Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Positivity_effect

The positivity effect is an age-related psychological phenomenon in which older adults exhibit a heightened preference for positive over negative emotional information during cognitive processing, such as attention and memory, relative to younger adults who display a negativity bias.^[1] This shift represents an adaptive mechanism that supports emotional well-being in later life, first systematically documented in studies around 2003.^[2] The concept is primarily explained by the socioemotional selectivity theory (SST), which posits that as perceived time left in life shortens with age, individuals prioritize emotionally meaningful goals and regulate emotions by focusing on positive stimuli to maximize gratification and minimize distress.^[1] Empirical evidence from over 100 studies, including meta-analyses, confirms the effect's reliability across domains like visual attention to emotional faces, recall of autobiographical events, and interpretation of ambiguous health scenarios, with stronger manifestations under conditions allowing unconstrained cognitive processing.^[2] For instance, older adults are more likely to remember positive images than negative ones in free-recall tasks, and eye-tracking research shows they allocate greater gaze time to uplifting social cues.^[2] This effect has notable implications for aging research and interventions, as it correlates with improved physical health outcomes, such as higher immune function markers, and suggests that positive-framing strategies in messaging—such as promoting exercise benefits—may enhance engagement among older populations.^[2] However, the positivity bias can diminish in high-stakes or resource-demanding contexts, highlighting its dependence on cognitive resources.^[1] Overall, the positivity effect underscores a motivational shift toward emotional optimization, distinguishing cognitive aging from mere decline.

Overview

Definition

The positivity effect refers to an age-related shift in cognitive processing, wherein older adults—typically those aged 60 and above—display a relative preference for positive over negative information, in contrast to the negativity bias commonly observed in younger adults.^[3] This phenomenon manifests as an enhanced focus on emotionally positive stimuli, leading to differential processing outcomes compared to age-matched neutral or negative content.^[1] Key characteristics of the positivity effect include its application across multiple cognitive domains, such as attention, memory, and evaluative judgments, where older adults allocate more resources to positive material.^[3] It typically emerges during middle age, around 50–60 years, and intensifies with advanced aging, potentially serving adaptive functions in emotional well-being.^[2] Quantitatively, it is often measured through metrics like difference scores or proportions of positive versus negative items recalled or attended to, revealing significant age-by-valence interactions in experimental paradigms.^[1] Unlike the general positivity bias across the lifespan—termed the Pollyanna principle, which describes a universal tendency to favor pleasant over unpleasant information regardless of age—the positivity effect is distinctly comparative, highlighting the amplified positivity in older versus younger adults.^[3]^[4] For instance, in a typical experimental setup, participants view a series of positive and negative facial expressions, with older adults demonstrating longer dwell times on positive faces relative to their younger counterparts.^[3] This effect is frequently attributed to socioemotional selectivity theory, which posits that perceived time limitations in later life prioritize emotionally meaningful experiences.^[1]

Historical background

The positivity effect, an age-related tendency for older adults to prioritize positive over negative information in attention, memory, and processing, originated in the 1990s through initial observations by Laura Carstensen and her colleagues at Stanford University during studies on emotional well-being and social motivations in aging. These early investigations, building on patterns of emotional experience across the lifespan, revealed that older individuals reported higher levels of positive affect and lower intensity of negative emotions compared to younger adults, challenging prior assumptions of emotional decline in later life. A pivotal 2000 publication by Carstensen and collaborators in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology provided empirical evidence from experience-sampling methods, documenting that emotional experiences become more positive and less variable with age, laying foundational support for the effect's conceptualization. This was followed by a landmark 2003 study by Mather and Carstensen in Psychological Science, which experimentally demonstrated older adults' attentional bias toward happy faces over angry or sad ones in visual search tasks, marking a shift toward targeted cognitive examinations of the phenomenon. Research on the positivity effect evolved rapidly after 2000, transitioning from anecdotal views of "aging wisdom" to rigorous empirical psychology, with widespread adoption in the field by the mid-2000s through publications in prominent outlets like Trends in Cognitive Sciences. A 2014 meta-analysis by Reed, Chan, and Mikels, synthesizing 100 studies, confirmed the effect's robustness across attention, memory, and interpretation domains, solidifying its status as a core finding in aging research. In the 2020s, the scope expanded to include applications in digital contexts, such as older adults' stronger positive responses to uplifting online news during the COVID-19 pandemic, highlighting the effect's relevance to modern media environments.^[5]

Theoretical frameworks

Socioemotional selectivity theory

Socioemotional selectivity theory (SST), proposed by Laura L. Carstensen in the late 1990s, posits that perceptions of time influence motivational goals across the lifespan. As individuals age and their perceived time horizon shortens, they shift from future-oriented goals focused on knowledge acquisition and preparation to present-oriented goals emphasizing emotional meaning and satisfaction. This theoretical framework explains the positivity effect as a byproduct of this motivational shift, where older adults increasingly prioritize positive information and experiences to optimize emotional well-being.^[6] SST functions as an adaptive emotional regulation strategy, enabling individuals to derive maximum emotional benefit from limited time. The theory predicts that the positivity effect emerges or intensifies under time-limited conditions, regardless of chronological age, because such perceptions trigger emotion-focused goals over information-seeking ones. For instance, experimental manipulations of future time perception—such as prompting participants to reflect on a constrained future—have been shown to enhance attentional and memory biases toward positive stimuli in younger adults, mimicking patterns typically observed in older adults. Conversely, inducing an expansive future time perspective can attenuate the positivity effect by reinforcing knowledge-acquisition priorities.^[7] The theory accounts for why the positivity effect strengthens in older adulthood, as naturally shrinking time horizons align goals with emotional optimization, fostering selective attention to and recall of positive material. Supporting evidence includes laboratory studies where altering time perceptions temporarily shifts cognitive processing; for example, a manipulation emphasizing future opportunities reduced positivity biases in older participants, aligning their responses more closely with those of younger adults.^[8] Extensions of SST apply its principles to non-age-related contexts of temporal constraint, such as end-of-life scenarios or chronic illness, where individuals similarly reorient toward emotionally gratifying goals to enhance quality of life. In health adversity, perceived limited time prompts prioritization of close relationships and positive emotional experiences, buffering against stress and promoting resilience.^[9]

Cognitive and motivational models

Cognitive models of the positivity effect posit that older adults' preference for positive information acts as an adaptive mechanism to manage cognitive load amid age-related declines in processing resources. According to this perspective, negative stimuli demand greater cognitive effort due to their complexity and salience, leading older individuals to selectively filter them out to preserve efficiency in attention and perception.^[10] This framework, explored in early work on selective attention, suggests that such filtering emerges later in information processing, around 500 milliseconds after stimulus onset, allowing older adults to prioritize less taxing positive content. Motivational accounts complement these cognitive explanations by emphasizing intrinsic drives, such as self-enhancement motives, which become prominent in aging to sustain self-esteem and emotional well-being. Research from the 2010s indicates that older adults may focus on positives to regulate mood and counteract potential threats to self-view, particularly in social contexts where maintaining a positive self-image is valued.^[10] Dynamic integration theory further integrates emotion and cognition, proposing that mature development favors a balanced equilibrium where positive affects are prioritized to resolve motivational conflicts in ambiguous or complex stimuli, as negative information requires more integrative effort that declines with age. These cognitive and motivational models differ from socioemotional selectivity theory by centering on internal processing efficiencies and self-regulatory drives rather than shifts in time perception across the lifespan. In particular, they highlight how resolving conflicts in ambiguous situations through positive bias aids cognitive economy, independent of future-oriented goals.^[10] In the 2020s, these models have been integrated with positive psychology frameworks to inform resilience training, where cultivating positivity effects enhances adaptive coping and well-being in older populations facing stressors. For instance, interventions drawing on self-enhancement and dynamic integration principles promote emotional balance, showing promise in reducing vulnerability to negative biases during cognitive decline.

Empirical evidence

Attention and perception studies

Empirical studies on attention and perception have demonstrated that older adults exhibit a bias toward positive stimuli compared to younger adults, who often show a preference for negative information. Key paradigms include the dot-probe task, in which participants indicate the location of a neutral probe following pairs of emotional faces; in this setup, older adults displayed faster response times to probes replacing positive faces, indicating an attentional preference for positive over neutral or negative stimuli. Similarly, eye-tracking methodologies have revealed that older adults allocate more fixations and longer dwell times to positive facial expressions, such as happy faces, while avoiding negative ones like angry or sad faces, particularly in free-viewing tasks. The positivity effect in attention extends to visual search tasks, where older adults identify positive targets, such as subtle happy expressions amid neutral distractors, more rapidly than negative ones, suggesting an automatic processing advantage for uplifting content.^[11] This bias also manifests in auditory perception, as older adults demonstrate reduced attentional engagement with negative sounds, such as dissonant music, and a relative preference for uplifting auditory stimuli like consonant tones, which they process with greater ease and less distraction.^[12] A meta-analysis of 100 studies confirmed the robustness of the age-related positivity effect across cognitive domains, including attention, with older adults showing a moderate bias toward positive information (effect size d = 0.28) and younger adults a small negativity bias (d = -0.20) under unconstrained processing conditions.^[13] Recent evidence from digital environments indicates that older users on social media platforms attend more to positive posts, such as uplifting images or messages, potentially amplifying well-being through selective exposure.^[14] This pattern aligns with socioemotional selectivity theory, emphasizing older adults' motivation to maintain positive emotional experiences.

Memory and recall studies

Research on the positivity effect in memory and recall has primarily utilized experimental paradigms such as free recall tasks, where participants encode and later retrieve emotional stimuli. In a seminal study, older adults demonstrated superior recall for positive images relative to negative ones compared to younger adults, particularly after a 25-minute delay, with the relative recall of negative images decreasing across successively older age groups. Variants of the emotional Stroop task have been adapted to examine interference effects in memory retrieval, revealing that older adults experience reduced disruption from negative emotional content during recall, suggesting diminished intrusion of negativity in memory processes.^[15] Key findings indicate enhanced retention of positive information in long-term memory among older adults. For instance, in a 2019 investigation, adults over 73 years recalled a higher proportion of positive images (mean = 0.50) than those aged 57-72 (mean = 0.32), while recalling fewer negative images overall, highlighting a strengthening positivity bias with advanced age.^[16] In autobiographical memory, older adults exhibit reduced negativity intrusion, retrieving fewer negative events and more positive or neutral ones compared to younger counterparts, which contributes to a more favorable self-narrative over time.^[17] A meta-analysis of 100 studies confirmed this age-related preference for positive over negative material across domains including memory, with effect sizes indicating reliable differences (Hedges' g ≈ 0.25 overall).^[18] The positivity effect in memory shows clear age gradients, remaining minimal in adults under 50 but emerging in middle age and peaking after 70, as evidenced by increasing positivity scores correlated with age (r = 0.32).^[16] This bias is further amplified by positive mood induction; when older adults were exposed to uplifting stimuli prior to encoding, their recall of positive information improved significantly more than in younger adults or under neutral conditions.^[19] Recent reviews affirm the robustness of these findings across 80% of studies, with stronger effects observed in naturalistic settings like autobiographical recall compared to lab-based tasks.^[20] Attention to positive stimuli, as a precursor to encoding, facilitates this selective long-term retention in older adults. In decision-making tasks, the positivity effect manifests as older adults' tendency to prioritize positive aspects of options, leading to greater satisfaction with choices compared to younger adults. For instance, when evaluating consumer products, older participants listed significantly more positive attributes (mean = 9.57) and fewer negative ones (mean = 3.36) than younger participants (positive: mean = 8.02; negative: mean = 5.20), resulting in higher immediate satisfaction ratings (t(98) = 3.30, p < .01) and sustained satisfaction two weeks later (t(87) = 3.30, p < .01).^[21] This bias emerges particularly when individuals actively deliberate on options, reflecting a motivational shift toward positive evaluations. In risk-taking paradigms, such as gambles involving potential gains or losses, older adults weigh positive outcomes more heavily and show reduced loss aversion compared to younger adults, often focusing on anticipated positive emotions. Social judgments also reveal a positivity bias, where older adults form more optimistic impressions from mixed or ambiguous information. In impression formation tasks involving behavioral descriptions with both positive and negative traits, older adults relied more on positive traits to shape overall evaluations, assigning higher positivity to targets than younger adults, especially when trait-diagnostic information was provided. For ambiguous facial expressions, such as surprised or neutral faces, older adults rated them as friendlier or happier more often than younger adults, interpreting valence more positively (e.g., surprised faces as joyful rather than fearful).^[22] This extends to interpersonal trust scenarios, like iterated trust games, where older adults exhibited reduced cynicism by preserving trust levels after minor negative interactions, unlike younger adults who showed greater distrust. Quantitative insights across domains highlight moderation of negative biases; for example, older adults display similar or heightened loss aversion in financial decisions compared to younger adults. Emerging research indicates older demographics prefer positive branding, such as optimistic messaging in health products, leading to higher selection rates in simulated shopping tasks. These patterns underscore how the positivity effect enhances adaptive decision-making and social harmony in later life by favoring optimistic inferences. As of 2025, studies confirm older adults provide more positive interpretations of ambiguous social and health scenarios, robust to content type.^[23]

Neural and biological mechanisms

Neuroimaging evidence

Neuroimaging studies, primarily using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and electroencephalography (EEG), have provided key insights into the neural substrates underlying the positivity effect in older adults. A seminal fMRI study demonstrated that older adults exhibit greater amygdala activation in response to positive emotional stimuli compared to negative ones, whereas younger adults show the opposite pattern, with stronger amygdala responses to negative stimuli.^[24] This age-related shift in amygdala reactivity aligns with theoretical predictions from socioemotional selectivity theory, suggesting enhanced emotional regulation via prefrontal mechanisms to prioritize positive information.^[25] Further fMRI evidence indicates reduced prefrontal cortex (PFC) regulation of negative stimuli in older adults, contributing to the positivity effect. For instance, older adults display hyperactivity in the ventromedial PFC during reward processing, which supports a bias toward positive outcomes and diminished attention to negatives.^[26] Additionally, altered functional connectivity within the default mode network (DMN) has been observed, with older adults showing stronger DMN engagement during self-referential processing of positive emotional content, facilitating a preference for emotionally positive information over negative.^[27] Age-specific patterns highlight differential neural responses across valence processing regions. Younger adults exhibit stronger activation in the insula in response to negative stimuli, reflecting heightened sensitivity to threat or aversion, whereas older adults demonstrate more balanced or enhanced orbitofrontal cortex activity for positive or rewarding stimuli, promoting emotional equilibrium.^[28]^[26] Recent advances using positron emission tomography (PET) have linked age-related changes in dopamine pathways to enhanced positivity processing. Specifically, preserved dopamine D1 receptor availability in striatal regions correlates with improved reward learning and sensitivity to positive reinforcement in older adults, potentially underpinning the neural basis for positivity enhancement despite overall dopaminergic decline.^[29]

Physiological correlates

Research has identified several hormonal changes in older adults that align with the positivity effect, particularly involving neuropeptides that promote positive emotional processing. Levels of oxytocin, often termed the "social bonding hormone," tend to increase with advancing age, and higher endogenous oxytocin release has been linked to greater life satisfaction and enhanced prosocial behaviors, potentially supporting a bias toward positive social information.^[30] These hormonal shifts may interact with neural pathways to amplify attentional preferences for positive content, though peripheral effects predominate in modulating emotional tone. Autonomic nervous system responses also reflect the positivity effect through attenuated stress reactivity. Older adults demonstrate lower cortisol output in response to negative emotional stimuli, indicative of a blunted hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis activation during affective tasks.^[31] For instance, in psychosocial stress paradigms, elderly participants exhibit delayed and reduced cortisol peaks compared to younger individuals, which correlates with diminished focus on aversive information and preserved engagement with positive elements. This dampened HPA response likely aids in maintaining emotional equilibrium amid age-related challenges.^[32] Genetic factors, such as variants in the COMT gene, play a role in dopamine regulation and the expression of positivity in aging. The COMT Val158Met polymorphism influences prefrontal dopamine levels, with the Met allele associated with higher dopamine availability; studies show that in older adults, this variant offsets age-related declines in affective well-being, promoting greater positive affect and resilience to negative emotions. Twin research supports the heritability of these effects, highlighting how COMT variability modulates emotional processing across the lifespan.^[33]^[34] Lifestyle factors like physical activity further enhance these physiological correlates, particularly through reductions in systemic inflammation. Recent 2025 investigations confirm that aerobic exercise interventions reduce levels of inflammatory markers such as C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 in older adults.^[35]

Implications and applications

Effects on well-being in aging

The positivity effect in older adults is associated with improved emotional well-being, including reduced rates of depression, as it promotes a focus on positive stimuli that buffers against negative emotional processing. For instance, a cross-sectional study of over 1,900 Chinese older adults found that the relationship between chronic pain and depressive symptoms weakens with advancing age, demonstrating an age-related positivity effect that mitigates depression risk, particularly in men.^[36] This aligns with longitudinal evidence showing that older individuals experience less intense negative emotions in daily life compared to younger adults, contributing to overall emotional resilience. Furthermore, the positivity effect enhances life satisfaction by fostering emotional regulation strategies that prioritize meaningful positive experiences, as outlined in socioemotional selectivity theory. In a study examining future time perspective and socioemotional functioning, greater positivity shifts in older adults correlated negatively with worry (a proxy for depressive tendencies, b = -1.99, p = 0.034) and explained up to 29% of the variance in attentional biases toward positive information, linking it to sustained well-being. Building briefly on empirical evidence from attention and memory studies, this cognitive bias supports resilience against stressors in later life.^[37] Applications of the positivity effect include therapeutic interventions tailored for seniors, such as incorporating positivity training into cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) to amplify emotional benefits. Age-adapted CBT programs emphasize reframing negative thoughts toward positive orientations, drawing on the natural positivity bias to improve mental health outcomes in older populations. Additionally, gratitude-based interventions, like journaling, have shown efficacy in reducing depressive symptoms and increasing happiness among older adults. The positivity effect also plays a key role in models of successful aging, such as the Rowe and Kahn framework, which integrates low disease risk, high cognitive and physical function, and active engagement with life—where emotional well-being enhanced by positive biases contributes to productive and satisfying later years. Seminal longitudinal data from experience sampling using a 7-day method across ages 18–94 confirmed that older adults derive greater positive affect from social interactions, supporting the framework's emphasis on emotional health as a pillar of successful aging.^[38] The positivity effect in older adults contributes to enhanced interpersonal dynamics by fostering more positive attributions and emotional experiences in social relationships. Older individuals report experiencing greater positive emotions during interactions with social partners relative to younger adults, which strengthens relational bonds and reduces conflict.^[39] This bias toward positivity also manifests in caregiving contexts, where elderly caregivers who cultivate positive aspects of their role—such as finding meaning and personal growth—exhibit lower levels of depression and burnout compared to those focusing on negative elements.^[40] In civic engagement, the positivity effect influences older adults' preferences in voting and community participation, often directing support toward optimistic policies or candidates perceived as competent and approachable. For instance, older voters demonstrate a stronger bias toward selecting political candidates with attractive and trustworthy facial appearances, aligning with their preferential processing of positive social cues over negative ones.^[41] This tendency promotes community involvement in initiatives emphasizing hopeful outcomes, such as environmental or health policies framed positively. Psychologically, the effect extends to collective positivity, particularly in media consumption patterns among older demographics. Older adults display a pronounced positivity bias when engaging with news, reporting higher happiness and a preference for positive content, as observed in their responses to COVID-19 coverage where they sought uplifting stories to regulate emotions effectively. A 2021 analysis highlighted how this drive for positive news shapes broader media trends, with seniors contributing to increased demand for optimistic reporting in digital and traditional outlets. In organizational psychology, the positivity effect benefits diverse age teams by enabling older members to contribute positive framing that mitigates conflicts and enhances overall performance. High positivity within teams correlates with improved collaboration and reduced negative relational dynamics, leading to higher group effectiveness.^[42] Public health campaigns can leverage this effect to boost vaccination uptake among the elderly by emphasizing positive benefits and success stories, which resonate more strongly with their cognitive biases and encourage participation. Recent 2025 research on older adults' adoption of artificial intelligence shows that perceived positive attributes of AI voice assistants foster greater trust and predict higher adoption rates among seniors, facilitating tech integration for health monitoring and social connectivity.^[43] This application highlights the effect's potential in bridging generational gaps in technology use.

Criticisms and future research

Methodological limitations

Early studies on the positivity effect, particularly those conducted before 2010, frequently suffered from small sample sizes, often with 20-30 participants per group, which limited statistical power and increased the risk of Type II errors.^[13] Additionally, the majority of these investigations relied on samples from Western, educated, industrialized, rich, and democratic (WEIRD) populations, primarily from the United States and Europe, thereby restricting the generalizability of findings to more diverse global contexts.^[13] Research on the positivity effect is further complicated by potential confounds related to health status, where conditions such as dementia or mild cognitive impairment can inflate negativity biases and mask the effect, as it is often absent or diminished in affected individuals compared to healthy older adults.^[44] Task demands also introduce variability; for instance, the effect weakens under cognitive load or when participants actively engage with stimuli through explicit judgments, as opposed to passive or implicit processing, suggesting that experimental conditions may inadvertently influence outcomes.^[2] The reliability of the positivity effect across studies is reflected in varying effect sizes, which differ significantly depending on paradigms such as eye-tracking versus memory tasks, with unconstrained processing yielding medium effects (d = 0.482) and constrained conditions producing only small ones (d = 0.134).^[13] To address these limitations, researchers have advocated for larger sample sizes, longitudinal designs to track developmental trajectories over time, the use of diverse stimuli that better reflect real-world emotional processing, alongside standardized measures to enhance comparability across studies, and emerging practices like preregistration to mitigate biases.^[13]^[2]

Cultural and individual differences

The positivity effect exhibits notable cultural variations, with research indicating a stronger manifestation in individualistic societies such as the United States compared to collectivist East Asian cultures. A 2018 study using eye-tracking to assess gaze preferences for emotional images found that older U.S. Americans displayed a greater bias toward positive over negative stimuli than older East Asians, regardless of the cultural relevance of the images, while no such difference emerged among younger adults.^[45] This disparity is attributed to cultural norms emphasizing personal achievement and positive self-focus in Western contexts, contrasted with East Asian emphases on interpersonal harmony and balanced emotional processing that may dampen preferential attention to positivity.^[46] Individual factors, particularly personality traits, significantly modulate the positivity effect. Among older Korean adults, those exhibiting the effect reported lower levels of negative affect, reduced anxiety, and fewer difficulties in emotion regulation, suggesting that higher neuroticism or emotional vulnerability diminishes the bias toward positive information during attentional processing.^[47] Gender differences also play a subtle role, with older women demonstrating a slight advantage in emotional positivity, as evidenced by higher emotional intelligence scores that correlate with enhanced recognition and regulation of positive emotions compared to older men.^[48] Demographic influences further shape the effect, including socioeconomic status (SES), which amplifies it among those with higher resources. In a 2022 study of Argentine older adults, high-SES individuals showed superior socioemotional processing, including better handling of positive social emotions, mediated by stronger cognitive and executive functions that support positivity biases, whereas low-SES groups exhibited attenuated effects due to resource constraints.^[49] Intersections with ethnicity reveal resilience links in U.S. minority groups; for instance, positive psychosocial factors like self-efficacy and social support in ethnically diverse older adults, including African Americans and Hispanics, bolster cognitive and emotional positivity, potentially mitigating stressors and enhancing the effect's protective role.^[50] Despite these insights, gaps persist, particularly in the need for more comprehensive global datasets to capture underrepresented regions beyond East-West comparisons.

References

[1]
The Theory Behind the Age-Related Positivity Effect - PMC - NIH
Sep 27, 2012 · The positivity effect refers to a relative preference in older adults (compared to younger adults) for positive over negative material in cognitive processing.
[2]
The positivity effect: a negativity bias in youth fades with age - NIH
Aug 5, 2017 · This shift from a negativity bias in younger age to a preference for positive information in later life is termed the 'positivity effect.'
[3]
Aging and motivated cognition: the positivity effect in attention and ...
This positivity effect in older adults' memories seems to be due to their greater focus on emotion regulation and to be implemented by cognitive control ...
[4]
The Pollyanna Principle: Selectivity in Language, Memory, and ...
The Pollyanna Principle: Selectivity in Language, Memory, and Thought. Front Cover. Margaret W. Matlin, David J. Stang. Schenkman Publishing Company, 1978.
[5]
Taking time seriously. A theory of socioemotional selectivity - PubMed
Socioemotional selectivity theory claims that the perception of time plays a fundamental role in the selection and pursuit of social goals.Missing: paper | Show results with:paper
[6]
Thinking about a limited future enhances the positivity of younger ...
Apr 25, 2016 · Results from both studies showed that regardless of chronological age, thinking about a limited future enhanced the relative positivity of participants' recall.Abstract · Experiment 1 · Experiment 2
[7]
The Theory Behind the Age-Related Positivity Effect - ResearchGate
Aug 7, 2025 · The “positivity effect” refers to an age-related trend that favors positive over negative stimuli in cognitive processing.
[8]
Living With Limited Time: Socioemotional Selectivity Theory in ... - NIH
SST posits that humans select goals in accordance with their placement in the life span for the purpose of maximizing life satisfaction (Carstensen, 2006; ...
[9]
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4868189/
[10]
Detecting subtle expressions: Older adults demonstrate automatic ...
Confirming the “positivity effect,” at 60 ms and 2000 ms presentation rates older adults (age ... The "zoom lens" of focal attention in visual search: Changes in ...
[11]
Distinct effects of positive and negative music on older adults ...
This suggests that older adults benefit from a positive musical context and can regulate emotion elicited by negative music by decreasing attention towards it ...
[12]
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24871301/
[13]
Measurement Invariance of Social Media Use in Younger and Older ...
Mar 11, 2021 · As social media sites are user-driven, older adults may intentionally shift their attention toward more positive content as well as selectively ...
[14]
age differences on pure and mixed blocks of the emotional Stroop
Mar 2, 2009 · Studies of aging and emotion suggest that older adults show diminished responsiveness to negative information, possibly resulting from increased emotion ...
[15]
Advanced Aging Enhances the Positivity Effect in Memory: Due to ...
Oct 21, 2019 · Older adults typically remember more positive than negative information compared to their younger counterparts; a phenomenon referred to as the 'positivity ...
[16]
Age-Related Positivity Effects and Autobiographical Memory Detail
This study investigated whether the age-related positivity effect strengthens specific event details in autobiographical memory.Results · Subjective Rating Analyses · Source Memory Analyses
[17]
Meta-analysis of the age-related positivity effect - PubMed
Analyses indicated that older adults show a significant information processing bias toward positive versus negative information, whereas younger adults show ...
[18]
Disentangling Aging and Mood Effects on Emotional Memory
Free recall also may lead to stronger emotional biases, including the positivity bias, than recognition tests (e.g., Charles et al., 2003; Tomaszczyk et al., ...
[19]
The positivity effect: A review of theories and recent findings.
The positivity effect is when older adults favor positive information in attention and memory, and give more positive interpretations of stimuli.Missing: et | Show results with:et
[20]
Amygdala Responses to Emotionally Valenced Stimuli in Older and ...
... older adults, seeing positive pictures led to greater amygdala activation than seeing negative pictures, whereas this was not the case for younger adults.
[21]
The Theory Behind the Age-Related Positivity Effect - Frontiers
The positivity effect concerns the relative difference between older and younger people in attention to and memory for positive as opposed to negative material.
[22]
Willingness to Wait and Altered Encoding of Time-Discounted ...
Apr 18, 2012 · These results suggest that natural aging results in altered representations of reward in orbitofrontal cortex. These changes may relate to the ...
[23]
Age differences in the default network at rest and the relation to self ...
Older adults show a 'positivity bias' in tasks involving emotion and self-referential processing. A critical network that is involved in self-referencing and ...
[24]
Affect in the Aging Brain: A Neuroimaging Meta-Analysis of Older Vs ...
Healthy aging is associated with increased neural processing of positive valence but attenuated processing of emotional arousal: An fMRI study. Neurobiology ...
[25]
Age-related differences in striatal dopamine D1 receptors mediate ...
Nov 10, 2022 · Age-related declines in dopamine signaling in brain reward regions affect sensitivity to the positive reinforcing effects of drugs.
[26]
Oxytocin Release Increases With Age and Is Associated With Life ...
The present study examines the endogenous release of the neuromodulator oxytocin (OT) in participants aged 18–99 and its relationship to prosocial behaviors.
[27]
Changes in serotonin levels with age could affect stress responses ...
May 4, 2023 · Researchers have observed that increased levels of serotonin cause the brain to process emotionally-charged information in a more positive way.
[28]
Adult age differences in the psychophysiological response to acute ...
On the physiological level (i.e., cortisol and HR), older adults presented not only reduced HPA and autonomic stress responses but also delayed HPA reactivity, ...
[29]
Daily Social Interactions and HPA Axis Activity Among Midlife and ...
One found that lower positive social support, especially from adult children, was linked to higher cortisol levels among older adults (Iob et al., 2018).
[30]
(PDF) Older Age May Offset Genetic Influence on Affect: The COMT ...
Oct 9, 2025 · This study examined how COMT and age may interact to shape daily affective experience across the life span. Results suggest that Met (vs. Val) ...
[31]
A twin study of childhood maltreatment and COMT variability
The functional variant Val158Met in the coding sequence of COMT gene is involved in the modulation of dopamine availability in the prefrontal cortex in both ...<|separator|>
[32]
Impact of aerobic exercise on chronic inflammation in older adults
Aug 8, 2025 · This study aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the effect of aerobic exercise training on inflammatory markers ...
[33]
Inflammatory biomarkers profiles and cognition among older adults
Jan 17, 2025 · Among older adults, a circulating pro-inflammatory immune profile is associated with lower baseline cognitive performance.
[34]
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022395613000502
[35]
[PDF] Age Appropriate CBT for Older People - Beck Institute
Age-appropriate CBT includes conceptualisation/cohort values, attitudes to ageing, optimal ageing (SOC), and wisdom (timelines). Wisdom is linked to better ...
[36]
https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025775
[37]
Better With Age: Social Relationships Across Adulthood - PMC - NIH
Older adults also report experiencing more positive emotions when interacting with their social partners than do younger adults (e.g., Charles & Piazza, 2007).
[38]
How Caregivers Can Cultivate Moments of Positivity
May 15, 2019 · The caregivers who learned positive emotion skills ended up experiencing more positive emotions and (in turn) less depression.
[39]
The influence of political candidates' facial appearance on older and ...
This research examines whether there are age differences in voting behavior based on facial appearance. Research shows that people tend to vote for more ...
[40]
Cross-level effects of positivity on performance - ScienceDirect
People low in positivity performed better when other group members' positivity was high.
[41]
Factors influencing older adults' adoption of AI voice assistants
Therefore, perceived trust in AI has a direct and positive effect on older adults' willingness to use AI voice assistants. Accordingly, this study proposes ...
[42]
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886915003402
[43]
Publication bias in psychology: A closer look at the correlation ...
Feb 15, 2024 · In line with previous research, they do not suggest that publication bias and related biases have a strong impact on meta-analyses in psychology ...
[44]
Cultural differences in the age-related positivity effect - PubMed
Findings revealed that regardless of cultural relevance of the pictures, older U.S. Americans showed more gaze preference for positive over negative pictures ...Missing: Suzuki 2007
[45]
Cultural variation in pro-positive versus balanced systems of emotions
Pro-positive/contra-negative emotion systems are more common in Western cultures, while balanced systems are more common in East Asian cultures.
[46]
Age-related Differences and Individual Differences of the Positivity ...
Older adults who do show the positivity effect exhibit less negative affect, are less anxious, have fewer difficulties in emotion regulation, and achieve ...
[47]
Gender differences in the predictive effect of perceive emotional ...
Apr 11, 2024 · Specifically, we found that older women have more EI than men. Additionally, older adults with high scores on emotional attention and low scores ...
[48]
Socioeconomic status impacts cognitive and socioemotional ...
Apr 11, 2022 · Socioeconomic status (SES) negatively impacts cognitive and executive functioning in older adults, yet its effects on socioemotional abilities have not been ...
[49]
Positive psychosocial factors and cognition in ethnically diverse ...
Positive psychosocial factors, particularly self-efficacy and social support, may protect against late-life cognitive decline.
[50]
(PDF) Meta-Analysis of the Age-Related Positivity Effect
According to SST, older individuals are expected to be more firmly committed to positive attitudes (Reed et al., 2014) . This is rooted in food-related research ...