Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Entitlement

Psychological entitlement is a stable personality trait characterized by a pervasive belief that one deserves preferential treatment, rewards, or outcomes superior to those of others, irrespective of merit, effort, or reciprocity.^[1]^[2] This sense of inherent deservingness often manifests as expectations of special privileges and an inflated self-importance, distinguishing it from earned entitlements based on contributions or contractual rights.^[3] Empirical assessments, such as the Psychological Entitlement Scale, quantify it as a unidimensional construct correlated with narcissistic tendencies and elements of the dark triad personality traits.^[4] In psychological research, entitlement predicts maladaptive behaviors, including interpersonal conflict, hostility toward non-compliant others, and reduced adherence to social norms or instructions.^[5]^[6] Status-seeking motivations underlie these patterns, fostering benign or malicious envy that drives demands for dominance or prestige, often at the expense of cooperative outcomes.^[1] While some studies indicate potential upsides, such as heightened proactivity in unique roles, the predominant findings link it to diminished organizational citizenship, engagement deficits, and relational strain across contexts like workplaces and education.^[7]^[8] These associations highlight entitlement's role in causal pathways toward personal and social dysfunction, with origins traced to cognitive biases amplifying perceived superiority over reciprocal obligations.^[9]

Definitions and Conceptual Foundations

Etymology and Core Definitions

The noun entitlement originated in English around 1823, derived from the verb entitle (late 14th century) via Anglo-French entitler and Late Latin intitulare, signifying the act of giving a title, inscription, or formal designation, often to a document, book chapter, or legal claim.^[10] ^[11] Its earliest documented use dates to 1782 in British print media, where it denoted a legal title or right to possession, such as in property or inheritance contexts.^[12] This initial sense emphasized a formal, enforceable claim grounded in title or statute, distinct from personal achievement or merit accrued through individual action. Core definitions of entitlement center on three interrelated but distinct concepts: a legal right to specified benefits under contract or law, a psychological conviction of deservingness irrespective of effort or reciprocity, and statutory guarantees of access to resources.^[13] In the legal domain, it refers to the state of being entitled to something via established title, where the claim is objectively verifiable and coercively upholdable by third parties, as opposed to subjective self-assessment of worth.^[12] The Oxford English Dictionary records the solidification of this usage in the 19th century, with expansions in the 20th century to include policy entitlements—rights codified by legislation, such as those emerging post-1945 in veterans' benefits frameworks.^[12] ^[14] The psychological sense, denoting an unwarranted belief in one's deservingness of advantages without corresponding contribution, represents a semantic shift from titular origins, gaining prominence in the mid-20th century and often carrying pejorative implications of unearned expectation.^[13] This diverges fundamentally from the original etymological root in enforceable titles, highlighting a tension between externally validated claims and internally generated senses of merit; the former relies on causal chains of legal or contractual reciprocity, while the latter may lack such empirical grounding.^[15] Dictionary evolutions, including Oxford English Dictionary entries from the 1940s onward, illustrate this broadening, where entitlement increasingly encompasses both objective rights and subjective attitudes without conflating the two.^[12]

Distinctions Between Types of Entitlement

Psychological entitlement refers to a stable belief that one deserves preferential treatment or resources beyond what is merited by contributions or agreements, characterized by subjective expectations lacking external validation.^[16] This form arises from internal cognitive biases rather than verifiable conditions, often leading to interpersonal conflicts due to its non-falsifiable nature, as claims of deservingness cannot be empirically tested against objective criteria.^[1] In contrast, legal entitlement denotes objective rights grounded in enforceable rules, such as inheritance or contractual obligations, where validity is determined by adherence to statutes and precedents rather than personal assertion.^[17] For instance, property interests protected under due process in U.S. law prior to the 1960s expansions required demonstration of vested rights through historical legal processes, emphasizing causal chains of acquisition over mere expectation.^[18] Philosophical entitlements, as articulated in Robert Nozick's framework, validate holdings through principles of just initial acquisition and voluntary transfer, conferring moral legitimacy only if prior steps align with non-coercive historical processes.^[19] This contrasts with positive entitlements, often government-conferred benefits requiring active provision by others, which may infringe on negative rights to non-interference by imposing obligations without reciprocal consent.^[20] The former prioritizes causal traceability to productive actions or trades, avoiding redistribution that disrupts established holdings, while the latter depends on institutional fiat, potentially lacking the empirical anchors of verifiable transactions.^[19] These distinctions highlight verifiability as a core differentiator: psychological claims evade dispute resolution due to their internal subjectivity, fostering ongoing contention without resolution mechanisms, whereas legal and philosophical types anchor to observable precedents or acquisition histories, enabling adjudication based on evidence of compliance with rules or justice principles.^[17] Conflating them risks eroding accountability, as unearned subjective deservingness lacks the causal realism of rights derived from merit-based or consensual origins, leading to policy distortions when subjective expectations are elevated to enforceable status.^[20]

Psychological Entitlement

Characteristics and Psychological Mechanisms

Psychological entitlement manifests as a stable personality trait characterized by a pervasive sense of deservingness, specialness, and exaggerated expectations of preferential treatment without reciprocal effort or merit.^[21] This belief system drives individuals to anticipate superior outcomes, resources, or admiration from others, often irrespective of their contributions or the constraints of reality.^[22] Unlike transient feelings of self-worth, it operates as a cognitive bias that distorts perceptions of fairness, positioning the entitled person as inherently superior.^[21] Core traits include grandiosity, a tendency toward exploitation of others, and intense anger or resentment when expectations remain unmet, frequently linked to underlying narcissistic structures.^[23] Grandiose self-views foster demands for unearned privileges, while exploitative behaviors prioritize personal gain over mutual benefit, eroding relational trust.^[24] Unfulfilled demands trigger disproportionate hostility, as the entitled individual interprets setbacks not as opportunities for adjustment but as injustices against their presumed status.^[25] These mechanisms stem from causal pathways such as childhood overpraise, which inflates self-perception without building resilience, or chronic unmet emotional needs, which evolve into rigid demands for compensation in adulthood.^[26] ^[27] In contrast to healthy ambition or self-confidence, which align with realistic goal pursuit and reciprocal social exchanges, psychological entitlement bypasses accountability and reciprocity, often generating conflict through self-image-protective goals that provoke hostility in interactions.^[5] Ambitious individuals typically invest effort proportional to rewards sought, fostering cooperation, whereas entitled ones expect yields without input, leading to relational friction and isolation.^[5] This distinction underscores entitlement's maladaptive nature, as it undermines causal chains of earned achievement in favor of unverified claims of superiority.^[28]

Empirical Studies and Measurement

The Psychological Entitlement Scale (PES), developed by Campbell et al. in 2004, serves as a primary self-report measure of psychological entitlement, consisting of nine items assessing beliefs in deserving more than others, such as "Great things should come to me."^[29] The scale demonstrates high reliability (Cronbach's alpha ≈ 0.84), validity through correlations with related constructs like narcissism, and stability over time, while remaining uncorrelated with social desirability bias.^[29]^[30] Empirical data indicate rising levels of psychological entitlement, particularly among younger cohorts. A 2016 study from Case Western Reserve University found that millennials reported higher entitlement scores compared to prior generations, linking this trend to chronic disappointment from unmet expectations.^[31] Self-reported surveys in 2025 similarly highlight perceptions of elevated entitlement in Generation Z, with 39% of hiring managers viewing them as the most entitled group regarding expectations for rapid promotions and raises, compared to 35% for millennials.^[32] Key correlates include negative associations with well-being and performance outcomes. Higher PES scores predict lower life satisfaction and self-esteem, with these links persisting across age groups but moderated by factors like perceived social support.^[33] In professional contexts, a 2022 study in Accounting Horizons showed that low monitoring exacerbates entitlement's effects, leading to reduced audit performance and increased misreporting among entitled individuals.^[34] Similarly, a 2024 BMC Psychology analysis of hotel employees revealed that psychological entitlement indirectly diminishes learning engagement through heightened envy, resulting in lower participation in training activities.^[8] Recent 2025 research further elucidates demographic interactions. A Nature study examined how psychological entitlement interacts with fixed versus growth mindsets in consumption behaviors, finding entitled individuals with fixed mindsets more prone to luxury-seeking as a compensatory mechanism.^[9] Complementing this, a Wiley-published experimental study demonstrated that entitlement's influence on meaning-making processes varies by age and gender, with older males showing stronger positive associations between entitlement and deriving personal significance from achievements.^[35] These findings underscore the scale's utility in capturing trait-like variations, though self-report limitations necessitate triangulation with behavioral measures in future validations.^[29]

Generational and Cultural Variations

Empirical studies indicate that self-reported psychological entitlement tends to be higher among Millennials and Generation Z compared to Baby Boomers and older cohorts, as measured by instruments like the Equity Sensitivity Instrument, where Millennials scored significantly more entitled than Boomers in assessments of deservingness relative to inputs and outcomes.^[36]^[37] This pattern aligns with findings from the Narcissistic Personality Inventory's entitlement subscale, where scores showed increases over time among younger samples, potentially reflecting heightened beliefs in personal deservingness amid cultural emphases on self-esteem and empowerment. However, meta-analyses challenge the notion of a dramatic "narcissism epidemic," revealing no consistent generational surge in overall narcissistic traits, including entitlement, and noting rising prosocial behaviors among youth that counter entitlement stereotypes.^[38] Causal explanations for these trends emphasize cultural and child-rearing shifts over purely economic hardships; for instance, widespread practices like participation awards and praise-focused parenting in the 1990s–2000s correlated with elevated entitlement in emerging adults, fostering expectations of unearned rewards independent of performance.^[39] While younger generations faced adverse conditions such as the 2008 recession, stagnant wages, and housing unaffordability—arguably justifying adaptive resilience rather than entitlement—data suggest these do not fully account for higher self-perceived deservingness, as entitlement links more strongly to delayed markers of adulthood (e.g., prolonged education and parental support) than to objective economic metrics.^[40] Critiques of stereotype activation experiments further indicate that priming narratives of "entitled youth" can amplify such traits in Millennials, implying a feedback loop where cultural accusations reinforce behaviors, though baseline differences persist.^[39] Cross-culturally, psychological entitlement manifests more prominently in individualistic societies like the United States, where it correlates with beliefs in personal superiority and special treatment, as opposed to collectivist contexts in Asia and Latin America, where communal norms suppress such traits.^[41] A 28-country validation study of the Psychological Entitlement Scale found higher mean scores in Western nations, attributing variations to cultural priors on self-deservingness versus group harmony, with weaker associations between entitlement and negative outcomes (e.g., reduced well-being) in emerging adults from non-Western samples.^[42] In collectivist settings, such as South Korea, entitlement measures show lower prevalence and different correlates, like reduced links to exploitativeness, highlighting how societal emphasis on interdependence mitigates grandiose self-views.^[43] These differences underscore that while economic prosperity may enable entitlement in affluent individualist cultures, causal roots lie in value systems prioritizing autonomy over obligation.^[44]

Consequences and Empirical Critiques

Psychological entitlement is associated with heightened interpersonal conflict and hostility, as entitled individuals often pursue self-image goals that prioritize defending a positive self-view over constructive interaction, leading to disputes in relationships.^[5] Empirical studies indicate that this trait fosters selfish and aggressive behaviors, exacerbating relational tensions by promoting a biased perception of social exchanges where the entitled party demands preferential treatment without reciprocity.^[45] For instance, research on college students shows that elevated entitlement, often amplified by overprotective parenting, intensifies fear of missing out and directly contributes to peer conflicts through diminished accountability.^[46] In professional settings, psychological entitlement correlates with reduced job performance and elevated turnover intentions, as entitled employees exhibit lower engagement and a reluctance to perform extra-role behaviors, viewing routine duties as beneath their deserving status.^[47] When monitoring is lax, this manifests in misreporting and shirking responsibilities, undermining organizational citizenship and overall productivity.^[34] Similarly, in educational contexts, academic entitlement diminishes student engagement both inside and outside the classroom, with entitled learners externalizing responsibility for outcomes and displaying incivility, which devalues effort and predicts poorer academic performance.^[48]^[49] Critiques of psychological entitlement challenge characterizations that conflate it with healthy ambition or empowerment, noting that such views overlook causal links to relational and personal harms; unfettered "empowerment" without temperance can engender entitlement, fostering isolation rather than genuine self-reliance.^[50] Data reveal that entitlement inversely relates to gratitude, eroding appreciation for achieved outcomes and self-esteem derived from merit-based efforts, while promoting vulnerability to distress through exaggerated expectations unmet by reality.^[51] This erosion of self-reliance is evident in entitled individuals' heightened dependence on external validation, contrasting with empirical associations between gratitude practices and improved psychological resilience.^[52] Academic sources, despite potential institutional biases toward minimizing individual accountability, consistently document these detriments, underscoring entitlement's role in perpetuating cycles of dissatisfaction independent of systemic factors.

Philosophical Perspectives

Entitlement Theory in Justice and Property

Robert Nozick's entitlement theory, presented in his 1974 book Anarchy, State, and Utopia, posits that distributive justice is determined not by the end-state pattern of holdings but by the historical processes through which they were acquired and transferred.^[53] Under this framework, a distribution of property is just if it satisfies three principles: justice in initial acquisition, justice in voluntary transfer, and rectification for past injustices.^[54] Initial acquisition draws from John Locke's proviso, allowing individuals to claim unowned resources through labor or production provided it does not worsen the situation of others, interpreted by Nozick as leaving sufficient alternatives or compensating for any disadvantage.^[54] Subsequent transfers must be consensual, entitling recipients to holdings from entitled holders without coercion.^[54] The theory emphasizes historical entitlement over patterned distributions, rejecting principles that mandate specific outcomes like equality or according to merit regardless of acquisition history.^[53] Nozick contrasts this with end-state theories, such as John Rawls's difference principle, which prioritizes the position of the least advantaged and permits redistribution to achieve patterned fairness.^[55] He argues that patterned approaches necessitate ongoing state intervention to correct deviations—such as wealth accumulation from voluntary exchanges like fans paying to watch basketball player Wilt Chamberlain, which disrupts equality—thereby violating individual entitlements and liberty.^[53] Rectification addresses historical wrongs, potentially requiring compensation but not wholesale redistribution, as justice traces back through legitimate titles rather than resetting to an egalitarian baseline.^[54] In applications to property rights, entitlement theory views private holdings as inviolable outcomes of productive labor and exchange, grounding ownership in self-ownership and the fruits of one's efforts akin to Lockean homesteading.^[54] Nozick contends that redistributive policies, including progressive taxation for welfare, infringe on these entitlements by forcibly transferring holdings from entitled owners to others, akin to partial serfdom since it compels labor for non-consensual ends.^[53] This critique holds that such interventions ignore the justice of historical processes, prioritizing theoretical patterns over actual rights derived from acquisition and transfer, though Nozick acknowledges the proviso's constraints may limit extreme accumulations if they preclude others' improvement.^[54] The theory thus defends a minimal state confined to protecting entitlements, without authority for patterned justice.^[53]

Earned Rights Versus Unearned Claims

Negative rights, such as those to life and liberty, function as protections against interference by others, requiring no active provision from third parties and aligning with inherent human capacities for self-preservation and action.^[20] These rights are "earned" in the sense that they stem from basic moral desert tied to individual agency, where one's entitlement arises from the absence of aggression rather than conferred benefits. In contrast, positive entitlements impose obligations on others to supply goods or services, such as claims to healthcare or income, which demand resources extracted from producers and thus represent unearned demands absent reciprocal contribution.^[56] This distinction underscores a causal mechanism: negative rights preserve incentives for productive effort by safeguarding outcomes of voluntary actions, while positive entitlements disrupt this by decoupling rewards from individual input, potentially fostering dependency as claimants anticipate provision without effort.^[57] Philosophers like Robert Nozick, in his 1974 work Anarchy, State, and Utopia, advanced an entitlement theory positing that holdings are just if acquired through legitimate initial acquisition or voluntary transfer, rendering redistributive policies unjust if they transfer from entitled holders to others without consent.^[58] Under this view, unearned claims—such as those mandating redistribution—violate property rights by treating individuals as means to others' ends, eroding the motivational link between labor and retention of fruits, as causal realism would predict reduced output when gains are foreseeably appropriated. Nozick's framework critiques patterned distributive justice (e.g., equality regardless of desert) for ignoring historical entitlements, arguing instead for rectification only of proven injustices like theft. Empirical support emerges from bargaining experiments by Hoffman and Spitzer in 1985, where legally assigned entitlements significantly influenced negotiation outcomes, with subjects splitting gains according to perceived rights rather than equal shares, indicating that unearned claims can skew distributions away from merit-based effort.^[57] Distinctions between deservingness (outcomes tied to effort or moral merit) and mere lawful entitlements (outcomes from rules irrespective of input) further highlight risks of unearned claims, as Feather's 2003 analysis shows people react more positively to earned rewards, perceiving unearned ones as less justified and potentially demotivating.^[59] In bargaining contexts, when entitlements are not grounded in productive contributions, participants exhibit fairness biases favoring the status quo of assigned rights, but this rigidity can hinder efficient reallocations if claims override causal contributions to value creation. Thus, privileging unearned positive entitlements over negative protections undermines the incentive structures essential for societal prosperity, as the chain from individual action to personal gain weakens under compulsory provision.^[57]

Moral Desert and Deservingness

Moral desert refers to the normative basis for deserving particular outcomes or benefits due to one's actions, efforts, or contributions, distinguishing it from mere entitlement claims lacking such grounding. In philosophical terms, desert entails that individuals merit rewards proportional to their responsible agency and value-creating inputs, such as labor or moral conduct, rather than default egalitarian distributions.^[60] This framework posits true entitlements as arising from verifiable contributions, as seen in systems like Social Security, where benefits are both deserved through prior work and institutionally entitled, blending moral merit with contractual rights.^[61] In contrast, inflated psychological entitlement involves a pervasive, unearned belief in preferential treatment, often linked to narcissism and interpersonal dysfunction, as validated by self-report measures showing such attitudes correlate with exploitative behaviors independent of actual desert.^[62] Key debates in desert theory highlight tensions between earned claims and alternative principles like equality or need. Proponents argue that desert prioritizes causal links between effort and outcome, critiquing entitlement theories—such as Robert Nozick's historical entitlement framework—for overlooking indirect injustices arising from unrectified past harms or systemic inequalities that undermine acquisition and transfer principles.^[63] Nozick's view holds that justice in holdings requires only procedural legitimacy in transfers, without patterned redistribution, yet critics contend this permits accumulations that perpetuate non-merit-based disparities, eroding the intuitive appeal of desert-based fairness.^[64] Empirical experiments on flexible fairness reveal that while equality serves as a baseline, perceptions of fairness flexibly incorporate earned entitlement, with participants rating unequal offers as fairer when recipients outperformed others, modulated by self-interest but rooted in merit recognition over pure egalitarianism.^[65] Truth-seeking analysis favors desert grounded in earned outcomes over gifted or need-based entitlements, as supported by studies distinguishing deservingness—tied to personal agency and results—from unearned entitlement, which fails to predict prosocial judgments or reduce self-defeating patterns.^[66] For instance, low-deserving individuals exhibit heightened vulnerability to misfortune attribution via entitlement concerns, whereas earned desert aligns with observed preferences for merit-based allocations in resource division tasks, challenging equity-oriented paradigms that downplay individual responsibility in favor of structural excuses.^[67] This empirical tilt underscores causal realism: outcomes causally traceable to effort sustain motivation and social cooperation more robustly than unlinked claims, countering biases in academic discourse that often prioritize redistribution over desert to address perceived inequities.^[68]

Entitlement in Economics and Public Policy

Structure of Government Entitlement Programs

Government entitlement programs consist of statutory provisions that mandate federal spending on benefits for individuals meeting predefined eligibility criteria, distinguishing them from discretionary programs subject to annual appropriations. In the United States, these programs form the core of mandatory spending, which totaled $4.1 trillion in fiscal year 2024, with Social Security and Medicare accounting for more than half of that amount.^[69] Key examples include Social Security, established by the Social Security Act of 1935 to provide retirement, disability, and survivor benefits; Medicare, enacted in 1965 under Title XVIII of the Social Security Act to offer health insurance primarily to those aged 65 and older or with certain disabilities; and Medicaid, also created in 1965 via Title XIX as a joint federal-state program delivering medical assistance to low-income individuals, families, pregnant women, the elderly, and people with disabilities.^[70]^[71] Eligibility for these programs varies by type, with Social Security requiring a minimum number of work credits earned through payroll tax contributions—typically 40 credits for retirement benefits, achievable after about 10 years of employment—and benefits commencing at age 62 for reduced payments or full retirement age (66-67 depending on birth year).^[72] Medicare eligibility extends to nearly all individuals aged 65 or older who qualify for Social Security or Railroad Retirement benefits, as well as younger people with end-stage renal disease or permanent kidney failure receiving dialysis, and those receiving Social Security Disability Insurance for at least 24 months; in 2021, beneficiaries aged 65 and older without end-stage renal disease comprised 86.9% of the Medicare population.^[73] Medicaid, by contrast, employs means-testing based on income and assets, with federal matching funds to states covering categories such as children in low-income families, adults below poverty thresholds, and long-term care for the disabled, serving nearly 80 million enrollees as of November 2024.^[74] These programs together represented 41% of total federal outlays in fiscal year 2024.^[75] Funding mechanisms differ between contributory and non-contributory structures. Contributory programs like Social Security and Medicare Part A rely on dedicated payroll taxes under the Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA), operating on a pay-as-you-go basis where current workers' contributions finance benefits for current retirees and disabled individuals, with Social Security serving 60.1 million old-age and survivor beneficiaries and 8.3 million disability beneficiaries at the end of 2024.^[72] Non-contributory programs, such as Medicaid and Supplemental Security Income (SSI), draw from general tax revenues without requiring prior individual contributions, focusing on need-based support; for instance, Medicaid finances acute and long-term services through federal grants matched by state funds at rates varying by state per capita income.^[70]^[76] Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid alone accounted for nearly 75% of mandatory outlays in 2024.^[77] Internationally, similar entitlement structures appear in European Union welfare states, where mandatory social insurance systems provide pensions, unemployment compensation, and healthcare as statutory rights triggered by contributions or means tests. Examples include Germany's contributory statutory pension insurance, funded by wage-based levies and covering old-age, disability, and survivors, and the United Kingdom's state pension alongside means-tested benefits like universal credit, reflecting post-World War II expansions in social protection against risks such as unemployment and old age.^[78] These parallel U.S. models in emphasizing eligibility-driven mandatory expenditures but often integrate broader universal elements, such as family allowances or housing support, within national social protection frameworks.^[79]

Fiscal and Macroeconomic Impacts

In the United States, federal entitlement spending—primarily Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid—has escalated dramatically since 1970, rising from 3.6 percent of GDP to 10.3 percent by 2015, with projections reaching 14.4 percent by 2030 due to demographic shifts and healthcare cost growth.^[80] ^[81] This expansion, driven by program expansions post-1970 and automatic benefit indexing, now constitutes the largest component of mandatory federal outlays, outpacing discretionary spending and contributing to persistent budget deficits.^[82] For instance, entitlements were identified as a key factor in the structural fiscal challenges discussed in 2024 Federal Reserve analyses, where rising mandatory commitments exacerbate revenue shortfalls amid slower economic growth.^[83] These programs' growth imposes macroeconomic strains, including crowding out of private investment as government borrowing absorbs capital that could otherwise fund productive enterprise, potentially reducing long-term GDP growth by redirecting resources toward consumption rather than capital formation.^[84] ^[85] Large-scale entitlement financing through deficits also heightens inflation risks, as evidenced by historical patterns where unchecked mandatory spending correlates with monetary expansion to service debt, diverting fiscal space from infrastructure or innovation. Moreover, entitlement structures can induce moral hazard by diminishing labor force participation incentives, with empirical models showing that generous benefits reduce work effort among eligible populations, thereby contracting the tax base and amplifying fiscal drag.^[86] Projections underscore unsustainability: the Social Security Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund faces depletion by 2033 under current law, necessitating a 19 percent across-the-board benefit cut absent reforms, while Medicare's Hospital Insurance Trust Fund is projected to exhaust reserves by 2036, leading to similar shortfalls.^[87] ^[88] Entitlements dominate long-term budgeting pressures, accounting for nearly all projected deficit growth over the next three decades per analyses of trustees' reports, challenging narratives that downplay their role by focusing on per-recipient costs amid persistent intergenerational transfers exceeding $7,500 annually in select poverty-related outlays when adjusted for program scale.^[89] ^[90] This trajectory highlights opportunity costs, as unreformed commitments foreclose alternatives like debt reduction or targeted investments, with Brookings assessments noting failures in aligning revenues to entitlement trajectories as a core budgetary vulnerability.^[89]

Policy Debates, Moral Hazards, and Reform Proposals

Progressive advocates for entitlement programs emphasize their role in poverty alleviation, pointing to data showing that means-tested benefits and Social Security lifted approximately 38 million people out of poverty in 2018 under the Supplemental Poverty Measure.^[91] However, empirical analyses reveal that expansions in welfare benefits correlate with reduced labor force participation, as evidenced by studies on Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) reforms in the 1990s, which imposed work requirements and time limits, leading to increased employment among single mothers by 10-20 percentage points in affected states.^[92] Conservative critiques, such as those from the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), highlight intergenerational inequity, arguing that current structures burden younger workers with unsustainable obligations amid demographic shifts, where the worker-to-beneficiary ratio is projected to fall from 2.8 in 2024 to 2.3 by 2035 due to aging populations.^[82]^[93] Moral hazards arise when entitlement benefits diminish incentives for self-reliance, with research indicating that extended unemployment insurance prolongs job search durations by 20-30% through reduced search effort, as found in randomized evaluations of benefit extensions.^[94] Similarly, analyses of welfare-to-work transitions show that pre-reform cash assistance discouraged labor supply, with benefit reductions post-1996 correlating to higher workforce entry rates without commensurate poverty increases, challenging claims that such programs solely serve as safety nets without behavioral distortions.^[95] These effects compound fiscal pressures, as the Social Security Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund faces depletion by 2035, potentially requiring 21% benefit cuts absent reforms, exacerbated by baby-boomer retirements swelling beneficiary rolls by 12 million over the next decade.^[96]^[72]^[97] Reform proposals prioritize fiscal solvency and incentive alignment, including means-testing for programs like Supplemental Security Income (SSI) to limit benefits to the truly needy, thereby reducing outlays projected to exceed revenues by 1.2% of GDP by 2050.^[82] Privatization options, such as partial shifts to personal retirement accounts, aim to mitigate moral hazards by tying returns to individual contributions rather than pay-as-you-go systems, though empirical simulations suggest hybrid models could stabilize funds while preserving baseline coverage.^[98] Post-1930s expansions, which universalized benefits beyond original safety-net intents, have driven current debates toward targeted adjustments like raising retirement ages gradually to reflect longevity gains, with AEI advocating phased implementations to avoid abrupt disruptions.^[82] Evidence from state-level welfare overhauls supports that such changes enhance long-term self-sufficiency without eroding poverty reductions achieved through earned income supplements.^[99]

Manifestations in Workplace and Education

In professional settings, psychological entitlement—a belief that one deserves superior treatment or rewards irrespective of contributions—manifests as demands for unearned promotions, raises, or accommodations, often leading to friction with managers and peers. Surveys indicate that employers frequently perceive younger workers, particularly Generation Z entrants, as exhibiting heightened entitlement, with 51% attributing workforce unpreparedness to this trait and 65% citing it as a barrier to hiring recent graduates. Such attitudes correlate with resistance to feedback, overestimation of abilities, and expectations of rapid advancement without commensurate performance, as evidenced by reports of employees seeking vice presidential roles shortly after onboarding or insisting on promotions despite minimal output.^[100]^[101]^[102] Empirical studies link psychological entitlement to tangible organizational costs, including reduced job performance, elevated turnover intentions, and increased interpersonal conflict. For instance, entitled employees underperform when monitoring is lax and exhibit lower compliance with ethical norms, while high entitlement levels predict neglect of collaborative duties and self-serving behaviors that undermine team dynamics. These patterns contribute to lower overall engagement, as entitled individuals prioritize perceived deservedness over discretionary effort, fostering cultures where merit-based rewards are contested rather than earned. In high-entitlement cohorts, such as service sector workers in analyzed samples, behavioral outcomes include heightened voluntary exits and diminished productivity, exacerbating recruitment challenges amid generational shifts.^[34]^[2] In educational environments, entitlement appears as students' expectations of high grades or accommodations without proportional effort, often framed as a consumer right to success in higher education. Research identifies academic entitlement as inversely related to classroom engagement, with entitled students showing decreased participation in both in-class activities and out-of-class study, prioritizing minimal input for maximal output. Prevalence estimates vary, but approximately 10% of graduating seniors score above median on entitlement measures, correlating with demands for grade adjustments based on personal circumstances rather than achievement. This mindset intersects with grade inflation trends, where average GPAs at U.S. four-year institutions rose over 16% from 1990 to 2020, partly driven by student pressures and institutional responses that erode grading rigor without corresponding gains in learning outcomes.^[48]^[103]^[104] Such manifestations in academia contribute to broader systemic issues, including diluted academic standards and mismatched skill preparation for professional transitions. Entitled orientations foster a paradox where students perceive education as a transactional service, demanding extensions or regrades as entitlements, which faculty report as increasingly prevalent amid consumerist cultural shifts. While some data suggest entitlement levels remain low overall, its impact is amplified in selective complaints that influence policy, perpetuating cycles of reduced effort and inflated credentials that signal competence less reliably to employers.^[105]^[106]^[107]

Effects on Interpersonal Relationships and Society

Psychological entitlement, characterized by a pervasive belief in deserving more than others without reciprocal effort, strains interpersonal relationships by promoting exploitative dynamics and reducing mutual respect. Individuals high in entitlement often pursue self-image goals at the expense of relational harmony, leading to increased hostility, conflict, and perceptions of others as obstacles rather than partners.^[5] In romantic and familial contexts, this manifests as expectations of special treatment, which correlate with lower relationship satisfaction, higher breakup rates, and relational entitlement that undermines couple outcomes through demands overriding empathy.^[108] For instance, entitled partners exhibit destructive behaviors like resentment-fueled demands, fracturing bonds by eroding trust and fostering cycles of blame rather than accountability.^[109] In family settings, entitlement contributes to estrangement, where perceived ungratefulness or exaggerated deservingness prompts cuts in ties, as parents report children's entitlement as a key factor in breakdowns alongside other conflicts.^[110] Sibling relationships suffer similarly, with relational entitlement moderating conflicts, particularly when financial dependence amplifies self-centered agency over familial reciprocity.^[111] These patterns reflect a causal shift from gratitude-based interactions to entitlement-driven exploitation, where individuals prioritize personal gains, leading to toxic behaviors that prioritize superiority over cooperation.^[109] On a societal level, widespread entitlement erodes social cohesion by diminishing reciprocity and fostering a culture of demands over earned contributions, resulting in reduced altruism and heightened aggressiveness in interactions.^[1] Entitled orientations correlate with self-serving decisions that undermine group trust and team spirit, as individuals view societal structures through a lens of exaggerated deservingness, leading to chronic frustration when expectations unmet.^[112] This contributes to broader harms, including weakened communal bonds, as entitlement's status-seeking drive amplifies interpersonal aggression and reduces collective flourishing by replacing mutual aid with zero-sum competitions.^[1] Empirical measures of psychological entitlement link it to outcomes like organizational conflict spillover into society, where unearned claims hinder adaptive behaviors essential for social stability.^[113]

Representations in Media and Arts

Depictions in Television and Film

Television series Entourage (2004–2011) depicts the theme of entitlement through the lens of Hollywood's inner circle, following actor Vincent Chase and his friends as they navigate fame, portraying their demands for preferential treatment and luxurious lifestyles as normalized consequences of sudden success.^[114] Critics have observed that the show voyeuristically highlights entitled behaviors among industry insiders, often blurring lines between satire and glorification of unearned perks.^[115] The HBO drama Succession (2018–2023) satirizes entitlement among ultra-wealthy heirs, centering on the Roy family's ruthless competition to inherit control of a global media conglomerate, where characters exhibit a profound sense of birthright over corporate power despite lacking merit-based qualifications.^[116] The series underscores causal links between inherited privilege and distorted self-perception, with siblings like Kendall Roy displaying narcissistic demands for leadership rooted in familial status rather than competence.^[117] ^[118] Reality television formats, such as those in the Real Housewives franchise (2006–present), frequently amplify entitled traits among participants seeking validation through conspicuous consumption and interpersonal conflicts, reflecting broader cultural pursuits of unearned status.^[119] Empirical studies correlate adolescent exposure to such programming with heightened self-reported entitlement and materialism, suggesting portrayals reinforce perceptions of deserved luxury without effort.^[120] In film, Pourris gâtés (English: Spoiled Brats, 2021) critiques generational entitlement by following a millionaire who simulates financial ruin to compel his adult children—accustomed to lavish, unearned support—to confront self-reliance and consequences of dependency.^[121] The narrative illustrates causal realism in entitlement's erosion of personal agency, as the protagonists grapple with diminished privileges on June 2, 2021, release. Similarly, The White Lotus anthology series (2021–present), while primarily television, extends film-like episodic critiques of tourist entitlement, depicting affluent guests' exploitative attitudes toward service staff in resort settings.^[122]

Themes in Literature and Popular Culture

In classical literature, entitlement manifests as hubris, an excessive pride or arrogance that defies natural or divine limits, invariably leading to the protagonist's downfall. Greek tragedians like Sophocles portrayed this in Oedipus Rex, where Oedipus's belief in his intellectual superiority and right to uncover truth blinds him to fate's constraints, culminating in self-inflicted ruin.^[123] Similarly, in Homer's Iliad, Achilles's entitled withdrawal from battle due to perceived slights against his honor prolongs the Trojan War and invites his death, underscoring hubris as a causal flaw inviting nemesis.^[124] These motifs serve as cautionary archetypes, emphasizing that unearned claims to superiority disrupt cosmic order and invite retribution, a theme echoed in later works without positive framing. Victorian novelist Charles Dickens extended critiques of entitlement to social structures, targeting aristocratic presumptions of inherited privilege. In Little Dorrit (1857), the Circumlocution Office exemplifies bureaucratic entitlement, where the Barnacle family monopolizes public resources through nepotism, satirizing how noble birth fosters inefficiency and moral decay.^[125] Dickens's portrayals, informed by his observations of 19th-century England's class rigidities, highlight entitlement's corrosive effects on meritocracy, as aristocrats evade accountability while the industrious suffer.^[126] Modern literature continues this vein through satires of psychological entitlement, as in R.F. Kuang's Yellowface (2023), where protagonist June Hayward's envy-driven theft of a manuscript reveals self-justified claims to success, critiquing publishing's merit myths amid identity politics.^[127] In popular culture, entitlement appears in fan dynamics, where consumers assert ownership over creators' outputs, fostering toxicity. Discussions of "toxic fandoms" describe behaviors like harassment over narrative choices in franchises such as Star Wars or the Marvel Cinematic Universe, rooted in fans' perceived rights to dictate content evolution.^[128] This entitlement escalates when passion morphs into demands for unearned influence, as seen in online backlash against deviations from canon, prioritizing personal expectations over artistic autonomy.^[129] Creators, including those in science fiction, have pushed back; a 2021 Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers Association advisory urged boundaries against audience overreach, noting that while fans may voice opinions, entitlement to control narratives undermines professional agency.^[130] Such portrayals remain predominantly negative, framing entitlement as a barrier to mutual respect rather than a virtue.

References

[1]
A Status-Seeking Account of Psychological Entitlement - PMC
Sep 26, 2018 · Psychological Entitlement. Psychological entitlement refers to an inflated and pervasive sense of deservingness, self-importance, and ...
[2]
Psychological entitlement and organizational citizenship behaviors
According to Campbell and colleagues (2004, p. 31), psychological entitlement refers to 'a stable and pervasive sense that one deserves more and is entitled to ...
[3]
Linking dark triad traits, psychological entitlement, and knowledge ...
Psychological entitlement is defined as “the phenomenon in which individuals consistently believe that they deserve preferential rewards and treatment ...
[4]
an overview of the research of psychological entitlement. definitions ...
Dec 8, 2017 · PDF | In this article, we describe the concept of entitlement and its different definitions over the years. We identified two historically ...
[5]
Creating Hostility and Conflict: Effects of Entitlement and Self-Image ...
These results suggest that by pursuing self-image goals, entitled people create conflict and hostility in their relationships. Keywords: narcissism, entitlement ...
[6]
Entitled People - What to Expect and How to Deal With Them | SPSP
May 15, 2019 · Psychological entitlement predicts failure to follow instructions. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10, 172–180. Emily Zitek is ...<|separator|>
[7]
Would entitled people be more proactive at work? Examining ...
We propose that psychological entitlement influences proactive work behavior in both positive and negative ways, with need for uniqueness, role-breadth self- ...Missing: mentality causes
[8]
Impact of psychological entitlement on engagement in learning ...
Sep 10, 2024 · Psychological entitlement and engagement in learning activities. Getting admiration is the primary concern of psychologically entitled ...
[9]
Exploring the interplay of psychological entitlement, mindset, and ...
Apr 2, 2025 · Psychological entitlement is characterized by an individual's persistent belief in their inherent deservingness and superiority over others.
[10]
Entitlement - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
Originating in 1823, from Old French "entitlement" meaning "title or inscription," the word means the right or claim to something, formed from entitle + ...
[11]
Entitle - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
"Intitle" originates from late 14c. Anglo-French entitler and Late Latin intitulare, meaning "to give a title or name to a chapter, book, etc."
[12]
entitlement, n. meanings, etymology and more
The earliest known use of the noun entitlement is in the late 1700s. OED's earliest evidence for entitlement is from 1782, in Morning Herald & Daily Advertiser.
[13]
ENTITLEMENT Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster
1. a : the state or condition of being entitled : right b : a right to benefits specified especially by law or contract 2. belief that one is deserving of or ...
[14]
How 'entitlement' and 'privilege' became epithets
Dec 11, 2018 · “Entitled” means “to furnish with proper grounds for seeking or claiming something,” M-W says, which doesn't get at common connotations for “ ...
[15]
When did the word "entitled" gain its second sense of "spoiled"?
May 2, 2020 · The OED's earliest example for that meaning is from R Coles, Privileged Ones, 1977 · "Sense of entitlement" apparently first caught on around ...
[16]
Sage Reference - Psychological Entitlement
Psychological entitlement refers to a general belief that one deserves more or is entitled to more than others are. Psychological entitlement ...
[17]
Overview of Procedural Due Process | U.S. Constitution Annotated
Procedural due process requires state actors to provide certain procedural protections before they deprive a person of any protected life, liberty, or property ...
[18]
Procedural Due Process Civil :: Fourteenth Amendment - Justia Law
The Interests Protected: “Life, Liberty and Property”. In the 1960s, however, the Court began a rapid expansion of the “liberty” and “property” aspects of the ...
[19]
Robert Nozick - Entitlement Theory, Libertarianism, Anarchy
Sep 13, 2025 · According to Nozick, anyone who acquired what he has through these means is morally entitled to it. Thus the “entitlement” theory of justice ...
[20]
Rights - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Dec 19, 2005 · A distinction between negative and positive rights is popular among some normative theorists, especially those with a bent toward libertarianism ...Human Rights · Legal Rights · Group
[21]
Trait entitlement: A cognitive-personality source of vulnerability to ...
... entitlement: Individual differences in students' externalized responsibility and entitled expectations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(4), 982–997.Publication History · Other Publishers · Tests And Measures
[22]
Trait Entitlement: A Cognitive-Personality Source of Vulnerability to ...
Aug 8, 2016 · Psychological entitlement is a personality trait characterized by pervasive feelings of deservingness, specialness, and exaggerated expectations.Missing: et 2017
[23]
Why Narcissists Feel So Entitled - Psychology Today
May 6, 2022 · Find a therapist who understands narcissism. Key points. Entitlement is the key trait that drives narcissistic behaviors. When narcissists ...
[24]
Narcissistic Personality Disorder: Progress in Understanding and ...
Oct 25, 2022 · Winner NA , Nicholson BC : Overparenting and narcissism in young adults: the mediating role of psychological control . ... entitlement and ...
[25]
Creating hostility and conflict: Effects of entitlement and self-image ...
Entitled people adopt self-image goals (goals that aim to construct and defend a positive self-image), which then lead to interpersonal conflict and hostility.
[26]
Understanding the Impact of Excessive Praise - Dr. Anthony Mazzella
In adulthood, individuals who were overpraised as children may exhibit narcissistic behaviors such as a lack of empathy, an inflated sense of entitlement, and a ...
[27]
Understanding the Entitlement Grandiosity Schema
Feb 25, 2024 · Entitlement grandiosity schema can emerge from childhood emotional deprivation, leading to maladaptive behaviors that require manipulation and ...Missing: overpraise | Show results with:overpraise
[28]
Entitlement, Anger, and Emotion Reciprocity - Psychology Today
Dec 15, 2023 · Anger and entitlement are inextricably linked. If you're angry, you perceive threats to some presumed entitlement, and if you're entitled, you're bound to be ...Missing: ambition | Show results with:ambition
[29]
Interpersonal consequences and validation of a self-report measure.
The Psychological Entitlement Scale (PES) was found to be reliable and valid (Study 1, 2), not associated with social desirability (Study 2), stable across ...
[30]
Psychological Entitlement Scale
The Psychological Entitlement Scale (PES; Campbell et al., 2004) is a 9-item scale that measures respondents' sense of entitlement.
[31]
Entitlement may lead to chronic disappointment - ScienceDaily
Sep 14, 2016 · Previous studies show entitlement is on the rise -- so-called "millennials" see themselves as generally more entitled than previous ...Missing: scores | Show results with:scores
[32]
Entitlement or Ambition? 39% of Gen Z and 35% of Millennials Seen ...
Mar 12, 2025 · 39% of Gen Z and 35% of Millennials Seen as Most Entitled for Raises and Promotions ... 2025 compared to 2024, while only 14% expect a decrease.
[33]
“Put Away Childish Things”: Psychological entitlement has weaker ...
We investigate whether negative associations between entitlement and life satisfaction, self-esteem, and perceived social support are weaker for both emerging ...
[34]
Will Someone Be Checking My Work? The Effect of Psychological ...
Psychological entitlement, defined as “a stable and pervasive sense that one deserves more and is entitled to more than others,” is taking a toll on the ...Missing: millennials | Show results with:millennials
[35]
The Interplay of Psychological Entitlement, Age, and Gender in ...
Jun 20, 2025 · This experimental study explores the role of meaning-making processes, focusing on the interplay between psychological entitlement, age, and gender.
[36]
Are Millennials Really an Entitled Generation? An Investigation into ...
Apr 2, 2019 · Results indicate that Millennials do indeed exhibit significantly more entitled scores on the Equity Sensitivity Instrument than Baby Boomers ( ...<|separator|>
[37]
Are Millennials Really an Entitled Generation? An Investigation into ...
The table indicates that Millennials had the lowest ESI scores (most entitled) and Baby Boomers had the highest ESI scores (most benevolent). An analysis of ...
[38]
https://psyche.co/ideas/is-narcissism-really-on-the-rise-among-younger-generations
[39]
[PDF] The Effects of Stereotype Activation on Generational Differences
Oct 11, 2016 · Millennials who experienced implicit stereotype activation about generational differences were higher in entitlement ... Psychological entitlement ...
[40]
Generations and Generational Differences: Debunking Myths ... - NIH
We explore and “bust” ten common myths about the science and practice of generations and generational differences.
[41]
[PDF] Measurement of Psychological Entitlement in 28 Countries
Oct 30, 2015 · This understanding of entitlement as perceived deservingness, whether or not people are entitled to benefits or support, is based on their ...
[42]
(PDF) Measurement of psychological entitlement in 28 countries
Aug 6, 2025 · From a social psychology perspective, entitlement focuses on what individuals believe they are entitled to receive in terms of social fairness ...
[43]
Validation of psychological entitlement measurement in South Korea
Jul 17, 2025 · Psychological entitlement (PE) is defined as 'a stable and pervasive sense that one deserves more and is entitled to more than others' (Campbell ...<|separator|>
[44]
CROSS- CULTURAL ENTITLEMENT AND RESILIENCE: A ...
Aug 27, 2018 · Through a parallel analysis of entitlement - based cognitions of the Western world and of adaptive cognitions of the Developing world, the ...
[45]
Psychological entitlement: Concept, measurements and related ...
Psychological entitlement can lead to narcissism, interpersonal conflict, selfish behavior, and aggressive behavior, etc. It can be influenced by ...
[46]
An Investigation of Helicopter Parenting and Interpersonal Conflict in ...
May 19, 2023 · We found that helicopter parenting enhances interpersonal conflict among college students, by strengthening psychological entitlement and fear of missing out.
[47]
(PDF) Psychological Entitlement and Behavioral Outcomes
Aug 7, 2025 · This paper explores the relationship between psychological entitlement and various behavioral outcomes, including job performance, turnover ...
[48]
Academic entitlement decreases engagement in and out of the ... - NIH
Jul 18, 2022 · The Academic Entitlement Scale is a 15-item measure consisting of two subscales: (a) externalized responsibility and (b) entitled expectations ( ...
[49]
[PDF] Entitlement Attitudes Predict Students' Poor Performance in ... - ERIC
May 7, 2013 · By virtue of these unreasonable expectations excessively entitled individuals may rely too heavily on others to achieve desirable outcomes, and ...<|separator|>
[50]
The Dark Side of Empowering Your Child | Psychology Today
Aug 8, 2024 · When empowerment is unfettered by other virtues such as temperance, justice, and humility, it can lead to negative outcomes, such as an entitled ...
[51]
The Sense of Entitlement vs. Gratitude: Polar Opposites
Feb 20, 2022 · Gratitude strengthens self-esteem while entitlement diminishes it. Entitlement may elevate our mood momentarily when an entitled desire is ...
[52]
Post-traumatic Growth: The Roles of the Sense of Entitlement ...
Apr 27, 2023 · Post-traumatic Growth: The Roles of the Sense of Entitlement, Gratitude and hope · Abstract. People believe that they are entitled to well-being ...
[53]
Robert Nozick's Political Philosophy
Jun 22, 2014 · Our investigation of the third topic, the historical entitlement doctrine of just holdings and competing conceptions of distributive justice, ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[54]
Robert Nozick's Political Philosophy.
As alluded to earlier, the entitlement theory of justice does not depend on the concept of just desert (reward) in order to validate the acquisition or transfer ...<|separator|>
[55]
Nozick on Distributive Justice and the Difference ... - Libertarianism.org
Oct 22, 2024 · The entitlement-desert distinction plays a pivotal role in the debate between Rawls and Nozick. What did Nozick take those concepts to mean?
[56]
[PDF] Understanding the Difference Between Positive and Negative Rights
Positive rights provide the right holder with a claim against another person or the state for some good, service, or treatment.
[57]
Entitlements, Rights, and Fairness: An Experimental Examination of ...
Entitlements, Rights, and Fairness: An Experimental Examination of Subjects' Concepts of Distributive Justice. Elizabeth Hoffman and; Matthew L. Spitzer.
[58]
[PDF] Nozick Chapter 3 - Entitlement Theory - Essential Scholars
people are entitled to whatever holdings arise from the correct application of the entitlement theory. In general, one might be entitled to something without.
[59]
The Psychology of Deservingness and Acceptance of Human Rights
deservingness. New York, NY: Kluwer/Plenum. Feather, N. T. (2003). Distinguishing between deservingness and entitlement: Earned outcomes. versus lawful outcomes ...
[60]
Desert - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Oct 9, 2015 · As Feinberg indicated, familiar deserts include such things as grades, wages, prizes, respect, honors and awards, rights, love, benefits and ...
[61]
What Do We Deserve? Moral Desert & Entitlement - Values of the Wise
In philosophy, it is termed moral desert (as in moral deservingness). That is, as a member of society, what rights does one have to goods and benefits and ...
[62]
interpersonal consequences and validation of a self-report measure
Nine studies were conducted with the goal of developing a self-report measure of psychological entitlement and assessing its interpersonal consequences.
[63]
[PDF] 3. The Need for Basic Rights: A Critique of Nozick's Entitlement Theory
I argue that Nozick's entitlement theory leads to indirect injustice and is therefore an unfitting philosophical theory, which means that the Libertarian Party ...
[64]
[PDF] Justiceand Desert in LiberalTheory
May 31, 2000 · reject the principle of distribution in accordance with moral desert even if ... Rawls, is moral deservingness, a reflection of one's moral ...
[65]
The Flexible Fairness: Equality, Earned Entitlement, and Self-Interest
Sep 9, 2013 · (2013) The Flexible Fairness: Equality, Earned Entitlement, and Self-Interest. PLoS ONE 8(9): e73106. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0073106.
[66]
Making Sense of Misfortune: Deservingness, Self-Esteem, and ... - NIH
The current findings highlight the important role that concerns about deservingness play in the link between lower self-esteem and patterns of self-defeating ...
[67]
Because I (don't) deserve it: Entitlement and lying behavior
Our results suggest that deservingness influences lying behavior because it creates an entitlement concern that makes lying more costly for the low-performing ...
[68]
Psychological Entitlement and Relative Deprivation Have ...
Apr 17, 2025 · We thus highlight how psychological entitlement shapes—and is shaped by—perceptions of injustice, irrespective of one's objective societal ...
[69]
Graphics | Congressional Budget Office
Mandatory outlays by the federal government totaled $4.1 trillion in 2024; more than half was for Social Security and Medicare.Mandatory Spending in Fiscal... · Discretionary Spending · Menu · Page 5
[70]
[PDF] Brief Summaries of Medicare & Medicaid, 2024 - CMS
Nov 15, 2024 · Title XIX of the Social Security Act is a Federal/State entitlement program that pays for medical assistance for certain individuals and ...
[71]
Medicaid Financing and Expenditures - Congress.gov
May 5, 2025 · Medicaid is a means-tested entitlement program that finances the delivery of primary and acute medical services as well as long-term services and supports ( ...
[72]
Trustees Report Summary - Social Security
At the end of 2024, 60.1 million people received OASI benefits, 8.3 million received DI benefits, and 67.6 million people were enrolled in Medicare. How ...Missing: CBPP | Show results with:CBPP
[73]
[PDF] Medicare beneficiary demographics - MedPAC
In 2021, beneficiaries ages 65 and older without ESRD composed 86.9 percent of the beneficiary population and accounted for 79.6 percent of Medicare spending.
[74]
Why Did They Do It That Way? Medicaid Financing
Apr 28, 2025 · As of November 2024, Medicaid and CHIP provided health coverage for almost 80 million people. Although the services covered by Medicaid vary ...Missing: entitlement | Show results with:entitlement
[75]
Medicaid Financing: The Basics - KFF
Jan 29, 2025 · Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are the three main entitlement programs and accounted for 41% of all federal outlays in FFY 2024 (Figure ...
[76]
Entitlement Programs - Federal Safety Net
Welfare programs such as SNAP (food stamps) or Pell Grants are examples of non-contributory programs. Participants receive benefits even though they have never ...
[77]
PGPF Chart Pack: The U.S. Budget - Peterson Foundation
Aug 6, 2025 · Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid account for nearly 75 percent of mandatory spending. 2024 Mandatory Outlays: $4,130 Billion. Social ...
[78]
Social protection statistics - social benefits - European Commission
This article presents statistics relating to expenditure on social protection benefits in the European Union (EU), the EFTA countries, as well as the ...
[79]
Sizing up Welfare States: How do OECD countries compare?
Feb 2, 2023 · Unemployment (e.g. unemployment compensation), · Housing (e.g. housing allowances), · Other Contingencies (e.g. social assistance type ...
[80]
Entitlement Reform Remains an Absolute Necessity
In 1970, spending on Social Security and the major health care entitlement programs was 3.6 percent of GDP. In 2015, spending on these programs was 10.3 percent ...
[81]
Entitlement Apocalypse | American Enterprise Institute - AEI
We spend 9.7 percent of GDP on entitlements today, and by 2030 we will spend around 14.4 percent. Two forces bear primary responsibility for pushing entitlement ...
[82]
The Path to Entitlement Reform | American Enterprise Institute - AEI
Jul 1, 2025 · The federal government's finances are now thoroughly dominated by spending on Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid (spending on the ...
[83]
Federal deficit, tax inequities, entitlement programs vie for ...
Apr 15, 2024 · A former senior economist at the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, Viard discusses federal entitlements and tax policy challenges during an era of rising ...
[84]
Reducing Spending Now: The Key to Growth, Not Austerity
Jan 16, 2025 · This surge in consumption more than offsets the initial reduction in entitlement benefits, demonstrating that fiscal discipline can create a win ...
[85]
The National Debt Can Crowd Out Investments in the Economy
Apr 23, 2025 · Large amounts of federal debt could “crowd out” investments by the private sector, making the economy less productive and stunting wage ...Missing: entitlements | Show results with:entitlements
[86]
Moral Hazard, Incentive Contracts and Risk: Evidence from ...
Dec 8, 2011 · We model how these incentive contracts affect the work rate and time taken in a procurement setting ... All Rights Reserved.Missing: entitlements | Show results with:entitlements
[87]
Analysis of the 2025 Social Security Trustees' Report
Jun 18, 2025 · If the OASI trust fund borrows from the disability fund, the trust funds would be depleted by 2034, leading to a 19 percent benefit cut. Social ...
[88]
[PDF] 2025 Medicare Trustees Report - CMS
Jun 18, 2025 · We have the honor of transmitting to you the 2025 Annual Report of the Boards of Trustees of the. Federal Hospital Insurance Trust Fund and the ...
[89]
A long-term budget for entitlements and required revenues | Brookings
Jan 9, 2017 · ... fail to provide an orderly pathway for helping to resolve disputes ... In “A long-term budget for entitlements and required revenues,” Stuart M.Missing: failures | Show results with:failures
[90]
What the 2025 Trustees' Report Shows About Social Security
Jul 2, 2025 · These facts reinforce the point that Social Security's fundamental challenge is demographic, traceable to a rising number of beneficiaries ...
[91]
Government programs kept tens of millions out of poverty in 2018
Sep 11, 2019 · Even Social Security—too-often thought of as strictly a program for older Americans—has a large impact on the welfare of children, lifting 1.5 ...
[92]
[PDF] Welfare Reform and the Labor Market
sample, they found that reducing/eliminating welfare benefits and imposing time limits had large labor supply effects. Ferrall (2012) and Chan (2013, 2017) ...
[93]
2024 OASDI Trustees Report - Social Security
The OASI cost rate rises rapidly from 2023 to about 2040. During this period, the aging of the baby-boom generation will increase the number of beneficiaries ...
[94]
[PDF] Moral Hazard versus Liquidity and Optimal Unemployment Insurance
This paper presents new evidence on why unemployment insurance. (UI) benefits affect search behavior and develops a simple method of calculating the welfare ...
[95]
[PDF] What Works in Welfare Reform | MDRC
To increase work and reduce welfare receipt, virtually every state re- quired adults who receive cash welfare benefits to work or participate in employment and ...
[96]
What the 2024 Trustees' Report Shows About Social Security
Jul 24, 2024 · After 2035, Social Security could still pay roughly 83 percent of scheduled benefits using its tax income even if policymakers took no steps to ...
[97]
Social Security is turning 90 — and its problems are only mounting ...
Aug 15, 2025 · In the next 10 years, Social Security is expected to swell by an additional 12 million recipients, according to the AARP. But even as it grows ...
[98]
Social Security: Lessons for Reform - Tax Foundation
Sep 24, 2024 · Experts explore Social Security reform options, including previous efforts like the Bowles-Simpson Proposal. See Social Security funding.
[99]
Welfare Reform - Cato Institute
Dec 15, 2022 · Studies also suggest that diversion participants are subsequently more likely to work than become traditional recipients of welfare.<|separator|>
[100]
40% of Business Leaders Find Gen Z Unprepared for Workforce
Aug 7, 2023 · Fifty-one percent blamed a sense of entitlement, and 43 percent attributed that lack of preparedness to technological skills. Whatever the ...Missing: workplace | Show results with:workplace
[101]
1 in 6 companies in the US hesitate to hire Gen-Z freshers: Here's why
Nov 11, 2024 · According to 40% of employers, Gen Z's workplace demeanor doesn't always align with professional standards. Sense of Entitlement. 65% of ...<|separator|>
[102]
Feeling Entitled? – It's the surest way to NOT get the promotion you ...
Jul 7, 2015 · Haines says entitlement manifests itself in the following workplace traits: a resistance to feedback, an inclination to overestimate talents and ...
[103]
Academic Entitlement and Academic Performance in Graduating ...
Fourteen (10%) students scored greater than the median total points possible on 1 or both of the academic entitlement instruments and were categorized as more ...
[104]
Addressing the Grade Inflation Collective Action Problem
Sep 30, 2025 · From 1990-2020, four-year college grade point averages (GPAs) rose more than 16% at public and non-profit universities. “A” is now the most ...Missing: entitlement statistics
[105]
(PDF) Student Entitlement - ResearchGate
Aug 6, 2025 · Our article places student entitlement in its social context, with specific attention to the prevalence of the consumer mentality, grade inflation, and the ...
[106]
Challenging Notions of Academic Entitlement and Its Rise among ...
Dec 6, 2017 · Despite contrasting data that show low levels of college student entitlement (e.g., [18]), media outlets have decried the entitled mentality of ...
[107]
Is the Sky Falling? Grade Inflation and the Signaling Power of Grades
Grade inflation compromises the signaling value of grades, undermining their capacity to achieve the functions for which they are intended.
[108]
Sense of Relational Entitlement and Couple Outcomes - MDPI
Jun 3, 2023 · Psychological entitlement represents the belief that one deserves more than others as well as the expectation of special treatment. While ...
[109]
How Destructive Entitlement Can Destroy Relationships
Apr 2, 2025 · Destructive entitlement fuels resentment and harm in relationships. Break the cycle with self-awareness, responsibility, and healing.
[110]
Family Estrangement: Why Families Cut Ties and How to Mend Them
Jun 10, 2020 · Less commonly, they felt that their child was ungrateful or entitled, or they truly didn't know the reason for the estrangement. These ...
[111]
Emerging adult siblings' relational entitlement and conflict
Guided by the agency model of narcissism and adult development literature, this study conceptualized relational entitlement as one form of state narcissism and ...Missing: fractures | Show results with:fractures
[112]
A Sense of Entitlement: From Childhood to the Workplace
Nov 24, 2020 · Entitlement is characterized by a lack of altruism or team spirit. Entitled people tend to be far more self-serving in their actions and decisions than others.
[113]
Psychological Entitlement: Interpersonal Consequences and ...
The Psychological Entitlement Scale (PES) was found to be reliable and valid (Study 1, 2), not associated with social desirability (Study 2), stable across time ...
[114]
https://www.slate.com/articles/arts/culturebox/2015/05/entourage_movie_2015_how_the_show_went_from_critical_darling_to_cultural.html
[115]
How I Got Addicted to 'Entourage,' a Voyeuristic Show About Entitled ...
so much that I couldn't stop watching it. Being ...
[116]
HBO's 'Succession': All in the rich, powerful and dysfunctional family
Jun 2, 2018 · And that's also what this show touches on, I think. It touches on that entitlement, on people being more and more taken away from the plot.
[117]
Kendall Roy's playlist: why hip hop is the perfect counterpoint for ...
May 22, 2023 · Hip hop is used to underpin, juxtapose and comment on the story of corporate intrigue, capitalist entitlement and white privilege.
[118]
Succession, White Lotus, and the Rise of Cynical TV
May 6, 2023 · Succession follows the story of a vicious TV mogul Logan Roy (based on Rupert Murdoch) and his irreparably damaged, entitled, sniveling kidalt children.
[119]
Generation Me in the Spotlight: Linking Reality TV to Materialism ...
Jul 29, 2016 · Today's youth, the Generation Me, is deemed materialistic, entitled, and narcissistic. Individuality has become an important value in ...
[120]
Linking Reality TV to Materialism, Entitlement, and Narcissism
Our findings indicate that the more reality TV adolescents view, the more materialistic, entitled, and narcissistic they are. No such patterns were found for ...
[121]
Spoiled Brats (2021) - IMDb
Rating 6.1/10 (8,989) A millionaire wants to help his spoiled children be better people, so he tricks them and pretends that the family lost the fortune on which the entitled young ...Official Trailer [OV] · Parents guide · Filming & production · 3 of 73Missing: satirizing | Show results with:satirizing
[122]
The White Lotus: The Significance of Wildlife in Season 1, Explained
Mar 21, 2023 · ... satirizing the characters' blind entitlement. the-white-lotus-nicole ... The show satirizes the spoiled behavior of its characters ...
[123]
Hubris - Definition and Examples - LitCharts
Hubris refers to excessive pride or overconfidence, which drives a person to overstep limits in a way that leads to their downfall.
[124]
Examples and Definition of Hubris in Literature - Literary Devices
Hubris is extreme pride, arrogance, or self-importance shown by a character, that ultimately brings about his downfall or consequences.
[125]
Why is Dickens so popular? | The British Academy
Feb 20, 2017 · Dickens had no love for aristocrats, for entitled people. In Little Dorrit we have Lord Decimus Tite Barnacle and all the lesser Barnacles ...
[126]
[PDF] Sir Nicholas: Chivalric Tropes and Dickens's Critique of the ...
Dec 3, 2024 · [and] a keen critic of aristocratic entitlement” (7). Similarly, Vanden Bossche goes on to explain that Dickens's work, in keeping with a ...
[127]
Yellowface summary by Rebecca F. Kuang: A Sharp Satire on Race ...
Jun 9, 2025 · Told in a confessional first-person voice, June is an unreliable narrator who exposes her entitlement, envy, and self-justification in shocking ...
[128]
What Are Toxic Fandoms? - Verywell Mind
Nov 28, 2023 · Toxic fandoms encompass a range of negative, abusive, and antisocial behaviors by fans, usually via social media.Historical Perspectives on... · Fandom and Identity · Fan Entitlement
[129]
The Thin Line Between Critique and Fan Entitlement
May 31, 2018 · What Do I Mean By “Fan Entitlement”? As I mentioned before, fans really are entitled to many things when it comes to fiction. However, when we ...Missing: depictions | Show results with:depictions
[130]
Managing A Creator's Public Profile and Navigating Audience ...
Dec 17, 2021 · Yes, everyone is entitled to their opinion and has the right to express it. But it doesn't mean you, as a creator, need to go onto social media ...