Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Perfect 10

Perfect 10 was an American adult magazine and associated website founded in 1997 by Norman Zadeh, specializing in high-resolution nude and topless photography of women selected under a strict "no silicone" editorial policy that prohibited models with breast implants or other cosmetic surgery enhancements.^[1]^[2] The publication distinguished itself in the competitive men's magazine market of the late 1990s and early 2000s by emphasizing natural body types and premium image quality, achieving circulation peaks that positioned it as a leading alternative to titles like Playboy.^[3] Its defining characteristics included a focus on petite models with unaltered figures, often marketed as celebrating unenhanced beauty, alongside features on celebrities and cultural topics.^[2] However, Perfect 10's most notable legacy stems from aggressive copyright enforcement, initiating multiple high-stakes lawsuits against internet companies—including Perfect 10, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc. and Perfect 10, Inc. v. CCBill, LLC—over unauthorized use of its images in search thumbnails, inline linking, and hosting services.^[4]^[5] These cases, which reached the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, established key precedents on fair use doctrine for digital thumbnails and safe harbor protections under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, though they also drew criticism for straining the company's resources amid widespread online image piracy.^[4]^[6] Persistent infringement ultimately forced the magazine to transition from monthly to quarterly issues before ceasing print operations entirely, with the website following suit due to unsustainable legal and financial pressures.^[6]^[3]

History

Founding and origins

Perfect 10 magazine was founded in 1997 by Norman Zadeh, a former Stanford University applied mathematics professor, professional poker player, and hedge fund manager who later adopted the surname Zada.^[3] The publication emerged from Zadeh's frustration with mainstream men's magazines like Playboy, which he perceived as increasingly favoring surgically enhanced models over those with natural figures.^[7] Specifically, Zadeh launched the magazine after a friend's daughter, aspiring to model, was rejected by Playboy for lacking breast implants, prompting him to create a platform dedicated exclusively to "all-natural" women without silicone enhancements or other artificial modifications.^[8] The inaugural issue appeared in Fall 1997, featuring Monica Hanson on the cover and establishing the magazine's core editorial stance: celebrating unaltered female beauty as a counterpoint to industry norms.^[9] Zadeh self-funded the venture initially, drawing on his diverse background in academia and finance to build a niche publication that emphasized high-quality photography of petite, natural models, often amateurs or unknowns, rather than celebrities or augmented professionals.^[10] This origins story reflects Zadeh's entrepreneurial pattern, seen in his prior creation of trading competitions and poker strategies, where he identified unmet market demands through contrarian reasoning.^[7] By its debut, Perfect 10 positioned itself as a "connoisseur's" alternative, prioritizing authenticity over commercial augmentation trends prevalent in competitors.^[3]

Publication period and evolution

Perfect 10 magazine debuted with its inaugural issue in Fall 1997, featuring model Monica Hanson on the cover and establishing its quarterly publication schedule from the outset.^[9] The early volumes followed a seasonal rhythm, with issues designated as Spring, Summer, Fall, and Winter editions, as evidenced by the sequence beginning with Volume 1, Number 1 in late 1997 and continuing through 1998's multiple quarterly releases.^[1] This frequency allowed for consistent output aligned with the magazine's niche focus on unretouched photography of naturally proportioned women, without reported deviations in print cadence during the initial years. Throughout its print run, Perfect 10 maintained quarterly or bimonthly intervals, culminating in 43 issues by 2007, reflecting steady production amid growing legal challenges over image rights but no major shifts in editorial volume or distribution model until the end.^[1] The publication's evolution remained conservative, prioritizing its core aesthetic of non-airbrushed, petite models over adaptations to broader industry trends like digital integration or format experimentation, which preserved its distinct identity but limited scalability in a changing media landscape. The final print edition appeared in Summer 2007 as issue 43, after which Perfect 10 discontinued physical copies and pivoted to a subscription-only website to sustain access to its archives and new content amid rising online competition and production costs.^[11] This transition marked the magazine's adaptation to digital dissemination, though the online platform eventually faced its own viability issues, effectively ending active publication by the early 2010s.^[12]

Decline and cessation

The print edition of Perfect 10 concluded with its Summer 2007 issue (No. 43), after which the publication shifted exclusively to a subscription-based online model amid declining revenues attributed to widespread digital piracy of its images.^[13]^[6] Company representatives, including founder Norman Roy (also known as Norm Zadeh), cited rampant unauthorized online distribution as the primary factor eroding the magazine's financial viability, with infringing copies proliferating on websites, Usenet services, and search engine results, reducing incentives for paid subscriptions and ad revenue.^[6]^[3] This transition failed to reverse the downturn, as the website perfect10.com continued facing similar infringement challenges, prompting aggressive litigation against entities like Google, payment processors, and Usenet providers.^[14] Perfect 10's legal strategy, which sought to hold intermediaries vicariously liable for user-uploaded content, yielded mixed results; while some cases affirmed limited rights against direct hosts, major rulings—such as the Ninth Circuit's 2007 decision in Perfect 10 v. Amazon.com permitting thumbnail images under fair use—limited enforcement efficacy and escalated costs. By 2011, Perfect 10 invoked potential bankruptcy in appeals, arguing irreparable harm from ongoing infringement, though courts found insufficient causal links to defendants' actions.^[15] The decisive blow came in the 2015 district court ruling in Perfect 10 v. Giganews, where the company lost on direct and secondary infringement claims after a jury trial; the court subsequently ordered Perfect 10 to pay $5.6 million in defendant's attorneys' fees, deeming the suit exceptionally meritless and the plaintiff's approach akin to copyright trolling through overbroad assertions of liability.^[16] This award, affirmed on appeal in 2017, exhausted remaining resources, leading to the effective cessation of operations.^[17] The perfect10.com domain lapsed into auction by 2020, selling for $47,510, signaling the entity's full dissolution without revival.^[13] Zadeh later reflected in his 2021 memoir that unchecked digital reproduction, combined with litigation's financial toll, marked the publication's irreversible fall, underscoring broader challenges for niche print media in the internet era.^[3]

Editorial philosophy

Core principles on natural beauty

Perfect 10's commitment to natural beauty was epitomized by its strict policy against featuring models with breast implants or other cosmetic surgeries, insisting on unaltered physiques to showcase what founder Norman Zada deemed authentic female form.^[18] Launched in 1997, the magazine rated women on a scale where a "Perfect 10" required unenhanced natural breasts alongside facial symmetry, arguing that silicone prosthetics fail to replicate the subtle dynamics, such as wavelike motion during movement, inherent to genuine tissue.^[19] Zada, a former mathematician and hedge fund manager, extended this philosophy to critique industry norms, viewing implants as distortions that prioritize artificial uniformity over proportional harmony and long-term viability, evidenced by documented risks like rupture and capsular contracture in medical literature.^[3] This approach extended to photographic practices, prohibiting airbrushing or digital alterations to preserve skin textures, minor asymmetries, and body contours as they appeared in reality, thereby challenging the polished, idealized images prevalent in competitors like Playboy.^[20] Zada contended that such manipulations mislead consumers on attainable beauty standards, potentially fueling dissatisfaction; empirical observations from the magazine's issues, spanning 1997 to 2010, consistently displayed unretouched nudes to affirm natural variance as superior to engineered perfection.^[18] By 2003, this no-enhancement rule had become a defining brand trait, with Zada publicly decrying silicone as a "bimbo vortex" that erodes genuine allure in favor of fleeting trends.^[18] The principles drew from causal observations of anatomy: natural breasts adapt organically to gravity and activity, maintaining elasticity without foreign materials that can migrate or degrade over time, as opposed to implants' static rigidity.^[19] Zada's advocacy aligned with broader critiques of the 1990s cosmetic boom, where augmentation rates surged from 40,000 procedures in 1990 to over 200,000 by 2000, yet Perfect 10 persisted in selecting talent via rigorous vetting to exclude surgical candidates, prioritizing metrics like proportional bust-to-waist ratios in unmodified states.^[3] This stance not only differentiated the publication commercially but also implicitly highlighted empirical downsides of enhancements, including higher complication rates—up to 20% for silicone gels per FDA data—reinforcing the magazine's thesis that unaltered beauty endures aesthetically and biologically.

Contrast with mainstream publications

Unlike mainstream men's magazines such as Playboy and Penthouse, which routinely featured models with breast implants and employed extensive airbrushing to conform to exaggerated ideals of proportionality, Perfect 10 strictly prohibited silicone enhancements, tattoos, and other cosmetic surgeries, while limiting photo retouching to maintain unaltered natural features.^[21]^[3] Publisher Norman Zadeh, motivated by dissatisfaction with industry norms, explicitly rejected artificial modifications after observing that women at Playboy clubs were predominantly augmented with silicone, describing the trend as unappealing and inauthentic.^[22] This philosophy targeted an audience seeking depictions of "girl-next-door" aesthetics—petite, non-enhanced figures rated a "perfect 10" on unaltered merit—contrasting with competitors' shift toward surgically optimized and digitally perfected imagery that prioritized fantasy over realism.^[3]^[22] By 2000, special editions reinforced this by branding content as "all-natural," underscoring a deliberate divergence from the era's commercial standards where enhancements became normalized to meet consumer expectations for hyper-feminized forms.^[23]

Content and production

Models and photography style

Perfect 10 exclusively featured models with natural, unaltered breasts, prohibiting silicone implants to emphasize authentic female anatomy over surgically enhanced figures. This selection criterion, articulated by founder Norman Zadeh, targeted voluptuous body types that contrasted with the emaciated or artificially augmented ideals in competing publications like Playboy or Penthouse.^[18] Models were typically petite in stature yet curvaceous, often described as "all-natural" in promotional materials, reflecting Zadeh's philosophy of celebrating genetic endowments without medical intervention.^[18] The magazine's photography style prioritized high-resolution imaging to capture fine details such as skin texture and natural imperfections, minimizing digital retouching that could slim waists or exaggerate features. This approach aimed to provide unfiltered depictions, enabling close scrutiny that underscored the publication's commitment to unaltered beauty. Shoots often employed artistic nudes in varied settings, from studio poses to outdoor environments, with lighting designed to highlight rather than conceal bodily realism.^[11] By avoiding airbrushing common in mainstream glossies, Perfect 10 positioned its visuals as a counterpoint to idealized, manipulated representations, appealing to audiences seeking verisimilitude in erotic content.^[18]

Supplementary media and events

Perfect 10 extended its content beyond print issues through a subscription-based website, perfect10.com, which offered high-resolution digital access to photographs of models adhering to the magazine's natural beauty standards, generating the company's primary revenue stream.^[6] The site emphasized exclusive, uncensored imagery not available in the physical magazine, positioning it as a core supplementary medium that complemented the publication's focus on unenhanced female forms.^[6] In addition to static images, Perfect 10 produced and distributed video content, including the "Model Boxing" series, which featured models from the magazine engaging in staged boxing matches followed by pictorial sessions. The first volume depicted participants in ring bouts aligned with the brand's aesthetic, while the 2005 release of Volume 2 continued this format, showcasing physical confrontations among models to appeal to the publication's audience.^[24]^[25] These DVDs were marketed directly from the magazine's pages, integrating video as an extension of its photographic style.^[24] The company also organized live events, such as the Hot Lingerie Fashion Show held on April 23, 2004, at the Perfect 10 Mansion in Beverly Hills, California, where models presented lingerie in line with the magazine's no-enhancement policy.^[26]^[27] Produced in collaboration with CKP and Eileen Koch and Company, the event highlighted the brand's models in a public showcase, blending fashion presentation with the publication's thematic emphasis on natural attributes.^[26] Such gatherings served to promote the magazine and its digital offerings, though they remained limited in scope compared to the core print and online media.^[28]

Legal disputes

Litigation approach and motivations

Perfect 10, Inc. pursued an aggressive litigation strategy centered on secondary copyright liability, targeting intermediaries that enabled or facilitated the distribution of its infringing images rather than focusing exclusively on primary violators, whose offshore operations and anonymity often rendered direct enforcement impractical. The approach began with formal demand letters demanding the removal of infringing content or cessation of supportive services, escalating to multiple federal lawsuits when unmet. This included claims of contributory and vicarious infringement against payment processors, search engines, and Usenet providers, with a two-pronged emphasis on disrupting financial flows—such as by suing Visa and Mastercard for handling transactions to pirate sites—and visibility mechanisms, like Google's thumbnail displays and hyperlinks.^[29]^[14] Founder Norman Zadeh described the rationale for confronting facilitators as severing the "economic lifeblood" of piracy, arguing that credit card processing and search functionalities provided indispensable support to sites profiting from unauthorized reproductions of Perfect 10's nude photography. The company filed over a dozen major suits between 2005 and 2015, including against Google (2004 onward), Amazon, CCBill, and Giganews, often appealing adverse rulings to the Ninth Circuit to challenge fair use defenses and safe harbors under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.^[29]^[30] These efforts were driven by the existential threat of digital infringement, which Perfect 10 asserted caused substantial revenue losses from its subscription website and merchandise, ultimately forcing the magazine's closure around 2008 due to inability to compete with free, ubiquitous copies. By litigating against scalable enablers, the company aimed to deter widespread violations and secure damages or injunctions to sustain its intellectual property-dependent business, viewing intermediary accountability as essential for content creators' viability in an era of unchecked online dissemination.^[6]^[31]

Major copyright cases

Perfect 10, Inc. initiated numerous copyright infringement lawsuits in the early 2000s to combat unauthorized online reproduction and distribution of its photographic images, particularly targeting search engines, web hosts, and payment processors that facilitated access to infringing sites.^[30] The company's aggressive approach stemmed from its business model reliant on exclusive, high-value nude photography, with claims often alleging direct infringement via thumbnails, contributory liability for linking or hosting, and violations of display and distribution rights under the Copyright Act.^[32] These cases frequently tested boundaries of fair use, the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) safe harbors, and secondary liability in the internet era, though Perfect 10 prevailed in only a minority of instances, with courts emphasizing transformative uses and technological neutrality.^[6] The most prominent litigation was Perfect 10, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc. and Google, Inc., filed on November 19, 2004, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.^[30] Perfect 10 accused Google of direct infringement by caching, creating, and publicly displaying thumbnail versions of its copyrighted images in search results, as well as contributory and vicarious infringement by linking to third-party websites hosting full-size infringing copies; Amazon was implicated for integrating Google's search functionality on its site.^[32] The district court initially granted a preliminary injunction in 2006, finding thumbnails likely infringed Perfect 10's display right but denying relief on linking claims due to insufficient evidence of Google's knowledge or control over infringing sites.^[33] On appeal, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in 2007 reversed the injunction on thumbnails, ruling their use transformative and thus fair under 17 U.S.C. § 107, as they served an informational search function without supplanting Perfect 10's market for full-size images.^[30] The court upheld denial of contributory liability for inline linking, noting Google's automated processes lacked the requisite intent or material contribution to direct infringement, though it remanded for further factual development on inducement claims.^[32] Subsequent proceedings extended into 2011, when the Ninth Circuit affirmed dismissal of remaining claims, concluding Perfect 10 failed to demonstrate irreparable harm from Google's operations, solidifying thumbnails as non-infringing in search contexts.^[15] Other significant cases included Perfect 10, Inc. v. CCBill LLC (2007), where Perfect 10 challenged web hosts' DMCA compliance, alleging they ignored repeat infringer notices and profited from sites displaying its images.^[14] The Ninth Circuit ruled the hosts qualified for safe harbor protection under 17 U.S.C. § 512, as their policies adequately addressed known infringements and specific knowledge of Perfect 10's claims was lacking.^[14] In Perfect 10, Inc. v. Giganews, Inc. (filed around 2011), Perfect 10 pursued contributory and vicarious claims against a Usenet provider for retaining infringing posts despite takedown requests; the court found no secondary liability absent evidence of direct control or financial benefit tied to specific infringements.^[6] These rulings highlighted systemic challenges for copyright holders against decentralized online platforms, often favoring defendants' automated systems over plaintiffs' unsubstantiated harm allegations.^[34]

Financial and strategic consequences

The extensive litigation pursued by Perfect 10, Inc. imposed significant financial burdens, including high legal fees and, in several instances, obligations to pay defendants' costs. For example, in Perfect 10, Inc. v. Giganews, Inc., the Ninth Circuit affirmed defenses against contributory and vicarious infringement claims, following district court rulings that highlighted the absence of direct financial benefits to the defendants from alleged infringements.^[17] Similarly, losses in cases against Visa International and CCBill LLC underscored the pattern of unsuccessful secondary liability assertions, with courts dismissing claims for lack of control or direct profit linkage.^[35]^[36] Perfect 10 attributed much of its revenue decline to online image piracy facilitated by defendants' services, claiming annual sales fell from nearly $2 million to $300,000 by the mid-2000s, with over $50 million in cumulative losses from 1996 to 2007 and ongoing annual deficits of at least $3 million thereafter.^[37] However, judicial reviews, such as in the Google litigation, emphasized the company's chronic unprofitability since its founding in 1997, suggesting inherent operational challenges rather than solely external infringement as the cause of fiscal distress.^[38] These disputes culminated in the suspension of print magazine operations after the summer 2007 issue (No. 43), which Perfect 10 directly linked to "rampant infringement" eroding its market viability.^[6] Strategically, the lawsuits sought to redefine intermediary liability for copyright holders but repeatedly failed to establish precedents favoring content owners, instead bolstering safe harbor protections under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act for platforms like search engines and payment processors.^[39] This resource-intensive approach—spanning over a decade and targeting entities from Google to credit card networks—diverted focus from content production and adaptation to digital models, accelerating the shift to a subscription-only website that ultimately proved unsustainable.^[40] Settlements, such as the 2012 voluntary dismissal with prejudice against Google, provided no public financial recovery and closed avenues for further pursuit without apparent strategic gains.^[41] The pattern of defeats fostered perceptions of Perfect 10 as an aggressive litigant, potentially alienating industry partners and complicating licensing efforts amid broader digital disruption in adult media.^[42]

Reception and impact

Positive assessments and innovations

Perfect 10 distinguished itself through a rigorous editorial policy mandating natural, unaltered female bodies, explicitly barring breast implants and limiting photographic retouching to preserve authenticity in depictions of beauty. This stance represented an innovation amid the 1990s rise of cosmetic surgery trends in modeling, positioning the publication as a niche advocate for unenhanced proportions and features, often described as appealing to "connoisseurs" seeking realism over idealized or augmented forms.^[43]^[44] The magazine's emphasis on high-resolution imaging further innovated presentation standards for nude photography, delivering sharper detail in print issues and early digital formats compared to contemporaries, which enhanced visual fidelity and anticipated web-based high-quality content distribution.^[43] Supporters, including publisher Norm Zadeh, lauded its commitment to showcasing "the world's most beautiful natural women" without surgical interventions, crediting this focus for cultivating a dedicated readership that valued empirical standards of proportion and genetics over modifiable aesthetics.^[3]

Criticisms from feminist and industry perspectives

Feminist analyses of nude photography in men's magazines, including Perfect 10's high-resolution images of topless and nude women, have contended that such representations reinforce the male gaze by framing female bodies as passive objects for visual and erotic consumption under patriarchal norms.^[45] This critique posits that even content emphasizing "natural" attributes—such as Perfect 10's policy against featuring models with breast implants or other cosmetic enhancements—ultimately commodifies women's physical forms to appeal to heterosexual male audiences, perpetuating gender hierarchies rather than challenging them.^[46] From an industry standpoint, Perfect 10 faced rebuke for its heavy dependence on copyright litigation against search engines, payment processors, and file-hosting services, with detractors labeling it a "copyright troll" that engineered infringement scenarios to extract settlements rather than sustain viable content production.^[47] In a 2010 countersuit by RapidShare, the service accused Perfect 10 of functioning "essentially as a paralegal operation" focused on lawsuits over business innovation, contributing to its operational decline as magazine circulation fell and legal costs mounted.^[48] Courts echoed these concerns; for instance, in 2015, Perfect 10 was ordered to pay Giganews $5.6 million in attorney fees after a ruling deemed its infringement claims against Usenet providers meritless and pursued in bad faith, underscoring how the company's strategy alienated partners and eroded credibility in digital media circles.^[49] Tech commentators further noted that Perfect 10's failures in cases like Perfect 10 v. Google (2007), where thumbnail images were ruled fair use, exemplified overreach that hindered broader online innovation without protecting creators effectively.^[40]

Broader cultural legacy

Perfect 10's distinctive editorial policy of featuring only models with natural, unenhanced breasts positioned it as a counterpoint to the burgeoning trend of cosmetic augmentation in the 1990s adult magazine industry, where publications like Playboy increasingly showcased surgically altered figures. Founder Norman Zadeh, operating under the pseudonym Norman Roy, explicitly rejected implants, motivated by instances where acquaintances were disqualified from modeling opportunities due to lacking them, thereby promoting an aesthetic centered on unaltered physical forms.^[3] This approach, coupled with a commitment to minimal photo retouching and high-resolution imaging, catered to a niche audience preferring realistic depictions over stylized enhancements, distinguishing the publication amid competitors' embrace of silicone enhancements.^[50]^[51] The magazine's aggressive pursuit of copyright enforcement, culminating in the 2007 Ninth Circuit ruling in Perfect 10, Inc. v. Google, yielded precedents that normalized thumbnail previews in search engines as transformative fair use, shielding tech platforms from liability for indexing reduced-resolution images. This decision, which rejected Perfect 10's claims of direct infringement by Google's image search features, enabled scalable visual indexing essential to the expansion of online discovery tools, thereby shaping everyday internet practices like rapid content browsing and aggregation.^[52] By affirming such uses did not harm original markets but facilitated access, the case contributed to a legal framework that prioritized technological innovation over stringent content controls, influencing subsequent digital media ecosystems despite Perfect 10's financial setbacks from prolonged litigation.^[53]

References

[1]
Perfect 10
Checklists Home Indexes Magazines. Perfect 10. 1997, v1 #1. Aug, v1 #2. Winter. 1998, v1 #3. Spring, v1 #4. Summer, v1 #5. Fall, v1 #6. Winter. 1999, v2 #1
[2]
Norm Zada, the founder of Perfect 10, an adult magazine focusing ...
Dec 5, 2008 · Norm Zada, the founder of Perfect 10, an adult magazine focusing on women without cosmetic surgery, poses in front of his home in Beverly Hills.
[3]
Norm Zadeh's Hysterically Funny New Tell-All Book, The Rise and ...
Aug 24, 2021 · ... Perfect 10 Magazine founder, Norman Zadeh (aka Zada). In the late 90's to mid-2000's, Perfect 10 was the unequivocal adult men's magazine ...
[4]
Perfect 10, Inc., a California Corporation, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Ccbill ...
Perfect 10, the publisher of an adult entertainment magazine and the owner of the subscription website perfect10.com, alleges that CCBill and CWIE violated ...
[5]
[PDF] Perfect 10, Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE, INC., et al. Defendants.
Defendant Arriba operated an image search engine much like Google's—it in-line linked to and framed, but did not store or serve, full- size copies of Kelly's ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[6]
[PDF] Perfect 10 v. Giganews - Santa Clara Law Digital Commons
¶ 17.) Due to the rampant infringement of its products, Plaintiff alleges, it has been forced to close down its previously well-known magazine Perfect 10.
[7]
About Us - Financial Competitions
In 1983, Norm taught a course at UCLA on how to make money in the stock and commodities markets. He opened a real $10,000 account and traded it in front of the ...Missing: story | Show results with:story<|separator|>
[8]
The Poker-Playing Adult-Magazine Mogul Behind One of the ...
Oct 29, 2020 · Norman Zadeh, the founder of both the United States Trading Championship and Perfect 10 magazine, has re-started his famed competition.
[9]
Perfect 10 # 1, Fall 1997 Magazine - Wonderclub
In stock Free deliveryPerfect 10 # 1, Fall 1997, perfect10 magazine premiere issue, back issues 1997, the magazine for connoisseurs, first issue ever, Covergirl Monica Hanson, ...
[10]
THE RISE AND FALL OF PERFECT 10: PERFECT 10 MAGAZINE ...
This book will take you through many worlds—academia, modeling, experiences with Hollywood celebrities including Lucille Ball, Joan Rivers, and Howard Stern ...
[11]
The History of Perfect 10 Modeling Agency | by gab1930s - Medium
Aug 20, 2025 · The Perfect 10 brand originated in the late 1990s with the founding of Perfect 10 magazine by Norm Zadeh (later Zada), a former computer science ...
[12]
https://vintagemagazinecompany.co.uk/collections/perfect-10
[13]
Former men's magazine Perfect10.com closes at $47,510
Jun 13, 2020 · The last print edition of the magazine was published in the summer of 2007. The domain name closed at NameJet on Friday at $47,510. Share.
[14]
[PDF] PERFECT 10, INC. v. CCBILL LLC - Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
Mar 29, 2007 · Perfect 10, the publisher of an adult entertainment maga- zine and the owner of the subscription website perfect10.com, alleges that CCBill and ...Missing: cessation | Show results with:cessation
[15]
Perfect 10, Inc. v. Google, Inc., No. 10-56316 (9th Cir. 2011)
The court held that Perfect 10 had not shown a sufficient causal connection between irreparable harm to Perfect 10's business and Google's operation of its ...
[16]
Copyright Troll Perfect 10 Ordered To Pay $5.6 Million Over Bogus ...
Mar 25, 2015 · Perfect 10 is a copyright trolling operation that pretends to be a pornographic magazine ... shutdown of X because of pornography (BBC).<|separator|>
[17]
[PDF] Perfect 10, Inc. v. Giganews, Inc - Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
Jan 23, 2017 · (“Perfect 10” or “P10”) challenges the district court's partial dismissal of its direct copyright infringement claim and grant of summary ...Missing: bankruptcy | Show results with:bankruptcy
[18]
Living Large in the 'Bimbo Vortex' - Los Angeles Times
Mar 16, 2003 · Norm made his dream a reality by founding Perfect 10, a skin magazine with a twist: all of its models are 100% natural--no silicone implants.Missing: Zada | Show results with:Zada
[19]
Breast Implants - LUKE IS BACK
Zadeh is behind Perfect 10, a glossy new adult men's magazine that refuses ... The wavelike motion of natural breasts is visible even in very small natural ...
[20]
[PDF] Read Airbrushing The Essential Guide
Leg World is focused on the female legs and feet. Perfect 10 publishes images of women untouched by plastic surgery or airbrushing. Pornographic bookstores ...
[21]
Top 10: Perfect 10 Models - AskMen
Aug 19, 2008 · At Perfect 10, the emphasis was on all-natural beauty, so none of their girls have gone under the knife for cosmetic reasons. So, what you ...
[22]
He's Just A Purist, Where Prurience Is Concerned
The millionaire publisher has launched a new magazine, “Perfect 10,” devoted to topless photos of 100 percent natural women. “I've been to strip joints and ...
[23]
PERFECT 10 Magazine Special Collector's Edition All Natural Feb ...
Out of stockThis special edition was published in March 2000 in the United States, showcasing natural beauty. The magazine is part of the Books & Magazines category. Have ...
[24]
https://www.fye.com/products/perfect-10-model-boxing-1_aec-mnol10065dvd
[25]
Perfect 10: Model Boxing Vol. 2 (Video 2005) - IMDb
Rating 8.2/10 (14) Direct from the pages of PERFECT 10 Magazine, witness these beautiful models as they hammer each other during volume 2!Missing: DVDs | Show results with:DVDs
[26]
Perfect 10 Magazine and CKP Present Hot Lingerie Fashion Show
Jun 7, 2011 · Perfect 10 Magazine and CKP Present Hot Lingerie Fashion Show - Produced by Eileen Koch and Company ; Small. €115.00 ; Medium · €300.00 ; Large. € ...
[27]
At the Perfect 10 Magazine Hot Lingerie Fashion Show, Perfect 10 ...
At the Perfect 10 Magazine Hot Lingerie Fashion Show, Perfect 10 Mansion, Beverly Hills, CA 04-23-04 , 11013744, entertainment, famous, person, celebrity, ...
[28]
Perfect 10 Magazine Hot Lingerie Fashion Show (542 pictures)
Perfect 10 Magazine Hot Lingerie Fashion Show (542 pictures). 2004-04-23, Beverly Hills, Calif, United States. Sort by:.
[29]
[PDF] Perfect 10 v. Visa, Mastercard, et al.
Sep 1, 2008 · In order to be guilty of vicarious infringement, Visa must “profit from direct infringement while declining to exercise a right to stop or limit ...
[30]
[PDF] Perfect 10, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc., 508 F.3d 1146 (9th Cir. 2007)
Perfect 10 sued Google and Amazon for copyright infringement. The court ruled that Google's use of thumbnail images was a fair use.
[31]
[PDF] Perfect 10, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc. - Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
May 16, 2007 · Perfect 10 sued Amazon.com and A9.com for copyright infringement of their nude model photos, similar to their suit against Google.
[32]
[PDF] PERFECT 10, INC. v. GOOGLE INC. 508 F.3d 1146 (9th Cir. 2007 ...
Perfect 10 claims that Google's search engine program directly infringes two exclusive rights granted to copyright holders: its display rights and its ...
[33]
Perfect 10 v. Google, Inc. - Stanford Copyright and Fair Use Center
Jan 31, 2023 · Google's creation and public display of “thumbnails” likely do directly infringe P10's copyrights as part of a preliminary injunction decision.
[34]
Perfect 10 v. Google: Naked Pictures Copyright Case Continues
Jul 31, 2010 · On July 18, 2010, Perfect 10 announced that the Canadian Federal Court denied Google's attempt to dismiss Perfect 10's copyright infringement ...
[35]
PERFECT 10 INC v. VISA INTERNATIONAL SERVICE ASSOCIATION
It sued because Defendants continue to process credit card payments to websites that infringe Perfect 10's intellectual property rights.
[36]
Perfect 10, Inc. v. CCBill, Inc., 488 F.3d 1102 (2007) - Quimbee
Perfect 10 sued CCBill in federal district court claiming copyright infringement. The district court ruled in CCBill's favor.Missing: consequences | Show results with:consequences
[37]
[PDF] Perfect 10 Inc. v. Google Inc. - Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
Aug 3, 2011 · On appeal, Perfect 10 claims that the district court erred in denying its motion for a preliminary injunction and also seeks review of the ...Missing: consequences | Show results with:consequences
[38]
Google Scores a Perfect 10 - The Media Institute
Oct 12, 2011 · Perfect 10 lost money from its inception, the court pointed out, and appeared to have never gained its initial loses back.Missing: losses lawsuits
[39]
Another Loss for Perfect 10, Another Good Day for Copyright Law
Feb 2, 2017 · The court found that Perfect 10 was unable to show that Giganews either contributed to users' infringement, induced users to infringe, or that ...Missing: approach | Show results with:approach
[40]
Perfect 10 Loses Once Again, Sets More Good Copyright Precedent
Jan 24, 2017 · I'm sure that some who Perfect 10 threatens just settle, but when cases go to court, Perfect 10 not only loses, but loses in impressive fashion, ...Missing: losses | Show results with:losses
[41]
Perfect 10 and Google agree to end long-running US copyright case
May 14, 2012 · The court said Perfect 10's claims that Google infringed its rights had been "voluntarily dismissed with prejudice", and that the publisher ...Missing: outcome impact<|separator|>
[42]
Giganews wins landmark victory in the 9th Circuit Court of Appeal ...
Jan 23, 2017 · In the case, the notorious repeat copyright plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc. – which before suing Giganews had sued Google, Amazon.com, Microsoft ...
[43]
[PDF] Imperfect 10: Digital Advances and Market Impact in Fair Use Analysis
Oct 14, 2006 · Perfect 10 is the publisher of an adult magazine and website, featuring photographs of “natural” models who have not had cosmetic surgery ...
[44]
Perfect 10: The Connoisseur's Magazine, Volume 5, Number 4, Fall ...
... Perfect 10" was the upscale men's magazine devoted to presenting "the world's most beautiful natural women. NO IMPLANTS, and almost no retouching". In ...
[45]
Nudity Redefined // Feminism and the Male Gaze in the Nude Portrait
Nov 12, 2018 · Patriarchal ideology has long defined how we perceive feminine nudity, modesty, and sensuality. Through this male gaze, the nude self-image of women becomes ...
[46]
Perfect 10 The connoisseur's Magazine. All Natural Women.
A monthly and then quarterly men's magazine – that features high resolution topless or nude photographs of 'all natural' women who have not had cosmetic ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[47]
Perfect 10: porn publisher or copyright troll? | Reuters
Yes, says file-hosting company Rapidshare. In a new countersuit against adult publisher Perfect 10, Rapidshare accuses its adversary of being a "copyright troll ...
[48]
Perfect 10: porn publisher or copyright troll? - The Hollywood Reporter
Dec 21, 2010 · In a new countersuit against adult publisher Perfect 10, Rapidshare accuses its adversary of being a “copyright troll” that runs “essentially a paralegal ...
[49]
“Copyright troll” Perfect 10 hit with $5.6M in fees after failed Usenet ...
Mar 27, 2015 · Perfect 10's model has been to sue third-party providers for carrying images of its porn. It hasn't been afraid to go after big targets ...Missing: influence | Show results with:influence
[50]
Perfect 10: The Connoisseur's Magazine, Volume 5, Number 4, Fall ...
... Perfect 10" was the upscale men's magazine devoted to presenting "the world's most beautiful natural women. NO IMPLANTS, and almost no retouching". In ...
[51]
What kind of woman reads Playboy? - Salon.com
Nov 24, 1998 · “Amateur” is the great buzzword of online erotica, and one of the more noteworthy skin magazines to emerge recently was Perfect 10 ... NO IMPLANTS ...
[52]
Perfect 10, Inc., a California Corporation, Plaintiff-appellant, v ...
Perfect 10, Inc. sued Google Inc., for infringing Perfect 10's copyrighted photographs of nude models, among other claims. Perfect 10 brought a similar action ...Missing: losses | Show results with:losses
[53]
In Perfect 10 v. Google, Round 3 Goes to Google: No Sloppy DMCA ...
Jul 28, 2010 · Perfect 10 claimed that Google violated its copyrights by linking to websites that hosted infringing material, caching websites that hosted ...Missing: cultural impact