Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Aprepitant

Aprepitant is a selective of the neurokinin 1 (NK1) receptor, a primarily used to prevent acute and delayed and induced by highly or moderately emetogenic . It functions by blocking the action of , a involved in the emetic reflex, in the and , thereby inhibiting emesis signals. Chemically, aprepitant is a white to off-white crystalline solid with the molecular formula C23H21F7N4O3 and a molecular weight of 534.43, making it practically insoluble in water but sparingly soluble in ethanol and . Developed as an agent, aprepitant was first approved by the U.S. (FDA) in 2003 under the brand name Emend for the prevention of (CINV); an indication for (PONV) was approved in 2006 but removed from the label in 2019. Pediatric indications for patients 12 years and older were approved in 2015. It is typically administered orally in capsule form (40 mg, 80 mg, or 125 mg) as part of a multidrug regimen that includes a 5-HT3 (such as ) and a (such as dexamethasone); for CINV, the standard regimen involves a 125 mg dose one hour before on day 1, followed by 80 mg once daily on days 2 and 3. An intravenous , fosaprepitant, was approved in 2008 and converts to aprepitant in the body, offering an alternative for patients unable to take oral medications. Off-label uses include the management of chronic refractory pruritus and potentially other conditions involving pathways, though evidence for these applications remains limited. Aprepitant exhibits favorable , with high (approximately 60-65%) after , extensive protein binding (over 95%), and a of about 9-13 hours, allowing once-daily dosing. As a substrate, moderate inhibitor, and inducer of the 3A4 () , it can interact with numerous drugs metabolized by this pathway, including , oral contraceptives, and certain chemotherapeutics, necessitating dose adjustments or monitoring. Common adverse effects include , , , hiccups, and , occurring in more than 10% of patients, while serious risks such as reactions or are rare, with transient mild elevations in liver enzymes noted in about 6% of users but rarely leading to clinical injury. Contraindications include to the drug and concurrent use with , , , or due to risk of QT prolongation and serious arrhythmias. Overall, aprepitant has significantly improved the control of CINV, reducing the incidence of these debilitating side effects in cancer patients and enhancing during treatment.

Medical Uses

Indications

Aprepitant is primarily indicated, in combination with other agents such as dexamethasone and a 5-HT3 , for the prevention of acute and delayed (CINV) associated with initial and repeat courses of highly emetogenic cancer (HEC), including high-dose , in adults and pediatric patients aged 6 months and older. It is also indicated for the prevention of and vomiting associated with initial and repeat courses of moderately emetogenic cancer (MEC) in adults and pediatric patients aged 6 months and older. For CINV prevention, the regimen typically involves an initial 125 mg dose orally or intravenously on day 1, approximately 1 hour prior to , followed by 80 mg once daily on days 2 and 3. As a secondary indication, aprepitant is approved for the prevention of (PONV) in adults, administered as a single 40 mg oral dose within 3 hours prior to induction of . This use leverages aprepitant's action as a neurokinin 1 (NK1) receptor antagonist to complement existing antiemetic therapies in the perioperative setting. Historically, aprepitant has been explored in off-label contexts, such as for radiation-induced , though these applications remain unapproved and without established clinical guidelines.

Administration and Dosage

Aprepitant is available as oral capsules in 40 mg, 80 mg, and 125 mg strengths, as well as an oral suspension at a concentration of 25 mg/mL for pediatric patients who cannot swallow capsules. The fosaprepitant is formulated as a 150 mg lyophilized powder for intravenous reconstitution and infusion. Oral formulations may be administered with or without food, while fosaprepitant is infused over 20 to 30 minutes via a central or , beginning 30 minutes before on day 1. For the prevention of (CINV) in adults, the recommended oral regimen is 125 mg on day 1 approximately 1 hour prior to chemotherapy initiation, followed by 80 mg once daily on days 2 and 3 in the morning or 1 hour prior to chemotherapy if administered that day. An equivalent intravenous option is 150 mg on day 1, 30 minutes before chemotherapy, followed by 80 mg oral aprepitant on days 2 and 3. In pediatric patients aged 6 months to 12 years weighing at least 6 kg, the oral dose is 3 mg/kg (maximum 125 mg) on day 1 and 2 mg/kg (maximum 80 mg) on days 2 and 3, administered 1 hour prior to chemotherapy or in the morning on subsequent days. For pediatric intravenous dosing, is given as 4 mg/kg (maximum 150 mg) up to age 11 years or 150 mg for ages 12 to 17 years on day 1 for single-day regimens, with weight-based adjustments for multi-day protocols. For the prevention of (PONV) in adults, a single 40 mg oral capsule is administered within 3 hours prior to induction of ; this indication is not approved for pediatric use. No dosage adjustment is required for mild to moderate hepatic impairment or for any degree of renal impairment, though patients with severe hepatic impairment should be monitored closely due to limited data. The CINV regimen is limited to 3 days of treatment, while PONV requires only a single dose.

Adverse Effects

Aprepitant is generally well-tolerated, with most adverse effects being mild to moderate in severity. Common side effects occurring in more than 3% of patients during clinical trials for the prevention of (CINV) include , , , hiccups, and asthenia. In pooled trials involving highly emetogenic (HEC) and moderately emetogenic (MEC), these effects were reported at the following incidences in patients receiving the aprepitant regimen compared to standard therapy (as of 2022 label):
Adverse EffectIncidence in Aprepitant Group (%)Incidence in Standard Therapy Group (%)
1312.2
8.67.9
Hiccups5.03.0
Constipation occurred at similar rates between groups. Adverse events in MEC trials were generally similar to those in HEC trials. Serious adverse effects are rare but include reactions such as , flushing, and dyspnea, which have been reported primarily with the intravenous formulation ( or IV aprepitant) at an incidence of less than 0.5% based on post-marketing surveillance. These reactions typically occur during or shortly after and require immediate discontinuation and supportive care. Additionally, aprepitant exposure is increased by 10-18% in patients with moderate hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh score 7-9), though no dosage adjustment is required; caution is advised due to limited data in severe impairment. No evidence of cumulative toxicity has been observed with short courses of aprepitant, which are typically administered over 3 days. Infusion-site reactions are specific to the formulation, with , , and pain reported in 2-3% of cases in HEC and MEC trials, often associated with peripheral venous access and vesicant chemotherapies. Monitoring recommendations include in patients with hepatic impairment to detect any elevations in transaminases, which occurred in 3% of patients. Severe allergic reactions should be reported immediately, with preparedness for management. In postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) pivotal trials, the discontinuation rate due to s was 0.2% for the 40 mg aprepitant dose versus 0.4% for , indicating good tolerability, though overall adverse event incidence was similar between groups (approximately 60%). Aprepitant acts as a moderate inhibitor of , which may increase exposure to co-administered drugs and potentially exacerbate their adverse effects.

Pharmacology

Mechanism of Action

Aprepitant acts primarily as a selective of the neurokinin 1 (NK1) receptor, a G-protein-coupled receptor found in the , where it blocks the binding of , the endogenous for this receptor. This antagonism occurs predominantly in the emetic center located in the , preventing the transmission of emetic signals. Substance P serves as a key mediator in the delayed phase of chemotherapy-induced emesis, released in response to cytotoxic agents such as , which then binds to NK1 receptors and activates the via central pathways. By crossing the blood-brain barrier, aprepitant inhibits this substance P-mediated signaling, thereby suppressing both acute and delayed emetic responses. This mechanism complements the actions of 5-HT3 receptor antagonists and corticosteroids, which primarily target serotonin-mediated acute emesis, providing broader coverage for emesis control. Aprepitant exhibits high potency at the human 1 receptor with an IC50 of approximately 0.1 nM and demonstrates minimal affinity for 2 or 3 receptors, as well as other emetic-related receptors such as 5-HT3 and . Its tight binding to 1 receptors, facilitated by a long , results in sustained receptor occupancy of over 90% for 24–48 hours following a single dose, enabling prolonged blockade of the emetic pathway.

Pharmacokinetics

Aprepitant exhibits nonlinear pharmacokinetics over the clinical dose range, with absolute of approximately 60-65% for doses of 80-125 mg. The oral formulation utilizes nanocrystalline aprepitant to enhance due to the drug's poor aqueous . Following , peak plasma concentrations (C_max) are reached at approximately 4 hours (T_max). Intravenous , a water-soluble , is rapidly and completely converted to aprepitant post-infusion, achieving 100% and higher initial plasma concentrations compared to . Aprepitant is highly bound to plasma proteins (>95%) and has an apparent volume of distribution at steady state of approximately 70 L, indicating extensive tissue distribution. It crosses the blood-brain barrier in humans, which is consistent with its central mechanism of action. Metabolism occurs extensively in the liver, primarily via cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4), with minor contributions from CYP1A2 and CYP2C19. The main metabolic pathways involve oxidation of the morpholine ring and side chains, yielding seven identified metabolites that exhibit only weak activity relative to the parent compound; aprepitant accounts for about 24% of plasma radioactivity after dosing. Elimination is predominantly through hepatic , with less than 5% of the dose excreted unchanged in and the remainder as metabolites, approximately 57% in and 45% in based on radiolabeled studies. The apparent terminal ranges from 9 to 13 hours, and plasma clearance is 62-90 mL/min. In special populations, show minimal clinically meaningful changes. Elderly patients exhibit 21-36% higher values compared to younger adults, but no dose adjustment is required. Renal impairment does not significantly alter total aprepitant exposure, with decreases of 21-42% in severe cases or end-stage renal disease, primarily due to reduced protein binding rather than clearance changes. Hepatic impairment results in small variations: is 11% lower in mild cases and 10% higher in moderate cases versus healthy subjects, with no adjustment needed; data for severe impairment are lacking. Sex and race/ethnicity differences (e.g., 9-74% higher in females or certain ethnic groups) are not clinically significant. Administration with a high-fat slightly increases oral but has no clinically meaningful effect, requiring no dosing adjustments.

Chemistry

Structure and Properties

Aprepitant has the molecular formula C23H21F7N4O3 and a molecular weight of 534.43 g/mol. Its IUPAC name is 5-[[(2R,3S)-2-[(1R)-1-[3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]ethoxy]-3-(4-fluorophenyl)morpholin-4-yl]methyl]-1,2,4-triazol-3-one. The of aprepitant centers on a ring with cis-vicinal substitution at the 2- and 3-positions: the 2-position bears an acetal-linked (1R)-1-[3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]ethoxy group, while the 3-position is substituted with a 4-fluorophenyl group; the morpholine nitrogen is connected via a to a 1,2,4-triazol-3-one ring. This arrangement includes three stereocenters, configured as 2R and 3S on the morpholine ring and 1R on the ethoxy moiety. These structural elements, particularly the lipophilic trifluoromethyl and fluorophenyl groups, enable high binding affinity to the NK1 receptor. Aprepitant appears as a white to off-white crystalline powder. It exhibits poor solubility, approximately 0.003–0.007 mg/mL across physiological ranges, but is highly lipophilic with a log P value of about 4.8. The compound has a of 253–255 °C. Under normal storage conditions, aprepitant remains stable as a non-hygroscopic solid. To address its solubility limitations, formulations—typically spherical particles measuring 100–200 —have been developed, which enhance rates and thereby improve oral absorption.

Synthesis

The original synthesis of aprepitant, developed by Merck, is a multi-step process that begins with the condensation of N-benzyl ethanolamine with to form a key oxazinone intermediate. This intermediate undergoes stereoselective reduction, followed by with (R)-1-(3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)ethanol and a fluorophenyl moiety to construct the core , ultimately appending the triazolinone side chain. The route achieves an overall yield of approximately 20-30%, limited by multiple purifications and stereochemical control steps. An improved, greener synthetic route was later developed by Merck to address environmental concerns, employing asymmetric synthesis to establish the required stereocenters. This approach utilizes Sharpless asymmetric epoxidation to prepare the chiral (R)-1-(3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)ethanol fragment, followed by ring closure to form the cis-morpholine core, reducing the number of steps to 8-10 while avoiding heavy metal reagents and achieving an overall yield exceeding 40%. The process emphasizes through convergent assembly of four complex fragments, significantly lowering waste generation to about 20% of the original route's raw material and water usage. Key challenges in aprepitant synthesis include precise control of the three stereocenters, particularly the cis configuration in the morpholine ring, and management of the reactive mixed acetal intermediate. Stereoselectivity is often achieved through crystallization-induced asymmetric transformation or chiral reduction, with L-Selectride employed for the low-temperature (-78°C) reduction of the morpholinone to the lactol intermediate in tetrahydrofuran. The is synthesized by direct of the hydroxyl group on aprepitant's triazolone moiety using a , such as tetrabenzyl , followed by deprotection to yield the dimeglumine salt. This one-step modification enhances for intravenous administration.

Development and History

Discovery and Preclinical Development

Aprepitant was identified in the early 1990s by Merck & Co. as part of a research program aimed at developing neurokinin-1 (NK1) receptor antagonists targeting substance P to address emesis, building on efforts that began in the 1980s to explore the role of substance P in disease. The program focused on discovering small-molecule substance P antagonists (SPAs) with brain penetration to block NK1 receptors in the central nervous system, where substance P mediates emetic responses. Preclinical studies established the rationale for NK1 antagonism in preventing chemotherapy-induced emesis, demonstrating that blockade of substance P signaling effectively inhibits triggered by agents like . In models, oral administration of aprepitant (1 mg/kg) significantly reduced acute and delayed emetic episodes induced by (8 mg/kg intraperitoneally), with over 370 emetic events observed in controls across 72 hours being largely antagonized. Similar efficacy was observed in models, where NK1 antagonists like aprepitant prevented -induced , highlighting the compound's high potency, selectivity, and ability to cross the blood-brain barrier, which led to its selection over earlier leads. Key milestones in lead optimization occurred between 1993 and 1997, when Merck conducted structure-activity relationship () studies using templates from Pfizer's CP-99,994 and related analogs to refine potency and . Aprepitant emerged as the optimized candidate due to its superior profile, but its initial oral was low (<10%) owing to poor aqueous solubility and dissolution in the gastrointestinal tract. To address this, Merck developed a novel nanocrystalline nanoparticle formulation that enhanced absorption and , enabling effective oral dosing for further advancement. The compound, a morpholine-based NK1 antagonist, was protected by US Patent 5,719,147, filed in 1995 and issued in 1998, covering its use in therapies including emesis prevention.

Clinical Trials and Approvals

The pivotal clinical development of aprepitant focused on its role in preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV), with two multicenter, randomized, double-blind Phase III trials evaluating the addition of aprepitant to standard antiemetic therapy (ondansetron and dexamethasone) in patients receiving cisplatin-based highly emetogenic chemotherapy. In the trial by Hesketh et al., involving 521 patients, the aprepitant regimen achieved a complete response (no emesis and no rescue therapy use) in 72.7% of patients during days 1-5 post-chemotherapy, compared to 52.3% with standard therapy alone (P < 0.001). Similarly, the Poli-Bigelli et al. trial with 547 patients reported a complete response rate of 71.5% in the aprepitant group versus 51.9% in the standard therapy group over the same period (P < 0.001). These results demonstrated superior control of both acute and delayed CINV phases, leading to U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of aprepitant (as Emend) on March 26, 2003, for prevention of acute and delayed CINV in adults receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy, in combination with other antiemetics. Subsequent evaluation expanded aprepitant's indications to postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Two Phase III trials (PONV Studies 1 and 2) compared a single 40 mg oral dose of aprepitant to 4 mg intravenous ondansetron in adults undergoing open abdominal surgery under general anesthesia. In PONV Study 1 (807 patients), aprepitant showed non-inferiority for complete response (no vomiting and no rescue therapy) in the first 24 hours (63.8% vs. 55.0%) and superiority for no emesis over 48 hours (81.5% vs. 66.3%; P < 0.001). In PONV Study 2 (851 patients), aprepitant was superior for no emesis in the first 24 hours (89.9% vs. 73.6%; P < 0.001) but did not meet superiority for complete response (44.8% vs. 42.3%; P = 0.61). Across both studies, aprepitant reduced the incidence of nausea and delayed the time to first vomiting episode compared to ondansetron. These findings supported FDA approval for PONV prevention in adults on June 30, 2006. Internationally, the (EMA) granted marketing authorization for aprepitant (as ) on November 11, 2003, for CINV prevention in adults, aligning with the indication. Pediatric extensions followed, with approval on September 2, 2015, for patients aged 12 years and older for CINV, and on December 21, 2015, for oral suspension in children under 12 years based on pharmacokinetic bridging and safety data from adult trials. The intravenous prodrug () received approval on January 25, 2008, for the same CINV indications as oral aprepitant, offering a 1-hour infusion alternative with comparable efficacy demonstrated in a Phase III noninferiority trial (complete response 71.0% vs. 67.8% for oral; P < 0.001 for noninferiority). In 2023, the approved injection (as ) extending use to pediatric patients 6 months and older for CINV prevention, supported by population pharmacokinetic modeling confirming similar exposure to adults. Post-marketing surveillance has confirmed aprepitant's safety profile, with no major label changes required by 2025. Generic versions of oral aprepitant capsules (40 mg, 80 mg, 125 mg) were first approved by the on September 24, 2012, increasing accessibility. Early investigational efforts in , including a 2006 Phase II trial, showed no significant efficacy over placebo (response rates 47% vs. 43%), prompting a shift in development focus to antiemetic applications where preclinical substance P antagonism had already proven promising for control.

Research Directions

Major Depressive Disorder

Early preclinical studies in the 2000s indicated that antagonism of neurokinin-1 (NK1) receptors could modulate the stress response by inhibiting signaling in the , a region central to emotional processing. This suggested potential effects through mechanisms independent of antiemetic actions. A phase II pilot study published in 2004, involving patients with , reported mood improvements with aprepitant monotherapy at doses achieving NK1 receptor occupancy, comparable to and superior to on Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) scores. Subsequent phase III trials in 2005-2006, including a multicenter, randomized, double-blind study (NCT00042029) with 547 participants, evaluated aprepitant at 300 mg/day versus and (an SSRI) over 6 weeks. The trial found no significant differences in HAM-D score reductions between aprepitant and placebo (p > 0.05), despite good tolerability and no major safety concerns. Similar negative results emerged from additional phase III trials, leading to the conclusion that aprepitant lacked antidepressant efficacy at tested doses. Following these negative phase III results in 2005-2006, development for was discontinued by Merck around 2007. A 2014 follow-up study examined aprepitant as an adjunct to in patients with inadequately responsive to SSRI monotherapy. Over 6 weeks, the combination (aprepitant 300 mg/day plus 20 mg/day) showed no greater improvement in depressive symptoms compared to plus , as measured by HAM-D and Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale scores. A 2017 review of NK1 receptor antagonists, including aprepitant, analyzed and confirmed the overall lack of efficacy for treatment across multiple trials. As of 2025, no ongoing clinical trials investigate aprepitant for depression, though theoretical interest persists in NK1 antagonism for treatment-resistant cases without supporting evidence.

Cannabinoid Hyperemesis Syndrome

Cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome (CHS) is a disorder characterized by recurrent episodes of intractable nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain linked to prolonged cannabis use, often presenting in cyclic patterns that mimic cyclic vomiting syndrome. Standard antiemetic agents, including ondansetron, metoclopramide, and haloperidol, frequently prove ineffective in CHS due to the central role of the neurokinin 1 (NK1) receptor pathway, which mediates substance P signaling in the emetic center of the brainstem. Emerging evidence supports the use of aprepitant, an NK1 receptor antagonist, for rapid symptom control in refractory CHS. A 2025 case series reported two adolescents (aged 16 and 17 years) with CHS who remained unresponsive to 36–45 hours of conventional therapies, including , metoclopramide, and cream; both experienced cessation within 1 hour of receiving 125 mg intravenous aprepitant, with tolerance to oral fluids in 1–2 hours and discharge the following day without further antiemetics. Similarly, a 2025 described a 38-year-old patient with CHS whose intractable persisted despite multiple antiemetics (, , , and ) and supportive care; 150 mg intravenous , the water-soluble of aprepitant, resulted in complete symptom resolution, allowing discharge after prior failures of standard CHS interventions like hot showers. A 2022 systematic review of CHS management options identified aprepitant as a in early cases, with one report showing full relief within 24 hours when other antiemetics failed; the proposed mechanism involves aprepitant blocking cannabis-induced release and NK1 receptor activation in the , thereby interrupting the emetic cascade. More recent data from a 2024 retrospective analysis of 58 children with or CHS reinforced this, documenting improvement in and for 84% of patients treated with aprepitant (typically a 3-day course starting at 125 mg), approximating 80–100% response rates in smaller CHS-specific subsets within 24 hours. Despite these findings, aprepitant's application in CHS is off-label, lacking support from large randomized controlled trials to confirm , optimal dosing, or long-term . Sustained relief depends on complete cannabis cessation, as ongoing use promotes symptom recurrence, and aprepitant addresses acute episodes rather than underlying . At the 2025 American Academy of Pediatrics National Conference, the adolescent case series was presented, positioning aprepitant as a novel option for pediatric CHS to first-line therapies.

Other Investigational Applications

Aprepitant has shown preliminary promise as an adjunctive for managing radiation-induced and in patients with . In a 2022 prospective phase II trial involving 43 patients with locally advanced undergoing chemoradiotherapy with , the addition of aprepitant to and dexamethasone achieved an overall emesis-free response rate of 88.4% (95% CI: 74.9–96.1), indicating effective control of delayed emesis compared to historical standard rates. This application remains unapproved and requires further validation in larger trials. Research into aprepitant's role in pruritus and has focused on its NK1 receptor to mitigate substance P-mediated . A 2023 preclinical study in diabetic mouse models of non-healing ulcers demonstrated that aprepitant accelerated wound closure by promoting re-epithelialization, deposition, and while reducing inflammatory responses, suggesting potential benefits for ulcers. Human investigations, including case series on refractory pruritus in chronic wounds, have reported symptom relief. Exploratory efforts have examined aprepitant for prophylaxis, leveraging its modulation of pathways implicated in neurogenic . A pilot study (n=14) in patients with refractory treated with inpatient IV found that oral aprepitant (125 mg day 1, 80 mg days 2–3) significantly reduced scores by over 50% in most participants, though it did not directly assess attack frequency reduction and no subsequent trials have advanced this to prophylaxis. Overall, these applications remain in early stages, with all evidence limited to small-scale or preclinical investigations and no Phase III data available; broader potential exists in other substance P-related conditions such as anxiety, supported by preclinical models showing reduced stress responses via NK1 antagonism.

References

  1. [1]
    Aprepitant - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf - NIH
    Jan 11, 2024 · Aprepitant and fosaprepitant are drugs used to prevent nausea and vomiting in cancer patients. Aprepitant can be taken orally or intravenously ...
  2. [2]
    Aprepitant - LiverTox - NCBI Bookshelf - NIH
    Feb 28, 2024 · Aprepitant and its prodrug fosaprepitant are antiemetic agents that are used to prevent cancer chemotherapy related nausea and vomiting.
  3. [3]
    [PDF] EMEND® - accessdata.fda.gov
    Aprepitant is a white to off-white crystalline solid, with a molecular weight of 534.43. It is practically insoluble in water. Aprepitant is sparingly ...
  4. [4]
    Aprepitant: a review of its use in the prevention of chemotherapy ...
    Oral aprepitant, in combination with other agents, is indicated for the prevention of acute and delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) ...
  5. [5]
  6. [6]
    [PDF] emend for injection - accessdata.fda.gov
    When administered intravenously, fosaprepitant, a prodrug of aprepitant, is converted to aprepitant within 30 minutes. Therefore, drug interactions following ...
  7. [7]
    [PDF] 9985512 This label may not be the latest approved by FDA. For ...
    EMEND (aprepitant), a dose-dependent inhibitor of CYP3A4, should be used with caution in patients receiving concomitant medications that are primarily ...
  8. [8]
    [PDF] emend_pi.pdf - Merck.com
    Table 3: Recommended Dosing in Pediatric Patients 6 Months to Less than 12 Years of Age or ... A single 240-mg dose of aprepitant (approximately 1.9 times the ...
  9. [9]
    [PDF] EMEND Label - accessdata.fda.gov
    Aprepitant is a white to off-white crystalline solid, with a molecular weight of 534.43. It is practically insoluble in water. Aprepitant is sparingly ...
  10. [10]
    [PDF] 3283529 This label may not be the latest approved by FDA. For ...
    When EMEND is used concomitantly with medications that induce. CYP3A4 activity, aprepitant plasma concentrations could be reduced and this may result in ...
  11. [11]
    Aprepitant: Package Insert / Prescribing Information - Drugs.com
    Administer aprepitant 1 hour prior to chemotherapy on Days 1, 2, and 3. If no chemotherapy is given on Days 2 and 3, administer aprepitant in morning. See Full ...
  12. [12]
    [PDF] EMEND® - accessdata.fda.gov
    Mechanism of Action. Aprepitant is a selective high-affinity antagonist of human substance P/neurokinin 1 (NK1) receptors. Aprepitant has little or no ...
  13. [13]
    The role of neurokinin-1 (substance P) antagonists in the prevention ...
    Conclusion. Aprepitant, a NK 1 receptor antagonist, exerts its effects via a common pathway of the emetic centers after crossing the blood brain barrier.Introduction · Aprepitant And... · Aprepitant And Postoperative...
  14. [14]
    Full article: Neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists: review of their role for ...
    The NK1RA antiemetic family acts by blocking the binding of substance P at NK1 receptors in the brain stem emetic center [Citation38]. This mechanism of action ...9. Nkras: Clinical... · 9.1. Nkra Efficacy · 9.1. 1. Aprepitant
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Emend, INN-aprepitant - European Union
    Aprepitant had high affinity (IC50 0.1nM) and was highly selective for the G-protein coupled NK1 receptor. In contrast, the principal effects of general ...Missing: Ki | Show results with:Ki
  16. [16]
    Current Trends and Future Directions in the Management of ...
    Feb 7, 2014 · In addition, receptor-binding studies have shown aprepitant striatal NK1 receptor occupancy of 90 % for over 48 hours after exposure. These ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] EMEND (fosaprepitant) for injection, for intravenous use Initial U.S. ...
    This label may not be the latest approved by FDA. For current labeling information, please visit https://www.fda.gov/drugsatfda. Page 2. 2. FULL PRESCRIBING ...
  18. [18]
    [PDF] 21-549 Emend Clinical Pharmacology Biopharmaceutics Review
    No unchanged aprepitant was detected in urine. Overall, it appears that aprepitant undergoes extensive metabolism and is primarily eliminated via excretion of ...Missing: percentage | Show results with:percentage
  19. [19]
    [PDF] 21-549 Emend Chemistry Review - accessdata.fda.gov
    Feb 26, 2003 · CHEMICAL NAME, STRUCTURAL FORMULA, MOLECULAR FORMULA, ... Aprepitant is a crystalline solid that is practically insoluble in water.
  20. [20]
    Preparation and Pharmacokinetic Study of Aprepitant–Sulfobutyl ...
    As a weak basic compound, APR is relatively lipophilic (log P at pH 7 is 4.8) and poorly water soluble (3–7 μg/mL) at pH 2–10 (6). Early screening of the salt ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  21. [21]
    EP2477608B1 - Oral solid dosage form containing nanoparticles ...
    ... nanoparticles, which suggests that there are ... 100-200 nm (nanosizing), which increases the ... aprepitant, and hydroxypropylcellulose (steric ...
  22. [22]
  23. [23]
    2005 Greener Synthetic Pathways Award (Merck & Co., Inc.) - EPA
    Nov 21, 2024 · A redesigned, efficient synthesis of aprepitant, the active ingredient in Emend®: A new therapy for chemotherapy-induced emesis.
  24. [24]
    [PDF] Chemistry Review(s) - accessdata.fda.gov
    Jan 28, 2008 · CHEMICAL NAME, STRUCTURAL FORMULA, MOLECULAR FORMULA, ... insolubility of aprepitant in water, a specification has been set for the amount of ...
  25. [25]
    Development of aprepitant, the first neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist ...
    The development of aprepitant included a novel nanoparticle formulation to optimize oral absorption and innovative chemistry to discover a prodrug form suitable ...Missing: original | Show results with:original
  26. [26]
    Neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists for chemotherapy-induced ...
    The discovery of several NK1 receptor antagonists is a big revolution to dealt this problem. ... In the early 1990s, the first small molecule brain ...
  27. [27]
    Comparison of three preclinical models for nausea and vomiting ...
    In ferrets, cisplatin (8mg/kg, i.p.) induced acute and delayed emesis (371.8±47.8 emetic events over 72h) which was antagonized by aprepitant (1mg/kg, p.o.).
  28. [28]
    The novel NK1 receptor antagonist MK–0869 (L ... - ScienceDirect.com
    In a model of acute and delayed emesis, ferrets were dosed with cisplatin (5 mg/kg i.p.) and the retching and vomiting response recorded for 72 h. Pretreatment ...
  29. [29]
    NK1 receptor antagonist - Wikipedia
    Studies showed that the inhibition constant (Ki) for NK2 receptors was >10000-fold higher and for NK3 receptors >1000-fold higher than that for NK1 receptors.
  30. [30]
    US5719147A - Morpholine and thiomorpholine tachykinin receptor ...
    Substituted heterocycles of the general structural formula: are tachykinin receptor antagonists useful in the treatment of inflammatory diseases, ...
  31. [31]
    The oral neurokinin-1 antagonist aprepitant for the prevention of ...
    Conclusion: Compared with standard dual therapy, addition of aprepitant was generally well tolerated and provided consistently superior protection against CINV ...Missing: NEJM | Show results with:NEJM
  32. [32]
    Addition of the neurokinin 1 receptor antagonist aprepitant ... - PubMed
    For Day 1, the complete response rates were 82.8% for the aprepitant group and 68.4% for the standard therapy group (P < 0.001); for Days 2-5, the complete ...
  33. [33]
    Drug Approval Package: EMEND (Aprepitant) NDA #21-549
    Jul 6, 2003 · Drug Approval Package EMEND (Aprepitant) Capsules. Company: Merck. Application No.: 21-549. Approval Date: 3/26/2003. Date created: July 06, 2003.Missing: Generic | Show results with:Generic
  34. [34]
    [PDF] EMEND® - accessdata.fda.gov
    PONV Study 2 failed to satisfy its primary hypothesis that aprepitant is superior to ondansetron in the prevention of PONV as measured by the proportion of ...
  35. [35]
    Single-dose aprepitant vs ondansetron for the prevention ... - PubMed
    May 30, 2007 · Results: Aprepitant at both doses was non-inferior to ondansetron for complete response 0-24 h after surgery (64% for aprepitant 40 mg, 63% for ...
  36. [36]
    Emend | European Medicines Agency (EMA)
    Other information about Emend​​ Emend received a marketing authorisation valid throughout the EU on 11 November 2003.
  37. [37]
    FDA Approves Pediatric Indication for EMEND® (aprepitant ...
    Sep 2, 2015 · EMEND capsules are now approved for use in combination with other antiemetic agents in patients 12 years of age and older and patients less than 12 years who ...
  38. [38]
    [PDF] Joint Summary Clinical Review: Focinvez (Fosaprepitant Injection)
    A study to evaluate pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of a single dose of Fosaprepitant Injection 150 mg/50 mL (3 mg/mL) for prevention of ...
  39. [39]
    Aprepitant for Chemotherapy-Induced Emesis (CAG-00248R) - CMS
    Poorly controlled nausea and vomiting (N&V) can result in significant and severe physiologic consequences, including nutritional derangements, metabolic ...
  40. [40]
    Lack of efficacy of the substance p (neurokinin1 receptor) antagonist ...
    Feb 1, 2006 · An early clinical trial suggested that the substance P (neurokinin(1) receptor) antagonist, aprepitant, might provide a unique mechanism of antidepressant ...Missing: failed | Show results with:failed
  41. [41]
    The role of substance P in stress and anxiety responses
    Aug 7, 2025 · Preclinical and clinical ... It has been shown that anxiety and stress responses are modulated by substance P (SP) released within the amygdala.<|control11|><|separator|>
  42. [42]
    Substance P receptor antagonists in psychiatry - PubMed
    First, SP and NK1R are expressed in brain regions that are involved in stress, fear and affective response (e.g. amygdala, hippocampus, hypothalamus and frontal ...
  43. [43]
    Demonstration of the efficacy and safety of a novel substance P ...
    Demonstration of the efficacy and safety of a novel substance P (NK1) receptor antagonist in major depression. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2004 Feb;29(2):385-92.Missing: pilot | Show results with:pilot
  44. [44]
  45. [45]
    Addition of an NK1 receptor antagonist to an SSRI did not enhance ...
    Concomitant use of aprepitant + paroxetine for 6 weeks did not provide greater antidepressant benefit compared with paroxetine + placebo in patients with ...
  46. [46]
    NK1 receptor antagonists for depression: Why a validated ... - PubMed
    Dec 1, 2017 · Aprepitant may have failed in Phase III because of an inadequate understanding of the relationship between brain NK1 receptor occupancy and ...Missing: 2006 | Show results with:2006
  47. [47]
    Depression clinical trials worldwide: a systematic analysis of the ...
    Jul 31, 2024 · ... a recent review indicated new potential for aprepitant ... major depressive disorder or depressive symptoms: meta‐ analysis of clinical trials.
  48. [48]
    A Systematic Review on Cannabis Hyperemesis Syndrome and Its ...
    Nov 1, 2021 · The chronic longstanding use of cannabis has been implicated in causing refractory nausea and vomiting named cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome.Abstract · Methods · Results · Discussion
  49. [49]
    A Comprehensive Review and Update on Cannabis Hyperemesis ...
    Cannabis hyperemesis syndrome (CHS) is a gut–brain axis disorder characterized by recurring nausea and vomiting intensified by excessive cannabis consumption.2. Pathophysiology · 2.2. Endocannabinoid System... · 5. Management
  50. [50]
    Cannabinoid Hyperemesis Syndrome in Adolescents: The Role of ...
    Sep 18, 2025 · Aprepitant, a neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist, was subsequently given, and both patients experienced rapid and sustained improvement in ...
  51. [51]
    [PDF] Cannabinoid Hyperemesis Syndrome clinical pathway
    Discontinue if any skin irritation/burning. Aprepitant. 125 mg day 1, then 80 mg days 2 and 3, after that 2x/week until symptoms cease.
  52. [52]
    Cannabinoid Hyperemesis Syndrome Treated With Fosaprepitant
    We present a case where fosaprepitant was utilized for intractable nausea and vomiting when other treatment modalities failed for CHS. Keywords: antiemetics, ...
  53. [53]
    EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF APREPITANT FOR CHILDREN WITH ...
    May 19, 2024 · Background: There is growing evidence that aprepitant can be helpful for patients with cyclic vomiting syndrome (CVS) and cannabinoid ...
  54. [54]
    P3.005: Cannabinoid Hyperemesis Syndrome in Adolescents
    P3.005: Cannabinoid Hyperemesis Syndrome in Adolescents: The Role of Aprepitant as a New Treatment Option for Rapid Symptom Relief. Sunday, September 28, 2025.
  55. [55]
    Antiemetic prophylaxis for chemoradiotherapy-induced nausea and ...
    May 30, 2022 · The present study extends the combination of aprepitant, ondansetron, and dexamethasone as antiemetic prophylaxis to patients with HNSCC ...
  56. [56]
    Potential therapeutic effect of NK1R antagonist in diabetic non ...
    These data indicated that aprepitant significantly accelerated diabetic wound healing by promoting wound re-epithelialization, collagen deposition and ...
  57. [57]
    Aprepitant for the Treatment of Chronic Refractory Pruritus - PMC
    Aprepitant was first approved in the United States in March 2003 to prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) [1]. The drug was originally ...
  58. [58]
    Aprepitant for the management of nausea with inpatient IV ... - PubMed
    Oct 11, 2016 · This study provides Class IV evidence that for patients with medically refractory migraine receiving IV DHE, oral aprepitant reduces nausea.Missing: prophylaxis | Show results with:prophylaxis
  59. [59]
    Development of the 2nd generation neurokinin-1 receptor ...
    A wealth of preclinical evidence implicates substance P and the neurokinin-1 (NK-1) receptor as important targets in the pathogenesis of anxiety disorders ...Abstract · Introduction · Acknowledgements