Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Normalizing constant

In probability theory and statistics, a normalizing constant is a scalar factor that scales a non-negative function to ensure its integral over the domain equals 1, transforming it into a valid probability density function (PDF).^[1] This constant, often denoted as c or Z, arises when defining distributions where the unnormalized form g(y) is known, but the scaling c = \left( \int g(y) \, dy \right)^{-1} must be computed to satisfy the normalization requirement.^[1] For discrete cases, it ensures the sum over all outcomes equals 1, converting the function into a probability mass function. The normalizing constant is central to Bayesian inference, where Bayes' theorem expresses the posterior distribution as proportional to the likelihood times the prior, with the normalizing constant being the marginal likelihood p(x) = \int p(x \mid \theta) p(\theta) \, d\theta.^[2] This integral often lacks a closed-form solution, making estimation techniques like Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) or importance sampling essential for computation.^[3] In exponential families of distributions, such as the Gaussian or Dirichlet, the normalizing constant involves special functions like the gamma function to ensure proper normalization.^[4] Beyond probability, normalizing constants appear in physics, particularly in quantum mechanics and statistical mechanics. In quantum mechanics, the wave function \psi(x) is normalized such that \int |\psi(x)|^2 \, dx = 1, with the constant chosen to satisfy this condition for probability interpretation of |\psi|^2.^[5] In statistical mechanics, the partition function Z = \sum_i e^{-\beta E_i} (where \beta = 1/(k_B T)) serves as the normalizing constant for the canonical ensemble probability distribution p_i = e^{-\beta E_i}/Z, linking microscopic states to thermodynamic properties like free energy via A = -k_B T \ln Z.^[6] Computing these constants can be challenging in complex systems, leading to advanced methods in both fields.^[7]

Fundamentals

Definition

In probability theory, the normalizing constant is a scalar value, typically denoted Z, that scales an unnormalized non-negative function f(x) to form a valid probability density function (PDF) for continuous variables or probability mass function (PMF) for discrete variables, ensuring the total probability measures exactly 1. This constant divides the unnormalized function such that the resulting distribution integrates to 1 over the continuous domain or sums to 1 over the discrete support, thereby making it a proper probability distribution.^[8] For the continuous case, the normalizing constant is given by

Z = \int f(x) \, dx,

where the integral is taken over the entire domain, yielding the normalized PDF p(x) = f(x)/Z with \int p(x) \, dx = 1. In the discrete case, it is

Z = \sum_x f(x),

producing the normalized PMF p(x) = f(x)/Z where \sum_x p(x) = 1. These formulations ensure the function adheres to the axioms of probability, providing a foundation for modeling uncertainties.^[2] The concept of the normalizing constant originated in probability theory through Pierre-Simon Laplace's foundational work on inverse probability in his 1774 memoir, where it was implicitly employed to compute posterior probabilities from likelihoods and priors. This early use laid the groundwork for its role in Bayesian inference, though the term "normalizing constant" emerged later as probability theory formalized. It is important to distinguish normalization in probability, which enforces a total measure of unity for interpretability as probabilities, from general normalization in vector spaces, where a vector is scaled by its norm to achieve unit length (e.g., \mathbf{u} = \mathbf{v} / \|\mathbf{v}\|) to preserve direction while standardizing magnitude.^[9] In Bayes' theorem, the normalizing constant specifically represents the marginal likelihood, integrating the joint distribution over parameters.^[2]

Mathematical Properties

One key mathematical property of the normalizing constant is its invariance under scaling of the unnormalized density function. Consider an unnormalized density f(x) with normalizing constant Z = \int_{\mathcal{X}} f(x) \, d\mu(x), yielding the probability density p(x) = \frac{f(x)}{Z}. If f(x) is rescaled by a positive constant c > 0 to form f'(x) = c f(x), the updated normalizing constant is Z' = \int_{\mathcal{X}} f'(x) \, d\mu(x) = c Z, so the normalized density becomes p'(x) = \frac{f'(x)}{Z'} = \frac{c f(x)}{c Z} = p(x). This property implies that the resulting probability distribution is independent of any arbitrary positive scaling in the specification of f(x), allowing flexibility in modeling without altering the probabilistic interpretation.^[10] The normalizing constant also exhibits uniqueness for a fixed unnormalized function f(x) > 0 over the domain \mathcal{X}, determined solely by the integral with respect to the underlying measure \mu. Specifically, Z is the unique value that ensures \int_{\mathcal{X}} p(x) \, d\mu(x) = 1, as any deviation would violate the normalization axiom of probability measures. This uniqueness holds provided f(x) is integrable and positive on \mathcal{X}, guaranteeing a well-defined and consistent probability model without ambiguity in the choice of Z beyond the measure's specification.^[10] Computing the normalizing constant often presents significant challenges, especially in high-dimensional settings or when f(x) incorporates intricate interactions, making direct evaluation of the integral infeasible. Such intractability arises because exact integration requires exhaustive enumeration or analytical closure, which is rarely possible for complex models. To address this, approximation techniques are widely used, including Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods that generate samples from the unnormalized distribution to estimate ratios of normalizing constants or expectations without computing Z explicitly, and variational inference approaches that approximate the posterior by minimizing the Kullback-Leibler divergence via a tractable family of distributions, effectively bounding the log-normalizing constant. These methods enable practical inference while acknowledging the computational barriers inherent to Z.^[11]^[12] Conceptually, the normalizing constant shares a direct analogy with the partition function in statistical mechanics, where it normalizes the exponential form of the Boltzmann distribution to sum probabilities over microstates to unity. This equivalence underscores the normalizing constant's role as a universal scaling factor in probabilistic frameworks, bridging abstract probability theory with physical systems.^[13]

Applications in Probability and Statistics

Discrete Distributions

In discrete probability distributions, the normalizing constant ensures that the probability mass function (PMF) sums to 1 over all possible outcomes. For an unnormalized function g(x), the normalized PMF is given by

p(x) = \frac{g(x)}{Z}, \quad Z = \sum_x g(x),

where the sum is over the support of the discrete random variable. This parallels the continuous case but uses summation instead of integration to handle countable outcomes.^[14] A classic example is the Poisson distribution, which models the number of events occurring in a fixed interval of time or space, assuming a constant average rate \lambda > 0. The unnormalized PMF is g(n) = \frac{\lambda^n}{n!} for n = 0, 1, 2, \dots, and the normalizing constant is Z = \sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{\lambda^n}{n!} = e^\lambda, derived as the Taylor series expansion of the exponential function. Thus, the normalized PMF is

p(n) = \frac{e^{-\lambda} \lambda^n}{n!},

which sums to 1. This distribution often arises as a limit of the binomial distribution when the number of trials goes to infinity while the success probability approaches zero, keeping the expected value fixed at \lambda.^[15] Another example is the categorical distribution, a generalization of the Bernoulli distribution to K \geq 2 categories, where the random variable takes one of K possible values. The parameters are probabilities \theta_1, \dots, \theta_K with \sum_{k=1}^K \theta_k = 1. If starting from unnormalized weights w_k > 0, the normalized probabilities are \theta_k = w_k / Z where Z = \sum_{k=1}^K w_k, ensuring the PMF p(X = k) = \theta_k sums to 1. In practice, such as in machine learning for multinomial logistic regression, the softmax function computes \theta_k = \frac{\exp(\eta_k)}{\sum_{j=1}^K \exp(\eta_j)}, where Z = \sum_{j=1}^K \exp(\eta_j) is the normalizing constant. For the uniform categorical distribution, Z = K and p(X = k) = 1/K.^[16]

Continuous Distributions

In continuous probability distributions, the normalizing constant ensures that the probability density function (PDF) integrates to 1 over the support of the random variable. For a non-negative unnormalized density f(x), the normalized PDF is given by

p(x) = \frac{f(x)}{Z}, \quad Z = \int f(u) \, du,

where the integral is taken over the entire support of the distribution. This form contrasts with discrete cases by replacing summation with integration, adapting the normalization to infinite spaces.^[14] A prominent example is the Gaussian distribution, where the unnormalized density is \exp\left(-\frac{(x - \mu)^2}{2\sigma^2}\right). The normalizing constant Z = \sqrt{2\pi\sigma^2} is derived by evaluating the integral through completing the square in the exponent and recognizing the result as a standard Gaussian integral.^[17] This yields the familiar PDF

p(x) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi\sigma^2}} \exp\left(-\frac{(x - \mu)^2}{2\sigma^2}\right),

which integrates to 1 for any mean \mu and variance \sigma^2 > 0.^[18] Another key example is the Beta distribution on the interval [0, 1], with unnormalized density f(x) = x^{\alpha-1}(1-x)^{\beta-1} for \alpha > 0, \beta > 0. The normalizing constant is the Beta function Z = B(\alpha, \beta) = \frac{\Gamma(\alpha)\Gamma(\beta)}{\Gamma(\alpha + \beta)}, where \Gamma denotes the gamma function, ensuring the PDF integrates to 1.^[19] This connection highlights the role of special functions in normalizing continuous distributions bounded on finite intervals.^[20] Computing the normalizing constant analytically remains challenging for many continuous distributions, particularly complex priors in Bayesian nonparametrics, where high-dimensional integrals lead to intractability. Such cases often necessitate numerical methods like Markov chain Monte Carlo to approximate Z or bypass its direct evaluation.^[21]

Bayes' Theorem

In Bayesian inference, Bayes' theorem expresses the posterior distribution of parameters \theta given observed data x as

p(\theta \mid x) = \frac{p(x \mid \theta) \, p(\theta)}{p(x)},

where p(x) denotes the marginal likelihood, which functions as the normalizing constant Z = p(x) = \int p(x \mid \theta) \, p(\theta) \, d\theta. This formulation allows for the coherent updating of prior beliefs p(\theta) with the likelihood p(x \mid \theta) to obtain the posterior p(\theta \mid x).^[22] The normalizing constant Z = p(x) plays a crucial role by ensuring that the posterior distribution integrates to unity over the parameter space, thereby qualifying it as a proper probability distribution. It represents the total probability of the data, averaged over all possible parameter values weighted by the prior, and is alternatively known as the evidence or marginal probability of the data. This normalization step distinguishes Bayesian updating from mere proportionality statements, enforcing probabilistic consistency. In practice, computing the marginal likelihood exactly is feasible in cases involving conjugate priors, such as the beta-binomial model, where a beta prior combined with a binomial likelihood yields a closed-form beta posterior and an explicit expression for Z via the beta function. For non-conjugate settings, where direct integration is intractable, approximations are commonly applied; the Laplace approximation models the integrand as a Gaussian centered at the posterior mode to estimate Z, while Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC) bypasses explicit calculation of Z by simulating synthetic data and accepting parameters that produce observations similar to x.^[23]^[24]^[25] The importance of this normalizing constant in Bayesian updating was explicitly addressed in Thomas Bayes' original 1763 essay, which derived the theorem and emphasized the need to account for the marginal probability of the data to obtain proper proportions, though the modern terminology of "normalizing constant" arose later in the evolution of statistical theory.^[26]

Uses Beyond Probability

Physics

In quantum mechanics, the normalizing constant plays a crucial role in ensuring the unitarity of quantum states by normalizing wave functions to represent conserved probabilities. For a wave function ψ(x), normalization requires that the integral of its modulus squared over all space equals unity: ∫ |ψ(x)|² dx = 1. This condition arises from the probabilistic interpretation of the wave function, where |ψ(x)|² dx gives the probability of finding the particle in dx at position x. To achieve this, an unnormalized trial wave function φ(x) is scaled by a constant 1/√Z, where Z = ∫ |φ(x)|² dx serves as the normalizing constant, setting the overall scale while preserving the shape of the wave function.^[27] This normalization is essential for maintaining conservation laws, such as the total probability being invariant under time evolution according to the Schrödinger equation. If the wave function is normalized at an initial time, it remains so throughout, as the equation preserves the norm. The process involves computing Z explicitly for specific systems, such as the hydrogen atom or harmonic oscillator, to obtain the exact normalized form. Failure to normalize would lead to inconsistent probability interpretations, violating the foundational postulates of quantum mechanics.^[28] In statistical mechanics, the normalizing constant manifests as the partition function Z, which ensures the Boltzmann distribution sums (or integrates) to unity across all possible states, thereby enforcing conservation of probability in thermal equilibrium. For a discrete system, Z = ∑_i e^{-β E_i}, where β = 1/(kT), E_i are the energy levels, k is Boltzmann's constant, and T is temperature; for continuous systems, it becomes Z = ∫ e^{-β H(x)} dx, with H(x) the Hamiltonian. This Z normalizes the probability density ρ_i = e^{-β E_i}/Z for state i, allowing the derivation of macroscopic thermodynamic properties from microscopic configurations.^[29] A key distinction from purely probabilistic contexts is that in statistical mechanics, Z directly connects to thermodynamic quantities, such as the Helmholtz free energy F = -kT ln Z, which encapsulates entropy and internal energy in a single potential. This relation enables predictions of phase transitions, heat capacities, and equilibrium constants without explicitly summing probabilities. For instance, in the ideal gas, the partition function for N indistinguishable particles is Z = (V^N / N!) (2π m kT / h²)^{3N/2}, where V is volume, m is mass, and h is Planck's constant; this ensures phase space probabilities integrate to 1 while yielding the Sackur-Tetrode equation for entropy.^[30]

Machine Learning

In machine learning, normalizing constants play a crucial role in defining probability distributions for generative models, particularly energy-based models (EBMs). In such models, the probability density is given by p(\mathbf{x}) = \frac{1}{Z} \exp(-E(\mathbf{x}; \theta)), where E(\mathbf{x}; \theta) is the energy function parameterized by \theta, and Z = \int \exp(-E(\mathbf{x}; \theta)) \, d\mathbf{x} is the intractable normalizing constant, also known as the partition function. Restricted Boltzmann machines (RBMs), a foundational class of undirected graphical models, exemplify this, where the joint distribution over visible and hidden units is p(\mathbf{v}, \mathbf{h}) = \frac{1}{Z} \exp(-E(\mathbf{v}, \mathbf{h})), and computing Z requires summing over an exponential number of configurations, rendering exact maximum likelihood training infeasible. To address the intractability of Z, approximation methods like contrastive divergence (CD) are employed for training EBMs such as RBMs. CD approximates the gradient of the log-likelihood by performing short Markov chain Monte Carlo runs to estimate the model's negative phase, avoiding direct computation of Z while still minimizing its implicit effect on the parameters. This approach has been pivotal in scaling EBMs for tasks like feature learning and pretraining deep networks, though it introduces biases that can affect model convergence. In Bayesian machine learning, the normalizing constant appears as the marginal likelihood, or evidence, Z = p(\mathbf{x}) = \int p(\mathbf{x} | \mathbf{z}) p(\mathbf{z}) \, d\mathbf{z}, which integrates out latent variables and serves as a basis for model selection and comparison via criteria like the Bayesian information criterion.^[31] Variational inference (VI) approximates this intractable Z by optimizing a lower bound, the evidence lower bound (ELBO), defined as \mathcal{L}(q) = \mathbb{E}_{q(\mathbf{z})} [\log p(\mathbf{x}, \mathbf{z}) - \log q(\mathbf{z})], where q(\mathbf{z}) is a variational posterior; maximizing the ELBO provides an estimate of \log Z and enables scalable posterior inference in large-scale models.^[31] A notable example where the normalizing constant is tractable is the Naive Bayes classifier, a probabilistic generative model assuming feature independence given the class label. Here, the evidence Z = p(\mathbf{x}) = \sum_c p(c) \prod_i p(x_i | c) is computed exactly as a sum over classes of the product of class-conditional marginals p(x_i | c), allowing straightforward posterior predictions p(c | \mathbf{x}) = \frac{p(\mathbf{x} | c) p(c)}{Z} without approximation, which contributes to its efficiency in text classification and spam detection tasks. Modern challenges in deep learning arise from the high dimensionality of data, making Z computation even more prohibitive in complex EBMs and latent variable models. Normalizing flows address this by parameterizing invertible transformations \mathbf{z} = f(\mathbf{x}; \theta) from a simple base distribution p(\mathbf{z}) (e.g., Gaussian) to the target, enabling exact and tractable density evaluation via the change-of-variables formula p(\mathbf{x}) = p(\mathbf{z}) \left| \det \frac{\partial f}{\partial \mathbf{x}} \right|, which implicitly normalizes the model without estimating a separate Z. This has facilitated advancements in generative modeling, such as density estimation and variational autoencoders, where flows enhance the expressiveness of approximations to handle scalability issues.

Other Fields

In signal processing, normalizing constants are essential for the Fourier transform to satisfy Parseval's theorem, which preserves the total energy of a signal between its time-domain and frequency-domain representations.^[32] This normalization, often involving factors like $1/\sqrt{2\pi}, ensures that the integral of the signal's squared magnitude remains invariant, facilitating accurate spectral analysis in applications such as audio filtering and image processing.^[33] In computer graphics, normalizing constants scale lighting models, such as the Phong reflection model, and texture maps to unit intensity, preventing over- or under-brightening in rendered scenes.^[34] By adjusting vector magnitudes to unity—particularly for surface normals and light directions—these constants maintain consistent illumination across varied geometries, enabling realistic shading without computational overflow.^[35] In economics, utility functions are normalized through scaling of parameters to standardize representations of consumer preferences, as seen in the Cobb-Douglas form where the exponents sum to one for homogeneity.^[36] This normalization preserves the shape of indifference curves, which map combinations of goods yielding equivalent satisfaction, while simplifying analysis of marginal rates of substitution without altering ordinal rankings.^[37] In information theory, the normalizing constant Z, known as the partition function, ensures that maximum entropy distributions integrate to unity while matching specified features, such as expected values under constraints.^[38] For instance, in feature matching tasks like natural language processing, Z normalizes the exponential form \exp(\sum \lambda_i f_i(x)) to yield probabilities that maximize uncertainty subject to empirical moments, promoting robust generalizations.^[39]

References

[1]
HARAN - Conditional Distributions, cont'd | STAT 415
The denominator, ∫g(y)dy , is also called the 'normalizing constant'. The normalizing constant is informally, "the thing that makes the density integrate ...
[2]
[PDF] 1 Bayes' theorem
With this terminology, the theorem may be paraphrased as posterior = likelihood×prior normalizing constant. In words: the posterior probability is ...
[3]
Simulating Normalizing Constants: From Importance Sampling to ...
In addition, sometimes a quantity of interest is deliberately formulated as a normalizing constant of a density from which draws can be made. For example, in ...
[4]
[PDF] ESTIMATION IN EXPONENTIAL FAMILIES WITH ... - Stacks
Without the knowledge of the normalizing constant, Bayesian methods can be difficult to implement an analyze. For example, the usual definition of the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[5]
[PDF] Quantum Mechanics - CUNY Graduate Center
suppose the wave function at t = 0 is given by ψ(x, 0) = A. ∞. X n=0 anun(x) where A is a normalizing constant, an are given constants, and un(x) are the ...
[6]
None
### Summary: Partition Function as a Normalizing Constant in Statistical Mechanics
[7]
[PDF] Simulating Normalizing Constants: From Importance Sampling to ...
In addition, sometimes a quantity of interest is deliberately formulated as a normalizing constant of a density from which draws can be made. For example, in ...
[8]
HARAN - Conditional Distributions, cont'd | STAT 414
The denominator, ∫g(y)dy , is also called the 'normalizing constant'. The normalizing constant is informally, "the thing that makes the density integrate ...
[9]
[PDF] Normed vector spaces - cs.wisc.edu
Definition 2 A vector with norm equal to 1 is a unit vector. Given a vector v, a unit vector can be derived by simply dividing the vector by its norm. This ...
[10]
[PDF] Probability: Theory and Examples Rick Durrett Version 5 January 11 ...
Jan 11, 2019 · Probability is not a spectator sport, so the book contains ... normalizing constant. Rein- troducing the constant we dropped at the ...
[11]
[PDF] Bayesian computation for statistical models with intractable ... - arXiv
Abstract: This paper deals with some computational aspects in the Bayesian analysis of statistical models with intractable normalizing constants.
[12]
https://proceedings.mlr.press/v37/rezende15.pdf
[13]
[PDF] Statistical Mechanics - James Sethna - Cornell University
This book covers statistical mechanics, including entropy, order parameters, and complexity, and is aimed at upper-level undergraduates and graduate students.
[14]
[PDF] Chapter 10 Continuous probability distributions - UBC Math
This process is called “normalization”, and the constant C is called the normalization constant. Consider the function f(x) = sin(πx/6) for 0 ≤ x ≤ 6. (a) ...
[15]
Normal Distribution | Gaussian | Normal random variables | PDF
The CDF of the standard normal distribution is denoted by the Φ function: Φ(x)=P(Z≤x)=1√2π∫x−∞exp{−u22}du. As we will see in a moment, the CDF of any normal ...
[16]
[PDF] The Gaussian distribution
The normalization constant Z is. Z = √. 2πσ2. The parameters µ and σ2 specify the mean and variance of the distribution, respectively: µ = E[x]; σ2 = var[x] ...
[17]
Beta function - StatLect
The Beta function is a function of two variables that is often found in probability theory and mathematical statistics (for example, as a normalizing constant ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[18]
The Beta Distribution - Random Services
Details: Of course, the beta function is simply the normalizing constant, so it's clear that $ f $ is a valid probability density function.
[19]
A Bayesian Nonparametric Regression Model With Normalized ...
Difficulty in working with the intractable normalizing constant is overcome thanks to recent advances in MCMC methods and the development of a novel auxiliary ...
[20]
Bayes' Rule - UBC Computer Science
The essence of the Bayesian approach is to provide a mathematical rule explaining how you should change your existing beliefs in the light of new evidence.
[21]
6 Inferring a Binomial Probability via Exact Mathematical Analysis
This chapter presents an example of how to do Bayesian inference using pure analytical mathematics without any approximations.
[22]
[PDF] Lecture 16 1 Laplace approximation review 2 Multivariate Laplace ...
Mar 31, 2010 · One application of the Laplace approximation is to compute the marginal likelihood. Letting M be the marginal likelihood we have,. M = Z. P(X ...
[23]
Approximate Bayesian Computation - PMC - PubMed Central - NIH
Approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) constitutes a class of computational methods rooted in Bayesian statistics.
[24]
LII. An essay towards solving a problem in the doctrine of chances ...
Bayes Thomas. 1763LII. An essay towards solving a problem in the doctrine of chances. By the late Rev. Mr. Bayes, F. R. S. communicated by Mr. Price, in a ...
[25]
[PDF] Quantum Physics I, Lecture Note 6 - MIT OpenCourseWare
Feb 23, 2016 · 2 The Wavefunction as a Probability Amplitude. Let's begin with a normalized wavefunction at initial time t0. Z ∞. Ψ∗(x, t0)Ψ(x, t0)dx = 1 ...
[26]
Normalization of the Wavefunction - Richard Fitzpatrick
A wavefunction is initially normalized then it stays normalized as it evolves in time according to Schrödinger's equation.
[27]
[PDF] Boltzmann Distribution and Partition Function - MIT OpenCourseWare
Because it automatically defines the equilibrium of a system, the partition function is foundational to equilibrium statistical physics. Consequently, for ...
[28]
[PDF] Lecture 07: Statistical Physics of the Ideal Gas - MIT OpenCourseWare
In these notes we derive the partition function for a gas of non-interacting particles in a fixed volume.
[29]
[PDF] Variational Inference: A Review for Statisticians - arXiv
May 9, 2018 · Maximizing the ELBO is equivalent to minimizing the KL divergence. Examining the ELBO gives intuitions about the optimal variational density. We ...
[30]
[PDF] EE 261 - The Fourier Transform and its Applications
... Theorem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 116. 3.7 The Central Limit ... constant λ, as is the distance between successive troughs. The ...
[31]
Parseval's Theorem: Fourier Normalization
Parseval's Theorem: To prove this, as with most theorems involving Fourier transforms, we need only use (10.5) and familiar integration techniques.
[32]
Introduction to Computer Graphics, Section 7.2 -- Lighting and Material
An interpolated normal vector is in general only an approximation for the geometrically correct normal, but it's usually good enough to give good results.
[33]
Basic Lighting - LearnOpenGL
Whenever we apply a non-uniform scale (note: a uniform scale only changes the normal's magnitude, not its direction, which is easily fixed by normalizing it) ...
[34]
[PDF] Preferences and Utility - UCLA Economics
Using Theorem 2, we can then normalise the symmetric Cobb–Douglas to α = β = 1. The Cobb–Douglas indifference curve has equation xα. 1 x β. 2 = k. Rearranging,.
[35]
4.11 The Cobb-Douglas Utility Function - EconGraphs
Normalizing a Cobb-Douglas utility function ... By normalizing the exponents to sum to 1, we can express the agent's preferences with a single parameter. ... This ...
[36]
Maximum Entropy - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Maximum entropy is defined as the probability distribution that maximizes entropy, subject to a set of specified constraints, thereby representing the most ...
[37]
[PDF] Feature Selection and Dualities in Maximum Entropy Discrimination
We begin by mo- tivating the discriminative maximum entropy frame- work from the point of view of regularization theory. We then explicate how to solve ...