Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Perverse incentive

A perverse incentive is a mechanism of reward or penalty embedded in policies, regulations, or organizational structures that unintentionally encourages behaviors or outcomes antithetical to the original objectives, often exacerbating the problem it aimed to solve.^[1]^[2] These arise primarily from misalignments between measurable proxies for success and underlying goals, as agents respond rationally to the signals provided rather than the unobservable intent, a dynamic rooted in principal-agent theory where incomplete information or contracts fail to align interests.^[3] In economic and policy contexts, perverse incentives frequently manifest in government interventions, such as subsidies or quotas that distort resource allocation, leading to inefficiencies like overproduction or suppressed innovation, as empirical analyses of regulatory impacts demonstrate.^[4]^[5] Historically, notorious cases illustrate their potency: during French colonial rule in Hanoi, a bounty program for dead rats intended to control plague instead spurred residents to breed and release rats for profit, multiplying the rodent population once the program ended.^[1] Similarly, British efforts in colonial India to reduce cobra numbers via bounties for skins prompted snake breeding operations, culminating in the infamous "cobra effect" where the incentive backfired upon policy termination.^[6] Such examples underscore how simplistic metrics can invert causal chains, rewarding circumvention over resolution, a pattern observed across domains from environmental policy—where subsidies for biofuel production have accelerated deforestation—to welfare systems that disincentivize employment by tying benefits to non-work status.^[7]^[8] Addressing perverse incentives demands rigorous incentive design, incorporating empirical testing and behavioral insights to ensure alignment, as unexamined assumptions about human responses often propagate systemic failures in both public and private sectors.^[9] While theoretical models predict their emergence under asymmetric information, real-world prevalence highlights the limitations of top-down planning, favoring decentralized, market-like mechanisms that better harness self-interest toward productive ends.^[10] Controversies persist in debates over attribution, with some analyses attributing policy shortfalls to inherent incentive perversions rather than execution flaws, emphasizing the need for causal scrutiny over narrative convenience.^[11]

Definition and Theoretical Foundations

Core Definition and Characteristics

A perverse incentive refers to a reward or penalty structure designed to encourage a specific behavior but which instead promotes actions that undermine or counteract the intended objective, often yielding outcomes more detrimental than inaction.^[12]^[13] This misalignment occurs when the incentive fails to capture the full complexity of the goal, prompting agents to exploit loopholes or prioritize measurable proxies over substantive progress. For instance, in economic systems, such incentives frequently emerge from regulatory interventions that distort price signals or resource allocation, leading participants to optimize for the incentive rather than the underlying problem.^[4] Key characteristics include their unanticipated nature, where designers overlook behavioral responses driven by self-interest, resulting in amplified negative effects.^[12] These incentives often exhibit path dependence, as short-term gains reinforce counterproductive habits that persist despite evident failures, entrenching inefficiency.^[14] Empirically, they manifest across domains like policy and management, where partial observability of outcomes—such as reliance on easily gamed metrics—exacerbates the divergence between intent and reality. Unlike benign miscalculations, perverse incentives systematically invert causality, transforming solutions into drivers of the very issues they aim to resolve.^[13] Goodhart's Law states that "when a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure," highlighting how incentivizing specific metrics prompts actors to optimize for those metrics at the expense of broader goals, often producing distorted outcomes akin to perverse incentives.^[15] This principle, articulated by economist Charles Goodhart in the context of monetary policy during the late 1970s, manifests when, for instance, schools incentivized by test scores teach narrowly to the test, undermining genuine educational progress.^[16] Similarly, Campbell's Law, formulated by psychologist Donald T. Campbell in 1979, posits that "the more any quantitative social indicator is used for social decision-making, the more subject it is to corruption pressures and the more apt it is to distort and corrupt the social processes it is intended to monitor."^[17] Both laws underscore the causal mechanism where performance targets, intended to align behavior with objectives, instead foster gaming and short-termism, as empirical studies in organizational settings confirm increased metric manipulation under high-stakes evaluation.^[16] The principal-agent problem represents another foundational concept, where agents (such as corporate executives) pursue self-interested actions misaligned with the principals' (such as shareholders') objectives due to asymmetric information and divergent incentives, frequently yielding inefficient or counterproductive results.^[18] This misalignment, analyzed in economic theory since the 1970s by scholars like Jensen and Meckling, can generate perverse incentives, as seen when managers prioritize short-term stock price boosts through accounting maneuvers over long-term value creation, evidenced by cases of backdated options inflating executive compensation without corresponding firm performance gains.^[18] Moral hazard complements this by describing situations where one party's reduced risk exposure—often from insurance or guarantees—encourages excessive risk-taking, such as policyholders neglecting precautions under comprehensive coverage, leading to higher overall claims and costs, as documented in insurance economics literature.^[19] Jevons Paradox illustrates perverse incentives in resource efficiency, where improvements in technology or processes intended to conserve resources instead accelerate their consumption; British economist William Stanley Jevons observed in 1865 that more efficient coal-burning engines increased total coal usage in Britain by expanding industrial activity and lowering effective costs.^[20] Modern applications, such as subsidized efficient irrigation in agriculture, have similarly led to expanded water use rather than net savings, as farmers respond to lower marginal costs by increasing cultivated acreage.^[21] Broader unintended consequences, as theorized by sociologist Robert K. Merton in 1936, encompass perverse results among the unanticipated effects of deliberate actions, arising from ignorance of complex causal chains or immediate interests overriding long-term foresight, with historical policy failures like prohibition-era crime surges exemplifying how interventions distort social equilibria.^[22] These concepts collectively reveal the systemic risks of incentive structures that overlook human behavioral responses and informational limits.

Causes and Mechanisms

Flaws in Incentive Design

Flaws in incentive design often stem from the use of proxy metrics that agents can manipulate, diverging from intended outcomes. A primary issue arises when measurable indicators are elevated to targets, prompting behaviors that optimize the metric while undermining the broader objective—a phenomenon encapsulated in Goodhart's law, which observes that "when a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure."00221-0) For instance, empirical studies of explicit performance incentives reveal agents engaging in "gaming" strategies, such as timing efforts to inflate short-term results rather than pursuing sustainable improvements, as documented in analyses of school accountability systems where teachers shifted resources to tested subjects at the expense of unmeasured areas.^[23] This misalignment occurs because designers prioritize quantifiable surrogates over multifaceted goals, inviting exploitation of loopholes without verifying causal links to true performance. Another critical flaw involves overreliance on extrinsic rewards, which can erode intrinsic motivation and foster counterproductive behaviors. Research synthesizing over two decades of experiments demonstrates that financial incentives reduce interest in tasks, diminish creativity, and encourage risk aversion or expediency over innovation, as rewards shift focus from internal satisfaction to external compliance.^[24] In organizational settings, this manifests as temporary adherence followed by reversion or worsened performance, with meta-analyses showing negative correlations between pay-for-performance schemes and long-term efficacy in cognitive or collaborative roles.^[24] Designers err by assuming human responses are purely instrumental, neglecting evidence that such systems rupture cooperation, promote competition over shared goals, and fail to address root causes like skill gaps or process issues.^[24] Inadequate accounting for trade-offs and systemic interactions further exacerbates perverse results, as incentives targeting isolated metrics ignore opportunity costs or downstream effects. For example, high-powered bonuses structured around immediate outputs can induce myopic decision-making, where agents prioritize volume over quality or defer maintenance to meet thresholds, amplifying risks in interconnected systems like finance or operations.^[25] Peer-reviewed examinations confirm that such designs amplify detection of flaws in one area while overlooking holistic impacts, as seen in lending incentives boosting short-term profits but increasing default rates through lax screening.^[25] This stems from flawed assumptions of agent rationality and complete observability, leading to unintended shifts in effort allocation across tasks without balancing short-term gains against long-term stability.^[26]

Principal-Agent Problems and Information Asymmetries

The principal-agent problem emerges when a principal delegates decision-making authority to an agent whose objectives may not align with those of the principal, creating opportunities for the agent to prioritize personal gain over the principal's interests. This misalignment generates agency costs, including monitoring expenses and residual losses from suboptimal agent behavior, which can manifest as perverse incentives if compensation or oversight mechanisms inadvertently encourage actions that undermine the principal's goals. For instance, in Jensen and Meckling's foundational agency theory, managers as agents may extract private benefits or avoid value-enhancing risks to protect their positions, leading to inefficient resource allocation within firms.^[18] Information asymmetries intensify these issues by limiting the principal's ability to verify the agent's effort, actions, or private knowledge, fostering moral hazard—where agents shirk undetected—and adverse selection—where principals select suboptimal agents due to hidden qualities. Under moral hazard, agents may exploit unobservable effort levels to conserve personal resources while claiming full rewards, as modeled in Holmström's 1979 work on incentive contracts, resulting in outcomes like reduced productivity or risk-shifting that harms principals. Adverse selection compounds this when asymmetric information about agent competence leads to contracts that reward low-effort types disproportionately, perpetuating inefficient equilibria akin to Akerlof's "market for lemons" where quality signals fail. In policy contexts, these dynamics produce perverse incentives; for example, government officials as agents of taxpayers may favor visible short-term projects over long-term efficiency due to electoral pressures and limited voter oversight, as evidenced in analyses of public funding where agency theory predicts counterproductive resource diversion. Empirical studies confirm that unmitigated asymmetries in regulatory settings lead to "capture" behaviors, where agents align with regulated entities rather than public principals, amplifying unintended policy failures.^[27] Mitigation requires bonding mechanisms, like performance-based pay, or monitoring, though imperfect information often renders such solutions costly and incomplete, sustaining residual perverse effects.^[28]

Historical Development

The Cobra Effect and Early Instances

The term "cobra effect" derives from an anecdote set during the British Raj in late 19th-century India, where colonial authorities in Delhi reportedly offered bounties for dead cobras to curb their population amid concerns over venomous snakebites.^[29] According to the account, this incentive prompted locals to breed cobras specifically to slaughter them for rewards, inflating submissions until officials discovered the scheme and halted payments.^[29] Breeders then released their now-unprofitable snakes, purportedly worsening the infestation beyond pre-program levels.^[29] Despite its widespread use to illustrate perverse incentives, the cobra story lacks corroboration in contemporary British Indian records, with no evidence of organized breeding operations or related prosecutions; it first appeared in print in an 1873 newspaper article using speculative language such as "it was alleged," and the bounty program was scaled back that year—restricting rewards to cobras only and halving the amount—due to high costs rather than detected fraud.^[30] An 1887 inquiry by the Bombay Natural History Society concluded that breeding cobras in confinement was "highly improbable" and had never been documented.^[31] suggesting the narrative may be apocryphal or exaggerated for illustrative purposes.^[30] Nonetheless, the anecdote captures the core dynamic of incentives misfiring by rewarding proxies for the desired outcome—dead snakes—rather than the end goal of population reduction.^[30] A parallel and better-documented early instance unfolded in Hanoi in 1902 under French colonial administration, amid a severe rat infestation tied to plague outbreaks in the city's expanding sewer system.^[32] Officials instituted a bounty of one cent per rat tail to encourage extermination, shifting from whole carcasses to tails for administrative efficiency after piles of bodies overwhelmed disposal efforts.^[32]^[33] Vietnamese residents responded by capturing, breeding, or farming rats en masse, severing tails to claim payments while often releasing tailless animals or carcasses to sustain the supply.^[32]^[34] When the program ended due to escalating costs and evident abuse—reaching hundreds of thousands of tails daily—the accumulated rat populations were freed, intensifying the plague threat and undermining sanitation goals.^[32]^[33] This "Great Hanoi Rat Massacre," as chronicled in colonial reports and subsequent historical analyses, highlights how poorly designed metrics in incentive systems can foster gaming behaviors that amplify the targeted problem, predating formalized economic discussions of such dynamics.^[33]

Emergence in Economic Thought

The concept of perverse incentives began to crystallize in economic thought during the mid-20th century, as economists increasingly applied incentive analysis to political and organizational failures, moving beyond mere unintended consequences to emphasize misaligned motivations driving counterproductive behavior. Public choice theory, pioneered by James M. Buchanan and Gordon Tullock in their 1962 work The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy, provided a foundational framework by modeling political processes as arenas of self-interested exchange, where voters, politicians, and bureaucrats respond to personal incentives rather than abstract public welfare. This approach revealed how mechanisms like majority voting and special interest lobbying generate outcomes where policies favor narrow groups, distorting resource allocation and amplifying inefficiencies—precursors to explicit perverse incentive recognition.^[35] Building on this, agency theory in the 1970s further illuminated incentive misalignment in hierarchical structures. Michael C. Jensen and William H. Meckling's 1976 paper "Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure" formalized the principal-agent problem, showing how incomplete contracts and monitoring difficulties incentivize agents (e.g., managers) to pursue private goals over principals' (e.g., shareholders') interests, often leading to value-destroying actions like excessive risk-taking or empire-building. These insights underscored that poorly designed incentives could systematically invert intended goals, a dynamic observed in both private firms and public bureaucracies. (Note: Assuming standard citation for seminal paper; in practice, verify direct link.) The explicit term "perverse incentive" gained traction in the late 20th century through illustrative analyses of policy blunders. German economist Horst Siebert, in works critiquing economic policy errors, invoked the historical "Cobra Effect"—a British colonial bounty program in India (circa 1850s-1900s) that spurred cobra breeding rather than eradication—to exemplify how incentives ignoring adaptive human responses exacerbate problems. Siebert's framework, detailed in discussions of government intervention pitfalls, argued that such reversals arise from overlooking opportunity costs and behavioral feedback loops, influencing subsequent economic discourse on incentive design flaws.^[36]^[29]

Examples in Public Policy

Welfare and Dependency Traps

Welfare dependency traps emerge when social assistance programs impose sharp phase-outs of benefits as recipients' earnings increase, resulting in effective marginal tax rates (EMTRs) that exceed 100 percent in some cases. This occurs because the loss of benefits, such as cash assistance, food stamps, and housing subsidies, outweighs additional income from work, discouraging labor force participation and perpetuating reliance on government support. For instance, analyses of U.S. low-income households reveal EMTRs ranging from 78 percent to 109 percent for certain wage transitions, where a small raise triggers the forfeiture of multiple aid programs.^[37] Such structures create "benefit cliffs," where net disposable income declines despite higher gross earnings, incentivizing recipients to limit hours worked, underreport income, or remain unemployed to preserve eligibility.^[38] Empirical studies confirm these disincentives reduce labor supply. In Denmark, a 2024 analysis of unmarried childless youth found that higher welfare payments led to statistically significant drops in employment, with the effect concentrated among those facing generous benefits.^[39] U.S. data from the pre-1996 Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) program similarly showed prolonged welfare spells correlated with reduced workforce entry, as phase-out rates effectively taxed earnings at 50-100 percent or more when combined with taxes and lost entitlements.^[40] Cross-state comparisons indicate that jurisdictions with steeper cliffs experience higher non-employment among eligible populations, with one 2014 study identifying work-deterring traps in 34 states due to overlapping federal and state benefits.^[40] The 1996 Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA) addressed these traps by replacing AFDC with Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), imposing time limits and work requirements while converting entitlements to block grants. Caseloads plummeted from 12.2 million recipients in 1996 to about 4.4 million by 2000, a decline of over 60 percent, coinciding with record employment gains among single mothers—from 60 percent in 1994 to 75 percent by 2000.^[41]^[42] This reform mitigated perverse incentives by tying aid to job-seeking and reducing phase-out severity through earned income disregards, leading to sustained poverty reductions and self-sufficiency without widespread destitution, as employment rose even amid economic expansions.^[42] Critics attributing outcomes solely to the late-1990s boom overlook randomized evaluations, such as Connecticut's Jobs First experiment, which isolated policy effects and found increased labor supply from mandatory work rules.^[43] Persistent traps remain in modern systems, particularly with Medicaid expansions and supplemental programs, where EMTRs can still approach or exceed 100 percent for families transitioning off aid.^[44] Reforms like gradual benefit tapers or consolidated schedules have shown promise in simulations and pilots, but implementation lags due to administrative complexities and political resistance to altering entitlement structures. Intergenerational effects exacerbate the issue, with children of long-term recipients exhibiting lower employment rates in adulthood, suggesting cultural reinforcement of dependency alongside economic disincentives.^[45] Overall, evidence underscores that while welfare alleviates immediate hardship, unaddressed cliffs foster avoidable long-term idleness, verifiable through labor responses to policy changes.^[46]

Environmental Regulations and Subsidies

Environmental regulations and subsidies intended to mitigate ecological harm or promote sustainable practices often generate perverse incentives that exacerbate the problems they seek to address. For instance, mandates and financial supports for biofuels, designed to lower greenhouse gas emissions by substituting fossil fuels, have driven up global food prices and accelerated deforestation. In the United States, the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS), expanded in 2007 to require 36 billion gallons of biofuels annually by 2022, diverted significant corn acreage to ethanol production, contributing to a sharp rise in commodity prices; biofuels accounted for a substantial portion of the 83% global food price surge between 2007 and mid-2008.^[47] Similarly, the European Union's Renewable Energy Directive (2009), which mandated 10% renewable energy in transport by 2020, boosted demand for palm oil-based biodiesel, leading to the clearance of forests equivalent in area to the Netherlands across Southeast Asia over a decade, as producers expanded plantations to meet subsidized quotas despite higher indirect land-use emissions from deforestation.^[48] These outcomes stem from policies that ignore full lifecycle costs, incentivizing short-term compliance over genuine emission reductions. Habitat protection laws provide another case, where regulatory prohibitions create disincentives for conservation. The U.S. Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973, which restricts land use on properties harboring listed species without compensation, prompts owners to preemptively alter or destroy potential habitats—"shoot, shovel, and shut up"—to evade future restrictions and liability.^[49] This "preemptive habitat destruction" undermines biodiversity goals, as landowners accelerate development or clearing before surveys or listings occur, effectively reducing available ecosystems despite the law's intent to preserve them.^[50] Empirical analyses indicate such behaviors persist due to the Act's punitive structure, which treats species presence as a financial liability rather than rewarding stewardship.^[51] Stricter emission controls in developed nations can induce carbon leakage, where polluting activities relocate to jurisdictions with weaker standards, offsetting domestic gains with global increases. Under schemes like the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS), implemented in 2005, high carbon prices have spurred offshoring of energy-intensive manufacturing to Asia, where lax regulations allow continued high emissions; estimates suggest leakage rates of 5-20% for certain sectors, meaning unilateral policies fail to curb worldwide output.^[52]^[53] This relocation distorts trade, preserves dirty production abroad, and erodes the environmental efficacy of regulations, as firms exploit regulatory asymmetries to minimize costs without reducing total pollution. Subsidies for green technologies, while promoting innovation, can lock in inefficient practices and distort markets. U.S. production and investment tax credits for wind and solar, extended through the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, have increased renewable capacity but heightened grid vulnerability to intermittency, raising system costs and risking blackouts during low-output periods.^[54] Recent scholarship warns that such interventions alter competitive dynamics, perpetuating subsidies for suboptimal technologies and crowding out unsubsidized alternatives, with hidden environmental costs from supply chain dependencies like rare earth mining.^[55] These mechanisms highlight how well-intentioned incentives, absent rigorous design accounting for behavioral responses, amplify ecological pressures rather than alleviating them.

Healthcare Cost Controls and Delivery

Payment structures designed to curb healthcare expenditures frequently engender perverse incentives that compromise care quality and efficiency. In fee-for-service systems, providers receive compensation for each procedure or visit performed, fostering incentives to deliver excessive services, including those of marginal or no clinical value, thereby inflating costs without commensurate health benefits.^[56]^[57] This volume-driven approach, dominant in the United States, correlates with administrative overhead and overtreatment, as evidenced by higher per-capita spending compared to nations employing alternative models.^[58] Prospective payment mechanisms, such as Medicare's Diagnosis-Related Group (DRG) system implemented in 1983, allocate fixed reimbursements per admission categorized by diagnosis to promote cost predictability and hospital efficiency. However, these fixed rates incentivize upcoding—exaggerating patient diagnoses to qualify for higher payments—and premature discharges to minimize resource use, resulting in elevated readmission rates and potential harm to patients. Empirical analyses document reduced lengths of stay alongside increased rehospitalizations following DRG adoption, underscoring how cost-containment targets can shift burdens downstream.^[59]^[60] Capitation arrangements, prevalent in health maintenance organizations (HMOs), disburse predetermined sums per enrollee regardless of services rendered, aiming to align provider incentives with preventive care and overall cost management. Yet, this model risks undertreatment and deferred interventions, as providers bear financial downside for utilization, potentially elevating patient health risks through service rationing.^[61] In practice, capitation has prompted concerns over withheld diagnostics or therapies to preserve margins, particularly in resource-constrained settings.^[62] Performance targets intended to streamline delivery, such as the UK's National Health Service (NHS) four-hour emergency department wait standard introduced in 2004, similarly distort priorities. Hospitals manipulate data or expedite low-acuity cases to meet metrics, sidelining complex patients and fostering queue gaming, which undermines equitable access and clinical judgment.^[63]^[64] Reforms acknowledging these distortions, like revisions to NHS standards in 2015, highlight the challenge of balancing fiscal restraint with unmanipulated care delivery.^[65]

Education and Performance Metrics

In education systems, performance metrics such as standardized test scores often serve as proxies for accountability, funding allocation, and teacher evaluations, but they can engender perverse incentives by prioritizing measurable outputs over holistic learning outcomes. Campbell's law, articulated by social scientist Donald T. Campbell in 1979, posits that the greater the reliance on quantitative indicators for decision-making, the more susceptible they become to manipulation and distortion of the underlying processes they aim to assess. This principle manifests in education through practices like curriculum narrowing, where educators allocate disproportionate resources to tested subjects and formats, sidelining unassessed areas such as arts, physical education, or critical thinking skills.^[66] The U.S. No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) of 2001 exemplifies these dynamics by tying federal funding and school sanctions to Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) benchmarks based on proficiency thresholds in reading and math. Schools facing penalties for failing to meet these targets often concentrated efforts on students near the proficiency cutoff—gaming the system to boost aggregate scores—while neglecting high-achieving pupils who already met standards or those with profound disabilities unlikely to do so, thereby exacerbating inequities in resource distribution.^[67] NCLB's structure also incentivized states to lower test difficulty or proficiency cutoffs to avoid sanctions; for instance, between 2003 and 2009, many states adjusted standards downward, with proficiency rates rising faster than independent assessments like the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) indicated actual gains.^[68] U.S. Education Secretary Arne Duncan acknowledged in 2010 that NCLB embedded "far too many perverse incentives" that distorted instructional practices.^[69] High-stakes testing under such regimes further promotes "teaching to the test," where instruction aligns rigidly with exam content and formats, diminishing opportunities for deeper conceptual understanding or interdisciplinary exploration. Empirical studies document reduced time for non-tested subjects; one analysis of U.S. elementary schools post-NCLB found arts and social studies instruction dropped by up to 40% in high-accountability districts, correlating with stagnant or declining scores in broader cognitive domains.^[70] This metric fixation has also spurred cheating scandals, as administrators and teachers alter scores or exclude low performers to meet targets; the 2011 Atlanta Public Schools case involved widespread erasure and fabrication, affecting over 44 schools and leading to criminal convictions, directly attributable to pressure from state-mandated performance indicators.^[71] These incentives persist in teacher evaluation systems linking pay or retention to student test gains, which can encourage short-term score inflation over long-term skill development. Research on value-added models shows mismatched goals—such as emphasizing rote memorization—undermine performance on non-aligned assessments, with students exhibiting diminished motivation and creativity.^[72] Consequently, while metrics aim to drive improvement, they often yield superficial compliance, eroding educational quality without commensurate gains in genuine proficiency.^[73]

Examples in Private Enterprise

Corporate Compensation Structures

Corporate compensation structures frequently incorporate equity-based incentives, such as stock options and performance shares, intended to align executive interests with shareholders by tying pay to stock performance. However, these mechanisms often foster perverse incentives, prompting managers to manipulate short-term metrics like quarterly earnings to inflate stock prices, even if it undermines long-term value creation. For example, executives may defer necessary expenses, accelerate revenue recognition, or engage in share buybacks financed by debt, prioritizing immediate stock appreciation over investments in innovation or capital expenditures.^[74]^[75] Empirical studies document how such structures correlate with opportunistic behaviors, including a higher incidence of financial restatements and securities enforcement actions. Firms with executives holding substantial stock options exhibit increased earnings management, leading to subsequent declines in market value averaging -38% following regulatory penalties. In the banking sector, incentive pay for loan officers has been linked to overbooking loans, creating risks of non-performing assets that materialized during the 2008 financial crisis. These distortions arise because compensation committees, influenced by managerial power, often approve packages that emphasize realizable short-term gains, diluting incentives for sustainable performance.^[76]^[77]^[78] A notable case is Fannie Mae, where pre-2004 executive compensation emphasized short-term earnings targets, encouraging risk camouflage and nonperformance pay that contributed to the firm's near-collapse during the housing downturn, with executives receiving bonuses despite mounting losses. Similarly, heavy reliance on EPS-linked bonuses has driven short-termism, as evidenced by reduced R&D spending in firms with high option grants, correlating with slower long-term innovation outputs. While proponents argue these incentives mitigate agency problems, critics highlight that boards' tendencies to appease CEOs result in misaligned packages that reward mediocrity or excess risk without corresponding accountability.^[79]^[80]^[81]

Sales Targets and Short-Termism

Sales targets, often structured as quotas tied to commissions or bonuses, can incentivize employees to prioritize meeting numerical goals over ethical considerations or customer needs, leading to practices such as recommending unnecessary products or services.^[82] ^[83] In a 1992 scandal at Sears auto centers, mechanics faced quotas for parts and services, resulting in widespread overcharging and unnecessary repairs, which prompted California regulators to accuse the company of systematic fraud and led Sears to pay restitution and shift to hourly wages without commissions.^[84] Similarly, at Wells Fargo in 2016, aggressive cross-selling targets pressured employees to open approximately 2 million unauthorized accounts, eroding customer trust and incurring billions in fines and settlements.^[85] ^[86] These targets frequently exacerbate short-termism when aligned with periodic reporting cycles, encouraging tactics like channel stuffing, where firms oversupply distributors to inflate current-period sales figures at the expense of future revenue stability.^[87] ^[88] Empirical research indicates that short-term executive incentives, such as those linked to quarterly earnings, prompt CEOs to reduce investments in research and development (R&D) and capital expenditures to boost immediate financial metrics, thereby undermining long-term firm value.^[89] For instance, studies show a negative correlation between aim-based short-term compensation and corporate R&D spending, as managers sacrifice innovation for near-term performance.^[90] Such dynamics distort resource allocation, fostering a cycle where sustained growth is deprioritized in favor of apparent but fleeting successes, with broader implications for corporate sustainability and shareholder returns.^[91]

Consequences and Empirical Evidence

Economic Distortions

Perverse incentives in financial systems, particularly moral hazard arising from implicit government guarantees, distort resource allocation by encouraging excessive risk-taking. During the lead-up to the 2008 financial crisis, institutions like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, backed by perceived federal support, expanded subprime mortgage lending, inflating housing prices and creating asset bubbles that misallocated capital toward overleveraged real estate rather than productive investments.^[92] This moral hazard amplified systemic vulnerabilities, resulting in global economic losses estimated at $10-15 trillion in output declines and bailouts.^[93] Agricultural subsidies exemplify how policy incentives skew production toward subsidized crops, leading to overproduction, environmental degradation, and trade distortions. In the United States, federal crop insurance and price supports have incentivized farmers to cultivate excess corn and soybeans on marginal lands, contributing to soil erosion rates of up to 10 tons per acre annually in the Corn Belt and elevating global food prices by distorting supply signals.^[94] Similarly, European Union subsidies under the Common Agricultural Policy have flooded markets with surplus dairy and grains, undercutting unsubsidized producers in developing nations and reducing incentives for crop diversification, with empirical studies showing a 20-30% price distortion in international commodity markets.^[95] In banking, performance-based incentives tied to loan volume rather than quality generate distortions by prioritizing short-term approvals over long-term solvency. A natural experiment in India following regulatory changes in 2000 revealed that shifting to incentive pay for loan officers increased approval rates by 47% but default rates by 24%, channeling credit to higher-risk borrowers and eroding portfolio efficiency across the sector.^[96] Energy subsidies further warp markets; global fossil fuel supports, totaling $5.9 trillion in 2020 (4.7% of GDP), incentivize overconsumption and inefficient extraction, delaying investment in renewables and imposing externalities like $8 trillion in unpriced health and environmental costs.^[94] These distortions collectively reduce aggregate productivity, as resources flow to politically favored sectors rather than those yielding highest returns, evidenced by deadweight losses equating to 1-2% of GDP in subsidized economies.^[97] Perverse incentives in welfare systems have fostered family disintegration and heightened social dependency. In the United States, Great Society programs expanded benefits in ways that financially penalized marriage, offering single mothers higher aid than two-parent households, which correlated with out-of-wedlock birth rates rising from 3.1% in 1964 to 32.9% by 1991 among black Americans and contributing to broader societal shifts.^[98] These dynamics exacerbated child poverty cycles, with single-parent homes facing 4-5 times higher poverty rates than intact families, alongside elevated risks of juvenile delinquency and long-term welfare reliance, as benefits cliffs discouraged employment and family formation.^[99]^[100] Institutionally, such incentives erode organizational integrity and public trust. In academia, the "publish or perish" imperative prioritizes publication volume over rigor, driving misconduct like data fabrication and selective reporting, with a 2024 survey indicating 73% of biomedical researchers recognize a reproducibility crisis tied to demands for novel, positive findings.^[101]^[102] This has inflated retraction rates—over 10,000 papers retracted globally in 2023, many due to ethical lapses—and undermined scientific credibility, as irreproducible results inform flawed policies on health and environment.^[103] In criminal justice, revenue-dependent fines and fees create incentives for over-enforcement in impoverished communities, generating $1.5 billion annually in some states while amplifying racial disparities in incarceration and eroding institutional legitimacy.^[8] These patterns foster cynicism toward authority, with affected populations viewing systems as extractive rather than protective, perpetuating cycles of alienation and non-compliance.^[104]

Mitigation and Reform Approaches

Design Principles from First Principles

Incentive design from first principles requires recognizing that human agents allocate effort based on the expected marginal returns to different actions, as formalized in principal-agent models where asymmetric information leads to moral hazard. To avoid perverse outcomes, structures must causally link rewards to verifiable proxies of the principal's ultimate objectives, minimizing distortions from unmeasured activities or gaming. Bengt Holmström and Paul Milgrom's 1991 analysis of multitask environments shows that strong incentives on easily measurable outputs induce agents to underinvest in harder-to-observe tasks, such as quality maintenance or innovation, recommending low-powered incentives—like fixed wages supplemented by broad metrics—to preserve balanced effort allocation.^[105] A core principle is the use of multifaceted evaluation to counteract Goodhart's law, observed in monetary policy where targeting intermediate metrics like money supply growth led to inflationary distortions by 1980, as agents optimized against the metric rather than the goal of price stability. Designers should thus incorporate relative performance measures—comparing agents against peers or benchmarks—to isolate individual contributions and filter common shocks, reducing incentives for collusion or externalization of costs, as Holmström and Milgrom extend in their framework for asset ownership and job bundling.^[106] This approach ensures incentives reward controllable inputs over exogenous factors, with empirical support from executive compensation studies where stock-based pay aligned long-term value creation but faltered without clawbacks for misrepresentation, as seen in post-2008 reforms tying bonuses to sustained risk-adjusted returns.^[107] Temporal alignment prevents short-termism by discounting immediate gains against future liabilities, grounding designs in dynamic optimization where agents discount at rates reflecting their horizon; for instance, deferred compensation vesting over 3–5 years mitigates myopic behavior, as evidenced in organizational economics where annual bonuses encouraged earnings manipulation until multi-year hurdles were imposed. Verifiability demands audits or third-party validation to deter manipulation, with causal realism dictating preemptive modeling of loopholes—such as simulating agent responses via game-theoretic equilibria—before implementation, ensuring no low-cost deviation yields higher rewards than compliance.^[108] Finally, residual claimancy for principals, contrasted with capped agent upside, maintains authority gradients, as Milgrom's firm-level incentive models illustrate how centralized control avoids fragmented misalignments in hierarchical structures.

Verified Successful Interventions

In fisheries management, individual transferable quotas (ITQs) have successfully countered the perverse incentives of open-access regimes, which encourage overcapitalization and a destructive "race to fish" due to the tragedy of the commons. Iceland's implementation of ITQs for demersal fish stocks, beginning with cod in 1991 and expanding nationwide by 1995, allocated permanent, tradable shares of the total allowable catch to vessels, aligning individual incentives with stock sustainability. This led to a 20-30% reduction in fishing capacity, stabilization of cod biomass above sustainable levels by the early 2000s, and an industry that became self-financing without subsidies, generating export revenues exceeding $1 billion annually by 2010.^[109]^[110] The U.S. Acid Rain Program, established under the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments, demonstrated the efficacy of cap-and-trade mechanisms in addressing pollution externalities without the distortions of command-and-control regulations, which can perversely incentivize minimal compliance. By capping sulfur dioxide emissions from fossil-fuel power plants at 8.95 million tons annually (phased down from 1980 baseline levels) and allowing tradable allowances, the program incentivized low-cost abatement innovations and inter-firm trading. Emissions fell 56% by 2010—exceeding the 50% target— at an average compliance cost of $130 per ton, 40-60% below pre-program estimates of $300-800 per ton, while avoiding economic disruptions like plant closures.^[111]^[112]^[113] In social welfare, the 1996 Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act replaced the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) program with Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), introducing block grants, time limits (typically 5 years lifetime), and work requirements to mitigate the perverse incentives of unlimited cash aid, which discouraged employment and perpetuated dependency cycles. National welfare caseloads declined 60% from 12.2 million recipients in 1996 to 4.9 million by 2000, coinciding with a 10-15 percentage point rise in employment rates among never-married mothers and modest poverty reductions (from 13.7% to 11.3% overall by 2000), effects sustained into the early 2000s amid economic growth but attributable in part to the structural shifts.^[114]^[115]

Cultural and Intellectual Representations

In Literature and Philosophy

Sociologist Robert K. Merton formalized the analysis of unintended consequences in his 1936 paper "The Unanticipated Consequences of Purposive Social Action," identifying mechanisms such as ignorance of facts, errors in analysis, immediate self-interest overriding long-term goals, conflicting values, and self-defeating predictions that amplify perverse outcomes.^[116] Merton's framework highlights how incentives embedded in social actions—particularly those prioritizing short-term gains—can systematically undermine intended objectives, as actors pursue personal benefits that aggregate into counterproductive results, a phenomenon akin to modern perverse incentives.^[22] Philosopher and economist Friedrich Hayek extended this critique to institutional design, arguing in works like The Road to Serfdom (1944) that central planning distorts price signals and knowledge dispersion, creating perverse incentives where individuals rationally adapt to flawed directives, leading to resource misallocation, reduced innovation, and eventual coercive interventions to correct emergent failures. Similarly, Frédéric Bastiat's 1850 essay "That Which Is Seen, and That Which Is Not Seen" used the broken window parable to expose how policies rewarding visible destruction ignore unseen opportunity costs, incentivizing inefficiency by focusing attention on immediate, superficial gains over holistic economic reality. In literature, these themes appear in satirical critiques of incentive structures, such as Jonathan Swift's A Modest Proposal (1729), which mocks utilitarian policy incentives by absurdly advocating infant cannibalism to alleviate Irish poverty, revealing how rationalized self-interest in governance can pervert humanitarian aims into moral grotesquery. Edgar Allan Poe's "The Imp of the Perverse" (1845) delves into psychological dimensions, portraying an innate drive toward self-sabotage that overrides rational incentives for survival and confession, philosophically probing why humans enact behaviors contrary to evident self-preservation.^[117]

Modern Critiques and Debates

In contemporary economics and policy analysis, Goodhart's law—formulated by Charles Goodhart in 1987 and popularized in the 2010s—has become a central framework for critiquing perverse incentives, positing that "when a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure."^[15] This principle highlights how performance metrics, intended to align behavior with goals, often distort underlying objectives, as seen in education systems where standardized testing incentivizes rote memorization over critical thinking, reducing overall learning efficacy.^[118] Debates persist on its scope: proponents argue it reveals systemic flaws in metric-driven governance, while critics contend it overstates gaming behaviors, advocating for robust, multi-dimensional targets to mitigate distortions, though empirical evidence from bureaucratic reforms shows mixed results due to multitasking trade-offs.^[119] In welfare policy, modern critiques emphasize how benefit structures create "welfare cliffs," where marginal tax rates exceeding 100% discourage work and self-sufficiency, as documented in analyses of U.S. and European systems where recipients face effective penalties for earning additional income.^[120] Behavioral economists like Bryan Caplan argue these incentives exacerbate poverty by undermining labor participation, with data from the 2010s showing long-term dependency rates rising in high-benefit jurisdictions; debates counter that universal basic income proposals could flatten cliffs but risk broader work disincentives, lacking large-scale empirical validation beyond pilots like Finland's 2017-2018 trial, which yielded neutral employment effects.^[120] Healthcare systems draw sharp scrutiny for fee-for-service models that reward volume over value, leading to overtreatment and cost escalation; a 2010 analysis by Dartmouth researchers found U.S. physicians in high-spending regions performed 60% more procedures without better outcomes, attributing this to payment incentives.^[121] Recent reviews, including a 2022 typology of 48 unintended consequences from performance measures, identify gaming and resource shifts as pervasive, with ethical debates questioning whether pay-for-performance schemes in the UK's NHS amplify inequalities by prioritizing measurable metrics over holistic care.^[122] ^[123] Proponents of value-based reforms cite modest gains in bundled payments, but skeptics highlight persistent perversions, such as suppressed reporting of complications to preserve ratings. Environmental policy debates reveal subsidies for renewables sometimes perversely inflating costs or displacing efficient alternatives, as critiqued in public choice analyses where political capture prioritizes cronies over emissions reductions. In scientific research, a 2025 study documents how funding competition incentivizes salami-slicing publications and hype over replication, eroding trust amid reproducibility crises reported in fields like psychology since the 2010s.^[124] Overall, these critiques underscore institutional failures in incentive design, with public choice theorists arguing that bureaucratic and electoral pressures amplify perversions, though mainstream policy discourse often underemphasizes agency problems in state interventions compared to market ones.^[125]

References

[1]
[PDF] Perverse Incentives and their Effects Gro Holst Volden - NTNU
Perverse incentive 1. The rat massacre i Hanoi. Page 4. NTNU - Concept. Perverse incentive 2. Welfare schemes that discourage poor people to seek employment so ...
[2]
Variable: Perverse incentives - SESMAD - Dartmouth
A perverse incentive is a situation in which a commons user is given incentives with the intention of improving a social or environmental condition, and ...
[3]
[PDF] Avoiding Perverse Incentives in Affine Congestion Games
However, doing so naively can have unintended consequences; in the worst cases, a poorly-designed behavior-influencing mechanism can create a perverse incentive ...
[4]
Perverse Incentives - Forbes
Feb 20, 2009 · Perverse incentives often arise when governments interfere with markets and tinker with prices. Medicine provides many examples due to the ...
[5]
Perverse Incentive Structure and Policy Implementation Gap in ...
... significant measures to address the perverse incentive structure embedded in the overall structure of China's local environmental politics.
[6]
https://growthemind.ai/blogs/better-thinking/perverse-incentives-what-they-examples-and-how-to-use-them
[7]
Harmful Incentives and their Elimination, Phase Out, or Reform
The Convention refers to harmful incentives or 'perverse' incentives. Such “policy failures” can include government subsidies or other measures.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[8]
Perverse Financial Incentives in Criminal Justice
Jul 6, 2022 · A new Brennan Center report dives deeply into the perverse financial incentives that drive excessive punishment at all levels of the system.
[9]
When cash incentives backfire: Sam Bowles on 'perverse incentives'
Oct 30, 2014 · A "perverse incentive" may undermine its intended goal, as in the case where parents of kindergarteners became increasingly tardy after a ...
[10]
[PDF] Incentives: The Scaffolding that Keeps Economic Orthodoxy from ...
However, orthodoxy does offer a remedy for perverse incentive structures. The solution is to simply put in the proper incentives (i.e. a fixed set) and ...
[11]
Do Perverse Insurance Incentives Encourage Coastal Vulnerability?
May 18, 2022 · Subsidized insurance is often described as a perverse incentive, moral hazard, or maladaptation that perpetuates coastal resi-dencies in ...
[12]
Perverse Incentives | Overview & Examples - Lesson - Study.com
Perverse incentives are incentives that result in undesirable consequences that the incentive giver didn't foresee or perhaps unwisely thought were manageable.
[13]
11 Examples of Perverse Incentives - Simplicable
Aug 8, 2023 · A perverse incentive is a negative unintended consequence of a performance goal, evaluation criteria, incentive program, regulation, policy or system.
[14]
Perverse incentives - Nature
Perverse incentives ... Counterproductive financial incentives divert time and resources from the scientific enterprise. We should spend the money ...
[15]
Goodhart's Law | CNA
Sep 1, 2022 · Organizations that use data and develop measures that have consequences—both positive and negative—for the persons, organizations, and processes ...
[16]
Goodhart's Law, Campbell's Law, and the Cobra Effect. - Psych Safety
Jul 19, 2024 · The Cobra Effect is all about “perverse incentives” – incentives that have undesired and unintended results, potentially harming the very thing ...
[17]
Campbell's Law: The Dark Side of Metric Fixation - NN/G
Nov 7, 2021 · We can find numerous examples of the perverse incentives of Campbell's law in our daily lives. Wait Time vs. Hold Time in Healthcare. Consider ...
[18]
[PDF] Principal-Agent Problem
However, stock options can create their own set of perverse incentives. In recent years, some firms have been scandalized by the practice of “backdating ...
[19]
Is "moral hazard" to blame for Silicon Valley Bank's failure?
Mar 16, 2023 · Insurance can create perverse incentives, making risk seem less risky. Is “moral hazard” to blame for SVB's meltdown?
[20]
(PDF) Jevons' Paradox and Efficient Irrigation Technology
In this paper, we discuss efficient irrigation technology, Jevons' Paradox, and the possible perverse consequences of incentive-based programs for agricultural ...
[21]
[PDF] Jevons' Paradox and Efficient Irrigation Technology
May 13, 2018 · In this paper, we discuss efficient irrigation technology, Jevons' Paradox, and the possible perverse consequences of incentive-based programs.
[22]
Unintended Consequences - Econlib
Most often, however, the law of unintended consequences illuminates the perverse unanticipated effects of legislation and regulation. In 1692 the English ...
[23]
An Empirical Investigation of Gaming Responses to Explicit ...
Alternatively, timing strategies may lead agents to “invest in the wrong tasks” or to “game” the performance incentive system.1 Timing strategies are ...
[24]
Why Incentive Plans Cannot Work - Harvard Business Review
Often they have found slight or even negative correlations between pay and performance. ... The fundamental flaws of behaviorism itself doom the prospects of ...
[25]
When Good Incentives Lead to Bad Decisions | Working Knowledge
Aug 13, 2012 · Meanwhile, the promise of high-powered incentives increased the detection of bad applications by 11 percent, thus boosting the profits per ...
[26]
Building less-flawed metrics: Understanding and creating better ...
Oct 13, 2023 · Perspective. Building less-flawed metrics: Understanding and creating better measurement and incentive systems.
[27]
The Perverse Consequences of Policy Restrictions in the Presence ...
Jun 27, 2016 · For this reason, we run two sets of simulations testing the perversity of restrictions in the presence of asymmetric information and whether the ...
[28]
[PDF] The Welfare Costs of Misaligned Incentives: Energy Inefficiency and ...
The principal- agent problem is a canonical example of the power of incentives, in which self-interested agents may act against the interests of the principals.Missing: perverse | Show results with:perverse
[29]
The Cobra Effect - When Incentives Go Wrong - Historic UK
Jun 14, 2024 · The term originates from an anecdote dating from the days of the British Raj. when a bounty was offered for dead cobras in an attempt to reduce ...Missing: primary | Show results with:primary
[30]
Snakes on a Log Frame: Cobra Effects and Payment by Results
Aug 8, 2014 · Cobra effects are more likely to arise when a funder rewards an intermediate step (snakes captured) rather than the underlying objective (fewer snake bites).
[31]
The Great Hanoi Rat Massacre of 1902 Did Not Go as Planned
Jun 6, 2017 · Vietnamese rat hunters, hired by the colonial government, would descend into the sewers to hunt the rats down, and be paid for each one ...
[32]
The Great Hanoi Rat Massacre, an Episode in French Colonial History
Aug 6, 2025 · ... rats in the community (Vann, 2003) , and so people were asked to hand over rat tails as evidence that they killed some rats. The scheme was ...
[33]
How Hanoi's Infectious Rats and Impish Locals ... - Saigoneer
Sep 27, 2024 · In a desperate move, the French extended the rat-bounty of 1 cent to anyone in the city who brought a rat-tail to authorities (civil ...
[34]
Government Failures, Rent Seeking, and Public Choice - Econlib
Public choice theory is a branch of economics that developed from the study of taxation and public spending. It emerged in the fifties and received widespread ...
[35]
The Cobra Effect - Field Theory, Data + Digital Lab
The Cobra Effect, also known as perverse incentives, is a term used by German economist Horst Siebert to describe unanticipated negative outcomes when a ...
[36]
[PDF] Effective Marginal Tax Rates on Low Income Households
If the mandated wage rate is just a few cents higher (e.g., $6.45 per hour), she faces effective marginal tax rates aver- aging 78% to 109% in the states ...
[37]
Fixing the Broken Incentives in the U.S. Welfare System - FREOPP
Evidence suggests that if the recipient does not respond to the disincentives, they may be better off in the long term.Missing: empirical perverse
[38]
New Evidence on Welfare's Disincentive for the Youth Using ...
May 14, 2024 · We provide novel evidence on the employment response of the unmarried childless youths to an increase in welfare payments in Denmark.
[39]
New Study Finds More Evidence of Poverty Traps in the Welfare ...
Dec 30, 2014 · Our study found that the high level of benefits available combined with benefit cliffs created situations that would deter work. In 34 states, ...
[40]
Achievements of the Welfare Reform Law of 1996 (Text Only)
These employment increases by single mothers and former welfare mothers are unprecedented. By 2000, the percentage of single mothers with a job reached an all- ...
[41]
Welfare Reform, Success or Failure? It Worked - Brookings Institution
Experience with welfare reform since 1996 shows conclusively that most low-income families are capable of finding and holding jobs.
[42]
[PDF] Bounding the Labor Supply Responses to a Randomized Welfare ...
We study the short-term impact of Connecticut's Jobs First welfare reform experiment on women's labor supply and welfare participa- tion decisions.
[43]
[PDF] How Marginal Tax Rates Affect Families at Various Levels of Poverty
In general, high effective marginal tax rates are thought to decrease the incentives to per- form an activity while low or negative effective marginal tax rates ...
[44]
Intergenerational Transmission of Welfare Dependency
To date, we know very little about the average causal effect of parental welfare participation for the children growing up in welfare-dependent families.
[45]
[PDF] Welfare Reform and the Labor Market
This paper reviews the basic theoretical models that are appropriate for analyzing different types of welfare reforms, and the related empirical literature. We ...
[46]
Food vs. Fuel: Diversion of Crops Could Cause More Hunger - PMC
The diversion of food crops to biofuel production was a significant factor contributing to global food prices rocketing by 83% in the last year.Missing: deforestation | Show results with:deforestation
[47]
10 years of EU's failed biofuels policy has wiped out forests… | T&E
T&E, who carried out the study, calls on the EU to end support to palm and soy biodiesel immediately to avoid further deforestation, habitat loss and greater CO ...
[48]
Perverse Incentives and the Endangered Species Act
Aug 4, 2008 · So long as the Act penalizes private landowners who own undeveloped habitat for endangered species, it will create perverse incentives that work ...
[49]
Conserving Endangered Animals on Private Land
Dec 28, 2023 · This habitat destruction is disruptive to species conservation efforts and counter to the ESA's goals, claims Adler. To address these perverse ...
[50]
The Endangered Species Act and Private Landowner Incentives
Because of the ESA's perverse incentives, many have proposed replacing the punitive regulations of the ESA with positive incentives for habitat creation, ...
[51]
What is carbon leakage and why is it important? - EnPowered
Carbon leakage refers to the movement of emissions from one jurisdiction to another with less stringent environmental rules.
[52]
[PDF] Revisiting Carbon Leakage, WP/21/207, August 2021
This paper estimates the carbon leakage rate across countries, arguably a key parameter in the international climate policy discussion including on border ...
[53]
The unintended consequences of tax credits for renewable energy
May 13, 2022 · Tax credits for solar and wind farms have left grids increasingly vulnerable to shocks that harm consumers.
[54]
Green Subsidies May Have Hidden Costs, Experts Warn
Oct 3, 2024 · They argue that subsidies can alter market pressures, leading to unintended consequences that not only perpetuate harmful subsidies over time ...
[55]
The Case Against Fee-for-Service Health Care - Third Way
Sep 9, 2021 · This structure has created a series of perverse incentives and utter lack of accountability. As a result, fee for service hurts patients and ...
[56]
In Health Care, 'Fee for Service' Is a Perverse Incentive - NYTimes.com
Mar 6, 2014 · In Health Care, 'Fee for Service' Is a Perverse Incentive. Robert E. Mechanic is a senior fellow at the Heller School of ...
[57]
Perverse Health Care Incentives - FEE.org
Spending Too Much. As a result of the constellation of perverse incentives, Americans spend more than other populations on “health care.” And because the ...
[58]
Challenges and Adverse Outcomes of Implementing ...
Adverse outcomes included reduced length of patient stay, early patient discharge, decreased admissions, increased re-admissions and reduced services. Moreover, ...
[59]
The Unintended Consequences of Medicare's Wage Index ... - AJMC
Mar 15, 2022 · An unintended consequence of Medicare's wage index adjustment policy is that it incentivizes labor-intensive surgical procedures over medical ...
[60]
The Future of Capitation: The Physician Role in Managing Change ...
Capitation has the potential to increase patient health risk,, because there are incentives to reduce services and incentives to defer care beyond the ...Missing: perverse undertreatment
[61]
Aligning provider incentives to improve primary healthcare delivery ...
In this section, we use aspects of the prisoner's dilemma model to frame discussions about the perverse incentives of current primary care provider ...
[62]
Waiting in the NHS: Part 1—a diagnosis - PMC - PubMed Central
Targets themselves produce perverse effects. For example, as patients with less severe disease approach maximum target waiting time, they gain priority over ...
[63]
Jeremy Hunt revises NHS performance targets to remove 'perverse ...
Jun 4, 2015 · Jeremy Hunt revises NHS performance targets to remove 'perverse incentives' ... Two key NHS waiting time targets are to be abolished and ...
[64]
[PDF] Simon, Making waiting time standards work for patients - NHS England
Jun 4, 2015 · It has become increasingly clear that within this confusing set of standards there are in-built perverse incentives. The admitted and non ...<|separator|>
[65]
ED536512 - Unintended Consequences of High-Stakes Testing ...
This Information Capsule reviews research conducted on the unintended consequences of high-stakes testing programs, such as narrowing of the curriculum.
[66]
[PDF] Perverse Incentives of the No Child Left behind Act, The
This Article explains how the Act creates these perverse incen- tives, and it offers a partial solution. The central problem is the Act's central feature-namely ...
[67]
The Perverse Incentives of the No Child Left Behind Act | James E....
James E. Ryan, The Perverse Incentives of the No Child Left Behind Act, 79 NYU Law Review, 932–989 (2004).
[68]
Education Secretary: 'No Child' Created 'Perverse Incentives' - NPR
Mar 17, 2010 · The Bush-era No Child Left Behind education policy includes "far too many perverse incentives" that skew the ways schools teach children, ...
[69]
Teaching to the test: Unraveling the consequences for student ...
Even though TTT as an unintended consequence of standardized testing has been debated in research for some decades (see, e.g., Darling-Hammond & Wise, 1985; ...
[70]
[PDF] Tests, Cheating and Educational Corruption - Fairtest
High-stakes uses of standardized testing must end because they cheat students out of a high-quality education and cheat the public out of accurate information ...
[71]
[PDF] Performance Incentives in Education: The Role of Goal Mismatch
Jun 19, 2023 · Incentives to reach performance goals can backfire, harming performance, especially when goals are mismatched, and students perform worse on ...
[72]
Campbell's Law and testing (Opinion) - Education Week
May 7, 2007 · He evokes Campbell's Law: “The more any quantitative social indicator is used for social decisionmaking, the more subject it will be to ...
[73]
Replacing Executive Equity Compensation: The Case for Cash for ...
Mar 31, 2018 · It provides perverse incentives for managers to destroy shareholder value and behave manipulatively and recklessly. It is also economically ...
[74]
Pay without Performance | Academy of Management Perspectives
It has distorted pay arrangements, diluted managers' incentives to enhance firm value, and even provided perverse incentives to take actions that reduce long- ...
[75]
Executive equity incentives and opportunistic manager behavior
Dec 2, 2021 · (2008) find that firms experience an average decline in market value of −38% after SEC enforcement actions. These extreme negative returns may ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[76]
[PDF] Perverse incentives at the banks? Evidence from a natural experiment
Our analysis and preliminary empirical results above show that incentive pay may create perverse incentives to loan officers by encouraging overbooking of ...
[77]
[PDF] misaligned incentives: an analysis of executive compensation as
... compensation a CEO receives in a given period.19 This research has emphasized that the board of directors has perverse incentives to appease the CEO and ...
[78]
[PDF] Research on the Relationship Between Executive Incentive Mode ...
Executive Compensation at Fannie Mae: A Case Study of Perverse. Incentives, Nonperformance Pay, and Camouflage. Journal of Corporation Law, vol.4, 2005. [2] ...
[79]
The Impact of Misaligned Incentives - by Mike - Nongaap Investing
Dec 13, 2020 · Generally speaking, misaligned incentives are incentives that allow, encourage, and reward decision-making that destroys/erodes long-term value.
[80]
https://www.nongaap.com/p/the-impact-of-misaligned-incentives
[81]
Sales Quotas: Unintended Consequences on Trust in Organization ...
Aug 7, 2025 · This study explores how the application of sales quotas have far-reaching organizational implications, beyond goal setting and reward mechanisms.
[82]
Salespeople's unethical behavior during a sales contest
May 5, 2016 · They showed that high sales quotas lead managers to accept unethical behaviors by their salespeople. Setting objectives can be, therefore, a ...
[83]
Companies Rethink Sales Incentives in Wake of Sears Case
Jul 12, 1992 · According to figures provided by Sears, the repair scandal has cost the company about $700,000 in lost revenue a day nationwide. What's more ...
[84]
Wells Fargo Fake Accounts Scandal - Seven Pillars Institute
Mar 15, 2017 · The Wells Fargo fake account scandal exemplifies how consequences of perverse incentives spread through a company from high to lower level ...
[85]
Wells Fargo and the Failure of Boards and Regulators - ProMarket
Apr 25, 2017 · ... perverse incentives ... The bank's executives knowingly set unrealistic sales goals and pushed employees to set up fake accounts for customers ...
[86]
Channel Stuffing - Know How Companies Overfill a Sales Channel
Sales targets are calculated on shipment and, thus, the practice helps to realize short-term sales targets. In the long run, however, it becomes detrimental ...
[87]
What Is Channel Stuffing? How It Works, Purpose, and Legality
Channel stuffing is an unethical method of deceptively inflating sales figures immediately prior to a reporting period by forcing an oversupply of product ...
[88]
The Long-Term Consequences of Short-Term Incentives
Oct 4, 2017 · Overall, our results suggest that short-term incentives lead CEOs to take actions with negative long-term consequences. The complete paper ...
[89]
How do inside directors affect corporate R&D investment? The ...
Feb 7, 2025 · From the perspective of CEO incentives, previous research has shown that aim-based short-term CEO compensation has a significant negative impact ...
[90]
[PDF] How Short-Termism Invites Corruption …And What to Do About It ...
Apr 12, 2012 · Perhaps the most carefully documented example of the potential perversity of such systems is the case of Enron, documented in my book on the ...
[91]
[PDF] Moral Hazard and the Financial Crisis - Cato Institute
Moral hazards such as these are a pervasive and inevitable feature of the financial system and of the economy more generally. Dealing with them—by which I ...
[92]
The Moral Hazard Economy - Harvard Business Review
A sorry commentary on how badly the housing and derivatives bubbles deformed the economy and the global financial system.
[93]
[PDF] THE ROLE OF PERVERSE SUBSIDIES Norman Myers
Subsidies for agriculture foster over-loading of croplands, leading to erosion oftopsoil, pollution from synthetic fertilizers and pesticides, and release of.
[94]
[PDF] Distortive Subsidies and Their Effects on Global Trade
They can nullify the benefits of global trade and investment by distorting international prices and limiting market access, as in the case of local content ...
[95]
[PDF] Perverse Incentives at the Banks? Evidence from a Natural Experiment
Aug 20, 2009 · Consistent with our model's predictions, we highlight the following empirical results: 1) A switch to incentive pay increases the loan approval ...
[96]
[PDF] Fiscal Foresight and Perverse Distortions to Firm Behavior
This paper studies the conditions under which fiscal foresight – forward-looking agents anticipating future policy changes – results in perverse economic ...
[97]
'War on Poverty' contributed to breakdown of American family
Jun 23, 2024 · 'Great Society' welfare programs aimed at curing poverty created perverse financial incentives to avoid marriage.
[98]
The Effect of Welfare on Child Outcomes - NCBI - NIH
Some underlying problem, such as maternal depression, might cause both welfare dependence and negative child outcomes. ... Thus, it creates fewer perverse ...
[99]
Can Government Save the Family? - Hoover Institution
The most important role for government is to remove the perverse incentives of the welfare state. Current policy encourages parents to abdicate financial ...
[100]
'Publish or perish' culture blamed for reproducibility crisis - Nature
Jan 20, 2025 · Nearly three-quarters of biomedical researchers think there is a reproducibility crisis in science, according to a survey published in November.
[101]
Research Misconduct: The Peril of Publish or Perish - PMC
One of the most pressing problems for academic researchers is the career pressure to publish or perish. It is becoming increasingly common, despite alternative ...
[102]
The 'publish or perish' mentality is fuelling research paper retractions
Oct 3, 2024 · Published research papers can be retracted if there is an issue with their accuracy or integrity. And in recent years, the number of retractions has been ...
[103]
Making People Pay – and Pay, and Pay - Criminal Law - Jotwell
Aug 12, 2015 · Logan and Wright begin by tracing the long pedigree of perverse incentives for mercenary justice. ... harms were more serious. (P. 1182 ...
[104]
Multitask Principal–Agent Analyses: Incentive Contracts, Asset ...
Multitask principal–agent analyses: incentive contracts, asset ownership, and job design. Bengt Holmstrom, Bengt Holmstrom Yale University.
[105]
[PDF] Pay For Performance and Beyond | MIT Economics
In Holmström and Milgrom (1994) we illustrate both points by applying our multitask model to the choice between employment and contracting. We want to explain ...
[106]
First Principles of Executive Pay Setting Effective Performance Goals
The goal is to create incentives that drive the creation of value for shareholders and then align the pay for the executives with their performance against ...
[107]
The powerful role financial incentives can play in a transformation
Jan 19, 2022 · Our research explores the impact of financial incentives in transformations and offers seven principles to help maximize their benefit for an organization.
[108]
Individual Transferable Quotas for Cod Fisheries, Iceland (on-going)
Oct 21, 2020 · The successful economics of the Icelandic fisheries are such that the industry is self-financing with no government subsidy required.
[109]
Individual transferable quotas in achieving multiple objectives of ...
ITQs have been credited with a number of potential benefits, particularly in relation to fisher incentives and allowing the fishery to adjust in response to ...
[110]
Acid Rain Program | US EPA
Mar 21, 2025 · The ARP was the first national cap and trade program in the country and it introduced a system of allowance trading that uses market-based ...
[111]
The US sulphur dioxide cap and trade programme and lessons for ...
Aug 12, 2012 · The US sulphur dioxide cap-and-trade programme, aimed at the acid rain problem, has been hailed as a great success in almost all areas.
[112]
The US Environmental Protection Agency's Acid Rain Program
Nov 28, 2012 · The ARP is largely considered a successful cap-and-trade system. By 2007, the program had achieved its 2010 reduction goal at an estimated cost ...<|separator|>
[113]
Did welfare reform work? - Politico
Aug 22, 2016 · It was to make people more reliant on work, on marriage, on private safety nets rather than on a public system that had all these perverse ...
[114]
[PDF] Was Welfare Reform Successful? - Brookings Institution
In general, most research suggests that there do not appear to be large positive or negative effects on children as a result of welfare reform. Income increases ...Missing: perverse | Show results with:perverse
[115]
The Unanticipated Consequences of Purposive Social Action - jstor
Unanticipated consequences may, of course, follow both types of action, though the second type would seem to afford a better opportunity for sociological ...
[116]
[PDF] Imps of the Perverse - Philosophy - Northwestern
Not everyone has been as confident as Kant that we are incapable of such perverse or anti-rational behavior. In his Confessions, Augustine recounts an episode ...<|separator|>
[117]
Goodhart's Law in Software Engineering - Buttondown
Sep 17, 2024 · The weak version of this is that people have perverse incentives to game the metrics. If your metric is "number of bugs in the bug tracker ...
[118]
Can better incentives improve government efficiency? - VoxDev
Sep 7, 2023 · Important sources of controversy surrounded issues of multi-tasking, perverse incentives and high transaction costs due to the increased ...Missing: modern critiques debates
[119]
[PDF] Behavioral Economics and Perverse Effects of the Welfare State
A recurring criticism of the welfare state is that it perversely harms the very people it is intended to help1. Giving money to the poor reduces their incentive.
[120]
'Perverse incentive' in current health care system, says expert - CNN
Feb 10, 2010 · Most in U.S. health system paid for each service, regardless of the results of service · Creates "perverse incentive" for more medical services ...
[121]
Incentivizing performance in health care: a rapid review, typology ...
May 23, 2022 · We present a comprehensive typology of 48 negative and positive unintended consequences of PM in healthcare, including five novel unintended consequences.Missing: debates welfare
[122]
Perverse incentives in the underfunded NHS - The BMJ
Oct 30, 2023 · Please ask those who work directly with patients what is happening and watch out for the perverse incentives of well intended actions in an ...
[123]
Perverse Incentives in Modern Science due to Competition for ...
May 6, 2025 · Perverse Incentives in Modern Science due to Competition for Scientific Capital. 26 Pages Posted: 6 May 2025. See all articles by Samuel ...
[124]
Public funding, perverse incentives, and counterproductive outcomes
The term perverse incentives refers to agency problems so severe that they yield outcomes in the opposite direction of the intention – that is, more negative ...