Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Busting

Busting is a 1974 directed by in his theatrical feature debut, starring and as detectives Michael Keneely and Patrick Farrel, who defy departmental orders and corruption to pursue a powerful mobster using unorthodox tactics amid chases, shootouts, and fistfights. The film portrays the realities of , including , stings, and internal malfeasance, emphasizing the protagonists' methods to expose and dismantle networks. While critically received with mixed reviews—earning a 17% approval rating on from limited contemporary assessments—Busting stands out for its raw, unpolished depiction of law enforcement's underbelly and Hyams' dynamic tracking shots in sequences, influencing later genres without achieving commercial blockbuster status. No major awards or widespread accolades followed its release, though it highlighted themes of institutional corruption that resonated in 1970s amid post-Watergate skepticism toward authority.

Synopsis

Plot Summary

Busting follows Los Angeles vice squad detectives Michael Keneely () and Patrick Farrell (), who specialize in raiding operations involving , , and narcotics. Their partnership is marked by contrasting personalities—Keneely's laid-back demeanor complements Farrell's intensity—as they navigate a corrupt system where arrests of low-level offenders frequently fail due to interference from higher authorities. The narrative unfolds episodically through a series of busts, beginning with the apprehension of high-end Jackie Faraday (Cornelia Sharpe), whose appointment book implicates influential figures. Evidence from this and subsequent raids, including a operation and a exchange discovered during a search, is systematically undermined, revealing the influence of mobster Carl Rizzo (), who controls vice rackets through payoffs to police and politicians. Defying orders from superiors to cease pursuit, the detectives conduct off-duty and aggressive tactics, leading to chases—such as one through a crowded farmer's market—and confrontations with Rizzo's enforcers. Tensions escalate as internal police pressures mount, including reassignment to demeaning tasks and pressure to perjure themselves. The climax involves unorthodox methods to infiltrate Rizzo's operations, culminating in his arrest during a hospital-based deal, though Rizzo mocks their efforts, confident in his ability to evade conviction through connections. The film resolves grimly with Keneely seeking civilian employment, underscoring the detectives' realization of systemic barriers to justice.

Production

Development and Pre-Production

Busting marked Peter Hyams's debut as a theatrical feature director, following his work in television. Producers and , fresh from the success of (1972), approached Hyams to develop a story centered on vice squad operations and offered him the chance to direct. Hyams, who also penned the , drew inspiration from real-world police activities amid the rising urban crime of the early , aiming to blend gritty realism with elements of humor and bureaucratic defiance in a framework. To ensure authenticity, Hyams conducted extensive research over six months, interviewing vice cops, prostitutes, and pimps across , , , and ; every key incident in the script derived from actual events reported by these sources. This approach distinguished the project from stylized predecessors like (1971), prioritizing unvarnished depictions of vice enforcement over pure procedural thriller tropes. , led by executive David Picker, greenlit the film with limited oversight, reflecting confidence in Hyams's vision despite his inexperience in features. Pre-production emphasized efficiency due to modest resources, culminating in a compressed timeline that began scripting and planning in early 1973, ahead of later that year. The lean setup, including a subsequent 35-day shooting schedule, underscored the film's independent ethos under Chartoff-Winkler Productions, aligning with ' distribution strategy for mid-budget action fare.

Casting and Character Development

Elliott Gould was selected to portray Vice Detective Michael Keneely, depicted as a tall, laconic officer who constantly chews gum and adopts a more relaxed demeanor amid the gritty demands of vice enforcement. was cast as his partner, Vice Detective Patrick Farrell, characterized as shorter, tougher, and more volatile, creating a dynamic contrast that underscores the authentic banter and tensions of real-world police partnerships in vice squads. This pairing drew on the actors' established personas—Gould's wry detachment from roles like The Long Goodbye and Blake's intense edge from —to reflect the film's emphasis on flawed yet resolute officers navigating bureaucratic hurdles and criminal networks without glorifying lawbreaking. Supporting characters reinforced the narrative's unvarnished view of vice-world operators, with cast as Carl Rizzo, a calculating mob boss whose operations span , drugs, and , presented as emblematic of entrenched urban criminality rather than sympathetic figures. played Rizzo's enforcer and bouncer, embodying the physical intimidation and moral depravity of low-level syndicate muscle in a manner that highlights the seedy underbelly of 1970s nightlife without mitigation or allure. These roles were shaped to contrast sharply with the protagonists' dedication, portraying criminals as opportunistic and corrosive to civic order, informed by director ' mandate to depict realities drawn from consultations with . The lead characters' traits and interactions were developed to mirror documented experiences of Los Angeles vice officers during a period of escalating street-level crimes, including a surge in prostitution and narcotics offenses that strained police resources from the late 1960s into the 1970s. Keneely and Farrell emerge as imperfect but persistent enforcers—prone to sarcasm and rule-bending yet committed to disrupting syndicates—eschewing idealized heroism for a pragmatic resilience against systemic releases of arrested suspects back into circulation. This characterization aligns with Hyams' intent to infuse procedural authenticity, prioritizing the causal frustrations of frontline policing over romanticized anti-authority tropes prevalent in contemporaneous films.

Filming and Technical Aspects

Principal photography for Busting took place entirely on location in and , from March 2 to April 6, 1973, enabling the capture of authentic , vice districts, and bustling public spaces such as Grand Central Market and the to convey the gritty realism of 1970s Los Angeles vice work. The adhered to a tight 35-day shooting schedule, prioritizing efficiency in documenting chaotic raid sequences and street-level pursuits amid real city environments rather than constructed sets. Cinematographer Earl Rath utilized the natural settings of to photograph the film's action, fostering a raw, unpolished aesthetic that mirrored the physical hazards and unpredictability of undercover operations, with minimal reliance on artificial enhancements. Practical stunts were employed to depict the tangible risks of busts, including hand-to-hand confrontations and vehicular chases, underscoring the film's commitment to procedural authenticity over stylized effects.

Release

Theatrical Premiere

Busting premiered in on February 6, 1974, marking the theatrical debut of director ' feature film. The opening was followed by a release on February 27, 1974, and a subsequent wide distribution by across the . United Artists marketed the film as a raw, unvarnished depiction of policing, contrasting with more idealized portrayals in contemporary cop movies. Trailers focused on high-stakes action, moral complexities in , and direct clashes with figures, appealing to viewers amid the era's growing skepticism toward institutional authority following events like Watergate. The campaign emphasized the film's roots in authentic underworld operations, targeting adult audiences drawn to gritty crime narratives. This approach aligned with broader trends in toward realism in depictions of urban and .

Box Office Performance

Busting earned approximately $3.6 million at the domestic , reflecting moderate commercial viability rather than performance against its low-budget production. This figure positioned the film well below 1974's top earners, including disaster spectacles like , which grossed $116 million in the United States. Released during a period of intense theatrical competition, Busting contended with high-profile releases amid broader economic strains from the 1973–1974 oil crisis, which quadrupled global oil prices and fueled recessionary pressures. Despite these headwinds, the U.S. achieved record receipts of $1.9 billion for the year, driven largely by escapist . The film's stronger relative appeal in urban areas aligned with heightened public interest in gritty crime narratives, coinciding with FBI-reported surges in index crimes—violent offenses rose steadily through the 1970s, with rates climbing from 363.5 per 100,000 inhabitants in 1973 to higher peaks by decade's end. This context underscored demand for realistic depictions of law enforcement amid national anxieties over rising urban vice and mob activity.

Reception

Contemporary Critical Response

Vincent Canby of The New York Times, in a February 28, 1974, review, commended Busting as "a good one for a change" among cop films, highlighting its "cool, intelligent variation" on the genre through fresh, unglamorous portrayals of vice squad officers played by Elliott Gould and Robert Blake, crediting director Peter Hyams for breathing vitality into familiar cops-and-robbers tropes. Canby appreciated the film's blend of gritty realism and wry humor, positioning it as a counterpoint to more idealized heroic depictions prevalent in earlier 1970s police thrillers like The French Connection. However, Canby expressed reservations about the film's pacing and episodic structure, which he found uneven despite its stylistic strengths. Other contemporary reviewers echoed this ambivalence; for instance, Alan R. Howard in the April 4, 1974, Hollywood Reporter noted strengths in the leads' chemistry but critiqued the narrative's formulaic elements amid the era's proliferation of vice and corruption-themed cop movies. Critics also faulted the film for underdeveloped supporting characters, particularly female roles reduced to stereotypical vice figures without deeper exploration, reflecting broader genre conventions rather than innovative depth. These divided sentiments are captured in the film's aggregated contemporary critic score of 17% on , based on six reviews, underscoring acclaim for Gould and Blake's dynamic partnership against a backdrop of structural shortcomings.

Long-Term Critical Assessment

In the decades following its release, Busting has garnered renewed appreciation among film scholars and critics for its unpolished portrayal of urban vice and institutional hurdles in , particularly as formats and streaming platforms made it accessible to wider audiences in the . Retrospective analyses, such as those accompanying the film's 2012 DVD release and 2022 Blu-ray edition, highlight its role as an early exemplar of the subgenre's shift toward moral ambiguity and procedural grit, predating more polished entries like (1987) by emphasizing raw interpersonal friction between officers amid systemic corruption rather than formulaic heroism. Critics have noted how the film's depiction of narcotics raids and mob infiltration anticipates the genre's evolution, blending procedural realism with cynical undertones that avoid romanticizing work. Actor , in a 2015 audio for the film's release, underscored its ethos, describing the narrative's focus on vice detectives battling entrenched influence and departmental indifference as a deliberate critique of real-world institutional failures in 1970s policing. Gould emphasized the characters' isolation in pursuing against protected criminal networks, framing the film as a stark rejection of sanitized narratives prevalent in earlier decades. This perspective aligns with later scholarly views praising the movie's causal depiction of police-mob entanglements, where operational risks stem directly from political cover-ups rather than abstract villainy, lending a prescient edge to its procedural elements. Filmmaker has further amplified the film's cult status through discussions on his Video Archives Podcast, where he and co-host dissected Busting's kinetic action sequences and vice-squad authenticity as influences on subsequent gritty crime cinema, positioning it as an underappreciated '70s artifact with enduring stylistic verve. While some modern critiques acknowledge dated aspects, such as period-specific dialogue and pacing that can feel uneven by contemporary standards, these are often outweighed by commendations for the film's unflinching avoidance of moral equivocation—portraying lords as unambiguously predatory and officers as flawed yet resolute—grounded in the era's empirical observations of underworld dynamics.

Audience and Cultural Reception

The film garnered a dedicated audience among viewers appreciative of gritty, procedural depictions of operations, evidenced by its user rating of 6.4 out of 10 based on over 2,300 votes. This score reflects approval for the film's raw portrayal of bust operations, with many users praising the unpolished authenticity of tactics against , contrasting with more stylized contemporaries. Audience metrics on further indicate middling but engaged popular reception, with a 51% Popcornmeter score from limited verified viewer inputs. In the context of the early 1970s, when U.S. rates surged—FBI data showing a 126% increase in murders from 1960 to 1974—Busting appealed to segments of the public favoring narratives of assertive restoring order amid perceived institutional leniency toward criminals. The protagonists' relentless pursuit of figures, often at odds with bureaucratic superiors, resonated as a to post-Watergate of , positioning the film as implicitly supportive of street-level policing over systemic . This alignment contributed to its niche endurance, particularly among those valuing unapologetic depictions of vice eradication. Over time, Busting cultivated a in action cinema circles, recognized for pioneering buddy-cop dynamics with moral grit, as noted in compilations of underappreciated entries. Its availability on formats like DVD and streaming services such as sustains viewership, with user discussions on platforms like emphasizing the visceral satisfaction of raid sequences and humorous undercurrents in criminal takedowns. This grassroots appreciation underscores its embedding in popular memory as a raw artifact of era-specific tensions between and enforcement, rather than broad mainstream acclaim.

Themes and Analysis

Portrayal of Law Enforcement Realism

In Busting, the protagonists, LAPD detectives Michael Keneely and Patrick Farrel, employ unorthodox tactics such as undercover stings and aggressive pursuits to dismantle low-level operations, often circumventing departmental protocols that prioritize paperwork and chain-of-command approvals over immediate action. These methods arise as pragmatic countermeasures to entrenched bureaucratic delays, where arrests of prostitutes and drug peddlers frequently result in rapid releases due to judicial leniency or external pressures, mirroring documented LAPD challenges in which squads encountered systemic obstacles that hampered sustained enforcement against organized rackets. The underscores the personal risks borne by dedicated officers, depicting high-stakes chases and shootouts in settings like late-night markets, where bystander peril heightens the stakes without glorifying , instead illustrating the raw hazards of confronting mob-insulated networks that evade standard procedures. This portrayal counters idealized depictions by emphasizing resolve amid institutional , as superiors undermine investigations into major figures, reflecting real-era LAPD dynamics where within vice units enabled persistence through payoffs and influence peddling. By linking procedural laxity directly to —such as arrested operatives resuming activities under protection—Busting grounds its narrative in causal mechanisms of entrenchment, drawing from the era's empirical realities where lenient handling of offenses correlated with unchecked expansion of and syndicates, rather than sanitized views that attribute failures solely to officer overreach. Director , leveraging his journalistic background, infuses the proceedings with a gritty that prioritizes operational efficacy, portraying aggression as a necessary response to systemic inefficacy rather than inherent pathology.

Depiction of Crime and Vice in 1970s Los Angeles

In Busting, is portrayed through gritty raids on streetwalkers and pimps operating in seedy underbelly locations, emphasizing the exploitative networks profiting from women's vulnerability amid urban economic pressures. These scenes align with 1970s realities, where prostitution arrests by the LAPD numbered in the thousands annually, often tied to organized elements controlling territories for profit rather than isolated acts. Drug operations are shown as intertwined with , featuring deals in back alleys and after-hours clubs, reflecting the era's surge in narcotics trafficking that fueled a rise in drug-related homicides from 564 total killings in 1970 to 1,006 in 1979, with attributing many to distribution rivalries and user violence. Gambling dens, depicted as underground poker games and bookie setups protected by muscle, underscore systemic erosion, mirroring persistent mob involvement in LA's illegal betting rings despite crackdowns. The film's mob boss, portrayed by as a calculating operator named Patrillo, embodies rational in expanding empires through payoffs to officials, critiquing how lax and political tolerance allowed such networks to thrive unchecked. This avoids romanticizing criminals as anti-heroes, instead presenting them as pragmatic exploiters capitalizing on permissive societal shifts, such as expanding and urban anonymity in a where overall rates climbed amid post-1960s debates on "victimless" offenses. Unlike contemporaneous glorifying underworld glamour, Busting highlights 's corrosive impact—family breakdowns, community decay, and eroded public safety—without excusing participants' agency in fueling demand. Cop triumphs over specific busts provide narrative counterbalance, showcasing arrests that disrupt operations and affirm enforcement's role, yet underscore broader futility against entrenched corruption, grounded in the vice squad's real-world episodic struggles against resilient syndicates. This depiction prioritizes empirical grime over moral equivocation, portraying LA's vice landscape as a profit-driven decay enabled by weak institutional resolve rather than inevitable urban fate.

Buddy Cop Dynamics and Moral Ambiguity

In Busting, Detectives Michael Keneely () and Patrick Farrel () embody the odd-couple archetype central to early narratives, with Keneely's quirky, gum-chewing demeanor contrasting Farrel's tough, one-liner-delivering intensity, fostering a low-key camaraderie that propels the episodic structure. Their thrives on resigned mutual reliance amid routine busts of prostitutes and small-time operators, treating as pragmatic maintenance rather than heroic quests, yet escalating when targeting mobster Carl Rizzo despite departmental pushback. This dynamic introduces moral ambiguity through their unorthodox tactics, such as unauthorized searches and defying superiors' orders to lay off Rizzo, which skirt legality but stem from necessity in a corrupt system riddled with payoffs and bureaucratic inertia. Unlike outright , their methods underscore a to delivery when institutional failures—evident in released suspects and internal opposition—render standard procedures futile, positioning the detectives as resolute agents against entrenched rather than indistinguishable from criminals. Black humor permeates their interactions as a mechanism, manifesting in sardonic exchanges like Farrel's fatalistic quips during botched operations or Keneely's ironic recitals, which humanize the grind without undermining the stakes of their ethical . This levity, blended with verbal duels against adversaries, reinforces a framework prioritizing tangible results over procedural purity, challenging equivocal portrayals by affirming the detectives' integrity amid pervasive cynicism.

Controversies

Accusations of Glorifying Unorthodox Policing

Upon its release on February 27, 1974, "Busting" drew accusations from some critics of glorifying unorthodox policing tactics, including , violations, and physical , as employed by protagonists Keneely () and Farrell () against Los Angeles vice lords. These claims positioned the film within the broader wave of cop movies, akin to "" (1971), where rule-bending was seen as endorsing vigilantism amid public frustration with escalating urban crime—homicides in rose 15% from 1970 to 1973—and perceived judicial leniency. Left-leaning reviewers, echoing concerns from figures like on similar films, argued such portrayals risked normalizing fascist fantasies of unchecked authority, potentially eroding in pursuit of order. The narrative, however, frames these methods not as blanket but as calibrated against irremediable threats—entrenched pimps and bosses shielded by corrupt insiders and legal technicalities—culminating in the detectives' suspension, which exposes systemic failures rather than celebrates . This structure reflects first-principles : conventional protocols enabled criminal entrenchment, necessitating targeted deviations to disrupt operations, as evidenced by the film's basis in real LAPD experiences where standard arrests often collapsed due to witness intimidation or bought-off evidence. Empirically, the depicted aggressive interventions paralleled LAPD vice unit outcomes, with departmental records showing over 5,000 arrests for , , and related organized vice activities in 1976 alone, correlating with temporary disruptions in Hollywood-area rings that evaded routine enforcement. Right-leaning commentary, by contrast, lauded the realism as validating tough measures against moral decay—fueled by unchecked vice profiting from societal breakdown—over abstract procedural ideals that empirically failed to curb or resilience. Such defenses highlight biases: outlets, often left-inclined, amplified excess risks while underemphasizing data on absent decisive action.

Depictions of Corruption and Ethical Concerns

Busting portrays as a barrier to effective enforcement, primarily through individual officers and superiors who shield figures. Detectives Michael Keneely and Patrick Farrel discover a prostitute's contact book listing fellow officers, implying direct collusion in protecting pimps and pornographers tied to Carl Rizzo. Superiors routinely dismiss arrests involving Rizzo's network, such as a botched bust, allowing mob-influenced operations to persist unchecked. These depictions frame as opportunistic graft by specific actors exploiting lax oversight in squads, rather than an inherent departmental flaw. Ethical concerns emerge from the interplay between the protagonists' aggressive tactics and the they confront, raising questions about boundaries in combating entrenched . Keneely and Farrel employ , , and warrantless raids—methods mirroring the ethical lapses of crooked colleagues—to target Rizzo's syndicate, culminating in a hospital that disrupts his operations. The implies that such ends-oriented approaches yield tangible results in disrupting mob-police alliances, as evidenced by the vice king's downfall despite institutional resistance, aligning with pragmatic assessments of high- environments where strict proceduralism fails. However, Keneely's at the film's close underscores the personal toll, highlighting unresolved tensions without endorsing unchecked . While the film effectively spotlights individual graft—such as bribe-taking and information leaks—some analyses its limited push for structural remedies, portraying honest officers as isolated rather than catalysts for . This focus on personal agency over systemic reflects cop genre conventions, balancing exposure of real-era vulnerabilities with a non-indictment of policing as a whole.

Legacy

Influence on the Buddy Cop Genre

"Busting" (1974) established key precedents in the subgenre through its portrayal of partners Mike Lally and Sonny Gondolfi, whose mismatched personalities—Lally's world-weary cynicism contrasting Gondolfi's impulsive aggression—drove episodic narratives centered on and narcotics raids in . Released on March 27, 1974, the film predated similar entries like (December 1974) by integrating gritty procedural realism with terse banter and foot chases, elements that became staples in the format's evolution toward 1980s action-comedies. Peter Hyams' directorial style in "Busting," marked by handheld cinematography capturing chaotic busts and a focus on institutional corruption hindering enforcement, influenced the subgenre's emphasis on unorthodox policing tactics over procedural orthodoxy. This approach prefigured the grit-humor balance in films like 48 Hrs. (1982), where reluctant partnerships tackled vice rings amid moral gray areas, though "Busting" leaned more toward cynicism than outright comedy. Hyams himself revisited refined iterations in Running Scared (1986), a Chicago-set buddy cop tale amplifying vehicular pursuits and partner friction in a manner resonant with contemporaries such as Beverly Hills Cop (1984), which adopted outsider-insider dynamics against urban vice. While lauded for pioneering vice-focused episodics that grounded dynamics in empirical work—drawing from Hyams' into LAPD operations—the film has been critiqued in genre retrospectives for reinforcing a formula of reactive busts and ethical compromises that later entries, including Hyams' own, commercialized without deeper causal exploration of systemic drivers. Such structural templates, evident in the film's 92-minute of interconnected raids yielding partial victories, contributed to the subgenre's proliferation but occasionally at the expense of innovation beyond heightened stakes or star power in successors.

Rediscovery and Modern Appreciation

The 2015 Blu-ray release by marked a significant revival for Busting, providing high-definition access to the film after decades of limited availability on , which broadened its audience beyond initial theatrical and viewings. This edition included audio commentaries, notably one featuring alongside critic Kim Morgan, where Gould discussed production challenges, including on-set improvisations and the film's unvarnished depiction of vice squad operations drawn from real policing experiences. A limited edition Blu-ray followed in 2021, further sustaining interest among collectors. Streaming platforms in the and beyond, such as , expanded accessibility, allowing younger viewers to encounter the film's raw portrayal of 1970s tactics without reliance on rare tapes or cable reruns. This digital availability coincided with reevaluations emphasizing Busting's resistance to sanitized narratives, particularly its unapologetic focus on aggressive crime-fighting amid contemporary of methods. Filmmaker has highlighted Busting in discussions and writings, praising its gritty buddy-cop dynamics and stylistic elements like chase sequences that echoed in his own work, such as the foot pursuit in (1992), contributing to its cult status among cinephiles who value pre-political-correctness depictions of vice eradication. Post-2020 online engagement reflects this appreciation, with logs showing spikes in viewings and reviews lauding the film's cynical humor, scuzzy authenticity, and rejection of moral equivocation in policing rings, often contrasting it favorably against modern reluctance to portray decisively. Similar sentiments appear in threads, where users in commended the leads' chemistry and the movie's unfiltered style as a refreshing antidote to current cultural hesitancy on vice squad realism. These discussions underscore a niche but growing recognition of Busting as a document of uncompromised 1970s urban enforcement, valued for prioritizing operational efficacy over institutional critique.

References

  1. [1]
    Busting (1974) - IMDb
    Rating 6.4/10 (2,365) Hyams engineered something of an achievement by crafting a rough cop film sans taking advantage of the right-wing scorn that warns us all to arm ourselves.Busting · Parents guide · Release info · Full cast & crewMissing: achievements controversies
  2. [2]
    Directors Special: Peter Hyams Goes Film-By-Film | Movies | Empire
    Jul 24, 2014 · ... controversial 2001 sequel, 2010. Busting. Busting. "That was my first film as a director. I was a writer, and I didn't want to write for ...
  3. [3]
    AFI|Catalog - American Film Institute
    A prostitute named Jackie pays an office visit to her client, a dentist, and police detectives Michael Keneely and Patrick Farrel blackmail the man into helping ...Missing: summary | Show results with:summary
  4. [4]
    Busting | Rotten Tomatoes
    Rating 17% (6) Busting is a 1974 crime movie about LA vice cops who go after a mobster, with a 17% Tomatometer and 51% Popcornmeter.
  5. [5]
    BUSTING is a raucous crime cinema classic - FuriousCinema.com
    Jul 28, 2016 · It features great acting, memorable action sequences like these crazy shootouts filmed via tracking shots and an ambulance chase that is so damn ...Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies<|control11|><|separator|>
  6. [6]
    Busting, directed by Peter Hyams | Classic Film Review
    Rating 3.0 · Review by Kevin HallSep 8, 2022 · Busting is a 1974 cop drama about two LA vice cops using unconventional methods, exposing police corruption, and features creative ...Missing: summary | Show results with:summary
  7. [7]
    'Busting' (1974): Overlooked, neglected gem from violent, cynical '70s
    Dec 9, 2017 · Everything in Busting is illegal and corrupt. When Keneely and Farrel bust the gorgeous hooker Jackie (lynx-eyed beauty Cornelia Sharp, looking ...Missing: synopsis | Show results with:synopsis
  8. [8]
    2,500 Movies Challenge: #2,939. Busting (1974) - Elliott Gould in ...
    Dec 9, 2023 · While searching the residence of one of Rizzo's known accomplices, Keneely and Farrel happen upon a drug swap. Shots are fired, and a chase ...Missing: plot summary -
  9. [9]
    AN INTERVIEW WITH PETER HYAMS (PART 1 OF 2)
    In the first part of a two part interview, I spoke with Peter about his early years and breaking into the industry, BUSTING, RUNNING SCARED, and the road that ...
  10. [10]
    Film: Breathing Life Into Cops and Robbers Style:'Busting' Stars ...
    Feb 28, 1974 · "Busting" is the first theatrical film to be directed by Mr. Hyams, though he has directed films for television and wrote the screenplay for " ...Missing: facts achievements controversies
  11. [11]
    https://www.money-into-light.com/2016/08/an-interview-with-peter-hyams-part-1-of.html
  12. [12]
    Busting (1974) - Filming & production - IMDb
    Busting: Defying orders to lay-off the case, two Los Angeles vice-squad cops go after a local mobster and use unorthodox methods to achieve results.Missing: budget | Show results with:budget
  13. [13]
    Busting - DVD Talk
    Mar 9, 2012 · Busting's production design matches its dyspeptic moral outlook, with cinematographer Earl Rath (lots of noted, and now classic, television ...Missing: handheld | Show results with:handheld
  14. [14]
    Busting - Books And Comics - Rock! Shock! Pop!
    Feb 20, 2012 · The Movie: Peter Hyam's 1974 cop film Busting follows two officers of the L.A.P.D.'s vice squad - Mike Keneely (Elliot Gould) and ...Missing: backstories | Show results with:backstories
  15. [15]
    Busting (1974) - Movie | Moviefone
    Rating 63% (49) Movie Details ; Theatrical Release:February 27th, 1974 ; Original Language:English ; Production Companies:Chartoff-Winkler Productions, United Artists.
  16. [16]
    BUSTING (1974, Elliott Gould, Robert Blake, Peter Hyams) - YouTube
    Jul 27, 2023 · Theatrical trailer of "Busting" by Peter Hyams. Starring Elliott Gould, Robert Blake, Allen Garfield, Antonio Fargas, Michael Lerner, ...Missing: inspiration vice squad Los Angeles
  17. [17]
    Was "Mame" *Really* a Flop? - Forums - THE LUCY LOUNGE
    Dec 18, 2018 · Busting (1974), Elliott Gould &, $3.6, $17.4, 64, 0/0. Robert Blake. 75, The ... For somebody looking for box office information on 1974 it is ...
  18. [18]
    The Towering Inferno (1974) - Box Office Mojo
    All Releases ; Domestic (100%) $116,000,000 ; International (–) – ; Worldwide $116,001,993.
  19. [19]
    Oil Embargo, 1973–1974 - Office of the Historian
    The onset of the embargo contributed to an upward spiral in oil prices with global implications. The price of oil per barrel first doubled, then quadrupled, ...
  20. [20]
    Film Box‐Office Receipts In '74 a Record $1.9‐Billion
    Jan 26, 1975 · In reporting on admissions during 1974, Mr. Valenti said that the average admission price was $1.88, up from $1.76 for 1973. Without listing ...
  21. [21]
    United States Crime Rates 1960 t0 2019 - The Disaster Center
    For the year 2016 and beyond the FBI report includes all genders of rape in the Forcible Rape category. Prior to 2016 rape reports counted were by females only.
  22. [22]
    UNIFORM CRIME REPORTS FOR THE UNITED STATES - 1970
    AN INITIAL SECTION PROVIDES A SUMMARY OF THE GENERAL CRIME PICTURE FOR THE UNITED STATES. THE VOLUME, TREND AND RATE OF CRIME RELATED TO CURRENT POPULATION ...
  23. [23]
    AFI|Catalog
    ... Busting (1974, see entry). In a positive review on 26 Apr 1974, LAT's ... New York opening: 10 Apr 1974; Los Angeles opening: 26 Apr 1974. Production ...
  24. [24]
    MGM MOD DVD of the Week: Busting - Radiator Heaven
    Feb 28, 2012 · RUNNING SCARED is similarly overlooked and overshadowed by the likes of BEVERLY HILLS COP, 48 HRS., and LETHAL WEAPON, just as BUSTING is often ...
  25. [25]
    BUSTING (1974) – Blu-ray Review - ZekeFilm
    Apr 8, 2022 · His amped-up antics are more “bluster” than “busting”, but 1970s filmmaking stalwart Peter Hyams knows exactly which direction to send him in.
  26. [26]
    10 Underappreciated American Neo-Noirs of the Early 1970s
    Jul 26, 2022 · In my humble opinion, one of the most underrated crime films of the 1970s. Busting (1974). Elliot Gould and Robert Blake are Keneely and ...
  27. [27]
    21 Things We Learned from Elliott Gould's Busting Commentary
    Dec 17, 2015 · Hyams and his two leads (Gould and Robert Blake) mix gritty violence and unfiltered cynicism in with the laughs resulting in an odd duck of a movie.
  28. [28]
    In Praise of Peter Hyams, the Journeyman Auteur - Crooked Marquee
    Sep 8, 2022 · Hyams followed up Busting with two pictures—Out Time (1974) and Peeper (1975)—that flopped before scoring a huge rebound with Capricorn One ( ...
  29. [29]
    Busting (1974) - User reviews - IMDb
    Directed by Peter Hyams, Busting apparently inspired the television show Starsky & Hutch. ... Los Angeles vice cops Keneely (Elliott Gould) and Farrell ...
  30. [30]
    11 Lesser-Known Action Movies with a Cult Following - MovieWeb
    Aug 11, 2023 · 11 Lesser-Known Action Movies with a Cult Following · Overlord (2018) · Outland (1982) · The Heroic Trio (1993) · Busting (1974) · Darkman (1990).
  31. [31]
    Watch Busting | Prime Video - Amazon.com
    Rating 4.1 (108) Elliott Gould and Robert Blake star in this comedy/drama about vice officers, assigned to the mean streets of LA, who wage a war against crooked cops on the ...Missing: sales | Show results with:sales
  32. [32]
    Busting (1974) : r/underratedmovies - Reddit
    May 9, 2025 · Strange movie. I mainly remember that crazy chase through the market.
  33. [33]
    Public Corruption, L.A.-Style: Where Have the Notorious Gone?
    Jan 25, 1998 · ... corruption and scandal be studiously ignored, or written about so ... The LAPD's Central Vice Squad was on the take; and a loose ...Missing: 1970s | Show results with:1970s
  34. [34]
    Busting (1974) - Scopophilia
    Aug 17, 2012 · Hyams use of tracking camera shots helps build the tension and I found it interesting that an innocent bystander ends up getting shot and killed ...
  35. [35]
    Busting (1974) - a 35mm presentation - KINO Rotterdam
    Apr 23, 2025 · Busting is a rowdy cop movie where two vice-squad cops defy orders to pursue a mobster using unorthodox methods. It is an action, drama, crime  ...Missing: plot summary
  36. [36]
    [PDF] , GAMBLING - Office of Justice Programs
    Oct 25, 1973 · vice offenses such as narcotics and dangeroUS drugs over the past ... Prostitution l' the family unit think this type f o gambling might af ...
  37. [37]
    Homicide -- Los Angeles, 1970-1979 - CDC
    The term "drug activity" can apply to drug use by victims or offenders, as well as to the activities involved in distributing, buying, and selling drugs. Police ...
  38. [38]
    Gangster Squad: Rooting Out Corruption in Mob-Riddled Los Angeles
    Jan 11, 2013 · When he returns from World War II, O'Mara finds that Cohen has taken over the city, and has corrupted it with gambling, prostitution and drugs.
  39. [39]
    [PDF] 1970 to 1996 206 Law Enforcement, Courts, and Prisons - Census.gov
    This section presents data on crimes com- mitted, victims of crimes, arrests, and data related to criminal violations and the crimi- nal justice system.
  40. [40]
    Trigger-Happy Hollywood: Dirty Harry, Fascism, and the Liberal ...
    May 22, 2019 · Both Dirty Harry and Dirty Harry 2 are conservative films, as any pro-cop, pro-gun, pro-law-and-order film in the 1970s must have been. Yet ...
  41. [41]
    LOS ANGELES - STATISTICAL DIGEST, 1976
    OFFENSE STATISTICS ARE PRESENTED FOR HOMICIDE, FORCIBLE RAPE, AGGRAVATED ASSAULT, ROBBERY, BURGLARY, LARCENY, VEHICLE THEFTS, WORTHLESS DOCUMENT OFFENSES, ...Missing: vice 1970s
  42. [42]
    When Dirty Harry Fought Pauline Kael - Oscilloscope Laboratories
    Mar 20, 2019 · “Dirty” Harry Callahan fought many bad guys across five films between the years 1971 and 1988, from a serial killer named Scorpio to violent ...
  43. [43]
    Busting Review (1974) - The Spinning Image
    Either Busting was an exposé of the lengths police corruption had gone to in modern, nineteen-seventies America, or it was a rollicking comedy thriller where ...
  44. [44]
    Busting - Our Daily Film - WordPress.com
    Mar 18, 2017 · San Francisco police detectives Freebie and Bean are determined to bust local crime boss Red Meyers at any cost, even if this means destroying the whole city ...<|separator|>
  45. [45]
    The 10 Funniest Buddy Cop Movies You've Probably Never Seen
    Dec 21, 2023 · Busting can be seen as a kind of dry run for the whole of the buddy cop genre, in a way, and as such, features almost all the expected elements.Missing: influence | Show results with:influence
  46. [46]
    Busting Blu-ray
    Rating 6/10 · Review by Brian OrndorfOct 4, 2015 · Busting Blu-ray Release Date September 22, 2015. Blu-ray reviews, news, specs, ratings, screenshots. Cheap Blu-ray movies and deals.
  47. [47]
    Busting Limited Edition Blu-ray
    Sep 20, 2021 · The release will be available for purchase on December 7. Synopsis: Meet the long and short of L.A.'s vice squad…
  48. [48]
    Busting streaming: where to watch movie online? - JustWatch
    ROTTEN TOMATOES 17%. Genres. Action & Adventure, Crime, Drama, Mystery & Thriller, Comedy, Detective Crime, Action Comedy. Runtime. 1h 32min. Age rating. R ...
  49. [49]
    RESERVOIR DOGS (1992) and BUSTING (1974) - YouTube
    Nov 26, 2022 · I recently saw Peter Hyams' BUSTING (1974) for the first time and realized that the iconic foot chase in Quentin Tarantino's RESERVOIR DOGS ...
  50. [50]
    Busting (1974) - Peter Hyams - Letterboxd
    Rating 3.5 (5,059) Defying orders to lay-off the case, two Los Angeles vice-squad cops go after a local mobster and use unorthodox methods to achieve results.Missing: summary | Show results with:summary
  51. [51]
    Busting (1974) : r/iwatchedanoldmovie - Reddit
    Jul 16, 2024 · The story isn't very good but the movie has some style and the leads, Robert Blake and Elliot Gould do a good job being humorous.