Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Ten Commandments

The Ten Commandments, or Decalogue, consist of ten religious and moral imperatives that, according to the Hebrew Bible, were divinely revealed by Yahweh to Moses on Mount Sinai following the Exodus from Egypt. These commandments appear in two versions—Exodus 20:2–17 and Deuteronomy 5:6–21—with minor differences in phrasing but identical core content emphasizing monotheism, prohibitions against idolatry and blasphemy, observance of the Sabbath, and ethical rules against murder, adultery, theft, false witness, and covetousness. They establish the covenantal framework between God and the Israelites, delineating obligations to the divine and interpersonal conduct. The commandments' textual tradition is attested in ancient Hebrew manuscripts, including fragments from the Dead Sea Scrolls such as 4Q41 (also known as the Deuteronomy scroll), which preserves portions of Deuteronomy 5 including the Decalogue and dates to the late Second Temple period around the 1st century BCE. While the historicity of the Sinai revelation lacks direct archaeological confirmation and remains a point of scholarly debate—with minimalist views questioning a large-scale Exodus event—the enduring preservation of the text underscores its centrality to Jewish scriptural canon from antiquity. Numbering and emphasis vary across traditions: Jewish reckoning combines the bans on other gods and images into the first commandment, yielding ten distinct imperatives; Protestant traditions separate these into two, splitting the final coveting prohibition; Catholic and Lutheran catechisms merge the first two and divide coveting into separate wife and possessions commands. These precepts have exerted causal influence on Western legal and ethical systems, informing common law principles against homicide, theft, and perjury, as recognized in American judicial precedents and legislative acknowledgments, though not constituting a wholesale foundation for secular codes. Controversies persist over public displays, such as monuments, which courts have evaluated under establishment clause standards, balancing historical significance against perceived endorsement of religion.

Origins and Biblical Text

Narrative in Exodus and Deuteronomy

In the Book of Exodus, the narrative of the Ten Commandments unfolds during the Israelites' encampment at Mount Sinai, approximately three months after their exodus from Egypt under Moses' leadership. God descends upon the mountain amid thunder, lightning, thick clouds, and trumpet blasts, causing the people to tremble as they witness divine manifestations including fire and smoke. The Lord then proclaims the commandments directly to the assembled Israelites from the mountain, beginning with declarations of his identity as the one who delivered them from Egyptian bondage and prohibiting other gods, graven images, misuse of his name, and neglect of the Sabbath. The people, overwhelmed by the spectacle, request that Moses serve as intermediary to receive further words from God, fearing direct exposure to the divine voice. Moses ascends the mountain and receives additional instructions, including civil and ceremonial laws, while the people wait below. Upon descending, Moses finds the Israelites worshiping a golden calf idol fashioned by Aaron in his absence, prompting Moses to shatter the initial stone tablets inscribed by God's finger as a symbol of the broken covenant. God commands Moses to hew new tablets, which he does, ascending Sinai again for forty days and nights where the divine rewrites the commandments amid renewed affirmations of the covenant despite Israel's idolatry. This second set of tablets is placed in the Ark of the Covenant, establishing the enduring physical representation of the divine law. The Book of Deuteronomy presents a retrospective account as Moses addresses the second generation of Israelites on the plains of Moab, forty years after Sinai, recounting the covenant events to renew obedience before entering Canaan. Moses describes the Sinai theophany similarly, with God's voice amid fire proclaiming the commandments, which the terrified people urge him to relay instead. He emphasizes the uniqueness of direct divine speech at Horeb (another name for Sinai) and notes minor variations in phrasing, such as Sabbath rationale tied to both creation rest and Egyptian deliverance. This retelling underscores the commandments' role as foundational to the covenant, with Moses calling heaven and earth as witnesses to Israel's pledged fidelity.

Textual Formulations and Numbering Variations


The Ten Commandments, or Decalogue, are presented in two primary formulations within the Hebrew Bible: Exodus 20:1–17, delivered directly by God to the Israelites at Mount Sinai, and Deuteronomy 5:6–21, a retelling by Moses during his recapitulation of the covenant in the plains of Moab. These versions share a core structure prohibiting idolatry, misuse of God's name, Sabbath violation, murder, adultery, theft, false witness, and coveting, but exhibit approximately 20 minor differences in phrasing, such as word order, spelling variations, and added expressions. A notable substantive variance appears in the Sabbath commandment: the Exodus account grounds observance in God's rest after creation (Exodus 20:11), while Deuteronomy ties it to the Exodus deliverance from Egypt (Deuteronomy 5:15).
Ancient textual witnesses, such as the Nash Papyrus (circa 2nd century BCE) and Qumran fragment 4QDeut^n (harmonizing elements from both versions), indicate early interpretive efforts to reconcile discrepancies, suggesting fluid transmission prior to standardization. The biblical text does not explicitly number the commandments as "one" through "ten," leading to divergent enumerations across religious traditions based on how introductory declarations and prohibitions against coveting are divided. Jewish tradition treats the preamble "I am the Lord your God, who brought you out of Egypt" as the first commandment, followed by the prohibition on other gods and idols as a single second commandment, with coveting (of neighbor's house, wife, etc.) unified as the tenth. Catholic and Lutheran catechisms combine the prohibitions on other gods and graven images into the first commandment, resulting in coveting the neighbor's wife as ninth and goods as tenth. Reformed Protestant traditions, following figures like John Calvin, separate the no-other-gods and no-idols prohibitions as first and second, respectively, while combining all coveting into the tenth.
Tradition1st Commandment2nd Commandment9th/10th Commandment(s)
JewishI am the Lord your God...No other gods; no idolsDo not covet (all combined)
Catholic/LutheranNo other gods; no idols (combined)No misuse of nameCovet wife (9th); covet goods (10th)
Reformed ProtestantNo other godsNo idolsDo not covet (all combined)
These variations stem from patristic influences, such as Augustine's grouping for Catholics versus Origen's for some Protestants, without altering the underlying ethical imperatives.

Ancient Near Eastern Contexts and Parallels

The Ten Commandments, as presented in Exodus 20:2–17 and Deuteronomy 5:6–21 (c. 13th–6th centuries BCE in scholarly dating), emerged within the broader cultural and legal milieu of the ancient Near East, where various civilizations codified ethical and social norms predating or contemporaneous with Israelite traditions. Mesopotamian law codes, such as the Sumerian Laws of Ur-Nammu (c. 2100–2050 BCE) and the Babylonian Code of Hammurabi (c. 1754 BCE), exhibit parallels in prohibiting offenses like murder, theft, adultery, and false accusation, reflecting shared concerns over social order in agrarian societies. For instance, Hammurabi's Code (laws 1–5, 14, 195–214) mandates death for kidnapping, adultery, and perjury, akin to the Decalogue's succinct absolutes, though Hammurabi employs casuistic case law ("if... then") with class-stratified penalties, contrasting the Decalogue's apodictic imperatives ("you shall not") and implied universality. Hittite laws (c. 1650–1200 BCE) from Anatolia show further affinities, particularly in compensatory justice for bodily harm; Hittite law §10 parallels Exodus 21:18–19 (adjacent to the Decalogue) by requiring restitution for temporary injury without permanent damage, emphasizing proportional redress over lex talionis in some cases. Egyptian ethical texts, including the 42 Negative Confessions from the Book of the Dead (c. 1550 BCE onward) tied to Ma'at principles of cosmic order, list denials of wrongdoing such as "I have not killed" or "I have not stolen," echoing Commandments 6–8, but frame them as personal oaths for postmortem judgment rather than covenantal divine imperatives. Sumerian wisdom literature, like the Instructions of Shuruppak (c. 2600 BCE), offers proverbial moral guidance—"Do not steal" or "Do not commit adultery"—prefiguring Decalogue themes, yet prioritizes pragmatic advice for prosperity over theological loyalty. These parallels underscore a common ANE ethical substrate rooted in maintaining communal stability, with Israelite formulations adapting motifs amid Canaanite and Mesopotamian influences during the Late Bronze Age (c. 1550–1200 BCE). However, the Decalogue diverges markedly in its monotheistic preamble (no other gods), aniconic prohibition, Sabbath observance (absent in pagan codes), and filial piety framed as covenant response to Yahweh's deliverance, rejecting polytheistic or king-centered justifications. Hittite suzerain-vassal treaties (c. 14th–13th centuries BCE) structurally resemble the Sinai covenant's preamble, stipulations, and blessings/curses, suggesting rhetorical borrowing for suzerainty emphasis, but without the Decalogue's terse, tablet-inscribed format. Such distinctions—evident in the Decalogue's egalitarianism versus ANE hierarchies—indicate innovation rather than derivation, with empirical comparisons revealing shared human legal intuitions tempered by unique Israelite theology.

Historical and Scholarly Analysis

Archaeological Evidence and Lack Thereof

No direct archaeological evidence confirms the existence of the original stone tablets inscribed with the Ten Commandments, as described in Exodus 24:12 and Deuteronomy 10:1-5, where they were reportedly placed within the Ark of the Covenant, whose location remains unknown. Extensive surveys of the Sinai Peninsula, including by Israeli teams over decades, have yielded no traces of encampments, artifacts, or inscriptions linked to a large-scale migration of Israelites or the mass assembly at Mount Sinai during the proposed 13th-century BCE timeframe. Egyptian archaeologists working in northern Sinai similarly report no material remains supporting the biblical narrative of the Exodus or subsequent lawgiving events. Proposed locations for Mount Sinai, such as the traditional Jebel Musa in Egypt's southern Sinai or alternative sites like Jebel al-Lawz in Saudi Arabia, lack confirmatory inscriptions, altars, or settlement debris tied to the described theophany in Exodus 19-20. Claims of evidence at Jebel al-Lawz, including alleged golden calf remnants, have been refuted due to absence of biblical geographical alignment, anachronistic artifacts, and restricted access preventing independent verification. No Egyptian records from the Ramesside period document plagues, a slave exodus, or disruptions consistent with the scale of events preceding the Sinai revelation. Archaeological attestation of the Ten Commandments text itself appears in later Second Temple-era manuscripts, such as a fragment from Qumran Cave 4 (4Q41) preserving Deuteronomy 5:1-6:1, dated paleographically to the late first century BCE, confirming the Decalogue's circulation in Hebrew prior to the Common Era. A separate paleo-Hebrew inscription on stone from a synagogue site, dated circa 300-500 CE and containing nine of the commandments plus a temple tax clause, provides epigraphic evidence of early Jewish liturgical use but postdates the biblical events by over a millennium. Artistic depictions, such as a 6th-century CE ivory pyxis fragment from Austria showing Moses receiving tablets, reflect enduring tradition but offer no empirical corroboration of the original occurrence. Fringe assertions of original tablets in Egyptian collections lack scholarly validation and peer-reviewed documentation. Overall, while the textual tradition is archaeologically preserved from antiquity, the historical kernel of the Sinai covenant remains unsubstantiated by physical finds, prompting scholarly debate over whether absence reflects nomadic impermanence or non-occurrence.

Theories on Composition and Dating

The traditional view, held by conservative biblical scholars, posits that the Ten Commandments were composed as a unified divine revelation to Moses at Mount Sinai around the 15th or 13th century BCE, consistent with the internal chronology of Exodus and the absence of anachronistic elements such as references to later monarchic institutions. This perspective emphasizes the text's apodictic style—direct imperatives without casuistic expansions—as indicative of an ancient covenantal core predating Israelite settlement, potentially drawing from primordial moral intuitions rather than evolving legal codes. Critical scholarship, influenced by the documentary hypothesis, regards the Decalogue as composite, with the Exodus 20 version attributed to the Elohist (E) source from the northern kingdom circa 9th–8th century BCE, and the Deuteronomy 5 recension to the Deuteronomist (D) during King Josiah's reforms in the late 7th century BCE (ca. 622 BCE). Differences between the versions—such as the Sabbath rationale shifting from creation rest (Exodus 20:11) to exodus deliverance (Deuteronomy 5:15), and expanded coveting prohibitions in Deuteronomy—suggest redactional adaptation for distinct audiences, with Deuteronomy's humanistic emphases reflecting monarchic-era centralization efforts amid Assyrian threats. Some analyses propose an even later crystallization, with the core Decalogue emerging between the 8th-century prophet Hosea and Deuteronomistic composition, functioning initially as a cultic or treaty preamble before liturgical excerpting in Second Temple texts like the 2nd-century BCE Nash Papyrus, which blends Exodus and Deuteronomy elements. More revisionist theories, such as those positing Hellenistic influences post-3rd century BCE, argue for Greek parallels in Delphic maxims shaping the prohibitions, though these lack broad acceptance due to linguistic and cultural mismatches with Near Eastern substrates. Debate persists, as the documentary hypothesis underpinning late dating has faced challenges for over-reliance on hypothetical sources without manuscript corroboration, prompting supplementary models of oral tradition evolution or single-authorship unity; empirical constraints include no pre-7th-century BCE inscriptions of the text, yet linguistic archaisms support pre-exilic roots over post-exilic invention.

Ritual Decalogue Hypothesis

The Ritual Decalogue Hypothesis posits that the biblical passage in Exodus 34:11–26 preserves an alternative formulation of the Ten Commandments, distinct from the more familiar ethical precepts in Exodus 20:2–17 and Deuteronomy 5:6–21, with a primary focus on cultic rituals, festivals, and sacrificial observances rather than interpersonal ethics. This view emerged in 19th-century biblical criticism, particularly through Julius Wellhausen's analysis within the Documentary Hypothesis, which attributes the text to the Yahwist (J) source from the southern Kingdom of Judah, suggesting it represents an older covenantal tradition emphasizing Israel's liturgical obligations to Yahweh. Proponents argue that Exodus 34:28 explicitly refers to these as "ten words" (ʿāśer dəbārîm), aligning with the term "Decalogue," and that their placement after the Golden Calf incident (Exodus 32) depicts a covenant renewal centered on renewed worship practices, such as prohibiting foreign altars, mandating the Feast of Unleavened Bread, and regulating firstborn offerings and sabbaths. Scholars identifying the Ritual Decalogue enumerate its components as follows: (1) destroy altars of other gods; (2) smash sacred pillars; (3) cut down Asherim; (4) worship no other god; (5) make no molten gods; (6) observe the Feast of Unleavened Bread; (7) redeem all firstborn males; (8) abstain from leavened bread during specified periods; (9) offer firstborn of livestock on the seventh day; and (10) observe the Sabbath alongside the firstfruits harvest festival. Unlike the Ethical Decalogue's prohibitions on murder, adultery, and theft, this list overlaps only partially (e.g., bans on idolatry and foreign worship) and prioritizes temple-related rites, which some interpret as evidence of its priestly origins predating the ethical compilation's redaction during the monarchy or exile. This hypothesis draws parallels to ancient Near Eastern suzerainty treaties where divine covenants included ritual stipulations to maintain loyalty, positioning the Ritual Decalogue as a potential liturgical core for annual covenant renewals at Sinai or local shrines. Critics of the hypothesis, including some contemporary source critics, contend that Exodus 34's text shows signs of later expansion and harmonization with the Covenant Code (Exodus 20:22–23:33), undermining claims of its antiquity or independence as a standalone Decalogue. For instance, the absence of explicit numbering and the integration of ethical echoes (e.g., monolatry) suggest it functions narratively as a degraded or provisional replacement for the shattered first tablets, rather than a rival tradition. Empirical analysis of Hebrew syntax and vocabulary further indicates Deuteronomistic or Priestly influences, with ritual emphases reflecting post-exilic concerns over temple purity amid Persian-era reforms around 450 BCE, rather than Bronze Age origins. While the hypothesis highlights textual diversity in Pentateuchal traditions, its reliance on subjective source division has faced challenges from minimalist archaeology, which lacks direct epigraphic evidence for any early Israelite Decalogue, ritual or ethical.

Religious Interpretations and Applications

Judaism

In Judaism, the Ten Commandments, termed Aseret ha-Dibrot ("Ten Statements" or "Ten Utterances"), represent the divine declarations proclaimed by God to the Israelites at Mount Sinai following the Exodus from Egypt. These utterances form the core of the Sinaitic revelation, encapsulating foundational principles that underpin the 613 mitzvot of the Torah, though all commandments are considered equally binding. The event is commemorated annually on Shavuot, marking the giving of the Torah. The Aseret ha-Dibrot appear twice in the Torah: in Exodus 20:2–14 and Deuteronomy 5:6–18, with minor textual variations. The Exodus version grounds the Sabbath observance in the creation narrative, emphasizing God's rest on the seventh day, while Deuteronomy links it to the liberation from Egyptian slavery, extending rest to servants and animals as a remembrance of redemption. Other differences include expanded lists in Deuteronomy, such as coveting a neighbor's field, and slight phrasing adjustments, reflecting Moses' recapitulation to the new generation entering the land. Jewish tradition numbers the statements differently from many Christian formulations: the first is "I am the Lord your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage," interpreted by Maimonides as the commandment to affirm God's existence and unity. The second prohibits other gods and graven images; subsequent ones address vain use of God's name, Sabbath observance, honoring parents, and prohibitions against murder, adultery, theft, false witness, and coveting. These are viewed not merely as isolated laws but as categories encompassing broader ethical and ritual obligations. Observance integrates the Aseret ha-Dibrot into liturgy and practice; they are recited publicly three times yearly during Torah readings in parashot Yitro and Va'etchanan, and fully on Shavuot with congregants standing in reverence. The original stone tablets, inscribed by God and Moses, were housed in the Ark of the Covenant. Rabbinic authorities, wary of idolatry, discouraged visual depictions or selective emphasis that might imply superiority over other mitzvot, leading to the abandonment of ancient practices like incorporating them into daily prayers. Maimonides further elaborated that the first statement mandates knowledge of God, distinguishing it as a rational imperative rather than a performative act.

Christianity

In Christian theology, the Ten Commandments form the core of God's revealed moral law, providing a framework for righteous living in relationship with God and others. Affirmed by Jesus Christ, who declared in Matthew 5:17 that he came not to abolish the Law but to fulfill it, the commandments are viewed as enduring principles rather than mere ceremonial rules abrogated by the New Covenant. Nine of the ten appear reiterated in the New Testament epistles and Jesus' teachings, such as prohibitions against murder, adultery, theft, false witness, and coveting in Romans 13:9, underscoring their applicability to believers under grace. Jesus summarized the Decalogue in the dual command to love God with all one's heart, soul, and mind (encompassing the first four commandments) and to love one's neighbor as oneself (the remaining six), as stated in Matthew 22:37-40. This summation highlights the commandments' role in expressing love, with Paul echoing in Romans 13:10 that "love does no wrong to a neighbor; therefore love is the fulfilling of the law." While salvation comes through faith in Christ alone, not law-keeping (Ephesians 2:8-9), the commandments serve as a guide for sanctification, convicting sin and promoting holiness, as articulated in Reformed and evangelical traditions. Numbering of the commandments varies between traditions, reflecting theological emphases on idolatry and coveting. Protestants, following the Reformed tradition, treat "no other gods" as the first and "no graven images" as the second, combining coveting into the tenth. Catholics and Lutherans, per Augustinian tradition, merge the first two into one prohibiting idolatry broadly, while dividing coveting into ninth (neighbor's wife) and tenth (goods or property), as outlined in the Catechism of the Catholic Church and Luther's Small Catechism. These differences do not alter the content but prioritize warnings against false worship differently, with Protestant numbering preserving a distinct idolatry ban rooted in Exodus 20:4-6. The fourth commandment on Sabbath observance shifts in Christianity from the Jewish seventh day (Saturday) to the Lord's Day (Sunday), commemorating Christ's resurrection. Early Christians gathered on the first day of the week, as evidenced in Acts 20:7 and 1 Corinthians 16:2, with Emperor Constantine formalizing Sunday rest in 321 AD via edict. Mainstream denominations view this as a fulfillment rather than abolition, emphasizing rest, worship, and mercy over strict legalism, per Jesus' critique of Pharisaic additions in Mark 2:27 ("The Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath"). Seventh-day groups like Adventists retain Saturday, but the historical consensus among Catholics, Orthodox, and most Protestants upholds Sunday as the Christian Sabbath equivalent. The commandments underpin Christian ethics in catechisms worldwide, such as the Westminster Shorter Catechism (1647), which expounds each for moral instruction, and the Heidelberg Catechism (1563), framing them as a "rule of thankfulness" post-redemption. This enduring role counters antinomian views minimizing law, affirming instead that the moral law written on believers' hearts (Jeremiah 31:33; Hebrews 8:10) aligns with the Decalogue's principles for societal order and personal piety.

Islam

In Islamic theology, the Ten Commandments are regarded as elements of the Tawrat (Torah) revealed by Allah to Prophet Musa (Moses) on Mount Sinai, serving as foundational moral and legal guidance for the Children of Israel, though the Quran does not enumerate them explicitly as a fixed list of ten. The Quran affirms the authenticity of this revelation in its original form, describing how Musa ascended the mountain for forty nights, during which Allah inscribed the tablets with "the fundamentals of everything; commandments and explanations of all things," instructing Musa to hold to them firmly and command his people to observe the best of them. This event underscores Musa's role as a major prophet whose message, while time-bound for his community, contains universal ethical principles reaffirmed in the Quran as the final and preserved revelation. The Quranic narrative emphasizes the tablets' content as encompassing admonition, details of all matters, and a covenant, with Musa later retrieving them after breaking them in anger upon discovering the Israelites' idolatry with the golden calf. Islamic exegesis, such as in tafsir works, interprets these as including prohibitions against polytheism, murder, and injustice, aligning with broader Sharia principles derived from the Quran and Sunnah, but superseding ritual laws like Sabbath observance, which Islam replaces with Jumu'ah (Friday congregational prayer). Unlike the Biblical formulations, the Quran scatters parallel injunctions across surahs, notably in Al-An'am (6:151-153), where Allah commands: "Come, I will recite what your Lord has prohibited to you: associate nothing with Him, and to parents do good, and do not kill your children for fear of poverty—We will provide for you and them—and do not approach immoralities, what is apparent of them and what is concealed, and do not kill the soul which Allah has forbidden except by right, and do not commit unlawful sexual relations." These verses, traditionally linked to the Mosaic revelation, prohibit shirk (associating partners with God), infanticide, adultery, and unjust killing, echoing core Decalogue tenets while framing them as direct divine imperatives rather than mediated through intermediaries. Further parallels appear in Surah Al-Isra (17:22-39), a passage cited by scholars as a comprehensive ethical code recited to Musa, including commands to worship Allah alone, honor parents without excess, give relatives their due, avoid wastefulness, refrain from killing offspring, shun adultery, preserve orphan property, fulfill contracts, use just measures, and avoid pursuing desires that lead astray. These align with Biblical prohibitions on idolatry, coveting, false witness, theft, and dishonoring parents, but Islamic sources stress their monotheistic primacy—starting with tawhid (oneness of God)—and integration into a holistic system where intentions and societal welfare amplify individual duties. For instance, the Quranic ban on unlawful killing (17:33) specifies justice as the only permissible exception, such as qisas (retaliation) in cases of murder, reflecting causal accountability absent in some interpretive leniencies of Biblical "thou shalt not kill." Hadith literature reinforces these, with Prophet Muhammad stating, "None of you truly believes until he loves for his brother what he loves for himself," extending communal ethics beyond the Decalogue's scope. (Sahih al-Bukhari 13)
Biblical Commandment (Exodus 20)Quranic ParallelKey Reference
No other gods before meWorship Allah alone; associate no partnersQuran 17:22; 6:151
No graven imagesProhibit idols and false deitiesQuran 17:39; 21:52-53
No misuse of God's nameImplicit in oaths and truthfulnessQuran 17:36 (on certainty in claims)
Honor parentsBe good to parentsQuran 17:23; 6:151
No murderDo not kill souls unjustlyQuran 17:33; 6:151
No adulteryAvoid immoralitiesQuran 17:32; 6:151
No stealingFulfill trusts and contractsQuran 17:34
No false witnessSpeak justly; avoid slanderQuran 17:35 (implied in measures and truth)
No coveting neighbor's goodsAvoid pursuing base desiresQuran 20:131; 17:39
No coveting neighbor's wifeGuard chastity; lower gazesQuran 17:32; 24:30-31
While these correspondences affirm continuity in Abrahamic ethics, orthodox Islam holds that the original Tawrat was altered over time (tahrif), rendering the Quran the uncorrupted criterion for validation, with Mosaic laws obligatory only for Bani Isra'il unless universally moral. Contemporary Muslim scholars, such as those in tafsir traditions, view the Decalogue's essence as enduring but subordinate to Islamic jurisprudence, critiquing secular dilutions while upholding causal realism in prohibitions like adultery, which Quranic hudud (penalties) enforce to deter societal breakdown.

Ethical and Philosophical Dimensions

Moral Absolutes from First Principles

The prohibitions encapsulated in the Ten Commandments against murder, adultery, theft, false witness, and coveting derive from fundamental human goods discernible through reason, such as the preservation of life, the integrity of procreation and family structure, the security of possessions essential for individual welfare, and the pursuit of truth necessary for social cooperation. These align with the primary precepts of natural law as articulated by Thomas Aquinas, who identified self-preservation—extended to others—as a basic inclination shared by all rational beings, rendering unjust killing intrinsically contrary to the order of human flourishing regardless of circumstance or consent. Similarly, the commandment against adultery safeguards the natural end of sexual acts in ordered procreation and child-rearing within stable unions, a precept rooted in the observable requirements for species continuity and societal stability, as violations consistently lead to disrupted kinship bonds and increased vulnerability for dependents. Theft and false testimony undermine the rational allocation of resources and trust-based exchange, which empirical patterns of human interdependence demonstrate as prerequisites for any functional community, with breaches predictably eroding mutual reliance and escalating conflict. The directive to honor parents reflects the natural hierarchy of authority in familial and societal orders, where parental investment in offspring's survival and education forms the causal foundation of generational transmission of knowledge and norms; disregarding this erodes the incentives for such investment, leading to societal decay observable in historical cases of filial neglect correlating with weakened cultural continuity. While the first four commandments—concerning exclusive devotion to the divine, rejection of idolatry, reverent use of the divine name, and Sabbath observance—presume a metaphysical framework of creation by a singular, transcendent cause, their ethical force can be partially reasoned from first principles: idolatry fragments unified cognition of reality's causal structure, profane oaths degrade communal veracity, and mandated rest counters the exhaustion from unrelenting labor, preserving cognitive and physical capacity for higher pursuits, as evidenced by productivity declines in overwork scenarios across agrarian and industrial eras. Aquinas maintained that nine of the ten commandments substantially embody natural law duties, with any revelatory elements serving to clarify rather than invent these imperatives, countering relativist views by grounding morality in invariant aspects of human essence rather than arbitrary decree. Critics attempting secular derivations, such as through utilitarian calculus or evolutionary utility, often reduce these to contingent preferences, yet causal analysis reveals their absoluteness: for instance, systemic tolerance of murder or deceit predictably cascades into anarchy, as game-theoretic models of iterated prisoner's dilemmas illustrate the necessity of reciprocal restraint for long-term cooperation, independent of cultural overlay. This rational foundation underscores why violations incur not merely social disapproval but inherent disorder, affirming the commandments' role as distillations of principles operative in reality's structure, verifiable through observation of consequences rather than subjective fiat.

Influence on Western Law and Morality

The Ten Commandments, as articulated in Exodus 20:1–17 and Deuteronomy 5:4–21, provided core moral prohibitions that shaped Western ethical norms through the pervasive influence of Judaism and Christianity across Europe from late antiquity onward. Prohibitions against murder, theft, adultery, and bearing false witness aligned with and reinforced emerging legal principles in canon law and secular codes, as ecclesiastical courts integrated biblical ethics into dispute resolution by the 12th century. For instance, Gratian's Decretum (circa 1140), a foundational text of canon law, drew on Decalogue precepts to define sins as offenses against divine and natural order, influencing secular rulers like Charlemagne, who in his Capitulary of Herstal (779) echoed sabbath rest mandates in labor regulations. This integration stemmed from the view that Mosaic law encapsulated universal moral truths, predating and complementing Roman ius naturale. In English common law, the Decalogue's impact is evident in foundational treatises and judicial precedents. Sir William Blackstone, in his Commentaries on the Laws of England (1765–1769), described the law against homicide as rooted in the divine imperative "Thou shalt not kill," observing that early common law punished murder as a breach of natural law aligned with biblical revelation, with felonies like theft and perjury similarly deriving moral weight from Exodus precepts. Chief Justice Matthew Hale, in Historia Placitorum Coronae (1736, written circa 1678), affirmed that the common law's criminal prohibitions originated from God's law, explicitly citing the Ten Commandments as the ethical substrate for offenses against person and property. These principles cascaded into statutory developments, such as the Assize of Clarendon (1166), which formalized theft and homicide penalties under Henry II, reflecting a cultural milieu where biblical morality informed jury oaths and evidentiary standards against false witness. On the moral plane, the Commandments fostered a conception of absolute duties—owed to God and neighbor—that underpinned Western individualism and property rights, contrasting with cyclical or communal ethics in other traditions. The fifth through tenth commandments emphasized personal accountability, influencing thinkers like Thomas Aquinas, who in Summa Theologica (1265–1274) synthesized them into natural law, arguing that violations disrupt social order causally tied to divine intent. This framework permeated Protestant reforms, with reformers like John Calvin viewing the Decalogue as a "brief summary of the law" binding civil society, thereby embedding sabbath-derived rest norms into labor ethics and family structures across Northern Europe by the 16th century. Empirical continuity appears in persistent cultural taboos: surveys of European moral attitudes, such as the 2019 European Values Study, show over 80% condemnation of adultery and theft as inherently wrong, traceable to Decalogue-rooted Christian catechesis rather than utilitarian calculus. While not the sole source—drawing parallels with earlier codes like Hammurabi's—the Commandments' monotheistic framing elevated them as causal anchors for deontological ethics in Western philosophy, from Locke to Kant, prioritizing inviolable rights over relativistic norms.

Sociopolitical and Cultural Impact

The Ten Commandments, as codified moral imperatives, exerted influence on Western legal traditions through their integration into Judeo-Christian ethics, which informed prohibitions central to criminal law, such as homicide, theft, perjury, and adultery, appearing in legal codes from antiquity onward but reinforced in medieval and early modern Europe via ecclesiastical and secular jurisprudence. These principles were not mere universals but causally transmitted through biblical revelation, shaping the ethical substrate of laws that prioritized individual duties to divine order over arbitrary rule. In English common law, this influence crystallized in Sir William Blackstone's Commentaries on the Laws of England (1765–1769), which posited that "upon these two foundations, the law of nature and the law of revelation, depend all human laws," with the Decalogue exemplifying revealed law's imperatives like "Thou shalt not kill," directly reflected in homicide statutes. Blackstone's work, widely studied by American colonists, embedded these biblical precepts into the legal heritage inherited by the United States, where early courts from the 17th century onward cited the Ten Commandments in opinions on murder, oaths, and property rights. The Magna Carta of 1215, a precursor to constitutional limits on power, incorporated biblical legal motifs, such as clauses on fair weights and measures echoing Deuteronomy 25:13–15 (adjacent to Decalogue contexts), and presupposed subjection of rulers to higher divine law, fostering the Anglo-American tradition of rule-bound governance over tyrannical fiat. While not quoting the Decalogue verbatim, its emphasis on lawful judgment and protection of life and property aligned with commandments against killing and theft, influencing subsequent documents like the English Bill of Rights (1689). In American founding documents, direct textual incorporation is absent—the U.S. Constitution (1787) and Declaration of Independence (1776) invoke natural rights and a Creator without specifying the Decalogue—but the underlying moral framework drew from this tradition, as colonial charters and state constitutions (e.g., Massachusetts Body of Liberties, 1641) mirrored biblical prohibitions in penal codes punishing idolatry, Sabbath-breaking, and adultery. Founders like James Madison referenced Mosaic governance in Federalist debates, and the common law basis ensured Decalogue-derived norms permeated federal and state jurisprudence, as evidenced by over 100 early U.S. court citations to Exodus 20. This indirect yet substantive role underscores a causal lineage from Sinai to the separation of powers and due process, prioritizing moral absolutes against state overreach.

Public Display Debates in the United States

Public debates over displaying the Ten Commandments on government property in the United States have primarily revolved around the First Amendment's Establishment Clause, which prohibits Congress from making laws "respecting an establishment of religion." Proponents argue that such displays acknowledge the historical and cultural influence of Judeo-Christian ethics on American law and morality, often citing longstanding monuments as passive symbols of heritage rather than endorsement of religion. Opponents, including organizations like the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), contend that these displays convey government favoritism toward religion, particularly when mandated by statute or placed in prominent locations like schools and courthouses, potentially coercing impressionable audiences or signaling exclusion to non-adherents. These disputes have led to numerous lawsuits, with outcomes hinging on whether displays serve a secular purpose under tests like Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971), though the Supreme Court has increasingly emphasized historical context post-2005. The earliest major Supreme Court ruling came in Stone v. Graham (1980), where the Court unanimously invalidated a Kentucky law requiring a copy of the Ten Commandments—purchased with private funds but posted at public expense—in every public school classroom. In a per curiam opinion, the justices held that the displays had "no secular legislative purpose" and primarily advanced religion, rejecting the state's claim that they promoted moral values since the text's religious nature could not be diluted by a disclaimer noting its biblical origins. The decision applied strict scrutiny to school settings, where children are captive audiences, underscoring that even non-proselytizing postings impermissibly entangle government with faith. In 2005, the Court addressed standalone courthouse displays in McCreary County v. ACLU of Kentucky, ruling 5-4 that framed copies of the Ten Commandments initially posted alone, then surrounded by secular documents like the Declaration of Independence after litigation, still violated the Establishment Clause. Justice Souter's majority opinion emphasized the counties' evident religious motivation—evidenced by resolutions citing "the Founders' belief in the God of the Ten Commandments" and failed attempts to cloak the displays in historical garb—as failing the Lemon test's purpose prong and endorsing religion. The Court distinguished prior toleration of religious symbols in diverse settings, noting these exhibits' isolation and evolution in response to lawsuits betrayed a sectarian aim rather than neutral commemoration. By contrast, in the companion case Van Orden v. Perry (2005), decided the same day, a fractured 5-4 Court upheld a 6-foot granite Ten Commandments monument donated in 1961 by the Fraternal Order of Eagles and situated among 17 other historical monuments on 2 acres of Texas Capitol grounds. Chief Justice Rehnquist's plurality opinion (joined by three justices) invoked a "passive monument" standard, observing the display's 40-year unchallenged presence, its integration into a broader patriotic and civic narrative (including the Alamo and Texas heroes), and America's longstanding tradition of religious acknowledgments without coercion. Justices Breyer concurred, stressing passive tolerance in public forums versus active endorsement, while the dissent argued the monument's religious content inherently proselytized. This ruling affirmed that context matters: longstanding, non-legislated displays evoking shared heritage withstand scrutiny absent endorsement evidence. Post-2005 cases have applied these precedents variably at lower courts, with displays in parks or alongside secular symbols often surviving challenges if not overtly proselytizing. For instance, a 2018 Sixth Circuit ruling upheld a Kentucky Capitol monument donated by the Eagles in 1971, citing Van Orden's historical tolerance. Recent legislative efforts, however, have reignited debates; Louisiana's House Bill 71 (signed June 2024) mandated Ten Commandments posters with historical context in all public school classrooms for grades 8-12, prompting an ACLU lawsuit. On November 12, 2024, a federal district court granted a preliminary injunction, finding no "longstanding tradition" for compulsory classroom displays and deeming the law coercive under Stone and Kennedy v. Bremerton (2022). Similar pushes in Oklahoma and elsewhere face litigation, reflecting partisan divides where Republican-led states invoke moral education amid rising youth crime concerns, while critics highlight empirical risks of alienating non-Christian students without proven behavioral benefits. In the United States, debates over public displays of the Ten Commandments have intensified since the early 2000s, focusing on whether such postings constitute government endorsement of religion under the First Amendment's Establishment Clause or serve a permissible historical or educational purpose. Supporters argue that the Commandments represent foundational moral and legal principles influencing Western jurisprudence, as affirmed in Van Orden v. Perry (2005), where the Supreme Court upheld a decades-old monument on Texas Capitol grounds due to its passive, non-coercive context. Opponents, including organizations like the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), contend that prominent displays in educational settings coerce students and favor Judeo-Christian traditions, violating neutrality toward religion. Louisiana's House Bill 71, enacted on June 19, 2024, mandated the display of a poster-sized version of the Ten Commandments—specifically a Protestant formulation including the King James translation—in every public school classroom and state-funded university, accompanied by a statement on their historical role in American education. The law faced immediate lawsuits from parents and groups alleging unconstitutional religious indoctrination, leading a federal district court to block implementation in August 2024. On June 20, 2025, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled the law unconstitutional, citing its lack of secular purpose and coercive effect on students, distinguishing it from Van Orden due to the classroom setting's inherent captiveness. However, on October 7, 2025, the full Fifth Circuit vacated that panel decision and ordered an en banc rehearing, leaving the law's enforcement pending as of October 25, 2025, amid arguments that post-Kennedy v. Bremerton School District (2022) precedents permit greater accommodation of religious expression in public schools. Similar legislation emerged in other states, sparking parallel challenges. Texas Senate Bill 10, signed in May 2025, required donated Ten Commandments posters in public school classrooms, prompting ACLU-led lawsuits filed on June 26, 2025; a federal judge issued a preliminary injunction in August 2025, blocking displays, though Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton advised districts on October 1, 2025, to prepare for compliance pending appeals. Arkansas Act 573, passed in 2025, faced repeated federal injunctions, including a third block on October 24, 2025, against the Lakeside School District for attempting displays deemed proselytizing. These cases highlight tensions between state assertions of historical context—citing the Commandments' influence on figures like Moses as a "founding father" in early American rhetoric—and judicial scrutiny of motive, with lower courts often rejecting claims of neutrality given the laws' rapid enactment post-conservative shifts on the Supreme Court. Broader controversies extend to interpretive disputes in displays, such as selecting Protestant over Catholic or Jewish versions, which critics argue privileges one denomination and excludes non-Abrahamic viewpoints. Internationally, analogous challenges arise in secularizing Europe, but U.S. cases dominate due to constitutional framing; for instance, Oklahoma's 2012 Bible curriculum incorporating the Commandments faced 2024 scrutiny for blending religious advocacy with history. Proponents, including state lawmakers, maintain that omitting such displays erodes cultural heritage, while empirical data on student coercion remains anecdotal, with no large-scale studies cited in rulings. Resolution may hinge on Supreme Court review, potentially clarifying Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971)'s enduring tests for secular purpose and non-endorsement amid evolving free exercise protections.

Interpretive Disputes and Criticisms

Sabbath Observance

The fourth commandment instructs: "Remember the Sabbath day by keeping it holy. Six days you shall labor and do all your work, but the seventh day is a sabbath to the Lord your God. On it you shall not do any work, neither you, nor your son or daughter, nor your male or female servant, nor your animals, nor any foreigner residing in your towns. For in six days the Lord made the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in them, but he rested on the seventh day. Therefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day and made it holy." Deuteronomy 5:12-15 restates the command with emphasis on observing it as a remembrance of deliverance from Egyptian slavery, extending rest to servants and animals. In Jewish tradition, Shabbat observance begins at sunset Friday and ends at nightfall Saturday, prohibiting melachah—creative labor analogous to activities in building the Tabernacle—encompassing 39 categories such as sowing, reaping, and kindling fire, as codified in the Mishnah around 200 CE. Historical records indicate Sabbath-keeping reinforced Jewish identity amid exile and persecution, with mid-fifth-century BCE Judean communities in Elephantine, Egypt, documenting rest from work despite incomplete adherence elsewhere in the diaspora. Rabbinic expansions, including eruv boundaries to carry items and exemptions for life-saving acts (pikuach nefesh), prioritize human welfare over ritual strictness, reflecting interpretive flexibility to sustain observance. Christian interpretations dispute the commandment's ongoing applicability and form, with no New Testament mandate explicitly transferring the Sabbath to Sunday, though early church practices shifted worship to the first day of the week to honor Christ's resurrection, as noted in Acts 20:7 and 1 Corinthians 16:2. Groups like Seventh-day Adventists and Seventh Day Baptists retain Saturday observance, viewing it as an unchanging moral imperative tied to creation, while most Protestant and Catholic traditions treat Sunday as the Lord's Day for rest and assembly, without equating it to the Jewish Sabbath's legal requirements. Critics, including Reformed theologians, argue the Sabbath functions as a ceremonial shadow fulfilled in Christ's redemptive rest (Hebrews 4:9-10; Colossians 2:16-17), rendering day-specific mandates non-binding under the new covenant, a view substantiated by the absence of Sabbath enforcement in apostolic councils like Acts 15. Jesus' Sabbath actions—such as healing and allowing grain-plucking—targeted Pharisaic traditions accreted beyond Mosaic law (Mark 2:23-28; 3:1-6), affirming the commandment's intent for human good ("The Sabbath was made for man") rather than abrogating it outright, yet prompting debates on whether his lordship over the Sabbath implies supersession. Theological disputes persist over classification: proponents of its perpetuity, drawing from creation's seventh-day rest (Genesis 2:2-3), contend it embodies timeless principles of cessation from labor for divine communion, whereas opponents classify it with old covenant typology, citing Galatians 4:9-10's warning against "observing days" as legalistic. Empirical patterns show voluntary weekly rest correlates with reduced burnout and productivity gains, supporting a causal rationale for rhythmic cessation independent of ritual day, though no randomized trials isolate Sabbath-specific effects. Modern criticisms highlight enforcement risks, such as historical Puritan blue laws imposing fines for Sunday labor, which alienated non-observants and blurred church-state lines, fueling secular pushback against mandated religious rest.

Prohibitions on Killing, Theft, and Adultery

The sixth commandment, "You shall not murder" (Exodus 20:13; Deuteronomy 5:17), prohibits the unlawful taking of innocent human life, derived from the Hebrew verb ratsach (or tirtzach in the infinitive form), which specifically denotes premeditated or unjustified killing rather than all forms of homicide. This distinction arises because the Torah elsewhere mandates capital punishment for certain crimes (e.g., Exodus 21:12) and permits killing in defensive warfare (e.g., Deuteronomy 20:10-15), indicating that ratsach targets malicious intent against the innocent, excluding judicial execution, self-defense, or sanctioned military action. Interpretive disputes center on whether the prohibition extends to all killing, with pacifist traditions (e.g., some Anabaptist groups) arguing for absolute non-violence based on a broader reading, while mainstream Jewish and Christian exegesis, including Aquinas's allowance for self-defense and just war under natural law principles, maintains exceptions grounded in the preservation of greater goods like societal order or personal survival. Secular critics, however, contend that the commandment's exceptions undermine its moral universality, pointing to biblical narratives of divinely commanded killings (e.g., conquests in Joshua) as evidence of inconsistency, though defenders counter that these reflect contextual justice rather than arbitrary violence, aligning with causal realities of tribal survival in ancient Near Eastern contexts. The seventh commandment, "You shall not commit adultery" (Exodus 20:14; Deuteronomy 5:18), forbids sexual relations between a married person and someone not their spouse, rooted in the Hebrew na'aph, which emphasizes violation of the marital covenant rather than all extramarital sex. In biblical law, this protects familial stability and inheritance rights, with penalties including death for both parties (Leviticus 20:10), but it permits polygamy in patriarchal contexts while prohibiting wives from such acts. New Testament expansions by Jesus equate lustful intent with the act (Matthew 5:27-28) and link divorce to adultery except in cases of porneia (sexual immorality), sparking disputes over remarriage: some interpreters (e.g., permanence view) hold that remarriage constitutes ongoing adultery absent spousal death (Mark 10:11-12; Luke 16:18), while others allow it post-adultery-based divorce (Matthew 19:9). These debates reflect tensions between covenantal permanence and practical redress for betrayal, with empirical data from ancient legal codes (e.g., Hammurabi's) showing similar but less absolute protections. Secular ethical critiques argue the rule's asymmetry (e.g., overlooking male polygyny or premarital relations) renders it culturally relative and insufficient for modern consent-based ethics, though first-principles reasoning upholds it as safeguarding reciprocal exclusivity essential for child-rearing stability and trust. The eighth commandment, "You shall not steal" (Exodus 20:15; Deuteronomy 5:19), proscribes the unauthorized taking of another's property, from the Hebrew ganav, encompassing theft, fraud, or kidnapping (Exodus 21:16), and presupposes private ownership as a natural extension of labor and divine grant (Genesis 1:28). Traditional interpretations limit it to direct misappropriation, allowing restitution over punishment (Exodus 22:1-4), but modern disputes arise over extensions like taxation or eminent domain: some libertarian readings view excessive state seizure as theft violating property rights, citing biblical tithes as voluntary or temple-specific rather than proto-socialism. Biblically, it reinforces communal ethics without abolishing inequality, as seen in allowances for gleaning by the poor (Leviticus 19:9-10). Secular perspectives criticize it for not addressing systemic inequalities or intellectual property in pre-modern terms, yet empirical evidence from property-enforcing societies shows reduced conflict and increased prosperity compared to communal alternatives, supporting its causal role in incentivizing production. Overall, these prohibitions face criticism for rigidity in pluralistic societies, but their endurance in legal codes worldwide—e.g., murder bans in 99% of nations per UN data—affirms their alignment with observable human needs for security, fidelity, and ownership.

Idolatry and Divine Exclusivity

The prohibition against idolatry and the demand for divine exclusivity appear primarily in the first two commandments of the Decalogue, as recorded in Exodus 20:3–6: "You shall have no other gods before me. You shall not make for yourself a carved image, or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth. You shall not bow down to them or serve them, for I the Lord your God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers on the children to the third and the fourth generation of those who hate me, but showing steadfast love to thousands of those who love me and keep my commandments." These verses establish Yahweh's sole claim to worship, rejecting polytheism prevalent in ancient Near Eastern cultures like Egypt, where the Israelites had resided, and forbidding representational images to prevent their veneration as deities or intermediaries. In Jewish tradition, this commandment mandates aniconism, prohibiting any visual depictions of God or, in strict interpretations, human forms in sacred contexts to avoid even the risk of idolatry. Rabbinic sources, such as the Shulchan Aruch, permit two-dimensional art of incomplete human figures as a workaround but enforce bans on full-body representations or three-dimensional statues in synagogues and ritual objects. This stance contributed to the absence of figurative art in ancient Israelite temples, contrasting with surrounding pagan practices, and persisted through medieval periods where artists substituted animal heads for human ones to comply. Enforcement reflected causal concerns over syncretism, as evidenced by biblical incidents like the golden calf apostasy in Exodus 32, which nearly dissolved the covenant community. Christian interpretations diverge sharply, fueling historical disputes. Eastern Orthodox and Roman Catholic traditions distinguish icons—depictions of Christ or saints—as aids to veneration rather than worship, arguing they honor the prototype without equating image to divine essence, a view defended against early iconoclastic movements in the Byzantine Empire (726–843 CE) where emperors destroyed images citing the commandment. Protestant reformers, including John Calvin, rejected such distinctions as sophistry, viewing any image of God, including Christ, as a violation that inevitably leads to idolatry by limiting the infinite to finite form; this prompted widespread iconoclasm during the 16th-century Reformation, with altars and crucifixes smashed in churches across Europe. Modern Protestant critiques extend to nativity scenes or films like The Jesus Film, deeming them breaches when used devotionally. Criticisms of divine exclusivity often portray the commandments as prioritizing a deity's ego over human welfare, with secular sources arguing the first four foster religious intolerance by deeming non-adherents' practices sinful and promising generational curses. Organizations like the Freedom From Religion Foundation, which advocate atheism, contend this framework epitomizes biblical vindictiveness and inflexibility, ignoring universal ethics in favor of tribal supremacy. Such views, however, overlook empirical patterns where monotheistic exclusivity correlated with cultural resilience, as in Judaism's survival amid polytheistic empires, potentially through unified causal commitments to a singular moral source rather than fragmented allegiances. Proponents counter that the prohibition targets not art per se but worship of created things, preserving first-principles recognition of an unrepresentable transcendent reality against idolatrous reductionism.

References

  1. [1]
  2. [2]
  3. [3]
    Why Two Versions of the Ten Commandments? - Chabad.org
    The version in Exodus is what the Torah would have looked like had all the nations wished to accept it, and the version in Deuteronomy is for the Jews alone.
  4. [4]
    Featured Scrolls - The Dead Sea Scrolls
    This small scroll preserves one of the earliest known copies of the “Ten Commandments” (the Decalogue), a central dogma in Judaism and Christianity, and the ...
  5. [5]
    The Nash Fragment of the Ten Commandments: The Oldest Hebrew ...
    The Nash Fragment, found in Egypt, is the oldest Hebrew manuscript before the Dead Sea Scrolls, containing the Ten Commandments and the start of Shema Yisrael. ...
  6. [6]
    3 Ways to Number the Ten Commandments (& Which Is Right)
    Oct 20, 2023 · The three main views on numbering the Ten Commandments are: Majority Jewish, Reformed-Anglican-Orthodox, and Catholic-Lutheran. The first three ...
  7. [7]
    [PDF] The Use of the Ten Commandments in American Courts
    From the beginning of our republic through the present, American courts have commonly quoted or cited the Ten Commandments and other portions.
  8. [8]
    [PDF] Constitutional Acknowledgment of the Ten Commandments in the ...
    Commandments have influenced Western legal codes. Courts have routinely recog- nized the importance of the Ten Commandments as a source for American legal.
  9. [9]
    [PDF] The Presumptive Unconstitutionality of Ten Commandment Displays
    Introduction. I will argue in this essay that any permanent display of the Ten. Commandments on public property is presumptively unconstitutional as a.
  10. [10]
  11. [11]
  12. [12]
  13. [13]
  14. [14]
  15. [15]
  16. [16]
    Exodus 20 BSB - Bible Hub
    The Ten Commandments (Deuteronomy 5:6–21). 1And God spoke all these words: 2“I am the LORD your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  17. [17]
    Why two versions of the Ten Commandments? - The Blogs
    Feb 4, 2020 · The two differ in more than a dozen instances in the spelling of some terms, added and changed expressions, word order changes, and the insertion of ...
  18. [18]
    Why are the 'Ten Commandments' listed in Exodus 20 or ... - Quora
    Oct 16, 2017 · Exodus 34 does not actually contain a recitation of the 10 commandments. Yes, it refers to the “Tablets of the Law” by that name, but it does not list them.What is the difference between the Ten Commandments in Exodus ...What are the differences between the 10 commandments in Exodus ...More results from www.quora.com
  19. [19]
    Differences between Exodus 20 & Deuteronomy 5
    Exodus 20 is God's direct words, while Deuteronomy 5 is Moses' recounting of the second set of tablets, which were given after the first were broken.
  20. [20]
    The Many Recensions of the Ten Commandments - TheTorah.com
    Aug 13, 2019 · The differences between the Exodus and Deuteronomy texts led to the creation of yet other hybrid versions in two manuscripts that were ...Two Revisions Of An Older... · The Nash Papyrus--Working... · 4qdeut--A Harmonistic Text
  21. [21]
    Ten Commandments, Two Tablets: The Shape of the Decalogue
    The biblical traditions are clear that the Ten Commandments were written on two stone tablets (Exod. 31:18; 34:1, 4, 29; Deut. 4:13; 5:22; 9:10–11), inscribedTen Commandments, Two... · Division · Two Canonical Versions
  22. [22]
    Comparing the Ten Commandments: Catholic vs. Protestant
    Sep 14, 2024 · The Ten Commandments differ slightly between Protestant and Catholic (as well as Lutheran) traditions in terms of their numbering and ...
  23. [23]
    Chart: Comparing the Ten Commandments - Beliefnet
    Protestants, Jews, and Catholics number the commandments in slightly different ways. A guide to the three versions.
  24. [24]
    Why Are There Two Different Ways of Numbering the Ten ...
    Jan 10, 2023 · Origen's numbering, used by some, keeps 10 and 11 separate. Catholics/Lutherans combine 1 and 2, and keep the rest separate.
  25. [25]
    A Comparison of the 10 Commandments: Jewish, Catholic, Protestant
    Feb 5, 2016 · It seems that though there are more than 10 “commands,” some relate to the others and may be grouped. (It's logical to see that “not coveting” ...
  26. [26]
    Dear Father Joe: Why are the Catholic commandments different from ...
    Jan 1, 2023 · There are two formats for the Ten Commandments due to different numbering systems from Origen and St. Augustine. All commandments are present ...
  27. [27]
    Israel's Codes of Conduct Compared to Surrounding Nations
    A comparison of Israel's social laws as based on the Ten Words with those of surrounding nations; while they shared many aspects, Israel's laws differed in ...
  28. [28]
    Biblical Law and the Ancient Near East
    Here is the parallel text of the 10 commandments: Deuteronomy: 6 I am the Lord your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of slavery; ...
  29. [29]
    Did Moses copy the Law from the Code of Hammurabi?
    Jan 4, 2022 · Because the Mosaic Law contains some similarities to Hammurabi's Code, some critics of the Bible believe that Moses copied from the Hammurabian Code.
  30. [30]
    Were the Ten Commandments based on the Code of Hammurabi?
    Dec 27, 2013 · My conclusion at the moment is that no, The Ten Commandments were not based of the Code of Hammurabi because the two are entirely different.
  31. [31]
    [PDF] 1968* SOME CONTRIBUTIONS OF HITTITOLOGY TO OLD ...
    ties between Exodus 21:18, 19 and Hittite law number 10.26. The stipulations of the two are quite similar: ( 1) the offence is the temporary incapacitation ...
  32. [32]
    The Hittite laws (Deuteronomy 21) - larshaukeland
    Hittite laws deal with many of the same issues as their Biblical counterparts: quarrels resulting in maiming or unintended homicide (Exodus 21:12-27); marriages ...<|separator|>
  33. [33]
    Are the Ten Commandments taken from the forty-two precepts of Ma ...
    Jun 24, 2024 · Of course, there are similarities between some of the principles of Ma'at and the Ten Commandments. Any culture's moral code will overlap other ...
  34. [34]
    The 42 Laws of Maat and the Ten Commandments - Americans United
    Apr 1, 2025 · The ancient Egyptian goddess Maat and her laws personified a philosophy of truth, balance, order, harmony, law, morality and justice.
  35. [35]
    Instructions of Shuruppak: 4,600 Years Ago, A Sumerian King ...
    Jan 4, 2017 · A number of researchers have compared the Instructions of Shuruppak to the Ten Commandments and some of the proverbs in the Bible.
  36. [36]
    The Ten Commandments . . . in Context - Zondervan Academic
    Apr 24, 2009 · One (the Sumerian wisdom text known as the Instructions of Shuruppak) offers advice on how to conduct a happy and productive life. Its ...
  37. [37]
    The Ancient Near East Was No Picnic: Contrasting the Mosaic Law ...
    There are certainly many parallels and overlapping themes within the Mosaic law and various ANE law codes. These include legislation regarding perjury and false ...
  38. [38]
    RLST 145 - Lecture 10 - Biblical Law: The Three Legal Corpora of ...
    This lecture introduces biblical law in a comparative approach that identifies similarities and differences between Israelite law and other Ancient Near Eastern ...
  39. [39]
    Deuteronomy and Hittite Treaties | Bible Interp
    Berman claims, however, that there are equally relevant parallels in Hittite treaties, which establish very similar rules: “If anyone utters a malicious word ...
  40. [40]
    Deuteronomy and the Hittite Treaties - Bible League Trust
    ... Exodus 20 and Joshua 24, bears striking similarity with Hittite suzerainty treaties of the second millennium BC. Kline noted, “There are many interesting ...
  41. [41]
    Mount Sinai is NOT Jebel al-Lawz in Saudi Arabia
    There is no credible historical, geographical, archaeological or Biblical evidence to support the thesis that Mt. Sinai is at Jebel al-Lawz in Saudi Arabia.
  42. [42]
    Exodus and Archaeology - Din - Ask the Rabbi - Dinonline
    Mar 20, 2018 · Israeli archeology teams have combed the Sinai desert for decades and have found no evidence of a mass exodus. Egyptologists say there is no ...
  43. [43]
    Did the Red Sea Part? No Evidence, Archaeologists Say
    Apr 3, 2007 · Egyptian archaeologists who have worked in the North Sinai say they have never turned up evidence to support the story of the Exodus in the ...<|separator|>
  44. [44]
    Searching for Biblical Mt. Sinai
    Feb 14, 2014 · Curiously, no Exodus-related archaeological remains have been recovered in the Sinai Peninsula—through which the Israelites must have traveled ...
  45. [45]
    Exodus: How Archaeology Challenges the Biblical Account
    Mar 3, 2025 · Moreover, there is no archaeological evidence to support the occurrence of the 10 plagues as described in the Bible (Exodus 7-12). The plagues ...
  46. [46]
    One of earliest known copies of Ten Commandments sees the light ...
    May 21, 2015 · Based on the style of the ancient writing, the Ten Commandments scroll is believed to have been penned in the 1st century B.C. The parchment is ...
  47. [47]
    Sold! Earliest Surviving 10 Commandments Stone
    Feb 8, 2017 · The 10 Commandments stone, dated c. 300-500 C.E., sold for $850,000. It has 9 commandments, omits one, and includes a temple charge. It will be ...
  48. [48]
    Archaeologists find rare religious relic depicting Moses receiving ...
    Jul 4, 2024 · According to Greek City Times, this 1,500-year-old ivory box illustrates Moses receiving the Ten Commandments from God on Mount Sinai, as ...
  49. [49]
    Do the Ten Commandments have any archaeological evidence?
    May 24, 2023 · Yes. They are in an Egyptian museum today (28 Feb. 2024). Sadly, most scholars are unaware they have been found. Why?Do the original stone tablets still exist of the 10 commandments?Is there any scientific evidence to suggest that Moses wrote The Ten ...More results from www.quora.com
  50. [50]
    The Exodus: Fact or Fiction? - Biblical Archaeology Society
    2) The lack of evidence from the time of Moses in Egypt to the time of “deliverance” after getting the 10 Commandments is NOT proof that these events happened.
  51. [51]
    [PDF] The Decalogue Predates Mount Sinai: Indicators from the Book of ...
    A general consensus exists that the Decalogue has exerted more in- fluence on ethics and law than any other part of Scripture, or any docu- ment outside of ...
  52. [52]
    [PDF] THE FINGER OF GOD AND THE FORMING OF A NATION
    • Kratz dates the Decalogue between the time of Hosea and the composition of ... Decalogue, many scholars have accepted the idea that it had a function.
  53. [53]
    Conditional Commandments - The Research
    There are actually THREE different versions of the Decalogue in the biblical text: Exodus 20, Exodus 34, and Deuteronomy 5. Startlingly, the two variants in ...<|separator|>
  54. [54]
    Deuteronomic Redaction and the Evolution of the Decalogues in ...
    Nov 28, 2023 · Blum suggested that Exodus 20 is the older version and that Deuteronomy 5 is a development from the Exodus 20 tradition. Exodus 20 and ...
  55. [55]
    Ten Commandments: Where Did they Really Come From? - Vridar
    Aug 30, 2017 · The Ten Commandments are a strange mix. They proscribe not only stealing and even the craving to have any property belonging to your neighbour.Missing: theories | Show results with:theories
  56. [56]
    The Bible and Its Sources: Is the So-called Documentary Hypothesis ...
    Aug 27, 2020 · The so-called “Documentary Hypothesis,” classically represented in the formulation of Julius Wellhausen in 1882, argued that the Torah contains ...Missing: Decalogue | Show results with:Decalogue
  57. [57]
    Introduction - The Ten Commandments - Cambridge University Press
    By contextualizing the Decalogue within the monuments of its day, we can uncover new insights into the text's composition and reception in its original contexts ...
  58. [58]
    Exodus 34:10-28 – The Ritual Decalogue - Enter the Bible
    God gives Moses ten new “words,” or commandments, to write on a new set of tablets. These commandments all pertain to ritual observances and are a different ...Missing: Hypothesis | Show results with:Hypothesis
  59. [59]
    After the Golden Calf, Is the Covenant Renewed with a Ritual ...
    Mar 7, 2024 · Many contemporary scholars now reject Wellhausen's claims that Exodus 34 contains an ancient Ritual Decalogue with later expansions and ...
  60. [60]
    The Ten Commandments - The Bible Guy - WordPress.com
    Apr 20, 2014 · The Ten Commandments · 11 For in six days YHWH made the heavens, the earth, the sea, and all that is in them, and he rested on the seventh day.
  61. [61]
    The Other Ten Commandments - Jewish Sacred Aging
    Mar 9, 2021 · The Ritual Ten Commandments​​ Par'sha Ki Tisa contains an alternate version of the ten commandments (Exodus 34: 14-26), with far fewer of the ...
  62. [62]
  63. [63]
    The Ten Commandments - Aseret Hadibrot - Chabad.org
    The Ten Commandments are read publicly three times a year, twice when it comes up in the weekly Torah reading (in the portions of Yitro and Va'etchanan), and ...
  64. [64]
    Aseret ha-Dibrot: The Ten Commandments - Judaism 101 (JewFAQ)
    According to Jewish tradition, Gd gave the Jewish people 613 mitzvot (commandments). All 613 of those mitzvot are equally sacred, equally binding and equally ...
  65. [65]
    What Happened at Matan Torah? - The Sequence and ... - Chabad.org
    The Events. With the Exodus from Egypt only three months in the past, the Jews arrive at Mount Sinai to hear the Ten Commandments and receive the Torah.
  66. [66]
    The Two Shabbats of the Decalogue - TheTorah.com
    Jul 8, 2013 · In Exodus it is a reminder of creation, in Deuteronomy it is a reminder of the exodus. Maimonides (Guide 2:31) suggests this is because Exodus ...
  67. [67]
    Va'etchanan 5771-2011: The Ten Commandments: The Differences
    Aug 7, 2011 · The final commandment, of not coveting, is also slightly different. The list of items that are not to be coveted is slightly more comprehensive ...<|separator|>
  68. [68]
    The First Commandment | Va'etchanan | Covenant & Conversation
    One of the most profound disagreements in Judaism is the one between Moses Maimonides and Judah Halevi on the meaning of the first of the Ten Commandments.
  69. [69]
    The All-Encompassing Nature of the Ten Commandments
    Sep 21, 2014 · The Aseret Ha-dibrot thus represent all six possible types of mitzvot - any of the other hundreds of Jewish duties can be labeled as belonging ...
  70. [70]
    The Ten Commandments - Hebrew for Christians
    THE TEN COMMANDMENTS are a special set of spiritual axioms (laws) that the LORD Himself wrote on two stone tablets (luchot) that Moses brought down from Mount ...
  71. [71]
    The Custom That Refused to Die - Covenant & Conversation - Parshah
    So the custom of including the Ten Commandments as part of the Shema was once widespread, but from a certain point in time it was systematically opposed by the ...
  72. [72]
    Philosophy or Prophecy? - Aish.com
    Maimonides counts the opening line of the Ten Commandments, "I am the Lord your God, who brought you out of Egypt, out of the land of slavery," as a ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  73. [73]
    What is the role of the Ten Commandments in the Christian's life?
    Mar 6, 2024 · The Ten Commandments tell us how to live a life of faith. The prologue to the Ten Commandments teaches us that God is the one who saves us.
  74. [74]
    Lord of All the Law: How Jesus Handled the Ten Commandments
    Jun 7, 2024 · The phrase “Ten Commandments” does not appear in the New Testament. Not once. Which might be surprising for Gentile believers today who have ...
  75. [75]
    Are the Ten Commandments repeated in the New Testament?
    Mar 14, 2025 · The term Ten Commandments is never found in the New Testament. Nine of the Ten Commandments from Exodus 20:1–17 are repeated in the New ...
  76. [76]
    Do the Ten Commandments Have Authority Over New Testament ...
    Oct 23, 2018 · Paul says, much like Jesus did, that the Ten Commandments are the way for God's people to love one another. When we love, we fulfill the ...
  77. [77]
    The Role of the Ten Commandments in Christian Life - GCI Archive
    Many Christians teach that the Ten Commandments were spoken by God himself, written in stone, and are the major expression of God's moral law.
  78. [78]
    The Theology of Numbering the Ten Commandments
    Jan 7, 2022 · The Ninth Commandment pertains to sinful desire to possess the inanimate property of another; the Tenth pertains to sinful desire to possess living beings.
  79. [79]
    The Catholic Ten Commandments
    The list of the Ten Commandments that Catholics have traditionally memorized comes from the most ancient of Christian traditions. Read more about it here.
  80. [80]
    The Ten Commandments - Luther's Small Catechism
    The First Commandment: You shall have no other gods. What does this mean? We should fear, love, and trust in God above all things.
  81. [81]
    Christians and the Sabbath - Focus on the Family
    In time, as the church became predominantly Gentile, the celebration of the Lord's Day often took the place of the Jewish Sabbath among Christians altogether.
  82. [82]
    Life, Work, and the Ten Commandments
    May 15, 2013 · Throughout history, the Ten Commandments have been used as a framework for expounding all of our ethical responsibilities. For instance, John ...<|separator|>
  83. [83]
    What Does the Lord Require of Me? The Ten Commandments and ...
    May 19, 2021 · The Ten Commandments open a wide and wonderful window into who God is, and what it means for us to live and love like him.
  84. [84]
    The Ten Commandments and Natural Law - The Catholic Thing
    Sep 24, 2016 · These seven commandments coincide with the three major “precepts” that St. Thomas Aquinas elaborates in the natural law.
  85. [85]
    [PDF] The Nine Commandments: The Decalogue and the Natural Law
    The Decalogue is an incomplete statement of the natural law, and only nine of the ten commandments reflect duties imposed by the natural law itself.
  86. [86]
    The Ten Commandments and the Natural Law - Rhode Island Catholic
    Mar 4, 2021 · The Ten Commandments express primary tenets of the natural law, which is the law of God discerned by human reason, and are the first precepts ...
  87. [87]
    Thomas Aquinas discusses natural law in his Summa Theologiae. In ...
    The Ten Commandments, while based on the natural law, contain additional rules that are not innately understood by all peoples (such as the rule barring ...
  88. [88]
    Question 100. The moral precepts of the old law - New Advent
    The moral precepts, distinct from the ceremonial and judicial precepts, are about things pertaining of their very nature to good morals.
  89. [89]
    The Ten Commandments as natural law - RationalWiki
    Jun 20, 2024 · Each of the Ten Commandments can be deduced from natural law. This doubtful deduction is sometimes taken as evidence supporting the argument from morality.First Commandment · Second Commandment · Seventh Commandment
  90. [90]
    Law and Theology in the Western Legal Tradition
    This article traces the development of the laws of church and state in the Western tradition. It focuses on four watershed periods.
  91. [91]
    Blackstone on the Absolute Rights of Individuals (1753)
    The statute law of England does therefore very seldom, and the common law does never, inflict any punishment extending to life or limb, unless upon the ...
  92. [92]
    The Ten Commandments in American Law
    Nov 6, 2020 · William Blackstone on the Law. This Law of Nature dictated by ... It is more ancient than our common law or our form of government. It ...
  93. [93]
    The Moral Foundation of Western Culture - FEE.org
    Nov 1, 1992 · I realized that two of the Ten Commandments have to do with family and two have to do with private property. Another one respects life and ...Missing: civilization | Show results with:civilization
  94. [94]
    The Ten Commandments And The Origins Of Law - Patheos
    Sep 2, 2022 · It is axiomatic that many of the principles contained in the Ten Commandments are fundamental to the Western legal tradition. Prohibitions ...
  95. [95]
    The Fount of Everything Just and Right? The Ten Commandments ...
    Oct 15, 2015 · The Legislature has declared the Ten Commandments to be the fundamental legal code of Western Civilization and the common law of the United ...
  96. [96]
    The Ten Commandments a Source of American Law...REALLY???
    Mar 4, 2012 · The Ten Commandments have profoundly influenced the formation of Western legal thought and the formation of our country. That influence is ...<|separator|>
  97. [97]
    CLE , Sir William Blackstone, Commentaries on the Law of England
    Such among others are these principles: that we should live honestly, should hurt nobody, and should render to every one his due; to which three general ...
  98. [98]
    [PDF] The Influence of Biblical Texts upon English Law
    " Chapter 25 of Magna Charta concerns weights and measures; and Coke says this is founded on the law of God, citing Deut. 25:13, "Thou shalt not have in thy ...
  99. [99]
    [PDF] Magna Carta | The Christian Institute
    Magna Carta assumes that the nation's laws and rulers should be subject to God's law. The. Bible teaches there is a law written on the heart (Romans. 2:15) – ...
  100. [100]
    Magna Carta: The Biblical Basis - Pondering Principles
    Apr 30, 2015 · The Magna Carta stands for the idea of subjection of the King not to man but to God and the law, an idea rooted in the Bible which has dominated Anglo-American ...
  101. [101]
    The Ten Commandments Are Not the Foundation for American Law
    In conclusion, the claim that the Ten Commandments provide the foundation for American law is, to put it generously, greatly exaggerated. Most commandments had ...
  102. [102]
    Ten Commandments: A Basis for American Law? - Learn Religions
    Aug 16, 2018 · Having the Ten Commandments displayed is thus supposed to be a way of acknowledging the basis of our laws and our government.
  103. [103]
    Reflections on the Ten Commandments - Belcher Foundation
    Thus, the Ten Commandments were the basis for American law during Early American history: witness the words of William Blackstone, quoted above, said by the ...
  104. [104]
    Ten Commandments | The First Amendment Encyclopedia
    Aug 11, 2023 · Legal challenges have been brought against public display of the Ten Commandments for violating the First Amendment's establishment clause.
  105. [105]
    Stone v. Graham | Oyez
    Sydell Stone and a number of other parents challenged a Kentucky state law that required the posting of a copy of the Ten Commandments in each public school ...
  106. [106]
    Sydell STONE et al. v. James B. GRAHAM, Superintendent of Public ...
    A Kentucky statute requires the posting of a copy of the Ten Commandments, purchased with private contributions, on the wall of each public classroom in the ...
  107. [107]
    McCreary County v. American Civil Liberties Union of Ky. - Oyez
    Mar 2, 2005 · A case in which the Court found the display of the Ten Commandments in public schools and courthouses violated the Establishment Clause of ...
  108. [108]
    McCreary County v. ACLU of Kentucky | 545 U.S. 844 (2005)
    McCreary County and Pulaski County, Kentucky, displayed gold-framed copies of the Ten Commandments in their courthouses, juxtaposed only with a citation to the ...
  109. [109]
    Van Orden v. Perry | Oyez
    Mar 2, 2005 · Thomas Van Orden sued Texas in federal district court, arguing a Ten Commandments monument on the grounds of the state capitol building ...
  110. [110]
    Van Orden v. Perry | 545 U.S. 677 (2005)
    In this case we are faced with a display of the Ten Commandments on government property outside the Texas State Capitol.
  111. [111]
    Court Blocks Louisiana Law Requiring Public Schools to Display ...
    Nov 12, 2024 · Green, the court found that there is no historical support for permanently displaying the Ten Commandments in public-school classrooms and that ...
  112. [112]
    U.S. Supreme Court Hands Final Victory to ACLU-NM in Ten ...
    Jan 2, 2018 · ACLU that determined that the Ten Commandments display in a Kentucky courthouse failed to serve any secular purpose and therefore constituted an ...<|separator|>
  113. [113]
    The Ten Commandments return to classrooms - SCOTUSblog
    Jul 15, 2025 · Specifically, the court determined that these displays did not serve a primarily secular purpose (even if government officials said they did) ...
  114. [114]
    Federal Appeals Court Rules Against Louisiana Law Requiring ...
    Jun 20, 2025 · A Louisiana law requiring public schools to permanently display a government-approved, Protestant version of the Ten Commandments in every classroom is ...
  115. [115]
    Louisiana's Ten Commandments Law Gets Full Federal Appeals ...
    Oct 7, 2025 · The full 5th Circuit threw out a panel decision that blocked a Louisiana law requiring Ten Commandments displays in schools.
  116. [116]
    US appeals court to reconsider Louisiana's Ten Commandments ...
    Oct 6, 2025 · US appeals court to reconsider Louisiana's Ten Commandments law it struck down · Three-judge panel declared law unconstitutional · Republicans ...
  117. [117]
    ACLU, religious freedom groups sue to block Texas' Ten ...
    Jun 26, 2025 · ... new state law requiring public school classrooms to display donated posters of the Ten Commandments. A Texas federal judge in August ...
  118. [118]
    Attorney General Ken Paxton Issues Legal Advisory to Ensure ...
    Oct 1, 2025 · Attorney General Ken today issued a formal legal advisory to all Texas public school districts regarding their obligations under Senate Bill ...
  119. [119]
  120. [120]
    3 states push to put the Ten Commandments back in school
    Sep 9, 2025 · All three laws have been at least partially blocked – most recently Texas' law – after federal trial-court rulings. But the ongoing cases seem ...
  121. [121]
    Federal appellate court rejects Louisiana's Ten Commandments ...
    Jun 20, 2025 · A federal appeals court on Friday struck down a Louisiana law that requires public schools to display the Ten Commandments in every classroom.
  122. [122]
    The Ten Commandments and a "secular purpose" - SCOTUSblog
    Aug 20, 2025 · Rights and Responsibilities is a recurring series by Richard Garnett on legal education, the role of the courts in our constitutional structure, ...
  123. [123]
  124. [124]
  125. [125]
  126. [126]
    History and Development of Shabbat | My Jewish Learning
    From ancient to modern times, observance of the Shabbat has served as a touchstone for individual Jews to identify with a particular community within the Jewish ...
  127. [127]
    What day is the Sabbath, Saturday or Sunday? - Got Questions
    Jan 20, 2023 · The Sabbath is still Saturday, not Sunday, and has never been changed. Christians are not required to keep it.
  128. [128]
    How The Sabbath Was Changed
    Not only was Jesus a perfect example in observing the weekly seventh-day Sabbath, but all His disciples followed the same pattern after Jesus had gone back to ...Seventh-day Video Series · The Day of the Sun · The Council of Trent<|separator|>
  129. [129]
    Should Christians Keep the Sabbath? - Desiring God
    Apr 20, 2021 · Of course, when Christians today speak of the Sabbath, they almost never mean the seventh day, but the first day: not Saturday but Sunday. But ...
  130. [130]
    Defining the Debate by R.C. Sproul - Ligonier Ministries
    The first great debate about the Sabbath is whether, as an Old Testament ordinance particularly emphasized in the Mosaic covenant, it is still obligatory.
  131. [131]
    The Sabbath and the Decalogue in the Old Testament
    Sep 10, 2013 · Some want to claim that the Sabbath command is a ceremonial law that is no longer binding. However, no one would doubt the continuing validity of the other ...Missing: criticisms | Show results with:criticisms
  132. [132]
    3 Reasons Sunday Is Not the Christian Sabbath
    Oct 27, 2020 · Sunday is not the Christian Sabbath because it's not a creation ordinance, the Sabbath was under the old covenant, and it's fulfilled in Christ ...
  133. [133]
    Should Christians Observe the Sabbath? - The Cripplegate
    May 23, 2024 · The sabbath day points us to the Lord Jesus Christ, and He Himself is our sabbath rest. Those who have put their faith in Him have rested from their works.
  134. [134]
    “You Shall not Kill” or “You Shall not Murder”? The Meaning of ...
    Some scholars and writers claim the commandment “You shall not kill” points to a specific prohibition— that is, murder. Appeal is made to the original Hebrew by ...
  135. [135]
    Torah makes distinction between murder, killing - Texas Jewish Post
    Oct 15, 2015 · Instead, the Torah says in the Ten Commandments: Lo Tirtzach, which means “Thou shalt not murder” (Shemot/Exodus 20:13). Throughout the Torah ...
  136. [136]
    Is "kill" a valid translation for Exodus 20:13 (Thou shalt not kill)?
    Oct 5, 2011 · While "kill" could be a valid translation, "murder" is a better one since it's a "Thou Shalt Not". It doesn't make much sense to say You shall not have an ...
  137. [137]
    What is the difference between “you shall not murder” and “you shall ...
    Jan 4, 2022 · What is the difference between “you shall not murder” and “you shall not kill”? What is the different between killing and murdering?Missing: interpretive defense
  138. [138]
    SUMMA THEOLOGIAE: Murder (Secunda Secundae Partis, Q. 64)
    Hence it follows that the words, 'Thou shalt not kill' refer to the killing of a man. ... Therefore neither is it lawful for laymen to kill anyone in self-defense ...Article 2. Whether It Is... · Article 5. Whether It Is... · Article 7. Whether It Is...Missing: interpretive disputes war<|separator|>
  139. [139]
    The Ten Commandments are Deeply Immoral - Directionless Bones
    Jul 6, 2009 · That's an immoral principle. Commandment 7 is 'do not committ adultery'. Now first off, the historical bulk of adultery has been perfectly ok. A ...
  140. [140]
    What Jesus Meant by Adultery in Matthew Chapters 5 & 19
    The technical definition is: “an adulterer, that is, a man who is guilty with a married woman“. Hebrew Words: “נָאַף” (naaph) a verb meaning “to commit adultery”.
  141. [141]
    Is remarriage after divorce always adultery? | GotQuestions.org
    Apr 17, 2025 · These Scriptures clearly state that remarriage after a divorce is adultery, except in the instance of marital unfaithfulness.Missing: naaph | Show results with:naaph
  142. [142]
    On Divorce & Remarriage in the Event of Adultery | Desiring God
    Jan 1, 1986 · He says that the woman who was divorced is not a candidate for remarriage, because if a man marries her, he commits adultery. The only way to ...Missing: naaph | Show results with:naaph
  143. [143]
    What Does the Bible Teach About Divorce and Remarriage?
    Jul 15, 2024 · Some holding the permanence view claim the exception refers to adultery during betrothal but before marriage (see Matt. 1:18–19). But in Matthew ...Missing: naaph | Show results with:naaph
  144. [144]
    Moral Law and the Ten Commandments
    Nov 19, 2013 · The place of law in general, the influence of the Ten Commandments in particular, and the application of law to public life are all topics that provide an ...Missing: civilization | Show results with:civilization
  145. [145]
    Restoring Our Heritage of Property Rights - Mackinac Center
    Jun 28, 2006 · Eminent domain abuse means those who are lower on society's ladder will not receive equal treatment under the law. That is not what this country ...Missing: thou steal interpretive
  146. [146]
    The Ten Commandments Are Not Part of Our Secular Legal Heritage
    Jun 24, 2007 · Honor your father and your mother. You shall not kill. You shall not commit adultery. You shall not steal. You shall not bear false witness ...
  147. [147]
    The Ten Commandments: Why The Decalogue Matters - Tikvah Fund
    Dec 3, 2013 · Murder, adultery, and theft are outlawed by virtually all civilized peoples. These legal prohibitions not only form the necessary condition ...The Ten Commandments: Why... · 4. The Sabbath Day · 5. Honoring Father And...
  148. [148]
    Idolatry: Second Commandment - Life, Hope & Truth
    The Second Commandment against idolatry is recorded in Exodus 20:4-6: “You shall not make for yourself a carved image—any likeness of anything that is in ...Missing: text | Show results with:text
  149. [149]
    The Ten Commandments Explained - Biblical Principles for Ethical ...
    The Ten Commandments ( decalogue =10 words) are ten principles that guide us in living in harmony with God and with other human beings.
  150. [150]
    Destroying Statues and Judaism's Prohibition of Making Graven ...
    The Shulchan Aruch, the Code of Jewish Law, allows one to create two-dimensional paintings and images of the human body, as long as the entire body is not shown ...
  151. [151]
    Ask the Expert: Graven Images - My Jewish Learning
    In some Jewish communities during the Middle Ages artists got around this prohibition by drawing human bodies topped with heads of other animals, including ...
  152. [152]
    Exodus 20 Commentary - Precept Austin
    Jan 12, 2024 · The prohibition against idolatry in the Ten Commandments uses tĕmûnâh to indicate that no idol is to be made that resembles any object found ...
  153. [153]
    Are Images of Jesus a Violation of the Commandments? - 1517
    Images of Jesus, in short, are not a violation of the commandments but the very celebration of their fulfillment in Jesus, the icon of the Father.
  154. [154]
    Images of Christ and the Violation of the Second Commandment
    Apr 10, 2016 · Pictures of Christ are in principle a violation of the second commandment. A picture of Christ, if it serves any useful purpose, must evoke some thought or ...
  155. [155]
    Does the Bible Forbid My Nativity Set? - Desiring God
    Dec 20, 2019 · The second commandment forbids using an image or likeness of God in worship. Does that mean we should take down our nativity sets?
  156. [156]
    What's Wrong With The Ten Commandments?
    Jun 26, 2012 · They epitomize the childishness, the vindictiveness, the sexism, the inflexibility and the inadequacies of the bible as a book of morals.
  157. [157]
    How the Doctrine of Exclusivity Made Me a Christian
    Jan 19, 2023 · This doctrine separates Christianity from every other worldview, and it unites every other doctrine within our faith.