Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Cheech and Chong's Next Movie

Cheech and Chong's Next Movie is a 1980 American comedy film directed by , who co-wrote and stars in it alongside as a pair of perpetually intoxicated slackers navigating chaotic escapades in . The film, produced and distributed by , serves as the second feature-length collaboration for the comedy duo following their 1978 debut , emphasizing episodic sketches revolving around marijuana consumption, aimless hedonism, and satirical jabs at authority figures and societal norms. Premiering on July 18, 1980, it features supporting appearances by actors such as and Betty Kennedy, with Chong assuming directorial control to avoid the creative constraints experienced under producer in the prior film. Critically, the movie received a blend of praise for its irreverent humor and criticism for its loose structure, earning a 71% approval rating on based on contemporary and retrospective reviews, while achieving commercial success as a box-office hit that reinforced the duo's influence on the emerging stoner comedy subgenre before such films became more mainstream.

Development and Pre-Production

Concept and Writing


Cheech and Chong's Next Movie was developed as a sequel to the duo's 1978 breakthrough film Up in Smoke, seeking to capitalize on its success by adopting a looser, anthology-style format consisting of episodic sketches rather than a cohesive narrative. This approach preserved the improvisational essence of their stand-up routines and comedy albums, focusing on drug-related humor and everyday absurdities encountered by the characters portrayed as versions of themselves.
The screenplay was credited to and , with Chong handling significant portions of the writing independently while Marin was on vacation, allowing for a flexible creative process that incorporated ad-libbed elements during production. This method echoed the sketch-based structure of their earlier Grammy-nominated albums, such as (1972), which featured similar vignettes of stoner and cultural . Chong emphasized that marijuana use was integral to their workflow, asserting that heightened intoxication led to more inventive and successful content: "the more stoned I was, the more crazy the movie was, and the more successful we were." The minimal plotting intentionally mirrored their live performance roots, prioritizing spontaneous humor over scripted continuity.

Financing and Studio Involvement

Following the massive success of their debut film , which earned approximately $104 million worldwide on a modest , Cheech and Tommy obtained financing from for Cheech and Chong's Next Movie. Universal served as both the production company and distributor, enabling the project to move forward with a reported of $3.2 million, deliberately kept low to replicate the independent ethos of the first film despite the potential for greater investment. This approach preserved creative autonomy, allowing the duo to emphasize improvised, edgy content without extensive studio oversight. Prior contractual frustrations from —including a "huge horrible deal" that netted Marin and Chong only $25,000 each despite the blockbuster returns, largely due to terms with producer —influenced negotiations for the sequel. Adler's tight creative control on the initial project had stifled the pair, prompting Chong to direct the follow-up himself for the first time and seek improved terms. These renegotiations yielded $1 million advances apiece for Marin and Chong, reflecting better participation amid the commercial leverage from their proven draw. The low budget, while posing logistical constraints typical of productions, facilitated unpolished, vignette-driven storytelling that aligned with the duo's stoner style, contrasting with higher-stakes studio films of the era. Universal's involvement provided distribution muscle but tolerated the film's provocative elements, as the prior hit's profitability mitigated risks from content deemed risqué by some executives. Co-production credits went to C & C Brown Productions, underscoring the blend of studio backing and personal oversight that balanced fiscal caution with artistic latitude.

Production

Filming and Locations

Principal photography for Cheech and Chong's Next Movie took place in October 1979, primarily in , California. Shooting focused on rundown neighborhoods in and East , including locations such as 7021 at North Sycamore Avenue, to authentically depict and the low-life environments reflective of the protagonists' stoner lifestyle. Real streets, abandoned houses, and other on-location sites were utilized extensively, with minimal constructed sets, allowing the production to capture the gritty, spontaneous essence of 1970s . This approach aligned with the film's low-budget constraints and improvised aesthetic, prioritizing natural urban backdrops over studio fabrication.

Direction and Improvisation Style

Cheech and Chong's Next Movie (1980) represented Tommy Chong's first credited directorial effort on a feature-length for the comedy duo, shifting from the collaborative direction of their debut Up in Smoke (1978), where Chong contributed uncredited segments. Chong's approach prioritized spontaneous actor performances over conventional storyboarding or detailed shot lists, enabling the film's loose, episodic structure to emerge from on-set dynamics rather than pre-planned narratives. This method aligned with the duo's origins in improvisational theater, allowing scenes to evolve organically and capture authentic comedic timing reflective of their live routines. Central to Chong's style was a heavy reliance on unscripted dialogues and extended takes, which infused the production with anarchic energy diverging from the scripted precision typical of mainstream comedies of the era. Rather than fixed scripts, the film employed situational outlines that permitted performers to ad-lib, drawing directly from and Chong's established improv rapport honed through years of stand-up and sketch work. This technique yielded unpredictable humor but required balancing improvisational flow with practical filming demands, such as maintaining continuity during prolonged sequences. Chong later expressed reluctance over editing decisions that shortened certain extended scenes to preserve overall momentum, underscoring his commitment to raw, actor-driven content over polished efficiency.

Cameos and Additional Talent

The film incorporated cameo appearances by emerging talents from the improv comedy community, leveraging Chong's directorial control and the production's low-budget ethos to recruit through personal and professional networks rather than traditional casting calls. This approach infused the episodic structure with authentic, vignette-driven sketches drawn from scene's improvisational style. Paul Reubens debuted his iconic character in a as a hotel desk clerk and the bellhop in an in-film movie parody, marking one of the character's earliest on-screen outings before (1985). , a improv troupe veteran, appeared as Gloria's mother in the Rolls-Royce sequence, delivering a standout performance that highlighted her comedic timing amid the film's chaotic ensemble. These contributions from Groundlings-affiliated performers like Reubens and McClurg bridged stoner humor with influences, amplifying the movie's appeal to audiences in 1980.

Content

Plot Summary

Cheech () and Chong () share a rundown house in , where their incessant marijuana smoking, loud music, and antics provoke complaints from their uptight neighbor, Mr. Slyman. After being fired from his job, Cheech heads to the welfare , hoping to leverage his relationship with employee Donna (), but she refuses aid, citing his unwillingness to work. Back home, Chong organizes an escalating attended by oddball characters, including topless women and disruptive guests, which devolves into flooding and general mayhem from improvised water bongs and other stoned experiments. Reuniting, the pair wanders the city in episodic vignettes of incompetence and escapism, detouring into a staffed by prostitutes where Cheech pursues fleeting encounters amid comedic mishaps. Further sketches lampoon government inefficiency through bungled efforts and bureaucratic , interspersed with surreal interruptions like a man's chaotic driving lesson and attempts to retrieve a family member from a hotel. The loose narrative builds to absurd heights with a stolen pursuit by , culminating in Chong's by aliens during the chase; he reappears offering Cheech "space cocaine" derived from origins, sparking a final hallucinatory sequence of interstellar delusions and feigned drug highs using household substitutes like laundry detergent, underscoring the film's theme of perpetual, unresolved aimlessness.

Cast and Characters

Cheech Marin stars as Cheech, the film's scheming yet laid-back protagonist whose portrayal exaggerates the archetype through impulsive schemes for quick cash amid constant evasion of responsibility. plays Chong, Cheech's perpetually stoned sidekick, whose dim-witted, perpetually mellow demeanor heightens the duo's caricature of drug-addled aimlessness and detachment from societal norms. Their on-screen chemistry, honed from prior stand-up and recording collaborations, drives the film's humor, prioritizing improvisational rapport over polished ensemble dynamics. Supporting characters provide foils to the leads' indolence, with as Donna, a offering romantic tension and grounded exasperation. Betty Kennedy appears as , contributing to the comedic interludes with her interactions amplifying the protagonists' chaotic lifestyle. Other notable roles include Sy Kramer as the uptight Mr. Neatnik, whose orderly persona clashes with the slackers' anarchy, and in a dual turn as the desk clerk and an early sketch, adding eccentric brevity without overshadowing the core duo. The casting emphasizes a lean ensemble of mostly character actors and newcomers, reflecting the production's modest scale and focus on the stars' inherent rapport rather than marquee names.
ActorCharacterRole Notes
Cheech / Dwayne 'Red' Mendoza as lead and opportunistic cousin; drives episodic misadventures.
ChongPassive, high companion; embodies passive stoner passivity.
DonnaRomantic foil; contrasts leads' lethargy with proactive energy.
Betty KennedyCandyComedic side interest; heightens absurdity in social encounters.
Desk Clerk / Brief cameo-like appearances; injects quirky eccentricity.

Soundtrack and Music

The musical score for Cheech and Chong's Next Movie was composed by Mark Davis, who provided original to underscore the film's comedic sequences and stoner escapades. Davis's contributions emphasized light, groovy instrumentation typical of late-1970s and influences, aligning with the era's popular sounds to enhance the hazy, laid-back atmosphere without overpowering the dialogue-driven humor. The film incorporated several licensed popular tracks, primarily diegetic music played in scenes such as parties and car rides, to amplify its party-centric vibe. Key songs included "Tequila" by (1958), featured in a comedic pursuit sequence; "Macho Man" by (1978), a hit underscoring a flamboyant scene; "Rich Girl" by (1976), a funk-pop number integrated during a hedonistic gathering; and "Hit the Road Jack" by (1961), used for ironic emphasis in a breakup moment. These selections drew from , , and genres prevalent around 1979–1980, evoking the film's countercultural excess through upbeat, rhythmic energy that mirrored the protagonists' marijuana-fueled antics. No official soundtrack album was released for the film, distinguishing it from predecessors like Up in Smoke, and the music remained embedded within the narrative rather than compiled separately. Additional original elements, such as the closing theme co-written by and performed by the "Dog Band" in a surreal , added whimsical, weed-infused audio cues for comedic timing. This approach prioritized in-scene immersion over standalone tracks, reinforcing the movie's improvisational, vibe-driven aesthetic.

Release and Distribution

Theatrical Premiere

Cheech & Chong's Next Movie was released theatrically in the United States on July 18, 1980, with initial openings in major urban centers including and . Distributed by , the film received a , making it available across numerous theaters nationwide shortly after its debut. The of America (MPAA) assigned the film an due to its extensive depictions of marijuana use, strong language, nudity, and sexual content, which aligned with the duo's signature stoner comedy style appealing primarily to youth audiences. Promotional efforts built on Cheech and Chong's prior success with and live concert tours, targeting their established fanbase through tie-ins that emphasized the film's irreverent humor and countercultural themes.

Home Media and Re-Releases

The film was first released on by / in 1987, followed by a reissue in 1990, providing audiences with access to the uncut version featuring the duo's improvised, R-rated humor without the alterations common in theatrical or broadcast edits. These formats contributed to the movie's enduring by allowing repeated viewings of its episodic, cannabis-themed vignettes in their original form. A DVD edition followed on September 2, 2003, maintaining the full runtime and content integrity while introducing enhancements for home entertainment systems of the era. This release further solidified its availability for fans seeking the unexpurgated experience beyond cinema screenings. Shout! Factory issued a Blu-ray version on , , presenting the film in with a 1.85:1 , which improved visual clarity for its location-shot sequences and practical effects. The edition includes supplementary materials such as a 19-minute interview with discussing production insights, though additional extras like commentaries are absent. This transfer represented a effort, enhancing for modern viewers while preserving the 1980 original cut. As of 2025, the movie remains available for digital rental or purchase on platforms including , , and Fandango at Home, typically for $3.99 to rent or $7.99 to buy, with ad-supported streaming on . These options continue to offer the unaltered theatrical version, supporting ongoing home consumption amid shifts to on-demand media.

Edited Versions for Broadcast

For broadcast , particularly on and syndicated networks in the 1980s and 1990s, Cheech and Chong's Next Movie underwent substantial edits to excise , , and explicit content, aligning with era-specific decency standards. Scenes depicting marijuana smoking were shortened or removed, with dialogue altered to omit references to ; a prominent example substitutes diamonds for marijuana in the luggage of the character , recasting the central plot away from its drug-centric origins. Profanity-laced exchanges were dubbed over or cut entirely, reducing runtime and muting the film's raw, improvisational dialogue style. These adaptations preserved skeletal plot progression and elements but diluted the satirical bite reliant on unvarnished portrayals of stoner life, prompting viewer dismay upon comparison to uncut releases like tapes that retained the 99-minute theatrical version's full irreverence. Fans who first viewed the broadcast cuts reported initial plot confusion—such as mistaking the film for a heist comedy about diamonds—highlighting how alterations severed causal ties between character motivations and the humor's foundation in . To compensate for excised footage, networks added extended animated intros, live-action preambles featuring alien spaceships, and repetitive loops, extending airtime while further distancing the version from Chong's original directorial vision. Such modifications underscored network priorities over artistic fidelity, as unedited formats allowed the film's first-principles critique of and to remain intact without compromise.

Commercial Performance

Box Office Earnings

Cheech & Chong's Next Movie opened in the United States on July 18, 1980, earning $5,262,963 in its first weekend across 814 theaters. ultimately grossed $41,675,194 domestically, with its performance demonstrating strong legs evidenced by a 7.92 multiplier from opening weekend to total domestic earnings. Worldwide totals matched the domestic figure at approximately $41.7 million, indicating limited international distribution or earnings at the time. This result closely mirrored the debut of the duo's prior film, Up in Smoke (1978), which earned a comparable $41.6 million domestically and served as a benchmark for the sequel's success among similar audiences. Produced on a reported budget of $5 million, the film's earnings underscored its commercial viability as a low-cost reliant on appeal rather than broad marketing.

Financial Analysis Relative to Budget

Cheech & Chong's Next Movie was produced on a modest of $3.2 million, a deliberate choice by and to retain creative autonomy following the $104 million worldwide gross of their debut film . This restrained expenditure, comprising actor advances of $1 million each alongside essential production elements, minimized financial exposure for while capitalizing on the duo's established fanbase. The film's domestic earnings of $41.7 million yielded an approximate 13-fold return on the , far exceeding typical break-even thresholds for theatrical releases that often require 2-2.5 times costs to account for and overheads. Adjusted for , this equates to roughly $175 million in 2023 dollars, highlighting robust margins in an era of rising investments but pre-mainstream stoner saturation. Such efficiency underscored the project's viability as a low-risk , with ancillary revenues from merchandise, live tours, and eventual sales providing additional offsets to any promotional expenditures.

Reception

Contemporary Critical Reviews

The film's release on , 1980, elicited mixed responses from critics, who often balanced acknowledgment of its humor against complaints of excessive , episodic structure, and absence of coherent . outlets frequently highlighted the duo's ability to capture a chaotic, countercultural milieu through sketch-like vignettes satirizing urban , systems, and interpersonal absurdities, though many deemed the execution juvenile and undisciplined. Janet Maslin's review in The New York Times on July 19, 1980, characterized the picture as "casual, slapdash and rude," yet conceded it was "frequently hilarious," emphasizing its immersive depiction of Los Angeles underbelly antics over traditional plotting. In contrast, Roger Ebert panned it as "embarrassing," faulting the lack of "invention in it, no imagination, no new comic vision," and viewing the proceedings as recycled stoner tropes without fresh insight. Variety's assessment on July 23, 1980, similarly noted the film's amusing but uneven collection of bits derived from the comedians' stage routines, though it critiqued the thin storyline connecting them. Some regional critics offered qualified praise for its satirical edge; Peter Rainer of the Los Angeles Herald-Examiner on July 18, 1980, deemed it an improvement over Up in Smoke for sharpening the duo's anti-establishment jabs at societal institutions. However, New York magazine's review on August 11, 1980, dismissed it outright as derivative and lacking substance, reflecting broader mainstream disdain for its unapologetic embrace of drug-fueled indecency. Aggregate scores from preserved contemporary critiques, such as Rotten Tomatoes' Tomatometer of 71% derived primarily from era-specific evaluations, underscore this divide, with approbation centered on comedic timing amid widespread reproof for plotlessness and coarseness.

Audience and Fan Responses

The film enjoyed enthusiastic grassroots support from marijuana enthusiasts and adherents upon its 1980 release, with audiences appreciating its loose, vignette-style filled with improvised drug-fueled antics that mirrored their lifestyles. Fans frequently cited the movie's appeal in fostering communal laughter during screenings, often enhanced by shared substance use, leading to anecdotal reports of multiple theater visits by the same groups seeking repeated immersion in its anarchic humor. This viewer affinity translated into a sustained via and later DVD formats, where the film's uncut content allowed private, ritualistic rewatches among dedicated stoner demographics, evidenced by ongoing sales of out-of-print tapes marketed as staples. On platforms aggregating user sentiment, such as , it maintains an average rating of 6.0 out of 10 from over 15,500 votes, indicating solid approval from fans who prioritize its raw, unfiltered over narrative cohesion, while casual viewers rate it lower. Positive fan testimonials there describe it as the duo's pinnacle achievement for those attuned to their , praising sketches like the scene for their quotable, exaggerated portrayals of altered states. Endorsements from comedy contemporaries, including cameos and associations with performers like (as ) and —both early in their careers and later SNL affiliates—underscore its resonance within emerging sketch and improv circles, where the film's boundary-pushing style influenced peers valuing absurd, drug-centric improvisation.

Retrospective Evaluations

In the 2010s and 2020s, amid expanding across U.S. states starting with and in 2012, analysts have increasingly positioned Cheech and Chong's Next Movie as a prescient countercultural relic that satirized bureaucratic overreach and prohibition-era absurdities long before policy shifts validated its worldview. reflected in a 2020 Guardian interview on the duo's films, including Next Movie, as "radical as they were bonkers," emphasizing their challenge to societal norms around drug use during an era of strict enforcement, a perspective that resonates more favorably post-legalization when viewed through the lens of normalized recreational marijuana markets exceeding $30 billion annually by 2023. Film scholars have credited with foundational contributions to stoner comedy's improvisational style, where Chong's direction leveraged loose, gestural performances to generate bathos-driven humor, as detailed in a Photogénie essay analyzing its visual and performative patterns as enduring templates for the genre's low-budget, character-centric . This appraisal balances acknowledgments of its technical roughness—shot on a modest $3 million budget with minimal scripting—against the charm of its unpolished improv, which a 2021 Decider retrospective praised for sustaining the duo's cultural relevance despite diminishing box-office returns in sequels. Later critiques have flagged dated portrayals, including ethnic and casual in female character depictions, as liabilities in modern reevaluations, with a 2025 Exclaim! analysis noting how such elements in Next Movie and predecessors have drawn scrutiny for reinforcing slurs and reductive tropes amid heightened sensitivity to representation post-#MeToo. Academic discussions in , such as a chapter in the 2023 Sage publication Drugs in Popular Culture, contextualize the film within evolving perceptions of marijuana media, observing its reprise of stoner archetypes in legalized environments without endorsing its era-specific excesses, thereby affirming its genre-establishing status while underscoring shifts in interpretive frameworks.

Cultural Impact and Legacy

Influence on Stoner Comedy Genre

Cheech and Chong's Next Movie employed an episodic, vignette-based structure of loosely linked misadventures, prioritizing comedic sketches over conventional plot progression, which became a stylistic cornerstone for subsequent stoner comedies. This format directly informed films like Harold & Kumar Go to White Castle (2004), where the protagonists' burger quest spirals into random, escalating encounters akin to the film's chaotic sequences; the writers of Harold & Kumar have explicitly credited Cheech and Chong's work as inspirational for establishing the subgenre. Likewise, Pineapple Express (2008) echoed this precedent through its blend of buddy dynamics and disjointed escapades amid cannabis-fueled pursuits. The movie's extensive use of , rooted in the duo's origins in stand-up routines and Chong's Vancouver improv troupe, normalized ad-libbed performances and free-form dialogue in post-1980 low-budget comedies. This technique allowed for organic, character-driven gags that prioritized performers' chemistry over rigid scripts, influencing directors in the stoner genre to adopt similar methods for authentic, unpolished humor. By grossing $41.7 million in North American receipts, the film demonstrated the profitability of R-rated youth-oriented humor infused with irreverent, cannabis-centric antics, thereby validating the genre's commercial model and spurring production of analogous projects in the ensuing decades.

Satirical Elements on Society and Bureaucracy

The film's sequences at and offices lampoon bureaucratic inefficiency through depictions of interminable waits, haphazard , and disruptive antics among recipients and staff. After protagonist loses his parking valet position due to negligence, he and Tommy Chong's character navigate the unemployment office, where boredom prompts a bystander—played by —to improvise sound effects for entertainment, while Cheech engages in an adulterous liaison with a , Donna, resulting in her immediate firing. These exaggerated portrayals highlight operational dysfunction, portraying government agencies as paralyzed by and susceptible to personal misconduct rather than streamlined service delivery. The protagonists' inherent laziness—favoring leisure and petty schemes over job-seeking—serves as a jab at , illustrating how benefits enable avoidance of productive labor. Cheech and Chong collect checks with minimal effort, reinforcing a of systemic incentives for among able-bodied claimants, unmoored from genuine economic . Such elements reflect the late economic malaise of , where U.S. averaged 6.2% across the decade and spiked to 9% in May 1975, alongside inflation hitting 13.3% in 1979, eroding incentives for work while expanding eligibility. Aid to Families with Dependent Children rolls ballooned from 4.6 million recipients in 1966 to 10.9 million by 1972, as policy expansions amid recessionary pressures fostered greater reliance on public assistance, which the film's caricatures implicitly critique as perpetuating non-work traps.

Portrayal of Counterculture and Drug Culture

Cheech and Chong's Next Movie (1980) depicts marijuana consumption as a pervasive, escapist norm within a lingering post-1960s countercultural enclave in Los Angeles, where the protagonists' aimless pursuits—ranging from jobless loafing to chaotic encounters with authority figures—revolve around acquiring and sharing cannabis as a means of detachment from mainstream societal pressures. The film's episodic structure emphasizes weed's role as a social lubricant, enabling transient bonds among eccentric, dropout characters in settings like rundown homes and welfare offices, thereby affirming hippie-era idleness blended with 1980s urban grit amid economic stagnation in East L.A. This portrayal underscores cannabis not as a catalyst for productivity but as a vehicle for surreal, gestural humor and dreamlike retreat from unemployment and bureaucratic drudgery, contrasting sharply with the era's intensifying federal "war on drugs," which had labeled marijuana a Schedule I substance under Nixon's 1971 campaign and portrayed it as a threat to social order. Cultural analyses of stoner comedy highlight how the duo's films, including Next Movie, normalized casual marijuana use by framing it as a peaceable to within hybrid, lifestyles, rejecting the era's dominant narratives of drug-induced deviance. Rather than advocating policy change, the depiction subtly foreshadowed later trajectories by presenting cannabis-fueled as a benign to "straight world" , influencing perceptions through comedic transformation of users into affably oblivious figures. This escapist ethos, devoid of redemptive arcs, captured the persistence of countercultural remnants as a form of low-stakes against encroaching , with joints facilitating irreverent critiques of institutional rigidity.

Controversies

Depiction of Drug Use and Moral Critiques

The film's repeated depictions of marijuana , often extending into extended bouts of that disrupt daily routines and employment pursuits, elicited objections from conservative observers who viewed such portrayals as endorsing sloth and societal disengagement. In a 1990 Los Angeles Times opinion piece reflecting on the duo's oeuvre, critic Harry Medved accused and of profiting by "glamorizing use," equating their influence to that of drug cartels in fostering youth experimentation and dependency. This sentiment aligned with broader Reagan-era concerns, where President explicitly faulted productions for normalizing and exacerbating national abuse epidemics, as stated in a 1986 interview. Critics tied these cinematic elements to empirical data on drug-related harms, including 1980s assessments documenting correlations between marijuana use and diminished alongside elevated petty involvement. A Office on Drugs and analysis from the era quantified annual losses from drugs at billions in foregone wages and output, attributing portions to chronic users' impaired motivation and absenteeism, while also factoring in victimization costs that strained public resources. Similarly, a U.S. Department of Justice report estimated drug use's economic toll, incorporating deficits from impaired cognition and health complications, with marijuana implicated in up to 20% of such cases among younger demographics. These reports, grounded in labor statistics and health surveys, fueled arguments that stoner comedies like the film reinforced causal pathways from casual depiction to real-world behavioral shifts, particularly amid rising anti-drug advocacy. Proponents, including Chong himself, countered that the content constituted harmless exaggerating countercultural excesses without prescriptive intent, with Chong later affirming in interviews that on-set marijuana use enhanced creative flow rather than modeling vice. Yet this defense clashed with perceptions of cultural normalization, as anecdotal accounts from parents and educators in the early attributed spikes in adolescent curiosity to media like Cheech and Chong's works, preceding intensified campaigns. No rigorous studies established direct causation between the 1980 film and usage patterns; Monitoring the Future surveys indicated lifetime marijuana prevalence among high school seniors held steady at approximately 60% from 1979 to 1980 before gradually declining to 54% by 1985, suggesting countervailing societal pressures like federal initiatives outweighed any anecdotal media influence.

Censorship and Editing Debates

The film received an from the of America (MPAA) upon its July 18, 1980, release, citing pervasive strong language, nudity, sexual content, and drug-related material as reasons for restricting audiences under 17 without adult accompaniment. This classification reflected broader tensions in over explicit comedy, though no public appeals or cuts were required to avoid an , unlike some contemporaries challenged for similar elements. Television broadcasts in the United States necessitated extensive edits to comply with indecency standards and network policies against depicting illegal substances, most notoriously substituting marijuana references with "diamonds" or "diamond chips." In the altered version, the protagonists' acquisition of a large —originally filled with marijuana from Cheech's cousin—becomes a cache of gems, rendering subsequent gags about consumption, intoxication, and related mishaps illogical and devoid of context, as the humor hinges on the drug's effects. Additional cuts removed , , and , further fragmenting scenes like the sequence and bureaucratic encounters. These modifications fueled critiques of overreach in broadcast , highlighting conflicts between artistic intent and regulatory demands for content; observers noted that sanitizing a predicated on stoner not only diminished its satirical bite but also produced a of itself, more absurd than the original. The edits exemplified early cable and network practices before the 1990s , where drug portrayals risked fines or advertiser backlash, prompting networks like to prioritize compliance over fidelity. While theatrical and versions preserved the uncut content, the TV iterations underscored ongoing free expression debates in media distribution, particularly for genre s reliant on unexpurgated vice for authenticity.

References

  1. [1]
    Cheech and Chong's Next Movie (1980) - IMDb
    Rating 6/10 (15,589) Cheech and Chong live in a decrepit old house and drive their neighbour crazy with their loud music, weed smoking and general anarchy and slacker view on life.Full cast & crew · Plot · Release info · TriviaMissing: summary significance
  2. [2]
    Cheech and Chong's Next Movie - AFI|Catalog
    A 30 Jun 1980 Box article reported that comedians Cheech Marin and Tommy Chong felt stifled by the creative control of Lou Adler, the producer and director ...Missing: significance | Show results with:significance
  3. [3]
    Cheech and Chong's Next Movie - UPHE.com
    Cheech and Chong's Next Movie trailers, video clips available on Blu-ray, DVD, Digital HD and On Demand from Universal Pictures Home Entertainment.
  4. [4]
    40 Years Ago: 'Cheech and Chong's Next Movie' Fires Up a Hit
    Jul 18, 2020 · Cheech and Chong's Next Movie, which premiered on July 18, 1980, is a relic from a time before stoner comedies went mainstream, ...Missing: significance | Show results with:significance
  5. [5]
    Cheech & Chong's Next Movie | Rotten Tomatoes
    Rating 71% (429) Perennially stoned Cheech (Cheech Marin) and Chong (Thomas Chong) tear through the city of Los Angeles, causing trouble wherever they go.Missing: significance | Show results with:significance
  6. [6]
    CHEECH AND CHONG MAKE THEIR 'NEXT MOVIE'
    Jul 19, 1980 · Cheech and Chong's Next Movie, which opened yesterday at the National and other theaters, is casual, slapdash and rude, and it's frequently hilarious.Missing: box reception controversies
  7. [7]
    Tommy Chong: 'We were always high. That was the job'
    Apr 10, 2020 · ... Cheech and Chong's Next Movie. The double-act were as radical as they were bonkers. And while the films were ostensibly about two aspiring ...
  8. [8]
    Cheech and Chong's First Movie Grossed $104 Million ... - People.com
    Apr 26, 2025 · Cheech and Chong's First Movie Grossed $104 Million. But They Only Made $25K Apiece: 'A Huge Horrible Deal'.Missing: financing | Show results with:financing
  9. [9]
    Hollywood Hot Heads - The Washington Post
    Jan 6, 1980 · "Cheech and Chong's Next Movie" completed filming in and around Los Angeles with Chong directing for the first time and a cost of $5 million, ...Missing: budget | Show results with:budget
  10. [10]
    Cheech and Chong's Next Movie (1980) - Filming & production - IMDb
    Cheech and Chong's Next Movie. Jump to. Filming locations (10), Filming dates (1). Edit. Filming locations. 7021 Hollywood Boulevard & North Sycamore Avenue ...
  11. [11]
    Retracing the Steps of Cheech and Chong's 'Next Movie' in L.A., 45 ...
    Jul 21, 2025 · When it came time for the doped-up duo's follow-up, it was a no-brainer considering Up in Smoke made over $44 million on an estimated $2 million ...
  12. [12]
    REVIEW: "CHEECH AND CHONG'S NEXT MOVIE" (1980)
    REVIEW: "CHEECH AND CHONG'S NEXT MOVIE" (1980); SHOUT! FACTORY BLU-RAY ... Los Angeles, like New York at the time, had a look and feel and character ...
  13. [13]
  14. [14]
    'Cheech and Chong's Last Movie': One Final Joint From a ...
    May 1, 2025 · The thing about Cheech and Chong, as a comedy duo, is that they were primarily improvisational. They didn't have scripts so much as situations.Missing: Next | Show results with:Next
  15. [15]
    Cheech and Chong Talk 40 Years of 'Up in Smoke' - Rolling Stone
    Apr 20, 2018 · The film became famous not just for its comically oversized spliffs for the comedians' sense of improv. In a scene where Cheech and Chong are ...
  16. [16]
    Paul Reubens' 10 Funniest Cameo Roles, Ranked - Screen Rant
    Aug 6, 2023 · 3 Pee-Wee/Desk Clerk in Cheech and Chong's Next Movie ... Before Pee-Wee's Big Adventure, Reubens would do the Pee-Wee character in his stand-up ...
  17. [17]
    Edie McClurg Turns 80 - Travalanche - WordPress.com
    Jul 23, 2025 · Movie roles: Carrie (1976); Cheech and Chong's Next Movie (1980); Oh God Book II (1980); Pandemonium (1982); Eating Raoul (1982); Mr. Mom ...
  18. [18]
    Cheech and Chong's Next Movie (Film) - TV Tropes
    A description of tropes appearing in Cheech and Chong's Next Movie. Cheech ... The Cameo: Features appearances by numerous comedians, including Rita ...Missing: guest | Show results with:guest
  19. [19]
    Cheech and Chong's Next Movie (1980) - Plot - IMDb
    Cheech and Chong live in a decrepit old house and drive their neighbour crazy with their loud music, weed smoking and general anarchy and slacker view on life.Missing: significance | Show results with:significance
  20. [20]
    Cheech & Chong's Next Movie - The Grindhouse Cinema Database
    Jul 4, 2023 · Plot Summary. Cheech and Chong live in a decrepit old house and drive their neighbor crazy with their loud music, weed smoking and general ...
  21. [21]
    Cheech and Chong's Next Movie (1980) - Scopophilia
    Mar 23, 2025 · This is, in my opinion, the best installment of the Cheech and Chong film series and an upgrade from their first film. This one has the same ...
  22. [22]
  23. [23]
    Cheech and Chong's Next Movie (1980) - Full cast & crew - IMDb
    Cheech and Chong's Next Movie ; Writers. Edit · Tommy Chong · Tommy Chong. written by (as Thomas Chong) &. Cheech Marin · Cheech Marin. written by ; Producers.
  24. [24]
    A History of Stoners in Film | Den of Geek
    Sep 1, 2015 · In 1978, they made their big-screen debut with Up In Smoke, which brought Tommy Chong and Cheech Marin's slacker personas to a wider audience.
  25. [25]
    The Untold Truth Of Cheech & Chong - Grunge
    May 20, 2022 · Cheech and Chong followed Up in Smoke with Cheech and Chong's Next Movie in 1980 and Nice Dreams in 1981. Sticking to their patented drug ...Cheech And Chong Become... · Cheech And Chong Conquer... · Cheech Without ChongMissing: minimalist | Show results with:minimalist
  26. [26]
    Soundtracks - Cheech and Chong's Next Movie (1980) - IMDb
    The soundtrack includes "Tequila" by The Champs, "Macho Man" by The Village People, "Rich Girl" by Hall & Oates, and "Hit The Road Jack" by Ray Charles.
  27. [27]
    Mark Davis - IMDb
    Composer. 1986. 1 episode. Bustin' Loose (1981). Bustin' Loose. 6.0. musical score composed by. 1981. Cheech and Chong's Next Movie (1980). Cheech and Chong's ...
  28. [28]
    Cheech and Chong's Next Movie (1980) Soundtrack - RingosTrack
    Rating 6/10 (15,289) Listen Cheech and Chong's Next Movie (1980) Soundtrack · Hit The Road Jack · Rich Girl · Hit The Road Jack · Rich Girl · Tequila · Love Me · Macho Man · Space Invader.
  29. [29]
    Jimmy Greenspoon (Deceased) - Former Keyboardist at THREE ...
    Co-writer for closing theme of CHEECH AND CHONG'S NEXT MOVIE (1980) and performed as the DOG BAND. ... Currently writing the original music score, song rewrites, ...
  30. [30]
    Cheech & Chong's Next Movie (1980) - Box Office and Financial ...
    Financial analysis of Cheech & Chong's Next Movie (1980) including production budget, domestic and international box office gross, DVD and Blu-ray sales ...
  31. [31]
    Cheech & Chong's Next Movie review (1980)
    Jul 23, 2005 · Cheech & Chong's Next Movie (1980) / Comedy. MPAA Rated: R for pervasive drug use, language, sexuality, and nudity. Running Time:95 min.
  32. [32]
    Cheech & Chong's Next Movie (1980) - Letterboxd
    Rating 3.1 (6,757) English. Alternative Titles. Cheech and Chong's Next Movie, Πανδαιμόνιο ... I honestly wonder if there was actually a script or if someone just pointed a ...
  33. [33]
    Cheech and Chong's Next Movie VHS 1990 Comedy Home Video ...
    Cheech and Chong's Next Movie is a classic 1980 comedy featuring the iconic duo Cheech Marin and Thomas Chong. Directed by Thomas Chong and produced by ...
  34. [34]
    Cheech And Chong's Next Movie - Shout! Factory
    In stock Free delivery over $75Jun 13, 2017 · Factory's Blu-ray of Cheech and Chong's Next Movie looks great in its 1080p, 1.85:1 widescreen presentation, which shows off the locations ...
  35. [35]
    Cheech and Chong's Next Movie Blu-ray
    Cheech and Chong's Next Movie Blu-ray Release Date June 13, 2017. Blu-ray reviews, news, specs, ratings, screenshots. Cheap Blu-ray movies and deals.
  36. [36]
    Cheech and Chong's Next Movie ... - Rewind @ www.dvdcompare.net
    Cheech and Chong's Next Movie (Blu-ray) (1980) · Blu-ray A America - Shout! Factory · Extras: Interview with Cheech Marin (19:27) · Subtitles: English HoH · Aspect ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  37. [37]
    Cheech and Chong's Next Movie (Blu-ray Review) - The Digital Bits
    Jun 21, 2017 · Extras Grade: C-. Cheech and Chong's Next Movie (Blu-ray Disc) · amazonbuttonsm. Review. Despite their popularity throughout the 1980s, Cheech ...
  38. [38]
    Cheech and Chong's Next Movie - Where to Watch and Stream
    Rating 66% (10) Cheech and Chong's Next Movie ; Watch on Apple TV From $3.99 ; Watch on Amazon Video From $3.79 ; Watch on Fandango At Home From $3.99.
  39. [39]
    Watch Cheech and Chong's Next Movie | Prime Video - Amazon.com
    $$7.99 Rating 4.7 (3,231) · 30-day returnsCheech and Chong's Next Movie ... A stolen Ferrari, the bodacious Donna, crazy Cousin Red, UFOs and drugs from space - just another reefer madness day for Cheech ...
  40. [40]
    Watch Cheech and Chong's Next Movie (1980) - Tubi
    Cheech and Chong's Next Movie ... The zany, stoner twosome return for more misadventures as Cheech loses his job, deals with an angry neighbor and tries to appeal ...
  41. [41]
    Bowdlerise / Film - TV Tropes
    An "Edited and Reconstructed for Television" version of Cheech and Chong's Next Movie features an abundance of changes from the theatrical version ...
  42. [42]
    Althouse: "One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest."
    Dec 25, 2006 · For instance, if you watch Cheech and Chong's Next Movie on TV, the movie is no longer about marijuana, it is about diamonds. (and ...<|separator|>
  43. [43]
    I grew up watching a television version of Ghostbusters - Reddit
    Apr 14, 2024 · I watched Cheech and Chong's next movie several times thinking they were looking for diamonds until I saw the real version. solon_isonomia.
  44. [44]
    Cheech and Chong TV versions... | Fanedit.org Forums
    Aug 14, 2012 · Has anyone ever attempted to preserve the TV edits of "Cheech and Chong's Next Movie" and "Born In East L.A."?
  45. [45]
    Cheech and Chong's Next Movie (1980) - Box Office Mojo
    Cheech and Chong live in a decrepit old house and drive their neighbour crazy with their loud music, weed smoking and general anarchy and slacker view on life.
  46. [46]
    Cheech & Chong Franchise Box Office History - The Numbers
    Box Office History for Cheech & Chong Movies ; Jul 18, 1980 · Cheech & Chong's Next Movie, $5,262,963, $41,675,194 ; Sep 15, 1978 · Up in Smoke, $41,590,893 ...
  47. [47]
  48. [48]
  49. [49]
    'Up in Smoke': How the Original Stoner Comedy Changed History
    Jul 28, 2020 · I actually wasn't able to ingest a Cheech and Chong flick in theaters until 1980, when Cheech and Chong's Next Movie hit North America. It ...
  50. [50]
    Up in Smoke movie review - Facebook
    Jul 6, 2025 · According to Chong and various sources, the duo's followup film, "Cheech and Chong's Next Movie" (1980) made more money on a second-run on ...The Fiberweed Van from Cheech & Chong's Up in Smoke MovieFan of The Pink Panther movies from the 70s? - FacebookMore results from www.facebook.com
  51. [51]
    Cheech and Chong's Next Movie VHS vintage OOP video MCA ...
    In stock Rating 5.0 (2) Cheech and Chong's Next Movie VHS vintage OOP video MCA 1992 cult film ; Hurry before it's gone. 1 person is watching this item. ; Breathe easy. Free returns.
  52. [52]
    Cheech and Chong's Next Movie (1980) - User reviews - IMDb
    Cheech and Chong's Next Movie is the popular comedy duo's second movie. While it's not as funny as "Up in Smoke", Cheech and Chong's Next Movie is still a fun ...
  53. [53]
    Cheech and Chong's Theory of Stoner Aesthetics - photogénie
    Jul 26, 2023 · In Cheech and Chong's Next Movie (1980), Chong uses this bathos to build a pattern of visual humour that is driven by gestural performances ...
  54. [54]
    Why Cheech And Chong Matter: A Guide To The Stoner Duo's Most ...
    Apr 20, 2021 · In the 1980 film Cheech and Chong's Next Movie, the line “dope's ... Then they go to a massage parlor, and a comedy club. Two important ...Missing: synopsis | Show results with:synopsis
  55. [55]
    How Cheech & Chong Continue to Influence Comedy Today Exclaim!
    Apr 24, 2025 · Their latest film, Cheech & Chong's Last Movie (due out in Canada this Friday, April 25, via Renaissance), takes a look back at their legacy.
  56. [56]
    Sage Academic Books - Drugs in Popular Culture
    Hosted in states that have legalized medical and recreational marijuana, the Cannabis ... In their second film, 1980's Cheech and Chong's Next Movie, they reprise ...
  57. [57]
    Moments That Changed The Movies: Up In Smoke | Oscars.org
    Apr 21, 2015 · We sit down with Marin, Chong plus the director of "Grandma's Boy" and the writers of "Harold and Kumar." The latter credits the ...Missing: influenced | Show results with:influenced
  58. [58]
    Cheech And Chong's Next Movie - DVD Talk
    Jun 29, 2017 · I saw Cheech and Chong's Next Movie (1980) when it was new but not once since until the Blu-ray. It wasn't as funny as I'd remembered it, ...Missing: contemporary | Show results with:contemporary
  59. [59]
    Stagflation in the 1970s - Investopedia
    Stagflation in the 1970s was a period with both high inflation and uneven economic growth. High budget deficits, lower interest rates, the oil embargo, and the ...
  60. [60]
    The 20th Anniversary of Welfare Reform - The American Action Forum
    Aug 22, 2016 · In particular, enrollment in AFDC increased from 4.6 million in 1966 to 10.9 million in 1972. This means that in just six years, AFDC enrollment ...<|separator|>
  61. [61]
    Wasted Whiteness: The Racial Politics of the Stoner Film | M/C Journal
    Aug 19, 2010 · The genre's origins in the work of Cheech Marin, a Chicano, and Tommy Chong, a Chinese-European Canadian, have been buttressed in this regard by ...Missing: escapist | Show results with:escapist
  62. [62]
    The privileged normalization of marijuana use – an analysis of ... - NIH
    For example, an article discussing Tommy Chong of Cheech and Chong, an American comedy duo of the 1970s and 1980s (and well known as marijuana advocates) ...
  63. [63]
    Hollywood's Drug Denial - The Washington Post
    Aug 6, 1986 · President Reagan, in an interview in the current Newsweek, linked Hollywood and the music industry as contributors to widespread drug abuse. ...Missing: administration | Show results with:administration
  64. [64]
    [PDF] THE SOCIAL IMPACT OF DRUG ABUSE - Unodc
    highest rates of marijuana use being observed among adolescents whose parents and friends were drug ... of productivity losses for victims of crime. Costs ...
  65. [65]
    [PDF] The Economic Impact of Illicit Drug Use on American Society
    (b) Incarceration and homicide compo- nents of Productivity included in Crime. ... This includes the costs of health care services, medications, and lost ...<|separator|>
  66. [66]
    Just Say No - Campaign, Nancy Reagan & Drugs - History.com
    May 31, 2017 · The "Just Say No" campaign, launched by Nancy Reagan, encouraged children to reject drugs by saying "no," and may have increased public concern.
  67. [67]
    [PDF] Use of marijuana and other illicit drugs by American high school ...
    The proportion using an illicit drug other than marijuana has remained roughly the same as in 1979. "We know that our statistics are slight underestimates for ...
  68. [68]
    Examples of censorship in movies - Badmovies.org
    Oddest example of censorship ... Years ago I saw "Cheech and Chong's Next Movie" on TV ... First off, wouldn't an edited version be more likely to be on T.V.?
  69. [69]
    Cheech and Chong's Next Movie TV Edit (Diamond Chips Version ...
    Sep 10, 2023 · This is the first part of the long lost TV edit of Next Movie. Back in the day you could not show cannabis on TV. Imagine that, a Cheech and ...
  70. [70]
    What are some examples of movie censorship gone wrong? - Quora
    Mar 15, 2019 · Their second film, Cheech and Chong's Next Movie, revolves around ... The TV-edited version of “Cabaret” had a couple of deleted scenes ...
  71. [71]
  72. [72]
    The early 90s, "Bag of Diamonds" Comedy Central edit of Cheech ...
    Sep 29, 2021 · The early 90s, "Bag of Diamonds" Comedy Central edit of Cheech and Chong's Next Movie ... TV rating system was rolled out and TV censorship was ...What was you're favorite “edited for tv” line change back in ... - RedditTV Edited Cuts of Movies : r/lostmedia - RedditMore results from www.reddit.com