Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Zacchaeus

Zacchaeus was a wealthy chief tax collector in the first-century Judean city of Jericho, depicted in the Gospel of Luke as a man of short stature who climbed a sycamore-fig tree to catch sight of Jesus amid a crowd.^[1] Encountering him there, Jesus called Zacchaeus down and announced his intention to stay at his house, prompting criticism from onlookers who viewed tax collectors—often Jewish agents for Roman authorities—as extortionists and traitors to their people.^[1]^[2] In response to the visit, Zacchaeus publicly pledged to give half his possessions to the poor and to restore fourfold any property he had obtained through fraud, actions aligning with Jewish restitution laws under the Torah.^[1] Jesus declared that salvation had come to Zacchaeus's household, affirming his status as a true son of Abraham despite his prior marginalization.^[1] The narrative, unique to Luke's Gospel among the canonical texts, illustrates themes of divine initiative in seeking the lost and the transformative potential of repentance, without independent attestation in extrabiblical sources such as Roman administrative records or other contemporary writings, where documentation of local tax functionaries remains sparse.^[1]^[3]

Biblical Account

Narrative in the Gospel of Luke

The narrative of Zacchaeus is recounted in the Gospel of Luke, chapter 19, verses 1 through 10.^[4] As Jesus enters the city of Jericho while passing through, a man named Zacchaeus, identified as a chief tax collector who is wealthy, attempts to see Jesus amid the crowd but cannot due to his short stature.^[4] He runs ahead along the route and climbs a sycamore-fig tree to obtain a better view.^[4] Upon reaching the spot, Jesus looks up at Zacchaeus, addresses him by name, and commands him to hurry down, declaring that he must stay at Zacchaeus's house that day.^[4] Zacchaeus descends promptly and welcomes Jesus joyfully.^[4] Onlookers murmur in disapproval, noting that Jesus has chosen to be the guest of a "sinner."^[4] Standing before the Lord, Zacchaeus pledges to give half of his possessions to the poor and, if he has defrauded anyone, to repay four times the amount.^[4] Jesus proclaims that salvation has come to this house today, affirming Zacchaeus as a son of Abraham, and states the purpose of the Son of Man: to seek out and save the lost.^[4]

Key Events and Dialogue

As Jesus entered Jericho and passed through the city, Zacchaeus, identified as the chief tax collector and a wealthy man, sought to see who Jesus was but could not due to the crowd and his short stature.^[5] He ran ahead and climbed a sycamore-fig tree along the route to catch a glimpse.^[5] When Jesus reached the tree, he looked up and said, "Zacchaeus, hurry and come down, for I must stay at your house today."^[6] Zacchaeus hurried down and received him joyfully, though the surrounding crowd grumbled, stating, "He has gone in to be the guest of a man who is a sinner."^[7] Zacchaeus then stood and addressed the Lord: "Behold, Lord, the half of my goods I give to the poor. And if I have defrauded anyone of anything, I restore it fourfold."^[8] In reply, Jesus declared, "Today salvation has come to this house, since he also is a son of Abraham. For the Son of Man came to seek and to save the lost."^[9]

Historical Context

Tax Collection Under Roman Rule in Judea

Following the deposition of Herod Archelaus in 6 CE, the Roman Empire annexed Judea as an imperial province under the direct administration of a prefect subordinate to the legate of Syria, initiating systematic Roman taxation independent of prior Herodian arrangements.^[10] A census conducted by Publius Sulpicius Quirinius assessed property values to establish tax liabilities, sparking widespread unrest led by Judas the Galilean, who viewed the taxation as a form of enslavement.^[11] The primary direct taxes included the tributum capitis, a poll tax levied on adult males based on means (approximately 1 denarius annually for many), and the tributum soli, a land tax typically set at 1 percent of assessed property value, both payable in coin to imperial coffers.^[10] ^[12] Indirect taxes supplemented these, encompassing customs duties (portoria) at 2–5 percent on goods entering or exiting trade routes, tolls on roads and bridges, and sales taxes on transactions, which were particularly burdensome in commercial hubs like Jericho near the Jordan River crossings.^[12] Unlike senatorial provinces where publicani (tax-farming syndicates) dominated, imperial provinces such as Judea relied more on direct collection by prefectural officials and military auxiliaries to minimize corruption and ensure revenue flow to the emperor's fiscus, though publicani or their subcontractors handled some customs and excises until reforms under later emperors.^[13] Local Jewish agents, often called telonai (tax collectors), were subcontracted for enforcement, bidding to meet fixed quotas and retaining any surplus as profit, which incentivized overcollection and frequent extortion.^[14] Chief tax collectors (architelones), such as those operating in districts like Jericho, supervised teams of subordinates, managed multiple collection stations, and guaranteed quotas to Roman authorities or intermediate contractors, amassing wealth through commissions and excesses but earning universal contempt as Roman collaborators.^[15] Jewish law deemed contact with carcasses unclean, extending ritually to tax collectors who handled pagan coinage bearing imperial images, rendering them social outcasts and ineligible for temple participation without purification.^[12] Resistance to this system fueled messianic revolts, as taxation symbolized loss of autonomy, with collectors embodying the invasive Roman fiscal machinery that prioritized extraction over local welfare.^[14] Chief tax collectors, or architelōnēs, in first-century Judea served as supervisory figures in the Roman tax administration, overseeing subordinate collectors (telōnai) who enforced both direct imperial levies—such as the poll tax (tributum capitis) instituted after the 6 CE census under Quirinius—and indirect duties on commerce, including tolls at key trade points like Jericho's markets and export routes for balsam, dates, and other goods.^[16] These roles emerged within a hybrid system blending Roman oversight with local agency; while elite Roman publicani companies initially bid for provincial tax-farming contracts, local Jewish officials like Zacchaeus managed on-the-ground collection, retaining commissions or surpluses to cover operational costs and personal profit, often exceeding mandated quotas through aggressive enforcement.^[14] Jericho's strategic position as a fertile oasis and transit hub amplified economic incentives, enabling chief collectors to accumulate substantial wealth via investments in regional trade, though this prosperity relied on extracting resources from an agrarian population already strained by multiple overlapping taxes from Herodians, temples, and Rome.^[2] Economically, these positions facilitated Rome's extraction of revenue to sustain legions, infrastructure, and provincial governance, with estimates suggesting Judea's annual tribute burden equated to about 1-2% of provincial GDP equivalents in grain, coin, and kind, funneled through collectors who bridged imperial demands and local economies.^[16] However, the system's opacity bred inefficiency and graft; collectors faced quotas but no strict audits, leading to widespread overassessment to mitigate risks of shortfalls, which enriched supervisors while impoverishing debtors through seizures or usury-like penalties.^[13] Socially, chief tax collectors embodied collaboration with foreign occupiers, earning universal contempt among Jews as traitors who prioritized personal gain over communal solidarity and ritual purity—handling idolatrous Roman coinage rendered them ritually unclean, while rabbinic texts equated their testimony with that of robbers and disqualified it in legal proceedings.^[17] This ostracism extended to family disgrace and exclusion from synagogues, positioning them as archetypal "sinners" in Pharisaic critiques, despite their elite status; their wealth, derived from perceived extortion, was deemed ill-gotten and ineligible for pious uses like charity or offerings.^[13]^[14] Such dynamics underscored broader tensions in Judean society, where economic roles under empire clashed with ethnic-religious identity, fostering resentment that manifested in passive avoidance or active evasion of tax obligations.^[16]

Interpretations and Controversies

Traditional Views of Repentance

In traditional Christian exegesis, Zacchaeus' encounter with Jesus exemplifies repentance as a transformative response to divine grace, marked by public confession and concrete restitution rather than mere remorse. Early interpreters, such as Cyril of Alexandria in his Commentary on Luke (c. 425 AD), emphasized Zacchaeus' declaration—"Behold, the half of my goods I give to the poor; and if I have taken anything from any man by false accusation, I restore him fourfold"—as a fulfillment of righteousness initiated by Christ's initiative, surpassing the legal restitution mandated in Exodus 22:1 for stolen property, which required fourfold repayment only for specific thefts like sheep.^[18] Cyril portrayed this as evidence of inner renewal, where the tax collector's prior greed yields to voluntary generosity, aligning repentance with the prophetic call in Ezekiel 18:21-23 for turning from transgressions through righteous deeds.^[18] This view underscores repentance (metanoia) not as self-generated but as faith-prompted action, producing "fruits worthy of repentance" as John the Baptist urged in Luke 3:8. Patristic writers like Ephrem the Syrian (c. 373 AD) in his hymns extended this to portray Zacchaeus' climb into the sycamore tree as symbolic humility preceding exaltation, with his subsequent pledge illustrating how salvation restores covenant sonship, as Jesus affirms: "This man also is a son of Abraham" (Luke 19:9).^[19] Such interpretations rejected viewing Zacchaeus' wealth as irredeemable, instead presenting his halved possessions given to the poor as almsgiving that atones and evidences justification, consistent with Jesus' teaching on treasure in heaven (Luke 12:33).^[20] In Eastern Orthodox tradition, the narrative anchors "Zacchaeus Sunday," the first Sunday before Great Lent (typically late January or early February), where it models repentance as disciplined preparation for asceticism, focusing on self-examination and restitution to combat avarice.^[21] This liturgical emphasis, traceable to Byzantine lectionaries from the 4th century onward, treats Zacchaeus' fourfold restoration as hyper-fulfillment of Torah justice, demonstrating that genuine contrition integrates confession, compensation, and charity, thereby securing eschatological salvation declared by Christ.^[22]

Debates on Textual Intent and Grammar

The primary grammatical debate in the Zacchaeus pericope centers on the verb tenses in Luke 19:8, where Zacchaeus declares, in Greek, "Behold, Lord, the half of my possessions I give [didōmi] to the poor, and if I have defrauded [esukophantēsa] anyone of anything, I restore [protidōmi] fourfold."^[23] The verbs didōmi and protidōmi are in the present indicative tense, which traditionally has been rendered in English translations as a future-oriented promise of repentance: "I will give" and "I will restore."^[24] This interpretation posits that Zacchaeus's statement constitutes a voluntary act of restitution triggered by Jesus's visit, aligning with the narrative's emphasis on salvation through response to divine initiative in verse 9 ("Today salvation has come to this house").^[25] However, scholars such as David Hamm argue that the present tense more accurately reflects habitual or ongoing action, suggesting Zacchaeus is defending his preexisting righteousness against the crowd's murmuring in verse 7 ("He has gone to be the guest of a man who is a sinner").^[26] Under this reading, the declaration serves not as a new resolution but as a rebuttal, with the aorist esukophantēsa (perfective past) in the conditional clause implying completed wrongs offset by prior restitution, and the presents indicating customary practice.^[27] Joel B. Green similarly notes the tenses' potential to denote regular behavior, framing the episode as Jesus vindicating Zacchaeus's status as a "son of Abraham" (v. 9) despite social ostracism, rather than converting a notorious extortionist.^[25] This view draws on Koine Greek's flexibility, where presents can express general truths or Semitic-influenced futuricity without strict volitive force, though critics counter that Luke's Lukan style elsewhere employs presents futuristically for promises (e.g., Luke 6:30).^[28] The debate extends to authorial intent, with some interpreting the grammar as rhetorical enthymeme—an implied syllogism where Zacchaeus's actions fulfill Abrahamic righteousness (Gen. 18:19), justifying Jesus's association and subverting expectations of tax collectors as irredeemable.^[29] Others, emphasizing narrative context, see intent in portraying transformative encounter over defense, as the story parallels parable-like structures elsewhere in Luke (e.g., ch. 15-18) without explicit prior virtue.^[30] No significant textual variants disrupt this discussion; critical editions like Nestle-Aland 28 confirm the reading's stability across major manuscripts (e.g., Codex Sinaiticus, Vaticanus), attributing variations to minor orthography rather than substantive grammar.^[31] Resolution favors contextual weighting: the present tense likely blends habitual claim with responsive intent, underscoring Luke's theme of salvation accessible to the marginalized without presupposing flawless prior conduct.^[32]

Skeptical and Historical-Critical Perspectives

Historical-critical scholarship examines the Zacchaeus pericope (Luke 19:1-10) through source criticism, noting its absence from the other Synoptic Gospels and Markan framework, attributing it to Luke's special source ("L") or potential Lukan composition designed to exemplify themes of divine initiative in salvation for social outcasts.^[33] The narrative's placement immediately before the triumphal entry underscores its programmatic role in Luke's Gospel, aligning with the author's emphasis on Jesus' mission to the "lost" (Luke 19:10), a motif echoed in earlier Lukan parables like the lost sheep and prodigal son, suggesting redactional shaping to reinforce theological priorities over strict historical reporting.^[34] Skeptics of the pericope's historicity highlight the lack of independent attestation outside Luke, with no corroborating accounts in Josephus, Roman records, or other early Christian sources, rendering it vulnerable under criteria like multiple attestation used in historical Jesus research. While the criterion of dissimilarity yields mixed results—Jesus' association with tax collectors appears in multiple traditions (e.g., Matthew 9:10-13; Luke 15:1-2), potentially indicating early authenticity—the story's idyllic resolution and symbolic elements, such as the sycamore tree and Jericho setting tied to balsam trade wealth, evoke illustrative rather than eyewitness detail. Some scholars propose the figure of Zacchaeus may represent a Lukan invention or stylized composite to address critiques of Jesus' table fellowship with sinners, paralleling Greco-Roman literary tropes of moral transformation in marginalized characters.^[35] Debates persist over the pericope's intent, particularly the grammar of Luke 19:8, where Zacchaeus' pledge ("Look, Lord, the half of my goods I give to the poor; and if I have defrauded anyone of anything, I restore it fourfold") employs present-tense verbs interpretable as habitual actions rather than future repentance, implying affirmation of prior righteousness rather than conversion. This reading challenges traditional views of dramatic turnaround, positioning Zacchaeus as a "righteous" tax collector vindicated against crowd prejudice, consistent with Luke's nuanced portrayal of wealth and piety (cf. Luke 18:18-30). Such ambiguity fuels skepticism toward the narrative as a historical event, viewing it instead as rhetorical enthymeme advancing Lukan soteriology.^[36]^[29]^[37] The physical description of Zacchaeus as "short in stature" (Luke 19:3) invites further scrutiny, as the Greek mikros te stature admits ambiguity—possibly denoting brevity of height, social insignificance, or even dwarfism in light of ancient Greco-Roman physiognomic stereotypes associating physical shortness with moral flaws, which Luke may subvert to highlight divine reversal of human judgments. Absent archaeological or epigraphic evidence for a historical Zacchaeus in first-century Jericho, critical perspectives prioritize the text's literary function over biographical fidelity, cautioning against conflating narrative vividness with verifiable occurrence.^[38]^[39]

Theological and Moral Implications

Salvation and Jesus' Mission

Jesus' declaration in Luke 19:9—"Today salvation has come to this house, because he also is a son of Abraham"—marks the restoration of Zacchaeus to Israel's covenant lineage, previously forfeited through his role as a tax collector viewed as a traitor.^[40] This pronouncement follows Zacchaeus' public commitment to redistribute half his possessions to the poor and repay fourfold any fraud, actions that biblical commentators interpret as evidence of genuine repentance rather than a prerequisite for earning salvation.^[41] The phrase "this house" extends salvation beyond the individual to his household, underscoring a transformative event initiated by Jesus' uninvited entry, which prompts Zacchaeus' response without prior demand for restitution.^[42] The narrative culminates in Luke 19:10: "For the Son of Man came to seek and to save the lost," a summation of Jesus' earthly mission drawn from Old Testament motifs of divine pursuit, such as Ezekiel 34's shepherd seeking scattered sheep.^[43] Here, "the lost" denotes those spiritually alienated, like Zacchaeus, whom Jesus actively seeks despite social scorn from onlookers who murmur about associating with sinners.^[40] This mission prioritizes initiative from the seeker—Jesus—over the sought's merit, contrasting Pharisaic expectations of righteousness and illustrating salvation as rescue from sin's dominion, not mere moral reform.^[42] The Zacchaeus episode thus exemplifies how Jesus' salvific work targets societal outcasts, fulfilling prophecies of a Messiah who binds up the broken rather than affirming the ostensibly upright.^[44] Commentaries emphasize that Zacchaeus' changed behavior confirms inner regeneration, aligning with New Testament patterns where faith produces fruit, yet salvation remains God's gracious act, not human achievement.^[41] This framework challenges views equating salvation with ethical performance alone, instead rooting it in Christ's purposeful seeking of the perishing.^[43]

Ethics of Restitution and Wealth

Zacchaeus' declaration in Luke 19:8, pledging to distribute half his possessions to the poor and restore fourfold any amounts obtained through false accusation, exemplifies a commitment to restitution as a concrete expression of repentance. This pledge exceeds standard Old Testament requirements for theft, where Exodus 22:1 mandates fourfold repayment specifically for stolen sheep but double for other goods found alive, while Numbers 5:6–7 requires confession and principal plus one-fifth for general wrongs.^[45] By voluntarily applying the stricter penalty without proven guilt, Zacchaeus demonstrates proactive ethical accountability, aligning with rabbinic interpretations that amplified restitution to affirm sincerity.^[46] Theological analyses interpret this act not as meriting salvation—Jesus pronounces it upon entering the house, prior to full execution—but as evidence of transformed priorities, where restitution rectifies causal harms from extortionate practices common among first-century tax collectors.^[29] Early patristic commentator John Chrysostom viewed the almsgiving component as supplementary to direct repayment, emphasizing restoration to victims before broader charity, thus prioritizing justice over mere philanthropy.^[47] This framework underscores causal realism in ethics: ill-gotten wealth perpetuates injustice, requiring disgorgement to enable genuine reconciliation, rather than indefinite retention under vague remorse. Regarding wealth, Zacchaeus retains half his estate post-restitution, contrasting with narratives like the rich young ruler's call to total divestment (Luke 18:22), implying that amassed resources are ethically neutral if pursued honestly and redirected justly.^[48] Jesus' affirmation of salvation in a tax collector's household challenges blanket condemnations of riches, affirming instead their potential compatibility with faith when paired with restitution and generosity, as empirical patterns in Lukan theology link unrepented avarice to spiritual barrier but reformed stewardship to inclusion.^[49] This ethic prioritizes verifiable amendment over ascetic renunciation, reflecting first-principles accountability where wealth's legitimacy hinges on origins and subsequent equity, not inherent moral taint.

Later Developments

Early Church Traditions

Early Church Fathers interpreted the encounter between Jesus and Zacchaeus in Luke 19 as a paradigm of genuine repentance and divine initiative in salvation. Cyril of Alexandria, in his Commentary on Luke (c. 425 CE), emphasized Zacchaeus' public vow to distribute half his possessions to the poor and restore fourfold any defrauded amounts, viewing this as immediate evidence of transformed character rather than mere intent, contrasting it with superficial piety.^[18] Similarly, Cyrillona, a Syriac Christian poet active around 396 CE, composed On Zacchaeus, portraying the tax collector's ascent into the sycamore tree as an act of humble seeking that mirrored humanity's fall and redemption, urging contemporary sinners to emulate his zeal for Christ's merciful pursuit.^[19] Hagiographical traditions from the early Church associated Zacchaeus with ecclesiastical leadership in Palestine. Eusebius of Caesarea, in his Ecclesiastical History (c. 325 CE), records a Zacchaeus as the fourth bishop of Jerusalem succeeding Symeon during Trajan's reign (98–117 CE), though Eusebius does not explicitly link this figure to the Gospel's publican. Later identifications in Eastern Christian lore equated the two, positing Zacchaeus' conversion led to his episcopal role, with some variants claiming he became the first bishop of Caesarea under Peter's ordination. The Pseudo-Clementine Recognitions (c. 3rd–4th century), an apocryphal text drawing on earlier oral traditions, depicts Zacchaeus as Peter's host and disciple in Caesarea, whom the apostle appoints bishop after refuting Simon Magus, framing him as a model of fidelity amid doctrinal conflict.^[50] These accounts, while influential in patristic successions, reflect legendary embellishments rather than verifiable history, as no contemporary sources confirm Zacchaeus' post-Gospel activities. Clement of Alexandria (c. 200 CE) referenced the episode in Quis Dives Salvetur to affirm the Gospel's enduring transformative power beyond Jesus' earthly ministry.^[51]

Liturgical and Iconographic Representations

In the Eastern Orthodox tradition, Zacchaeus is commemorated on the Sunday preceding the Triodion period, known as the Sunday of Zacchaeus, which falls five weeks before Great Lent and features the Gospel reading from Luke 19:1-10 emphasizing repentance and preparation for fasting.^[52] ^[53] This liturgical observance highlights Zacchaeus's transformation from a tax collector to a disciple, serving as a model for spiritual ascent and humility. Additionally, the Orthodox Church venerates Zacchaeus as an apostle and the first bishop of Caesarea, with his personal feast day on April 20, marking his repose; he is not formally canonized in the Roman Catholic Church.^[54] ^[55] Iconographically, Zacchaeus appears in Eastern Orthodox icons primarily as a hierarchical figure, vested as a bishop and holding a Gospel book, reflecting traditions of his episcopal role in Caesarea.^[53] Narrative scenes from his encounter with Jesus, such as climbing the sycamore tree or hosting Christ, are depicted in various Christian art forms, including early ivory diptychs from the 5th-6th centuries—one of the earliest known religious ivories showing Zacchaeus in the tree—and later medieval German works, 19th-century watercolors, and modern stained glass.^[56] ^[57] ^[58] These representations often symbolize elevation toward divine sight and repentance, with the sycamore tree in Jericho preserved as a pilgrimage site under Greek Orthodox care, underscoring its enduring symbolic role in Christian devotion.^[59]

References

[1]
Luke, CHAPTER 19 | USCCB - Daily Readings
CHAPTER 19 Zacchaeus the Tax Collector.* 1He came to Jericho and intended to pass through the town. 2Now a man there named Zacchaeus, who was a chief tax ...Missing: primary | Show results with:primary
[2]
https://drivethruhistory.com/zacchaeus-the-tax-collector/
[3]
Who was Zacchaeus in the Bible? | GotQuestions.org
Feb 9, 2025 · Zacchaeus in the Bible was a man whose life-changing encounter with Jesus was recorded by Luke (Luke 19:1–10).
[4]
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke%2019%3A1-10&version=NIV
[5]
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke%2019%3A1-4&version=ESV
[6]
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke%2019%3A5&version=ESV
[7]
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke%2019%3A5-7&version=ESV
[8]
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke%2019%3A8&version=ESV
[9]
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke%2019%3A9-10&version=ESV
[10]
Judea as a Roman Province, AD 6-66 | Religious Studies Center
Each Roman governor was given command of the military forces stationed in the province and was charged with maintaining peace and collecting taxes throughout ...
[11]
Tribute, Taxes, and Imperial Administration in Early Roman Palestine
Judea began paying tribute after 6 C.E. following annexation, with a property assessment by Quirinius. The governor of Judea was subordinate to the imperial ...
[12]
Tax collection in First-century Israel
In first century Israel there were both Jewish and Roman systems of tax collection. When the Romans occupied a territory they tended to leave the local ...
[13]
Tax Gatherers - Jewish Virtual Library
The first Roman organization of taxes in Syria and Palestine was begun by Pompey (c. 65 B.C.E.). Under Gabinius' administration there was almost no place for ...
[14]
Tax Collectors in Jesus' Day - Evidence Unseen
How did the Romans collect taxes? The Romans formed “joint-stock companies,” where they would buy certain Jewish provinces for periods of five years. These ...
[15]
Strong's Greek: 754. ἀρχιτελώνης (architelónés) -- Chief tax collector
Chief tax collectors were responsible for meeting the quota promised to Rome and for turning a profit beyond that quota. Because they represented foreign rule, ...
[16]
Taxes in First-Century Palestine - Bible Odyssey
Aug 30, 2022 · People in Palestine in the first century CE were subject to a variety of taxes. Direct taxes levied by the Roman state included land taxes (tributum soli) ...
[17]
How Tax Collectors Were Viewed in the First Century
The Talmud classified tax collectors with murderers and robbers, and their gains as acquired by deceit and violence, unfit even to be accepted for charity.
[18]
Cyril of Alexandria, Commentary on Luke (1859) Sermons 124-134 ...
"For Zacchaeus, it says, stood up, and said to the Lord, Behold, the half of whatever I possess I give to the poor, and if I have defrauded any man, I make ...
[19]
[PDF] Cyrillona's On Zacchaeus - BYU ScholarsArchive
It is not, however, a commentary on the gospel episode, but a discourse on salvation and the mercy of. God toward sinners. In Syriac homiletic literature ...
[20]
https://www.jerusalemperspective.com/4610/
[21]
[PDF] ZACCHAEUS SUNDAY St Gregory the Theologian
Jan 25, 2015 · A Man Who is a Sinner Luke's Gospel stated, “And when Jesus came to the place, He looked up and saw him, and said to him, 'Zacchaeus, make ...
[22]
Zacchaeus / OrthoChristian.Com
Feb 11, 2019 · Zacchaeus was lost because the people had wrongly rejected him, not because he was a sinner. Christ is thus not converting him from sinner to ...
[23]
Luke 19:8 Lexicon: Zaccheus stopped and said to the Lord, "Behold ...
Zacchaeus stood up and said to the Lord, "Lord, I'll give half of my property to the poor. I'll pay four times as much as I owe to those I have cheated in any ...Missing: tense interpretation
[24]
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke%2019%3A8&version=NIV
[25]
Commentary on Luke 19:1-10 - Working Preacher
When Zacchaeus speaks in verse 8, he may not be naming his future plans but his regular practice. Green notes that the tenses of the Greek verbs translated “I ...
[26]
Luke 19:8 Once Again: Does Zacchaeus Defend or Resolve? - jstor
"' The question is not so much how those present tenses are to be translated as how they are to be understood.
[27]
Text Study for Luke 19:1-10 (Part Two) - The Acedic Lutheran
Oct 24, 2022 · That's the traditional interpretation ... “The story is therefore not about Zacchaeus's repentance but about the curing of his illness” (page 387) ...
[28]
Did Zacchaeus say "I [already] give," or "I will give" half his ...
Sep 28, 2022 · Zacchaeus is making a strict promise by saying, in the present tense (a Hebrewism because Hebrew does not have a future tense) that he promises to give ...
[29]
[PDF] The Enthymeme in Luke 19:9 and the Salvation of Zacchaeus
Studies on salvation in the Luke 19:1-10 Zacchaean story generally tend to exhibit an underdeveloped analysis of its rhetoric as part of the controversy genre.
[30]
The Literary Form of Luke 19:1-10 - Scholarly Publishing Collective
Apr 1, 1991 · 1 D. Hamm, "Luke 19:8 Once Again: Does Zacchaeus Defend or Resolve:' JBL 107 (1988). 436. -37. H. Conzelmann, ,. The Theology of St. Luke.Missing: debates textual intent
[31]
Tricky NT Textual Issues - Luke 19 - Google Sites
Luke 19:1-10 - Jesus and Zacchaeus. At the beginning of his chapter 37, Tertullian reports that: "Salvation comes to the house" of Zacchaeus, and then refers ...
[32]
The Story of Zacchaeus: Vindication or Conversion? (Luke 19:1-10).
Jul 8, 2018 · Thus the debate heightens as to whether the salvation is from sin. Amazement or Retort. The pericope does not betray any ...<|separator|>
[33]
The Literary Form of Luke 19:1-10 - jstor
10). It should be obvious that in the Zacchaeus story Luke actually dialogues with his reader. He invites the reader, despite the fact that he or she may be.
[34]
Commentary on Luke 19:1-10 - Working Preacher
Oct 31, 2010 · Zacchaeus' declaration of his financial dealings in verse 8 a promise of future action in response to Jesus' visit, or is it a report on his present behavior?
[35]
https://referenceworks.brill.com/display/entries/EECO/SIM-00003690.xml
[36]
[PDF] The Righteous Zacchaeus: A Re-Reading Of Luke 19:1-10 - PJLSS
Aug 19, 2024 · This work is a re-reading of Luke 19:1-10 from a perspective wherein. Zacchaeus, a chief tax-collector in the Jewish-Roman interaction is ...Missing: debates intent
[37]
Has little Zacchaeus the tax collector been misunderstood? - P.OST
Mar 22, 2023 · The suggestion was that Zacchaeus was all along a righteous tax collector, who welcomes Jesus into his home with a clear conscience.
[38]
Jesus the Short King - Biblical Archaeology Society
Oct 4, 2024 · The story of Zacchaeus is well known from the New Testament and, for many, the fact that Zacchaeus was too short to see Jesus is one of the most ...
[39]
Zacchaeus in the Gospel of Luke Comic Figure, Sinner, and ...
Jan 5, 2020 · In this article I suggest Zacchaeus is represented by Luke as a dwarf. I interpret the passage in light of contemporaneous Greco-Roman ideas about dwarfs.
[40]
Enduring Word Bible Commentary Luke Chapter 19
c. Today salvation has come to this house: Jesus knew that the repentant Zacchaeus was saved, rescued from the bondage, power, guilt, and penalty of his sin. ...
[41]
What is repentance and is it necessary for salvation? - Got Questions
Mar 7, 2025 · Jesus happily proclaimed that salvation had come to Zacchaeus's house, and that even the tax collector was now “a son of Abraham” (verse 9)—a ...
[42]
Little Man's Lost and Found - The Gospel Coalition
Mar 5, 2023 · Jesus says to Zacchaeus, “The Son of Man came to seek and to save the lost” (Luke 19:10). Zacchaeus is mainly remembered for being short and a ...Missing: analysis | Show results with:analysis
[43]
Jesus Came to Seek and Save the Lost - Grace Church Greeley
Apr 9, 2023 · And this sentence in Luke 19:10, “The Son of man came to seek and save the lost.” That is a summary of his entire life's work. And so ...
[44]
The Story of Zacchaeus in Luke 19: Lessons on Repentance and ...
Zacchaeus was a chief tax collector in Jericho. That means he worked for the Roman government and collected taxes from the Jewish people. Tax collectors were ...Missing: primary | Show results with:primary
[45]
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Numbers+5%3A6-7&version=ESV
[46]
Does Zacchaeus Teach Restitution for Salvation? (Luke 19:1-10)
Sep 25, 2023 · Zacchaeus did what he did, not to be saved, but because he was saved. Repentance isn't just stopping something, it is also starting something, ...
[47]
Chrysostom's reception of Luke 19:8b (the declaration of Zacchaeus)
In De beato Philogonio 4, Chrysostom does not necessarily link Zacchaeus's 'salvation' with his declaration, but his declaration definitely serves to propitiate ...Missing: grammar intent
[48]
[EPUB] Justice and reconciliation in Luke 19:1–10: A South African post ...
Aug 16, 2024 · Zacchaeus's repentant stance, particularly in relation to economic justice, is seen as an essential model for addressing justice for victims of ...
[49]
Reparations: A Critical Theological Review - Kevin DeYoung
Apr 22, 2021 · The principle of restitution found in the story of Zacchaeus and in the Christian tradition is essential to Christian repentance and obedience, ...Missing: scholarly | Show results with:scholarly
[50]
The Clementine Recognitions Volumes 1-5 - biblical.ie
... Zacchaeus, ordained by himself, as bishop. And in this way both statements will appear true, both that these bishops are reckoned before Clement, and yet ...
[51]
Who was Zacchaeus, and why is his story significant in Luke 19:2?
Zacchaeus was a historically grounded, high-ranking tax official in Roman Jericho whose radical conversion underlines Jesus' mission to redeem the morally and ...
[52]
Sunday of Zacchaeus - Orthodox Church in America
Feb 2, 2025 · In other words, we must prepare for spiritual effort and growth. Saint Zacchaeus is also commemorated on April 20.Missing: Catholic | Show results with:Catholic
[53]
Zacchaeus Sunday - Orthodox Pebbles
The Sunday preceding the start of the Triodion is the Sunday of Zacchaeus, the fifth Sunday before Great Lent. The Triodion, in its turn, is the preparatory ...Missing: day Catholic
[54]
Did Zacchaeus in the Bible become a canonized saint? - Aleteia
Oct 30, 2022 · While the Roman Catholic Church does not recognize Zacchaeus as a canonized saint, the Eastern Orthodox Church does, assigning him a feast day of April 20.
[55]
Apostle Zacchaeus - Orthodox Church in America
Apr 20, 2023 · The holy Apostle Zacchaeus was a rich publican at Jericho. Since he was short of stature, he climbed a sycamore tree in order to see the Savior passing by.
[56]
Zacchaeus - theology and the arts
Aug 3, 2016 · It is a justly famous piece because it is one of the first ivory diptychs with religious content and one of the earliest known representations ...
[57]
Zaccheus - Textweek
Links to images of Zacchaeus Luke 19:1-10 ; Zacchaeus and Christ, Unknown German, 1170's. Getty Museum. ; Adulteress - Magdalene - Samaritan - Zaccheus - Good ...
[58]
Zacchaeus in the Sycamore Awaiting the Passage of Jesus (Zachée ...
Zacchaeus in the Sycamore Awaiting the Passage of Jesus (Zachée sur le sycomore attendant le passage de Jésus), 1886–1896. Opaque watercolor over graphite on ...
[59]
Zaccheus welcomes Jesus: Art in the Christian Tradition
Dec 21, 2006 · Photographs of their interpretations were made, and these were then transcribed to paintings. Date: 1973. Artist: JESUS MAFA. Country: Cameroon ...