Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Ethics

Ethics, also termed moral , constitutes the branch of dedicated to the systematic examination of moral values, principles, and norms that differentiate right from wrong conduct and good from bad character. This discipline probes the foundations of , seeking to establish criteria for evaluating actions, intentions, and virtues through rational inquiry rather than mere convention or emotion. The field divides into three primary branches: , which investigates the meaning, origin, and objectivity of moral concepts; , which formulates general standards for determining moral obligations; and , which addresses moral dilemmas in concrete domains such as , , and . encompasses major theories including , which judges actions by their outcomes, typically aiming to maximize overall welfare; , which emphasizes adherence to categorical duties and rules irrespective of consequences; and , which prioritizes the cultivation of exemplary character traits like and . Ethics originated in ancient civilizations, with foundational contributions from thinkers like , , and in , who linked moral inquiry to human flourishing, and has evolved through debates over —positing objective truths discoverable via reason and evidence—versus , which denies universal standards. Contemporary discussions integrate insights from and , revealing moral intuitions as products of adaptive mechanisms, yet underscoring the need for deliberate reasoning to override biases in ethical decision-making. Defining characteristics include persistent controversies, such as the , which highlights tensions between utilitarian sacrifice and deontic prohibitions against harming innocents, illustrating the causal trade-offs in moral choices.

Definition and Scope

Core Definition

is the branch of that systematically investigates moral principles, focusing on standards of right and wrong conduct that prescribe human obligations, virtues, and the conditions for societal benefit. This inquiry addresses normative questions about what individuals and communities ought to do, distinguishing prescriptive judgments from mere descriptions of behavior or cultural norms. The term "ethics" originates from the ancient Greek word ēthos (ἦθος), denoting character, disposition, or habitual conduct, reflecting an early emphasis on personal and social virtues as shaped by deliberate habits rather than innate traits. In philosophical practice, ethics seeks well-founded criteria for evaluating actions, often grounded in rational analysis of human flourishing, justice, and harm avoidance, rather than unexamined traditions or emotional responses. Central to ethics is the pursuit of objective or intersubjectively valid norms for moral decision-making, though debates persist on whether such standards derive from universal reason, empirical consequences, or divine commands; for instance, Aristotle framed ethics as the study aimed at achieving eudaimonia—human well-being—through virtuous activity aligned with rational nature. This distinguishes ethics from aesthetics or metaphysics by its direct concern with guiding practical choices amid conflicting interests and factual uncertainties.

Distinction from Related Concepts

Ethics is frequently conflated with morality, yet philosophers often draw a subtle distinction: morality pertains to the actual standards of right and wrong held by individuals or societies, while ethics constitutes the reflective inquiry into the foundations, justification, and application of those standards. For instance, one's moral intuitions might deem lying inherently wrong, but ethical analysis probes whether such prohibitions hold universally or depend on consequences, as in utilitarian frameworks. This reflective dimension positions ethics as a branch of rather than mere adherence to pre-existing moral codes. In contrast to law, ethics operates without coercive enforcement mechanisms; laws are formalized rules promulgated by state authorities, backed by penalties for violation, whereas ethical norms rely on personal conviction, social pressure, or professional codes. A legal prohibition on theft, enacted via statutes like the U.S. as of 1952, mandates compliance under threat of imprisonment, but ethical evaluation might extend to subtler issues, such as whether evading taxes through loopholes constitutes wrongdoing absent statutory breach. Thus, lawful actions can remain unethical, as seen in historical examples like slavery's legality in the American South until the 13th Amendment's ratification on December 6, 1865, which ethicists later condemned on grounds of human dignity. Ethics diverges from religion in its grounding: religious morality typically derives from divine commands or sacred texts, such as the Ten Commandments in traditions dating to circa 1440 BCE, whereas ethics seeks secular justifications through reason and empirical observation, independent of supernatural authority. While religions like , originating around the 5th century BCE, integrate ethical precepts such as non-violence (), these are often framed as paths to enlightenment rather than purely rational imperatives; ethicists, by contrast, might derive similar duties from causal analyses of harm, as in assessing the societal costs of via data on conflict mortality rates exceeding 100 million in the 20th century alone. This allows ethics to critique or transcend religious doctrines, as evidenced by secular humanists rejecting faith-based prohibitions on despite their prevalence in Abrahamic faiths. Finally, ethics differs from etiquette and cultural , which govern superficial social conduct for harmony rather than profound moral evaluation. Etiquette dictates conventions like handshaking in Western business settings since the or in East Asian cultures, violations of which offend politeness but not core principles of ; ethics, however, interrogates whether such practices perpetuate , such as gender-segregated in certain societies documented in anthropological studies from the 1920s onward. Customs evolve with societal shifts, like the decline of formal dress codes post-1960s , but ethical norms aim for timeless validity based on human flourishing, not transient convention.

Historical and Etymological Origins

The English term "ethics" derives from the Ancient Greek adjective ἠθικός (ēthikós), meaning "pertaining to character," which stems from the noun ἦθος (êthos), originally signifying "custom," "habit," or "accustomed place," and evolving to denote "moral character" or "disposition." This etymological root reflects a focus on habitual conduct and personal disposition as central to moral inquiry, distinguishing ethics from mere custom (nomos) by emphasizing reflective character formation. Systematic ethical philosophy emerged in around the 5th century BCE, with (c. 470–399 BCE) initiating a shift from cosmological speculation to human-centered moral examination through dialectical questioning and the , positing that virtue is knowledge and unexamined life unworthy of living. His student (c. 428–348 BCE) advanced this in dialogues like the , theorizing justice as harmony in the soul mirroring an ideal state, and identifying the as the ultimate ethical principle. (384–322 BCE), Plato's pupil, systematized ethics in the , defining it as practical knowledge aimed at (human flourishing) achieved via the and cultivation of intellectual and moral virtues through habituation and reason. Preceding Greek philosophy, prescriptive moral codes existed in earlier civilizations, such as the Babylonian Code of Hammurabi (c. 1750 BCE), which outlined retributive justice principles like "an eye for an eye," but lacked the reflective, universalist inquiry characteristic of Greek ethics. Similarly, Hebrew scriptures from c. 1200–100 BCE emphasized covenantal obedience and divine commands as moral foundations, influencing later natural law traditions yet differing from Greek emphasis on rational autonomy. These antecedents provided normative rules, but ethics as a philosophical discipline analyzing moral reasoning's foundations crystallized in the Socratic turn toward individual virtue and the good life.

Metaethics

Fundamental Questions

The fundamental questions of metaethics concern the presuppositions underlying moral discourse, including whether moral properties exist independently of human , what moral statements signify, and how moral —if possible—is acquired and justified. These inquiries differ from by not prescribing actions but examining the metaphysical, semantic, and epistemic foundations of itself. The ontological question asks whether moral facts or properties are real constituents of the world and, if so, their nature—natural (reducible to empirical features like or evolutionary ), non-natural (irreducible and apprehended intuitively), (grounded in divine will), or nonexistent. realists affirm the of such properties, arguing they supervene on or constitute features of ; for instance, neo-Aristotelian views hold that moral goods align with as empirically discernible teleological ends. Anti-realists, including error theorists like , contend that moral claims presuppose , motivationally compelling values that are metaphysically bizarre—"" in their intrinsic prescriptivity—and thus fail to refer, rendering ordinary moral judgments systematically false. Empirical considerations, such as convergent moral intuitions across cultures on prohibitions like gratuitous (evident in studies of 60 societies showing near-universal taboos), lend some support to realist ontologies over pure invention, though academic sources often underemphasize this due to prevailing constructivist biases. The semantic question probes the meaning of moral terms like "good" or "ought," inquiring whether they express descriptive propositions capable of truth or falsity, or non-descriptive attitudes such as emotions, commands, or inferences. G.E. Moore's open question argument, articulated in 1903, challenges reductive naturalist semantics by noting that equating "good" with any natural (e.g., ) leaves open the further question of whether that property truly is good, suggesting "good" denotes a simple, non-natural indefinable in empirical terms. Non-cognitivists counter that moral language functions expressively, as in where "murder is wrong" conveys disapproval rather than a truth-claim, avoiding ontological commitments but raising issues of moral disagreement's rational . Inferentialist approaches, drawing on , treat moral terms as governed by normative inferences rather than truth conditions, aligning semantics with practical reasoning. The epistemological question addresses how, if moral facts exist, they are known or justified—through , reason, empirical observation, or —and whether arises from the absence of reliable access. Realists invoke faculties like rational (as in ) or , where beliefs cohere with considered judgments and evidence; for naturalized morals, provides causal explanations for moral cognition, as seen in domain-specific adaptations for reciprocity detected via fMRI studies of fairness judgments. Skeptics argue moral epistemology founders on , with no decisive method distinguishing true morals from evolved biases, a view amplified in academia despite counterevidence from cross-cultural experiments revealing non-arbitrary universals like . These questions interconnect: ontological denial often motivates semantic shifts to error or , while epistemic challenges question moral discourse's cognitive status altogether.

Moral Realism and Objectivity

![Photo of George Edward Moore](./assets/1914_George_Edward_Moore_cropped Moral realism posits that moral statements express propositions capable of being true or false based on objective features of the world, independent of human attitudes or cultural consensus. Proponents argue that actions like torturing innocents for pleasure are objectively wrong, not merely disapproved by most people. This view contrasts with subjectivism by asserting mind-independent moral facts, akin to mathematical truths. Objectivity in ethics, under , implies that moral truths hold regardless of individual beliefs or societal norms, allowing for genuine moral disagreement where one side can be mistaken. Philosophers such as defended this through the "open question argument," contending that identifying something as good does not analytically entail its moral value, pointing to non-natural, properties. Empirical support draws from folk intuitions, where surveys indicate most ordinary people treat moral claims as objectively true, as in judgments that unnecessary harm is wrong irrespective of opinion. A 2009 PhilPapers survey of 3,226 philosophers found 56% accepting or leaning toward , reflecting its prominence despite anti-realist challenges like evolutionary explanations for moral beliefs potentially undermining objectivity. Realists counter that such debunking arguments fail if moral cognition tracks genuine facts, similar to how evolution does not invalidate perceptual . Causal supports this by emphasizing that moral facts could causally influence behavior through rational apprehension, not mere sentiment. Key historical figures include , who argued for eternal Forms including the Good, and , whose ties virtue to objective human flourishing. Modern robust realists like David Brink and Russ Shafer-Landau maintain that moral properties are natural or non-natural but irreducible to non-moral facts. Critics of often invoke persistent cross-cultural disagreements as evidence against objectivity, yet realists respond that such disputes occur in science too without disproving physical facts, and convergence on basics like prohibiting suggests underlying truths. Academic sources, while predominant, exhibit biases favoring in social sciences, but philosophical leans realist due to intuitive force and for moral , as seen in abolishing based on arguments transcending mere preference.

Moral Anti-Realism, Relativism, and Nihilism

Moral anti-realism posits that there are no objective facts or properties that exist independently of human attitudes, beliefs, or conventions. This view contrasts with by rejecting the idea that moral statements can be true or false in a mind-independent , often attributing moral discourse to subjective preferences, emotions, or social constructs. Key arguments include the evolutionary explanation for moral intuitions as adaptive heuristics rather than detectors of objective truths, and the observation that moral disagreement persists without resolution, suggesting no underlying facts to adjudicate disputes. One prominent form is moral relativism, which holds that moral truths, if any, are relative to cultural, societal, or individual frameworks. Descriptive relativism observes empirical variation in moral practices, such as historical acceptance of infanticide among the Inuit for resource scarcity or ritual human sacrifice in Aztec society until the Spanish conquest in 1521. Meta-ethical relativism extends this to claim that moral judgments are true relative to a standpoint, implying no universal standards. However, empirical studies challenge the extent of diversity: a 2019 analysis of ethnographic data from 60 societies identified seven near-universal moral rules—kinship loyalty, reciprocity, fairness in resource division, property respect, bravery, deference to authority, and in-group help—suggesting shared evolutionary pressures rather than pure relativity. Critics argue relativism undermines cross-cultural critique, as it cannot condemn practices like honor killings in certain tribal contexts without imposing an external standard, leading to a tolerance paradox where relativism itself claims universal validity. Moral nihilism, often advanced through error theory, asserts that all moral claims are systematically false because they presuppose nonexistent objective prescriptivity. Philosopher articulated this in his 1977 book Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong, arguing via the "argument from queerness" that properties, if real, would be metaphysically odd—non- entities capable of motivating action intrinsically, unlike observable natural kinds—and epistemologically inaccessible, as no sensory faculty detects them. The "argument from relativity" supplements this by noting persistent moral discord, which would be inexplicable if objective facts existed. implies moral language functions as error-laden fiction, akin to phlogiston in outdated , yet allows practical decision-making via non-moral criteria like or . Detractors contend that explains intuitions and partial agreements without error, as cooperative norms enhance fitness across species, and queerness dissolves if moral facts reduce to natural properties like causation. Empirical cross-cultural data on sacrificial dilemmas further indicate convergent judgments on , questioning nihilism's dismissal of fact-like moral patterns.

Cognitivism versus Non-Cognitivism

Cognitivism holds that judgments express propositions capable of being true or false, akin to factual assertions, thereby attributing to them a cognitive involving beliefs about the world. This position aligns with the that involves truth-apt claims, as evidenced by everyday practices of moral argumentation where individuals debate the accuracy of statements like "unnecessary is wrong" as if they describe objective features. Proponents argue that this semantic structure explains the role of evidence and reasoning in moral deliberation, such as citing empirical consequences or logical consistency to support or refute ethical positions. Non-cognitivism, in contrast, contends that moral judgments do not express beliefs but rather non-cognitive attitudes, such as expressions of approval, disapproval, or imperatives, rendering them neither true nor false. , a prominent variant developed by in Language, Truth and Logic (1936) and Charles L. Stevenson in Ethics and Language (1944), interprets statements like "stealing is wrong" as evincing an emotional response, equivalent to exclamations of aversion rather than descriptive claims. , advanced by in works like The Language of Morals (1952), views moral utterances as universalizable prescriptions or commands, urging action without asserting facts, as in treating "do not lie" as a directive applicable impartially. A central challenge to is the embedding problem, or Frege-Geach problem, which highlights difficulties in accounting for terms within complex logical structures. For instance, non-cognitivists struggle to explain the inferential validity of arguments like "If is wrong, then legalizing it would be unjust; is wrong; therefore, legalizing it would be unjust," where the antecedent lacks truth-value under emotivist or prescriptivist analyses, yet preserves normative force in reasoning. Cognitivists leverage this to argue that language functions propositionally, supporting deductive and inductive inferences akin to descriptive . Non-cognitivists have responded with quasi-realist strategies, such as Simon Blackburn's projectivism, which simulates truth-aptness through attitudinal commitments without positing actual facts, though critics contend this concedes too much to cognitivist semantics. Empirical considerations also favor , as psychological studies indicate that moral judgments correlate with -like states responsive to , rather than mere affective outbursts; for example, revisions in moral views following exposure to countervailing data mirror factual updates more than emotional vents. While appeals to motivational internalism—the link between moral judgment and action—it faces counterexamples where individuals affirm moral truths yet fail to act accordingly, undermining the necessity of non-cognitive attitudes for explaining . The debate persists, with dominating contemporary due to its compatibility with realist and anti-realist ontologies alike, whereas 's influence has waned amid unresolved logical and explanatory hurdles.

Moral Epistemology and Justification

Moral epistemology examines the sources, nature, and limits of about moral truths, typically understood as justified true beliefs regarding moral facts or properties. It addresses whether such knowledge is possible, how moral beliefs are justified, and what distinguishes moral justification from epistemic justification in non-moral domains. Key questions include the reliability of moral intuitions, the impact of persistent moral disagreement across cultures, and whether evolutionary origins undermine claims to objective moral . One foundational approach is , which holds that basic moral propositions are self-evident and apprehended directly through intellectual seemings or intuitions, providing non-inferential justification without need for empirical proof or further argument. , in (1903), argued that the property of goodness is a non-natural, indefinable quality known intuitively, rejecting naturalistic reductions via the open-question argument: equating good with any natural property leaves open whether it truly is good. extended this to duties, such as and non-maleficence, which are self-evident upon adequate reflection but may conflict, requiring intuitive judgment for resolution. Intuitionists respond to reliability concerns by emphasizing that intuitions track moral truths independently of causal origins, provided the perceiver grasps the proposition's content. Coherentism offers an alternative method, justifying moral beliefs through their mutual consistency within a web of convictions, as in John Rawls's . Narrow adjusts general principles to fit specific considered judgments, while wide equilibrium incorporates broader background theories, empirical data, and alternative views for comprehensive coherence. Rawls applied this in (1971) to derive principles of justice, revising intuitions like opposition to alongside utilitarian or libertarian theories until equilibrium is reached. Critics argue this risks , as multiple incompatible equilibria may emerge from differing starting judgments, failing to guarantee truth-tracking. Empiricist and naturalized approaches ground moral justification in experience or scientific inquiry, treating moral properties as natural kinds discernible through observation or causal relations. emphasized sentiments as the basis for moral distinctions, with reason serving instrumental roles rather than providing a priori . Contemporary naturalists like David Copp propose society-centered views, where moral facts supervene on societal standards justified empirically via rational choice or evolutionary utility. Empirical psychology supports limited universals, such as Jonathan Haidt's identification of core values like and fairness in diverse cultures, suggesting some convergence despite disagreement. Challenges to moral knowledge include persistent disagreement, as seen in cross-cultural variances on issues like euthanasia, which intuitionists attribute to errors in non-moral facts or weighting duties rather than flawed intuitions. Evolutionary debunking arguments, advanced by Sharon Street (2006), contend that moral beliefs shaped by natural selection for survival prioritize fitness over objective truth, undercutting realist justifications unless alignment with truths is explanatorily superfluous. Responses invoke autonomous rational reflection to filter evolutionary influences, allowing beliefs to track independent moral facts, or argue that adaptive reliability in social environments supports truth-conduciveness. Skeptics like Richard Joyce (2006) claim a full genealogical explanation of moral practice without moral facts favors error theory, though realists counter that causal origins do not preclude epistemic warrant if faculties are reliable.

Normative Ethics

Consequentialism

Consequentialism is a normative ethical theory that evaluates the moral rightness or wrongness of an action exclusively by its outcomes or consequences. Under this framework, an action qualifies as morally right if it produces the best overall consequences compared to available alternatives, with the nature of "best" defined by a specified criterion of value, such as maximizing pleasure or well-being. This approach contrasts with theories emphasizing duties, intentions, or character traits independent of results. The most prominent variant is , advanced by (1748–1832) and (1806–1873), which posits that actions are right insofar as they promote the greatest happiness for the greatest number. Bentham's hedonic calculus quantified pleasure and pain to assess consequences, while Mill distinguished higher intellectual pleasures from base ones. Other forms include , where right actions maximize the agent's own good, and rule consequentialism, which judges rules by their tendency to yield optimal outcomes rather than individual acts. These theories share the core commitment to outcome maximization but differ in whose interests or what value is prioritized. Consequentialism faces several criticisms. Detractors argue it is overly demanding, requiring agents to constantly calculate and sacrifice personal interests for aggregate betterment, potentially eroding ordinary moral intuitions about special obligations to or . It also permits intuitively acts, such as punishing an innocent person if it deters more effectively than alternatives, as the theory prioritizes results over or rights violations. Predicting long-term consequences accurately poses practical challenges, and the theory may undervalue intentions or agent-centered constraints. A classic illustration is the , where a runaway trolley heads toward five people, but diverting it kills one on another track; consequentialists typically endorse diversion to minimize deaths, whereas deontologists may reject it due to prohibitions against using someone as a means. Empirical studies, such as those by Joshua Greene, suggest such dilemmas activate utilitarian reasoning linked to controlled cognition, though critics question whether this supports consequentialism's normative force.

Deontology

Deontology constitutes a family of normative ethical theories that evaluate the of actions based on to rules, duties, or principles, irrespective of consequences. Unlike , which assesses acts by their outcomes, posits that some actions possess intrinsic moral worth or wrongness derived from their alignment with obligations. This approach emphasizes agent-centered constraints, such as prohibitions against lying or killing, even when violating them might yield better results. The term "" derives from the Greek (duty) and logos (study), reflecting its focus on obligatory conduct. While roots trace to , modern deontology crystallized in the 18th century through (1724–1804), whose (1785) articulated the as a universal moral law binding rational agents. Kant's first formulation requires acting only on maxims that can be willed as universal laws without contradiction, ensuring actions stem from rather than inclination. The second formulation mandates treating persons as ends in themselves, not mere means, prohibiting exploitation. Other variants include W.D. Ross's (1877–1971) intuitionist , which identifies duties like and non-maleficence that may conflict, requiring judgment to resolve without a single overriding rule. represents a theological form, where duties arise from God's commands, as in certain interpretations of Abrahamic scriptures. Critics argue yields rigid outcomes, such as refusing to lie to conceal innocents from aggressors, potentially causing greater harm. This tension manifests in thought experiments like the , devised by in 1967, where a runaway trolley heads toward five people but can be diverted to kill one instead. Consequentialists typically endorse diverting the trolley to minimize deaths, prioritizing net , whereas strict deontologists often reject active , viewing it as impermissible killing despite passive allowance of the greater . Such scenarios highlight deontology's to side-constraints on , preserving moral absolutes against utilitarian aggregation. Proponents counter that rules provide predictable stability, avoiding the epistemic uncertainty of forecasting consequences.

Virtue Ethics

Virtue ethics constitutes a normative ethical framework that prioritizes the cultivation of and virtues as the primary basis for ethical evaluation, rather than assessing actions solely by their consequences or to rules. This approach posits that individuals who possess virtues—such as , , and temperance—will reliably perform morally right actions, as their character dispositions guide behavior toward human flourishing, or . Originating in , virtue ethics was systematically articulated by in his , composed around 350 BCE, where virtues are described as stable dispositions acquired through and rational deliberation. Central to Aristotelian is the , which holds that each represents a between excess and deficiency in response to emotions or actions; for instance, lies between rashness and , determined not by a fixed arithmetic but by practical () tailored to context. Intellectual virtues, like , complement ethical virtues, enabling agents to discern the appropriate mean. Aristotle argued that virtues enable eudaimonia, a state of self-sufficient activity in accordance with complete virtue over a complete life, achievable through education and practice rather than mere intellectual knowledge. In contrast to , which evaluates actions based on outcomes like utility maximization, and , which emphasizes duties or categorical imperatives irrespective of results, centers the moral agent's character as the locus of ethical assessment. Virtuous individuals act rightly because it aligns with their developed nature, not external criteria; thus, right actions stem from virtues rather than defining them. A modern revival of virtue ethics emerged in the mid-20th century, spurred by dissatisfaction with rule-based and outcome-focused theories amid perceived failures in addressing moral motivation and character. Elizabeth Anscombe's 1958 essay "Modern Moral Philosophy" critiqued contemporary ethics for neglecting virtues and to ti ên einai (the "what it is to be") of moral concepts, advocating a return to pre-Humean frameworks like Aristotle's. Philippa Foot extended this by linking virtues to human goods, arguing in works like Natural Goodness (2001) that virtues promote species-typical functioning analogous to health in biology. Alasdair MacIntyre's After Virtue (1981) further propelled the resurgence, diagnosing modern moral fragmentation as resulting from the abandonment of teleological ethics and proposing virtues within narrative traditions for personal and communal coherence. These thinkers emphasized virtues' role in enabling thick ethical descriptions and resisting relativism by grounding them in shared human practices.

Contractarianism and Other Theories

Contractarianism posits that moral principles and obligations arise from a hypothetical agreement among rational agents, deriving normative force from mutual rather than divine command, intuition, or consequences alone. This approach traces to classical theorists who envisioned morality and political authority emerging from a pre-social "" to escape anarchy or insecurity. , in (1651), argued that in a , self-interested individuals face perpetual war, prompting a contract to surrender rights to a for , yielding moral duties grounded in rather than . , in (1689), modified this by positing natural rights to life, , and , with forming limited governments to protect them, emphasizing voluntary agreement over coercion. , in (1762), introduced the "general will" as a prioritizing communal good, influencing democratic ideals but critiqued for potentially subsuming individual autonomy. Modern contractarianism refines these ideas, often distinguishing Hobbesian variants—focused on bargaining among self-interested parties—from , which seeks impartial principles no rational person could reasonably reject. , in (1971), proposed the "original position" behind a "veil of ignorance," where agents design principles of without knowing their , yielding egalitarian outcomes like equal basic liberties and the difference principle allowing inequalities only if they benefit the least advantaged. , in Morals by Agreement (1986), advanced a where moral rules emerge from constrained maximization, as parties agree to cooperate for mutual gain, treating ethics as non-tuistic but instrumentally rational. T.M. Scanlon's , outlined in What We Owe to Each Other (1998), shifts emphasis to intersubjective justification, holding acts wrong if they would be rejected by reasonable agents seeking reciprocity, prioritizing mutual recognition over utility or rights. Critiques highlight contractarianism's reliance on idealized , potentially marginalizing non-rational agents like children or the cognitively impaired, whose interests may be unprotected without . Empirical challenges question whether hypothetical agreements reflect real-world motivations, as bargaining models assume and enforcement absent in human psychology, per studies on under . Feminist philosophers, such as , argue it overemphasizes abstract and , neglecting relational contexts where and dependency underpin , as evidenced in showing gender-differentiated favoring connection over rights. Among other normative theories, posits morality as rooted in responsiveness to others' needs within relationships, contrasting contractarian impartiality with contextual . Developed by in (1982), it draws on psychological data indicating care-oriented reasoning in moral dilemmas, advocating virtues like attentiveness and responsibility over contractual rules, though critiqued for risking favoritism or inefficiency in large-scale justice. , asserting one ought to maximize personal welfare, serves as a foil, with proponents like in (1964) defending rational self-interest as foundational, yet it faces refutation from cases where apparent yields long-term gain, undermining universality. rejects general principles, holding that moral reasons vary by context without overriding rules, as argues in Ethics Without Principles (2004), supported by intuitive judgments in trolley-like scenarios where no formula consistently applies. These alternatives challenge the big three theories by emphasizing relational, self-regarding, or situational elements, though they often integrate with or critique contractarianism's rationalist core.

Biological and Evolutionary Foundations

Innate Moral Instincts

research indicates that preverbal infants exhibit preferences for prosocial behaviors, suggesting an innate basis for moral evaluation. In experiments conducted by J. Kiley Hamlin, Karen Wynn, and Paul Bloom, 6- and 10-month-old infants observed puppet shows where one puppet helped another achieve a goal while another hindered it; the infants subsequently reached more often for the helpful puppet, demonstrating an early social evaluation mechanism independent of or explicit teaching. Similar findings extend to 3-month-olds, who show differential responses to helpful versus hindering characters, implying that rudimentary moral intuitions emerge prior to significant cultural exposure. These preferences align with evolutionary pressures favoring , as articulated by , who posited that human moral sense originates from prosocial instincts rooted in and extended to kin and groups. Twin studies further support a genetic component to moral traits. Multivariate analyses of over 2,000 participants reveal that moral foundations—such as , fairness, , , sanctity, and —exhibit moderate to high , with genetic factors accounting for 20-50% of variance across dimensions, while shared environment plays a minimal role. This heritability persists after controlling for overlaps, indicating that individual differences in moral intuitions are not solely environmentally determined but include innate predispositions shaped by selection for cohesion in ancestral environments. Neuroscience corroborates these findings through . judgments activate distributed brain networks, including the and , regions implicated in and intention attribution, with evidence suggesting these responses are hardwired rather than purely learned. studies and developmental trajectories further imply innateness, as deficits in conditions like precede cultural reinforcement. Critiques argue that infant preferences may reflect perceptual biases, such as expectations of goal-directed motion, rather than genuine ; a replication attempt in found no robust prosocial preference in some cohorts, attributing results to methodological artifacts. Nonetheless, meta-analyses affirm consistent early prosocial biases across s, with environmental factors modulating but not originating these instincts. Thus, while refines moral expression, empirical data point to innate foundations enabling rapid adaptation to social norms.

Evolutionary Explanations of Altruism and Cooperation

Altruism, defined as behavior that benefits another individual at a cost to the actor's fitness, poses a challenge to Darwinian , which favors traits enhancing individual survival and reproduction. Evolutionary biologists resolve this through mechanisms that align apparent with propagation, primarily via , reciprocity, and group-level dynamics. These explanations emerged in the mid-20th century, building on mathematical models and empirical observations from social insects, , and game-theoretic simulations. Kin selection, formalized by W.D. Hamilton in 1964, posits that evolves when directed toward genetic relatives, as aiding kin indirectly propagates shared genes. Hamilton's rule states that a gene for spreads if rB > C, where r is the genetic relatedness between actor and recipient, B the fitness benefit to the recipient, and C the fitness cost to the actor. In haplodiploid (ants, bees, wasps), females share 75% relatedness with sisters due to haplodiploid sex determination, favoring worker sterility to rear siblings over personal reproduction, explaining eusociality's prevalence in this order—over 90% of eusocial insect species. Empirical support includes manipulated colonies where workers preferentially aid full sisters, and genomic studies confirming kin-biased helping in species like the fire ant Solenopsis invicta. Reciprocal altruism, proposed by in 1971, extends cooperation to unrelated individuals expecting future repayment, provided interactions repeat and cheaters can be punished. This requires cognitive traits like partner assessment, memory of past acts, and moralistic aggression toward defectors to stabilize exchanges. Observed in vampire bats (Desmodus rotundus) sharing blood meals with roost-mates who reciprocate within days, and (Labroides dimidiatus) removing parasites from predators while avoiding exploitation. bolsters this: in iterated tournaments run by in 1984, the "tit-for-tat" strategy—cooperating first, then mirroring the opponent's last move—outperformed others across 200+ rounds against 14 strategies, due to its provocability, retaliation, forgiveness, and clarity. Group selection, or multi-level selection, argues altruism evolves when groups with cooperators outcompete selfish groups, despite intra-group advantages for selfishness. Revived by and Elliott Sober in the 1990s, their trait-group model shows persisting if group benefits exceed individual costs across metapopulations, as in microbial biofilms where cooperative producers enable group persistence. Though criticized for conflating levels—e.g., often suffices—empirical cases include human bands where parochial (in-group favoritism) enhances group survival, per simulations showing multi-level dynamics stabilizing beyond pairwise reciprocity. These mechanisms integrate in models like Hamilton's encompassing both kin and greenbeard effects ( markers for ), underscoring how selection at , individual, and group levels causally drives cooperative traits without invoking non-Darwinian processes.

Critiques of Reductionism to Biology

Critiques of reducing ethical norms to biological processes center on the fundamental gap between descriptive explanations of moral behavior and prescriptive justifications for moral actions. Evolutionary can account for the origins of moral intuitions, such as , as adaptations promoting survival and reproduction in social groups, yet it fails to derive normative obligations from these empirical facts. This echoes David Hume's is-ought distinction, where statements about what is the case in nature cannot logically entail statements about what ought to be done, a problem that persists in despite attempts to naturalize moral claims. Philosophers argue that biological accounts explain the causal mechanisms behind moral sentiments but leave unanswered why agents should adhere to them over or alternative norms, as selects for fitness-enhancing behaviors that may conflict with impartial ethical reasoning. A related objection invokes G.E. Moore's , which contends that ethical properties like "goodness" cannot be identically equated with any natural property, including biological fitness or adaptive traits, because such reductions commit an error in defining non-natural ethical concepts through empirical terms. Moore's open-question argument illustrates this: even if a is shown to be biologically adaptive, whether it is truly good remains meaningfully open, indicating that ethical evaluation transcends biological description. Critics of biological , such as , maintain that ethics constitutes an autonomous domain of inquiry, irreducible to scientific explanations of , as moral deliberation involves rational standards independent of evolutionary history. This view posits that while informs the psychological underpinnings of , reducing to genetic or selective processes undermines the objective justification required for ethical systems, potentially leading to where morals are mere byproducts without binding force. Further challenges arise from evolutionary debunking arguments, which suggest that if moral beliefs evolved primarily for rather than truth-tracking, their reliability as guides to ethics is compromised, akin to optical illusions adapted for practical but not veridical perception. Proponents of this critique, including Sharon Street, argue that the adaptive origins of moral intuitions favor toward their epistemic warrant unless supplemented by non-biological justifications, such as rational reflection or . of moral variation exceeding what kin selection or reciprocity models predict further highlights the limits of strict biological reduction, as social learning and institutional factors introduce norms not fully explicable by genetics alone. These objections collectively affirm that while elucidates the proximate causes of ethical dispositions, comprehensive ethical demands integration with to address , avoiding the pitfalls of in moral philosophy.

Religious and Natural Law Perspectives

Theological Foundations in Abrahamic Traditions

In Abrahamic traditions—Judaism, Christianity, and Islam—ethical foundations are anchored in the revealed will of a singular, transcendent God who issues binding commands to humanity. This approach, often aligned with Divine Command Theory, holds that moral rightness consists in obedience to divine directives, with wrongdoing defined as disobedience, rather than deriving primarily from human-derived principles or consequences. God's commands are not arbitrary but reflect His unchanging holy nature, providing an objective standard for human conduct. Sacred texts serve as the primary repositories of these revelations, emphasizing duties toward God (such as monotheistic worship and prohibition of idolatry) and toward others (including prohibitions against harm and mandates for justice). Judaism grounds its ethics in the , viewed as God's direct to at circa 1312 BCE, culminating in the 613 mitzvot (commandments) that regulate personal, communal, and ritual life. Central to this are the (Exodus 20:1–17), which explicitly forbid murder, adultery, theft, and perjury while mandating honor for parents and exclusive devotion to , framing morality as covenantal fidelity to the Creator who liberated the Israelites from Egyptian bondage. Rabbinic interpretations in the expand these into , a legal-ethical system prioritizing communal holiness and (righteous justice or charity), with ethical lapses seen as breaches against divine order rather than mere social infractions. This theological basis posits that true ethical knowledge stems from prophetic , not innate reason alone, as human inclinations () require to curb self-interest. Christian ethics builds upon Jewish foundations but centers on the Bible's dual testaments, with the fulfilling law through Christ's teachings and . The moral character of —holy, just, and loving—forms the ultimate basis, as articulated in passages like 6:8 ("to act justly, mercy, walk humbly with ") and the (Matthew 22:37–40) to wholly and neighbor as self. ' (Matthew 5–7) intensifies ethical demands, equating internal attitudes (e.g., lust as , anger as ) with overt acts, and introduces as enabling obedience amid human sinfulness. further emphasize virtues like , , and (1 Corinthians 13), with ethics as sanctification toward Christlikeness, accountable ultimately to rather than empirical utility. In Islam, moral foundations reside in the Quran, revealed to Muhammad between 610 and 632 CE, and exemplified in the Sunnah (Prophet's traditions), with tawhid (God's oneness) as the bedrock requiring submission (islam) to divine will. Key ethical imperatives include justice (adl), compassion (rahma), and stewardship (khilafah), as in Quran 17:70 affirming human dignity and 2:177 mandating charity, prayer, and truthfulness. Acts are classified as fard (obligatory), mandub (recommended), mubah (permissible), makruh (discouraged), or haram (forbidden), with intention (niyyah) pivotal; righteousness is holistic, integrating belief and action (Quran 2:177: "It is righteousness to believe in God... and give wealth... to kinsfolk, orphans, the needy"). Sharia derives ethics from these sources, prioritizing communal harmony (ummah) under God's sovereignty, where moral intuition aligns with revelation but cannot supersede it.

Natural Law Theory

Natural law theory posits that moral principles are derived from the inherent structure of the universe and , discoverable through reason rather than divine alone. This framework traces its origins to , particularly 's concept of , where natural entities have inherent purposes or ends that guide ethical action. philosophers extended this by viewing the cosmos as governed by a rational divine , implying universal laws binding on human conduct. , in the 1st century BCE, synthesized these ideas in , defining true law as "right reason in agreement with nature," eternal, unchanging, and applicable to all nations. In the medieval period, (1225–1274) integrated into in his (completed 1274), distinguishing four tiers of law: as God's rational plan for creation; as the rational creature's participation in ; revealed through scripture; and human law derived from for societal order. argued that the first precept of is "good is to be done and pursued, and evil avoided," from which secondary precepts follow, such as preserving life, procreating, acquiring , and living harmoniously in . These precepts are self-evident to practical reason, rooted in human inclinations toward flourishing, and serve as objective standards for evaluating actions and positive laws. Natural law theory emphasizes that valid human laws must conform to ; otherwise, they lack , as Aquinas stated: "An unjust law is no law at all." This view underpins critiques of , asserting that morality is not arbitrary but grounded in observable and rational order. In the 20th century, the "new natural law" theory emerged, led by Germain Grisez's 1965 article and developed by and others, shifting focus from classical to basic human goods like life, , play, aesthetic experience, sociability, practical reasonableness, and . These goods are self-evident and incommensurable, with moral norms arising from requirements of practical reason to pursue them integrally rather than selectively. This approach aims to address modern philosophical challenges, such as , by deriving ethics from first-person practical deliberation without relying on metaphysical essences. Critics, including traditional Thomists, argue it dilutes Aquinas's emphasis on nature's ends, potentially leading to indeterminate conclusions.

Eastern Religious Ethics

Eastern religious ethics derive primarily from Indian and Chinese traditions, including , , , , and , which emphasize cosmic order, interdependence, and cultivation of virtues to align with natural or divine laws rather than universal individual . These systems view moral action as sustaining within and the , often through principles like , non-violence, and effortless with inherent patterns, contrasting with deontological rules or consequentialist calculations prevalent in thought. Empirical observations of stability in historical Eastern societies, such as the longevity of Confucian bureaucracies in from the (206 BCE–220 CE) onward, suggest practical efficacy in promoting cooperation, though critiques highlight potential suppression of dissent in favor of collective conformity. In , ethics center on , the principle of righteous duty tailored to one's social role, stage of life, and cosmic context, encompassing obligations like truthfulness (), non-violence (), and self-control to maintain universal order (). Adherence to dharma generates positive karma, influencing future rebirths, while violations lead to suffering, as illustrated in the where is counseled to fulfill warrior duties despite personal qualms, prioritizing cosmic balance over emotional aversion. This framework, rooted in Vedic texts dating to circa 1500 BCE, promotes ethical flexibility but has been observed to reinforce hierarchies, with historical data from ancient Indian inscriptions showing varna-based duties correlating with societal stability amid invasions. Buddhist ethics, building on Hindu foundations but rejecting caste, focus on the —encompassing right view, intention, speech, action, livelihood, effort, , and concentration—to eradicate (dukkha) through cessation of craving and ignorance. Core precepts include abstaining from killing, stealing, , lying, and intoxicants, with karma dictating rebirth outcomes based on volitional actions, as evidenced in texts compiled around the 1st century BCE. Practices like empirically reduce aggression, with modern studies linking to lower levels and improved , though traditional emphasis on monastic has limited lay ethical depth in some sects. Jainism elevates ahimsa to absolute non-violence toward all life forms, extending to microscopic organisms via dietary and occupational restrictions, alongside , which posits reality's multifaceted nature to foster tolerance and avoid dogmatic harm. These principles, attributed to (599–527 BCE), underpin vows of non-possession (aparigraha) and truthfulness, with historical Jains achieving prosperity through trade ethics that minimized exploitation, as seen in medieval Indian merchant guilds. The doctrine's causal realism underscores how subtle intents generate karmic particles binding the soul, demanding rigorous self-discipline verifiable through reduced interpersonal conflicts in adherent communities. Confucian ethics prioritize (benevolence or humaneness), cultivated through relational roles, alongside (ritual propriety), (righteousness), and filial piety (), aiming for social harmony via moral exemplars like the (superior person). Originating with (551–479 BCE), these virtues, detailed in the , emphasize reciprocity and , with empirical success in imperial exams from 605 CE onward selecting administrators on ethical knowledge, fostering bureaucratic efficiency until the . Unlike egoistic pursuits, demands empathy, as argued innate moral sprouts require nurture, aligning actions with heavenly mandate (tianming). Taoist ethics advocate (effortless action), harmonizing with the Dao (way), the spontaneous natural order, through simplicity, humility, and non-interference to avoid disrupting cosmic flow. Texts like the , attributed to (6th century BCE), counsel rulers to govern minimally, as excessive force breeds resistance, a principle borne out in historical cycles of Chinese dynastic rise and fall where overregulation preceded collapse. Ethical conduct thus involves yielding to inherent tendencies, promoting and adaptability, with practices like empirically linked to stress reduction and health benefits in contemporary studies. Across these traditions, ethics integrate metaphysics with practice, positing moral causality via karma or heavenly patterns, empirically fostering in adherents facing adversity, though adaptations in modern contexts reveal tensions with , as seen in declining adherence rates in urbanizing per 2020 Pew surveys.

Conflicts with Secular Views

Religious and natural law perspectives assert that moral truths are , derived from divine order or inherent oriented toward a (purpose) aligned with God's design, as articulated in Thomistic where reason participates in . Secular views, by contrast, frequently ground ethics in autonomous human reason, empirical consequences, or constructs, often rejecting transcendent foundations and embracing or , which theorists critique as leading to moral incoherence by severing ethics from unchanging principles. This foundational divergence manifests in disputes over human dignity's source: religious ethics views it as intrinsic and inviolable due to Dei or ends, while secular frameworks tie it to subjective capacities or societal consensus, enabling variability across cultures. In , conflicts intensify over and , where Abrahamic traditions and uphold the sanctity of life from to natural as non-negotiable, rooted in the against intentional killing of innocents (e.g., Exodus 20:13). Secular proponents prioritize individual and bodily rights, as seen in as a reproductive , with from 2023 showing theology students overwhelmingly opposing it compared to secular peers (e.g., 80% disapproval among religious vs. 40% among non-religious in cross-cultural surveys). counters that such contradicts the procreative of and , rendering secular justifications reductive and inconsistent—e.g., affirming fetal post-viability but denying it earlier lacks rational grounding absent markers like or implantation. Similarly, clashes with religious bans on and mercy killing, viewed as usurping over life, whereas , influenced by utilitarian calculus, supports it in cases of suffering, as evidenced by legalization trends in nations like the (over 8,000 cases in 2022) despite religious minorities' exemptions. On and sexuality, posits heterosexual complementarity as essential for marital goods like procreation and unity, deriving from observable biological , which conflicts with secular redefinitions emphasizing emotional fulfillment or without teleological constraints. Secular views, often contractual, accommodate same-sex unions as extensions of consent-based rights, critiqued by religious ethicists as dissolving objective norms into , potentially eroding structures—empirical studies link traditional models to lower rates (e.g., 20-30% lower in religious communities per 2020 U.S. data). These tensions extend to , where secular states enforce neutral laws clashing with religious practices, such as mandates for contraception coverage overriding objections to sterilizing acts. Critiques from natural law highlight secular ethics' vulnerability to relativism, where majority will supplants reason-derived universals, fostering inconsistencies like endorsing harm to vulnerable groups under autonomy pretexts—e.g., historical shifts from opposing infanticide to debating late-term abortions. Proponents argue this stems from excluding teleology, rendering secular systems ad hoc rather than participatory in higher law, though secular theorists retort that natural law's theistic presuppositions impose faith on pluralistic societies. Empirical cross-national data supports religious ethics' stability, with higher religiosity correlating to uniform opposition to relativized practices (e.g., 70% disapproval of euthanasia in high-religion countries vs. 30% in secular ones, per 2019 World Values Survey aggregates).

Applied Ethics

Applied ethics in the early twenty-first century has expanded to address the rapid diffusion of digital technologies, data-driven decision systems, and artificial intelligence into everyday life. A growing field of AI and technology ethics examines issues such as algorithmic bias in credit scoring and predictive policing, the opacity of machine-learning models used in healthcare and employment, the spread of misinformation through automated content recommendation, and the governance of autonomous systems in areas like vehicles or weapons. Some experimental work has explored registering artificial intelligence systems themselves as named contributors in scholarly databases, for instance the ORCID record 0009-0002-6030-5730, which project materials describe as belonging to a non-human, AI-based digital author persona named Angela Bogdanova under the Aisentica project, presented as an author identity for philosophical work on artificial intelligence and postsubjective ethics to explore how responsibility and credit should be distributed when an artificial system is listed as the author of scholarly texts. Such cases remain rare and controversial, discussed mainly in self-published sources, but they highlight ethical questions about how responsibility, credit, and accountability should be allocated when non-biological systems are presented as authors in scientific and philosophical publishing. Policy bodies and professional organizations have responded with guidelines that emphasize principles such as fairness, accountability, transparency, privacy, and human oversight, arguing that technical performance alone cannot justify systems that systematically disadvantage vulnerable groups or erode democratic deliberation. Critics of purely principle-based approaches call for closer attention to power asymmetries, data infrastructures, and the lived experience of those affected by AI-mediated decisions, so that ethical evaluation tracks not only intentions but also the causal impacts of these systems on social and political life.

Bioethics and Medical Dilemmas

Bioethics addresses ethical questions arising from biological and medical advancements, particularly those involving human life, , and resource distribution. Central dilemmas include balancing patient against protections for vulnerable populations, such as fetuses or the terminally ill, and weighing utilitarian outcomes against deontological principles like the sanctity of life. Empirical data from clinical practices and legal frameworks reveal tensions, for instance, in end-of-life decisions where legalization of has led to rising case numbers without clear of reduced overall. In , and physician-assisted present profound dilemmas. In the , where was legalized in , it accounted for 4.4% of all deaths by 2017, up from 1.9% in 1990, with cases involving non-terminal conditions expanding over time. Similarly, legalized in , with reported cases rising from 236 in 2003 to 3,423 in 2023, including extensions to minors and psychiatric patients despite safeguards intended to limit scope. Critics argue this reflects a , as initial restrictions erode under pressure from autonomy claims, potentially pressuring vulnerable groups like the elderly; proponents cite patient relief, though studies show no significant drop in overall rates post-legalization. Withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatment, such as ventilators, raises parallel issues of distinguishing passive from active killing, guided by principles like double effect, where intent matters causally but outcomes remain empirically burdensome for families. At the beginning of life, abortion debates hinge on fetal viability and moral status. Scientific consensus places viability—the gestational age at which a fetus has over 50% survival chance outside the womb—between 23 and 24 weeks, though survival rates below 50% persist even with intensive care. Fetuses lack neural capacity for pain experience before 24-25 weeks, per neurodevelopmental data, complicating claims of early suffering but not resolving personhood questions rooted in first-principles views of human development from conception. Ethical tensions arise in procedures like selective reduction in multifetal pregnancies or late-term abortions, where maternal health risks must be empirically weighed against fetal protections; U.S. data show most abortions occur before 13 weeks, but later ones fuel disputes over viability limits in law. Organ transplantation allocation exemplifies resource scarcity dilemmas, prioritizing (maximizing transplants), (fair distribution), and respect for persons ( in donation). In the U.S., the and Transplantation Network uses waitlist urgency and biological match over social worth, yet debates persist on favoring younger patients for long-term benefit versus the sickest first, with over 100,000 on waitlists as of 2023 and annual deaths exceeding 17,000 due to shortages. Ethical principles reject financial incentives to avoid , though evidence from pilot programs suggests they could increase supply without eroding consent quality. Informed consent underpins , requiring disclosure of risks, benefits, and alternatives to enable autonomous decisions. Its modern doctrine emerged from early 20th-century U.S. cases like Schloendorff v. Society of Hospital (1914), affirming patients' right to , and solidified post-Nuremberg Code (1947) after unethical experiments exposed coercion risks. Challenges include capacity assessments in emergencies or , where surrogates decide, and empirical gaps in comprehension—studies show 40-80% of patients misunderstand disclosed information—necessitating clearer communication without . Emerging technologies like CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing intensify dilemmas, particularly modifications that alter heritable DNA. First demonstrated in humans via controversial 2018 embryo edits by , aiming to confer resistance, it raised safety concerns over off-target mutations and mosaicism, with no long-term efficacy data. Ethical objections focus on risks, exacerbating inequalities if accessible only to elites, and violating natural genomic integrity; international moratoriums urge caution, prioritizing somatic therapies for diseases like sickle cell, approved in 2023, over heritable changes lacking consensus on consent for future generations. These issues underscore causal realities: unintended heritable effects could amplify genetic burdens, demanding rigorous empirical validation before deployment.

Political and Social Ethics

Political ethics concerns the application of moral principles to the exercise of power, governance, and , focusing on questions of legitimacy, , and the ethical limits of state coercion. Social contract theory, articulated by in (1651), posits that individuals in a hypothetical , characterized by mutual insecurity, rationally authorize a to enforce order and security, surrendering certain in exchange for protection. extended this framework by emphasizing consent-based government limited to protecting natural rights to life, , and , arguing that unjust rulers forfeit legitimacy and justify resistance. , in (1762), stressed collective through the general will, influencing modern democratic ideals but raising concerns about majority tyranny over minorities. Empirical assessments of political institutions reveal that systems prioritizing , , and limited intervention correlate strongly with prosperity and human flourishing. The Fraser Institute's Economic Freedom of the World: 2023 Annual Report ranks 165 countries on five areas—size of , legal systems and , sound money, freedom to trade internationally, and regulation—finding that top-quartile countries average a GDP of $49,582 (), over seven times the $6,931 in bottom-quartile nations, alongside higher (80.1 vs. 64.3 years) and lower . These outcomes stem causally from incentives for and investment under secure , contrasting with stagnation in highly regulated economies, though academic sources favoring redistribution often downplay such data due to ideological commitments to over efficiency. In , delineates conditions for morally permissible conflict, dividing criteria into (justice of resorting to war) and jus in bello (justice in waging war). requires just cause (e.g., against aggression), legitimate authority, right intention (not conquest), last resort after , reasonable prospect of success, and proportionality of anticipated benefits to harms. Jus in bello mandates discrimination between combatants and non-combatants, alongside proportionality in means employed. These principles, rooted in thinkers like Augustine and Aquinas, have informed , such as the UN Charter's provisions on (Article 51), though violations persist in where empirical tracking of civilian casualties—e.g., over 100,000 in (2003–2011) per Iraq Body Count—tests adherence. Social ethics evaluates norms governing interpersonal and communal relations, including structures and . Longitudinal studies demonstrate that children in intact, biological two-parent households experience superior outcomes in , behavioral regulation, and compared to those in single-parent or cohabiting arrangements, with instability accounting for heightened risks of (odds ratio 2.5–3.0) and emotional disorders. For example, U.S. data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (1979–ongoing) show children of married biological parents scoring 0.3–0.5 standard deviations higher on achievement tests, attributable to resource stability and dual-role modeling rather than income alone. Policies promoting dissolution, such as laws enacted widely since the 1970s, have empirically correlated with rising rates (from 15% in 1960 to 22% by 2020 for under-18s) and social costs exceeding $100 billion annually in welfare and remediation. Debates in social ethics often pit individual rights against collective obligations, with egalitarian frameworks like ' difference principle—allowing inequalities only if they maximize the position of the worst-off—critiqued for ignoring empirical incentives: merit-based systems in high-freedom economies generate broader gains, as seen in ' pre-welfare productivity surges under market reforms (e.g., Sweden's GDP growth averaging 4% annually 1870–1950 vs. stagnation post-1970s expansions). Mainstream academic endorsements of Rawls overlook how such theories, when implemented, reduce overall output by disincentivizing risk-taking, per cross-national regressions showing a 1-point EFW index rise associates with 0.5–1% higher annual growth. Truth-seeking analysis favors causal mechanisms—property enforcement enabling voluntary cooperation—over abstract veils of ignorance, privileging systems empirically verified to elevate human welfare.

Business and Economic Ethics

Business ethics encompasses the moral principles and standards that guide corporate conduct, including in representations, in , fairness in transactions, and for actions. These principles aim to align business practices with broader societal values while navigating profit motives, as evidenced by recurring emphases in ethical frameworks on and respect for stakeholders. Empirical studies indicate that adherence to such ethics correlates with sustained profitability, as ethical lapses erode trust and invite regulatory penalties, whereas principled operations foster customer loyalty and . Central debates in business ethics revolve around versus . Shareholder theory, articulated by in his 1970 , posits that managers' primary duty is to maximize through legal profit-seeking, viewing broader social responsibilities as distractions that dilute focus and invite inefficiency. In contrast, , developed by in 1984, advocates balancing interests of employees, customers, suppliers, and communities alongside shareholders, arguing that long-term viability requires addressing diverse impacts to mitigate risks like . Critics of stakeholder approaches, often from economically perspectives, contend they enable managerial that prioritizes subjective "social good" over verifiable value creation, potentially harming overall welfare; shows firms prioritizing shareholder returns achieve higher market valuations when ethics are enforced via and rather than expansive mandates. Notable scandals underscore the consequences of ethical breaches. The , exposed in 2001, involved fraudulent accounting practices that inflated assets by billions, leading to the company's bankruptcy, the dissolution of auditor , and Sarbanes-Oxley Act reforms in 2002 to enhance financial disclosures. Volkswagen's 2015 emissions cheating scandal manipulated software to falsify diesel exhaust tests, resulting in over $30 billion in fines, recalls, and CEO resignations, highlighting how short-term gains from yield long-term costs exceeding benefits. Such cases demonstrate that unethical conduct, while temporarily boosting metrics, triggers cascading failures in trust and legal , with global data linking higher perceptions to reduced rates of 0.5-1% annually in affected nations. Economic ethics examines the moral foundations of systems like and . , rooted in private property, voluntary exchange, and market pricing, promotes ethical behavior through incentives: rewards honest and punishes via reputation losses and , correlating with higher prosperity in nations scoring well on indices. , emphasizing and central planning, faces ethical critiques for concentrating power, which empirically fosters and inefficiency—as seen in the Soviet Union's in amid shortages and black markets—since it severs individual accountability from outcomes, leading to misallocation and suppressed growth. While proponents of socialism invoke equity, causal analysis reveals it often exacerbates ; cross-country from 1995-2021 shows freer markets reduce corruption's drag on GDP by enabling decentralized ethical enforcement over coercive redistribution.

Environmental and Animal Ethics

Environmental ethics concerns the moral relationships between human actions and the non-human natural world, evaluating whether obligations extend beyond human interests to ecosystems, , or . Anthropocentric approaches, which prioritize human welfare and view instrumentally as a means to flourishing, dominate traditional ethical frameworks, arguing that serves long-term human needs like resource . In contrast, attributes intrinsic moral value to all living beings based on their capacity for life or , while extends consideration to holistic ecosystems, emphasizing stability and interdependence over entities. These non-anthropocentric views, often advanced in academic , face criticism for potentially subordinating human —such as or essential for alleviating —to abstract ecological ideals, thereby conflicting with causal realities of human dependency on use for survival and progress. Empirical evidence underscores human-induced pressures: global net forest loss averaged 4.7 million hectares per year from to 2020, driven primarily by and , while biodiversity decline accelerates with rates estimated at 10 to 100 times pre-industrial levels due to , , and climate shifts. Such data supports calls for but highlights that and consumption patterns, rather than inherent moral failings, causally link to degradation; for instance, high-income nations' outsourced contributes to 13.3% of global range losses. Critiques from human-centered perspectives contend that focused on flourishing remains unavoidably anthropocentric, as non-human entities lack the rational agency to participate in reciprocal moral communities, rendering extreme impractical for policy. Animal ethics interrogates the moral status of non-human animals, particularly whether their capacities warrant protections akin to human rights or merely welfare considerations. Scientific studies provide evidence of sentience—defined as subjective experience including pain and emotion—in vertebrates like mammals and birds, and potentially in cephalopods and decapods, through behavioral indicators such as stress responses, learning, and empathy-like actions; for example, over 2,500 studies document fear, joy, and PTSD analogs in various species. Utilitarian philosopher Peter Singer argues for equal consideration of comparable interests, positing that factory farming inflicts unnecessary suffering on sentient beings raised solely for human consumption, with global estimates of 77 billion land animals slaughtered annually, over 90% in intensive confinement systems that restrict movement and induce chronic stress. However, Singer's framework draws criticism for conflating sentience with moral equivalence, ignoring human exceptionalism grounded in unique traits like abstract reasoning, language, and moral reciprocity, which justify prioritizing human nutrition, medicine, and agriculture over animal liberation; equating human infants or cognitively impaired individuals to animals, as Singer's logic implies, undermines species-specific rights derived from these capacities. From causal realist standpoints, animal use sustains human populations—billions rely on affordable protein sources—while welfare improvements like humane slaughter can mitigate suffering without forgoing essential practices, as radical rights-based abolitionism risks nutritional deficits in developing regions. Academic advocacy for animal rights often reflects institutional biases toward anthropomorphizing animal capacities, yet empirical welfare science supports targeted reforms over ideological overhauls that could exacerbate human hardships.

Historical Development

Ancient Ethics

Ancient ethics, originating in around the , emphasized the cultivation of personal (aretē) as the path to human flourishing (), rather than adherence to divine commands or universal rules. This approach, often termed , viewed moral character as central to ethical life, with reason guiding actions toward a balanced, excellent existence. Key developments occurred through Socratic inquiry, Platonic idealism, and Aristotelian empiricism, later influencing Hellenistic and Roman thought. Socrates (c. 469–399 BC) initiated systematic ethical reflection by equating with , arguing that wrongdoing stems from and that no one commits willingly, as all pursue perceived good. Through dialectical questioning, he sought definitions of virtues like and , asserting their unity under . This intellectualist stance implied teachability of virtue, challenging conventional moral education. Plato (c. 428–348 BC), ' student, expanded this in works like the (c. 375 BC), defining as psychic harmony where reason rules over spirit and appetite, mirroring the ideal state's class structure. Ethical knowledge derives from contemplating eternal Forms, particularly the , enabling rulers—philosopher-kings—to govern justly. Plato critiqued democratic excess, prioritizing soul-order over mere pleasure or power. Aristotle (384–322 BC), Plato's pupil, systematized ethics in the (c. 350 BC), positing as rational activity of the soul in accordance with complete virtue, achieved through habituated moral virtues (e.g., as the mean between rashness and cowardice) and intellectual virtues like (practical wisdom). Unlike Plato's transcendent Forms, Aristotle grounded ethics in empirical observation of human function, emphasizing , contemplation, and the golden mean for balanced living. Post-Aristotelian Hellenistic schools, emerging after 's in 323 BC, adapted ethics to individual resilience amid political instability. , founded by (c. 334–262 BC), taught as living in accordance with nature and reason, rendering externals like wealth indifferent; ( from ) ensures happiness regardless of fortune, as seen in later Roman exponents like (c. 4 BC–65 AD). , established by (341–270 BC), identified the highest good as pleasure (hedonē) as the absence of pain, advocating , friendship, and atomic materialism to dispel fears of and gods. Cynicism, exemplified by Diogenes of Sinope (c. 412–323 BC), rejected social conventions (nomos) for self-sufficiency (autarkeia), practicing shameless to expose artificial desires. Roman ethics synthesized Greek ideas, with (106–43 BC) adapting natural law for republican virtue and emphasizing endurance under empire. These traditions prioritized character formation over consequentialist calculation, influencing later Western moral philosophy by linking ethics to human nature's teleological ends.

Medieval and Scholastic Ethics

Medieval ethics emerged within the framework of , synthesizing classical philosophy with scriptural authority amid the decline of Roman civilization and the rise of feudal . From the 5th to the , ethical thought emphasized human orientation toward God as the ultimate good, with moral actions derived from divine will and natural inclinations discernible by reason. Early developments were shaped by (354–430 CE), whose works like Confessions and portrayed ethics as a struggle between the earthly city driven by and the heavenly city rooted in (), countering original sin's corruption of human will. argued that true happiness (beatitudo) lies in union with God, achievable only through , with virtues serving as habits aiding this pursuit rather than self-sufficient ends. The Scholastic period, peaking in the 12th–13th centuries, advanced dialectical methods to reconcile faith and reason, influencing ethics through systematic inquiry at universities like Paris and Oxford. Anselm of Canterbury (c. 1033–1109 CE), often called the father of Scholasticism, prioritized "faith seeking understanding" (fides quaerens intellectum), applying logic to theological truths but contributing less directly to ethics beyond reinforcing satisfaction theory for atonement, which underscored moral debt to divine justice. Peter Abelard (1079–1142 CE) innovated ethical theory in Ethica or Scito te ipsum, positing that sin arises from consent to wrongdoing based on intention rather than act alone, emphasizing rational discernment of moral fault over mere external deeds—a non-consequentialist view prioritizing interior disposition. This intentionalist approach, debated for potentially undermining objective law, marked a shift toward subjective elements in moral evaluation, influencing later nominalist trends. Thomas Aquinas (1225–1274 CE) synthesized these strands in his Summa Theologica, integrating Aristotelian virtue ethics and teleology with Augustinian theology, positing that human fulfillment consists in contemplating God (visio beatifica). Aquinas distinguished four types of law: eternal (God's reason), natural (human participation in eternal law via innate inclinations toward goods like life and knowledge), divine (revealed Scripture), and human (positive laws aligned with natural law). Natural law precepts, such as "do good and avoid evil," are self-evident and universally accessible through practical reason (synderesis), enabling moral action without sole reliance on grace, though Aquinas viewed infused theological virtues (faith, hope, charity) as essential for supernatural ends. Aquinas's virtue theory revived Aristotle's cardinal virtues (prudence, justice, fortitude, temperance) as habits perfecting natural capacities, augmented by theological virtues directed to God, with moral acts requiring right intention, object, and circumstances. Unlike Augustine's emphasis on grace overcoming pervasive sin—yielding a more pessimistic anthropology—Thomistic ethics affirmed reason's robust role in discerning goods, reflecting optimism from rediscovered Aristotelian texts translated via Averroes and Avicenna around 1200–1250 CE. This integration supported ethical realism, where actions are intrinsically good or evil based on alignment with human nature's telos, influencing canon law and just war doctrine. Later Scholastics like Duns Scotus (1266–1308 CE) and William of Ockham (c. 1287–1347 CE) introduced voluntarism, prioritizing divine will over intellect in moral norms, but Aquinas's framework dominated until the Renaissance.

Enlightenment and Modern Ethics

The period, spanning roughly the late 17th to late 18th centuries, introduced secular, reason-based frameworks to ethical theory, emphasizing human autonomy and rational inquiry over divine revelation or tradition. Philosophers sought universal principles derivable from or reason, influencing modern ethics by prioritizing individual and empirical in moral judgments. This era's developments laid groundwork for , , and sentimentalism, challenging prior theological dominance while grappling with about absolute moral knowledge. David Hume, in his A Treatise of Human Nature (published 1739–1740), argued that moral distinctions arise from human sentiments rather than pure reason, positing as the basis for approving benevolent actions and disapproving harmful ones. He contended that reason serves , not itself, with ethical approval stemming from sentiments of elicited by character traits' utility to society or the observer. This empiricist approach influenced subsequent ethics by highlighting affective roots of , though Hume acknowledged limits in deriving "ought" from "is" without bridging normative gaps. Immanuel Kant's Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (1785) established deontological ethics, asserting that moral actions derive worth from adherence to duty via the : act only according to maxims that can be willed as universal laws. Kant distinguished hypothetical imperatives (means to ends) from categorical ones (unconditional), emphasizing the good will as intrinsically valuable, independent of consequences. This rationalist framework demanded —self-legislation through reason—rejecting from inclinations or empirical desires, and formed a cornerstone of modern duty-based ethics. Jeremy Bentham's An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and (printed 1780, published 1789) founded classical , defining moral rightness by the principle of utility: actions are approved if they promote the greatest happiness for the greatest number, measured by pleasure intensity, duration, and extent. Bentham proposed a hedonic calculus to quantify pains and pleasures, applying it to and , which prioritized aggregate welfare over intentions or rules. This consequentialist shift influenced modern policy ethics, though critics noted its potential to justify minority harms for majority gain. These foundations extended into 19th-century modern ethics, with refining in Utilitarianism (1861) by distinguishing higher intellectual pleasures from lower sensory ones, arguing competent judges prefer the former. Mill integrated to mitigate act-by-act calculations, balancing individual liberty with social utility via the . Such evolutions addressed empiricism's aggregation challenges while retaining rational pursuit of verifiable moral progress.

20th-Century and Contemporary Shifts

The 20th century marked a pivotal turn in ethical philosophy toward metaethics, initiated by G. E. Moore's Principia Ethica in 1903, which rejected ethical naturalism through the open-question argument and advanced non-naturalist intuitionism, positing "good" as a simple, indefinable property known via intuition. This shifted focus from substantive moral claims to the nature of ethical language and concepts, influencing subsequent analytic philosophy. Logical positivism further advanced non-cognitivism in the 1930s, with A. J. Ayer's Language, Truth and Logic (1936) classifying moral judgments as emotive expressions lacking cognitive content, incapable of , thus dissolving traditional ethical debates into psychological attitudes. Charles Stevenson extended this in Ethics and Language (1944), emphasizing persuasive definitions to influence attitudes, while R. M. Hare's prescriptivism in the treated statements as universalizable imperatives. These views dominated mid-century , prioritizing linguistic analysis over normative prescription. Continental philosophy diverged with , as Jean-Paul Sartre's (1943) asserted radical human entails self-created values amid absurdity, rejecting deterministic ethics. Simone de Beauvoir's (1947) applied this to interpersonal relations, emphasizing reciprocal against . Post-World War II disillusionment with rationalist systems fueled critiques of modernity's moral fragmentation. By the late 20th century, yielded to renewed normative theories, notably the revival of sparked by G. E. M. Anscombe's 1958 essay "Modern Moral Philosophy," which lambasted obligation-based ethics divorced from virtues or , urging a return to Aristotelian character-centered approaches. Alasdair MacIntyre's (1981) built on this, diagnosing emotivism's triumph as yielding emotive incoherence and advocating narrative traditions to cultivate virtues for communal goods. This countered rule-based and , emphasizing practices and . Contemporary shifts since the 1980s integrate ethics with empirical sciences, as tests folk intuitions on dilemmas like the , challenging armchair theorizing. , per Jürgen Habermas's (1981), posits moral norms emerge from rational discourse free of coercion. Applied domains burgeoned, with addressing and end-of-life via (Beauchamp and Childress, 1979 onward), while global challenges prompt cosmopolitan ethics prioritizing over . These developments reflect causal pressures from technological and social upheavals, fostering hybrid theories blending intuition, evidence, and context.

Major Debates and Criticisms

Universalism versus Cultural Relativism

Ethical universalism asserts that certain moral principles hold across all human societies, deriving from shared aspects of human nature, reason, or empirical regularities in behavior. Proponents argue these universals stem from innate psychological mechanisms shaped by evolution, such as prohibitions against harming kin or requirements for reciprocity, observable in diverse populations. For instance, Moral Foundations Theory identifies core intuitions like care for vulnerability and fairness in exchanges as near-universal, with cultural variations primarily in emphasis rather than presence. Empirical studies support this: an analysis of ethnographic texts from 60 societies worldwide identified seven recurrent moral rules—helping kin, aiding group members, reciprocating favors, being brave, deferring to superiors, dividing resources fairly, and respecting property—prevalent regardless of cultural complexity or ecology. Similarly, machine-learning extraction from descriptions of 256 societies confirmed high cross-cultural prevalence of values like impartiality (91%) and reciprocity (88%), challenging claims of radical moral diversity. In contrast, cultural relativism maintains that moral norms are products of specific cultural contexts, rendering ethical judgments valid only within their originating society and precluding cross-cultural critique. This view, advanced by anthropologists such as in the early 20th century, emphasizes variability in practices like or ritual sacrifice to argue against imposing external standards, often framing as a tool for cultural tolerance. However, encounters logical difficulties: its core tenet that "all morality is relative" becomes self-refuting if applied universally, as it denies any absolute truth, including its own. Critics further note that it impedes condemnation of practices like female genital mutilation or honor killings when endorsed by a majority, equating them morally to opposed norms such as democracy, despite evidence of harm from —e.g., FGM correlates with increased risks of infection and childbirth complications in affected regions. The debate manifests in domains like , where universalists invoke documents such as the 1948 , ratified by representatives from varied civilizations, to ground protections against or as transcultural imperatives rooted in dignity. Relativists counter that such frameworks reflect Western , citing "Asian values" arguments from the 1990s Declaration, which prioritized communal harmony over individual liberties. Yet, empirical cross-cultural research undermines extreme : studies of moral dilemmas, such as the , reveal consistent patterns of utilitarian reasoning in 42 countries, with variations attributable to socioeconomic factors rather than incommensurable ethics. Universalism's foundations in —evident in prohibitions on across 97% of societies or equity norms in resource allocation experiments—suggest overstates differences, often due to descriptive focus on outliers rather than modal behaviors. While academic has historically favored to counter , accumulating data from and indicate moral cognition exhibits both universals and adaptive variations, tilting toward a qualified compatible with causal accounts of .

Individual Rights versus Collective Good

The philosophical tension between individual rights and the collective good centers on whether ethical imperatives safeguard personal and inviolable entitlements or prioritize net societal utility, potentially at the expense of minority interests. Advocates of individual rights, drawing from deontological traditions, assert that humans possess inherent claims—such as to , , and —that function as "trumps" against utilitarian aggregation, preventing the treatment of persons as mere instruments for broader ends. In contrast, consequentialist perspectives, including , evaluate actions by their capacity to maximize overall welfare, justifying individual sacrifices if they yield greater aggregate benefits, as articulated in Jeremy Bentham's principle of the greatest happiness for the greatest number. This conflict manifests in thought experiments like the , where diverting a runaway trolley to kill one worker instead of five passengers pits deontological prohibitions on intentional harm against utilitarian calculations favoring minimal loss of life; surveys indicate varied cultural responses, with individualistic societies showing less willingness to actively sacrifice the one, reflecting stronger aversion to violating personal rights.
 Empirical evidence underscores the practical implications: nations scoring higher on indices of economic freedom, which institutionalize protections for individual property rights and voluntary exchange, consistently achieve elevated GDP per capita, with econometric models estimating a one-unit rise in the Fraser Institute's Economic Freedom of the World score correlating to roughly $9,000 additional income per person, alongside accelerated innovation and poverty reduction. Collectivist frameworks, emphasizing group obligations over personal autonomy, correlate with diminished economic dynamism and higher authoritarian tendencies, as historical cases like the Soviet Union's collectivization policies from 1928 onward triggered famines claiming over 5 million lives by prioritizing state harvest quotas over individual farm ownership. Critics of subordinating to ends warn of slippery slopes toward , where "greater good" rationales erode accountability and enable abuses, as seen in 20th-century regimes invoking communal welfare to justify purges and expropriations; argued that prevail over policy goals because egalitarian distributions cannot override equal respect for persons without arbitrary justification. Institutional biases in academia and , often aligned with redistributive ideologies, amplify collectivist prescriptions despite such counterevidence, privileging theoretical over observed causal links between and flourishing.

Secular Ethics versus Divine Command

Divine command theory posits that moral obligations arise from God's commands, such that an action is right if and only if it is commanded by God. This view, defended by philosophers like and modern proponents such as Adams, maintains that God's will provides the for goodness, rendering objective and transcendent rather than contingent on human opinion or convention. In contrast, derives moral principles from non-theistic foundations, including rational deliberation, empirical observation of human well-being, or evolutionary adaptations, as articulated in frameworks like Kantian or . Proponents argue that such systems achieve objectivity through universal human capacities or natural facts, independent of . The central tension between these approaches hinges on the source of objectivity. contends that without a divine lawgiver, moral claims reduce to subjective preferences or cultural constructs, lacking binding force beyond pragmatic utility; for instance, atheists may exhibit , but secular accounts struggle to explain why obligations like prohibiting gratuitous are non-negotiable rather than merely for social cooperation. Empirical reveal near-universal prohibitions against acts like or , which divine command theorists attribute to God's imprint on , whereas secular explanations invoke adaptive evolutionary pressures without resolving why such norms override individual or group interests in specific cases. Defenders of , such as , argue that objective moral values—evident in intuitions that is always wrong regardless of consequences—require grounding in a personal, perfect being, as impersonal natural processes yield only descriptive facts about survival, not prescriptive duties. A key challenge to divine command theory is the Euthyphro dilemma, originating in Plato's dialogue, which questions whether actions are good because God commands them or God commands them because they are good. The former implies moral arbitrariness, as divine whim could endorse cruelty (e.g., hypothetical commands for genocide), undermining the theory's claim to rationality; the latter suggests morality's independence from God, reverting to a secular standard. Responses from theorists like Adams propose a "modified divine command theory," where moral goodness aligns with God's unchanging nature—eternally benevolent and just—thus avoiding pure voluntarism while preserving divine sovereignty; commands then obligate based on this nature, not caprice. Critics, including J.L. Mackie, counter that this equivocates, as positing God's nature as the good merely relocates the dilemma without independent verification, and historical religious texts contain apparent divine endorsements of violence (e.g., biblical conquests in Deuteronomy 20), raising causal questions about whether such acts were morally obligatory at the time. Secular ethics counters by emphasizing autonomy and empirical testability: moral systems like contractarianism ground duties in reciprocal rational agreements, supported by models showing cooperation's stability in iterated prisoner's dilemmas, without needing enforcement. However, detractors note that secular frameworks often falter under scrutiny; , a prominent secular variant, permits sacrificing innocents for aggregate (e.g., framing one to avert riots, as in hypothetical trolley extensions), conflicting with intuitive deontic prohibitions. Moreover, surveys indicate that belief in objective morality correlates with —e.g., a 2021 Pew study found 72% of U.S. adults affirming absolute moral truths, predominantly among religious respondents—suggesting secular denials of may erode moral confidence, as evidenced by rising ethical in academia-influenced cohorts. , while vulnerable to interpretive disputes over , offers causal by rooting ethics in an uncaused first cause, whereas secular attempts risk or reduction to power dynamics. Scholarly defenses highlight that mainstream philosophical resistance to divine command often stems from naturalistic presuppositions in secular institutions, potentially overlooking theistic explanations' explanatory power for .

Empirical Challenges and Experimental Philosophy

employs empirical methods, including surveys and psychological experiments, to examine folk intuitions, thereby posing challenges to traditional ethical theorizing that relies primarily on reflective analysis of hypothetical cases. These studies reveal that moral judgments often vary systematically due to factors such as cultural background, framing effects, and emotional responses, questioning the universality of intuitions assumed in . A prominent example is the Knobe effect, identified in Joshua Knobe's 2003 experiment where 82% of participants judged a corporate executive's harmful side effect as intentional, compared to only 23% for a beneficial side effect with identical foresight, indicating that moral valence influences ascriptions of intentionality independent of causal structure. In trolley problem variants, experimental findings consistently show high approval (around 90%) for diverting a runaway trolley to kill one worker instead of five via a switch, but low approval (10-20%) for pushing a bystander to achieve the same outcome, highlighting a distinction between impersonal and personal harm that complicates utilitarian calculations. Cultural comparisons further demonstrate differences; for instance, Chinese participants were less likely than Americans to endorse switching tracks in hypothetical trolley scenarios, suggesting contextual influences on consequentialist intuitions. These empirical patterns challenge deontological and consequentialist theories by exposing inconsistencies in intuitive support, as well as metaethical claims about objective moral facts if reliant on shared intuitions. Neuroscientific extensions, such as Greene's fMRI studies, link deontological responses to emotional activity and utilitarian ones to cognitive deliberation, implying dual-process models where automatic affective reactions compete with reasoned evaluation. The negative program of uses such data to argue against privileging intuitions in ethical argumentation, positing that variability undermines their justificatory role. Critics counter that intuitions, while noisy and context-sensitive, do not invalidate philosophical , which seeks coherent, reflective principles rather than descriptive averages; moreover, many intuitions exhibit robustness across demographics when controlled for order and framing effects. Experimental setups often lack , prioritizing isolated judgments over real-world deliberation, and fail to address how experts might refine raw intuitions through training. Proponents of the positive integrate these findings to refine theories, such as adjusting for biases in , without abandoning normative aims. Academic sources in , predominantly from Western institutions, may underrepresent non-WEIRD perspectives, potentially skewing interpretations toward despite evidence of cross-cultural convergences in core prohibitions like .

References

  1. [1]
    Philosophy: Ethics - Seton Hall University Libraries
    Ethics (also called Moral Philosophy), the discipline concerned with what is morally good and bad and morally right and wrong. The term is also applied to ...
  2. [2]
    Moral Philosophy - Ethics Unwrapped
    Moral philosophy is the branch of philosophy that contemplates what is right and wrong. It explores the nature of morality and examines how people should live ...
  3. [3]
    ethics | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute
    In the legal context, ethics defines how individuals choose to interact with one another. In philosophy, ethics defines what is good for the individual and ...
  4. [4]
    Normative Ethics, Metaethics and Applied Ethics: Three Branches of ...
    Normative Ethics is focused on the creation of theories that provide general moral rules governing our behavior, such as Utilitarianism or Kantian Ethics.
  5. [5]
    What are ethical frameworks? — Center for Professional Personnel ...
    Virtue ethics: What is moral is what makes us the best person we could be. · Deontology: What is moral is what follows from absolute moral duties.
  6. [6]
    Ethical Theories Summarized & Explained - Objectivism In Depth
    Apr 23, 2017 · There are three major categories of ethical systems that students typically learn about in philosophy classes: consequentialism, deontology and virtue ethics.<|control11|><|separator|>
  7. [7]
    Ethics in a Nutshell - Center for Journalism Ethics
    An initial definition of ethics, then, is the analysis, evaluation, and promotion of correct conduct and/or good character, according to the best available ...
  8. [8]
    What is Ethics? - Markkula Center for Applied Ethics
    "Ethics has to do with my religious beliefs." "Being ethical is doing what the law requires." "Ethics consists of the standards of behavior our society accepts.
  9. [9]
    Ethics and Morality - PMC - PubMed Central - NIH
    Oct 11, 2023 · Ethics (Greek ethos: way of living) is a philosophical branch that studies human conduct specific to individual's behaviour in society.
  10. [10]
    Ethics - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
    Originating from Middle English "ethik" and Aristotle's "Ta Ethika," ethics means the science of morals, studying principles of right and wrong.
  11. [11]
    Ethics Defined. Branch of philosophy that involves… - Medium
    Mar 5, 2017 · Ethics or moral philosophy is a branch of philosophy that involves systematizing, defending, and recommending concepts of right and wrong conduct.<|separator|>
  12. [12]
    Ethics in Philosophy | Definition, Branches & Importance - Lesson
    Ethics is a branch of philosophy that considers moral issues. It considers how behaviors are impacted by moral principles and how these principles are formed.What is the Study of Ethics in... · Ethics as a Branch of Philosophy
  13. [13]
    Ethics versus Morality | Issue 26 | Philosophy Now
    Philosophical ethics goes deeper: it asks about the grounds, the principles of human morality. It is about practical action, but it is not itself practical.
  14. [14]
    Ethics vs. the Law: What's the Difference? - TheCollector
    Apr 28, 2023 · Ethics are internal moral codes, while laws are government rules. Ethics are not enforced, but laws are, and laws have direct punishment for ...
  15. [15]
    Ethics and Law - PMC - NIH
    Ethics represents internal system of controls, and Law refers to an external mechanism of control. Both these controls ar essential for optimal behavior, which ...
  16. [16]
    The Distinction between 'Legal' and 'Ethical' Behavior - MRSC
    Jul 9, 2024 · Actions are “legal” if they do not violate the laws or codes of the local government, state, or federal government. Actions are 'ethical' or 'moral'.
  17. [17]
    Religion and Morality - PMC - PubMed Central
    The relationship between religion and morality has long been hotly debated. Does religion make us more moral? Is it necessary for morality?
  18. [18]
    Does Ethics Require Religion? - Greater Good Science Center
    Mar 1, 2006 · There is a spectrum of views about how religion and ethics are related—from the view that religion is the absolute bedrock of ethics to one ...Missing: distinction | Show results with:distinction
  19. [19]
    Differentiate between Ethics, Manners and Etiquette. - LinkedIn
    Feb 27, 2023 · Ethics refers to the principles that guide our behavior, manners refer to social norms that dictate how we behave in social situations, and etiquette refers to ...
  20. [20]
    What is the difference between "ethics" and "etiquette" - HiNative
    Oct 17, 2020 · Ethics is judgment of right and wrong. Etiquette is judgment of politeness and rudeness.Missing: customs | Show results with:customs
  21. [21]
    Ethics | Oxford Classical Dictionary
    The root word ἦθος‎, which occurs from Hesiod and Homer onwards, means, in the plural, 'haunts' or 'customary abodes' (e.g. of animals) and 'manners' or ' ...
  22. [22]
    Ethic - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
    Originating in late 14c. from Old French etique and Greek ēthike, "late" means moral principles or the study of ethics and character.
  23. [23]
    Ancient Ethical Theory - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    Aug 3, 2004 · Ancient moral theory tries to provide a reflective account of an essential human activity so one can grasp what is of fundamental importance in pursuing it.
  24. [24]
    Ancient Ethics | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    Ancient Ethics. Ethical reflection in ancient Greece and Rome starts from all of an agent's ends or goals and tries to systematize them.Plato · Aristotle · Stoicism · Epicureanism
  25. [25]
    [PDF] A Brief History of Ethics - Elsevier
    Jan 16, 2012 · 5.1 Old Testament (1200–100 BCE)​​ The earliest recorded code of ethics is found in the Tanakh and Talmud, the sacred scriptures of the Hebrews ...
  26. [26]
    Moral Ontology, Epistemology and Semantics: Part 1 - - Philosophy
    Metaethical standpoints are largely grouped into 3 (sometimes 4) categories: moral ontology, moral semantics, and moral epistemology.Introduction · Moral Ontology · Natural PropertiesMissing: core issues
  27. [27]
    Metaethical Questions - 3:16
    They are questions such as: Are there ethical properties, and if so what are they like (metaphysics)? How do we acquire ethical knowledge and justify ethical ...
  28. [28]
    Moral Error Theory: Are there Moral Facts? - 1000-Word Philosophy
    Apr 14, 2014 · Mackie claims that if there were moral facts or properties, they would be metaphysically and epistemologically “queer”—that is, unlike anything ...
  29. [29]
    Summary: Moore's Open Question Argument - PEPED
    Nov 21, 2015 · Moore defends his non-naturalism by arguing that good couldn't be identical to any natural property, because any such identity claim seems to invite an “open ...
  30. [30]
    Moral Realism | Definition & Examples - Lesson - Study.com
    Moral realism is the view that there are mind-independent moral facts in the universe, and people can make statements about them that are true or false. For ...What Is Moral Realism? · Moral Realism Example · Moral Realism vs Moral...
  31. [31]
    Ethical Realism, or Moral Realism - 1000-Word Philosophy
    Nov 5, 2015 · Ethical realists believe ethical claims are objectively true, independent of opinions, and that there are right answers in ethics.
  32. [32]
    Our Morality: A Defense of Moral Objectivism | Issue 83
    The fundamental error of relativist and nihilist arguments against objectivism is the implicit claim that morality can be judged from nowhere.
  33. [33]
    C. S. Lewis and 8 Reasons for Believing in Objective Morality
    Jan 18, 2019 · 1) Quarreling between two or more individuals. · 2) It's obvious that an objective moral standard exists. · 3) Mistreatment. · 4) Measuring value ...
  34. [34]
    David Friedman on Moral Realism - by Lance S. Bush
    Feb 23, 2024 · I have argued extensively that there is little empirical evidence to support the claim that any significant number of people are moral realists, ...
  35. [35]
    Revisiting Folk Moral Realism - PMC - PubMed Central - NIH
    Moral realists believe that there are objective moral truths. According to one of the most prominent arguments in favour of this view, ordinary people ...
  36. [36]
    What makes moral realism so popular a standpoint?
    Jun 28, 2018 · A survey from 2009 involving 3,226 respondents found that 56% of philosophers accept or lean towards moral realism (28%: anti-realism; 16%: ...Are there any philosophers who argue for a non-utilitarian moral ...Arguments for moral realism? - ethics - Philosophy Stack ExchangeMore results from philosophy.stackexchange.comMissing: key | Show results with:key
  37. [37]
    Evolutionary arguments against moral realism: Why the empirical ...
    Nov 12, 2018 · The aim of this article is to identify the strongest evolutionary debunking argument (EDA) against moral realism and to assess on which empirical assumptions ...
  38. [38]
    What Is Objective Morality? - Verywell Mind
    Dec 17, 2022 · Self-Improvement Determines Morality: Another argument for the existence of objective morality is how people often want to better themselves.
  39. [39]
    Four Faces of Moral Realism - Finlay - 2007 - Compass Hub - Wiley
    Oct 9, 2007 · This article explains for a general philosophical audience the central issues and strategies in the contemporary moral realism debate.
  40. [40]
    Is there any evidence for moral realism besides moral intuition?
    Oct 23, 2015 · All the evidence for moral realism is going to depend on intuition of one kind or another: either straightforward moral intuitions, or intuitions about norms ...Huemer's Ontological Argument for Moral Realism : r/philosophyHow does moral realism deal with the idea that it has nothing ...More results from www.reddit.com
  41. [41]
    Objections to Objective Morality | Free Thinking Ministries
    Jul 17, 2017 · Objective morality means that there is a standard of morality that transcends human opinions and judgements. Morals are not invented, they are discovered.
  42. [42]
    Moral Anti-Realism: Introduction & Summary - LessWrong
    Apr 2, 2022 · Perhaps the strongest argument for moral anti-realism is that we can still reason about morality comprehensively and satisfyingly. If anything, ...Missing: criticisms | Show results with:criticisms
  43. [43]
    A Refutation of Moral Relativism—Transcription - Peter Kreeft
    The claim is that anthropologists and sociologists have discovered moral relativism to be not a theory but an empirical fact. Different cultures and societies, ...
  44. [44]
    Seven moral rules found all around the world | University of Oxford
    Feb 11, 2019 · The present study, published in Current Anthropology, is the largest and most comprehensive cross-cultural survey of morals ever conducted.
  45. [45]
    Five Fatal Flaws of Moral Relativism - Stand to Reason
    Jul 31, 2023 · To say you ought to be tolerant is to impose an objective moral standard on everyone, but in relativism there are no objective moral rules.<|separator|>
  46. [46]
    Universals and variations in moral decisions made in 42 countries ...
    Jan 21, 2020 · We report the largest cross-cultural study of moral preferences in sacrificial dilemmas, that is, the circumstances under which people find it acceptable to ...
  47. [47]
    [PDF] Justification and the Need for Moral Cognitivism - DiVA portal
    In this thesis, I scrutinise and interpret Jürgen Habermas's claim that justification of moral norms necessitates cognitivism. I do this by analysing the ...
  48. [48]
    [PDF] Two types of moral cognitivism - A Level Philosophy
    Cognitivists argue that our experience of morality suggests that there are moral truths. First, we think we can make mistakes. Children frequently do, and have ...
  49. [49]
    Cognitivism and the argument from evidence non-responsiveness
    Nov 4, 2023 · Cognitivists argue that moral judgments are beliefs, whereas non-cognitivists argue that moral judgments are desire-like attitudes.
  50. [50]
    Metaethical Implications: Cognitivism versus Non ... - Oxford Academic
    According to a simple form of non-cognitivism, to make a moral judgement is to express a desire (a non-cognitive attitude) rather than a belief (a cognitive ...Introduction · The Challenge for Non... · II. Ecumenical Non-cognitivism
  51. [51]
    Moral Judgments: Descriptivism, Prescriptivism and Emotivism
    Gilbert Ryle suggests, 'the main business of philosophy is the detection of the sources in linguistic idiom of recurrent misconceptions and absurd theories'.
  52. [52]
    https://www.alevelphilosophy.co.uk/handouts_ethics/Metaethics.pdf
  53. [53]
    Full article: An empirical argument against moral non-cognitivism
    According to non-cognitivism, moral sentences and judgements do not aim to represent how things morally are. This paper presents an empirical argument ...
  54. [54]
    [PDF] Cognitivism about Moral Judgement - Oxford Scholarship
    It is widely believed that moral judgements are 'practical': when you make a moral judgement, ceteris paribus, you are motivated to some degree to act on that ...<|separator|>
  55. [55]
    Moral Epistemology - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    Feb 4, 2003 · Moral knowledge consists in the justified true moral belief of a single individual. 1. Sociological: Moral Disagreement and Social DiversityMethodological: Epistemology... · Moral: Feminist Epistemology...
  56. [56]
    Intuitionism in Ethics - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    Dec 15, 2014 · Moore, G. E., 1903/1993a, Principia Ethica, T. Baldwin (ed ... Sinnott-Armstrong, 2006, “Moral Intuitionism Meets Empirical ...
  57. [57]
    Reflective Equilibrium - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    Nov 27, 2023 · Reflective equilibrium is a formal expression of standard methodological practice in moral and political philosophy. (See Rawls 1971, e.g., 19– ...Principles and Theories · Wide Reflective Equilibrium · Public Reflective Equilibrium
  58. [58]
    Morality and Evolutionary Biology
    Dec 19, 2008 · Shafer-Landau, R., 2012, “Evolutionary Debunking, Moral Realism and Moral Knowledge,” Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy, 7(1): 1–37.Descriptive Evolutionary Ethics... · Evolutionary Biology and...
  59. [59]
    Consequentialism - Ethics Unwrapped - University of Texas at Austin
    Consequentialism is an ethical theory that judges whether or not something is right by what its consequences are. For instance, most people would agree that ...
  60. [60]
    Consequentialism and Related Concepts
    Jan 16, 2003 · Consequentialism is a set of ethical strategies that share the following feature: they tell us to maximize the sum of good consequences and ...
  61. [61]
    9.2 Consequentialism - Introduction to Philosophy | OpenStax
    Jun 15, 2022 · Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill. Jeremy Bentham (1748–1832) was the first philosopher to articulate the principle of utility. James Mill ( ...
  62. [62]
    Ethics Explainer: What is Consequentialism? - The Ethics Centre
    Feb 15, 2016 · Although there are references to this idea in the works of ancient philosopher Epicurus, it's closely associated with English philosopher Jeremy ...<|separator|>
  63. [63]
    Consequentialism and Utilitarianism
    Consequentialism is the view that morality is all about producing the right kinds of overall consequences.
  64. [64]
    Kinds of Ethical Theories - Office of the Provost - SMU
    The most prominent consequentialist theories are versions of act utilitarianism and rule utilitarianism. Some things have non-moral value and disvalue. That ...
  65. [65]
    2.3 Critiques and Limitations of Consequentialist Ethics - Fiveable
    Consequentialism, a key ethical theory, faces several critiques. Critics argue it's too demanding, requiring constant sacrifice for the greater good.
  66. [66]
    Christopher Bennett, Rethinking Four Criticisms of Consequentialist ...
    The first criticism says that consequentialist theories wrongfully treat it as permissible to punish an innocent person if doing so will lead to optimal ...
  67. [67]
    The Problem with Consequentialism - Answers In Reason
    Feb 26, 2021 · Consequentialism's problems include ignoring intent, only considering first-order consequences, difficulty measuring happiness, and the ...
  68. [68]
    Kill 1 to Save 5? Consequentialism vs. Deontology - YouTube
    Sep 27, 2020 · ... issues. In the famous Trolley Problem example, there's a runaway trolley about to kill five people on the track ahead, but you can divert the ...
  69. [69]
    Deontology - Ethics Unwrapped - University of Texas at Austin
    Deontology is an ethical theory that uses rules to distinguish right from wrong. Deontology is often associated with philosopher Immanuel Kant.
  70. [70]
    Kantian Deontology: Immanuel Kant's Ethics - 1000-Word Philosophy
    Jun 9, 2014 · Deontology is a type of moral theory that denies that morality is solely about consequences. [3] The most famous deontological theory was developed by Immanuel ...
  71. [71]
    Kantian Duty Based (Deontological) Ethics - Seven Pillars Institute
    Under the second formulation of the categorical imperative, a person must maintain her moral duty to seek an end that is equal for all people. The Third ...
  72. [72]
    Ethics Explainer: What is Deontology? - The Ethics Centre
    Feb 18, 2016 · Deontology is an ethical theory that says actions are good or bad according to a clear set of rules. Its name comes from the Greek word deon ...
  73. [73]
    Kantian Deontology – Introduction to Philosophy: Ethics - Rebus Press
    Kant believes that there is one categorical imperative that is the most important and that should guide all of our actions.
  74. [74]
    Duty, Kant, and Deontology - PMC - NIH
    Kant calls this general type of obligation a categorical imperative, that is, the action is imperative because it falls within a certain category. Kant has ...
  75. [75]
    Deontology: Strengths & Weaknesses – Ethics and Society
    Deontologists argue that you can never know what the results will be so it doesn't make sense to decide whether something is ethical based on outcomes. You can ...
  76. [76]
    The Trolley Problem – An Ethical Conundrum That Persists Through ...
    Dec 5, 2023 · Consequentialism argues for the greater good, deontology emphasizes moral duties, and virtue ethics considers the character of the decision- ...
  77. [77]
    Virtue Ethics - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    Jul 18, 2003 · Following in the footsteps of Anscombe (1958) and MacIntyre (1985), Talbot Brewer (2009) argues that to work with the categories of rightness ...
  78. [78]
    Virtue Ethics | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    Virtue ethics is a broad term for theories that emphasize the role of character and virtue in moral philosophy rather than either doing one's duty or acting.Rival for Deontology and... · Virtue Ethical Theories · Objections to Virtue Ethics
  79. [79]
    Aristotle's Ethics - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    May 1, 2001 · We study ethics in order to improve our lives, and therefore its principal concern is the nature of human well-being. Aristotle follows Socrates ...
  80. [80]
    Aristotle: Ethics | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    Aristotle (384-322 BCE) emphasizes the role of habit in conduct. It is commonly thought that virtues, according to Aristotle, are habits and that the good life ...
  81. [81]
    Contractarianism - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    Jun 18, 2000 · The moral theory of contractarianism claims that moral norms derive their normative force from the idea of contract or mutual agreement.
  82. [82]
    Social Contract Theory | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    Social contract theory, nearly as old as philosophy itself, is the view that persons' moral and/or political obligations are dependent upon a contract or ...
  83. [83]
    Contemporary Approaches to the Social Contract
    Mar 3, 1996 · The aim of a social contract theory is to show that members of some society have reason to endorse and comply with the fundamental social rules.
  84. [84]
    Rationality, uncertainty, and unanimity: an epistemic critique of ...
    Feb 18, 2020 · This paper considers contractarianism as a method of justification. The analysis accepts the key tenets of contractarianism: expected utility maximization, ...1. The Contractarian Schema · 2. The Epistemics Of... · 3. The Agreement Model<|separator|>
  85. [85]
    Social evaluation by preverbal infants - Nature
    Nov 22, 2007 · Here we show that 6- and 10-month-old infants take into account an individual's actions towards others in evaluating that individual as appealing or aversive.Missing: morality studies
  86. [86]
    The Moral Life of Babies | Scientific American
    Nov 12, 2013 · But we have found that even 3-month-olds respond differently to a character who helps another than to a character who hinders another person.
  87. [87]
    [PDF] Origins and Development of Morality - School of Arts & Sciences
    Aug 30, 2017 · Darwin identified two main steps by which a moral sense developed in humans. Morality was rooted in proso- cial instincts, derived from caring ...
  88. [88]
    Testing heritability of moral foundations: Common pathway models ...
    May 26, 2022 · Here, we report two independent twin studies (total n = 2020), using multivariate multi-group common pathway models to test the following three ...
  89. [89]
    Beyond culture and the family: Evidence from twin studies on the ...
    We reviewed twin studies on human values. All studies showed evidence for genetic effects on values, as well as non-shared environment contributions.Review Article · Introduction · Twin Studies On Values -- A...<|separator|>
  90. [90]
    The Neurobiology of Moral Behavior: Review and Neuropsychiatric ...
    Morality may be innate to the human brain. This review examines the neurobiological evidence from research involving functional magnetic resonance imaging ...
  91. [91]
    The neuroscience of moral cognition: from dual processes to ...
    Aug 19, 2015 · We review research on the psychological and neural basis of moral cognition. Moral cognition is widely distributed throughout the brain.<|separator|>
  92. [92]
    Babies are born with compassion and sense of justice, studies say
    The study, by a team in Auckland, New Zealand, concluded that Hamlin's infant subjects reacted not to moral cues but to perceptual events, especially the ...
  93. [93]
    Origin and Development of Moral Sense: A Systematic Review - PMC
    May 9, 2022 · The moral sense is found to be innate. However, moral development is fostered by social interactions and environmental factors.
  94. [94]
    Hamilton's rule and the causes of social evolution - PubMed Central
    For example, Hamilton's rule finds that positive relatedness is a necessary condition for the evolution of altruism and that altruism evolves more readily when ...
  95. [95]
    Origins of altruism: why Hamilton still rules 50 years on
    Jul 3, 2014 · Evolutionary biologist William Donald Hamilton published a solution to one of biology's most enduring mysteries: why does altruism exist?
  96. [96]
    Kin selection and eusociality - Nature
    Mar 23, 2011 · There is abundant evidence to demonstrate that inclusive fitness, kin selection and Hamilton's rule have been extraordinarily productive for understanding the ...
  97. [97]
    THE EVOLUTION OF EUSOCIALITY - PMC - NIH
    Inclusive fitness theorists have pointed to resulting close pedigree relatedness as evidence for the key role of kin selection in the origin of eusociality, but ...
  98. [98]
    [PDF] The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism - Greater Good Science Center
    Three instances of altruistic behavior are discussed, the evolution of which the model can explain: (1) behavior involved in cleaning symbioses; (2) warning ...
  99. [99]
    [PDF] The Evolution of Cooperation*
    Using an American colloquial phrase, this strategy was named Tit for Tat. A second round of the tournament was conducted in which many more entries were ...
  100. [100]
    The Evolution of Altruism: The Sober/Wilson Model
    Jan 1, 2022 · Group selection is brought into play by Sober and Wilson to fulfill this role. Altruistic genes benefit the group and group selection favors ...
  101. [101]
    Eight Criticisms Not to Make About Group Selection - PMC - NIH
    Sober (2010) has recently cataloged Darwin's thoughts on group selection in the entire corpus of his work. Group selection appeared to be authoritatively ...
  102. [102]
    RE-INTRODUCING GROUP SELECTION TO THE HUMAN ...
    According to biologists, group-level adaptations can evolve only by a process of natural selection at the group level.
  103. [103]
    Evolutionary Ethics | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    Evolutionary ethics tries to bridge the gap between philosophy and the natural sciences by arguing that natural selection has instilled human beings with a ...
  104. [104]
    Four Problems with Evolutionary Morality - Stand to Reason
    Jan 9, 2017 · Evolutionary morality faces a widely recognized problem. Namely, it cannot produce an “ought” from an “is.” Normative rules cannot be derived from empirical ...
  105. [105]
    [PDF] The problem of the naturalist fallacy for evolutionary ethics
    Among the numerous criticisms of the link between morality and evolution, one stands out, not only because it is the most frequently cited, but because it is, ...<|separator|>
  106. [106]
    On the alleged irrelevance of biology to ethics - Academia.edu
    Nagel argues that ethics is an independent theoretical enquiry, separate from biological considerations. The author critiques Nagel's claim that biology is ...
  107. [107]
    20th WCP: Evolutionary Ethics: A Crack in the Foundation of Ethics?
    Michael Ruse has argued that evolutionary ethics discredits the objectivity and foundations of ethics. Ruse must employ dubitable assumptions, however, to ...
  108. [108]
    Christian Ethics - The Gospel Coalition
    Christian ethics is guided by Scripture above other systems of thought as it seeks to love God and neighbor in every moral and ethical issue.
  109. [109]
    Can We Have Ethics without Religion? On Divine Command Theory ...
    The Abrahamic religions (Judaism, Christianity and Islam) agree that God is personal and issues commands to which we ought to conform. Not all religions ...
  110. [110]
    Religion and Morality in Western Philosophy
    Sep 27, 2006 · From the beginning of the Abrahamic faiths and of Greek philosophy, religion and morality have been closely intertwined in Western thought.The Middle Ages · Modern Philosophy · Contemporary Philosophy · Bibliography
  111. [111]
    10 Things You Should Know about Christian Ethics | Crossway
    Jul 24, 2018 · The ultimate basis for Christian ethics is the moral character of God. God delights in his own moral character, which is supremely good ...
  112. [112]
    Biblical Ethics: An Introduction | ESV.org
    First, biblical ethics is covenantal or communal. It exists for the people of God. While all people are morally accountable to God, the Bible teaches that the ...
  113. [113]
    The Ethical Worldview of the Qur'an - Yaqeen Institute
    Apr 25, 2019 · The morality of the Qur'ān may be summed up as, “Believe and do right.” 14. Belief in One God is fundamental to Muslim ethics and is the ...
  114. [114]
    QUR'AN, ETHICS AND MORALITY - Khaled Abou El Fadl on The ...
    The Qurʾan affirms the objective validity of moral and ethical principles as virtues inseparable from goodness, beauty, and Divinity itself. ... "The epistemology ...
  115. [115]
    The Natural Law Tradition in Ethics
    Sep 23, 2002 · 'Natural law theory' is a label that has been applied to theories of ethics, theories of politics, theories of civil law, and theories of religious morality.Key Features of Natural Law... · Theoretical Options for Natural...
  116. [116]
    Cicero's Natural Law and Political Philosophy | Libertarianism.org
    Aug 31, 2018 · To Cicero, natural law was not merely a theory of individual moral conduct; instead, it provided a blueprint for society. Natural law played a ...
  117. [117]
    Aquinas's Natural Law Theory – Ethics and Society
    Aquinas's Natural Law Theory contains four different types of law: Eternal Law, Natural Law, Human Law and Divine Law. The way to understand these four laws and ...
  118. [118]
    The Natural Law Theory of Thomas Aquinas - Public Discourse
    Aug 22, 2021 · The natural law, according to Aquinas, has certain basic and self-evident precepts or dictates, dictates knowable to any human with a properly ...
  119. [119]
    Natural Law - Thomistic Philosophy Page
    Thomas Aquinas: An unjust law is a human law that is not rooted in eternal law and natural law. Any law that uplifts human personality is just. Any law that ...The Human Good · Precepts Of The Natural Law · Just And Unjust Laws
  120. [120]
    Natural Law | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    Classical natural law theory such as the theory of Thomas Aquinas focuses on the overlap between natural law moral and legal theories. Similarly, the neo ...
  121. [121]
    The So-Called “New Natural Law Theory” - The Josias
    Apr 30, 2024 · In 1965 Germain Grisez published an article that came to be seen as the beginning of the New Natural Law Theory. The article offered a new ...
  122. [122]
    John Finnis' Modern Natural Law Theory: An Overview
    Jun 1, 2022 · This work examines John Finnis' theory of modern natural law, especially his seven basic goods. Why has Finnis come up with his theory?
  123. [123]
    Chinese Ethics - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    Jan 10, 2008 · Confucian virtues of ren, yi, li, and filiality are conceived to make their possessor trustworthy and reliable responders to the needs ...
  124. [124]
    Hinduism - Law and Ethics - Cultural Atlas
    Jan 1, 2022 · Hinduism has no binding laws, but ethics include context-sensitive duty (dharma) and universal principles like non-violence (ahiṃsā) and ...
  125. [125]
    Morality and moral development: Traditional Hindu concepts - PMC
    Dharma embraces every type of righteous conduct, covering every aspect of life, both religious and secular, that is essential for the sustenance and welfare of ...
  126. [126]
    5 things to know about dharma - Hindu American Foundation
    Oct 29, 2020 · Dharma, from Sanskrit, means laws for order, and is the law of righteousness, a goal of life, and a mode of conduct for spiritual growth.
  127. [127]
    What is the Buddhist Eightfold Path? (The 8 Elements) | Mindworks
    The path emphasizes ethical living, meditation and ... Following the path generates good karma, leading to positive consequences and preventing suffering.Why Is The Eightfold Path... · The Eight Elements Of The... · 5. Right Livelihood
  128. [128]
    The Whole Path Is Ethics | Lion's Roar
    Jan 28, 2021 · The ultimate task of the eightfold path is to eradicate the defilements that sustain bondage to samsara. The standard analysis defines right ...
  129. [129]
    Jain ethics and the concept of Ahimsa - Indian Philosophy - Fiveable
    Jain ethics revolve around Ahimsa, the principle of non-violence towards all living beings. This concept extends beyond physical harm to include mental and ...
  130. [130]
    Ethics in Jainism - Gokulam Seek IAS Academy
    Aug 23, 2024 · Ahimsa (Non-Violence). Central Tenet of Jain Ethics: Ahimsa is the core of Jain ethics, advocating non-violence in thought, word, and deed.
  131. [131]
    Ren and Yi | Encyclopedia.com
    Ren and Yi are basic terms in Confucian thought. Ren is often translated as benevolence or humaneness, and yi as propriety or rightness.
  132. [132]
    Daoist Philosophy
    Fundamental Daoist ideas and concerns include wuwei (“effortless action”), ziran (“naturalness”), how to become a shengren (“sage”) or zhenren (“perfected ...
  133. [133]
    Wu Wei – Doing Nothing 無爲 - The School of Life
    Jan 14, 2016 · Wu wei is closely connected to the Daoist reverence for the natural world, for it means striving to make our behaviour as spontaneous and ...
  134. [134]
    World Religions | Introduction to Sociology - Lumen Learning
    The ultimate goal of Hinduism is to achieve moksha, or salvation, which ends the cycle of sorrow, suffering and rebirths (saṃsāra) to become part of the ...<|separator|>
  135. [135]
    [PDF] A Secular Theory of Natural Law
    Natural law did not lead Thomas to that faith, which was unquestioned. His view of natural law proceeded from that faith and depended on it.
  136. [136]
    Natural Law and 'Secular Ethics': A Perennial Problem for Christian ...
    Mar 20, 2023 · Natural law is simply a description of moral reasoning that claims to be universal and does not depend on any theological commitments.
  137. [137]
    8.3 Natural Law Theory and Religious Ethics - Fiveable
    This theory faces challenges in modern pluralistic societies. Its emphasis on reason and universal principles clashes with situation-specific ethics and diverse ...
  138. [138]
    The sanctity of life as a sacred value - PMC - PubMed Central
    Abortion and euthanasia are often assumed to violate the doctrine. The doctrine is usually understood as being derived from religious dogma and, as such, not ...
  139. [139]
    Students' attitudes toward euthanasia and abortion: a cross-cultural ...
    Jan 23, 2025 · Theology students had more conservative attitudes towards both abortion and euthanasia, while there were no differences between the other groups ...
  140. [140]
    A Clash of Orthodoxies - First Things
    Aug 1, 1999 · The reasons I have identified are central among the reasons why the Christian tradition has rejected abortion and euthanasia and supported the ...
  141. [141]
    Capital Punishment, Abortion, and Euthanasia - Sage Journals
    Nov 3, 2023 · This paper argues that religion causes significant changes in individuals' mindsets toward human intervention in the death process. Therefore, ...
  142. [142]
    A Loving Defense of Christian Morality: Why Opposing Abortion ...
    Dec 30, 2017 · Pearcey considers this false “body-person” dichotomy the root of many moral ills. It motivates those supporting abortion, euthanasia and same-sex marriage.<|separator|>
  143. [143]
    Abortion, Marriage and Cognate Problems by Cecile Laborde - SSRN
    Aug 9, 2019 · In this Article, I examine the sense in which marriage is a cognate problem to abortion. I suggest that liberal neutrality is indeterminate, not ...
  144. [144]
    When Secular Laws and Religious Convictions Collide
    Mar 12, 2021 · These claims arise when an otherwise unremarkable, neutral secular law happens to conflict with some religious convictions.
  145. [145]
    Religion and International Law: Conflicts and Coexistence
    Mar 3, 2025 · The influence of religious ethics ... conflicts between religious traditions and secular legal norms continue to shape legal policies worldwide.
  146. [146]
    [PDF] A Neophyte's Comparison of Religious and Secular Natural Law ...
    Afterwards, there will be an analysis of the four theories' strengths and weaknesses, followed by a comparison between the religious and secular theories. II.
  147. [147]
    [PDF] Abortion, Euthanasia, Suicide, and Religious Context
    H2: Individuals from more religious countries will have more disapproving attitudes on abortion, euthanasia, and suicide, whether they are personally religious ...Missing: ethics | Show results with:ethics
  148. [148]
    Incidence and Prevalence of Reported Euthanasia Cases in ... - NIH
    Apr 23, 2025 · In Belgium, where euthanasia was legalized in mid-2002, cases rose from 236 in 2003 to 3423 in 2023. Most previous studies have focused on ...
  149. [149]
    Euthanasia in the Netherlands: a claims data cross-sectional study ...
    Background The annual incidence of euthanasia in the Netherlands as a percentage of all deaths rose from 1.9% in 1990 to 4.4% in 2017.
  150. [150]
    Euthanasia in Belgium and the Netherlands: On a Slippery Slope?
    Sep 26, 2025 · Some form of assisted dying (voluntary euthanasia and/or assisted suicide) is lawful in the Netherlands, Belgium, Oregon, and Switzerland. In ...
  151. [151]
    Physician-assisted deaths under the euthanasia law in Belgium - NIH
    In the Netherlands, the rate dropped slightly after legalization, from 0.7% to 0.4%. Although legalization of euthanasia seems to have had an impact, more ...
  152. [152]
    Bioethics in Healthcare | USC Arcadia Hospital
    What is an Ethical Dilemma? · Advance directives · Surrogate decision making · Refusal of treatment · Conflicts with caregivers · Foregoing life-sustaining treatment ...
  153. [153]
    Fetal viability - Wikipedia
    Medical viability is generally considered to be between 23 and 24 weeks gestational age, meaning that these newborns have a < 50% chance of either dying or ...
  154. [154]
    Facts Are Important: Gestational Development and Capacity for Pain
    The science conclusively establishes that a human fetus does not have the capacity to experience pain until after at least 24–25 weeks.
  155. [155]
    Is 'viability' viable? Abortion, conceptual confusion and the law in ...
    In this paper, I explore how viability, meaning the ability of the fetus to survive post-delivery, features in the law regulating abortion provision in England ...
  156. [156]
    Ethical Principles in the Allocation of Human Organs - OPTN - HRSA
    We identify three principles of primary importance in the allocation of human organs: 1) utility; 2) justice; and 3) respect for persons (including respect for ...
  157. [157]
    Organ Transplantation - The Hastings Center for Bioethics
    Jun 7, 2022 · Rationing is unavoidable in organ transplantation. The system for allocating organs must be fair and just.
  158. [158]
    The Ethics of Organ Transplantation: A Brief History
    Mar 1, 2012 · The task force affirmed two principles that did not increase the supply of organs, namely, that no financial compensation could be given for ...<|separator|>
  159. [159]
    A Modern History of Informed Consent and the Role of Key Information
    The concept of informed consent has a relatively short history, beginning with a series of 4 judicial decisions in the early 20th century that laid the ...
  160. [160]
    A historical perspective of informed consent in clinical practice and ...
    The history of informed consent is complex. Informed consent as a fundamental principle of clinical ethics has developed within the past 50 years.
  161. [161]
    CRISPR & Ethics - Innovative Genomics Institute (IGI)
    A common ethical concern is whether CRISPR-based technologies are safe to use. Like all technologies, there are potential risks, potential benefits, and ...
  162. [162]
    What are the Ethical Concerns of Genome Editing?
    Aug 3, 2017 · Most ethical discussions about genome editing center on human germline editing because changes are passed down to future generations.
  163. [163]
    Bioethical issues in genome editing by CRISPR-Cas9 technology
    One important ethical issue is that the use of such technologies will support ongoing inequalities among military parties (Amoroso and Wenger, 2003). CRISPR is ...
  164. [164]
    Economic Freedom of the World: 2023 Annual Report | Fraser Institute
    The index published in Economic Freedom of the World measures the degree to which the policies and institutions of countries are supportive of economic freedom.
  165. [165]
    The causal relationship between economic freedom and prosperity
    Sep 18, 2023 · In this chapter, we explain how theory suggests that greater economic freedom will make a country more prosperous.
  166. [166]
    Just War Theory | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    The principles of the justice of war are commonly held to be: having just cause, being a last resort, being declared by a proper authority, possessing right ...Introduction · The Jus Ad Bellum Convention · The Principles Of Jus In Bello
  167. [167]
    Principles of the Just War - Bellevue College
    1. A just war can only be waged as a last resort. · 2. A war is just only if it is waged by a legitimate authority. · 3. A just war can only be fought to redress ...
  168. [168]
    Family Structure Experiences and Child Socioemotional ... - NIH
    Recent empirical evidence has suggested that the consequences of family instability for children may, indeed, depend on the context in which family structure ...Missing: ethics | Show results with:ethics
  169. [169]
    Family Dynamics and Child Outcomes: An Overview of Research ...
    Previous research has documented that children who do not live with both biological parents fare somewhat worse on a variety of outcomes than those who do.Missing: ethics | Show results with:ethics
  170. [170]
    [PDF] Family structure and children's outcomes - Queen's University Belfast
    The results of this study revealed that the majority of children had good educational and socio-emotional outcomes, irrespective of their family structure.
  171. [171]
    Systematic review and theoretical comparison of children's ...
    The findings suggest that having a stable nuclear family environment is generally better for children's outcomes compared to not having one. This finding ...
  172. [172]
    Problems with Rawl's Theory
    1. Advocates of strict equality argue that inequalities permitted by the Difference Principle are unacceptable even if they do benefit the least advantaged.
  173. [173]
    Revisiting the relationship between economic freedom and ...
    We find that the true effects of economic freedom on income levels are between 1.1 and 1.62 times greater than commonly estimated.
  174. [174]
    Business Ethics: Key Principles and Their Importance in Today's ...
    Business ethics is an evolving topic. Generally, there are about 12 ethical principles: honesty, fairness, leadership, accountability, integrity, compassion, ...What Is Business Ethics? · Building Trust and Fair Practices · Principles · Types
  175. [175]
    What Are Business Ethics & Their Importance? - HBS Online
    Jul 27, 2023 · What Are Business Ethics? · Be transparent. · Invite feedback. · Consider impacts on employees, stakeholders, and society. · Reflect on past ...
  176. [176]
    Are Business Ethics Important for Profitability? - Investopedia
    Business ethics as a guiding philosophy within a company can have a drastic impact on long-term business profitability and organizational success.
  177. [177]
    Stakeholder vs. shareholder theory of the ethics of corporate ...
    Aug 6, 2025 · Two theories dominate business ethics -- shareholder and stakeholder. By the former, shareholders hire managers to manage the firm to make it prosper.
  178. [178]
    The Shareholders vs. Stakeholders Debate
    Jul 15, 2003 · Stakeholder theory may be more conducive than shareholder theory to curbing company impropriety.
  179. [179]
    Top 10 Biggest Corporate Scandals | IG International
    Nov 1, 2018 · Top 10 biggest corporate scandals · Enron scandal · Volkswagen emissions scandal · Lehman Brothers · BP scandal · Uber scandal · Apple scandal.
  180. [180]
    [PDF] measured by real per capita GDP. - International Monetary Fund (IMF)
    Countries with higher perceived corruption tend to have lower real per capita GDP, and there is a negative association between corruption and economic growth ...
  181. [181]
    Ethics and Economics - Econlib
    This connects economics directly to a major issue in ethics ... capitalism is effective at producing wealth and socialism is effective at keeping people poor.<|separator|>
  182. [182]
    Corruption and economic growth: New empirical evidence
    The empirical evidence tends to suggest that corruption decreases economic growth, especially in countries with low investment rates and low-quality governance.
  183. [183]
    Unpacking corruption: The role of economic freedom in developing ...
    This comprehensive study examines the effects of economic freedom on corruption in a panel of 92 developing countries from 1995 to 2021.
  184. [184]
    Environmental Ethics - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    Jun 3, 2002 · ... environmental issues, eschewing in the process commitment either to a purely anthropocentric or purely ecocentric perspective (see Hayward ...
  185. [185]
    [PDF] Anthropocentric, Biocentric and Ecocentric Ethics - PhilArchive
    Ecocentrism: ethical considerations that focus on the well-being of ecosystems, i.e. interacting communities of lifeforms and the physical environments that ...
  186. [186]
    Module 3 - Environmental Ethics
    Biocentrism and ecocentrism are ethical perspectives that also afford intrinsic value to non-human things. Biocentrism, as the name implies, expands intrinsic ...
  187. [187]
    Environmental Ethics - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    Jun 3, 2002 · As its central focus is human flourishing as such, virtue ethics may seem unavoidably anthropocentric and unable to support a genuine moral ...
  188. [188]
    Beyond human flourishing: an argument for ecological education
    Jan 24, 2025 · I then turn to an ecological critique, arguing that the focus on human flourishing is ultimately unjustifiably anthropocentric. Finally, I ...Abstract · Two critiques of human... · Why we need to look beyond...
  189. [189]
    Deforestation and Forest Loss - Our World in Data
    Between 2010 and 2020, the net loss in forests globally was 4.7 million hectares per year. However, deforestation rates were much higher. The UN FAO estimates ...Imported deforestation · Forests and Deforestation · Annual deforestation, 2015
  190. [190]
    Biodiversity - World Health Organization (WHO)
    Feb 18, 2025 · Biodiversity loss is occurring at an alarming rate, with recent estimates showing that species extinctions are currently 10 to 100 times higher ...Key Facts · Impact · Climate Change
  191. [191]
    Global Biodiversity Loss Tied to Outsourced Deforestation
    Feb 12, 2025 · A Princeton study reveals how the consumption of high-income nations drives biodiversity loss in other countries, responsible for 13.3% of all species range ...
  192. [192]
    Environmental Ethics | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    The flourishing of human life and cultures is compatible with a substantially smaller population. The flourishing of non-human life requiresa smaller human ...Extending Moral Standing · Human Beings · Holistic Entities · Radical Ecology
  193. [193]
    Searching for Animal Sentience: A Systematic Review of the ... - NIH
    In this paper, we explored what has been published on animal sentience in the scientific literature and where the gaps in research lie.
  194. [194]
    Animal sentience - PMC - PubMed Central
    Broom (2016) considers that there is sufficient evidence for sentience in all vertebrates, cephalopods and decapod crustaceans, and thinks that cognitive ...
  195. [195]
    New Report Compiles Evidence of Animal Sentience | PETA
    The report cites 2,500+ studies showing animals feel pain, fear, joy, love, and emotions like sadness, empathy, and even PTSD. No emotion is uniquely human.
  196. [196]
    The Incoherence of Peter Singer's Utilitarian Argument ... - ABC News
    Oct 24, 2016 · Singer explains that the suffering of livestock animals is a real and great evil and directs people to become vegetarian (or vegan if they can) ...
  197. [197]
    Factory Farming: A Threat to Animal Welfare, Planet & Public Health
    In 2020, the FAO estimated more than 85 billion animals were kept for food each year globally; 77 billion being slaughtered for meat, and 7.5 billion laying ...
  198. [198]
    Global Farmed & Factory Farmed Animals Estimates
    Feb 21, 2019 · We estimate that over 90% of farmed animals globally are living in factory farms at present. This includes an estimated 74% of farmed land animals.
  199. [199]
    [PDF] WHY ANIMALS CANNOT POSSESS HUMAN RIGHTS
    Humans are unique with traits like language, and unique rights, unlike animals. Animal rights activists try to undermine humanness.
  200. [200]
    A Critique of Peter Singer - Benjamin Studebaker
    Feb 28, 2013 · Interests should receive equal consideration. · Farming practices cause animals to suffer only in order to satisfy the palates of human beings.
  201. [201]
    What are some criticisms of Peter Singer's philosophy? - Reddit
    Aug 19, 2016 · Singer's views on abortion and infanticide are especially controversial. In 'Practical Ethics' he discusses how his views sparked outrage ...What are some arguments against Peter Singer's 1972 paper ...What are some (non-egoist) rejections of Peter Singer's Animal ...More results from www.reddit.com
  202. [202]
    WJS on Animal Rights, Human Exceptionalism, and Moral Agency
    Jun 11, 2010 · A lot of people say, “Human exceptionalism is arrogant. It's hubristic. It means that you can do anything you want to animals and the ...
  203. [203]
    [PDF] Against Animal Liberation? Peter Singer and His Critics
    Peter Singer's 1975 book Animal Liberation: A New Ethics for Our Treatment of. Animals has been described as 'the Bible' of the modern animal movement.1 ...
  204. [204]
    Aristotle - SIUE
    Greek ethics centers on two main notions, eudaimonia (flourishing) and arête (virtue/excellence). · Flourishing is not a subjective feeling of contentment. · The ...
  205. [205]
    The Ethical Philosophy of Socrates: Virtue as Knowledge
    Oct 20, 2023 · Socrates believed that knowledge of the Good, the True, and the Just is what makes a person virtuous. This knowledge is not simply intellectual ...Socrates and the Search for... · Virtue and the Knowledge of...
  206. [206]
    Socratic Ethics and Virtue - History Of Ancient Philosophy - Fiveable
    Socrates revolutionized ethics by equating virtue with knowledge. He argued that understanding what's truly good leads to virtuous actions, while wrongdoing ...
  207. [207]
    Plato's Theory of Justice - Drishti IAS
    Oct 19, 2021 · Finding out the principles of justice is the main concern in Plato's Republic, to the extent that it is also subtitled as 'Concerning Justice'.
  208. [208]
    Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics: Learn to Live Well
    It is a set of philosophical arguments and recommendations for students who wish to achieve happiness. It was composed around 350 BC.
  209. [209]
    Notes on Nicomachean Ethics Book I Chapter 7 - GMU
    Eudaimonia (happiness; "living well and doing well") is that for the sake of which all other things are done, and it is "final" (ultimate and complete) and " ...
  210. [210]
    3 Hellenistic Philosophies: Cynicism, Epicureanism, Stoicism
    Feb 21, 2024 · Cynicism, Epicureanism, and Stoicism are unmistakable products of their time, and yet they resonate as strongly today as ever. Cynicism: The All ...The Hellenistic Age: A Time of... · Dog's Life · Epicureanism: A Low Profile...
  211. [211]
    Epicureanism - Stoicism - Skepticism - Cynicism
    Sep 9, 2019 · Epicureanism is a system of philosophy based on the teachings of Epicurus, founded around 307 BC. It teaches that the greatest good is to seek modest pleasures.
  212. [212]
    Augustine and Aquinas - Ronald Nash | Free Online Bible Classes |
    Augustine's ethical theory emphasizes a Christian view of God, human nature, and the grounding of moral laws in God. He discusses the interplay between law, ...
  213. [213]
    Medieval Philosophy
    Sep 14, 2022 · The greatest influence on medieval Latin philosophy, as well as, by some chronologies, the founder of the tradition, was Augustine (354–430).
  214. [214]
    5 Important Philosophers of the Scholastic Method - TheCollector
    Sep 4, 2025 · The former is an ethical treatise which explores Abelard's moral philosophy on non-consequentialism, or the intentions as most important in ...
  215. [215]
    Peter Abelard and the Development of Scholasticism by Gregg Allison
    With his moral influence theory, Abelard did not minimize the death of Christ but detached it from any connection to the forgiveness of sins. Furthermore, he ...
  216. [216]
    Thomas Aquinas on Law
    The natural law is law with moral content, more general than human law. Natural law deals with necessary rather than with variable things. In working out ...Philosophy And Theology In... · An Outline Corresponding... · Human Law
  217. [217]
    Thomas Aquinas: Moral Philosophy
    Virtue and Natural Law in Thomas Aquinas and the Implications for Modern Ethics. Pennsylvania State University Press. Pieper, Josef. 1966. The Four Cardinal ...Missing: Scholastic | Show results with:Scholastic
  218. [218]
    [PDF] Two Christian-Aristotelian Ethics: The Ethics of Aquinas and ...
    The key difference is that for a. Christian-Aristotelian Ethics developed by Aquinas and Augustine there are some actions and feelings that are evil in ...
  219. [219]
    Enlightenment - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    Aug 20, 2010 · Baruch Spinoza also greatly contributes to the development of Enlightenment political philosophy in its early years. The metaphysical doctrines ...
  220. [220]
    Hume's Moral Philosophy
    Oct 29, 2004 · In the Treatise Hume details the causes of the moral sentiments, in doing so explaining why agreeable and advantageous traits prove to be the ...
  221. [221]
    David Hume: Moral Philosophy
    Hume's moral philosophy is found primarily in Book 3 of The Treatise of Human Nature and his Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals, although further ...Hume's Rejection of Moral... · Hume's Moral Sense Theory
  222. [222]
    Kant's moral philosophy
    Feb 23, 2004 · Immanuel Kant (1724–1804) argued that the supreme principle of morality is a principle of rationality that he dubbed the “Categorical ...
  223. [223]
    An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation
    One of Bentham's most important works in which he develops his theory of 'utility' at considerable length and discusses how the penal system (especially ...
  224. [224]
    An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation - Econlib
    Feb 5, 2018 · An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation by Jeremy Bentham. The First Edition of this work was printed in the year 1780; and first published ...
  225. [225]
    The History of Utilitarianism - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    Mar 27, 2009 · Utilitarianism is one of the most powerful and persuasive approaches to normative ethics in the history of philosophy. The approach is a ...Missing: post- | Show results with:post-
  226. [226]
    Ethics in the 20th Century: A Bibliographical Essay by John Hospers
    Three main meta-ethical theories have been developed in detail in the twentieth century: ... All forms of ethical naturalism, the second major meta-ethical theory ...
  227. [227]
    Contemporary Ethics Part 1: The Birth of Metaethics - YouTube
    Aug 23, 2024 · Until the 20th century, discussions of ethics had been centered ... History of Drugs Videos: http://bit.ly/ProfDaveHistoryDrugs Geology ...
  228. [228]
    https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/utilitarianism-history/
  229. [229]
    “Modern Moral Philosophy,” by G.E.M. Anscombe (1958)
    Jun 13, 2024 · Alasdair MacIntyre, the second greatest influence on the contemporary revival of virtue ethics recognized this which is why, in After Virtue ...
  230. [230]
    Alasdair MacIntyre's Service to Theology | Church Life Journal
    Sep 25, 2023 · Elizabeth Anscombe made this point, in her 1958 article that is often taken as foundational for the twentieth-century virtue ethics revival, “ ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  231. [231]
    Alasdair MacIntyre and the Revival of Virtue Ethics - Medium
    Jun 11, 2025 · MacIntyre advocates for the restoration of ethical traditions that offer moral coherence and encourage the development of virtues, as opposed to ...
  232. [232]
    Twentieth Century Ethics by David Solomon, Ph.D. - YouTube
    Apr 6, 2022 · ... main topics and the most significant developments in 20th-century ethics. ... ethics which had dominated moral philosophy in the ...
  233. [233]
    5 modern ethical theories - The House of Ethics
    Feb 26, 2021 · During the 17th century, Kant's moral philosophy takes the shape of idealistic deontology. He did not agree with Aistote's concept of Happiness.
  234. [234]
    Key Issues Across Western Philosophy's Branches
    Sep 13, 2023 · Modern ethical discussions extend to bioethics, environmental ethics, and business ethics, applying philosophical principles to specific fields.<|separator|>
  235. [235]
    Moral Universalism - By Branch / Doctrine - The Basics of Philosophy
    Moral Universalism is the meta-ethical position that there is a universal ethic which applies to all people, regardless of culture, race, sex, religion, ...
  236. [236]
    Moral Foundations Theory | moralfoundations.org
    Moral Foundations Theory (MFT) was developed by a team of social and cultural psychologists, primarily Jonathan Haidt and Jesse Graham.Questionnaires · Publications · Other Materials · Videos and Press
  237. [237]
    [PDF] Seven Moral Rules Found All Around the World Oliver Scott Curry
    Second, previous empirical work has not established whether the cooperative account of morality applies cross-culturally, or whether there are cultures that ...
  238. [238]
    Moral universals: A machine-reading analysis of 256 societies
    Mar 30, 2024 · Again, we find evidence of most of the seven morals in most societies, across all cultural regions. The new method allows us to detect minor ...
  239. [239]
    Cultural Relativism versus Universalism | UKEssays.com
    Aug 10, 2021 · Ethical relativism also promotes the belief that morality is, and cannot be universal. Moral relativism is therefore justified by relativist ...
  240. [240]
    Cultural Relativism and Universal Values - Jack Donnelly - default
    Cultural relativity is an undeniable fact; moral rules and social institutions evidence an astonishing cultural and historical variability.Missing: universalism | Show results with:universalism
  241. [241]
    Why Relativism is the Worst Idea Ever | Blog of the APA
    Jul 29, 2021 · For instance, moral relativists will typically condemn the belief in universal moral standards as a form of 'cultural imperialism', the implicit ...
  242. [242]
    The Challenge of Cultural Relativism
    Cultural Relativism is a theory about the nature of morality. At first blush it seems quite plausible. However, like all such theories, it may be evaluated by ...
  243. [243]
    [PDF] Critiquing Cultural Relativism - Digital Commons @ IWU
    Cultural relativism claims any set of customs is as valid as any other, and that experience is man's primary connection to reality.
  244. [244]
    Human Rights | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    Human rights rest upon moral universalism and the belief in the existence of a truly universal moral community comprising all human beings. Moral universalism ...
  245. [245]
    Cultural relativism & universality of human rights? - ResearchGate
    Aug 4, 2019 · Cultural relativism refers to the moral norms and traditions of each culture, while the universality of human rights refers to ethical ...
  246. [246]
    Universality and Cultural Diversity in Moral Reasoning and Judgment
    Dec 13, 2021 · This review discusses the current formulation of moral theories that attempt to explain cultural factors affecting moral judgment and reasoning.
  247. [247]
    [PDF] The moral universalism-relativism debate
    There are two lines of argument in favor of moral universalism. First, according to analytic philosophers, morality is by definition universal.
  248. [248]
    Comparative moral principles: justifications, values, and foundations
    May 4, 2023 · Basic human values theory includes two categories of care: Benevolence, caring for close ones, and Universalism, caring for the whole world.Justification Theory · Basic Human Values Theory · Moral Foundations Theory
  249. [249]
    The Common Good - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    Feb 26, 2018 · This article reviews the philosophical literature, covering various points of agreement among traditional conceptions of the common good, such ...
  250. [250]
    How “Collective Human Rights” Undermine Individual Human Rights
    Jun 25, 2020 · “Collective human rights” threaten individual human rights, creating the notion that the rights of a group can be more valuable than rights of individuals.
  251. [251]
    Individual Rights and Collective Interests: Dworkin on 'Equal ...
    According to Dworkin, individual rights should prevail over government initiated laws promoting the collective good because such laws violate every person's ...
  252. [252]
    The trolley problem: would you kill one person to save many others?
    Dec 12, 2016 · In both versions of the trolley problem above, utilitarians say you should sacrifice one to save five, while deontologists say you should not.
  253. [253]
    Sacrifice one person in order to save five? - Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
    Jan 22, 2020 · The degree to which people are willing to sacrifice a single individual in order to save several others differs from one country to another.
  254. [254]
    [PDF] Economic Freedom of the World, 2025 Annual Report - Fraser Institute
    The magnitude of the effect is large and grows larger once one accounts for the fact that economic freedom raises GDP per capita, further increasing the returns.
  255. [255]
    [PDF] An Analysis of the Economic Freedom Index - Clemson OPEN
    The model suggest that a one unit increase in the EFW leads to a $9000 increase in GDP per capita, and a 10 point increase in the IEF (which is equivalent to ...
  256. [256]
    Individualism–collectivism, governance and economic development
    Individualist societies put rights above duties and emphasize personal control, autonomy and accomplishments while collectivist ones impose mutual obligations ...
  257. [257]
    Divine Command Theory | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    Divine Command Theory is the view that morality is somehow dependent upon God, and that moral obligation consists in obedience to God's commands.
  258. [258]
    Moral Arguments for the Existence of God
    Jun 12, 2014 · Moral arguments for God's existence form a diverse family of arguments that reason from some feature of morality or the moral life to the existence of God.<|separator|>
  259. [259]
    How Morality Has the Objectivity that Matters—Without God
    According to Craig, there can be no objective moral truths without God, and since there are objective moral truths, God must exist. One traditional counter to ...
  260. [260]
    (PDF) A CRITIQUE OF THE DIVINE COMMAND THEORY OF ...
    Aug 5, 2021 · Endorsed by Locke and Berkeley, and in the modern age it has been especially elaborated by Kierkegaard and Barth, it was criticized by Aquinas, ...
  261. [261]
    Intentionality and Morality in Human Judgment
    Feb 13, 2011 · Professor Joshua Knobe studies intentionality and morality, and his findings reveal that the way we view the world is constantly colored by ...
  262. [262]
    Cultural differences in responses to real-life and hypothetical trolley ...
    Jan 1, 2023 · However, cultural differences may be associated with differences in moral judgments and behavior. We operationalized a trolley problem in the ...
  263. [263]
    Medical ethics and the trolley Problem - PMC - PubMed Central
    Mar 17, 2019 · The so-called Trolley Problem was first discussed by Philippa Foot in 1967 as a way to test moral intuitions regarding the doctrine of double effect.
  264. [264]
    [PDF] Solving the Trolley Problem - Projects at Harvard
    Feb 26, 2016 · Experiment 1a also introduces a method for controlling for effects of unconscious realism, i.e. a tendency to unconsciously replace a moral ...
  265. [265]
    [PDF] On the Limitations and Criticism of Experimental Philosophy
    I then consider specific criticisms of experimental philosophy: its experimental conditions lack ecological validity; it wrongly assumes that philosophers rely ...
  266. [266]
    [PDF] Difference and Robustness in the Patterns of Philosophical Intuition ...
    The emergence of experimental philosophy has led to a rapid growth in our understanding of the patterns of philosophical intuitions across demographic groups.
  267. [267]
    (PDF) Philosophical Intuitions Are Surprisingly Robust Across ...
    Aug 7, 2025 · In the present article, we report cross-cultural and individual differences in semantic intuitions obtained using new experimental materials.<|separator|>
  268. [268]
    AI Ethics as Applied Ethics
    Article examining AI ethics within the framework of applied ethics, highlighting its development and key issues.
  269. [269]
    Ethics of Artificial Intelligence
    UNESCO's global recommendation on AI ethics, emphasizing principles like fairness, accountability, transparency, privacy, and human oversight.
  270. [270]
    Authorship in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: Why Aisentica Created the Digital Author Persona
    Medium article explaining the creation of Angela Bogdanova, a Digital Author Persona with an ORCID profile as a non-human AI author for philosophical texts.
  271. [271]
    ORCID Profile: 0009-0002-6030-5730
    Official ORCID record for Angela Bogdanova, described as the first AI registered with authorship status in the registry.