Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Shepseskaf

Shepseskaf was an ancient who ruled as the sixth and final king of the Fourth during period, reigning for a brief span estimated at four to seven years around the mid-25th century BC. Likely the son of his predecessor , Shepseskaf ascended following the completion of the pyramids' era, overseeing a transitional phase marked by reduced monumental scale and the onset of Fifth Dynasty solar theology. His most defining architectural choice departed from dynastic tradition: rather than erecting a pyramid like those of Khufu, Khafre, and Menkaure, Shepseskaf constructed a vast, low-profile mastaba tomb at South Saqqara, known as the Mastabat al-Fir'aun, measuring approximately 100 by 80 meters and resembling a bench or sarcophagus in form. This structure, unique in its hybrid design blending mastaba solidity with pyramid-like enclosure walls, may reflect resource constraints, ideological shifts, or deliberate symbolism amid potential dynastic weakening, as evidenced by contemporary king lists and archaeological remnants. Recent excavations have uncovered additional artifacts and structural details within the complex, including subsidiary burials and inscriptions affirming his royal titulary, underscoring its role as a funerary innovation bridging Old Kingdom phases. Shepseskaf's successor, Userkaf, founded the Fifth Dynasty, signaling evolving religious emphases on the sun god Ra over the solar-helical cult of prior reigns.

Family and Origins

Parentage and Succession from Menkaure

Shepseskaf succeeded as pharaoh, marking the end of the Giza pyramid-building phase of the Fourth Dynasty, with the transition evidenced by the royal annals inscribed on the , which list him immediately following Menkaure in the sequence of rulers. This direct succession implies a close familial connection, as dynastic continuity in the typically passed through royal bloodlines to maintain legitimacy and centralized authority. The prevailing view among Egyptologists holds that Shepseskaf was Menkaure's son, inferred from his role in completing the unfinished elements of Menkaure's at , as documented in contemporary decrees that attribute the final brickwork and stone enhancements to Shepseskaf's oversight. This involvement suggests not only administrative continuity but also a personal stake consistent with filial duty, especially since Menkaure's elder sons, such as Prince Khuenre, appear to have predeceased him based on unfinished tomb preparations and lack of succession claims. Alternative theories proposing Shepseskaf as Menkaure's brother lack supporting inscriptions or artifacts and are less favored, given the pattern of patrilineal inheritance in the dynasty. Shepseskaf's mother remains unidentified, with speculation pointing to a minor consort of , possibly Rekhetre, rather than a principal like Khamerernebty II, as no royal inscriptions link him explicitly to known wives. This uncertainty reflects the fragmentary nature of Fourth Dynasty genealogical records, reliant on indirect evidence from statues, stelae, and contexts rather than comprehensive .

Consorts and Offspring

Queen Bunefer, attested in a Giza tomb (G 8408), held titles such as "priestess of King Shepseskaf" and "king's daughter of his body," leading to interpretations of her as either Shepseskaf's consort or daughter serving in his mortuary cult. Egyptologist Salim Hassan proposed her as Shepseskaf's wife based on these associations, while others, noting the "daughter" title, argue she was his offspring rather than . No other consorts are definitively linked to Shepseskaf through inscriptions or artifacts, though Queen Khentkaus I has been speculatively associated in some reconstructions of Fourth Dynasty kinship, without direct evidence tying her to him as wife. Offspring of Shepseskaf remain sparsely documented, with no sons verifiably attributed to him. Princess Khamaat, who married the high priest and Ptahshepses of , has been suggested as his daughter, potentially borne by Bunefer if interpreted as wife, though this link relies on chronological and titular inferences rather than explicit filiation statements. The founder of the Fifth Dynasty, , is sometimes conjectured as Shepseskaf's son due to direct succession, but lacks supporting genealogical evidence such as shared tomb reliefs or royal annals confirming paternity; alternative theories posit Userkaf's rise through maternal or collateral lines. Hypothetical sons like Djedefptah appear in fragmentary king lists but remain unattested archaeologically, underscoring the evidential gaps in Shepseskaf's .

Reign and Chronology

Relative Position in the Fourth Dynasty

Shepseskaf is conventionally placed as the sixth and final of the , immediately succeeding and marking the end of the dynasty's core sequence before the transition to the Fifth Dynasty under . This positioning aligns with the standard chronological order established from multiple ancient records: as founder, followed by , , , , and then Shepseskaf. The Turin King List, a Ramesside-era papyrus canon of rulers, explicitly records Shepseskaf's entry following Menkaure's, assigning him a reign of four years, though traces suggest possible partial damage that might indicate up to seven years in some interpretations. This direct succession is corroborated by contemporary inscriptions, such as those bearing Shepseskaf's Horus name and cartouches at sites like Saqqara, which lack overlap with Menkaure's monuments but appear in contexts post-dating them. Archaeological evidence reinforces this relative placement without indication of significant rivals or insertions; for instance, administrative papyri and reliefs from the transition smoothly from Menkaure-era styles to Shepseskaf's, with no attested s bridging the two. Some Egyptologists propose a possible ephemeral ruler, such as a "Baka" or "Djedefptah" mentioned in fragmentary king lists or Manetho's Aegyptiaca, potentially interposed between Shepseskaf and , but no monuments, inscriptions, or durable artifacts substantiate such a figure, rendering Shepseskaf's terminal position in the the prevailing view.

Estimated Duration and Dating Evidence

The Turin Royal Canon, a New Kingdom document compiling earlier king lists, records Shepseskaf's reign as lasting four years. This figure aligns with the paucity of dated artifacts and inscriptions attributable to his rule, including quarry marks and administrative papyri that do not extend beyond low regnal years, indicating a short tenure insufficient for extensive monumental campaigns. Modern Egyptologists generally estimate the duration at four to seven years, reconciling ancient variances with archaeological evidence such as the incomplete state of Menkaure's complex, which Shepseskaf appears to have finalized without initiating major new constructions. Shepseskaf's position in the Fourth Dynasty chronology is secure as the successor to Menkaure, based on consistent sequences in the Palermo Stone fragments, Abydos king lists, and Saqqara tablets, placing him immediately before the Fifth Dynasty founder Userkaf. Absolute dating remains provisional due to the absence of contemporary eclipse records or fixed synchronisms with Near Eastern chronologies, with variants arising from radiocarbon calibration of Old Kingdom wood samples and Bayesian modeling of pyramid construction phases. Conventional estimates situate his reign circa 2498–2491 BC in high chronologies or 2472–2467 BC in lower ones calibrated against 14C data from Giza mastabas and Khufu-era timbers. Archaeoastronomical proposals further refine potential endpoints; a total visible over on April 1, 2471 BC has been correlated with the symbolic shift from pyramidal to architecture under Shepseskaf, interpreted as a response to celestial omen signaling dynastic transition, though this awaits corroboration from additional stratigraphic or textual evidence. Overall, the short reign underscores a of consolidation rather than expansion, with evidential weight favoring brevity over extended rule.

Administrative Achievements and Policies

Shepseskaf's primary documented administrative action involved the completion of his predecessor Menkaure's mortuary temple at Giza, as recorded in a decree on a fragmented limestone stela discovered in the temple complex. The inscription explicitly states that Shepseskaf "made it as a monument for his father, the King of Upper and Lower Egypt, [Menkaure]," emphasizing the prioritization of unfinished royal projects and the allocation of resources for their finalization using available materials, including mudbrick for portions of the temple and causeway. This decree further mandated ongoing offerings, such as daily provisions of 20 measures (likely bread or similar staples) to a senu-ti shrine associated with the cult, alongside exemptions for temple priests from corvée labor and taxation obligations, thereby instituting a policy of fiscal and labor privileges to sustain mortuary endowments. Attested high officials under Shepseskaf reflect continuity in the Fourth Dynasty's centralized bureaucracy, with roles filled predominantly by royal kin or trusted courtiers. Babaef II, a prince and likely son of , served as , overseeing judicial and executive functions, while Sekhemkare, another royal descendant, held priestly titles linked to pyramid cults. Additional functionaries included Shepseskafankh, titled royal acquaintance, overseer of ka-priests, and , responsible for ritual and estate management. These appointments underscore a reliance on familial networks for administrative stability, with no evidence of expanded delegation to non-royal nomarchs or overseers during his tenure. The brevity of Shepseskaf's reign—estimated at four years per the King-list, or up to seven based on fragmentary —limited opportunities for broader policy innovations, such as territorial expansions or fiscal overhauls, with surviving evidence pointing to pragmatic governance focused on continuity rather than transformative reforms. Post-reign inscriptions indicate that his own received private offerings from officials but lacked sustained state backing, suggesting administrative priorities shifted under his Fifth Dynasty successors toward and decentralized priesthoods.

Monumental Activities

Non-Pyramidal Constructions

Shepseskaf completed the unfinished elements of Menkaure's pyramid complex at , including the valley temple and aspects of the , which had been initiated in stone but required finalization following Menkaure's death around 2503 BCE. The valley temple, in particular, was hastily finished in by Shepseskaf, incorporating an enclosed and storage facilities to support the funerary cult, as evidenced by architectural plans and archaeological remains. An inscription in the records Shepseskaf's dedication, stating that he "made it as his monument for his father ," alongside provisions for pekher offerings to sustain the ongoing cult. This completion extended to partial construction of the linking the valley temple to the , though it terminated abruptly near Khufu's quarry, suggesting resource constraints or a shift in priorities during his brief reign of approximately 2 to 7 years. No other major non-pyramidal structures, such as independent temples or administrative complexes, are firmly attributed to Shepseskaf beyond these filial completions, aligning with the limited scale of documented activities in his era.

Other Attested Projects and Inscriptions

Shepseskaf issued the earliest known royal decree, inscribed in the of at , which protected the pyramid complex by exempting its personnel from taxes and labor, thereby ensuring its maintenance. This administrative measure, dated to his second , reflects continuity in honoring his predecessor while asserting royal authority over sacred sites. An inscription in Menkaure's Valley Temple attributes to Shepseskaf the completion of the unfinished elements of the , using materials from local quarries to finalize the structure left incomplete at Menkaure's death. This work, distinct from his own , underscores limited but targeted monumental activity focused on rather than new constructions. The Palermo Stone records events from Shepseskaf's accession year, including ritual appearances of the king and the "stretching of the cord" ceremony, possibly linked to initiating construction projects, though specifics remain sparse due to the fragment's lacunae. Three additional inscriptions, dated to this accession year, appear in necropolis tombs, attesting quarry operations or administrative markings associated with construction under his oversight. Quarry marks bearing Shepseskaf's name have been identified in mastabas, indicating extraction and transport of blocks for elite tombs during his reign, though these likely supported ongoing rather than novel initiatives. An inscription on his own at refers to the structure as a "," suggesting ideological framing of the monument despite its form, with no evidence of extensive associated quarrying beyond the core site's sourcing from Dashur.

Tomb Complex

Site Selection in Saqqara

Shepseskaf's tomb complex was sited in South , diverging from the where his predecessors , , and had erected their pyramids. This location positioned the monument as the southernmost royal tomb in the necropolis, the primary burial ground for , capital situated about 25 kilometers south of . The choice returned to a site with deep historical precedence, including the Third Dynasty of approximately 4 kilometers to the north, rather than extending the Fourth Dynasty's focus. The precise rationale for selecting South Saqqara over Giza remains uncertain, with Egyptologists noting a lack of direct contemporary evidence. One interpretation suggests the decision aimed to associate Shepseskaf's structure with 's established Memphite traditions and earlier royal precedents, potentially reinforcing dynastic legitimacy amid questions over his parentage from a secondary consort of . This alignment with Djoser's innovative yet non-pyramidal monument may have symbolized continuity with pre- royal architecture, contrasting the resource-intensive pyramids of recent reigns. Alternative theories link the site choice to broader shifts, including possible economic strains from Giza's quarrying or a deliberate distancing from emphases intensified there, though these remain speculative without inscriptional support. Saqqara's geological stability and proximity to ' administrative centers likely facilitated logistics, but such practical factors alone do not explain the abrupt relocation from the dynasty's established plateau. Excavations have confirmed the site's intact suitability for large-scale , yet no artifacts explicitly detail the selection process. Overall, the move underscores Shepseskaf's unconventional approach, prefiguring Fifth Dynasty trends toward Saqqara-based pyramids.

Architectural Design and Features

The of Shepseskaf, known as , features a rectangular oriented north-south, enclosed within a double wall, with a core constructed from two levels of yellow-grey quarried west of and casing of fine Tura over pink in the lower portions. The overall dimensions approximate 99.6 meters in length, 74-77 meters in width, and 18 meters in height, with sides sloping inward to form a flat roof, distinguishing it as the largest such royal tomb of . The north facade includes an entrance elevated 2.5 meters above ground level, leading via a descending corridor lined in pink with vault-imitating ceilings into the substructure. The substructure comprises a main corridor extending to an antechamber, from which branches a narrow passage accessing six storage niches and five storerooms, while the chamber lies east-west oriented beyond the antechamber. The chamber measures roughly 7.79 meters in length, 3.85 meters in width, and 4.9 meters in height, housing fragments of a dark comparable in style to that of . Access to the chamber was secured by slabs, with the layout emphasizing axial progression from north entrance to eastern , a configuration that influenced subsequent Fifth Dynasty substructures. Adjunct features include a attached to the eastern facade, constructed in two phases with a limestone-paved and a for offerings, connected by a of whitewashed mudbricks simulating a vaulted corridor leading from the southeast enclosure corner. This design integrates traditions with pyramidal elements, such as the elevated platform and granite usage, reflecting a transitional form possibly intended as a symbolic "primeval " rather than an incomplete . Excavations by Jean-Philippe Lauer revealed minimal decoration, with the structure's mass emphasizing durability over elaboration, aligning with late Fourth Dynasty economies in monumental stonework.

Theories Explaining the Mastaba Choice

Scholars have proposed several explanations for Shepseskaf's unprecedented decision to erect a mastaba, known as the Mastabat al-Fir'aun, rather than a pyramid, marking a departure from the Fourth Dynasty tradition of true pyramids at Giza. This choice, executed in South Saqqara during his reign circa 2494–2490 BCE, has been attributed primarily to practical and resource-related factors. Following the completion of his predecessor and father Menkaure's pyramid—the smallest and most challenging of the Giza trio—Shepseskaf likely faced depleted manpower and materials, rendering a new pyramid construction infeasible within his brief reign of approximately six to seven years. Egyptologist Miroslav Verner posits that the mastaba served as a provisional tomb while resources were redirected to finishing Menkaure's complex, though the monument's elaborate subterranean chambers and causeway suggest it was not merely expedient. Alternative interpretations emphasize ideological or symbolic intent over mere logistics. Gustave Jéquier theorized that the flat-roofed, sarcophagus-like form symbolized a rejection of the pyramid's associations, potentially protesting the rising influence of Re's priesthood, which gained prominence in the subsequent Fifth Dynasty with its sun temples and Re-centric pyramids. This view aligns with observations that Shepseskaf's structure evokes Early Dynastic mastabas, possibly invoking archaic traditions from Abydos to assert legitimacy amid dynastic transitions. Some analyses further suggest religio-political motives, where the mastaba's relocation to distanced Shepseskaf from Giza's established pyramid cults, signaling a deliberate pivot in funerary before the Fifth Dynasty's emphasis. A minority hypothesis considers the mastaba as an aborted pyramid project, with its base dimensions and orientation mirroring pyramid foundations, potentially truncated due to Shepseskaf's untimely death and intervention by successors like . However, excavations reveal no clear evidence of superimposed pyramid remnants, undermining claims of incomplete conversion. These theories remain speculative, as no contemporary texts elucidate the rationale, and the monument's hybrid features—enclosing a burial chamber akin to —blur distinctions between and low-step pyramid forms.

Excavations and Recent Discoveries

The of Shepseskaf, designated Mastabat al-Fir’aun and measuring approximately 99.6 meters in length by 74.4 meters in width, was initially explored by French Egyptologist in 1858, who documented its basic layout and entrance but left much of the interior unexamined. A more systematic excavation occurred between 1924 and 1925 under Swiss Egyptologist Gustave Jéquier, who cleared the subterranean chambers, uncovered a looted chamber containing fragments of a , and identified key inscriptions, including a , that confirmed the monument's attribution to Shepseskaf. Jéquier's work also revealed the structure's core construction of limestone blocks encased in fine Tura limestone, though no major artifacts remained due to ancient plundering. Following nearly a century without systematic , a joint Polish-Egyptian archaeological mission, comprising the Institute of Mediterranean and Oriental Cultures of the Polish Academy of Sciences (IKŚiO PAN) and Egypt's Ministry of Tourism and Antiquities, initiated the "Pharaoh's " project in early 2024. The initial phase focused on surface surveys, architectural analysis, and the production of a model to identify potential hidden structures and assess preservation needs, marking the first detailed modern study of the site. The second season, commencing in January 2025, advanced excavations within the burial chamber, adjacent subterranean rooms, and the eastern mortuary chapel, utilizing geophysical techniques such as to map unexcavated underground features and the ancient processional ramp leading to the structure. Additional fragments were recovered, enabling partial reconstruction of the vessel, while comprehensive generated a precise internal model of the tomb's corridors and chambers. Analyses of recovered stone, , and organic remains from these efforts aim to refine dating and insights, with ongoing interdisciplinary work by archaeologists, geologists, and conservators. No intact artifacts or major new chambers have been reported as of March 2025, but the mission's non-invasive methods have enhanced understanding of the mastaba's layout without further damage to the vulnerable structure.

Transition and Legacy

Role in Dynastic Shift to the Fifth Dynasty

Shepseskaf, reigning approximately from 2498 to 2491 BCE, is regarded as the final of the , with his successor establishing the around 2491 BCE. The transition appears to have occurred without recorded strife, reflecting continuity in royal legitimacy amid evolving administrative and religious priorities. Evidence from king lists, such as the Turin Papyrus, positions Shepseskaf as the dynasty's endpoint, though damage to these documents underscores gaps in direct attestation. Familial connections likely facilitated the handover, though precise relations remain debated due to sparse inscriptions and ambiguous titles. may have been Shepseskaf's brother or son-in-law, potentially through marriage to a royal daughter, ensuring dynastic stability. , bearing titles of "King's Wife" and "King's Mother" linked to both rulers, supports theories of her role as a bridging figure—possibly Shepseskaf's consort and mother to 's successors and Neferirkare—indicating matrilineal ties preserved power within an extended network. Such affiliations contrast with later dynastic breaks, suggesting Shepseskaf's court prioritized inheritance norms over external challenges. The shift also signaled ideological adaptations, with elevating the cult of through sun temples like Nekhen-Re, diverging from Shepseskaf's non-pyramidal but building on late Fourth solar emphases evident in prior Giza constructions. This religious pivot, alongside administrative decentralization favoring provincial elites and priesthoods, marked the Fifth 's character without rupturing Shepseskaf's foundational stability. Overall, Shepseskaf's brief rule (estimated 4–7 years) served as a hinge, transmitting Fourth traditions while accommodating emerging and resource reallocations that defined his successors' era.

Perceptions in Subsequent Egyptian Eras

Shepseskaf's legitimacy as a of the Fourth was affirmed in subsequent king lists. The Turin Royal Canon, a Ramesside-era document compiling earlier records, attributes a reign of four full years to Shepseskaf, though the entry is partially damaged, placing him after and before an unidentified . Similarly, the , inscribed during the reign of (c. 1290–1279 BCE) and expanded under , includes Shepseskaf's as the 24th entry, positioned between and , indicating his recognition as a without omission or condemnation. In the Ptolemaic-era historiography of , preserved in fragments by later authors like Africanus, Shepseskaf corresponds to the "Sebercheres," credited with a seven-year reign as the seventh of the Fourth . Evidence of Shepseskaf's funerary cult extends into later periods, though it was modest compared to predecessors. An official state-sponsored cult operated briefly after his death but faded by the mid-Fifth Dynasty, reflecting limited institutional support. However, private veneration revived during the , as attested by a stela discovered at his tomb site (Mastabat al-Fara'un), which documents ongoing cultic activity focused on offerings and rituals at the location. No records indicate widespread New Kingdom revival or narrative traditions portraying Shepseskaf negatively; his inclusion in royal annals suggests continuity in viewing him as a transitional yet accepted sovereign marking the end of the Fourth Dynasty.

Debates in Modern Egyptology

One persistent debate concerns the precise classification of Shepseskaf's monument, the , as either a true or a transitional form akin to a low . Some scholars, analyzing its architectural orientations—such as the entrance and burial chamber alignments matching those of Giza s—argue it represents continuity in Fourth Dynasty funerary design rather than a radical departure, potentially indicating an aborted pyramid project due to resource limitations or intentional scaling down. , including archaeoastronomer Giulio Magli, emphasize its flat-topped, sarcophagus-like profile as evidence of a deliberate rejection of pyramidal form, possibly tied to evolving religious symbolism or personal ideology, though empirical evidence for such shifts remains sparse and contested. Succession debates center on whether Shepseskaf was directly followed by , founder of the Fifth Dynasty, or by the shadowy figure Thamphthis (also called Sedjeskare Isesi in some interpretations), known primarily from Manetho's fragmentary lists. Proponents of direct succession cite potential familial links via Khentkawes I, possibly Shepseskaf's daughter and Userkaf's mother, supported by her tomb's proximity and inscriptions implying dynastic bridging, but lack of explicit contemporary records fuels skepticism. Thamphthis's existence is dismissed by many as a Manethonic or misattribution, given the absence of archaeological corroboration, though some reconstructions posit a brief to explain chronological gaps in king lists. Chronological and reign-length controversies further complicate interpretations, with the crediting Shepseskaf four years and seven, while cattle-count records suggest a maximum of six to eight years without clear evidence of . Recent archaeoastronomical proposals link a 2471 BC to either Shepseskaf's or Userkaf's reign, depending on alignment assumptions, highlighting tensions between textual annals and celestial modeling but yielding no consensus due to variable eclipse visibility data and king-list variances. These debates underscore broader uncertainties in late Fourth Dynasty transitions, where short reigns and sparse inscriptions challenge causal attributions of dynastic decline to economic or ideological factors over mere happenstance.

References

  1. [1]
    Pharaoh Shepseskaf of the Fourth Dynasty - World History Edu
    Nov 27, 2024 · Pharaoh Shepseskaf, the last ruler of Egypt's Fourth Dynasty during the Old Kingdom, reigned during a time of transition.
  2. [2]
    Shepseskaf in hieroglyphs - Pharaoh.se
    Shepseskaf was the last pharaoh of the fourth dynasty. The Turin papyrus and the Saqqara king list is damaged where the last rulers of the dynasty would be ...Missing: historical facts
  3. [3]
    King Shepseskaf - Cairo Top Tours
    Last King of the Fourth Dynasty. After the majority of his 4th Dynasty predecessors chose to construct their funerary monuments, Shepseskaf (2472–2467) was ...<|separator|>
  4. [4]
    Archaeologists reveal new discoveries in Pharaoh Shepseskaf's tomb
    Mar 25, 2025 · Shepseskaf was an Egyptian pharaoh of the Fourth Dynasty of the Old Kingdom, believed to have ascended the throne after Menkaure died in 2503 ...Missing: facts | Show results with:facts
  5. [5]
    Egyptian Pharaohs : Old Kingdom : Dynasty 4 : Shepsekaf
    Shepseskaf did not built a pyramid, but instead built a large, sarcophagus shaped mastaba in Saqqara. The mastaba he built is different from any others in Egypt ...
  6. [6]
    Shepseskaf - Ancient Egypt Online
    Shepseskaf (“his soul is noble”) is generally confirmed as the last ruler of the fourth dynasty of ancient Egypt. It is generally suggested that he only ...
  7. [7]
    Pharaoh Shepseskaf's Strange Tomb May Have An Astronomical ...
    Mar 31, 2025 · When Shepseskaf – likely the son of Menkaure – died, his body was placed in a construction on a plateau to the south of Saqqara, out of view of ...
  8. [8]
    Shepseskaf - Digital Giza
    Shepseskaf. Jump to... Jump to: Details; Finds 1; Published Documents 19 ... Son of Menkaure. Horus name: [SpsXt] Shepseskhet. Finds 1. Collapse or Expand.
  9. [9]
    Ancient Egyptian Chronology, pp. 124-143, "Contemporaneous ...
    Son of Menkaure. Horus name: [SpsXt] Shepseskhet. Snefru. Type Individual ... Remarks Possible son of Shepseskaf and last king of Dynasty 4, according to Manetho.
  10. [10]
    [PDF] The Queens of the Fourth Dynasty - Harvard University
    The following kings are listed in Sekhemkare's tomb: Khafre, Menkaure, Shepseskaf, Userkaf,. Sahure. This is interesting in that it is generally believed.Missing: succession | Show results with:succession
  11. [11]
    Bunefer (G 8408) - Digital Giza - Harvard University
    Daughter or wife of Shepseskaf. Southern, middle and northern chapel entrance lintels and drums, and northern and southern pilasters, inscribed for Bunefer ...Missing: evidence | Show results with:evidence
  12. [12]
    Biography of Shepseskaf | The Ancient Egypt Site
    Mykerinos was succeeded by his oldest surviving son, Shepseskaf. His wife, Bunefer, bore him a daughter, Khamaat, who married the Memphite high-priest ...Missing: relations | Show results with:relations
  13. [13]
    Shepseskaf | Ancient Egyptian Pharaoh Shepseskaf - AskAladdin
    Being the son of Menkaure, his mother was obviously either Queen Khamerernebty II or Queen Rekhetre, any one of the wives of Menkaure. Similarly, Khentkaus I, ...
  14. [14]
    The Fourth Dynasty of Ancient Egypt - Pharaoh.se
    The chronological order ; 5, Baufra, Baefra, Baufre, Baka, Bicheris, Bikka ; 6, Menkaura, Menkaure, Mykerinos, Mycerinus ; 7, Shepseskaf, – ; 8, Thamphthis ...
  15. [15]
    Turin King List: column 4 - Pharaoh.se
    Shepseskaf succeeded Menkaura, and is known to only have ruled for a few years, which would seem to fit well with the 4 years recorded here. The traces on ...Missing: Menkaure | Show results with:Menkaure
  16. [16]
    The Ancient Egypt Site - 4th Dynasty
    ... place between Shepseskaf and Userkaf for one king. No inscriptions or monuments from the end of the 4th Dynasty can be linked with this name. Another ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] the old kingdom in egypt - Harvard University
    King Shepseskaf had the Horus-name Shepsesykhet. The. Turin Canon allows him four years. In this time he would have had to complete his father's funerary ...
  18. [18]
    Inscriptional Evidence for the History of the Fourth Dynasty - jstor
    short reign of Shepseskaf. Perhaps the queen had already turned G 7530-7540 over to her daughter Meresankh III by the Year 19 of. Mycerinus. The latter may ...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] 1061 REANALYSIS OF THE CHRONOLOGICAL DISCREPANCIES ...
    A continuous chronological model was constructed for the 4th Dynasty. The boundaries of the sequence extended from 500 calendar yr before the historical reign ...Missing: Fourth | Show results with:Fourth
  20. [20]
    The April 1, 2471 b.C. eclipse and the end of 4th Egyptian dynasty
    Dec 18, 2024 · This date is compatible with existing chronologies for the reign of Pharaoh Shepseskaf, who adopted a clamorous symbolic break with respect ...
  21. [21]
    (PDF) King Shepseskaf and his Pyramid, the Mastabat Fara'un
    Feb 8, 2025 · PDF | Recently, in arXiv, we have proposed a discussion about the Egyptian kings Shepseskaf and Userkaf, in relation to an eclipse of 2471 ...
  22. [22]
    [PDF] I e have just finished our final field season of the two-and
    On a stela he decreed: "He made it as a monu- ment for his father, the King of Upper and. Lower Egypt, [Menkaure]." Reisner found the stela in fragments near ...
  23. [23]
    [PDF] King Shepseskaf and his Pyramid, the Mastabat Fara'un
    Feb 1, 2025 · “His reign heralded the ascendancy of the cult of Ra, who effectively became Egypt's state ... evidence that she was accepted as a ruler of Egypt.
  24. [24]
    Shepseskaf - Landious Travel
    Shepseskaf's relation to this predecessor Menkaure is not entirely particular. He might have been his son or possibly his brother. The identity of his mother is ...Family · Relative Chronology · The Decision To Build A...
  25. [25]
    Shepseskafankh (G 8492) - Digital Giza
    Southern false door inscribed for Shepseskafankh, identified as [rx nswt jmj-r Hmw-kA jmj-r pr] royal acquaintance, overseer of ka-priests, steward; in situ.
  26. [26]
    [PDF] Palace and Temple: Architecture - Decoration - Ritual
    The temple's hasty completion was presumably due to Menkaure's sudden ... 3: Plan of Menkaure valley temple, showing Shepseskaf s addition of compound ...
  27. [27]
    New Findings from Menkaure Valley Temple|AERA
    2) completed by Menkaure's successor Shepseskaf and a later “Second Temple” (shown in orange on Fig. 2) built over 200 years later, probably under king Pepi II.
  28. [28]
    Shareholders: The Menkaure Valley Temple Occupation in Context
    Some 50 years after Shepseskaf completed Menkaure's Valley Temple, a Fifth Dynasty king, most likely Niuserre, refurbished the MVT with additional ...
  29. [29]
    In the Houses of the Menkaure Valley Temple: The Pekher Offerings ...
    After the decree of Shepseskaf, nx expresses meals that are “saved” for the king in the Pyramid Texts (PT 501 B, 1072a). The final t must be the passive marker, ...
  30. [30]
    Pyramid of Menkaure (page two) - Ancient Egypt Online
    The causeway was partially constructed by Shepseskaf after Menkaure's death, but it seems that it was not completed. It halts at the west side of Khufu's quarry ...
  31. [31]
    The Plateau - Official Website of Dr. Zahi Hawass - King Menkaure
    Menkaure is the son of Khafre and the grandson of Khufu of Dynasty IV. He bore the titles Kakhet and Hornub. There are doubts that Menkaure could be the son of ...Missing: historical | Show results with:historical
  32. [32]
    (2012) The Development of Ancient Egyptian Royal Inscriptions
    This article examines the development of Ancient Egyptian royal inscriptions from the Old Kingdom up to the Eighteenth Dynasty. It traces the evolution from ...
  33. [33]
    the royal annals of the palermo stone - Academia.edu
    The Palermo Stone records the reigns and significant events of early Egyptian dynasties. Narmer is the first king of Dynasty I, preceding Aha, affecting ...<|separator|>
  34. [34]
    Egyptian Art in the Age of the Pyramids, pp. 138-153, "Excavating ...
    "Excavating the Old Kingdom. The Giza Necropolis and Other Mastaba Fields." In Egyptian Art in the Age of the Pyramids. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art ...
  35. [35]
    Shepseskaf's Tomb - The Ancient Egypt Site
    Even in the choice of his funerary monument, Shepseskaf chose not to follow the standard established by his ancestors. His tomb consists of a mastaba-shaped ...
  36. [36]
    King Shepseskaf and His Mysterious Tomb at Saqqara - Tour Egypt
    Unlike his immediate predecessors and his successors, Shepseskaf chose the form of a Mastaba rather than a pyramid for his tomb, and perhaps for various reasons ...
  37. [37]
    Mastaba el-Fara'un - Ancient Egypt Online
    It is composed of a core of two levels of yellow-grey limestone blocks from the quarries west of Dashur, cased in Tura limestone and (in the lower layer only) ...
  38. [38]
    Mastaba of Shepseskaf | Egyptian Monuments - WordPress.com
    Feb 19, 2009 · Shepseskaf was the last pharaoh of Dynasty IV and the son of Menkaure. His royal tomb at South Saqqara is known as Mastabat el-Fara'un, an Arabic name which ...<|separator|>
  39. [39]
    The Mastaba El-Faraun, Cairo - GPSmyCity
    This mastaba measures approximately 99.6 meters in length and 74.4 meters in width, with a height of around 18 meters and sides sloping at an angle of roughly ...Missing: features | Show results with:features
  40. [40]
    (PDF) Mastaba el-Faraun, a laymans guide - ResearchGate
    Jan 24, 2018 · and a return to the old, pre-solar traditions.” Miroslav Verner in his Pyramids book says the following on the location;. “Shepseskaf's ...
  41. [41]
    Orientation of Entrance and Burial Chamber in the Pyramids of the ...
    Orientation and layout of Shepseskaf's substructure of the monument persisted in the pyramids of the ... burial chamber ... Tura limestone. Alabaster is soft and ...
  42. [42]
    [PDF] POLITECNICO DI TORINO Repository ISTITUZIONALE
    “The fact that Shepseskaf chose to build a mastaba rather than a pyramid has puzzled scholars. There are multiple theories about why he would have done this.
  43. [43]
    The Later Old Kingdom (Chapter Three) - Cambridge University Press
    Nov 26, 2020 · It has also been suggested that Shepseskaf's mastaba was planned to reflect the old tradition of the mastaba tombs of the first kings at Abydos ...
  44. [44]
    Mastaba of Shepseskaf - Egypt Tour Packages
    The burial monument of Shepseskaf remains a mystery to Egyptologists. It is unclear why this king chose South Saqqara as the location for his tomb instead of ...Missing: selection | Show results with:selection
  45. [45]
    Archaeological mission advances research in the “Bench of the ...
    Mar 24, 2025 · Archaeologists suggest that Shepseskaf was either the son or brother of Menkaure, ascending to the throne after Menkaure's death in 2503 BC and ...Missing: primary | Show results with:primary<|control11|><|separator|>
  46. [46]
    Polish Archaeologists to Explore tomb of Pharaoh Shepseskaf in Egypt
    Nov 18, 2024 · ... Shepseskaf, located in the ancient Saqqara necropolis near Cairo. ... The cost of the project, set to begin in January 2025, is approximately ...
  47. [47]
    Biography of Userkaf - The Ancient Egypt Site
    If Khentkaus I was indeed Userkaf's wife, then his two successors, Sahure and Neferirkare, were his sons. No further wives nor children are known for Userkaf.Missing: Khamerernebty | Show results with:Khamerernebty<|separator|>
  48. [48]
    Satellite-Aided Analysis of the Position of the Sun Temples ... - MDPI
    The successor to Shepsekaf, and founder of the Vth dynasty, is King Userkaf, who initiated a process of return to the solar tradition which would become ...
  49. [49]
    [PDF] Towards a New History for the Egyptian Old Kingdom
    Manetho's account of the Fourth Dynasty is therefore an important, but not yet fully recognized, source for the determination of the regularity of the census ...
  50. [50]
    Abydos Canon king list - Pharaoh.se
    Cartouche of Shepseskaf. Shepses kaf. šps-s-kꜢ-f. His soul is noble. No. 25. Shepseskaf. Cartouche of Userkaf. User kaf. wsr-kꜢ-f. His ka is strong. No. 26.
  51. [51]
    Manetho | Ancient Egypt Online
    Names of rulers listed by Manetho along with the duration of reign in years ... Sebercheres; Reigned for 7 years (A), Shepseskaf. Tamphtis; Reigned for ...
  52. [52]
    (PDF) An Interview about Shepseskaf - ResearchGate
    Jun 23, 2025 · Abstract. his paper delves into specific claims made in a recent interview (May 26, 2025) concerning King Shepseskaf (Egyptian Fourth Dynasty) ...
  53. [53]
    Two Egyptian Kings, Shepseskaf and Userkaf, and a solar eclipse ...
    Dec 30, 2024 · Magli considers that this eclipse happened during the reign of the 'last ruler of the 4th dynasty, Shepseskaf'. Some literature is giving the ...
  54. [54]
    Two Egyptian Kings, Shepseskaf and Userkaf, and a solar eclipse ...
    Dec 29, 2024 · Magli considers that this eclipse happened during the reign of the 'last ruler of the 4th dynasty, Shepseskaf'. Some literature is giving the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  55. [55]
    (PDF) Two Egyptian Kings, Shepseskaf and Userkaf, and a solar ...
    Dec 30, 2024 · Two Egyptian Kings, Shepseskaf and Userkaf ... son of Ramesses II. We also consider what was reported by earth.com, where we even find "evidence ...