Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Kolmogorov extension theorem

The Kolmogorov extension theorem is a foundational result in , named after Soviet mathematician Andrey Nikolaevich Kolmogorov, that establishes the existence and uniqueness of a on an infinite product of measurable spaces given a consistent family of finite-dimensional probability distributions. Formulated in Kolmogorov's seminal 1933 monograph Foundations of the Theory of Probability, the theorem provides the rigorous basis for constructing stochastic processes—such as , Markov chains, and Lévy processes—by specifying only their marginal distributions on finite subsets of the index set, thereby bridging finite probability calculations to infinite-dimensional sample spaces. In its classical form, applicable to real-valued processes indexed by the natural numbers, the theorem states that if a of Borel probability measures \{\mu_n\}_{n=1}^\infty on \mathbb{R}^n satisfies the condition \mu_{n+k}(E \times \mathbb{R}^k) = \mu_n(E) for all Borel sets E \subset \mathbb{R}^n and integers k \geq 1, then there exists a unique \mu on the product \sigma-algebra of \mathbb{R}^\mathbb{N} such that the finite-dimensional marginals of \mu coincide with the \mu_n. This ensures that projections onto finite coordinates align, preventing contradictions in the limiting measure. The proof relies on measure-theoretic tools like , adapted to infinite products, and guarantees that the resulting measure is defined on the canonical space of all sequences in \mathbb{R}^\mathbb{N}. More general versions of the theorem extend to arbitrary index sets T (possibly uncountable) and measurable spaces (X_t, \mathcal{A}_t), requiring additional conditions such as the existence of compact classes \mathcal{C}_t \subset \mathcal{A}_t to ensure tightness and prevent pathological counterexamples, like those constructed by and Jessen in 1948 showing consistent families without extensions in non-separable spaces. These broader formulations, often involving for , are crucial for processes on continuous time, such as processes. Beyond , the theorem underpins applications in fields like , where it justifies the existence of asset price paths, and , where it models infinite belief hierarchies in incomplete information settings.

Background Concepts

Finite-dimensional distributions

A stochastic process indexed by a set T is defined as a family of random variables \{X_t : t \in T\} taking values in \mathbb{R}, each defined on a common probability space (\Omega, \mathcal{F}, P). This family describes the evolution of a random phenomenon over the index set T, which may represent time or another parameter space. The finite-dimensional distributions of such a process capture the joint laws of the random variables at any finite number of indices. For a finite t = \{t_1, \dots, t_n\} \subseteq T with n \in \mathbb{N}, the finite-dimensional P_t is the on \mathbb{R}^n induced by the vector (X_{t_1}, \dots, X_{t_n}), formally given by P_t(B) = P\bigl( (X_{t_1}, \dots, X_{t_n}) \in B \bigr) for every B \subseteq \mathbb{R}^n. These distributions represent the marginal projections of the process onto finite coordinates and fully characterize its probabilistic structure when extended consistently across all finite s. The collection of all finite-dimensional distributions determines the law of the on the infinite product space \mathbb{R}^T, as they specify all finite joint probabilities from which the full measure can be constructed via the Kolmogorov extension theorem. This role underscores their foundational importance in , enabling the rigorous definition of processes like from specified marginals.

Consistency conditions for distributions

In the context of the Kolmogorov extension theorem, consistency conditions provide the compatibility requirements that a family of finite-dimensional distributions must satisfy to potentially define a stochastic process on an infinite-dimensional space. These conditions ensure that the marginal distributions align properly across different subsets of the index set, mirroring how projections operate in the full product space. Formally, consider a family of probability measures \{P_s\}_{s \in \mathcal{F}}, where \mathcal{F} is the collection of all finite subsets of the index set T, and each P_s is defined on \mathbb{R}^s. The family is consistent if, for every finite subsets t \subseteq s \subseteq T, the marginal distribution P_t equals the pushforward of P_s under the projection map \pi_{s \to t}: \mathbb{R}^s \to \mathbb{R}^t that forgets the coordinates in s \setminus t. That is, P_t = P_s \circ \pi_{s \to t}^{-1}. This relation guarantees that integrating out extra variables from a higher-dimensional distribution recovers the lower-dimensional one exactly. These conditions are necessary for compatibility in the product space \mathbb{R}^T because any probability measure on this space induces finite-dimensional marginals via coordinate projections; thus, the given family must reproduce these projections consistently to admit an extension without contradictions in the marginals. Without consistency, the distributions would imply incompatible probabilities for overlapping events when embedded in the infinite product. Additionally, each P_s must be a probability measure on \mathbb{R}^s, which implicitly requires countable additivity to ensure the total probability is 1 and that the measure behaves well under disjoint unions of cylinder sets. This additivity is crucial for the family to integrate coherently into a sigma-additive measure on the product sigma-algebra.

Statement of the Theorem

Basic probability version

The Kolmogorov extension theorem in its basic probability version addresses the construction of stochastic processes from specified finite-dimensional distributions. Specifically, consider a countable index set T, such as the natural numbers \mathbb{N}. Suppose there is a collection of probability measures \{ \mu_t : t \subseteq T, \, |t| < \infty \}, where each \mu_t is defined on the Borel \sigma-algebra of \mathbb{R}^t (identifying finite subsets with their cardinalities for the dimension). These measures satisfy the consistency conditions: for any finite subsets s \subseteq t \subseteq T, the marginal distribution of \mu_t on the coordinates corresponding to s coincides with \mu_s. Under these assumptions, the theorem guarantees the existence of a probability space (\Omega, \mathcal{F}, P) and a family of random variables \{ X_t : t \in T \} with values in \mathbb{R} such that, for every finite subset t \subseteq T, the joint distribution of (X_s)_{s \in t} is exactly \mu_t. The space \mathbb{R} is a standard Borel space, ensuring that the finite-dimensional distributions are defined on Polish spaces, which facilitates the extension without additional tightness requirements in this countable-index setting. The resulting process can be realized on the canonical space \Omega = \mathbb{R}^T equipped with the product \sigma-algebra generated by the cylinders, where X_t(\omega) = \omega_t for \omega \in \mathbb{R}^T. Moreover, the probability measure induced on \mathbb{R}^T by this construction is unique. This uniqueness holds because the finite-dimensional distributions determine the law of the process completely on the countable product space. This version of the theorem bridges the specification of marginal and joint behaviors in finite dimensions to the existence of a coherent infinite-dimensional process, foundational for defining sequences of random variables with prescribed dependencies.

Measure-theoretic formulation

The measure-theoretic formulation of the Kolmogorov extension theorem establishes the existence of a probability measure on the infinite product of measurable spaces under consistency conditions on finite-dimensional marginals. Let T be an arbitrary index set, which may be uncountable, and for each t \in T, let (E_t, \mathcal{B}_t) be a measurable space, where each E_t is a Polish space equipped with its Borel \sigma-algebra \mathcal{B}_t. For every finite subset F \subset T, define E_F = \prod_{t \in F} E_t with the product \sigma-algebra \mathcal{B}_F = \bigotimes_{t \in F} \mathcal{B}_t, and let \{\mu_F\}_{F \subset T, |F| < \infty} be a family of probability measures on (E_F, \mathcal{B}_F) that is Kolmogorov consistent, meaning that for any finite F \subset G \subset T, \mu_G \circ \pi_{G,F}^{-1} = \mu_F, where \pi_{G,F}: E_G \to E_F is the natural projection map. Consider the product space E^T = \prod_{t \in T} E_t. The cylinder \sigma-algebra \mathcal{C}, which is the product \sigma-algebra \mathcal{B}(E^T) = \bigotimes_{t \in T} \mathcal{B}_t, is generated by the cylinder sets of the form \pi_F^{-1}(B) for finite F \subset T and B \in \mathcal{B}_F, with \pi_F: E^T \to E_F the canonical projection. Under the consistency assumption, there exists a unique probability measure \mu on (E^T, \mathcal{B}(E^T)) such that the finite-dimensional projections satisfy \mu \circ \pi_F^{-1} = \mu_F for all finite F \subset T. This construction relies on the Carathéodory extension theorem applied to the premeasure defined by the consistent family on the algebra of finite-dimensional rectangles. Since each E_t is Polish, the finite-dimensional measures \mu_F are tight, meaning for every \varepsilon > 0 and B \in \mathcal{B}_F, there exists a compact K \subset E_F such that \mu_F(B \setminus K) < \varepsilon. This tightness ensures that the premeasure is \sigma-additive. Without such regularity, when the spaces are not Polish, such an extension may not exist, as multiple measures on the cylinders could agree on finite projections but fail to extend consistently to the product \sigma-algebra, as shown in counterexamples like those of Andersen and Jessen in 1948. This formulation can be viewed through the lens of projective limits in measure theory, where the consistent family \{\mu_F\} defines a projective system, and the Kolmogorov extension yields the projective limit measure \mu on the inverse limit space E^T. It generalizes the basic probability version, which applies specifically to real-valued processes on countable index sets, by accommodating abstract Polish spaces and uncountable T.

Proof Sketch

Construction via cylinder sets

The Kolmogorov extension theorem constructs a probability measure on the infinite product space \mathbb{R}^T, where T is an arbitrary index set, starting from a consistent family of finite-dimensional distributions \{P_u\}_{u \subset T, |u| < \infty}, where for each finite u = \{t_1, \dots, t_n\}, P_u is a probability measure on the Borel \sigma-algebra \mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^n). The initial step focuses on the algebra of cylinder sets, which form a foundational collection of subsets amenable to direct measure assignment based on the given distributions. Cylinder sets are defined as the preimages under finite-dimensional projections: for a finite subset \{t_1, \dots, t_n\} \subset T and a Borel set B \in \mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^n), the cylinder is C = \pi_{t_1, \dots, t_n}^{-1}(B) \subset \mathbb{R}^T, where \pi_{t_1, \dots, t_n}: \mathbb{R}^T \to \mathbb{R}^n is the projection map (x_s)_{s \in T} \mapsto (x_{t_1}, \dots, x_{t_n}). These sets capture constraints on finitely many coordinates while leaving the rest unconstrained, reflecting the finite-dimensional nature of the input distributions. The collection of all such cylinders generates an algebra \mathcal{A}, which is closed under finite unions, intersections, and complements, as intersections and unions of cylinders remain cylinders or finite combinations thereof. To each cylinder C = \pi_{t_1, \dots, t_n}^{-1}(B), assign the pre-measure \nu(C) = P_{t_1, \dots, t_n}(B), where P_{t_1, \dots, t_n} is the consistent finite-dimensional distribution on \mathbb{R}^n. This assignment is well-defined due to the consistency conditions, which ensure that the measure on any cylinder depends only on the specified coordinates and is independent of how additional unconstrained coordinates are included. The pre-measure \nu satisfies key properties required for extension. It is finite and normalized, with \nu(\emptyset) = 0 and \nu(\mathbb{R}^T) = 1, following from the probability nature of the P's. Finite additivity holds: for disjoint cylinders C_1, C_2 \in \mathcal{A}, \nu(C_1 \cup C_2) = \nu(C_1) + \nu(C_2), as disjointness in finite dimensions projects to disjointness in the cylinders. Moreover, \sigma-additivity of \nu on \mathcal{A} is established using the consistency conditions to verify continuity from above: for a decreasing sequence A_n \in \mathcal{A} with \cap A_n \neq \emptyset, \lim \nu(A_n) = \nu(\cap A_n). This follows from approximations in the finite-dimensional marginals. By Carathéodory's extension theorem, the \sigma-additive pre-measure \nu on the algebra \mathcal{A} uniquely extends to a probability measure \mu on the \sigma-algebra \sigma(\mathcal{A}) generated by the cylinders, which coincides with the product \sigma-algebra on \mathbb{R}^T. This \mu preserves the finite-dimensional distributions, as \mu(C) = \nu(C) for all C \in \mathcal{A}.

Extension to the full product space

Following the construction of the pre-measure on the algebra of cylinder sets, the Carathéodory extension theorem guarantees the existence of a unique probability measure \mu on the \sigma-algebra \sigma(\mathcal{A}) generated by these sets, where \mathcal{A} consists of finite-dimensional cylinders in the product space \mathbb{R}^T. This extended measure \mu preserves the finite-dimensional distributions, satisfying \mu(\pi_t^{-1}(B)) = P_t(B) for every finite subset t \subset T and Borel set B \in \mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{|t|}), where \pi_t: \mathbb{R}^T \to \mathbb{R}^{|t|} is the canonical projection and P_t denotes the given consistent probability measure on the finite-dimensional space. This verification follows directly from the definition of the pre-measure on cylinders and the uniqueness property of the Carathéodory extension. The stochastic process \{X_s\}_{s \in T} is realized on the probability space (\mathbb{R}^T, \sigma(\mathcal{A}), \mu) by setting X_s(\omega) = \pi_s(\omega) for each coordinate projection \pi_s: \mathbb{R}^T \to \mathbb{R}. For any finite t \subset T, the joint distribution of (X_s)_{s \in t} is the pushforward measure \mu \circ \pi_t^{-1} = P_t, confirming that the process has the prescribed finite-dimensional distributions. This construction ensures the process is measurable with respect to the product \sigma-algebra, as the projections are measurable by definition. When the index set T is uncountable, the extension \mu exists on the product \sigma-algebra but may concentrate on non-separable or discontinuous paths without additional conditions. To ensure the existence of a version of the process with separable or continuous paths, Kolmogorov's continuity criterion is invoked, requiring tightness of the finite-dimensional distributions via moment conditions such as \mathbb{E}[|X_t - X_s|^\alpha] \leq C |t - s|^{1 + \beta} for some constants C > 0, \alpha > 0, and \beta > 0. This criterion guarantees the existence of a continuous modification of the process on a , ensuring the measure is well-behaved . Uniqueness of the extension follows from the fact that any two probability measures \mu_1 and \mu_2 on \sigma(\mathcal{A}) that agree on the cylinder \mathcal{A} (by ) must coincide on the generated \sigma-, hence \mu_1 = \mu_2 \mu_1-. This holds even for uncountable T, as the cylinder sets generate the relevant \sigma- and determine the measure uniquely via the \pi-\lambda theorem for countable subs.

Implications and Applications

Existence of stochastic processes

The Kolmogorov extension , through its measure-theoretic formulation, ensures the of a on the space that realizes a given consistent of finite-dimensional distributions, thereby guaranteeing the of a with those marginals. This core implication allows researchers to define complex processes, such as , solely by specifying their finite-dimensional Gaussian distributions, obviating the need to construct the underlying upfront. As a result, the theorem forms the foundational tool for rigorously establishing the of processes in modern . For processes taking values in non-real spaces, such as spaces, the Ionescu-Tulcea extension theorem extends this result by constructing the process iteratively through regular conditional distributions, ensuring uniqueness under suitable measurability conditions. This generalization addresses limitations of the standard Kolmogorov theorem, which assumes real-valued or Euclidean-valued processes, and is essential for applications involving more abstract state spaces. The theorem also resolves key challenges in related areas, such as , where it underpins the construction of processes that realize weakly convergent finite-dimensional distributions on the canonical space, facilitating proofs of convergence in distribution for processes. In theory, this enables the embedding of limiting distributions into path spaces without presupposing the of the limiting process. Additionally, the theorem connects finite-dimensional specifications to global path properties: the Kolmogorov-Chentsov theorem provides conditions under which the resulting process admits a continuous modification, ensuring that, for example, moment bounds on increments imply the existence of paths with specified regularity . This brief linkage highlights how the extension theorem's output can be refined to yield processes with desirable sample path continuity.

Examples in probability

A fundamental application of the Kolmogorov extension theorem arises in the construction of sequences of independent random variables. For a countable index set T and probability measures \mu_i on \mathbb{R} for each i \in T, define the finite-dimensional distributions as the product measures \mu_{i_1} \times \cdots \times \mu_{i_n} on \mathbb{R}^n for finite subsets \{i_1, \dots, i_n\} \subset T. These distributions form a consistent family, as the marginal distribution over any subcollection is the product of the corresponding individual measures. The theorem then yields a unique probability measure on the product space \mathbb{R}^T (endowed with the product \sigma-algebra) whose finite-dimensional projections match these products, realizing a sequence of independent random variables X_i with laws \mu_i. The theorem also underpins the existence of , a cornerstone of . Consider the on [0, \infty), where the finite-dimensional distributions at ordered times $0 < t_1 < \cdots < t_k are multivariate Gaussian with mean vector \mathbf{0} and covariance matrix \Sigma satisfying \Sigma_{ij} = \min(t_i, t_j). This family is consistent, since the marginal distribution for any subset of times is the multivariate Gaussian induced by the corresponding principal submatrix of \Sigma, preserving the covariance structure. Applying the theorem produces a probability measure on the path space \mathbb{R}^{[0,\infty)} (with the product \sigma-algebra) such that the coordinate process has these specified finite-dimensional laws; further regularity arguments yield continuous paths almost surely. Another illustrative case is the homogeneous Poisson process with intensity \lambda > 0, which counts events over time. For ordered times $0 < t_1 < \cdots < t_k, the finite-dimensional distributions of the counts N(t_1), \dots, N(t_k) (with N(0) = 0) are determined by independent Poisson increments: N(t_i) - N(t_{i-1}) \sim \mathrm{Poisson}(\lambda (t_i - t_{i-1})) for i = 1, \dots, k (setting t_0 = 0), so the joint law is the convolution of these marginals. Consistency follows, as marginalizing over a subcollection sums the relevant Poisson increments, yielding the Poisson distribution for the net count over the combined interval. The theorem thus constructs a probability measure on the space of cadlag functions from [0, \infty) to \mathbb{N}_0, defining the Poisson process with the desired finite-dimensional properties. The consistency condition is essential, as its violation precludes any extension. For instance, suppose the one-dimensional distributions are \mu_t = \mathcal{N}(0,1) for each t, but a two-dimensional distribution \mu_{t_1,t_2} (with t_1 \neq t_2) has marginal \mu_{t_1} = \mathcal{N}(0,2); this family fails consistency, since the marginals do not match across dimensions, and no probability measure on the product space can reconcile the contradiction.

Generalizations and Extensions

Non-countable index sets

When the index set T is uncountable, such as \mathbb{R}_+, the Kolmogorov extension theorem still applies in its measure-theoretic formulation to construct a probability measure on the \sigma-algebra generated by the cylinder sets of the product space S^T, where S is a Polish state space, provided the finite-dimensional distributions are consistent. This \sigma-algebra, known as the cylinder \sigma-algebra or product \sigma-algebra, is generated by the cylinder sets, which depend on finitely many coordinates. As a result, the theorem guarantees existence of a process whose finite-dimensional marginals match the given family, but the measure may not define probabilities for all subsets of S^T, particularly those involving uncountably many coordinates. To overcome this limitation and ensure the process has well-behaved sample paths, such as or right-continuity with left limits (càdlàg), additional conditions beyond mere consistency are necessary. One standard approach requires the family of finite-dimensional distributions to be tight, meaning that for every \epsilon > 0, there exists a compact set K \subset S^n such that the probability outside K is less than \epsilon for all finite n. Tightness, formalized via , implies relative compactness in the and allows the extended measure to concentrate on a separable of S^T, facilitating measurable modifications. Alternatively, Kolmogorov's continuity theorem provides sufficient conditions for path regularity: if there exist constants \alpha, \beta > 0 and C > 0 such that \mathbb{E}[|X_t - X_s|^\alpha] \leq C |t - s|^{d + \beta} for all s, t \in T and dimension d, then the process admits a version with Hölder continuous paths of order \gamma for any $0 < \gamma < \beta / \alpha. These conditions ensure the cylinder measure extends to a tight probability on a suitable path space. A prominent example is the construction of Lévy processes on the uncountable index set \mathbb{R}_+, where the finite-dimensional distributions are consistent due to independent and stationary increments, as characterized by the Lévy-Khintchine formula. The extension theorem, combined with tightness from moment conditions or characteristic functions, yields a version on the Skorokhod space D_{\mathbb{R}_+, \mathbb{R}}, enabling applications in fluctuation theory and option pricing. Without such regularity assumptions, however, the extension can fail dramatically: for instance, on the space [0,1]^{[0,1]}, consistent families exist whose cylinder measures do not admit tight extensions, leading to pathological processes lacking separable or measurable versions, where almost every sample path is discontinuous everywhere.

Abstract measure spaces

The Kolmogorov extension theorem generalizes to projective systems of probability measures on abstract measurable spaces (E_t, \mathcal{B}_t), where each E_t is a Polish space equipped with its Borel \sigma-algebra \mathcal{B}_t, ensuring the of a measure on the product space under consistency conditions. In this setting, the finite-dimensional distributions form a projective family, and tightness of the marginal measures—guaranteed by Prokhorov's theorem for probability measures on separable metric spaces—ensures relative compactness in the weak topology, allowing the extension to a unique probability measure on the infinite product \sigma-algebra. This framework extends beyond real-valued processes to arbitrary state spaces, provided the spaces are standard Borel to avoid pathologies in the product construction. A key variant for sequential constructions is the , which constructs measures on the product space \prod_{n=1}^\infty (E_n, \mathcal{B}_n) from an initial distribution \mu_1 on (E_1, \mathcal{B}_1) and consistent transition kernels P_n: \mathcal{B}_n \times E_{n-1} \to [0,1] satisfying the . This is particularly useful for on general measurable spaces, where conditional distributions are specified recursively, yielding a unique measure on the path space without requiring topological assumptions on the state spaces beyond measurability. The theorem ensures consistency by integrating over finite-dimensional cylinders, providing a probabilistic foundation for processes like time-inhomogeneous . Applications of these extensions appear in the theory of random measures and point processes on non-Euclidean spaces, such as manifolds or abstract Polish spaces, where finite-dimensional distributions on subsets define consistent intensities. For instance, in spatial point processes, the Kolmogorov extension (via tightness) constructs the law of a random counting measure on a product of Borel spaces, enabling models for irregular configurations in statistical physics or ecology. Similarly, random measures on non-standard spaces, like those arising in Lévy processes on Lie groups, rely on projective limits to ensure the existence of infinite-dimensional realizations consistent with marginal laws. However, the extension may fail in non-complete measurable spaces, leading to non-uniqueness or non-existence of the product measure despite consistency of finite-dimensional distributions, as demonstrated by counterexamples where the product does not capture all limits. In such cases, additional regularity conditions, like completeness of the measures, are required to guarantee uniqueness up to null sets.

Historical Development

Origins in the 1930s

In the early 20th century, the mathematical treatment of stochastic processes, particularly continuous-time phenomena like , faced significant challenges in rigorous definition and probability assignment. Louis Bachelier's 1900 doctoral thesis introduced a model for stock price fluctuations resembling Brownian motion, treating paths as continuous functions but lacking a measure-theoretic foundation for infinite-dimensional spaces. Similarly, Norbert Wiener's 1923 construction of the provided an explicit integral representation for Brownian motion paths, yet it did not generalize to arbitrary consistent finite-dimensional distributions without a broader framework for infinite products of probability measures. These limitations underscored the need for a systematic way to extend finite-dimensional probabilities to infinite sequences, ensuring consistency across dimensions. Maurice Fréchet's 1930 work on the extension of the total probability theorem to countable infinities of events laid crucial groundwork by addressing probabilities over infinite collections and functional dependencies in abstract spaces, influencing the axiomatic approach to such extensions. Andrey Kolmogorov addressed these issues decisively in his 1933 monograph Grundbegriffe der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung, where he formulated the axioms of probability and introduced the consistency theorem—now known as the —for constructing measures on countable infinite products of from consistent finite-dimensional distributions. This initial version focused on countable index sets and Polish spaces like , providing the first rigorous existence result for stochastic processes defined by their marginals. Kolmogorov's contribution built directly on Fréchet's abstractions while integrating measure theory to resolve the foundational paradoxes in pre-1930s probability.

Subsequent refinements

In the decades following Kolmogorov's foundational work in the 1930s, refinements to the extension addressed challenges in extending consistent finite-dimensional distributions to uncountable index sets and more general spaces, particularly through criteria ensuring tightness and representation. During the 1940s and 1950s, key advancements focused on tightness conditions for in broader settings. Prokhorov's 1956 theorem introduced a tightness criterion that guarantees relative compactness of families of probability measures on spaces, facilitating extensions of the Kolmogorov to uncountable products by ensuring the existence of convergent subsequences. This was complemented by Skorokhod's 1956 representation , which provides a constructive way to realize of probability measures on separable spaces via almost sure convergence of random variables on a common , thus strengthening the applicability of extension results to stochastic processes. The 1960s saw further generalizations to non-sequential and abstract product structures. Ionescu Tulcea's 1949 work extended the theorem to non-sequential products of probability spaces, providing conditions under which consistent families of measures can be lifted to a measure on the without relying on topological assumptions, using lifting properties in measure theory. Similarly, Varadarajan's projective limit theorem (1965) established necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of projective limits of measures on inverse systems of compact Hausdorff spaces, generalizing Kolmogorov's approach to topological measure theory and enabling extensions in more abstract settings. Key figures like Joseph Doob and contributed to these refinements through their work on martingale theory and processes, integrating extension principles into the study of conditional expectations and . Doob's 1953 monograph formalized martingales in the context of processes, implicitly relying on refined extension theorems to construct processes with given marginals and transitions. Blackwell's contributions in the 1950s and 1960s, including and information bounds, advanced the theorem's role in sequential decision processes. In modern stochastic analysis, these refinements underpin textbooks like Revuz and Yor's 1999 treatment of continuous martingales and , where the theorem's extensions ensure the existence of processes with specified finite-dimensional laws under tightness conditions. Computational aspects emerged in the 2000s, with simulation methods leveraging Skorokhod representations for approximations of stochastic processes on uncountable domains, as detailed in advanced numerical probability texts.

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] Kolmogorov Extension, Martingale Convergence, and ...
    Abstract. We show that the Kolmogorov extension theorem and the Doob martingale convergence theorem are two aspects of a common gen-.
  2. [2]
    [PDF] Kolmogorov's theorem - LSU Math
    Here we shall consider the most basic form of Kolmogorov's theorem. It says that if we are given a family of probability measures µn on Rn, for all n ≥ 1,.
  3. [3]
    [PDF] Expository Notes on the Kolmogorov Extension Problem
    The Kolmogorov extension theorem has been used to represent types as “infinite hierarchies of beliefs” with varying degrees of explicitness by Böge and Eisele ...
  4. [4]
    Appendix B. Stochastic Processes
    To be more precise, a stochastic process is a collection of random variables X = {Xt,t ∈ T} such that, for each fixed t ∈ T, Xt is a random variable that takes ...
  5. [5]
  6. [6]
    [PDF] new simple proofs of the kolmogorov extension theorem and ...
    Nov 29, 2019 · The Kolmogorov extension theorem (Theorem 1) is useful when showing the existence of a stochastic process whose finite-dimensional distributions.
  7. [7]
  8. [8]
    Foundations of Modern Probability - SpringerLink
    In stock Free deliveryThis expanded 3rd edition of Olav Kallenbergs Foundations comes as one book in two volumes and gives a comprehensive overview of Modern Probability Theory.
  9. [9]
    [PDF] FOUNDATIONS THEORY OF PROBABILITY - University of York
    FOUNDATIONS. OF THE. THEORY OF PROBABILITY. BY. A.N. KOLMOGOROV. Second English Edition. TRANSLATION EDITED BY. NATHAN MORRISON. WITH AN ADDED BIBLIOGRPAHY BY.
  10. [10]
    [PDF] Probability: Theory and Examples Rick Durrett Version 5 January 11 ...
    Jan 11, 2019 · Probability is not a spectator sport, so the book contains almost 450 exercises to challenge the reader and to deepen their understanding.” The ...
  11. [11]
    [PDF] The Kolmogorov extension theorem - Jordan Bell
    Jun 21, 2014 · Theorem 11 (Kolmogorov extension theorem). Suppose that {(Xi, Mi) ... Suppose that {Xi : i ∈ I} is a family of Polish spaces and.
  12. [12]
    [PDF] Building Infinite Processes from Finite-Dimensional Distributions
    Section 2.2 considers the consistency conditions satisfied by the finite-dimensional distributions of a stochastic process, and the ex- tension theorems (due ...
  13. [13]
    [PDF] FOUNDATI<lNS THEORY OF PROBABILITY - AltExploit
    We define as elementary theory of probability that part of the theory in which we have to deal with probabilities of only a finite number of events.
  14. [14]
    [PDF] The Kolmogorov continuity theorem, Hölder continuity, and the ...
    Jun 11, 2015 · 2−i. Z. The Kolmogorov continuity theorem gives conditions under which a stochastic process whose state space is a Polish space has a continuous ...
  15. [15]
    275A, Notes 2: Product measures and independence - Terry Tao
    Oct 12, 2015 · We will be able to take virtually any collection of random variables (or probability distributions) and couple them together to be independent via the product ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Lecture 8: February 22 8.1 Stochastic Process
    Hence, the probabilities defined on (Wt1 ,...,Wtk ) are consistent and then the Kolmogorov's extension theorem shows the existence of probability distribution.
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Almost None of the Theory of Stochastic Processes - Stat@Duke
    This is intended to be a second course in stochastic processes (at least!); I am going to assume you have all had a first course on stochastic processes, ...
  18. [18]
    Probability Measures on Metric Spaces - ScienceDirect.com
    Probability Measures on Metric Spaces presents the general theory of probability measures in abstract metric spaces. This book deals with complete separable ...
  19. [19]
    PROBABILITY MEASURES IN INFINITE CARTESIAN PRODUCTS
    ability is relevant, and each counterexample of the type considered by Sparre. Andersen and Jessen [9] and by HMmos [4] must evidently violate the con ...
  20. [20]
    abstract ergodic theorems(1) - jstor
    ALEXANDRA IONESCU TULCEA AND CASSIUS IONESCU TULCEA. Introduction. In this paper we prove certain maximal theorems and certain pointwise convergence theorems.Missing: original | Show results with:original
  21. [21]
    [PDF] brownian motion - University of Utah Math Dept.
    In 190 lbert Einstein came to the problem of Brow- nian motion independently (and unaware of) of Bachelier's work; his motivation was to answer Brown's ...
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Norbert Wiener and Probability Theory - Indian Academy of Sciences
    It is under the influence of Bachelier's work that geometric Brow- nian motion (a variant of Brownian motion) has become a basic model for a stock price ...
  23. [23]
    [PDF] The Sources of Kolmogorov's Grundbegriffe - arXiv
    In general, the answer is negative; a counterexample was given by Erik Sparre. Andersen and Børge Jessen in 1948, but as we noted in Section 4.3, Ulam had.