Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Michael Lind

Michael Lind (born April 23, 1962) is an American writer, academic, and policy analyst known for his analyses of U.S. political economy, national identity, and strategic interests.^[1] A graduate of the University of Texas and Yale University, Lind has taught at Harvard University and Johns Hopkins University.^[2] He co-founded the New America think tank in 1999, where he served as the first fellow, policy director of the Economic Growth Program, and co-founder of the American Strategy Program, authoring its foundational manifesto.^[2] Lind has authored more than a dozen books on history, politics, and foreign policy, including The Next American Nation (1995), which argues for a trans-ethnic civic nationalism rooted in shared creedal values, and The New Class War (2020), which contends that modern democracies are strained by conflicts between a rootless managerial elite and national working classes aligned with small capitalists.^[3] His works often challenge both progressive cosmopolitanism and unrestricted free-market orthodoxy, emphasizing industrial policy, national cohesion, and realism in foreign affairs over ideological interventions.^[3] Earlier in his career, Lind edited for publications like The New Republic and The National Interest, contributing to debates on conservatism and strategy before evolving toward a critique of elite overreach and advocacy for democratic nationalism.^[2]

Early Life and Education

Childhood and Upbringing

Michael Lind was born on April 23, 1962, in the Austin area of Texas.^[1] ^[4] As a fifth-generation Texan, his family background connected him to the state's historical settlement patterns, with ancestors including indentured servants who arrived among early American colonists.^[5] ^[6] Lind spent his first four or five years in south Austin, where the regional culture instilled values of self-reliance rooted in Texan and broader Southern traditions.^[4] His childhood unfolded in a Texas navigating the aftermath of desegregation, exposing him to local adaptations in Southern society.^[5] Among early intellectual influences, Lind cited Robert Conquest's The Great Terror (1968) as the most formative book he encountered, which shaped his initial understanding of totalitarian regimes and Soviet history prior to university studies.^[5] This precocious engagement with political history reflected nascent interests that aligned with the independent-minded ethos of his Texan upbringing.

Academic Training

Michael Lind completed his undergraduate studies at the University of Texas at Austin in the Plan II Liberal Arts Honors Program, an interdisciplinary curriculum emphasizing humanities, social sciences, history, and philosophy through close engagement with primary texts and critical analysis.^[7]^[8] He graduated with honors in 1982.^[4] Subsequently, Lind enrolled at Yale University in 1982 for graduate work, earning a Master of Arts in international relations in 1985.^[9] This program provided training in geopolitical strategy, diplomatic history, and global policy frameworks, immersing him in debates over state sovereignty and international order.^[2] Lind then returned to the University of Texas, obtaining a Juris Doctor from the School of Law in 1988.^[10] The law curriculum honed his skills in constitutional interpretation, institutional analysis, and legal reasoning, fostering a capacity for dissecting power dynamics within federal systems.^[4] These experiences at a public university in Texas and an elite Ivy League institution offered contrasting intellectual environments, blending regional pragmatism with cosmopolitan theory.^[7]

Professional Career

Journalism and Editorial Roles

Lind served as executive editor of The National Interest from 1991 to 1994, a realist-oriented foreign policy journal founded by Irving Kristol, during which he shaped content amid debates over neoconservatism, post-Cold War U.S. strategy, and the limits of American interventionism.^[11]^[12] In this role, Lind engaged with prominent neoconservative figures and contributed to discussions questioning the ideological fervor of the era's foreign policy establishment.^[13] Transitioning to domestic-focused outlets, Lind joined Harper's Magazine as an editor in 1994, where he wrote on economic inequality and the erosion of national middle-class capitalism, notably in his June 1995 article "To Have and to Have Not," which argued that globalization was transforming the U.S. into a "sweatshop republic" by undermining domestic manufacturing and wage standards.^[14]^[15] This period marked his growing skepticism toward elite-driven economic orthodoxies. From 1995 to 1996, he held the position of senior editor at The New Republic, co-authoring pieces such as "For a New Nationalism" with John Judis in March 1995, which critiqued the Clinton administration's prioritization of global integration over domestic national interests and called for policies centering American workers.^[13]^[16] Lind also contributed as a staff writer to The New Yorker starting in 1996, using the platform to challenge prevailing post-Cold War liberal assumptions on markets, identity, and governance.^[13] These roles amplified his contrarian journalism, including essays questioning libertarian free-market absolutism, multicultural fragmentation over civic unity, and the bipartisan elite consensus on deregulation and cosmopolitanism.^[16]^[15]

Think Tank Involvement and Policy Advocacy

In 1999, Michael Lind co-founded the New America Foundation (later renamed New America), a Washington, D.C.-based think tank, alongside Ted Halstead, Sherle Schwenninger, and Walter Mead, and served as its inaugural fellow.^[17] ^[18] As policy director of New America's Economic Growth Program and director of its Next Social Contract initiative, Lind focused on developing pragmatic policy frameworks to address national economic challenges, emphasizing reforms that prioritize domestic priorities over unchecked ideological pursuits.^[19] Lind's advocacy through New America critiqued the adverse effects of globalization on American workers and communities, arguing for selective industrial policies to rebuild manufacturing and foster innovation-led growth rather than reliance on free trade alone.^[20] ^[21] He promoted "national developmentalism" as a historical American tradition involving government coordination of public-private investments in infrastructure, technology, and human capital to achieve broad-based prosperity, positioning it as an alternative to both laissez-faire globalism and overreaching state control.^[21] This approach sought to mitigate class divisions exacerbated by elite-driven economic shifts, advocating for countervailing institutions like vocational training networks and regional development banks.^[22] Lind's think tank work has extended into public commentary, where he applies these policy insights to ongoing debates on class conflict, managerial overreach, and democratic resilience. In contributions to The Spectator, as a contributing editor, he has warned against liberal economies devolving into "mafiacracies" dominated by networked elites, urging nation-state interventions to restore balanced power structures.^[23] ^[24] Similarly, in The Critic, he critiques institutional mimicry of elite models in cultural sectors, advocating policy adjustments to align incentives with national cohesion over fragmented advocacy.^[25] These efforts underscore his commitment to evidence-based reforms grounded in historical precedents and empirical outcomes, rather than partisan dogma.^[21]

Academic Positions

Michael Lind has taught at Harvard University and Johns Hopkins University, contributing to instruction in areas such as American political economy and foreign policy.^[26]^[7] These roles enabled him to engage students with historical and theoretical analyses of democratic institutions and national governance structures.^[10] Since at least the early 2010s, Lind has served as Professor of Practice at the Lyndon B. Johnson School of Public Affairs at the University of Texas at Austin, where he draws on his background as a fifth-generation Texan to incorporate regional economic and policy dimensions into coursework on public administration and political development.^[7]^[11] In this capacity, his teaching emphasizes practical applications of historical precedents to contemporary challenges in industrial policy and nationalism.^[27]

Core Ideas and Political Evolution

Defense of Democratic Nationalism

In The Next American Nation (1995), Michael Lind articulated a vision of democratic nationalism positing the United States as a liberal nation-state sustained by a transracial national identity comprising three intertwined elements: a national community rooted in adapted Anglo-American traditions, a civic religion derived from Protestant ethics, and a creedal commitment to constitutional republicanism.^[28] This framework rejects ethnic balkanization and multiculturalism, which Lind viewed as dissolving shared solidarity into competing tribalisms, in favor of a cohesive civic order where immigrants assimilate into a common American ethos rather than retaining perpetual hyphenated identities.^[29] He argued that such nationalism aligns with empirical patterns of stable democracies, which historically emerge in culturally homogeneous polities capable of fostering mutual loyalty beyond abstract rights.^[30] Lind's historical analysis traces the American nation's origins to an Anglo-Protestant synthesis forged in the early republic, where English legal and cultural inheritance merged with a Puritan-influenced work ethic and federalism to create a prototype adaptable to mass immigration.^[31] This synthesis enabled successive waves of Europeans and others to integrate via public schools emphasizing patriotic history, English language proficiency, and civic virtues, as evidenced by declining foreign-language press usage and rising intermarriage rates by the mid-20th century.^[32] Unlike cosmopolitan models presuming borderless universalism, Lind emphasized causal realism in national formation: identities cohere through lived proximity and institutional reinforcement, not voluntary cosmopolitanism, which empirical failures in multinational empires like the Soviet Union underscore.^[30] Central to Lind's critique is the erosion of national solidarity by an ascendant rights-based individualism, which prioritizes personal autonomy and procedural entitlements over collective duties, fragmenting society into atomized interests.^[28] He contended that this universalist abstraction, detached from the concrete loyalties of kin, faith, and patria that underpin human motivation—as observed in Tocqueville's warnings of democratic ennui—undermines the republican bonds necessary for self-governance.^[30] Democratic nationalism, by contrast, restores realism by grounding citizenship in a particularist civic cultus, empirically validated by the durability of assimilated nation-states like post-1945 America, where shared narratives of founding myths and heroic sacrifices sustained cohesion amid diversity.^[31]

Analysis of Class Conflict and Managerial Elites

In The New Class War: Saving Democracy from the Managerial Elite (2020), Michael Lind frames modern political divisions as a conflict between a technocratic managerial class and a telocratic working-class majority, where technocracy prioritizes expert rule by remote elites while telocracy emphasizes popular sovereignty rooted in local communities.^[33]^[34] This analysis posits the managerial elite—estimated by Lind at about 15% of the U.S. workforce, spanning professionals in corporations, finance, government, and nonprofits—as having consolidated power through institutional capture since the mid-20th century, displacing earlier pluralistic balances of labor, business, and community interests.^[35]^[36] Lind depicts this elite's dominance as engendering "neo-feudal" tendencies, characterized by credential barriers that exclude non-elites from high-status roles and enable remote governance detached from working-class locales, a dynamic intensified by post-2020 shifts toward remote work that further insulate managers from on-site realities.^[34]^[37] He argues that myths of meritocracy mask this credentialism as fair competition, while in practice it perpetuates oligarchic control, eroding democratic accountability and fueling populist backlashes like the 2016 U.S. election and Brexit.^[38]^[39] To restore class equilibrium, Lind calls for "countervailing power" through revived institutions such as independent labor unions, wage boards, and localized decision-making bodies that empower workers against elite overreach, drawing on mid-20th-century models where such structures checked managerial expansion without resorting to state socialism.^[40]^[4] This approach debunks egalitarian illusions by acknowledging inherent class tensions, advocating pragmatic alliances over ideological purity to prevent either corporate or progressive managerial variants from entrenching a bifurcated society.^[34]^[41] Lind's emphasis on this class realism marks an evolution from his 1990s neoconservative phase, which critiqued cultural leftism, toward a broader populist realism that prioritizes working-class agency against bipartisan elite capture, viewing both neoliberal globalization and identity-focused progressivism as symptoms of technocratic decay.^[4]^[42] He warns that without such institutional reforms, transient populism risks collapse, leaving managerial hegemony unchallenged and democracy hollowed out by 21st-century feudal divides.^[43]^[44]

Economic and Industrial Policy Prescriptions

Lind advocates a form of state-guided capitalism modeled on historical American precedents, particularly the Hamiltonian system of the early republic, which combined public investment with private enterprise to build national industries. In Land of Promise: An Economic History of the United States (2012), he contends that U.S. economic expansions, such as those in the 19th and early 20th centuries, relied on federal subsidies for manufacturing, protective tariffs against foreign competition, and large-scale infrastructure projects like canals, railroads, and electrification, rather than reliance on market forces alone.^[45] ^[46] These policies, Lind argues, enabled the diffusion of technology from elite innovators to mass production, fostering widespread prosperity without degenerating into European-style mercantilism.^[47] Criticizing neoliberal reforms from the 1970s onward for accelerating deindustrialization through deregulation, offshoring, and financial dominance, Lind attributes the erosion of manufacturing employment—from 19.5 million jobs in 1979 to 12.8 million by 2019—to policies that subordinated industrial capacity to global trade liberalization and shareholder primacy.^[48] To reverse this, he prescribes "good jobs" initiatives centered on vocational education aligned with local supply chains, such as apprenticeships in advanced manufacturing, and sectoral bargaining frameworks where industry-wide wage boards negotiate standards for benefits and training, as implemented in nations with resilient middle classes like Denmark and Sweden.^[40] ^[49] In writings from the early 2020s, including Hell to Pay: How the Suppression of Wages Is Destroying America (2023), Lind calls for renewed national investments in physical and digital infrastructure—targeting $2 trillion annually in public-private partnerships—to combat secular stagnation marked by productivity slowdowns since the 1970s and real median wage flatness for non-college workers.^[49] He positions "national developmentalism" as a middle path, endorsing targeted industrial policies like R&D tax credits and procurement preferences for domestic firms while dismissing socialism's emphasis on worker ownership as inefficient and laissez-faire's aversion to intervention as empirically discredited by post-2008 underinvestment in productive capacity.^[21] This approach, per Lind, prioritizes causal drivers of growth—human capital formation and capital deepening—over ideological extremes, evidenced by historical correlations between protectionist eras and per capita GDP gains exceeding those under free-trade orthodoxy.^[50]

Foreign Policy Perspectives

Lind initially engaged with elements of neoconservative foreign policy discourse during the 1990s, contributing to outlets like The New Republic that supported assertive U.S. interventions, but by the early 2000s, he began critiquing the neoconservative push for regime change in Iraq as ideologically driven rather than strategically sound. In April 2003, shortly after the invasion, Lind contended that a small network of neoconservative intellectuals, including Paul Wolfowitz and Douglas Feith, had leveraged post-9/11 fears and President George W. Bush's inexperience to prioritize reshaping the Middle East for pro-Israel aims over direct U.S. security threats.^[51] This marked an early divergence from what he later termed "fantasy"-based strategies blending neoconservative universalism with unilateral nationalism, which he argued produced operational failures like the 2006 Israel-Hezbollah war and prolonged Iraqi insurgency.^[52] By the mid-2010s, Lind's views coalesced into "civilizational realism," a framework prioritizing bloc-based geopolitics amid great-power competition over liberal internationalist efforts to export democratic values. He rejected alliances predicated on shared ideology, instead favoring pragmatic coalitions grounded in mutual economic, military, and strategic interests, such as the U.S.-Saudi partnership despite divergent domestic systems.^[53] In a 2017 analysis, Lind outlined a future of stabilized superpower blocs—an American-led sphere, a Chinese economic zone, and a Russian Eurasian alliance—where U.S. policy should concentrate on containing rivals through deterrence and neutralized border regions, like a demilitarized Ukraine, to preclude escalation into direct conflict.^[54] Lind has consistently cautioned against indefinite military engagements that exhaust U.S. resources and against transnational globalism, which he sees as empowering unaccountable elites at the expense of national decision-making autonomy. He criticized the Obama administration's handling of the 2011 Arab Spring uprisings as a form of "democratic messianism" that inadvertently fueled regional chaos and groups like ISIS, underscoring the perils of intervening to impose universal norms in culturally distinct zones.^[53] In the context of renewed U.S.-China and U.S.-Russia tensions, Lind advocates preserving the cohesion of the American bloc as the paramount interest, warning that domestic populist backlashes against elite foreign policy consensus risk fracturing alliances unless tethered to tangible national gains.^[55]

Major Works

Key Nonfiction Books

Lind's first major nonfiction work, The Next American Nation: The New Nationalism and the Fourth American Revolution (1995), proposed a vision for American national renewal through a civic nationalism that transcends ethnic divisions, framing U.S. history as a series of regime changes culminating in a "trans-American" majority culture.^[56] The book critiqued multiculturalism and binationalism as threats to cohesion, advocating instead for a shared republican identity rooted in shared institutions rather than racial or ethnic purity, as a blueprint for addressing post-Cold War fragmentation.^[57] In Up from Conservatism: Why the Right is Wrong for America (1996), Lind reflected on his departure from conservatism, arguing that the Republican Party had shifted toward policies favoring economic elites at the expense of the working class, leading to increased class divisions.^[58] Drawing on his experiences as a former conservative writer, the book diagnosed the right's embrace of free-market orthodoxy and cultural traditionalism as misaligned with broader American interests, marking his pivot toward a more populist critique of ideological rigidity.^[59] Land of Promise: An Economic History of the United States (2012) traced the nation's industrial development from colonial times, emphasizing the pivotal role of federal intervention in fostering innovation through infrastructure, tariffs, and public investments, countering laissez-faire narratives.^[60] Lind highlighted historical precedents like Hamilton's system of national banking and internal improvements, which enabled technological waves from steam to computing, underscoring how state action propelled U.S. economic ascent amid global competition.^[45] The New Class War: Saving Democracy from the Managerial Elite (2020) analyzed contemporary societal divides as a conflict between a remote managerial overclass—concentrated in urban centers and wielding power via bureaucracy and expertise—and a diverse working-class majority excluded from real influence.^[61] Lind prescribed power-sharing mechanisms, such as decentralized governance and vocational pathways, to integrate working-class voices into politics and economy, viewing populism as a symptom of this imbalance rather than its cause.^[36] Big Is Beautiful: Debunking the Myth of Small Business (2018), co-authored with Robert D. Atkinson, argues that large firms outperform small businesses in driving productivity, innovation, and social outcomes, challenging the notion that small businesses are inherently superior engines of economic growth.^[62] Hell to Pay: How the Suppression of Wages Is Destroying America (2023) critiques elite-driven wage suppression policies as contributors to economic stagnation and social division, extending analyses of class conflict by advocating reforms to enhance worker compensation and national economic resilience.^[63]

Selected Articles and Essays

Lind critiqued libertarianism in several essays for Salon, challenging its theoretical foundations by highlighting the lack of historical precedents for pure libertarian governance. In "The Question Libertarians Just Can't Answer" (June 4, 2013), he posed why no country has fully implemented libertarian policies if they purportedly maximize prosperity and liberty, attributing this to inherent incompatibilities with democratic nation-states requiring public goods provision.^[64] Similarly, "Why Libertarians Apologize for Autocracy" (August 30, 2011) argued that libertarian aversion to state intervention overlooks how modern democracies rely on national sovereignty to balance markets and social cohesion, rendering libertarianism antidemocratic in practice.^[65] His essays on nationalism emphasized the nation-state's enduring viability against globalist alternatives. In "National Good" for Prospect magazine (2002), Lind defended ethnically or culturally homogeneous nation-states as optimal units for fostering democratic solidarity and welfare, rejecting cosmopolitan critiques as empirically unproven.^[66] Extending this in American Affairs, "National Developmentalism: From Forgotten Tradition to New Consensus" (May 20, 2019) advocated reviving U.S. historical policies of national economic coordination over free-market orthodoxy, arguing they better serve industrial sovereignty and worker interests.^[21] Likewise, "Nationalism's Dividends" (May 20, 2019) in the same journal contended that nationalism historically elevated individual dignity by dismantling feudal hierarchies, positioning it as a secular force for equality absent in supranational or tribal models.^[67] Recent writings addressed work futures, elite overreach, and partisan realignments. In a Forbes analysis tied to wage suppression themes (May 16, 2023), Lind outlined strategies for "good jobs" via industrial policy, warning that elite-driven deindustrialization risks social collapse without targeted state intervention in labor markets.^[49] Addressing Democratic elite drift, "Renewing the Democratic Party" (American Affairs, May 20, 2025) faulted the party for alienating working-class voters through urban-centric, technocratic priorities, urging a return to pluralistic nationalism to reclaim broad coalitions.^[68] These pieces positioned nationalism as a corrective to managerial pathologies, echoing Lind's broader insistence on causal links between policy failures and populist backlashes.

Fiction and Poetry

Michael Lind's creative output in fiction and poetry remains peripheral to his reputation as a policy thinker and nonfiction author, comprising a small number of works that experiment with narrative and verse forms to probe personal, cultural, and historical tensions. These pieces, often self-published or issued by niche presses, reflect exploratory impulses rather than a sustained literary career, with themes echoing his broader interests in American identity and societal conflict but abstracted into imaginative structures.^[69]^[70] In fiction, Lind penned the novel Power Town, a satirical portrayal of intrigue within Washington political circles, which critiques elite machinations through fictional narrative rather than direct argumentation. This work, referenced in contemporaneous reviews of his political writings, underscores his use of storytelling as a vehicle for dissecting power dynamics outside analytical essays.^[13] Lind's poetry includes the collection Parallel Lives (2007), his debut volume of verse published by Etruscan Press, which incorporates classical meters like alcaics alongside reflections on parallel historical and personal trajectories. Subsequent publications feature the chapbook When You Are Someone Else (Aralia Press), containing poems such as "Certain Dark" that appeared in Poetry magazine, evoking introspective motifs of transformation and obscurity. More recent verse, including "Looking for the Republic" (2021) in Liberty Island, invokes motifs of lost civic ideals and regional American heritage, as in allusions to Texas roots, while maintaining a concise, formal style suited to occasional publication in literary outlets.^[69]^[70]^[71]^[72] These endeavors, limited in volume and dissemination, prioritize thematic resonance with Lind's nonfiction—such as national motifs and elite critique—over commercial or critical prominence in literary spheres.

Reception and Influence

Achievements and Positive Impact

Michael Lind co-founded the New America think tank in 1999 alongside Ted Halstead, Sherle Schwenninger, and Walter Mead, serving as its inaugural fellow and policy director of the Economic Growth Program.^[17] ^[7] This institution advanced centrist policy innovations, including analyses of U.S. economic structures and proposals for industrial revitalization, influencing discussions on sustainable growth models.^[18] Lind also co-initiated New America's American Strategy program, which examined national security and foreign policy frameworks grounded in historical precedents.^[7] Through New America and related efforts, Lind supported electoral reforms such as ranked-choice voting via his co-founding of FairVote, contributing to its implementation in over 50 U.S. jurisdictions by 2023, including cities like New York and San Francisco, to enhance voter representation and reduce partisan extremes.^[73] Lind's publications have catalyzed shifts in intellectual discourse on class dynamics, with "The New Class War" (2020) cited in policy circles for framing managerial elite dominance as a driver of populist backlashes, informing strategies to realign democratic governance toward broader coalitions.^[34] ^[74] His emphasis on democratic nationalism has resonated in national conservative forums, promoting evidence-based critiques of elite cosmopolitanism and advocating worker-centered industrial policies that prioritize empirical outcomes over ideological purity.^[75]

Criticisms and Intellectual Debates

Critics from the left, such as Daniel Lazare in New Left Review, have argued that Lind's advocacy for democratic nationalism overlooks the ideological weakness of nationalism in American history, positing it as a "grand illusion" that substitutes geographic expansion for genuine social reform under the U.S. Constitution's constraints.^[76] Lazare contends that this framework impedes radical change by prioritizing national unity over class-based mobilization, rendering nationalism exclusionary toward internal divisions like those rooted in economic inequality.^[76] In response, Lind rebutted in New Left Review that American constitutionalism has historically channeled conflicts into institutional reforms rather than revolution, citing empirical patterns of class compromise—such as the New Deal's integration of labor into the political system—as evidence against predictions of systemic collapse, while critiquing radical left analyses for underestimating these precedents.^[77] Libertarian and right-leaning commentators have dismissed Lind's prescriptions for state intervention in industrial policy and economic nationalism as akin to creeping socialism, arguing they expand government power at the expense of market freedoms and individual liberty.^[78] For instance, analyses from libertarian outlets portray Lind's national developmentalism—advocating subsidies, tariffs, and public investment—as ignoring historical evidence of state overreach leading to inefficiency and authoritarianism, rather than sustainable growth.^[78] Lind has countered such views by invoking U.S. historical precedents like the American System of the 19th century, where federal investments in infrastructure and protectionism fostered industrialization without devolving into socialism, supported by data on wage stagnation and deindustrialization under neoliberal policies since the 1970s.^[21] Debates have also arisen over Lind's intellectual trajectory, from early neoconservative affiliations in the 1990s—marked by contributions to outlets like The New Republic—to his later embrace of populist nationalism, with some observers questioning the consistency amid shifts aligning with changing political winds, such as his break from the Republican Party in 1992 over cultural conservatism.^[75] Lind has defended this evolution as a principled response to empirical shifts in class dynamics, pointing to data on the rise of a transnational managerial elite since the late 20th century—evidenced by metrics like executive compensation decoupling from productivity—as necessitating a reevaluation of free-market orthodoxy in favor of working-class empirics over ideological purity.^[75]^[79]

References

[1]
Lind, Michael 1962- | Encyclopedia.com
Lind, Michael 1962-PERSONAL: Born April 23, 1962. Education: Attended Yale University and University of Texas. Religion: Methodist.
[2]
Michael Lind
### Biography of Michael Lind
[3]
Michael Lind: books, biography, latest update - Amazon.com
Michael Lind is the author of more than a dozen books about U.S. political and economic history, politics and foreign policy. He has explained and defended ...
[4]
Michael Lind Wants to Put America Back Together - Texas Monthly
UT professor Michael Lind believes our country is falling apart—and he has a plan to fix it.<|separator|>
[5]
Michael Lind On Populism And Elites - by Andrew Sullivan - Substack
Apr 7, 2023 · Michael also co-founded the think tank New America. The author of many books, his most recent is The New Class War: Saving Democracy from the ...
[6]
How the South Skews America - POLITICO Magazine
Jul 3, 2015 · Michael Lind is a Politico Magazine contributing editor and ... As a fifth-generation Texan, and a descendant of Southerners back to ...
[7]
Michael Lind - Foreign Policy Research Institute
He is the author of more than a dozen books of nonfiction, fiction, poetry and children's literature, including several that were New York Times Notable Books ...
[8]
Michael Lind - LAITS Podcasting
Michael Lind is a professor of practice at the LBJ School. A graduate of the Plan II Liberal Arts Honors Program and the Law School at The University of Texas.Missing: childhood family
[9]
A DIEHARD REVISIONIST LOOKS AT VIETNAM – Hartford Courant
That's the provocative thesis advanced by Michael Lind ... When Lind, a Texas native, arrived at Yale in 1982 to study for his master's in international relations ...
[10]
Michael Lind - Independent Institute
Michael Lind is Co-Founder of the New America Foundation. A graduate of the University of Texas and Yale University, Lind has taught at Harvard University and ...
[11]
Michael Lind | Foreign Affairs
A former Executive Editor for The National Interest and Staff Writer for The New Yorker, he is a Co-Founder of the think tank New America and the author of ...
[12]
Michael Lind | HuffPost
Mr. Lind has been an editor or staff writer for The New Yorker, Harper's Magazine, and The New Republic. From 1991 to 1994, he was executive editor of The ...
[13]
Up From Conservatism by Michael Lind - Commentary Magazine
Sep 1, 1996 · In the same brief span Lind has held senior editorial posts first at Harper's, then at the New Republic, and now at the New Yorker, to each of ...
[14]
NOT IN HIS RIGHT MIND - The Washington Post
Aug 5, 1995 · Lind ditched the National Interest last summer and moved to New York to join Harper's magazine. In April, he reestablished a Washington presence ...
[15]
Michael Lind, To have and to have not
By Michael Lind, in Harper's Magazine, June, 1995 ... The banana republic is being replaced by the sweatshop republic as national, middle-class capitalism gives ...Missing: key | Show results with:key
[16]
John Judis & Michael Lind: For a New Nationalism | The New Republic
Mar 26, 1995 · The theme of Bill Clinton's 1992 campaign was “Putting People First,” identifying American national interests with “those who do the work, pay ...Missing: 1990s | Show results with:1990s
[17]
Michael Lind - New America
He is the author of numerous books of history, political journalism, fiction, poetry, and children's literature. His most recent book is Land of Promise: An ...
[18]
Michael Lind - The Globalist
Mr. Lind has taught at Harvard University and Johns Hopkins University and writes frequently for the Financial Times, New York Times, Democracy Journal, and ...Missing: biography | Show results with:biography
[19]
Michael Lind - Open to Debate
He is the author of a number of books of history, political journalism, fiction, and poetry, including “Land of Promise: An Economic History of the United ...
[20]
The end of globalization ? | Ifri
Michael Lind, Policy Director of the Economic Growth Program at the New America Foundation in Washington, D.C, was the guest of the French Institute for ...
[21]
National Developmentalism: From Forgotten Tradition to New ...
May 20, 2019 · National developmentalism is the school which should guide American economic policy at home and abroad.
[22]
Michael Lind | ITIF
Michael Lind is a visiting professor at the Lyndon B. Johnson School of Public Affairs at the University of Texas. He was a co-founder of New America.Missing: Plan II
[23]
Michael Lind, Author at The Spectator World
Michael is the author of The New Class War: Saving Democracy From The Managerial Elite and a contributing editor to The Spectator. AI. Politics.Missing: contributions Critic
[24]
Our future is a 'mafiacracy' | The Spectator
Feb 14, 2025 · The nightmare of today's critics of liberalism is an endless future of constant social upheaval and atomisation as a result of unchecked markets and radical ...Missing: contributions | Show results with:contributions
[25]
Author: Michael Lind | The Critic Magazine
Michael Lind. It's not rocket science. It all goes wrong when arts departments start imitating research universities. Features · Michael Lind · Lessons of The ...Missing: contributions Spectator
[26]
https://newamerica.org/our-people/michael-lind/
[27]
Michael Lind - LAITS Podcasting
Michael Lind is a professor of practice at the LBJ School of Public Affairs at the University of Texas at Austin. He is the author of more than a dozen books.
[28]
the new nationalism and the fourth American revolution : Lind ...
Jul 12, 2010 · A provocative look at the past, present, and future of our national identity, Michael Lind maintains that American society is not breaking into separate tribal ...Missing: civic | Show results with:civic
[29]
The Next American Nation: The New Nationalism And The Fourth ...
The Next American Nation: The New Nationalism And The Fourth American Revolution · Browse all categories.Missing: summary | Show results with:summary
[30]
In Defense of Liberal Nationalism - Foreign Affairs
May 1, 1994 · The idea that every nation should have its own state has been the most powerful political force of the past two hundred years.
[31]
The Case for American Nationalism - The National Interest
Michael Lind is a contributing editor at The National Interest, cofounder of the New America Foundation and policy director of its Economic Growth Program. He ...
[32]
How to Fix America's Identity Crisis - POLITICO Magazine
Jul 4, 2016 · Neither the left's multiculturalism nor the right's nativism works for all Americans. But there is a third way. By MICHAEL LIND. July 04, 2016.Missing: civic | Show results with:civic
[33]
The New Class War by Michael Lind - Penguin Random House
Free delivery over $20 30-day returnsMichael Lind is the author of more than a dozen books of nonfiction, fiction, and poetry, including The New Class War, The Next American Nation, and Land of ...
[34]
The New Class War - American Affairs Journal
May 20, 2017 · That the post–Cold War pattern of globalization has been chiefly motivated by opportunities for international arbitrage and tax-and-subsidy ...Missing: critique | Show results with:critique
[35]
Our Neo-Feudal Future - First Things
Jan 1, 2022 · Michael Lind estimates that this “overclass” constitutes some 15 percent of the American workforce, a far larger portion than the membership ...Missing: credentialism | Show results with:credentialism
[36]
The new class war: did a liberal elite pave the way for rise of Trump?
Feb 2, 2020 · Michael Lind, the author of The New Class War: Saving Democracy from the Managerial Elite, has a theory. Today's political villain, he ...
[37]
The New Class War Book Summary by Michael Lind - Shortform
Rating 4.5 (30) In The New Class War, Michael Lind examines the divide between the elite governing class and the working class majority. He explores how the governing elite ...
[38]
The New Class War Isn't a Culture War - Jacobin
Feb 19, 2020 · Michael Lind's The New Class War: Saving Democracy from the Metropolitan Elite follows from a series of works on the “white working class” ...
[39]
Michael Lind on Populism, Racism, and Restoring Democracy
Feb 6, 2020 · Isaac Chotiner interviews Michael Lind about his new book, “The New Class War,” which pins the destruction of the American middle class on ...Missing: contributions | Show results with:contributions
[40]
Bring Back Countervailing Power - by Michael Lind
Sep 20, 2023 · A new ethos of wage boards and worker power would help right the injustices in our economy.Missing: localism | Show results with:localism
[41]
Michael Lind's The New Class War includes foundations in its ...
Jan 21, 2020 · Michael Lind's The New Class War includes foundations in its criticism of “the managerial elite”. The GR Editors Jan 21, 2020. A brief excerpt.<|separator|>
[42]
US political analyst Michael Lind interview - New Statesman
Jan 7, 2023 · Michael Lind on how the rise of the liberal “overclass” triggered Trumpism, Brexit and the return of the nation-state.Missing: 1990s | Show results with:1990s
[43]
Away in a Manager: On Michael Lind's “The New Class War”
Jan 28, 2020 · To writer Michael Lind, Trump's victory, along with Brexit and other populist stirrings in Europe, was an outright declaration of “class war” by ...Missing: analysis | Show results with:analysis
[44]
Michael Lind on Reviving Democracy - The American Interest
Jan 29, 2020 · I think their theory of class and class conflict is wrong, but they're actually closer to reality than the technocratic progressives who think ...Missing: telocracy | Show results with:telocracy
[45]
Land of Promise: An Economic History of the United States - EH.net
Michael Lind, Land of Promise: An Economic History of the United States. New ... Lind has long called for policies in the tradition of Alexander Hamilton ...
[46]
'Land of Promise,' by Michael Lind - The New York Times
May 24, 2012 · This ambitious economic history of the United States argues that the country thrives when the federal government acts as a robust partner to ...Missing: subsidies protectionism
[47]
The Next American System - Democracy Journal
Read more about FinanceHistoryInfrastructure · Michael Lind is co-founder of New America and the author of Land of Promise: An Economic History of the United ...
[48]
The Pluralist Alternative To Neoliberalism - American Affairs Journal
Dec 20, 2021 · The decline of good jobs with good benefits caused by the managerial elite's offensive against working-class bargaining power helps to ...Missing: critiques | Show results with:critiques
[49]
“Hell To Pay”: Michael Lind On A True Good Jobs Strategy - Forbes
May 16, 2023 · Michael Lind's new book on the wage gap, Hell to Pay: How the Suppression of Wages is Destroying America.
[50]
National Developmentalism: The Alternative to Neoliberalism and ...
Jan 22, 2024 · This neo-New Dealism will lead to stagnation, fiscal crisis, and diminished international competitiveness, and it could erode America's ...
[51]
How neoconservatives conquered Washington - and launched a war
Apr 9, 2003 · First they converted an ignorant, inexperienced president to their pro-Israel, hawkish worldview. Then 9/11 allowed them to claim Iraq threatened the US.
[52]
From Fantasy to Fiasco - The American Prospect
Mar 19, 2008 · The convergence of conservative nationalists and neoconservatives within the Bush administration, and the deadly fantasies it spawned.Missing: critique | Show results with:critique
[53]
Michael Lind: The Path from Liberal Internationalism to Civilizational ...
Jun 29, 2019 · Lind does not use the term "civilization" that is customary for us, because he holds that the boundaries and composition of the "bloc" cannot be ...Missing: early influences
[54]
Blocpolitik - The National Interest
Jun 18, 2017 · The division of the globe among superpower-led blocs was the central fact of the Cold War from the end of World War II until the 1990s.Missing: civilizational | Show results with:civilizational
[55]
Winning the Second Cold War - Compact Magazine
Nov 1, 2023 · Foreign-policy liberalism identifies the American interest with a larger group of nations, united by free trade and democratic government. As ...Missing: critique | Show results with:critique<|control11|><|separator|>
[56]
Next American Nation eBook by Michael Lind - Simon & Schuster
In this marvelously written, wide-ranging and thought-provoking book, Michael Lind provides a comprehensive revisionist view of the American past.
[57]
The Next American Nation: The New Nationalism and the Fourth ...
Jul 1, 1995 · His book is an extraordinary performance, breathtaking in its audacity, combining an original reinterpretation of American history with a double ...Missing: summary | Show results with:summary
[58]
Up from Conservatism | Book by Michael Lind - Simon & Schuster
In Up From Conservatism, this former rising star of the right reveals what he believes to be the disturbing truth about the hidden economic agenda of the ...
[59]
BOOKS OF THE TIMES;An Ex-Conservative Indicts the Right
Jul 12, 1996 · In "Up From Conservatism," Mr. Lind makes his apostasy explicit and public. His new book is both a personal accounting of his break from the ...
[60]
Land of Promise: An Economic History of the United States
30-day returnsLand of Promise: An Economic History of the United States [Lind, Michael] on Amazon ... Hamilton's Republic (1997), and The Next American Nation (1995).Missing: infrastructure subsidies protectionism
[61]
The New Class War: Saving Democracy from the Managerial Elite
This book analyzes the new class war between the elite "managerial overclass" and the working class, proposing a compromise to save democracy.
[62]
The question libertarians just can't answer - Salon.com
Jun 4, 2013 · If your approach is so great, why hasn't any country anywhere in the world ever tried it? By Michael Lind. Published June 4, 2013 4:17PM (EDT).Missing: essays | Show results with:essays
[63]
Why libertarians apologize for autocracy - Salon.com
Aug 30, 2011 · The experience of every modern democratic nation-state proves that libertarianism is incompatible with democracy. By Michael Lind ...
[64]
National good - Prospect Magazine
The ethnically homogeneous nation-state is alive and well. It remains the largest feasible focus for both belonging and democracy. By Michael Lind.
[65]
Nationalism's Dividends - American Affairs Journal
May 20, 2019 · Nationalism added dignity to the identity of every human being, collapsing the “society of orders” and elevating the importance of the secular world.
[66]
Renewing the Democratic Party - American Affairs Journal
May 20, 2025 · The Democratic Party has lost its way. A party whose very purpose has been to fight for working families has forfeited their trust and ...
[67]
Parallel Lives by Michael Lind - Etruscan Press
In stockHe is the author of more than a dozen books of history, political journalism, and fiction. Parallel Lives is his first collection of verse.
[68]
Certain Dark - The Poetry Foundation
Poems, readings, poetry news and the entire 110-year archive of POETRY magazine ... Certain Dark. By Michael Lind. When You Are Someone Else. JSTOR Logo. JSTOR ...
[69]
POEM: Looking for the Republic - Liberty Island
Aug 31, 2021 · Michael Lind is the author of more than a dozen books of nonfiction, fiction and poetry ... A fifth generation native of Austin, Texas, Lind ...
[70]
Michael Lind - Light Poetry Magazine
Michael Lind is the author of more than a dozen books of nonfiction, fiction, and poetry, including a chapbook, When You Are Someone Else (Aralia Press, ...
[71]
The First 20 Years - New America
Jan 10, 2019 · Another of our co-founders, Michael Lind, also co-founded FairVote. Ranked-choice voting allows voters to rank the candidates they prefer ...Missing: contributions | Show results with:contributions
[72]
'The New Class War': Michael Lind on the Growing Divide in US ...
Feb 6, 2020 · He has taught at Harvard and Johns Hopkins and is currently a professor of practice at the Lyndon B. Johnson School of Public Affairs at the ...Missing: teaching | Show results with:teaching
[73]
Op-Ed: The Return of Class Conflict - Niskanen Center
Feb 6, 2020 · Lind portrayed U.S. history as a series of regime changes driven by shifting political settlements between powerful social classes, from the ...
[74]
[PDF] The Grand Illusion of Democratic Nationalism: A Reply to Michael Lind
The objectivity issue is also what makes Lind's concept of democratic nationalism so unconvincing. Real democracy requires the establish- ment of an objective ...
[75]
Why There Will Be No Revolution in the US: A Reply to Daniel Lazare
Feb 1, 1999 · The American tradition of constitutionalism deserves to be criticized—but not because it has proven to be an impediment to socialism or simple ...
[76]
Center for a Stateless Society » The Question Michael Lind Just ...
Last year at Salon Michael Lind asked “The question libertarians just can't answer” (June 4): “Why are there no libertarian countries?
[77]
Classless Utopia versus Class Compromise - American Affairs Journal
May 20, 2018 · Michael Lind is a fellow at the Clements Center for National Security at the University of Texas at Austin, a fellow at New America, and a ...