Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Pet

A pet is a domesticated animal kept primarily for human companionship, pleasure, or emotional support, rather than for utility such as labor, food production, or scientific experimentation.^[1]^[2] Common examples include dogs, cats, fish, birds, and small mammals like rabbits or rodents, with dogs and cats comprising the vast majority of owned pets in households worldwide.^[3] In the United States, approximately 45.5% of households own at least one dog and 32.1% own cats, reflecting their prevalence as primary companion animals.^[3] Pet-keeping traces its origins to the domestication of dogs and cats over 12,000 years ago, initially intertwined with practical roles like hunting and pest control, but evolving into widespread non-utilitarian companionship from the 18th century onward, with notable early examples in various societies including Europe.^[4]^[5] Empirical studies indicate benefits such as reduced cardiovascular mortality and improved mental health outcomes associated with pet ownership, including lower blood pressure and enhanced emotional well-being, though these are correlational and influenced by factors like increased physical activity in owners.^[6]^[7] Controversies arise from risks including zoonotic disease transmission, allergic reactions, animal bites, and welfare concerns in cases of neglect or exotic pet trade, underscoring the responsibilities of ownership.^[6]

Types of Pets

Domesticated Species

Domesticated pets consist of animal species that have undergone selective breeding over multiple generations, resulting in genetic and behavioral adaptations that facilitate coexistence with humans, such as reduced aggression, enhanced sociability, and dependence on human-provided resources for survival.^[8] The earliest examples include dogs (Canis familiaris), derived from gray wolves (Canis lupus) through a process beginning approximately 15,000 to 40,000 years ago, which selected for traits like loyalty, pack-oriented social bonding, and utility in herding or guarding.^[9] Domestic cats (Felis catus), originating from the Near Eastern wildcat (Felis silvestris lybica), were domesticated around 10,000 years ago in the Fertile Crescent, primarily for their independent hunting prowess against rodents attracted to early agricultural stores, with minimal alteration to their solitary nature compared to dogs.^[10] In the United States as of 2024, dogs remain the most prevalent domesticated pet, owned by 59.8 million households—equating to about 45.6% of all U.S. households—with selective breeding yielding over 300 recognized breeds exhibiting specialized traits such as retrieving instincts in Labrador Retrievers or herding behavior in Border Collies.^[3] Cats follow closely, present in 42.2 million households or roughly 32.2%, valued for low-maintenance companionship and retained predatory skills that originally aided pest control in human settlements.^[3] Worldwide, dogs and cats dominate pet ownership, comprising the majority of companion animals due to their adaptability to domestic environments and long history of co-evolution with humans.^[11] Other common domesticated species include birds, such as parrots and finches, bred for vocal mimicry and colorful plumage that enhance interactive companionship, with about 6 million U.S. households owning birds as of recent surveys.^[12] Freshwater and saltwater fish, maintained in aquariums, represent another major category, with roughly 11.5 million U.S. households keeping them for their ornamental appeal and minimal space requirements, though they exhibit less behavioral adaptation for direct human interaction compared to mammals.^[13] Small mammals like hamsters, guinea pigs, and rabbits—selectively bred for docility and compact size—appeal for ease of care in confined spaces, numbering around 5.7 million individual small animals across U.S. households, though precise household ownership data varies.^[13] These species collectively underscore the emphasis on traits promoting manageability and aesthetic or affectionate bonds in pet-keeping.^[14]

Non-Traditional and Wild Animals

Non-traditional pets encompass reptiles, amphibians, exotic birds, small mammals like hedgehogs, and invertebrates such as tarantulas, which lack the full domestication of dogs or cats and often require specialized husbandry to approximate wild conditions. Wild animals, including primates, big cats, and venomous spiders, are kept by a small minority under strict permits or illegally, posing amplified risks due to their unadapted behaviors and needs. In the United States, reptile ownership reached approximately 6 million households by 2023, representing about 4.6% of total households, with trends showing a 27% increase in Gen Z ownership from 2023 to 2025 driven by interest in low-maintenance companions.^[15]^[16] However, true exotics and wild species constitute less than 2% of pet-owning households, reflecting barriers like high costs and expertise demands.^[3] Legal frameworks impose significant hurdles, varying by jurisdiction; in the US, states like California ban primates and big cats as pets without permits, while federal laws under the Lacey Act prohibit interstate transport of certain wild species without documentation. In Europe, national rules differ widely—e.g., the UK requires licenses for dangerous wild animals under the 1976 Act, and the EU lacks uniform exotic pet regulations but enforces CITES for trade in endangered species, leading to bans in countries like Austria on keeping venomous reptiles without authorization. Practical challenges include sourcing appropriate enclosures and diets; for instance, ball pythons demand precise humidity and temperature gradients, and failures result in respiratory infections or refusal to eat. Keeping wild animals often involves illegal trade, with nearly one-third of imported exotics dying en route due to stress from capture and transport.^[17]^[18] Captivity induces species-specific chronic stress in non-domesticated animals, manifesting as stereotypies like pacing in big cats or reduced activity in reptiles, which correlate with suppressed immune function and premature mortality. Studies indicate captive wild mammals experience physiological changes akin to trauma, including elevated cortisol and learned helplessness, shortening lifespans compared to wild counterparts—e.g., pet cheetahs rarely exceed 10 years versus 12 in the wild due to enclosure-induced pathologies. Exotic birds like parrots suffer feather-plucking from boredom, while amphibians face skin issues from improper UVB exposure. Zoonotic transmission heightens dangers; reptiles and amphibians harbor Salmonella in up to 90% of cases asymptomatically, causing over 80,000 annual US infections, primarily in children under 5, with outbreaks linked to pet turtles. Exotic birds transmit Chlamydia psittaci (psittacosis), and primates carry herpes B virus, fatal in humans without prompt treatment. These risks, absent or minimal in domesticated pets, underscore causal mismatches between wild physiologies and domestic settings.^[19]^[20]^[21]

Historical Development

Prehistoric Origins

The domestication of dogs from wolves represents the earliest documented human-animal bond with potential pet-like elements, emerging during the Upper Paleolithic period in Eurasia. Genetic studies of ancient canid remains indicate that dogs diverged from wolf ancestors between 18,800 and 32,100 years ago, likely in Europe, based on DNA extracted from fossils showing distinct ancestry separate from modern wolves with minimal later gene flow.^[22]^[23] Archaeological evidence includes morphological changes in proposed Paleolithic dog remains, such as reduced tooth size and altered cranial features, suggesting early selective pressures toward domestication traits as far back as 30,000 years ago, though many pre-16,000 BP claims remain contested due to overlap with wild wolf variation.^[24]^[25] Burials provide the strongest indications of companionship beyond mere utility, with one of the earliest examples from the Erralla cave in Spain, dated to approximately 17,000 years ago during the Magdalenian period, where a canid specimen exhibits domesticated traits and was associated with human activity sites.^[26] Similarly, the Bonn-Oberkassel burial in Germany, around 14,700 years old, interred a puppy with two humans, implying ritual significance and emotional or symbolic attachment rather than solely economic value.^[27] These findings predate widespread agriculture and suggest that selective tolerance of less aggressive wolves near human camps fostered proto-domestic bonds. This relationship likely arose from mutualistic survival advantages, where wolves scavenged human food waste and provided early warning against predators or intruders via barking and group vigilance, while humans offered reliable scraps in exchange, reducing competition for resources.^[28] Over time, wolves with traits like enhanced scent detection and endurance aided human hunting efficiency, enabling pursuit of larger or faster prey that solitary humans or wolves could not reliably secure, as evidenced by coevolutionary models linking canid cooperation to human expansion during the Pleistocene.^[29]^[30] Such pragmatic reciprocity, devoid of modern anthropomorphic sentiment, laid the causal foundation for affinity, transitioning utility into enduring tolerance without evidence of other species achieving comparable prehistoric integration.^[31]

Ancient Civilizations

In ancient Egypt, cats were domesticated primarily for controlling rodents and other pests in agricultural settings, with archaeological evidence indicating their widespread presence by the New Kingdom (c. 1550–1070 BCE).^[32] They held religious significance as manifestations of the goddess Bastet, leading to the mummification of millions of cats as votive offerings, particularly from the Late Period (c. 664–332 BCE), where temple complexes at sites like Bubastis yielded cat mummies in such quantities that breeding and culling of kittens for ritual purposes became common practices.^[33] ^[34] This reverence coexisted with utilitarian roles, but little archaeological or textual evidence suggests broad concern for individual animal welfare beyond elite or sacred contexts; excess animals were often sacrificed to meet demand for mummification.^[35] Dogs in ancient Greece and Rome served functional roles in hunting, herding, and guarding rather than companionship, as evidenced by artistic depictions, burial remains, and texts like those describing Molossian mastiffs from Epirus used for flock protection and warfare support by the 5th century BCE.^[36] ^[37] Roman mosaics and Pompeii casts from 79 CE show chained guard dogs, underscoring their status as property for elite estates, with selective breeding for size and strength prioritizing utility over affection.^[38] Such animals symbolized wealth and security for landowners, but culling of underperforming or surplus dogs was routine, reflecting pragmatic rather than sentimental ownership.^[39] In Mesopotamia, records from Sumerian texts around 2000 BCE mention dogs domesticated for hunting and property guarding, with limited evidence of birds or fish kept ornamentally beyond ritual or dietary uses.^[40] Similarly, in ancient China, early fish pond cultivation of carp appears in Shang dynasty (c. 1600–1046 BCE) oracle bones, serving food production rather than decoration, while birds featured in omens but not as verified pets for the elite until later periods.^[41] Across these civilizations, pet-like keeping was largely confined to elites as status markers—exotic or trained animals signaling affluence—without widespread institutional focus on welfare, as surplus culling for rituals or utility prevailed.^[42]^[43]

Modern Emergence and Expansion

The institutionalization of pet keeping accelerated during the Victorian era in Britain, marked by the establishment of formal breeding organizations and exhibitions that prioritized aesthetic conformation over practical utility. The Kennel Club, founded on April 4, 1873, by Sewallis Evelyn Shirley and associates, introduced standardized rules for dog breeding, registration, and shows to promote purebred varieties amid rising middle-class interest in companion animals.^[44] The first organized dog shows emerged earlier, with the inaugural event in Newcastle in 1859 featuring setters and pointers, followed by the National Dog Show at Crystal Palace in 1870, which evolved into platforms for judging appearance and pedigree rather than working ability.^[45] This shift reflected broader social changes, including urbanization and sentimental views of animals as family members, fostering selective breeding that fixed modern dog breeds.^[46] Post-World War II economic expansion and demographic shifts in Western nations propelled mass pet adoption, particularly through suburbanization and increased disposable incomes that enabled dedicated pet care. In the United States, the suburban boom of the 1950s integrated pets into the nuclear family ideal, with larger homes accommodating animals previously restricted to urban apartments or farms, while veterinary advancements and commercial products further encouraged ownership.^[47] This era saw pets transition from utilitarian roles to companions, supported by marketing that portrayed them as emotional substitutes amid rising individualism. By the late 20th century, these trends had scaled into a major industry, with U.S. pet expenditures projected to reach $157 billion in 2025, encompassing food, supplies, and services driven by sustained consumer demand.^[12] Globally, pet keeping expanded unevenly into the 21st century, with Asia experiencing a pronounced boom linked to rapid urbanization that diminished traditional livestock integration in households. In China, urban pet ownership surged as young professionals in densely populated cities favored compact companions over children or rural animals, with the market valued at approximately 300 billion RMB (about $42 billion) by 2024 and annual spending exceeding 300 billion yuan on cats and dogs alone.^[48] This growth, projected to continue at rates like 7.5% annually, contrasted with Europe's more stable patterns, where cat populations held steady at 74.4 million in the EU amid mature markets and slower demographic shifts.^[49] ^[50] In both regions, economic drivers intertwined with cultural adaptations, though Asia's trajectory highlighted how reduced space for working animals accelerated the companion pet paradigm.^[51]

Ownership Trends and Economics

Prevalence and Demographics

In the United States, 66% of households owned at least one pet as of 2024, equating to approximately 86.9 million homes according to surveys reported in early 2025.^[52] Dog-owning households numbered 59.8 million, while cat-owning households reached 42.2 million, with many households maintaining multiple pets across species.^[3] Globally, companion animals total around 1 billion, including roughly 470 million pet dogs and 370 million pet cats, though estimates vary due to inclusion of semi-feral populations in some regions.^[53] Ownership demographics skew toward younger adults and specific living arrangements. Millennials represent 31% of U.S. pet owners, with 76% of this group owning pets, while Gen Z pet ownership climbed to 20% of households by 2024, with this cohort most likely to have multi-pet homes.^[54]^[55] Families with children and rural residents show elevated rates, as 71% of rural adults own pets—higher than suburban (65%) or urban (55%) counterparts—often citing space and lifestyle compatibility.^[56] Active households and homeowners prefer dogs (58% ownership rate among owners versus 39% for renters), whereas apartment dwellers favor cats for lower space needs (36% homeowner cat ownership versus 29% renters).^[52] Post-pandemic trends indicate stabilization after a 2020-2022 adoption surge, with U.S. pet owners now 40% less likely to acquire new animals compared to 2023 peaks, reflecting adjusted expectations around remote work declines and housing constraints.^[57] Shelter adoptions totaled 1.9 million animals in the first half of 2025, down 1% from 2024, signaling reduced intake and persistent caution in expansions.^[58]

Industry Scale and Market Dynamics

The U.S. pet industry is projected to generate $157 billion in expenditures in 2025, reflecting a 3.3% increase from $151.9 billion in 2024 and continuing a pattern of steady expansion driven by consumer demand for premium products and services.^[12] This growth is segmented primarily into pet food and supplies, which comprise the largest share at approximately 59% of total spending, followed by veterinary care (around 25%), and ancillary services such as grooming, boarding, and live animal purchases.^[12] Pet food alone accounted for $51.7 billion in sales in 2024, underscoring its dominance within the supplies category amid rising costs for raw materials and formulation innovations.^[59] Market dynamics are propelled by the "humanization" of pets, where owners treat animals as family members, fueling demand for high-end offerings like dietary supplements, specialized nutrition, and lifestyle accessories.^[60] The pet supplements sector, targeting issues such as joint health, allergies, and anxiety, is expected to expand at a 10% annual rate, with North American demand amplified by this anthropomorphic trend.^[60] Similarly, vegan and plant-based pet foods have gained traction, incorporating nutrient-rich alternatives like synthetic proteins to align with owner preferences for ethical and health-focused diets, though their market penetration remains niche due to nutritional efficacy debates.^[61] Pet fashion and grooming services further exemplify this shift, with profit incentives encouraging brands to differentiate through customization and premium pricing. Supply chain realities reveal a competitive landscape where profit motives intensify breeding and production scales, yet foster innovations in sourcing and efficiency.^[62] For instance, 44% of pet food ingredients in 2024 consisted of upcycled byproducts from other industries, reducing waste while maintaining cost competitiveness and supporting sustainability claims that appeal to eco-conscious consumers.^[63] These adaptations, including tech-enabled monitoring devices and traceable supply networks, mitigate disruptions like raw material shortages, enabling projected compound annual growth rates of up to 9.8% through 2030.^[64] However, inflationary pressures on ingredients and veterinary inputs have tempered volume growth, shifting emphasis toward value-added, functional products over basic commodities.^[62]

Health Effects

Impacts on Animal Welfare

Selective breeding for desirable traits in pets has introduced genetic predispositions to certain health disorders, distinct from baseline lifespans in ancestral wild populations. In brachycephalic dog breeds, such as bulldogs and pugs, shortened muzzles result in higher incidences of upper respiratory tract disorders, affecting 22% of extreme brachycephalic dogs compared to 15.8% in the general dog population.^[65] These issues manifest as obstructed airways, increased respiratory effort, and elevated mortality risks, with upper respiratory disorders contributing to 17% of deaths in extreme brachycephalic breeds versus 0% in non-brachycephalic ones.^[66] While average pet dog lifespans range from 10 to 13 years—exceeding the 6 to 8 years typical for wild wolves due to protection from predation and environmental hazards—large breed dogs often experience reduced longevity from such breeding artifacts, averaging 10-12 years against longer wild canid benchmarks in controlled comparisons.^[67]^[68] Overfeeding and sedentary lifestyles contribute to widespread obesity, impacting approximately 59% of U.S. dogs and 61% of cats as overweight or obese based on 2022 veterinary assessments, with rates persisting into 2024 surveys showing 33% of cats and 22% of dogs classified as obese.^[69]^[70] This condition correlates causally with reduced mobility, joint strain, and comorbidities like diabetes, independent of natural metabolic variations. Abandonment exacerbates welfare risks, with U.S. shelters recording community intakes for dogs and cats totaling around 6 million annually in recent years, down 1.4% from 2023 to 2024, yet resulting in approximately 690,000 euthanasias in 2023 due to overcrowding and unadoptable status.^[71]^[72] Veterinary interventions, including routine checkups and vaccinations, have empirically extended pet lifespans by mitigating chronic diseases; dogs receiving regular evaluations show a 30% lower incidence of such conditions.^[73] However, prolonged confinement in domestic settings links to behavioral pathologies, particularly separation-related behaviors like vocalization, destruction, and elimination issues, observed in studies of dogs isolated for typical owner absences, with frustration-prone individuals exhibiting heightened responses.^[74] These patterns, akin to stress-induced adaptations rather than inherent wild traits, underscore causal ties between restricted movement and anxiety manifestations, though mitigated by enrichment.^[75]

Human Health Outcomes

Pet ownership has been associated with various human health outcomes, though most evidence derives from observational studies prone to confounding factors such as selection bias, where healthier individuals are more likely to acquire and maintain pets.^[76]^[77] Systematic reviews indicate correlations between pet ownership and improved mental health metrics, particularly among the elderly, including reduced depression and loneliness, but these findings often fail to establish causality due to unadjusted variables like pre-existing social support or physical capability.^[78]^[79] For physical health, dog owners tend to engage in more walking, with meta-analyses reporting small to moderate effect sizes (Cohen's d ≈ 0.26 for walking), yet this increment—often around 13-20 minutes of moderate activity daily—does not consistently translate to meeting broader fitness guidelines or preventing obesity.^[80]^[81] Claims of pet ownership extending human longevity, such as a 24% reduced all-cause mortality risk in some cohorts, remain unsubstantiated by causal evidence, as longitudinal data cannot rule out reverse causation or survivor bias.^[82] Conversely, pets pose documented health risks through zoonotic transmission and direct injury. In the United States, approximately 4.5 million dog bites occur annually, with nearly 20% resulting in infection and an average of 43 fatalities yearly from 2011-2021.^[83]^[84] Allergies to pets affect 10-20% of the global population, leading 5-15% of sensitized owners to relinquish animals, while urban environments may exacerbate symptoms in both owners and pets.^[85]^[86] Parasites and bacteria, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), demonstrate bidirectional transmission between pets and humans, with identical strains isolated in households indicating shared reservoirs rather than unidirectional spillover.^[87]^[88] Comprehensive reviews of zoonoses highlight pets as vectors for pathogens like Toxoplasma gondii and Salmonella, particularly in immunocompromised individuals, underscoring the need for hygiene practices to mitigate empirical risks despite overall low incidence in healthy populations.^[87]^[89]

Positive Associations

Observational studies have identified correlations between pet ownership and improved human health outcomes, particularly in cardiovascular metrics and stress modulation, though these associations do not establish causation and may reflect confounding factors such as lifestyle differences among owners.^[7] Dog ownership has been linked to reduced cardiovascular risks in large cohort analyses. A Swedish registry-based study of over 3.4 million adults found that dog owners exhibited lower rates of cardiovascular disease and mortality, with the protective effect most pronounced in single-person households.^[90] A systematic review and meta-analysis of multiple studies reported a 24% reduction in all-cause mortality risk among dog owners compared to non-owners (relative risk 0.76, 95% CI 0.67-0.87), alongside a 31% lower risk of cardiovascular death (relative risk 0.69, 95% CI 0.50-0.94).^[91] These findings align with mechanisms involving increased physical activity from dog walking and enhanced social interactions.^[7] Interactions with pets trigger physiological responses that correlate with stress reduction. Human-animal contact elevates oxytocin levels while decreasing cortisol, promoting parasympathetic activation and bonding.^[92] In experimental settings, dog-owner interactions have demonstrated concurrent rises in oxytocin for both parties and cortisol reductions in owners, suggesting a bidirectional stress-relieving effect.^[93] Such hormonal shifts may contribute to broader mental health benefits observed in pet owners.^[92] Service animals provide targeted therapeutic support for specific conditions. For individuals with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), service dogs have been associated with improved psychosocial functioning, including higher social and emotional outcomes, in comparative studies of veterans.^[94] Similarly, seizure response dogs for epilepsy patients show efficacy in reducing seizure frequency by up to 31% in treatment-resistant cases, alongside quality-of-life improvements.^[95] Among elderly populations, pet ownership correlates with lower loneliness prevalence. Older adults owning pets are 36% less likely to report loneliness than non-owners, with the strongest inverse association in those living alone.^[96] Animal-assisted interventions in long-term care facilities have reduced loneliness scores, independent of whether live or robotic animals were used, indicating companionship as a key factor.^[97] Recent surveys highlight pet ownership's role in addressing isolation among younger demographics post-COVID-19. Generation Z pet owners frequently report pets as aids for mental well-being, with high adoption of calming products reflecting awareness of anxiety mitigation, amid broader trends of prioritizing pet companionship for emotional support.^[98] In 2025 polling, a significant portion of young pet owners equate pets to family members, correlating with perceived reductions in social isolation.^[99]

Potential Hazards

In the United States, approximately 885,000 dog bite victims seek medical care annually, with children under 17 accounting for a disproportionate share of severe injuries due to their smaller size and lower ability to defend themselves.^[83] These incidents often result in infections, with nearly one in five bites becoming infected, and while fatal attacks remain rare at an average of 16 per year, they predominantly involve children and can cause life-altering trauma such as disfigurement or long-term disability.^[83] ^[100] Other pets, including cats and exotic species like reptiles, contribute to lesser but notable injury risks through scratches, falls, or allergic reactions exacerbating wounds. Pet allergens pose a widespread hazard, affecting 10-20% of the global population and up to 30% in the U.S., with cat dander (primarily Fel d 1 protein) triggering asthma exacerbations, rhinitis, and anaphylaxis in sensitized individuals.^[101] ^[102] Dog allergens similarly impact 10-15% of allergy sufferers, persisting in environments long after pet removal and complicating management for vulnerable groups like asthmatics or immunocompromised persons.^[101] Infectious diseases transmitted via pets represent another empirically documented risk, notably toxoplasmosis from cats, where oocysts shed in feces infect humans through contaminated soil, water, or undercooked meat, with meta-analyses linking chronic Toxoplasma gondii infection to elevated schizophrenia odds ratios of 2.7 independent of genetic factors.^[103] Childhood cat exposure correlates with later psychotic experiences in some cohorts, though causation remains debated due to confounders like urban living; pregnant women face heightened fetal transmission risks leading to congenital defects.^[104] ^[105] Many purported health benefits of pet ownership, such as reduced cardiovascular risk or improved mental health, diminish or vanish upon replication with controls for socioeconomic status, personality traits, and selection bias toward healthier owners, potentially masking net hazard exposure by encouraging adoption without full risk disclosure.^[106] ^[107] This methodological shortfall underscores the need for causal evidence prioritizing empirical harms over correlative gains.

Legal Frameworks

International Agreements

The Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), adopted on March 3, 1973, and entering into force on July 1, 1975, establishes a framework to regulate international trade in over 38,000 species of animals and plants, including many sought as exotic pets such as parrots, turtles, and reptiles, to ensure that trade does not threaten species survival.^[108] Appendix I species, like the African grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus), face the strictest controls prohibiting commercial trade, while Appendices II and III allow regulated exports with permits.^[109] As of 2024, 184 parties participate, facilitating seizures of trafficked specimens; for instance, in 2022, European Union member states reported 1,886 seizures of live animals presumed destined for the pet trade, predominantly parrots, birds of prey, and turtles.^[110] Enforcement realities demonstrate CITES's partial success in curbing illegal international pet trafficking, with annual global seizures of thousands of birds alone—such as over 1,000 parrots reported in India and more than 1,600 exotic birds (including protected parakeets and canaries) intercepted in Nigeria in July 2025—but persistent smuggling routes and demand sustain the trade.^[111]^[112] Empirical analyses indicate that CITES listings have reduced export volumes for regulated parrot species by limiting legal quotas and increasing detection risks, yet they fail to address unregulated domestic breeding or captive propagation, which supplies much of the pet market without international oversight.^[113] The World Health Organization (WHO) issues non-binding guidelines on zoonotic diseases transmissible from pets, such as rabies from dogs or salmonellosis from reptiles, emphasizing surveillance, vaccination, and hygiene to mitigate risks, but these lack enforcement mechanisms and reveal compliance gaps, particularly in developing nations where resource constraints hinder implementation.^[114] For example, WHO's One Health approach promotes integrated animal-human disease monitoring, yet reports highlight ongoing pet-related outbreaks in regions with weak veterinary infrastructure, underscoring the guidelines' aspirational rather than coercive nature.^[87] No comprehensive global treaty enforces pet welfare standards beyond trade controls, leaving domestic excesses unaddressed by international law.

Domestic Regulations

Domestic regulations on pet ownership vary significantly across countries, reflecting differences in public safety concerns, animal control practices, and administrative capacities rather than uniform standards. In the United States, dog licensing is typically mandated at the municipal or county level, requiring owners of dogs aged four months or older to register annually with local authorities, often alongside proof of rabies vaccination; for instance, New York State law enforces this for all such dogs, with fees varying by spay/neuter status and typically ranging from $10 to $20.^[115]^[116] Similarly, in New York City, all dogs must be licensed and wear the tag in public, with fines for non-compliance aimed at ensuring traceability and vaccination compliance.^[117] In the United Kingdom, mandatory microchipping for dogs was introduced on April 6, 2016, requiring implantation of an identification chip by eight weeks of age to facilitate reuniting lost pets with owners and reduce strays; failure to comply can result in fines up to £500 or seizure of the animal.^[118]^[119] Within the European Union, while no overarching mandatory registration exists as of 2025, 24 member states require dog microchipping, with seven extending it to cats, often tied to travel or breeding rules under the EU Pet Travel Regulation; recent parliamentary proposals in June 2025 advocate for EU-wide mandates to curb illegal trade, but implementation remains national.^[120]^[121]

Guardianship and Liability

Guardianship requirements emphasize owner accountability for pet care and identification, with liability often imposed strictly to address real-world risks of injury or property damage. In Germany, under § 833 of the Civil Code, animal owners bear strict liability for any damages caused by their pets, irrespective of negligence, covering injuries or property harm; dog liability insurance (Hundehaftpflicht) is mandatory in six federal states, including Berlin and Hamburg, with unlimited coverage recommended due to potential high claims.^[122]^[123] Japan similarly enforces strict liability for animal-inflicted damages under civil principles, holding owners or keepers responsible for preventable harms without requiring proof of fault, though enforcement focuses on supervision duties to prevent bites or escapes.^[124]^[125] These frameworks prioritize causal accountability over emotional attachments, contrasting with more lenient systems elsewhere.

Prohibitions and Cultural Exceptions

Prohibitions target high-risk species or breeds to mitigate public hazards, with exceptions often accommodating local traditions or phased implementations. In the United States, 21 states outright ban private ownership of primates as pets, citing dangers like disease transmission and aggression; California enforces a total prohibition, while others permit limited species under permits, reflecting state-level assessments of welfare and safety risks over uniform federal rules.^[126]^[127] China's regulations are decentralized, with cities like Beijing prohibiting "ferocious" breeds such as Rottweilers, Mastiffs, and any adult dogs exceeding 35 cm in height in key zones since local ordinances predating 2020, intensified by post-pandemic enforcement to control strays and attacks, though no national breed list exists.^[128]^[129] Exceptions in some jurisdictions allow cultural or working roles for restricted animals, such as herding dogs in rural areas, balancing practical utility against urban risks.^[130]

Guardianship and Liability

In the United States, pet guardianship entails specific legal duties, including mandatory rabies vaccination for dogs and cats typically required by age four months, with proof of vaccination prerequisite for obtaining local licenses in most jurisdictions. Licensing must generally occur within 30 days of acquiring a pet, renewable annually or triennially based on vaccine duration, to ensure traceability and public health safeguards. ^[131] ^[132] Many municipalities incentivize neutering through reduced licensing fees—often 50% lower for sterilized animals—to curb overpopulation, though enforcement varies by locality and lacks uniform national mandates. ^[132] Non-compliance with these requirements remains notable; while core rabies vaccination rates exceed 90% in vaccinated populations per veterinary clinic data, follow-up booster adherence drops, with national medians for related protocols like leptospirosis at 63-70% among compliant dogs, indicating gaps in sustained guardianship. Failure to meet these duties can result in fines up to $1,000 per violation in some areas, alongside impoundment risks. ^[133] Liability for pet owners arises primarily from negligence or strict liability statutes, holding guardians accountable for injuries inflicted by their animals, such as dog bites, which trigger civil claims regardless of prior incidents in 30 states. U.S. insurers disbursed $1.57 billion in dog-related injury payouts in 2024, reflecting 22,658 claims—a 19% rise from 2023—with average settlements reaching $69,272 amid escalating medical and legal costs. For strays stemming from owner negligence, such as inadequate containment, prior owners remain liable if traceability is established, though unowned ferals complicate recovery, underscoring enforcement challenges. ^[134] ^[135] Rising liability trends have spurred pet-specific insurance uptake, yet many standard homeowners policies exclude high-risk breeds, prompting premiums to climb 7-18% annually in bite-prone regions; lax local enforcement of licensing and containment correlates empirically with elevated abandonment, as evidenced by shelter intakes surging in under-regulated areas due to unchecked breeding and relinquishment tied to unaddressed non-compliance. ^[136] ^[137]

Prohibitions and Cultural Exceptions

In the United States, the Big Cat Public Safety Act, enacted on December 20, 2022, prohibits private individuals from possessing, breeding, or engaging in direct contact with big cats such as lions, tigers, leopards, and jaguars, with exemptions limited to accredited zoos and wildlife sanctuaries to mitigate risks of attacks and escapes.^[138]^[139] This federal measure addresses prior state-level variations, where only six states previously lacked restrictions, aiming to reduce incidents like the over 300 big cat attacks recorded in the U.S. since 1990.^[140] European Union regulations on big cats as private pets vary by member state, lacking a uniform ban but imposing national prohibitions or permit requirements in most countries due to safety and welfare concerns; for instance, private ownership is restricted or illegal without specialized facilities in nations like France and the Netherlands, while Germany permits it under stringent conditions that still result in welfare issues.^[141] Switzerland enforces unique welfare-based prohibitions, including a ban since 2008 on keeping solitary goldfish, as they require social companionship, and restrictions on small round bowls that fail to provide adequate oxygen and space, leading to stunted growth and high mortality rates.^[142]^[143] Cultural exceptions persist in regions where animals classified as pets elsewhere serve alternative roles, such as dog meat consumption in parts of China and South Korea, where historical estimates indicated around 10 million dogs consumed annually across Asia before declines, providing a protein source amid food scarcity in earlier eras.^[144] In South Korea, consumption has dropped sharply, with only 8% of respondents reporting intake in the past year as of 2022 (down from 27% in 2015), culminating in a 2024 ban effective 2027 amid farm closures, yet traditional practices highlight contrasts with Western norms viewing dogs solely as companions.^[145]^[146] These prohibitions correlate with fewer human-animal conflict incidents, while cultural persistence underscores contextual utility in resource-limited settings without implying endorsement.^[140]

Ecological Footprint

Carbon and Resource Demands

The production of pet food, particularly for dogs and cats, contributes significantly to global greenhouse gas emissions through livestock sourcing and processing. Annual global dry pet food production is associated with 56–151 million metric tons of CO₂ equivalent emissions, equivalent to 1.1–2.9% of total global agricultural emissions.^[147] These figures stem from lifecycle analyses accounting for feed crop cultivation, animal rearing, and manufacturing, with meat-based diets as the primary driver due to methane from enteric fermentation and manure management in livestock.^[148] Wet pet food exacerbates this, with emissions per 1,000 kcal reaching up to 33.56 kg CO₂eq compared to 4.25 kg for dry formulations.^[148] In the United States, where pet ownership is high, dogs and cats alone generate approximately 64 million metric tons of CO₂ equivalent annually from food consumption, comparable to the emissions of a mid-sized country like Greece. This includes embedded emissions from meat production, which dominates pet diets despite alternatives like plant-based or insect-derived feeds showing lower footprints in controlled studies.^[148] Resource demands extend to water and materials. U.S. pet food production requires about 5.1 trillion gallons of water yearly, encompassing irrigation for feed grains and processing for meat ingredients.^[149] Additionally, the U.S. pet industry generates over 300 million pounds of plastic waste annually from packaging for food, treats, and supplies, much of which enters landfills due to limited recycling infrastructure.^[150] However, pet food utilization of livestock byproducts—inedible for humans, comprising roughly 44% of cattle and 30% of hog liveweight—offsets some inefficiency critiques by diverting material from waste streams rather than requiring dedicated animal slaughter.^[151] U.S. pet food manufacturers incorporate about 8.65 million tons of such byproducts yearly, enhancing overall agricultural resource efficiency.^[152] Lifecycle assessments indicate that while emissions remain substantial, these practices reduce net environmental burdens compared to total discard of byproducts.^[153]

Biodiversity Interactions

Domestic cats exert significant predatory pressure on wildlife, with free-ranging cats—including owned pets and unowned populations—estimated to kill between 1.3 and 4.0 billion birds and 6.3 to 22.3 billion mammals annually in the United States, based on a synthesis of field studies, owner surveys, and depredation analyses.^[154] The median estimates from this analysis indicate approximately 2.4 billion bird deaths and 12.3 billion mammal deaths per year, underscoring cats as a leading anthropogenic cause of avian and small mammal mortality, surpassing other human-related factors like buildings or vehicles in scale.^[155] These figures derive from empirical data on cat densities, ranging behaviors, and prey return rates, highlighting the outsized role of even pet cats that are allowed outdoor access, which contribute substantially despite comprising only about 30% of the total cat population.^[154] Domestic dogs similarly disrupt biodiversity through multiple mechanisms, including direct predation, behavioral disturbance, and habitat alteration. Field observations document dogs chasing and injuring wildlife, such as shorebirds and ground-nesting species, with leashed dogs still eliciting flight responses that interrupt foraging and nesting activities, leading to reduced reproductive success.^[156] Urban and suburban dogs contribute to soil compaction and erosion via trampling in natural areas, exacerbating habitat degradation in parks and reserves, as evidenced by studies measuring vegetation cover loss and sediment displacement in dog-frequented zones.^[157] Dogs also facilitate invasive species spread by transporting seeds on fur and paws, though this vector's quantitative impact remains less studied compared to predation effects.^[158] A 2025 peer-reviewed analysis synthesizes these "multifarious" impacts, identifying dogs' fecal waste as a vector for waterway pollution through nutrient loading and pathogen transmission, which alters aquatic ecosystems and harms fish and invertebrate populations downstream from urban runoff.^[159] Empirical monitoring in protected areas reveals elevated stress hormones in wildlife exposed to dog disturbances, correlating with avoidance of optimal habitats and cascading effects on food webs.^[160] While dogs occasionally assist in conservation efforts like scent detection for endangered species, no field studies demonstrate net positive biodiversity outcomes from widespread pet ownership, with disruptions empirically outweighing any incidental benefits in most contexts.^[161]

Sustainability Initiatives

Efforts to mitigate the environmental impact of pet ownership include the development of alternative feeds such as vegan, plant-based, and insect-derived options, which have shown substantial reductions in emissions through controlled studies. A life-cycle assessment of vegan dog food indicated that replacing conventional meat-based diets could lower global warming potential by 340 kg CO2eq annually per dog, with broader modeling suggesting up to 84-95% fewer emissions for cultivated alternatives compared to beef.^[162]^[163] Insect proteins offer similar benefits, with production chains achieving 72-97% lower greenhouse gas emissions relative to traditional meat sources when scaled for feed applications.^[164] These formulations address the high resource intensity of meat-heavy pet diets, which dominate the market.^[165] Upcycled ingredients—derived from food manufacturing byproducts—further support resource efficiency by diverting waste from landfills into pet nutrition. In 2024, U.S. pet food production incorporated approximately 4.1 million tons of upcycled materials, accounting for 44% of total ingredients by volume, primarily in dog and cat foods.^[166] This practice reduces the demand for virgin agricultural inputs, though its net emissions savings depend on the upstream sourcing of byproducts, often still tied to animal agriculture.^[167] Beyond feeds, initiatives emphasize adoption from shelters to limit pet population expansion and selective breeding for lower-maintenance varieties with reduced caloric needs. Adopting existing shelter animals avoids the resource costs of breeding and rearing new litters, curbing overall sector growth in emissions and land use.^[168] Breeds like English bulldogs, basset hounds, and greyhounds require less exercise and food intake than high-energy counterparts, potentially lowering lifetime feed demands by aligning with sedentary lifestyles.^[169] Industry coalitions and reports highlight the expansion of these measures, yet their aggregate effect remains modest relative to the pet sector's total footprint, as meat-based products constitute the majority of sales and global pet numbers exceed 1 billion. Analyses indicate that while alternative feeds and waste diversion are scaling, they offset under 10% of emissions industry-wide, constrained by consumer preferences and supply chain inertia.^[165]^[167]

Ethical Considerations

Pro-Pet Ownership Rationales

Pet ownership provides companionship that empirically enhances human well-being through physiological mechanisms such as elevated oxytocin and reduced cortisol levels during interactions like petting and talking to dogs.^[170]^[92] These hormonal responses contribute to mood improvement by fostering emotional bonding, addressing social isolation in modern environments where human interactions may be limited.^[171] In child development, exposure to pets correlates with increased empathy, compassion, and responsible behavior, as children learn caregiving through daily animal interactions.^[172] Studies indicate that pet attachment in childhood promotes prosocial attitudes toward animals and peers, potentially training emotional regulation and nurturing skills absent in pet-free households.^[173] Practically, certain pets like dogs serve as effective guardians, deterring burglaries through barking and presence, with research showing that homes with large, vocal dogs experience lower intrusion rates compared to those without.^[174] Neighborhood-level data further links higher dog ownership to reduced crime, as the perceived occupancy cue discourages opportunistic offenders.^[175] From an evolutionary standpoint, domestication represents a symbiotic arrangement where humans gain utility from animal labor—such as herding or hunting assistance—while providing reliable sustenance and protection, yielding net survival advantages for both parties over millennia.^[176] Domesticated animals evade the high predation and starvation mortality typical of wild counterparts, where juvenile survival rates often fall below 50% due to natural threats, rendering pet life comparatively secure absent equivalent "freedom."^[177] This mutualism aligns with human predispositions for interspecies affiliation, enhancing psychological resilience without necessitating wild existential risks.^[178]

Opposing Ethical Critiques

Animal rights advocates, particularly abolitionists like Gary L. Francione, contend that pet ownership inherently treats sentient beings as replaceable property, denying them the basic right not to be regarded or used as things.^[179] This perspective views domestication as a form of exploitation that perpetuates dependency, where animals are bred into vulnerability and separated from kin groups, rendering them incapable of independent survival while subjecting them to human-imposed lifespans and conditions.^[180] Francione and co-author Anna Charlton argue that continuing the institution of pet-keeping justifies creating more such dependents, which they equate to moral inconsistency with animal rights principles, advocating instead for the ethical care of existing domesticated animals without further breeding.^[180] Critics highlight the denial of autonomy in confined living, where pets experience chronic boredom from limited opportunities for natural behaviors, as evidenced by studies on captive animals seeking stimulation in barren environments.^[181] In 2023 discussions, welfare experts noted that many dogs and cats in homes endure monotonous routines akin to zoo captivity, exacerbating stress and behavioral issues, with some calling for reduced pet populations to prioritize higher welfare standards over casual ownership.^[181] Selective breeding for traits like brachycephalic features has intensified these vulnerabilities, producing animals with respiratory and mobility impairments that critics liken to eugenics-inspired manipulations, heightening lifelong suffering and reliance on veterinary interventions.^[182] Empirical data on shelter outcomes underscores these critiques, with approximately 690,000 dogs and cats euthanized in U.S. shelters in 2023 alone, reflecting high intake and surrender rates that abolitionists interpret as admissions of systemic failure in providing stable, species-appropriate care.^[183] This turnover, involving millions of animals annually entering facilities, is seen by opponents as evidence of the exploitative cycle: initial acquisition driven by human desires, followed by relinquishment due to incompatibilities, ultimately culminating in death as a "humane" endpoint rather than a resolution of inherent ethical conflicts.^[184]

Breeding Practices and Controversies

Selective breeding of pets, particularly dogs, has prioritized aesthetic traits over functional health in many "fashion" breeds, resulting in exaggerated physical features that compromise welfare. Brachycephalic breeds such as pugs exhibit severe respiratory challenges due to shortened muzzles, with studies indicating that up to 50% suffer significant breathing difficulties and 26.5% develop upper respiratory tract disorders, often requiring surgical interventions like soft palate resection.^[185]^[186] These issues stem from artificial selection for flat faces, which narrows airways and impairs thermoregulation, leading to chronic exercise intolerance and heat sensitivity; pugs are 1.9 times more likely than non-pugs to experience multiple disorders annually.^[187] In contrast, utility or working breeds, selected primarily for performance traits like herding or retrieval, demonstrate greater physiological robustness, with lower incidences of conformation-related ailments because breeding emphasizes endurance and structural integrity over appearance.^[188] Purebred dogs face elevated risks of inherited genetic disorders compared to mixed-breed counterparts, with data showing purebreds are 2.7 times more likely to carry at least one common recessive condition due to closed gene pools and inbreeding that amplifies deleterious alleles.^[189] Conditions such as hip dysplasia, dilated cardiomyopathy, and cataracts occur at higher rates in purebreds, reflecting the causal link between reduced genetic diversity and disease predisposition; for instance, elbow dysplasia and hypothyroidism are notably more prevalent in select purebred lines.^[190] While some analyses question overall lifetime prevalence differences, the pattern holds for breed-specific vulnerabilities, underscoring how selective pressures for uniformity exacerbate rather than mitigate health trade-offs.^[191] Puppy mills, high-volume commercial operations, intensify these problems by prioritizing quantity over quality, producing an estimated 2 million puppies annually in the United States under substandard conditions that include overcrowding, minimal veterinary care, and repeated breeding cycles without health screening.^[192] Dogs in these facilities often originate from already compromised stock, propagating genetic defects and infectious diseases, with offspring sold through pet stores or online, evading oversight; approximately 10,000 such mills operate, many unlicensed, leading to higher rates of congenital anomalies and behavioral issues from early weaning and poor socialization.^[193] Neutering practices, while aimed at curbing unplanned breeding, introduce behavioral controversies, as scientific studies reveal inconsistent outcomes and potential drawbacks. Early neutering does not reliably reduce aggression and may increase fear-based responses or anxiety in some males, with large-scale data indicating neutered dogs exhibit higher stranger-directed aggression and noise phobias compared to intact counterparts.^[194]^[195] Hormonal alterations post-neutering can disrupt neural development, exacerbating excitability or compulsions in breeds prone to such traits, though effects vary by age, breed, and sex; for example, castration shows limited efficacy against inter-dog aggression and may heighten reactivity in certain lines.^[196] In response to these challenges, responsible breeders have increasingly adopted health testing protocols, including genetic screening for disorders like progressive retinal atrophy and orthopedic evaluations via OFA certifications, to select against carriers and promote diverse, viable lineages.^[197] Trends since the 2010s emphasize genomic tools like Embark panels for polygenic risk assessment, reducing incidence of heritable conditions in tested litters by identifying low-risk matings; this shift counters inbreeding depression, though adoption remains uneven, with show-oriented kennels slower to prioritize function over form.^[198]^[199]

References

[1]
https://www.britannica.com/animal/pet
[2]
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pet
[3]
U.S. pet ownership statistics | American Veterinary Medical ...
In 2024, 45.5% of US households own dogs (59.8M total) and 32.1% own cats (42.2M total). Average vet spending is $580/$433 per year. Fish, reptiles, and birds ...
[4]
Ask Smithsonian: When Did People Start Keeping Pets?
Sep 28, 2016 · Pets have been harnessed to humans for possibly tens of thousands of years. Regardless of when pet ownership got started, our long ...
[5]
The Invention of Pets - JSTOR Daily
Jan 28, 2017 · Pet are a relatively recent invention. In the 18th and 19th centuries, pethood arose in the split between farm animals and home animals.
[6]
Assessing the benefits and risks of owning a pet - PMC - NIH
We discuss the benefits of pet ownership, including improvements in cardiovascular outcomes and the mental health of children, adults and seniors.
[7]
Dog Ownership and Survival: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Oct 8, 2019 · Dog ownership is associated with lower risk of death over the long term, which is possibly driven by a reduction in cardiovascular mortality.Missing: controversies empirical
[8]
Deciphering the puzzles of dog domestication - PMC - NIH
This domestication occurred in two main phases: the initial domestication of the wild gray wolf to primary dog and the subsequent improvement of these ...
[9]
How Accurate Is the Theory of Dog Domestication in 'Alpha'?
Aug 15, 2018 · Gray wolves and dogs diverged from an extinct wolf species some 15,000 to 40,000 years ago. There's general scientific agreement on that point, ...
[10]
The origins of cats - International Cat Care
Nov 28, 2024 · Cats' ancestor lived in Asia 10-12 million years ago. Domestication likely began in the Middle East around 10,000 years ago, with the Near ...
[11]
Most Popular Pets by Country 2025 - World Population Review
The most popular pet in the world is the dog. There is a reason why people say the dogs are a man's best friend, and there are tens of millions of them living ...
[12]
Industry Trends & Stats - American Pet Products Association
Number of U.S. Households That Own a Pet ; Bird, 6 million ; Cat, 49 milion ; Dog, 68 million ; Horse, 2 million ; Freshwater Fish, 10 million.
[13]
Facts + Statistics: Pet Ownership and Insurance | III
Number Of U.S. Households That Own A Pet, by Type Of Animal ; Dog, 68.0 ; Cat, 49.0 ; Freshwater fish, 9.6 ; Small animal, 5.7.Missing: mammals | Show results with:mammals
[14]
The 8 Most Popular Pets in 2023 - PetMD
Jan 25, 2024 · The 8 Most Popular Pets in 2023 · 1. Dogs · 2. Cats · 3. Freshwater Fish · 4. Small Animals · 5. Birds · 6. Reptiles · 7. Horses · 8. Saltwater Fish.
[15]
Reptiles and Small Mammals: An Industry Perspective - BSM Partners
Jul 17, 2023 · The American Pet Products Association (APPA) estimates that there are over 6 million households in the U.S. that have reptiles as pets.
[16]
From Bigger Tanks to Stronger Bonds: Fish & Reptile Ownership ...
Sep 24, 2025 · Gen Z makes its mark in reptile ownership, now representing a third of all reptile owners (33%), a striking 27% increase from 2023. More ...Missing: 2020-2025 | Show results with:2020-2025
[17]
The Dangers of Keeping Exotic Pets | Born Free USA
Exotic animals do not make good companions. They require special care, housing, diet, and maintenance that the average person cannot provide.Missing: lifespan | Show results with:lifespan
[18]
https://eurogroupforanimals.org/files/eurogroupforanimals/2020-07/Eurogroup%2520for%2520Animals_Exotic%2520pets%2520reoprt_v5%2520%25281%2529.pdf
[19]
Chronic captivity stress in wild animals is highly species-specific
Dec 4, 2019 · Conclusion is that captivity can be a powerful chronic stressor that may be possible to mitigate, but the impact is highly species-specific.
[20]
Mistreatment of Wild Animals in Captivity - Ballard Brief
Apr 26, 2025 · It is very common for captive animals to die earlier than is normal due to the stressful and unhealthy conditions in captive establishments.
[21]
Zoonoses Associated with Reptiles & Amphibians - wsu iacuc
The zoonotic diseases associated with reptile and amphibian contact are primarily bacterial infections. These include Salmonella, Mycobacterium, Campylobacter, ...Missing: exotic birds
[22]
Dogs first domesticated in Europe, study says - CNN
Nov 14, 2013 · A new study in the journal Science argues that the domestication of dogs happened between 18,800 and 32,100 years ago in Europe.
[23]
Origins and Genetic Legacy of Prehistoric Dogs - PMC
We sequenced 27 ancient dog genomes and found that all dogs share a common ancestry distinct from present-day wolves, with limited gene flow from wolves since ...
[24]
Morphological evidence for early dog domestication in the European ...
Aug 31, 2020 · It indicates that putative Upper Paleolithic dogs may represent a discrete canid group with morphological signs of domestication.
[25]
Initial dog domestication and Pleistocene wolf variation
A handful of proposed Paleolithic (pre-16,000 BP) domesticated dog remains have been reported from Europe and Siberia, but are highly contested. •. Very little ...
[26]
The domestic dog that lived ∼17,000 years ago in the Lower ...
The Erralla specimen represents one of the earliest domesticated dogs in Europe, in the Lower Cantabrian Magdalenian period.
[27]
Archaeological Evidence for Dog Domestication - Beauty in the Bones
Jan 21, 2014 · Jumping forward a couple thousand years one of the oldest dog remains of this period was found in Europe was in Germany and dated to 14,000 BP.
[28]
Commensalism or Cross-Species Adoption? A Critical Review of ...
Apr 15, 2021 · At some point in the process, humans also began to recognize the benefits of living with resident, semi-domestic wolves, either as guards or as ...
[29]
How hunting with wolves helped humans outsmart the Neanderthals
Feb 28, 2015 · The answer, she argues, was the creation of the human-wolf alliance. Previously they separately hunted the same creatures, with mixed results.
[30]
The First Domestication: How Wolves and Humans Coevolved
Dec 11, 2017 · A new book argues that cooperation rather than competition between humans and wolves was important in wolves becoming dogs.
[31]
The ecology and evolution of human‐wildlife cooperation - Cram
Jun 20, 2022 · Humans followed the wolves and were much more effective at killing large prey, especially proboscideans, using tools (e.g. spears and bows, ...
[32]
The Taming of the Cat - PMC - PubMed Central - NIH
By 2,900 years ago the domestic cat had become the official deity of Egypt in the form of the goddess Bastet, and such cats were sacrificed, mummified and ...
[33]
Genetic Comparison of Egyptian Cat Mummies to their Feline ... - NIH
May 19, 2012 · In their role as totemic animals of Bastet, votive cat mummies were purchased by worshiping pilgrims, offered at temples, and then buried in ...
[34]
Cat Mummies | McClung Museum of Natural History & Culture
May 1, 2001 · Mummies were placed in the cult center and dedicated to Bastet in order to increase her favor. Evidence also suggests that numerous domesticated ...
[35]
Cats may have been domesticated much later than we thought
May 30, 2025 · Based on evidence both from iconography and extensive mummification of cats as part of the worship of Bastet, the second paper concludes ...Over 40% of pet cats play fetch · Scientists solve mystery of how...
[36]
Dogs in Ancient Greece and Rome
The Molossian, a heavy mastiff used by the shepherds of Epirus in the mountains of northwestern Greece, protected the flock and guarded the house. In the ...
[37]
63: Dogs in Antiquity: Greece & Rome - Ancient Art Podcast
Aug 17, 2014 · Evidence in the Iliad and Odyssey suggests that the Greeks at the time of Homer primarily used dogs for hunting, shepherding, and guarding, not warfare.
[38]
[PDF] The Roman Dogma of Animal Breeding: “Bark”aeological Findings ...
The cast of the dog having died in the eruption of Mount. Vesuvius (figure eight) is also believed to have been that of a guard dog, as it was collared and ...
[39]
The Roman Dogma of Animal Breeding: “Bark”aeological Findings ...
Apr 3, 2020 · The Romans kept dogs for many purposes; such as for hunting game, protecting a flock of sheep, guarding the house, and providing companionship.
[40]
sumerian | ALL MESOPOTAMIA
Mesopotamians domesticated dogs for practical purposes like everyone else; security for their dwellings and their herds, as well as hunting.
[41]
[PDF] Chinese Fish Culture. History and Development, - DTIC
Jun 6, 2023 · Pond fish culture was recorded in the Yin dynasty (1100 B.C.) with carp being the most likely fish cultured. Additional development in carp.Missing: birds | Show results with:birds
[42]
For Pets in Ancient Egypt, Life Was Hard (or Really Easy)
Jul 1, 2015 · The animals included hippos, baboons, great cats, and crocodiles, all status symbols found buried with the tombs of the elite of the day.
[43]
Pets in Ancient Egypt - World History Encyclopedia
Mar 18, 2016 · The ancient Egyptians kept animals as pets ranging from domesticated dogs and cats to baboons, monkeys, fish, gazelles, birds (especially falcons), lions, ...
[44]
History of the Kennel Club | About us
The Kennel Club was founded on 4 April 1873 by SE Shirley and twelve other gentlemen. They wanted to have a consistent set of rules for governing the popular ...
[45]
History of Conformation: The Evolution of Dog Shows
Jan 19, 2024 · The first dog show dates back to the mid-19 th century in Newcastle, England, in 1859, when 27 Setters and 23 Pointers exhibited their best features.
[46]
Westminster 2017: Dog Breeds in Competititon Share a History | TIME
Feb 10, 2017 · The Westminster Kennel Club Dog Show 2017 takes place Feb.13-14. Of the more than 200 breeds competing, many date back to the Victorian Era.<|separator|>
[47]
Obsession with Pets at All-Time High | Live Science
Oct 22, 2007 · Larger incomes, suburban homes, better vet care and pet products have fueled America's love of pets.
[48]
Asia's pet boom lets food, health care, tech players off leash
Mar 29, 2025 · A growing affinity for pets in India, where Euromonitor forecasts a nearly 60% jump in the pet care market over the 2024-2029 period, took root ...
[49]
Inside China's Pet Market Boom - CKGSB Knowledge
Jun 25, 2025 · Urban Chinese pet owners spent over ¥300 billion ($41 billion) on their cats and dogs in 2024, a 7.5% annual increase and an average annual ...
[50]
More than 140 million cats and dogs in the EU - FEDIAF
Cats remain the most popular pets in European households with a stable population of 74.4 million in the EU and 102.7 million in Europe and Russia.<|control11|><|separator|>
[51]
Asia Pacific Pet Food Market Size | Industry Report, 2030
Pet ownership across the Asia Pacific region is growing rapidly, fueled by urbanization, rising disposable incomes, and shifting social attitudes. More people, ...
[52]
Pet Ownership Statistics 2025 – Forbes Advisor
Jan 2, 2025 · As of 2024, 66% of US households (86.9 million homes) own a pet. [1] That's up from 56% in 1988, pet ownership statistics show.Missing: mammals | Show results with:mammals
[53]
Pet Ownership Statistics 2025 - World Animal Foundation
Apr 25, 2025 · Almost 1 in 10 U.S. families owns an exotic animal as a pet. Pet Ownership Statistics. As per the latest American Pet Products Association ...
[54]
Pet Ownership Statistics in 2025 | The Zebra
Jul 11, 2024 · In 2020, 17.6 exotic pets were owned by 9 million households in the U.S.; Around 7,000 pets are currently kept as pets in the United States.
[55]
The State of the Pet Industry 2025 Report Pet Age
Sep 30, 2025 · Pet ownership among Gen Z rose from 11% in 2018 to 20% in 2024 and this group is also the most likely of the generations to have a multi-pet ...
[56]
Majority of Americans think of their pets as family members
Jul 7, 2023 · Rural Americans: 71% of adults living in rural areas have a pet – much higher than the shares in suburban and urban areas. Rural Americans also ...
[57]
Paws and Reflect: 2025 Pet Trends in a Post-Pandemic World
Jan 19, 2025 · In fact, pet owners are now 40% less likely to add a new pet to their pack compared to two years ago. Our latest report, Paw Power: Pet ...
[58]
Shelter Animals Count Releases 2025 Mid-Year Report on U.S. ...
Aug 6, 2025 · Adoptions decreased slightly, with nearly 1.9 million animals adopted in the first half of 2025—down 1% from the prior year. Nearly 2.8 million ...
[59]
600+ Ingredients Drive $51.7B Pet Food Sales, According to New ...
Apr 7, 2025 · In 2024, U.S. pet food sales hit $51.7 billion with 9.8 million tons produced using 600+ safe, nutritious ingredients. The industry used over 4 ...
[60]
Pet Owners Are Changing: How Will the Industry Respond | BCG
Mar 4, 2025 · Demand for supplements—which are increasingly used to help with joint mobility, allergies, or anxiety in pets—is forecast to grow by 10% each ...
[61]
Pet Food Trends Converge with Owners' Diets - Gray Construction
Vegan pet foods use a variety of natural, nutrient-rich ingredients to keep pets healthy and can add synthetic proteins and other ingredients to meet ...
[62]
Growth In The Pet Industry Is At A Turning Point - Forbes
Oct 10, 2024 · The pet industry has become accustomed to steady, consistent growth at high levels throughout the range of products and services being offered ...
[63]
2025 pet food ingredient report reveals $51.7B market, rising ...
Apr 3, 2025 · 44% of pet food ingredients are upcycled. A new focus of the 2025 report is the use of upcycled ingredients in pet food. In 2024 ...
[64]
US Pet Market Size, Growth, Trend Analysis & Competitive ...
Jul 4, 2025 · The US Pet Industry is expected to reach USD 157 billion in 2025 and grow at a CAGR of 9.80% to reach USD 250 billion by 2030.
[65]
Epidemiological associations between brachycephaly and upper ...
Jul 14, 2015 · Upper respiratory tract disorders were a frequent diagnosis overall (15.8 %) but were more common in extreme brachycephalic dogs (22.0 %) than ...
[66]
Brachycephalic Breeds Fact Sheet
Upper respiratory disorders were the cause of death for 17% of dogs with extreme brachycephalic conformation (Pugs, Bulldogs and French Bulldogs) compared to 0% ...
[67]
Can Dogs Live Longer Than Wolves? - Wag!
Mar 1, 2018 · According to Animal Planet, wolves live between ten and 18 years, while National Geographic says that wolves in the wild live on average six to eight years.
[68]
Researchers explore why wild canids live longer than domestic ...
Aug 31, 2020 · Or why wild canids, such as gray wolves, live longer than similar sized domesticated dogs (20.6 vs 10-12 years)? Drs. Ana Jimenez (Colgate ...
[69]
Pet Obesity Articles & News — APOP
The 2022 U.S. Pet Obesity Prevalence Survey found a staggering 61% of cats and 59% of dogs are overweight or have obesity, indicating a widespread problem with ...
[70]
Fighting Pet Obesity: How to Keep Your Dog or Cat at a Healthy ...
According to a 2024 survey by the Association for Pet Obesity Prevention (APOP), approximately 22% of dogs and 33% of cats in the U.S. are classified as obese, ...
[71]
America's Animal Shelters Are Overwhelmed. Pets–and Staff–Are at ...
Apr 17, 2024 · In 2023, 690,000 dogs and cats were euthanized in shelters across the US. For many members of the public, this calls to mind healthy ...
[72]
2024 Statistics - Shelter Animals Count
In 2024, community intakes for dogs and cats totaled 1.4% fewer than in 2023, representing 83,000 fewer animals. Intakes are evenly split between dogs and ...
[73]
Want your dog to live a longer life? Here are 6 science-backed tips
Oct 8, 2025 · A 2023 paper found dogs regularly evaluated by a vet were 30 percent less likely to develop chronic diseases. It also found that vaccinated dogs ...Missing: advancements | Show results with:advancements
[74]
Impact of Changes in Time Left Alone on Separation-Related ... - NIH
Feb 15, 2022 · Dogs can develop separation-related behaviours (SRBs), such as barking/howling, pacing, toileting or destroying household items when they ...
[75]
Separation-related behavior of dogs shows association with their ...
Sep 28, 2021 · We hypothesized that dogs that are prone to frustration or fearfulness in other contexts would show a different behavioral response to separation from the ...
[76]
Pet Ownership and Quality of Life: A Systematic Review of the ... - NIH
Dec 16, 2021 · In 38% (five of 13) of the studies, attachment to a cat or dog was associated with a positive impact on mental health in 38% of the studies.
[77]
Exploring the differences between pet and non-pet owners
Pet selection effects are rarely accounted for in existing research, making it impossible to separate the potential impacts of pet ownership from the factors ...
[78]
Dog ownership and mental health among community‐dwelling older ...
Our study had several strengths. This is the first systematic review to have considered the mental health of community‐dwelling dog owners aged 70 and over.
[79]
Pet ownership, loneliness, and social isolation: a systematic review
Jul 11, 2022 · In addition, pets may also enhance mental health components. Pet ownership was shown to be related to lower levels of depressive symptoms [7] ...
[80]
Dog owners are more likely to meet physical activity guidelines than ...
Apr 18, 2019 · A non-significant but relevant effect size was found; dog walkers measured 2000 more steps and 13 more minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical ...
[81]
Dog ownership and physical activity: A review of the evidence
Meta-analysis showed DO engage in more walking and PA than NDO and the effect sizes are small to moderate (d = 0.26 and d = 0.16, respectively). Three studies ...
[82]
Does Dog Ownership Really Prolong Survival? | Circulation
Oct 20, 2020 · This meta-analysis reported a 24% decreased risk of all-cause mortality among dog owners compared with non-dog owners. The protective effect was ...
[83]
Dog Bite Prevention: A New Screening Tool - PMC - NIH
According to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), in the United States (US) alone, an estimated 4.5 million dog bites occur each year.
[84]
QuickStats: Number of Deaths Resulting from Being Bitten or Struck ...
Sep 8, 2023 · During 2011–2021, a total of 468 deaths from being bitten or struck by a dog occurred (average = 43 deaths per year).
[85]
Allergic to Your Pet? Learn About Dog and Cat Allergies
Allergies to cats and dogs affect 10 to 20% of the world's population.2. Allergies to pets with fur, such as cats and dogs, are common. Even rabbits, guinea ...
[86]
Human allergy to cats: A review of the impact on cat ownership and ...
Oct 8, 2021 · Human cat allergies cause 5-35% of potential owners to avoid cat ownership and 5-15% to relinquish cats, though many owners keep their cats ...
[87]
A Review of Zoonotic Disease Threats to Pet Owners
Exposure to contaminated urine, feces, blood, saliva, nasal secretions, or other body fluids, or material within the animals' habitat can transmit bacterial or ...
[88]
Pet animals as reservoirs for spreading methicillin-resistant ...
The worldwide finding is that cats and dogs, and small exotic animals kept by humans, can become infected or colonized with HA-MRSA or CA-MRSA clones.
[89]
Domestic Animals as Potential Reservoirs of Zoonotic Viral Diseases
Feb 15, 2023 · Zoonotic diseases can be transmitted directly or indirectly, by contact, via aerosols, through a vector, or vertically in utero. Zoonotic ...
[90]
Dog ownership and the risk of cardiovascular disease and death
Nov 17, 2017 · Dog ownership appears to be associated with lower risk of CVD in single-person households and lower mortality in the general population.
[91]
Dog Ownership and Survival: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Oct 8, 2019 · Dog ownership was associated with a 24% risk reduction for all-cause mortality as compared to nonownership (relative risk, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.67- ...
[92]
Oxytocin and Cortisol Levels in Dog Owners and Their ... - Frontiers
Oct 12, 2017 · We have previously shown that dog–owner interaction results in increasing oxytocin levels in owners and dogs, decreasing cortisol levels in ...
[93]
The Role of Oxytocin in the Dog–Owner Relationship - PMC
Oct 12, 2019 · Based on previous literature we predicted that dogs and owners would show an increase in oxytocin after a positive social interaction, and that ...
[94]
The effects of service dogs on psychosocial health and wellbeing for ...
Individuals with a service dog exhibited significantly better psychosocial health including higher social, emotional, and work/school functioning.Missing: efficacy | Show results with:efficacy
[95]
Service Dogs Lead to Fewer Seizures in Resistant Epilepsy
Mar 14, 2024 · Working with medically trained service dogs is associated with a 31% reduction in seizures compared with usual care in treatment-resistant ...Missing: efficacy | Show results with:efficacy
[96]
Pet Ownership may Attenuate Loneliness Among Older Adult ... - NIH
Pet owners were 36% less likely to report loneliness, and living alone without a pet was associated with the greatest odds of loneliness. Pet ownership may ...
[97]
Animal-Assisted Therapy and Loneliness in Nursing Homes
Both living and robotic dogs reduced loneliness in nursing home residents, with no difference in effectiveness between the two. Attachment was not the ...
[98]
https://wildearth.com/blogs/dog-knowledge/surprising-stats-for-dog-parents
[99]
Half of Gen Z see their pets as actual children, shocking new poll ...
May 12, 2025 · Gen Z sees no difference between their pet and an actual human child (48%) and millennials see them as siblings (13%).Missing: isolation | Show results with:isolation
[100]
Quick Statistics - U.S. Dog Bite Statistics - DogsBite.org
Aug 21, 2025 · Approximately 4.5 million dog bites occur each year in the United States. Nearly 1 out of 5 bites becomes infected.
[101]
Dog and Cat Allergies: Current State of Diagnostic Approaches and ...
Feb 1, 2018 · Allergies to dogs and cats affect 10%–20% of the population worldwide and is a growing public health concern as these rates increase.
[102]
Pet Allergies: Causes, Symptoms, Treatment & Prevention
Up to 3 out of every 10 people in the U.S. are allergic to cats and dogs. You're more than twice as likely to be allergic to a cat than a dog.<|separator|>
[103]
Toxoplasmosis and Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Meta ...
Apr 22, 2022 · Toxoplasma infection appears to be a risk factor independent of the known genetic risk factors for schizophrenia (SCZ) (15). The global age‐ ...
[104]
Association Between Childhood Exposure to Pet Cats and Later ...
Dec 11, 2022 · Cat-transmitted infections, especially Toxoplasma gondii, are possible risk factors for the later development of schizophrenia. We conducted a ...
[105]
Cat Ownership and Schizophrenia-Related Disorders and Psychotic ...
This study aimed to systematically review and meta-analyze publications that reported the relationship between cat ownership and schizophrenia-related outcomes.
[106]
(PDF) Pet Ownership and Human Health: A Brief Review of ...
Aug 6, 2025 · ... pets, recent studies have failed to replicate the benefits. A review of the association between pets and allergic sensitisation found ...
[107]
Pet Ownership Patterns and Successful Aging Outcomes ... - Frontiers
This study examines PO patterns among healthy community-dwelling older adults and the relationship of PO to cognitive and physical functions and psychological ...Introduction · Methods · Results · Discussion
[108]
What is CITES?
Its aim is to ensure that international trade in specimens of wild animals and plants does not threaten the survival of the species. Convention text. CITES was ...
[109]
What is CITES? International laws protecting wild animals | IFAW
Mar 10, 2025 · CITES is an international agreement between national governments around the globe to regulate the trade in wild animals and plants to ensure it ...
[110]
EU is hub for illegal trade in protected wild species, report finds
Apr 16, 2024 · In 2022, the total seizure of 1,886 live animals were all assumed to be destined for the pet trade. Parrots, birds of prey, turtles and ...
[111]
In unfamiliar lands: Trafficking of exotic wildlife species in India
Parrots were the most seized species, with over 1000 individuals reported in seizure incidents. The seized parrots included parakeets (600+), Grey Parrot, ...
[112]
Nigeria seizes more than 1,600 exotic birds in one of the ... - CNN
Aug 5, 2025 · Nigerian customs said they seized more than 1600 parrots and canaries that were being transported from Lagos international airport to Kuwait ...
[113]
Global trade in parrots – Influential factors of trade and implications ...
The potential threats to wild parrot populations posed by the exotic pet trade warrant the early listing of the entire order Psittaciformes in the Appendices ...
[114]
Zoonoses - World Health Organization (WHO)
Jul 29, 2020 · A zoonosis is an infectious disease that has jumped from a non-human animal to humans. Zoonotic pathogens may be bacterial, viral or parasitic.Missing: enforcement | Show results with:enforcement
[115]
SECTION 109 Licensing of dogs required; rabies vaccination required
Licensing of dogs required; rabies vaccination required. 1. (a) The owner of any dog reaching the age of four months shall immediately make application for ...
[116]
State and Local Regulation > Licenses :: DogLaw.HugPug.com
In most places, basic annual license fees are about $10 to $20. Almost everywhere, fees are higher for animals that have not been spayed or neutered.<|separator|>
[117]
Dog Licenses - NYC Health
All dogs in New York City must have licenses, and the licenses must be attached to their collars while in public. Dog owners may be fined for violating ...Missing: United | Show results with:United
[118]
Compulsory dog microchipping comes into effect - GOV.UK
Apr 6, 2016 · From today (6 April 2016) it will be compulsory for owners to ensure their dog is microchipped.
[119]
Microchipping your dog | The Kennel Club
Microchipping for dogs was made compulsory in England, Scotland and Wales in April 2016. It has been compulsory in Northern Ireland since January 2015. How ...
[120]
The EU could save Member States billions with mandatory ...
Apr 1, 2025 · Currently, 24 EU Member States require mandatory microchipping of dogs and 7 EU Member States require microchipping of cats, with more countries ...
[121]
MEPs back mandatory microchipping of all cats and dogs in the EU
Jun 19, 2025 · MEPs have voted to make microchipping and registration mandatory for all cats and dogs in the EU to combat illegal trade and improve animal welfare standards.
[122]
Animal Liability Law in Germany
The owner of an animal is also liable for the damage caused by the animal. The corresponding legal regulations are contained in the Civil Code. There, § 833 BGB ...
[123]
Comprehensive Guide to Dog Liability Insurance in Germany
Legal Liability: In Germany, dog owners are legally responsible for any damage or injury caused by their pets. This can include anything from a dog knocking ...
[124]
Dog owners' supervising duty and criminal negligence – A critical ...
Strict liability means that damages are to be paid to the aggrieved party, the only crucial fact being that the dog caused the bodily injuries or property ...
[125]
Table of Dog Bite Strict Liability Statutes
The owner of a dog is strictly liable for damages for injuries to persons or property caused by the dog and which the owner could have prevented. Presumably ...
[126]
Captive Primates: Dangerous, Yet Legal in Many Parts of the U.S.
Oct 13, 2021 · While 21 states have already explicitly banned private ownership of all primate species, the legislation differs drastically between the remaining 29 states.<|separator|>
[127]
Primate pet ownership fuels a brutal industry. This bill could slow it ...
Jul 26, 2025 · California is among the states with total bans on pet primate ownership. Others have partial bans. But in some states it remains legal for ...
[128]
Dog-keeping Restrictions on Breeds in Beijing
Ferocious dogs and adult dogs with a height of more than 35 cm are prohibited in the key management zones. Eg.: Mastiff, German Doberman Pinscher, St. Bernard, ...Missing: 2020 onwards
[129]
[PDF] CHINA REGULATIONS AND PROTOCOLS FOR CATS AND DOGS
Dogs banned in Beijing: Mastiff, German Pinscher, St. Bernard, Great Dane, Great Pyrenees, Bernese Mountain Dog, Rottweiler,. Weimaraner, Setter, Afghan Hound, ...
[130]
Netizens debate bans on Chinese pastoral dogs in cities across ...
Jul 4, 2025 · There is currently no nationwide list of banned dog breeds in China. A widely circulated "prohibited breeds" list, originating from a local ...Missing: onwards | Show results with:onwards
[131]
Getting a Dog: Legal Considerations - Buying Pets - Nolo
Usually, you must have proof that your dog has an up-to-date rabies vaccination to get a dog license. Vaccines that last for three years are available for dogs ...
[132]
Dog ownership laws and pet rules in the US - PetsRadar
Feb 10, 2025 · Licensing and vaccinations ... Most states require dogs to be licensed within 30 days after bringing them home. However, just like microchipping, ...
[133]
Variability in non-core vaccination rates of dogs and cats in ...
Feb 11, 2022 · Nationally, 63.4% of dogs in the study population with core vaccinations were current for leptospirosis vaccination, and the median clinic ...
[134]
Triple-I/State Farm: US Dog-Related Injury Claim Payouts Hit $1.57 ...
Apr 16, 2025 · US insurers paid out $1.57 billion in dog-related injury claims in 2024, according to the Insurance Information Institute (Triple-I) and State Farm.
[135]
Dog Bite Claims Soar in Frequency and Cost: Report
Apr 25, 2025 · Insurers in the U.S. paid out about $1.6 billion in dog-related injury claims in 2024, according to data compiled by the Insurance Information ...Missing: payouts | Show results with:payouts
[136]
Dog Bite Claims Cost $1.6 Billion in 2024, Rising 86% in 10 Years
May 7, 2025 · Additionally, the average cost per claim reached $69,272 in 2024, an increase of 18% from 2023—and an increase of 86% over the past decade.
[137]
Overcrowding at LA County animal shelters is leading ... - calanimals
Apr 11, 2024 · Increased costs of pet care and failure to spay or neuter pets are part of the issues contributing to overpopulation at animal shelters.
[138]
Big-cat Owners Must Register by June 18 | U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Apr 18, 2023 · The Big Cat Public Safety Act makes it illegal to privately possess or breed big cats. The act was signed into law December 20, 2022, to end ...
[139]
U.S. to Curb Private Ownership of Big Cats - Yale E360
Dec 12, 2022 · The U.S. is set to enact a new law that prohibits private citizens from obtaining lions, tigers, jaguars, leopards, and other big cats as pets.
[140]
State Laws Exotic Cats | Big Cat Rescue | Wild cats in the wild
6 states do not ban or regulate keeping big cats: Alabama, Nevada, North Carolina, Wisconsin, Delaware, and Oklahoma, but all private owners are banned from ...
[141]
Lions, tigers, snakes: Wild animals in German households - DW
Jul 21, 2023 · There are few regulations in Germany about keeping wild animals, so tarantulas, crocodiles, or tigers can also be found in German households.
[142]
Owning one pet goldfish is illegal in Switzerland - The Mirror
Jul 28, 2016 · In Switzerland, it has been illegal to own one solitary goldfish since 2008, when the country introduced a whole host of animal rights' legislation.
[143]
The World's Best Companion Animal Protection Laws - PETA
Aug 7, 2019 · More cities and countries are passing animal protection laws that secure rights for those kept as companions. But animals still need us to speak
[144]
Dog meat: Why is it a sensitive topic in South Korea? - BBC
Jan 12, 2024 · According to a Gallup poll last year, only 8% of people had tried dog meat in the past 12 months, a significant decline from 27% in 2015.Missing: annual trends
[145]
South Korea passes bill to ban eating dog meat, ending ... - CNN
Jan 9, 2024 · The number of respondents who had eaten dog meat in the past year had also fallen, from 27% in 2015, to just 8% in 2022. Between 2005 and 2014, ...
[146]
A Legal Ban on Dog Meat Production: Political Decision-Making for ...
Aug 4, 2024 · This study's findings show that the prevailing perception of consuming dog meat is negative in South Korea, largely due to concerns over animal cruelty.
[147]
The global environmental paw print of pet food - ScienceDirect.com
We find annual global dry pet food production is associated with 56–151 Mt CO 2 equivalent emissions (1.1%−2.9% of global agricultural emissions).
[148]
Environmental impact of diets for dogs and cats | Scientific Reports
Nov 17, 2022 · This average dog would be responsible for 828.37 kg of CO2eq per year if consuming dry diets or 6,541 kg of CO2eq per year if consuming wet ...
[149]
Pet Food Sucking Up U.S. Water | National Geographic
Apr 26, 2010 · Per dollar of pet food, 140 gallons (530 liters) of water are used indirectly in the production process, for a total of 200 gallons (757 liters ...
[150]
Pet Sustainability Coalition: Flex Forward | U.S. Plastics Pact
The Need: According to research conducted on behalf of the Pet Sustainability Coalition (PSC), it is estimated that 300 million pounds of plastic pet food and ...
[151]
https://www.ers.usda.gov/amber-waves/2011/september/beef-and-pork-byproducts/
[152]
New Research Shows U.S. Pet Food Manufacturers Feed America's ...
Mar 11, 2020 · The research finds that U.S. pet food manufacturers give back to the agricultural economy by using 8.65 million tons of animal- and plant-based ...
[153]
LCA and carbon footprint of pets - ESU-services
The carbon footprint of horses, dogs, cats and other pets was calculated for the first time in a life cycle assessment.
[154]
The impact of free-ranging domestic cats on wildlife of the United ...
Jan 29, 2013 · We estimate that free-ranging domestic cats kill 1.3–4.0 billion birds and 6.3–22.3 billion mammals annually. Un-owned cats, as opposed to owned ...
[155]
Outdoor Cats: Single Greatest Source of Human-Caused Mortality ...
Jan 29, 2013 · The study estimated that the median number of birds killed by cats annually is 2.4 billion and the median number of mammals killed is 12.3 ...
[156]
Study finds pet dogs pose significant threat to wildlife and ecosystems
Apr 9, 2025 · "Many owners simply don't realize the environmental damage dogs can cause, from disturbing wildlife to polluting ecosystems," Associate ...
[157]
[PDF] Understanding the Ecological Impacts of Dogs in Natural Areas
Aug 4, 2023 · This includes disturbance through trampling, foraging, changes in soil composition, soil compaction, and soil erosion. All of these contributing ...
[158]
The global impacts of domestic dogs on threatened vertebrates
Impacts include predation, disturbance, disease, competition, and hybridisation. ... Doherty et al. Invasive predators and global biodiversity loss. PNAS. (2016).
[159]
Bad dog? The environmental effects of owned dogs
Keywords: conservation, human-animal interaction, pets, wildlife disturbance, zoonoses. References. Alexander KA, Kat PW, Frank LG, Holekamp KE, Smale L, House ...
[160]
The ecological impact of humans and dogs on wildlife in protected ...
However, human use of these areas can cause disturbance to wildlife, threatening the biodiversity preservation goals of protected areas. ... conservation ...
[161]
Pet dogs have 'extensive and multifarious' impact on environment ...
Apr 9, 2025 · Dogs have “extensive and multifarious” environmental impacts, disturbing ... dogs played vital roles in conservation work, such as in wildlife ...
[162]
A life cycle assessment of vegan dog food - ScienceDirect.com
Switching to a vegan diet can reduce GWP emissions by 340 kg CO2eq per year, while this could increase up to 6000 if high quality meat is fed.
[163]
Vegan Pet Food 'Most Effective' Measure to Tackle Climate Footprint ...
May 27, 2025 · One LCA found that cultivated meat for pet food can generate 84-95% fewer emissions than beef, and 47% fewer than chicken.
[164]
Environmental impact potential of insect production chains for food ...
Aug 14, 2023 · GHG associated with meat can be reduced in this case by 72% to 97% (350–466 Mton CO2eq) (Figure 1). The biggest potential for impact reduction ...
[165]
Pet Food's Surprising Role In Climate Change - Faunalytics
Aug 7, 2025 · How big is your dog's carbon pawprint? This paper explores the climate impacts of pet food and weighs vegan diets as an alternative.Ecological Pawprints · Byproduct Myth · Potential For Alternative...
[166]
My Top 3 Takeaways from the 2025 Pet Food Production and ...
Apr 17, 2025 · According to the report, 44% of pet food ingredients are upcycled ingredients (adding up to 4.1 million tons!), showcasing the pet food ...<|separator|>
[167]
3 Key Takeaways from the 2025 Pet Food Production and Ingredient ...
3 million tons of upcycled ingredients into dog food and over 1 million tons into cat food. ... dog and cat food by volume, followed by whole and milled grains.
[168]
https://thekindpet.com/blogs/blog/how-does-adopting-an-animal-help-the-environment
[169]
13 Low-Energy Dog Breeds | PetMD
Sep 11, 2024 · Dog Breeds With Low Energy · 1. English Bulldog · 2. Basset Hound · 3. Greyhound · 4. Great Pyrenees · 5. Irish Wolfhound · 6. Clumber Spaniel · 7.Missing: sustainable | Show results with:sustainable
[170]
Dogs Supporting Human Health and Well-Being: A Biopsychosocial ...
Mar 30, 2021 · Positive dog-owner interactions including stroking, petting, and talking have been shown to result in increased oxytocin levels in both dog ...
[171]
Psychosocial and Psychophysiological Effects of Human-Animal ...
We propose that the activation of the oxytocin system plays a key role in the majority of these reported psychological and psychophysiological effects of HAI.
[172]
Childhood Attachment to Pets: Associations between Pet ... - NIH
May 6, 2017 · This study examined associations between childhood attachment to pets and caring and friendship behaviour, compassion, and attitudes towards animals.
[173]
Peer bonds and nature's embrace: exploring the influence of pet ...
Oct 21, 2024 · For example, studies have shown that children with pets often demonstrate higher levels of empathy and nature emotional connection to ...
[174]
Will Your Dog Prevent A Burglary? - ADT
The study concluded that if “a homeowner had a big, loud dog most burglars would stay away.” One of the convicted burglars even said, “dogs are a deal breaker ...<|separator|>
[175]
Paws on the Street: Neighborhood-Level Concentration of ...
Jun 25, 2022 · Indeed, some studies suggest that dogs contribute to household crime deterrence (Grooms and Biddle 2018), but research has yet to assess how NH ...
[176]
(PDF) The biology of the human-animal bond - ResearchGate
Aug 6, 2025 · Our relationship with domestic animals is rooted in evolutionary, psychological, and physiological processes.
[177]
How wild animals die: what we know so far
Dec 1, 2020 · In all scenarios, baseline mortality in the absence of predators is 50 individuals per year. If predator-induced mortality is completely ...
[178]
Human-animal bond | American Veterinary Medical Association
The human-animal bond is a mutually beneficial relationship between people and animals, important to human, animal, and community health and welfare.
[179]
Commentary #2: “Pets” - Animal Rights The Abolitionist Approach
Aug 12, 2009 · Question 3: Does the institution of pet ownership violate animals' basic right not to be regarded as things? Answer: Yes. Pets are our property.
[180]
Why keeping a pet is fundamentally unethical | Aeon Essays
Sep 8, 2016 · We oppose domestication and pet ownership because these violate the fundamental rights of animals. The term 'animal rights' has become ...
[181]
The case against pet ownership - Vox
Apr 11, 2023 · Some leading animal welfare experts say we ought to shrink the pet population and shift pet ownership from a casual hobby to a serious ...
[182]
Exploring animal breeding through the lenses of authoritarian and ...
Oct 11, 2023 · These historical instances of human eugenics show what kinds of horrific actions can be achieved when such a concept has no ethical safeguards.
[183]
2023 Statistics - Shelter Animals Count
... , transfer, etc.) 690,000. total animals were euthanized in 2023. dog and cat euthanasia percentages. 330,000. cats euthanized. 360,000. dogs euthanized. Non- ...
[184]
As pet shelters hit capacity, more dogs are now euthanized than cats
Feb 20, 2024 · Shelter and rescue populations in the U.S. have surged by 900,000 overall since January 2021, and more than 359,000 dogs were euthanized in 2023 ...
[185]
[PDF] Pugs - SWOSU Digital Commons
Mar 6, 2020 · The. Kennel Club states that “50% of pugs have significant breathing problems and only 7% to 15% of pugs breathe like a normal dog.” In her ...Missing: prevalence | Show results with:prevalence
[186]
Pug - Brachycephalic Airway Obstruction Syndrome (BAOS) - UFAW
Of 200 Pugs, 53 dogs (26.5%) had at least one upper respiratory tract disorder, and 26 (13.0%) had disorders at multiple sites – this was the highest prevalence ...Missing: statistics | Show results with:statistics
[187]
Health of Pug dogs in the UK: disorder predispositions and protections
May 18, 2022 · The extremely flattened faces and heads of Pugs have been associated with respiratory disorders, including BOAS [19, 48], as well as upper ...
[188]
Working Dogs vs. Show Dogs: An Introduction - MyDogDNA
Feb 18, 2025 · Working dogs are bred for function, while show dogs are bred to meet breed standards for physical appearance and temperament. Working dogs ...
[189]
Frequency and distribution of 152 genetic disease variants in ... - NIH
Apr 30, 2018 · Purebred dogs were 2.7 times more likely than mixed breed dogs to be genetically affected for at least one of the common recessive disorders ( ...
[190]
Prevalence of inherited disorders among mixed-breed and purebred ...
Jun 1, 2013 · Purebred dogs were more likely to have 10 genetic disorders, including dilated cardiomyopathy, elbow dysplasia, cataracts, and hypothyroidism.
[191]
New Study Dispels Myth That Purebred Dogs Are More Prone To ...
Apr 30, 2024 · Some conditions, like dental calculus and osteoarthritis, appeared with roughly the same frequency in both purebred and mixed-breed dogs. Other ...
[192]
Detailed Discussion of Commercial Breeders and Puppy Mills
In the United States today, there are approximately 10,000 puppy mills producing more than 2,400,000 puppies each year. Of those 10,000 mills, only around 2,000 ...
[193]
[PDF] Puppy Mills: Facts and Figures - Humane World for Animals
2,165,181 Estimated number of puppies sold annually who originated from puppy mills – USDA licensed and non-USDA licensed (not all breeders require a USDA ...
[194]
Neutering Causes Behavior Problems in Male Dogs
May 31, 2024 · New data from a large-scale study finds that neutered male dogs are more likely to show aggression and fear-related behaviors.
[195]
Dog Neuter, Yes or No? A Summary of the Motivations, Benefits, and ...
Apr 6, 2025 · Additionally, some studies suggest increases in stress, fear, anxiety, and even certain types of aggression following neutering. The limitations ...
[196]
Effects of neutering on undesirable behaviours in dogs
Dec 30, 2021 · Evidence on neutering's impact on dog behavior is conflicting. It may not reduce aggression, and may increase anxiety, and early neutering may ...
[197]
Purebred Dogs: Health Testing for a Stronger Breed
Oct 9, 2025 · Increasingly, breeders are turning to health testing to ensure they are doing all they can to create strong matches between dogs that result in ...
[198]
The Importance of Health Testing for Dog Breeding | PetPace
Health testing for dogs before breeding is a fundamental step in responsible dog breeding. It ensures the transmission of good health to future generations.
[199]
Stay Ahead of Dog Breeding Trends & Innovations - American Breeder
Sep 23, 2024 · Discover the latest trends and innovations in dog breeding for 2024. Learn how to use genetic testing, reproductive technology, and ethical ...