Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

One-upmanship

One-upmanship is the art of securing a subtle psychological advantage over others in social, professional, and everyday situations through clever, indirect tactics that avoid overt conflict or cheating.^[1] The term was coined by British author and broadcaster Stephen Potter (1900–1969), who popularized it in his 1952 satirical book One-Upmanship: Being Some Account of the Activities and Teachings of the Lifemanship Correspondence College of One-Upness and Games-Lifemastery.^[2]^[3] As a sequel to Potter's earlier work The Theory and Practice of Gamesmanship (1947), which applied such strategies to sports like tennis and golf, One-Upmanship expands the concept to broader life contexts, framing it as instruction from a fictional institution dedicated to "lifemanship."^[4]^[1] The book details specialized techniques—known as "gambits" and "ploys"—across fields including medicine (doctorship), the arts (e.g., exhibitionship), transportation (carmanship), and business, often emphasizing poise, feigned expertise, and turning potential rivals into admirers.^[1] Potter's humorous approach satirizes competitive social dynamics and self-improvement literature, with sequels like Supermanship (1958) further exploring advanced forms of social dominance.^[5] The works have had lasting cultural impact, inspiring adaptations such as the 1960 film School for Scoundrels (scripted by Peter Ustinov) and a 1970s BBC television series, while the term "one-upmanship" has become a standard English expression for outmaneuvering others competitively.^[6]^[7]

Definition and Etymology

Definition

One-upmanship is the art or practice of subtly outdoing or surpassing others in social, conversational, or competitive situations to gain a psychological advantage, typically through indirect and non-confrontational means that avoid outright cheating or aggression.^[8] This approach emphasizes clever maneuvering to maintain a sense of superiority, often leaving the other party feeling slightly inferior without recognizing the tactic as intentional. The term was popularized by British author Stephen Potter in his 1952 satirical book One-Upmanship, which expanded on his earlier concepts to apply them beyond specific contexts.^[1] Unlike gamesmanship, which Potter defined as the art of winning games or sports through ethically dubious but rule-compliant expedients—such as psychological distractions during play—one-upmanship extends this principle to broader everyday interactions, focusing on lifelong interpersonal dynamics rather than isolated athletic or recreational events.^[9] Gamesmanship is confined to competitive arenas where rules govern conduct, whereas one-upmanship operates in unstructured social environments, prioritizing ongoing relational edges over victory in a single contest.^[10] In practice, one-upmanship manifests through subtle escalations in dialogue or display, such as responding to a colleague's anecdote about a routine trip with a casually mentioned more adventurous journey to imply greater experience, or positioning one's superior gadget in view during a discussion to underscore personal achievement without explicit boasting.^[11] These tactics aim to shift the balance of perceived status incrementally, fostering a persistent "one-up" position in relationships.^[7]

Etymology

The term one-upmanship was coined by British author Stephen Potter in his 1952 book One-Upmanship: Being Some Account of the Activities and Teaching of the Lifemanship Correspondence College of One-upness and Gameslifemastery, as a satirical extension of his earlier invention "gamesmanship," which he introduced in The Theory and Practice of Gamesmanship; or, The Art of Winning Games Without Actually Cheating published in 1947.^[12]^[13] The word draws on the psychological tactics Potter described for gaining subtle advantages in social and competitive situations, building directly on the framework of Gamesmanship to encompass broader life scenarios. According to the Oxford English Dictionary, the earliest recorded use of "one-upmanship" appears in 1952, in the linguistic analysis by Simeon Potter, a philologist, who discussed the term in the context of emerging English neologisms.^[14] Spelling variations of the term have included "one-upmanship" (the most common form, with the hyphen), "oneupmanship" (as a single word), and less frequently "one-upsmanship," reflecting minor orthographic adaptations in early printings and dictionaries.^[15]^[16] The term's evolution traces from its origins in 1950s literary satire—where Potter used it to mock self-improvement genres—to its establishment as a widespread 20th-century idiom signifying the act of competitively outdoing others through clever superiority. This linguistic development was influenced by the pre-existing phrase "one-up," first attested in 1919 with the meaning of scoring one additional point over an opponent in games or contests, which provided a foundational metaphorical structure for Potter's coinage.^[17] Potter's innovation also popularized "upmanship" as a productive suffix in his series of books, denoting the art of gaining an edge in specific spheres, as seen in Lifemanship: Some Notes on Lifemanship (1950), and this pattern has since generalized in English to describe analogous competitive strategies.^[18]

Origins in Literature

Stephen Potter's Upmanship Series

Stephen Potter (1900–1969) was a British author, lecturer in English literature, and BBC producer, best known for his satirical books exploring psychological tactics to secure social and competitive advantages. Born on 1 February 1900 in Wandsworth, London, he studied English at Merton College, Oxford, from 1919 to 1923, and later served as a lecturer at Birkbeck College, University of London, from 1926 to 1937, where he specialized in Romantic poets like Samuel Taylor Coleridge. During World War II, Potter contributed to the BBC, producing over 150 wartime programs and collaborating with comedian Joyce Grenfell on satirical radio sketches, which honed his humorous style.^[19]^[3] Potter's "upmanship" series began with Gamesmanship; or, The Art of Winning Games Without Actually Cheating, published in 1947 by Rupert Hart-Davis, followed by Lifemanship in 1950, One-Upmanship in 1952, and Supermanship in 1958, all from the same publisher. These works were posthumously compiled in The Complete Upmanship in 1970, which gathered the four titles into a single volume.^[19]^[20] The books present satirical guides to navigating life's competitions through cunning psychological maneuvers rather than outright cheating, featuring cartoons by illustrator Frank Wilson to underscore the absurdities of social one-upping. In particular, One-Upmanship focuses on strategies for sustaining a subtle edge—or "one-up" position—over interlocutors in everyday conversations and encounters.^[21] The series achieved bestseller status in post-World War II Britain, with Gamesmanship evolving from a cult favorite into a major commercial success that resonated with a war-weary middle class amid shifting social norms. Their witty parody of etiquette and ambition influenced mid-20th-century British humor, particularly in satirizing class hierarchies and interpersonal rivalries.^[3]

Key Concepts from the Books

In Stephen Potter's Upmanship series, the central philosophy frames everyday life as an interconnected series of subtle "games" in which individuals compete for social superiority, or to be "one up," without resorting to overt conflict or outright cheating. This approach posits that social interactions are inherently competitive, akin to a "genteel slug-fest" governed by quasi-Darwinian principles of rivalry and advantage-seeking among acquaintances.^[3] The goal is not domination through aggression but achieving a psychological edge through finesse, ensuring one remains superior while preserving an appearance of fairness and good form. Potter describes this as "the art of winning games without actually cheating," a principle that extends beyond sports to all facets of human relations.^[13] Upmanship, as the core skillset, involves countering others' advantages through strategic, non-confrontational ploys designed to unsettle or undermine without detection. Key ideas include "Potterizing," a technique for subtly eroding an opponent's confidence or position, such as the "Mona Lisa Ploy," where one doodles indifferently during another's important speech to imply disinterest or superiority.^[1] Complementing this is the "one-down" trap, where feigning inferiority lures the opponent into overconfidence, allowing a reversal, as in business scenarios where one pretends to lack a pen to force the other to lend one and thus appear presumptuous.^[3] Potter applies these across specialized domains, or "-manships," such as "hotelmanship" (manipulating hotel interactions for prestige), "partymanship" (dominating social gatherings through conversational ploys like the "Canterbury Block," dismissing ideas with a qualified agreement), "carmanship" (claiming road superiority without aggression), and "doctorship" (gaining the upper hand on patients or colleagues without harm).^[1]^[22] The books' theoretical structure mimics faux-academic treatises, complete with diagrams, invented rules, and pseudoscientific analyses, satirizing British social climbing and pop psychology of the mid-20th century. Potter invents authorities like the Lifemanship Correspondence College and characters such as Gattling-Fenn to deliver advice in a mock-pedantic tone, blending condescension with humor—techniques like "plonking" (dogmatically stating the obvious) or "Joad’s Request" (demanding clarification to sow doubt) are presented with illustrative figures and step-by-step "lessons."^[23]^[3] This format parodies self-help literature while critiquing the era's obsession with status and competitiveness, as seen in quotes like "Carmanship: or the art of stealing the crown of the road without being an absolute hog."^[1] Through this blend of wit and pseudo-strategy, Potter's works established one-upmanship as a humorous yet incisive critique of human competitiveness, influencing perceptions of social dynamics by highlighting the absurdity of subtle power plays in daily life.^[22] The series—spanning Gamesmanship (1947), Lifemanship (1950), One-Upmanship (1952), and Supermanship (1958)—builds a cohesive philosophy that warns against the pitfalls of being "one down" while celebrating the cleverness of staying atop without apparent effort.^[13]^[23]^[1]

Techniques of One-upmanship

Social techniques of one-upmanship involve subtle strategies to gain psychological advantage in casual interpersonal exchanges, often by elevating one's status while diminishing others without overt confrontation. These methods, popularized in Stephen Potter's satirical works, emphasize conversational dominance and non-verbal cues to maintain superiority in everyday social scenarios.^[1] In conversations, practitioners employ ploys such as topping anecdotes, where a shared story is escalated with a more impressive or exaggerated counterpart to overshadow the original teller, as illustrated in Potter's examples of outdoing rivals' tales during social banter (p. 70, 89). Name-dropping serves to imply elite connections, such as casually referencing figures like Bob Hope to elevate one's narrative (p. 41), while feigned modesty—pretending humility to provoke compliments or admiration—creates an illusion of gracious superiority, evident in tactics like understated boasts on book jackets (p. 75, 83). These maneuvers rely on timing and delivery to appear effortless, ensuring the one-upper remains socially palatable. At parties or gatherings, one-upmanship manifests through dramatic entrances or thematic displays, such as arriving with a flair of carmanship—showcasing vehicle prowess en route—or exhibitionship, adopting a poised, knowing demeanor amid crowds to draw attention (p. 62, 82). In friendships, subtler approaches include health ploys, where minor ailments are magnified to elicit sympathy and concern, or litmanship, subtly flaunting cultural knowledge to position oneself as the intellectual arbiter (p. 27, 74, 85). For instance, during group travel to a house party, a practitioner might use passenger techniques like delayed map-reading or foot gestures to imply others' incompetence without direct criticism (p. 85-86). Subtle tactics extend to body language and response timing, such as the Mona Lisa Ploy of enigmatic poising or doodling to unsettle interlocutors (p. 54), or handling objects like guns with implied expertise to convey unspoken adventures (p. 100). These non-verbal signals maintain dominance by projecting confidence and control, often through strategic pauses that force others to fill silences on the one-upper's terms (p. 47). However, such techniques carry risks of backlash if detected as manipulative, potentially leading to irritation, social exclusion, or loss of credibility; Potter notes cases where overzealous ploys annoy observers or result in outright anger, as with aggressive driving salutes provoking shouts from companions (p. 21, 38, 84). In extreme fictional illustrations, failed gambits escalate to personal peril, underscoring the fine line between advantage and alienation (p. 88).^[1]

Professional Techniques

In professional settings, one-upmanship manifests as subtle strategies to gain advantage in career progression, business negotiations, and competitive arenas, often drawing from Stephen Potter's satirical frameworks in One-Upmanship. These tactics emphasize psychological positioning over overt aggression, allowing individuals or organizations to elevate their status without violating explicit rules. For instance, in career advancement, professionals may employ techniques to appear more composed or authoritative during evaluations or discussions, such as the "Harvard technique" of feigning indifference after rigorous preparation to project effortless superiority.^[1] A common ploy in meetings involves preempting colleagues' ideas by rephrasing them with added nuance or authority, thereby claiming subtle ownership while maintaining plausible deniability. Potter describes this through "committeeship," where participants use specialized jargon—like economic terms in Regil's style—to dominate conversations and marginalize others without direct confrontation. Similarly, networking often relies on associating with higher-status contacts to enhance perceived value; for example, executives might casually reference alliances with influential figures to imply shared expertise, boosting their own credibility in professional circles.^[1] In business contexts, Potter outlines ploys such as "negative selling," where salespeople feign minor incompetence (e.g., the No-Pen Approach of fumbling for a writing tool) to build client trust and encourage hasty commitments (pp. 45-47). Executives may further boast incremental successes—such as minor efficiency gains—to overshadow peers, as seen in "supreme boss-ship," which favors understated simplicity over flashy displays to convey unassailable control (p. 49).^[1] Competitive edges are sharpened by timing announcements of "superior" features just after rivals' launches, undercutting them without head-on rivalry; this can trap competitors in an escalation cycle, where each side offers escalating benefits at diminishing margins, eroding profitability across the board. In sales, implying superiority through demonstrated results—rather than boasts—avoids escalation while positioning one's offerings as inherently better, as in Potter's emphasis on poised, result-oriented dominance.^[24]^[1] While these methods skirt ethical lines by relying on implication and psychology, Potter's works stress non-cheating approaches, framing them as "games of life" that border on manipulation only in high-stakes environments like corporate deals, where subtle advantages can determine promotions or contracts. In practice, such tactics risk fostering distrust if overused, though they remain tools for ambition-driven professionals navigating competitive landscapes.^[1]

Psychological Aspects

Motivations

One-upmanship often stems from underlying insecurity and a need for external validation, particularly among individuals with low self-esteem who engage in outdoing others to temporarily boost their ego. This behavior serves as a compensatory mechanism, where achieving superiority over peers alleviates feelings of inferiority and reinforces a fragile sense of self-worth.^[25] Research indicates that such tendencies are linked to narcissistic traits, especially vulnerable narcissism, where individuals cope with deep-seated insecurities by seeking social dominance and self-elevation through competitive displays.^[26] For instance, hypercompetitive individuals, driven by parental influences like overprotection that foster insecurity, pursue wins at all costs to affirm their value, often masking low self-esteem with aggressive superiority-seeking.^[25] A core psychological driver is social comparison theory, proposed by Leon Festinger in 1954, which posits that individuals have a fundamental drive to evaluate their abilities and opinions by comparing themselves to others, particularly when objective standards are absent. This process motivates one-upmanship as a means to affirm higher status, with people selectively comparing to similar others to reduce discrepancies and achieve slight superiority, thereby enhancing self-evaluation.^[27] Competitive behaviors emerge from this unidirectional drive upward, where outdoing peers not only clarifies one's standing but also propels improvement and status maintenance within relevant groups.^[27] From an evolutionary perspective, one-upmanship reflects adaptive status-seeking behaviors that likely originated in ancestral environments to secure resources, mates, and social alliances through competition. High status conferred reproductive advantages, as evidenced in non-industrial societies where dominant individuals achieved greater mating success, selecting for motives like dominance and costly signaling to outcompete rivals.^[28] In modern contexts, however, these ancient drives can become maladaptive, persisting as one-upmanship despite cooperative social norms, as the pursuit of relative superiority no longer reliably yields fitness benefits in egalitarian settings.^[28] Cultural factors further shape these motivations, with one-upmanship being more prevalent in individualistic societies that emphasize personal achievement and competition over group harmony. In such cultures, like those of Western nations, individuals are socialized to prioritize self-reliance and outperforming others for validation, leading to higher rates of competitive choices compared to collectivistic societies where cooperation and conformity restrain overt status-seeking.^[29] For example, studies among fishermen show individualistic groups exhibiting 45.6% competitiveness rates versus 27.6% in collectivistic ones, highlighting how cultural norms amplify the drive to affirm status through one-upmanship.^[29]

Impacts on Relationships

One-upmanship in personal relationships frequently erodes trust and fosters resentment, as individuals prioritize outdoing each other over mutual support, leading to cycles of retaliation known as "tit-for-tat" escalation or emotional distance. Research on relational dynamics indicates that such competitive behaviors diminish satisfaction by devaluing partners through constant comparison, often driven by insecurities that prompt validation-seeking at the expense of intimacy.^[30]^[31] In marital contexts, one-upping manifests as a defensive tactic during conflicts, where one partner counters the other's grievance with a more severe example, exacerbating negativity and hindering resolution, as identified in studies of conflict patterns predictive of relationship dissolution./5%3A_Conflict_and_Interpersonal_Communication/5.4%3A_Dealing_with_Conflict)^[32] In group settings, such as teams or workplaces, one-upmanship promotes toxicity by undermining collaboration and correlating with higher stress levels and employee turnover. For instance, in nursing environments, horizontal violence—which encompasses one-upmanship behaviors like jockeying for superiority—positively correlates with burnout and intention to leave, as nurses experiencing these dynamics report increased emotional exhaustion and reduced team cohesion.^[33]^[34] Broader organizational studies link competitive one-upping to a culture of distrust and rivalry, where it displaces cooperative efforts, elevates interpersonal tension, and contributes to higher attrition rates, with affected individuals often disengaging to avoid ongoing rivalry.^[35] While predominantly negative, one-upmanship can rarely motivate self-improvement when kept in check, encouraging personal growth through healthy competition that boosts motivation and accomplishment without relational harm. However, this potential is limited, as excessive engagement generally diminishes authentic connections by prioritizing individual superiority over shared vulnerability.^[36] To mitigate these impacts, awareness of one's competitive tendencies combined with empathy training has shown promise in counteracting relational fallout, fostering greater intimacy and reducing escalatory behaviors. Empirical reviews of empathy interventions demonstrate their effectiveness in enhancing interpersonal understanding and prosocial responses, particularly in service and team contexts where competition erodes bonds, leading to improved satisfaction and lower conflict intensity.^[37]^[38]

Cultural Impact and Examples

In Media and Adaptations

The BBC adapted Stephen Potter's one-upmanship concepts into the sketch comedy series One-Upmanship in the 1970s, written by Barry Took and produced by Bernard Thompson. Starring Richard Briers as the titular Potter, Peter Jones as Gatling-Fenn, and Frederick Jaeger as Cogg-Willoughby, the program was set at the fictional Yeovil College of Lifemanship and featured humorous vignettes on social, professional, and leisure ploys drawn from the books. A pilot Christmas special aired on December 19, 1974, subtitled "The Sadist's Guide to Yule," followed by a six-episode series in 1976 and additional episodes in 1978, emphasizing the art of subtle superiority in everyday scenarios.^[39] The 1960 film School for Scoundrels, directed by Robert Hamer, directly drew from Potter's One-Upmanship and Lifemanship for its premise of a school teaching gamesmanship to navigate social hierarchies. Ian Carmichael portrayed the bumbling Henry Palfrey, who enrolls to outwit rivals like the smug Terry-Thomas (as Raymond Delauney), while Alastair Sim delivered a memorable performance as the charismatic instructor Mr. S. Potter, embodying the sly essence of one-upmanship. The screenplay, credited to Patricia Moyes and Hal E. Chester with Potter's novels as source material, satirized British class dynamics and inspired audiences familiar with the books through its witty takedowns of social pretension.^[40] Beyond screen adaptations, Potter's ideas extended to other formats, including the 1977 jazz album One-Upmanship by the Mal Waldron Quintet featuring soprano saxophonist Steve Lacy, recorded in Germany and released on Enja Records. This instrumental work, with tracks evoking competitive interplay through improvisation, served as a subtle musical homage to the competitive spirit of Potter's writings. Overall, these media extensions perpetuated one-upmanship as a staple of British satirical humor, influencing portrayals of rivalry and verbal sparring in comedy.^[41]

Modern Usage

In contemporary society, one-upmanship manifests prominently on social media platforms, where users engage in subtle competitions to assert superiority through curated content. Politicians in the 2020s have similarly employed live-tweeting during events to outpace opponents, as seen in election campaigns where rapid policy announcements on platforms like X (formerly Twitter) aim to dominate narratives and undermine rivals' visibility. On a global scale, one-upmanship appears in international relations, particularly through technological and strategic rivalries. The U.S.-China tech competition exemplifies this, with both nations pursuing advancements in artificial intelligence and semiconductors to demonstrate subtle superiority in economic and military domains.^[42] Similarly, the renewed space race involves competitive milestones, such as China's lunar missions and the U.S. Artemis program—as of November 2025, the Artemis II mission is scheduled for September 2026, with the first crewed lunar landing delayed to 2027 or later—where each success serves as a display of national prowess amid escalating tensions.^[43] In everyday scenarios, one-upmanship influences personal and professional interactions via digital tools. On dating apps, users frequently exaggerate profiles—altering height, income, or interests—to outshine potential matches and secure attention in a crowded marketplace, a form of deceptive self-presentation driven by competitive pressures.^[44] In corporate culture, "humblebrags" on LinkedIn, such as posts lamenting a "busy" schedule while highlighting promotions, represent indirect bids for admiration, often backfiring by eliciting resentment rather than respect.^[45] Cultural awareness of one-upmanship has grown since the 2000s psychology boom, which popularized concepts like positive psychology but also highlighted its excesses. Terms like "toxic positivity"—the insistence on unrelenting optimism—have been critiqued in modern culture.^[46]^[47]

References

[1]
[PDF] ONE-UPMANSHIP i
Stephen Potter was bom in 1900 and educated at West- uunster School and ... actually mean that one. Where docs the Mysterious. Religious C-haracter come ...
[2]
One-Upmanship by Stephen Potter 1952 | Country House Library
Out of stockAuthor · Stephen Potter ; Publisher · Rupert Hart-Davis ; Publication Date · 1952 ; Format · Hardback in dust-jacket ; Condition · This book is in good condition for its ...
[3]
Stephen Potter: Life Among the Acquaintances
May 18, 2011 · Potter kept going. In 1952 came One-upmanship ("Being Some Account of the Activities and Teaching of the Lifemanship Correspondence College ...
[4]
Gamesmanship by Stephen Potter: Near Fine Soft cover ... - AbeBooks
Title: Gamesmanship ; Publisher: Rupert Hart-Davis ; Publication Date: 1947 ; Language: English ; Binding: Soft cover ...
[5]
1950-1958 Lifemanship; One-Upmanship; Supermanship
In stock 20-day returnsThe first edition, first impression of these three volumes from Stephen Potter, the British writer known for his parodies of self-help books. Each volume in the ...
[6]
Michael Flanders & Stephen Potter, humorists - Chiswick Book Festival
... One-Upmanship (1952) and Supermanship (1958). The books were adapted for the cinema in the 1960s (as School For Scoundrels, scripted by Peter Ustinov) and ...
[7]
one-upmanship - Good Word Word of the Day alphaDictionary ...
Meaning: The tactic of using psychological means to gain an advantage in every situation, the drive to better others by cleverly outfoxing rather than ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[8]
ONE-UPMANSHIP Definition & Meaning | Dictionary.com
One-upmanship definition: the art or practice of achieving, demonstrating, or assuming superiority in one's rivalry with a friend or opponent by obtaining ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[9]
GAMESMANSHIP Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster
Nov 1, 2025 · 1. The art or practice of winning games by questionable expedients without actually violating the rules. 2. The use of ethically dubious methods to gain an ...
[10]
The Theory and Practice of Gamesmanship - Bloomsbury Publishing
Free delivery over $35Apr 22, 2014 · Stephen Potter has used his extensive experience as a master gamesman to compile this instructional text on the techniques, strategies and ...
[11]
ONE-UPMANSHIP definition in American English - Collins Dictionary
If you refer to someone's behavior as one-upmanship, you disapprove of them trying to make other people feel inferior in order to make themselves appear more ...
[12]
One-upmanship : Stephen Potter - Internet Archive
Sep 27, 2023 · One-upmanship. by: Stephen Potter. Publication date: 1971-01-01. Publisher: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Collection: internetarchivebooks; ...
[13]
The THeory and Practice of Gamesmanship : Stephen Potter
Oct 27, 2022 · The THeory and Practice of Gamesmanship. by: Stephen Potter. Publication date: 1965. Collection: internetarchivebooks; inlibrary; printdisabled.
[14]
one-upmanship, n. meanings, etymology and more
The earliest known use of the noun one-upmanship is in the 1950s. OED's earliest evidence for one-upmanship is from 1952, in the writing of Simeon Potter.
[15]
ONE-UPMANSHIP Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster
Oct 9, 2025 · one-upmanship. noun. one-up·man·ship ˌwən-ˈəp-mən-ˌship. variants or less commonly one-upsmanship ... merriam-webster.com/dictionary/one- ...Missing: variations | Show results with:variations
[16]
oneupmanship - Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Noun. oneupmanship (uncountable). Alternative spelling of one-upmanship.Missing: variations | Show results with:variations
[17]
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/one-up
[18]
Some Notes on Lifemanship. : Stephen Potter - Internet Archive
Nov 29, 2023 · Publication date: 1951-01-01. Publisher: London: Hart-Davis 1951. Collection: internetarchivebooks; inlibrary; printdisabled.
[19]
Biography - Stephen Potter
One-upmanship is published by Rupert Hart-Davis. 1954. An anthology, Sense of Humour, is published by Max Reinhardt. 1955. Divorced from Mary Potter. Marries ...
[20]
The complete upmanship ; including, Gamesmanship, Lifemanship ...
Dec 8, 2021 · The complete upmanship ; including, Gamesmanship, Lifemanship, One-upmanship, Supermanship. 349 p. : 24 cm. Reprint of the 1970 ed. published in London by Hart ...
[21]
manship Books - Stephen Potter's
It starred Terry Thomas as the cad who frustrates Ian Carmichael (the hero) before he resorts to being taught one-upmanship by Stephen Potter, played by ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition<|control11|><|separator|>
[22]
The complete upmanship; including, Gamesmanship, Lifemanship ...
Jun 25, 2012 · The complete upmanship; including, Gamesmanship, Lifemanship, One-upmanship, Supermanship ; Publication date: 1971 ; Topics: Conduct of life.
[23]
Lifemanship : Stephen Potter : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming
Mar 18, 2023 · Lifemanship · Share or Embed This Item · Flag this item for · Lifemanship · DOWNLOAD OPTIONS · IN COLLECTIONS · SIMILAR ITEMS (based on metadata).
[24]
[PDF] MAY 10, 1979 THE SPECIAL PROBLEMS OF BUBBLE MEMORY ...
May 10, 1979 · ... specmanship game that prevails throughout the data-converter community. As far as resolution, accuracy, and linearity are concerned ...
[25]
The Escalation Trap: How to Manage the Escalating Momentum of ...
Have you and your rivals become locked into a game of one-upmanship-each trying to outdo the other by offering the customer more benefits at the same.
[26]
Winning at all costs: The etiology of hypercompetitiveness through ...
Nov 18, 2019 · Hypercompetitiveness reflects the need to compete and win at all costs as a means of maintaining or enhancing one's own self-worth (Horney, 1937 ...
[27]
Narcissism Driven by Insecurity, Not Grandiose Sense of Self, New ...
Mar 25, 2021 · Narcissism is driven by insecurity, and not an inflated sense of self, finds a new study by a team of psychology researchers.
[28]
https://content.csbs.utah.edu/~cashdan/evpsych/status_2020.pdf
[29]
[PDF] Status-seeking, competition, & risk
“He who dies with the most toys wins....” what exactly? Why are people motivated to succeed? Why compete for status? An evolutionary psychologist would ...
[30]
Rise and fall of competitiveness in individualistic and collectivistic ...
May 21, 2013 · Our first finding shows that individual competitiveness is more important in individualistic than in collectivistic societies. We observe ...
[31]
3 Signs Your Relationship Is Suffering from One-Upmanship
May 8, 2024 · Research confirms a link between body dissatisfaction and decreased satisfaction in romantic relationships, as explained by sociometer theory.
[32]
https://www.gottman.com/blog/the-four-horsemen-defensiveness/
[33]
The Four Horsemen: Defensiveness - The Gottman Institute
May 25, 2025 · One of the Four Horsemen, Defensiveness, is righteous indignation or innocent victimhood in an attempt to ward off a perceived attack.
[34]
Association between horizontal violence and turnover intention in ...
Oct 6, 2022 · Horizontal violence had a low positive correlation with turnover intention in nurses. Nurses who experienced horizontal violence were more likely to leave or ...
[35]
The impact of horizontal violence among nurses on their job burnout
Sep 24, 2025 · Research indicates that inter-nurse horizontal violence is a significant predictor of job burnout, with a positive correlation between the two.
[36]
Transforming Horizontal Violence Globally
This may include attitudes and behaviors such as envy, jealousy, distrust, one-upmanship ... HV has primarily been examined in studies focusing on workplace ...
[37]
The Psychology of Competitiveness
Aug 1, 2024 · Healthy competitiveness often leads to personal growth, increased motivation, and a sense of accomplishment. Source: Gregory Gallegos/Unsplash.
[38]
Empathy training for service employees: A mixed-methods ...
Aug 14, 2023 · This study systematically reviews empirical papers implementing and testing empathy training programs in various service domains.<|control11|><|separator|>
[39]
The effectiveness of empathy training in health care: a meta-analysis ...
The present study showed that empathy training could be effective. This confirmed previous findings and supported the use of such training.Missing: mitigate competitive
[40]
One-Upmanship - Comedy - BBC
One-upmanship: Definition (idiomatic) A cycle of trying to one-up or outdo an opponent. That notion was the basis for the spoof self-help book written by ...
[41]
School For Scoundrels - STUDIOCANAL's Vintage Classics
School For Scoundrels. 1960. Buy Now. Directed By. Robert Hamer. Synopsis. Based on the Stephen Potter 'One Upmanship ... Terry-Thomas (Private's Progress, I'm ...
[42]
One-Upmanship - Steve Lacy, Mal Waldron | Album - AllMusic
Rating 8.8/10 (12) Release Date: February, 1977. Duration: 01:03:31. Genre: Jazz. Styles: Hard Bop, Post-Bop, Jazz Instrument, Piano Jazz.
[43]
Viral Challenges Are What's Keeping Us Occupied
Mar 26, 2020 · Instagram has been overrun with viral challenges. On Tuesday, thousands of teenagers began posting unflattering photos of themselves to their feeds.
[44]
The US-China tech rivalry shapes the economic relationship
Jun 8, 2020 · Peter Petri and David Dollar discuss the growing technology competition between China and the United States.
[45]
NASA Is Crucial to the U.S. Winning the New Space Race
Oct 14, 2025 · The U.S. wants to remain a superpower in space. It can't without supporting NASA.
[46]
Contradictory deceptive behavior in online dating - ScienceDirect.com
Deceptive behavior is common in online dating because personal profiles can be easily manipulated. This study conducts two experiments to examine ...
[47]
Is There a Right Way to Brag? | Psychology Today
Jun 21, 2014 · No one likes a show off. But is it ever okay to brag about yourself, your accomplishments, your loved ones?Missing: modern | Show results with:modern
[48]
Understanding Toxic Positivity in Modern Culture - ResearchGate
May 15, 2025 · This article examines the rise of toxic positivity, tracing its roots through psychological theories and cultural shifts.Missing: upmanship | Show results with:upmanship
[49]
[PDF] Positive Psychology and Cultural Sensitivity - Marquette University
Abstract: This paper aims to address the cultural sensitivity of positive psychology. In 2000,. Seligman and Csikszentmihalyi (2000) developed positive ...Missing: upmanship toxic