Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Shasu

The Shasu (Egyptian hieroglyphic: š3sw) were Semitic-speaking pastoral nomads who inhabited the , Transjordan, and adjacent arid zones from the Late (c. 1550–1200 BCE) into the Early (c. 1200–1000 BCE). Primarily attested in New Kingdom texts, reliefs, and administrative records, they appear as mobile herders of sheep, goats, and cattle, often traversing regions east of the and engaging in , , or with Egyptian forces. Egyptian depictions portray the Shasu as both threats—such as spies or raiders requiring military campaigns—and opportunistic allies, including as permitted grazers in the eastern or mercenaries in pharaonic armies. A defining inscriptional reference occurs in the Soleb Temple of Amenhotep III (c. 1390–1352 BCE) and the Amarah West Temple of Ramesses II (c. 1279–1213 BCE), enumerating "the land of the Shasu of Yhw" (or Yhw3) among subdued territories, with the toponym Yhw widely regarded by Egyptologists as the earliest extra-biblical attestation of Yahweh, the god later associated with ancient Israel. This connection has prompted scholarly inquiry into potential Shasu contributions to Yahwistic origins and proto-Israelite , though archaeological surveys in areas like the Jabal Hamrat Fidan reveal a persistent without evidence of widespread or monumental architecture typical of emerging states.

Etymology and Terminology

Linguistic Origins

The Egyptian term for Shasu is š3sw (conventionally transliterated from hieroglyphic šꜣsw), a denoting a group of nomadic or semi-nomadic peoples encountered by primarily in the and adjacent regions. This designation appears in texts from the Eighteenth Dynasty onward, circa 1550 BCE, often accompanied by hieroglyphic determinatives indicating foreign hill-dwellers, walkers, or bowmen, which underscore their perceived mobile and lifestyle rather than a fixed ethnic identity. Etymologically, š3sw is most plausibly derived from the Egyptian verb š3s or šꜣs, meaning "to wander," "to travel," or "to move on foot," reflecting an observer's of these groups as itinerant herders or foragers who traversed arid terrains on foot with . This interpretation aligns with the term's consistent application in records to semi-nomadic populations engaging in , distinct from settled Canaanites or urban dwellers, though the precise semantic evolution remains debated due to limited comparative lexical data from contemporary non-Egyptian sources. Alternative hypotheses propose a borrowing into , potentially from roots like Hebrew šāsā or šāsas ("to plunder" or "to devastate"), which could capture perceptions of Shasu as raiders or bandits disrupting routes and borders, as depicted in reliefs. However, this view lacks direct philological attestation in preserved Shasu-influenced languages and is less favored, as š3sw functions as a generic for various nomads without implying inherent predation, akin to later terms for . The term's persistence into the Ramesside period (circa 1295–1070 BCE) without significant phonetic shift further supports an origin over wholesale adoption.

Egyptian Designations and Meanings

The Egyptian designation for the Shasu is the term š3sw, transliterated from hieroglyphic script and approximated in pronunciation as šaswə or shasu. This word appears in New Kingdom texts, with possible earlier attestations from the Old Kingdom, such as on the causeway of Unas (c. 2375–2345 BCE), though its consistent use as an ethnic or social label emerges prominently from the reign of Thutmose II (c. 1492–1479 BCE). Etymologically, š3sw derives from the Egyptian verb šꜣs, meaning "to wander" or "to travel," reflecting a designation rooted in mobility and implying nomadic or semi-nomadic pastoralists who traversed arid regions for herding. Most Egyptologists translate it as "nomads" or "Bedouin," emphasizing cattle-herding groups rather than settled populations, though some propose nuances like "pastoralist" or "plunderer" based on contextual usages in military or tribute records. Alternative derivations link it to "those who move on foot," underscoring pedestrian migration, while a minority view suggests influence from Semitic roots connoting raiding (šāsas, "to plunder"), potentially reflecting Egyptian perceptions of these groups as disruptive border actors. The primary consensus favors the indigenous Egyptian verbal origin, as it aligns with textual depictions of š3sw as mobile herders in the southern Levant and Transjordan, distinct from urban Canaanites or other foes like the ʿpr.w (Apiru). In inscriptions, š3sw often pairs with tꜣ ("land"), as in tꜣ š3sw ("land of the Shasu"), denoting not a unified polity but diffuse territories or tribal zones east of Egypt, such as those associated with Edom or Yhw. This formulation implies a geographical rather than strictly ethnic category, with connotations of lawlessness or otherness in Egyptian worldview, as š3sw frequently appear as captives, spies, or tribute-payers in temple reliefs and annals from the Eighteenth to Twentieth Dynasties. The term's flexibility allowed it to encompass various Semitic-speaking groups, prioritizing lifestyle—seasonal wandering and pastoralism—over fixed identity, though later Iron Age contexts show it evolving toward broader "eastern nomad" stereotypes.

Historical Mentions

Eighteenth Dynasty References

The Shasu are attested in Egyptian inscriptions from the early Eighteenth Dynasty, primarily as semi-nomadic pastoralists inhabiting regions of the and Transjordan, often encountered during pharaonic campaigns against Asiatic groups. The earliest explicit references occur in the reign of (c. 1479–1425 BCE), whose annals and temple reliefs at detail subjugation of Shasu tribes alongside city-states and other nomads during his multiple expeditions into (Syria-Palestine). These texts record from Shasu, including , goats, and prisoners, portraying them as mobile herders rather than settled populations, with specific scenes depicting captures in areas near Pekanan and Yenoam. Under (c. 1427–1400 BCE), Shasu appear in lists of foreign captives and tribute-bearers, grouped with Habiru and other elements in reports from his Asiatic campaigns, emphasizing their role as border raiders or auxiliaries pressuring control over trade routes. Administrative papyri and stelae from this period quantify Shasu prisoners, such as 89 individuals noted in one record, relocated for labor in the Valley, reflecting pragmatic policies toward nomadic threats without ideological extermination. By the reign of Amenhotep III (c. 1390–1353 BCE), Shasu references expand in topographical lists at the Soleb temple, enumerating multiple "Shasu-lands" (e.g., associated with sites near Dothan in northern Canaan and arid zones eastward), distinct from urban Canaanite toponyms and underscoring their decentralized tribal structure across the Negev and Moabite highlands. These inscriptions, carved during sed-festival celebrations, frame Shasu territories as peripheral conquests, with no evidence of centralized kingdoms but rather clan-based mobility exploiting pastoral niches amid settled agriculture. Scholarly analyses of these lists, drawing from hieroglyphic onomastics, confirm Shasu as Semitic-speaking groups, differentiated from Hayka (Hittites) or Peleset (Philistines) by their non-urban, herding lifestyle.

Amarna Letters and Late Bronze Age

The , diplomatic correspondence from and rulers to pharaohs and (circa 1350–1330 BCE), reference nomadic groups termed Sutu (or Šūtu), the cognate of the Shasu, as southern pastoralists involved in raids and alliances that exacerbated regional instability. These mobile tribes are portrayed as operating from Transjordan and southern , preying on settled populations and occasionally allying with rebellious city-states against vassals. For example, Amarna Letter EA 195 describes activities in the context of appeals for pharaonic , underscoring their role as opportunistic disruptors in the Late geopolitical landscape. Distinguished from the 'Apiru (often semi-sedentary rebels or displaced persons), the Sutu/Shasu are consistently depicted in the letters and related Egyptian texts as specialized pastoral nomads prone to violence during scarcity or political vacuum, living in symbiosis with agrarian communities but capable of large-scale depredations. Anson Rainey, analyzing the corpus, emphasized their Bedouin-like mobility and southern origins, contrasting them with the more localized 'Apiru threats. At least eight letters mention Suteans explicitly, highlighting their presence across Canaan and the Beqaa Valley. In the broader Late Bronze Age context (circa 1550–1200 BCE), Shasu/Sutu incursions reflected the era's fragile balance between imperial control and peripheral tribal dynamics, with nomads exploiting weakened loyalties amid Mycenaean trade disruptions and internal religious upheavals under . records from the period, including inscriptions, corroborate the letters by noting Shasu as captives and adversaries in southern levants, with thousands reportedly subdued in campaigns to secure routes and borders. This nomadic pressure contributed to the erosion of centralized authority in , presaging the transitions.

Ramesside and Iron Age Contexts

In the Ramesside period (c. 1292–1077 BCE), Shasu references proliferated in Egyptian military, administrative, and rhetorical texts, portraying them primarily as pastoral nomads encountered during campaigns in the southern Levant and Transjordan. Ramesses II (r. 1279–1213 BCE) inscribed claims of plundering Shasu-lands and capturing the mountain of Seir, linking the Shasu to territories in Edom and the Negev highlands, as detailed in his temple stelae and victory narratives. At Amara West, Ramesses II's temple features lists of Shasu lands, including variants echoing earlier 18th Dynasty enumerations, such as the Shasu of Yhw, integrated into broader geopolitical mappings of Egypt's eastern frontiers. Ramesses III (r. 1186–1155 BCE) continued these interactions, with inscriptions at and administrative papyri referencing Shasu incursions, tribute extraction, and possible incorporation as border guards or laborers, amid broader defenses against Levantine disruptions. Model letters from the era, such as those in the Anastasi papyri, depict Shasu as mobile threats penetrating Egyptian fortresses, requiring vigilant patrol responses. These accounts underscore the Shasu's role as semi-nomadic groups exploiting transitional zones between Egyptian-controlled and arid hinterlands, often subdued through punitive expeditions or coerced alliances. As the New Kingdom transitioned into the (c. 1200–586 BCE), Egyptian dominance waned post-Ramesses III, leading to a decline in direct Shasu mentions in royal inscriptions, though the term persisted in Third Intermediate Period records denoting similar nomadic elements. Archaeological patterns of mobility in the and southern Transjordan during Iron Age I align with Shasu descriptors, suggesting continuity of these groups amid the emergence of settled polities like , without explicit Egyptian attestation after the empire's retraction. This shift reflects causal disruptions from migrations and internal Egyptian instability, reducing centralized oversight of peripheral nomads.

Geographical and Territorial Associations

Primary Regions in the Southern Levant

The Shasu were primarily associated with the southern Transjordanian highlands, encompassing the region of Seir—identified in Egyptian texts as Sʿrr—which corresponds to the ancient territory of , extending from the valley southward toward the . Inscriptions from the temple of at Soleb (ca. 1370 BCE) and at Amarah West (ca. 1270 BCE) list Sʿrr among Shasu toponyms, placing these nomadic groups in rugged, arid terrains east of the Dead Sea suitable for and seasonal . Other named Shasu lands, such as Yhw and Pysps (possibly near modern Punon or the Wadi Faynan area), further localize their core activities in copper-rich zones of southern , where archaeological surveys reveal Late nomadic camps and early mining exploitation. To the north, Shasu presence extended into Moabite fringes, evidenced by toponyms like Shr in lists and references to nomadic incursions in Papyrus Anastasi VI (ca. 1200 BCE), describing Shasu grazing flocks in the eastern plateau. These areas, between the Zered and Arnon wadis, featured intermittent settlements and pastoral routes linking highlands to oases. military texts from Ramesses II's reign (1279–1213 BCE) document campaigns against Shasu in these Transjordanian sectors, portraying them as mobile threats disrupting trade and borders. Westward, Shasu territories overlapped the highlands and northern fringes, where Egyptian fortifications like those at Kadesh-Barnea (ca. 13th–12th centuries BCE) countered nomadic movements into southern . Texts such as the reliefs of (ca. 1184–1153 BCE) depict Shasu captives from these peripheral zones, indicating fluid boundaries rather than fixed polities, with groups exploiting marginal lands for herding and raiding. Sparse material traces, including collared-rim jars and temporary encampments at sites like Tell Masos, align with this semi-nomadic footprint, though definitive attribution remains debated due to the perishability of pastoral artifacts.

Movements and Border Interactions

The Shasu exhibited patterns of seasonal migration as pastoral nomads, traversing arid zones including the , Desert, southern Transjordan, and the fringes of the , regions directly abutting Egyptian-controlled territories in the and eastern frontiers. Egyptian administrative texts from the New Kingdom period, such as those from the reign of (c. 1390–1352 BCE), record the importation of Shasu and personnel into , suggesting controlled movements across borders for or labor purposes, often under escort to mitigate raiding risks. These interactions reflect Egypt's strategy to regulate nomadic access to frontier water sources and grazing lands, limiting unauthorized incursions while exploiting Shasu herds for economic gain. Military confrontations arose when Shasu groups disrupted Egyptian border security, prompting punitive campaigns to secure trade routes and suppress perceived threats. During Thutmose III's expeditions (c. 1479–1425 BCE), Shasu in the Canaanite highlands were targeted to prevent interference with Egyptian movements into Asia, with inscriptions detailing the capture of nomadic bands and seizure of their tents as symbols of subjugation. Later, under Ramesses II (c. 1279–1213 BCE), Shasu nomads served in espionage roles during the Battle of Kadesh, where captured individuals—depicted in temple reliefs as being beaten—provided false intelligence on Hittite positions, exacerbating Egyptian tactical vulnerabilities and highlighting the Shasu's opportunistic border-crossing activities. Such episodes underscore the dual role of Shasu as both potential allies in reconnaissance and adversaries in asymmetric warfare against Egyptian forces. Archaeological evidence from sites like Tell el-Borg in the eastern reveals temporary reed structures possibly occupied by Shasu during the Second Intermediate to early New Kingdom periods, indicating sporadic settlements or transit points near amid Egypt's efforts to fortify against nomadic influxes. These findings align with textual accounts of Shasu integration into labor systems, as or tributaries, which facilitated monitored movements while curtailing independent raiding. Overall, Shasu- dynamics embodied a pragmatic coexistence, balancing , economic exchange, and deterrence to manage the inherent fluidity of nomadic lifeways against imperial stability.

The Shasu of Yhw

Key Inscriptions from Soleb and Amara West

The Soleb inscription originates from the temple complex at Soleb in , constructed by during his reign (ca. 1390–1352 BCE) and dedicated initially to Amun-Ra. This monument features extensive topographical on its walls, enumerating over 100 place names or tribal territories, including several associated with Shasu nomads as "tꜣ šꜣsw" (lands of the Shasu). One specific entry reads "tꜣ šꜣsw yhwꜣ," denoting the land of the Shasu of Yhwꜣ, inscribed within a cartouche-like frame amid other Shasu toponyms such as Seir and other southern regions. These likely served a propagandistic purpose, cataloging known foreign entities to assert dominion, though the Shasu are portrayed as pastoral nomads rather than settled states. A near-identical inscription appears at Amara West, a Ramesside temple site approximately 50 km north of Soleb, built by Ramesses II (ca. 1279–1213 BCE) as part of his Nubian building program. This version replicates the Soleb Shasu list, including the "tꜣ šꜣsw yhwꜣ" toponym in the same sequence and hieroglyphic form, indicating direct copying from Amenhotep III's earlier monument rather than independent documentation. Excavations at Amara West in the 1930s and later confirmed the inscription's presence on temple reliefs, preserving it amid a similar array of Asiatic and nomadic designations. The duplication underscores the administrative continuity of Egyptian records on peripheral groups across dynasties, with no evidence of alteration to the Yhwꜣ reference despite the roughly 150-year interval. Both inscriptions employ standard New Kingdom hieroglyphic conventions for foreign toponyms, with "yhwꜣ" rendered using signs for y (a hand or arm variant), h (wick), and w (quail chick with alef), enclosed to signify a bounded . No accompanying describes campaigns against these specific Shasu; instead, they form part of static decorative inventories, possibly drawn from or trade reports. Scholarly transcriptions, based on photographs and squeezes, confirm the reading without significant lacunae at the Yhwꜣ entry, though the lists' original sources remain hypothetical administrative archives.

Phonological and Toponymic Analysis

The designation Yhw in the Egyptian inscriptions is phonetically rendered using hieroglyphic signs that approximate Semitic consonants: the reed-leaf sign (Gardiner N16 or M17 for /y/ or /i/), the twisted-wick sign (M8 for /ḥ/ or /h/), and the quail-chick or bolt sign (M23 or G43 for /w/ or /u/). This transcription yields a vocalization such as yahwe or yahu, aligning closely with the consonantal skeleton YHWH of the Hebrew divine name Yahweh, minus the final /h/ which Egyptian orthography often omitted in foreign toponyms or theonyms. The absence of a determinative for deity (such as a seated god figure) in the Soleb and Amara West lists further suggests a non-theophoric reading, though the phonological match has prompted speculation of an underlying divine referent. Toponymically, Yhw functions as a territorial marker in the formula "Shasu of [place]," paralleling other designations like "Shasu of " or "Shasu of Seir" in the same inscriptions, which denote nomadic groups tied to specific regions rather than ethnic or cultic identities. These lists, from Amenhotep III's Soleb temple (ca. 1406–1392 BCE) and Ramesses II's Amara West temple (ca. 1279–1213 BCE), enumerate Shasu lands primarily in the southern Transjordan and , placing Yhw geographically near and , south of the Dead Sea. Scholars such as Anson Rainey and Michael Astour interpret Yhw as a place name for a arid or highland district associated with pastoral nomads, possibly linked etymologically to roots for "desolation" or "he who causes to be," but without direct evidence of deification in the Egyptian context. The debate over Yhw as toponym versus theonym hinges on syntactic parallels and regional cultic patterns; while Raphael Giveon, who published the Soleb materials, initially favored a divine name interpretation due to phonological proximity to YHWH, subsequent analyses emphasize the list's geographic focus, arguing that any theophoric element would reflect a localized cult among Shasu clans rather than an abstract god-name. No contemporary texts confirm Yhw as a standalone toponym, but biblical references to 's southern origins (e.g., 3:3, Deuteronomy 33:2) corroborate a Transjordanian association, supporting causal links between Shasu mobility and early Yahwistic ethnogenesis without implying Israelite equivalence. Egyptian scribal conventions, which adapted foreign names conservatively, underscore the need for caution against retrojecting later Hebrew vocalizations onto these 14th–13th century BCE attestations.

Scholarly Interpretations and Debates

Identification with Edomites and Southern Nomads

Scholars frequently identify subgroups of the Shasu, specifically those termed "Shasu of Edom" in Egyptian records, with the nomadic pastoralists who occupied the arid highlands and valleys of southern Transjordan, corresponding to the biblical territory of Edom or Seir. This association stems from Late Bronze Age texts that delineate Shasu territories overlapping with Edom's core regions, including the Arabah rift and eastern Negev fringes, where mobile herders exploited seasonal pastures and copper resources. A key Ramesside papyrus from approximately 1192 BCE documents the supervised transit of "tribes of the Shasu of Edom" through the fortress of Merneptah-Hotephirmaat in the Wadi Tumilat (Theku), allowing access to water sources for their livestock during migrations, which underscores their vulnerability to drought and reliance on Egyptian permissions for border crossings. Archaeological correlations bolster this linkage, particularly in the Faynan copper district of southern Jordan, where Late Bronze and early Iron Age sites reveal nomadic encampments transitioning to fortified industrial complexes around 1200–1000 BCE. Thomas E. Levy posits that Edomite ethnogenesis crystallized among Shasu-like nomads amid intensified metallurgical activities, forming proto-tribal structures that prefigured the Iron Age kingdom of Edom, evidenced by tumuli burials and slag heaps indicating pastoralists integrated into resource extraction. Such findings contrast with earlier views of Edom as a purely sedentary entity, highlighting Shasu mobility as foundational to its socioeconomic base. As southern nomads, the Shasu exemplified broader Bedouin-style groups across the Negev, Sinai, and Moabite borders, with "Edom" serving as an Egyptian toponymic qualifier for those in the southeastern Levant rather than a strict ethnic marker. This interpretation aligns with Egyptian usage of "Shasu" as a descriptor for semi-nomadic herders irrespective of self-identification, potentially encompassing precursors to multiple Transjordanian polities; however, critics like those analyzing Jabal Hamrat Fidan excavations note the term's vagueness, arguing it denotes lifestyle over lineage, with limited direct material continuity to 9th-century BCE Edomite pottery and architecture. Debates thus center on whether Shasu of Edom represent a discrete ethnic cohort or fluid alliances, informed by the absence of indigenous self-appellations in Egyptian sources and sparse nomadic traces in Edom's archaeology.

Connections to Yahweh Worship and Origins

The phrase "Shasu of Yhw" appears in inscriptions from Soleb, erected during the reign of (circa 1390–1352 BCE), and from Amara West, associated with (circa 1279–1213 BCE), listing nomadic groups in the and Transjordan as conquered or peoples. These texts the term as tȝ šȝsw yhw, typically translated as "the land of the Shasu of Yhw," where šȝsw denotes pastoral nomads and yhw is a specific ethnic or territorial descriptor. Phonological analysis identifies yhw as the consonantal root YHWH, the tetragrammaton representing the Israelite deity Yahweh, marking these as the earliest extra-biblical attestations of the name, predating widespread Israelite settlement in Canaan. Scholars such as Donald B. Redford and Jean Leclant interpret this as evidence of Yahweh veneration among Shasu nomads, possibly in regions like Edom or Seir, rather than a mere toponym, given the pattern of associating divine names with tribal lands in Egyptian lists. While some debate persists over whether yhw strictly denotes a place versus a theophoric element, the vocalization and context align closely with later Semitic usages of YHWH as a proper divine name, unsupported by alternative etymologies in contemporary sources. This association positions Shasu nomads as likely carriers of early worship, originating in southern arid zones such as northern Arabia or the Edomite highlands, from which the cult diffused northward to proto-Israelite groups by the early (circa 1200–1000 BCE). echoes this southern provenance, depicting 's emergence "from Seir" or "Paran" (Judges 5:4; 3:3), consistent with Shasu mobility patterns between , , and Transjordan documented in Ramesside records. Daniel E. Fleming proposes that these Shasu Yhw groups represent precursors to the "people of YHWH" in archaic Hebrew traditions, bridging to later sedentary cults without requiring Israelite invention of the deity. Empirical inscriptional data thus challenges Canaanite-centric models of , favoring a gradual adoption from peripheral nomads over endogenous development. The Shasu of Yhw, attested in Egyptian inscriptions from the Soleb of (ca. 1390–1352 BCE) and the Amara West of (ca. 1279–1213 BCE), have prompted hypotheses linking these nomads to proto-Israelites due to the phonological similarity between Yhw and the divine name (YHWH), Israel's national . These texts list "the land of the Shasu of Yhw" as a toponym in the southern Transjordan or northern Arabian regions, suggesting early worship of a or tribal group associated with among pastoral nomads. Scholars such as Thomas Römer propose that originated among these Shasu groups in areas like or Seir—regions biblically tied to Yahweh's southern emergence (e.g., 3:3)—before its adoption by proto-Israelite settlers in the highlands during the early (ca. 1200–1000 BCE). This view posits or tribal amalgamation, where Shasu nomads contributed religious elements, including monolatrous Yahweh veneration, to the forming Israelite identity amid the . Proponents further argue for socioeconomic parallels: Shasu , clan-based raiding, and marginal interactions with and polities mirror biblical depictions of early Hebrew tribes as semi-nomadic herders emerging from desert fringes (e.g., motifs of wilderness wandering). Manfred Bietak has suggested Shasu elements formed part of the "" for proto-Israelites, potentially through intermarriage or into Levantine hill country sites lacking pig remains and featuring collared-rim jars, hallmarks of early Israelite ca. 1200 BCE. However, such connections rely on indirect toponymic and onomastic evidence rather than explicit ethnic identification, with Yhw possibly denoting a place rather than a divine , though most Egyptologists favor the link based on vocalization patterns in hieroglyphic lists. Critics, including Anson Rainey and others, contend that equating Shasu with proto-Israelites or overextends the evidence, as Shasu designate a diffuse category of Bedouin-like nomads across , , and Transjordan from the 18th to 12th centuries BCE, not a cohesive precursor to the "Israel" first appearing in the (ca. 1208 BCE) as a Canaan-based people group. Archaeological surveys reveal proto-Israelite settlements in central highlands as primarily indigenous agrarian developments from collapsed villages, with minimal nomadic influx evidenced by continuity in pottery and architecture, contrasting Shasu's ephemeral desert camps lacking durable remains. The term "proto-Israelites" itself is deemed anachronistic by some, blurring distinct Late mobile groups (Shasu, Habiru) with Iron Age sedentary entities, potentially driven by maximalist biblical interpretations rather than stratified data. No inscriptions or artifacts directly bridge Shasu of Yhw to Hebrew script or cultic practices until the 9th century BCE Iron Age inscriptions like , underscoring the proposals as speculative correlations rather than causal origins.

Archaeological and Material Evidence

Challenges in Tracing Nomadic Remains

Nomadic pastoralists like the Shasu produced minimal durable artifacts, relying on ephemeral tents, woven fabrics, and portable goods that decompose rapidly in arid environments, leaving few identifiable traces beyond occasional low-density scatters of sherds or animal bones. Corrals constructed from thorny shrubs or vegetation similarly perish without residue, while the absence of monumental or fixed settlements hinders stratigraphic analysis and precise dating. Environmental factors in the southern Levant's desert fringes compound these issues: wind deflation strips away surface materials, forming artifact-poor "desert pavements" that mask underlying deposits, and episodic flash floods or erosion obliterate temporary campsites before they can accumulate sufficient volume for detection. Sediment buildup in wadis can bury remains deeply, evading surface surveys, while organic preservation is rare due to hyper-arid conditions and bioturbation. Distinguishing Shasu-specific signatures proves elusive, as faunal assemblages dominated by sheep and remains overlap with those of semi-nomadic or early sedentary herders, lacking unique ethnic diagnostics like inscribed objects; dating of sparse organics yields broad ranges, often spanning centuries. Archaeologists' paradigms, attuned to sites, frequently overlook subtle nomadic patterns, such as dispersed features or minimal-tool kits, leading to under-recognition in surveys of or Transjordan. Reliance on Egyptian textual attestations introduces further complications, as these urban-elite records exhibit biases portraying nomads as raiders or subordinates, potentially inflating conflicts while omitting socioeconomic details verifiable only through material correlates that remain scarce. Ethnographic analogies to modern aid interpretation but falter amid post-depositional disturbances from later pastoral reuse of the landscape. Consequently, proposed Shasu-linked sites, such as those in the Jabal Hamrat Fidan region yielding Late ceramics and pastoral faunal profiles, demand multidisciplinary integration to overcome these evidentiary gaps.

Relevant Sites in Edom and Transjordan

Archaeological evidence for the Shasu in and Transjordan is limited by the ephemeral nature of nomadic , with most traces appearing in transitional contexts from Late to Early . Sites in the Faynan region of southern , corresponding to ancient or Seir, provide indirect links through exploitation and practices potentially associated with Shasu groups. Egyptian texts from circa 1500–1100 BCE explicitly reference Shasu nomads in (Seir), aligning with sparse finds of pastoral activity during this period. Khirbet en-Nahas, a major copper smelting center in the Faynan district, yields evidence of intensive production beginning in the late 13th to early 12th centuries BCE, based on radiocarbon dating of slag and structures. This activity follows smaller-scale exploitation in the preceding centuries, attributed by some scholars to Shasu pastoralists who controlled arid zones and engaged in opportunistic mining before organized state involvement. The site's Iron Age I fortifications and industrial scale suggest a shift from nomadic raiding or herding to semi-sedentary resource control, consistent with textual depictions of Shasu as mobile herders and mercenaries in Egyptian campaigns. Excavations by Levy et al. uncovered over 100,000 tons of ancient slag, underscoring the site's role in regional trade networks that may have drawn nomadic participation. In the nearby Jabal Hamrat Fidan, excavations at Wadi Fidan 40 reveal a large cemetery with approximately 3,500 shaft tombs dating to Early Iron Age II (circa 1000–800 BCE), interpreted as belonging to Shasu or proto-Edomite nomads based on simple grave goods, lack of monumental architecture, and proximity to pastoral routes. Associated settlements show evidence of herding camps and early metallurgy, linking nomadic mobility to resource extraction in the Wadi Arabah. These finds, including ceramics and faunal remains indicating sheep and goat pastoralism, support models of Shasu clans transitioning toward territorial polities amid environmental pressures and trade demands. Broader Transjordanian plateau sites, such as those in the Edomite highlands, exhibit minimal Late Bronze Age occupation, with surface sherds and tombs suggesting transient Shasu presence rather than fixed villages. This scarcity reinforces textual evidence of nomads dominating uncultivable fringes, with sedentization accelerating in I–II as evidenced by fortified hilltop sites like Buseirah (biblical Bozrah), though direct Shasu attribution remains inferential.

Socioeconomic and Cultural Characteristics

Pastoral Nomadism and Clan Organization

The Shasu practiced nomadism, sustaining themselves through the herding of including sheep, goats, and , with seasonal migrations between summer pastures and lowland fall-winter grazing areas in regions spanning the , Transjordan, and . administrative records, such as Papyrus Anastasi VI from the late 13th century BCE, attest to their mobility by permitting Shasu groups access to the eastern for flock grazing during regional droughts, highlighting the precariousness of their arid-zone pastoral economy. Their social structure centered on clans, termed wh˙ywt in Egyptian texts, which operated within a segmentary lineage system led by chiefs known as wru. This organization facilitated coordinated herding, resource sharing, and defense, as evidenced in Papyrus Harris I (circa 1150 BCE), which enumerates Shasu clans and their leaders subdued during Ramesses III's campaigns. Temple inscriptions from Soleb and Amara West under Amenhotep III (14th century BCE) list multiple Shasu tribal territories, implying a loose confederation of semi-autonomous clans identified by geographic or totemic names. Archaeological evidence from the Wadi Fidan 40 in Jordan's Jabal Hamrat Fidan (11th–9th centuries BCE) supports clan-based social differentiation, with like beads and ornaments in female burials indicating status variations within nomadic pastoralist groups linked to Shasu through contextual and textual correlations. Such findings suggest clans supplemented herding with opportunistic activities like early processing, though full remained limited.

Roles as Mercenaries, Herders, and Raiders

The Shasu primarily engaged in pastoral nomadism, herding cattle, sheep, and goats as semi-nomadic groups traversing the arid regions of the southern Levant, Sinai, Negev, and Transjordan from the late Bronze Age onward. Egyptian administrative texts, such as those from the 18th Dynasty, reference Shasu managing flocks invited into Egypt to utilize frontier water sources and pastures during times of scarcity, indicating a symbiotic yet controlled interaction with the Nile Valley economy. Organized in clans under tribal chieftains, their mobile herding lifestyle facilitated seasonal transhumance, adapting to scarce resources in marginal lands unsuitable for intensive agriculture. Shasu groups also participated in raiding activities, operating as brigands who targeted caravans, villages, and border outposts across and the , as depicted in reliefs showing them as spies and subdued by pharaonic forces around 1274 BCE. Such incursions, documented in New Kingdom inscriptions, highlight their role as opportunistic predators exploiting weaknesses in sedentary societies, with garrisons frequently countering Shasu incursions into the Eastern Desert and coastal areas. These raids contributed to regional instability, prompting military expeditions to pacify Shasu territories, such as those under and in the 14th–13th centuries BCE. In addition to raiding, some Shasu served as mercenaries in armies, particularly during the reign of (circa 1186–1155 BCE), integrating into military campaigns against and other threats as auxiliary forces. Place names like Pen-Shasu in suggest settlements of Shasu warriors, possibly rewarded for service, underscoring their utility as skilled familiar with . This mercenary role reflects pragmatic employment of nomadic expertise, balancing with incentives to harness Shasu mobility for rather than unchecked predation.

Decline and Later Historical Impact

Transition to Iron Age Sedentism

Archaeological evidence indicates that Shasu nomads, previously documented as pastoralists in Late Bronze Age texts, began exhibiting patterns of economic intensification in the early (ca. 1200–1000 BCE) within the region of southern , particularly through involvement in and in the Faynan district. This shift followed the around 1200 BCE, which created power vacuums allowing nomadic groups to exploit mineral resources previously controlled by interests. Sites like Khirbet en-Nahas, covering approximately 10 hectares, yielded over 20 high-precision radiocarbon dates confirming industrial-scale production peaking in the 10th–9th centuries BCE, with heaps exceeding 6 million kilograms. These activities fostered semi-sedentary practices among Shasu-linked populations, integrating seasonal metallurgy (likely fall/winter) with highland pastoralism during summers, rather than a complete abandonment of mobility. The absence of typical sedentary architecture at Faynan sites, combined with evidence of non-local labor mobilization, supports interpretations of nomadic chiefdoms orchestrating large-scale operations without full sedentization. Cemeteries such as Wadi Fidan 40, radiocarbon-dated to the 10th–8th centuries BCE (e.g., cal. BC 1015–845 from Grave 92), contain over 2,000 beads, iron ornaments, and wooden artifacts consistent with pastoral nomadism, serving as territorial markers amid resource competition but showing no permanent habitation nearby. By Iron Age II (ca. 1000–586 BCE), this resource-driven complexity contributed to broader in , evidenced by fortified hilltop sites like Busayra (biblical Bozrah) and increased settlement density, suggesting gradual integration of nomadic Shasu elements into emerging state structures. However, direct continuity remains inferred from regional patterns and textual associations, as no Iron Age inscriptions explicitly name Shasu groups, and some analyses highlight persistent nomadic influences without clear transitional architecture.

Legacy in Biblical and Regional Traditions

The "Shasu of Yhw," referenced in inscriptions from the 14th and 13th centuries BCE, represent an early attestation of worship among nomadic groups in the or Transjordan, predating the Israelite and suggesting a legacy of rooted in pastoralist traditions outside urban centers. These records, including lists at Soleb and Amarah West under (ca. 1390–1352 BCE) and (ca. 1279–1213 BCE), denote "Yhw" as a toponym associated with Shasu lands, with the theophoric element widely interpreted by philologists as the divine name due to its consonantal match and contextual fit with nomadic herders. This connection implies that biblical portrayals of 's southern origins—such as in Deuteronomy 33:2, where he arises from , Seir, and Paran, or 3:3 linking him to Teman and Mount Paran—may preserve collective memories of Shasu-like clans as vectors for the deity's cult, rather than originating solely in Israelite tribal narratives. In biblical traditions, Shasu characteristics as mobile herders, raiders, and occasional mercenaries align with depictions of pre-settlement or related southern tribes, such as the or Midianites, who interacted with proto-Israelites in the transitional Bronze-Iron Age period. Scholarly analyses propose that Shasu contributed demographically to highland settlements in around 1200–1000 BCE, reflecting a sedentarization process echoed in biblical accounts of tribal confederacies emerging from nomadic fringes, though direct ethnic continuity remains unproven without genetic or epigraphic corroboration. These echoes underscore a causal link between Shasu socioeconomic patterns—clan-based vulnerable to Egyptian campaigns—and the biblical motif of as a delivering wanderers from imperial dominance, as in motifs, without implying wholesale Israelite identity with Shasu. Beyond Israelite texts, Shasu legacies in regional traditions appear muted, assimilated into Edomite, Moabite, or Ammonite polities by the Iron Age, with no distinct Shasu ethnonym surviving in Assyrian or Phoenician records post-1100 BCE. Egyptian administrative papyri, such as Papyrus Anastasi VI (ca. 1150 BCE), portray Shasu as persistent border threats, a trope potentially influencing later Near Eastern views of desert nomads as disruptive outsiders, but lacking the theological depth of Yahwistic integration seen in biblical redaction. This attenuation reflects empirical patterns of nomadic incorporation into sedentary states, where Shasu cultural markers dissolved into broader Semitic tribal mosaics rather than persisting as autonomous traditions.

References

  1. [1]
    Exodus: The Name Yahweh in Egyptian Hieroglyphic Texts
    Mar 8, 2010 · It is generally accepted that the term Shasu means nomads or Bedouin people, referring primarily to the nomadic or semi-nomadic peoples of Syria-Palestine.
  2. [2]
    The Shasu and Egypt - The Past
    Oct 16, 2024 · The Shasu were semi-nomadic Bedouin from the southern Levant, who interacted with Egypt as captives, invited to feed flocks, or as mercenaries.Missing: sources | Show results with:sources
  3. [3]
    Shasu - Warburton - Major Reference Works - Wiley Online Library
    Oct 26, 2012 · The elusive population group designated Shasu in New Kingdom Egyptian texts is generally thought to consist of lawless Nomads whom Egyptians ...Missing: sources | Show results with:sources
  4. [4]
    [PDF] UC Santa Barbara - eScholarship
    nomadic population east of Egypt in the Late Bronze Age, but the ancient texts clearly place the SAsw nomads of Egyptian texts in the southern Levant ...
  5. [5]
    Archaeology and the Shasu Nomads - Ancient Near East
    The Shasu were a social group of nomads who are known from Egyptian texts -- wall reliefs and monuments dating from the 18th Dynasty (circa 1550–1295 BCE)Missing: pastoralists | Show results with:pastoralists
  6. [6]
    Yhwʒ of Shasu-Land (Chapter 2) - Yahweh before Israel
    Nov 17, 2020 · Yhwʒ is a name from Egyptian texts in Sudan, possibly related to Yahweh, found in lists from Soleb and ‘Amarah West, and is a starting point ...
  7. [7]
    The Land of the š3sw (Nomads) of yhw3 at Soleb - ResearchGate
    Aug 7, 2025 · 2 A number of scholars suggested that the name YHWA/YHA/YH may also be the Egyptian transcription of the name of YHWH, god of the Hebrews. They ...
  8. [8]
    [PDF] Archaeology and the Shasu Nomads:: Recent Excavations in ...
    Jul 21, 2004 · Archaeology and the Shasu Nomads:: Recent Excavations in the Jabal Hamrat Fidan, Jordan · 22 Citations · 24 References.<|control11|><|separator|>
  9. [9]
    šꜣsw - Wiktionary, the free dictionary
    Probably from šꜣs (“to travel, to wander”). A borrowing derived from Hebrew שָׁסָה (šāsā) or שָׁסַס (šāsas, “to plunder”) has also been suggested.
  10. [10]
    Kingdoms of the Levant - Shasu / Shutu (Canaan) - The History Files
    Speculation about the Shutu mentions that the name may be a variant of the Egyptian term 'Shasu', Semitic cattle-herding nomads who operated in a clan system ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  11. [11]
    Yahweh In Egyptian Hieroglyphic Texts -- By: Charles F. Aling
    It is generally accepted that the term Shasu means nomads or Bedouin people, referring primarily to the nomadic or semi-nomadic peoples of Syria-Palestine.Missing: meaning | Show results with:meaning
  12. [12]
    Canaan-3 - The Black Hyksos and Hebrews - Realhistoryww.com
    The name evolved from a transliteration of the Egyptian word š3sw, meaning "those who move on foot", into the term for Bedouin-type wanderers. The term ...
  13. [13]
    [PDF] Ancient Records of Egypt, Volume II
    ... Inscriptions of Ameniseneb. VOLUME I1 . . . . . THE EIGHTEENTH DYNASTY. Reign ... Shasu . . . . . Scene 3. Capture of Pekanan. . . . . . Scene 4. Capture ...
  14. [14]
    [PDF] Ancient Records of Egypt, Volume III
    Shasu war into Syria, and gained possession of the Ph~nician coast. If ... of the Eighteenth Dynasty, has survived to us. The great inscription of ...
  15. [15]
    [PDF] ancient egyptian coregencies
    the Eighteenth Dynasty of Egypt: Seven Studies (Toronto, 1967) pp. 51-52. 16. Cf. similarly the alabaster bark shrine of Tuthmosis IV, finished by Amenophis ...Missing: "scholarly | Show results with:"scholarly
  16. [16]
    The Literature of the Ancient Egyptians - Project Gutenberg
    ... eighteenth dynasty. The deceased is supposed to be standing in the "Usekht ... Shasu[1] alive, but I did not count them. I accompanied the Kings of the ...
  17. [17]
    Shasu in Medio Oriente | PDF | New Kingdom Of Egypt - Scribd
    Rating 5.0 (1) ... Shasu early in the Eighteenth Dynasty. However, in the reign of Amenhotep III, a toponym list places the Shasu in northern Canaan in such places as Dothan.
  18. [18]
    [PDF] Canaan or Gaza? - Journal of Ancient Egyptian Interconnections
    This study seeks to investigate the terms Canaan, Pa-Canaan, and Canaanite from the Egyptian perspective in the. Eighteenth through Twentieth Dynasties. How did ...Missing: "scholarly | Show results with:"scholarly
  19. [19]
    FRONTIER POLICY IN THE LATE EIGHTEENTH DYNASTY ... - Brill
    There are a few scholars (Astour 1979; Görg 1979: 200–202), how- ever, who locate the land of the Shasu in northern Syria. ... Eighteenth Dynasty inscriptions.
  20. [20]
    Suteans - Wikipedia
    Amarna letters. edit. Around 1350 BCE, the Suteans are mentioned in 8 of 382 Amarna letters. Amarna Letter EA195 mentions the Suteans and is entitled "Waiting ...
  21. [21]
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Who Were the Early Israelites? By Anson Rainey
    The sutu appear to be. Egyptian mercenaries in the Lebanese Beqa' near Damascus, where we read of a place called 'Ain-Shasu. Page 4. A text in the hypostyle ...
  23. [23]
    [PDF] Who are the Habiru of the Amarna Letters?
    Finally, what about the Habiru mentioned in the ancient texts prior to the Amarna Age; who were they? ... On the ethnic identity of the Sutu/Shasu, see Horn, “ ...
  24. [24]
  25. [25]
    [PDF] JAEI.Pithom and Rameses II.pdf - Department of Jewish Studies
    borrowing from the Egyptian noun šAsw “Shasu.”32. Given the proliferation of Shasu references in. Ramesside texts,33 one should assume that this word was ...
  26. [26]
    The Localization of the Shasu-Land of Ramses II's Rhetorical Texts
    Ramses II's rhetorical texts correlate Shasu with specific geographic locations, emphasizing military significance. Mount Seir/Edom is identified as a central ...Missing: "scholarly | Show results with:"scholarly
  27. [27]
    Egypt's Interactions with Pastoral Nomads in the Sinai, Negev, and ...
    This reference under Ramesses III may be the last significant reference to the Shasu in the New Kingdom before Egypt‟s Levantine empire collapsed and receded.
  28. [28]
  29. [29]
    [PDF] by Thomas E. Levy - UCSD Levantine Archaeology Lab
    While these early Egyptian historical sources tell us that the inhabitants of Seir/Edom were “Shosu/. Shasu,” a nomadic people, they do not tell us what the ...
  30. [30]
    The Egyptian Presence in the Negev and the Local Society during ...
    Feb 4, 2021 · Egyptian texts of that time speak about the shasu peoples, seminomadic pastoral groups living in the Negev and southern Jordan, with whom the ...Missing: territories | Show results with:territories
  31. [31]
    [PDF] PREVENTION THROUGH DETERRENCE ALONG EGYPT'S ...
    Jun 9, 2017 · The ethnonym “Shasu” in Egyptian can be connected to verbs meaning “to wander,” while in Canaan's West. Semitic language it bore relation to the ...
  32. [32]
    (PDF) Rameses II and the Battle of Kadesh: A Miraculous Victory?
    ... Shasu (Bedouin) spies. His fears falsely allayed, Rameses presses northward towards Kadesh into the Hittites' trap, accompanied only by his retainers and ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  33. [33]
    [PDF] The History of Shasu Bedouins: A New Vision
    Giveon said the Shasu played two parts during the battle of. Kadesh: as spies and soldiers defending the city side by side with Ramesses without presenting the ...
  34. [34]
    New ArchAeologicAl evideNce for ANcieNt BedouiN (ShASu) oN ...
    Margaret drower aptly described the situation with these pastoral nomads relative to egypt by saying: “on the borders of the delta, from time immemorial small ...
  35. [35]
    The Land of the š3sw (Nomads) of yhw3 at Soleb - eScholarship
    According to the building inscription of Amenhotep III from Thebes, the Soleb temple was named Khaemmaat and was dedicated to Amun-Ra and to Amenhotep III as a ...
  36. [36]
    (PDF) Yahweh of the Southlands - Academia.edu
    ... shasu of yhw” is a reference to the divine name.97 Ramses II supplies another, more direct reference to the shasu of Seir at Karnak in the 13th century BCE ...
  37. [37]
    [PDF] Signs of YHWH, God of the Hebrews, in New Kingdom Egypt?
    The individual Shasu units, according to him, were most easily understood to derive from indigenous social and political organization, which Egyptian scribes ...
  38. [38]
    [PDF] The Land of the SAsw (Nomads) of yhwA at Soleb - Luis Jovel
    8 Amara West was the seat of the Egyptian administration of Upper Nubia or Kush from the reign of Seti I onwards. 9 Horn, “Jericho in a Topographical List of ...
  39. [39]
    Recent Excavations in the Jabal Hamrat Fidan, Jordan | Request PDF
    Archaeology and the Shasu Nomads: Recent Excavations in the Jabal Hamrat Fidan, Jordan. July 2004. DOI:10.1515/9781575065489-008. In book: Le-David Maskil (pp ...
  40. [40]
    The Soleb Inscription: Earliest-Discovered Use of the Name 'Yahweh'
    Oct 10, 2022 · Almost all scholars believe the Egyptian word “shasu” should be translated as “cattle-herding nomads,” or simply “nomads.” More significant, ...Missing: texts | Show results with:texts<|separator|>
  41. [41]
    The Origins of Yahweh and the Revived Kenite Hypothesis
    Feb 5, 2016 · The early extra-biblical evidence is thus consistent with the possibility that Yahweh was first venerated by nomadic Bronze Age tribes in Edom, ...
  42. [42]
    Let there be God: The origin of Yahweh worship - Big Think
    Jun 28, 2022 · The inscription contains the phrase “Shasu of Yhw.” The Shasu were a nomadic tribe who lived in northern Arabia. Yhw, meanwhile, was the ...
  43. [43]
    When and from Where did YHWH Emerge? - Entangled Religions
    YHWH was not an indigenous deity of the region, into which YHWH worshippers spread by settlement, but was rather originally connected to the southern regions “ ...
  44. [44]
    The People of Yahweh (Chapter 6) - Yahweh before Israel
    Nov 17, 2020 · Contemporary scholarly interest in the Shasu name Yhwʒ follows especially its potential relationship to the later god Yahweh. Certainly this ...<|separator|>
  45. [45]
    The Wilderness Tradition and the Origin of Israel - Oxford Academic
    The theory of Israel's association with the Shasu-beduoin as a source for the origin of the divined name, YHWH is studied and dismissed. In the end, it is ...
  46. [46]
    Proto-Israelites: The Story of a Misleading Term
    According to Bietak, the Shasu were part of “the gene pool” (sic) for “proto-Israelites” (Bietak 2015: 21), and “south- ern Levantine” groups in late Ramesside ...
  47. [47]
  48. [48]
    Shasu or Habiru: Who Were the Early Israelites? - The BAS Library
    It is time to clarify for BAR readers the widely discussed relationship between the habiru, who are well documented in Egyptian and Near Eastern ...
  49. [49]
    Nomads, Tribes, and the State in the Ancient Near East: Cross ...
    This paper explores the relationship between the nomadic population (attribute to the Shasu nomads known from ancient Egyptian sources) buried in the cemetery ...
  50. [50]
    None
    ### Summary of A.J. Frendo's Reasons for Difficulty in Identifying Nomads in the Near Eastern Archaeological Record
  51. [51]
    Chapter 12 Exodus on the Ground: The Elusive Signature of Nomads in Sinai
    ### Summary of Key Challenges in Identifying Nomadic Remains in Sinai or Similar Arid Regions
  52. [52]
    [PDF] SOME THOUGHTS ON KHIRBET EN-NAI:IAS, EDOM, BIBLICAL ...
    1500-1100 BCE refer to the nomadic people of Edom as the Shasu (Kitchen 1992; Ward 1992). ... Radiocarbon Dating ofthe Khirbat-en Nahas Site (Jordan) and.
  53. [53]
    Faynan, Nomads and the Western Negev in the Early Iron Age
    Feb 20, 2024 · The final report on the Edom Lowlands Regional Archaeology Project concludes that local nomadic tribes created a complex polity at early ...
  54. [54]
    Recent Excavations in the Jabal Hamrat Fidan, Jordan
    This essay explores the Shasu pastoral nomads, an ethnic group contemporary to early Israel, through archaeological findings from a recently excavated Iron ...
  55. [55]
  56. [56]
    [PDF] Burton MacDonald - DoA Publication
    Archaeological Evidence for the Transjor- dan/Edomite Plateau. The archaeological evidence for human presence on the southern Transjordan/Edomite. Plateau ...Missing: Shasu | Show results with:Shasu
  57. [57]
    Transjordan Early Edom And Moab 1900 BC - Bible.ca
    The written historical sources for the lands of the Jordan plateau, between rift valley and outer desert, come for periods before c. 1000 BC almost entirely ...
  58. [58]
    [PDF] NOMADS, TRIBES, AND THE STATE IN THE ANCIENT NEAR EAST
    Kitchen's 1992 summary of late Bronze age to early iron age textual data from egypt sup- port this interpretation where edom is referred to as seir and ...
  59. [59]
    Nomads, Mercenaries, and Goldmines: Desert Politics in the ...
    Oct 8, 2021 · Here, however, a band of Shasu had come south along the Red Sea coast into the Egyptian Eastern Desert and evidently became a nuisance for ...
  60. [60]
  61. [61]
    [PDF] Who Were the Early Israelites? By Anson Rainey
    Whether the original meaning of the term was. “pastoralist” or “plunderer” is uncertain. What is clear, however, is that the shasu were pastoralists (nomads) ...
  62. [62]
    The Desert's Role in the Formation of Early Israel and the Origin of ...
    Several scholars have suggested different locations for the “Shasu land Yhw,” where the God was probably worshiped: in the Edomite Mountains (Redford 1992, 273; ...
  63. [63]
    [PDF] Egypt and the Exodus - Department of Jewish Studies
    All of this is to say: quite possibly the Shasu of Edom mentioned in P. Anastasi VI are not Edomites per se, for there is a good possi- bility that they were ...Missing: "scholarly | Show results with:"scholarly