Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Runway incursion

A runway incursion is any occurrence at an involving the incorrect presence of an , vehicle, or person on the protected area of a surface designated for the landing and takeoff of . These events represent a critical hazard, as they can result in collisions between , or between and ground vehicles or personnel, potentially causing catastrophic accidents. The (FAA) classifies runway incursions into four severity categories: Category A incidents, where a collision is narrowly avoided; Category B, involving significant collision potential requiring immediate action; Category C, where there is ample time and distance to avoid a collision; and Category D, the least severe, with no immediate safety consequences. Runway incursions arise from multiple causes, with pilot deviations accounting for approximately 60-65% of incidents, often due to miscommunication, lack of situational awareness, distraction, or failure to obtain clearance before entering a runway. Other contributing factors include operational errors by air traffic controllers, such as issuing ambiguous instructions, and vehicle or pedestrian deviations on the movement area without authorization. In fiscal year 2024, the FAA reported 1,758 runway incursions in the United States, with serious Category A and B events totaling nine—representing 0.51% of total incidents but highlighting ongoing risks at high-traffic airports. Globally, the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) reports that while runway incursion accidents remain rare, incidents occur at a high rate, contributing to nearly 40% of fatal accidents when combined with related high-risk categories like runway excursions. Prevention efforts focus on enhanced , improved communication protocols, and technological interventions, such as runway status lights, ground-based systems, and standardized for clearances. The FAA's Runway Incursion Mitigation Program identifies hotspots at airports with multiple prior events and implements targeted mitigations, contributing to a 73% reduction in the rate of serious incursions in the first ten months of 2024 compared to 2023. As of 2025, serious incursions remain low amid increasing air traffic. ICAO's Global Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Incursions promotes international standards, including risk assessments and , to address rising risks. Despite these advancements, vigilance remains essential, as human factors continue to drive the majority of occurrences.

Fundamentals

Definition

A runway incursion is defined by both the (FAA) and the (ICAO) as any occurrence at an involving the incorrect presence of an , vehicle, or person on the protected area of a surface designated for the and take-off of . This definition emphasizes unauthorized intrusions that compromise the safety of active operations, regardless of intent or outcome. The scope of a incursion encompasses the physical surface and areas inside hold position markings on adjacent taxiways or ramps. It specifically excludes events outside these protected zones, such as excursions, which involve an aircraft veering off or overrunning the surface during takeoff or . Similarly, it is distinct from broader surface incidents, defined as unauthorized movements within the movement area that do not involve the protected area. The term "runway incursion" originated in the aftermath of investigations into major accidents, including the 1977 Tenerife disaster—the deadliest in history, resulting from a collision between two aircraft on the runway—to standardize global reporting and analysis of such safety events. This standardization facilitated improved international coordination on runway safety protocols.

Severity Categories

The (FAA) utilizes a four-tier severity to evaluate runway incursions, enabling consistent risk assessment and targeted investigations into these unauthorized or unapproved runway events. This , detailed in FAA Order 7050.1B, categorizes incursions from A (most severe) to D (least severe) based on factors such as aircraft proximity, relative speeds, visibility conditions, and the nature of corrective or evasive actions required to avert a collision. Category A represents the most serious incidents, where a collision is narrowly avoided with little to no opportunity for evasive action, often involving high-risk scenarios like simultaneous movements on intersecting runways. For instance, an may abort takeoff and swerve to miss an oncoming by mere feet, with proximity typically under 100 feet horizontally or vertically and significant maneuvers such as rejected takeoffs or abrupt turns being necessary. These events demand immediate and extreme interventions due to minimal separation and high speeds involved. Category B incidents carry a significant potential for collision, requiring time-critical evasive actions by pilots, air traffic controllers (), or ground personnel to maintain . Criteria include reduced separation, such as less than 2,000 feet horizontally or 200 feet vertically, often exacerbated by moderate to high speeds or limited visibility; an example is an overflying another by 150 feet during a takeoff roll, necessitating urgent ATC instructions or pilot braking. Category C encompasses moderate-risk situations where ample time and distance allow for avoidance without immediate peril, typically featuring greater separation margins. Here, proximity exceeds 2,000 feet horizontally or 200 feet vertically, with lower relative speeds and better visibility enabling non-urgent corrections; a representative case involves a vehicle entering the while an approaching has sufficient runway length to stop safely. Category D denotes the least severe incursions, characterized by an unauthorized presence on the protected runway area but with no immediate danger to other traffic. These often involve a single entity, such as a or crossing a hold line without conflicting movements nearby, resulting in no required evasive actions and minimal risk due to isolated conditions.

Causes and Analysis

Human Factors

Human factors play a pivotal role in incursions, with errors by pilots, air traffic controllers (), and ground personnel often stemming from cognitive, perceptual, and physiological limitations. Pilot deviations represent the predominant category, accounting for approximately 62% of all U.S. incursions in 2024, according to a U.S. Office of Inspector General report analyzing FAA data. These deviations typically involve pilots failing to comply with clearances, such as incorrectly entering or crossing a without authorization, which violates . Common contributing factors include mishearing or misinterpreting instructions due to radio congestion or accents, from visual illusions on unfamiliar runways (e.g., approach effects), and impairing decision-making during long duty periods. Such errors frequently result in higher-severity Category A or B incursions, where collision avoidance maneuvers are required. Air traffic controller errors, classified as operational incidents, contribute to about 20% of incursions and arise from lapses in issuing precise directives or maintaining vigilance over surface movements. For instance, controllers may provide ambiguous instructions, such as unclear taxi routes at complex , leading to unintended runway entries by or vehicles. Failures to monitor displays or anticipate conflicts during high-traffic scenarios can also allow simultaneous clearances that compromise separation minima between on intersecting runways. These incidents underscore the demands of multitasking in tower environments, where brief attentional shifts can escalate risks. Ground vehicle and deviations, comprising roughly 18% of cases, often result from inadequate or breakdowns in communication protocols among non-pilot personnel. Drivers or workers may enter protected areas without confirming clearance, particularly at busy hubs where is overlooked or instructions are misrelayed via radio. Lack of recurrent exacerbates these issues, as personnel unfamiliar with layouts misjudge hold-short lines during routine operations. Underlying many human errors are psychological elements, including cognitive es and pressures that distort . Expectation , for example, leads pilots to assume a familiar clearance pattern and proceed onto a prematurely, a factor identified in numerous deviation analyses. Similarly, elevated during peak hours impairs both pilots' and controllers' ability to process complex instructions, increasing the likelihood of overlooked conflicts. These factors highlight the need for targeted interventions focused on behavioral patterns rather than isolated mistakes.

Systemic and Environmental Factors

Airport layout issues significantly contribute to runway incursions by creating confusion during ground operations, particularly at busy hubs with complex taxiway configurations and non-standard geometries. For instance, intricate networks of intersecting runways and taxiways can lead pilots and ground personnel to misidentify paths, increasing the risk of unauthorized entry onto active runways. The (FAA) identifies "hot spots"—specific locations with heightened collision or incursion potential, such as confusing runway-taxiway intersections—as key problem areas, with 171 such sites documented across U.S. airports as of August 2025. At Chicago O'Hare International Airport, a major hub handling approximately 776,000 annual operations in 2024, mitigation efforts included removing a hazardous taxiway configuration that had been linked to multiple incursions. Such targeted redesigns under the Runway Incursion Mitigation (RIM) program have reduced risks by up to 81% at affected locations. Environmental conditions exacerbate these layout challenges by impairing visibility and , thereby amplifying the potential for disorientation on the airfield. Low-visibility scenarios, such as , heavy , , or operations during nighttime hours, reduce the effectiveness of visual cues and surveillance technologies like the Airport Surface Detection Equipment (ASDE-X), leading to higher incursion rates. FAA reports indicate that poor weather conditions, including reduced visibility, contribute to a notable portion of surface incidents, with fiscal year 2024 data showing 1,758 total incursions amid varying environmental factors. The Surface Awareness Initiative (SAI), which leverages Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) for real-time visibility assessments, has been implemented to address these weather-related vulnerabilities at select airports. Systemic flaws within operations further enable incursions through deficiencies in and procedures that support safe movement. Inadequate , faded markings, or insufficient —often identified during FAA Part 139 inspections—can confuse users, particularly at high-traffic intersections where quick decision-making is essential. The Incursion Mitigation (RIM) program has targeted these issues by enhancing and at 93 non-standard geometry locations, achieving a 78% reduction in incursions as of 2023. Communication protocols, while effective in local Runway Safety Action Team (RSAT) meetings, suffer from limited across FAA divisions, hindering comprehensive risk mitigation. High traffic volumes at understaffed towers compound these problems, with staffing shortages leading to controller fatigue and extended work schedules, as observed in 2024 site visits; fiscal year 2024 saw a 12% increase in incursions from 2021 levels amid rising operations. The FAA's Aviation Safety Information Analysis and Sharing (ASIAS) program provides critical insights into these systemic elements through integrated data analysis, revealing procedural gaps in surface movement guidance that allow incursions to occur. ASIAS employs tools like the Aviation Runway Risk Analysis (ARIA) and Barrier Analysis Review (BAR) to evaluate risks holistically, identifying weaknesses in guidance protocols at complex airports where geometry and traffic intersect with environmental stressors. For example, ASIAS data highlights how unclear taxiway instructions in low-visibility conditions can lead to deviations, underscoring the need for standardized procedures to close these gaps. Poor signage, in particular, can amplify pilot errors by providing ambiguous directional cues during stressful operations. Overall, these factors illustrate the interplay between infrastructure, environment, and operations in fostering a safer airfield environment.

Prevention and Mitigation

Procedural and Training Measures

Regulatory bodies such as the (FAA) and the (ICAO) have established key standards to minimize procedural errors leading to runway incursions. The FAA mandates that pilots read back all clearances involving holding short of runways, line-up and wait instructions, and runway crossings to confirm understanding and reduce miscommunication risks. Similarly, ICAO's Procedures for Air Navigation Services (Doc 4444) requires flight crews to read back safety-related parts of (ATC) clearances, including those for runway operations, to ensure accurate comprehension. The sterile cockpit rule, enforced by the FAA under 14 CFR §121.542 and §135.100, prohibits non-essential activities and conversations during critical phases of flight, including , to maintain focus on surface movements. ICAO endorses a comparable sterile flight deck policy in its Manual on the Prevention of Runway Incursions, restricting distractions during and other low-altitude operations below 10,000 feet. Additionally, both organizations promote Surface Movement Guidance and Control Systems (SMGCS) at towers, particularly in low-visibility conditions, to provide structured guidance for aircraft and vehicles on the movement area. ICAO's Circular 148 outlines requirements for SMGCS implementation to enhance and prevent incursions. The FAA's Runway Safety Program offers comprehensive training initiatives to address human factors in runway operations. This program includes self-guided simulator sessions for pilots, focusing on recognizing and navigating hot spots—high-risk areas prone to incursions—through interactive scenarios simulating ramp-to-runway taxiing and post-landing movements. These sessions emphasize correct ATC instruction interpretation and hot spot avoidance, integrated into the FAASTeam WINGS course lineup for flight instructors. ICAO's Global Runway Safety Action Plan similarly recommends CRM and Threat and Error Management training tailored to runway incursion prevention for all personnel. Airport-specific procedures further tailor these measures to local risks. At high-risk airports, the FAA issues Arrival Notices (AANs), graphical depictions of approach paths highlighting misalignment hazards to prevent wrong-surface landings, now integrated into the Chart Supplement and approach charts for 44 such facilities. Standardized markings on diagrams use consistent symbology—circles or ellipses for permanent ground movement risks and diamonds for transient ones—implemented nationwide since May 2022 to improve pilot awareness. also conduct regular safety audits, with the FAA initiating comprehensive reviews of incursion risks at the 45 busiest U.S. facilities in 2024, including procedural gap assessments, followed by a 2025 oversight report evaluating mitigation progress. These procedural and training measures have demonstrated effectiveness in curbing pilot deviations. FAA reports indicate a notable decline in the rate of documented incursions from to 2024. The National Runway Safety Plan (2024-2026) credits ongoing enhancements with contributing to stabilized incursion rates despite increased air traffic, underscoring their role in long-term risk reduction.

Technological Solutions

The Surface Awareness Initiative (SAI) is an ADS-B-based system that enhances air traffic controllers' situational awareness by displaying real-time positions of aircraft and vehicles on airport surfaces directly on tower screens, helping to prevent operational errors such as runway incursions at airports lacking advanced radar surveillance. Launched in late 2023, SAI updates displays every second and was first operational at airports like Nashville International and Austin-Bergstrom by mid-2024, with FAA contracts awarded to providers including Saab, Indra, and uAvionix for deployment at over 50 U.S. airports by the end of 2025. The Runway Incursion Device (RID), introduced by the FAA in March 2025 as the final element of its Runway Safety Portfolio, serves as a memory aid for controllers by providing visual flashing lights, voice prompts, and alerts to indicate when a or is occupied by or vehicles, thereby reducing the risk of incursions due to oversight. Initial installations are planned at five airports including Austin for evaluation, with first operational deployments beginning in April 2025 at select facilities, and full rollout planned across 74 U.S. towers by the end of 2026 to address gaps in smaller facilities. Other established systems complement these efforts by providing surveillance and verification capabilities. The Status Lights (RWSL) system uses automated, embedded red lights in and pavements to visually pilots and operators of unsafe conditions, such as an occupied ahead, without relying on controller communication; it is deployed at 20 major U.S. airports as of 2025. In September 2025, the FAA issued a for a cost-effective Safety Lighting System to enable wider deployment at additional airports. The Airport Surface Detection Equipment, Model X (ASDE-X) integrates , multilateration, and ADS-B data to enable controllers to track all surface movements of aircraft and ground vehicles in real time, particularly at high-traffic hubs like O'Hare and International, where it has been operational since the early . Additionally, the Approach Verification (ARV) tool, integrated into the FAA's Standard Terminal Automation Replacement System () and rolled out nationwide starting in March 2024, delivers visual and audible to controllers if an approaching aircraft is aligned with the wrong or surface, preventing landing errors. Emerging technologies are incorporating to further bolster real-time monitoring and guidance. AI-enhanced systems, such as Universal Avionics' Taxi Assist unveiled in 2025, use speech-to-text analysis of clearances to generate graphical taxi routes on electronic flight bags, helping pilots avoid incursions by providing clear visual paths and overlays, with potential integration into apps like . Universal taxi guidance systems build on this by offering airport-wide visual cues, such as illuminated paths, to mitigate issues like poor visibility; the FAA has supported prototypes and plans expansions tied to SAI deployments at 50 sites by late 2025.

History and Impact

Historical Development

Prior to the , runway incursions were rarely recognized as a distinct issue, with incidents often attributed to individual errors rather than systemic risks, as comprehensive categorization and reporting systems were not yet established. The first major push for awareness came following a series of 1972 incidents, including the December 20 Chicago-O'Hare runway collision between a DC-9 and a CV-880, which resulted in 10 fatalities and highlighted communication breakdowns in low-visibility conditions. This event prompted initial FAA efforts to review ground operations, though formalized programs remained limited. The 1977 Tenerife disaster marked a pivotal moment, as the collision between two Boeing 747s—one from and one from —on the runway at Los Rodeos Airport resulted in 583 fatalities, the deadliest aviation accident in history and a classic runway incursion driven by miscommunication and fog. This tragedy spurred global awareness and led the (ICAO) to develop standardized definitions and procedures for runway safety, emphasizing and clear phraseology to prevent similar occurrences. In the and , regulatory responses intensified with the FAA issuing its Runway Incursion Action Plan in 1991, followed by the National Blueprint for Runway Safety in 2000, which outlined initiatives for improved , , and to reduce incursions. The 2001 Linate Airport crash in , where an MD-87 collided with a Citation on the amid dense fog, killing 118 people, further accelerated reforms, including enhanced EUROCONTROL-ICAO collaboration on surface movement guidance and control systems. From the to 2025, incursions saw a notable rise in reported near-misses, with U.S. totals exceeding 1,000 annually by 2023—reaching 1,756 in 2023—partly due to a post-pandemic surge in and staffing challenges. In response, the FAA issued a Safety Call to Action in March 2025, targeting general and business through enhanced , technology deployment, and risk mitigation to address the increased volume of operations.

Notable Incidents and Statistics

One of the most devastating runway incursions in aviation history occurred on March 27, 1977, at Los Rodeos Airport in , , where two 747s—one operated by and the other by —collided on the runway amid dense fog and miscommunication between pilots and . The aircraft was cleared for takeoff but initiated its roll while the Pan Am jet was still taxiing on the active runway, resulting in 583 fatalities, making it the deadliest aviation accident to date. On October 8, 2001, at , , a MD-87 (Flight 686) collided with a CitationJet 525A during takeoff in heavy fog, exacerbated by poor airport signage, lack of ground radar, and unauthorized entry of the Cessna onto the active . The crash killed all 110 on the MD-87, all four on the Cessna, and four on the ground, totaling 118 deaths. On August 27, 2006, at in , —a Bombardier CRJ-100—attempted takeoff from the wrong, shorter (Runway 26 instead of 22), leading to a crash shortly after liftoff due to insufficient length for the aircraft's weight. The accident resulted in 49 fatalities among the 50 on board, with the first officer surviving. More recently, on January 2, 2024, at Tokyo's , a A350-900 (Flight 516) collided with a Bombardier Dash 8-300 on 34R during , after the Dash 8 entered the runway without clearance due to a misheard instruction from . While all 379 occupants of the A350 evacuated safely before the aircraft was engulfed in fire, five of the six crew members perished. Significant near-misses have also underscored the risks of runway incursions. On June 9, 2005, at Boston Logan International Airport, a 737-300 crossed an active runway just as an was accelerating for takeoff, coming within seconds of collision due to air traffic controller workload and communication errors; quick action by the A330 pilots averted disaster for the 381 people on board. In November 2023, at , , an armed individual breached security and drove a onto the and runway area while holding his child hostage, creating a security-related incursion that halted all operations for over 18 hours without aircraft involvement but highlighting vulnerabilities in perimeter access. In the United States, the reported 1,758 runway incursions in fiscal year 2024, with nine classified as the most severe Category A or B events—representing about 0.5% of total incidents but involving high collision risk. Globally, the (ICAO) has noted a rise in runway-related incidents, including incursions, following the post-COVID traffic rebound, with such events contributing to 40% of fatal accidents in high-risk categories in 2024 amid record flight volumes. These incidents have driven substantial enhancements, but their impacts extend to , with serious incursions often incurring costs exceeding $100 million per event due to damage, operational disruptions, investigations, and liability— as evidenced by FAA investments totaling over $100 million in 2023 alone for incursion prevention at high-risk airports.

References

  1. [1]
    Runway Incursions - Federal Aviation Administration
    Oct 13, 2022 · What is a Runway Incursion? Any occurrence at an aerodrome involving the incorrect presence of an aircraft, vehicle or person on the ...
  2. [2]
    Ending Serious Close Calls | Federal Aviation Administration
    Jul 10, 2025 · Runway Incursion Data. A runway incursion is any occurrence at an ... Causes of runway incursions for CY2023: 60% are Pilot Deviations ...
  3. [3]
    [PDF] FAA Has Taken Steps To Prevent and Mitigate Runway Incursions ...
    Mar 12, 2025 · Runway incursion data is mainly used to conduct analyses to prevent and mitigate runway incursions at individual airports.
  4. [4]
    Are plane close calls and crashes actually increasing? Here's ... - CNN
    May 21, 2025 · The FAA reported 1,664 runway incursions in 2024, down from 1,837 in 2023. Serious “Category A” safety events, classified as serious incidents ...
  5. [5]
    Runway Incursions and the ICAO 2024 Safety Report - Avion50
    Oct 13, 2025 · Together with other high-risk categories, runway incursions make up nearly 40% of fatal accidents worldwide. This underscores why pavement ...
  6. [6]
    Airports Runway Incursion Mitigation (RIM) Program
    The FAA developed this inventory of airport locations where multiple runway incursions (RIs) occurred. The RI data collected from 2007-2024 indicates ...<|separator|>
  7. [7]
    Global Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Incursions (GAPPRI)
    As air traffic operations increase, the risk of runway incursions also is likely to increase unless new safety defenses are implemented. Runway incursion risks ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  8. [8]
    [PDF] Model Advisory Circular — Runway Incursion Prevention and Pilot ...
    runway incursion occurrences and accidents. 3.3 According to FAA data, approximately 65 percent of all runway incursions are caused by pilots, with ...Missing: statistics | Show results with:statistics
  9. [9]
    [PDF] ORDER 7050.1A - Federal Aviation Administration
    Sep 16, 2010 · An incident that meets the definition of a runway incursion, such as incorrect presence of a single vehicle/person/aircraft on the protected ...
  10. [10]
    Runway Incursion | SKYbrary Aviation Safety
    A runway incursion is any incorrect presence of an aircraft, vehicle, or person on a protected area for landing and takeoff.
  11. [11]
    Runway Excursions | Federal Aviation Administration
    Oct 13, 2022 · A runway excursion ( RE ) is a veer off or overrun from the runway surface ( ICAO ). These surface events occur while an aircraft is taking off or landing.
  12. [12]
    Global Runway Safety Action Plan - ICAO
    Feb 19, 2024 · Although the number of runway incursion accidents reported is very low, the number of runway incursion incidents remains high (at a rate of one ...
  13. [13]
    [PDF] 7050.1B with Change 1 and 2 - Federal Aviation Administration
    Oct 20, 2021 · A representative example for each type of runway incursion is provided here to help the reader understand the severity categories. These ...
  14. [14]
    [PDF] Spatial Disorientation: Visual Illusions
    They are caused by runways with different widths, upsloping or downsloping runways, and upsloping or downsloping final approach terrain. Pilots learn to ...
  15. [15]
    Runway Incursions: Causes and Mitigation Strategies
    Jan 3, 2024 · Lack of clear clearances, ambiguous phraseology, or pilot fatigue can contribute to unintentional runway incursions. Spatial disorientation: ...Villamizar · Causes Of Runway Incursions · Japan Airlines 516 CrashMissing: FAA mishearing
  16. [16]
    Close Calls and the New York Times: What You Need to Know
    Aug 21, 2023 · 60% are Pilot Deviations; 20% are Operational Incidents; 20% are Vehicle/Pedestrian deviations. You can stay updated on runway incursion data ...Missing: percentage | Show results with:percentage
  17. [17]
    Speaking of human factors: an interview study on the causes and ...
    16). According to the FAA's national runway safety statistics, pilot deviation has been identified as the most common cause, contributing to over 60 % of ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  18. [18]
    Conquering Biases - IFR Magazine
    Not surprisingly, expectation bias is among the most common causes of runway incursions involving pilot deviations. Other runways, taxiways, and nearby ...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] 472 AIRPORT DIAGRAMS HOT SPOTS
    Aug 7, 2025 · A “hot spot” is a runway safety related problem area on an airport that presents increased risk during surface operations. Typically it.
  20. [20]
    None
    Summary of each segment:
  21. [21]
    [PDF] National Runway Safety Plan, 2024-2026
    The FAA's Runway Incursion Mitigation (RIM) Program focuses on identifying and addressing non- standard geometry factors at runway/taxiway intersections that ...
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Aviation Safety Information Analysis and Sharing Wrong Runway ...
    one another, the use of a runway as a taxiway, complex airport layout, one taxiway leading to multiple runways, and areas where multiple runways and/or taxiways.
  23. [23]
    Taxi and Ground Movement Procedures
    Read back hold instructions phraseology may be initiated for any point on a movement area when the controller believes the read back is necessary. Issue ...
  24. [24]
    ATC Clearance | SKYbrary Aviation Safety
    The flight crew shall read back to the air traffic controller safety-related parts of ATC clearances and instructions which are transmitted by voice. The ...
  25. [25]
    The sterile cockpit rule - NASA ASRS
    Commonly known as the "sterile cockpit rule," these regulations specifically prohibit crew member performance of non-essential duties or activities.
  26. [26]
    Sterile Flight Deck | SKYbrary Aviation Safety
    A sterile flight deck restricts crew activity to essential tasks during critical phases like taxi, takeoff, approach, and landing, and below 10,000 feet.<|separator|>
  27. [27]
    [PDF] SURFACE MOVEMENT GUIDANCE Date: AC No: 120-57B AND ...
    Aug 25, 2020 · This AC provides guidance for developing a SMGCS plan for airports with low visibility, to ensure safe movement of aircraft and vehicles.
  28. [28]
    ICAO Circular 148 - Surface Movement Guidance and Control Systems
    The purpose of this Circular is to assist States in assessing the types of surface movement guidance and control systems required at their various aerodromes. ...
  29. [29]
    Runway Safety Pilot Simulator - Federal Aviation Administration
    Runway Safety Pilot Simulator. Videos from the cockpit to assist pilots and self-guided videos for flight instructors to help students.
  30. [30]
    Human Factors: Addressing Human Error, Fatigue, and Crew ...
    Jun 10, 2025 · Cross-Functional Exercises: Involving pilots, cabin crew, and ground staff in CRM training fosters a cohesive safety culture across departments.
  31. [31]
    [PDF] Global Runway Safety Action Plan - ICAO
    Feb 19, 2024 · Ensure flight crew complete Crew Resource Management (CRM) and Threat and Error Management (TEM) training addressing runway incursion prevention ...<|separator|>
  32. [32]
    Arrival Alert Notices (AANs) - Federal Aviation Administration
    Apr 11, 2024 · Arrival Alert Notices (AAN) are graphics produced by the FAA that visually depict an approach at specific airports to help mitigate wrong surface misalignment ...
  33. [33]
    Hot Spot Standardized Symbology - Federal Aviation Administration
    Jul 15, 2024 · Beginning May 19, 2022, the FAA will standardize these symbols to three shapes with two distinct meanings: a circle or ellipse for ground ...
  34. [34]
    FAA opens audit into runway incursion risks at 45 busiest US airports
    Oct 15, 2024 · The runway incursion audit will include a risk profile for each airport, along with identifying potential gaps in procedures, equipment, and ...
  35. [35]
    Bizav Safety Experts Share Tips on Preventing Runway Incursions
    Mar 6, 2025 · FAA statistics from 2023 to 2024 showed a significant reduction in the overall rate of documented runway incursions – dropping from 33.532 ...
  36. [36]
    Surface Safety Portfolio - Federal Aviation Administration
    Mar 19, 2025 · The Surface Awareness Initiative (SAI) delivers capabilities to improve controller situational awareness and reduce runway incursions. The ...
  37. [37]
    Emerging Airport Technology Aims to Reduce Runway Incursions
    Jun 9, 2025 · The FAA awarded contracts to install SAI systems at 50 airports, with a promise to have them operational by the end of 2025. Universal Taxi ...
  38. [38]
    FAA to Install New Runway Safety Technology
    Apr 15, 2024 · The Federal Aviation Administration plans to implement the Surface Awareness Initiative (SAI) system at the first four airports by July 2024.Missing: CRM deviations 2020-2025
  39. [39]
    FAA Launches Final Initiative of Runway Safety Portfolio
    Mar 19, 2025 · The RID is a memory aid for air traffic controllers that improves safety by indicating when a runway is occupied or closed.Missing: errors ambiguous
  40. [40]
    FAA's new runway incursion system aims to help boost ... - CBS News
    Jun 30, 2025 · The new device alerts controllers if a runway is already occupied, and uses voice prompts and flashing lights to get controllers' attention.
  41. [41]
    FAA expands runway safety technology across 74 control towers
    Mar 20, 2025 · Deployment across the remaining 69 airports is scheduled for completion by the end of 2026. Meanwhile, the SAI system, which uses automatic ...
  42. [42]
    FAA to install Runway Incursion Device at 74 traffic towers - AeroTime
    Mar 20, 2025 · The RID is the third and last initiative from the FAA's February 2023 Safety Call to Action to improve runway safety and reduce runway ...<|separator|>
  43. [43]
    Runway Status Lights | Federal Aviation Administration
    Apr 3, 2025 · RWSL is composed of red in-pavement airport lights which signal a potentially unsafe situation on taxiways and runways. The system is automated ...RWSL DescriptionIn This SectionRWSL Questions and AnswersRWSL Photo GalleryRunway Status Lights System ...
  44. [44]
    Airport Surface Detection Equipment, Model X (ASDE-X)
    Sep 7, 2023 · ASDE-X is a surveillance system using radar, multilateration and satellite technology that allows air traffic controllers to track surface movement of aircraft ...
  45. [45]
    Airport Surface Detection Equipment, Model X (ASDE-X) - SKYbrary
    ASDE-X is a runway-safety tool that helps controllers detect conflicts by tracking vehicles and aircraft on airport surfaces, using data from various sources.
  46. [46]
    FAA Rolls Out New Technology for Controllers to Improve Surface ...
    Mar 14, 2024 · The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) announced today it is launching a new surface safety tool, called Approach Runway Verification (ARV),
  47. [47]
    Approach Runway Verification (ARV) | SKYbrary Aviation Safety
    Jan 25, 2024 · Approach Runway Verification (ARV) is a surface safety tool for use in air traffic control towers that provides controllers with visual and audible alerts.
  48. [48]
    Universal Avionics Unveils AI Taxi Assist to Combat Runway ...
    Mar 19, 2025 · The Universal Taxi Assist system leverages speech-to-text technology designed for noisy environments. It analyzes verbal air traffic control ...
  49. [49]
    [PDF] EVALUATION OF A PROTOTYPE ADVANCED TAXIWAY ...
    Taxiway Guidance System (ATGS) that is designed to provide improved airport surface guidance to pilots through automatically controlled taxiway lighting.
  50. [50]
    [PDF] Lessons Learned and Lives Saved - NTSB
    Abstract: This report highlights some of the thousands of transportation safety improvements that have resulted from NTSB accident investigations and ...
  51. [51]
    [PDF] aircraft accident report - NTSB
    Jul 5, 1973 · A North Central Airlines DC-9-31 and a Delta Air Lines Convair (CV-88J) collided at the intersection of Runway 271 and the North-South taxiway ...
  52. [52]
    Timeline of FAA and Aerospace History
    Runway Incursion Plan. February 7, 1991. On February 7, FAA issued a runway incursion plan to cut incursions through actions that included tests of advances in ...
  53. [53]
    MD87 / C525, Milan Linate, 2001 | SKYbrary Aviation Safety
    On 8th October 2001, an SAS MD-87 taking off as cleared from Milan Linate in thick fog collided at high speed with a German-operated Cessna Citation.
  54. [54]
    ICAO and Eurocontrol Cooperation on Runway Safety Improvement
    Dec 31, 2018 · Since the Linate accident in 2001 EUROCONTROL has been working with ICAO and other partner organisations to ensure runway safety improvement ...
  55. [55]
    Runway incidents have risen but serious close calls ... - ABC News
    Feb 24, 2023 · Last year, there were at least 1,633 runway incursions at U.S. airports -- which the agency defines as any occurrence at an airport in which an ...
  56. [56]
    Runway Safety Statistics - Federal Aviation Administration
    May 15, 2025 · Regional Runway Incursion Totals · Aviation Safety Information Analysis and Sharing system (ASIAS) · Close Calls · Runway Safety Resources.
  57. [57]
    New Tech and Training Tackle Rising Runway Incursion Threat
    May 1, 2025 · In 2024, the agency recorded 1,758 incursions, nearly matching 2023's total of 1,760 and continuing an upward trend from a pandemic-era dip in ...
  58. [58]
    [PDF] NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY .- .- . ..Y BOARD
    The collision of two Boeing 747% on a runway at the Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain, airport on March 27, 1977, caused 583 fatalities--more fatalities than in ...
  59. [59]
    B742 / B741, Tenerife Canary Islands Spain, 1977 - SKYbrary
    On March 27, 1977, a KLM Boeing 747 took off without clearance in low visibility, colliding with a backtracking Pan Am 747 in Tenerife, killing 583.
  60. [60]
    Accident McDonnell Douglas DC-9-87 (MD-87) SE-DMA, Monday 8 ...
    SAS flight 686, a MD-87 and a Cessna 525A CitationJet 2 collided on the runway at Milan-Linate Airport, Italy, killing all 110 occupants on the MD-87, all 4 ...
  61. [61]
    [PDF] Attempted Takeoff From Wrong Runway Comair Flight 5191 ... - NTSB
    Aug 27, 2006 · Comair Flight 5191 crashed during takeoff from the wrong runway at Blue Grass Airport. The report discusses safety issues and recommendations.
  62. [62]
    [PDF] (AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION INTERIM REPORT ...
    Dec 25, 2024 · ... accident, a runway collision that occurred on. January 2, 2024, at Haneda International Airport in Tokyo, Japan, involving a Bombardier. DHC-8 ...
  63. [63]
    A359-DH8C Tokyo Haneda Japan 2024 | SKYbrary Aviation Safety
    Both aircraft were extensively damaged by the collision and both caught fire. Five of the six occupants of the DHC8 were killed and one was seriously injured.
  64. [64]
    [PDF] Aviation Investigation Final Report - NTSB
    Runway 15R intersected three active runways: 4L, 4R, and 9. The LCW was responsible for an Airbus A330, and the LCE was responsible for a Boeing 737. Both ...
  65. [65]
    Hamburg airport hostage standoff over, suspect arrested, police say
    Nov 5, 2023 · Police arrested a man and rescued a child at the centre of a hostage standoff at Hamburg airport on Sunday, ending a crisis that had forced authorities to ...
  66. [66]
    [PDF] State of Global Aviation Safety - ICAO
    Aug 11, 2025 · Over 80 per cent fatalities resulted from accidents related to loss of control-inflight (LOC-I) and bird strikes (BIRD) in 2024. The other.
  67. [67]
    FAA Invests Over $100M to Reduce Runway Incursions at Airports
    May 22, 2023 · The Federal Aviation Administration has awarded more than $100 million to 12 airports across the country to reduce runway incursions.