Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Trinity Dam

Trinity Dam is an earthfill on the River in Trinity County, , forming with a maximum capacity of 2,448,000 acre-feet. Completed in after began in , the structure stands 538 feet high with a crest length of 2,450 feet and serves as a central feature of the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation's by diverting River water southward via to augment flows. The dam supports agricultural for Central Valley farmlands, generates hydroelectric power through the adjacent Trinity Powerplant with an installed capacity of 100 megawatts, and provides by regulating reservoir storage during high inflows. Its operations have enabled substantial economic benefits from water exports but at the cost of reduced downstream river flows, which historically supported salmonid fisheries, leading to federal mandates for increased environmental releases under programs like the Trinity River Restoration Program initiated in the and . While praised for engineering scale—creating California's third-largest reservoir by volume—the project exemplifies trade-offs in large-scale hydraulic , where upstream impoundment and diversion prioritize human water demands over unaltered riverine ecology.

History

Planning and Authorization

The planning for the Trinity River Division, which includes Trinity Dam, emerged from early 20th-century assessments of water resources in , with federal and state agencies, including the Federal Power Commission, conducting studies on Trinity River development as early as 1923 to address regional water shortages and power needs. These efforts gained momentum in the post-World War II era amid expanding demands for in California's Central Valley, leading the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation to release preliminary plans in 1949 for integrating the River into the (CVP) through diversion infrastructure. The proposed division aimed to capture Trinity River flows via a dam and reservoir, tunneling water southward to augment Sacramento River supplies for CVP users, while incorporating flood control and hydroelectric generation capabilities. Authorization followed congressional approval on August 12, 1955, through Public Law 86-386 (69 Stat. 719), which empowered the Secretary of the Interior to construct the Trinity River Division features, including Trinity Dam, as an extension of the CVP. The specified a capacity and diversion mechanisms to deliver supplemental to Central , estimated at up to 600,000 acre-feet annually, alongside provisions for minimum instream releases of 120,000 acre-feet to support downstream fisheries in the Trinity River. This act reflected pragmatic engineering priorities for redistribution in a hydrologically variable region, prioritizing verifiable hydrological data from prior surveys over unsubstantiated environmental concerns prevalent in some contemporary critiques. Post-authorization planning refined designs through Bureau of Reclamation technical reports, culminating in a summary of preliminary data that outlined specifications, alignments, and power facilities to ensure feasibility and cost-effectiveness. These documents emphasized causal linkages between upstream storage and downstream benefits, such as mitigating risks documented in historical Trinity River events and enhancing CVP reliability without relying on speculative long-term ecological models.

Construction and Completion

The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation awarded twelve major contracts for Trinity Dam in 1956, initiating the construction phase of the Trinity River Division within the . The principal contract, valued at $48,928,101, went to Trinity Dam Contractors, a led by Guy F. Atkinson Company along with M.J. Grogan, R.E. McKee, and Morrison-Knudsen Company. This firm handled the core embankment work, while Allum Brothers of , secured the outlet tunnel excavation contract, and Gates and Fox managed the diversion tunnel. Preliminary site activities began on June 4, 1956, with outlet work, followed by diversion excavation at the upstream portal on September 15, 1956. Main started on March 12, 1957, after initial excavations on May 28, 1957, which included river diversion to enable embankment placement. The structure is a zoned earthfill embankment comprising an impervious core, semi-impervious shoulders, river gravel zones, and rockfill shells, with armoring on the upstream face for . In 1958, contractors placed a record 7.6 million cubic yards of embankment material, reflecting intensive earthmoving operations in the rugged Trinity River canyon. Closure of the diversion tunnel occurred on November 3, 1960, allowing initial impoundment in what became Clair Engle Lake (renamed Trinity Lake in 1963) to commence on November 22, 1960. The dam reached structural completion in 1961, establishing it as the world's highest embankment dam at 538 feet until Oroville Dam exceeded it later that decade. Associated powerplant construction finished with structural elements by December 15, 1961, and turbine installation by December 23, 1963, enabling full operational integration with the adjacent Lewiston Dam and powerhouse.

Initial Operations and Diversions

The Trinity River Division of the initiated flow regulation at Trinity Dam in , prior to full completion of the structure, to manage Trinity River inflows and begin storage in the developing reservoir. This early phase focused on stabilizing downstream flows while continued, with the dam's earthfill reaching operational height by late 1962. Water diversions from the Trinity River basin to the system commenced on April 15, 1963, via the newly constructed Spring Creek Tunnel, marking the onset of interbasin transfers for generation and irrigation augmentation in California's Central Valley. Initial diversions routed stored water from Trinity Reservoir through Lewiston Dam—a reregulating structure completed concurrently—to the diversion facilities, enabling releases into the Clear Creek Powerplant tunnel before integration into the broader Shasta Division operations. During the first years of operation (1963–early 1960s), the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation diverted an average of 1.2 million acre-feet annually, prioritizing power production and agricultural demands amid variable Klamath Basin inflows. The Trinity Powerplant at the dam's base activated its two generating units in 1964, with an initial capacity of 100,000 kilowatts, converting from reservoir releases into electricity supplied to the Pacific Gas and Electric . Concurrently, the upstream Spring Creek Powerplant began operations that year at 150,000 kilowatts, facilitating pumped-storage diversions that maximized export of Trinity water southward while returning excess to Whiskeytown Reservoir. These early diversions, governed by interim operating criteria emphasizing storage buildup and flood risk mitigation, reduced natural Trinity River outflows by up to 50% in dry periods, altering downstream from pre-dam conditions. By 1963, had filled sufficiently to support full-scale diversions, reaching its initial operational storage of approximately 2.4 million acre-feet.

Design and Specifications

Dam Structure

Trinity Dam is an located on the Trinity River in . Completed in 1962, it stands at a structural of 538 feet (164 m) from foundation to crest, with a hydraulic height of 440 feet (134 m). The crest measures 2,450 feet (747 m) in length and 40 feet (12 m) in width, situated at an elevation of 2,395 feet (730 m) above . As a zoned earthfill structure, the dam is constructed from compacted layers of impervious core materials, surrounded by permeable zones for drainage and stability, typical of mid-20th-century embankment designs engineered for seismic resilience and longevity. The embankment's base width exceeds 1,000 feet to distribute loads across the valley foundation, minimizing settlement risks. Key structural features include an uncontrolled morning glory spillway with a capacity of 22,400 cubic feet per second (635 m³/s) at 2,387 feet (727 m) elevation, designed to handle extreme flood events without operator intervention. An auxiliary spillway provides additional discharge of 2,250 cubic feet per second (64 m³/s) at 2,370 feet (722 m) elevation. Outlet works, including river and auxiliary gates, enable controlled releases up to 7,200 cubic feet per second (204 m³/s) for power generation and downstream flow management, integrated into the dam's toe via tunnels and penstocks. These elements ensure the dam's role in flood control while maintaining structural integrity under varying hydrologic loads.

Reservoir Characteristics

Trinity Lake, impounded by Trinity Dam on the Trinity River in , serves as a key storage reservoir within the , with a maximum capacity of approximately 2.4 million acre-feet (3.0 billion cubic meters). This volume supports water diversion to the , generation, and , with storage levels fluctuating based on inflows, releases, and operational demands. At full pool elevation of 2,370 feet (722 meters) above mean sea level, the reservoir spans a surface area of about 17,000 acres (69 square kilometers) and features 145 miles (233 kilometers) of irregular shoreline, enabling extensive recreational use amid the surrounding Shasta-Trinity National Forest. The main arm extends roughly 19 miles (31 kilometers) northward from the dam, with depths reaching a maximum of 416 feet (127 meters) near the dam face, contributing to thermal stratification that influences water quality management and downstream temperature control via selective withdrawals. Average depths, derived from volume-to-area ratios under typical operations, approximate 140-150 feet, though precise figures vary with seasonal drawdowns. The reservoir's includes multiple arms—such as the Stuart Fork and Coffee Creek inflows—creating a dendritic shape that enhances trapping but also poses challenges for navigation and during high flows. Water levels are monitored daily, with historical maxima near capacity during wet years like , and minima during droughts, reflecting the reservoir's role in balancing regional amid variable Klamath-Trinity River Basin .

Associated Infrastructure

The primary associated infrastructure of Trinity Dam includes its outlet works, spillways, powerhouse, and diversion facilities. The outlet works consist of a main system with an 11-foot diameter conduit that bifurcates into two 7-foot diameter conduits, each equipped with an 84-inch ring-follower gate and energy dissipator to manage controlled releases and prevent downstream erosion. An auxiliary outlet works features a box intake structure connected to a 7-foot diameter concrete conduit leading to another 84-inch gate, providing additional release capacity up to approximately 320 cubic feet per second at water surface elevation 1,902 feet. These structures facilitate flood control releases, minimum flow requirements for the Trinity River, and temperature regulation downstream. Spillway infrastructure comprises a service spillway with a capacity of 22,400 cubic feet per second at elevation 2,387 feet and an auxiliary spillway rated at 2,250 cubic feet per second at 2,370 feet, designed as a or type to handle extreme inflows during rare events. The total spillway system protects the from overtopping, with the auxiliary serving as a to the primary chute. Hydropower facilities at the dam include the Trinity Powerplant, a peaking facility with a generating capacity of 140,000 kilowatts, utilizing penstocks to direct water through turbines before discharge into Lewiston Lake. Water not used for power or local flows is diverted via the Clear Creek Tunnel, a 10.7-mile conduit extending from Lewiston Dam (immediately downstream of Trinity Dam) to the basin, enabling transbasin transfer for and further generation at downstream plants like Carr Powerhouse. Lewiston Dam itself, a smaller structure forming Lewiston Lake, regulates post-powerhouse flows and supports the tunnel intake, with operational constraints limiting diversions to preserve downstream river . Transmission lines connect the powerhouse to regional grids, prioritizing project needs before serving preference customers.

Operations and Functions

Hydropower Generation

The Trinity Powerplant, situated at the base of Trinity Dam, is a conventional above-ground hydroelectric facility featuring two Francis turbines coupled to generators. It provides an installed capacity of 140,000 kilowatts (kW), enabling peaking operations that prioritize releases from Trinity Lake for electricity production. The turbines each support a nameplate capacity of 70 megawatts (MW), with water flow directed through penstocks from the reservoir to drive generation before discharge into the Trinity River downstream. Originally equipped with a combined nameplate capacity of 100,000 kW upon commissioning in 1962, the facility underwent upgrades in the mid-1980s that increased output by 20,000 kW per unit through advancements in high-voltage generator technology. This enhancement expanded the plant's role within the (CVP), where generated power first meets on-site project demands—such as pumping and support—before allocation to preference customers in northern and via the . Annual energy production varies with hydrological conditions, , and operational priorities like and diversion, but averages approximately 415 million kilowatt-hours (kWh) based on historical data through the early . More recent figures indicate outputs around 359 million kWh in certain years, reflecting constraints from environmental releases and reduced inflows. The plant contributes to the CVP's broader portfolio, which emphasizes renewable generation amid competing uses for Trinity River .

Water Diversion and Supply

Water from the is diverted southward to the basin via the of the , augmenting supplies for agricultural irrigation, municipal, and industrial use in the Central Valley. releases stored water from into the downstream , a regulating that maintains flows and temperatures. At , a significant portion of this water enters the , a 10.7-mile conduit with a 17.5-foot capable of conveying up to 3,200 cubic feet per second to on , a tributary. This transbasin diversion, operational since the early , transfers an average of 704,000 acre-feet annually from the wetter watershed to support contractors, whose farmlands span millions of acres reliant on such imports during dry periods. The process also integrates with hydropower generation, as diverted flows pass through the Judge Francis Carr Powerhouse before entering Keswick Reservoir, contributing to the project's overall energy output while prioritizing water delivery. Diversions are limited by operational criteria established under the congressional authorization (P.L. 84-386) and subsequent environmental mandates, including the 1996 Trinity River Record of Decision, which requires minimum instream flows—typically 300 to 1,000 cubic feet per second in summer—to protect habitat and river , thereby capping export volumes in low-flow years. These constraints balance supply benefits against downstream Trinity River needs, with actual diversions varying based on hydrologic conditions and Endangered Species Act compliance.

Flood Control Measures

Although flood control is not an authorized purpose of the Trinity River Division under its 1955 congressional authorization, the Trinity Dam and Reservoir provide de facto through operational practices that leverage the lake's large storage capacity to attenuate peak flows during storm events. Trinity Lake, with a total usable storage of approximately 6,388,000 acre-feet, absorbs excess runoff from the Trinity River , reducing downstream discharge volumes and velocities on the Trinity and Klamath Rivers, which protects communities, , and ecosystems from inundation. This incidental benefit arises from the absence of dedicated flood pools, as cost allocations assign 0% of project expenses to flood control, yet the reservoir's scale—combined with surcharge capacity—enables passive storage during winter and spring high-flow periods when inflows can exceed 50,000 cubic feet per second. Flood management operations rely on hydrological forecasting and coordinated releases rather than formal rule curves. The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation monitors inflows using real-time data from upstream gages, satellite imagery, and models from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, adjusting outflows via the dam's powerhouse (maximum capacity of 1,150 megawatts, translating to controlled releases up to several thousand cfs) and radial gates to maintain reservoir levels below spillway crest elevation (2,376 feet above sea level) while minimizing downstream peaks. During major events, such as the 1964 floods or atmospheric river storms in water year 2023, operators prioritize dam safety by pre-releasing water if forecasts indicate surcharge risks, effectively delaying and flattening hydrographs to prevent levee breaches or channel scour in the lower Trinity Basin. Coordination with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ensures alignment with broader Sacramento River system operations, though Trinity's contributions remain unquantified in federal flood damage reduction estimates beyond incidental effects. These measures are constrained by competing demands for generation, water diversions to the via Clear Creek Tunnel (up to 1,500 cfs average), and minimum instream flows for fisheries under the Trinity River Mainstem Fishery Restoration Program. Without explicit authorization, storage space for is not reserved seasonally, leading to variable efficacy; for instance, full reservoirs in years like 2015 limit attenuation potential, while empty conditions enhance it. Empirical analyses indicate that operations have historically reduced flows by 20-50% in moderate events, though exact figures depend on antecedent conditions and lack peer-reviewed basin-wide modeling specific to Trinity.

Environmental Impacts

Effects on River Ecology and Fisheries

The construction of Trinity Dam and associated Lewiston Dam in the early 1960s blocked anadromous to over 100 miles of upstream in the Trinity River watershed, resulting in an estimated loss of 80-90% of total anadromous fishery habitats above the dams. Below the dams, reduced flows from diversions—historically exporting up to 90% of the river's inflow to the basin—led to a 60-80% decline in anadromous production, primarily affecting (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) and trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Diversions substantially lowered Trinity River flows downstream of Lewiston Dam, shifting from pre-dam peaks of thousands of cubic feet per second (cfs) to chronic averages in the hundreds of cfs, with most high releases confined to May for rather than mimicking natural hydrographs. This reduction impaired geomorphic processes, including and inundation, causing channel incision, loss of gravel bars for spawning, and degradation of rearing habitats such as off-channel alcoves essential for juvenile survival. Consequently, wild and populations failed to recover to pre-dam levels, with numbers dropping to critically low figures; for instance, Trinity River fall returns averaged under 10,000 adults annually in recent decades compared to historical estimates exceeding 50,000. Hypolimnetic releases from Lewiston Dam maintain cold water temperatures beneficial for salmonid migration and spawning—typically below 55°F (13°C) during summer—but the low flow volumes exacerbate stranding risks for juveniles and limit overall availability, while excessive cold in certain periods can slow metabolic growth rates in rearing fish. These hydrological alterations, compounded by legacy effects from upstream and , have shifted the river toward dominance by non-native species and reduced benthic productivity supporting salmonid webs. Overall, the dams' operations prioritize water exports for and , directly causal to the persistent suppression of native fisheries despite subsequent mitigation attempts.

Salmon Hatchery Operations

The Trinity River Hatchery, situated on the Trinity River near Lewiston, , functions as a key mitigation facility for the hydrological alterations imposed by Trinity Dam and the downstream Lewiston Dam, which together block approximately 109 miles of historical anadromous fish habitat in the upper Trinity River basin. Operational since 1958, prior to the dams' full impoundment in the early 1960s, the hatchery compensates for lost natural production by artificially propagating salmonids whose upstream migration is impeded, thereby aiming to sustain downstream populations and fisheries in the Trinity, systems, and . Adult salmonids returning to the lower Trinity River are trapped and collected at the facility, typically via weirs or pumps integrated with the flow below Lewiston Dam, with spawning occurring from late fall through winter depending on species run timing. Eggs from mature females—averaging yields such as 3,507 eggs per female in documented cycles—are fertilized, incubated in controlled trays to achieve high rates (often exceeding 90% to eyed stage), and hatched are transferred to rearing ponds or raceways fed by chilled to mimic thermal regimes. Juveniles are reared for 6–18 months to the smolt stage, marked for tracking (e.g., via adipose clips or coded-wire tags), and released volitionally through the hatchery ladders or directly into the to promote acclimation and reduce stress-induced mortality, which has historically affected up to one-third of releases within 10 kilometers downstream. The hatchery targets production of spring-run and fall-run (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), federally threatened (O. kisutch), and (O. mykiss), with aggregate annual releases approximating 5 million juveniles to offset dam-related losses and support tribal, recreational, and commercial harvest quotas. Specific outputs include roughly 4.6 million salmon smolts and 450,000 annually, though production is capped at 150,000–500,000 smolts under the NOAA-approved Genetic Management Plan to minimize genetic risks to wild stocks. Releases occur primarily in spring for and smolts, with fry or fingerlings dispersed earlier to tributaries for natural rearing enhancement, as evidenced by collaborative efforts introducing over 100,000 fry to tributaries in 2025. Facility upgrades, funded by $65.9 million from the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law in 2023, address aging infrastructure to boost rearing capacity, improve water quality control, and align with Endangered Species Act biological opinions, ensuring sustained viability for recovering salmonid runs amid ongoing river flow management. These operations are monitored via annual escapement surveys at weirs like those at Junction City and Willow Creek, which track hatchery-origin returns contributing 70–80% of basin adults in some years, informing adaptive adjustments to release strategies.

Restoration and Mitigation Efforts

The Trinity River Restoration Program (TRRP), established in December 2000 through a Record of Decision by the U.S. Department of the Interior, represents the primary coordinated effort to mitigate the environmental impacts of Trinity Dam and the Trinity River Division of the on anadromous fish populations. Administered by the Trinity Management Council—a multi-agency including the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Hoopa Valley Tribe, and California Department of Fish and Wildlife—the program targets restoration of naturally spawning and trout to levels approximating pre-dam abundances, addressing the historical diversion of up to 90% of the river's flow that contributed to a 96% decline in salmon populations. Central to TRRP's strategy is the implementation of environmental flow releases from Lewiston Dam, immediately downstream of Trinity Dam, designed to emulate the pre-dam and support salmonid life stages. These include base flows of 300 cubic feet per second (cfs) from to for overwintering juveniles, test flows up to 15,000 cfs in spring to mobilize sediments and create rearing , and pulse flows in late spring peaking at around 8,000 cfs to scour channels and mimic natural flood events essential for formation. Initiated in 2001, these managed flows have aimed to counteract the river's post-dam transformation into a straightened, armored channel with reduced complexity, though annual adjustments occur based on hydrologic conditions and storage. Physical habitat restoration complements flow management through mechanical interventions along approximately 40 miles of the mainstem Trinity River below Lewiston Dam. Projects involve excavating and reconstructing meanders, creating side channels and alcoves for juvenile rearing, adding large woody to enhance cover and pool depth, and reintroducing to restore spawning riffles, with over 1 million cubic yards of augmented since 2001 to offset upstream trapping by the dam. These efforts, informed by geomorphic modeling and monitoring, seek to increase available salmonid habitat by 30-50% in targeted reaches, as assessed in phase 1 evaluations completed by 2010. Watershed-scale mitigation addresses upstream contributors to habitat degradation, including fine sediment from and that impairs and juvenile survival. TRRP-funded initiatives have decommissioned over 200 miles of abandoned and promoted riparian on tribal and private lands, reducing sediment yields by an estimated 20-40% in sub-basins, thereby supporting downstream fisheries recovery. Additionally, the Trinity River Hatchery, operational since 1958, supplements natural production by releasing up to 1.5 million juvenile and annually to offset the inundation of 109 miles of historical spawning above the dams. Ongoing assessments, including annual flow evaluations and monitoring, guide , with a 2024-2025 review proposing modest increases in spring flows to enhance juvenile emigration amid persistent challenges like drought and ocean conditions. Despite these measures, program evaluations indicate partial success, with populations showing modest rebounds but remaining below recovery targets, attributed in part to constraints on water allocation from Trinity Reservoir.

Controversies and Challenges

Dam Safety and Structural Concerns

![Trinity Dam embankment][float-right] The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) oversees the safety of Trinity Dam through its program, which systematically evaluates structural integrity, hydrologic stability, and seismic resilience to address potential risks. Regular inspections and risk assessments ensure the dam meets performance standards under anticipated loading conditions, including floods and earthquakes. Seismic evaluations identify low to moderate ground shaking as a primary concern, given the dam's location in the with identified nearby faults and unstable rock masses around the reservoir perimeter. Investigations, including those from , have determined seismic activity poses the greatest threat, necessitating ongoing monitoring for potential earthquake-induced landslides or foundation instability. Hydrologic risk assessments reveal that Trinity Dam's spillway capacity is insufficient to pass the probable maximum flood (PMF), a theoretical extreme event, without overtopping, which could lead to erosive failure due to the unarmored face. A 2000 USBR SOD report highlights this as a key vulnerability, prompting operational protocols for controlled releases during high inflow events to mitigate overtopping risks. In response to identified aging infrastructure needs, USBR conducted maintenance in early 2023 to enhance structural integrity, including refurbishment of the Trinity Powerplant intake structure, completed by March 31, 2023, without interrupting normal operations beyond routine releases. No acute structural deficiencies have been reported in recent evaluations, with the earthfill —standing 538 feet high and 2,450 feet long—deemed capable of acceptable performance under static, hydrologic, and seismic loads following these interventions.

Water Allocation Debates

The Trinity River Division Act of 1955 authorized the construction of Trinity Dam as part of the , permitting the diversion of surplus Trinity River water—averaging 704,000 acre-feet annually—to the Basin primarily for irrigation in the and other Central Valley uses. The Act included limitations to protect downstream interests, mandating minimum annual releases of at least 120,000 acre-feet from Trinity Reservoir to sustain fish life and other in-basin needs in the Trinity River. Historically, these diversions captured up to 90% of the river's flow, reducing natural contributions to the system and contributing to declines in anadromous fish populations such as and . In response to ecological degradation, the 2000 Trinity River Mainstem Fishery Restoration Record of Decision (ROD), signed by the Secretary of the Interior, increased dedicated in-basin flows by 25-50%—retaining up to 50% of annual Trinity inflows for restoration—through scheduled releases from , including minimum summer baseflows of 450 cubic feet per second and variable peak flows to mimic natural hydrographs for habitat maintenance. These allocations, managed adaptively under the , aim to restore pre-dam salmonid levels while constraining exports via the , which has a capacity of 3,200 cubic feet per second to . Debates persist over the prioritization of these in-stream flows versus diversions for Central Valley agriculture and urban supply, exacerbated by water rights claims exceeding available supply by a factor of seven, according to a 2012 State Control Board assessment. Environmental advocates, including fishing associations and tribes such as the Hoopa Valley and , argue that Bureau of Reclamation diversions frequently violate Endangered Species Act obligations by elevating water temperatures—projected to reach 58.6°F in critical periods—and causing high juvenile mortality, as seen in 2021 when up to 75% of eggs perished due to lethal conditions. In 2022, the Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen’s Associations threatened litigation, demanding a Trinity-specific biological opinion to halt exports amid low flows, highlighting the absence of updates to the 2000 framework despite changed conditions. Agricultural interests counter that diversions are essential for irrigating over 5,000 acres in Shasta and Tehama Counties and broader CVP beneficiaries, asserting that fish recovery efforts overlook hydrological variability and that prior salmon die-offs, such as 65,000 adults in the Lower in 2002, stemmed from broader ocean and factors rather than Trinity allocations alone. Proposals to reduce summer baseflows, as debated in 2025, have drawn criticism for risking further losses and degradation, while federal operations occasionally release excess beyond ROD maxima to support interests, fueling accusations of inconsistent prioritization. These tensions reflect broader conflicts, where empirical monitoring under informs adjustments but has not resolved competing demands amid drought cycles and over-allocation. The primary legal disputes surrounding Trinity Dam center on conflicts between water diversions for agricultural use via the and requirements for in-stream flows to protect endangered and fulfill tribal reserved water rights under the (ESA) and federal treaties. The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation), which operates the dam, has faced repeated challenges from tribes asserting priority rights to Trinity River water for fisheries essential to their sustenance and culture, predating the 1955 authorizing legislation. These tensions escalated with policy decisions on minimum flow releases from Lewiston Dam, downstream of Trinity Dam, which influence Trinity River hydrology. The Hoopa Valley Tribe has pursued multiple actions alleging Reclamation's diversions violate the ESA by harming threatened through insufficient cold-water releases, as well as breaching tribal water rights reserved under the 1864 Hoopa Valley Treaty. In October 2022, the tribe sued Reclamation, claiming federal water contracts with Central Valley irrigators like Westlands Water District undermine tribal sovereignty by prioritizing agricultural allocations without collecting owed payments or ensuring environmental compliance. In July 2024, Hoopa filed a notice of intent to sue Reclamation and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for diverting over 500,000 acre-feet annually from Trinity Reservoir instead of releasing it for salmon habitat, arguing this contravenes biological opinions mandating protective flows. The Tribe, asserting senior water rights under the 1855 Treaty, has similarly contested low dam releases, filing a November 2024 lawsuit claiming Reclamation's restrictions during dry conditions violate the ESA by increasing mortality from warm temperatures and low oxygen. This action followed inter-tribal friction, with Hoopa criticizing it as a tactic to alter the 2000 Trinity River Record of Decision (ROD), which sets flow criteria for restoration; the suit was voluntarily dismissed in December 2024 after negotiations. In December 2024, escalated by suing over proposed flow modifications, highlighting ongoing debates over ROD implementation amid climate variability. Agricultural interests have countered with suits against flow augmentations, such as Westlands Water District and San Luis Delta-Mendota Water Authority's 2013 challenge to Reclamation's release of 74,000 acre-feet from Lewiston Dam to bolster salmon runs, arguing it violated water law by subordinating project purposes. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the releases in 2017, ruling they did not infringe state anti-exportation doctrines or Reclamation's . In August 2023, a state court invalidated a Trump-era 2020 granting Westlands up to 1 million acre-feet from over 10 years, finding it improperly waived and ignored environmental mandates. Earlier precedents include the 1979 County of Trinity v. Andrus case, where local plaintiffs unsuccessfully argued California law prohibited inter-basin diversions from Trinity to the ; the court deferred to supremacy under the . A 2014 ruling dismissed irrigators' claims against ROD-mandated flows, affirming Reclamation's authority to prioritize fish recovery without breaching water rights. Policy disputes persist over ROD revisions, with 2025 proposals for adjusted releases based on inflow forecasts drawing criticism from stakeholders for potentially favoring either fisheries or irrigation amid declining returns. These cases underscore Reclamation's balancing act under the 1992 Improvement Act, which mandates ecosystem restoration, yet faces accusations of inconsistent enforcement influenced by administrative priorities.

Economic and Societal Impacts

Contributions to Agriculture and Regional Economy

The Trinity River Division of the (CVP), including Trinity Dam completed in 1962, diverts water from the Trinity River basin to augment flows in the , thereby supporting for in the . This diversion, historically reaching up to 90% of the Trinity River's flow, enables reliable water supplies for crop production in an otherwise variable hydrologic regime, transforming marginal lands into productive farmland. Approximately 51% of the water originating in Trinity County is routed southward through hydroelectric facilities before reaching Central Valley agricultural users, facilitating irrigation-dependent farming. The augmented Sacramento River flows contribute to the CVP's overall delivery of more than 7 million acre-feet of annually, a substantial portion of which sustains irrigated across roughly 3 million acres in the Central Valley, including key districts. This supports high-value crops such as , , and , bolstering regional output in an area where generates billions in annual economic value; for the CVP as a whole, and related industry returns have exceeded 100 times the federal investment of $3 billion. By stabilizing availability, the Trinity Division mitigates risks, enhances yields, and underpins employment in farming, processing, and distribution sectors throughout . Hydroelectric generation at Trinity Dam and associated facilities, with a of 100 megawatts at the dam itself, produces that partially subsidizes downstream agricultural deliveries, further amplifying economic benefits to the . This integration of power production and water conveyance has sustained despite environmental and legal constraints on diversions imposed since the 1980s, though actual contributions vary annually based on and policy allocations.

Recreational Use and Tourism

Trinity Lake, formed by the impoundment of the Trinity River behind Trinity Dam, serves as a central hub for water-based and outdoor in . The reservoir, measuring 21 miles long with 145 miles of shoreline, accommodates activities such as power boating, , water skiing, and houseboating across its numerous coves and arms, managed in coordination with the Shasta-Trinity National Forest. Fishing draws significant visitation, with the lake supporting populations of , , , , , , and landlocked in its clear, rocky waters. Anglers access prime spots via shoreline casting or boats launched from marinas like Trinity Lake Resort & Marina, which offers rentals for both day use and extended trips. Camping facilities enhance the area's appeal, including U.S. Forest Service sites such as the vehicle-accessible and the boat-in-only Mariner's Roost with seven sites on the main arm. Private operators, including , provide RV hookups, tent pads, and deluxe cabins near Trinity Center, catering to extended stays amid the forested surroundings. Tourism emphasizes the lake's uncrowded, scenic environment, complementing nearby attractions like the Wilderness for and provisioning stops in Weaverville for expeditions. These opportunities, facilitated by Bureau of Reclamation storage and Forest Service oversight, position Trinity Lake as a key draw for regional outdoor enthusiasts seeking low-density water recreation.

Long-Term Sustainability Assessments

The Trinity River Restoration Program (TRRP), initiated in 2000 through a U.S. Department of the Interior Record of Decision, employs to evaluate and enhance the long-term sustainability of the Trinity River ecosystem downstream of Trinity and Lewiston Dams. This approach integrates monitoring of geomorphic changes, populations, and conditions to adjust restoration actions, including rehabilitation, and augmentation, and variable releases, with the goal of restoring anadromous production to approximate pre-dam levels of 19,000 to 75,500 annual fall-run returns observed in the 1950s. Periodic assessments, such as U.S. Geological Survey evaluations of channel morphology, indicate partial success in creating pools and bars for juvenile rearing, though deficits persist due to upstream trapping by the , limiting complexity. Fish monitoring shows juvenile production roughly doubling over the past two decades compared to pre-restoration baselines, yet returning adults remain below historical abundances, with smaller body sizes and reliance on supplementation signaling incomplete . A 2024 Finding of No Significant Impact for proposed flow adjustments affirmed that refined environmental releases—such as synchronized peak flows and elevated wet-season baseflows—would support ecosystem sustainability without adverse effects, as validated by the Trinity Management Council. Climate change projections exacerbate sustainability risks, with modeling identifying Trinity Dam among California reservoirs facing heightened flood hazard variability from altered precipitation patterns, potentially straining structural integrity and reliability. Adaptive flow strategies aim to mitigate temperature regime shifts—colder summers and warmer winters post-dam—while Bureau of Reclamation reviews of water management plans highlight optimism for balanced allocations amid competing demands from Central Valley and in-river needs. However, Phase 1 efficacy reviews underscore that sustained progress requires ongoing trade-offs, as diversions averaging up to 50% of Trinity River flows to the Sacramento system constrain full .

References

  1. [1]
    Central Valley Project | California-Great Basin - Bureau of Reclamation
    Apr 8, 2024 · Dam and Reservoir, Storage Capacity (acre-feet). Shasta Dam and Reservoir, 4,552,000. Trinity Dam and Reservoir, 2,448,000. Folsom Dam and ...About the CVP · Ratesetting · Laws/Regs/Links · Financial Information<|separator|>
  2. [2]
    Trinity River - Northern California Area Office - Bureau of Reclamation
    Mar 22, 2023 · Completed in 1962, Trinity Dam is an earthfill structure that is 538 feet high with a crest length of 2,450 feet. The dam forms Trinity Lake, ...
  3. [3]
    [PDF] Trinity Dam Operating Criteria Trinity River Division Central Valley ...
    Construction of Trinity Dam began in 1957. The dam was completed and storage of inflow to Clair Engle Lake commenced November 22,. 1960. Construction of ...
  4. [4]
    Trinity Powerplant - Bureau of Reclamation
    Trinity Dam's hydroelectric powerplant began operation in 1964 with a capacity of 100,000 kilowatt (kW) for its two generators. In the mid-1980's Reclamation ...
  5. [5]
    [PDF] Mid-Pacific Region, Trinity River Restoration Program
    1960: Trinity Dam begins managing flow. 1963: Trinity/Lewiston Dams fully completed. 1981: Interior Secretary increased flows and initiated Trinity River Flow ...
  6. [6]
    [PDF] Determination of Controlled-Release Capacity from Trinity Dam
    Abstract. Recent studies of alternatives for restoring anadromous fisheries on the Trinity River have recommended increased releases from Trinity Dam.
  7. [7]
    Trinity Dam - Bureau of Reclamation
    Trinity Dam is founded on the uppermost part of the Copley Greenstone, a mildly metamorphosed volcanic formation of probable Devonian age. Most of the reservoir ...
  8. [8]
    [PDF] CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT DOCUMENTS
    The Trinity development has been under study by various ag~erH:ae:::s, including the State o:f California and the Federal Power Commission, since 1923. It was ...<|separator|>
  9. [9]
    TRRP: What is the TRD? - Trinity River Restoration Program
    In 1949, Reclamation released preliminary plans to develop the Trinity River as part of the Central Valley Project. The TRD was authorized by an act of Congress ...
  10. [10]
    [PDF] 719 Public Law 386 Be it enacted hy the Seriate and House of ...
    Public Law 386 authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to construct the Trinity River division, including a reservoir, to increase water supply for irrigation.Missing: legislation | Show results with:legislation
  11. [11]
    Trinity Dam and Trinity River - Water Education Foundation
    Feb 11, 2014 · The 1955 Trinity River Division Authorization Act required minimum water releases of 120,000 acre-feet to maintain Trinity River salmon and ...Missing: date legislation
  12. [12]
    [PDF] TRINITY RIVER DIVISION
    TRINITY RIVER DIVISION -- CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT. SUMMARY OF PRELI.MINARY DATA. AUGUST 19()5. The Trinity River Diversion Project as recently authorized is a ...
  13. [13]
    [PDF] Trinity Division - Central Valley Project - Bureau of Reclamation
    Bureau of Reclamation, Technical Record of Design and Construction, Trinity River Division Features of the Central Valley Project, California: Trinity Dam and ...
  14. [14]
    [PDF] Trinity Division - Central Valley Project
    The contractor built the crest of Trinity to its ultimate height, and nearly finished the dam by the end of 1960. At the time of final completion in 1961 ...
  15. [15]
    Trinity River Watershed Council
    Construction of Trinity Dam started in 1956 and was completed on December 23, 1963. Loading. Flow Regulation Begins at Trinity Dam. 1960. Natural flows are now ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Trinity Division - Bureau of Reclamation
    Trinity Dam and Reservoir​​ Trinity Dam regulates flows on the Trinity River and stores water for irrigation within Trinity Reservoir. Completed in 1962, it is ...Missing: date | Show results with:date
  17. [17]
    [PDF] How the Trinity River Lost Its Water
    These irrigated lands now pollute the San Joaquin. River and San Francisco Bay because of high levels of selenium and other contaminants that leach from its ...
  18. [18]
    [PDF] Trinity River - State Water Resources Control Board
    of Trinity Dam and the associated features comprising the Trinity River Division, Central Valley Project began in 1955. The project was completed and the ...Missing: date | Show results with:date
  19. [19]
    Location 3203 - Reclamation Information Sharing Environment (RISE)
    Trinity Dam is an earthfill dam on the Trinity River located about 7 miles (11 km) northeast of Weaverville, California. The dam was completed in the early ...
  20. [20]
    Trinity Lake Construction - KrisWeb
    Trinity lake has 16,000 surface acres, 145 miles of shoreline and a drainage area of 692 sq miles. The Trinity dam is a zoned earthfill structure 538 feet high ...
  21. [21]
    [PDF] Determination of Controlled-Release Capacity from Trinity Dam
    Planned releases at Trinity are made through the powerplant, the river outlet works, the auxiliary outlet works, and the uncontrolled morning glory spillway, ...
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Appendix A - Facility Descriptions and Operations
    The dam was completed in 1962, forming. Trinity Lake, which has a maximum storage capacity of approximately 2.4 MAF. Water is diverted from the Trinity River ...
  23. [23]
    [PDF] Environmental Assessment - Bureau of Reclamation
    Jul 6, 2021 · Trinity Lake storage varies according to upstream hydrology, downstream water demands, and instream flow requirements. Lewiston Reservoir is a ...Missing: characteristics | Show results with:characteristics
  24. [24]
    Trinity Lake, Trinity River, and Trinity Alps Wilderness | Forest Service
    May 27, 2025 · Trinity Lake, when full, has 145 miles of shoreline, contains 17000 surface acres and holds 2500000 acre-feet of water. Trinity Lake Dam is ...Missing: initial filling<|separator|>
  25. [25]
    Shasta-Trinity National Forest - Trinity Lake - USDA Forest Service
    When full, it has a 145-mile shoreline and is 19 miles long. The Stuart Fork ... The Main Arm of the lake stretches from teh dam north for about 19 miles.
  26. [26]
    Trinity Lake - California's Greatest Lakes
    Lake Size: 17,280 surface acres ; Maximum Depth: 416 feet ; Length: 19 miles ; Shoreline: 145 miles ; Dam Construction: 1957-1961.
  27. [27]
    20210701 WTMP MTC01 Presentation
    • Surface area at maximum storage: 30,000 acres ... • Trinity Lake and Lewiston Lake: Trinity Camp (A) ... • High-Resolution Reservoir Model: CE-QUAL-W2 model of ...Missing: characteristics | Show results with:characteristics
  28. [28]
    [PDF] Water Temperature Management in Reservoir-River Systems ...
    Reservoirs with selective withdrawal capabilities are able to blend water from different depths and temperatures to achieve targeted downstream river.
  29. [29]
    [PDF] Midnight Reservoir Elevation And Flows
    Trinity (Storage Capacity 2,448,000 Acre-Feet at Elevation 2370.00). Storage (Acre-Feet):. 1,741,300. Elevation (Feet):. 2,322.27. Inflow (CFS)(Daily Avg):. 976.Missing: Dam specifications volume
  30. [30]
    Schematic of spillways and outlet facilities at Trinity Dam (Wahl and...
    ... outlet works branch is an 11-ft diameter conduit that bifurcates into a pair of 7-ft diameter conduits, each leading to an 84-inch ring-follower gate and an ...
  31. [31]
    Trinity Dam construction and issues in California - Facebook
    Apr 17, 2024 · Here is a good photo of Trinity Dam from the upstream side prior to filling. The glory hole spillway is the tiny circle in the upper left.Trinity Dam Safety of Dams Report and Flood Risk - FacebookTrinity Dam SOD Release and Emergency Spillway ConcernsMore results from www.facebook.com
  32. [32]
    Power plant profile: Trinity, US
    Oct 21, 2024 · The hydro power project consists of 2 turbines, each with 70MW nameplate capacity. Development status. The project got commissioned in 1962 ...Missing: Dam specifications
  33. [33]
    [PDF] Mid-Pacific Region - Trinity Division, Central Valley Project
    In the mid-1980's Reclamation uprated both generators by 20,000 kW by using advancements in high voltage technology bringing the current total capacity to 140, ...
  34. [34]
    [PDF] Chapter 21, Energy - State Water Resources Control Board
    Jan 22, 2007 · The energy generation factor is about 543 kWh/af with an efficiency of 85%. ... The average annual Trinity Powerplant energy generation was 415 ...
  35. [35]
    [PDF] cvp-hydropower-production.pdf - Bureau of Reclamation
    The CVP has 11 plants with a max 2,100 MW capacity, typically producing 4,500,000 MWh in an average year, with 5,567,688 MWh in 2011.<|separator|>
  36. [36]
    TRRP: Record of Decision (ROD) - Trinity River Restoration Program
    Initial plans to divert Trinity River water to the Sacramento River were included in the California State Water Plan in the 1930s, but later dropped.
  37. [37]
    [PDF] Central Valley Project Final Cost Allocation Study
    The breakdown of construction costs allocated across reimbursable sub-purposes is shown Table ES-3.
  38. [38]
    TRRP: Flow FAQ - Trinity River Restoration Program
    Maintaining storage space is a very important aspect of flood control operations, and is fundamental in protecting areas downstream of Trinity Dam, as well ...
  39. [39]
    [PDF] Assessing Geomorphic Change along the Trinity River Downstream ...
    The reservoir behind Trinity Dam began filling in 1960, and Lewiston Dam was completed in 1963. Following closure of the Trinity. Dam, annual water diversions ...
  40. [40]
    Trinity River Restoration Program | U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
    The TMC established the Trinity River Restoration Program (TRRP) in 2000 to restore naturally-spawning salmon and steelhead populations to pre-dam levels.
  41. [41]
    [PDF] the effects of scour and marginal inundation on trinity river
    A 1980 EIS estimated the loss of 80-90% of total anadromous fishery habitats by blocking passage above the dams, and a 60-80% decline in anadromous fish ...
  42. [42]
    Undoing Decades of Environmental Harm on a California River
    Dec 11, 2023 · ” By 1963 two dams had been built and the Trinity River Diversion began transferring water to the Sacramento River watershed. The dams ...
  43. [43]
    TRRP: Environmental Flows - Trinity River Restoration Program
    TRRP works to restore the processes and attributes of an ecologically functioning river system, which should, in turn, recover diminished salmon and steelhead ...
  44. [44]
    [PDF] Finding of No Significant Impact - BLM National NEPA Register
    Flow Management. Flow management in the Trinity River, including flow diversion into the Sacramento River basin, limits aquatic habitat-forming hydraulic ...
  45. [45]
    [PDF] TRRP Restoration Activities - the NOAA Institutional Repository
    Aug 21, 2020 · The purpose of the. TRRP is to mitigate impacts of the Trinity River Division of the Central Valley Project (CVP) on anadromous fish populations ...
  46. [46]
    [PDF] The Influence of Lewiston Dam Releases on Water Temperatures of ...
    Contributions of flow from Lewiston Dam to the lower Trinity River and Klamath River ... Temperature Effects on Chinook Salmon and. Steelhead: a Review ...<|separator|>
  47. [47]
    [PDF] Draft Long-Term Plan for Protecting Late Summer Adult Salmon in ...
    Lewiston dams on the Trinity River as well as Iron Gate Dam on the mainstem Klamath River. Creation of these dams degraded habitat below Lewiston Dam and ...
  48. [48]
    [PDF] review of the trinity river restoration program following phase 1, with ...
    mitigate the downstream effects of the Trinity and Lewiston Dams on naturally spawning salmon. Such projects were identified and recommended in the ...
  49. [49]
  50. [50]
    [PDF] Trinity River Coho Salmon HGMP Final Environmental Assessment
    Sep 1, 2020 · Trinity River Hatchery (TRH) began production of salmon and steelhead in 1958 to mitigate for the loss of 109 miles of anadromous fish ...
  51. [51]
    Featured Article – June 2023 - Trinity River Restoration Program
    The Trinity River Hatchery produces spring run Chinook Salmon, fall run Chinook Salmon, steelhead, and the federally threatened Coho Salmon. These species are ...
  52. [52]
    [PDF] Juvenile Salmonid Emigration Monitoring on the Mainstem Trinity ...
    Hatchery-reared steelhead and coho salmon are typically volitionally released as smolts or yearling-plus (age-1) in early spring. Chinook salmon. All collected ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  53. [53]
    [PDF] Trinity River Salmon and Steelhead Hatchery
    The 315 females that were spawned produced 1,105,000 eggs, for an average of 3,507 per female. Average egg size was 205 per ounce. c. Marked Steelhead Returns.
  54. [54]
    TRRP: Adult Salmonids - Trinity River Restoration Program
    Chinook salmon, coho salmon, and adult fall-run steelhead are made annually above two mainstem Trinity River weir sites at Junction City and Willow Creek.Missing: operations | Show results with:operations
  55. [55]
    California to Close Mad River Fish Hatchery After 50+ Years Amid ...
    May 4, 2025 · ... Trinity River Hatchery, which produces 4.6 million salmon and 450,000 steelhead each year. CDFW officials also cited structural flaws in the ...
  56. [56]
    [PDF] the Hatchery and Genetic Management Plan (HGMP) for Trinity ...
    Sep 24, 2020 · The proposed action would result in a range of coho salmon smolt production from 150,000 to 500,000, which may help to increase the natural ...
  57. [57]
    Yurok Tribe - Facebook
    Mar 26, 2025 · In addition to coho, the hatchery has already spawned 100 Chinook salmon this season, collecting over 277,000 eggs, with a goal of producing ...Missing: operations | Show results with:operations<|separator|>
  58. [58]
    Huffman Announces $65.9 Million for Trinity River Hatchery Upgrades
    Apr 5, 2023 · The recovery of threatened Coho and Chinook salmon depends on the work the Trinity River Hatchery is doing, and it's important the facility can ...
  59. [59]
    [PDF] - 1 - ANNUAL REPORT TRINITY RIVER BASIN SALMON AND ...
    An estimated 19,058 (4,650 naturally produced and 14,408 hatchery produced) adult fall run steelhead entered the Trinity River basin upstream of Willow Creek ...
  60. [60]
    [PDF] Mainstem Trinity River Chinook Salmon Spawning Survey, 2019
    We define 'hatchery-origin' as fish produced and released from Trinity River Hatchery (TRH), and 'natural-origin' as fish that emerge from a redd, regardless of ...
  61. [61]
    Trinity River Restoration Program
    TRRP is a multi-agency program with eight Partners forming the Trinity Management Council (TMC), plus numerous other collaborators.Water Year 2025 – Current Flow · Foundational Documents · Restoration · Flow FAQ
  62. [62]
    [PDF] Trinity River Restoration Program - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
    At one point, up to 90% of the flow was diverted to the Central Valley. Dramatic changes in flow and available habitat led to a 96% decrease in salmon.
  63. [63]
    The Trinity River: Lessons in Restoration - The Revelator
    Jul 15, 2025 · In 2024 the conservation organization American Rivers included the Trinity River in its list of most endangered rivers due to “outdated water ...Missing: significance | Show results with:significance
  64. [64]
    TRRP - Trinity River Restoration Program
    TRRP's mission is to allow nature a chance to heal itself. Our primary method is through returning more flows to the river.
  65. [65]
    TRRP: Watershed Activities - Trinity River Restoration Program
    By improving land use practices and removing unused logging roads, fine sediment supply to the Trinity River decreases, which increases salmon and steelhead ...Missing: mitigation | Show results with:mitigation<|separator|>
  66. [66]
    [PDF] Trinity River Coho Salmon HGMP Final Environmental Assessment
    Trinity River Hatchery (TRH) began production of salmon and steelhead in 1958 to mitigate for the loss of 109 miles of anadromous fish habitat upstream of the.
  67. [67]
    Trinity River Restoration - California Trout
    Hatchery influences are especially apparent to for anadromous species where dams blocked access to spawning habitat and hatcheries were established as ...
  68. [68]
    Dam Safety - Bureau of Reclamation
    Jun 20, 2025 · The Safety of Dams (SOD) program focuses on evaluating and implementing actions to resolve safety concerns at Reclamation dams.Missing: Trinity | Show results with:Trinity
  69. [69]
    Reclamation refurbishes intake structure at Trinity Powerplant
    Mar 22, 2023 · The dam maintenance project is expected by be complete by March 31. Contact Public Affairs Office at mppublicaffairs@usbr.gov or 916-978-5100 ...
  70. [70]
    Despite public concerns Trinity Dam releases are normal, Bureau of ...
    Mar 22, 2023 · These water releases are part of the normal procedure and not a part of the ongoing maintenance project designed to enhance dam integrity.
  71. [71]
    [PDF] LAND-290 - State Water Resources Control Board
    Mar 27, 2018 · Under the plan of development and operation an average of 704,000 acre-feet of Trinity River water would be diverted annually to the. Sacramento ...
  72. [72]
    News Archive: RECLAMATION ANNOUNCES TRINITY RIVER ...
    The Trinity River Mainstem Fishery Restoration Record of Decision (ROD), signed December 19, 2000, would have increased flows down the Trinity River by 25 ...
  73. [73]
    Water's for Fighting - North Coast Journal
    Sep 19, 2013 · Water rights claims for the Trinity River are nearly seven times the amount of available water supply, according to a 2012 report by the ...
  74. [74]
    Fishermen threaten to sue Bureau of Reclamation over Trinity River ...
    May 21, 2022 · The amount of water the bureau is diverting from the Trinity River to the Central Valley Project has decimated the river's salmon ...Missing: disputes | Show results with:disputes
  75. [75]
    Trinity lawsuit not about fish - California Farm Water Coalition
    Reclamation knew earlier this year that a large number of returning salmon were likely to swim up the Klamath River and could have preserved the needed water.
  76. [76]
    Trinity River summer flow cuts ill-advised
    Feb 14, 2025 · The 1955 Trinity River Act that authorized construction of Trinity and Lewiston dams required summer low flows of 150 cfs. That requirement ...Missing: date | Show results with:date<|separator|>
  77. [77]
    Low Dam Releases Harm Coho Salmon, Tribe Says in New Lawsuit
    Nov 21, 2024 · Restricted dam releases violate the Endangered Species Act's prohibition against taking threatened coho salmon in the Trinity River in ...Missing: disputes | Show results with:disputes
  78. [78]
    Hoopa Valley Tribe sues US over California water contracts - AP News
    Oct 31, 2022 · The Hoopa Valley Tribe alleged in a lawsuit Monday that the federal government is violating its sovereignty and failing to collect money from California farms.
  79. [79]
    Hoopa Valley Tribe files intent to sue feds over Trinity River water ...
    Jul 26, 2024 · The Hoopa Valley Tribe filed an intent to sue the US Bureau of Reclamation and Department of Fish and Wildlife, accusing them of violating the Endangered ...
  80. [80]
    Tribal Water Dispute Escalates as Yurok Tribe Files Suit Over Trinity ...
    Dec 4, 2024 · In court documents, Hoopa officials argue that modifying the carefully calibrated ROD flows could harm fish populations and impair tribal ...
  81. [81]
    Yurok Tribe Ends Suit Over Low Dam Release Impact on Coho ...
    Dec 13, 2024 · The Yurok Tribe voluntarily dismissed its suit against the US Bureau of Reclamation claiming that restricted dam releases violate the ...
  82. [82]
    [PDF] U.S. Court of Appeal
    Feb 21, 2017 · In late summer 2013, the Bureau of Reclamation (“BOR”) released Trinity River water from the Lewiston Dam, above and beyond the amount ...Missing: lawsuits | Show results with:lawsuits
  83. [83]
    State court blocks Trump federal contract with Westlands Water ...
    Aug 12, 2023 · “The court's ruling at last exposes how the Trump Administration was complicit in signing a water contract that failed to collect Westlands debt ...
  84. [84]
    County of Trinity v. Andrus - Environmental Law Reporter
    The court rejects plaintiffs' argument that California law bars the diversion of water from the Trinity River division into another watershed, finding that ...Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
  85. [85]
    Judge Rejects Agribusiness' Water-Grabbing Lawsuit over Trinity ...
    Oct 1, 2014 · After an evidentiary hearing in August 2013, Judge O'Neill rejected the irrigators' request to block the flow program. Judge O'Neill rejected a ...Missing: disputes | Show results with:disputes<|separator|>
  86. [86]
    2025 Recommended Changes to Trinity River Environmental Flow
    Nov 25, 2024 · Without ample Trinity River water, we will see terrible salmon mortality in the Lower Klamath – as we did in 2002, when 65,000 adult salmon ...Trinity Dam Safety of Dams Report and Flood Risk - FacebookTrinity Dam Water Release and Potential Failure in CaliforniaMore results from www.facebook.com
  87. [87]
    [PDF] Judge Rejects Agribusiness' Water-Grabbing Lawsuit over Trinity ...
    A federal judge dismissed almost all claims in a lawsuit brought by a coalition of agribusiness and irrigators seeking to prevent the protection of salmon ...
  88. [88]
    Trinity PUD Trinity Dam Renewable Energy, Hydroelectricity
    The water goes through the turbines at the Trinity Dam, and then it goes through the tunnel to Carr Powerhouse at Whiskeytown Lake. From there it goes through ...
  89. [89]
    Central Valley Project: Issues and Legislation - Congress.gov
    The Trinity Division primarily consists of two dams (Trinity and Lewiston Dams), related power facilities, and a series of tunnels (including the 10.7-mile ...
  90. [90]
    About the CVP| California-Great Basin - Bureau of Reclamation
    Aug 24, 2022 · Thus, hundreds of thousands of acres developed for irrigation in the ... Trinity River Division was authorized by Public Law 386, 84th ...
  91. [91]
    [PDF] TRINITY RIVER DIVISION
    Its operations call for release of water into the river downstream to help sustain the great salmon and steelhead fisheries of the Trinity. A fish hatchery.Missing: initial | Show results with:initial
  92. [92]
    [PDF] trinity county forest ecology - North Coast Resource Partnership
    The subsidies provided to WWD represent complexities in the process by which the true economic benefits of Trinity River water to agricultural production are.
  93. [93]
    Trinity Lake - UpState CA
    21 miles long and 145 miles of shoreline makes Trinity Lake the third largest lake in California. Trinity Lake remains uncrowded, even in the peak summer ...Missing: tourism statistics
  94. [94]
    Trinity Lake/Lewiston Lake Campgrounds | shastacascade.com
    Description: Trinity and Lewiston Lakes is where water oriented sports such as fishing, water-skiing and houseboating dominate the recreation spotlight.
  95. [95]
    Trinity Lake Resort & Marina | Shasta Trinity National Forest
    Trinity Lake is encompassed by miles of tree-lined shores to explore and countless secluded coves, perfect for claiming as your own houseboat rental base camp.59' Deluxe Houseboat · Trinity Lake Marina · Trinity Cabin FAQs · Boat Rentals
  96. [96]
    Trinity Lake - Fish Reports & Map
    Its clear, rocky waters support thriving populations of smallmouth and largemouth bass, rainbow and brown trout, kokanee salmon, catfish, and landlocked Chinook ...
  97. [97]
    What Types of Fish Are in Trinity Lake, and Where Should You Be ...
    Jan 13, 2020 · The lake will come alive with native rainbow trout, brown trout, kokanee salmon, smallmouth and largemouth bass and catfish.
  98. [98]
    Tannery, Shasta-Trinity National Forest - Recreation.gov
    Rating 4.0 (81) Popular activities on Trinity Lake include power and non-motorized boating, fishing, sailing and water skiing. Anglers can cast for catfish, as well as a ...
  99. [99]
    Alpine View Campground, Shasta-Trinity National Forest
    Rating 3.9 (27) The area offers excellent opportunities for fishing, boating and hiking around Trinity Lake. The campground is very popular with the boating public, as the ...
  100. [100]
    Shasta-Trinity National Forest | Mariner's Roost Boat-In Campground
    Aug 6, 2025 · Mariner's Roost is a boat access only campground located on the main arm of Trinity Lake. The campground offers 7 campsites.
  101. [101]
    Trinity Center, California Campground | Trinity Lake KOA Holiday
    Rating 4.5 (1,000) Join us for incredible fishing, hiking and campfires under the stars. The Trinity Lake KOA Holiday offers RV, Tent, and Deluxe Cabin camping. Our Cabin Rentals ...Book Now · Lodging · Info · Photos
  102. [102]
    [PDF] TRINITY COUNTY2019˨20
    Visitors often use Weaverville as a place to gather provisions for fishing, hunting, hiking, kayaking and camping expeditions into the. Trinity Alps Wilderness, ...<|separator|>
  103. [103]
    Assessing geomorphic change along the Trinity River downstream ...
    The Trinity River Restoration Program, one of the nation's largest adaptively managed river restoration programs, requires periodic assessment to determine ...
  104. [104]
    Sedimentation and Wood Augmentation Project - TRRP
    The TRRP project involves adding varying sizes of sediment and wood to the Trinity River, creating bars and pools, and providing juvenile rearing habitat.Missing: sustainability | Show results with:sustainability
  105. [105]
    Climate‐Induced Changes in the Risk of Hydrological Failure of ...
    Feb 5, 2019 · Our results demonstrate that the New Don Pedro, Shasta, Lewiston, and Trinity Dams are associated with highest potential changes in flood hazard ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  106. [106]
    Trinity River water management plan receives positive feedback ...
    Sep 18, 2025 · As these plans move forward, stakeholders are optimistic about the potential benefits for local ecosystems and the long-term sustainability of ...