Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Wilmès II Government

The Wilmès II Government was a minority led by Prime Minister from 17 March 2020 to 1 October 2020. It was formed as an emergency administration in response to the emerging , inheriting the same of ministers from the preceding Wilmès I , which included parties such as the (MR), (Open Vld), and (CD&V). The government received cross-party support from nine political formations, enabling Parliament to grant it special powers for three months to enact restrictions, including nationwide lockdowns and closures, alongside substantial economic aid packages to mitigate the crisis's impacts. Despite operating without a stable majority amid Belgium's ongoing political following the 2019 elections—which had left the country without a full for over 500 days—the Wilmès II focused primarily on . Its tenure was marked by the implementation of stringent containment measures that temporarily curbed virus spread but coincided with one of Europe's highest per capita mortality rates, particularly in residential care facilities where systemic vulnerabilities contributed to thousands of deaths. The 's special powers were extended briefly before its replacement by the De Croo I Government, ending the extended caretaker period and ushering in a new coalition.

Background and Formation

Preceding Political Deadlock

The Belgian federal elections of 26 May 2019 produced a highly fragmented Chamber of Representatives, with the (N-VA) securing 24.2% of the vote in to become the largest party overall, while the French-speaking (PS) dominated with similar strength but refused coalitions involving nationalists. This outcome exacerbated longstanding linguistic and ideological cleavages, as parties prioritized fiscal restraint, migration controls, and further devolution of powers, clashing irreconcilably with parties' demands for higher public spending and opposition to perceived dominance in federal structures. King Philippe initiated consultations immediately after the elections, appointing Liberal as informateur on 3 July 2019 to explore viable majorities, followed by leader on 7 October 2019, whose efforts collapsed amid mutual recriminations over economic policy and the exclusion of , which had surged to 18.6% in but faced a bipartisan cordon sanitaire. No cross-community coalition proved feasible, as arithmetic majorities required bridging the Flemish-Walloon divide without incorporating extremes, a configuration rejected by both sides' core demands. By late October 2019, the protracted —marking over nine months since the prior Michel II government's on 31 December 2018—necessitated a minority caretaker administration under , sworn in on 27 October with support only from four liberal and center-right parties holding 44 of 150 seats. This Wilmès I government operated in a constitutional vacuum, with routine decisions devolved to civil servants and the ongoing deadlock preventing budget approval or structural reforms, a pattern rooted in Belgium's consociational that amplifies points across linguistic communities. The impasse endured into early 2020, with failed preformation attempts by figures like Koen Geens (CD&V) in January, leaving Belgium without a fully empowered executive as the COVID-19 crisis emerged, prompting parliamentary extension of the caretaker's mandate on 17 March 2020 to enable emergency governance. This reflected not mere negotiation fatigue but structural incentives in Belgium's divided polity, where regional electoral divergences—Flanders tilting rightward, Wallonia leftward—systematically hinder national consensus without territorial concessions unacceptable to losers.

Establishment and Confidence Vote

The Wilmès II Government was established on 17 March 2020, when the cabinet—identical in composition to the preceding , comprising ministers primarily from the Open VLD, , and CD&V parties—took the oath as a . This formation occurred against the backdrop of the intensifying and Belgium's ongoing political impasse since the May 2019 federal elections, which had prevented the establishment of a new coalition. The transition elevated from to head of a functioning , enabling decisive action on the crisis without resolving underlying partisan divides. On 19 March 2020, the Belgian House of Representatives conducted a vote of confidence in the Wilmès II Government, which passed with the support of nine political parties, including several opposition groups such as PS, sp.a, Ecolo, Groen, and DéFI. This resulted in 152 votes in favor out of 150 required for a majority, with abstentions from N-VA and PTB/PVDA, providing the government a broad but temporary parliamentary mandate despite its minority status of 44 seats. The confidence was explicitly linked to the government's agenda for managing the pandemic, with parties agreeing to reevaluate support after the initial crisis phase, reflecting a pragmatic cross-party consensus driven by the emergency rather than ideological alignment.

Granting of Special Powers

On 27 March 2020, the Belgian Parliament adopted two special powers laws that delegated extensive legislative authority to the Wilmès II Government to address the escalating COVID-19 crisis. These laws empowered the executive—formally the King acting on government advice—to enact royal decrees on matters including public health protection, economic stabilization, social welfare adjustments, and civil security, bypassing the standard parliamentary process for urgency. The delegation was limited to three months, expiring on 27 June 2020, and required decrees to be submitted to Parliament for retrospective review within one week of issuance. The legislative action stemmed from a cross-party agreement reached on 21 March 2020 among representatives of ten major political formations, spanning and Francophone groups, which facilitated unanimous parliamentary support despite the government's minority composition. This broad consensus was necessitated by the protracted political deadlock preceding the government's formation on 17 March 2020, enabling swift crisis response amid rising infections— reported over 8,000 cases by late March. The special powers built on an initial confidence vote secured by Prime Minister earlier that month, which had already implicitly endorsed enhanced executive flexibility for pandemic management. These powers facilitated over 100 royal decrees, covering lockdowns, resource allocation, and fiscal interventions like deferred tax payments and liquidity support, with the government issuing the first such decree on 7 April 2020. Parliamentary oversight mechanisms included mandatory reporting and the potential for revocation, though no major revocations occurred during the initial term; the framework emphasized proportionality and alignment with constitutional limits, as reviewed by the for select measures. Critics, including some constitutional scholars, noted risks of executive overreach in delegating core legislative functions, but the context and temporary nature mitigated formal challenges.

Government Composition and Support

Cabinet Structure and Key Ministers

The Wilmès II Government was a minority comprising 13 ministers, including the , from four centre-right parties: the French-speaking Mouvement Réformateur (), the Flemish Christen-Democratisch en Vlaams (CD&V), the Flemish Open Vlaamse Liberalen en Democraten (Open Vld), and the Flemish Nieuw-Vlaamse Alliantie (N-VA). It maintained the identical composition and portfolio distribution of the preceding Wilmès I Government, which transitioned into this form on 17 March 2020 after Parliament granted it special powers to manage the crisis. The structure adhered to Belgium's constitutional requirement for linguistic balance in the , though the caretaker status allowed continuity from the Michel II configuration with assuming the premiership. Sophie Wilmès (MR) served as Prime Minister, also responsible for Beliris federal development projects and federal cultural institutions. Seven vice-prime ministers oversaw key portfolios: Koen Geens (CD&V) for Justice and the Buildings Agency; (Open Vld) for Interior and Security; (MR) for Foreign Affairs, European Affairs, and adjunct trade responsibilities; Valérie De Bue (MR) for Middle Classes, SMEs, Self-Employed, Agriculture, and ; Philippe De Backer (Open Vld) for Development Cooperation; (N-VA) for Security and Interior with Asylum and Migration; and David Clarinval (MR) for and . Other ministers included (Open Vld), who handled Health, Social Integration, Asylum, and Migration—critical during the pandemic response; Pieter De Crem (CD&V) for Defence; (N-VA) for Environment, Energy, Sustainable Mobility, and adjunct trade; Sven Gatz (Open Vld) for Budget, Pensions, and the Buildings Agency; and (Open Vld) for Justice and the . The cabinet's ministers outnumbered Francophone ones (nine to four, including the ), reflecting the participating parties' linguistic distributions in this interim arrangement.
PositionMinisterPartyLinguistic Group
Prime Minister, Beliris and Federal Cultural InstitutionsMRFrancophone
Vice-PM, Justice, Buildings AgencyKoen GeensCD&V
Vice-PM, Interior and SecurityOpen Vld
Vice-PM, Foreign and European Affairs, Adjunct TradeMRFrancophone
Vice-PM, Middle Classes, SMEs, Self-Employed, Agriculture, Valérie De BueMRFrancophone
Vice-PM, CooperationPhilippe De BackerOpen Vld
Vice-PM, Security and Interior, Asylum and MigrationN-VA
Public Service, David ClarinvalMRFrancophone
Health, Social Integration, Asylum and MigrationOpen Vld
DefencePieter De CremCD&V
Environment, Energy, Sustainable Mobility, Adjunct TradeN-VA
Budget, Pensions, Buildings AgencySven GatzOpen Vld
Justice, Open Vld
This table enumerates the full ministerial roster, emphasizing the government's operational focus on crisis management without secretariats in the core Council. Key figures like De Block and De Croo played pivotal roles in health and security coordination, respectively, amid the extraordinary powers vested on 17 March 2020.

Parliamentary Minority Dynamics

The Wilmès II Government operated as a minority cabinet in the Belgian Chamber of Representatives, controlling 38 of the 150 seats through its coalition of the Reformist Movement (MR), Open Flemish Liberals and Democrats (Open Vld), and Christian Democratic and Flemish (CD&V) parties. This limited parliamentary base necessitated reliance on external support to secure legislative approval, particularly for emergency measures amid the COVID-19 crisis. Following its swearing-in on March 17, 2020, the government obtained a vote of confidence on March 19, 2020, passing with a large majority in the Chamber due to backing from nine parties, including the Flemish and Francophone socialists (sp.a and PS) and greens (Groen and Ecolo). Opposition came primarily from the New Flemish Alliance (N-VA), Vlaams Belang, and the Humanist Democratic Centre (cdH), which abstained or voted against, highlighting linguistic and ideological divides. This cross-party endorsement formed a temporary "health coalition" involving seven additional parties beyond the governing trio, enabling the passage of special powers legislation that delegated broad decree authority to the executive for six months. The arrangement reflected crisis-driven pragmatism, suspending typical coalition bargaining in favor of ad-hoc majorities, though it exposed vulnerabilities: the government's minority status amplified Flemish-French tensions, with N-VA critiquing perceived centralization of powers. Special powers were initially supported near-unanimously by all ten parliamentary groups, but sustaining governance required ongoing negotiations. By mid-2020, as the initial mandate neared expiration in June, parliamentary dynamics shifted toward extensions amid stalled full . In September 2020, the supporting seven parties renewed confidence in the cabinet until October 1, averting collapse after Vlaams Belang's no-confidence motion failed due to lack of backing. This pattern underscored the government's dependence on opposition tolerance rather than inherent majority control, fostering legislative efficiency during the emergency but postponing structural reforms until the De Croo I Government's formation in October 2020. The minority setup, while effective for urgent decrees, intensified debates over democratic accountability, with critics arguing it blurred lines between caretaker and full executive authority.

Policy Implementation During Crisis

COVID-19 Health Measures

On 12 March 2020, the Belgian federal government under Prime Minister introduced initial restrictions to curb transmission, including the closure of schools, universities, cafés, restaurants, and leisure centers; a ban on gatherings of more than 1,000 people; and a recommendation for teleworking where possible. These measures followed the detection of community transmission and aimed to reduce contact rates amid rising cases. The Wilmès II Government, sworn in on 17 March 2020 with special powers granted by parliament on 27 March, escalated to a full national announced by Wilmès on 18 March, effective immediately until 5 April (later extended). Under the , non-essential was prohibited, with citizens required to stay home except for essential activities such as grocery shopping, medical visits, or brief outdoor exercise; non-essential retail, including clothing and electronics stores, was shuttered, while supermarkets, pharmacies, and food services for takeaway remained open. Borders closed to non-essential on 20 March, though freight and essential worker movement continued. Health protocols emphasized measures, including frequent handwashing, respiratory , and a minimum 1.5-meter rule enforced nationwide. and testing expanded via the federal service, with Sciensano coordinating surveillance; by late March, daily testing capacity reached several thousand, prioritizing symptomatic cases and healthcare workers. Hospitals activated plans, postponing non-urgent procedures to preserve ICU beds, which peaked at over 2,000 patients in April. Easing began in phases from 13 April, reopening parks and individual sports while maintaining bans on group activities and indoor hospitality; a mandatory face rule for followed on 11 May. In response to a second wave, stricter measures returned in October 2020, including a 10 p.m. from 30 October, of non-essential shops, and limits on events, coordinated through the . These policies relied on federal-regional consultation, though enforcement varied by community due to Belgium's decentralized health competencies.

Economic Support Initiatives

The Wilmès II Government introduced a simplified temporary unemployment scheme due to force majeure caused by COVID-19, effective from March 13, 2020, which allowed employers to suspend contracts without standard administrative hurdles, with the state covering unemployment benefits at approximately 70% of previous remuneration (subject to caps). This measure was retroactively applicable from October 1, 2020, for certain cases and included provisions for alternating work and unemployment days, aiming to preserve employment amid lockdowns. The scheme was extended through multiple phases, transitioning partially to economic unemployment rules by September 2020 for non-crisis sectors while retaining flexibility for heavily impacted branches. On March 6, 2020, the approved 10 initial measures to support businesses, self-employed individuals, and employees, including deferrals of , , and social security contributions to ease liquidity pressures. These were part of the broader Federal Plan for Social and Economic Protection, with subsequent activations on March 20 and June 13, 2020, extending bridging allowances for self-employed workers until at least August 2020 (potentially December) and providing grants for independent workers facing turnover declines. The plan also incorporated state guarantees for short-term bank credits and investment incentives, such as a temporary tax shelter regime to encourage corporate investments. Fiscal stimulus efforts included an initial €1 billion supplementary budget approved by the on March 19, 2020, to fund crisis-related expenditures, complemented by EU-approved state aids targeting sectors like and events with turnover drops exceeding specified thresholds. By May 20, 2020, parliament enacted additional fiscal revival measures, focusing on post-lockdown recovery while coordinating with regional authorities to mitigate economic contraction estimated at double digits for 2020. These initiatives contributed to Belgium's economic resilience, as noted in later evaluations, though they relied on cross-party support in the context.

Coordination with Regional Governments

In Belgium's federal system, policy falls under regional and community competencies, requiring the Wilmès II Government to coordinate closely with the Flemish, Walloon, and -Capital Region executives during the crisis to implement cohesive measures. The primary forum for this was the (NSC), which convened federal Prime Minister , key ministers, and regional minister-presidents—Jan Jambon (), Elio Di Rupo (), and Rudi Vervoort ()—to deliberate and decide on restrictions applicable nationwide. This body met frequently from March 2020 onward, enabling joint announcements despite the federal minority government's limited parliamentary base. Early NSC decisions under Wilmès II set the tone for unified action: on 12 March 2020, it approved closures of schools, universities, cafés, and non-essential retail starting 16 March, alongside bans on mass gatherings exceeding 1,000 people. The 17 March meeting escalated to a full , confining non-essential movement and halting non-urgent activities until at least 5 April, with regions tasked for enforcement and . Later sessions, such as on 27 July and 20 August 2020, adjusted exit strategies, including mandatory mask use in and risk-based quarantines, reflecting epidemiological data shared across levels. The 1 April 2020 granting of special powers to the federal executive streamlined decree issuance for economic and health responses, yet regional buy-in remained essential, with and aligning on federal testing targets while adding localized incentives like business subsidies. Coordination challenges persisted, including delays in unified communication and divergences in reopening timelines—such as ' earlier push for school restarts—stemming from Belgium's and partisan divides between regional nationalists and federal liberals. By October 2020, the NSC's role diminished in favor of the Consultative Committee, amplifying regional input amid second-wave pressures and highlighting ongoing frictions in .

Outcomes and Evaluations

Public Health Results

Belgium recorded 19,720 confirmed COVID-19 deaths in 2020, with the majority occurring during the Wilmès II Government's tenure from March to October, aligning closely with an estimated excess mortality of 18,765 deaths for the full year, primarily attributable to the pandemic and a late-summer heat wave. This excess figure, calculated via the Be-MOMO model comparing observed deaths to historical baselines, indicates that reported COVID fatalities captured most non-seasonal increases without substantial undercounting. Per capita, Belgium's COVID-19 mortality rate reached approximately 1,675 deaths per million inhabitants in 2020, placing it among Europe's highest, exceeding neighbors like Germany (around 1,000 per million) but comparable to the Netherlands and higher than Scandinavian countries with stricter early border controls. A significant portion of deaths—over 50% in the first wave—occurred in nursing homes for the elderly, reflecting vulnerabilities in facilities where infection control lagged despite national guidelines issued in March 2020. Between and , 2020, 9,591 deaths were reported alongside 39,076 total deaths, with estimates for weeks 11-26 at 8,985, underscoring the pandemic's direct toll amid hospital pressures that peaked with ICU occupancy exceeding 80% capacity in April. Broad national criteria for attributing deaths to , including cases with positive tests within 30 days or clinical suspicion, contributed to higher reported rates compared to countries with narrower definitions, though this transparency likely reflected true epidemiological burden rather than inflation. Public health outcomes showed mixed containment: strict lockdowns from mid-March reduced transmission rates (R_t dropping below 1 by late March), averting some hospitalizations, but regional disparities persisted, with and experiencing higher excesses due to denser urban populations and delayed regional coordination. By October 2020, cumulative cases neared 150,000 with testing expansion revealing underreported community spread earlier, yet mortality remained elevated relative to GDP-adjusted healthcare spending, prompting evaluations that highlighted systemic issues in elderly protection over successes. Overall, while measures prevented total healthcare collapse, Belgium's death toll ranked second in Europe by mid-2020, influenced by demographics (high elderly share) and initial exposures rather than stringency alone.

Economic Impacts

The Wilmès II Government's containment measures, including strict lockdowns, led to a severe economic contraction, with Belgium's GDP declining by 13.9% year-on-year in the second quarter of 2020 due to halted activity in services, trade, and sectors. For the full year, GDP contracted by 6.2%, exceeding the 2009 recession's 2.0% drop and reflecting the broadest downturn since , though milder than initial forecasts of up to 8% shrinkage from the and Federal Planning Bureau. Labor market impacts were mitigated through expanded temporary under provisions, which peaked at over 1.25 million recipients in April 2020—approximately one-third of the —and covered nearly 40% of private-sector employees by that month. This scheme, retaining full wage replacement for many, stabilized official at around 5.5-6% throughout 2020, avoiding the sharper rises seen in countries with less generous short-time work systems, though it deferred structural adjustments in affected industries like and retail. Fiscal responses included an initial €1 billion supplementary in March 2020 for immediate liquidity support and business guarantees, alongside deferrals of social security contributions and payments, contributing to a 9.4% GDP for the year. Public debt rose from 98% of GDP in 2019 to approximately 114% by year-end, with projections reaching 115% amid sustained expenditures and revenue shortfalls from reduced economic activity. These short-term supports preserved liquidity and household incomes but postponed comprehensive recovery investments, leaving without a formalized post-crisis economic program by August 2020 and amplifying vulnerabilities from pre-existing high debt levels. Quarterly recovery signs emerged in the fourth quarter with modest GDP growth, yet the overall fiscal strain highlighted the trade-offs of spending without offsetting revenue measures.

Social and Political Repercussions

The Wilmès II Government's stringent measures, including nationwide s from March 2020, contributed to a marked deterioration in across , with self-reported symptoms rising to 15% and anxiety to 17% by 2022 from pre-pandemic baselines of 10% each. registrations for mental health issues increased by 9% in 2020 and 40% in 2021 compared to 2018-2019 averages, disproportionately affecting young adults aged 18-29 and healthcare workers amid prolonged isolation and service disruptions. also declined, particularly during the second in late 2020, as evidenced by longitudinal surveys tracking population-level emotional distress. Social unrest emerged in specific incidents, such as the April 11, 2020, riots in following a shooting, resulting in nearly 100 arrests and underscoring tensions exacerbated by enforcement in diverse urban areas. Healthcare sector discontent peaked on May 16, 2020, when staff at a hospital performed a "guard of dishonor" by turning their backs on Wilmès during her visit, protesting chronic underfunding, equipment shortages, and inadequate working conditions amid the crisis. Vulnerable populations faced amplified burdens, with 57% of 2020 deaths occurring in nursing homes and higher incidence rates among low-socioeconomic and ethnic minority groups, though targeted income supports temporarily reduced from 8.1% to 7.3%. Politically, initial public approval for measures was strong but waned over time, with a VRT poll showing support dropping alongside Prime Minister Wilmès's personal approval from 53% to 30% by May 2020. Trust in the national government stood at 32%, below the average of 41%, and further eroded due to perceived inconsistencies in communication and frequent protocol changes, particularly among unvaccinated groups where confidence fell to 3% by early 2022. Regional linguistic divides intensified, with parties advocating faster reopenings while Walloon counterparts favored stricter controls, fueling ongoing federal-regional frictions and contributing to the government's inability to secure broad parliamentary backing beyond crisis-specific powers. The reliance on special executive powers via ministerial decrees, bypassing routine parliamentary oversight, raised proportionality concerns and highlighted Belgium's pre-existing political fragility, as the crisis temporarily unified parties for but failed to resolve underlying deadlocks, prolonging governance into late 2020. Despite effective coordination in areas like job retention schemes covering 30% of workers, the overall response did not translate into sustained for Wilmès or her Open VLD-led , with nationalists voicing persistent dissatisfaction over perceived Walloon influence in decision-making.

Criticisms and Controversies

Response Effectiveness Debates

Belgium recorded one of the highest death rates in during the early , with reaching 11.8% in 2020 compared to the average of 5.8%, prompting debates over the Wilmès II Government's response effectiveness. Critics, including medical professionals who protested by turning their backs during ' hospital visit on May 18, 2020, argued that initial delays in testing expansion and inadequate protections for vulnerable populations undermined containment efforts. The evaluation highlighted poor pre-crisis preparedness, such as depleted stockpiles and incomplete continuity plans in only 16 of 24 federal administrations, as factors exacerbating the first wave's severity. Nursing homes emerged as a focal point of contention, accounting for 45% of total deaths from March to September 2022, with 57% occurring in alone due to initial lapses in infection control and limited testing (only 16% of care home deaths were confirmed positive early on). supporters countered that Belgium's of all suspected cases in nursing homes—even untested—led to inflated statistics relative to neighbors like the , which reported lower per capita deaths with less stringent measures; Wilmès emphasized transparency in counting as a deliberate policy choice. However, analyses attributed real vulnerabilities to fragmented coordination across federal and regional levels, delaying targeted interventions like mobile testing teams until later waves. Lockdown measures, imposed from March 18, 2020, were credited by some with preventing hospital overload—thanks to high bed capacity (5.5 per 1,000 inhabitants)—and controlling transmission peaks at 25-30 weekly deaths per 100,000, but debates persisted on their given economic fallout and social costs like rising issues ( from 10% to 18%, anxiety to 20%). The minority government's reliance on parliamentary confidence votes for special powers fostered compromises that moderated stringency compared to unitary states, potentially averting overreach but also slowing decisive action; the noted slow policy adjustments and blurred science-policy boundaries as hindrances to optimal outcomes. Comparisons to Sweden's lighter restrictions or the ' phased approach fueled arguments that Belgium's strategy, while flattening curves in subsequent waves via expanded testing (33 million by March 2022), incurred unnecessary without proportionally superior health gains.

Overreach and Democratic Concerns

The Wilmès II Government received special powers from the on 27 and 28 March 2020, enabling it to adopt urgent measures against via royal decree without prior legislative approval, initially for three months and retroactively validating actions from mid-March. These powers, grounded in Article 105 of the Belgian Constitution, covered , order, social provisions, and economic safeguards, but their delegation to a minority caretaker administration—lacking a full parliamentary —prompted debates on legitimacy during a period of pre-existing political . Critics, including constitutional scholars, argued that this framework concentrated authority excessively in the , diminishing parliamentary oversight as decrees required only ex post facto approval, which was often perfunctory amid the crisis. The reliance on ministerial decrees under the Civil Security Law for implementing restrictions—such as the nationwide from 18 March 2020 and subsequent curfews—further fueled concerns, as these instruments were seen as stretching beyond their intended scope for localized emergencies and lacking robust constitutional anchoring under Article 108. Legal professionals amplified these issues, with Belgian bar associations and over 1,000 lawyers signing an in February 2021 decrying the undemocratic nature of prolonged restrictive measures enacted outside parliamentary channels, insisting that such actions required legislative validation to uphold democratic principles. Judicial scrutiny reflected mixed outcomes: while the largely upheld measures, it annulled specific ones like bans on religious services for disproportionality, and the Brussels Court of Appeal in June 2021 (case 2021/KR/17) highlighted broader rule-of-law risks in the emergency framework. Opposition parties, initially supportive for crisis unity, later contested extensions, arguing they eroded checks and balances in a fragmented . These dynamics underscored tensions between exigency and democratic norms, with analysts noting that Belgium's absence of a dedicated constitutional clause amplified reliance on powers, potentially normalizing dominance absent sunset clauses or stricter tests.

Partisan and Regional Disputes

The Wilmès II Government's minority status, reliant on parliamentary support rather than a stable , exacerbated partisan tensions, particularly along linguistic lines. Initially formed on March 17, 2020, with special powers granted by a broad majority excluding key parties, the administration drew criticism from the Nieuw-Vlaamse Alliantie (N-VA), ' largest party, for centralizing authority in a French-speaking-led during a that demanded fiscal prudence. N-VA leaders argued that the government's continuation without a fresh vote in September 2020 violated the original three-month mandate for , viewing it as an undemocratic extension amid stalled talks. Vlaams Belang (VB), the radical-right opposition party, mounted sharper attacks, accusing Wilmès of leveraging special powers to erode parliamentary transparency and oversight, effectively sidelining debate on measures like lockdowns and economic aid. VB framed these as federal overreach, resonating with voters wary of Walloon-influenced spending—Belgium's COVID response included €50 billion in federal support by mid-2020, which VB and N-VA decried as unsustainable debt accumulation favoring southern regions. In contrast, Francophone parties like the Parti Socialiste (PS) generally backed extensions, prioritizing unified over structural reforms. Regional disputes compounded these partisan rifts, as public health falls under regional competence, leading to misalignments between federal directives and subnational execution. The , headed by N-VA's , frequently pushed for swifter reopenings and localized testing strategies, clashing with federal timelines—for instance, advocating earlier school resumptions in May 2020 while aligned more closely with national caution. These divergences highlighted entrenched Flemish skepticism toward federal intervention, rooted in and demands, versus Walloon preferences for coordinated, expansive aid; coordination forums like the Interfederal Health Conference saw heated debates over , with securing opt-outs on certain tracing apps. Such frictions delayed uniform policy rollout and fueled narratives of inefficiency in a system where regional majorities (N-VA-VB in , PS-led in ) pulled in opposing directions.

Dissolution and Legacy

Expiration of Emergency Powers

The special powers granted to the Wilmès II Government on 27 March 2020, enabling rapid royal decree measures to address the without initial parliamentary scrutiny, were set to last three months and expired on 27 June 2020. Although the enabling legislation permitted a single renewal for an additional three months, declined to extend them, citing sufficient stabilization of the acute crisis phase and a return to normalized oversight. This decision reflected political calculations amid ongoing coalition negotiations, as the minority government's reliance on ad hoc support from opposition parties, particularly nationalists, had already strained legislative agility during the emergency. Post-expiration, the cabinet shifted to conventional lawmaking, necessitating parliamentary approval for pandemic-related decisions, which exposed vulnerabilities in its limited mandate and contributed to delays in adapting to emerging waves of infections. emphasized continuity in protocols but warned of potential reimposition of restrictions if epidemiological indicators worsened, underscoring the transition from executive discretion to deliberative consensus. The lapse of these powers intensified pressure for a stable coalition, as status without enhanced authority hampered fiscal responses, including recovery fund negotiations, though it preserved checks against prolonged executive overreach. By September 2020, amid stalled talks, the government faced a no-confidence motion over its extended tenure, but upheld its role pending formation of a successor administration.

Long-Term Political Influence

The Wilmès II Government's deployment of special powers, granted by on March 17, 2020, and extended through July 2020, established a functional template for crisis governance in Belgium's fragmented federal system, where no overarching state-of-emergency framework exists to centralize authority across regions and communities. This approach, involving broad delegations for measures like lockdowns and economic aid, was retrospectively validated by the Belgian on March 2, 2023, ruling that such powers could constitutionally restrict assembly, movement, and labor obligations in comparable future pandemics, thereby normalizing legislative-executive partnerships over rigid constitutional emergencies. The precedent influenced subsequent policy debates on federal coordination, exposing inefficiencies in Belgium's multi-level governance—such as divergent regional health strategies—that persisted beyond the crisis, prompting calls for streamlined crisis protocols without altering the underlying consociational divides between Flemish and Francophone parties. While the government's temporary cross-party backing (from seven of ten parliamentary groups) enabled decisive action amid the 2019-2020 political deadlock, it did not catalyze lasting ideological realignments; the ensuing De Croo I Government, sworn in on October 1, 2020, after 541 days of negotiations, replicated exclusionary dynamics by forming a "Vivaldi" coalition that sidelined Flemish nationalists, underscoring the crisis's limited role in resolving structural impasses. For key figures, the tenure elevated Sophie Wilmès's stature within the (), transitioning her from caretaker to Foreign Affairs in the De Croo from October 2020 until a on April 21, 2022, after which she assumed roles as a and Vice-President of the group, sustaining liberal influence at supranational levels. Broader partisan repercussions were muted: maintained modest electoral footing in the 2024 federal elections amid ongoing fragmentation, with no empirical surge or decline directly traceable to Wilmès II policies, though public trust in federal faced scrutiny for perceived over-delegation without proportional reforms.

References

  1. [1]
    Europe Versus Coronavirus – Belgium: Successful Crisis ...
    March 17: The Wilmès II government is established. It is a minority government with special powers, set up for six months to deal with the crisis. On the same ...<|separator|>
  2. [2]
    Belgian PM Wilmès stays in post — but the Flemish aren't happy
    Sep 17, 2020 · The seven parties therefore agreed to extend the remit of Wilmès' minority government until October 1. They hope to finish their negotiations ...
  3. [3]
    Belgium's Accordion Response to COVID-19 - Verfassungsblog
    Mar 10, 2021 · Nine political parties made a deal to give the resigning minority government full authority to combat the virus and its economic and social ramifications.
  4. [4]
    European Legal Responses to COVID-19: Belgium
    Nov 10, 2020 · Two laws passed on March 27 granted this newly-formed government special powers for three months to address the pandemic. After an agreement was ...
  5. [5]
    Belgium agrees on government nearly two years after previous one fell
    Sep 30, 2020 · The deal, only finalised in the early hours of Wednesday , ends 652 days of caretaker and minority governments, since the fall of the previous ...
  6. [6]
    Belgium's response to the COVID-19 pandemic - PMC
    We summarize the unfolding of the pandemic in Belgium from February to December 2020, discuss the countermeasures that were implemented and provide some ...Missing: Wilmès | Show results with:Wilmès
  7. [7]
    The Perpetual Struggle to Form the Belgian Government
    Aug 19, 2020 · This is the story of how Belgium—451 days after the last election—still finds itself in the middle of a government formation.
  8. [8]
    Belgium hands powers to caretaker PM to fight Covid-19 after 15 ...
    Mar 16, 2020 · Wilmès saw King Philippe on Monday, who officially nominated her to form a government – the first time a woman has been given the task in ...Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
  9. [9]
    Belgian government talks collapse - Politico.eu
    Aug 14, 2020 · Belgium's two top politicians have abandoned efforts to put together a coalition government, national media outlets reported Friday.Missing: deadlock | Show results with:deadlock<|separator|>
  10. [10]
    Wilmès faces Belgium's government formation puzzle
    Jun 15, 2020 · Wilmès' caretaker government was granted special powers in March to allow it to manage the new coronavirus crisis. Those powers expire at the ...
  11. [11]
    After 600 Days of Political Deadlock, Why Isn't Belgium Facing Civil ...
    Aug 25, 2020 · Earlier this month, Belgium broke its own record for the longest period a country has gone without an elected government in peacetime.Missing: causes | Show results with:causes
  12. [12]
    [PDF] Belgium: Political Developments and Data in 2020
    Wilmès II was sworn in on 17 March in the exact same party composition and same ministerial portfolios for the same ministers as Wilmès I, namely a minority ...
  13. [13]
    Belgium: Political Developments and Data in 2020
    On 17 March, the Wilmès Cabinet became a fully ffedged government, supported by seven opposition parties (Wilmès II; see Cabinet report above). It received ...
  14. [14]
    [PDF] Belgium - Tilburg University Research Portal
    As it is a constitutional custom in Belgium that the government requests a vote of confidence of Parliament, Wilmès. II gained the support of a large majority ...
  15. [15]
    The accidental prime minister - Politico.eu
    Apr 2, 2020 · Sophie Wilmès was only meant to be a caretaker leader. Instead, she's calmly leading Belgium through its worst crisis since World War II.
  16. [16]
    COVID‐19 and the politics of strained multi‐level policy cooperation ...
    Nov 18, 2020 · On top of its expanded legislative power, the newly created Wilmès II cabinet was also given emergency decree powers for a period of six months, ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  17. [17]
    Parliamentary oversight in the health crisis
    May 10, 2020 · Sophie Wilmès became head of government in October 2019. On 19 March, the MPs of nine political parties expressed their confidence (Wilmès II ...
  18. [18]
    [PDF] The Parliament in the time of coronavirus Belgium
    It is also true that the ministerial order in question was adopted on 23 March. 2020, i.e. four days before the adoption on 27 March 2020 of the Special Powers ...
  19. [19]
    Agreement for the deposit of a "special powers" bill - Sophie Wilmès
    Mar 21, 2020 · The ten parties of the #largeunion today agreed to submit a bill to grant special powers. Goal: vote next Thursday. I thank all participants ...Missing: decree | Show results with:decree
  20. [20]
    [PDF] BE_Report on Coronavirus pandemic- May
    May 18, 2020 · 27 Belgium, Order of 7 April 2020 of special powers No. 2 issued in implementation of the decree of 17 March 2020 granting special powers to ...
  21. [21]
    Special Powers Act : Belgian Parliament puts Government in the ...
    Mar 27, 2020 · On 26 March 2020, Belgian Parliament adopted a so-called Special Powers Act, whereby it delegates a significant part of its law-making ...
  22. [22]
    [PDF] COVID-19 legislation in Belgium at the crossroads of a political and ...
    May 29, 2020 · This paper discusses the corona virus crisis legislation in Belgium, against the background of a political crisis.<|separator|>
  23. [23]
    [PDF] Gouvernement Wilmès II - composition - Crisp
    13 ministres. Sophie Wilmès, MR : Première ministre, chargée de Beliris et des Institutions culturelles fédérales. Koen Geens, CD&V : vice-Premier ministre, ...
  24. [24]
    Disenchanted Belgians turn their backs on Wilmès - Politico.eu
    but her minority government only holds 38 of the 150 seats in parliament. “ ...
  25. [25]
    March 2020 - Rulers.org
    Mar 17, 2020 · On March 17 her government is sworn in, with no change in key positions. On March 19 it wins a confidence vote in the Chamber of ...
  26. [26]
    New Belgian government gets backing from MPs | VRT NWS: news
    Mar 19, 2020 · Nine parties including the Flemish and Francophone socialists and greens voted in favour, the Flemish nationalist N-VA, the far right and the ...<|separator|>
  27. [27]
    COVID-19 legislation in Belgium at the crossroads of a political and ...
    May 29, 2020 · 13 March 2020, 2nd ed. 64 Special powers were granted by the respective Parliaments to the executive of the Walloon Region (laws of 17 March ...<|separator|>
  28. [28]
    Why did it take so long to form Belgium's new 'Vivaldi' coalition?
    Jul 10, 2020 · The confidence motion was passed last Sunday (October 3), with 87 votes in favour and 54 against. Why did the process last so long? It's a new ...
  29. [29]
    Belgium and COVID-19: When a Health Crisis Replaces a Political ...
    Apr 21, 2020 · The country had been ruled by a caretaker government – Michel I and then Wilmès I since October 2019 – for fifteen months. The caretaker ...Missing: composition | Show results with:composition
  30. [30]
  31. [31]
    State Aid SA.64775 (2021/N) – Belgium COVID-19
    Oct 14, 2021 · (4). In the context of the COVID-19 health crisis, the measure aims to support the sectors of nightclubs, restaurants and cafés and some of ...
  32. [32]
  33. [33]
    Coronavirus | sciensano.be
    Sciensano closely follows the epidemiological situation of the coronavirus in Belgium. We describe the evolution of the epidemic and assess its consequences.Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
  34. [34]
    Extension of temporary unemployment due to force majeure
    From 13 March 2020, the status of temporary unemployment due to force majeure will be flexibly applied by the NEO.Missing: Wilmès | Show results with:Wilmès
  35. [35]
    [PDF] COVID-19 Temporary Unemployment Scheme in Belgium ...
    ✓ COVID-19 Temporary unemployment can be awarded retroactively from October 1, 2020. ✓ Working days can be followed by days of unemployment.Missing: Wilmès | Show results with:Wilmès
  36. [36]
    New rules on temporary unemployment as of 1 September 2020
    From 1 September 2020, new rules on temporary unemployment will enter into force. Companies and sectors that are substantially impacted by the Covid-19 ...
  37. [37]
    [PDF] Coronavirus Covid 19
    Apr 19, 2020 · On 17 March 2020, the government announced more stringent measures to slow the spread of the virus. Covid-19 in Belgium until 5 April 2020 ( ...
  38. [38]
    Agreement of the Inner Cabinet + 10 on spending power support ...
    Jun 6, 2020 · - An extension and improvement of the bridging right for the self-employed until 31 August 2020, with a possible extension until 31 December ...
  39. [39]
    New measures for the third part of the Federal Plan for Social and ...
    Jun 13, 2020 · A first part relates to the encouragement of investment. Specifically, it is about: A new Covid-19 tax shelter system, which is temporary, ...
  40. [40]
    [PDF] Belgium: 2020 Article IV Consultation-Press Release; Staff Report
    The caretaker authorities have recently taken targeted measures to support affected firms and individuals, including to facilitate access to.
  41. [41]
    [PDF] State Aid SA.61748 (2021/N) – Belgium COVID-19
    Feb 19, 2021 · (41) The measure aims at supporting previously healthy undertakings that face a significant decline in turnover due to COVID-19 related ...
  42. [42]
    [PDF] Evaluation of Belgium's COVID-19 Responses | OECD
    Dec 9, 2023 · Belgium is the second country to invite the OECD to apply this analytical framework and comprehensively evaluate its responses to the COVID-19 ...
  43. [43]
    Belgium: Legal Response to Covid-19 - Oxford Constitutional Law
    The replacement of the NSC by the CCO in October 2020 signalled a desire by the Regions and Communities to have greater influence in developing the Belgian ...
  44. [44]
    Measures taken by the National Security Council of 27 July 2020
    Jul 28, 2020 · Measures taken by the National Security Council of 27 July 2020. Date: 28 July 2020. Additional measures to strengthen the double strategy to ...Missing: decisions | Show results with:decisions
  45. [45]
    Prime minister - Sophie Wilmès
    The National Security Council extended to include the Minister-Presidents met on Thursday 20 August to take stock of the epidemiological situation and to ...
  46. [46]
    [PDF] Reflections on competences, actors and party politics in Belgium
    If anything, the COVID-19 outbreak has made clear that coordination and cooperation among government levels is a major challenge for the Belgian federal system ...
  47. [47]
    Excess mortality during the COVID-19 crisis in 2020
    Aug 5, 2025 · Be-MOMO estimates 18 765 deaths in excess in 2020. This can be explained by 19 720 COVID-19 deaths in 2020 and excess mortality during the Augustus' heat wave ...
  48. [48]
    Geospatial patterns of excess mortality in Belgium - ScienceDirect.com
    Consequently, these waves also changed the mortality pattern in 2020. Belgium had a COVID-19-reported mortality rate of 1675.37 per million inhabitants in 2020 ...
  49. [49]
    Lessons from COVID-19 mortality data across countries - PMC - NIH
    Although Belgium ranks first in mortality from COVID-19 (possibly due to the broadest criterion for attributing a death to COVID-19), it does not rank first ...
  50. [50]
    All-cause mortality supports the COVID-19 mortality in Belgium and ...
    Between March 10th to June 21st 2020, there were 9591 COVID-19 deaths and 39,076 deaths from all-causes.
  51. [51]
    COVID-19 mortality, excess mortality, deaths per million and ...
    Feb 17, 2022 · The excess mortality in Belgium between weeks 11 and 26 2020, based on the weekly average from 2009 to 2019, is 8,985 (95% prediction interval: ...Missing: Wilmès | Show results with:Wilmès
  52. [52]
    [PDF] Belgium - Sustainable Governance Indicators
    Dec 9, 2021 · This certainly contributed to the fact that Belgium was the country with the second-highest reported COVID-19 fatalities per capita by mid-2020.
  53. [53]
    Belgium's economy in a nutshell - Economic outlook of October 2020
    Dec 18, 2020 · During the second quarter of 2020, the Belgian GDP strongly decreased (-13.9 % year-on-year), which is the result of severe containment measures ...Missing: Wilmès | Show results with:Wilmès
  54. [54]
    Belgium's GDP grew slightly in fourth quarter of 2020
    Jan 29, 2021 · Over the year 2020 as a whole, however, GDP contracted by 6.2%, three times as much as during the recession (-2.0%) of 2009. ... World public debt ...
  55. [55]
    Belgian economy could shrink 8% in 2020 due to coronavirus ...
    Apr 8, 2020 · The bank and agency estimated an increase in Belgium's budget deficit to 7.5% of gross domestic product and its debt to 115% of GDP in 2020.
  56. [56]
    [PDF] The Belgian economy in the wake of the COVID-19 shock
    In April 2020, almost 40 % of employees in the private sector, i.e. over one million people, received temporary unemployment benefits. This is five times ...
  57. [57]
    Evaluation of Belgium's COVID-19 Responses - OECD
    Unemployment and social assistance benefits were extended only slightly. Income inequality and poverty declined in 2020, and the labour market recovered swiftly ...
  58. [58]
    Belgium opts for short-term government fix to coronavirus crisis
    Mar 16, 2020 · Ten parties, including the three in government, will back a plan to give emergency powers to the caretaker government. That enables Wilmès' team ...
  59. [59]
    belgian debt agency annual report 2020
    As regards public finances, Belgium's deficit amounted to 9.4% of GDP in 2020. ... will increase the public debt in the numerator of this fraction, and thus ...
  60. [60]
  61. [61]
    4 reasons Belgium needs a government - Politico.eu
    Aug 13, 2020 · Belgium has survived long periods without a government before, but without leadership from the top, major societal challenges are getting worse.
  62. [62]
    The evolution of the subjective well-being of the general population ...
    Nov 16, 2023 · Our results show the subjective well-being of the Belgian population decreased during the COVID-19 pandemic, notably during the second lockdown and the fifth ...
  63. [63]
  64. [64]
    VRT poll: coronavirus measures losing support - The Brussels Times
    May 20, 2020 · Prime minister Sophie Wilmès, meanwhile started at 53% and fell in the end to 30%.
  65. [65]
    Coronavirus Belgium: 'Outraged' medics turn their backs in protest at ...
    May 18, 2020 · Scores of medics turned their backs on Sophie Wilmès during a hospital visit in protest at the Belgian prime minister's handling of the Covid-19 ...Missing: response | Show results with:response
  66. [66]
    Coronavirus: Why so many people are dying in Belgium - BBC
    May 1, 2020 · Belgium believes its high Covid-19 mortality rate is down to more rigorous counting of cases ... Prime Minister Sophie Wilmès recently suggested ...
  67. [67]
    Analysis: Can we trust Belgium's COVID-19 death statistics?
    Apr 22, 2020 · The country currently has the highest death rate per capita from COVID-19 in the world. Yes, you read that properly, in the world.
  68. [68]
    Reflections on the COVID-19 Restrictions in Belgium and the Rule of ...
    Moreover, at the outbreak of the pandemic, Belgium did not have a special law dealing with health emergencies. Parliament handed special powers to the ...
  69. [69]
    Belgian lawyers criticize government for undemocratic coronavirus ...
    Feb 10, 2021 · Belgian lawyers have warned the country's leaders that restrictive coronavirus measures are only legitimate if they go through parliament.
  70. [70]
    Fighting COVID 19 – Legal Powers and Risks: Belgium
    Mar 25, 2020 · Even without special powers, many Belgian governments have already acted to mitigate the immediate socio-economic impact of the crisis.
  71. [71]
    [PDF] Performing the COVID-19 Crisis in Flemish Populist Radical-Right ...
    Jun 16, 2020 · In this context, VB stands out from many other radical-right popu‐ list parties because it is effectively a permanent opposition party that is ...
  72. [72]
    Coronavirus Shapes Belgium's Government and Populist Opposition
    Mar 30, 2020 · Amid the Coronavirus pandemic, acting Belgian Prime Minister Sophie Wilmès has formed an emergency government with full powers, including ...Missing: partisan | Show results with:partisan
  73. [73]
    Belgian Prime Minister hopes for full-fledged government by ...
    May 3, 2020 · ... Wilmès' special powers have expired. "It's the only possibility for a strong government," he said. Belgium has not been able to form a full ...
  74. [74]
    Belgium loosening lockdown but crisis not over yet, PM warns
    Jun 4, 2020 · Wilmès emphasized her first priority is to deal with the health crisis, while bolstering support measures for dealing with the fallout of the ...
  75. [75]
    The basics of Belgium's government formation - The Brussels Times
    Sep 25, 2020 · These powers allowed Wilmès' minority coalition to introduce new legislation, but only relating to the coronavirus, to guide the country ...
  76. [76]
    Belgium's strict COVID measures constitutional, can be used in ...
    Mar 2, 2023 · Law allows government to restrict entry into the country, limit freedom of assembly and require people to work if needed.
  77. [77]
    Evaluation study of the urban governance of the COVID-19 crisis in ...
    Aug 5, 2024 · This study explored how the local COVID-19 response was organised and adapted to the specific city population and context in the City of Antwerp, Belgium.
  78. [78]
    After 2 Years of Paralysis, Belgium Forms a (Very Fragile) Government
    Oct 1, 2020 · A fragile coalition government finally took power on Thursday, ending one of the longest political stalemates in the Western world.
  79. [79]
    Sophie Wilmès takes leave of absence as Belgian foreign minister
    Apr 21, 2022 · Three ministers will share out her portfolios, including Prime Minister Alexander De Croo, who is taking over foreign affairs.
  80. [80]
    Who am i ? - Sophie Wilmès
    I have been the Prime Minister of Belgium from October 2019 to october 2020. On 1 October 2020 I was sworn in as Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Foreign ...Missing: cabinet | Show results with:cabinet
  81. [81]
    Belgium's make-or-break election, explained - Politico.eu
    May 31, 2024 · On June 9, Belgians will elect a new federal parliament, regional parliaments and members of the European Parliament all on the same day.<|separator|>