Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Materialism

Materialism is a form of philosophical monism positing that matter constitutes the fundamental reality of the universe, with all phenomena, including mental states and consciousness, arising from or reducible to physical processes and interactions.^[1] This view contrasts sharply with idealism, which prioritizes mind or ideas as primary, and dualism, which posits separate immaterial substances like souls.^[2] Originating in ancient Greek atomism, materialism traces its roots to thinkers such as Leucippus and Democritus in the 5th century BCE, who proposed that the universe consists of indivisible atoms moving in a void, explaining all change through mechanical collisions rather than divine intervention.^[3] This tradition was advanced by Epicurus and poetically expounded by Lucretius in De Rerum Natura around 50 BCE, emphasizing empirical observation and rejecting supernatural causes.^[4] In the modern era, materialism gained traction through figures like Thomas Hobbes and later scientific materialism, aligning with empirical discoveries in physics and biology that reveal no necessity for immaterial entities to account for observed causal chains.^[5] A defining characteristic of materialism is its commitment to causal closure under physical laws, implying that events have sufficient physical explanations without invoking non-physical agents, a stance bolstered by the success of naturalistic sciences in predicting and manipulating reality.^[3] Controversies persist, particularly regarding the explanatory gap for subjective experience—known as the hard problem of consciousness—where critics argue that purely material accounts fail to fully capture qualia, though proponents maintain these emerge from complex neural configurations without requiring dualistic supplements.^[2] Materialism's influence extends to rejecting theological explanations in favor of testable hypotheses, underpinning advancements from Galilean mechanics to evolutionary biology, yet it faces ongoing debate over whether strict determinism undermines moral responsibility or if emergent properties allow for compatibilist interpretations.^[1]

Core Concepts

Defining Materialism and Matter

Materialism is a philosophical doctrine that asserts the physical realm constitutes the fundamental and sole reality, with all existent phenomena—including mental states, consciousness, and apparent non-physical entities—ultimately reducible to or emergent from physical entities and their interactions.^[6] This view denies the independent existence of immaterial substances or supernatural causes, positing instead that explanations of reality must invoke only those entities and laws describable within physical science.^[7] Central to materialism is the principle of causal closure of the physical, which holds that every physical event has a complete physical cause or set of physical causes sufficient to determine its occurrence, thereby precluding non-physical influences from playing any causal role in the physical world.^[8]^[9] Matter, in the materialist framework, refers to objective reality that exists independently of perception or consciousness, manifesting as entities with properties such as mass, energy, spatial extension, and susceptibility to physical laws.^[10] Classically articulated in works like Lenin's Materialism and Empirio-Criticism (1909), matter is "that which, acting upon our sense-organs, produces sensation," emphasizing its status as external, mind-independent substance reflected through sensory experience.^[10] In modern physicalist variants of materialism, matter encompasses not only tangible substances but also fundamental components like quantum fields, particles, and forces, as delineated by empirical physics—such as the Standard Model, which identifies quarks, leptons, and gauge bosons as basic constituents observed via experiments like those at the Large Hadron Collider in 2012 confirming the Higgs boson.^[11] This conception aligns with causal realism by grounding all causal chains in verifiable physical mechanisms, rejecting appeals to unobservable non-physical entities for explanatory completeness. The insistence on empirical verifiability distinguishes materialist definitions from idealist or dualist alternatives; for instance, while dualism posits separate mental substances interacting with matter (as in Descartes' 1641 Meditations), materialism requires that any mental causation be identical to or supervenient upon physical processes to avoid violating causal closure, as evidenced in peer-reviewed analyses of mental causation debates.^[12] Empirical support for this framework draws from neuroscience, where correlates of consciousness—such as neural firing patterns during decision-making tasks in fMRI studies published in Nature (e.g., Libet et al., 1983, replicated in later works)—suggest mental events align exhaustively with brain states without residual non-physical gaps. Thus, materialism privileges first-principles reasoning from observed physical laws over speculative ontologies, maintaining that claims of immaterial reality lack causal efficacy or independent evidence.

Key Principles and Causal Realism

Materialism posits that matter constitutes the fundamental reality, with all existent entities either identical to or dependent upon material substances and their configurations. This ontological stance denies the existence of independent immaterial entities, such as souls or supernatural agents, asserting instead that phenomena like consciousness emerge from organized material processes, particularly neurobiological activity in the brain.^[1]^[13] A core principle involves the primacy of objective matter, which exists independently of perception or cognition; consciousness, in turn, reflects and arises from material interactions rather than preceding or creating them. Epistemologically, this grounds knowledge in empirical observation of material phenomena, prioritizing sensory data and scientific inference over a priori intuitions or revealed truths.^[14]^[15] Causally, materialism embraces the view that all changes and events result from interactions among material entities, governed by physical laws without resort to non-material influences. This commits to causal realism, wherein causation manifests as inherent powers within matter—such as atomic collisions or field forces—to produce real effects, irreducible to mere patterns of succession and verifiable through empirical testing. Such a framework explains diverse outcomes, from planetary motion to cognitive functions, via traceable material mechanisms, as evidenced by advances in physics and neuroscience since the 17th century.^[16]^[17]^[18]

Varieties of Materialism

Classical and Reductive Materialism

Classical materialism emerged in ancient Greece with Leucippus and his student Democritus in the 5th century BCE, positing that the universe consists entirely of indivisible particles called atoms and the empty space, or void, through which they move.^[19] Atoms, eternal and uncreated, vary in shape, size, and position, with all phenomena arising from their mechanical collisions and arrangements governed by necessity rather than purpose or supernatural forces.^[20] This view rejected teleological explanations prevalent in contemporaries like Aristotle, asserting instead a causal chain driven by physical interactions alone.^[21] Epicurus revived and systematized atomism around 306 BCE in Athens, incorporating a principle of atomic swerve—random deviations in motion—to account for free will and avoid strict determinism while maintaining materialism's core denial of immaterial souls or divine intervention in natural processes.^[22] In this framework, even sensation and thought result from fine, spherical atoms composing the soul, which disperse at death, eliminating personal immortality.^[21] Lucretius propagated these ideas in his 1st-century BCE poem De Rerum Natura, emphasizing empirical observation and the rejection of fear-based religious cosmologies in favor of atomic explanations for phenomena like lightning and plagues.^[22] Reductive materialism, a modern variant particularly in philosophy of mind, holds that higher-level mental states are identical to or fully explicable by underlying physical states, typically neural processes in the brain, without residue.^[23] This position, often termed type-identity theory, was formalized by U.T. Place in his 1956 paper "Is Consciousness a Brain Process?", arguing that conscious experiences correlate exactly with specific brain events, and advanced by J.J.C. Smart in 1959's "Sensations and Brain Processes," which defended the identity on parsimony and scientific unification grounds.^[24] Proponents contend that such reduction aligns with causal realism, as mental causation operates through physical mechanisms, avoiding dualism's interaction problems while accommodating empirical neuroscience findings, such as correlations between brain activity and reported qualia via fMRI studies since the 1990s.^[13] Critics, however, highlight explanatory gaps, noting that identity claims fail to bridge subjective experience to objective descriptions, though reductive materialists counter with progressive scientific refinements rather than ontological novelty.^[23]

Non-Reductive and Emergent Materialism

Non-reductive materialism asserts that mental and other higher-level properties are distinct from fundamental physical properties, depend on them through supervenience, and possess independent causal efficacy without being reducible to physical descriptions.^[25] This position emerged as a response to the mind-body problem, rejecting both Cartesian dualism—which posits non-physical substances—and strict reductive materialism, which equates mental states with specific neural or physical configurations.^[25] Proponents argue for multiple realizability, where a single mental property, such as pain, can be instantiated by diverse physical substrates across species, undermining type-type identity theories.^[25] Key formulations include Donald Davidson's anomalous monism, outlined in his 1970 paper "Mental Events," which holds that mental events are identical to physical events at the token level but lack strict psychophysical laws due to the holistic and interpretive nature of mental ascriptions, ensuring token identity while preserving non-reductivism.^[25] Jerry Fodor and Hilary Putnam advanced arguments from the autonomy of special sciences, contending that disciplines like psychology operate with irreducible predicates not eliminable by physics, as reduction would erase explanatory power at higher levels.^[25] These views align with physicalism by affirming that all entities are ultimately physical, yet higher properties contribute causally without violating the completeness of physics through mechanisms like realization or constitution.^[25] Emergent materialism represents a subtype or allied variant, positing that complex physical systems generate novel properties and laws at higher organizational levels that are irreducible to their constituents, often incorporating downward causation where emergent features influence lower-level processes within the physical domain.^[26] Pioneered by Samuel Alexander in his 1920 work Space, Time, and Deity, it emphasizes levels of complexity—such as chemical, biological, and psychological—each with autonomous laws studied by distinct sciences, rejecting both vitalism and reductionism.^[26] For instance, mental intentionality emerges from neural complexity but exerts causal control over behavior via psychological laws, compatible with materialism as all causation remains intra-physical.^[26] A primary challenge to both arises from Jaegwon Kim's exclusion argument, developed in works from the 1980s onward, which contends that if physical properties suffice for causal completeness, distinct mental properties either overdetermine effects (violating parsimony) or become epiphenomenal, rendering non-reductivism incoherent unless higher properties reduce or eliminate.^[27] Defenders, such as Lynne Rudder Baker, propose property-constitution views where mental properties confer unique causal powers at their level without independent substances, preserving efficacy through non-competitive realization.^[25] Empirical support draws from neuroscience, where phenomena like consciousness correlate with but are not fully explained by microphysical states, though critics argue emergence lacks precise mechanisms beyond complexity assertions, risking vagueness.^[26]^[27]

Dialectical and Historical Materialism

Dialectical materialism emerged in the 1840s as a synthesis of materialist ontology and dialectical method, primarily articulated by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels in works such as The German Ideology (written 1845–1846). It posits that reality consists of matter in motion, governed by objective laws of contradiction and transformation, rejecting idealist notions that ideas or spirit drive historical change. Unlike Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel's dialectics, which viewed contradictions as resolving in an absolute spirit through thesis-antithesis-synthesis, dialectical materialism "inverts" this by locating dialectics in material conditions: contradictions arise from economic and productive forces, leading to qualitative leaps via negation of the negation.^[28]^[29] Central principles include the unity of opposites (e.g., forces of production clashing with relations of production), the transformation of quantity into quality (gradual changes precipitating revolutionary shifts), and the negation of the negation (prior forms preserved in higher syntheses). Engels elaborated these in Anti-Dühring (1877), emphasizing that nature and society develop through internal conflicts rather than external design, with matter as primary and consciousness as secondary. This framework underpinned Marxist analysis, asserting that human thought reflects material being, not vice versa.^[30] Historical materialism applies dialectical principles to societal evolution, contending that the "base" of economic production—comprising productive forces (technology, labor) and relations (class ownership)—determines the "superstructure" of laws, politics, ideology, and culture. History progresses through stages (e.g., primitive communism, slavery, feudalism, capitalism) via class antagonisms, where the ruling class's exploitation of the proletariat intensifies contradictions until bourgeois relations are negated by socialist ones. Marx outlined this in A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy (1859), arguing that "it is not the consciousness of men that determines their being, but, on the contrary, their social being that determines their consciousness."^[28]^[31] Empirically, historical materialism predicted capitalism's collapse through immiseration of the proletariat and revolution in industrialized nations, yet advanced economies like Britain and Germany saw rising living standards and welfare reforms by the early 20th century, averting predicted uprisings. Revolutions instead occurred in less developed contexts, such as Russia in 1917, yielding Soviet-style states that prioritized state ownership over worker control, often devolving into bureaucratic authoritarianism rather than classless society. The collapse of communist regimes in Eastern Europe (1989–1991) and the Soviet Union (1991) challenged the theory's teleological claims, as market reforms and democratic transitions supplanted dialectical progression toward communism, highlighting predictive shortcomings rooted in overemphasis on economic determinism over cultural and contingent factors.^[32]^[28]

New Materialism and Relational Variants

New Materialism emerged in the late 1990s as a philosophical framework that revitalizes materialist ontology by positing matter as dynamic, self-organizing, and agentic, rather than the passive substrate of classical variants. The term was coined by Manuel DeLanda and Rosi Braidotti to address the shortcomings of cultural constructivism and persistent humanist dualisms, such as mind-matter and nature-culture divides, by integrating post-structuralist insights with scientific developments in quantum mechanics and complexity theory.^[33] Key figures include Karen Barad, Jane Bennett, and Elizabeth Grosz, whose works emphasize the performative capacities of material processes in generating phenomena without relying on transcendent human agency.^[34] At its core, New Materialism rejects the reduction of reality to static substances, instead highlighting matter's vitality through relational entanglements where agency arises from distributed interactions across human and nonhuman elements.^[35] This involves concepts like Barad's "intra-actions," which describe how entities co-emerge through mutual exclusions and inclusions in entangled systems, drawing on Niels Bohr's complementarity principle to argue that apparatuses of observation are constitutive of what is observed.^[33] Bennett's vital materialism extends this by attributing affective force to mundane objects, such as electrical grids or debris, illustrating how nonhuman actants exert causal influence independent of intentional subjects.^[34] These ideas promote a processual view of materiality as open, contingent, and capable of ethical reconfiguration beyond anthropocentric priorities.^[35] Relational variants amplify this by foregrounding ontology as fundamentally composed of networks and assemblages, influenced by Gilles Deleuze, Félix Guattari, and Bruno Latour, where stability emerges from fluid relations rather than inherent essences.^[33] DeLanda's assemblage theory, for instance, models social and natural formations as intensive processes of individuation, rejecting hierarchical reductions in favor of horizontal multiplicities.^[34] In contrast to classical materialism's focus on particulate building blocks and causal chains from base to superstructure, these variants prioritize diffraction and emergence, critiquing representational epistemologies for flattening relational depths while cautioning against unsubstantiated vitalist projections that diverge from empirical observables in physics.^[35]^[33]

Historical Origins and Evolution

Ancient and Pre-Modern Roots

The origins of philosophical materialism emerged in ancient Greece among pre-Socratic thinkers seeking natural explanations for the cosmos without invoking divine agency. Thales of Miletus (c. 624–546 BCE), often regarded as the first Western philosopher, proposed water as the fundamental principle (arche) underlying all matter, observing its role in nourishment and transformation processes like evaporation and condensation.^[36] Anaximander (c. 610–546 BCE), his successor, introduced the boundless (apeiron) as an eternal, indeterminate substance from which opposites arise through separation, emphasizing mechanical processes over mythological origins.^[36] Anaximenes (fl. 546 BCE) refined this by identifying air as the primary substance, which rarefies into fire or condenses into wind, cloud, water, earth, and stone via motion and density changes, thus prioritizing observable physical transformations.^[37] These Milesian inquiries laid groundwork for material explanations by attributing cosmic order to material principles rather than anthropomorphic gods, though they retained hylozoistic elements implying inherent life in matter.^[36] Explicit materialism crystallized in the atomist theory of Leucippus (fl. 5th century BCE) and his pupil Democritus (c. 460–370 BCE), who posited that reality consists solely of indivisible atoms differing in shape, size, and arrangement, moving eternally through a void.^[38] ^[39] This framework explained all phenomena—including qualities like color and taste—as mechanical interactions of atoms colliding and aggregating, rejecting teleology, purpose, and immaterial souls; even sensation and thought arise from atomic impacts on the body.^[39] Democritus extended this to ethics, advocating a deterministic universe where free will illusions stem from atomic necessity, though he emphasized rational pursuit of moderate pleasure.^[39] Their system countered Eleatic monism by reintroducing void as non-being, enabling change without creation or destruction ex nihilo.^[38] Epicurus (341–270 BCE) adapted atomism to address determinism and divine interference, introducing the concept of atomic "swerve" (clinamen) to allow slight deviations in motion, preserving contingency and free will within a materialist ontology. He denied the immortality of the soul, viewing it as a composite of fine atoms dissipating at death, and argued that gods, if existent, must be material yet uninvolved in human affairs due to their self-sufficient bliss. This ethical materialism aimed at ataraxia (tranquility) through understanding natural causes, freeing individuals from superstitious fears. The Roman poet Lucretius (c. 99–55 BCE) popularized these ideas in De Rerum Natura, a hexameter epic systematically expounding Epicurean physics, cosmology, and biology as products of atomic chance and necessity, explicitly rejecting supernatural creation or intervention.^[40] ^[41] Parallel materialist thought arose in ancient India with the Charvaka (or Lokayata) school, dating to at least the 6th century BCE, which rejected Vedic authority, afterlife, karma, and immaterial souls in favor of direct perception (pratyaksha) as the sole valid epistemology.^[42] Charvakas asserted that consciousness emerges from the combination of four material elements—earth, water, fire, and air—analogous to intoxication from fermented ingredients, denying any transcendent reality or moral absolutes beyond sensory pleasure.^[42] Their hedonistic ethics prioritized immediate gratification while critiquing priestly rituals as exploitative, though texts survive only in orthodox refutations, indicating marginal status amid dominant idealist traditions.^[42] In the pre-modern era, materialism remained subterranean in the West under Platonic, Aristotelian, and Christian dominance, which subordinated matter to forms, essences, or divine will; Stoics incorporated material pneuma (breath) as an active principle pervading passive matter but infused it with rational logos akin to providence.^[43] Atomism persisted sporadically through Epicurean circles but faced suppression, resurfacing fragmentarily in medieval Islamic and Latin transmissions before Enlightenment revival.^[38]

Enlightenment and Modern Foundations

Thomas Hobbes (1588–1679) advanced materialism in the 17th century by positing that all phenomena, including human thought and society, arise from the motions of material bodies, rejecting immaterial substances like souls or spirits.^[44] In his 1651 work Leviathan, Hobbes described the universe as composed solely of matter in motion, with mental processes reducible to physical interactions, thus establishing a mechanistic framework that influenced subsequent Enlightenment thinkers.^[45] This view aligned with emerging scientific empiricism, drawing on observations of mechanical causes in nature, though Hobbes's materialism faced opposition from religious authorities for its deterministic implications.^[46] The Enlightenment era (roughly 1685–1815) saw materialism gain traction amid the Scientific Revolution's emphasis on observable, quantifiable laws, as articulated by figures like Robert Boyle and Isaac Newton, who promoted corpuscular theories of matter without invoking supernatural agency.^[47] French philosophers radicalized these ideas, with Julien Offray de La Mettrie (1709–1751) arguing in L'Homme Machine (1748) that humans are complex automata governed entirely by physical organization and sensations, denying any non-material soul and extending animal mechanism to humankind based on anatomical and physiological evidence.^[48] La Mettrie's treatise, informed by medical practice and Newtonian physics, portrayed consciousness as an emergent property of cerebral matter, challenging Cartesian dualism and ecclesiastical doctrines.^[49] Paul-Henri Thiry, Baron d'Holbach (1723–1789), synthesized these strands in The System of Nature (1770), asserting that the universe consists only of matter and motion under eternal, necessary laws, rendering God, free will, and immortality illusions perpetuated by ignorance and fear.^[50] Holbach's deterministic materialism, supported by empirical observations from chemistry and astronomy, critiqued religion as antithetical to rational inquiry and moral progress through natural causality.^[51] These works laid modern foundations by integrating materialism with atheism and secular ethics, paving the way for 19th-century scientific positivism while provoking censorship and debate over whether such views adequately accounted for human agency or moral responsibility.^[52]

19th-20th Century Developments

In the nineteenth century, materialism experienced a resurgence driven by empirical science and critiques of idealism. German thinkers such as Ludwig Büchner advanced a scientific variant, asserting in his 1855 book Force and Matter that all phenomena, including life and consciousness, arise from physical forces and matter without supernatural intervention, drawing on recent discoveries in physiology and physics.^[53] This approach emphasized observable mechanisms over metaphysical speculation, influencing popular thought amid industrialization and Darwinian biology, which provided materialist accounts of species origins through natural selection as detailed in Charles Darwin's On the Origin of Species (1859). Ludwig Feuerbach's anthropological materialism, developed in works like The Essence of Christianity (1841), reduced religious concepts to human projections, paving the way for Karl Marx's critique in the Theses on Feuerbach (spring 1845), where Marx rejected Feuerbach's "contemplative" materialism for failing to account for human praxis as transformative activity shaping reality.^[54] Marx and Friedrich Engels then formulated dialectical materialism, integrating Hegelian dialectics with materialist ontology; Engels elaborated this in Anti-Dühring (1877–1878), applying contradictory motion and negation to natural processes and historical change, arguing that matter in motion underlies all development without teleological purpose.^[55] This framework underpinned historical materialism, viewing societal evolution as driven by economic base contradictions rather than ideas. The twentieth century saw materialism evolve into physicalism, adapting to quantum and relativistic physics while reinforcing ontological claims through analytic philosophy. Vladimir Lenin defended classical materialism against "empirio-criticism"—a subjectivist idealism influenced by Ernst Mach—in Materialism and Empirio-criticism (1909), insisting on objective reality independent of perception to counter revisionist trends within Marxism.^[56] In psychology, John B. Watson's behaviorism, outlined in his 1913 manifesto "Psychology as the Behaviorist Views It," rejected mental states as unobservable, treating behavior as physiological responses to stimuli, aligning with materialist causal chains devoid of inner qualia.^[57] Philosophers like Gilbert Ryle, in The Concept of Mind (1949), dismantled Cartesian dualism as a "category mistake," reinterpreting mental predicates as behavioral dispositions rooted in bodily capacities.^[58] By mid-century, physicalism supplanted stricter materialism to accommodate non-mechanical physical laws, with the term coined in the 1930s by Otto Neurath and Rudolf Carnap to denote supervenience on current physics.^[59] J.J.C. Smart's "Sensations and Brain Processes" (1959) epitomized type-identity theory, positing that phenomenal experiences are identical to neurophysiological events, verifiable through scientific correlation rather than introspective reports, thus reducing mental causation to physical processes.^[60] These developments prioritized empirical testability and causal closure under physical laws, though dialectical variants persisted in Marxist states, where state ideology enforced materialist interpretations of history and science. Despite quantum challenges to classical determinism, physicalism's commitment to exhaustive physical explanation dominated Anglo-American philosophy, sidelining dualist alternatives.

Post-2000 Contemporary Shifts

In the opening years of the 21st century, philosophical materialism experienced a notable diversification through the ascent of new materialism, a framework that gained momentum in continental philosophy and interdisciplinary fields like feminist theory and environmental studies. Originating in the mid-1990s with independent coinages by Manuel DeLanda and Rosi Braidotti, new materialism rejected the perceived anthropocentric and linguistic biases of prior postmodern approaches, instead positing matter as inherently dynamic and agentic, drawing on Deleuzian concepts of assemblages and immanence.^[61] This shift emphasized relational ontologies where human and nonhuman entities co-constitute realities, influencing over a dozen monographs and anthologies by 2012, including the first dedicated volume by Rick Dolphijn and Iris van der Tuin.^[62] Central to this development was Jane Bennett's Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things (2010), which argued for recognizing the "thing-power" of inanimate objects—such as electrical grids or debris—in political and ecological processes, thereby challenging human exceptionalism without invoking supernatural forces.^[63] Complementing this, Karen Barad's agential realism, articulated in Meeting the Universe Halfway (2007), reframed quantum phenomena through "intra-actions," where apparatuses and phenomena mutually enact boundaries, integrating materialist ontology with performative epistemology derived from physics experiments like the double-slit.^[64] These works proliferated new materialist applications across disciplines, with over 20 key texts published between 2007 and 2018, fostering variants like speculative realism that further decentered human subjectivity in favor of flat, processual material ontologies.^[65] In parallel, analytic philosophy sustained orthodox materialist commitments, particularly physicalism, amid refinements from cognitive neuroscience and computational models, though without paradigm-altering breaks comparable to continental innovations. Surveys of professional philosophers indicated physicalism's enduring majority in mind-body debates, supported by empirical correlations between brain states and mental functions documented in fMRI studies post-2000.^[66] However, critiques within materialist circles highlighted limitations of strict reductionism, prompting explorations of emergent properties in complex systems, as in Adrian Johnston's transcendental materialism, which synthesized Lacanian psychoanalysis with Hegelian dialectics to address subjectivity's material genesis.^[67] This era thus marked materialism's adaptation to globalization, technology, and ecological crises, prioritizing causal efficacy of distributed material networks over isolated substances.

Materialism and Empirical Science

Relation to Physicalism and Reductionism

Materialism posits that all entities and phenomena are composed of or dependent upon matter, while physicalism asserts that everything is physical, with "physical" defined by the entities and properties posited by fundamental physics, such as particles, fields, and forces.^[68] Historically, materialism emphasized tangible matter, but as physics evolved beyond classical corpuscles to include non-material entities like quantum fields, physicalism emerged as a refined successor, accommodating these developments without restricting ontology to "matter" alone.^[68] This distinction highlights physicalism's greater flexibility, yet the terms are often used interchangeably in contemporary philosophy, with physicalism viewed as materialism updated for post-19th-century science.^[68] Reductionism, in this context, involves explaining higher-level phenomena (e.g., biological or mental processes) by deriving them from lower-level physical or material constituents, often via type-identity or functional reductions.^[69] Reductive materialism or physicalism claims that all properties reduce to fundamental physical ones, as in the identity theory where mental states are identical to brain states, supported by advances like the quantum-mechanical explanation of chemical bonds.^[70] However, not all materialists or physicalists endorse reductionism; non-reductive variants maintain that while higher-level properties supervene on physical bases (no change without physical change), they are not fully reducible due to multiple realizability or emergent causal powers, preserving physical closure without ontological elimination.^[69] This non-reductive stance addresses empirical complexities in fields like biology, where wholes exhibit properties not predictable from parts alone, yet remains committed to materialism's core denial of non-physical substances.^[68] The interplay underscores materialism's alignment with empirical science's success in reducing diverse phenomena to physical laws, but debates persist over whether non-reductivism undermines causal efficacy or merely reflects incomplete theories, as seen in ongoing challenges to fully reducing consciousness to neural correlates.^[69]

Achievements in Physics, Chemistry, and Biology

The unification of terrestrial and celestial mechanics in Isaac Newton's Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica, published in 1687, established a mathematical framework describing motion, gravity, and planetary orbits solely through interactions of material bodies governed by universal laws, eliminating the need for teleological or immaterial explanations. This deterministic model enabled precise predictions, such as the return of Halley's Comet in 1758, confirmed observationally and attributed to physical causes alone. Subsequent advancements, including James Clerk Maxwell's equations (1861–1865) unifying electricity, magnetism, and optics as properties of the electromagnetic field permeating space, further demonstrated how light and radiation emerge from material interactions without invoking non-physical entities. Albert Einstein's theory of general relativity (1915) extended this by explaining gravity as spacetime curvature caused by mass-energy distributions, verified empirically by the 1919 solar eclipse observations of starlight deflection. The Standard Model of particle physics, developed in the 1970s and validated by the 2012 discovery of the Higgs boson at CERN's Large Hadron Collider, accounts for electromagnetic, weak, and strong nuclear forces acting on quarks, leptons, and bosons—all fundamental physical constituents of matter—with predictions matching experimental data to parts per billion. In chemistry, Friedrich Wöhler's synthesis of urea from inorganic ammonium cyanate in 1828 provided experimental evidence against vitalism, showing that organic compounds could arise from non-living matter via chemical reactions alone. Antoine Lavoisier's law of conservation of mass, established through quantitative experiments in the 1770s and 1780s, demonstrated that matter is neither created nor destroyed in chemical transformations, laying the foundation for a closed material system analyzable by physical laws. Dmitri Mendeleev's periodic table (1869) organized elements by atomic weight and properties, predicting undiscovered elements like gallium (confirmed 1875), revealing periodic patterns attributable to electron configurations in atomic structure. Quantum chemistry, building on Erwin Schrödinger's wave equation (1926), has enabled computational modeling of molecular bonds and reactions, as in the accurate prediction of benzene's stability via Hückel molecular orbital theory (1931), confirming chemical phenomena as outcomes of quantum mechanical interactions among atoms. Biological achievements underscore materialist explanations through mechanisms rooted in chemistry and physics. Charles Darwin's theory of natural selection, outlined in On the Origin of Species (1859), posited species evolution via heritable variations and environmental pressures acting on populations, supported by fossil records and observations like the Galápagos finches' beak adaptations. The elucidation of DNA's double-helix structure by James Watson and Francis Crick in 1953 revealed the molecular basis for genetic inheritance, with base-pairing enabling information storage and replication purely through physicochemical properties. The Human Genome Project, completed in 2003, sequenced approximately 3 billion base pairs, identifying genes linked to traits and diseases (e.g., BRCA1 mutations correlating with breast cancer risk at 55–72% lifetime probability), demonstrating how phenotypic complexity arises from genomic sequences and epigenetic modifications without non-material interventions. In neuroscience, functional MRI studies since the 1990s have mapped specific brain regions to cognitive functions, such as the fusiform face area activating during facial recognition with 90%+ accuracy in localization, correlating mental processes to neural activity patterns. These empirical correlations, while not fully explanatory of qualia, align biological functions—from metabolism to behavior—with material substrates amenable to scientific investigation.

Methodological Materialism vs Ontological Claims

Methodological materialism, also referred to as methodological naturalism, constitutes the foundational assumption of scientific inquiry that natural phenomena are explicable through material causes, laws, and processes, deliberately excluding supernatural or immaterial interventions from explanatory frameworks. This approach mandates that hypotheses be testable via empirical observation, experimentation, and falsification, thereby yielding reproducible knowledge independent of theological presuppositions. As articulated by philosopher Alvin Plantinga, it operates as a provisional methodological constraint—akin to "provisional atheism"—that brackets divine agency during scientific investigation without denying its potential reality.^[71] Such a stance has propelled advancements like the mapping of the human genome, completed in 2003 under the leadership of Francis Collins, by focusing exclusively on biochemical mechanisms. This methodological commitment remains neutral on metaphysical questions, permitting scientists to endorse immaterial realities—such as a divine intelligence—while adhering to material explanations in their professional work. Collins, for instance, who directed the National Human Genome Research Institute from 1993 to 2008 and later the National Institutes of Health from 2009 to 2021, has publicly maintained that methodological naturalism aligns with theistic belief, arguing that scientific success reflects God's orderly creation rather than precluding transcendent causes.^[72] Plantinga further defends its compatibility with Christianity, asserting that no intrinsic conflict arises between empirical science and faith when supernatural claims are reserved for domains beyond methodological scope, such as ultimate origins or moral order. Ontological materialism, conversely, advances a substantive metaphysical thesis: that matter—or more precisely, physical entities and their interactions—exhausts all of reality, with no room for independent immaterial substances, consciousness as non-physical, or supernatural agents. This position, which Plantinga critiques as extending methodological limits into dogmatic exclusion, posits the completeness of physical laws in accounting for every phenomenon, including mental states and biological complexity.^[73] Unlike its methodological counterpart, ontological materialism bears the burden of comprehensive explanatory power, yet it encounters scrutiny for overreaching empirical evidence; for example, while physics describes particle interactions with precision—such as the Standard Model's predictions verified to 10 decimal places in electron magnetic moment measurements— it does not demonstrably reduce qualia or intentionality to material terms alone.^[73] The divergence underscores a key philosophical tension: methodological materialism's empirical fertility does not logically entail ontological claims, as science delineates "how" mechanisms operate without resolving "why" existence is material-only. Proponents of ontological materialism, often aligned with physicalism, argue that the absence of detectable supernatural effects justifies exclusivity to matter, but critics like Plantinga counter that this conflates evidential silence with ontological negation, potentially importing untestable biases into interpretation.^[71] Empirical data, such as the fine-tuning of cosmological constants (e.g., the cosmological constant measured at approximately 10^{-120} in Planck units), may suggest design alternatives compatible with methodological practice but challenging ontological strictures.^[73] Thus, while methodological materialism fortifies scientific rigor, ontological assertions invite broader evidentiary demands beyond current physical paradigms.

Challenges from Physics

Quantum Mechanics and Non-Locality

Quantum mechanics reveals non-locality through phenomena like entanglement, where spatially separated particles exhibit correlated properties such that the measurement of one instantaneously determines the state of the other, irrespective of distance. This effect, first highlighted in the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paradox of 1935, prompted debates over whether quantum mechanics necessitates "spooky action at a distance" or hidden local variables.^[74] John Bell's theorem, formulated in 1964, demonstrated that local realistic theories—positing that physical properties exist independently and are determined by local causes—cannot replicate quantum predictions without violating statistical inequalities derived from such assumptions. Experimental tests, including John Clauser's work in the 1970s, Alain Aspect's 1982 experiments closing detection loopholes, and Anton Zeilinger's later demonstrations of entanglement over large distances, consistently violated these Bell inequalities, confirming quantum non-locality. These results earned Clauser, Aspect, and Zeilinger the 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics for establishing the violation of local realism through entangled photons.^[75]^[76] For materialism, which posits that all phenomena reduce to physical processes governed by local interactions in spacetime, non-locality poses a challenge by implying that fundamental physical states may involve irreducible holistic correlations transcending separable material components. This undermines classical materialist intuitions of locality, where causal influences propagate continuously at or below light speed, as non-local correlations suggest instantaneous dependencies without transferable information, preserving special relativity but questioning strict separability of physical entities.^[77] Interpretations of quantum mechanics respond variably: the de Broglie-Bohm theory embraces explicit non-locality via pilot waves guiding particles, maintaining determinism within a materialist framework, while the many-worlds interpretation restores locality by branching realities without collapse. Nonetheless, the empirical reality of non-locality compels materialists to accommodate non-separable quantum states as basic physical ontology, complicating reductionist claims that higher-level phenomena emerge solely from local particle interactions. Critics argue this holistic aspect erodes the foundational locality assumed in many physicalist accounts, though proponents counter that quantum field theory integrates such features without invoking non-physical elements.^[78]^[79]

Wave Function Collapse and Observer Roles

In quantum mechanics, the wave function mathematically represents a system's possible states as a superposition of probabilities, evolving deterministically via the Schrödinger equation until a measurement occurs, at which point it purportedly "collapses" into a single definite outcome.^[80] This collapse is not derived from the theory's core equations but introduced ad hoc in interpretations like the Copenhagen formulation, where measurement by an "observer" triggers the transition from superposition to eigenvalue.^[81] Early proponents, including Niels Bohr and Werner Heisenberg, emphasized the observer's role without specifying consciousness, framing it as irreversible amplification by macroscopic apparatus interacting with the quantum system.^[82] The precise nature of the observer sparked debate, notably in the von Neumann–Wigner interpretation, where John von Neumann formalized the measurement problem as an infinite regress: the wave function of the measuring device becomes entangled with the system, extending the superposition to the observer unless consciousness intervenes to collapse it.^[81] Eugene Wigner extended this in 1961, positing that a friend's conscious observation could resolve his own superposition, implying mind as a non-physical causal agent in physical processes.^[83] This view, while mathematically consistent, lacked empirical support and faced criticism for introducing dualism, as it suggested subjective awareness—potentially non-material—fundamentally alters objective reality, challenging strict materialism by privileging mental states over purely physical dynamics.^[83]^[84] Contemporary physics largely rejects consciousness as essential, favoring decoherence theory, which explains apparent collapse through environmental interactions entangling the system with a vast "bath" of degrees of freedom, rapidly suppressing interference terms and yielding classical-like probabilities without invoking observers.^[80] Developed in the 1970s–1980s by physicists like Wojciech Zurek, decoherence occurs on femtosecond timescales for macroscopic systems, rendering superpositions unobservable even pre-measurement, thus resolving the observer regress physically via irreversible information leakage to the environment.^[80] Experimental validations, such as cavity QED studies showing coherence loss mirroring theoretical predictions, support this over consciousness-dependent models, which predict detectable delays absent in data.^[82] Alternatives like the many-worlds interpretation eschew collapse entirely, positing universal wave function branching, further diminishing the observer's privileged role.^[80] For materialism, these developments mitigate challenges: if collapse (or its semblance) arises from physical entanglements, as decoherence posits, no non-material consciousness is required, preserving ontological physicalism where all causation traces to material interactions.^[80] Persistent advocacy for observer-induced collapse, as in some quantum foundations research, stems more from interpretive preferences than evidence, with experiments like those testing objective reduction models (e.g., Penrose's Orch-OR) yielding inconclusive results as of 2022, often constrained by quantum gravity uncertainties rather than confirming mental causation.^[84] Thus, while the observer problem historically fueled anti-materialist arguments by highlighting measurement's asymmetry, empirical advances favor purely physical explanations, underscoring quantum mechanics' compatibility with materialism absent verified dualistic mechanisms.^[81]^[84]

Digital Physics and Simulation Hypotheses

Digital physics proposes that the fundamental structure of the universe is discrete and computational, akin to a vast cellular automaton or digital mechanism, rather than continuous fields or particles as in classical materialism. This view traces to Konrad Zuse's 1969 book Rechnender Raum (Calculating Space), where he argued that physical laws emerge from computation on a discrete grid of cells updating according to local rules, implying the universe's history is a calculated sequence without invoking continuous spacetime.^[85] Edward Fredkin advanced the idea in the 1970s and coined "digital physics" in 1978, later favoring "digital philosophy," positing that reality conserves information through reversible processes, with phenomena like mass and energy deriving from informational persistence in a finite-state machine.^[86] Proponents claim this framework derives empirical laws—such as cellular automata yielding glider-like patterns analogous to particles—challenging materialism's reliance on unobservable continuous substances by reducing physics to verifiable algorithmic rules, though continuous symmetries in quantum field theory remain approximated rather than exactly reproduced.^[87] Such models imply matter and forces are emergent from underlying bits or logic operations, prioritizing information ontology over substantial materialism, where "stuff" like atoms loses primacy to rule-based discreteness. This shifts causal realism toward computational substrates, potentially resolving quantum discreteness (e.g., Planck-scale limits) as inherent to the grid, but lacks direct empirical tests beyond simulations matching low-energy physics. Critics note that while compatible with physicalism if computers are material, the hypothesis inverts priorities: fundamental reality becomes code, with observed matter as illusionary output, echoing information-theoretic interpretations without necessitating non-physical minds. No experiment distinguishes digital from analog universes, rendering it speculative despite formal models like Stephen Wolfram's A New Kind of Science (2002) exploring rule universality. The simulation hypothesis extends digital physics by arguing our perceived reality is likely a computer-generated ancestor simulation run by advanced posthumans. Philosopher Nick Bostrom formalized this in his 2003 paper "Are You Living in a Computer Simulation?", presenting a trilemma: either nearly all civilizations go extinct before posthuman stages (probability near zero); or posthumans rarely run detailed simulations of ancestors; or we are almost certainly simulated beings, as one base reality would spawn vastly more simulated minds (e.g., billions per history via efficient computation). Bostrom estimates that if posthumans simulate 10^33 operations per second—feasible with projected computing advances—one such civilization could emulate human history multiple times over, making unsimulated observers a negligible fraction.^[88] For materialism, the hypothesis poses ontological challenges if true, as experienced physics would be programmed approximation, not bedrock reality, with "matter" reduced to data structures in a host system whose base laws remain unknown and potentially non-material. Yet it presupposes computational physicalism in the simulators' world, offering no disproof but probabilistic doubt on fundamental particles' autonomy, aligning with digital physics' information primacy. Empirical gaps persist: no detectable artifacts (e.g., pixelation at Planck scales or simulation glitches) exist, and the argument hinges on unverified assumptions about posthuman motivations and tech feasibility, remaining unfalsifiable without base-reality access.^[89] Variants, like those incorporating quantum computing, suggest nested simulations but amplify speculation without causal evidence overturning materialism's empirical successes in predicting unobserved phenomena via material models.

The Consciousness Problem

Hard Problem of Qualia and Subjective Experience

The hard problem of consciousness, as articulated by philosopher David Chalmers in his 1995 paper "Facing Up to the Problems of Consciousness," refers to the challenge of explaining why and how physical processes in the brain give rise to subjective, first-person experiences, rather than merely functional or behavioral outcomes.^[90] Chalmers distinguishes this from the "easy problems," which involve explaining cognitive functions such as attention, reportability, or the integration of information—tasks amenable to neuroscientific reduction—arguing that solving the easy problems leaves unexplained the existence of phenomenal consciousness itself.^[91] This core issue persists because physical descriptions of neural activity, no matter how detailed, appear to account only for third-person observable mechanisms, failing to address the "why" of experiential "what-it-is-likeness."^[92] Central to the hard problem are qualia, defined in philosophy of mind as the introspectively accessible, phenomenal properties of mental states—the subjective qualities that characterize experiences, such as the vivid redness perceived in viewing a ripe tomato or the sharp ache of pain.^[93] Qualia are intrinsic and ineffable, inaccessible to objective measurement, yet undeniable from the first-person perspective; they constitute the raw feels that distinguish conscious states from mere information processing.^[94] Materialist frameworks, which posit that all phenomena reduce to physical or functional properties, encounter an explanatory gap here: even a complete physical account of color vision—detailing retinal cones, neural firing patterns in the visual cortex, and behavioral responses—does not entail or illuminate why such processes are accompanied by the specific qualitative feel of redness, as opposed to darkness or no experience at all.^[95] This gap, first highlighted by Joseph Levine in 1983 as the difficulty in deriving subjective "feels" from objective physical facts, underscores a fundamental tension for ontological materialism.^[95] Chalmers employs the conceivability argument: it is logically possible to envision "philosophical zombies"—entities physically and behaviorally identical to humans but lacking qualia—suggesting that physical facts alone do not necessitate consciousness, thus challenging reductive physicalism's claim of entailment.^[90] Empirical neuroscience excels at correlating brain states with reports of experience (e.g., specific activations in the anterior cingulate cortex during pain), but correlations do not constitute causal or reductive explanations for qualia's emergence, leaving materialism without a verified mechanism to bridge the subjective-objective divide.^[92] Materialist responses, such as Daniel Dennett's illusionism, propose that qualia are illusory or reducible to functional roles, denying the hard problem's coherence by reframing consciousness as a user-illusion generated by cognitive systems.^[96] However, critics like Chalmers counter that such views fail to engage the first-person data of experience, as denying qualia's reality equates to denying evident introspection without empirical warrant, akin to rejecting other observables.^[90] No neuroscientific breakthrough as of 2025 has closed the gap; functional MRI studies and optogenetic manipulations reveal mechanisms of awareness but not the ontological ground of subjectivity, reinforcing the problem's persistence against purely materialist ontologies.^[91]

Neuroscientific Correlations vs Explanations

Neuroscience has advanced significantly in mapping neural correlates of consciousness (NCC), identifying patterns of brain activity associated with specific conscious states, such as visual perception or decision-making. For instance, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies since the 1990s have shown that activity in the visual cortex correlates with conscious awareness of stimuli, while disruptions in prefrontal or parietal regions link to diminished consciousness in conditions like anesthesia or coma.^[97]^[98] These findings demonstrate reliable empirical associations, enabling predictions of behavioral outcomes from neural data, yet they remain descriptive rather than explanatory regarding the causal origins of subjective experience. The distinction between correlation and explanation becomes critical in addressing the hard problem of consciousness, which questions why physical processes in the brain give rise to qualia—the intrinsic, felt qualities of experience, such as the redness of red or the pain of a headache—rather than merely functioning without phenomenal content. Neural imaging techniques, including electroencephalography (EEG) and positron emission tomography (PET), reveal synchronized oscillations or metabolic changes tied to awareness, but these do not elucidate how or why such activity produces the "what it is like" aspect of mentality, as opposed to zombie-like information processing devoid of inner experience.^[99]^[100] Critics argue that equating NCC with consciousness itself, as in some identity theories, conflates measurable indicators with the explanandum, failing to bridge the epistemic gap between objective brain states and subjective phenomenology.^[101] Materialist accounts often posit that exhaustive neural mappings will eventually dissolve the hard problem through reduction, yet decades of research, including integrated information theory and global workspace models, have yielded functional explanations for access consciousness (reportable thoughts) but not phenomenal consciousness. For example, while NCC research predicts consciousness from neural dynamics under frameworks like the free energy principle, it sidesteps qualia's non-computational, intrinsic nature, which resists third-person scientific reduction.^[102]^[103] This limitation persists despite technological progress; as of 2023 surveys, most neuroscientists acknowledge neurons' necessity for consciousness but hesitate on sufficiency for explaining qualia, highlighting an enduring explanatory shortfall in physicalist paradigms.^[104] Empirical gaps, such as the inability to manipulate qualia directly via neural intervention without altering behavior alone, underscore that correlations inform mechanisms of reportability, not the generation of first-person experience.

Psychedelics, Anomalous Experiences, and Empirical Gaps

Psychedelic substances such as psilocybin and N,N-dimethyltryptamine (DMT) reliably induce profound alterations in consciousness, including ego dissolution, encounters with autonomous entities, and perceptions of alternative realities, which some researchers argue exceed straightforward neural correlates and pose challenges to reductive materialist explanations.^[105] In controlled studies at Johns Hopkins University, high doses of psilocybin occasioned complete mystical-type experiences in 60-70% of participants, characterized by unity, sacredness, and ineffability, with effects persisting for months and correlating with reduced depression and increased openness.^[106] These experiences often involve content—such as vivid geometric patterns or interactions with non-human intelligences—that shows consistency across users regardless of cultural background, suggesting mechanisms beyond idiosyncratic brain hallucination.^[107] DMT administration, whether endogenous or exogenous, produces immersive states mimicking near-death experiences (NDEs), including out-of-body perceptions and realm transitions, with 94% of users reporting encounters with similar "beings" in naturalistic surveys.^[108] Neuroimaging during DMT infusion reveals hyperconnectivity and desynchronization in brain networks, yet fails to account for the hyper-lucid, narrative coherence of reports, which include veridical elements like accurate environmental details during clinical administration.^[109] Critics of materialism contend these phenomena imply access to non-local information or dimensions, as the subjective intensity and therapeutic outcomes—such as sustained remission in anxiety disorders—persist despite reversion to baseline brain chemistry.^[110] Anomalous experiences, encompassing NDEs and psi phenomena like precognition, further highlight empirical gaps, occurring during cerebral anoxia or flatline EEGs where materialist models predict unconsciousness yet yield enhanced cognition and verifiable perceptions.^[111] In cardiac arrest survivors, NDEs feature out-of-body veridicality, such as describing surgical tools unseen from the body position, challenging the view that consciousness derives solely from synaptic activity.^[112] Meta-analyses of psi experiments, aggregating over 90 studies on precognitive anticipation, report small but statistically significant effect sizes (Hedges' g ≈ 0.09), robust against sensory leakage controls, though replication debates persist due to selective reporting concerns.^[113] These domains reveal materialism's explanatory deficits: while correlations link psychedelics to serotonin receptor agonism and anomalous events to temporal lobe activity, causal reduction to physical processes leaves unexplained the qualitative richness, cross-cultural invariance, and post-experience behavioral shifts, prompting postmaterialist frameworks that posit consciousness as fundamental rather than emergent.^[114] Ongoing trials, such as those probing psychedelic-induced attribution of consciousness to non-biological entities, underscore unresolved tensions between empirical phenomenology and ontological commitments.^[115]

Philosophical and Logical Objections

Epistemological Limits and Self-Refutation Claims

Critics argue that strict materialism, particularly in its eliminative form, encounters self-refutation because it posits the eventual elimination of propositional attitudes like beliefs, yet the endorsement of eliminative materialism itself constitutes a belief requiring such attitudes for rational acceptance.^[96] Philosopher Paul Boghossian contends that if eliminative materialism denies the reality of content-bearing states, it undermines the semantic content necessary to assert or justify the theory, rendering it incapable of being true or believed without contradiction.^[96] A prominent epistemological challenge arises from Alvin Plantinga's evolutionary argument against naturalism, which extends to materialist variants reliant on unguided evolution. Plantinga posits that if naturalism (the view that no supernatural entities exist) and evolution are true, the probability that human cognitive faculties produce mostly true beliefs is low, as evolution selects for survival-enhancing behaviors rather than truth-tracking reliability.^[116] Consequently, a naturalist who accepts evolution holds a belief (in naturalism and evolution) that undermines confidence in the reliability of the very faculties producing it, defeating the rationality of the position.^[117] This argument, formalized in Plantinga's 1993 book Warrant and Proper Function, estimates the probability of reliable cognition under these assumptions as roughly 0.1 or less for any given belief, amplifying skepticism across all naturalistic claims.^[116] Transcendental epistemological objections further highlight limits, asserting that materialism presupposes conditions for knowledge (such as intentionality and normativity) that it cannot itself explain or reduce to physical processes without circularity.^[118] For instance, the justification of empirical knowledge under materialism faces the problem that physicalist reductions of mind to brain states fail to account for why such states should confer epistemic warrant, as causal efficacy for survival does not entail veridicality.^[119] Critics like Victor Reppert argue that materialist accounts of reasoning borrow intentional concepts they purport to eliminate, committing a performative contradiction in denying immaterial aspects of cognition while relying on them for argumentation.^[96] These challenges underscore broader limits: materialism's commitment to a closed physical ontology struggles to ground abstract objects like logical laws or truths, which appear necessary for scientific inference yet resist material reduction.^[120] Empirical support for these critiques draws from cognitive science's inability to derive semantic content from neural firings alone, as noted in philosophical analyses since the 1980s, reinforcing that materialist epistemology risks undercutting its own justificatory foundations.^[121]

Free Will, Intentionality, and Reductionist Failures

Materialist ontologies, by positing that all reality consists of physical entities governed by deterministic or probabilistic laws, encounter profound difficulties in accommodating libertarian conceptions of free will, which require agents to initiate causal chains independently of antecedent physical conditions. Classical arguments, such as those from Peter van Inwagen's Consequence Argument, demonstrate that if determinism holds—as entailed by a closed physical causal order—then human actions are ultimately necessitated by events outside the agent's control, rendering genuine alternative possibilities illusory.^[122] Quantum indeterminacy offers no rescue, as stochastic processes introduce randomness rather than agent-directed control, failing to confer the self-determination presupposed in moral responsibility.^[123] Compatibilist maneuvers, advanced by figures like Daniel Dennett, redefine free will as rational deliberation within causal constraints, yet critics contend this conflates behavioral freedom with metaphysical agency, sidestepping the regress problem where deliberations themselves reduce to prior neural firings. Empirical neuroscience, including Benjamin Libet's 1983 experiments showing brain activity preceding conscious intent, has been invoked to support determinism but equally admits interpretations allowing veto power or post hoc rationalization, underscoring reductionism's inability to causally eliminate volitional efficacy without begging explanatory questions.^[124]^[125] Multiple neuroimaging studies since, such as those by John-Dylan Haynes in 2008, replicate readiness potentials antedating awareness, yet fail to preclude emergent intentional causation, highlighting correlational limits rather than reductive success. Intentionality—the "aboutness" or directedness of thoughts toward objects—exacerbates these issues, as articulated by Franz Brentano in 1874, who identified it as the defining mark of mental phenomena absent in mere physical states. Physical tokens, like ink on paper, exhibit derived intentionality only via interpretive conventions, lacking the intrinsic semantic content of beliefs or desires, which resist reduction to spatiotemporal configurations or causal roles.^[126] Theories attempting naturalization, such as teleosemantic accounts by Ruth Millikan, invoke evolutionary functions to ground representation, but falter on normativity: misrepresentation implies error relative to truth conditions, a evaluative dimension irreducible to adaptive fitness without circularity. John Searle's 1980 Chinese Room thought experiment illustrates this breach, where syntactic manipulation of symbols mimics understanding without genuine comprehension, exposing the gap between formal computation and intentional grasp. Reductionist paradigms falter comprehensively here, as they demand strict type or token identity between mental and physical states, yet intentionality's holistic dependencies—on background capacities, social practices, and logical relations—defy micro-reduction without residue, per Hilary Putnam's multiple realizability arguments extended to semantics. Causal exclusion principles further undermine: if physical laws close under causation, mental intentional states either epiphenomenally shadow neural events (denying efficacy) or overdetermine outcomes (violating parsimony), neither preserving the deliberative control intuitive to agency. Philosophers like Jaegwon Kim acknowledge this "exclusion problem" as a core impasse for non-reductive physicalism, implying that full materialism collapses into eliminativism, which discards intentional idioms as folk relics despite their indispensable role in scientific practice itself. Empirical gaps persist, as no neural mapping fully predicts specific propositional attitudes, affirming reduction's explanatory shortfall.^[127]

Idealism, Panpsychism, and Dualist Alternatives

Idealism asserts that reality consists fundamentally of mental entities or perceptions, denying the independent existence of material substance. George Berkeley, in his A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge published in 1710, contended that objects exist only as ideas perceived by minds, encapsulated in the principle "esse est percipi" (to be is to be perceived), thereby eliminating the need for unperceived material substrates that materialism posits. Berkeley's likeness principle argued that since sensory qualities like color and taste are mind-dependent, the purported primary qualities (shape, extension) inferred by materialists must also be perceptual, rendering materialism's distinction incoherent and prone to skepticism about unobserved realities.^[128] Panpsychism proposes that consciousness or proto-conscious properties are inherent in all fundamental physical entities, avoiding the emergence of subjective experience from purely non-conscious matter as required by materialism. This view addresses the hard problem of consciousness by treating phenomenal experience as intrinsic to the universe's basic structure, rather than an inexplicable byproduct of physical processes.^[129] Philosopher Philip Goff, in his 2019 book Galileo's Error, defends constitutive panpsychism, where micro-level subjects of experience combine to form macro-level consciousness, positing that physics describes only relational structures while leaving intrinsic nature—identified as experiential—unexplained by materialist reduction.^[130] David Chalmers has deemed panpsychism a serious contender, noting in discussions of his 1996 work that it sidesteps dualism's interaction issues while accommodating scientific data on consciousness correlations. Recent analyses, such as a 2024 review in Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, highlight panpsychism's resurgence alongside critiques of materialist neuroscience, though it faces the combination problem of how simple experiences aggregate into complex unified ones.^[131] Dualism maintains a fundamental distinction between mental and physical realms, offering an alternative to materialism's monistic reduction of mind to matter. René Descartes, in his 1641 Meditations on First Philosophy, formulated substance dualism, identifying the mind as a non-extended thinking substance res cogitans distinct from the extended body res extensa, supported by the indivisibility of self-awareness contrasting with the body's divisibility. Modern variants include property dualism, which accepts a single material substance but insists mental properties like qualia are non-physical and irreducible, as argued by Chalmers in his naturalistic dualism framework where consciousness features require expansion beyond physics' closure principles.^[132] This approach preserves causal efficacy of mental states without violating physical laws through emergent supervenience, though critics note challenges in mind-body interaction; proponents counter that materialist eliminativism fares worse empirically given persistent qualia reports.^[131] A 2023 paper in the Journal of the American Philosophical Association explores idealist-infused panpsychism as bridging dualism and idealism, integrating spacetime structure with experiential fundamentals to challenge materialist spacetime primacy.^[133]

Religious and Metaphysical Critiques

Abrahamic Perspectives on Immaterial Realms

In Abrahamic traditions, immaterial realms encompass spiritual entities such as God, angels, demons, and human souls, which exist independently of physical matter and interact causally with the material world, positing a dualistic ontology that rejects strict materialism's reduction of reality to physical processes alone.^[134] Judaism, Christianity, and Islam each articulate these realms through scriptural revelation and theological elaboration, emphasizing divine creation ex nihilo and post-mortem continuity of personal identity beyond bodily decay. This framework attributes moral agency and eternal judgment to non-corporeal aspects of existence, challenging materialist accounts that deny non-physical causation or persistence.^[135] Judaism conceptualizes the human soul as comprising multiple immaterial levels—nefesh (vital soul tied to physical life), ruach (emotional spirit), neshamah (intellectual divine breath), chayah (higher will), and yechidah (unique essence)—which originate from God and return to Him after death, surviving bodily dissolution in an afterlife realm known as Olam Ha-Ba (World to Come).^[134] Rabbinic texts affirm bodily resurrection at the end of days alongside the soul's interim existence in Gan Eden (paradise) or Gehinnom (purgatorial realm), where purification occurs without material annihilation, as evidenced in the Talmud's discussions of post-mortem judgment.^[136] This immaterial persistence underpins ethical imperatives, as the soul's divine spark enables free moral choice irreducible to neural firings, countering materialist determinism.^[137] Christian doctrine traditionally upholds the soul's immortality, derived from God's breath in Genesis and New Testament affirmations of immediate post-death presence with Christ or separation from Him, enabling conscious existence in heaven or hell prior to bodily resurrection.^[138] The Catechism of the Catholic Church, echoing patristic fathers like Augustine, describes the soul as a spiritual principle enabling intellect and will, subsisting after death in an immaterial state awaiting final judgment, where heaven entails beatific vision of the triune God and hell eternal separation due to unrepented sin.^[139] Evangelical theologians argue this immaterial realm includes angelic hierarchies and demonic principalities, as in Ephesians 6:12, exerting influence over physical events via divine permission, as seen in scriptural miracles like the Exodus or Resurrection, which defy materialist explanations confined to natural laws.^[140] Islamic theology posits the ruh (soul or spirit) as an immaterial command from Allah, breathed into the fetus around 120 days gestation, animating the body and persisting after death in Barzakh, an intermediary realm of waiting until the Day of Judgment (Yawm al-Qiyamah).^[141] In Barzakh, souls experience preliminary bliss in Illiyin (for the righteous) or torment in Sijjin (for the wicked), based on earthly deeds, before resurrection for eternal Akhirah in Jannah (paradise) or Jahannam (hell), realms of non-physical reward or punishment emphasizing personal accountability.^[142] Quranic verses, such as Surah Al-Mu'minun 23:100, describe Barzakh as a barrier preventing return to earthly life, underscoring the soul's independence from matter and its role in tawhid (divine unity), which critiques materialist reductionism by invoking unseen causal agencies like jinn and angels.^[143] Across these traditions, immaterial realms provide explanatory power for phenomena like moral intuition, prophetic revelation, and reported near-death experiences aligning with scriptural descriptions, which materialists attribute solely to brain activity but which Abrahamic scholars, drawing on historical testimonies from figures like Moses or Muhammad, view as evidence of transcendent interaction.^[134] While some modern interpreters within these faiths explore compatibilist views, orthodox positions maintain that denying immaterial subsistence undermines core doctrines of divine sovereignty and human dignity, as souls' eternal orientation toward or away from God cannot be reduced to emergent properties of matter.^[139]

Eastern Views and Non-Dual Traditions

In ancient Indian philosophy, the Cārvāka or Lokāyata school represented an indigenous form of materialism, emerging around the 6th century BCE, which asserted that reality consists solely of the four physical elements—earth, water, fire, and air—and that consciousness arises from their combination without any immaterial soul or afterlife.^[42] This view rejected inference and testimony as valid means of knowledge, relying only on direct perception, and denied moral causation or karma, promoting hedonism in the present life.^[144] Non-dual traditions, particularly Advaita Vedānta, mounted systematic critiques against such materialism. Adi Śaṅkara (c. 788–820 CE), the foundational exponent of Advaita, refuted the Cārvāka position in his commentary on the Brahma Sūtra, arguing that insentient matter cannot produce sentience, as effects inherit the qualities of their causes; thus, consciousness must be an independent, non-material reality rather than an emergent property.^[145] In Advaita's non-dual ontology, ultimate reality (Brahman) is pure, unchanging consciousness, with the material world appearing as an illusory superimposition (māyā) upon it, rendering materialism incomplete by privileging apparent multiplicity over substratal unity.^[146] Buddhist schools, including Mahāyāna non-dual strains like Madhyamaka and Yogācāra, similarly critiqued Lokāyata for its ethical nihilism and failure to account for dependent origination, viewing materialist denial of rebirth and karma as an extreme that ignores interdependence and emptiness (śūnyatā).^[147] While early Buddhism avoided metaphysical absolutes, non-dual interpretations emphasize that phenomena lack inherent existence, with consciousness not reducible to matter but arising interdependently, challenging materialist reductionism by positing no ultimate duality between mind and matter.^[148] These traditions collectively prioritize experiential realization of non-duality over empirical materialism, seeing the latter as bound to transient appearances.

Theistic Materialism and Compatibility Debates

Theistic materialism posits that the divine can be reconciled with an ontological commitment to matter as the fundamental reality, often by conceiving God as immanent within or composed of material substances rather than purely immaterial.^[149] This view contrasts with classical theism's emphasis on an immaterial, transcendent deity, yet proponents argue it aligns empirical observations of a physical universe with belief in purposeful causation.^[150] In ancient philosophy, the Stoics exemplified early theistic materialism through their corporealism, asserting that only bodies exist and that God, equated with the active principle of pneuma (a material fiery breath), permeates and animates the cosmos as its rational soul.^[149] Zeno of Citium and Chrysippus described the universe as a living, material entity governed by divine logos, where fate and providence operate via material causation without invoking non-corporeal entities.^[149] This framework allowed for theistic piety—through recognition of divine order in nature—while rejecting Platonic forms or immaterial souls, influencing later materialist theologies by prioritizing observable physical processes.^[149] Seventeenth-century thinker Thomas Hobbes advanced a mechanistic materialism that tentatively incorporated theism, viewing God as the initial material cause of motion in an otherwise deterministic material world, though his deistic leanings minimized ongoing divine intervention.^[151] Hobbes's Leviathan (1651) reduced mental phenomena, including religious experience, to corporeal motions, yet affirmed God's existence as inferred from the universe's self-motion, challenging Cartesian dualism while preserving a nominal theistic foundation.^[151] In Latter-day Saint theology, materialism forms a core doctrine, with Joseph Smith's teachings asserting that "there is no such thing as immaterial matter" and that God possesses a tangible body of "spirit" refined into organized intelligence, rendering the divine anthropomorphic and embedded in a material ontology.^[150] Parley P. Pratt's 1840s writings elaborated this as a rejection of classical immaterialism, positing eternal progression through material elements, which distinguishes Mormon theism from Trinitarian orthodoxy by equating spiritual and physical substances.^[152] Contemporary philosopher Peter van Inwagen, a Christian theist, endorses materialism regarding human persons—denying immaterial souls and viewing minds as emergent from physical organisms—while upholding divine creation and resurrection through God's reassembly of material constituents at the eschaton.^[153] In works like Material Beings (1990), van Inwagen argues that organisms are material simples with life predicates, compatible with theism via God's omnipotence overriding physical closure for miracles, thus avoiding dualism without atheism.^[154] Debates on compatibility center on whether ontological materialism—holding all reality dependent on physical processes—accommodates theistic claims of immaterial divine agency or personal immortality. Proponents of compatibility, often via non-reductive physicalism, contend that mental and spiritual states supervene on but are not identical to brain processes, allowing God's transcendent causation to initiate or sustain the material order without violating causal closure, as defended by Christian physicalists like Nancey Murphy.^[155] This view aligns with biblical emphasis on bodily resurrection (e.g., 1 Corinthians 15:42–44, describing transformation of perishable material bodies) over Platonic soul immortality, positing empirical gaps in neuroscience as room for divine purpose.^[156] Critics argue that strict materialism self-undermines theism by eliminating grounds for immaterial divine attributes like omniscience or aseity, reducing God to an emergent property or efficient cause within matter, as critiqued in classical theism's doctrine of divine simplicity.^[157] For instance, if consciousness reduces to physical states, theistic intentionality—God's eternal mind—lacks causal efficacy independent of matter, rendering providence illusory and conflicting with scriptural depictions of an uncreated, spiritual God (e.g., John 4:24).^[158] Empirical challenges, such as the hard problem of qualia, further strain compatibility, as materialist explanations fail to account for subjective experience without invoking non-physical teleology favored by theistic realism.^[157] These debates persist in philosophy of religion, with surveys indicating most analytic theistic philosophers reject reductive materialism due to its implications for free will and moral accountability, favoring dualist or emergentist alternatives despite methodological reliance on physical sciences.^[155] Ultimately, compatibility hinges on whether theism demands ontological exceptions to materialism, a tension unresolved by empirical data alone but informed by first-cause arguments tracing material contingency to a non-material ground.^[159]

Cultural Impacts and Broader Implications

Influence on Atheism, Secularism, and Ethics

Philosophical materialism has exerted a significant influence on atheism by offering a comprehensive ontology that excludes immaterial substances, thereby eliminating the metaphysical basis for divine entities. The ancient atomists, including Democritus around 400 BCE, proposed a universe of indivisible particles in motion through void, operating without teleological purpose or godly intervention, which prefigured atheistic interpretations of reality. This tradition culminated in the Enlightenment with Paul-Henri Thiry, Baron d'Holbach's The System of Nature (1770), which systematically argued that matter and motion alone account for all existence, rendering theism incoherent and nature self-sufficient.^[160] D'Holbach's work, circulated clandestinely due to its radical denial of free will and immortality, inspired later atheists like Bertrand Russell, who in 1927 cited materialist determinism as incompatible with traditional religious doctrines.^[161] Materialism's emphasis on empirical causation over supernatural agency advanced secularism by justifying the privatization or exclusion of religion from public institutions. During the Enlightenment, materialist critiques eroded the presumed divine foundations of monarchy and law, as seen in Julien Offray de La Mettrie's Man a Machine (1747), which reduced human faculties to mechanical processes, undermining clerical authority. This intellectual shift contributed to practical secular reforms, such as the French National Assembly's 1790 Civil Constitution of the Clergy, which subordinated the church to state control and promoted civic virtue based on rational utility rather than faith.^[162] In the 19th century, Karl Marx's historical materialism further secularized social theory by attributing societal development to economic forces and class relations, influencing communist regimes that enforced atheism as state policy, as in the Soviet Union's 1918 decree separating church from state and confiscating religious properties.^[163] In ethics, materialism fosters secular systems grounded in observable natural processes, positing morality as emergent from evolutionary adaptations rather than transcendent imperatives. Edward O. Wilson's Sociobiology: The New Synthesis (1975) applied biological analysis to human conduct, contending that altruistic behaviors and moral norms evolved to maximize inclusive fitness in kin and group selection, providing a materialist basis for evaluating ethical claims through empirical evidence.^[164] Wilson later synthesized this into a "scientific humanism," arguing in works like The Social Conquest of Earth (2012) that moral progress requires understanding human nature's material constraints, such as eusociality in hunter-gatherer societies, to design cooperative institutions without religious appeals.^[165] Such naturalistic approaches, echoed in utilitarian frameworks like Peter Singer's, derive obligations from consequences on sentient beings' physical states, influencing bioethics debates on issues like animal welfare since the 1970s.^[15]

Critiques of Determinism and Nihilism

Critiques of determinism within materialism center on its purported implication that all events, including human decisions, are fully caused by prior physical states, leaving no room for genuine agency. However, this linkage has been challenged by developments in quantum mechanics, which demonstrate inherent probabilistic elements in subatomic processes, such as the unpredictable decay of particles, thereby introducing fundamental indeterminacy incompatible with classical determinism.^[166] This indeterminacy, observed experimentally since the early 20th century through phenomena like the double-slit experiment yielding interference patterns without deterministic trajectories, suggests that materialism need not entail a clockwork universe, allowing for non-determined outcomes even in a purely physical framework.^[167] Further logical objections highlight determinism's self-undermining nature: if all thoughts and beliefs are strictly determined by prior causes, then acceptance of determinism itself arises not from rational evaluation but from causal necessity, rendering it incapable of being true in a cognitively meaningful sense.^[168] Philosophers have argued that this precludes genuine deliberation or moral responsibility, as agents could neither endorse nor reject ideas on evidential grounds; for instance, a determinist praising evidence for their view would ironically attribute that praise to unchosen physical antecedents rather than reasoned choice.^[169] Empirical support for such critiques draws from neuroscience, where studies like Benjamin Libet's 1983 experiments showing brain readiness potentials preceding conscious intent have been contested for conflating unconscious preparation with full causation, failing to disprove veto power or higher-level agency.^[170] Regarding nihilism, the charge that materialism dissolves objective meaning or value—reducing purposes to illusory byproducts of neural firings—faces rebuttals emphasizing emergent properties in complex systems. Biological evolution, evidenced by over 3.5 billion years of adaptive pressures documented in fossil records and genetic analyses, fosters goal-directed behaviors (e.g., survival and reproduction) that confer objective fitness advantages, grounding a form of intrinsic purpose without invoking non-material realms.^[171] Critics of nihilistic interpretations argue that denying value's reality equates to rejecting observable causal patterns, such as how human flourishing correlates with specific neural and social configurations, measurable via metrics like longevity and societal stability in longitudinal studies spanning decades.^[172] Nihilism itself is critiqued as internally inconsistent, positing the negation of all claims while implicitly asserting its own validity, a performative contradiction akin to denying logic's binding force mid-argument.^[173] Materialist responses further contend that subjective or intersubjective meanings—arising from consistent patterns in human cognition, as mapped by fMRI scans revealing shared reward responses to cooperative acts—suffice for ethics without transcendent anchors, countering the slide into valuelessness; for example, evolutionary game theory models from the 1970s onward demonstrate how reciprocal altruism stabilizes populations, implying normative pressures independent of cosmic purpose.^[174] These critiques maintain that while materialism eschews supernatural teleology, it aligns with causal realism in affirming value through verifiable, matter-based mechanisms rather than unsubstantiated absolutes.

Materialism in Economics and Consumerism

Philosophical materialism, asserting that all phenomena arise from material processes without immaterial essences, underpins economic frameworks reducing human agency to pursuit of tangible resources and utility.^[4] This perspective aligns with classical and neoclassical economics, where self-interested actors maximize material wealth, as in Adam Smith's analysis of market exchanges driven by observable incentives rather than spiritual motivations.^[175] By denying transcendent purposes, it shifts fulfillment toward empirical gains, fostering theories like historical materialism in Marx, which posits economic bases as the causal drivers of societal structures.^[176] In practice, this manifests in consumerism, where identity and satisfaction derive from acquiring goods, amplified in secular societies lacking non-material anchors. Consumer spending accounts for about 70% of U.S. GDP, propelling growth through demand for durables and services, yet this reliance on material throughput sustains cycles of production and obsolescence.^[177] ^[178] Studies link such materialistic values to heightened compulsive buying and status signaling, as individuals compensate for existential voids with possessions.^[179] Empirical evidence reveals drawbacks: materialistic orientations negatively correlate with life satisfaction, with high materialists reporting lower positive affect and higher negative emotions due to unmet relational needs.^[180] ^[181] Gratitude mediates this, as materialists exhibit reduced appreciation for non-material sources of joy, exacerbating dissatisfaction despite rising consumption.^[182] While boosting short-term economic metrics, persistent materialism contributes to environmental strain, with material footprints preceding GDP expansions in resource-intensive economies.^[183] Critics argue this framework overlooks causal limits, such as diminishing returns on happiness post-basic needs, where further material accumulation yields negligible well-being gains.^[184] In affluent contexts, it perpetuates inequality by prioritizing aggregate output over distributive equity, as wealth concentration amplifies consumption disparities without resolving underlying motivational reductions.^[185] Thus, while enabling technological and productive advances, materialism's economic instantiation risks systemic unsustainability absent integration of non-reductive human dimensions.

References

[1]
[PDF] MATERIALISM: A HISTORICO-PHILOSOPHICAL INTRODUCTION
Nov 24, 2015 · Materialism – the philosophical doctrine that 'Everything that exists, is material', including human beings, who cannot then have an ...
[2]
What is Materialism? | Issue 42 - Philosophy Now
Materialism asserts that everything is or can be explained in relation to matter. This would be straightforward enough if we had a clear and stable idea of ...<|separator|>
[3]
Materialism matters: The role of philosophy in science
matter — exists, and everything in the Universe, including consciousness, is made from or is a ...
[4]
Materialism - The Decision Lab
Philosophical Materialism: The belief that everything that truly exists is matter; everything is material. Thus, all phenomena we see result from material ...
[5]
IX: A Very Brief History of Materialism
Galileo, Bacon and Descartes have laid the basis in materialist philosophy for the revolution in natural science, industry and social development.
[6]
The Case for Materialism | Thinking about Consciousness
The causal argument focuses on the way in which conscious occurrences operate as causes. It says that conscious causes must be identical to physical causes.1.3 The Ontology Of Causes · 1.4 Epiphenomenalism And... · 1.6 Functionalism And...
[7]
A grounding physicalist solution to the causal exclusion problem
Aug 14, 2020 · Causal Closure. Every physical fact that has a cause has a sufficient physical cause (or has its probability fixed by purely physical ...
[8]
The Causal Closure of the Physical and Naturalism - Oxford Academic
The causal closure of the physical says only that when we are within the physical realm we will find that every physical effect has a physical cause. Even so, ...
[9]
THE CAUSAL CLOSURE PRINCIPLE - jstor
Apr 26, 2015 · The idea that mental entities are causally relevant to bodily behaviour is central to our pretheoretical conception of human agency.
[10]
Lenin: 1908/mec: 1. What Is Matter? What Is Experience?
Matter is what produces sensation, and experience is related to the environment. Lenin interprets experience as materialist, as something objective given from ...
[11]
Grounding Causal Closure or Something Near Enough
Dec 28, 2024 · The task of this paper is to develop an account of the ground of the causal closure of the physical, or something near enough, that enables physicalists to ...Grounding Causal Closure Or... · 2 The Causal Argument · Notes
[12]
Physical Causal Closure and the Invisibility of Mental Causation
This chapter develops more detailed models of mental causation of the kinds adumbrated, and explains why, if such models are correct, it should nonetheless ...
[13]
Materialism and Behaviorism – Introduction to Philosophy
There are no thoughts, no emotions, no minds. Everything is just an effect of brain and other physical processes. This kind of materialism is called eliminative ...
[14]
Materialism - ProleWiki
Mar 7, 2023 · The main principles of materialism can be formulated as such: The world is by its very nature material; everything which exists comes into ...Main principles · History · Early materialism
[15]
Materialism, Freedom & Ethics | Issue 159 - Philosophy Now
Materialism, Freedom & Ethics · Reality Consists of Physical Things. A materialist view of the world might strike you as characteristically modern and Western.Materialism, Freedom &... · Reality Consists Of Physical... · Compatibilism And...<|separator|>
[16]
(PDF) Causal Realism - ResearchGate
Causal realism is the view that causation is a real and fundamental feature of the world. That is to say, causation cannot be reduced to other features of the ...
[17]
(PDF) Contemporary Materialism: Its Ontology and Epistemology
Jan 17, 2022 · This concept asserts that all events in the universe are governed by causation and can be rationally explained without any supernatural ...
[18]
Ben Gibran, Causal realism in the philosophy of mind - PhilPapers
Jun 4, 2014 · Causal realism is the view that causation is a structural feature of reality; a power inherent in the world to produce effects, independently of ...
[19]
Atomism: Democritus and Leucippus' Materialist Universe
Oct 11, 2023 · Democritus and Leucippus, founders of Atomism, proposed a universe consisting of indivisible atoms moving in the void, a view that combines ...Missing: classical | Show results with:classical
[20]
The Atomists – Democritus and Leucippus | Greek Philosophy Class ...
Fundamental Principles of Atomism. The universe consists of two fundamental entities: atoms and void; Atoms are indivisible, uncreated, and indestructible ...Missing: classical | Show results with:classical
[21]
Atoms & Void - filosofs.co
Jul 20, 2022 · For Epicurus, the entirety of reality consisted of nothing but atoms and void (emptiness), and it was from this ontological viewpoint that ...Missing: classical | Show results with:classical
[22]
Materialism: Atoms and Void | Highbrow
Jun 26, 2020 · Epicurus's philosophy was rooted in Democritus's atomist view of the universe. He imagined the world and everything in it as a turbulent ...Missing: classical | Show results with:classical
[23]
IMNotes5.htm
The fundamental idea of reductive materialism is that every kind of mental state, including consciousness, just is a corresponding kind of physical state. For ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
[24]
Phil 340: Smart's Identity Theory - Jim Pryor
A better summary of identity theory is that every mental state is identical to (equals) some brain state.
[25]
[PDF] Nonreductive Materialism
Nonreductive materialism holds that the mental is part of the material world, but mental properties are causally effective without being reducible to physical ...
[26]
[PDF] Emergent Materialism | Sean Sayers
1. Materialism (ontological physicalism): everything is ultimately composed of physical constituents (fundamental physical particles and forces).Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[27]
[PDF] Kim on Overdetermination, Exclusion and Nonreductive Physicalism ...
Kim on Overdetermination, Exclusion and Nonreductive Physicalism. Jaegwon Kim argues that nonreductive physicalism entails the causal irrelevance of mental ...
[28]
Karl Marx - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Aug 26, 2003 · In The German Ideology manuscripts, Marx and Engels contrast their new materialist method with the idealism that had characterised previous ...
[29]
American Materialism - Anthropology - The University of Alabama
Marx developed the concept of dialectical materialism borrowing his dialectics from Hegel and his materialism from others. To Marx, “the mode of production in ...
[30]
Untitled
Engels perpetuated Marx's insistence that materialism must be dialectical, particularly in his Anti-Duhring (1878) where he defended the Hegelian aspects of ...
[31]
Marx and historical materialism | MR Online
Jan 29, 2018 · Two further, crucial distinctions are necessary to get a grip on Marx's historical materialism. The first is between “base” and “superstructure” ...<|separator|>
[32]
[PDF] The Validity of Karl Marx's Theory of Historical Materialism
Marx's theory of historical materialism uses the evolution of productive forces and class struggle to explain history. With the fall of communism in the 20th.
[33]
New Materialism: Interviews & Cartographies - University of Michigan
Q1: “New materialism” as a term was coined by Manuel DeLanda and Rosi Braidotti in the second half of the 1990's. New materialism shows how the mind is ...Missing: thinkers | Show results with:thinkers
[34]
New Materialism
### Summary of New Materialism
[35]
New Materialism - The Sociological Review
Sep 16, 2020 · The materiality addressed in these new materialisms is relational, plural, open, complex, uneven and contingent; cuts across dualistic ...Missing: variants | Show results with:variants
[36]
Presocratic Philosophy
Mar 10, 2007 · Like the other Presocratics, Thales sees nature as a complete and self-ordering system, and sees no reason to call on divine intervention from ...Who Were the Presocratic... · Presocratic Atomism · The Presocratic Legacy
[37]
Presocratics | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Thales supposed the principle or source (arche) of all things to be water. Aristotle guesses some reasons why Thales might have believed this (Graham 29). First ...
[38]
Ancient Atomism - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Oct 18, 2022 · Democritus' atomism was revived in the early Hellenistic period: Epicurus (341–270 BCE) founded an atomist school in Athens about 306 BCE. The ...
[39]
Democritus - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Aug 15, 2004 · He elaborated a system originated by his teacher Leucippus into a materialist account of the natural world. The atomists held that there are ...
[40]
Lucretius - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Sep 22, 2023 · Epicurus advanced atomist explanations to an unsurpassed degree, yet Epicurean science remained subordinate to the ethical aim of freeing us ...
[41]
Lucretius | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
In Santayana's view, Epicurus was but a supplier of half-baked ideas; it was Lucretius who was the true creator of scientific materialism and the real founder ...Lucretius' Personality and... · Philosophy · Epicurus · Lucretius as a Philosopher
[42]
Lokayata/Carvaka – Indian Materialism
The terms Lokāyata and Cārvāka have historically been used to denote the philosophical school of Indian Materialism. Literally, “Lokāyata” means philosophy ...History · Status in Indian Thought · Materialism as Heresy · Doctrine
[43]
Stoicism - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Jan 20, 2023 · Stoic ontology is radically materialist or, more precisely, corporealist. According to the Stoics, only bodies exist, because only bodies ...Missing: theistic | Show results with:theistic
[44]
Thomas Hobbes - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Mar 11, 2009 · 3. Materialism. By the time of Leviathan and De Corpore, Hobbes was convinced that human beings (including their minds) were entirely material.
[45]
Thomas Hobbes (1588–1679): The Materialist View of Human Nature
Hobbes believed that all phenomena in the universe, without exception, can be explained in terms of the motions and interactions of material bodies.
[46]
Thomas Hobbes - Philosopher, Leviathan, Social Contract | Britannica
Oct 8, 2025 · Hobbes was thus a mechanical materialist: He held that nothing but material things are real, and he thought that the subject matter of all the natural sciences ...
[47]
Enlightenment - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Aug 20, 2010 · There is a renowned Scottish Enlightenment (key figures are Frances Hutcheson, Adam Smith, David Hume, Thomas Reid), a German Enlightenment ( ...
[48]
Man a Machine - Project Gutenberg
Le corps humain est une machine qui monte elle-même ses ressorts; vivante image du mouvement perpétuel. Les aliments entretiennent ce que la fièvre excite. Sans ...Man a Machine · 123 · 146 · 165
[49]
Man a Machine by Julien Offray de la Mettrie - Books - Amazon.com
Man a Machine (French: L'homme Machine) is a work of materialist philosophy by the 18th-century French physician and philosopher Julien Offray de La Mettrie.
[50]
The System of Nature, Volume I (of Ii), by Paul Henri Thiery (baron D ...
Holbach is best known for The System of Nature (1770) and deservedly, since it is a clear and reasonably systematic exposition of his main ideas. His initial ...
[51]
Paul-Henri Thiry (Baron) d'Holbach
Sep 6, 2002 · For Holbach, like Spinoza and Hobbes, holds that each person seeks his own preservation (System of Nature, 40; cf, Spinoza's Ethics IIIp9 and ...Metaphysics: Matter and... · Ethics: Virtue for the Sake of... · Bibliography
[52]
System of Nature | work by Holbach - Britannica
The System of Nature, published under the name of JB Mirabaud, caustically derided religion and espoused an atheistic, deterministic materialism.
[53]
Modern History - Internet History Sourcebooks
Ludwig Büchner: Force and Matter--Empirico-Philosophical Studies Intelligibly Rendered, 1855. This is one of the most successful, and early, statements on ...
[54]
Theses On Feuerbach by Karl Marx - Marxists Internet Archive
Theses On Feuerbach ... Written: by Marx in Brussels in the spring of 1845, under the title “1) ad Feuerbach”; Marx's original text was first published in 1924, ...
[55]
1877: Anti-Duhring - Marxists Internet Archive
In October 1878, Germany's Anti-Socialist Law was instituted and Anti-Dühring was banned along with Engels' other works. In 1886, a second edition appeared in ...Socialism, Theoretical · Fragment on Ireland · Notes by Engels · Introduction
[56]
Materialism and Empirio-criticism - Marxists Internet Archive
The book Materialism and Empirio-criticism. Critical Comments on a Reactionary Philosophy was written by Lenin during February to October 1908 in Geneva and ...Chapter 1.1, Sensations And... · 6. Freedom and Necessity · 1908/mec · Conclusion
[57]
Watson's Positivism: Materialist or Phenomenalist? - SpringerLink
It is a commonly held opinion that John B. Watson's behaviorism was a species of philosophical materialism. Edna Heidbreder, for instance, spoke of it as ...
[58]
The concept of mind. - APA PsycNet
Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. Barnes & Noble. Abstract. The Cartesian distinction between the inner and the outer world cannot be maintained ...
[59]
The Mind-Body Problem - Open Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science
Feb 10, 2025 · Some philosophers in the early 20th century introduced the term physicalism to replace materialism, partly because physics recognizes the ...Core Concepts · Questions, Controversies... · The Argument For Physicalism...
[60]
[PDF] Sensations and brain processes - andrew.cmu.ed
J. J. C. Smart, Ernest Sosa, J. T. Stevenson, Charles Taylor. MACMILLAN ... Sensations and brain processes. 55 the plain man, in the first paragraph of ...
[61]
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/o/ohp/11515701.0001.001/1:5.2/--new-materialism-interviews-cartographies
[62]
https://oxfordre.com/literature/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190201098.001.0001/acrefore-9780190201098-e-1013
[63]
“The Flesh of The Perceptible”: The New Materialism of Leviathan
Sep 25, 2018 · Jane Bennett has become one of New Materialism's most prominent proponents since the release of her now-seminal text, Vibrant Matter in 2010.
[64]
New Materialism(s) - Critical Posthumanism Network
Apr 25, 2018 · “New materialism” is a term coined in the 1990s to describe a theoretical turn away from the persistent dualisms in modern and humanist ...
[65]
(PDF) WHAT IS NEW MATERIALISM? - ResearchGate
Nov 19, 2019 · New materialism is one of the most important emerging trends in the humanities and social sciences, but it is also one of the least ...
[66]
How did materialism become such a prominent view in the 21st ...
Jan 30, 2022 · I suspect that insofar as materialism is a prominent position in Anglophone philosophy, it has been for the better part of a century.What are the most important post-2000 developments in philosophy?What exactly is "new" about "new materialism"? : r/CriticalTheoryMore results from www.reddit.comMissing: shifts 2000
[67]
On Transcendental Materialism: Adrian Johnston, interviewed by ...
Adrian Johnston is one of the most widely followed philosophers writing today. Influenced by Žižek and his readings of German idealism.
[68]
Physicalism - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Feb 13, 2001 · The word 'materialism' appears in English towards the end of the 17th century, but the word 'physicalism' was introduced into philosophy only in ...
[69]
[PDF] Can Physicalism Be Non-Reductive? - Philosophy
I myself incline strongly to the first view – that properly formulated physicalism is reductive, and hence that, to echo Jaegwon Kim's provocative language from ...
[70]
[PDF] Physicalism: Ontology, Determination, and Reduction
The physicalism that appears plausible has two components: ontological physicalism-the Principle of Physical Exhaustion- and Physical Determinationism, a ...
[71]
Methodological Naturalism? Part 1. Origins & Design 18:1. Plantinga ...
The philosophical doctrine of methodological naturalism holds that, for any study of the world to qualify as "scientific," it cannot refer to God's creative ...
[72]
Methodological versus metaphysical naturalism: A comprehensive ...
May 23, 2025 · Yet prominent scientists like Francis Collins and Kenneth Miller demonstrate that methodological naturalism can be practiced effectively while ...
[73]
Science or Materialism? Pick a Lane - Word on Fire
Aug 20, 2024 · Ontological materialism is believing that only matter exists. Materialism as a practice of science is distinct from materialism as a philosophy ...
[74]
How Bell's Theorem Proved 'Spooky Action at a Distance' Is Real
Jul 20, 2021 · This article explains the textbook approach to Bell's Theorem: if Bell-type inequalities are violated, then our Universe is non-local.
[75]
Press release: The Nobel Prize in Physics 2022 - NobelPrize.org
Oct 4, 2022 · Alain Aspect, John Clauser and Anton Zeilinger have each conducted groundbreaking experiments using entangled quantum states.
[76]
Bell's Theorem - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Jul 21, 2004 · Bell's theorem shows that no theory that satisfies the conditions imposed can reproduce the probabilistic predictions of quantum mechanics under all ...Introduction · Proof of a Theorem of Bell's Type · Some Variants of Bell's Theorem
[77]
Quantum Entanglement: A Challenge to Physicalism
Quantum entanglement, characterized by nonlocal correlations between particles, challenges fundamental assumptions of physicalism, particularly its reliance ...
[78]
[1501.04618] Quantum non-locality - It ain't necessarily so... - arXiv
Jan 19, 2015 · We show that such claims are unfounded and that every derivation of Bell's inequalities requires a premise -- in addition to locality and freedom of choice.
[79]
[PDF] Making Sense of Bell's Theorem and Quantum Nonlocality
Mar 27, 2017 · Bell's theorem and its many extensions have led to the claim that quantum mechanics and by inference nature herself are nonlocal in the sense ...
[80]
The Role of Decoherence in Quantum Mechanics
Nov 3, 2003 · Decoherence is precisely the study of such situations. It is is relevant (or is claimed to be relevant) to a variety of questions ranging from the measurement ...Theory of Decoherence · Decoherence and the... · The Role(s) of Decoherence in...
[81]
Consciousness and the Collapse of the Wave Function
Does consciousness collapse the quantum wave function? This idea was taken seriously by John von Neumann and Eugene Wigner but is now widely dismissed.
[82]
Collapse of wave functions in Schrödinger's wave mechanics - Nature
Feb 5, 2025 · This indicates that dynamical collapse of the wave function through inelastic scattering can explain the emergence of particle-like signals.
[83]
Does Consciousness Cause Quantum Collapse? | Issue 121
On the physicalist interpretation, consciousness is not mentioned at all. Instead, it is the physical correlate of consciousness (Φ) that causes collapse. The ...
[84]
Physics Experiments Spell Doom for Quantum 'Collapse' Theory
Oct 20, 2022 · The truth is that “the fundamental cause of the wave function collapse is yet unknown,” said Inwook Kim (opens a new tab), a physicist at ...
[85]
Zuse hypothesis - Algorithmic Theory of Everything - Digital Physics ...
Zuse was the first to propose that physics is just computation, suggesting that the history of our universe is being computed on, say, a cellular automaton.
[86]
Remembering the Improbable Life of Ed Fredkin (1934–2023) and ...
Aug 22, 2023 · Digital Physics & Reversible Logic. Back at MIT in 1975 after his year at Caltech, Ed was no longer the director of Project MAC, but was still ...Missing: proponents | Show results with:proponents
[87]
ZUSE-FREDKIN-THESIS
Juergen Schmidhuber makes the case that Konrad Zuse had the idea that the universe is running on a grid of computers as early as 1967.Missing: key proponents
[88]
https://www.simulation-argument.com/
[89]
The Simulation Argument FAQ
The simulation argument suggests we are likely in a simulation, or that we will go extinct before reaching a posthuman stage, or that posthuman civilizations ...
[90]
[PDF] Facing Up to the Problem of Consciousness - David Chalmers
The really hard problem of consciousness is the problem of experience. When we think and perceive, there is a whir of information-processing, but there is ...
[91]
Hard problem of consciousness - Scholarpedia
May 21, 2009 · The hard problem of consciousness (Chalmers 1995) is the problem of explaining the relationship between physical phenomena, such as brain processes, and ...
[92]
Hard Problem of Consciousness | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
The hard problem of consciousness is the problem of explaining why any physical state is conscious rather than nonconscious.Stating the Problem · Chalmers · Responses to the Problem · Strong Reductionism
[93]
Qualia - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Aug 20, 1997 · Philosophers often use the term 'qualia' (singular 'quale') to refer to the introspectively accessible, phenomenal aspects of our mental lives.Uses of the Term 'Qualia' · Are Qualia Irreducible, Non... · Qualia as Intrinsic...
[94]
Qualia | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Qualia are often referred to as the phenomenal properties of experience, and experiences that have qualia are referred to as being phenomenally conscious.The Hard Problem of... · Qualia and Physicalism · Qualia and Representationalism
[95]
[PDF] MATERIALISM AND QUALIA THE EXPLANATORY GAP
First of all, the phenomenon of consciousness arises on the macroscopic level. That is, it is only highly organized physical systems which exhibit mentality ...
[96]
Eliminative Materialism - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
May 8, 2003 · Eliminative materialism (or eliminativism) is the radical claim that our ordinary, common-sense understanding of the mind is deeply wrong.A Brief History · Arguments For Eliminative... · Arguments Against Eliminative...
[97]
The Neuroscience of Consciousness
Oct 9, 2018 · Conscious experience in humans depends on brain activity, so neuroscience will contribute to explaining consciousness.
[98]
The Neural Correlates of Consciousness and Attention: Two Sister ...
This paper discusses the conceptual issues that stir the debate about the dissociation of consciousness and attention and reviews the most relevant studies in ...
[99]
What Can Neuroscience Tell Us about the Hard Problem of ... - NIH
Aug 12, 2016 · What Can Neuroscience Tell Us about the Hard Problem of Consciousness? ... The neural correlates of consciousness: An analysis of cognitive ...Missing: explanations | Show results with:explanations
[100]
A Persistent Challenge for Neuroscientific and Philosophical Theories
May 19, 2025 · The most prominent theories on the neuronal correlates of consciousness (NCC) are then compared with philosophical attempts to address the ...
[101]
Neural Correlates of Consciousness Meet the Theory of Identity - PMC
Jul 24, 2018 · We favor the theory of the identity of mind and brain, according to which states of phenomenal consciousness are identical with their neural correlates.
[102]
The neural correlates of consciousness under the free energy principle
Under the free energy principle, neural correlates should be defined in terms of neural dynamics, not neural states, and should be complemented by research on ...Missing: neuroscientific | Show results with:neuroscientific
[103]
Sensing Qualia - PMC - PubMed Central - NIH
Mar 11, 2022 · There are three problems with this method of accounting for qualia which I will address in turn: the notion of intrinsicality and evolutionary ...
[104]
What Neuroscientists Think, and Don't Think, About Consciousness
Neuroscience has furnished evidence that neurons are fundamental to consciousness; at the fine and gross scale, aspects of our conscious experience depend on ...Missing: neuroscientific | Show results with:neuroscientific
[105]
Psychedelics and Consciousness: Distinctions, Demarcations, and ...
Abstract. Psychedelic substances produce unusual and compelling changes in conscious experience that have prompted some to propose that psychedelics may provide ...
[106]
Mystical Experiences Occasioned by the Hallucinogen Psilocybin ...
We hypothesized that mystical experiences during the psilocybin session, as measured by the SOCQ, would lead to increases in Openness. We investigated this ...
[107]
DMT Models the Near-Death Experience - Frontiers
Aug 14, 2018 · Commonly described features of the DMT experience include a feeling of transcending one's body and entering into an alternative 'realm', an ...
[108]
A Thematic and Content Analysis of DMT Experiences From a ...
Introduction: N,N-dimethyltryptamine (DMT) is an endogenous serotonergic psychedelic capable of producing radical shifts in conscious experience.
[109]
DMT alters cortical travelling waves - eLife
Oct 12, 2020 · N,N, Dimethyltryptamine (DMT) can rapidly induce an extremely immersive state of consciousness characterized by vivid and elaborate visual imagery.
[110]
Advanced brain imaging study hints at how DMT alters perception of ...
Mar 21, 2023 · During the immersive DMT experience there was increased connectivity across the brain, with more communication between different areas and ...Missing: material | Show results with:material
[111]
(PDF) Implications of Near-Death Experiences for a Postmaterialist ...
Oct 9, 2025 · “Near-death experiences” include phenomena that challenge materialist reductionism, such as enhanced mentation and memory during cerebral impairment.
[112]
This is your brain on death: a comparative analysis of a near ... - NIH
Jun 29, 2023 · This article presents a case study of an individual who is popularly documented to have had a profound near-death experience while in a coma caused by ...<|separator|>
[113]
Feeling the future: A meta-analysis of 90 experiments on the ...
Oct 30, 2015 · We discuss the controversial status of precognition and other anomalous effects collectively known as psi. Keywords: precognition, psi, ESP, ...
[114]
Anomalous Cognition: An Umbrella Review of the Meta-Analytic ...
Oct 28, 2021 · Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the results of all meta-analyses on anomalous cognition conducted between 1989 and 2021 in order ...
[115]
New Johns Hopkins Study Explores Relationship Between ...
Mar 31, 2022 · A new study by Johns Hopkins Medicine researchers addresses the question of whether psychedelics might change the attribution of consciousness.
[116]
[PDF] An Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism - AWS
According to Plantinga, blind evolution is not likely to lead to reliable cognitive faculties, which means that naturalists who recognize this cannot rationally ...
[117]
Plantinga's Evolutionary Argument against Naturalism
Nov 8, 2020 · Plantinga argues that naturalism is self-defeating because if our cognitive faculties have evolved by naturalistic processes, they are aimed, ...
[118]
Epistemological Objections to Materialism - Oxford Academic
This chapter argues that materialism is vulnerable to two kinds of epistemological objections: transcendental arguments, that show that materialism is ...
[119]
[PDF] ESSAY: The Argument Against Materialism - PhilArchive
Materialism as a form of metaphysics therefore becomes self-refuting, it collapses on itself. The very form of the speculation, the assumption, that such an.
[120]
Why the Idea of Materialism Refutes Itself - Adventist Review
Oct 11, 2024 · The idea that all reality is only materialistic and mechanical is refuted by the idea itself, which as an idea exists in non-materialistic and non-mechanical ...
[121]
[PDF] AGAINST MATERIALISM - Andrew M. Bailey
two arguments against materialism. The first is an argument from possibility ... typically thinks of an immaterial self, a soul, a thing that thinks, as simple.
[122]
Free Will - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Jan 7, 2002 · The problem is that we often fail to choose to do things we want to choose, even when it appears that we had the ability to choose otherwise ( ...
[123]
Dualism and Mind | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
So, a strong sense of free will is compatible with dualism but incompatible with materialism. Since freedom in just this sense is required for moral appraisal, ...
[124]
Compatibilism - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Apr 26, 2004 · Compatibilism offers a solution to the free will problem, which concerns a disputed incompatibility between free will and determinism.Arguments for Incompatibilism · State of the Art · IncompatibilistMissing: materialism | Show results with:materialism
[125]
Mental Causation - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
The term “mental causation” applies to causal transactions involving mental events or states, such as beliefs, desires, feelings, and perceptions.
[126]
Intentionality - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Aug 7, 2003 · In fact, Brentano held that intentionality is the hallmark of the mental: much of twentieth century philosophy of mind has been shaped by what, ...
[127]
Mind and the Causal Exclusion Problem
The nonreductive physicalist posits that mental events supervene on physical events, so there are not two independent causal processes, so behavioural effects ...Introduction · The Causal Exclusion Problem · Solutions to the Causal...
[128]
Berkeley's Argument on Materialism Analysis Essay - IvyPanda
Jan 12, 2019 · Berkeley argued that perceiving an object to as possessing both primary and secondary qualities was not enough to ascertain that the object ...
[129]
The Case For Panpsychism | Issue 121 - Philosophy Now
This is the difficulty David Chalmers famously called 'the hard problem of consciousness'. Physical mechanisms are well-suited for the explanation of physical ...
[130]
Problems for Goff's panpsychism - Edward Feser
Jul 3, 2022 · Panpsychism is the view that conscious awareness pervades the physical world, down to the level of basic particles.<|separator|>
[131]
Panpsychism and dualism in the science of consciousness - PubMed
Aug 4, 2024 · A resurgence of panpsychism and dualism is a matter of ongoing debate in modern neuroscience. Although metaphysically hostile, panpsychism ...Missing: developments 2020-2025
[132]
The Mind-Body Problem & Consciousness: Dualism vs. Materialism
Feb 22, 2025 · Dualism is the idea that while the body is made of physical material, the mind is made of something immaterial.
[133]
Idealist Panpsychism and Spacetime Structure | Journal of the ...
Oct 9, 2023 · Idealist panpsychists posit that fundamental reality is purely experiential. Moreover, they posit that consciousness at the fundamental level ...
[134]
The Soul and the Afterlife - Chabad.org
The Midrash states that the soul has five names: Nefesh (soul of vitality), Ruach (spirit), Neshamah (breath of life), Chaya (living one), and Yechidah ( ...
[135]
What Is Judaism's View of the Soul? - Aish.com
Oct 14, 2024 · Nefesh (נפש): the nefesh is the lowest level of the divine soul, and it corresponds to action and doing. · Ruach (רוח): the ruach is associated ...
[136]
Death and Afterlife - St Andrews Encyclopaedia of Theology
Jul 21, 2025 · Rabbinic texts oscillate between belief in bodily resurrection, where body and soul are judged together, and the notion of a soul that exists ...
[137]
Body and Soul - My Jewish Learning
Judaism teaches that the body and soul are separate yet indivisible partners in human life. Rather than imprisoning or corrupting the soul, the body is a God- ...
[138]
The Biblical Truth About the Immortal Soul | United Church of God
Jan 24, 2011 · Traditional beliefs about heaven and hell are based on an under-lying teaching—that everyone has an immortal soul that must go somewhere ...
[139]
Hell 3 - The Immortality Of The Soul - Theologica
Nov 23, 2023 · Many evangelical Christians believe that all human beings, once they have been created, will live forever either in heaven or hell. For example, ...
[140]
Is the human soul mortal or immortal? - Talk Jesus
Dec 14, 2019 · The unmistakable teaching of the Bible is that all people, whether they are saved or lost, will exist eternally, in either heaven or hell.
[141]
Seven Stages of Life in Islam - IslamiCity
Nov 27, 2020 · Allah breathed into the body of man part of His spirit called (Ruh) Soul . When the soul enters the body it becomes alive. When this soul is ...
[142]
Barzakh (Purgatory) - The Stage Between this World and the Hereafter
The literal meaning of 'Barzakh' is a veil or a barrier that stands between two things and which does not allow the two to meet. For example, that part or ...Missing: ruh | Show results with:ruh
[143]
Life After Death In Islam: The Concept And The 14 Stages Of Afterlife
Jul 31, 2021 · In Islam, it is believed that when a person dies, the soul enters the state of waiting, also known as Barzakh, until the Day of Judgement. This ...Missing: ruh | Show results with:ruh
[144]
[PDF] Materialism in Ancient Indian Philosophical System
Apr 13, 2024 · Charvaka philosophy is an ancient school of Indian materialism which is also known as Lokayata school of philosophy. This school used to hold ...
[145]
Materialist View of Consciousness | Advaita Vision
Oct 7, 2016 · The arguments used by Shankara in his commentary on the Brahmasutra to refute the materialist view of Consciousness.
[146]
Advaita (non-duality) - Vedanta
Oct 24, 2024 · One infinite, unchanging reality, which we call consciousness, self or brahman, and in which a world can arise and a world can disappear into.
[147]
Lokayata: Significance and symbolism
Aug 19, 2025 · Shaivism critiques Lokayata's atheistic views, while Mahayana Buddhism considers it erroneous in ethics and existence. Theravada views Lokayata ...
[148]
Buddhist Metaphysics | Issue 146 - Philosophy Now
Brian Morris describes four varieties of Buddhist metaphysics, and questions whether they can form one coherent system of thought.
[149]
What is Stoicism? What did the Greek Stoics teach? | GotQuestions.org
Jan 4, 2022 · Stoicism teaches materialism—that all of creation is made of material stuff, including god/logos and human souls (which are made of fire). When ...
[150]
Materialism and the Mormon Faith - Dialogue Journal
An interesting and important facet of the Mormon conception of reality is the materialism that is defended so consistently and emphatically by Mormon writers.
[151]
Materialist Philosopher Thomas Hobbes' Theory of Religion
Sep 13, 2021 · Hobbes was a physicalist and materialist, both perspectives important to his views on religion. He criticized René Descartes' dualism.Missing: theism | Show results with:theism
[152]
[PDF] Parley P. Pratt's “Materiality” and Early Mormon Theology | Ensign
Mormon materialism, then, at least in the eyes of Parley Pratt, served as a distinctive catalyst for the de- velopment of early Mormon theology. Page 6. 164.Missing: theism | Show results with:theism
[153]
(PDF) Peter van Inwagen Materialism, Free Will and God
This book discusses the philosophy of influential contemporary philosopher Peter van Inwagen. ... materialism, organicism, theism and realism concerning ...
[154]
[PDF] Van Inwagen, Zimmerman & Materialist Resurrection
Peter van Inwagen rejects the dualist conception of an immaterial soul. Since there is no soul that leaves the body at the moment of death, the prospect of ...
[155]
Christian physicalism and the biblical argument for dualism
Sep 18, 2021 · For it is compatible with physicalism that, although we are necessarily constituted by physical bodies, we can continue to exist without our ...
[156]
As I Live and Breathe: “Soul” and “Spirit” in Christian Physicalism
Jan 28, 2023 · Christian physicalism views humans as physical organisms, with consciousness as a function of the brain, not a non-physical soul or spirit.Missing: compatibility | Show results with:compatibility
[157]
Christian Physicalism - New Dualism Archive
What you have in your hands is a set of critiques against physicalism, generally, and the supposed compatibility of Christianity with physicalism, specifically.
[158]
Christian Physicalism: The Progressive Deconstruction of Christianity
Jun 28, 2021 · Christian physicalism believes humans lack souls, rejecting body-soul unity, and that the soul is unessential to humanity, leading to a ...Missing: compatibility | Show results with:compatibility<|control11|><|separator|>
[159]
Materialism | Reasonable Faith
Apr 29, 2012 · Dr. William Craig answers weekly Questions and Answers on Christian Doctrine and apologetics. Read question Materialism here.
[160]
The System of Nature, or, the Laws of the Moral and Physical World ...
This publication stands as a foundational text in the discourse of atheistic materialism, presenting a systematic view of nature, morality, and human existence.
[161]
Philosophy and Religion: Deism, Materialism, Atheism (Chapter 27)
Atheism simply means not believing in God. The eighteenth-century writers who feature most commonly in discussions of deism, materialism or atheism are, in ...<|separator|>
[162]
The Enlightenment: 4.2 Materialism | OpenLearn - Open University
Building on the foundations laid by ancient philosophers such as the Roman poet Lucretius (c.98–55 BCE) and bolstered by the Enlightenment's commitment to the ...
[163]
The Three Phases of Materialism - Hungarian Conservative
Oct 30, 2023 · Materialism also cannot be equated with atheism, although an indirect connection always exists between the two. It is not only popular authors ...
[164]
[PDF] Sociobiology: The New Synthesis (25th Anniversary Edition)
Moral precepts in turn must be based on a sound, objective knowledge of human nature. In 1984 I combined my two intellec- tual passions, sociobiology and the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[165]
The Evolutionary Ethics of E. O. Wilson - The New Atlantis
In his new book The Social Conquest of Earth (2012), naturalist E. O. Wilson argues that our best chance at understanding and advancing morality will come ...
[166]
https://madisoncatholicherald.org/farewell-to-materialism-and-determinism/
[167]
A Materialist Gives Up on Determinism | Mind Matters
Nov 16, 2020 · Without determinism, free will deniers have no justification for their bizarre delusion. We are free to choose based on moral considerations, ...
[168]
Materialists Choose to Believe in Determinism – CEH
Oct 27, 2023 · All deterministic beliefs are logically doomed. This should be easy to see: a belief that is determined cannot be a belief at all, ...
[169]
The Illogicality of Determinism - VoegelinView
Nov 20, 2019 · In order for determinism to be true, moral responsibility must be an illusion and meaningful love must be an illusion. Determinists continue to ...
[170]
In Defense of Free Will: How Modern Materialism and Determinism ...
May 30, 2024 · In Defense of Free Will: How Modern Materialism and Determinism Are Mistaken ... critique of attempts to reconcile free will with determinism.
[171]
Materialism | Meaningness
As an attempt to reconcile eternalism and nihilism—with an emphasis on nihilism—materialism tries to overcome the obstacles to nihilism and the defects of ...
[172]
The Menace of Nihilism: Whether All Things Come to Nothing
Jun 26, 2023 · Nihilism represented a crude form of positivism and materialism, a revolt against the established social order; it negated all authority exercised by the state.
[173]
What are the critiques of nihilism? - Quora
Aug 17, 2022 · Nihilism is nothing. Literally. It means “nothing”-ism. It's a self contradictory viewpoint. It's impossible to be a true nihilist.What are some of the flaws of nihilism? - QuoraDo Atheism and the philosophy of Materialism naturally move into ...More results from www.quora.com
[174]
[PDF] Metaphysics of Nihilism: A Philosophical Critique - Futurity Philosophy
Dec 7, 2024 · Following a systematic review method, this study critically examines nihilism from metaphysical viewpoints such as reality, existence, meaning, ...
[175]
Materialism and economic psychology - ScienceDirect
This article argues that materialism is a variable relevant to many aspects of economic psychology.Missing: influence | Show results with:influence
[176]
Historical Materialism and the Economics of Karl Marx
The doctrine of the economic interpretation of history has revivified and influenced almost all modern historical research.
[177]
Economy - USDN Sustainable Consumption Toolkit
In the US, roughly 70% of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) comes from household consumption so it's no surprise that economic policy is rooted in boosting consumer ...Missing: materialism | Show results with:materialism
[178]
Understanding Consumerism: Impact, Benefits, and Drawbacks
As a result of higher consumer spending, a rise in GDP can occur. In the United States, signs of healthy consumer demand can be found in consumer confidence ...
[179]
Materialism, life satisfaction and Compulsive Buying Behavior
Jan 5, 2023 · Previous studies indicated that materialism is negatively associated with consumer's high ethical principles. ... beliefs that buying and ...
[180]
Materialism, affective states, and life satisfaction: case of Croatia
Nov 14, 2015 · People who believed that owing material goods leads to happiness experienced lower levels of life satisfaction and positive affect, and higher ...
[181]
Materialism and well-being: the role of consumption - ScienceDirect
Numerous studies find a negative relation between materialism and well-being. The present paper discusses the role of consumption in that relation.
[182]
Why are materialists less happy? The role of gratitude and need ...
We propose that one reason materialists are less satisfied with their lives is that they experience less gratitude.Missing: studies | Show results with:studies<|separator|>
[183]
Eco-paradox USA: The relationships between economic growth and ...
Both material and carbon footprint growth lead to subsequent GDP growth, supporting materialist views. ... Environmental impact increases with GDP and ...
[184]
Money and happiness: the income–happiness correlation is higher ...
The end of materialism hypothesis states that the income–happiness correlation will get smaller with an increase in GDP per capita. In contrast, the continuous ...
[185]
The Problematic Role of Materialistic Values in the Pursuit of ...
Mar 19, 2022 · Results show that materialistic values were negatively associated with sufficiency attitudes, mindfulness, and flow experiences.