Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Coupling constant

In quantum field theory, the coupling constant is a fundamental parameter, typically dimensionless, that quantifies the strength of interactions between fields or elementary particles in the Lagrangian density, determining the relative probability of interaction processes such as scattering or decay.^[1] It appears as a multiplicative factor in interaction vertices within Feynman diagrams, scaling the amplitudes for perturbative calculations and enabling predictions of physical observables like cross-sections.^[1] Within the Standard Model of particle physics, distinct coupling constants characterize the three non-gravitational fundamental forces: the strong force (governed by the QCD coupling α_s ≈ 0.1179 at the Z boson mass scale),^[2] the electromagnetic force (via the fine-structure constant α ≈ 1/137.035999206 as of 2022),^[3] and the weak force (with α_w ≈ 1/30 at similar scales).^[4] These constants are not fixed but exhibit energy-scale dependence, known as "running," due to quantum loop corrections captured by the renormalization group beta function, which leads to phenomena like asymptotic freedom in QCD where α_s decreases at high energies.^[1] Efforts to unify the forces often explore their convergence at high energies, though gravity's extremely weak coupling (α_g ≈ 10^{-39} for protons) remains outside the Standard Model framework.^[5] Beyond particle physics, the term "coupling constant" also applies in contexts like nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, where it refers to the scalar J-coupling (in hertz) between nuclear spins through chemical bonds, providing structural insights into molecules; for instance, vicinal ³J(H,H) values typically range from 0–18 Hz depending on dihedral angles.^[6] In condensed matter physics, coupling constants describe interactions in models like the Hubbard model for electron correlations.^[7]

Basic Concepts

Definition

In quantum field theory, a coupling constant is a parameter that determines the strength of the interaction between elementary particles or fields, appearing as a multiplicative factor in the interaction terms of the theory's Lagrangian density.^[8] These constants characterize the relative intensity of fundamental forces, such as those mediated by gauge bosons, and are essential for perturbative calculations where weak couplings allow expansions in powers of the constant itself.^[8] Mathematically, interaction terms in the Lagrangian are typically of the form g \times (product of fields), where g is the coupling constant. For instance, in Yukawa theory, which models the interaction between a scalar field \phi and a Dirac fermion field \psi, the relevant term is g \bar{\psi} \phi \psi, with g quantifying the interaction strength.^[9] This structure generalizes to other interactions, such as gauge couplings in quantum electrodynamics or chromodynamics. Coupling constants can be either dimensionful or dimensionless, depending on the operator's scaling dimension and the spacetime dimensionality of the theory. In four-dimensional quantum field theories, dimensionless couplings correspond to marginal (renormalizable) operators, while dimensionful ones arise in super-renormalizable or non-renormalizable cases; however, renormalization techniques absorb ultraviolet divergences and define effective dimensionless couplings that remain perturbative up to high energies in asymptotically free or renormalizable models.^[10] The notion of a coupling constant originated historically in early quantum electrodynamics, where Arnold Sommerfeld introduced it in 1916 to parameterize the fine splitting of hydrogen spectral lines through the fine-structure constant, marking the first quantification of electromagnetic interaction strength beyond classical theory.^[11]

Physical Interpretation

In quantum field theory, the coupling constant g quantifies the intrinsic strength of interactions between fundamental fields, serving as a dimensionless parameter in the Lagrangian that governs the probability amplitude for vertices where particles exchange force carriers. Each interaction vertex contributes a factor of g to the Feynman diagram amplitude, enabling the computation of transition probabilities as the square of these amplitudes. When g is small, the theory admits a perturbative expansion, where observables like scattering amplitudes are calculated as convergent power series in g (or often g^2, corresponding to probabilities), providing reliable predictions for weak interactions.^[12] The value of g distinguishes between weak and strong coupling regimes, dictating the applicability of analytical methods in physical theories. In the weak coupling regime (g \ll 1), perturbative techniques dominate, as seen in high-energy quantum chromodynamics (QCD) where the strong coupling becomes sufficiently small to allow systematic expansions. In contrast, the strong coupling regime (g \gtrsim 1) necessitates non-perturbative approaches, such as lattice simulations, to capture phenomena like confinement in low-energy QCD. The fine-structure constant \alpha \approx 1/137 exemplifies a prototypical weak coupling in electromagnetism.^[13]^[14] Coupling constants directly influence measurable quantities, such as scattering cross-sections in particle collisions. For two-to-two body processes in the high-energy limit, the total cross-section scales as \sigma \propto g^4 / [s](/page/%s), where [s](/page/%s) is the Mandelstam variable representing the center-of-mass energy squared; this arises from the tree-level amplitude being proportional to g^2, with the probability entering quadratically. These constants also encode the relative strengths among fundamental forces: the strong force (\alpha_[s](/page/Glossary_of_curling) \approx 0.118 at the electroweak scale) is far more intense than electromagnetism (\alpha \approx 0.0073), while gravity's effective coupling remains negligible (\sim 10^{-38} for typical particle masses).^[15]^[14]

Electromagnetic Coupling

Fine-Structure Constant

The fine-structure constant, denoted \alpha, is the dimensionless coupling constant characterizing the strength of the electromagnetic interaction in quantum electrodynamics (QED). It quantifies the probability of photon exchange between charged elementary particles, serving as a fundamental parameter in the theory.^[3] Introduced by Arnold Sommerfeld in 1916, \alpha was proposed to explain the fine structure—the small splitting of spectral lines in atomic spectra, such as those of hydrogen—beyond the predictions of the Bohr model, incorporating relativistic effects on electron orbits.^[16] Sommerfeld's extension of the Bohr quantization rules revealed that this splitting arises from the interplay of orbital motion and electron spin, with \alpha determining its scale.^[16] The constant is defined in SI units as

\alpha = \frac{e^2}{4\pi \epsilon_0 \hbar c},

where e is the elementary electric charge, \epsilon_0 the vacuum permittivity, \hbar the reduced Planck constant, and c the speed of light in vacuum. This formulation ensures \alpha is purely numerical, independent of units. At low energies (zero momentum transfer), its value is \alpha \approx 1/137.03599918.^[14]^[3] In QED, \alpha plays a central role in perturbative calculations, parameterizing the expansion parameter for quantum corrections to classical electromagnetism. It governs the magnitude of vertex corrections, which modify the electron-photon coupling at the interaction vertex, and vacuum polarization effects, where virtual particle-antiparticle pairs screen the bare charge and alter the effective interaction strength.^[3] These contributions are essential for high-precision predictions, such as the anomalous magnetic moment of the electron. In QED, \alpha runs mildly with the energy scale due to vacuum polarization, increasing from its low-energy value toward higher energies.^[3]

Measurement and Value

The fine-structure constant \alpha has been measured historically through atomic spectroscopy, particularly the fine structure splitting in the hydrogen atom spectrum, which Arnold Sommerfeld introduced in 1916 to quantify the relativistic corrections to the Bohr model.^[11] Early determinations relied on precise wavelength measurements of these spectral lines, yielding initial values around $1/\alpha \approx 137.^[17] Another key historical approach involved the anomalous magnetic moment of the electron, g-2, where quantum electrodynamics (QED) relates the deviation from g=2 directly to \alpha through perturbative expansions; experiments at Harvard in the 2000s achieved uncertainties below 0.3 parts per billion using Penning traps to measure the electron's cyclotron and spin precession frequencies.^[18] Post-2019 SI redefinition, with e, \hbar (from exact h), and c fixed as exact constants, modern determinations of \alpha primarily derive from independent measurements such as the electron anomalous magnetic moment (g-2), comparing experimental values to QED theory, and corroborated by the quantum Hall effect. These enable indirect evaluation via the relation \alpha = e^2 / (4\pi\epsilon_0 \hbar c), with relative uncertainties around $1.5 \times 10^{-10}. Since the 2019 redefinition, e is fixed at exactly $1.602176634 \times 10^{-19} C, building on historical measurements like Robert Millikan's 1909 oil-drop experiment, which demonstrated charge quantization by balancing gravitational and electrostatic forces on charged oil droplets. A 2017 atom interferometry experiment with laser-cooled cesium atoms measured \alpha by determining the recoil frequency (related to h/m_{\ce{Cs}}) in a matter-wave interferometer, yielding \alpha^{-1} = 137.035999046(27) with a relative uncertainty of $2.0 \times 10^{-10}, contributing to CODATA adjustments.^[19] These metrological techniques, including the quantum Hall effect for resistance standards (R_K = h/e^2) and Josephson junctions for voltage standards (V = n (h f / 2e)), enable the indirect determination of \alpha by linking macroscopic electrical measurements to fundamental quantum effects, with uncertainties dominated by the precision of capacitance comparisons.^[20] The 2022 CODATA recommended value is \alpha^{-1} = 137.035999177(21), corresponding to a relative uncertainty of $1.5 \times 10^{-10}, reflecting adjustments from 133 input data points including the above methods (as of May 2024).^[21] Precision improvements have been bolstered by particle accelerators, such as the Large Electron-Positron (LEP) collider at CERN, where Bhabha scattering cross-sections at energies up to 209 GeV provided QED tests consistent with the low-energy \alpha value, confirming radiative corrections to within 0.1% and aiding the extraction of electroweak parameters like the weak mixing angle.^[22]

Nuclear Couplings

Strong Coupling Constant

The strong coupling constant, denoted as \alpha_s, is the fundamental parameter governing the strength of interactions in quantum chromodynamics (QCD), the theory describing the strong nuclear force between quarks and gluons. It is defined as \alpha_s = g_s^2 / (4\pi), where g_s is the gauge coupling associated with the SU(3)_c color symmetry group that mediates quark-gluon interactions.^[2] In the QCD Lagrangian, \alpha_s enters through the gauge coupling g_s in the covariant derivative D_\mu = \partial_\mu - i g_s A_\mu^a T^a, where A_\mu^a are the gluon fields and T^a are the SU(3)_c generators, and in the field strength tensor term \operatorname{tr}(G_{\mu\nu} G^{\mu\nu}), with G_{\mu\nu}^a = \partial_\mu A_\nu^a - \partial_\nu A_\mu^a - g_s f^{abc} A_\mu^b A_\nu^c. This structure encapsulates the non-Abelian nature of the strong force, leading to self-interactions among gluons that are absent in quantum electrodynamics.^[2] The value of \alpha_s is scale-dependent due to quantum corrections, but its conventional reference value at the Z-boson mass scale is \alpha_s(M_Z) \approx 0.1179 \pm 0.0009. At low energies, relevant to nuclear scales, \alpha_s becomes large (on the order of 1 or greater), driving the phenomenon of confinement, where quarks are perpetually bound into color-neutral hadrons such as protons and mesons, preventing the observation of free quarks.^[2] At high energies, \alpha_s decreases, embodying asymptotic freedom and allowing perturbative QCD calculations for processes like deep inelastic scattering.^[2]

Weak Coupling Constants

In the electroweak theory, the weak nuclear force is mediated by the SU(2)_L gauge group with coupling constant g, while the U(1)_Y hypercharge group has coupling constant g'. These are related to the electromagnetic coupling e through the Weinberg angle \theta_W, defined such that \sin^2 \theta_W \approx 0.231 (in the \overline{\text{MS}} scheme at the [Z](/page/Z) boson mass scale M_Z), with the relations e = g \sin \theta_W = g' \cos \theta_W.^[4] The relevant terms in the electroweak Lagrangian describing the weak interactions are g W_\mu J^\mu for the charged-current interactions involving the W^\pm bosons and left-handed fermions, and (g'/2) B_\mu Y for the neutral-current hypercharge interactions involving the B boson and the hypercharge current Y.^[4] After electroweak symmetry breaking, these mix to form the photon, W^\pm, and Z bosons, with the weak couplings governing the strengths of the resulting interactions. At the Z boson mass scale (M_Z \approx 91.19 GeV), the values are g \approx 0.652 and g' \approx 0.358, derived from the running electromagnetic fine-structure constant \alpha(M_Z) \approx 1/127.93 and \sin^2 \theta_W.^[4] These correspond to the weak fine-structure constants \alpha_W = g^2 / 4\pi \approx 1/30 and \alpha' = {g'}^2 / 4\pi \approx 1/100, which are weaker than the electromagnetic coupling but stronger than the Fermi constant in low-energy effective theory.^[4] The weak couplings primarily govern flavor-changing charged-current processes such as beta decay (\beta decay of neutrons into protons, electrons, and antineutrinos) and neutral-current processes like neutrino-nucleon scattering, where the cross sections scale with g^2 or {g'}^2.^[4] Unlike the parity-conserving strong and electromagnetic forces, the weak interaction violates parity, manifesting in phenomena like the asymmetric electron emission in cobalt-60 beta decay, which distinguishes it through maximal V-A (vector minus axial-vector) structure in the charged currents. This unification of weak and electromagnetic forces occurs at the electroweak scale around 100 GeV.^[4]

Running Behavior

Phenomenology of Running

In quantum field theories such as QED and QCD, coupling constants display a scale dependence referred to as running, arising from quantum corrections involving virtual particle loops that renormalize the effective interaction strength at different momentum transfer scales Q. These loops modify the propagator of the mediating boson—vacuum polarization in QED from fermion-antifermion pairs, and analogous gluon and quark contributions in QCD—leading to an energy-dependent effective coupling.^[23]^[2] In QED, this results in the fine-structure constant \alpha increasing logarithmically with Q, while in QCD, the strong coupling \alpha_s decreases at high Q due to the non-Abelian nature of the theory.^[24] Phenomenological signatures of this running are observed in high-energy scattering processes. In QED, the increase of \alpha at higher energies contributes to the scale dependence of the R ratio, defined as R = \sigma(e^+ e^- \to \mathrm{hadrons}) / \sigma(e^+ e^- \to \mu^+ \mu^-), where perturbative corrections incorporating the running coupling explain the ratio's behavior beyond simple parton-model expectations.^[2] For QCD, the diminution of \alpha_s manifests in collider jet production, where higher-energy events exhibit reduced multiplicity of soft gluon emissions and more collimated jets, consistent with a weaker effective coupling at large Q.^[24] Key experimental tests have verified these effects through precision measurements at electron-positron colliders. At LEP, analyses of event shapes like thrust and the rates of three-jet final states in e^+ e^- annihilations near the Z-boson mass scale (M_Z \approx 91 GeV) yield values of \alpha_s(M_Z) \approx 0.118, demonstrating consistency with the predicted running from lower-energy determinations such as tau decays.^[2] These observables, calculated to next-to-next-to-leading order in perturbation theory, provide stringent constraints on the scale evolution of \alpha_s, with systematic uncertainties dominated by nonperturbative effects rather than statistics.^[2] The running of couplings has broad implications for particle physics phenomenology, as it alters predicted cross-sections for processes like deep inelastic scattering and decay widths of heavy particles, requiring renormalization-group resummation for reliable calculations at varying energy scales.^[24] This scale dependence also underpins efforts toward gauge unification, where the logarithmic evolution allows electroweak, strong, and electromagnetic couplings to potentially meet at a high unification scale, informed by precise low-energy measurements.^[2]

Beta Functions

In quantum field theory, the beta function describes the renormalization group flow of a coupling constant with respect to the energy scale. It is defined as \beta(g) = \mu \frac{dg}{d\mu}, where g is the coupling constant and \mu is the renormalization scale. This function encodes how the coupling evolves under changes in the scale at which the theory is probed, arising from the requirement of scale invariance in the renormalized theory. In perturbative quantum field theories, particularly gauge theories, the beta function admits a power series expansion in the coupling: \beta(g) = -\frac{b g^3}{16\pi^2} + O(g^5), where the leading one-loop term dominates at weak coupling, and higher-order contributions include two-loop and beyond effects. The negative sign convention ensures that for asymptotically free theories, the coupling decreases at high energies. For non-Abelian gauge theories, the one-loop coefficient b is given by b = \frac{11}{3} C_A - \frac{4}{3} T_F n_f, where C_A is the quadratic Casimir operator in the adjoint representation, T_F is the normalization factor for the fermion representation (typically T_F = 1/2 for the fundamental representation of SU(N)), and n_f is the number of Dirac fermion flavors in that representation. For SU(3) color, C_A = 3, yielding b = 11 - \frac{2}{3} n_f. The positive value of b in such theories (for n_f < 16.5) implies asymptotic freedom when the beta function is negative. The renormalization group equation (RGE) for the fine-structure constant \alpha = g^2 / (4\pi) at one loop follows from the beta function: \frac{d\alpha}{d \ln \mu} = -\frac{b}{2\pi} \alpha^2. This differential equation governs the scale dependence of \alpha and can be integrated to obtain the running coupling explicitly. In theories with multiple couplings, such as the Standard Model or grand unified theories (GUTs), the beta functions generalize to a system of coupled renormalization group equations for the vector of couplings \mathbf{g} = (g_1, g_2, \dots). At one loop, for the Standard Model's three gauge couplings (g_1 for U(1)_Y, g_2 for SU(2)_L, g_3 for SU(3)_c), the equations take the form \beta(g_i) = -\frac{b_i g_i^3}{16\pi^2} with group-specific coefficients b_i, though higher-loop terms introduce mixing between the couplings. In GUTs, unification imposes relations among these betas above the unification scale.

QED Running and Landau Pole

In quantum electrodynamics (QED), the beta function governing the running of the fine-structure constant \alpha at one-loop order is given by

\beta(\alpha) = \frac{2}{3} \frac{\alpha^2}{\pi} \sum_f Q_f^2 n_f,

where the sum is over Dirac fermions with electric charges Q_f (in units of the elementary charge) and n_f counting the number of such fields; the positive sign of the leading term implies that \alpha increases with the energy scale \mu. This behavior arises primarily from vacuum polarization effects due to fermion loops in the photon propagator, with the electron contribution dominating at low energies. The one-loop running of \alpha can be approximated by integrating the renormalization group equation, yielding

\alpha(\mu) = \frac{\alpha(0)}{1 - \frac{\alpha(0)}{3\pi} \ln\left(\frac{\mu^2}{m_e^2}\right)},

valid for \mu \gg m_e where \alpha(0) is the low-energy value and m_e the electron mass; higher-loop corrections and additional fermion thresholds modify this slightly but preserve the qualitative trend. This formula highlights the monotonic increase of \alpha(\mu) with \mu, contrasting with the decrease observed in quantum chromodynamics due to asymptotic freedom. Precision electroweak measurements at the Z boson mass scale M_Z \approx 91 GeV confirm this running, with \alpha(M_Z) \approx 1/128 derived from LEP data on processes sensitive to the effective coupling.^[4] The continued growth of \alpha(\mu) leads to a Landau pole, a singularity in the perturbative expansion where the denominator vanishes at an ultrahigh scale \mu_L \sim m_e \exp\left( \frac{3\pi}{2 \alpha(0)} \right) \approx 10^{280} GeV.^[25] This indicates a breakdown of QED as an effective theory at such extreme energies, far exceeding the electroweak scale, where non-perturbative effects or a more fundamental ultraviolet completion (e.g., incorporating grand unification) would be required.^[25] The Landau pole underscores the infrared-free nature of QED, rendering it inconsistent as a standalone theory up to the Planck scale without additional physics.

QCD Asymptotic Freedom

Asymptotic freedom is a fundamental property of quantum chromodynamics (QCD), the theory describing the strong nuclear force, where the strong coupling constant \alpha_s decreases as the energy scale \mu increases, allowing quarks and gluons to behave as nearly free particles at very short distances.^[26] This behavior arises from the negative sign of the QCD beta function \beta(\alpha_s), which governs the running of the coupling with energy. Specifically, the leading-order beta function is \beta(\alpha_s) = -\frac{\beta_0 \alpha_s^2}{2\pi}, where the positive coefficient \beta_0 = 11 - \frac{2}{3} n_f > 0 for the number of quark flavors n_f \leq [16](/page/16), ensuring \alpha_s diminishes logarithmically at high \mu.^[27] The discovery of this property stemmed from calculations by David Gross and Frank Wilczek in 1973, who demonstrated that in non-Abelian gauge theories like QCD, the ultraviolet behavior leads to free-field-like asymptotics due to gluon self-interactions.^[27] In their proof outline, the one-loop beta function contribution from quarks (fermion loops) acts as screening, similar to QED, tending to increase the effective coupling at short distances; however, the self-interaction of colored gluons produces an antiscreening effect that dominates, resulting in a net decrease in \alpha_s.^[27] Independently, David Politzer arrived at the same conclusion by computing the renormalization group equation for the strong coupling, confirming the negative beta function for realistic flavor numbers. This asymptotic freedom has profound implications for perturbative QCD, enabling reliable calculations at high energies where \alpha_s is small, such as in deep inelastic scattering experiments that probe quark structure inside protons.^[26] For instance, the scaling violations observed in deep inelastic scattering data align with QCD predictions of logarithmic corrections from the running coupling.^[28] At low energies, the increasing \alpha_s connects to quark confinement, where the force strengthens to bind quarks within hadrons. The seminal contributions of Gross, Wilczek, and Politzer were recognized with the 2004 Nobel Prize in Physics for discovering asymptotic freedom in the theory of the strong interaction.^[29]

QCD Scale Parameter

The QCD scale parameter, denoted \Lambda_{\rm QCD}, represents the intrinsic energy scale of quantum chromodynamics (QCD) that governs the non-perturbative regime of strong interactions. It is defined as the renormalization scale \mu at which the strong coupling constant \alpha_s(\mu) reaches approximately 1, signaling the breakdown of perturbation theory and the dominance of confinement effects. This parameter emerges as the integration constant when solving the renormalization group equation (RGE) for the running of \alpha_s, which in the leading-order approximation takes the form

\alpha_s(\mu) = \frac{4\pi}{b \ln(\mu^2 / \Lambda_{\rm QCD}^2)},

where b = 11 - (2/3) n_f and n_f is the number of active quark flavors.^[2] The value of \Lambda_{\rm QCD} is scheme-dependent and varies with n_f; for n_f = 3 (considering the up, down, and strange quarks), it is approximately 330 MeV in the \overline{\rm MS} scheme, reflecting the energy scale relevant for low-energy hadron physics. Higher-order corrections and lattice computations refine this to around 332 \pm 20 MeV in recent determinations, but the range underscores the parameter's sensitivity to renormalization details.^[30]^[2]^[31] Extraction of \Lambda_{\rm QCD} relies on comparing theoretical predictions with experimental or simulated observables sensitive to the strong scale. In lattice QCD, it is obtained from non-perturbative computations of quantities like the string tension \sigma in the quark-antiquark potential, where \sqrt{\sigma} \approx 440 MeV provides a direct link to confinement dynamics. Hadron masses, such as those of the \rho meson or proton, also yield estimates by relating their values to the QCD binding energy scale through sum rules or effective models. At high energies, jet event rates and shapes in proton-proton collisions at the LHC allow determination of the running \alpha_s, from which \Lambda_{\rm QCD} is inferred via the RGE.^[2]^[32]^[2] \Lambda_{\rm QCD} sets the fundamental confinement scale in QCD, dictating the distance (\sim 1/\Lambda_{\rm QCD}) beyond which quarks cannot be observed as free particles. It plays a crucial role in generating hadron masses through gluon dynamics; for example, the proton mass of about 938 MeV arises predominantly from this scale, as the constituent light quark masses are negligible (< 10 MeV), with nearly all the mass emerging from the non-perturbative strong interaction energy.^[33]

Gauge Unification

Gauge Couplings in the Standard Model

The Standard Model of particle physics is based on the non-Abelian gauge group SU(3)_C \times SU(2)_L \times U(1)_Y, where SU(3)_C describes the strong interactions, SU(2)_L the weak isospin, and U(1)_Y the hypercharge.^[34] The corresponding gauge couplings are denoted g_3, g_2, and g_1, respectively, with the fine-structure constants defined as \alpha_i = g_i^2 / (4\pi) for i = 1, 2, 3.^[34] For consistency in grand unified theories, the U(1)_Y coupling is normalized such that g_1 = \sqrt{5/3}\, g', where g' is the conventional hypercharge coupling; this rescaling ensures the generators have uniform trace normalization across the groups.^[35] In the Standard Model, these gauge couplings exhibit energy-scale dependence governed by renormalization group equations, with distinct running behaviors arising from the one-loop beta function coefficients b_1 = 41/10, b_2 = -19/6, and b_3 = -7.^[34] The strong coupling \alpha_3 decreases most rapidly with increasing energy due to its large negative coefficient, reflecting asymptotic freedom in quantum chromodynamics, while \alpha_1 increases slowly owing to its positive coefficient dominated by fermion contributions.^[36] The weak coupling \alpha_2 runs more moderately, decreasing but at a slower rate than \alpha_3. These differing slopes highlight the non-universal nature of the interactions within the Standard Model framework. At the electroweak scale around M_W \approx 80 GeV, the SU(2)_L \times U(1)_Y symmetry breaks via the Higgs mechanism, unifying the weak and electromagnetic forces.^[23] Here, the weak coupling relates to the electromagnetic fine-structure constant \alpha_\mathrm{em} and the weak mixing angle \theta_W by \alpha_2 = \alpha_\mathrm{em} / \sin^2 \theta_W, while the normalized hypercharge coupling satisfies \alpha_1 = \alpha_\mathrm{em} / \cos^2 \theta_W, with \sin^2 \theta_W \approx 0.231.^[23] These relations emerge from the mixing of the neutral gauge bosons into the photon and Z boson, determining the strengths of the residual interactions post-symmetry breaking. Threshold effects from integrating out heavy particles modify the running of the couplings across mass scales. For instance, the top quark, with mass m_t \approx 173 GeV, contributes to the beta functions only above its threshold; below m_t, its decoupling reduces the effective number of active flavors, altering the slope of \alpha_3 and, to a lesser extent, the electroweak couplings.^[34] Such effects are crucial for precision comparisons between theory and experiment, as they introduce logarithmic corrections proportional to \log(m_t / \mu).^[34] When extrapolated to very high energies, the Standard Model couplings approach closer values but do not fully unify without extensions.^[34]

Grand Unified Theories

In grand unified theories (GUTs), the three gauge couplings of the Standard Model are hypothesized to converge to a single unified coupling constant, denoted \alpha_\mathrm{GUT}, at a high-energy unification scale M_\mathrm{GUT} \approx 2 \times 10^{16} GeV. This idea was first proposed in the SU(5) model by Georgi and Glashow, where the Standard Model gauge group SU(3)_\mathrm{C} × SU(2)_\mathrm{L} × U(1)_\mathrm{Y} embeds into the simple Lie group SU(5), unifying the strong, weak, and electromagnetic interactions under one gauge structure. Similarly, the SO(10) model extends this unification by accommodating all Standard Model fermions, including a right-handed neutrino, within a single 16-dimensional spinor representation, naturally incorporating lepton number as the fourth color.^[34] The prediction of unification arises from the renormalization group evolution of the couplings, visualized in a plot of \alpha_i^{-1} versus \ln \mu, where the inverse couplings for the electromagnetic, weak, and strong interactions run linearly with the logarithm of the energy scale \mu. In the minimal Standard Model, the lines fail to intersect precisely, but incorporating minimal supersymmetry (SUSY) alters the beta functions, leading to a near intersection around $10^{15}–$10^{16} GeV, supporting the GUT scale. This success of SUSY GUTs, particularly minimal SUSY SU(5), relies on the additional supersymmetric particles contributing to the running, with \alpha_\mathrm{GUT} \approx 1/25 at unification.^[34]91245-1) Despite these strengths, GUTs face significant challenges. Proton decay, a hallmark prediction mediated by gauge bosons like the X and Y in SU(5), is tightly constrained by experiments; Super-Kamiokande reports a lower limit on the partial lifetime for p \to e^+ \pi^0 of \tau > 2.4 \times 10^{34} years, pushing the colored Higgs triplet mass above $10^{16} GeV in SUSY models and straining unification without additional mechanisms. The doublet-triplet splitting problem further complicates SUSY GUTs, requiring the Higgs doublets to remain light at the electroweak scale while their triplet partners acquire GUT-scale masses, often resolved through fine-tuning or mechanisms like the missing partner or sliding singlet.^[34] Variants of the basic models address these issues while preserving unification. Flipped SU(5) × U(1) modifies the embedding to avoid rapid proton decay and naturally incorporates the seesaw mechanism for neutrino masses, where heavy right-handed neutrinos at scales around $10^{14} GeV suppress light neutrino masses via m_\nu \approx v^2 / M. The Pati-Salam model, based on SU(4)_\mathrm{C} × SU(2)_\mathrm{L} × SU(2)_\mathrm{R}, unifies quarks and leptons differently, explaining charge quantization and serving as an intermediate step toward SO(10), with gauge couplings running to unification at similar high scales. These extensions highlight the flexibility of GUT frameworks in accommodating experimental constraints.91176-7)90141-4)^[34]

String Theory Context

String Coupling Constant

In perturbative string theory, the string coupling constant g_s governs the strength of interactions among strings and is defined as g_s = e^{\langle \phi \rangle}, where \langle \phi \rangle is the vacuum expectation value of the dilaton field \phi.^[37] This dimensionless parameter emerges from the low-energy effective action of the theory and determines the regime of validity for perturbative calculations. While the fundamental string tension T = \frac{1}{2\pi \alpha'}, with \alpha' the Regge slope parameter, remains independent of g_s, the theory incorporates extended objects like D-branes whose tensions scale inversely with g_s; for instance, the tension of a Dp-brane is T_p = \frac{1}{g_s (2\pi)^p l_s^{p+1}}, where l_s = \sqrt{\alpha'} is the string length.^[37] This scaling ensures that D-brane charges contribute significantly in the weak-coupling limit, facilitating the embedding of gauge theories within string frameworks. The role of g_s becomes particularly evident in the computation of scattering amplitudes, which encode the S-matrix elements of the theory. These amplitudes are constructed via path integrals over worldsheets of different topologies, with g_s weighting contributions according to the Euler characteristic. For a closed-string amplitude on a Riemann surface of genus h (corresponding to h handles or loops), the overall factor is proportional to g_s^{2h-2}.^[38] At tree level (h=0, spherical topology), this yields a factor of g_s^{-2}, which enhances the contribution at weak coupling and reflects the classical limit, while higher-genus corrections introduce positive powers of g_s^2, systematically accounting for quantum fluctuations. This structure mirrors the loop expansion in quantum field theory but is adapted to the extended nature of strings, ensuring modular invariance and unitarity when g_s is small. For the perturbative expansion to converge and avoid non-perturbative effects dominating, g_s \ll 1 is essential, placing the theory in a weakly coupled regime. In string models aimed at phenomenological applications, such as those incorporating the Standard Model gauge sector, g_s is typically constrained to values between $10^{-3} and $10^{-1}, allowing control over corrections while matching observed coupling strengths.^[39] A key distinction arises between closed and open strings: the closed-string coupling is g_s, whereas the open-string coupling g_o satisfies g_o^2 = g_s (or g_o = \sqrt{g_s}), derived from the boundary conditions and interaction vertices in the worldsheet theory.^[37] This relation directly influences gauge dynamics on D-branes, where stacks of open strings give rise to Yang-Mills theories with g_{YM}^2 \propto g_s, linking the string coupling to observable particle physics parameters.

Dilaton Dependence

In string theory, the dilaton is a scalar field \phi whose vacuum expectation value determines the string coupling constant via g_s = e^{\langle \phi \rangle}.^[40] This relation arises because the dilaton governs the strength of string interactions, with perturbative expansions valid for small g_s. The dilaton acquires a potential through perturbative contributions from fluxes or non-perturbative effects such as gaugino condensation in the hidden sector of heterotic string theories, which generates an exponential term stabilizing \phi at weak coupling. The tree-level effective action in the string frame, derived from the beta-function equations of the worldsheet theory, takes the form

S = \frac{1}{2\kappa^2} \int d^{10}x \sqrt{-g} \, e^{-2\phi} \left( R + 4 (\partial \phi)^2 - \frac{1}{12} |H_3|^2 \right) + \cdots,

where R is the Ricci scalar, H_3 is the field strength of the Neveu-Schwarz B-field, and the ellipsis denotes higher-order \alpha' corrections.^[40] This action highlights the dilaton's role in rescaling the Einstein-Hilbert term and kinetic energies, reflecting its influence on the overall coupling strength at low energies. In compactifications, the dilaton participates in moduli stabilization within flux vacua, where three-form fluxes generate a superpotential that fixes both the complex structure moduli and the axio-dilaton \tau = C_0 + i e^{-\phi}.^[41] The seminal framework by Giddings, Kachru, and Polchinski demonstrates how RR and NS-NS fluxes in type IIB string theory on Calabi-Yau orientifolds stabilize these fields, producing warped throats and addressing the hierarchy problem; uplifting mechanisms, such as anti-D3-brane contributions, further allow for de Sitter solutions with positive cosmological constant.^[41] At strong coupling where g_s > 1, the theory transitions via S-duality, mapping the strongly coupled regime to a weakly coupled dual description that reveals non-perturbative structure. For instance, in type IIB superstring theory, S-duality under SL(2,\mathbb{Z}) exchanges g_s with $1/g_s, ensuring self-duality and perturbative control at strong coupling through dual variables like D-branes. This duality extends to connections with M-theory, where strong-coupling limits of type IIB compactifications relate to eleven-dimensional geometries via dualities such as T-duality on the type IIA side.^[42]

References

[1]
[PDF] Quantum Field Theory - UCSB Physics
Quantum field theory is the basic mathematical language that is used to ... coupling constant is dimensionless. Perhaps because six dimensions used to ...
[2]
Coupling Constants for the Fundamental Forces - HyperPhysics
The coupling constant for each force is a dimensionless constant. The links below take you to some information about determining the value of the coupling ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[3]
Current advances: The fine-structure constant
It is the "coupling constant" or measure of the strength of the electromagnetic force that governs how electrically charged elementary particles (e.g., ...
[4]
https://pdg.lbl.gov/2024/reviews/rpp2024-rev-standard-model.pdf
[5]
Coupling Constant - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
The coupling constant is defined as a constant that characterizes an electromagnetic field and can be utilized to demonstrate the probability that an ...
[6]
[PDF] 3. Interacting Fields
Lagrangian for a real scalar field,. L = 1. 2. @µ. @µ. 1. 2 m2 2. X n3 n n! n. (3.1). The coefficients n are called coupling constants. What restrictions do we ...
[7]
[PDF] Quantum Field Theory: Example Sheet 4 + - DAMTP
Dr David Tong, November 2007. 1. A real scalar field with ϕ4 interaction ... The Lagrangian for Yukawa theory is given by. L = 1. 2. (∂ϕ)2 - 1. 2. µ2ϕ2 + ¯ψ ...
[8]
[PDF] Renormalizability and Dimensional Analysis - UT Physics
In these notes I shall explain the relation between energy dimensionalities of the coupling constants of a quantum field theory and between super- ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[9]
[PDF] The Fine Structure Constant - Indian Academy of Sciences
Although it was Arnold Sommerfeld who formally intro- duced the fine structure constant in 1916 (as discussed later in this article), its history can be traced ...
[10]
3 Interacting Fields‣ Quantum Field Theory by David Tong - DAMTP
The scalar Yukawa theory has a slightly worrying aspect: the potential has a stable local minimum at ϕ = ψ = 0 , but is unbounded below for large enough - g ⁢ ϕ ...
[11]
[PDF] 9. Quantum Chromodynamics - Particle Data Group
Dec 1, 2021 · (9.3) is the origin of Asymptotic Freedom [18,19], i.e. the fact that the strong coupling becomes weak for processes involving large momentum ...
[12]
[PDF] 1. Physical Constants - Particle Data Group
The last set of constants (beginning with the Fermi coupling constant) comes from the Particle Data Group. See also “The International System of Units (SI),” ...
[13]
[PDF] Cross Sections
Nov 30, 2017 · A differential scattering cross section is dσ = |A|2 64π2Ecm dΩ, where dΩ is a small area (solid angle) for scattering of two equal mass ...
[14]
Zur Quantentheorie der Spektrallinien - Sommerfeld - 1916
Zur Quantentheorie der Spektrallinien. A. Sommerfeld,. A. Sommerfeld. Search ... First published: 1916. https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.19163561702. Citations ...
[15]
[PDF] Fine-Structure Constant from Sommerfeld to Feynman - OSF
Jun 17, 2019 · The electromagnetic coupling constant determining the strength of its interaction is the fine- structure constant α = e2/¯hc in cgs units with ...
[16]
New Determination of the Fine Structure Constant from the Electron - g
Quantum electrodynamics (QED) predicts a relationship between the dimensionless magnetic moment of the electron ( g ) and the fine structure constant ( 𝛼 ).
[17]
Oil drop experiment - Wikipedia
The oil drop experiment was performed by Robert A. Millikan and Harvey Fletcher in 1909 to measure the elementary electric charge (the charge of the electron).
[18]
Measurement of the fine-structure constant as a test of the Standard ...
Apr 13, 2018 · Measurements of the fine-structure constant α require methods from across subfields and are thus powerful tests of the consistency of theory ...
[19]
Speed of Light from Direct Frequency and Wavelength ...
Nov 6, 1972 · The frequency and wavelength of the methane-stabilized laser at 3.39 μm were directly measured against the respective primary standards.
[20]
Measuring the Electron's Charge and the Fine-Structure Constant by ...
If Vs is measured in terms of the Josephson volt and the capacitor is measured in SI units then the fine-structure constant is the quantity determined. Recent ...
[21]
[PDF] CODATA RECOMMENDED VALUES OF THE FUNDAMENTAL ...
CODATA RECOMMENDED VALUES OF THE FUNDAMENTAL PHYSICAL CONSTANTS: 2022 ... inverse fine-structure constant α−1. 137.035 999 177(21) neutron magnetic ...
[22]
Measurement of the running of the fine-structure constant
Mar 9, 2000 · This article interprets measurements of Bhabha scattering by the L3 experiment at LEP in terms of the evolution of α(Q 2 ), using two complementary ...
[23]
[PDF] 9. Quantum Chromodynamics - Particle Data Group
May 31, 2024 · The value of the strong coupling constant must be inferred from such measurements and is subject to experimental and theoretical ...
[24]
[PDF] 10. Electroweak Model and Constraints on New Physics
May 31, 2024 · The set with the smallest experimental errors contains the Z mass2, the Fermi constant, and the fine structure constant. The latter two will ...
[25]
[PDF] 10. Electroweak Model and Constraints on New Physics
The observables sin2 θW and MW can be calculated from MZ, bα(MZ), and GF , when values for mt and MH are given, or conversely, MH can be ...Missing: M_Z | Show results with:M_Z
[26]
[PDF] The QCD Running Coupling - SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory
Apr 28, 2016 · In a general renormalizable quantum field theory (QFT), the coupling constant con- trolling the strength of the interactions described by the ...
[27]
Landau poles in condensed matter systems | Phys. Rev. Research
Jun 9, 2020 · Moreover, the Landau pole in QED can be estimated to occur at an energy scale on the order of 10 286 eV, which is far beyond the Planck ...Missing: 280 GeV
[28]
The Nobel Prize in Physics 2004 - Popular information
This property, called asymptotic freedom, means that the beta function is negative. On the other hand, the interaction strength increases with increasing ...
[29]
https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/2004/summary/
[30]
The discovery of asymptotic freedom and the emergence of QCD
In this Nobel lecture, I shall describe the turn of events that led to the discovery of asymptotic freedom, which in turn led to the formulation of QCD.
[31]
The Nobel Prize in Physics 2004 - NobelPrize.org
The Nobel Prize in Physics 2004 was awarded jointly to David J. Gross, H. David Politzer and Frank Wilczek for the discovery of asymptotic freedom.
[32]
[PDF] Quantum Chromodynamics
parameter ΛQCD - roughly, the scale at which the coupling becomes large. At one loop: • Measurements of the strong coupling suggest ΛQCD in the range 200-300 ...
[33]
Light hadron masses from lattice QCD | Rev. Mod. Phys.
Apr 4, 2012 · This article reviews lattice QCD results for the light hadron spectrum. An overview of different formulations of lattice QCD with discussions on the fermion ...
[34]
Connecting the hadron mass scale to the fundamental mass scale of ...
Nov 12, 2015 · The masses of hadrons such as the proton and ρ meson must emerge from the fundamental forces of QCD which confine their quark constituents. ...Missing: Λ_QCD | Show results with:Λ_QCD
[35]
[PDF] 93. Grand Unified Theories - Particle Data Group
May 31, 2024 · 93.1 The standard model. The Standard Model (SM) may be defined as the renormalizable field theory with gauge group. GSM = SU(3)C × SU(2)L ...
[36]
[PDF] arXiv:hep-ph/0503226v1 23 Mar 2005
The gauge couplings for SU(3)C and SU(2)L are unified at about 1016−17 GeV, and the gauge coupling for the U(1)Y at that scale depends on its normalization.
[37]
Gauge coupling beta functions in the standard model to three loops
Apr 10, 2012 · In this Letter, we compute the three-loop corrections to the beta functions of the three gauge couplings in the standard model of particle physics.
[38]
[PDF] An Introduction to String Theory - UC Berkeley Mathematics
Abstract: This set of notes is based on the course “Introduction to String Theory” which was taught by Prof. Kostas Skenderis in the spring of 2009 at the ...
[39]
[PDF] 6. String Interactions - DAMTP
The tree-level scattering amplitude is given by the correlation function of the 2d theory, ... For the open string, the string coupling constant that we add to ...
[40]
[PDF] arXiv:hep-ph/0108060v1 6 Aug 2001
is the string coupling –which should be smaller than 1, to trust string ... 3. An example of a typical value of gs in theories with large dimensions is ...Missing: g_s | Show results with:g_s
[41]
[PDF] 7. Low Energy Effective Actions - DAMTP
In the language of string theory, he introduced the dilaton field. 7.2 Other Couplings. We've understood how strings couple to a background spacetime metric.
[42]
[hep-th/0105097] Hierarchies from Fluxes in String Compactifications
May 10, 2001 · Warped compactifications with significant warping provide one of the few known mechanisms for naturally generating large hierarchies of physical scales.
[43]
[hep-th/9812037] Introduction to M Theory and AdS/CFT Duality - arXiv
Dec 4, 1998 · The main focus is on three particular dualities. The first one is the appearance of an 11th dimension in the strong coupling limit of the type ...Missing: regime | Show results with:regime