Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Advocate general

An Advocate General is a in the Court of Justice of the (CJEU) tasked with delivering independent, reasoned opinions on cases to aid the Court's judges in their deliberations, without participating in judgments.642237) There are currently 11 Advocates General, appointed for renewable six-year terms by the common accord of EU member state governments following consultation with an independent panel to ensure qualifications equivalent to those for high judicial office and a commitment to . Under Article 252 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the , they must act with complete independence, presenting submissions in open court on matters requiring their view, such as preliminary references from national courts or actions for . These opinions, while non-binding, frequently influence final rulings due to their detailed analysis of EU law, contributing to uniform interpretation across member states.642237) The role, inspired by the commissaire du gouvernement tradition, underscores the CJEU's emphasis on transparent legal reasoning in supranational adjudication.642237)

Overview

Definition and Core Functions

The Advocate General serves as the principal legal advisor and chief law officer to the government of a or subnational entity in certain jurisdictions, such as those modeled on the constitutional framework. This role is established to ensure the receives legal and effective representation in judicial proceedings, distinct from practitioners by virtue of its constitutional or statutory embedding. Appointment is typically made by the head of the —such as a in systems—requiring qualifications equivalent to those for a , emphasizing expertise in constitutional and . Core functions encompass providing formal legal opinions on matters referred by the , including of statutes, constitutional provisions, and prospective , to guide and avoid litigation risks. The officeholder must represent the in superior courts, including high courts and appellate bodies, in both civil and criminal cases involving , such as challenges to actions or defense against suits. Additional duties include discharging statutory responsibilities, such as opining on contracts or administrative decisions, and exercising a right of in all courts within the jurisdiction to facilitate direct participation in proceedings. In legislative contexts, the Advocate General holds privileges to address assemblies on bills or questions pertinent to legal duties, aiding in the scrutiny of proposed laws without voting rights, thereby bridging executive-legal and parliamentary functions. This advisory and representational mandate underscores a commitment to upholding state authority under the , with the officeholder maintaining despite executive appointment, as tenure aligns with gubernatorial pleasure but is insulated from direct political interference in core opinions.

Distinctions from Related Roles

The Advocate General serves as the principal legal advisor to subnational governments in certain jurisdictions, such as state governments in , distinguishing it from General, who holds a parallel but national role advising the central executive and representing it in supreme courts. In , for instance, the Attorney General is appointed by the under Article 76 of the and provides counsel on matters affecting the government, with authority to appear in any court on its behalf, whereas the Advocate General, appointed by the state under Article 165, focuses on state-specific legal issues and represents the state primarily in the and High Courts. This jurisdictional divide reflects federal structures where the Advocate General lacks the Attorney General's broader parliamentary privileges, such as the right to speak in and attend sessions of the national legislature without voting. Unlike prosecutorial roles such as the or equivalents, the Advocate General does not initiate or oversee criminal proceedings, which remain independent functions in most systems to preserve separation from executive influence. In Indian states, prosecution duties fall to public prosecutors under the framework, while the Advocate General's remit is confined to advisory opinions and civil litigation representation for the state executive. Similarly, in the , the advises the UK Government on and reserved matters, intervening in Scottish courts only on or UK-wide issues, in contrast to the , who heads the Crown Office and Service, directing all criminal prosecutions in as the chief law officer for the . This separation ensures the Advocate General's role emphasizes constitutional oversight and legal advocacy without prosecutorial authority, mitigating potential conflicts in dual-government systems like post- . The position also differs from the , who typically acts as a deputy to the Attorney General with a focus on appellate litigation support rather than independent advisory duties. In , the Solicitor General assists the Attorney General in appearances but holds no equivalent state-level counterpart to the Advocate General's standalone state advisory function. Tenure further underscores distinctions: Advocate Generals serve at the pleasure of appointing governors or executives without fixed terms, akin to Attorneys General, but their removal often ties to state political shifts rather than national ones, as seen in India's federal dynamics where state-level appointments have averaged 2-5 years per incumbent since 1950. In the UK context, the Advocate General for Scotland's ministerial status under the UK Attorney General contrasts with the more autonomous prosecutorial independence of the , who cannot be dismissed without Scottish parliamentary processes post-devolution in 1998.

Historical Development

Origins in Common Law Traditions

The role of the Advocate General in common law traditions derives from the medieval English development of principal law officers serving the Crown, who provided legal advice, represented the sovereign in litigation, and prosecuted on behalf of the state. This position evolved from the 13th century onward, as English kings increasingly relied on specialized legal counsel amid the consolidation of royal authority and the growth of common law courts. By 1243, King Henry III had appointed Laurence de Delbek as a professional attorney to represent royal interests in Parliament and courts, marking an early formalized instance of such advisory and representational duties. The title Attorney General—the direct antecedent to Advocate General roles in successor jurisdictions—first appeared in 1461 with the appointment of John Herbert as attornatus regis, emphasizing the office's function as the King's chief legal agent. In , a parallel institution emerged within the mixed legal system blending civil and influences, where the assumed comparable responsibilities as the Crown's primary prosecutor and advisor. The office of is documented from at least 1483, during the reign of James III, when it handled criminal prosecutions, civil suits on behalf of the sovereign, and legal opinions on matters. This role reflected principles of executive legal representation while adapting to Scotland's institutional framework, including the Faculty of Advocates established in 1532 for barristers akin to England's serjeants. The modern , created by the effective from 1999, succeeded aspects of the 's UK-facing duties post-devolution, advising the Government exclusively on without prosecutorial functions. British colonial expansion exported this common law model to dominions and territories, establishing Advocate Generals as chief legal officers for provincial or state executives. In , the position originated under rule through provincial legislatures, with formal appointments such as the Advocate General for Bombay in the early 19th century under the Charter Act 1833, which structured legal administration on English lines. Post-independence, Article 165 of the (1950) enshrined the Advocate General as the principal advisor to state governments, mirroring the Attorney General's role at the federal level and retaining common law emphases on independence and courtroom advocacy. Similar adaptations occurred in and other nations, where the office ensured executive access to impartial legal counsel amid federal structures, perpetuating the tradition of non-partisan yet government-aligned jurisprudence.

Evolution and Global Adoption

The office of the Advocate General within traditions evolved from legal advisory roles established during British colonial rule in , where provincial administrations required dedicated counsel distinct from central imperial authorities. By the early , positions such as the Advocate-General of were appointed to advise the provincial government on legal matters, with John Pearson serving in that capacity from 1824 to 1840. Similar roles emerged in other presidencies, like Bombay, functioning initially as senior law officers for the before transitioning to crown responsibilities after 1858. These appointments reflected practical needs for localized legal expertise in expansive colonial territories governed under principles imported from , emphasizing representation and advice over prosecutorial duties handled separately. The 1935 Government of India Act marked a pivotal formalization, introducing elected provincial governments and entrenching Advocate General positions to support emerging autonomy while maintaining alignment with imperial oversight; for example, in the United Provinces, the first such appointment occurred in 1937. This evolution addressed causal demands of federal-like structures in diverse regions, where uniform central legal advice proved inadequate, prioritizing empirical governance needs over centralized control. Post-independence, the role adapted to sovereign federalism: India's 1950 Constitution enshrined it under Article 165, requiring governors to appoint qualified Advocates General to tender advice on state legal questions and represent states in high courts, with the first appointments following the January 26, 1950, commencement. Pakistan mirrored this in its 1956 and subsequent constitutions, including Article 140 of the 1973 document, assigning provincial Advocate Generals analogous duties to sustain subnational legal independence inherited from colonial precedents. Global adoption remained selective, confined primarily to former British dependencies adopting federal or devolved systems necessitating state-level chief legal officers separate from national Attorneys General. India and institutionalized the role to manage provincial litigation and advice amid partition's legal fragmentation, with over 28 Indian states now maintaining such positions as of 2025. In the , a modern variant arose via the , creating the to advise on implications for UK-wide policy post-devolution, handling an average of 20-30 cases annually in Scottish courts by the 2010s. This sparse spread—absent in unitary nations like or , which favor consolidated Attorneys General—highlights the role's contingency on structural rather than universal export, with no widespread emulation in non-colonial contexts due to varying institutional priorities.

In Commonwealth Nations

India

The Advocate General serves as the chief legal advisor to the state government in , appointed by the of each state pursuant to Article 165(1) of the , which requires the appointee to meet the qualifications for a judge under Article 217—namely, being a citizen of with at least ten years of practice as an advocate in a or courts subordinate thereto, or ten years as a in . The position holds office at the pleasure of the , lacking a fixed tenure, which allows for removal without stated cause but aligns with constitutional conventions emphasizing legal expertise over political allegiance. Under Article 165(2), the Advocate General's core duties include tendering advice to the on legal matters referred by the and undertaking other legal functions assigned by the or mandated by the or prevailing laws. This encompasses opining on the legality of proposed legislation, interpreting statutes, and counseling on constitutional compliance, thereby safeguarding state interests against federal overreach or intra-state disputes. Additionally, the officeholder represents the state in litigation before the , , and tribunals, particularly in inter-state water disputes, cases, or challenges to central laws under Schedules VII's . Article 165(3) grants the Advocate General the right of audience in all courts and tribunals across , equivalent to a , ensuring unimpeded advocacy without additional permissions. The role, instituted via the Constitution effective January 26, 1950, evolved from provincial Advocate Generals under the Government of India Act, 1935, which provided legal counsel to colonial governors but with limited independence. Post-independence, the framers debated the provision on June 1, 1949, in the Constituent Assembly to mirror the Union Attorney General's functions at the state level while adapting to federal structure, emphasizing impartiality despite gubernatorial appointment. In practice, Advocates General assist in drafting state bills, defend executive actions in public interest litigations, and occasionally opine on gubernatorial discretions, though their advice lacks binding force akin to the Union counterpart under Article 76. Each of India's 28 states maintains its own Advocate General, supported by Additional and Deputy Advocates General, with appointments often reflecting the ruling party's legal cadre but constrained by judicial qualification standards to mitigate partisanship.

Pakistan

The Advocate General serves as the principal law officer for each province in Pakistan, functioning as the chief legal advisor to the provincial government. Established under Article 140 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of , 1973, the position is appointed by the of the respective province. A candidate must possess qualifications equivalent to those required for appointment as a of the provincial , ensuring a high threshold of legal expertise. The officeholder serves at the pleasure of the and is prohibited from engaging in private legal practice during tenure to maintain undivided focus on public duties. Primary functions include providing legal advice to the provincial on matters referred by the , drafting , and representing the province in litigation before courts, including the and . The Advocate General holds the right of audience in all provincial courts and may arrange for counsel to appear in civil cases involving interests, such as disputes over provincial revenues or administrative actions. Additionally, the office supports the provincial assembly by opining on the constitutionality of proposed bills and participates in assembly proceedings with the right to speak but without voting privileges. Each province maintains its own Advocate General's office, structured hierarchically with additional law officers and staff to handle caseloads; for instance, Punjab's office oversees representation in thousands of annual cases across civil, criminal, and constitutional domains. The role underscores in Pakistan's legal framework, distinct from the federal , by focusing exclusively on provincial and intergovernmental disputes. While independent in rendering advice, the position's alignment with the executive branch has occasionally raised questions about in politically charged litigation, though constitutional tenure protections aim to mitigate .

In the United Kingdom

England and Wales

The Attorney General for England and Wales serves as the chief law officer of the Crown in England and Wales, fulfilling the advocate general's core functions of providing legal advice to the government and representing the Crown in legal proceedings. Appointed on the advice of the Prime Minister, the Attorney General is a member of the government and must be a qualified lawyer, typically a King's Counsel. The current holder is Lord Richard Hermer KC, appointed on 5 July 2024. Unlike the separate Advocate General for Scotland, the role in England and Wales integrates advisory and prosecutorial oversight duties without a distinct titular "advocate general" designation, reflecting the centralized common law tradition where the Attorney General historically evolved from medieval royal counsel positions. Key responsibilities include advising the , individual departments, and ministers on domestic and international legal matters, including constitutional issues and obligations. The Attorney General superintends the Prosecution Service () and the Serious Fraud Office (SFO), ensuring public interest in prosecutions, though not directing specific cases. Consent is required for sensitive prosecutions, such as those under the or for , to safeguard or . In court, the Attorney General may intervene as of right in appeals raising points of public importance, such as references to the under the Act 1972. The for assists the Attorney General, deputizing in parliamentary duties and , and may prosecute on behalf of . This dual structure supports the advocate general functions amid high caseloads; for instance, the Attorney General's Office handled over 1,000 pieces of in 2023-2024, covering areas like compliance and boundaries. Independence is maintained through conventions limiting political influence on advice, though appointments have sparked debate over alignment with government policy, as seen in historical resignations tied to ethical conflicts, such as Lord Goldsmith's role in the 2003 legality opinion. In , the Attorney General for concurrently holds the title of since 2020, advising on reserved matters post-devolution, but this does not extend operational functions into jurisprudence. The role's efficacy relies on access to Counsel for complex litigation, with annual budgets allocated via the ; the Attorney General's Office expenditure was approximately £20 million in 2022-2023, funding specialist teams on counter-terrorism and .

Scotland

The serves as one of the and provides legal advice to the Government specifically on , including its application to both devolved and reserved matters. This role ensures the Government receives independent guidance on Scottish legal issues distinct from the , who advises the . The position was established by the to address the post-devolution, replacing the prior reliance on the for Government advice on . Appointment to the office is made by the monarch on the recommendation of the Prime Minister, with the appointee conventionally a member of the House of Lords and a King's Counsel experienced in Scots law. Catherine Smith KC, the current incumbent, was appointed on 5 September 2024 and sworn in at the Court of Session in Edinburgh on 27 September 2024, following her elevation to the peerage. The Advocate General leads the Office of the Advocate General (OAG), a department comprising approximately 50 lawyers and support staff based in Edinburgh and London, which handles the UK Government's Scottish legal affairs. Key functions include representing the UK Government in Scottish courts and tribunals on reserved matters, such as foreign affairs, defense, and certain economic policies, while instructing standing junior counsel for litigation. The OAG does not engage in criminal prosecutions, which remain the domain of the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service under the Lord Advocate. In practice, the role supports the maintenance of the devolution settlement by challenging Scottish legislation incompatible with retained EU law or exceeding devolved competence, as seen in referrals to the Supreme Court under section 33 of the Scotland Act 1998. The Advocate General also contributes to legislative scrutiny, advising on the compatibility of UK bills with devolved powers.

Northern Ireland

The serves as the principal legal advisor to the Government on law, with a focus on reserved and excepted matters outside the competence of the . This role ensures the UK Government's interests are represented in legal questions involving the scope of , such as the division between devolved, reserved, and excepted powers under the Northern Ireland Act 1998. Established by section 22 of the Justice (Northern Ireland) Act 2002, the position was introduced to address the need for specialized advice on devolution arrangements following the 1998 and the restoration of the institutions. Unlike the separate , the is held concurrently by the Attorney General for , a cabinet-level appointment made by the monarch on the advice of the . The officeholder receives no additional salary for the role but must be called to the Bar of to fulfill duties there. Key responsibilities include advising the UK Government on the legality of proposed legislation affecting Northern Ireland's constitutional framework, intervening in judicial proceedings related to devolution disputes, and consulting with the Attorney General for Northern Ireland on appointments such as the Crown Solicitor. The Advocate General does not provide advice to the Northern Ireland Executive or individuals, maintaining independence from devolved institutions while safeguarding UK-wide legal coherence. This setup has been utilized in high-profile cases, such as challenges to the Northern Ireland Protocol under the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018, where the office opined on the interaction between retained EU law and domestic devolution limits.

In European Supranational Bodies

Court of Justice of the European Union

In the (CJEU), Advocates General serve as independent members who assist the Court by delivering reasoned opinions on cases assigned to them, analyzing the facts, applicable law, and potential outcomes without participating in the final deliberations or judgments. These opinions, presented with complete impartiality, aim to propose solutions that promote uniform interpretation of EU law across member states, though they remain non-binding on the Court. The , the primary judicial body within the CJEU, comprises one judge per member state (27 total) alongside 11 Advocates General, a number fixed since amendments effective in and operational from 2020 to handle the caseload efficiently. Advocates General are appointed through a process mirroring that of judges: governments of member states propose candidates, who must possess qualifications for high judicial office or be recognized jurisconsults of proven competence, followed by an opinion from an independent panel assessing suitability, and final approval by common accord of the member states' governments. Appointments are for renewable six-year terms, with five positions allocated to nationals of the EU's largest member states (, , , , and ) to ensure balanced representation, while the remaining six rotate among other states. Among the Advocates General, peers elect a First Advocate General for a three-year renewable term to coordinate their work, as exemplified by the re-election of Szpunar to this role on October 8, 2024, for the period ending October 6, 2027. In practice, an Advocate General is typically assigned to every case before the Court of Justice unless the Court deems it unnecessary due to simplicity or settled precedent, allowing them to attend hearings, question parties, and review the case file before drafting their opinion, which is delivered publicly weeks after the hearing. These opinions often dissect complex legal issues, such as the scope of EU competences or the proportionality of member state measures, providing detailed reasoning that influences the Court's jurisprudence; for instance, the Court follows Advocate General opinions in approximately 70-80% of cases, though it may diverge when prioritizing institutional balance or textual interpretation of treaties. This role, inspired by the French Conseil d'État but adapted to EU supranational needs, enhances transparency and legal rigor without prosecutorial functions, distinguishing it from national equivalents.

Benelux Court of Justice

The Benelux Court of Justice, established under the 1965 Treaty instituting the Benelux Court of Justice that entered into force on January 1, 1974, incorporates three Advocates General as integral officials to support judicial proceedings. These positions mirror the advisory function found in supranational courts, with one Advocate General nominated by each of the member states—, , and —from senior prosecutors attached to their respective supreme courts: the Belgian Cour de Cassation, the Dutch Hoge Raad der Nederlanden, and the Luxembourg Cour de Cassation. In proceedings before the court, which primarily address disputes involving the interpretation and application of treaties and uniform laws—such as those governing , enforcement of administrative sanctions, and cross-border legal uniformity—the Advocates General deliver independent legal opinions on the merits of each case. These opinions, presented with complete , analyze the factual and legal issues, propose solutions grounded in Benelux law and relevant national , and aim to guide the court's judges toward consistent rulings across the three states. Unlike binding judgments, these advisory submissions do not determine outcomes but often influence deliberations by highlighting interpretive challenges in harmonized rules, particularly in the court's three chambers composed of rotating judges from the member states' supreme courts. Appointment details emphasize national selection tied to prosecutorial expertise, ensuring familiarity with high-level criminal and civil enforcement, though specific term lengths are governed by the treaty protocol without public divergence from standard supranational practices of renewable fixed periods. The Advocates General participate in cases referred by national courts or institutions, focusing on preliminary rulings that promote legal coherence, as seen in involving uniformity under conventions. Their role underscores the court's supranational mandate to resolve conflicts arising from divergent national interpretations, thereby fostering without supplanting domestic judicial .

Independence and Controversies

Political Influence and Appointment Issues

In the Court of Justice of the (CJEU), Advocates General are appointed by the common accord of the governments of the Member States for renewable six-year terms, under Article 253 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the (TFEU), following consultation with an independent panel that assesses candidates' qualifications but lacks veto power. This process, identical to that for judges, allows national governments to nominate individuals often aligned with their political orientations, as evidenced by patterns where appointing states' policy preferences correlate with Advocates General's cited precedents and voting alignments in politically salient cases. Empirical studies, including regression analyses of over 1,000 CJEU decisions from 1999 to 2012, indicate that while formal is mandated by Article 252 TFEU—requiring Advocates General to act with "complete "—their reasoned opinions frequently reflect the ideological leanings of their nominating governments, particularly in areas like and . Such findings challenge claims of apolitical selection, as only 18 of 27 Member States (as of 2020) employ formalized domestic selection committees to mitigate executive dominance in nominations. In India, Advocates General for states are appointed by the Governor under Article 165 of the , but in practice on the advice of the , vesting significant discretion in the ruling and linking the inherently to interests. This has drawn for enabling the selection of advocates ideologically sympathetic to the government, as seen in where appointments have been faulted for lacking transparent criteria beyond political loyalty, potentially undermining the office's duty to provide dispassionate legal counsel to legislatures and courts. Comparable concerns extend to the national —analogous in function—whose appointment by the President on advice has fueled debates over independence, with instances like the 2013 Coalgate scandal highlighting perceived governmental pressure on opinions, though defenders note the 's constitutional design prioritizes accountability over insulation. Pakistan's provincial Advocates General face acute appointment controversies, with executives nominating from among practicing lawyers, often triggering petitions over eligibility and partisanship; for example, the 2019 Peshawar High Court rejection of a challenge to Khyber Pakhtunkhwa's Advocate General affirmed procedural validity but underscored recurrent claims of favoritism under Article 140A of the . Resignations amid scandals, such as Punjab's acting Advocate General Mustafa Ramday in 2014 following age-related eligibility disputes and the 2025 sacking of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa's additional Advocate General over courtroom conduct, illustrate how political expediency can erode perceived neutrality, exacerbating broader judicial politicization where appointments mirror ruling coalitions' preferences without mandatory independence safeguards. In the , the —distinct from CJEU roles—is appointed by the as a law officer, serving at governmental pleasure without fixed tenure, which embeds political accountability but invites influence critiques, as articulated in 2023 analyses warning of over-politicization where appointees like human rights specialist Richard Hermer (2024) navigate tensions between duties and cabinet membership. This contrasts with service justice's , an independent judicial head insulated from direct ministerial control, yet overall law officers' hybrid status has prompted calls for structural reforms to curb executive sway in advice on matters like or . Across these systems, appointment mechanisms prioritizing governmental consensus over merit-based depoliticization foster debates on causal links between executive selection and diluted , with from patterns and case involvements suggesting sustained, if subtle, alignment over abstract pledges.

Debates on Role Efficacy and Judicial Impact

The role of Advocates General in the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has been subject to scrutiny regarding its efficacy in assisting judicial decision-making, particularly amid rising caseloads. Since the Lisbon Treaty amendments in 2009, which expanded the Court's jurisdiction, the proportion of cases receiving an Advocate General's opinion has declined to approximately 48%, with over half of judgments now issued without such input due to efficiency demands. This shift raises questions about whether the institution remains effective in providing comprehensive legal analysis for all significant matters, as opinions are now prioritized for complex or novel cases involving preliminary references or fundamental rights. Empirical studies indicate substantial judicial impact, with the CJEU following Advocate General recommendations in roughly 70-80% of cases where opinions are delivered, though precise figures vary by and era. Mathematical models analyzing patterns confirm this , attributing it to the Advocates General's role in synthesizing facts, precedents, and policy implications, which often shapes the Court's reasoning even when outcomes diverge. Notable divergences, such as in Case C-50/00 P Unión de Pequeños Agricultores v Council (2002), where the Court rejected the Advocate General's view on standing for non-privileged applicants, highlight limits to this sway but underscore how opinions foster rigorous debate. Debates on efficacy center on the non-binding nature of opinions versus their de facto authority, with proponents arguing they enhance legitimacy by offering transparent, independent perspectives akin to a "first draft" , promoting normative without compelling collegial . Critics, including some legal scholars, contend this high adherence rate may undermine the Court's perceived , potentially allowing individual Advocates General—appointed via political processes—to steer outcomes disproportionately, especially in politically sensitive areas like or . A related contention is whether Advocate General opinions sufficiently substitute for formal dissenting or separate opinions, which the CJEU avoids to maintain uniformity; advocates for suggest introducing such to better expose internal divisions and bolster , arguing the current model risks opaque . In non-EU contexts, such as Pakistan's provincial or the UK's devolved equivalents, efficacy debates are less formalized but echo concerns over advisory overload and political skew in high-volume litigation environments. For instance, Pakistani face criticism for diluted impact amid executive pressures, with empirical reviews showing variable success in defending state actions before superior courts, though quantitative follow-through data remains sparse compared to the . These comparisons highlight a broader tension: while the role aids judicial efficiency in supranational or federal systems, its efficacy wanes without structural safeguards against caseload surges or appointment biases.

References

  1. [1]
    Presentation - Court of Justice of the European Union - CURIA
    The Court of Justice is the judicial institution of the EU, composed of 27 judges and 11 advocates general, with the task of examining the legality of EU ...
  2. [2]
    EU Court of Justice: three judges and an advocate-general appointed
    Jul 3, 2024 · The judges and advocates-general are appointed by common accord of the governments of the member states after consultation of a panel ...
  3. [3]
    The Advocates-General (Article 252, TFEU) - Lewik
    It shall be the duty of the Advocate-General, acting with complete impartiality and independence, to make, in open court, reasoned submissions on cases.
  4. [4]
    Article 165: Advocate-General for the State - Constitution of India
    (1) The Governor of each State shall appoint a person who is qualified to be appointed a Judge of a High Court to be Advocate-General for the State.
  5. [5]
    ADVOCATE GENERAL FOR KARNATAKA - About-us
    The Advocate General is a constitutional office, the foremost law officer, principal legal advisor, and defends the state's interests in court.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  6. [6]
    Advocate General | Law and Judiciary Department | India
    Appointment :- · Duties :- · As an adviser to Government :- · As an adviser to officers :- · Statutory Duties :- · To attend meetings of the Legislature and ...
  7. [7]
    Functions - ADVOCATE GENERAL HIMACHAL PRADESH
    The Advocate General advises the State Government, represents the State in High Court criminal cases, and appears in civil cases, and participates in the State ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  8. [8]
    What Is the Difference between Attorney General and Advocate ...
    He/She is the highest law officer in the country. The Constitution of India (Article 165) has provided for the office of the advocate general for the states. ...
  9. [9]
    Difference Between Attorney General and Advocate General
    Mar 12, 2025 · Attorney General: Appointed by the President. Advocate General: Appointed by the Governor.
  10. [10]
    What are the roles of Scotland's lord advocate, and do they clash?
    May 24, 2021 · After devolution, the lord advocate became legal advisor to the Scottish government, while a new office of Advocate General for Scotland was set ...
  11. [11]
    HM Advocate General for Scotland - GOV.UK
    The Advocate General for Scotland is one of the Law Officers of the Crown, who advise the government on Scots law.
  12. [12]
    The law officers: a constitutional and functional overview
    Feb 14, 2025 · Law officers are senior legal advisors to the UK Government, Scottish Government, Welsh Government and Northern Ireland Executive.Missing: Commonwealth countries
  13. [13]
    Attorney General, Solicitor General and Advocate General in Indian ...
    Aug 11, 2017 · Attorney General of India is the Indian government's chief legal advisor, and its primary lawyer in the Supreme Court of India.
  14. [14]
    [PDF] Origin and Development of the Office - Courtesy Chapter
    The position of attorney general in state government is firmly rooted in seven hundred years of Anglo-American history. Since at least the mid-thirteenth.
  15. [15]
    The History and Role of the Law Officers | Rt Hon Robert Buckland KC
    Feb 18, 2019 · The Law Officers, Attorney and Solicitor General, provide legal advice, act as guardians of the rule of law, and the Attorney General's office ...
  16. [16]
    The Role of the Advocate General and its constitutional context
    Jun 10, 2013 · My role, in a nutshell, is to assist the court in upholding the law – like the other Law Officers, in government, we are Ministers for “Rule of ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Law officers: a constitutional and functional overview - UK Parliament
    Feb 14, 2025 · The current Attorney General for England and Wales (Richard Hermer. KC) and Advocate General for Scotland (Catherine Smith KC) were both made.
  18. [18]
    History of the legal profession | Bar Council of India
    The history of the legal profession in India can be traced back to the establishment of the First British Court in Bombay in 1672 by Governor Aungier. The ...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] The Common Law in India
    The common law in India is based on English principles, deeply influencing the laws and judicial system, and resembling English law in structure.
  20. [20]
    Journal of John Pearson, Advocate General of Bengal, 1824.
    John Pearson (1771-1841) was Advocate General of Bengal from 1824 to 1840. A graduate of Oxford (1789) and Lincoln's Inn (1802), he was the eldest child of ...
  21. [21]
    Advocate-General of Bombay - Wikipedia
    Prior to 1858, when it was administered by the East India Company, the Advocate-General was the senior law officer of that company and also the Attorney-General ...
  22. [22]
    [ODF] ODT - Allahabad High Court
    Dr Asthana became the first Advocate General in 1937. The task of the Advocate General then was difficult as well as delicate as his opinion and advice to the ...
  23. [23]
    Definition of Advocate General of State - BYJU'S
    Definition of Advocate General of State. The highest law officer of the states in India is called the Advocate General of State.
  24. [24]
    Advocate General Of The State: Role, Responsibilities ... - PWOnlyIAS
    Dec 23, 2024 · Appointed by the Governor, the Advocate General advises the state government on legal matters and represents it in court.
  25. [25]
    Law officers | Institute for Government
    Sep 8, 2020 · There are three UK government law officers: the attorney general, the solicitor general and the advocate general.
  26. [26]
    Article 165 in Constitution of India - Indian Kanoon
    (1)The Governor of each State shall appoint a person who is qualified to be appointed a Judge of a High Court to be Advocate-General for the State.
  27. [27]
    Advocate General of State, Power, Duties and Provision
    Feb 22, 2024 · Advocate General of State is the highest law officer responsible for advising the State Government on legal matters referred to him by the ...
  28. [28]
    Role and functions - Office of Advocate General, Chhattisgarh
    The Governor of each State shall appoint a person who is qualified to be appointed as a Judge of a High Court to be Advocate General for the State. It shall be ...
  29. [29]
    Advocate General of State: Power, Appointment & Duties - Unacademy
    Advocate General of State is the highest law officer and is appointed by the Governor under Article 165 to defend the interest of the State Government.
  30. [30]
    Chapter 3: "The Provincial Governments" of Part IV: "Provinces"
    It shall be the duty of the Advocate-General to give advice to the Provincial Government upon such legal matters, and to perform such other duties of a legal ...
  31. [31]
    Overview - Advocate General Punjab
    The Office of the Advocate General is a constitutional office created under Article 140 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973 and is headed ...
  32. [32]
    Constitutional Provision - Advocate General
    (1) The Governor of each Province shall appoint a person, being a person qualified to be appointed a Judge of the High Court, to be the Advocate-General for the ...
  33. [33]
    Duties and Functions - Advocate General Punjab
    It is the duty of the Advocate General that he will appear, or arrange for the appearance of counsel in the following civil cases.
  34. [34]
    Advocate General Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
    The Advocate General's Office is a Constitutional Office established under Article 140 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. Advocate ...
  35. [35]
    Attorney General - GOV.UK
    The Attorney General is chief legal adviser to the Crown and has a number of independent public interest functions, as well as overseeing the Law Officers' ...<|separator|>
  36. [36]
    About us - Attorney General's Office - GOV.UK
    The Attorney General's Office (AGO) provides legal advice and support to the Law Officers who give legal advice to government and perform other duties in the ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  37. [37]
    New Attorney General appointed - GOV.UK
    Oct 25, 2022 · The Prime Minister has appointed Rt Hon Victoria Prentis MP as Attorney General of England and Wales and Advocate General for Northern Ireland.
  38. [38]
    Catherine Smith KC appointed as Advocate General for Scotland
    Sep 5, 2024 · The Advocate General for Scotland is one of the Law Officers to the Crown and the UK Government's principal legal adviser on matters relating to Scots law.
  39. [39]
    Advocate General for Scotland, Catherine Smith KC, sworn in
    Sep 27, 2024 · Catherine Smith KC was sworn in as Advocate General for Scotland at a ceremony at the Court of Session in Edinburgh today (Friday 27 September).
  40. [40]
    [PDF] Who are OAG? The UK Government's Scottish Legal Team - GOV.UK
    Office of the Advocate General (OAG). • OAG is a UK Government department with approximately 50 lawyers and support staff based in Edinburgh and London.
  41. [41]
    About us - Office of the Advocate General for Scotland - GOV.UK
    The Office of the Advocate General consists of around 40 lawyers plus administrative staff, with offices in Edinburgh and in Dover House, London.
  42. [42]
    Law Officers are called to Northern Ireland Bar - GOV.UK
    Apr 4, 2023 · The Advocate General is the chief legal adviser to the UK Government on Northern Ireland law.
  43. [43]
    Justice (Northern Ireland) Act 2002 - Explanatory Notes
    Accordingly, this section establishes a new post of Advocate General for Northern Ireland to take responsibility for Northern Ireland interests in these issues.Missing: duties | Show results with:duties
  44. [44]
    [DOC] Duties and Responsibilities of the Attorney General Microsoft Word ...
    33. The Advocate General for Northern Ireland must consult the Attorney General before appointing the Crown Solicitor for Northern Ireland. Consultative ...
  45. [45]
    Role of Advocates General at the CJEU | Think Tank
    Oct 10, 2019 · Advocates General are Members of the Court of Justice of the EU, and are appointed under the same procedure as judges. They enjoy the same ...
  46. [46]
    Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU)
    Role: Ensuring EU law is interpreted and applied the same in every EU country; ensuring countries and EU institutions abide by EU law. ; Members: Court of ...
  47. [47]
    Personnel Changes at the Court of Justice of the EU - eucrim
    Maciej Szpunar was re-elected by his peers as First Advocate-General of the ECJ for the period from 8 October 2024 to 6 October 2027. At the General Court of ...
  48. [48]
    [PDF] Court of Justice at work - Role of Advocates General at the CJEU
    According to the second paragraph of Article 252 TFEU, the duty of an Advocate General involves 'acting with complete impartiality and independence, to make, ...
  49. [49]
    Advocate General CJEU | Significance and functions - Arthur & Marin
    Nov 12, 2024 · The Advocate General at the CJEU assists the Court by issuing independent and reasoned opinions on referred cases.
  50. [50]
    The Benelux Court of Justice - Jurisconsul
    May 17, 2024 · The Court is composed of three chambers, with members chosen from among the judges of the Belgian Court of Cassation, the Hoge Raad der ...
  51. [51]
    [PDF] Benelux Court of Justice - Max Planck Institute Luxembourg
    The three advocates-general are chosen from among the public prosecution at the States Parties' civil and criminal Supreme Courts, namely: the Dutch Hoge Raad, ...
  52. [52]
    Benelux Court of Justice - Oxford Public International Law
    The three advocates-general are chosen from among the public prosecution at the States Parties' civil and criminal Supreme Courts, namely: the Dutch Hoge Raad, ...
  53. [53]
    Our organisation - Benelux
    The Benelux Court of Justice. The Benelux Committee of Ministers. The Committee of Ministers is the highest decision-making body of the Benelux Union. It ...
  54. [54]
    Explanation jurisprudence | Benelux Office for Intellectual Property
    Benelux Court of Justice. BCJ (concl. A-G), Benelux Court of Justice (conclusion by the Advocate-General). CASS BE, cassation decision in Belgium. CASS LU ...
  55. [55]
    [PDF] The Politics of Citations at the ECJ: Policy Preferences of E.U. ...
    ECJ features a smaller number of Advocates General.25 Advocates General are quasi- judicial members of the ECJ who enjoy a similar status to the judges.
  56. [56]
    https://clok.uclan.ac.uk/id/eprint/32794/1/FINAL_Report_AG%2520Appointment_CJEU_Feb20.pdf
  57. [57]
    [PDF] appointment of advocate generals at the cjeu
    Of the profiles of the AG successfully nominated to the ECJ to date, their backgrounds generally include a law degree and professional experience in either ...
  58. [58]
    Critical Analysis of the Appointment Process and Functions of the ...
    Jan 15, 2025 · Challenges in the Role of the Advocate General · Independence and Political Influence: The AG is inherently tied to the government due to the ...
  59. [59]
    Appointment of the Advocate General in Uttar Pradesh
    Jul 1, 2025 · Criticism of the Appointment Process: Political Influence: The ruling party usually appoints a candidate aligned with its ideology. Lack of ...Missing: issues | Show results with:issues
  60. [60]
    [PDF] CONSTITUTIONAL ROLE AND INDEPENDENCY OF ATTORNEY ...
    An appointed Attorney General is subject to interest group politics and all the potentially compromising influences. An appointed Attorney General could be ...
  61. [61]
    Q.23 “The Attorney-General is the chief legal adviser and lawyer of ...
    Jan 9, 2025 · Concerns about political influence, as the appointment is made on the advice of the government. · Debates over the extent of independence in ...
  62. [62]
    PHC rejects plea against advocate general's appointment - Dawn
    Mar 14, 2019 · Mr Waqar said some elements continued trying to make the appointment of the advocate general controversial on flimsy grounds. Published in ...
  63. [63]
    Amid controversies: Mustafa Ramday resigns as acting advocate ...
    Jul 4, 2014 · A petition in the LHC had challenged the appointment stating that Ramday was underage for the office and could not hold the constitutional post.
  64. [64]
    KP additional advocate general sacked after controversy over ...
    Mar 24, 2025 · Noroz Khan is at the centre of a controversy related to hearing of Atif Khan's plea challenging a call-up notice.
  65. [65]
    Between Law and Politics - Policy Exchange
    Jan 17, 2023 · This report considers the constitutional role of the Law Officers and defends the institutional status quo.
  66. [66]
    Henry Weston: Stop the over-politicisation of the office of Attorney ...
    Oct 19, 2023 · Past Attorney Generals have very rarely been “politically ambitious.” However, future Attorney General appointments are more likely than before ...<|separator|>
  67. [67]
    Judge Advocate General - Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
    The Judge Advocate General (JAG) is the senior Judge Advocate and the judicial head of the Service Courts. This is an entirely standalone role.Missing: common | Show results with:common
  68. [68]
    Are European Court of Justice judges biased towards their member ...
    Feb 26, 2025 · This article argues and provides evidence that member states are influencing case outcomes at the CJEU when they submit observations to panels ...
  69. [69]
    The Workload of the Court of Justice of the European Union
    The ratio between Judges and Advocates General was 15:8 in 2003. It is now 27:8. Approximately 52% of cases now proceed to judgment without an opinion.
  70. [70]
    How often does the ECJ follow Advocates General? Or should that ...
    Oct 18, 2010 · We trot out the fact that these advisory opinions are followed in about 80% of cases. I say 'fact', but on closer inspection it seems that the status of the 80 ...
  71. [71]
    https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/cambridge-yearbook-of-european-legal-studies/article/advocate-generals-opinions-or-separate-opinions-judicial-engagement-in-the-cjeu/EBB3F9334C5075F7C402D4C6D97D2EC7
  72. [72]
    Advocate Generals' Opinions or Separate Opinions? Judicial ...
    Oct 27, 2017 · The article questions if the CJEU needs dissenting opinions, as AG's opinions provide a space for norms and innovation, though not binding.Missing: debates efficacy
  73. [73]
    Measuring the Influence of the Advocate General on the Court of ...
    Jan 17, 2016 · 'The advocate general's opinion is usually quite influential in helping the ECJ decide its cases'. 'The opinion does not mean the court will ...Missing: impact | Show results with:impact