrative scale and payer negotiations over organic care coordination, with limited evidence of sustained cost declines absent policy supports. Over-reliance on Medicare-centric programs like MSSP thus fostered quasi-IDS growth, but empirical shortcomings in broad efficiency gains—evident in variable ACO performance and ongoing price inflation post-merger—indicate that such interventions often substitute for market-driven integration, potentially entrenching provider market power under the guise of reform.

Operational and Financial Mechanisms

Care Coordination and Delivery Processes

In integrated delivery systems, care coordination typically begins with single-entry points via primary care providers serving as gatekeepers, who assess patient needs and direct referrals to affiliated specialists or services to maintain continuity across the care continuum. This gatekeeping process minimizes redundant consultations and ensures that initial evaluations inform subsequent interventions within the system's network. Shared protocols govern transitions between care settings, such as hospital-to-home discharges, where standardized checklists outline patient education, follow-up scheduling, and symptom monitoring to bridge gaps in post-acute management. These protocols emphasize patient-specific action plans, including symptom recognition and contact procedures, executed by discharge teams to facilitate seamless handoffs. For patients with chronic conditions, multidisciplinary teams—integrating physicians, nurses, pharmacists, and care coordinators—convene to formulate and oversee unified treatment regimens, addressing multifaceted needs like disease progression and adherence barriers. Care managers within these teams proactively track high-risk individuals through regular check-ins and risk stratification, intervening to avert complications such as exacerbations. Such processes causally mitigate errors prevalent in fragmented care, including medication discrepancies, which affect 50% to 70% of patients during transitions due to incomplete handoff information. Empirical evaluations of vertically integrated models akin to IDS demonstrate 10% to 15% lower 30-day readmission rates compared to non-integrated settings, attributable to enhanced tracking and protocol adherence.

Payment and Reimbursement Models

Integrated delivery systems (IDS) employ payment models that emphasize risk-bearing to incentivize cost control and care efficiency, fundamentally differing from fee-for-service (FFS) reimbursement by tying provider revenue to total expenditures rather than service volume. Common structures include capitation, bundled payments, and shared savings, often implemented via accountable care organizations (ACOs) formed by IDS entities. These mechanisms promote accountability for population-level outcomes, with empirical evidence indicating that deeper vertical integration within IDS enhances their effectiveness by facilitating coordinated risk management across providers. Capitation delivers fixed per-member-per-month payments to IDS for comprehensive care of enrolled beneficiaries, shifting utilization risk to providers and rewarding underrun budgets through retained margins. This aligns incentives against FFS-driven overprovision, as IDS must manage total costs to avoid losses, though success depends on accurate risk adjustment and population predictability. Bundled payments, conversely, consolidate reimbursement into a single sum for defined care episodes—such as joint replacements—encompassing hospital, physician, and post-acute services, thereby encouraging IDS to minimize fragmented billing and duplicative interventions. CMS's Bundled Payments for Care Improvement models, tested from 2013 onward, yielded episode cost reductions averaging 3-5% in participating integrated networks without quality declines. Shared savings predominate in Medicare's Shared Savings Program (MSSP), where IDS-affiliated ACOs receive 40-75% of spending reductions below an updated benchmark after satisfying quality metrics and a minimum savings rate (typically 1-2.5% based on beneficiary count). Tracks with downside risk, such as the former Track 3 or current ENHANCED track, impose shared losses up to 20% of benchmark excess, amplifying discipline on expenditures. From 2016 to 2020, MSSP ACOs generated gross shared savings exceeding $10 billion cumulatively, with annual earned savings rising 35% on average and 83% of participants achieving positive benchmarks by 2020, though outcomes varied markedly by organizational maturity and risk track. Hybrid approaches layer these onto FFS baselines, as in MSSP's BASIC track, offering upside-only sharing initially (up to 40%) before escalating to two-sided risk, enabling IDS to build capabilities while curbing baseline overutilization. Performance disparities underscore that tightly integrated IDS—spanning primary, specialty, and facility care—realize superior savings through unified decision-making, contrasting with looser networks.

Technology and Data Integration

Integrated delivery systems employ electronic health record (EHR) platforms to centralize patient data across affiliated providers, enabling seamless access and reducing duplication in care documentation. Epic Systems' EHR holds a dominant position, commanding 42.3% of the U.S. acute care hospital market share in 2024, particularly among large integrated networks where its scalability supports multi-site coordination. Health information exchanges (HIEs) complement EHRs by facilitating electronic data transfer between IDS components, with enterprise HIE models tailored for internal network sharing to enhance continuity without external dependencies. Integrated data repositories power analytics applications, including predictive modeling for risk stratification, which segments patients by likelihood of adverse events such as hospitalizations; empirical studies show such tools, applied to EHR-derived datasets, correlate with decreased emergency department utilization through proactive interventions. Interoperability barriers remain, as evidenced by 2021 Office of the National Coordinator (ONC) findings where over 60% of hospitals participated in sending, receiving, querying, and integrating patient data, though system-affiliated facilities achieved higher exchange rates than independent ones due to aligned infrastructure. To address proprietary constraints, IDS increasingly adopt Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) standards via application programming interfaces (APIs), enabling real-time data queries across vendors and minimizing lock-in risks by enforcing modular, standards-based connectivity.

Empirical Benefits and Evidence

Efficiency and Cost Management Outcomes

Empirical studies of integrated delivery systems (IDS) have identified instances of cost reductions attributable to structural efficiencies, particularly in models emphasizing coordinated care across providers. A systematic literature review of integrated care initiatives, which encompass IDS frameworks, concluded that such systems are likely to lower overall costs while enhancing outcomes, though evidence quality remains moderate due to methodological variations in studies. In specific cases, integrated primary care models within IDS have yielded per-capita cost savings of 15-19% after multivariate adjustments for patient factors, primarily through streamlined service delivery and reduced redundant utilization. Prominent examples like Kaiser Permanente illustrate these efficiencies, with Medicare data from the early 2010s showing nearly all of its hospitals operating at costs significantly below the national average, facilitated by salaried physician models and capitated payments that incentivize resource conservation. Economies of scale in IDS enable bulk purchasing of supplies and pharmaceuticals, yielding volume discounts that can reduce procurement expenses by leveraging centralized negotiation power across network facilities. In rural settings during the 1990s, IDS networks emerged as a viable strategy for cost management amid financial pressures, allowing small hospitals to share administrative overhead and achieve sustained operational viability without proportional increases in spending. These networks minimized per-service costs by pooling resources for joint purchasing and unified management, preserving service continuity in low-volume areas.

Improvements in Care Quality and Continuity

Integrated delivery systems (IDS) enhance care quality by fostering coordinated processes that align providers across care settings, leading to higher adherence to evidence-based guidelines as measured by Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) scores. For instance, Kaiser Permanente, a longstanding IDS, achieved the highest performance among U.S. health plans in 69 HEDIS measures in 2025, outperforming national benchmarks in preventive screenings such as breast cancer (12% higher rate), cervical cancer (10% higher), and colorectal cancer (20% higher). This superior guideline adherence stems from IDS structures that standardize protocols and leverage shared incentives, empirically linking vertical integration to improved process metrics in chronic care delivery. Care continuity benefits from unified electronic health records (EHRs) in IDS, which minimize information silos and handoff disruptions inherent in fragmented systems. GAO analysis of IDS like Denver Health and Geisinger Health System found EHR-enabled real-time data access and registries supported proactive chronic disease monitoring, reducing protocol deviations and errors in conditions like diabetes and asthma. Vertical integration further bolsters continuity by internalizing care transitions, as evidenced by a 10% reduction in 30-day unplanned hospital readmissions (odds ratio 0.900) post-integration in analyzed hospitals, with pronounced effects for diabetes complications (odds ratio 0.689). Enthoven notes that such integration cures fragmentation for complex patients, yielding better outcomes through coordinated networks that prioritize clinical protocols over siloed incentives. These quality gains are causally tied to IDS mechanisms that reduce adverse events via fewer inter-provider handoffs and enhanced data interoperability. In Geisinger’s model, integrated care navigation and physician alignment decreased cardiac surgery adverse outcomes through standardized ProvenCare protocols. Empirical data from large-scale IDS demonstrate sustained improvements in chronic management, where aligned providers achieve parity or superiority in health outcomes compared to fee-for-service models, despite resource constraints.

Population Health and Preventive Care Impacts

Integrated delivery systems promote population health by embedding preventive care into routine practice, as capitated payment models and shared risk incentivize providers to address modifiable risk factors before they escalate into acute conditions, thereby shifting focus from episodic treatment to sustained wellness management. This structure enables systematic tracking of patient cohorts across primary, specialty, and community services, facilitating targeted interventions like vaccinations, lifestyle counseling, and chronic disease monitoring that yield measurable reductions in disease incidence. Empirical analyses of such systems highlight causal links between integration and upstream health gains, where aligned incentives minimize deferral of low-cost preventives in favor of high-cost downstream care. In exemplar systems like Kaiser Permanente, preventive screening adherence significantly outpaces national benchmarks, with 2024 breast cancer mammography rates at 81.8% versus the U.S. average of 73%, positioning the organization in the 90th percentile of Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) performance. Cervical cancer screening rates are similarly elevated at 7 percentage points above national figures, and colorectal screening exceeds by 11 points, reflecting proactive outreach via electronic reminders and embedded protocols that boost completion by up to 17 percentage points in targeted cohorts. These outcomes stem from population-level data analytics that identify and engage at-risk members, demonstrating how IDS infrastructure sustains high uptake of evidence-based screenings recommended by bodies like the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Longitudinal studies from the 2010s affirm that integrated models yield lower emergency department utilization and hospitalization rates for managed populations compared to fragmented care environments, with integrated primary care linked to declining ED visit trends, particularly among older adults, through enhanced chronic condition management and reduced fragmentation. For instance, continuity fostered by IDS correlates with decreased preventable hospitalizations, as providers leverage unified records to preempt exacerbations, evidenced by reduced acute care episodes in high-risk groups under holistic oversight. Such patterns underscore the preventive efficacy of IDS, where empirical data from randomized and observational designs show 20-30% relative drops in avoidable acute events attributable to coordinated early interventions.

Criticisms, Challenges, and Empirical Shortcomings

Antitrust Concerns and Reduced Competition

Integrated delivery systems (IDS) have facilitated extensive mergers and acquisitions among hospitals and physician groups since 2010, often resulting in entities controlling dominant market shares in local regions. For instance, between 2010 and 2018, over 680 hospital mergers occurred, contributing to scenarios where one or two health systems command the majority of inpatient care in nearly half of U.S. metropolitan areas by 2022. Such consolidations have raised antitrust alarms by creating de facto local monopolies, with some IDS achieving 70% or greater shares in specific markets, reducing competitive pressures on pricing and service offerings. U.S. antitrust enforcers, including the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), have increasingly scrutinized these integrations for eroding competition. The FTC has pursued legal challenges against hospital-IDN ties, securing injunctions in cases where mergers threatened to eliminate rivals in concentrated markets, with notable actions building on precedents from the late 2010s onward. For example, vertical integrations allowing hospitals to absorb physician practices have been contested for enhancing monopsony power over payers, leading to blocked deals that would have further entrenched oligopolistic structures. These efforts highlight how IDS expansions can foreclose entry by smaller providers and distort bargaining dynamics without verifiable efficiency gains offsetting the competitive harms. Empirical analyses attribute post-merger price escalations primarily to heightened bargaining leverage rather than operational synergies. A 2016 study of hospital price variation found monopolistic consolidations correlated with markups exceeding 20% over competitive benchmarks, driven by reduced insurer negotiating options in concentrated locales. Subsequent research on vertical integrations confirmed price hikes of 3-12% for physician services following IDS absorptions, with hospitals leveraging integrated networks to demand premiums from commercial payers. Policies under the Affordable Care Act, including accountable care organization incentives, have accelerated these consolidations by waiving certain antitrust scrutiny for collaborative models, fostering oligopolies that pass higher costs to consumers through elevated premiums and out-of-pocket expenses.

Evidence of Cost Inflation and Inefficiencies

Empirical studies on hospital-physician vertical integration, a cornerstone of many integrated delivery systems (IDS), have documented elevated healthcare spending without proportional efficiency or quality gains. Analysis of data from 2013 to 2017 showed that such integrations drove primary care physician price increases ranging from 2.1% to 12.0%, attributable to enhanced negotiating leverage and shifts toward higher-cost hospital sites of service. Similarly, hospital costs rose by 1% to 3% post-integration, reflecting added administrative overhead and referral patterns favoring facility-based care over lower-cost alternatives. These findings align with broader evidence of 0.5% to 1.0% per capita price hikes tied to integration intensity, as providers steer patients to pricier in-network venues. Accountable care organizations (ACOs) within IDS frameworks have similarly underdelivered on cost containment pledges. Evaluations reveal net Medicare savings remain minimal, even after adjusting for selection effects where low performers exit the program. By 2018, ACO implementations had boosted federal spending relative to benchmarks, undershooting Congressional Budget Office projections by more than $2 billion due to insufficient benchmarking adjustments and persistent utilization growth. In performance years through 2023, while shared savings payments reached $3.1 billion, over 30% of ACOs incurred losses or generated no savings, highlighting uneven outcomes driven by baseline fee-for-service incentives that integration fails to fully supplant. Precedents from 1990s integrated delivery networks (IDNs) and physician-hospital organizations (PHOs) illustrate recurring inefficiencies, including administrative bloat that amplified rather than offset costs. These entities often collapsed under layered bureaucracies, with diversification strategies yielding no operating improvements and instead fostering redundant management structures. Causal factors included enduring provider misalignments—hospitals prioritizing facility fees and physicians volume-based billing—undermined by incomplete risk-sharing and cultural clashes, leading to higher per capita expenditures without scalable coordination. Modern IDS risk mirroring these pitfalls, as integration expands administrative layers without dismantling upstream incentives for service intensification. Proponents' emphasis on IDS cost-saving potential frequently stems from selection bias, spotlighting high-performing outliers like mature ACOs while disregarding the majority's stagnation or failure, including high attrition rates among underachievers. This skews perceptions, as aggregated data across IDNs show inconsistent cost reductions, with quality metrics rarely justifying spending upticks. Such patterns underscore that structural integration alone does not enforce causal efficiencies absent rigorous incentive realignment.

Quality Dilution and Access Barriers

In capitated payment models within integrated delivery systems (IDS), financial incentives to manage fixed reimbursements per patient have historically led to service rationing, particularly evident during the 1990s HMO expansion. A 1995 analysis of HMO practices found that these systems withheld certain services from sicker patients to contain costs, contributing to widespread patient complaints about denied referrals and treatments. This backlash manifested in declining HMO enrollment, falling from approximately 32% to 26% of the insured population between 1997 and 2003, driven by perceptions of restricted access to necessary care. Empirical studies on healthcare consolidation, a core feature of IDS formation, reveal no net improvement in care quality. A review of 26 studies on consolidation's impact found that 20 (77%) reported either no change or a decline in quality metrics, such as patient outcomes and safety indicators, despite structural integrations intended to enhance coordination. Similarly, analyses of hospital mergers show mixed or negative effects on patient experience and clinical processes, with market concentration enabling reduced emphasis on underperforming services without corresponding quality gains. These findings suggest that IDS market power facilitates selective service prioritization, often favoring high-margin procedures over comprehensive care continuity. Access barriers arise from facility rationalizations post-IDS mergers, particularly in rural areas. Between 2010 and 2021, nearly 140 rural hospitals closed, with consolidation dynamics—such as mergers with distant urban systems—exacerbating local service reductions in over 180 communities by eliminating inpatient access. Unprofitable rural facilities facing closure often merged instead (17% of cases), but these integrations frequently resulted in service line cuts or facility downgrades, limiting equitable access for non-urban populations. IDS structures inherently prioritize insured patient panels under managed care contracts, creating empirical disparities for the uninsured. These systems, optimized for capitated revenue from enrolled populations, de-emphasize uncompensated care, as evidenced by reduced charity services in consolidated networks where market dominance allows focus on reimbursable services. Post-merger data indicate selective cuts to low-revenue services, such as emergency or preventive care for uninsured individuals, countering claims of broad continuity by channeling resources toward profitable insured cohorts. This selective orientation, rooted in IDS economic incentives, perpetuates access inequities without verifiable offsets in overall population coverage.

Major Examples

Pioneer Systems like Kaiser Permanente

Kaiser Permanente, established in 1945 by industrialist Henry J. Kaiser and physician Sidney R. Garfield, pioneered the staff-model health maintenance organization (HMO) as a fully integrated payer-provider system, combining prepaid health insurance with direct ownership of hospitals and employment of physicians to deliver care exclusively to its members. This structure emphasizes coordinated care through salaried providers incentivized via capitation rather than fee-for-service, operating across eight states and Washington, D.C., with approximately 12.6 million members as of 2024. The model's foundational premise relies on aligning financial incentives with preventive and efficient care delivery, reducing fragmentation inherent in traditional third-party payer systems. Operationally, Kaiser maintains a closed network comprising 40 hospitals and over 600 medical offices and clinics, where members receive all primary, specialty, and hospital services from Permanente Medical Groups' employed physicians, limiting external referrals to preserve integration and cost controls. Early adoption of electronic health records (EHR) systems, including paperless charting introduced in Northern California in 1993 and the comprehensive KP HealthConnect platform rolled out from 2004 to 2010 using Epic software, enabled seamless data sharing across ambulatory and inpatient settings, facilitating real-time clinical decision-making and population-level analytics. Empirical evidence from comparative studies indicates that such staff-model HMOs achieve per-enrollee costs 10-40% lower than fee-for-service Medicare, attributable to reduced administrative overhead and emphasis on ambulatory over inpatient care, though exact margins vary by region and era. Kaiser's track record includes consistent high performance in preventive care metrics, with its medical groups ranking first nationally in 2024 Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) measures for screenings, immunizations, and chronic disease management, outperforming the 90th percentile benchmarks. This outperformance stems from integrated data enabling proactive interventions, such as automated reminders and embedded care coordinators. However, the staff-model's closed-panel design restricts patient choice to in-network providers, potentially deterring those preferring broader options and complicating care for members relocating outside operational regions, as evidenced by patient satisfaction surveys highlighting access constraints in non-core areas.

Large-Scale For-Profit Networks

Large-scale for-profit integrated delivery networks (IDNs) in the United States prioritize operational scale to deliver high-acuity inpatient and surgical services, often achieving dominance in regional markets through aggressive expansion. HCA Healthcare exemplifies this model, operating 186 hospitals and approximately 2,400 ambulatory sites as of December 2023, with net patient revenue reaching $56.3 billion in the same year. These networks integrate hospital facilities with physician practices and outpatient centers to streamline high-volume procedures, such as inpatient surgeries, which comprised a significant portion of HCA's case volume in 2023. Empirical growth for these entities has been driven by mergers and acquisitions, particularly in the 2010s, when HCA and similar chains pursued numerous deals to consolidate facilities in high-demand regions like the Southeast and Florida. This strategy enabled HCA to secure the leading or second-leading inpatient market share in approximately 80% of its operational markets by 2023. For-profit chains leverage centralized management to focus on revenue-generating services, including emergency and acute care, which support their scale advantages over smaller providers. While such networks demonstrate enhanced operational efficiency— with for-profit hospitals generally outperforming peers in expense management and productivity metrics due to profit incentives— they encounter trade-offs in market power. HCA has faced multiple antitrust challenges, including lawsuits alleging post-acquisition price hikes and reduced competition in local markets, as seen in federal and state actions in North Carolina following its 2019 purchase of Mission Health. These dynamics highlight how scale fosters internal efficiencies but invites regulatory scrutiny over potential consumer costs.

Regional and Specialized IDNs

Regional integrated delivery networks (IDNs) and specialized variants prioritize localized service delivery within defined geographic boundaries or clinical niches, fostering adaptations such as enhanced coordination for rural populations or subspecialty protocols that diverge from broader national models. These systems often integrate hospitals, clinics, and outpatient services to address regional demographics, yielding empirical outcomes like improved continuity in community settings versus targeted advancements in high-acuity fields. Variations emerge between purely community-oriented IDNs, which emphasize accessible primary care in underserved areas, and academic hybrids that embed research to refine subspecialty interventions, though both must navigate local regulatory and payer dynamics. The Mayo Clinic operates as a non-profit regional IDN centered on Minnesota with extensions into Iowa and Wisconsin, drawing over half its Rochester campus patients from a 120-mile radius across these states to enable integrated care pathways.63152-2/fulltext) Its model fuses clinical operations with research, as reflected in its mission of advancing health through combined practice, education, and discovery, supporting system-wide mortality reductions from 1.78 to 1.53 per 100 admissions between late 2015 and 2017 via multicomponent interventions. Holding dominant regional influence as Minnesota's largest employer with 57,000 workers and $3.3 billion in net patient revenue for its top facility, Mayo exemplifies academic hybridization yielding lower-than-expected adverse events in diverse subspecialties. Cleveland Clinic illustrates a specialized IDN with emphasis on cardiology, securing the world's top ranking for cardiac surgery and demonstrating zero mortality across more than 4,500 mitral valve procedures. Predominantly serving Northeast Ohio, where it commands the market as the state's highest-revenue hospital system at $6.04 billion in net patient revenue, the network has maintained declining mortality trends in adult cardiac surgeries over 18 years, with observed rates often below national predictions for procedures like thoracic interventions. This focus drives subspecialty excellence, such as superior post-operative survival in ischemic heart disease cases, contrasting with more generalized regional IDNs by prioritizing volume-driven expertise in high-risk domains.

Recent Developments and Future Trends

Participation in Value-Based Programs (2020s)

In the early 2020s, integrated delivery systems (IDSs) deepened involvement in value-based reimbursement programs, particularly Medicare's Accountable Care Organization (ACO) models under the Shared Savings Program (MSSP), as federal policies incentivized a transition from fee-for-service payments rewarding volume to arrangements tying reimbursements to cost efficiency and quality outcomes. Large IDSs—defined by high revenue and extensive affiliations—exhibited participation rates of 90-95% in Medicare ACOs from 2020 to 2022, often sponsoring multiple entities, with an average of 5.2 ACOs per large system by 2022; overall IDS engagement in ACOs rose to 71.3% by 2022, reflecting consolidation and regulatory pressures rather than organic market dynamics alone. By performance year 2024, the MSSP encompassed 480 ACOs serving 10.8 million beneficiaries, with 75% earning shared savings payments totaling $4.1 billion and netting $2.4 billion in Medicare savings—a record amid variable per-ACO results influenced by benchmark adjustments and care coordination challenges. IDS-affiliated ACOs contributed substantially, though empirical data indicate lower average savings per beneficiary ($328 annually for large IDS-involved ACOs versus $541 for non-IDS ACOs across 2016-2022), potentially due to scale-related coordination frictions in integrated networks. Adoption of risk-bearing arrangements accelerated, with 67% of MSSP ACOs in two-sided risk tracks by 2024, exposing participants to downside financial liability for excess costs; for large IDSs, 63.8% of affiliated ACOs operated under such models by 2022, lower than the 80.5% rate for non-IDS ACOs, highlighting uneven progression toward full accountability amid policy mandates like mandatory participation pathways. This policy-driven shift, evidenced by CMS track options and waiver provisions, prioritizes incentivized risk assumption over unprompted efficiency gains, yielding quality scores above 84% across IDS-involved ACOs but inconsistent net savings.

Adoption of AI, Telehealth, and Digital Tools

Integrated delivery networks (IDNs) have accelerated the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) for predictive analytics in 2024-2025, particularly to forecast patient readmission risks and optimize resource allocation. By 2024, 71% of non-federal acute-care hospitals, many operating within IDN frameworks, reported using predictive AI embedded in electronic health records (EHRs) to identify high-risk discharges. This adoption supports targeted interventions, with AI models demonstrating potential to reduce readmission rates by 15-20% through data-driven risk stratification. Overall, 88% of health systems, including IDNs, employed AI internally by mid-2025, focusing on operational enhancements like triage and pattern recognition in large datasets, though only 18% had established mature governance structures to manage implementation risks. Telehealth adoption within IDNs has sustained post-COVID momentum, with virtual platforms embedded into coordinated care models to extend access across networked facilities. In 2024, telehealth accounted for 22% of non-emergency medical visits related to mental health diagnoses in integrated settings, reflecting IDNs' emphasis on scalable remote monitoring and follow-up. AI augmentation of telehealth, such as chatbots for initial patient triage and scheduling, has further streamlined workflows, enabling preliminary assessments that reduce provider workload without compromising accuracy. Digital tools, including AI-enhanced interoperability standards, have bolstered IDNs' data exchange capabilities in 2024-2025, aligning with federal priorities for seamless health information networks. The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) documented advancements in nationwide interoperability, facilitating IDNs' integration of disparate provider data for real-time analytics. These tools yield efficiency gains, such as improved diagnostic precision in remote consultations and reduced administrative burdens through automated decision support, though empirical outcomes vary by system maturity.

Market Growth Projections to 2034

The U.S. integrated delivery network (IDN) market is forecasted to expand from USD 25.7 billion in 2025 to USD 67.1 billion by 2034, achieving a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 11.3%. This trajectory reflects sustained demand for coordinated care models amid rising healthcare expenditures and provider integration. Globally, the IDN market is projected to grow from USD 13.41 billion in 2025 to USD 34.05 billion by 2034, at a CAGR of 10.91%, driven primarily by North American dominance, which accounted for 40% of revenue share in 2024. Key drivers include ongoing consolidation, enabling economies of scale and enhanced negotiating power with payers. As of April 2024, over 1,100 active IDNs operated across the U.S., with notable regional concentrations in states like California, Texas, and New York facilitating localized network expansions. These networks' growth in scale supports projections, as larger IDNs capture higher market shares through mergers and affiliations, correlating with empirical increases in net patient revenue for top performers exceeding $50 billion annually. However, regulatory pushback against further mergers, including heightened antitrust reviews, could moderate the pace of consolidation and influence long-term growth rates. Market analysts from firms like Global Market Insights emphasize that while economic incentives favor integration, external constraints may cap aggressive expansion in saturated regions.

Broader Impacts

Economic and Market Effects

Integrated delivery systems (IDNs) collectively represent a substantial portion of U.S. healthcare expenditures, with the IDN market valued at $1.92 trillion in 2023, comprising roughly 40% of total national health spending estimated at $4.8 trillion that year. Leading IDNs, such as HCA Healthcare, drive this scale through revenue growth, reporting $64.97 billion in 2023—a 7.86% increase from 2022—fueled by acquisitions and operational expansions across 182 hospitals. This concentration enables IDNs to influence pricing negotiations with payers, where empirical analyses indicate that hospital consolidations correlate with price markups of 6% to 10% in affected markets, as bargaining power shifts toward fewer, larger entities. Market dynamics have trended toward oligopolistic structures, with the top 10 IDNs— including HCA, Kaiser Permanente, and Ascension—commanding significant shares through mergers that reduce the number of independent providers. For instance, IDN affiliations encompass 40% to 70% of U.S. providers and facilities, amplifying their leverage in regional markets where consolidation has led to higher per capita spending without commensurate cost reductions. While proponents argue scale yields efficiencies like centralized purchasing, rigorous studies find scant evidence of net cost savings, with post-merger price hikes often outpacing any administrative gains, contributing to overall spending inflation. These effects manifest in broader economic pressures, as IDN-driven consolidation correlates with elevated commercial insurance premiums—up to 15% in highly concentrated areas—passed to employers and consumers, exacerbating the U.S. system's high-cost profile relative to peers. HCA's sustained dominance, with projected 2025 revenues of $75-76.5 billion, underscores how for-profit IDNs prioritize revenue growth amid fragmentation, where competition erodes but fixed costs and pricing power persist. Trade-offs between reduced rivalry and operational scale thus favor incumbents, empirically tilting markets toward higher expenditures over competitive restraint.

Policy and Regulatory Influences

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), enacted in 2010, promoted the formation of Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) to foster integrated delivery systems (IDS) through shared savings incentives tied to quality and cost metrics, accelerating provider consolidations as hospitals and physicians aligned to participate in Medicare's Shared Savings Program. This policy-driven push, while aiming to replicate successful models like Kaiser Permanente, facilitated market concentration by encouraging mergers that reduced competition, with hospital system consolidations rising post-2010 amid ACO incentives. In response, the Department of Justice (DOJ) intensified antitrust enforcement in the 2020s, launching probes into nonprofit health systems for potential anticompetitive practices and challenging mergers like UnitedHealth Group's acquisition of Amedisys, which required divestitures of over 160 facilities to preserve competition. Empirical evidence links these regulatory influences to cost distortions, particularly in (MA) programs where IDS affiliations enable higher reimbursements; federal spending per MA enrollee exceeded traditional Medicare benchmarks by an average of $321 in 2019, contributing to overpayments estimated at $84 billion annually by 2025, partly due to risk adjustment practices favoring integrated networks. Such policy-induced shifts, including ACO waivers from certain antitrust , have empirically raised overall spending by incentivizing upcoding and narrower networks rather than gains, with MA penetration correlating to 5-10% higher per-enrollee costs in some analyses when adjusted for selection effects. Advocacy for market-based reforms emphasizes reducing mandates like ACO participation requirements in favor of deregulating barriers to entry, such as certificate-of-need laws, to counteract government-driven consolidation without relying on antitrust interventions that overlook underlying payment distortions. This perspective counters overstated dependence on regulation by noting that 1990s IDS expansions, which saw widespread formations but majority failures due to mismanagement and misaligned incentives, stemmed from private sector overreach absent heavy mandates, underscoring that causal failures often trace to execution flaws rather than regulatory voids.

References

  1. [1]
    Integrated Delivery System - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Integrated Delivery System ... Integrated delivery systems refer to healthcare organizations that unite financing groups with physicians and allied providers, ...
  2. [2]
    Delivery System Integration - The Healthcare Imperative - NCBI - NIH
    It could be formed from an integrated delivery system, a physician-hospital ... The defining characteristic of ACOs is that a set of physicians and a hospital ...
  3. [3]
    [PDF] integrated delivery networks - iqvia
    Examples of provider networks include Joslin Diabetes. Center and Texas Oncology. Some familiar IDNs include The Mayo Clinic, The Cleveland Clinic, Partners.
  4. [4]
    The performance of integrated delivery systems | AcademyHealth
    Jul 20, 2016 · There is growing evidence that hospital-physician integration has raised physician costs, hospital prices and per capita medical care spending.
  5. [5]
    IDN Healthcare | What is an Integrated Delivery Network?
    System III networks offer care that allows patients to stay within the integrated delivery system throughout their lives, from pediatric care to geriatric care ...
  6. [6]
    [PDF] Integrated Delivery Networks: - National Academy of Social Insurance
    Under claimed provider rationales for IDN formation, the principal advantages are improved effi- ciency (presumably translating into better operating ...Missing: disadvantages | Show results with:disadvantages
  7. [7]
    [PDF] Integrated Delivery System (IDS) Participation in Medicare ...
    Aug 8, 2025 · Abbreviations: IDS, integrated delivery system. * One of four systems added to the list of large IDSs based on being acquired by or ...
  8. [8]
    [PDF] Integrated Health Care - Literature Review
    Varied definitions of IDS are provided in Table 1. Table 1. Definitions of Integrated Delivery System (IDS). An organized, coordinated and collaborative ...<|separator|>
  9. [9]
    The New World of Managed Care: Creating Organized Delivery ...
    The model integrated delivery system shown in Exhibit 1 depicts a defined or enrolled population that has insurance coverage for a predetermined set of benefits ...
  10. [10]
    Inappropriate Laboratory Testing: Significant Waste Quantified by a ...
    Jun 6, 2024 · A meta-analysis of laboratory test utilization studies ending in 2012 estimated 10%–30% of lab tests were unnecessary,5 which extrapolates to a ...Missing: fragmentation | Show results with:fragmentation
  11. [11]
    Integrated Delivery Systems: The Cure for Fragmentation | AJMC
    Evidence suggests that IDSs can improve healthcare quality, improve outcomes, and reduce costs-especially for patients with complex needs-if properly ...
  12. [12]
    Integrated Delivery Network | What is an IDN? - Definitive Healthcare
    An example of a system III IDN is HCA Healthcare. This large IDN includes 214 hospital locations. Other system components include but are not limited to ...
  13. [13]
    [PDF] n. integrated delivery systems - IRS
    Integrated delivery systems (IDS) are alliances of medical facilities and practitioners, managed by a central organization, integrating hospital and outpatient ...
  14. [14]
    [PDF] The Changing Landscape of the U.S. Health Care System - RAND
    May 17, 2023 · 8 By 2017, in most markets, a single hospital system had more than a 50-percent market share of hospital discharges,9 reducing competition.
  15. [15]
    Top IDNs by Net Patient Revenue - Definitive Healthcare
    Jul 18, 2025 · An IDN may include facilities such as hospitals, physician groups, clinics, ambulatory surgery centers, and imaging centers, to name a few.
  16. [16]
    Is Bigger Better? A Closer Look at Small Health Systems in the ... - NIH
    The number of both small and large systems increased from 2013–2017. Small systems had a larger share of practice sites (43.1% versus 11.7% for large systems in ...
  17. [17]
    Horizontal and Vertical Integration of Health Care Providers
    Jan 20, 2020 · We distinguish between structures characterized by the horizontal integration of providers delivering similar services and the vertical integration of ...
  18. [18]
    What is an Integrated Delivery Network? - Trella Health
    May 11, 2022 · What is an example of an IDN? ... Some of the most well-known integrated delivery networks include The Mayo Clinic, The Cleveland Clinic, Memorial ...
  19. [19]
    The Impact of Health Insurer Acquisitions of Physician Practices on ...
    Aug 5, 2025 · ... Optum—the nation's largest payvider (vertically integrated payer-provider)—from 2007 to 2023. These data were integrated with non-UHG ...Missing: IDS | Show results with:IDS
  20. [20]
    How Kaiser Permanente Evolved
    Oct 17, 2023 · They co-founded Kaiser Permanente in 1945 and introduced a revolutionary health care model. One that integrated preventive and evidence-based ...
  21. [21]
    [PDF] HISTORY OF HEALTH INSURANCE IN THE UNITED STATES
    Early Growth of Health Insurance: The 1940s and 1950s. Private health insurance grew rapidly during the 1940s and 1950s, but obtaining accurate measures of ...
  22. [22]
    A History of Leading the Way - Kaiser Permanente
    Kaiser partnered closely with founding physician Sidney R. Garfield, MD, to open their proven system of prepaid care to the public in Northern California.
  23. [23]
    Group Health Cooperative, Part 7: New Beginnings, Old Challenges ...
    Aug 9, 2007 · The health care visionaries who founded Group Health Cooperative in Seattle in 1945 were activists in the farmers' grange movement, ...
  24. [24]
    World War II – The Greatest Health Care Change of All Time - MSATP
    World War II gave birth to the private health care market. In 1942, Congress passed the Stabilization Act of 1942 freezing wages and salaries for workers.<|control11|><|separator|>
  25. [25]
    Henry J. Kaiser: America's Health Care Visionary
    May 3, 2024 · In co-founding Kaiser Permanente, he helped transform American health care systems and care delivery. Henry J. Kaiser stands atop a ship in 1942 ...
  26. [26]
    Must Good HMOs Go Bad? — The Commercialization of Prepaid ...
    May 21, 1998 · Prepaid group health care began in the 1940s as an insurgent, even radical form of medicine. At the time, few Americans had health insurance.<|separator|>
  27. [27]
    Health maintenance organization environments in the 1980s ... - NIH
    Rising health benefit costs in the private sector increased business involvement in HMOs in the early 1980s.
  28. [28]
    Managed Care — A Look Back and a Look Ahead
    Apr 3, 1997 · The growth of managed care became rapid only after large corporations decided that they had to bring their steeply rising costs for health ...
  29. [29]
    Revisiting the Relationship between Managed Care and Hospital ...
    This paper analyzes whether the rise in managed care during the 1990s caused the increase in hospital concentration.
  30. [30]
    Trends In Hospital Consolidation: The Formation Of Local Systems
    Aug 7, 2025 · 1990s and highlights recent research that addresses this topic. Trends In Hospital Consolidation. The number of mergers peaked in 1996 at 152 ...
  31. [31]
    [PDF] Change, Consolidation, and Competition in Health Care Markets
    From 1985 to 1995, the number of hospitals fell by 9 percent, from 5,732 to 5,194, and the number of hospital beds fell by 13 percent, from 1 million to ...
  32. [32]
    [PDF] Hospital Alignment with Physicians as a Bargaining Response to ...
    By 1996, approximately 55% of hospitals were aligned with physicians in the form of physician-hospital organizations (PHO) or management services organizations ...
  33. [33]
    The Managed Care Backlash - jstor
    Unhappy physicians contribute to the managed care backlash, and many of ... The im- plication was that corporate medicine would retaliate against critics.
  34. [34]
    [PDF] From Hero to Goat: Managed Care in the 1990s
    Apr 10, 2003 · Managed care in the 1990s saw payors influence spending, control premiums, and led to provider integration, but was seen as interfering with  ...
  35. [35]
    Physician Practices: Background, Organization, and Market ...
    Jan 2, 2013 · During the 1990s, some hospitals found that physician productivity declined after practices were purchased by hospitals. Merritt Hawkins data ...
  36. [36]
    Vertical Integration of Physicians and Hospitals (Chapter 6)
    ... 1990s were characterized by dissolution of many systems and physician-hospital contracts. ... How physicians' organizations compete: Protectionism and efficiency.<|separator|>
  37. [37]
    The End of an Era: What Became of the “Managed Care Revolution ...
    Since the mid-1990s, managed care has developed differently than expected in local health care markets nationally. Three key developments shaped health care ...
  38. [38]
    How the ACA Will Change the Health Care Delivery System - NCBI
    Affordable Care Act payment reforms are changing the emphasis from volume-driven to value-driven reimbursement based on meaningful outcomes measurements, ...Missing: revival post-
  39. [39]
    561 ACOs Participating in Medicare Shared Savings Program in 2018
    Jan 24, 2018 · According to CMS, there are 124 new ACOs, 65 ACOs that renewed their contracts, and 372 that are continuing the program but are not up for ...
  40. [40]
    ACOs and the Future of Health Care - NAACOS
    As of 2020, there are 558 Medicare ACOs serving more than 12 million Medicare beneficiaries. That is roughly 20 percent of Medicare beneficiaries making the ...<|separator|>
  41. [41]
    Medicare Accountable Care Organizations: Past Performance and ...
    Apr 16, 2024 · This Congressional Budget Office report summarizes recent research findings about Medicare accountable care organizations (ACOs)
  42. [42]
    Hospital Mergers and Acquisitions From 2010 to 2019 - NIH
    May 12, 2025 · We analyzed 1537 M&A‐related ownership changes from 2010 to 2019 from our analytic sample of 4896 unique acute care general hospitals or ...
  43. [43]
    Understanding Mergers Between Hospitals and Health Systems in ...
    Aug 23, 2023 · For example, according to one study, about 1,500 hospitals were targeted as part of a completed merger or acquisition from 2010 through 2019 ...
  44. [44]
    [PDF] Is There Too Little Antitrust Enforcement in the US Hospital Sector?
    There were over 1,000 hospital mergers from 2002 to 2020. During that period, the ftc only took enforcement action against 13 transactions.
  45. [45]
    Is There Too Little Antitrust Enforcement in the US Hospital Sector?
    We show that, from 2010 to 2015, predictably anticompetitive mergers resulted in price increases over 5 percent.
  46. [46]
    States with strong antitrust laws challenge more hospital mergers ...
    Dec 8, 2021 · Across the 862 mergers proposed during the 2010s, 42 (4.9%) were challenged by states and the Federal Trade Commission, and 35 (4.1%) of those ...
  47. [47]
    How the Affordable Care Act Fuels Health Care Market Consolidation
    Aug 1, 2014 · It strengthens incentives for hospital systems to buy up independent medical practices and surgery centers, weakens the competitive ...
  48. [48]
    Do hospital mergers reduce costs? - ScienceDirect.com
    According to the healthcare market intelligence firm Irving Levin, there were nearly 900 announced hospital mergers and acquisitions1 (M&A) between 2000 and ...
  49. [49]
    ACOs' Strategies for Transitioning to Value-Based Care - OIG
    Jul 19, 2019 · These strategies involve working to increase cost awareness in ACO physicians, engaging beneficiaries to improve their own health, and managing ...Missing: shift distortions subsidies
  50. [50]
    Value-Based Care, Part 1: A Lucrative Business Strategy Disguised ...
    Value-based care does not create value for the ultimate payer but simply allows that ultimate payer to cap its financial exposure.
  51. [51]
    Primary care gatekeeping and referrals: effective filter or failed ... - NIH
    This article discusses the concept of gatekeeping, contrasts the processes of referral to specialists in the United States and the United Kingdom.
  52. [52]
    Leaving Gatekeeping Behind — Effects of Opening Access to ...
    Gatekeeping refers to the prior approval of referrals to specialists by a primary care physician. Although many health plans view gatekeeping as an ...
  53. [53]
    Strategy 4: Care Transitions From Hospital to Home: IDEAL ... - AHRQ
    Strategy 4: Care Transitions From Hospital to Home: IDEAL Discharge Planning · Describe what life at home will be like · Review medications · Highlight warning ...
  54. [54]
    Transitional Care Strategies From Hospital to Home - NIH
    The basic elements of a successful transitional care strategy include patient engagement, use of a dedicated transitions provider, medication management ( ...
  55. [55]
    Effects of multidisciplinary teamwork in non-hospital settings on ...
    Apr 15, 2025 · Multidisciplinary teamwork can improve patient-reported outcomes for patients with chronic conditions in non-hospital settings.
  56. [56]
    Care Coordination | Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
    Care coordination involves organizing patient care and sharing information to achieve safer, more effective care, meeting patient needs and preferences.
  57. [57]
    Improving Medication Reconciliation with Comprehensive ...
    Jun 11, 2021 · Unintentional medication discrepancies in hospitals are common, ranging from approximately 50% on admission to 70% on discharge, with more than ...
  58. [58]
    Can Vertical Integration Reduce Hospital Readmissions? A... - LWW
    By merging health care providers of different levels into a single unit,4 vertical integration is a means to reduce fragmentation of care and its negative ...Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
  59. [59]
    Is There an Ideal Payment Model That Enables Integrated Care - NIH
    Nov 22, 2024 · In the realm of integrated care, various payment models have been promulgated including global budgets, shared/bundled payment models, and capitation.
  60. [60]
    What is an Integrated Delivery System? - MMIT
    The goal of an IDS is to improve the quality, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness of care by integrating various aspects of healthcare delivery. Key Features ...
  61. [61]
    [PDF] AND BUNDLED PAYMENT MODELS: - American College of Surgeons
    A related issue is that bundled payments tend to be most effective in integrated delivery systems, where it is easier to align incentives across providers.
  62. [62]
    [PDF] Capitated Payments - Center For Evidence-Based Policy
    A capitation payment is a fixed dollar amount paid per member over a set period of time (per-member-per-month is the most common approach) to cover a ...
  63. [63]
    The Case for Capitation - Harvard Business Review
    Bundled payment systems, however, spur patients to seek out highly specialized groups that treat only one disease and its related conditions. Finally ...
  64. [64]
    Bundled Payments - CMS
    Jan 7, 2025 · Defining key terms:Bundled Payment: A single payment for the combined cost of eligible services and supplies – like treatments, tests, ...
  65. [65]
    Will Bundled Payments Change Health Care? Examining the ... - NIH
    Bundled payments have the potential to substantially improve care coordination and generate savings for cardiovascular care.
  66. [66]
    42 CFR Part 425 -- Medicare Shared Savings Program - eCFR
    This part implements section 1899 of the Act by establishing a shared savings program that promotes accountability for a patient population.
  67. [67]
    [PDF] ACCOUNTABLE CARE ORGANIZATION PAYMENT SYSTEMS
    There are currently two major Medicare ACO programs. The first, the Medicare Shared. Savings Program (MSSP), is a permanent part of the Medicare program. It was ...
  68. [68]
    Financial Performance of Accountable Care Organizations: A 5-Year ...
    Results: ACOs' earned shared savings grew annually by 35%, while the proportions of ACOs with positive shared savings grew by 21%. For 1-year increase in ACO ...
  69. [69]
    Highlights of the 2020 Medicare ACO Program Results - NAACOS
    In 2020, Medicare ACOs generated $4.8B gross savings, $2.1B net savings, with 83% of MSSP ACOs saving money, and a 97.8% average quality score.
  70. [70]
    Determinants of Success in Shared Savings Programs - NIH
    Among ACOs realizing savings, 86 (45%) ACOs received a total of $316 million in bonuses. Despite this wide variation in performance and savings across ACOs, ...
  71. [71]
    Epic sees largest net gain in EHR market share in 2024: KLAS
    May 2, 2025 · The company now has a 22.9% share of the acute care hospital EHR market, down from 23.4% a year prior, according to KLAS' estimates. Cerner's ...
  72. [72]
    Mind the Gap: The Potential of Alternative Health Information ... - NIH
    Enterprise HIE facilitates information exchange within an integrated delivery system or set of close partners. Similarly, electronic health record (EHR) ...
  73. [73]
    The effect of predictive analytics-driven interventions on healthcare ...
    We find evidence that predictive analytics-driven interventions directed at high-risk individuals reduced emergency room and specialist visits, yet not ...Missing: IDS | Show results with:IDS
  74. [74]
    Interoperability and Methods of Exchange among Hospitals in 2021
    This data brief presents the state of interoperability among hospitals, as of 2021. We present trends on information exchange and the availability and use of ...Missing: fragmented | Show results with:fragmented
  75. [75]
    Interoperable Exchange of Patient Health Information Among U.S. ...
    May 1, 2024 · In 2023, 70% of hospitals engaged in all four domains of interoperable exchange, maintaining the same level from 2022 to 2023.Missing: fragmented | Show results with:fragmented
  76. [76]
    Cost and effects of integrated care: a systematic literature review ...
    Jul 6, 2020 · Our findings suggest that integrated care is likely to reduce cost and improve outcome. However, existing evidence varies largely and is of moderate quality.
  77. [77]
    An empirical investigation of the efficiency effects of integrated care ...
    Jan 13, 2012 · The estimated results after the multivariate adjustment revealed cost savings of 15–19% due to the family doctor model. Beck [18] intensely ...
  78. [78]
    Could Kaiser Permanente's Low-Cost Health Care Be Even Cheaper?
    Jun 25, 2012 · Recent Medicare data show all but one of Kaiser's hospitals cost significantly less than the national average. And the company's electronic ...
  79. [79]
    The Benefits of Implementing an Integrated Procurement System
    Bulk Purchasing: Consolidating purchases through an integrated system allows for bulk purchasing, which can lead to volume discounts and reduced costs.
  80. [80]
    [PDF] Understanding Integrated Rural Health Networks
    They found that rural hospital networks are a popular, low-cost strategy for dealing with an uncertain environment. Network survival is enhanced by the mutual ...
  81. [81]
    HEDIS report confirms Kaiser Permanente's nation-leading care
    Aug 25, 2025 · The report shows Kaiser Permanente is the highest-performing health care organization in the U.S. for 69 care measures, including: Adult ...
  82. [82]
    Exceptional care | Kaiser Permanente
    Compared to the national average, Kaiser Permanente's screening rates are 12% higher for breast cancer, 10% higher for cervical cancer, and 20% higher for ...
  83. [83]
    [PDF] GAO-11-49 Health Care Delivery: Features of Integrated Systems ...
    Nov 16, 2010 · Enthoven, “Integrated Delivery Systems: The Cure for Fragmentation ... well-child care, immunizations, and chronic disease management.<|separator|>
  84. [84]
    Can Vertical Integration Reduce Hospital Readmissions? A ...
    Apr 13, 2017 · Our results suggest that readmissions decreased overall after vertical integration [odds ratio (OR)=0.900; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.812–0.997].
  85. [85]
    One or Two Health Systems Controlled the Entire Market for ... - KFF
    Oct 1, 2024 · A substantial body of evidence has found that consolidation can contribute to higher prices, with unclear effects on quality. This analysis ...
  86. [86]
    https://docs.house.gov/meetings/IF/IF02/20180214/106855/HHRG-115-IF02-Wstate-GaynorM-20180214.pdf
  87. [87]
    Federal Antitrust Enforcement in Health Care - NIHCM Foundation
    This horizontal merger of Nampa-based physicians was part of St. Luke's strategy of creating the region's largest vertically integrated delivery system. In ...<|separator|>
  88. [88]
    Antitrust Issues in Integrated Health Care Delivery Systems
    Good afternoon. It is a pleasure to be here today to discuss the antitrust analysis of physician networks and other integrated delivery systems.
  89. [89]
    The True Price of Reduced Competition in Health Care: Hospital ...
    Mar 14, 2016 · New study reveals the potential damage of the merger frenzy that has accelerated in recent years. hospital monopolies Zack Cooper.Missing: waivers oligopolies<|separator|>
  90. [90]
    Price Effects of Vertical Integration and Joint Contracting ... - NIH
    Jun 8, 2023 · We found that vertical integration and joint contracting led to price increases of 2.1%–12.0% for primary care physicians and 0.7%–6.0% for specialists.
  91. [91]
    Hospital Pricing Following Integration with Physician Practices
    We find a robust 3–5% increase in hospital prices following integration. There is little indication that hospital quality is commensurately higher.Missing: hikes | Show results with:hikes
  92. [92]
    Price Effects Of Vertical Integration And Joint Contracting Between ...
    We found that vertical integration and joint contracting led to price increases from 2013 to 2017, from 2.1 percent to 12.0 percent for primary care physicians.
  93. [93]
    The effect of hospital‐physician integration on hospital costs
    Aug 10, 2022 · The results in this paper show that hospital costs increase by one to three percent after hospital-physician integration.
  94. [94]
    The Association between Hospital-Physician Vertical Integration and ...
    A 10-percentage-point increase in vertical integration was associated with a 1.0% price increase for primary care, a 0.6% increase for orthopedics, and a 0.5% ...
  95. [95]
    the Actual Financial Performance of Accountable Care Organizations
    Recent ACO assessments conclude that 2019 net savings are minimal despite selection and attrition bias (greater drop-out of ACOs that failed to achieve savings) ...Missing: majority | Show results with:majority
  96. [96]
    Medicare ACOs Increased Spending Contrary to Projections
    Mar 29, 2018 · Avalere's research shows that the actual ACO net savings have fallen short of initial CBO projections by more than $2 billion.Missing: majority no
  97. [97]
    ACOs Earn $3.1 Billion, Medicare Saves $2.1 Billion: CLA
    Nov 19, 2024 · For performance year 2023, 69% of participating ACOs, or 313, achieved savings. Those savings ranged from $157,000 to more than $101 million.
  98. [98]
    Accountable care organizations may have difficulty avoiding the ...
    Accountable care organizations may have difficulty avoiding the failures of integrated delivery networks of the 1990s · Authors · Affiliation.
  99. [99]
    Participation and attrition in the Medicare Shared Savings Program
    Apr 1, 2025 · Results. The total number of MSSP ACOs grew from 114 in 2012 to 548 in 2018 and then gradually fell to 480 in 2024 (Figure 1A).
  100. [100]
    A Mixed Diagnosis for HMOs : They strongly deny rationing care, but ...
    Aug 27, 1995 · COLUMN ONE : A Mixed Diagnosis for HMOs : They strongly deny rationing care, but Times study finds they withhold some services from sicker ...Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
  101. [101]
    A closer look at the managed care backlash - PubMed
    Abstract. Background: Much anecdotal evidence exists regarding the managed care backlash of the late 1990s, but limited empirical evidence is available.Missing: bashing | Show results with:bashing
  102. [102]
    Health care consolidation pushes up costs, but not quality
    Jan 2, 2025 · There were 26 studies that analyzed effects on quality of care and CMPs, and 20 (77%) of those found either no change or a decrease in quality.
  103. [103]
    [PDF] Addressing Healthcare Consolidation in the U.S.
    Research on mergers and acquisitions have shown mixed effects on its impact on quality. Some studies have shown a decline in patient experience post-acquisition ...
  104. [104]
    Profitability decline is forcing many rural hospitals to close or merge
    Jun 16, 2023 · Between 2010 and 2021, almost 140 rural hospitals closed. Additionally, about one-third of the rural hospitals still operating are unprofitable.
  105. [105]
    Rural Hospital Closures & Care-Access Crisis | 2025 State of the State
    Feb 10, 2025 · Access to inpatient care has disappeared in 182 rural communities since 2010. No metric has encapsulated the plight of rural hospitals since ...
  106. [106]
    Hospital Survival In Rural Markets: Closures, Mergers, And Profitability
    Apr 3, 2023 · A minority of unprofitable hospitals (7 percent) closed. A larger share (17 percent) merged, most commonly with organizations from outside of ...
  107. [107]
    Health Care Delivery: Features of Integrated Systems Support ...
    Nov 16, 2010 · Providers have formed integrated delivery systems (IDS) to improve efficiency, quality, and access. The Health Care Safety Net Act of 2008 ...
  108. [108]
    Impact of Hospital Consolidation on Outcomes, Quality, and Access
    Oct 5, 2023 · In her presentation, she summarized the evidence that consolidation increases commercial healthcare prices, with no positive effects on quality ...Missing: IDS | Show results with:IDS
  109. [109]
    Fast Facts | Kaiser Permanente
    Founded in 1945, Kaiser Permanente headquartered in ... Kaiser Permanente's history in the Pacific Northwest goes back to the medical group established ...
  110. [110]
    Our Model | Kaiser Permanente
    ... hospitals and 608 medical facilities. We serve 12.6 million people in ... Kaiser Permanente, and our model of a nonprofit health plan and hospital ...
  111. [111]
    An integrated EHR at Northern California Kaiser Permanente - NIH
    The first paperless charting and data systems went live at NCAL Kaiser Permanente in 1993. A comprehensive IBM DB2 Clinical Data Repository and a mainframe ...
  112. [112]
    [PDF] Kaiser Permanente: The Electronic Health Record Journey
    Implemented from 2004 to 2010 and using Epic Systems as a basis, KP HealthConnect… ▫ Includes both ambulatory and inpatient systems. ▫ Integrates billing, ...
  113. [113]
    The Rise and Fall of a Kaiser Permanente Expansion Region - PMC
    KP expanded to Hawaii in 1958 and a decade later established regions in Colorado (1969) and Ohio (1969). After the passage of the Health Maintenance ...
  114. [114]
    Kaiser Permanente Review - Healthcare Insider
    Sep 28, 2025 · Kaiser Permanente operates in 10 regions across 8 states and D.C., using a closed HMO model with Kaiser-employed providers and limited ...Missing: staff criticisms choice<|control11|><|separator|>
  115. [115]
    HCA Healthcare Reports Fourth Quarter 2023 Results and Provides ...
    Jan 30, 2024 · As of December 31, 2023, HCA operated 186 hospitals and approximately ... Number of Hospitals. 186. 182. 186. 182. Number of Freestanding ...
  116. [116]
    HCA outlines plans to expand market share by 2030 - Yahoo Finance
    Nov 10, 2023 · Already, HCA holds the most or second-most inpatient market share in about 80% of its markets, Foster said. Through expanding emergency services ...
  117. [117]
    For-profit hospitals as anchor institutions in the United States
    Dec 11, 2021 · Conclusions. Study findings suggest that for-profit hospitals operate more efficiently in terms of expenses, but this also may translate into a ...
  118. [118]
    HCA Healthcare must face antitrust case over health costs, US judge ...
    Feb 22, 2024 · The company in court papers had called the plaintiffs' claims “baseless” and said they only serve to "increase hospitals' cost of doing business ...Missing: premiums | Show results with:premiums
  119. [119]
    HCA Hit With Antitrust Suit Over High Prices - MedPage Today
    Aug 12, 2021 · Lawsuit focusing on Mission Health eyes past merger tactics, ignored price transparency rule.Missing: premiums | Show results with:premiums
  120. [120]
    Mission and values - Mayo Clinic
    Mission: Inspiring hope and promoting health through integrated clinical practice, education and research. Vision: Transforming medicine to connect and cure.
  121. [121]
    The Mayo Clinic Hospital Mortality Reduction Project - ResearchGate
    Between Q3, 2015, and Q4, 2017, system-wide mortality reduced from 1.78 to 1.53 (per 100 admissions; p = .01). The actual plan implemented in Mayo Clinic's ...Missing: subspecialty | Show results with:subspecialty
  122. [122]
    Mayo Clinic's $1.3B operating profit sets new yearly record
    Mar 5, 2025 · Mayo Clinic is Minnesota's largest employer, with about 57,000 workers in the state. Add in operations in Arizona, Florida, Iowa and Wisconsin, ...Missing: share | Show results with:share
  123. [123]
    Top 25 Minnesota hospitals by net patient revenue
    Jun 5, 2023 · The top 3 Minnesota hospitals by net patient revenue are Mayo Clinic ($3.3B), M Health Fairview ($1.7B), and Abbott Northwestern ($1.3B). The ...Missing: share | Show results with:share
  124. [124]
    Cleveland Clinic News and Notes
    Over the years, Cleveland Clinic surgeons have performed more than 4,500 mitral valve surgeries with a 0% mortality rate. Cleveland Clinic has been a pioneer in ...Missing: network | Show results with:network
  125. [125]
    Top 20 hospitals in Ohio ranked by net patient revenue
    Jan 9, 2023 · Non-profit Cleveland Clinic Main Campus in Cleveland had the highest net patient revenue among hospitals in Ohio, with nearly $6.04 billion.
  126. [126]
    Vital Statistics in Adult Cardiac Surgery, Include Valve and Aorta ...
    Mortality Remains Low Even as Volumes Rise. Over the past 18 years, mortality for adult cardiac surgery procedures at Cleveland Clinic has substantially trended ...Missing: integrated delivery network
  127. [127]
    Cardiac Surgery Outcomes: STS Star Rating and E15 Matrix Data Set
    The observed mortality for these operations at Cleveland Clinic are shown versus the predicted mortality rates across the country. The Society of Thoracic ...Missing: integrated delivery
  128. [128]
    Vital Stats in Adult Cardiac Surgery, Ischemic Heart Disease and ...
    Oct 21, 2022 · Check out this infographic-style recap of Cleveland Clinic's latest outcome and volume data in adult cardiac surgery, ischemic heart disease ...Missing: integrated delivery network
  129. [129]
    [PDF] Shared Savings Program Fast Facts – As of January 1, 2024 | CMS
    Percent. 31%. 69%. Page 2. Shared Savings Program Fast Facts – As of January 1, 2024. 2. Medicare Shared Savings Program ACO Assigned Beneficiary Population by ...
  130. [130]
    [PDF] Medicare Shared Savings Program Accountable Care Organizations ...
    Sep 29, 2025 · For Performance Year (PY) 2024, ACOs in the Shared Savings Program achieved the highest rates of shared savings since the inception of the ...
  131. [131]
    AI in Hospitals: 2025 Adoption Trends & Statistics | IntuitionLabs
    Oct 17, 2025 · Surveys indicate rapid uptake: by 2024, 71% of non-federal acute-care hospitals reported using predictive AI integrated into their electronic ...
  132. [132]
    AI Predictive Analytics in Healthcare: Cut Readmissions by 15-20%
    Apr 22, 2025 · Discover how AI predictive analytics in healthcare delivers 30-35% better outcomes and 90% diagnostic accuracy. Transform your data from ...Missing: IDNs | Show results with:IDNs
  133. [133]
    Health system adoption of AI outpaces internal governance and ...
    Aug 14, 2025 · 88% of health systems use AI internally, but only 18% have mature governance, and over 80% lack mature AI programs.
  134. [134]
    Mid-level Prescribers, Telehealth, and Digital Health Applications in ...
    Mar 7, 2025 · In 2024, non-emergency medical visits related to mental health or obesity diagnoses were conducted over telehealth 22% and 10% of the time, ...
  135. [135]
    Review article The impact of artificial intelligence on remote healthcare
    AI chatbots can be used in triaging patients' queries, in scheduling appointments, and some preliminary assessment. This enhances efficiency (Reddy et al., 2019) ...
  136. [136]
    ONC Reports on Progress on Advancing Nationwide, Trusted Health ...
    Apr 4, 2024 · ONC reports significant progress in the past year toward nationwide interoperability, and connecting nationwide, trusted HINs.
  137. [137]
    Integrating Artificial Intelligence Into Telemedicine - NIH
    Aug 23, 2025 · Overall, evidence from multiple specialties indicates that AI can enhance telemedicine by improving diagnostic accuracy, patient monitoring, and ...
  138. [138]
    U.S. Integrated Delivery Networks Market Size Report, 2034
    The US integrated delivery networks market size was valued at USD 23.6 billion. The market is expected to reach from USD 25.7 billion in 2025 to USD 67.1 ...
  139. [139]
    Integrated Delivery Network Market Size and Forecast 2025 to 2034
    Jun 4, 2025 · The global integrated delivery network market size accounted for USD 12.09 billion in 2024 and is predicted to increase from USD 13.41 billion ...
  140. [140]
    U.S. Integrated Delivery Network Market Size, Growth, Report 2024 ...
    Apr 25, 2024 · The U.S. integrated delivery network market size was valued at USD 1,442.20 billion in 2023 and is poised to exceed USD 3,774.84 billion by 2033 ...
  141. [141]
    U.S. Integrated Delivery Network Market Size | Report, 2030
    The U.S. integrated delivery network market size was estimated at USD 1.92 trillion in 2023 and is expected to expand at a CAGR of 10.25% from 2024 to 2030.
  142. [142]
    HCA Healthcare Revenue 2011-2025 - Macrotrends
    HCA Healthcare annual revenue for 2023 was $64.968B, a 7.86% increase from 2022. HCA Healthcare annual revenue for 2022 was $60.233B, a 2.52% increase from 2021 ...
  143. [143]
    An Examination of New Theories on Price Effects of Cross-Market ...
    Based on empirical tests of their theory, DH&L find price increases of 6% to 10% attributable to certain cross-market hospital mergers.Missing: studies | Show results with:studies
  144. [144]
    Top 10 largest health systems in the U.S.
    Apr 4, 2025 · The largest health system in the country is HCA Healthcare, with 220 hospitals in its network according to the most recent 12-month interval in ...Missing: inpatient | Show results with:inpatient
  145. [145]
    New evidence on the impacts of cross‐market hospital mergers on ...
    Apr 23, 2024 · Overall, this study provides further evidence that cross‐market hospital mergers lead to price increases and novel findings of no quality effect ...
  146. [146]
    Hospital Consolidation Continues to Boost Costs, Narrow Access ...
    Jan 19, 2023 · Consolidation has consistently produced higher care prices. Nevertheless in 2023, health care merger mania not only continues, but is expanding in increasingly ...
  147. [147]
    https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/hca-healthcare-beats-quarterly-estimates-strong-demand-medical-care-services-2025-10-24/
  148. [148]
    Who Pays for Rising Health Care Prices? Evidence from Hospital ...
    Jun 21, 2024 · Using exposure to hospital mergers as an instrument, we estimate that a 1% increase in health care prices lowers payroll and employment at non- ...
  149. [149]
    The Impact of the Payment and Delivery System Reforms of the ...
    Apr 28, 2022 · To reduce medical errors and prevent HACs, the ACA imposed a 1% financial penalty for hospitals in the top quartile for preventable HACs.Missing: revival | Show results with:revival
  150. [150]
    [PDF] Accountable Care Organizations and the Medicare Shared Savings ...
    Jan 27, 2025 · ACOs are modeled on integrated delivery systems such as the Mayo Clinic, Geisinger Health. System, Kaiser Permanente, and Intermountain ...Missing: push | Show results with:push<|separator|>
  151. [151]
    Accountable Care Organizations May Have Difficulty Avoiding The ...
    Accountable Care Organizations May Have Difficulty Avoiding The Failures Of Integrated Delivery Networks Of The 1990s · Lawton R. Burns and; Mark V. Pauly.Missing: unmanaged | Show results with:unmanaged
  152. [152]
    DOJ Launches Antitrust Probe Into Major Hospital Networks
    Jul 28, 2025 · The Department of Justice has formally launched an antitrust inquiry into hospital consolidation, targeting leading nonprofit health systems ...
  153. [153]
    Justice Department Requires Broad Divestitures to Resolve ...
    Aug 7, 2025 · Decree Would Require Divestiture of at Least 164 Home Health and Hospice Facilities; Impose $1.1M Civil Penalty for False Certification.Missing: delivery networks 2020s
  154. [154]
    Higher and Faster Growing Spending Per Medicare Advantage ...
    Aug 17, 2021 · This analysis finds that Medicare spending for Medicare Advantage enrollees was $321 higher per person in 2019 than if enrollees had instead ...
  155. [155]
    What 8 recent studies found about Medicare Advantage
    Jun 25, 2025 · The federal government will spend $84 billion more on Medicare Advantage enrollees than if they were enrolled in fee-for-service plans, ...<|separator|>
  156. [156]
    Growing divergence between Medicare Advantage plan bids and ...
    We found that divergent trends in benchmarks and bids are, in part, due to the increasing influence of payment adjustments, such as quartile spending ...Missing: IDN ties
  157. [157]
    Market Concentration in Health Care: Government Is the Problem ...
    Jul 19, 2022 · Such laws inhibit innovations including affordable primary care, interstate telehealth, and integrated delivery systems. The anti ...