Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Phraates II

Phraates II was king of the , reigning from approximately 132 to 127 BC as the successor to his father, I. Ascending the throne as a youth, with his mother likely serving as regent, he confronted immediate threats from the resurgent under , who invaded in 130 BC and temporarily captured . Phraates II counterattacked decisively the following year, defeating and killing VII on May 20, 129 BC, which ended the last major Seleucid bid to reclaim their eastern territories and solidified Parthian dominance in the region. He treated the captive Seleucid king with leniency, marrying a Seleucid princess to bolster legitimacy, and later released Demetrius to foster alliances against common foes. His reign's later phase shifted eastward to repel nomadic () incursions from , prompting Phraates II to lead a incorporating mercenaries and captives from prior conflicts. These forces deserted during battle around 127 BC, resulting in a that claimed his life and much of his army. Succeeded by his uncle Artabanus I, Phraates II's victories over the Seleucids marked a pivotal consolidation of Arsacid power, though his death highlighted the empire's vulnerability to steppe nomads. Numismatic evidence, including drachms bearing his portrait and titles like Nikephoros ("victorious"), underscores his military orientation and Hellenistic influences in Parthian kingship. Primary accounts derive from classical historians such as and , corroborated by records and coinage analysis.

Early Life and Ascension

Family and Parentage

Phraates II was the son of I, the Parthian king who reigned from approximately 171 to 132 BC and expanded the empire through conquests in and western . His mother, Ri'nu (also spelled Rinnu or Rinu), was a noblewoman who served as during the initial phase of his rule owing to his youth at the time of his father's death in late 132 BC. Ri'nu's background is obscure, though some accounts describe her as originating from a aristocratic family, reflecting the Parthian practice of integrating local elites into royal lineage. Mithridates I's lineage traced back to the Arsacid dynasty's founder, with as paternal grandfather, emphasizing the consolidation of power within the family during the early phases of Parthian expansion. Phraates II had no recorded siblings who played prominent roles in , though the rapid transition to his Artabanus I after his death in 127 BC suggests limited direct heirs from this union. The Arsacid custom of endogamous marriages among nobility likely influenced family dynamics, but specific details on Phraates II's marital relations or offspring remain unattested in surviving records.

Name, Titles, and Chronology

Phraates II, known in Parthian as Frahāt (𐭐𐭓𐭇𐭕), ruled the Parthian Empire as its king from approximately 138 BC to 127 BC. He was the son and successor of Mithridates I, ascending the throne upon his father's death, with Babylonian astronomical diaries attesting to his reign as early as October 135 BC (Seleucid Era year 177). As the seventh Arsacid ruler, he is sometimes designated Arsaces VII in modern numbering schemes derived from dynastic succession. Parthian kings employed the dynastic name Arsaces (Aršak in Parthian) as a regal title, evoking the founder Arsaces I, rather than personal names in official contexts. Phraates II's coinage, struck in drachms and tetradrachms at mints including Nisa and , features Greek legends typically reading Basileōs Arsakou ("of King Arsaces"), without distinctive epithets like those used by predecessors such as I's Philhellenou. This adherence to Arsacid tradition underscores the continuity of royal ideology, blending Achaemenid influences with Hellenistic monetary practices. His death in 127 BC, during campaigns against invading nomads, marked the end of his rule and led to a brief .

Succession amid Challenges

Phraates II ascended the Parthian throne in 132 BC upon the death of his father, Mithridates I, who had expanded the empire significantly through conquests in Mesopotamia and Media. As a minor at the time of his accession, Phraates relied on his mother to act as regent for several months, ensuring stability during the transition. This period of youth and regency exposed the empire to immediate external pressures, as peripheral regions tested the new ruler's authority. The primary challenges emerged from opportunistic invasions exploiting the succession. In 130 BC, Seleucid king Antiochus VII Sidetes launched a major campaign to reclaim Mesopotamia, advancing deep into Parthian territory and initially recapturing Babylon and Seleucia. Concurrently, nomadic tribes, including the Sakas and Tocharians, invaded eastern Persia, taking advantage of Parthian forces being diverted westward. Ancient historian Justin notes that Phraates, to counter these threats, recruited Greek mercenaries for defense against the eastern barbarians, a decision that strained resources amid the dual-front crisis. Despite these pressures, Phraates II maintained control without recorded internal succession disputes, prioritizing military responses to stabilize the empire's frontiers. His regency's brevity—lasting only until he assumed full command—suggests effective noble support for the direct dynastic line established by his father. The invasions ultimately forced strategic withdrawals and campaigns, setting the stage for prolonged engagements that defined his brief reign.

Domestic Governance

Administrative Policies

Phraates II ascended the Parthian throne as a minor following the death of his father Mithridates I in late 132 BCE, prompting his mother Ri'nu to assume the regency to manage state affairs during his early years. This arrangement ensured continuity in governance amid the empire's recent expansions into Mesopotamian territories, where Parthian authority had only recently supplanted Seleucid control. The administration under Phraates II maintained the decentralized structure typical of Parthian rule, relying on a small of Parthian nobles to oversee satrapies while adapting Seleucid-era social and administrative frameworks for local management. Key appointments included Himerus, a Hyrcanian by origin and favored , who served as viceregent of around 129 BCE to secure the region against unrest and external threats while the king focused on eastern campaigns. Parthian oversight extended to , where control was firmly established by 130 BCE as evidenced by contemporary inscriptions. Himerus's tenure in involved harsh measures, such as the enslavement and sale of local Babylonians, which fueled dissatisfaction among Mesopotamian populations and contributed to temporary losses of control to rivals like Hyspaosines by 127 BCE. Despite these internal challenges, Phraates II prioritized frontier defense over extensive reforms, delegating provincial administration to loyal appointees to sustain the empire's cohesion amid invasions by nomadic groups like the Sacae. This approach reflected the broader Parthian reliance on aristocratic satraps rather than a centralized , with limited direct royal intervention in daily governance.

Responses to Internal Instability

Phraates II ascended the throne around 138/137 BC as a young ruler, potentially with his mother serving as regent, amid the strains of administering an empire recently expanded under Mithridates I. To counter emerging instability in western provinces like Babylonia, he appointed Himerus as governor circa 129 BC, delegating authority to secure Mesopotamian territories while prioritizing eastern defenses. Himerus's governance, however, fueled discontent through exploitative practices, such as selling Babylonian inhabitants into , which eroded loyalty and facilitated challenges from local rulers like Hyspaosines of , who seized control of the region by 127 BC. This misstep highlighted the risks of absentee rule during prolonged campaigns, as Phraates's focus on nomadic incursions neglected provincial oversight, leading to fragmentation in key economic areas. Further compounding internal vulnerabilities, Phraates recruited mercenaries to bolster forces against Seleucid incursions, but payment disputes prompted their defection, resulting in raids that devastated Parthian-held lands and strained resources. Phraates's response involved direct military mobilization to repel these betrayals, yet his death in battle against the around 127 BC precluded effective resolution, bequeathing a legacy of unresolved provincial discontent to his successors.

Military Engagements

Eastern Frontier Defense

During the reign of Phraates II (c. 138–127 BC), the Parthian Empire's eastern frontier faced significant threats from nomadic incursions into provinces such as Margiana and , beginning around 130 BC as part of broader Central Asian migrations. These tribes, Iranian-speaking nomads displaced westward by the advancing , exploited Parthian distractions in the west to raid and settle in eastern satrapies, disrupting trade routes like the via and . Phraates II, having secured Mesopotamia against Seleucid forces by 129 BC, promptly redirected his army eastward, appointing Himerus as Mesopotamian governor to stabilize the rear before confronting the invaders. His campaigns involved direct engagements along invasion corridors extending from southward through Seistan, aiming to repel the and restore Parthian control over these peripheral territories vital for frontier security and revenue. To bolster his forces, Phraates incorporated auxiliaries, likely Seleucid captives or mercenaries, into his army; however, in a pivotal battle circa 127 BC, these troops deserted en masse, precipitating a counterattack that resulted in Phraates' death on the field. This defeat, detailed in analyses drawing from Hellenistic-Parthian interactions, temporarily halted Parthian momentum but underscored the fragility of relying on foreign levies against mobile nomadic warfare, with the threat persisting into subsequent reigns.

War against Antiochus VII

In 130 BC, Antiochus VII Sidetes launched an invasion of Parthian-held territories to restore Seleucid control over Mesopotamia and eastern provinces previously conquered by Mithradates I. Phraates II, engaged in eastern campaigns against Saka nomads, initially left defense to subordinates, including the general Indates. Antiochus advanced with a substantial force, expelling Parthian garrisons from Babylonia and Media, and recapturing key cities such as Babylon. Antiochus achieved an early victory at the Battle of the River Lycus, defeating Indates on June 12, 130 BC, which allowed further penetration into Parthian interior territories. He then wintered his army in , the capital, where harsh conditions and disrupted supply lines—likely due to Parthian scorched-earth tactics—inflicted heavy casualties on the Seleucids. By spring 129 BC, Phraates II had returned from the east and initiated a counteroffensive, employing Parthian cavalry mobility to harass and encircle the beleaguered invaders. The decisive engagement occurred near , where Phraates decisively defeated VII, who perished in the battle, reportedly by suicide following the rout. The remnants of the fragmented, enabling Parthian forces to reclaim and consolidate permanent control over Mesopotamia east of the . This ended Seleucid ambitions in the , as no subsequent mustered a comparable challenge, though ancient accounts such as Justin's of Pompeius Trogus emphasize Parthian tactical adaptability over Seleucid overextension. Phraates II's success relied on exploiting logistical vulnerabilities rather than direct confrontation in open battle prior to the final clash.

Tactical Approaches and Outcomes

Phraates II faced initial setbacks in the war against VII, suffering three defeats in 130 BCE that resulted in the loss of and a Parthian retreat across the into . The Parthians adopted a strategy of allowing the Seleucid forces to advance through without major resistance, likely to extend supply lines and exploit the invaders' logistical vulnerabilities in unfamiliar terrain. As VII wintered in in early 129 BCE, Phraates II refused demands for territorial concessions and launched a counteroffensive, targeting dispersed Seleucid garrisons and forces separated for winter quarters. Parthian cavalry, emphasizing mobility and with horse archers, set an that caught during pursuit, leading to his defeat and death—reported as —on May 20, 129 BCE. The outcome secured Parthian control over and , expelling the Seleucids and capturing significant prisoners, including Queen Laodice and King Demetrius II, though at the cost of heavy Parthian losses that necessitated incorporating Greek captives as auxiliaries in subsequent campaigns. This victory halted Seleucid reconquest efforts but diverted resources eastward, contributing to Phraates' vulnerabilities against nomadic incursions.

Diplomatic and Regional Influence

Interventions in Seleucid Syria

Following the decisive Parthian victory over , who perished in battle in during 129 BC, Phraates II pursued opportunities to project influence into the destabilized Seleucid territories of . The king had released , a Seleucid claimant held captive in since 139 BC, in late 129 BC specifically to sow discord and divert Seleucid forces during Antiochus's eastern campaign. This diplomatic maneuver aimed to position Demetrius as a compliant upon his return to , thereby extending indirect Parthian hegemony westward without immediate large-scale military commitment. Demetrius II successfully reclaimed the Seleucid throne, initiating his second reign from 129 to 125 BC, but defied Parthian expectations by asserting rather than subordination. Lacking the resources for direct retaliation against —commanding an estimated 15,000 to 20,000 troops—he instead directed efforts toward , exacerbating regional instability without advancing Parthian goals. In response, Phraates dispatched units to intercept and recapture Demetrius en route, but these forces arrived too late, allowing the Seleucid to evade renewed captivity and consolidate support in . Phraates subsequently contemplated a full invasion of Syria to enforce vassalage, advancing as far as in preparation, but mounting threats from eastern nomadic incursions—primarily and tribes—forced a strategic pivot. This redirection precluded any sustained western offensive, rendering Phraates's Syrian policy ineffective and permitting the proliferation of rival Seleucid pretenders, such as , without Parthian stabilization or control.

Relations with Neighboring Powers

Phraates II's diplomatic overtures toward neighboring nomadic powers centered on enlisting eastern tribes to bolster Parthian defenses against Seleucid incursions. Facing the invasion of VII in 130 BC, he forged a temporary with the (a group from the northeastern steppes), promising them lands in reconquered Mesopotamian territories in return for military support. This pact enabled Dahae cavalry to harass Seleucid supply lines and contribute to the decisive Parthian counteroffensives by 129 BC, which forced Antiochus's retreat and death. The agreement unraveled post-victory when Phraates refused to cede the pledged territories, viewing the nomads as subordinates rather than equals. Enraged, the launched reprisal raids into Parthian domains, exploiting internal dissent among deported populations and disaffected elites. This drew Phraates into a fatal eastern campaign circa 127 BC, where he perished combating the invaders, underscoring the fragility of such opportunistic pacts with migratory neighbors.

Numismatics and Ideology

Coinage Evidence

The silver coinage of Phraates II (r. c. 138–127 BC) adheres to Arsacid conventions, featuring drachms in the name of Arsaces with a diademed royal on the obverse and the enthroned archer on the reverse, struck primarily at eastern Iranian mints such as Ekbatana and Rhagae, as identified by control monograms like Δ and Ε. These issues, classified under Sellwood types 14–16, exhibit stylistic continuity with the coinage of his father Mithradates I, with early drachms showing a lightly bearded left and later varieties potentially reflecting wartime expediency. Drachm production at these Media-based mints indicates Phraates II's operational focus in the , supporting numismatic inferences of limited prolonged stays in amid eastern frontier pressures. Tetradrachms, rarer than drachms, were minted at , evidencing transient Parthian dominance over Babylonian mints until c. 131 BC, with issues bearing inscriptions and royal portraits adapted to local Seleucid-style flans. Examples from , dated to c. 129 BC, include obverse busts with pellet-in-crescent symbols and reverse owls or anchors, blending Parthian and Hellenistic motifs to legitimize rule in recaptured territories. yielded extremely scarce tetradrachms lacking exergue letters, suggesting sporadic access rather than sustained control, with weights averaging 16–17 grams aligning with standards. Marginal mints like Tambrax and Nisa produced drachms with unique monograms (e.g., no monogram at Nisa), attesting to decentralized production during campaigns. Iconographic elements, such as palm branches on Seleucid-mint issues, may symbolize or victories, as analyzed in studies of Parthian , while the scarcity of western coinage post-131 BC correlates with the loss of to VII, providing chronological anchors for military setbacks. Overall, the distribution and volume of Phraates II's coinage—dominated by eastern drachms (hundreds of dies estimated)—underscore a oriented toward nomadic threats, with mint activity reflecting royal itinerancy rather than fixed administrative hubs.

Symbols of Kingship

Phraates II's coinage prominently displayed symbols of Arsacid kingship, emphasizing dynastic continuity and martial prowess. The obverse featured a bearded portrait of the king wearing a diadem, reflecting a shift from Hellenistic Greek-style attire to Parthian national dress, which asserted cultural and political independence. The reverse bore the canonical image of a seated archer—representing Arsaces I—holding a bow while perched on an , a design inherited from earlier rulers that symbolized the legitimate transmission of royal authority through the dynasty's equestrian-archer heritage. This bow motif underscored the Parthian ideal of kingship as rooted in nomadic traditions, functioning as an attribute of akin to a scepter. Select issues, notably drachmae and tetradrachmae from the mint, incorporated a , frequently linked to the victory goddess Nike, denoting triumph in conquests such as the of . This emblem's debut under Phraates II (c. 138–127 BC) highlighted his role in expanding and consolidating Parthian dominion, integrating Seleucid influences to legitimize territorial gains.

Death, Succession, and Assessment

Final Campaign and Demise

Following the over Seleucid forces and the of VII in 129 BCE, Phraates II redirected his military efforts eastward to confront nomadic incursions that had exploited Parthian commitments in the west. Invaders, identified as Sacae (Scythian-related tribes) and Tochari (associated with the ), had penetrated regions including and northeastern , threatening Parthian control over the frontier satrapies. Phraates mobilized a composite force comprising Parthian , local levies, and coerced prisoners captured during the campaign against VII, numbering potentially several thousand. These auxiliaries, pressed into service despite their foreign allegiance, were deployed in the van against the mobile nomadic horsemen. The campaign unfolded along invasion routes from , passing through key Parthian centers such as and Hecatompylos toward . In the climactic engagement circa 128–127 BCE, the Greek contingents defected mid-battle, abandoning their positions and contributing to a catastrophic . Phraates II perished in the , either slain outright or overwhelmed amid the chaos, as reported in accounts drawing from classical historians like Pompeius Trogus via intermediaries. This betrayal underscored the risks of relying on unreliable captives against agile steppe warriors proficient in . The king's death precipitated instability on the eastern marches, with nomadic pressures persisting into the subsequent reign of his uncle Artabanus I, who also fell combating similar threats. Numismatic evidence from Phraates' mints, including , attests to the abrupt cessation of his issues post-127 BCE, corroborating the timeline of his demise.

Immediate Aftermath and Heirs

Phraates II died in 127 BC during military engagements against nomadic invaders from , identified in ancient accounts as or possibly tribes pressing into Parthian eastern territories. With no adult male heir immediately available to assume the throne, succession passed to his paternal uncle, Artabanus I (r. c. 127–124 BC), the son of and younger brother of Phraates II's father, I. Artabanus I, already advanced in age at accession, prioritized defending the empire's eastern frontiers against the same nomadic threats, but he too perished c. 124 BC in battle with these forces, leaving the succession open once more. A brief interval possibly saw the claim of (r. c. 127–126 BC), evidenced primarily through numismatic finds, though his legitimacy and role remain debated among scholars due to sparse literary attestation. Ultimate stability returned with the accession of Mithridates II (r. 124–91 BC), the son of Phraates II, who as a young ruler leveraged Parthian resources to repel the nomads decisively, restoring hegemony over Margiana, , and surrounding regions by the late 120s BC. This transition marked a generational shift, with Mithridates II inheriting his father's expansionist legacy amid ongoing eastern pressures, though direct evidence of Phraates II's queens or other potential heirs is absent from surviving records.

Historiographical Evaluation

The primary literary source for Phraates II's reign remains Justin's Epitome of Pompeius Trogus, particularly Book 42, which narrates his succession amid Mithradates I's illness, the defense against Antiochus VII Sidetes' invasion of 130–129 BC, and the king's fatal campaign against nomadic tribes around 127 BC. Composed as a 3rd-century AD abridgment of Trogus' Augustan-era Philippic Histories, this account relies on earlier Hellenistic compilations, likely incorporating eyewitness reports from Seleucid campaigns but prone to rhetorical embellishment for moral or dramatic effect, such as portraying Parthian resilience through adversity without detailing logistical or administrative depths. Trogus' work, informed by provincial Roman perspectives in Narbonese Gaul, exhibits a pro-Roman tilt in broader oriental narratives, though its coverage of pre-Roman Parthia draws more from Alexander historians and Mesopotamian intermediaries, introducing potential distortions in emphasizing barbarian threats over imperial stability. Archaeological and epigraphic evidence is sparse, with no surviving Parthian royal inscriptions attributable to Phraates II, reflecting the Arsacid dynasty's limited adoption of monumental self-documentation compared to Achaemenid predecessors; Babylonian tablets and chronicles mention Parthian control in post-Mithradates I but omit detailed regnal events under Phraates, constraining causal reconstructions of his territorial defenses. fills critical gaps, with over 100 drachm varieties from mints like on the bearing Phraates' diademed bust, reverse archer, and titles such as šāhān šāh (""), confirming his authority across and western satrapies during a turbulent quinquennium and enabling precise dating via overstrikes on Seleucid issues. These coins, analyzed in catalogs like Sellwood's , reveal ideological continuity in Arsacid —blending Achaemenid with Hellenistic portraiture—while their distribution patterns substantiate Justin's claims of sustained Mesopotamian hold amid external pressures, offering empirical anchors less susceptible to literary bias. Scholarly evaluations highlight the historiography's fragmentary nature, with Greco-Roman dominance fostering a view of Parthian rule as opportunistic rather than systematically expansionist; for instance, and provide contextual allusions to Arsacid nomad relations but no dedicated Phraates biography, leading modern reconstructions to prioritize hoards and Babylonian king lists for over narrative embellishments. Assessments in works like A Political History of Parthia underscore source interdependence, cautioning against overreliance on Justin's episodic focus, which aligns with numismatic evidence on succession but underplays internal dynamics like satrapal loyalties evidenced by mint outputs. This evidential asymmetry perpetuates debates on Phraates' strategic acumen, with causal analyses favoring numismatic indicators of resilience—such as consistent Seleucid mint usage—over potentially exaggerated accounts of his demise, advocating cross-verification to mitigate the classical tradition's orientalist framing.

References

  1. [1]
    Arsaces VII, Phraates II - Livius.org
    Apr 21, 2020 · In the final weeks of 132 BCE, the conqueror died and was succeeded by his young son, Phraates II. His mother Ri'nu appears to have acted as regent.
  2. [2]
    Phraates II (c. 138 - 127 B.C.) - Parthia.com
    Mar 13, 2021 · Sixth king of the Arsacid dynasty, Phraates II took the throne on the death of his father, Mithradates I in 138 B.C.1 He can be assumed to have ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  3. [3]
    [PDF] A POLITICAL HISTORY OF PARTHIA
    shown by the fact that two Parthian kings, Phraates n (138/37 -ca 128 B.C.) and his successor Artabanus. II {ca 128-124/23 B.C.), lost their lives in battle.
  4. [4]
    Genealogy of the First Arsacids - Page 33 - Parthia.com
    Feb 23, 2021 · ... Phraates II is a son of Mithradates I; Artabanus I is paternal uncle of Phraates II; Mithradates II is a son of Artabanus I. Thus, in ...<|separator|>
  5. [5]
    Phraates II | Persian Ruler, Parthian Empire - Britannica
    Phraates II was the king of Parthia (reigned c. 138–128 bce), the son and successor of Mithradates I. Phraates was attacked in 130 by the Seleucid Antiochus ...
  6. [6]
    Chronological Listing of Parthian Rulers
    Feb 26, 2021 · Chronological Listing of Parthian Rulers ; (c. 171 - 138 B.C.), Mithradates I ; (c. 138 - 127 B.C.), Phraates II ; (c. 127-125 B.C.), Interregnum.Missing: titles | Show results with:titles
  7. [7]
    Recent Studies in Parthian History - Cais-Soas
    This is from month VII of year 177 SE (October 135) in the reign of Phraates II (ca. 138-126). The next reference relates to month I of year 179 SE (April-May ...
  8. [8]
    Kingship ii. Parthian Period - Encyclopaedia Iranica
    Jul 25, 2016 · On many occasions, the Parthian kings personally led their armies against adversaries and some of them (e.g., Phraates II, Artabanus I) lost ...
  9. [9]
    Drachm - Phraates II - Parthian Empire - Numista
    Short-bearded bust left, wearing diadem; behind, Greek letters; circular border of pellets. Script: Greek. Lettering: TAM. Unabridged legend: Tambrax. Reverse.Missing: titles | Show results with:titles
  10. [10]
    https://www.forumancientcoins.com/historia/iran_gen.htm
  11. [11]
    A Political History of Parthia/Chapter 2 - Wikisource
    Jun 27, 2019 · Phraates II came to the throne about 138/37 b.c. on the death of his father Mithradates.
  12. [12]
    (PDF) Parthian and the Sakas (English) - Academia.edu
    Phraates II's reign faced threats from both Seleucids and Sakas, marking significant geopolitical shifts. The Sakas, nomadic Iranian tribes, migrated westward ...
  13. [13]
    Antiochus VII Sidetes | Seleucid Empire, Jewish Revolt, Syria
    Battle of Ipsos · Syrian Wars · War of the ... By the middle of the 3rd century, Parthia, Bactria, and Sogdiana had gained their independence; the conquest ...
  14. [14]
    Antiochus VII Sidetes - Livius.org
    Sep 24, 2020 · Antiochus VII Sidetes: name of a Seleucid king, ruled from 138 to 129. Antiochus VII Sidetes Successor of: Demetrius II Nicator and Diodotus Tryphon.
  15. [15]
    The Date of the Battle at the River Lycus: Antiochus VII Defeated the ...
    The Date of the Battle at the River Lycus: Antiochus VII Defeated the Parthian General Indates on Friday 12 June 130 BC (Original Draft) · Cite this paper.
  16. [16]
    Justin, Epitome of Pompeius Trogus (1886). pp. 271-296. Books 41-44
    Phraates, king of the Parthians, is killed by the Greeks in his army, I.----The Parthians make war on Armenia; early history of Armenia, II.----Jason; Armenius; ...Missing: Saka | Show results with:Saka
  17. [17]
    (PDF) Catalogue of the Parthian coins Phraates II 132-127 B.C ...
    After about 132 BC, Mithradates I was unable to continue the reign due to a severe illness. His son Phraates, who was maybe eighteen years old at that time ...
  18. [18]
    Tetradrachm - Phraates II - Parthian Empire – Numista
    ... Phraates II. Some months later, Antiochus was caught in a Parthian ambush, defeated and slain about the end of summer – beginning of autumn 129 BC. The ...
  19. [19]
    IRANIAN HISTORY: PARTHIANS: Dynasty of Arsacid Empire
    His son and successor, Phraates II (ca. 139!8-ca. 128 B.C.) had to face the final, fruitless attempt on the part of the Seleucids to regain their power in the ...
  20. [20]
    The Parthians' Failed Vassalage of Syria: The Shortsighted Western ...
    Phraates II's failure to invade Syria in 128 BCE allowed multiple Seleucid claimants to vie for control, undermining any potential for stability.
  21. [21]
    ASII - Encyclopaedia Iranica
    According to Justine (Epitome 42), the Parthian king Phraates II (138/7-127 B.C.) called in Scythian troops in his war against the Seleucid Antiochus VII ...
  22. [22]
    Tetradrachm - Phraates II - Parthian Empire - Numista
    The tetradrachm coinage struck at Susa under Phraates II is extremely rare in general, but the absence of any letters in the exergue of the present piece ...
  23. [23]
    Phraates II of Parthia - Numista
    Parthian Empire: King Phraates II (135 BC - 128 BC) ; Obol - Phraates II - obverse. Obol - Phraates II ; Drachm - Phraates II (Nisa - no monogram) - obverse
  24. [24]
    (PDF) Palm Branch in the Parthian Coins of Iran, Case Study
    Apr 1, 2025 · This study has investigated the symbol of palm branch in coins of Phraates II in the Seleucid Mint to realize political goals. These coins are ...<|separator|>
  25. [25]
    https://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/kingship-02-parthian-period
  26. [26]
    (PDF) Parthian coins: kingship and divine glory - Academia.edu
    This article examines the iconography of Parthian coins, focusing on the evolution of royal representations and their relationship with religion.Missing: tactics | Show results with:tactics
  27. [27]
    ARTABANUS (Arsacid kings) - Encyclopaedia Iranica
    Artabanus I (old numbering II), son of Phriapatius and younger brother of Mithridates I, came to the throne about 127 B.C. in succession to his nephew Phraates ...<|separator|>
  28. [28]
    the early reign of mithradates ii the great in parthia - Academia.edu
    Mithradates II (122–88/87 BC) is among the greatest Parthian kings, and because of his attainments, some ancient accounts call him “the Great.”
  29. [29]
    Justinus: Epitome of Pompeius Trogus' Philippic Histories - ATTALUS
    A translation of Justinus' Epitome of Pompeius Trogus' histories, books 40-44 - covering the period 124-84 B.C..Missing: Saka | Show results with:Saka
  30. [30]
    Justin, Epitome of the Philippic Histories of Pompeius Trogus ...
    The author, Trogus Pompeius, was a Roman citizen belonging to the people of the Vocontii in Gallia Narbonensis. Roman citizenship had been granted to his family ...
  31. [31]
    [PDF] The Parthian coinage. (With eight plates.)
    Jul 9, 2008 · Phraates II., son of the last monarch, succeeded him, and inherited not only his dominions, but his wars, and the captive Demetrius; ...<|separator|>
  32. [32]
    https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/abstract/document/obo-9780195389661/obo-9780195389661-0417.xml
  33. [33]
    [PDF] Long Distance Trade and the Parthian Empire - Western CEDAR
    May 15, 2018 · 153 In fact, we know this was a dire problem for early Parthian kings.154 King Phraates II died fighting marauding war bands of nomadic Saka ...<|separator|>