Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Reforestation

Reforestation is the re-establishment of forest cover through planting trees or deliberate seeding on land previously classified as forest but that has since lost its tree cover due to deforestation, degradation, or natural disturbances. This practice aims to restore ecological functions such as carbon sequestration, soil stabilization, and habitat provision, though its success hinges on factors like species selection, site preparation, and long-term maintenance. Globally, reforestation efforts have contributed to modest increases in forest area in some regions, countering ongoing net forest losses estimated at over 420 million hectares from 1990 to 2020, predominantly in tropical areas. Key benefits of effective reforestation include enhanced biodiversity when native species mixtures are used, improved water retention, and potential mitigation of climate change through biomass accumulation, with studies indicating that well-managed plantings can sequester significant carbon if sapling survival rates exceed 50-70%. However, challenges persist, including high initial mortality from drought, pests, or poor matching of trees to local conditions, which often limits net gains despite billions of trees planted annually worldwide. In many cases, natural regeneration outperforms artificial planting in cost-effectiveness and ecological outcomes, as it leverages existing seed banks and soil microbiomes without the risks of mechanical disturbance. Notable achievements include large-scale programs in countries like China and Ethiopia, where millions of hectares have been afforested or reforested, though empirical assessments reveal variable survival and limited restoration of pre-disturbance biodiversity. Controversies arise from widespread use of monoculture plantations, which prioritize fast-growing exotic species for timber or carbon credits but often support lower wildlife diversity, increase vulnerability to pests and fires, and fail to replicate the complex structures of native forests. Mixed-species approaches drawing from native flora yield superior long-term resilience and ecosystem services, underscoring the need for site-specific strategies over uniform global pledges.

Historical Development

Pre-Industrial Practices

In ancient Roman agriculture, agroforestry systems integrated tree planting with crop cultivation to enhance soil stability and yields, as evidenced by practices described in classical texts from 700 BCE to 300 CE, where olives and vines were interplanted with cereals and legumes in hedgerow or scattered patterns to prevent erosion and provide shade without displacing annual crops. These methods relied on manual propagation and selective replanting of species like olive trees in orchards that supported understory farming, maintaining productivity on sloped terrains across the Mediterranean basin for centuries through localized property management rather than centralized directives. In pre-industrial Europe, coppicing emerged as a widespread technique for regenerating woodlands, involving the periodic cutting of trees such as hazel, oak, and ash at ground level to stimulate stump sprouting for fuelwood, poles, and fodder, with evidence from tree-ring analysis indicating sustainable yields in coppice-with-standards systems dating back to the early Middle Ages and earlier Iron Age precedents. This practice, managed by smallholders and communities, preserved forest cover by enforcing rotational cycles of 5–20 years per stool, yielding consistent biomass without full clear-cutting, as demonstrated by the persistence of multi-layered stands that supplied timber for construction while regenerating naturally through vegetative means tied to usufruct rights. Similar selective replanting and management occurred in parts of Asia, where ancient systems combined tree integration with terraced agriculture to combat soil loss; for instance, in China's Loess Plateau regions, pre-industrial farmers incorporated woody species along terrace edges for reinforcement, as inferred from historical landforms that sustained fertility and reduced runoff in rain-fed systems developed over millennia. These efforts, limited by hand tools and labor-intensive propagation, emphasized polycultures over monocultures, with empirical longevity shown in enduring terrace complexes that supported crop-tree mosaics without industrial inputs. In pre-colonial sub-Saharan Africa, indigenous communities maintained woodland cover through regulated practices like selective thinning and replanting of multipurpose trees for agroforestry, governed by communal taboos and tenure systems that prevented overexploitation, as historical accounts and remnant landscapes indicate stable savanna-forest mosaics in regions like the Sahel prior to 19th-century disruptions. Success stemmed from localized ecological knowledge, such as protecting sacred groves and propagating species for fruit, medicine, and soil enhancement via farmer-managed regeneration, achieving sustainability on scales constrained by population densities and manual methods rather than coercive policies.

Industrial and Colonial Era

In the early 18th century, amid acute timber shortages driven by mining, smelting, and naval demands in Saxony, Hans Carl von Carlowitz articulated principles of sustained-yield forestry in his 1713 treatise Sylvicultura Oeconomica. He advocated managing forests to ensure perpetual regeneration matching harvest rates, emphasizing selective cutting, species-appropriate planting, and protection from overexploitation as causal necessities for long-term wood supply, influencing subsequent German state forestry policies that prioritized economic yield over ecological diversity. These ideas spread across Europe, prompting systematic replanting in regions like Prussia and France by the mid-19th century, where state-controlled forests recovered timber stocks but often through monoculture plantations that simplified native ecosystems and increased vulnerability to pests. Colonial powers extended such practices abroad for strategic resources, exemplified by British efforts in India to secure teak (Tectona grandis) for shipbuilding amid depleting European oak supplies. Following the 1792 annexation of Malabar, officials established controlled plantations, with the Nilambur teak scheme commencing in 1842 under state oversight to propagate durable, rot-resistant timber through seed collection and line planting, yielding initial successes in timber production by the late 19th century but at the cost of local displacement and enforcement of exclusionary forest laws that prioritized imperial extraction over indigenous management. Similar ventures in Burma and Java focused on export-oriented monocrops, where weak enforcement of regeneration rules led to failures, including soil degradation from intensive harvesting without adequate rotation cycles, underscoring how colonial open-access incentives hindered sustainable outcomes compared to domestic property-secured systems. In the United States, 19th-century logging surges in the Midwest and Appalachia, fueled by railroad and urban expansion, prompted federal responses culminating in the Forest Reserve Act of March 3, 1891, which authorized the President to withdraw public lands from sale for protection against further denudation. This enabled the designation of 21 million acres as reserves by 1897, laying groundwork for managed reforestation on degraded federal lands, though early efforts emphasized fire suppression and natural regrowth over artificial planting, achieving timber stabilization in some areas while critics noted ecological disruptions from excluding natural disturbance regimes essential for diverse forest composition. Secure private property rights in American states facilitated voluntary replanting by timber firms, contrasting colonial overexploitation elsewhere; empirical data from regions like Michigan showed faster recovery under ownership incentives, with harvest rates stabilizing post-1880s as proprietors invested in seed sowing to avert shortages. Overall, these initiatives demonstrated economic motivations yielding partial successes in resource renewal but recurrent failures when disregarding site-specific ecology, such as mismatched species leading to high mortality rates exceeding 50% in initial European and colonial trials.

20th Century to Present

Following World War II, the U.S. Soil Conservation Service expanded programs to address soil erosion and promote reforestation on degraded lands, with Congress increasing appropriations and enacting the Anderson-Mansfield Reforestation and Revegetation Act of 1950 to accelerate tree planting on national forests and rangelands. In 1978, China launched the Three-North Shelter Forest Program, an expansive ecological initiative to combat desertification through afforestation and reforestation across northern regions, achieving over 30 million hectares of planted area by the early 2020s while aiming for completion by 2050. Large-scale global campaigns gained momentum in the late 20th and early 21st centuries, with the Trillion Trees initiative, originating from UN efforts in 2011 and amplified by organizations like Plant-for-the-Planet, evolving into platforms such as 1t.org targeting one trillion trees by 2030 to restore forests and sequester carbon. Concurrently, the 8 Billion Trees initiative set a goal to restore 40 million acres of degraded land by 2025, emphasizing private and community-driven planting. A 2024 study in Nature Climate Change revealed that well-planned reforestation in low- and middle-income countries could achieve up to 10 times more low-cost carbon removal—below $20 per metric ton—than prior IPCC estimates by combining natural regeneration and targeted planting, highlighting untapped potential in degraded areas. However, 2025 modeling research indicated substantially less viable land for effective reforestation than previously assumed, as soil carbon dynamics often result in topsoil losses offsetting aboveground gains, limiting net sequestration in many sites. Private land ownership has driven successes, particularly in the U.S. Southeast, where 85% of the 39 million acres suitable for reforestation are privately held, enabling market-incentivized booms in timber plantations and carbon credit projects that outpace public efforts. Despite ambitious pledges, global forest fire emissions have surged 60% since 2001, with 2023 fires alone releasing carbon equivalent to annual fossil fuel emissions in magnitude, frequently outpacing reforestation gains and turning forests into net emitters in fire-prone regions.

Definitions and Principles

Core Definitions

Reforestation is the process of establishing a new forest on land that was recently forested but has been cleared, primarily through human intervention such as tree planting or seeding to accelerate the restoration of tree cover. This practice contrasts with unaided natural regeneration, emphasizing directed efforts to achieve desired species composition and density on deforested sites. Central principles include site-specific species selection to match local climate, soil properties, and elevation, ensuring physiological adaptation and minimizing mortality from environmental stressors. Stocking density, the planned number of seedlings or saplings per hectare, typically ranges from 1,000 to 3,000 stems depending on species growth rates and management goals, with adjustments for expected early losses. The term originated in 19th-century European silviculture, where systematic regeneration techniques were formalized to counteract timber shortages from industrialization, evolving into modern protocols focused on measurable outcomes. Success is defined causally through long-term empirical indicators, such as survival rates of at least 75% after 5-10 years and progressive biomass accumulation exceeding 5-10 tons per hectare annually in early stages, rather than initial planting volumes which often overstate viability due to high attrition.

Distinctions from Afforestation and Restoration

Reforestation specifically involves the reestablishment of tree cover on lands that were previously forested but have been deforested or severely degraded, aiming to restore the prior forest composition where historical evidence indicates forest presence. In contrast, afforestation establishes forests on lands without recent forest history, such as long-standing grasslands or savannas, converting open ecosystems into wooded ones. Ecological restoration extends beyond mere tree planting to encompass the full recovery of native biodiversity, soil health, and ecological processes, often incorporating non-tree vegetation like shrubs and understory species absent in pure reforestation efforts. Prior land-use history serves as the primary criterion for differentiation, with verifiable records—such as satellite imagery or historical surveys—determining whether an area qualifies as formerly forested. Conflating these practices risks policy miscalculations, as afforestation on non-forest lands often yields lower ecological success due to mismatched site conditions, including soil types and water availability unsuitable for sustained tree growth. For instance, afforestation in savannas has led to biodiversity declines by suppressing fire-adapted grasses and herbs that support native herbivores, with studies documenting up to 50% species loss in converted areas. Mislabeled projects, such as those under initiatives like Africa's AFR100, have applied afforestation techniques to savanna grasslands while claiming reforestation benefits, inflating carbon offset projections and diverting resources from true forest recovery sites. Carbon sequestration outcomes further underscore these distinctions empirically: reforestation on former forest lands typically achieves higher long-term permanence, with rates of 4.5 to 40.7 tons of CO2 per hectare per year in early decades, as trees align with native adaptations. Afforestation, however, faces albedo penalties—darker canopies reducing surface reflectivity and potentially increasing local warming by 0.1 to 1.2°C in temperate zones—alongside risks of reversal if trees fail in non-native soils. Restoration's inclusion of diverse vegetation enhances soil carbon stability beyond trees alone, mitigating monoculture vulnerabilities observed in afforestation plantations. Such errors in classification have propagated in carbon markets, where unverifiable claims overestimate global mitigation by treating incompatible conversions as restorative.

Objectives and Empirical Benefits

Economic Objectives and Outcomes

Reforestation pursues economic objectives centered on sustainable timber production to secure long-term supplies of wood products for industries such as construction, manufacturing, and pulp. This approach aims to replace depleted natural stocks with managed plantations capable of repeated harvesting cycles, thereby stabilizing resource availability and reducing price fluctuations driven by overexploitation of old-growth forests. Secure timber resources also underpin employment in logging, processing, and related sectors, fostering regional economic resilience in forest-dependent communities. A secondary objective involves mitigating soil erosion to safeguard adjacent agricultural productivity, as tree roots stabilize slopes and reduce runoff that strips topsoil from farmlands. Empirical data indicate that reforestation on degraded hillsides can prevent annual soil losses equivalent to thousands of tons per hectare, preserving arable land value and lowering sedimentation costs for irrigation systems. Outcomes from private-sector reforestation efforts reveal financial viability, with timber plantations delivering internal rates of return (IRR) of 3-7% annually in temperate zones like the United States and Europe, bolstered by low-risk environments and steady market demand. In faster-growth regions of developing countries, such as parts of Latin America, returns can exceed these figures due to accelerated biomass accumulation, often surpassing inflation and alternative investments over 20-30 year rotations. Agroforestry models within reforestation have demonstrably reduced poverty, with large-scale tree planting correlating to lower rural poverty rates and higher household incomes in sub-Saharan Africa through sales of timber, non-timber products, and integrated crops. World Bank analyses confirm these socioeconomic gains, noting diversified forest incomes as a key driver of livelihood improvements without relying on subsidies. Selective logging in sustainably managed reforestation sites has similarly sustained cash flows for smallholders, outperforming clear-cutting by preserving site productivity for future yields. Critics argue that monoculture-dominated reforestation, while offering short-term boosts via rapid harvests, undermines longevity by acidifying soils, eroding nutrient bases, and heightening pest risks, which can halve productivity in subsequent cycles compared to mixed-species stands. Secure property rights, enabling owner-directed decisions on replanting and harvesting, have empirically supported higher regrowth and investment rates than centralized state quotas, which often suffer from misaligned incentives and enforcement gaps.

Environmental Objectives and Evidence

Reforestation efforts primarily target environmental restoration through soil stabilization, where tree roots anchor soil particles to mitigate erosion, as demonstrated in watershed projects where reforestation reduced sediment loads by binding soil and intercepting precipitation impacts. These benefits are most evident in site-appropriate contexts, such as degraded slopes with low-intensity surrounding land use, but poorly sited plantations can exacerbate runoff if vegetation cover fails to establish adequately. Water regulation constitutes another core objective, with forests enhancing infiltration and reducing peak flows through increased evapotranspiration and soil moisture retention, though systematic reviews indicate frequent decreases in overall water yield post-reforestation due to higher transpiration demands. Natural regeneration often outperforms monoculture plantations in stabilizing hydrological cycles, as diverse root structures and canopies better modulate soil water content and prevent deficits in semi-arid regions. However, large-scale afforestation risks long-term soil water deficits in water-limited areas, underscoring the need for context-specific implementation to avoid unintended hydrological disruptions. Carbon sequestration receives significant emphasis, yet empirical limits constrain its climate mitigation potential; even maximal global reforestation over 30 years would offset only about eight months of current anthropogenic emissions, highlighting sequestration as supplementary rather than transformative. Permanence remains challenged by disturbances like wildfires, which can rapidly release stored carbon, rendering credits vulnerable despite buffers in project designs. In non-tropical zones, albedo reductions from darker forest canopies absorb more solar radiation, partially offsetting sequestration benefits by increasing local warming, an effect negligible in tropics but critical for net climate impact assessments in temperate and boreal regions. Mixed-species forests generally deliver superior ecosystem services compared to monoculture plantations, with studies showing enhanced hydrological regulation and erosion control through greater structural diversity, though well-managed plantations can approximate natural outcomes under optimal conditions. These outcomes affirm reforestation's role in targeted restoration but demand rigorous site matching to realize verifiable gains without overreliance on exaggerated carbon narratives.

Social Objectives and Real-World Impacts

Social objectives of reforestation often include enhancing access to fuelwood for rural communities and preserving cultural heritage tied to forested landscapes. In regions where households rely on wood for cooking and heating, reforestation initiatives aim to secure sustainable supplies, reducing deforestation pressures from informal harvesting. Cultural roles emphasize restoring sacred groves or traditional sites integral to indigenous practices, fostering community identity and intergenerational knowledge transmission. Empirical evidence indicates that local participants prioritize utility-driven planting, such as species yielding fruits, nuts, or fuelwood, over motives like carbon sequestration or biodiversity enhancement. A 2021 global analysis of tree-planting motivations found that utility benefits motivated 68% of respondents, compared to 12% for carbon storage and 10% for biodiversity, highlighting a preference for direct, tangible gains in household resilience. Successful projects yield co-benefits including improved public health from reduced air pollution—U.S. forests alone removed 17.4 million tonnes of pollutants in 2010, averting respiratory illnesses—and localized tourism drawing visitors to restored areas, though these accrue unevenly without inclusive governance. Poverty alleviation emerges as a secondary impact in utility-focused efforts, yet communal schemes risk elite capture, where influential locals monopolize benefits like timber access or subsidies, sidelining marginalized groups. Secure individual property rights correlate with higher participation rates by incentivizing stewards to invest in long-term planting, contrasting top-down programs that can displace communities through restricted land use or imposed species selections misaligned with needs. This underscores causal links between tenure clarity and voluntary engagement, mitigating conflicts over resource control.

Methods and Implementation

Natural Regeneration Approaches

Natural regeneration approaches in reforestation emphasize passive recovery processes, where forests regrow through existing seed banks, seed dispersal from adjacent areas, and vegetative sprouting from remnant trees or roots, without direct human planting of seedlings. These methods rely on ecological succession, allowing pioneer species to establish and facilitate later successional stages, often resulting in forests more structurally similar to pre-disturbance conditions compared to monoculture plantations. Key techniques include excluding herbivores and fire through fencing or controlled grazing to protect emerging seedlings, thereby enabling spontaneous recolonization in areas with viable propagule sources. Success depends on factors such as proximity to seed sources, soil seed bank viability, and the presence of remnant trees, which accelerate recovery by providing perches for seed-dispersing birds and shade for understory development. For instance, post-logging sites with retained seed trees exhibit faster canopy closure and biomass accumulation, as observed in Borneo's dipterocarp forests over three decades of monitoring. Empirical evidence from a 2017 meta-analysis of 133 tropical studies indicates that natural regeneration outperforms active restoration in achieving higher aboveground biomass and species richness. Recent 2024 assessments confirm that in approximately 46% of suitable deforested tropical regions, passive regeneration yields greater biodiversity retention and carbon sequestration at lower costs than tree planting. These approaches offer significant cost advantages, often requiring minimal intervention beyond initial protection, making them up to several times cheaper per hectare than labor-intensive planting efforts. Spontaneous recovery has been documented in diverse contexts, such as secondary forests in Europe following 20th-century logging cessation, where natural processes restored mixed-species stands within decades. However, limitations arise in severely degraded soils lacking organic matter or facing chronic erosion, where regeneration proceeds more slowly or fails due to poor seedling establishment and competition from invasives. In such cases, light management like targeted weeding may be integrated to enhance outcomes without shifting to full active methods, balancing ecological authenticity with practical viability.

Artificial Planting Techniques

Artificial planting techniques encompass direct seeding, where seeds are sown onto prepared sites, and the use of nursery-produced seedlings, which dominate reforestation efforts due to higher control over early growth stages. Direct seeding provides a lower-cost option for large-scale applications but achieves lower seedling establishment rates, often below those of transplanted stock, owing to vulnerabilities like predation and desiccation. Site preparation precedes planting and typically involves mechanical scarification, herbicide treatments, or burning to suppress competing vegetation and improve soil-seed contact, thereby enhancing germination and initial survival. Species selection prioritizes genotypes adapted to local climate, soil, and elevation to match site conditions, favoring native trees over exotics to avoid maladaptation risks while balancing growth rates; exotics may offer faster establishment in some contexts but carry higher failure potential in mismatched environments. Proper genetic matching and site suitability can yield seedling survival rates of 50-80% over initial years, contrasting with broader averages where mortality reaches 44% after five years due to suboptimal conditions. Nursery stock methods produce containerized or bareroot seedlings under controlled conditions, enabling outplanting with intact root systems for faster field establishment, particularly when leveraging residual roots from prior stands to accelerate coppice-like regrowth in plantations. Such plantations frequently rely on monocultures of select species for operational efficiency and uniform growth, yet these have drawn criticism as "green deserts" for diminishing biodiversity, soil depletion, and reduced resilience to pests and disturbances relative to diverse assemblages. Emerging drone seeding trials facilitate direct aerial application over remote or rugged terrain, promising scalability, but field results demonstrate limited efficacy—often low germination without protective coatings or post-seeding interventions to counter seed loss and environmental stresses.

Hybrid and Advanced Strategies

Hybrid strategies in reforestation integrate elements of natural regeneration with targeted artificial interventions to accelerate forest recovery while leveraging ecological processes. Enrichment planting, for instance, involves supplementing naturally regenerating areas with seedlings of desired species to enhance biodiversity, timber quality, or resilience, particularly in degraded tropical fragments where natural succession alone may favor less valuable pioneers. Applied nucleation, another hybrid technique, establishes small clusters of planted trees to facilitate seed dispersal and natural colonization across larger landscapes, combining direct seeding or planting with minimal ground preparation to mimic natural patch dynamics. These methods have demonstrated superior outcomes in carbon sequestration compared to pure natural regeneration or monoculture planting; a 2024 global analysis estimated that hybrid approaches could remove up to 40% more atmospheric carbon dioxide at lower costs than standalone methods, as they balance rapid initial growth from assisted planting with long-term ecosystem stability from natural processes. Advanced strategies incorporate genetic technologies to optimize tree stock for environmental stressors. Post-2020 tree breeding programs have focused on selecting and propagating genotypes with enhanced drought resistance, such as through genomic-assisted breeding that identifies traits for improved water-use efficiency without compromising growth rates. For example, selective breeding in species like pines and eucalypts has produced varieties that maintain productivity under projected climate scenarios, enabling reforestation in marginal lands previously unsuitable due to aridity. These genetic improvements are often integrated into hybrid frameworks, where resilient seedlings are used for enrichment in regenerating sites to boost overall stand vigor and carbon storage potential. Decision support tools further refine hybrid implementations by modeling site-specific outcomes. Discussions at the 2025 Reforestation Summit highlighted tools like climate-adapted seed selectors and spatial prioritization models that integrate data on soil, climate, and regeneration trajectories to recommend optimal mixes of natural and assisted methods. Such tools aid in avoiding suboptimal choices, with evidence indicating they enhance success rates by 20-30% in heterogeneous landscapes through predictive analytics on species matching and intervention timing. However, advanced and hybrid strategies risk failure when technological interventions overlook local adaptation and ecological context. Over-reliance on genetically modified or non-native stock without provenance testing has led to high mortality in projects ignoring site-specific conditions, as seen in large-scale initiatives where mismatched genetics resulted in up to 80% seedling loss due to unforeseen pests or soil incompatibilities. Empirical cases from India and Africa underscore that bypassing community knowledge of indigenous dynamics exacerbates these issues, emphasizing the need for grounded validation to prevent "phantom forests" that inflate sequestration claims but deliver negligible real-world benefits.

Economic and Incentive Structures

Private Market Mechanisms

Private landowners engage in reforestation through timber production, where forests are planted and managed for commercial harvest, generating revenue via leases or direct sales that incentivize sustained growth cycles typically spanning 20-50 years depending on species and region. In the United States, private forests covering approximately 475 million acres contribute to timber markets, with owners deriving economic value from wood products while maintaining land productivity, as evidenced by analyses of family-owned operations balancing harvest with regeneration. Eco-tourism complements these efforts, as reforested areas attract visitors for activities like guided hikes or wildlife viewing, providing supplementary income; for instance, small-scale operations in tropical regions integrate reforestation with tourism to restore degraded landscapes while fostering rural economic development. Carbon credit markets represent a key private mechanism, where reforestation projects sell verified emission reductions or sequestered carbon to offset corporate emissions, but require proof of additionality—demonstrating that planting would not occur without credit revenue—and verifiable sequestration through monitoring protocols like remote sensing and ground inventories. High-quality credits demand permanence, often secured via long-term contracts or buffers against risks like fires, yet 2025 analyses highlight persistent issues, with critics noting that many projects issue non-additional credits for activities that would proceed anyway, undermining climate impact as per peer-reviewed evaluations of offset efficacy. These mechanisms promote self-sustaining reforestation by aligning private property incentives with utility maximization, where owners invest in trees for future yields rather than short-term exploitation, yielding economic resilience on U.S. private lands through diversified revenue from timber, carbon, and ecosystem services. Empirical evidence from 2023-2024 assessments indicates higher long-term survival rates in market-driven projects, as profit motives encourage adaptive management against pests and climate variability, contrasting with dependency on transient funding elsewhere. For example, southeastern U.S. private holdings, comprising 85% of reforestation-suitable acreage, demonstrate viability through voluntary carbon removal initiatives that enhance landowner returns without external mandates.

Public Policies and Subsidies

Public policies promoting reforestation often include direct subsidies, tax credits, and national afforestation targets aimed at enhancing carbon sequestration and ecosystem restoration. These interventions seek to offset private costs of tree planting and maintenance, with global examples including payments for ecosystem services and fiscal incentives tied to planted area. However, empirical outcomes reveal frequent inefficiencies, such as distorted land use prioritizing quantity over ecological viability, leading to suboptimal carbon storage and heightened environmental risks. In Chile, Decree 701 enacted in 1974 provided subsidies covering up to 75% of afforestation costs, spurring a 13% increase in plantations relative to unsubsidized scenarios by 2011, primarily with exotic species like Pinus radiata and Eucalyptus spp. These incentives replaced diverse native forests with monocultures, resulting in biodiversity declines—evidenced by reduced native species richness and increased invasive spread—without commensurate gains in aboveground carbon storage. The policy's emphasis on exotic timber species for export revenues exacerbated soil degradation and water scarcity in Mediterranean ecosystems, illustrating how subsidies untethered from native density requirements amplify ecological trade-offs. China's Grain for Green Program, launched in 1999, subsidized conversion of cropland to forests on sloped areas in regions like the Loess Plateau, restoring over 28 million hectares by 2020 and curbing soil erosion. Yet, afforestation with monoculture species such as Populus and Robinia consumed 20-40% more soil moisture than native grasslands, elevating drought risks and depleting regional water resources, with runoff reductions of up to 50% in some basins. Unintended displacement effects included conversion of flatter, productive lands to forests to meet quotas, undermining food security for rural households and prompting out-migration. These outcomes highlight how top-down targets, while achieving superficial coverage, often overlook hydrological limits and local livelihoods. Recent analyses, including 2024 assessments, indicate that subsidized reforestation frequently underperforms carbon goals when favoring artificial planting over natural regeneration, with mixed strategies sequestering up to 10 times more carbon at lower costs per ton if site-specific factors like native vegetation potential are prioritized. Government-imposed quotas and broad incentives distort resource allocation, favoring short-term metrics over long-term viability, as seen in variable policy impacts reducing tree cover loss by only about 4 percentage points globally on average. Empirical evidence suggests that reducing regulatory distortions—such as through tenure reforms enabling local monitoring—enhances regrowth rates more effectively than heavy subsidization, with private initiatives outperforming state-driven efforts in human-dominated landscapes by aligning incentives with sustainable practices. Targeted subsidies with strict safeguards, like biodiversity mandates, show promise but remain rare amid pervasive implementation failures.

Environmental and Ecological Effects

Positive Ecosystem Services

Reforestation enhances hydrological functions by increasing soil infiltration and reducing surface runoff, thereby mitigating flood risks in downstream areas. Empirical studies indicate that restored forests decrease peak streamflows during heavy rainfall events due to enhanced evapotranspiration and water storage in soils and biomass. For instance, paired watershed analyses in forested catchments show that afforestation can lower annual water yields by 10-30%, reflecting greater retention that buffers against flooding. Tree roots mechanically stabilize slopes, preventing erosion and landslides, as demonstrated in U.S. reclamation projects where reforestation on steep mined lands reduced sediment yields by over 90% compared to untreated sites. Well-executed reforestation promotes wildlife habitat recovery by providing structural complexity and food resources in previously degraded areas. In protected regrowth zones, bird species richness has increased by 20-50% within 5-10 years post-planting, with understory development supporting insectivorous and ground-nesting species. Mammal populations, such as deer and small rodents, rebound as canopy closure restores cover and forage, evidenced in restoration sites where occupancy rates doubled after a decade of natural regeneration aided by initial planting. These gains are more pronounced in diverse stands, where mixed species foster layered habitats that sustain higher trophic levels than uniform plantations. Reforested areas improve local microclimates by moderating temperature fluctuations and elevating humidity through shading and transpiration. Forest canopies reduce daytime air temperatures by 2-4°C and increase relative humidity by 5-10% relative to open lands, creating refugia for temperature-sensitive organisms. In U.S. conservation contexts, such as post-fire reforestation, these effects stabilize soil moisture and air conditions, enhancing understory plant establishment and overall ecosystem resilience. Diverse reforestation yields stronger microclimate buffering than monocultures, as varied canopy architectures optimize airflow and evaporative cooling.

Risks to Biodiversity and Soil Health

Monoculture plantations in reforestation efforts often function as biodiversity sinks, supporting far fewer species than natural forests due to uniform canopy structure and reduced understory habitat diversity. A global meta-analysis of tree plantations found consistently lower biodiversity metrics, including species richness and abundance of specialist taxa, compared to native woodlands, attributing this to homogenized environments that favor generalists while excluding obligate forest dwellers. These "green deserts" emerge because single-species stands lack the structural complexity—such as varied strata and deadwood resources—that sustains diverse arthropod, fungal, and vertebrate assemblages in heterogeneous natural ecosystems. Reforestation with exotic fast-growing species exacerbates soil depletion through accelerated nutrient extraction and altered microbial dynamics, as these trees prioritize rapid biomass accumulation over sustainable cycling. In tropical contexts, exotics like eucalyptus can reduce soil microbial diversity by up to 50% under certain conditions, impairing decomposition and fertility restoration via disrupted symbiotic networks. High transpiration rates in such species further deplete soil moisture reserves, creating drier profiles that hinder native recolonization and promote long-term degradation, with empirical data showing persistent water deficits years post-planting. In China, large-scale reforestation policies since the 1990s have inadvertently decreased native forest cover by 6% between 2001 and 2013, as agricultural and degraded lands were converted to plantations, displacing diverse assemblages without equivalent regeneration. This trade-off prioritizes short-term canopy closure over species richness, with studies confirming plantations hold 20-50% less carbon in soil and biomass pools than comparable natural stands due to shallower rooting and harvest cycles. Invasive risks compound these issues when non-native species escape plantations, outcompeting locals via allelopathy or superior resource capture, as seen in projects where eucalyptus hybrids suppress understory flora by 70-90%. Soil compaction from heavy machinery during site preparation reduces porosity by 20-30%, impeding root penetration and aeration, which delays recovery and amplifies erosion in subsequent rotations. Empirical comparisons underscore that such practices yield ecosystems with diminished resilience, where normalized endorsements overlook causal chains linking uniformity to trophic simplification and nutrient lockup.

Challenges and Barriers

Technical and Operational Hurdles

Reforestation projects frequently face high seedling mortality, with empirical data showing that 18% of planted saplings die within the first year and up to 44% after five years in tropical and subtropical restoration efforts, primarily due to inadequate site preparation and environmental stresses. Droughts intensify this vulnerability by restricting soil moisture and root establishment, particularly in dryland ecosystems where heat-induced mortality risks have risen with climate variability. Pests and diseases, including invasive species, further erode survival rates by targeting vulnerable young trees, necessitating targeted interventions like resistant stock selection to mitigate losses. Soil constraints limit suitable sites, as 2025 global soil carbon mapping models indicate far less viable land for reforestation than optimistic estimates suggest, with topsoil carbon dynamics revealing patchy potential for sustained growth due to inherent limitations in nutrient retention and water-holding capacity. Without ongoing maintenance such as irrigation, weed control, and protection from herbivores, failure rates can exceed 50% in challenging terrains, underscoring the causal link between post-planting care and long-term viability. Operational demands are inherently labor-intensive, involving precise seedling handling, site-specific adaptations, and repeated assessments that scale poorly for vast areas, often rendering artificial methods less efficient than natural regeneration in resource-limited scenarios. Monitoring these efforts compounds difficulties, as field-based tracking in remote or rugged locations proves resource-heavy and inconsistent, though satellite-derived vegetation indices enable remote evaluation of canopy development and early mortality signals to inform adaptive strategies.

Land Use and Socioeconomic Conflicts

Reforestation initiatives frequently compete with established agricultural and pastoral land uses, particularly in developing regions where arable land is scarce and vital for livelihoods. This competition arises as projects seek to convert pastures or croplands into tree plantations, potentially displacing farming communities and intensifying resource scarcity. In tropical areas, such conversions can undermine local food production systems, as the economic value derived from agriculture often surpasses the long-term returns from timber or carbon credits in reforestation schemes. The risks of socioeconomic displacement are pronounced when reforestation targets productive farmland, leading to reduced food security and heightened vulnerability for smallholder farmers. For instance, in tropical landscapes, the opportunity costs of forgoing agricultural yields—estimated in some studies to exceed $1,000 per hectare annually depending on crop types—can render reforestation uneconomical without compensatory mechanisms, as the foregone income from staples like maize or soy outpaces projected forest benefits over decades. World Bank analyses highlight that such land conversions, if poorly planned, exacerbate poverty by limiting access to cultivable plots, with evaluations showing spikes in household income loss where alternative livelihoods are not integrated. Conflicts often stem from enclosures or top-down impositions that bypass local property rights, prompting resistance from pastoralists and farmers who view tree planting as an infringement on communal grazing or cropping areas. Effective resolutions prioritize securing tenure rights, enabling voluntary participation through market-based incentives rather than relocation. Successes occur in incentive-aligned models like agroforestry, where farmers integrate trees on their own lands, boosting incomes by 20-50% via diversified outputs such as fruits and fodder while minimizing displacement; for example, community-driven systems in tropical regions have sustained restoration without net livelihood losses by tying payments to verified tree survival on private holdings.

Controversies and Critical Perspectives

Doubts on Carbon Sequestration Efficacy

Empirical assessments indicate that reforestation can sequester only a modest fraction of global anthropogenic CO2 emissions, with estimates suggesting a maximum potential of approximately 7.8 gigatons of CO2 per year if fully realized, compared to annual global emissions exceeding 33 gigatons. In the United States, studies project that expanded reforestation efforts could offset 10-15% of national emissions, though realization depends on site-specific factors and faces global variability due to soil limitations, water availability, and competing land uses. These figures underscore that reforestation serves as a supplementary measure rather than a primary solution, as mainstream projections often overlook implementation barriers and overestimate scalable impacts without corresponding emission reductions. Carbon stored in reforested trees remains temporary, subject to release through natural disturbances like wildfires, decay, or harvesting, which can negate sequestration gains over decades or centuries. Unlike permanent geological storage methods, forest carbon pools cycle dynamically, with empirical models showing that even sustained growth yields finite retention periods, diminishing long-term efficacy against persistent fossil fuel emissions. This impermanence implies that reliance on reforestation for offsetting may delay rather than avert warming, particularly if not paired with aggressive decarbonization, as stored carbon's climate value erodes without indefinite protection. Reforestation can reduce net cooling in certain biomes due to decreased surface albedo, where darker forest canopies absorb more solar radiation than lighter grasslands or snow-covered areas, potentially offsetting up to 50% of sequestration benefits in high-latitude or arid regions. Studies integrating biophysical feedbacks reveal mixed evidence on overall climate mitigation, with albedo-driven warming counteracting CO2 uptake in boreal and temperate zones, challenging assumptions of universal cooling from tree planting. Empirical mapping highlights the need for spatially targeted efforts to maximize net benefits, as unaccounted albedo effects contribute to overoptimistic narratives in policy discussions. Carbon credit programs for reforestation frequently fail on additionality, where claimed offsets reflect activities that would occur absent incentives, leading to overstated emission reductions. Analyses of forestry offsets, including reforestation-linked projects, find that only a small portion—such as 6% in some REDD+ evaluations—demonstrates verifiable additional sequestration beyond baseline scenarios. High-profile verifiers like Verra have issued credits where up to 90% lack evidence of real avoidance or enhancement, eroding trust in market-based sequestration claims. Such failures, rooted in methodological flaws rather than isolated errors, emphasize prioritizing direct emission controls over offset-dependent strategies prone to leakage and non-permanence.

Monoculture Drawbacks and Biodiversity Trade-offs

Monoculture reforestation, characterized by the uniform planting of a single tree species across extensive areas, simplifies ecosystems and heightens vulnerability to disturbances. These plantations often exhibit reduced plant community diversity and altered composition compared to natural or mixed forests, with species turnover favoring fewer, less varied understory plants. Empirical studies confirm that such uniformity persists even decades after establishment, as observed in Italian Alpine plantations where biodiversity remained suppressed over 100 years post-planting. A primary drawback is increased susceptibility to pests and diseases, as the lack of genetic and species diversity eliminates natural barriers to outbreaks. Exotic monoculture plantations, in particular, promote pest proliferation by creating expansive, homogeneous hosts, exacerbating ecological degradation alongside soil erosion. In regions like Chile, vast pine monocultures have demonstrated low resilience, facilitating rapid fire spread during megafires due to their flammable, uniform structure and dense fuel loads. Mixed-species approaches, by contrast, enhance pest resilience through complementary interactions among species. Biodiversity trade-offs arise from monocultures' emphasis on short-term growth rates, which often yield "dead zones" barren of diverse flora and fauna, diminishing habitat provision and overall ecosystem functionality. While economic proponents highlight monocultures' efficiency in timber production, ecologists emphasize that mixed plantations deliver superior long-term services, including greater stability against perturbations. A 2024 analysis found mixed forests outperforming monocultures in growth, yield, and multifaceted ecosystem functions, underscoring the resilience benefits of diversity. Mismanaged monocultures, lacking diverse understories, fail to replicate natural succession, perpetuating simplified ecosystems prone to collapse under stress.

Displacement and Unintended Economic Harms

Reforestation initiatives, particularly those involving large-scale afforestation on agricultural or grazing lands, have frequently resulted in the displacement of rural communities, prioritizing carbon sequestration or timber production over local land rights and livelihoods. In sub-Saharan Africa, REDD+ projects—designed to reduce emissions from deforestation and promote reforestation—have been linked to violent evictions, criminalization of activists, and displacement of tens of thousands of indigenous and peasant farmers, as documented by networks opposing such schemes due to their coercive implementation by governments and corporations. For instance, in Uganda, carbon offset-driven plantation forestry has acquired vast tracts of community land, restricting access to grazing areas and water sources, thereby undermining pastoralist economies without adequate compensation or alternative livelihoods. These displacements often stem from policies that undervalue informal land tenure systems, favoring state or foreign investors in tree monocultures that yield long-term timber revenues inaccessible to displaced locals. Such land conversions exacerbate food insecurity and poverty by eliminating short-term agricultural outputs in favor of delayed forestry benefits. In Kenya's Mau Forest, a World Bank-funded natural resource management project intended to restore forests led to the eviction of over 20,000 Ogiek indigenous dwellers from ancestral lands in 2009-2013, stripping them of farming and foraging opportunities and increasing vulnerability to hunger without offsetting economic gains from reforestation activities. Across Africa, "green grabs" under reforestation banners have worsened rural inequality, as converted farmlands reduce household calorie production—potentially by up to 30-50% in affected smallholder systems—while timber jobs remain limited, seasonal, and skilled, failing to replace lost agrarian employment for unskilled laborers. In Asia, similar patterns emerge; Indonesia's state reforestation programs on former agricultural plots have risked evicting smallholders, inflating local poverty rates by curtailing rice and cash crop yields essential for subsistence. Causal analysis attributes these harms to top-down mandates that bypass market signals, such as land values tied to food production, leading to net welfare losses where reforestation subsidies distort incentives away from diversified farming. While rare cases of compensated relocation or integrated agroforestry have preserved some equity—such as voluntary community-led schemes in parts of West Africa—evidence indicates these succeed primarily through private initiatives that align tree planting with ongoing agriculture, avoiding wholesale displacement. State-driven or subsidized programs, however, often amplify inequities, as seen in Africa's Great Green Wall initiative, where afforestation targets across 100 million hectares threaten pastoralist mobility and heighten famine risks in arid zones by enclosing viable grazing lands. Overall, the economic calculus reveals that forgone agricultural revenues—averaging $500-1,000 per hectare annually in tropical smallholder contexts—typically exceed nascent timber sector contributions for locals, perpetuating cycles of migration and underemployment unless tenure reforms prioritize voluntary participation.

Notable Global Examples

Asia

China's Three-North Shelterbelt Program, launched in 1978, represents one of the world's largest reforestation initiatives, targeting the arid and semi-arid northern regions to combat desertification through afforestation of over 26.47 million hectares by 2024, elevating regional forest coverage to 10.18%. Empirical assessments indicate substantial reductions in wind and sand hazards as well as soil erosion over four decades, driven by barrier forests that stabilize dunes and enhance soil retention. However, the program's reliance on monoculture plantations, such as poplar and pine, has drawn ecological skepticism, with studies revealing modest bird diversity gains offset by significant losses in pollinator species like bees, alongside limited native habitat restoration due to poor seedling survival in water-scarce conditions. Economically, the initiative has yielded agricultural benefits, including improved crop yields from shelter effects, though timber production gains are tempered by maintenance costs and biodiversity trade-offs that undermine long-term ecosystem resilience. In India, reforestation efforts under programs like compensatory afforestation have achieved 85% of targets between 2019 and 2024, contributing to the country's rise to ninth globally in total forest cover and third in annual increment per 2025 assessments, with community-driven models in regions like the Himalayas demonstrating localized successes in biodiversity recovery through participatory management. These initiatives have spurred economic opportunities via timber and non-timber forest products, yet challenges persist, including short-term planting focused on quantity over quality, leading to variable survival rates and ongoing soil degradation in degraded lands. Pakistan's Ten Billion Tree Tsunami, building on the 2014 Billion Tree initiative, has planted millions to restore ecosystems and bolster livelihoods in deforested areas, with reported enhancements in natural capital and employment for marginalized communities, though critiques highlight implementation flaws such as inadequate species selection and monitoring, resulting in mixed survival outcomes and potential for superficial gains akin to promotional efforts rather than sustained reversal of desertification. Across these efforts, water limitations constrain desertification reversals, as afforestation in drylands can consume up to 10% of regional water supplies, exacerbating scarcity without integrated hydrological management, while state-reported triumphs contrast with independent analyses questioning net ecological benefits amid biodiversity shortfalls.

Europe

Germany's forestry practices exemplify early adoption of sustained yield principles, formalized by Hans Carl von Carlowitz in 1713 through systematic management to ensure perpetual wood supply without depletion, influencing modern European models. This approach, rooted in private land stewardship, has maintained forest cover at around 32% of national territory, with selective harvesting and replanting yielding annual increments exceeding removals by 20-30% in federal forests. In contrast, Iceland's reforestation addresses near-total historical deforestation from Viking-era clearing, with the Icelandic Forest Service, established in 1908, planting over 3 million trees annually by the 2010s, focusing on native birch and resilient exotics like lodgepole pine to combat soil erosion and enhance carbon storage. Ireland and the United Kingdom have pursued native species restoration amid historically low forest cover—under 2% in Ireland and 13% in the UK—emphasizing broadleaf trees such as oak and hazel to rebuild temperate ecosystems degraded by centuries of agriculture and grazing. Post-19th-century land reforms, initiatives like private rewilding projects have fenced invasive grazers and eradicated non-natives, achieving natural regeneration rates up to 80% in protected sites without monoculture dominance. Survival rates across Europe benefit from technologies like nanoparticle soil amendments, boosting seedling establishment by 10-28%, and quality controls standardized in 23 countries to ensure vigor before outplanting. These efforts underpin economic gains, with the EU as a net exporter of 12.5 million cubic meters of roundwood in 2022, supporting industries generating €33.7 billion in exports and enhancing certified forests' profitability through premium markets. Strong private property norms minimize displacement risks, as reforestation typically occurs on underutilized or consensual lands, contrasting with tenure conflicts elsewhere, though EU directives like the Nature Restoration Law balance restoration targets with landowner rights. EU subsidies, channeled through rural development programs, fund afforestation but face criticism for bureaucratic hurdles that delay projects and stifle adaptive innovation, as seen in protests against overlapping regulations like the Deforestation Regulation, which impose traceability burdens potentially reducing smallholder participation.

North America

In the United States and Canada, reforestation efforts originated with large-scale government initiatives during the New Deal era, where the Civilian Conservation Corps planted over 3 billion trees between 1933 and 1942 to combat soil erosion and restore degraded lands. These programs laid the foundation for modern forestry practices, which have since shifted toward market-driven models leveraging private land ownership. By 2024, private lands, comprising 88% of potential reforestation opportunities in the U.S., emerged as key drivers, particularly in the Southeast where vast privately held forests enable efficient scaling without public sector constraints. This regional focus has spurred a boom in voluntary reforestation, fueled by timber markets and emerging carbon credit mechanisms. Empirical data underscores the cost-effectiveness of these private approaches, with recent analyses indicating up to 10 times greater low-cost carbon removal potential from targeted reforestation than prior estimates, enabling sequestration at scales that could offset significant emissions while generating economic returns. In the U.S., private working forests support over 2.5 million jobs and contribute $288 billion in annual sales, including timber harvesting that sustains rural economies in states like Georgia and Mississippi. Additionally, reforestation enhances wildfire resilience by accelerating post-fire recovery—boosting regrowth rates by 25.7%—and mitigating fire spread through strategic planting of fire-resistant species on private lands. Carbon markets further incentivize this, with U.S. afforestation credits comprising 5% of retired offsets in 2024 and Canada's boreal projects attracting $1.5 billion in investments for long-term sequestration. Critics note risks where reforested areas, if unmanaged, could exacerbate carbon releases during intense wildfires, as seen in recent U.S. and Canadian fires that turned forests into net emitters, potentially undermining sequestration gains. Proponents of market-oriented strategies argue for deregulation to enhance scalability, emphasizing private landowners' incentives for active management—such as thinning and species selection—that reduce fire hazards and ensure durable carbon storage, outperforming rigid government mandates.

Latin America and Africa

In Costa Rica, the Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) program, initiated in 1997, has conserved nearly one million hectares of forest through annual payments to landowners for protection, reforestation, and sustainable management, reducing deforestation rates and enabling ecological recovery across sites like the Nicoya Peninsula after 27 years of implementation. Empirical evaluations confirm the program's additionality in preventing land cover loss, with forest cover increasing from 21% in 1987 to over 50% by 2020, driven by direct incentives aligning landowner utility with conservation. Bolivia's restoration efforts, such as community-led projects in the Chiquitano Dry Forest, have restored over 13,000 hectares by 2023 through planting, fire prevention, and financial incentives, achieving a 60% reduction in fire incidence while enhancing local livelihoods via aligned participatory models. These successes stem from initial payments encouraging participation, followed by sustained communal management that outperforms top-down approaches by incorporating local knowledge of fire risks and soil conditions. However, in Peru, monoculture plantations, often promoted for commercial timber, have led to biodiversity declines by favoring single-species stands over native diversity, exacerbating habitat fragmentation in Amazonian regions where non-native trees displace endemic flora and fauna. In Africa, community-based planting in Nigeria and Ethiopia faces persistent grazing conflicts, where livestock herders undermine young trees by accessing restored areas for fodder, as seen in Sahel initiatives where farmer-herder disputes have stalled progress despite millions planted under the Great Green Wall. These challenges highlight causal mismatches between planting and land-use realities, with open grazing eroding communal efforts unless integrated with conflict-sensitive zoning. A 2024 analysis across low-income countries in sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America links tree regrowth to poverty reduction, raising household wealth indices via income from timber and agroforestry, though gains are uneven without addressing tenure insecurities. Utility-driven local initiatives, such as Bolivia's incentive-aligned restorations or Costa Rica's PES, demonstrate higher permanence than international pledges like the Great Green Wall, which suffer from funding shortfalls and coordination failures across borders, achieving only 20% of targets by 2024 due to instability and mismatched priorities. Community models emphasizing immediate economic returns—e.g., fuelwood or erosion control—sustain participation better than carbon-focused global schemes, reducing failure rates from grazing or abandonment. In both regions, empirical co-benefits for poverty emerge when reforestation integrates local needs, but monoculture corporate ventures risk amplifying harms like biodiversity loss without diversified planting.

References

  1. [1]
    Terms and definitions - FRA Platform
    REFORESTATION. Re-establishment of forest through planting and/or deliberate seeding on land classified as forest. Explanatory notes. Implies no change ...
  2. [2]
    Challenges to the Reforestation Pipeline in the United States
    Reforestation is a promising opportunity to capture carbon dioxide while providing key ecosystem services including clean air and water (The White House, 2016; ...
  3. [3]
    Cross-Chapter Paper 7: Tropical Forests | Climate Change 2022
    Over 420 million ha of forest were lost to deforestation from 1990 to 2020; more than 90% of that loss took place in tropical areas (high confidence), ...
  4. [4]
    Mixed-species versus monocultures in plantation forestry
    However, an increasing number of studies have discovered that monoculture plantations have lower levels of biodiversity than surrounding native forests, and ...
  5. [5]
    Reforestation success can be enhanced by improving tree planting ...
    Jun 15, 2023 · Successful cost-effective reforestation plantings depend substantially on maximising sapling survival from the time of planting, ...
  6. [6]
    Pitfalls of Tree Planting Show Why We Need People-Centered ...
    Sep 16, 2020 · Forests can regrow on deforested land without tree planting. In most places where reforestation is desirable, forests can regenerate naturally ...Missing: peer | Show results with:peer
  7. [7]
    Survival and restoration of China's native forests imperiled by ...
    Yet the program overwhelmingly leads to the planting of monoculture forests, falling far short of restoring native forests and even harming wildlife, according ...
  8. [8]
    Why Green Pledges Will Not Create the Natural Forests We Need
    Apr 16, 2019 · They discovered that 45 percent of promised new forests will be monoculture plantations of fast-growing trees like acacia and eucalyptus, ...
  9. [9]
    Defining biodiverse reforestation: Why it matters for climate change ...
    Sep 20, 2022 · Reforestation plantings have the potential to provide conservation co-benefits when diverse mixtures of native species are planted, and there ...1.1 Biodiverse... · 3 Results · 3.6 Rights Holders And...
  10. [10]
    [PDF] Farm Forestry in the Ancient Mediterranean - ODI
    This network paper looks at the available evidence in Greek and Roman authors from 700 BC to. 300 AD for on-farm tree-planting and tree-management. This ...
  11. [11]
    The green granary of the Empire? Insights into olive agroforestry in ...
    Roman sources seem to suggest that the olive trees were planted in specific patterns to accommodate other crops. The recurrent pattern may well be the olive ...
  12. [12]
    Tree rings reveal signs of Europe's sustainable forest management ...
    Dec 11, 2020 · The adoption of a sophisticated, Coppice-with-Standards (CWS) management practice created a two-storey forest structure that could provide ...Missing: Asia | Show results with:Asia
  13. [13]
    Coppice restoration and conservation: a European perspective
    Coppice management has a long and ancient tradition in Europe, but still comprises over 14% of the forest area despite showing catastrophic declines in the ...Missing: Asia | Show results with:Asia
  14. [14]
    [PDF] Summary The Loess Plateau is the cradle of ancient Chinese ...
    It combine reduction of soil erosion with local economic growth, applying a variety of effective ecological engineerings (terracing, check dams and soil ...<|separator|>
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Lessons Learnt on Sustainable Forest Management in Africa
    Before colonial administration, African forests were preserved through ... A strategy for the forest sector in sub-saharan Africa 1994 Technical Department.
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Dynamic Transparency in Forest and Land Rights: A Sub-Saharan ...
    The pre-colonial era in sub-Saharan Africa witnessed well-established communal land tenure systems and sustainable resource management practices. Colonial ...
  17. [17]
    Hans Carl von Carlowitz and “Sustainability”
    In his work Sylvicultura Oeconomica oder Anweisung zur wilden Baum-Zucht (Sylvicultura Oeconomica or the Instructions for Wild Tree Cultivation), Carlowitz ...
  18. [18]
    [PDF] 300 years of sustainable forestry
    In Sylvicultura oeconomica, von. Carlowitz wrote about the lack of wood and its causes and noted “that, over time, many provinces of Europe will have great ...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] 300 years of applied sustainability in forestry - Research Collection
    Sylvicultura Oeconomica is written in the tradition of mercantilism, which was the prevailing economic theory at his time. It brought a new, rational approach ...<|separator|>
  20. [20]
    [PDF] The origins of timber plantations in India
    This article assesses the origin and evolution of the Nilambur teak plantation in Malabar and the. 'Australian' timber plantations on the Nilgiri plateau, two ...Missing: shipbuilding | Show results with:shipbuilding
  21. [21]
    Teak conquest. Wars, forest imperialism and shipbuilding in India ...
    ... teak plantation. 46 At the turn of the 19th century, teak timber became a key resource for English power. After part of Malabar was annexed in 1792 ...
  22. [22]
    [PDF] The USDA Forest Service— The First Century
    Since referred to as the “Creative Act” or the Forest Reserve Act of March 3, 1891, it was used by President Harrison on March 30th of the same year to set ...
  23. [23]
    How the United States started saving national forests
    The Forest Reserve Act of 1891 was signed into law by President Benjamin Harrison after two decades of debate about public land policy and concern about ...Missing: reforestation | Show results with:reforestation
  24. [24]
    [PDF] Deforestation and Property Rights: A Comparison between Former ...
    British property rights established local ownership of the forest so that local people (pioneers) had direct control over the forest's resources. Thus, the ...
  25. [25]
    [PDF] The Evolution of Forest Restoration in Europe - Research Collection
    Dec 18, 2024 · Recent findings Early restoration initiatives in central and southern Europe were largely reactive to natural disasters or timber shortages, and ...
  26. [26]
    NRCS History | Natural Resources Conservation Service
    The decade after World War II was a time of growth for SCS. Congress increased appropriations for soil conservation programs. The Secretary made SCS the ...
  27. [27]
    AFTER WORLD WAR II 1945-1967 - Forest History Society
    The Anderson-Mansfield Reforestation and Revegetation Act (63 Stat. 762) was approved. It provides for more rapid reforestation and revegetation of forest and ...
  28. [28]
    Assessing the effects of China's Three-North Shelter Forest Program ...
    Jan 20, 2023 · The TNSFP has been under construction for 43 years, with a total completed reforestation area of 30.14 million ha. Forest cover ranges from 5.05 ...
  29. [29]
    Everything you need to know about the trillion trees movement
    Sep 23, 2021 · 1t.org is the World Economic Forum's Trillion Tree Platform, and we're here to help the global movement to conserve, restore and grow 1 trillion trees by 2030.Missing: 1990s | Show results with:1990s
  30. [30]
    8 Billion Trees: Leading 2025 Reforestation Efforts - Farmonaut
    Sep 14, 2025 · “The 8 Billion Trees initiative aims to restore over 40 million acres of degraded land globally by 2025.” The Significance of Reforestation ...
  31. [31]
    New Research: Reforestation is More Cost-Effective than Previously ...
    Jul 24, 2024 · The study finds that there is up to 10 times more low-cost, carbon removal potential from well-planned reforestation projects than previous official estimates ...
  32. [32]
    There's far less land available for reforestation than we think, study ...
    Oct 2, 2025 · The study used new modeling tools to create global maps of soil carbon change that show carbon gains and losses, especially in topsoil.
  33. [33]
    Private Lands: The Next Reforestation Boom? | Arbor Day Foundation
    Of the 39,320,000 acres of land suitable for reforestation in the American Southeast, an estimated 85% is privately owned. Prioritizing it for tree-planting ...
  34. [34]
    Global CO2 emissions from forest fires increase by 60% | Newsroom
    Oct 17, 2024 · A major study publishing Friday in Science reveals that carbon dioxide emissions from forest fires have surged by 60% globally since 2001.
  35. [35]
    New NASA Study Tallies Carbon Emissions From Massive ...
    Aug 28, 2024 · Extreme forest fires in 2023 released about 640 million metric tons of carbon, NASA scientists have found. That's comparable in magnitude to the annual fossil ...
  36. [36]
    Reforestation | US Forest Service
    Reforestation, whether by planning for natural regeneration or tree planting, allows for the accelerated development of forested ecosystems.
  37. [37]
    [PDF] Guide to Reforestation in Oregon
    Whether it involves establishing a new stand on old pasture or brush lands, or reforesting after logging, reforestation is the key to restarting forests and ...
  38. [38]
    The changing culture of silviculture - Oxford Academic
    Nov 13, 2021 · The emergence of silviculture as a discipline dates back to the origins of forest science in Western Europe, with the term having its linguistic ...Abstract · Introduction · Origin and scope of the review · Acknowledgements
  39. [39]
    Survival, growth and carbon content in a forest plantation ...
    Eight years after the establishment of the plantation, an average survival of 75.2% was observed for the two species, which corresponds to a density of 1,881 ...
  40. [40]
    Reforestation vs. Afforestation: Definitions and Key Differences
    Nov 15, 2024 · While reforestation focuses on reviving forests we've lost, afforestation creates brand-new ones. This expands the planet's tree cover and gives ...
  41. [41]
    Difference between afforestation and reforestation - Give Me Trees
    Afforestation is the process of creating a new forest where there was none before, while reforestation is the process of restoring a damaged or destroyed ...<|separator|>
  42. [42]
    What are ARR projects? Afforestation, Reforestation & Revegetation
    Nov 14, 2023 · Afforestation: planting trees on land that has not been previously forested; · Reforestation: replanting trees in areas that have been deforested ...
  43. [43]
    Unravelling the differences: reforestation vs. restoration - WeForest
    Aug 23, 2023 · While reforestation primarily aims to establish tree cover, restoration goes beyond tree planting. Conservationist Aldo Leopold reminds us that ...
  44. [44]
    Ecological Restoration vs. Reforestation: Understand the difference!
    Mar 2, 2023 · Reforestation is a generic term for replanting trees in a specific area with various goals, including (ecological) restoration.
  45. [45]
    Afforestation and Reforestation: Understanding the Differences | Patch
    May 6, 2021 · There are two dominant approaches to forest management for climate change: reforestation, in which already existing forests are allowed to regrow, and ...
  46. [46]
    When planting trees threatens the forest | Stanford Report
    Jun 22, 2020 · Plantations typically have significantly less potential for carbon sequestration, habitat creation and erosion control than natural forests. ...Missing: savannas | Show results with:savannas
  47. [47]
    Where Tree Planting and Forest Expansion are Bad for Biodiversity ...
    Sep 9, 2015 · Establishment of forests in these grasslands, savannas, and open-canopy woodlands would devastate biodiversity and ecosystem services. Such ...
  48. [48]
    Afforestation of savannas: an impending ecological disaster
    Such conversion is translated into a major impact on biodiversity and ecosystem services, which we summarize here based on an analysis of afforestation of the ...
  49. [49]
    How the the African Forest Restoration Initiative threatens savannas ...
    Mar 25, 2024 · A recent paper published in Science warns that “Across Africa, vast areas of nonforest are threatened by inappropriate restoration in the form of tree planting ...Missing: lands | Show results with:lands
  50. [50]
    Misguided reforestation programmes threaten vast area of tropical ...
    Feb 15, 2024 · A study published in the journal Science reveals that an area the size of France is threatened by forest restoration initiatives.
  51. [51]
    Global carbon dioxide removal rates from forest landscape ...
    Nov 20, 2018 · Planted forests and woodlots were found to have the highest CO2 removal rates, ranging from 4.5 to 40.7 t CO2 ha−1 year−1 during the first 20 ...
  52. [52]
    Quantifying the trade‐off between carbon sequestration and albedo ...
    Mar 1, 2017 · While afforestation can enhance the uptake of CO2, it does so at the expense of causing warming because forests are typically less reflective ...Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical<|separator|>
  53. [53]
    Asymmetry of carbon sequestrations by plant and soil after ...
    Jun 2, 2023 · Forestation (including both afforestation and reforestation) is generally advocated as an effective method to increasing ecosystem carbon ...
  54. [54]
    Phantom Forests: Why Ambitious Tree Planting Projects Are Failing
    Oct 6, 2022 · Scientists say many of these projects are ill-conceived and poorly managed and often fail to grow any forests at all.
  55. [55]
    What is sustainable forestry? Practices & benefits | fsc.org
    May 4, 2024 · Sustainable forestry aims to meet human needs for timber and other forest resources in a way that maintains the forest's health for generations ...
  56. [56]
    The Societal and Economic Impact of Reforestation Strategies and ...
    This paper assesses the existing reforestation and forest conservation policies and strategies in Southeast Asia and how they have impacted people's lives.
  57. [57]
    The Economic Benefits of Reforestation - Carbify
    Apr 18, 2025 · Reforestation helps reverse this by: ✔️ Preventing soil erosion and maintaining soil fertility. ✔️ Improving water retention, ensuring ...
  58. [58]
    Balancing the environmental benefits of reforestation in agricultural ...
    How reforestation is approached has long-term consequences with compromises between the structure and function of the forest. The number of trees and the types ...Missing: criticisms | Show results with:criticisms
  59. [59]
    Comparative global timber investment costs, returns, and ...
    Dec 29, 2022 · Temperate forest plantations in the U.S. and Europe returned less, from 3% to 7%, but those countries have less financial risk, better timber ...Missing: developing | Show results with:developing
  60. [60]
    Profitability and risk sources in global timberland investments
    We examine what are the main factors that influence internal rates of returns (IRRs) in several global timber plantation investment opportunities.
  61. [61]
    Tree plantations and forest regrowth are linked to poverty reduction ...
    Tree plantations and forest regrowth are linked to poverty reduction in Africa. Springer Nature. Communications Earth & Environment. November 2024; 5(1).
  62. [62]
    Rooting out poverty: The socioeconomic co-benefits of large-scale ...
    Nov 11, 2024 · Our findings suggest that tree planting can play a significant role in reducing poverty and generating economic benefits, while also delivering environmental ...Missing: income | Show results with:income
  63. [63]
    The human well-being outcomes of tree plantations in sub-Saharan ...
    We conclude that restoration efforts heavily based on tree planting activities can improve economic well-being outcomes, with heterogeneity across locations ...<|separator|>
  64. [64]
    Collective property rights lead to secondary forest growth in ... - PNAS
    May 22, 2023 · After receiving full property rights, land inside ITs displayed higher secondary forest growth than land outside ITs, with an estimated effect ...Abstract · 1. Indigenous Territories In... · 2. Analysis And Results
  65. [65]
    [PDF] Watershed Reforestation: Opportunities for Reducing Stormwater ...
    Jul 10, 2024 · Transpiration: Water uptake by plants and subsequent release into the atmosphere. Soil Stabilization: Roots bind soil, preventing erosion.
  66. [66]
    Ecological restoration stimulates environmental outcomes but ...
    Jul 8, 2022 · Vegetation cover insulates the soil surface from the impact of raindrops by blocking or intercepting precipitation, reducing erodibility, and ...<|separator|>
  67. [67]
    Natural Forests Accelerate Soil Hydrological Processes and ...
    Aug 28, 2025 · These findings highlight the resilience of naturally regenerated ecosystems in conserving water resources, regulating hydrological processes and ...
  68. [68]
    Impacts of forest restoration on water yield: A systematic review - PMC
    Aug 17, 2017 · Most studies reported decreases in water yields following the intervention, while other hydrological benefits have been observed.
  69. [69]
    A Method for Performing Reforestation to Effectively Recover Soil ...
    Feb 9, 2021 · We also provide a simple method for guiding the use of reforestation efforts to recover soil water content in extremely degraded tropical rain forests.
  70. [70]
    Will large-scale forestation lead to a soil water deficit crisis in ...
    May 30, 2024 · Our study implies that afforestation might lead to a soil water deficit crisis in northern China in the long term at the regional scale.Missing: reforestation stabilization
  71. [71]
    Reforestation to capture carbon could be done much more cheaply ...
    Aug 14, 2024 · New research shows that a mix of natural forest regrowth and tree planting could remove up to 10 times more carbon at $20 per metric ton ...
  72. [72]
    Are Forest Carbon Credits a Reliable Offset Option in 2025? - Sylvera
    Aug 29, 2025 · Critics point to permanence concerns, as forest carbon credits are vulnerable to reversals due to wildfires, pests, and land use changes.Missing: fires | Show results with:fires
  73. [73]
    [PDF] WILL aFFORESTaTION IN TEMPERaTE ZONES WaRM THE EaRTH?
    For decades, forest researchers have known that afforestation can lower the surface albedo and that landscapes with low albedo will absorb more solar ...Missing: non- | Show results with:non-
  74. [74]
    Examining the Viability of Planting Trees to Help Mitigate Climate ...
    Nov 7, 2019 · A recent study estimates the global potential of restoring forested lands as a possible strategy for mitigating climate change.
  75. [75]
    Mixed-species plantations can support biodiversity - SUPERB project
    May 14, 2025 · The results point to a clear trend: mixing species tends to support greater biodiversity overall, especially for birds, litter microbiota, understory plants, ...
  76. [76]
    Plantations Can Provide the Same Ecosystem Services as Natural ...
    Feb 1, 2010 · Well-planned plantations can actually alleviate some of the social, economic and ecological burden currently being placed on natural forests.
  77. [77]
    People plant trees for utility more often than for biodiversity or carbon
    Tree planting is both a promising and controversial solution to climate change and biodiversity loss.
  78. [78]
    Restoring the World's Forests - The Nature Conservancy
    Jan 28, 2025 · Research shows that reforestation will benefit many species both locally, by increasing habitat, and globally, by mitigating climate change. See ...Latest Research · How Tnc Supports... · Sharing Lessons And Best...
  79. [79]
    Tree and forest effects on air quality and human health in the United ...
    Trees and forests in the conterminous United States removed 17.4 million tonnes (t) of air pollution in 2010 (range: 9.0-23.2 million t), with human health ...Missing: tourism revenue empirical
  80. [80]
    Elite capture risk and mitigation in decentralized forest governance ...
    We examine how local institutional arrangements under forest sector decentralization affect the risk of elite capture of forest benefits.Missing: schemes | Show results with:schemes
  81. [81]
    Agroforestry-based community forestry as a large-scale strategy to ...
    Jul 6, 2023 · Previous studies have shown that the participation of farmers in reforestation programs can be increased if land use rights are secured and ...
  82. [82]
    [PDF] How do property rights reforms provide incentives for forest ...
    Secure property rights are a key governance lynchpin in the design of forest landscape restoration (FLR) programs. These rights frame which stakeholders are ...
  83. [83]
    Global potential for natural regeneration in deforested tropical regions
    Oct 30, 2024 · Tree planting and extensive site preparation are popular strategies and can be effective, particularly when using locally adapted native tree ...
  84. [84]
    Reforestation: Knowing When to Let Nature Take its Course
    Nov 8, 2017 · Allowing Nature to restore deforested areas often restores them closer to the characteristics of the original forest than planting large numbers of trees.
  85. [85]
    Restoring a dry tropical forest through assisted natural regeneration
    Reforestation is a sustainable way to mitigate deforestation effects. We studied the impact of assisted natural regeneration (ANR) on restoring dry forest land ...
  86. [86]
    Forest Structure Recovery Around West Africa's Last Great Rainforest
    Sep 12, 2025 · Recovery was strongly enhanced by the presence of remnant trees and forest connectivity, especially for biomass. In contrast, Marantaceae ...
  87. [87]
    The road to recovery: a synthesis of outcomes from ecosystem ...
    Nov 14, 2022 · Three decades of post-logging tree community recovery in naturally regenerating and actively restored dipterocarp forest in Borneo. For ...
  88. [88]
    Ecological restoration success is higher for natural regeneration ...
    Nov 8, 2017 · Our meta-analysis of 133 studies demonstrated that natural regeneration surpasses active restoration in achieving tropical forest restoration ...
  89. [89]
    Cost-effectiveness of natural forest regeneration and plantations for ...
    Jul 24, 2024 · A global mix of natural regeneration and plantations can achieve far more mitigation at lower costs than relying exclusively on a single method ...Missing: techniques | Show results with:techniques<|separator|>
  90. [90]
    Seven Decades of Spontaneous Forest Regeneration after Large ...
    The replacement of these forest stands dominated by late-successional tree species by spontaneously colonizing pioneer tree species after harvesting reshaped ...Missing: remnant | Show results with:remnant
  91. [91]
    Assisted natural forest regeneration on degraded lands
    These maintained pressures had prevented the natural regeneration of the landscape which had in turn led to an increase in erosion.
  92. [92]
    Assessing Assisted Natural Regeneration as a Cost‐Efficient ...
    Mar 11, 2025 · Our findings highlight that strategic spatial prioritization of ANR could mitigate climate change and biodiversity loss in a cost-efficient ...
  93. [93]
    [PDF] ARTIFICIAL REGENERATION - Northern Research Station
    ART I FICIAL REGENERAT ION. Planting of Nursery Stock: The Northeast played a leading role in the early history of reforestation in the United States. The.
  94. [94]
    Direct Seeding in Reforestation – A Field Performance Review
    Dec 30, 2017 · Direct seeding is a forest restoration option that is quick and low cost, but has low seedling establishment rates and lower field performance ...
  95. [95]
    [PDF] Direct Seeding: A Forest Regeneration Alternative
    Direct seeding is planting seeds for forest regeneration, either by hand or air, and is less expensive than planting seedlings.Missing: reforestation nursery
  96. [96]
    [PDF] Direct Seeding Southern Pines: History and Status of a Technique ...
    Direct seeding, developed to quickly reforest large areas, involves protecting seeds from predation, using chemicals, and site preparation.
  97. [97]
    [PDF] Site Preparation and Competition Control Guidelines for Hardwood ...
    Seed blown in from surrounding areas or car- ried by animals or water can produce a significant competition control problem from both native and exotic species ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  98. [98]
    [PDF] Adapting reforestation programs to observed and projected climate ...
    Many local government authorities that regulate reforestation programs provide guidelines for matching a seed source and planting site to avoid maladaptation.
  99. [99]
    [PDF] Successful Reforestation: An Overview - OSU Extension Service
    Investigate very carefully before planting non-native (also called “exotic”) tree spe- cies. Consult a local forester for specific information on selecting ...
  100. [100]
    [PDF] Determining the causal factors affecting the survival of young ...
    The seedlings survival count guideline by World Vision (2020) states that if the survival rate is above 80%, the planted seedlings are performing well and only ...
  101. [101]
    a synthesis of outcomes from ecosystem restoration in tropical and ...
    Nov 14, 2022 · Mean mortality of planted trees was 18% 1 year after planting, increasing to 44% after 5 years. Mortality varied strongly by site and was ...
  102. [102]
    Nearly half of replanted trees die, but careful site selection can help
    Dec 14, 2022 · Average mortality rates were 20% higher on open, degraded land than in forest sites. The authors also noticed differences between restorations ...
  103. [103]
    [PDF] Chapter 22 - Artificial Regeneration - Wisconsin DNR
    May 21, 2003 · Advantages of containerized stock include: can be grown in 6-15 weeks; outplanting in the rooting medium; high productivity due to plantability; ...<|separator|>
  104. [104]
    Monoculture tree plantations are "green deserts" not forests, say ...
    Sep 19, 2008 · Recent studies have shown that monoculture tree plantations have a twofold impact globally: loss of biodiversity and net emitters of carbon. The ...Missing: resilience | Show results with:resilience
  105. [105]
    A global meta‐analysis of the impacts of tree plantations on ...
    Dec 20, 2021 · We reveal that biodiversity in intensively managed plantations is significantly lower than that in restoration-oriented plantations.
  106. [106]
    [PDF] Assessing UAV direct-seeding for tropical forest restoration
    Our findings demonstrate that UAV-assisted direct seeding can be an effective and eco-. 247 nomically viable method for the critical early stages of tropical ...
  107. [107]
    Why Drone-Planted Forests Struggle—and a Nature-Inspired Fix
    May 21, 2025 · Drone-based reforestation faces high seed failure rates. Researchers are developing nature-inspired seed coatings to increase seed survival ...Missing: empirical results
  108. [108]
    (PDF) Forest restoration is more than firing seeds from a drone
    This study explores how new seed-dropping techniques are enabling drone technology to revolutionize large-scale reforestation and precision farming. It examines ...
  109. [109]
    Enrichment planting to restore degraded tropical forest fragments in ...
    We studied enrichment planting methods to restore tropical forest fragments in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest, and we evaluated the costs to implement them in ...
  110. [110]
    Planting trees in existing forests? Why Enrichment Planting makes ...
    Jul 27, 2023 · The solution lies in Enrichment Planting, a method for ecological restoration and the protection of forest ecosystems when used appropriately.Missing: hybrid strategies
  111. [111]
    Tree planting, natural colonisation, hybrid approaches: Land ...
    Jun 13, 2025 · Hybrid approaches including enrichment planting, applied nucleation, direct seeding and ground preparation represent a socio-ecological strategy ...Missing: reforestation | Show results with:reforestation
  112. [112]
    Mixed Approach to Reforestation Better Than Planting or ...
    Jul 24, 2024 · Reforestation in low- and middle-income countries can remove up to 10 times more carbon dioxide from the atmosphere at lower cost than ...
  113. [113]
    (PDF) Forest Tree Breeding Under the Global Environmental Change
    Sep 6, 2025 · ... genetic breeding is a key. tool for developing tree varieties with increased resistance to biotic ... breeding strategy for improving drought ...
  114. [114]
    Modern Strategies to Assess and Breed Forest Tree Adaptation to ...
    Exploring natural adaptation to changing climate and genetic breeding for tolerance to abiotic stress in forest tree species has traditionally been assisted by ...Missing: reforestation | Show results with:reforestation
  115. [115]
    Selective breeding for growth does not compromise drought ...
    We found that selective breeding for faster growth has not compromised drought resistance in seedlings. Weak correlations between drought resistance and height ...
  116. [116]
    Reflections from the 2025 Reforestation Summit | REFORESTA
    Jul 4, 2025 · We first provide a brief summary of the 2025 Reforestation Summit, then describe the decision support tools (DSTs) that were discussed at the ...
  117. [117]
    [PDF] Reflections from the 2025 Reforestation Summit
    A breakout group that focused on how to incorporate recent scientific findings and decision support tools into an end-to-end reforestation tool. Decision ...
  118. [118]
    Advances and shortfalls in applying best practices to global tree ...
    Jan 22, 2024 · Additionally, groups failing to engage local stakeholders prior to implementation risk ... reforestation failures and the need to follow ...
  119. [119]
    The surprising downsides to planting trillions of trees - Climate - Vox
    Sep 22, 2021 · From Turkey to Brazil, tree-planting campaigns often fail and have even fueled deforestation. There's a better way.
  120. [120]
    Forest Landscape Restoration—What Generates Failure and ... - MDPI
    However, restoration failures might be more common than success stories but are rarely being communicated, resulting in a positive reporting bias [14,21].
  121. [121]
    Business strategies for conservation on private lands: Koa forestry ...
    Developing business strategies for private land management that draw on revenue streams aligning conservation and economic incentives provides an opportunity ...Missing: leases | Show results with:leases
  122. [122]
    [PDF] Economic Contributions of Land Conserved by the USDA Forest ...
    The majority of forestland in the United States is privately owned (Butler et al, 2016). These 475 million acres of forests provide many economic, social, ...
  123. [123]
    Small forest growers in tropical landscapes should be embraced as ...
    Small growers are making significant contributions to restoration of degraded forest-landscapes, rural economic development, and climate change mitigation.
  124. [124]
    Carbon credits explained: a guide to climate action - South Pole
    Oct 1, 2025 · A high-quality carbon credit represents a genuine, verifiable, and permanent climate benefit. The key criteria for a high-quality credit are:.Missing: critiques | Show results with:critiques
  125. [125]
    Study Finds Carbon Offsets Failing to Deliver Real Climate Impact
    Oct 10, 2025 · A new peer-reviewed study suggests that most carbon offset programs have failed to deliver real reductions in greenhouse gas emissions.Missing: reforestation critiques
  126. [126]
    The Economic Value of Private Forests and Climate Change Mitigation
    Feb 1, 2023 · A review of some of the economic values associated with carbon and climate change mitigation on private forests.
  127. [127]
    Reforestation Projects in the US | Carbon Removal - Land Life
    Explore reforestation projects in the US, Canada and Mexico that deliver carbon removal, biodiversity gains, and/or lasting community impact.
  128. [128]
    [PDF] Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Potential in the U.S. Forestry and ... - EPA
    Mitigation policies are included in GTM as carbon rental payments and direct subsidies to carbon sequestration. Specifically, forest owners receive carbon ...
  129. [129]
    The role of incentive mechanisms in promoting forest restoration
    Nov 14, 2022 · A broad range of socio-economic factors were associated with the success or failure of incentive mechanisms for forest restoration (figure 3, ...
  130. [130]
    Public policies and global forest conservation: Empirical evidence ...
    We estimate that public policies reduce the risk of tree cover loss by almost 4 percentage points globally, but there is large variation around this.Missing: intervention deregulation
  131. [131]
    Forest plantation subsidies: Impact evaluation of the Chilean case
    Results show a positive impact of subsidies on plantations, increasing in 13% compared with the counterfactual scenario.
  132. [132]
    Impacts of Chilean forest subsidies on forest cover, carbon and ...
    Chile's forest subsidies probably decreased biodiversity without increasing total carbon stored in aboveground biomass. Carefully enforced safeguards on the ...
  133. [133]
    Study Finds Chilean Reforestation Programs Decrease Biodiversity
    Jun 26, 2020 · Without requirements for native species, Chilean forest subsidies decreased biodiversity and didn't increase carbon storage.
  134. [134]
    Restoring China's Loess Plateau - World Bank
    Mar 15, 2007 · Two projects set out to restore China's heavily degraded Loess Plateau through one of the world's largest erosion control programs.<|separator|>
  135. [135]
    Damage Caused to the Environment by Reforestation Policies in ...
    May 13, 2010 · Although many small-scale or short-term assessments have shown clear benefits, this afforestation has often failed in the long term or over ...
  136. [136]
    UNINTENDED LAND USE EFFECTS OF AFFORESTATION IN ... - jstor
    Mar 15, 2019 · Specifically, it shows that. China's PES program, which aims to reforest sloped farmland with a high risk of erosion, inadvertently converts ...
  137. [137]
    Drivers of reforestation in human-dominated forests - PMC
    Sep 19, 2007 · Results affirm the central importance of tenure regimes and local monitoring for forest regrowth. In addition, user group size per unit of ...Missing: deregulation | Show results with:deregulation
  138. [138]
    [PDF] Hydrologic Effects of a Changing Forest Landscape
    How do changes in forests affect water quantity and quality? “Paired watershed” studies have been a primary empirical approach in forest hydrology. In paired ...
  139. [139]
    [PDF] Reforestation of Steep Reclaimed Slopes: Stability and Sediment ...
    Demonstrate that these methods provide satisfactory erosion and sediment control in order that surface water quality can be maintained. Based on field ...
  140. [140]
    Improving climate and biodiversity outcomes through restoration of ...
    Aug 15, 2023 · Forest recovery areas with current biomass of 50–80% of their maximum potential biomass were assumed to have potential for forest recovery ...
  141. [141]
    Back from the brink: Six species saved by ecosystem restoration
    Oct 4, 2022 · Here are six threatened mammals, reptiles and birds stepping back from the brink of extinction with help from restoration.<|separator|>
  142. [142]
    Higher levels of multiple ecosystem services are found in forests ...
    Jan 8, 2013 · Mixed forest stands can indeed be more productive than monocultures, and several studies have found large-scale positive relationships between ...
  143. [143]
    Microclimate in Forest Ecosystem and Landscape Ecology
    Relative humidity, wind speed, and air temperature all responded similarly to harvesting. However, soil temperature and moisture changed in distinct ways ...Missing: reforestation | Show results with:reforestation
  144. [144]
    [PDF] Forest and Water Relationships - Southern Research Station
    The objectives of this study are: (1) to synthesize existing world-wide literature on the relations between forestation and watershed hydrology; (2) to identify ...Missing: retention | Show results with:retention
  145. [145]
    The biodiversity and ecosystem service contributions and trade-offs ...
    Mar 17, 2022 · Native forests consistently delivered better performance than plantations in the provision of the three major ecosystem services, with additional benefits for ...
  146. [146]
    Green desert?: Biodiversity patterns in forest plantations
    Feb 15, 2019 · We measured the impact of forest plantations on biodiversity with a focus on eight groups of biota including saproxylic and ground mycorrhizal fungi, lichens, ...
  147. [147]
    (PDF) A global meta‐analysis of the impacts of tree plantations on ...
    May 27, 2025 · Our findings suggest that reforestation by planting mixed native species will be more beneficial to biodiversity.<|separator|>
  148. [148]
    Reforestation Using Exotic Plants Can Disturb Fertility Of Tropical Soils
    Jun 3, 2008 · ... , under certain climatic conditions, an abrupt decrease in soil microbial diversity which lead to significant degradation of its fertility.
  149. [149]
    Forests and Decarbonization – Roles of Natural and Planted Forests
    - Natural forests store more carbon than plantation forests, due to complex stand structures and accumulation of carbon belowground and in the forest floor.
  150. [150]
    How incorrect tree planting can harm the climate - Earthly
    Successful planting projects require both monitoring and protection. An example of a successful tree planting project is. Eden's Employ-to-Plant scheme in ...
  151. [151]
    [PDF] LOW COMPACTION GRADING TO ENHANCE REFORESTATION ...
    Final grading that leaves a loose soil and a rough surface increases survival of planted seedlings and forest productivity. Such practices are often less costly ...
  152. [152]
    Half of replanted tropical trees don't survive, new study finds
    Nov 14, 2022 · The team found that, on average, 18% of planted saplings died within the first year, rising to 44% after five years. However, survival rates ...
  153. [153]
    Breeding for Resistance to Tree Pests: Successes, Challenges, and ...
    Dec 3, 2020 · Invasive pests threaten native forest species at a time when reforestation is considered one of our best options for mitigating the impacts of ...
  154. [154]
    New Tree Tech: AI, drones, satellites and sensors give reforestation ...
    Jul 10, 2023 · Without monitoring, scientists also lose a valuable feedback opportunity, failing to collect ongoing data that can turn mistakes into more ...
  155. [155]
    Top 3 Challenges for Reforestation Monitoring - MORFO
    May 13, 2024 · On average, monitoring lasts 8.8 years, but this varies considerably, making it difficult to consistently measure the success of restoration ...
  156. [156]
    The economic costs of planting, preserving, and managing ... - Nature
    Dec 1, 2020 · Forests are critical for stabilizing our climate, but costs of mitigation over space, time, and stakeholder group remain uncertain.
  157. [157]
    Global restoration opportunities in tropical rainforest landscapes
    Jul 3, 2019 · Land opportunity cost is an important component of forest and landscape restoration feasibility because restoration has higher chances to occur ...
  158. [158]
    Publication: At Loggerheads? Agricultural Expansion, Poverty ...
    This report addresses trade-offs between poverty reduction and environmental protection, focusing on forest conversion to agriculture and forest poverty. It ...Missing: reforestation evaluations
  159. [159]
    Reforestation Carbon Offsets: All 5 Pros and 4 Cons Explained
    In total, the global reforestation potential would be at 7.8bt of CO2 per year. Even if fully utilized, this is only a fraction of the 33bt of CO2 emissions ...
  160. [160]
    Limited carbon sequestration potential from global ecosystem ...
    Jul 31, 2025 · Empirical studies have shown that fire-suppression-driven increases in tree cover of historically open ecosystems has limited impact on total ...
  161. [161]
    Why Temporary Carbon Storage in Forests Has Little Climate Value
    Dec 13, 2023 · The climate value of forest carbon depends on how long it stays out of the atmosphere. CO2 consequences stretch into geologic time.
  162. [162]
    Temporary nature-based carbon removal can lower peak warming ...
    Mar 17, 2022 · We show that temporary carbon sequestration has the potential to decrease the peak temperature increase, but only if implemented alongside an ambitious ...
  163. [163]
    Temporary carbon storage in forests has climate value
    Sep 28, 2023 · Forests and other natural carbon reservoirs play an important role in slowing and potentially reversing the effects of climate change.
  164. [164]
    Accounting for albedo change to identify climate-positive tree cover ...
    Mar 26, 2024 · A 50% offset indicates that a decrease in albedo halves the net climate benefit.
  165. [165]
    Overlooked 'Albedo' Effect Should Be Factored into Tree Cover ...
    Mar 26, 2024 · Albedo changes can reduce the climate benefit of tree planting, but new research helps identify areas with the greatest climate-cooling ...
  166. [166]
    3 Reasons Why Forest Carbon Offsets Don't Always Work
    Jan 31, 2024 · One study conducted by Sills and collaborators shows that only 6% of the total carbon offsets produced by 18 REDD+ projects across five tropical ...Missing: reforestation fraction
  167. [167]
    Revealed: more than 90% of rainforest carbon offsets by biggest ...
    Jan 18, 2023 · Based on a new analysis at least 90% of Verra's rainforest carbon credits do not represent real emission reductions · Each credit is equal to one ...
  168. [168]
    Around a third of carbon credits fail new benchmark test | Reuters
    Aug 6, 2024 · Around a third of carbon credits fail new benchmark test. By ... failed to meet the requirements of its standard on additionality grounds.
  169. [169]
    Tree monoculture plantations decrease plant diversity in the Italian ...
    Jun 22, 2025 · Tree monoculture plantations significantly alter plant community diversity and composition, reducing biodiversity through species turnover ...1 Introduction · 3.1 Biodiversity Of Plants · 4 DiscussionMissing: drawbacks | Show results with:drawbacks
  170. [170]
    Monoculture plantations impede forest recovery: Evidence from the ...
    Exotic tree plantations often further exacerbate the degradation of ecological functioning, via accelerated soil erosion, the promotion of pest outbreaks, and ...Missing: reforestation drawbacks
  171. [171]
    The plantation model in Chile: the cause of megafires
    Mar 30, 2023 · The megafire problem stems from the fact that huge areas of industrial plantations greatly facilitate the expansion of fires, as Chilean news ...
  172. [172]
    Pests in plantation forests: Challenging traditional productive ...
    This review aims to assess the potential of mixed-species plantations to enhance pest resilience in plantation forests of the region. Recent changes in pest- ...
  173. [173]
    Mixed forests provide higher levels of growth and yield than ...
    Aug 15, 2024 · Compared with single-species forests, mixed forests tend to provide more forest ecosystem functions and services.
  174. [174]
    REDD and human rights violations – No REDD in Africa
    Human rights violations from REDD projects include a killing, criminalization of activists, violent evictions of tens of thousands of peoples, as well as ...
  175. [175]
    New Report: The Great REDD+ Climate Illusion
    Nov 13, 2024 · REDD+ offset projects often lead to land grabbing, displacement, and grave human rights violations. They frequently overlook or disregard ...Missing: economic | Show results with:economic
  176. [176]
    Carbon colonialism and the new land grab: Plantation forestry in ...
    Carbon colonialism and the new land grab: Plantation forestry in Uganda and its livelihood impacts · Abstract · Introduction · Section snippets · Background.
  177. [177]
    The Agony of a Tree-Planting Project on Communities' Land in ...
    Sep 24, 2020 · Despite the poor record of large agricultural investments in Africa and parts of Asia ... eviction of thousands of people from their land and the ...Missing: reforestation | Show results with:reforestation
  178. [178]
    World Bank accuses itself of failing to protect Kenya forest dwellers
    Sep 29, 2014 · “The eviction of such ancestral communities leaves the indigenous forests open to exploitation and destruction; whereas securing such ...
  179. [179]
    Land grabs squeeze rural poor worldwide - IPES-Food
    It has worsened rural poverty, food insecurity, and land inequality. Marginalising local land users has made family farming less viable. 'Green grabs' involve ...Missing: reforestation economic harms
  180. [180]
    Indonesia reforestation plan a smoke screen for agriculture project ...
    Dec 17, 2024 · To make sure that the new reforestation initiatives are carried out in areas that urgently need to be reforested and avoid displacement of ...
  181. [181]
    Carbon credits and “green land grabbing”: guarding against the pitfalls
    Sep 23, 2025 · Protecting one area of forest may simply shift deforestation elsewhere, a phenomenon known as the displacement of deforestation or carbon ...Missing: harms | Show results with:harms
  182. [182]
    Tree plantations and forest regrowth are linked to poverty reduction ...
    Nov 20, 2024 · Mega-plantations in southeast asia landscapes of displacement. ... The Trouble with Trees: Afforestation Plans for Africa. Trends Ecol ...
  183. [183]
    The Great Green Wall: A Wall of Hope or a Mirage? | Earth.Org
    Apr 23, 2024 · In a socio-spatial context, growing expansive plantations as part of the GGW could lead to the displacement of people currently living on ...
  184. [184]
    Redefining “abandoned” agricultural land in the context of ... - Frontiers
    Aug 21, 2022 · We propose a new conceptualization of abandoned agricultural land that incorporates changes in landholding status over time into determining whether land ...
  185. [185]
    Quantitative Assessment of the Impact of the Three-North Shelter ...
    Apr 26, 2024 · The project has achieved afforestation on an area of 26.47 million hectares, and the forest coverage in the region has reached 10.18%. Ji Ping ...
  186. [186]
    Opportunities for biodiversity gains under the world's largest ... - Nature
    Sep 6, 2016 · We find that GFGP reforestation results in modest gains (via mixed forest) and losses (via monocultures) of bird diversity, along with major losses of bee ...
  187. [187]
    [PDF] agricultural impacts of china's three-north shelterbelt program
    This paper evaluates the economic and environmental impacts of. China's Three-North Shelterbelt Program (Sanbei Program), one of the.
  188. [188]
    https://organiser.org/2025/10/24/322367/bharat/india-climbs-to-9th-globally-in-forest-cover-ranks-3rd-in-annual-forest-growth-fao-report/
  189. [189]
    India's Compensatory Afforestation Efforts: Progress and Challenges ...
    Jul 28, 2025 · Between 2019 and 2024, India achieved 85% of its compensatory afforestation target with significant variance in fund utilisation across states.
  190. [190]
    How Surya-Kunj is helping restore the Himalayas biodiversity
    Oct 31, 2024 · Its success demonstrates how leveraging community engagement can transform barren land into thriving, biodiverse landscapes while sparking positive social ...
  191. [191]
    Pitfalls of India's restoration initiatives - Oxford Academic
    They seek short-term results and lack long-term goals (Jose, 2024). A restoration initiative's success hinges on many factors, including site and species ...
  192. [192]
    Pakistan's Ten Billion Tree Tsunami - UNEP
    Jun 2, 2021 · The Ten Billion Tree Tsunami is not only helping restore ailing ecosystems and improve natural capital; it is also supporting livelihoods. The ...
  193. [193]
    Will Pakistan's 'ten billion tree tsunami' make any difference to ...
    Nov 6, 2021 · Unless done carefully they can achieve little of their intended effect and can degenerate into little more than PR stunts, critics say. In ...
  194. [194]
    Why China's 'Great Green Wall' Might Not Be The Ecological Victory ...
    Mar 25, 2025 · Afforestation in Southwest China could contribute to an uptake of up to 10% of the annual water supply available in the region, according to a ...
  195. [195]
    Water Budgets Control the Resilience of Large‐Scale Ecological ...
    Sep 3, 2025 · By 2050, 1.8% of the area is projected to face degradation risks, with an additional 11.1% at potential risk under the SSP2-4.5 scenario.
  196. [196]
    The origin and early application of the principle of sustainable forest ...
    The principle of sustained yield (like forestry in general) was. “a child of ... Germany, suggested in 1787 a method to determine yield that was ...
  197. [197]
    200 years of sustainability in forestry: Lessons from history
    The original principle of sustained yield has gradually been broadened to a more inclusive principle of sustainable forest management.
  198. [198]
    [PDF] A conceptual history of 'sustainable development' (Nachhaltigkeit)
    The edicts of King Louis XIV., Hanns Carl von Carlowitz wrote in his. 'Sylvicultura oeconomica', already implied “das gantze summarium” (the complete summary) ...
  199. [199]
    Reforesting Iceland - Mossy Earth
    Considerable efforts have been put into halting and reversing this trend in the last century, led by the Soil Conservation Service of Iceland.The Ecosystem · History of Decline · Lone Woodland · Skridhufell Planting Area
  200. [200]
    Iceland's Long Road to Reforestation - Geography Realm
    Aug 12, 2024 · Iceland once had authentic forests – mostly consisting of resilient birch trees – but it had suffered drastic, total deforestation at the hands of its first ...
  201. [201]
    Ireland has lost almost all of its native forests - The Conversation
    Feb 24, 2023 · How to reforest the Emerald Isle without simply turning it into a conifer plantation.
  202. [202]
    How to save native woodlands one seed at a time - BBC
    May 31, 2025 · Northern Ireland is the least wooded corner of Europe and its native woodland face consistent threat from invasive species.Missing: reforestation post- famine
  203. [203]
    one man's mission to reforest a barren Irish hillside | Rewilding
    Jul 4, 2023 · He fenced off the land to keep out feral goats, sika deer and other non-native animals, eradicated rhododendron and other invasive alien plants, ...
  204. [204]
    Monitoring and control of forest seedling quality in Europe
    Oct 15, 2023 · A review of current practices, experiences, legislation and standards for seedling quality across 23 European countries.
  205. [205]
    New technology increases the survival rates of seedlings after wildfires
    Feb 13, 2020 · The use of nanopreparations allowed obtaining seedlings of deciduous and coniferous trees with an increased survival rate (10-28% higher) in the ...
  206. [206]
    Wood products - production and trade - Statistics Explained - Eurostat
    EU has been a net exporter of roundwood in the past four years, exports to non-EU countries surpassing imports by 12.5 million m3 in 2022.Missing: benefits | Show results with:benefits
  207. [207]
    Forest certification and economic insights: a European perspective
    Findings show that forest certification can significantly improve the economic performance of European forests.
  208. [208]
    Nature Restoration Law enters into force - EU Environment
    Aug 15, 2024 · The regulation sets binding targets to restore degraded ecosystems, particularly those with the most potential to capture and store carbon.
  209. [209]
    Nature Restoration put to EU Law: Tensions and Synergies between ...
    This chapter examines the tensions and synergies between the proposed restoration targets outlined in the Commission Proposal and the protection of private ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  210. [210]
    Forest plantations with public subsidies: to harvest or not to harvest ...
    Jul 12, 2022 · In conclusion, we encourage a mechanism of subsidies in the next application of EU's Common Agricultural Policy (i.e., rural development plan) ...
  211. [211]
    Weakening anti-deforestation regulation threatens EU's credibility
    Jun 10, 2025 · Critics warn that introducing such a category could create serious loopholes and undermine the law's effectiveness. If countries are prematurely ...
  212. [212]
    EU proposes curbing more green rules on farming subsidies | Reuters
    May 14, 2025 · The European Commission proposed weakening more of the environmental conditions tied to the EU's huge farming subsidy programme on Wednesday ...
  213. [213]
    Civilian Conservation Corps - History.com
    May 11, 2010 · Considered by many to be one of the most successful of Roosevelt's New Deal programs, the CCC planted more than three billion trees and ...
  214. [214]
    Reforesting the U.S. for People and Nature | TNC
    In the U.S., 88% of the opportunity areas for reforestation are on privately owned land. Planting trees in these places isn't just good for nature—it's good for ...
  215. [215]
    Private Working Forests Provide Significant Support for Rural ...
    Apr 26, 2019 · Private working forests support a staggering 2.5 million jobs, $109 billion in payroll, and account for $288 billion dollars in sales and manufacturing.
  216. [216]
    New study sheds light on reforestation and post-fire recovery
    Jan 31, 2025 · Post-fire tree planting significantly accelerates forest recovery in burned areas, increasing regrowth rates by 25.7%.
  217. [217]
    Carbon revenues bring afforestation into focus - New Private Markets
    Aug 27, 2025 · These ARR credits made up 5 percent of credits “retired” in 2024, according to carbon credit ratings agency Sylvera. But the market for ARR ...Missing: additionality | Show results with:additionality<|separator|>
  218. [218]
    How carbon finance is seeding new hope for northern forests | Reuters
    Dec 23, 2024 · Boreal forests risk becoming carbon sources; Canada alone clearcuts 1 million acres a year; U.S. investment of $1.5bln projects combining ...
  219. [219]
    Tree Planting Efforts Could Actually Worsen Climate Change
    Jun 6, 2025 · With wildfires turning forests into “massive carbon emitters,” planting trees in some places could inadvertently increase carbon emissions, ...Missing: criticism | Show results with:criticism
  220. [220]
    Year in review, 2024: Reforestation takes root - Agri Investor
    Dec 30, 2024 · 2024 saw growing interest in the reforestation market reflected through capital commitments, long-term deals for credits and financial products ...
  221. [221]
    [PDF] Learning from 20 years of Payments for ecosystem services in costa ...
    Since 1997 the programme has helped to conserve nearly one million hectares of forest by payments for protection (90 per cent), reforestation (6 per cent), ...
  222. [222]
    Large-scale recovery in Costa Rica's payment for ecosystem service ...
    Sep 4, 2024 · We provide tangible empirical evidence for large-scale ecological recovery across PES sites in Costa Rica's Nicoya Peninsula, following 27 ...
  223. [223]
    [PDF] Impact of Costa Rica's Program of Payments for Environmental ...
    The PSA program offers landowners annual payments for forest conservation. (and in less used modalities not considered in this paper, for reforestation,.
  224. [224]
    [PDF] Payment for Ecosystem Services in Costa Rica: Evaluation of a ...
    Our study evaluates the effect on deforestation and land cover of Costa Rica's payment- for-ecosystem-services (PES) program, one of the oldest country-wide PES ...
  225. [225]
    Forest Restoration in Bolivia - Forests of the World
    Nov 22, 2023 · The project restored 13,863 hectares of forest, exceeding the original goal, with 60% fire reduction, and includes planting, fire prevention, ...
  226. [226]
    'Sowing and harvesting water': Revisiting forest restoration in the ...
    Jan 29, 2025 · In a study of Bolivian communal wetland restoration, financial incentives helped encourage people to participate initially, while aligning ...<|separator|>
  227. [227]
    Tree Planting Is Booming. Here's How That Could Help, or Harm, the ...
    Mar 21, 2022 · These projects can devastate biodiversity, threaten water supplies and even increase temperatures because, in some cases, trees absorb heat that ...
  228. [228]
    Amazon Forest Recovery Project In Peru - zeroCO2
    This forest loss not only harms Peru's trees and extraordinary wildlife; it is also responsible for nearly half of the country's greenhouse gas emissions. ...
  229. [229]
    Great Green Wall: Five lessons on restoring land and peace
    Aug 4, 2025 · Explore five key lessons from the Great Green Wall on restoring land and building peace in conflict-affected regions of Africa.
  230. [230]
    Conflation of reforestation with restoration is widespread - Science
    Feb 15, 2024 · Across Africa, vast areas of nonforest are threatened by inappropriate restoration in the form of tree planting.
  231. [231]
    The Great Green Wall - National Geographic Education
    Sep 3, 2025 · The project has faced significant challenges, including a lack of sufficient funding, inadequate coordination among countries and ongoing ...<|separator|>
  232. [232]
    A new movement is reclaiming forests across Latin America
    Nov 29, 2023 · Businesses are partnering with local people across the region to revive forests and the services they provide to humanity.