Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Muller's ratchet

Muller's ratchet is a fundamental concept in evolutionary genetics that describes the irreversible accumulation of deleterious in or non-recombining genomic regions of finite size, driven by the stochastic loss—due to —of the class of individuals carrying the fewest . This results in a progressive decline in mean , as there is no to purge the or restore higher-fitness genotypes without recombination. The idea was first articulated by the American in his paper, where he argued that recombination facilitates mutational advance by counteracting the buildup of harmful genetic changes in lineages lacking genetic exchange. illustrated this through theoretical considerations of how rare beneficial mutations spread more effectively in recombining populations, while deleterious ones accumulate unchecked in their absence, likening the effect to an irreversible mechanical device. The specific term "Muller's ratchet" was coined a decade later by population geneticist Joseph Felsenstein in 1974, who formalized the model to explain the evolutionary advantages of in averting such decay. At its core, the operates in finite populations where rates introduce deleterious changes at a rate U per , and selection acts against them with s, reducing multiplicatively as (1 - s)^k for k s per individual. A "click" of the happens when drift eliminates the entire zero- (or lowest-) class, shifting the population's toward higher loads; subsequent clicks occur at a rate approximately r \approx \frac{1}{N} \exp\left( \frac{U}{s} \right) in large populations N (under assumptions of small s and multiplicative ), where recovery is impossible without back-mutations or . Early quantitative models, such as Haigh's 1978 analysis, demonstrated that even low rates can drive rapid accumulation in small populations, establishing the as a key predictor of for lineages. Muller's ratchet has profound implications across biology, notably explaining the degeneration of the in mammals, where suppression of recombination leads to pervasive fixation and loss over evolutionary time. Simulations show that factors like lower rates in females or background selection can accelerate this process by orders of magnitude, contributing to the Y's reduced content compared to the X. Similarly, it applies to uniparentally inherited organelles such as mitochondria, where empirical studies in species like reveal ratchet-like erosion of mitochondrial genomes despite compensatory mechanisms. The ratchet also underscores the selective pressure for and recombination, as these processes periodically generate -free lineages, halting the decline and enabling in complex eukaryotes.

History and Etymology

Origin of the Concept

The concept of deleterious mutation accumulation in asexual populations originated with geneticist , who first articulated it in a 1932 paper presented as part of the Symposium: The Biology of Sex. In this work, Muller argued that hinders evolutionary progress by preventing the efficient combination of beneficial mutations and allowing harmful ones to persist within lineages, as there is no mechanism like recombination to separate advantageous from disadvantageous genetic elements. He emphasized that, over generations, this leads to a progressive decline in fitness, as superior genotypes cannot readily form without genetic mixing, contrasting sharply with the advantages conferred by . Muller revisited and expanded these ideas in a paper, where he detailed how the absence of recombination in asexual lineages results in an inevitable buildup of deleterious , ultimately dooming such populations to unless offset by rare back-mutations or selection strong enough to purge them—conditions he deemed unlikely in practice. Here, he framed this process as a key disadvantage of , reinforcing his earlier contention that evolved primarily to counteract accumulation by enabling the reshuffling and selection of genetic . Muller's arguments highlighted the ratchet-like irreversibility of decline in asexuals, where once a loses its least-mutated class, recovery becomes progressively harder. These proposals emerged amid broader debates on the evolution of sex during the 1930s through 1960s, where Muller engaged with contemporaries like , who favored recombination's role in accelerating through beneficial synergies, while Muller stressed its necessity for mitigating mutational load in the face of ongoing genetic damage. This idea was later formalized mathematically by in 1978.

Development of the Term

The term "Muller's ratchet" was coined by evolutionary biologist Joseph Felsenstein in his 1974 paper published in the journal Genetics, where he described the irreversible accumulation of deleterious mutations in asexual populations as a ratchet-like mechanism that advances in one direction without reversal. Felsenstein explicitly attributed the underlying concept to Hermann J. Muller's earlier work, refining it metaphorically to emphasize the one-way progression akin to a mechanical ratchet preventing backward movement. This nomenclature distinguished Muller's original qualitative description of the process from the more formalized metaphorical framing Felsenstein provided, which highlighted its implications for the evolutionary advantage of recombination in counteracting and mutation accumulation. Muller's foundational 1964 paper in Mutation Research had introduced the analogy in the context of recombination's role in mutational progress but did not name the phenomenon after himself. Following Felsenstein's introduction, the term rapidly gained traction in literature. An early prominent adoption appeared in John Haigh's 1978 quantitative analysis in Theoretical Population Biology, which modeled the ratchet's operation and solidified its use as a standard descriptor for deleterious dynamics in lineages. By the 1980s and 1990s, "Muller's ratchet" became a cornerstone concept in peer-reviewed journals such as and , frequently invoked in discussions of reproduction's limitations and the selective pressures favoring sex.

Core Mechanism

Conceptual Explanation

Muller's ratchet refers to the irreversible accumulation of deleterious mutations in asexual populations, driven by the tight linkage of genes and the absence of recombination that prevents the purging of harmful genetic variants. This process, first proposed by geneticist , acts as a one-way mechanism where the genetic quality of the population declines over time without reversal. In , offspring inherit the entire of their parent, including all existing mutations, plus any new ones that arise, leading to a stepwise increase in mutational load.90027-8) The operation of the unfolds through a series of qualitative steps. Deleterious continually arise in the , creating a distribution of genotypes classified by their number of such , with the fittest class being those free of them.90027-8) Over generations, can cause the frequency of this fittest class to decline, potentially leading to its loss if it becomes too rare to persist. Once lost, no mechanism exists to recreate mutation-free individuals, as new only add to existing ones rather than removing them.90027-8) Subsequent in the now-fittest (but still mutated) class further shift the 's equilibrium toward higher mutational loads, "clicking" the forward in an inexorable manner. In small populations, the ratchet accelerates due to the amplified effects of , which more readily eliminates low-frequency advantageous or least-deleterious genotypes, overwhelming the counteracting force of purifying selection.90027-8) Purifying selection removes highly unfit individuals but struggles against mildly deleterious mutations linked across the , allowing them to hitchhike to fixation. This interplay results in a gradual but persistent decline in mean , particularly pronounced when population sizes are limited and mutation rates are non-negligible.90027-8) In contrast, sexual populations mitigate the through recombination, which shuffles alleles between chromosomes, breaking linkage and enabling the creation of offspring with fewer deleterious mutations by combining beneficial or neutral segments from different parents. This genetic mixing allows purifying selection to more effectively target and eliminate harmful mutations in isolation, preventing their accumulation and maintaining higher overall fitness compared to lineages. Thus, recombination serves as a key escape from the 's grip, highlighting a primary evolutionary advantage of sexual reproduction.90027-8)

Mathematical Formulation

The mathematical formulation of Muller's ratchet was first rigorously modeled by Haigh in using a Wright-Fisher framework for an asexually reproducing of fixed size N, where individuals accumulate deleterious at a rate \lambda per , each with a selective s (such that the relative of an individual with k mutations is (1 - s)^k).90027-8) In this model, mutations are assumed to be independent and irreversible, with no back-mutations or recombination, leading to a stepwise decline in as the least-mutated classes are lost to . Under deterministic assumptions (ignoring drift), the of numbers across the follows a with mean \theta = \lambda / s. The expected number of individuals in the fittest (with zero ), denoted n_0, is given by n_0 = N e^{-\theta}, where N e^{-\theta} represents the proportion of the free of , scaled by size.90027-8) More generally, the expected number in k (with k ) is n_k = \frac{N e^{-\theta} \theta^k}{k!}. $&#36;90027-8) This [distribution](/page/Distribution) arises because selection balances the influx of [mutations](/page/The_Mutations), maintaining a stable frequency of classes in large [populations](/page/Population) where drift is negligible. However, in finite populations, stochastic drift can eliminate the zero-mutation class when $n_0 < 1$, causing a "click" of the ratchet as the population shifts to a new, lower-fitness equilibrium centered on one more mutation per individual.90027-8) The ratchet advances irreversibly because recreation of the lost class requires multiple back-mutations, which is probabilistically unlikely. The critical population size $N_c$ below which the ratchet clicks rapidly is approximated by N_c \approx \frac{\theta}{s} \log\left(\frac{\theta}{s}\right), derived from the point where drift overcomes selection in maintaining $n_0$.90027-8) For typical values (e.g., $\theta \approx 1$, small $s$), $N_c$ is on the order of hundreds to thousands, highlighting the ratchet's relevance in small asexual populations. Haigh's model highlights limitations of purely deterministic approaches, which predict stable equilibria only when $n_0 \gg 1$ (e.g., $n_0 > 25$) and mutation accumulation proceeds slowly via independent forward mutations.90027-8) In contrast, [stochastic](/page/Stochastic) effects dominate in realistic finite [populations](/page/Population), where drift-driven loss of classes accelerates the [ratchet](/page/Ratchet), especially for mildly deleterious mutations ($s$ small relative to $1/N$). Subsequent extensions have refined these by incorporating variable [population](/page/Population) sizes or synergistic [fitness](/page/Fitness) effects, but Haigh's Poisson-based framework remains foundational for quantifying [ratchet](/page/Ratchet) progression.90027-8) ## Evolutionary Context ### Role in the Evolution of Sex Muller's ratchet posits a significant disadvantage for [asexual reproduction](/page/Asexual_reproduction), as the irreversible accumulation of deleterious [mutations](/page/The_Mutations) creates selective pressure favoring the evolution of recombination and [sexual reproduction](/page/Sexual_reproduction). In his seminal work, Hermann J. Muller argued that non-recombining lineages experience a "ratchet" effect, where [genetic drift](/page/Genetic_drift) leads to the stochastic loss of mutation-free genomes, preventing the purging of harmful [mutations](/page/The_Mutations) and resulting in a progressive decline in fitness. This mechanism, he proposed, would drive the emergence of recombination as an adaptive trait, allowing populations to reshuffle genomes and restore lower-mutation states more effectively than asexual cloning.[](https://doi.org/10.1016/0027-5107(64)90047-8) In asexual populations, deleterious mutations accumulate roughly linearly over generations due to the linkage of mutations across the genome, leading to an escalating [genetic load](/page/Genetic_load) that reduces mean [fitness](/page/Fitness). Models demonstrate that this load increases at a rate dependent on [population size](/page/Population_size) and [mutation](/page/Mutation) parameters, with the fittest class continually lost to drift, unrecoverable without recombination. In contrast, sexual populations maintain a substantially lower [genetic load](/page/Genetic_load) through [outcrossing](/page/Outcrossing), which breaks linkage disequilibria and enables selection to eliminate deleterious alleles more efficiently, producing [offspring](/page/Offspring) with fewer [mutations](/page/The_Mutations) on average. This disparity in load accumulation underscores the ratchet's role in favoring [sex](/page/Sex), as [sexual reproduction](/page/Sexual_reproduction) generates greater variance in [offspring](/page/Offspring) [fitness](/page/Fitness), enhancing adaptability. Theoretical models further support [sex](/page/Sex) as an [adaptation](/page/Adaptation) specifically countering the [ratchet](/page/Ratchet), particularly in large, long-lived [populations](/page/Population) where the process operates slowly but inexorably over extended timescales. In such scenarios, the ratchet's incremental clicks impose a cumulative burden that recombination mitigates by periodically resetting [mutation](/page/Mutation) distributions, preserving [population](/page/Population) viability. Simulations and analytical frameworks confirm that recombination evolves under these conditions by halting [mutation](/page/Mutation) buildup, with benefits most pronounced when [population](/page/Population) sizes are sufficient to delay but not prevent the ratchet's advance. Debates persist on whether the [ratchet](/page/Ratchet) alone provides a sufficient explanation for the widespread prevalence of [sex](/page/Sex) across taxa. Proponents highlight its potency in stable environments, where [mutation](/page/Mutation) accumulation dominates over other pressures, yet critics argue it requires [synergy](/page/Synergy) with factors like host-parasite coevolution (the [Red Queen hypothesis](/page/Red_Queen_hypothesis)) to fully stabilize [sexual reproduction](/page/Sexual_reproduction), as the ratchet's effects may be too gradual in highly dynamic settings. Empirical and modeling studies suggest that while the ratchet offers a robust selective force, its explanatory power is enhanced when integrated with complementary mechanisms, rather than standing in isolation.[](https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1420-9101.2002.00415.x) ### Antiquity of Recombination Genetic evidence indicates that mechanisms of [genetic recombination](/page/Genetic_recombination), including [horizontal gene transfer](/page/Horizontal_gene_transfer) (HGT) in prokaryotes, originated over 3.5 billion years ago, predating the divergence of major bacterial lineages and extending back to the [last universal common ancestor](/page/Last_universal_common_ancestor) (LUCA).[](https://bmcecolevol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12862-015-0350-0) Phylogenetic analyses of ancient [gene](/page/Gene) families, such as [aminoacyl-tRNA](/page/Aminoacyl-tRNA) synthetases, reveal patterns of HGT that shaped early microbial genomes, facilitating the exchange of genetic material among coexisting lineages around the time of LUCA, estimated at approximately 4.2 billion years ago.[](https://bmcecolevol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12862-015-0350-0) This primitive form of recombination allowed for the integration of beneficial genes and the mitigation of mutational burdens in [asexual](/page/Asexual) prokaryotic populations.[](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4817804/) In eukaryotes, meiotic recombination emerged as an advanced counterpart, present in the last eukaryotic common ancestor (LECA), which lived around 1.8 to 2.1 billion years ago.[](https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3002917) Genomic surveys confirm that LECA possessed a core set of meiotic genes, enabling [homologous recombination](/page/Homologous_recombination) during [meiosis](/page/Meiosis) to ensure proper chromosome segregation and [genetic diversity](/page/Genetic_diversity).[](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5031615/) This system likely evolved from prokaryotic precursors, building on mechanisms like bacterial transformation to support [sexual reproduction](/page/Sexual_reproduction) in early eukaryotic cells.[](https://academic.oup.com/bioscience/article/60/7/498/234118) Central to these ancient recombination processes is the [recA/RAD51 gene family](/page/Gene_family), which is highly conserved across all domains of life—[bacteria](/page/Bacteria), [archaea](/page/Archaea), and eukaryotes—demonstrating duplications that occurred before the archaea-eukaryote split over 3 billion years ago.[](https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.0604232103) In prokaryotes, [RecA](/page/RecA) proteins mediate [homologous recombination](/page/Homologous_recombination) for [DNA repair](/page/DNA_repair), while eukaryotic RAD51 homologs perform analogous roles in both mitotic and meiotic contexts.[](https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.0604232103) These genes' preservation underscores recombination's fundamental role in maintaining [genome](/page/Genome) stability by repairing double-strand breaks and countering deleterious mutations, functions that predate the [evolution](/page/Evolution) of multicellularity by billions of years.[](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8307549/) The antiquity of these recombination mechanisms implies that selective pressures, such as the accumulation of harmful [mutations](/page/The_Mutations) in asexual lineages akin to Muller's ratchet, influenced early life forms and promoted the development of primitive genetic exchange systems.[](https://academic.oup.com/bioscience/article/60/7/498/234118) By enabling the reshuffling and repair of genetic material, recombination provided a [countermeasure](/page/Countermeasure) to mutational decay long before complex eukaryotic sexuality arose.[](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5031615/) ## Related Phenomena ### Connection to Mutational Meltdown [Mutational meltdown](/page/Mutational_meltdown) refers to a vicious cycle in small [asexual](/page/Asexual) populations where the accumulation of deleterious mutations, initially driven by mechanisms like Muller's ratchet, reduces mean fitness and thereby shrinks [population size](/page/Population_size), which in turn weakens the efficacy of [natural selection](/page/Natural_selection) and accelerates further mutation accumulation through enhanced [genetic drift](/page/Genetic_drift).[](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1993.tb01266.x) This process creates a [positive feedback](/page/Positive_feedback) loop that can lead to population extinction, particularly when the genomic [mutation rate](/page/Mutation_rate) is sufficiently high relative to [population size](/page/Population_size).[](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1993.tb01266.x) In a seminal model developed by Lynch and colleagues, mutational meltdown is formalized through analytical approximations that predict a critical threshold population size below which the process becomes inevitable, typically on the order of a few hundred individuals when deleterious mutations occur at moderate to high rates.[](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1993.tb01266.x) The model incorporates the probability of extinction, which increases sharply with the genomic mutation rate $ U $, as higher $ U $ elevates the mutational load and hastens fitness decline; for instance, simulations demonstrate that extinction times shorten dramatically when $ U $ exceeds 0.5 for populations around effective size $ N_e = 100 $.[](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1993.tb01266.x) A key equation highlights the optimal selection coefficient $ s^* $ that minimizes extinction risk, given by $ s^* \approx U / x $, where $ x $ satisfies $ N_e x = e^x - 1 $, underscoring that meltdown is most severe when selection against mildly deleterious mutations ($ s \ll 1 $) is ineffective in small populations.[](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1993.tb01266.x) The synergy between Muller's ratchet and [mutational meltdown](/page/Mutational_meltdown) arises because the ratchet provides the initial irreversible buildup of mutations in the absence of recombination, which then feeds into demographic decline by reducing reproductive output and increasing stochastic fluctuations in [population size](/page/Population_size).[](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1993.tb01266.x) This interaction is exacerbated under conditions of high genomic [mutation rate](/page/Mutation_rate) $ U $ and low selection coefficients $ s $ for deleterious alleles, as these parameters diminish the ratchet's click rate while amplifying drift's role in fixing additional mutations.[](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1993.tb01266.x) However, the cycle can be mitigated by occasional [sexual reproduction](/page/Sexual_reproduction), which generates recombinant genotypes that purge mutation loads more effectively than clonal propagation, or by [migration](/page/Migration) introducing fitter lineages from larger source populations, thereby restoring [genetic diversity](/page/Genetic_diversity) and halting the feedback loop.[](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1993.tb01266.x) ### Exceptions in Asexual Lineages While Muller's ratchet poses a significant challenge to [asexual](/page/Asexual) lineages by promoting the irreversible accumulation of deleterious [mutations](/page/The_Mutations), certain genetic and ecological [mechanisms](/page/Crank) can mitigate its effects, allowing some [asexual](/page/Asexual) populations to persist over extended periods. These exceptions do not eliminate the process entirely but slow its progression, effectively delaying the [fitness](/page/Fitness) decline predicted by the standard ratchet model.[](https://academic.oup.com/evolut/article/47/6/1744/6870416) Genetic mechanisms play a key role in evading the ratchet. High levels of heterozygosity, often maintained through [polyploidy](/page/Polyploidy), enable asexual organisms to mask deleterious recessive mutations in homozygous states, thereby reducing their selective impact and preventing rapid fixation. For instance, in polyploid asexual amoebae such as those in the genus *[Naegleria](/page/Naegleria)*, the possession of multiple chromosome sets allows for functional redundancy, which buffers against mutational load and has been observed to correlate with stable fitness over generations without evidence of degradation.[](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2016.08.003) Similarly, gene conversion events—non-reciprocal transfers of genetic [information](/page/Information) between homologous sequences—can purge deleterious alleles by repairing [mutations](/page/Mutation) without requiring full meiotic recombination, as demonstrated in ancient asexual lineages like bdelloid rotifers where such processes maintain allelic diversity.[](https://www.nature.com/articles/nature12326) Genome plasticity in certain asexual microbes, such as heritable endobacteria, can also introduce variability and retain limited recombination-like processes, counteracting clonal uniformity and slowing mutation accumulation.[](https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.02057-15) Ecological factors further contribute to ratchet evasion by countering the [genetic drift](/page/Genetic_drift) that drives mutation fixation. Large effective population sizes (N) diminish the influence of drift, as selection becomes more efficient at removing deleterious variants before they spread; in such populations, the [ratchet](/page/Ratchet) "clicks" infrequently, preserving overall [fitness](/page/Fitness). High migration rates in metapopulations similarly reduce local drift by promoting [gene flow](/page/Gene_flow), which replenishes [genetic diversity](/page/Genetic_diversity) and prevents isolated subpopulations from accumulating mutations independently.[](https://hal.science/hal-03492318v1/document) Theoretical models identify critical thresholds beyond which the ratchet is effectively stalled. Specifically, when the [effective population size](/page/Effective_population_size) exceeds a [critical value](/page/Critical_value) (N > N_c, where N_c scales inversely with the [deleterious mutation rate](/page/Mutation_rate)), the expected number of mutation-free individuals remains sufficient to avoid irreversible losses, allowing [asexual](/page/Asexual) lineages to persist without recombination. A prominent example of long-term evasion involves bdelloid rotifers, ancient [asexuals](/page/Asexual) that have persisted for over 40 million years. These organisms incorporate [horizontal gene transfer](/page/Horizontal_gene_transfer) (HGT) from diverse sources, including [bacteria](/page/Bacteria) and fungi, at rates far exceeding those in other eukaryotes; this influx of foreign DNA not only replaces damaged genes but also enhances adaptability, effectively bypassing the ratchet by simulating the genetic mixing of [sex](/page/Sex).[](https://bmcbiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12915-015-0202-9) [Genome](/page/Genome) analyses confirm that HGT-derived genes constitute up to 8-14% of their [proteome](/page/Proteome), with evidence of ongoing integration that mitigates mutational decay.[](https://www.nature.com/articles/nature12326) ## Biological Examples and Evidence ### Natural Case Studies Bdelloid rotifers, a class of microscopic aquatic animals, represent one of the most striking examples of long-term [asexuality](/page/Asexuality), with [fossil](/page/Fossil) evidence indicating an ancient origin exceeding 30 million years without observed [sexual reproduction](/page/Sexual_reproduction).[](https://www.nature.com/articles/nature12326) Their [genome](/page/Genome)s exhibit accumulated pseudogenes and degenerate [gene](/page/Gene) copies, consistent with the irreversible buildup of deleterious mutations predicted by Muller's ratchet in non-recombining lineages.[](https://bmcecolevol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12862-018-1288-9) However, the ratchet's progression appears slowed by enhanced [DNA repair](/page/DNA_repair) mechanisms, including multiple copies of non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) [gene](/page/Gene)s (3–8 per [genome](/page/Genome)) that promote gene conversion between allelic variants, effectively mimicking recombination to purge mutations.[](https://bmcecolevol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12862-018-1288-9) Additionally, [horizontal gene transfer](/page/Horizontal_gene_transfer) (HGT) contributes 5–10% of their [gene](/page/Gene)s from non-metazoan sources, incorporating functional [DNA repair](/page/DNA_repair) enzymes like AlkD and UVDE that bolster resilience to desiccation-induced damage and further counteract mutational accumulation.[](https://bmcecolevol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12862-018-1288-9) The [Amazon molly](/page/Amazon_molly) (*Poecilia formosa*), a gynogenetic fish [species](/page/Species) endemic to [Mexico](/page/Mexico) and southern [Texas](/page/Texas), provides evidence of genomic strategies to evade Muller's ratchet despite ~100,000 years (~500,000 generations) of clonal reproduction via sperm-dependent parthenogenesis.[](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-018-0473-y) [Genome](/page/Genome) sequencing reveals exceptionally high heterozygosity (index *H* ≈ 0.5), approximately tenfold greater than in its sexual parental [species](/page/Species) (*P. mexicana* and *P. latipinna*), arising from its hybrid origin and maintained through the absence of recombination, which "freezes" divergent parental alleles.[](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-018-0473-y) This elevated heterozygosity buffers against deleterious mutations by masking recessive variants and facilitating gene conversion at a rate of 3 × 10⁻⁸ per site per generation, while occasional paternal [introgression](/page/Introgression) (0.33–8.1 Mb, ~1% of the [genome](/page/Genome)) introduces novel alleles to further mitigate load accumulation.[](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-018-0473-y) Consequently, the [species](/page/Species) shows few signs of genetic degeneration, with high [major histocompatibility complex](/page/Major_histocompatibility_complex) (MHC) diversity (e.g., 80 class I alleles across 20 individuals) supporting immune function without the expected fitness decline from the ratchet.[](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-018-0473-y) Darwinulid ostracods, such as *Darwinula stevensoni*, exemplify ancient parthenogenetic crustaceans with a fossil record spanning over 200 million years, yet molecular analyses reveal unexpectedly low [mutation](/page/Mutation) loads compared to expectations under Muller's ratchet.[](https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2002.2314) In *D. stevensoni*, [nucleotide](/page/Nucleotide) divergence in nuclear genes (e.g., ITS1, COI, 28S rDNA) is minimal (0–0.3% within individuals), far lower than in sexual [ostracod](/page/Ostracod) relatives, indicating limited accumulation of deleterious mutations over time.[](https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2002.2314) This contrasts with the predicted Meselson effect of high intraindividual divergence in long-term asexuals and suggests efficient purifying selection or [DNA repair](/page/DNA_repair) mechanisms, such as gene conversion observed in multi-copy sequences, to counteract the ratchet's effects.[](https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2002.2314) Up to 50% of [genetic variation](/page/Genetic_variation) in adults may stem from [somatic](/page/Somatic) mutations, but [germline](/page/Germline) stability maintains low overall load relative to sexual counterparts.[](https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2002.2314) In [cassava](/page/Cassava) (*Manihot esculenta*), a 2024 study (preprint) applied Muller's ratchet to explain the erosion of [sexual reproduction](/page/Sexual_reproduction) genes in parthenogenetic lineages, where the absence of recombination led to the fixation of deleterious mutations, reducing sexual viability and highlighting the ratchet's role in [plants](/page/Plant).[](https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.02.14.580345v1) Mitochondrial genomes in eukaryotic cells, evolving as uniparentally inherited asexual units without recombination, demonstrate classic ratchet-like degeneration across diverse taxa.[](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8583893/) Comparative analyses of [transfer RNA](/page/Transfer_RNA) (tRNA) genes show accelerated nucleotide substitution rates in mitochondrial versus [nuclear](/page/Nuclear) genomes, with mitochondrial tRNAs exhibiting reduced stem-binding [stability](/page/Stability) (<50% of [nuclear](/page/Nuclear) counterparts) and highly [variable](/page/Variable) loop sizes (50-fold more than [nuclear](/page/Nuclear) tRNAs).[](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8583893/) This leads to structural compaction and [gene](/page/Gene) [loss](/page/Loss); for instance, many animal mitochondrial genomes have shed tRNA genes or minimized intergenic regions, reflecting the fixation of mildly deleterious mutations over time.[](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8583893/) No invariant sites persist in mitochondrial tRNAs, unlike ~20% in [nuclear](/page/Nuclear) versions, underscoring the ratchet's role in eroding functional complexity in these intracellular [asexual](/page/Asexual) lineages.[](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8583893/) ### Experimental and Observational Support Laboratory experiments with asexual microbial populations have provided direct evidence for the operation of Muller's [ratchet](/page/Ratchet) through controlled serial passaging, where small population sizes promote the accumulation of deleterious mutations and subsequent fitness declines. In a seminal study using *[Salmonella](/page/Salmonella) typhimurium* as a model DNA-based microbe, populations of approximately 100 individuals were propagated asexually for up to 1,700 generations via serial transfer, mimicking high [genetic drift](/page/Genetic_drift). Fitness assays revealed that about 1% of the 444 evolved lineages exhibited significant growth rate reductions, attributable to the irreversible fixation of deleterious mutations, consistent with ratchet predictions in finite asexual lineages.[](https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.93.2.906) Similar patterns emerged in long-term evolution experiments with *[Escherichia coli](/page/Escherichia_coli)*, where asexual lines under bottlenecks showed progressive mutation buildup and fitness erosion over thousands of generations, aligning with theoretical expectations for ratchet clicks.[](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8649513/) Computational simulations, particularly [Monte Carlo](/page/Monte_Carlo) approaches, have validated the dynamics of Muller's ratchet in finite asexual populations by quantifying click rates and [mutation](/page/Mutation) distributions. Post-2000 models employing [stochastic](/page/Stochastic) simulations of multilocus haploid genotypes demonstrated that in populations of size *N* ranging from 10 to 10^5, the ratchet advances at a rate proportional to the logarithm of *N*, with deleterious [mutations](/page/The_Mutations) accumulating as a traveling wave of [genetic diversity](/page/Genetic_diversity). These simulations confirmed that without back mutations or recombination, the mean number of [mutations](/page/The_Mutations) per [genome](/page/Genome) increases steadily, leading to fitness valleys that hinder [adaptation](/page/Adaptation), particularly at low genomic [mutation](/page/Mutation) rates (*μL* ≪ 1). Genomic sequencing analyses have revealed elevated loads of deleterious alleles in asexual relative to sexual lineages, supporting ratchet-driven degeneration. In aphids, comparative genomics of the endosymbiont *Buchnera aphidicola*—an obligate asexual symbiont—showed accelerated nonsynonymous substitution rates and A+T bias in coding sequences, indicative of fixed deleterious mutations due to small effective population sizes and lack of recombination. Low *dN/dS* ratios across genes further evidenced relaxed purifying selection, with genome erosion patterns consistent with ratchet operation over evolutionary timescales.[](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC39726/) More recent 2020s sequencing of pea aphid (*Acyrthosiphon pisum*) genomes highlighted reduced heterozygosity and negative Tajima's D values in obligate parthenogenetic (asexual) lineages within an 840-kb X-linked region associated with reproductive mode, suggesting localized mutation accumulation and lower diversity compared to cyclical parthenogens (which undergo periodic sex).[](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10538257/) A 2023 preprint on [experimental evolution](/page/Experimental_evolution) of the [RNA virus](/page/RNA_virus) tobacco etch virus (*Potyvirus*) (updated 2024, unpublished as of November 2025) confirmed [ratchet](/page/Ratchet) effects, with serial passages through plant hosts under severe transmission bottlenecks (1–10 virions) leading to irreversible accumulation of deleterious mutations and [fitness](/page/Fitness) declines, as measured by plaque assays and deep sequencing of quasispecies clouds. Larger founder populations or multiple infections mitigated the ratchet, restoring [fitness](/page/Fitness) via complementation.[](https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.08.01.550272v4)

References

  1. [1]
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0027-5107(64)90047-8
  2. [2]
    Some Genetic Aspects of Sex | The American Naturalist
    Some Genetic Aspects of Sex. H. J. Muller. H. J. Muller. Search for more ... Carlson Muller, Hermann Joseph (1890–1967), (Jan 2015): 13–17. https://doi ...Missing: paper | Show results with:paper
  3. [3]
    The relation of recombination to mutational advance - ScienceDirect
    View PDF; Download full issue. Search ScienceDirect. Elsevier · Mutation Research/Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis · Volume 1, Issue 1, May ...
  4. [4]
    H. J. Muller and R. A. Fisher on the Evolutionary Significance of Sex
    Muller, on the other hand, developed an explanation based on the greater rate with which two or more beneficial mutations will come together into single.
  5. [5]
    https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-8-62
  6. [6]
    The accumulation of deleterious genes in a population—Muller's ...
    Abstract. A quantitative study of the operation of Muller's Ratchet for the accumulation of deleterious genes in an asexually reproducing population is made.
  7. [7]
    S RATCHET AND MUTATIONAL MELTDOWNS - Oxford Academic
    Muller, H. J. 1964. The relation of recombination to mutational advance. Mutation Research 1:2-9. Pamilo, P., M. Nei, and W.-H. Li. 1987. Accumu- lation of ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  8. [8]
    https://www.jstor.org/stable/4331338
  9. [9]
    https://academic.oup.com/genetics/article/78/2/737/5995051
  10. [10]
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0040580978900278
  11. [11]
    Ancient horizontal gene transfer and the last common ancestors
    Apr 22, 2015 · Analyses of ancient gene families show that HGT existed in the distant past, even at the time of the organismal last universal common ancestor (LUCA).
  12. [12]
    Horizontal Gene Transfer and the History of Life - PMC - NIH
    Horizontal gene transfer is a major evolutionary force that constantly reshapes microbial genomes. Emerging phylogenetic methods use information about ...
  13. [13]
    Reconstructing the last common ancestor of all eukaryotes
    Nov 25, 2024 · Most researchers accept that LECA originated after an association of at least 2 organisms descending from prokaryotes of evolutionarily distinct ...
  14. [14]
    What can we infer about the origin of sex in early eukaryotes? - NIH
    Current analysis shows that the last eukaryotic common ancestor (LECA) was capable of full meiotic sex. The original eukaryotic life cycle can probably be ...
  15. [15]
    Evolutionary Origin of Recombination during Meiosis | BioScience
    We hypothesize in this article that meiotic recombination, a key part of the sexual process in eukaryotes, arose from the sexual process of transformation in ...
  16. [16]
    Origins and evolution of the recA/RAD51 gene family - PNAS
    Jul 5, 2006 · In meiosis, recombination between homologous chromosomes is of central importance for the association and proper segregation of homologous ...
  17. [17]
    Evolutionary Origins of DNA Repair Pathways: Role of Oxygen ...
    As shown in Figure 1, cellular life evolved several distinct enzymatic mechanisms to counteract mutagenesis and DNA damage to their double-stranded genomes, ...
  18. [18]
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1993.tb01266.x
  19. [19]
    MULLER'S RATCHET AND MUTATIONAL MELTDOWNS | Evolution
    Finally, we consider the consequences of the mutational meltdown for the extinction of mitochondrial lineages in sexual species. Extinction, Muller's ratchet, ...Missing: seminal | Show results with:seminal
  20. [20]
    No evidence for accumulation of deleterious mutations and fitness ...
    Jul 6, 2020 · Asexual individuals had significantly higher genome-wide heterozygosity ... Asexual amoebae escape Muller's ratchet through polyploidy. Trends ...Missing: exceptions | Show results with:exceptions
  21. [21]
    Genomic evidence for ameiotic evolution in the bdelloid rotifer ...
    Jul 21, 2013 · Hence, the homogenizing and diversifying roles of sex may have been replaced in bdelloids by gene conversion and horizontal gene transfer, in an ...
  22. [22]
    Defying Muller's Ratchet: Ancient Heritable Endobacteria Escape ...
    Jun 21, 2016 · This continual decrease in the mean fitness of a population was described by Hermann Joseph Muller (9) and is known as Muller's ratchet.<|control11|><|separator|>
  23. [23]
    [PDF] The spatial Muller's ratchet: Surfing of deleterious mutations ... - HAL
    Sep 26, 2022 · Muller's ratchet is a mechanism that was first proposed as an explanation for the evolution of recombination, it can be formulated as follows.<|control11|><|separator|>
  24. [24]
    Horizontal gene transfer in bdelloid rotifers is ancient, ongoing and ...
    Nov 4, 2015 · Bdelloid rotifers are microscopic animals that contain a higher proportion of horizontally transferred, non-metazoan genes in their genomes than typical of ...Missing: Muller's ratchet
  25. [25]
    Evolutionary diversity and novelty of DNA repair genes in asexual ...
    Nov 28, 2018 · Bdelloid rotifers are the oldest, most diverse and successful ... Muller's Ratchet [5, 8, 19]. Functional divergence of multiple copy ...
  26. [26]
    Clonal polymorphism and high heterozygosity in the celibate ...
    Feb 12, 2018 · First, the classical model of demise, Muller's ratchet, states that deleterious mutations cannot be purged without meiosis, and their ...
  27. [27]
    No slave to sex | Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B
    ... Muller's ratchet. In this case, our data support these hypotheses on the prevalence of sex, even if the two extant ancient asexual groups (bdelloids and ...
  28. [28]
    Molecular Evidence for Muller's Ratchet in Mitochondrial Genomes
    A comparative study of the transfer RNA genes in animal mitochondrial and nuclear genomes demonstrates that the former accumulate nucleotide substitutions much ...
  29. [29]
    Muller's ratchet decreases fitness of a DNA-based microbe. - PNAS
    Muller proposed that an asexual organism will inevitably accumulate deleterious mutations, resulting in an increase of the mutational load and an inexorable ...
  30. [30]
    Estimate of the genomic mutation rate deleterious to overall fitness ...
    Here we use Escherichia coli to provide an estimate of the genomic deleterious-mutation rate for total fitness in a microbe.Missing: Muller's ratchet
  31. [31]
    The solitary wave of asexual evolution - PNAS
    Using analysis and Monte Carlo simulations, we demonstrate the accuracy of our results over almost the entire range of population sizes. Two limiting cases of ...
  32. [32]
    Adaptive evolution of asexual populations under Muller's ratchet
    We study the population genetics of adaptation in nonequilibrium haploid asexual populations. We find that the accumulation of deleterious mutations, ...Missing: Monte Carlo simulation 2000-2020
  33. [33]
    Accelerated evolution and Muller's rachet in endosymbiotic bacteria
    These observations are best explained as the result of Muller's ratchet within small asexual populations, combined with mutational bias. In light of this ...Missing: Kubota | Show results with:Kubota
  34. [34]
    Contrasting Evolutionary Patterns Between Sexual and Asexual ...
    This study aims at finely characterizing the genomic region(s) associated with the variation of reproductive mode in the pea aphid and gaining functional and ...Missing: ratchet 2020-2025
  35. [35]
    None
    Nothing is retrieved...<|control11|><|separator|>
  36. [36]
    Asexual Experimental Evolution of Yeast Does Not Curtail ... - NIH
    An empirical study concluded that sex is at the root of TE's evolutionary success because the yeast TE load was found to decrease rapidly.