Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Community

Community denotes a social aggregation of individuals linked by recurrent interactions, mutual recognition of interdependence, and a collective orientation toward shared norms or objectives, frequently anchored in geographic proximity or affinity-based ties.^[1] Empirical delineations emphasize four core attributes: a delimited locale or relational sphere, membership defined by biological or social criteria, common institutions facilitating coordination, and bonds of solidarity enabling collective action.^[2] These elements underpin the entity's functionality, as communities historically served as foundational units for resource pooling, conflict resolution, and cultural transmission, evolving from prehistoric kin-based clusters to agrarian villages and, later, industrial-era neighborhoods.^[3] Strong communal structures correlate with measurable benefits, including elevated psychological resilience via sense of belonging—quantified through scales assessing emotional security, shared symbols, and reciprocal influence—and reduced societal pathologies like isolation or norm erosion.^[4]^[5] Defining traits encompass not merely spatial clustering but causal dynamics of trust accrual through iterated exchanges, where proximity fosters accountability and cultural homogeneity reinforces cooperative equilibria over zero-sum rivalries.^[6] Notable exemplars span indigenous tribes sustaining ecological stewardship via enforced reciprocity to modern intentional groups prioritizing self-reliance, though scalability challenges persist beyond small-scale settings of roughly 150 members, per Dunbar's number derived from primate grooming limits extrapolated to human neocortex capacity.^[7] Contemporaneous data document a precipitous erosion of these ties, with longitudinal surveys registering halved participation in civic associations since mid-20th-century baselines, alongside surging solitary pursuits and attenuated family networks amid rising geographic transience and digital mediation displacing embodied encounters.^[8]^[9] This attenuation manifests in heightened loneliness metrics—now epidemic in industrialized nations—and diminished social capital, wherein causal vectors include secularization curtailing ritual bonds, welfare expansions supplanting mutual aid, and urban designs prioritizing throughput over congregation, yielding fragmented pseudocommunities online that lack enforceable commitments.^[10] Such trends, substantiated across class and racial strata, underscore communities' role not as optional accoutrements but as prerequisites for scalable human flourishing, with restoration hinging on reinstating low-friction interfaces for organic affiliation.^[11]

Etymology and Historical Evolution

Origins and Early Usage

The English word "community" originates from the Latin communitas, a noun derived from communis ("common" or "shared"), denoting a fellowship or collective of individuals bound by mutual obligations, public duties, and commonality rather than mere aggregation.^[12] This term emerged prominently in medieval Latin texts around the 11th-12th centuries, applied to structured groups such as religious orders, where members shared spiritual and material responsibilities, and feudal assemblies, emphasizing reciprocal liabilities within hierarchical yet interdependent locales.^[13] ^[14] By the late 14th century, communitas entered Middle English via Old French comuneté, initially signifying the "commonalty" or body of common people organized around shared territorial bounds, customary privileges, or guild-like associations, as seen in legal and administrative records tying inhabitants to local governance and economic interdependence.^[12] Through the 15th to 17th centuries, usage in English documents—such as charters and parish rolls—reinforced this sense of organic, duty-bound cohesion in villages, towns, and trade fraternities, prioritizing collective welfare and restraint on individual autonomy over nascent contractual individualism.^[12] ^[15] This Latin-rooted conception diverged from the ancient Greek koinōnia, which conveyed participatory fellowship or joint sharing in civic, philosophical, or kinship affairs, often within fluid tribal or polis structures; the medieval communitas instead formalized such bonds into enduring local entities amid Europe's shift from clan-based tribalism to manorial and ecclesiastical polities, institutionalizing mutual aid as a structural imperative.^[16] ^[17] The concept of community in social thought was formalized in the late 19th century by Ferdinand Tönnies, who in his 1887 treatise Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft delineated two ideal types of social organization: Gemeinschaft (community), characterized by organic, affective bonds rooted in kinship, tradition, and shared habits that foster instinctive cooperation and mutual support; and Gesellschaft (society), marked by instrumental, rational calculations and contractual relations that prioritize individual interests over collective harmony.^[18] Tönnies argued that the transition from Gemeinschaft to Gesellschaft under industrialization eroded the natural unity of wills, leading to fragmented social behavior driven by self-interest rather than inherent solidarity.^[19] This distinction established a causal framework linking pre-modern communal structures to cohesive human interactions, contrasting with modernity's atomizing effects. Building on such analyses, Émile Durkheim in The Division of Labor in Society (1893) identified mechanical solidarity as the binding force in traditional communities, where similarity in beliefs, occupations, and lifestyles enforces conformity and collective conscience, thereby regulating behavior through repressive laws and shared rituals.^[20] In contrast, organic solidarity emerges in differentiated societies via the division of labor, promoting interdependence but risking anomie if not balanced by moral regulation; Durkheim thus posited that communal forms sustain social integration by aligning individual actions with group norms, preventing deviance through inherent likeness rather than calculated exchange.^[20] Max Weber extended these ideas by typologizing authority structures, associating traditional authority with communities where legitimacy derives from sacred traditions, hereditary roles, and personal fealties that stabilize behavior through habitual obedience and patriarchal or patrimonial hierarchies.^[21] This contrasts with rational-legal authority in bureaucratic societies, grounded in abstract rules, expertise, and impersonality, which Weber saw as enabling efficient coordination but diminishing the affective ties that communities rely on for loyalty and predictability in human conduct.^[22] In early 20th-century American sociology, the Chicago School advanced community theory through an ecological lens, with Robert E. Park and colleagues in the 1920s examining urban dynamics as processes of competition, invasion, succession, and segregation that undermined primary communal relations amid rapid city growth.^[23] Park's framework treated the city as a mosaic of natural areas where community erosion stemmed from spatial mobility and ethnic heterogeneity, causally linking environmental adaptation to shifts in social interaction patterns from intimate, face-to-face ties to impersonal associations.^[24]

Conceptual Frameworks

Sociological and Semantic Definitions

In sociology, community is defined as a collectivity of individuals characterized by sustained social interactions, shared norms and values, and a sense of mutual identification or belonging, often within a defined spatial or relational boundary. This conceptualization distinguishes communities from transient aggregates like crowds, which lack enduring ties, or impersonal markets, where exchanges occur without normative commitment or reciprocal identification.^[25] A seminal analysis by George A. Hillery Jr. in 1955 examined 94 definitions from sociological literature, identifying convergence on three core elements: a population organized into a social structure, an area of interaction, and common ties among members.^[26] These elements underscore the necessity of ongoing interpersonal relations and collective orientation, rather than mere proximity or shared interests alone. Semantically, the term has evolved from predominantly territorial connotations—emphasizing geographic locality as the basis for dense, multiplex interactions—to include relational forms unbound by place, such as networks sustained through shared identities or functions.^[4] This shift reflects technological and social changes, like urbanization and digital connectivity, enabling "communities of interest" without physical co-location.^[27] However, empirical evidence prioritizes territorial foundations for causal stability, as physical proximity facilitates repeated face-to-face encounters, norm enforcement, and resilience against disruption, fostering higher levels of trust and accountability than dispersed relational ties. Overly expansive postmodern usages, which extend "community" to any loosely affiliated group based on affinity or discourse, have been critiqued for diluting analytical precision and eroding the concept's utility in explaining bounded social order.^[28] Such definitions obscure distinctions between enduring structures with mutual obligations and ephemeral aggregates, complicating causal assessments of cohesion and governance; sociologists like Steven Brint argue for reconstruction emphasizing verifiable interaction density and boundaries to restore rigor.^[29] Boundedness remains essential for accountability, as unbounded affinity groups often evade collective responsibility, contrasting with traditional communities where proximity enables monitoring and sanctioning of deviance.^[30]

Multidisciplinary Perspectives

In archaeology, communities manifest through material evidence of prehistoric settlements that indicate cooperative organization and ritual practices predating formalized agriculture. Göbekli Tepe, dated to approximately 9600 BCE in southeastern Turkey, features monumental T-shaped pillars arranged in circular enclosures, interpreted as ritual centers that drew participants from surrounding regions, suggesting emergent social bonds through shared ceremonial activities rather than sedentary farming.^[31] This site challenges linear narratives of social complexity by evidencing large-scale coordination among hunter-gatherer groups, with settlement patterns revealing deliberate construction and periodic gatherings that fostered group cohesion via symbolic labor.^[32] Ecological perspectives define communities as assemblages of interacting species populations within a shared habitat, emphasizing trophic dependencies and resource partitioning that sustain equilibrium through mutual adaptations. For instance, in a forest ecosystem, predator-prey dynamics and symbiotic relations among flora and fauna exemplify interdependence, where species co-evolve to optimize niche exploitation without centralized direction.^[33] Analogies to human groups highlight parallels in resource-sharing networks, such as mutualistic interactions reducing individual foraging costs, yet such comparisons risk anthropomorphic fallacy by overlooking human capacities for deliberate reciprocity, language-mediated norms, and cultural transmission absent in non-sentient systems.^[34] From an economic and political viewpoint, communities emerge as spontaneous orders, per Friedrich Hayek's framework, wherein decentralized interactions among individuals generate adaptive governance structures superior to imposed state hierarchies due to localized knowledge utilization. Hayek distinguished these self-organizing systems—evident in customary laws and market exchanges—from top-down organizations, arguing that the former harness dispersed information for resilient coordination.^[35] Empirical studies corroborate lower transaction costs in high-trust, tight-knit groups, where repeated interactions and social monitoring diminish opportunism, as seen in regional analyses linking generalized trust to reduced defection risks and enhanced cooperation efficiencies compared to impersonal state bureaucracies.^[36]

Core Concepts

Gemeinschaft versus Gesellschaft

Ferdinand Tönnies introduced the distinction between Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft in his 1887 book Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft, positing them as ideal types representing fundamental forms of human association driven by distinct wills: the essential will rooted in instinct and habit for Gemeinschaft, and the arbitrary will guided by rational calculation for Gesellschaft.^[37] Tönnies viewed Gemeinschaft as prevalent in pre-modern, agrarian contexts where social bonds arise organically from kinship, neighborhood, and tradition, fostering cohesion through shared customs and affective ties rather than explicit agreements.^[38] In contrast, Gesellschaft emerges in modern, urban-industrial settings, where interactions are instrumental, contractual, and oriented toward individual interests, leading to calculated cooperation amid potential fragmentation.^[37] Gemeinschaft relies on customary norms and personal relationships that engender mutual obligations, as seen in historical rural European villages where familial and communal interdependence supported stability, though Tönnies' framework lacks direct empirical validation from contemporaneous data and remains theoretically normative.^[39] Empirical correlates include lower social isolation in traditional settings; for instance, analyses of early modern European communities reveal particularized trust within kin-based networks, enabling cooperation but limiting broader economic mobility due to exclusionary practices like guilds.^[40] Such structures causally reinforced cohesion via repeated interactions and shared fates, yet they could stifle innovation, as evidenced by stagnant rural productivity in pre-industrial England prior to manufacturing shifts around 1750.^[41] Gesellschaft, by emphasizing rational pursuit of self-interest, facilitates scalability and specialization in industrial economies but correlates with elevated anomie, or normlessness, as individuals prioritize contracts over enduring loyalties.^[42] Émile Durkheim's 1897 analysis of European suicide statistics from 1841–1872 demonstrated this through higher rates in urban, Protestant, and unmarried populations—up to 2–3 times rural baselines—attributing egoistic and anomic suicides to weakened collective restraints amid rapid economic change, rather than personal pathology.^[43] These patterns reflect causal fragmentation: detached mobility erodes integrative ties, increasing vulnerability to despair, though Gesellschaft also enables adaptive resilience via formalized institutions.^[44] The transition from Gemeinschaft to Gesellschaft accelerated during the Industrial Revolution starting in the late 1700s, as mechanized production drew rural labor to cities; in Britain, urban dwellers exceeded 50% of the population by 1851, dissolving village-based networks through geographic uprooting and factory discipline that prioritized output over tradition.^[45] This shift, while spurring growth—evident in manufacturing's role in England's pre-1750 income rise—causally fragmented familial units, as documented in 19th-century family structure changes from extended to nuclear forms under urban pressures, without inherently valorizing either type but highlighting trade-offs in cohesion versus efficiency.^[46]^[41] Tönnies observed this evolution not as inevitable progress but as a tension between organic solidarity and rational individualism, empirically underscored by rising urban social pathologies like Durkheim's documented suicide upticks.^[42]

Sense of Community and Belonging

A sense of community encompasses the psychological experience of membership, mutual influence, and emotional interconnectedness among individuals within a group. In 1986, David W. McMillan and David M. Chavis outlined a foundational model identifying four core elements: membership, which involves clear boundaries, emotional safety, personal investment, and a common symbol system; influence, characterized by reciprocal reinforcement where members shape and are shaped by the group; integration and fulfillment of needs, through shared resources and mutual aid; and shared emotional connection, fostered by time together, shared history, rituals, and relational bonds.14:1<6::AID-JCOP2290140103>3.0.CO;2-I) This framework posits sense of community as a dynamic force promoting cohesion without presupposing uniform positivity, as elements like influence can amplify conformity pressures. Empirical measurement of sense of community relies on validated scales derived from these models, such as the Sense of Community Index and its brief variants, which assess the four elements via Likert-scale items. Seymour B. Sarason first conceptualized psychological sense of community in 1974 as the perception of similarity to others, acknowledged interdependence, and mutual commitment, serving as a foundational construct in community psychology.^[47] These scales demonstrate reliability (Cronbach's alpha typically exceeding 0.80) and validity through correlations with behavioral outcomes; for example, higher sense of community scores predict greater community participation, with regression coefficients around 0.30-0.50 in diverse samples, indicating that perceived belonging causally drives involvement via reciprocity incentives.^[48]^[49] Longitudinally, stronger psychological sense of community correlates with reduced social isolation and improved mental health metrics, such as lower depression scores (odds ratios of 0.85 per unit increase in community scales), by buffering against loneliness through perceived support networks.^[50] However, these benefits exhibit variability tied to group composition; in heterogeneous settings with low shared attributes, sense of community weakens, yielding smaller effect sizes on isolation reduction compared to homogeneous groups where similarity amplifies bonds.^[51] Causally, belonging engenders prosocial reciprocity within groups, as members invest in collective efficacy for mutual gain, yet it also entrenches biases; Henri Tajfel's 1971 minimal group paradigm experiments revealed that even arbitrary categorizations—lacking prior interaction or shared traits—elicited in-group favoritism, with participants allocating resources to favor their group by an average maximum difference of 1.3 units on payoff matrices despite no personal stakes. This demonstrates how minimal belonging triggers discriminatory allocations, suggesting sense of community can reinforce exclusionary dynamics under causal pressures of social categorization, independent of ideological or material incentives.

Types and Variations

Geographic and Traditional Communities

Geographic communities consist of individuals united by a shared physical location, such as rural villages or urban ethnic enclaves, where proximity enables regular face-to-face interactions and mutual reliance for daily needs. These formations emphasize territorial bonds over abstract affiliations, fostering dense social networks grounded in immediate environmental and interpersonal dependencies.^[52] Traditional communities, often overlapping with geographic ones, maintain inherited customs, kinship structures, and localized governance, as observed in longstanding agrarian settlements where generational continuity reinforces collective identity and resource sharing.^[53] Empirical evidence highlights the historical stability of such communities, though data indicate erosion in modern contexts. Robert Putnam's analysis in Bowling Alone documents a marked decline in U.S. local civic engagement post-1950s, with participation in community organizations like parent-teacher associations and fraternal groups dropping by 50% or more between 1960 and 1990, reflecting weakened face-to-face ties amid urbanization and mobility.^[54] This shift correlates with reduced social capital, as measured by lower rates of informal neighborly assistance and local volunteering, contributing to fragmented spatial bonds despite population growth in proximate areas.^[55] Notable successes include mutual aid systems in insular groups like Amish settlements, where communal labor for tasks such as barn-raising and informal funds cover major expenses, yielding poverty rates above national averages but social assistance usage far below, often under 5% in surveyed districts compared to broader rural norms.^[56] However, geographic and traditional communities can exhibit insularity that promotes exclusion, as in modern gated enclaves where physical barriers and private security correlate with heightened residential segregation, concentrating wealthier demographics and limiting cross-class interactions in suburban settings.^[57] Historically, such bounded groups have faced or incited tensions, with ethnic enclaves' self-imposed separation sometimes escalating to external violence, underscoring trade-offs between internal resilience and broader societal integration.^[58]

Functional, Interest-Based, and Virtual Communities

Functional communities, also known as occupational or professional communities, consist of individuals united by shared work-related experiences, skills, and identities rather than geographic proximity. These groups facilitate knowledge exchange and collaboration essential for specialized tasks, as seen in historical guilds that regulated crafts and modern professional networks that enhance career mobility and expertise pooling.^[59] In regions like Silicon Valley, dense networks of engineers and entrepreneurs have driven innovation through informal knowledge spillovers, with studies showing that face-to-face interactions and chance encounters among firms correlate with an 8% increase in patent citations between inventors, underscoring the causal link between such functional ties and technological advancement.^[60]^[61]^[62] Interest-based communities form around common hobbies, values, or ideological commitments, enabling mobilization for collective goals without territorial constraints. Hobby groups, such as amateur astronomy clubs or book discussion circles, foster skill development and social bonds through regular activities, while ideological ones like the National Rifle Association (NRA) exemplify policy influence, having spent over $30 million on lobbying in 2022 alone to shape gun rights legislation via candidate endorsements and grassroots campaigns.^[63]^[64] These structures allow rapid assembly around specific causes, as evidenced by the NRA's role in blocking federal assault weapons bans post-1994, though their narrow focus can amplify echo effects rather than broad consensus.^[64] Early virtual communities, precursors to modern online platforms, emerged in the 1980s with systems like Usenet, a distributed network of discussion groups launched in 1980 that connected users across universities for topic-specific exchanges on everything from computing to politics.^[65] By the mid-1980s, Usenet hosted thousands of newsgroups with global participation, demonstrating scalability through asynchronous text-based interaction unbound by location.^[65] However, these early forms often exhibited lower member commitment compared to in-person groups, with high turnover due to anonymity and lack of enforced accountability, leading to transient engagements rather than enduring loyalties.^[66] Unlike geographic communities, these non-territorial variants offer flexibility in membership and adaptation to niche needs, enabling efficient resource allocation for innovation or advocacy, yet they risk internal fragmentation when subgroups prioritize divergent sub-interests, potentially diluting collective efficacy as seen in splintering professional forums or ideological factions.^[67]

Formation and Dynamics

Processes of Building and Organizing

Communities emerge spontaneously when individuals facing shared incentives, such as geographic proximity or acute crises, coordinate to reduce risks and costs of cooperation through repeated low-friction interactions. Proximity fosters organic ties by enabling frequent exchanges that build trust via direct reciprocity, as modeled in agent-based simulations of spatial social networks. Crises amplify this by creating immediate mutual dependencies; after the April 18, 1906, San Francisco earthquake, which measured 7.9 magnitude and left approximately 225,000 homeless, residents self-organized into networks providing soup kitchens, ad hoc shelters, and resource distribution, independent of formal authorities.^[68] ^[69] Similar patterns recur in disasters, where emergent groups handle up to 70% of initial search, rescue, and supply tasks through decentralized volunteering, driven by prosocial norms activated under threat.^[70] ^[71] Organized community building involves deliberate mechanisms like leadership selection and ritual practices to solidify cohesion beyond initial incentives. Emergent leaders, often those demonstrating competence in egalitarian settings, coordinate resource allocation and conflict resolution, as observed in small-scale societies where task-oriented authority prevents free-riding.^[72] Anthropological records indicate that initiation rites—endurance tests or symbolic ordeals in tribal groups, such as scarification among Australian Aboriginals or seclusion in African Poro societies—signal costly commitment, enhancing intragroup trust and fusion-like identification that sustains alliances.^[73] ^[74] These rituals exploit emotional arousal to rewire social bonds, increasing willingness for collective defense or labor. Empirical metrics from social network analysis quantify building efficacy: high network density, the proportion of realized ties among possible ones (often exceeding 0.2 in cohesive groups versus under 0.05 in sparse ones), correlates with elevated cooperation rates, while reciprocity—the mutuality of exchanges—predicts network stability and resident-perceived success in civic outcomes like problem-solving efficacy.^[75] ^[76] In stable communities, these indicators reflect adaptive structures where denser, reciprocal ties buffer against defection, as validated in longitudinal studies of collaborative groups.^[77]

Socialization, Maintenance, and Decline

Socialization within communities involves the transmission of norms, values, and behaviors primarily through family structures and educational systems, enabling individuals to internalize group expectations and achieve conformity. Empirical studies indicate that cultural socialization by parents and peers fosters a sense of belonging and adherence to shared cultural practices, with family discussions and modeling playing key roles in shaping youth's cultural identities and behaviors.^[78] This process causally contributes to conformity under group pressure, as evidenced by Solomon Asch's 1951 experiments, where participants faced with unanimous incorrect judgments from confederates conformed in 37% of critical trials, demonstrating how social influence overrides individual perception to maintain group consensus.^[79] Such mechanisms ensure that newcomers or younger members align with community standards, reducing internal conflict and promoting cohesion. Maintenance of communities relies on rituals that reinforce norm adherence and sanctions that deter deviance, with empirical evidence linking these practices to enhanced group stability. Rituals, including ceremonial gatherings and repeated symbolic acts, facilitate the transmission and strengthening of social norms by creating emotional bonds and signaling commitment, as observed in cross-cultural analyses where ritualized behaviors correlate with sustained cooperation and reduced free-riding.^[80] Sanctions, ranging from social ostracism to rewards for compliance, further uphold order; studies on resource management communities show that monitoring and punitive measures against transgressions predict higher collective action success. Homogeneous groups exhibit greater longevity, as shared ethnic or cultural backgrounds minimize norm conflicts; for instance, ethnic enclaves persist across generations due to reinforced internal ties, contrasting with diverse settings where coordination challenges arise.^[81] Decline occurs when factors disrupt these processes, particularly high residential mobility, which fragments repeated interactions essential for trust-building, and ethnic diversity, which empirically erodes social capital in the short term. Robert Putnam's 2007 analysis of over 30,000 U.S. respondents across 41 communities revealed an inverse relationship: higher ethnic fractionalization correlates with lower trust, fewer friendships, and reduced civic engagement, even controlling for socioeconomic variables, suggesting diversity hampers "hunkering down" behaviors that weaken communal bonds.^[82] Mobility exacerbates this by increasing turnover, as longitudinal data link population flux to diminished associational ties and generalized trust, predictors of dissolution in both geographic and functional communities. These dynamics highlight that without adaptive socialization or maintenance, communities face heightened risks of fragmentation.

Empirical Benefits

Social capital refers to the networks of relationships, trust, and norms of reciprocity that facilitate cooperation within or between communities.^[83] In community contexts, it manifests as bonding social capital, which strengthens ties within homogeneous groups through dense, inward-focused connections, and bridging social capital, which fosters links across diverse groups to promote broader cooperation.^[84]^[85] Empirical trends in the United States indicate a decline in such community-generated social capital since the mid-20th century, evidenced by reduced participation in civic organizations, club memberships, and informal social interactions.^[83] This erosion correlates with rising loneliness, with approximately one in three U.S. adults reporting frequent feelings of isolation as of 2023, a pattern exacerbated among younger demographics and those with limited social support networks.^[86]^[87] Communities rich in social capital contribute to individual well-being by buffering against mental health declines; for instance, a 2023 cross-sectional analysis found that higher neighborhood sense of community was associated with fewer depression symptoms, independent of other socioeconomic factors.^[50] Similarly, psychological sense of community has been shown to inversely correlate with depression severity, mediating effects through reduced perceived stress.^[88] Longitudinal evidence from cohesive communities underscores links to physical health outcomes, such as the Roseto effect observed in Roseto, Pennsylvania, during the 1960s, where strong social bonds and family-oriented networks coincided with myocardial infarction death rates 30-50% below national averages, despite comparable risk factors like diet and smoking.^[89] Individuals in high-social-capital environments also exhibit greater volunteering rates, which reinforce personal resilience and purpose, though causal pathways emphasize reciprocal trust over mere participation.^[83]

Economic, Health, and Resilience Outcomes

Communities with robust social capital exhibit lower poverty rates and reduced crime compared to fragmented ones, as evidenced by longitudinal data linking communal networks to economic stability. World Bank panel studies in Bangladesh demonstrate that microfinance groups, which build trust and mutual support among participants, reduced household poverty by 5-10 percentage points over time, with benefits extending to non-participants through local economic spillovers.^[90] Similarly, analyses of U.S. urban neighborhoods show that concentrated disadvantage—marked by weak social ties—correlates with elevated violent crime rates, whereas stronger informal networks enforce norms that suppress criminal behavior and foster economic participation.^[91] Health outcomes improve markedly in settings with dense community interconnections, as strong ties buffer physiological stress responses and promote longevity. The Harvard Study of Adult Development, tracking participants since 1938, reveals that relational satisfaction at age 50 predicts physical health at age 80 more accurately than cholesterol levels, smoking, or socioeconomic status, with those reporting warm relationships facing half the mortality risk.^[92] This pattern holds at the community level, where empirical reviews confirm social capital mitigates all-cause mortality by enhancing access to support during illness and reducing isolation-linked inflammation.^[93] Resilience to shocks is empirically higher in cohesive communities, where localized networks enable swift, adaptive responses outperforming top-down coordination. During the 2011 Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami, which caused over 15,000 deaths, pre-existing social capital in affected regions facilitated grassroots aid distribution—such as neighbor-led evacuations and resource sharing—that filled gaps in centralized efforts delayed by infrastructure damage and bureaucratic hurdles.^[94] Cross-disaster studies further substantiate that communities with high bonding and bridging ties recover faster, with social capital accounting for up to 20% variance in post-event functionality through mechanisms like collective preparedness and mutual aid.^[95]

Criticisms and Drawbacks

Conformity, Exclusion, and Suppression

Communities often exert conformity pressures that compel individuals to align with group norms, sometimes overriding personal ethics or rationality. In Stanley Milgram's 1961 obedience experiments, 65% of participants administered what they believed to be lethal electric shocks to a confederate under authority directives, illustrating how situational roles in groups foster destructive compliance.^[96] Similarly, Philip Zimbardo's 1971 Stanford Prison Experiment demonstrated rapid conformity to assigned roles, with "guards" exhibiting abusive behaviors toward "prisoners" within days, highlighting deindividuation and power dynamics in confined groups.^[97] These laboratory findings analogize to real-world communities, such as cults, where empirical accounts reveal enforced uniformity through isolation and socialization processes that induce commitment, akin to "brainwashing" but rooted in normal social influences amplified by group isolation.^[98] Exclusion mechanisms in communities stem from in-group favoritism, where members preferentially allocate resources or support to insiders, empirically evidenced in multiplayer dictator games showing higher generosity toward in-group partners over out-group ones.^[99] This bias contributes to discrimination, as meta-analyses confirm small-to-medium effects of greater cooperation within groups compared to between them, potentially stifling broader social integration.^[100] The contact hypothesis, positing that intergroup interactions reduce prejudice under optimal conditions, frequently fails in divided societies; for instance, in areas of high majority-group density, minority members experience persistent bias despite proximity, termed the "wallpaper effect," as everyday contact reinforces rather than diminishes stereotypes.^[101] In Northern Ireland's post-conflict context, sustained residential segregation and limited meaningful cross-community engagement have perpetuated ethno-religious divisions, with empirical surveys indicating minimal prejudice reduction from superficial interactions.^[102] Suppression of dissent within communities amplifies echo chambers, causally linking group cohesion to intolerance of deviation, as seen in historical witch hunts where social turmoil prompted mass accusations and executions to enforce communal purity. Between the 14th and 17th centuries, European authorities executed an estimated 200,000 to 500,000 individuals, predominantly women, amid economic and religious upheaval, using spectral evidence and communal testimonies to quash perceived threats.^[103] In the 1692 Salem witch trials, group polarization—where shared fears escalated collective judgments—led to 20 executions, driven by informational cascades and normative pressures rather than isolated hysteria.^[104] Modern affinity groups, such as activist circles, exhibit analogous dynamics through social ostracism of nonconformists, where empirical studies link ideological conformity to reduced tolerance for intra-group disagreement, fostering self-censorship to maintain solidarity.^[105] Such suppression empirically correlates with diminished innovation, as uniform thought patterns limit critical scrutiny and adaptive responses to challenges.^[106]

Conceptual Vagueness and Ideological Exploitation

The concept of community has long been criticized for its definitional ambiguity, with sociologist George A. Hillery Jr. identifying 94 distinct definitions in the sociological literature as of 1955, encompassing variations in emphasis on territory, social interaction, shared values, or institutional structures, yet lacking consensus on core elements.^[26] This proliferation underscores a persistent vagueness that permits flexible application but hinders precise empirical analysis, as definitions often prioritize normative ideals over observable behaviors. Robert Brint, in his 2001 critique and reconstruction, further delineates major subtypes of community—such as functional, supportive, and symbolic—tied to differing behavioral outcomes like cooperation levels or conflict resolution, revealing how the term's elasticity accommodates diverse phenomena while masking underlying inconsistencies in measurement and comparison.^[28] Ideological exploitation of the term's vagueness has manifested in contrasting political agendas, where left-leaning frameworks invoke community to justify aggregating local grievances into broader power structures for state intervention. Saul Alinsky's 1971 Rules for Radicals exemplifies this by framing community organizing as a tactic for mass mobilization to "seize power" from elites, transforming diffuse social ties into coordinated vehicles for redistributive policies and institutional expansion, often blurring voluntary association with coercive collectivism.^[107] In opposition, conservative and libertarian perspectives, as articulated by Friedrich Hayek, caution that such invocations erode individualism by subordinating personal autonomy to group planning, arguing in works like Individualism and Economic Order (1948) that collectivist appeals to community solidarity inevitably prioritize centralized control over spontaneous market orders, leading to diminished liberty and economic inefficiency.^[108] These divergent uses highlight how the term's looseness enables rhetorical alignment with ideological goals, from progressive empowerment narratives to defenses of decentralized localism. In complex modern societies, the empirical utility of community as an analytical category has been questioned for overstating local insularity at the expense of broader causal forces. Maurice R. Stein's 1960 analysis in The Eclipse of Community critiques canonical American community studies—such as those on Chicago or Middletown—for perpetuating a "myth" of self-contained locales, where findings of social cohesion or decline obscure the pervasive influence of national markets, migration, and corporate structures that transcend parochial boundaries.^[109] This perspective posits that rigid adherence to community-centric models distorts understanding of social dynamics, as evidenced by post-World War II shifts toward urban anonymity and economic interdependence, rendering localized studies empirically limited without integrating macroeconomic realities.^[110]

Contemporary Developments

Rise of Digital and Online Communities

Digital communities emerged in the late 1970s with Bulletin Board Systems (BBS), which allowed dial-up access to shared message boards, followed by Usenet in 1980 as a distributed discussion system over ARPANET precursors.^[111] These early forms enabled text-based interactions among limited users, primarily academics and hobbyists, but lacked the scale of later platforms. The advent of widespread internet access in the 1990s paved the way for web forums, culminating in social media sites like Facebook, launched in 2004 initially for Harvard students before expanding globally.^[112] By April 2024, Facebook alone reported over three billion monthly active users, facilitating connections based on shared interests rather than physical proximity and diminishing reliance on geographic ties characteristic of traditional communities.^[113] Unlike traditional communities bound by locality and face-to-face interactions, digital ones operate at unprecedented scales, with asynchronous, algorithm-driven engagement that prioritizes weak ties and transient memberships over enduring local bonds.^[114] This shift enables global participation but introduces novel dynamics, such as anonymity, which empirical analyses link to reduced social accountability and heightened expression of extreme views. For instance, network studies of 2010s platforms like 4chan and certain Reddit subreddits show how pseudonymous environments fostered alt-right radicalization through escalating rhetoric and peer reinforcement, with users progressing from mainstream discourse to ideological echo effects.^[115] Such patterns diverge from traditional settings, where physical presence and reputational costs constrain deviance. A key controversy involves echo chambers, theorized by Cass Sunstein in 2001 as self-reinforcing information environments that limit exposure to opposing views, potentially amplifying polarization.^[116] While broad empirical rejection of pervasive echo chambers exists—most users encounter diverse content via platform algorithms—2020s studies validate selective reinforcement in polarized subgroups, particularly during events like the COVID-19 pandemic, where reliance on ideologically aligned online sources correlated with heightened misinformation acceptance and risk misperception.^[117] ^[118] These findings, drawn from network analyses and surveys, underscore how digital scale exacerbates causal pathways to division absent in geographically anchored communities, though mainstream media and academic sources emphasizing this risk may overstate universality due to institutional biases favoring alarmist interpretations.^[119]

Recent Research and Trends (2020s)

The COVID-19 pandemic prompted a rapid transition to remote work, which empirical studies link to weakened local community ties due to reduced face-to-face interactions and economic spillovers. A 2021 analysis by the National Bureau of Economic Research revealed that high-skill remote workers' decreased presence in urban centers reduced demand for local services like dining and retail, straining community-dependent economies and informal social networks.^[120] Longitudinal data from 2020 to 2021 further demonstrated that sustained home-based work eroded employees' sense of workplace community and social support, with causal associations to declines in self-rated health via diminished relational buffers against stress.^[121] These shifts persisted into 2023, as surveys indicated persistent isolation among older adults, where canceled in-person engagements failed to be fully offset by virtual alternatives, reducing bridging social capital essential for broader community resilience.^[122] From 2023 onward, research has increasingly focused on multisector community partnerships to tackle social determinants of health (SDOH), emphasizing participatory models that integrate local input for sustainable interventions. Evaluations of such collaborations, including those from 2023-2024, show they enhance capacity to influence upstream factors like housing and education, leading to measurable policy shifts that promote equitable health outcomes without relying solely on top-down directives.^[123]^[124] These efforts underscore causal pathways where community-driven SDOH strategies mitigate disparities more effectively than isolated individual actions, though success hinges on sustained funding and cross-sector alignment.^[125] Advancements in AI have begun informing community organizing, particularly through predictive analytics for mobilization and resource allocation. By 2023-2025, grassroots initiatives adopted AI tools to process large datasets on participant behaviors, enabling targeted outreach that boosts engagement rates in campaigns addressing local issues like environmental justice.^[126] In public health contexts, AI-driven forecasting models predict community-level risks, such as disease outbreaks, allowing proactive organizing that aligns interventions with empirical needs rather than reactive responses.^[127] However, these applications require community-engaged oversight to avoid algorithmic biases that could exacerbate exclusion.^[128] Empirical reviews of online communities highlight dual-edged mental health impacts: peer support forums facilitated coping and symptom management during isolation peaks, with 2023 studies documenting reduced distress via shared experiences and moderated exchanges.^[129]^[130] Conversely, a 2024 Nature synthesis identifies causal risks from addictive engagement patterns and echo chambers, where algorithms amplify extreme views, fostering hate groups that translate to offline harms like radicalization, independent of platform moderation efficacy.^[131] Critiques of recent community-centric approaches caution against undue optimism, arguing they often mask state-level failures in core infrastructure provision, as evidenced by pandemic-era mutual aid networks that proved insufficient without governmental backups.^[132] Such analyses, drawing from 2020s resilience studies, emphasize that while communities can innovate amid institutional shortfalls, over-reliance on voluntary structures ignores scalable causal dependencies on public policy for equitable outcomes.^[133]

References

[1]
17.4G: Community - Social Sci LibreTexts
Dec 15, 2020 · The term community refers to a group of interacting people, living in some proximity, either in space, time, or relationship.
[2]
What Is Community? An Evidence-Based Definition for Participatory ...
They noted overall agreement in the use of 4 basic attributes to describe community: locality, biological and social membership, common institutions, and shared ...
[3]
Defining Community - Social Welfare History Project
Oct 17, 2017 · The idea of community has played an important role in American and social work history. As with most history the concept's definition has changed over time.
[4]
Sense of Community: A Definition and Theory - Dr. David McMillan
Sep 7, 2025 · Their measure included seven items: feeling at home in the community, satisfaction with the community, agreement with the values and beliefs of ...
[5]
[PDF] Psychological sense of community and its relevance to well-being ...
Sense of community is feelings of belonging, identity, and support, but can also promote division and negative mental health states. It has both positive and ...
[6]
The effects of community characteristics on community social behavior
This paper explores social norms as a mechanism of how neighborhood characteristics can affect individual behavior.
[7]
Key Characteristics That Define a Community - Sociology Institute
Nov 30, 2022 · Key characteristics of a community include territory, population, close social relationships, cultural similarity, organized interaction, and a ...<|separator|>
[8]
Disconnected: The Growing Class Divide in American Civic Life
Aug 22, 2024 · This report aims to build on previous social capital research by documenting the racial and class divisions in social capital creation.
[9]
The Great Deterioration of Local Community And The Loss of The ...
Jun 10, 2024 · The decline of local community, trust, and social capital. That's the long process charted in Robert Putnam's 2000 masterpiece Bowling Alone.
[10]
Closure of 'Third Places'? Exploring Potential Consequences ... - NIH
Third places are closing across the United States. Americans may be losing access to key services, goods, and amenities, in addition to community sites.
[11]
The Decline of Social Capital in the United States and its Effect on ...
Dec 27, 2021 · Additionally, the familial source of social capital declines as Americans marry less and have fewer children. Furthermore, Americans are less ...
[12]
Community - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
Originating in late 14c. from Old French and Latin, "community" means a group living locally or the common people, emphasizing shared, public fellowship.
[13]
The History of Communities: From Cavemen to 2025 - Decommerce
The term “community” comes from the Latin word communitas, meaning "fellowship" or "shared responsibility." This word reflects the heart of what communities ...Missing: etymology | Show results with:etymology
[14]
The Rule of Law in Cities of the Medieval Low Countries
Jul 25, 2023 · The concept of “communitas” had been known in church law, but it acquired new meanings after approximately 1100. These meanings were derived ...
[15]
(DOC) Freedom in Medieval Community - Academia.edu
Medieval society exhibits a continuous struggle on the part of peasants to secure minimal 'customs' and privileges or liberties. This paper examines urban ...
[16]
Making sense of the word community in European languages | — CCC
If we go back to Antiquity, the Greek κοινός and the Latin communitas share a common etymology: both words contain the idea of togetherness, or “with-ness”, ...
[17]
Définitions | — CCC —
If we go back to Antiquity, the Greek κοινός and the Latin communitas share a common etymology: both words contain the idea of togetherness, or “with-ness”, ...
[18]
Tönnies: Community and Civil Society
Ferdinand Tönnies' Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft (first published in 1887) is a classic of social and political theory, which explores the clash between ...
[19]
Ferdinand Tönnies, Community and Civil Society (1887)
In tune with the argument so far, the theory of Gemeinschaft is based on the idea that in the original or natural state there is a complete unity of human wills ...
[20]
The Division of Labor in Society (1893) - Emile Durkheim
Durkheim had thus postulated two distinct types of social solidarity (mechanical and organic) ... organic solidarity, the product of the division of labor.The Function of the Division of... · The Causes of the Division of...
[21]
Types of Authority | Introduction to Sociology - Lumen Learning
According to Weber, power made legitimate by laws, written rules, and regulations is termed rational-legal authority. In this type of authority, power is vested ...
[22]
Power and Authority – Introduction to Sociology
If traditional authority derives from custom and tradition, rational-legal authority derives from law and is based on a belief in the legitimacy of a society's ...
[23]
[PDF] The Chicago School of Sociology 1915-1940 - UChicago Library
Robert Park asserted that the city represented a new type of community and, due to its large size, was comprised of many smaller communities. The sociology ...
[24]
Robert Park and Ernest Burgess, Urban Ecology Studies, 1925 ...
In the 1920s, Park and Burgess developed a distinctive program of urban research at the University of Chicago.Missing: community | Show results with:community
[25]
Community – Meaning, Definitions and Elements - Lawrist
A community is a local group. It always occupies a specific geographical area. Locality is the physical basis of a community. For example, even wandering tribes ...
[26]
Definitions of community : Areas of Agreement - Semantic Scholar
Definitions of community : Areas of Agreement · G. A. Hillery · Published 1955 · Sociology · Rural Sociology.
[27]
What is community? - infed.org
It is a relational idea: 'the opposition of one community to others or to other social entities' (op. cit.). This leads us to the question of boundary – what ...
[28]
[PDF] A Critique and Reconstruction of the Community Concept
Community remains a potent symbol and aspiration in political and intellectual life. However, it has largely passed out of sociological analysis.
[29]
Clarifying Community Concepts: A Review of Community ... - MDPI
A major challenge in using these concepts within sociology is the lack of consistent definitions and frameworks. Many studies employ these terms without ...
[30]
(PDF) Rethinking the Concept of Community - ResearchGate
Aug 10, 2025 · According to [75] , three elements define the historical concept of community: imagined reality, social interactions, and process, intended as ...
[31]
Göbekli Tepe - UNESCO World Heritage Centre
Göbekli Tepe is located in Upper Mesopotamia, a region which saw the emergence of the most ancient farming communities in the world. Monumental structures ...Missing: patterns | Show results with:patterns
[32]
Complex Societies before Agriculture: Göbekli Tepe - Peter Turchin
May 17, 2013 · Göbekli Tepe was a major religious and ritual center. It periodically gathered together people from a fairly large-scale society.
[33]
Ecological Community - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
An ecological community is a collection of species living contemporaneously in the same place and comprising populations of individuals that are spatially ...
[34]
Species Interactions and Competition | Learn Science at Scitable
Organisms live within an ecological community, which is defined as an assemblage of populations of at least two different species that interact directly and ...
[35]
Hayek on Kinds of Order in Society | Online Library of Liberty
It is when we pass from the biggest organization, serving particular tasks, to the order of the whole of society which comprises the relations between those ...
[36]
Firm innovation and generalized trust as a regional resource
Closer networks and high trust environments increase monitoring, lower transaction costs and thereby decrease the likelihood of defection (Aghion and Durlauf, ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[37]
Ferdinand Tonnies - Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft
Tonnies argued that there are two basic forms of human will: the essential will, which is the underlying, organic, or instinctive driving force; and arbitrary ...
[38]
Tönnies, Ferdinand (1855-1936) - Mathieu Deflem
In his first book, Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft (originally published in 1887), Tönnies presented his most famous and enduring contribution to social thought.Missing: original evidence
[39]
Ferdinand Tönnies – Gemeinschaft & Gesellschaft - Sociology Guide
Ferdinand Tönnies wrote the influential sociological work “Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft” to explore the fundamental dichotomy between two alternative ways of ...
[40]
[PDF] the use and abuse of trust: social capital - Sheilagh Ogilvie
This article considers this view in the light of empirical findings for early modern Europe. It draws the distinction between a 'particularized' trust in ...
[41]
Economic growth before the Industrial Revolution: Rural production ...
We show how England became a high-income economy before 1750. Rural manufacturing and the weakening of guilds mattered for England's success.
[42]
Suicide (1897) - Emile Durkheim
Indeed, each society has a "definite aptitude" for suicide, the relative intensity of which can be measured by the proportion of suicides per total population, ...
[43]
Social complexity, modernity and suicide - PubMed Central
Durkheim studied the variability of suicide rates by analyzing suicide data in France, Prussia, England, Saxony, Bavaria and Denmark from 1841 to 1872. The ...<|separator|>
[44]
Anomie Theory in Sociology - Simply Psychology
Oct 9, 2025 · Durkheim famously explored anomie in his study Suicide (1897). He argued that suicide rates are influenced by social forces, not just personal ...
[45]
The first urban society
Oct 31, 2024 · Britain was the first society to become predominantly urban, with over half the population living in towns or cities by 1851.
[46]
Household and family during urbanization and industrialization
Feb 5, 2014 · Frédéric Le Play (1855, 1872) was the first scholar who investigated shifts in family configurations in a systematic way, and he was one of ...
[47]
Sarason, S.B. (1974) The Psychological Sense of Community ...
The purpose of the present study is to explore older adults' understanding and conceptualizations of the concept “psychological sense of community” (PSOC)Missing: Irwin | Show results with:Irwin
[48]
Validation of A brief sense of community scale: Confirmation of the ...
Dec 26, 2007 · An 8-item Brief Sense of Community Scale (BSCS) was developed to represent the SOC dimensions of needs fulfillment, group membership, influence, and shared ...
[49]
Measurement Performance of the Sense of Community Index ... - NIH
Validity was tested against measures of community participation, empowerment, mental health, and depression. ... correlated a sense of community measure ...
[50]
Sense of community and mental health: a cross-sectional analysis ...
Jun 30, 2023 · This study aims to examine whether sense of community, a type of social capital, is associated with mental health.Missing: homogeneity | Show results with:homogeneity
[51]
The Association Between Community Participation and Loneliness ...
Mar 19, 2024 · The hypothesis that community participation can mitigate the effects of social isolation and improve health outcomes forms the basis of this ...Missing: homogeneity | Show results with:homogeneity
[52]
[PDF] Defining Geographic Communities
Jun 30, 2005 · A community that does have a common location can be called a geographic community. 2.2. Common ties. 2.2.1. Experiences. A common experience can ...
[53]
Mutual Aid – Amish Studies - Elizabethtown College Groups
Many Amish communities have an informal aid plan to help members with large hospital bills or other exceptional needs.Missing: low dependency
[54]
Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community
In this important book, Putnam demonstrates that social capital increased between 1900 and the late 1960s and then dramatically decreased.
[55]
[PDF] Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital
It would seem, then, that net participation by Americans, both in religious services and in church-related groups, has declined. Page 3 of 11. Robert Putnam - ...
[56]
[PDF] Amish Economic Transformations: New Forms of Income and Wealth ...
Second, Amish in this Census Tract have higher rates of poverty than the national average, yet low rates of social assistance. Third, church leadership is ...
[57]
Members Only: Gated Communities and Residential Segregation in ...
Using the American Housing Survey for 2001 and Census 2000, I examine the link between gated communities and residential segregation.
[58]
From Prison Islands to Island Paradises: Are Violent Histories Being ...
Nov 4, 2024 · Exploring the materiality of past violence, including imprisonment, confinement, wars, and terrorist attacks are essential components of these ...
[59]
Occupational Community - Easy Sociology
Aug 26, 2024 · Occupational communities are groups of individuals bound together through shared work experiences, skills, knowledge, and often, a collective sense of identity.Table Of Contents · Shared Identity · Social BoundariesMissing: guilds | Show results with:guilds<|separator|>
[60]
New study quantifies the impact of face-to-face interactions on ...
Sep 15, 2022 · “Our estimates shed light on the potential impact on knowledge flows if Silicon Valley firms allowed remote work on a permanent basis, a ...
[61]
The Role of Chance Encounters in Silicon Valley Innovation
Mar 29, 2023 · Without such encounters, patent citations between Silicon Valley inventors would decline by about 8%, according to the study. The innovation ...
[62]
[PDF] Knowledge Spillovers in Silicon Valley
To study the degree to which knowledge flows result from such interactions, we explore the relationship between these meetings and the citations among the firms ...
[63]
Types of Interest Groups - CliffsNotes
Interest groups include economic, public, government, religious, civil rights, ideological, and single-issue groups.Missing: based | Show results with:based
[64]
The NRA and Gun Lobbyists - The Harris Writing Workshop
The gun lobby influences policy by supporting candidates, funding lobbying, and opposing gun control, including the NRA and NSSF.Missing: examples hobby ideological
[65]
The History of Usenet: The Oldest Online Community - UsenetServer
Apr 8, 2025 · By 1980, Usenet was live and publicly accessible. Within a few years, the platform's user base had spread to hundreds of systems across ...Missing: commitment levels
[66]
View of On the Early Days of Usenet - First Monday
Usenet was born in 1979. It has grown from a design conceived of by graduate students Tom Truscott and Jim Ellis at Duke University in North Carolina.Missing: virtual | Show results with:virtual
[67]
The 24 Different Types of Communities - Orgo
Jan 5, 2025 · Discover the different types of communities, from interest-based and identity-driven groups to action-oriented and professional networks.Missing: functional sociology
[68]
[PDF] A Paradise Built In Hell The Extraordinary Communi
When the massive earthquake struck San Francisco in 1906, it left the city in ruins with thousands homeless and widespread fires destroying neighborhoods. Yet, ...
[69]
[PDF] Not My Fault: 1906 quake highlights importance of social ties
Apr 18, 2019 · The 1906 earthquake caused at least 3,000 deaths, 28,000 destroyed buildings, and 225,000 homeless. Local media builds social capital, which is ...
[70]
Emergent groups and spontaneous volunteers in urban disaster ...
Their activities include search and rescue, transporting and distributing relief supplies, and providing food and drink to victims and emergency workers.
[71]
Emergent groups and spontaneous volunteers in urban disaster ...
Spontaneous responses by self-organizing, “emergent” voluntary groups and individuals are a common feature of urban disasters.<|separator|>
[72]
Leadership in an Egalitarian Society - PMC - PubMed Central
Leadership is instrumental to resolution of collective action dilemmas, particularly in large, heterogeneous groups. Less is known about the characteristics ...Traits Of Task Group Leaders... · Results · Leader Emergence And...Missing: cohesion | Show results with:cohesion
[73]
The Ties That Bind Us : Ritual, Fusion, and Identification
Life-changing, emotionally intense (especially dysphoric) rituals produce identity fusion and a durable sense of psychological kinship with other group members.
[74]
Initiation Rites and Rituals in African Cosmology
Membership in a sacred society often cuts across tribal or social boundaries, and entrance can involve a series or rites extending over several years.
[75]
Community Connections: Social Capital and Community Success1
May 30, 2012 · Hypothesis 1: The density of a community's civic network will be positively associated with resident ratings of community success, including: (a) ...
[76]
[PDF] The Impact of Social Network Structure on the Growth and Survival ...
We show that several social network features, including clique ratio, density, clustering coefficient, reciprocity and centralization, have significant effects ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[77]
Structuring successful collaboration: a longitudinal social network ...
Feb 11, 2016 · This paper reports on a third social network survey of the TRN and focusses on the structure of the collaborative arrangements among members.
[78]
The Cultural Socialization Scale: Assessing Family and Peer ...
Cultural socialization refers to the process through which youth learn about a culture and develop a sense of belonging to the cultural group (Umaña-Taylor & ...
[79]
The Asch Conformity Experiments - Verywell Mind
Nov 13, 2023 · Asch found that people were willing to ignore reality and give an incorrect answer in order to conform to the rest of the group. At a Glance.What Is Conformity? · Methods · Results
[80]
(PDF) The Essential Role of Ritual in the Transmission and ...
Oct 9, 2025 · This article summarizes evidence demonstrating that ritual and ritualized behaviors are essential to the transmission and reinforcement of social norms.<|separator|>
[81]
Living in Ethnically Homogenous Area Boosts Health of Minority ...
Oct 18, 2012 · Living in Ethnically Homogenous Area Boosts Health of Minority Seniors · Study finds lower rates of heart disease and cancer than for those ...
[82]
E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and Community in the Twenty‐first ...
Jun 15, 2007 · Robert D. Putnam ... In the short run, however, immigration and ethnic diversity tend to reduce social solidarity and social capital.Missing: decline | Show results with:decline
[83]
Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital
Something happened in America starting in the mid-to-late twentieth century to diminish civic engagement and social connectedness.Missing: trends | Show results with:trends
[84]
What is the difference between bonding and bridging social capital?
Bonding social capital is within a group or community whereas bridging social capital is between social groups, social class, race, religion or other important ...
[85]
Bridging or Bonding: An Organizational Framework for Studying ...
Mar 6, 2021 · Putnam describes bonding social capital as networks that are close-knit, continuous, and strong. These networks are comprised of individuals ...2. Theory · 2.1. Social Capital As A... · 4. Analysis
[86]
Health Effects of Social Isolation and Loneliness - CDC
May 15, 2024 · About 1 in 3 adults in the U.S. report feeling lonely.A1. About 1 in 4 U.S. adults report not having social and emotional support.A1. Graphic ...
[87]
Loneliness, Lack of Social and Emotional Support, and Mental ...
Jun 20, 2024 · In 2022, the prevalence of feeling lonely always, usually, or sometimes among adults in 26 U.S. states was highest for bisexual (56.7%) and ...
[88]
Psychological Sense of Community as Mediator
May 20, 2025 · Psychological sense of community was directly negatively associated with depression and also indirectly negatively associated through stress.
[89]
The Roseto effect: a 50-year comparison of mortality rates - PMC - NIH
Earlier studies found striking differences in mortality from myocardial infarction between Roseto, a homogeneous Italian-American community in Pennsylvania, and ...
[90]
[PDF] Microfinance and Poverty: Evidence Using Panel Data from ...
Microfinance thus helps not only poor partici- pants but also the local economy. Shahidur R. Khandker is lead economist in the World Bank Institute's Poverty ...Missing: crime | Show results with:crime
[91]
[PDF] "Concentrated Disadvantage, Economic Distress, and Violence ...
Criminologists long have known that crime rates tend to be higher in neighborhoods that are socioeconomically disadvantaged (Shaw and McKay, 1942; Bursik, ...<|separator|>
[92]
Over nearly 80 years, Harvard study has been showing how to live a ...
Apr 11, 2017 · Several studies found that people's level of satisfaction with their relationships at age 50 was a better predictor of physical health than ...
[93]
The importance of connections: Ways to live a longer, healthier life
Dec 8, 2024 · Researchers agree that social connection can help people live longer and healthier lives. Being socially disconnected, for example, is associated with higher ...
[94]
(PDF) Social Capital and Community Resilience in Tōhoku-Oki
Apr 17, 2024 · First, disaster response relied mostly on locally driven relief due to a clear understanding of the local culture. Second, there was an urgency ...
[95]
The role of social capital in building community disaster resilience
Research findings show that villagers in region with abundant social capital are more likely to contribute to hazard preparedness.
[96]
Meta-Milgram: An Empirical Synthesis of the Obedience Experiments
Apr 4, 2014 · Milgram's famous experiment contained 23 small-sample conditions that elicited striking variations in obedient responding.
[97]
Demonstrating the Power of Social Situations via a Simulated Prison ...
Jun 8, 2004 · In 1971, a team of psychologists designed and executed an unusual experiment that used a mock prison setting, with college students role ...
[98]
(PDF) Life inside a deviant “religious” group: Conformity and ...
Aug 10, 2025 · To gain an increased understanding of the conformity and commitment inducing practices that occur in 'cult movements', the accounts of group ...
[99]
In-group favouritism and out-group discrimination in naturally ... - NIH
Sep 4, 2019 · Our results show clear evidence of in-group favouritism in both natural groups. A large number of the Red and Yellow subjects gave more to their ...
[100]
Ingroup favoritism in cooperation: A meta-analysis. - APA PsycNET
We find a small to medium effect size indicating that people are more cooperative with ingroup, compared to outgroup, members.Publication History · Affiliation · Tests And Measures<|separator|>
[101]
The Wallpaper Effect: The Contact Hypothesis Fails for Minority ...
Dec 11, 2013 · The Wallpaper Effect: The Contact Hypothesis Fails for Minority Group Members Who Live in Areas with a High Proportion of Majority Group Members.Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
[102]
(PDF) Intergroup Contact Theory - ResearchGate
3. The hypothesis fails to address process. The chapter proposes four processes: learning about the outgroup, changed behavior, affective ties, and ingroup ...
[103]
The European Witch Craze of the 14th to 17th Centuries - jstor
From the early decades of the 14th century until 1650, continental. Europeans executed between 200,000 and 500,000 witches, 85% or more of whom were women.
[104]
Group Polarization: Did It Play a Role in the Salem Witch Trials?
Learn how group polarization may have played a role in the unraveling of a small village during the Salem Witch Trials.<|separator|>
[105]
[PDF] Conformity and Dissent - Chicago Unbound
These points are illustrated by reference to theoretical and empirical work on conformity, cascades, and group polarization.
[106]
A Systematic Review of Research on Conformity
Jul 18, 2024 · This systematic review offers a comprehensive overview of conformity research conducted since 2004. Adhering to the PRISMA guidelines, the review identified 48 ...
[107]
[PDF] Rules for radicals Saul Alinsky 1971
In this book we are concerned with how to create mass organizations to seize power and give it to the people; to realize the democratic dream of equality, ...
[108]
[PDF] Individualism and Economic Order - library.fa.ru
"individualism," later attacked him for his extreme collectivism was far from incon- sistent but merely the result of the fact that in the case of Rousseau ...
[109]
https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691620459/the-eclipse-of-community
[110]
The Myth of Community Studies - jstor
If community studies are to be undertaken they must be justified as one would justify any piece of sociological research, i.e. they must.
[111]
Networking & The Web | Timeline of Computer History
From the late 1970s on academics and geeks continue expanding “techie” online communities like Usenet (a message board conceived by Duke University students) ...
[112]
History of Social Networking
Early social networking included BBS (1978), Usenet (1980), Friendster (2002), Myspace (2003), and Facebook (2004), with Twitter launched in 2006.<|separator|>
[113]
https://www.statista.com/topics/751/facebook/
[114]
Offline and online communities: Differences and consequences for ...
This article explores the relationship between face-to-face and online social life, by developing different constructs for each.
[115]
White supremacists anonymous: how digital media emotionally ...
Oct 2, 2023 · This study proposes that these platforms afford emotional processes that lie at the core of far-right movements.
[116]
Danger in the internet echo chamber - Harvard Law School
Mar 24, 2017 · Law School Professor Cass R. Sunstein argues that social media curation of information reinforces established beliefs, making it more difficult to find common ...Missing: empirical validation 2020s
[117]
A Systematic Review of Echo Chamber Research - arXiv
Jul 9, 2024 · This systematic review synthesizes current research on echo chambers and filter bubbles to highlight the reasons for the dissent in echo chamber research.Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
[118]
COVID-19 Echo Chambers: Examining the Impact of Conservative ...
Our study aims to assess the impact of reliance on conservative and liberal online news sources on risk perception and mitigation behaviors associated with ...Missing: Cass 2020s
[119]
[PDF] A More Critical Reappraisal of the Evidence
Most empirical studies that reject the echo chambers hypothesis still acknowledge the existence of a small percentage of users who come closer to inhabiting ...
[120]
Remote Work by High-Skill Workers Hurt Local Service Economies
Dec 1, 2021 · The COVID-induced shift to remote work has devastated the service economy that had catered to elite workers' needs.
[121]
(PDF) Working from home during the COVID 19 pandemic
Aug 7, 2025 · This paper examines employees' workplace sense of community and social support across one year of the COVID 19 pandemic and associated self- ...
[122]
COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts on Community Connections and Third ...
With opportunities for community engagement canceled or moved online, what impact did the pandemic have on bonding and bridging social capital for older adults?
[123]
Key insights on multisector community partnerships from real-world ...
Community partnerships build capacity to address social determinants of health (SDOH). •. Partnerships contributed to changes that support healthy living.
[124]
Sustainability Strategies for Multisector Community Partnerships ...
Sep 19, 2024 · Multisector community partnerships (MCPs) are a key element of the public health approach to addressing social determinants of health (SDOH) ...<|separator|>
[125]
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice - LWW
Multisector community partnerships play a pivotal role in public health strategy for understanding and addressing social determinants of health (SDOH) and ...Missing: participatory | Show results with:participatory
[126]
How AI Can Help Strengthen Grassroots Organizing
Nov 15, 2023 · Boosting activism through data: AI can assess and analyze vast amounts of data to help grassroots organizers tailor their messaging based on the ...Missing: predictive analytics
[127]
ai-powered framework for community health forecasting and ...
Jul 30, 2025 · AI in community health forecasting and planning allows health systems to move from reactive to proactive modes by predicting disease outbreaks, ...
[128]
AI-Augmented Prevention Science Needs Community-Engaged ...
Sep 24, 2025 · With large amounts of data to comb through, predictive analytics and machine learning often play key roles in identifying statistically ...Missing: mobilization | Show results with:mobilization<|separator|>
[129]
The Role of Moderators in Facilitating and Encouraging Peer-to ...
Feb 16, 2023 · Among many forms of digital mental health, peer support programs have been shown to facilitate information exchange for medication, coping ...
[130]
From Social Network to Peer Support Network - JMIR Mental Health
Feb 28, 2023 · Peer support can be provided informally online. This support is more informal in that it is not tied to services and can be accessed by anyone ...
[131]
Online communities come with real-world consequences for ... - Nature
Aug 2, 2024 · We focus on online communities that are exemplary for three domains: work, hate, and addictions. We review the risks that emerge from these online communities.
[132]
Beyond resilience? State failure, mutual aid and local action
Jan 23, 2025 · In this paper we draw on the work of Cindi Katz to explore resilience as multi-faceted, and linked to Katz's notions of 'resistance' and ' ...Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
[133]
Community resilience to wildfires: A systematic review of impacts ...
This study conducts a systematic review of global literature on CR to wildfires, following PRISMA 2020 guidelines.