Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Culling

Culling is the selective killing of animals within a population to reduce numbers, typically targeting surplus, diseased, or genetically inferior individuals in wildlife, livestock, or invasive species contexts. This practice serves to control overpopulation that exceeds habitat carrying capacity, thereby averting starvation, habitat degradation, and heightened disease transmission among animals and to humans. In agriculture and forestry, culling mitigates crop and property damage from herbivores like deer, while in disease management, it aims to interrupt pathogen cycles, as seen in efforts to curb bovine tuberculosis via badger reduction. Effectiveness hinges on factors such as population isolation, culling intensity, and species behavior; isolated groups respond better to reduction than open systems where immigration and compensatory breeding offset losses. Controversies arise over ethical implications and outcomes, with critics questioning humane methods like shooting or gassing and citing instances where culling fails to achieve goals or disrupts ecosystems, though proponents emphasize empirical needs for balancing anthropocentric and ecological priorities.

Definitions and Terminology

Definition and Scope

Culling is the deliberate and selective removal of individual animals from a population, typically through killing, to reduce numbers, improve overall health, or enhance genetic traits. This process targets animals deemed unfit, such as those with poor productivity, disease, weakness, or undesirable characteristics, distinguishing it from random slaughter or euthanasia applied to isolated cases without broader population goals. The scope of culling extends across agriculture, where it optimizes livestock herds by exiting low-performing animals—such as dairy cows sold for slaughter or salvage—to sustain productivity and replace them with higher-potential stock; wildlife management, aiming to curb overpopulation that leads to habitat degradation or human conflicts; and disease control, involving mass removal to halt pathogen spread below persistence thresholds. In agricultural contexts, it has been applied since at least the mid-20th century in programs like U.S. beef cattle management to address infertility rates exceeding 10-15% in herds. Wildlife applications include targeted reductions in species like elephants or deer to maintain ecosystem carrying capacity, often when populations exceed sustainable densities by factors of 2-5 times. While primarily focused on vertebrates like mammals and birds, culling principles apply to aquaculture and occasionally invertebrates, though ethical and efficacy debates persist, with evidence showing variable success in disease suppression depending on population density and contact rates. It excludes non-selective harvesting or natural predation, emphasizing human-directed intervention for predefined outcomes rather than incidental mortality.

Etymology

The term "cull" entered English in the mid-15th century as a verb meaning "to select, pick, or gather," borrowed from Old French cuillir or cueillir ("to pick, gather, or pluck"), which traces to Latin colligere ("to collect, gather together, or bind"), a compound of com- ("together") and legere ("to gather, choose, or read"). This root emphasized selection from a group, initially applied to gathering fruits, flowers, or superior items. By the 17th century, the specialized sense emerged in agriculture and animal husbandry: "to select livestock by weeding out the weak, diseased, or inferior," reflecting a shift toward removal rather than retention of the chosen. The noun form, denoting the act or the removed animals, followed around 1600 for general selection but extended to rejected stock by the mid-1600s. In modern usage for population control, "culling" retains this selective partitioning but implies systematic killing to maintain herd quality or ecological balance.

Historical Development

Pre-Modern Practices

In the Neolithic era, selective culling emerged as a foundational practice in early animal husbandry, particularly involving the slaughter of young male sheep, goats, and cattle to preserve breeding females for milk production and sustainable herd management. This strategy optimized resource use in nascent pastoral economies, with archaeological evidence from sites in Anatolia showing widespread adoption by the mid-eighth millennium BC (circa 7000 BC), as indicated by mortality profiles dominated by juvenile males under 2-3 years old. Similar patterns in Southwest Asian Neolithic assemblages confirm culling targeted surplus males to reduce competition for forage while retaining reproductive stock, marking a shift from opportunistic hunting to managed exploitation. By the Bronze and Iron Ages, these practices persisted and refined in the Southern Levant and Mediterranean, where selective removal of animals with undesirable traits or excess numbers supported secondary products like wool and dairy alongside meat. Zooarchaeological data from multifunctional sites reveal kill-off patterns favoring the culling of immature males in dairy-oriented systems, ensuring herd viability amid environmental constraints. In classical antiquity, Roman agricultural texts describe analogous farm-level decisions to eliminate weak or diseased livestock, though ritual sacrifices often mirrored utilitarian slaughter techniques, such as stunning with hammers or axes before throat-cutting to minimize suffering and preserve meat quality. Medieval European farming continued these traditions, with early records from England (circa 5th-11th centuries AD) documenting elevated autumn-winter mortality in calves and lambs attributable to deliberate culling, driven by fodder shortages and the need to prioritize draft or milking animals. Such removals curbed overpopulation, mitigated disease transmission in communal pastures, and focused resources on high-value stock, as evidenced by faunal remains showing selective slaughter of non-productive individuals. Overall, pre-modern culling relied on rudimentary tools like axes and relied on empirical observation rather than genetics, emphasizing herd health and economic necessity over large-scale intervention.

Industrial and Scientific Era Advancements

During the late 18th century, as part of the British Agricultural Revolution, Robert Bakewell (1725–1795) introduced systematic selective breeding practices that incorporated rigorous culling to enhance livestock traits such as meat yield, wool production, and disease resistance. By evaluating progeny performance and culling animals failing to transmit superior qualities—such as faster growth or finer fleece—Bakewell developed breeds like the New Leicester sheep, which yielded up to 30% more carcass weight than earlier varieties, and improved Longhorn cattle for dairy and beef efficiency. These methods marked a shift from haphazard elimination to performance-based selection, influencing continental European agriculture by the early 19th century. In the 19th century, scientific understanding advanced culling through emerging veterinary diagnostics, notably the tuberculin test for bovine tuberculosis developed by Robert Koch in 1890, enabling test-and-slaughter protocols to isolate and remove infected animals from herds, thereby preventing widespread epizootics. This approach, formalized in early 20th-century programs like the U.S. Meat Inspection Act of 1906, reduced TB prevalence in cattle from over 5% in tested herds by 1917 to near eradication in many regions by mid-century, prioritizing herd health over individual retention. Wildlife management in the Industrial and Scientific Eras evolved with ecological insights, incorporating culling quotas based on population surveys to sustain game species amid habitat loss from urbanization and agriculture. In North America, the late 19th-century crisis of overhunted populations—such as passenger pigeons driven to extinction by 1914—spurred the North American Model of Wildlife Conservation, formalized in principles by the 1930s, which used regulated harvests as targeted culling to balance ecosystems and prevent starvation from overabundance. Technological aids, including breech-loading rifles introduced in the 1860s and aerial reconnaissance by the early 20th century, improved precision and scale in predator or invasive species culls, such as wolves in the U.S. to protect ungulates. By the early , quantitative integrated culling with estimates, allowing breeders to cull based on predicted breeding values rather than alone; for instance, programs culled low-milk producers using early evaluations, boosting yields by 20-30% per in U.S. herds from 1920 to 1950. These data-driven strategies, rooted in 19th-century biometric , underscored culling's in causal genetic , distinct from mere .

Methods and Techniques

Selective Culling in Breeding

Selective culling in breeding entails the systematic removal of animals displaying undesirable traits from a population to concentrate favorable genetic characteristics in future generations. This practice applies artificial selection by excluding individuals based on phenotypic assessments of traits such as productivity, health, conformation, or fertility, thereby increasing the selection differential and accelerating genetic gain. The response to selection follows the breeder's equation, R = h^2 \times S, where R is the genetic gain, h^2 is heritability, and S is the selection differential enhanced through culling. In livestock breeding programs, criteria for culling often include low reproductive performance, structural weaknesses, or failure to meet growth benchmarks. For instance, beef cow herds maintain annual culling rates of 15-20% to replace underperformers with superior , directly linking to improved herd profitability and calf production. In poultry flocks, selective culling targets unproductive or ill birds post-lay, preserving resources and elevating average egg production and viability across the flock. Dairy operations similarly cull heifers with predicted low lactation yields, optimizing genetic progress despite potential short-term herd size reductions. Empirical data from controlled breeding trials demonstrate that rigorous culling elevates trait heritability; for example, consistent removal of inferior animals in cattle lines has yielded measurable increases in weaning weights and fertility rates over successive generations. However, unadjusted culling can bias breeding value estimations by preferentially removing extremes, necessitating statistical corrections in genetic evaluations to accurately predict progeny performance. While genomic tools now supplement phenotypic culling by identifying carriers of deleterious alleles early, traditional selective culling remains foundational for realizing heritable improvements in closed populations.

Mass Culling in Populations

Mass culling in populations entails the large-scale, non-selective killing of animals within wild, feral, or extensive livestock groups to curb disease transmission or mitigate overabundance impacts on ecosystems and human activities. This approach prioritizes rapid population reduction over individual assessment, often implemented via methods like aerial shooting, poisoning, or coordinated sharpshooting when containment zones encompass entire herds or flocks. Empirical evidence from outbreaks demonstrates its role in halting epidemics, though ecological rebound and ethical concerns persist where alternatives like vaccination or habitat management prove feasible. In disease eradication efforts, mass culling has been pivotal during viral outbreaks affecting livestock. The 2001 foot-and-mouth disease epidemic in the United Kingdom necessitated the slaughter of approximately 6.5 million animals across infected and contiguous premises to prevent further spread, incurring direct costs of £8 billion and disrupting rural economies for years. Preemptive culling of at-risk farms reduced transmission rates by removing potential carriers, as modeled in epidemiological analyses of the event. Similarly, highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) responses involve depopulating entire flocks; since January 2022, U.S. outbreaks have impacted over 174 million birds across 1,708 sites, with culling enforced under federal guidelines to avert zoonotic risks and sustain poultry production. Globally, HPAI control has led to over 400 million birds culled since 2003, underscoring the scale required for containment in dense commercial settings. For overpopulation management, mass culling targets species exerting pressure on habitats or human infrastructure. In the United States, white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) populations exceeding carrying capacities in urban-suburban interfaces prompt organized removals; the Huron-Clinton Metroparks in Michigan initiated sharpshooter-led culls in 1999, stabilizing densities and enabling oak regeneration by curbing browsing damage. Such programs harvest hundreds to thousands annually in localized areas, balancing recreational hunting limits with targeted reductions to minimize vehicle collisions and crop losses, which exceed $2 billion nationwide from deer-related damages. Feral swine (Sus scrofa) control similarly employs population-wide tactics like aerial gunning and trapping; a 2018 Nebraska study documented removals of over 500 individuals in weeks via integrated culling, disrupting social structures and slowing recolonization. Controversial applications include predator culls for human safety, where efficacy data often lags implementation. Australia's Queensland Shark Control Program, operational since 1962, deploys drum lines and nets targeting species like great whites (Carcharodon carcharias), but peer-reviewed assessments find no causal link to reduced bite incidents, attributing stability to broader surveillance rather than lethality. These programs remove dozens annually yet face criticism for incidental bycatch of non-target marine life, highlighting trade-offs in causal realism over precautionary measures. Overall, mass culling's success hinges on precise execution and monitoring, as incomplete efforts can exacerbate issues like compensatory reproduction in resilient species.

Technological and Humane Methods

Captive bolt devices represent a primary technological method for humane culling in livestock, delivering a high-velocity bolt to induce immediate cerebral disruption and unconsciousness in ruminants such as cattle and sheep. Penetrating variants embed the bolt into the brain for destruction of vital centers, while non-penetrating models rely on concussive force; both achieve insensibility within fractions of a second when positioned accurately at the forehead intersection of imaginary lines from the base of each ear to the opposite eye. Modern pneumatic or powder-actuated pistols incorporate ergonomic designs and calibration tools to match animal size, reducing operator error and ensuring compliance with kinetic energy thresholds, such as at least 300 joules for mature cattle. Electrical stunning systems apply controlled alternating or direct current via electrodes to provoke generalized epileptiform activity, rendering pigs, sheep, and calves unconscious for slaughter or culling; head-only applications last 3-10 seconds at 1-2 amps to avoid cardiac arrest until exsanguination. Advancements include automated restraint conveyors with integrated stunners that synchronize current delivery to animal movement, minimizing variability and stress indicators like elevated cortisol levels observed in manual handling. These systems must adhere to parameters validated by electroencephalography studies showing loss of evoked potentials indicative of insensibility. Gas-based methods, such as systems using or mixtures, facilitate culling of and small mammals by inducing hypercapnic , leading to and without ; concentrations escalating from 20-40% CO2 achieve unconsciousness in 20-40 seconds for broilers. Technological refinements include multi-chamber tunnels with gas and sensors for of oxygen depletion below 2% and CO2 above 40%, optimizing during outbreaks where manual methods prove infeasible. shutdown plus adjuncts like or CO2 injection in enclosed barns enable depopulation of thousands of , though depends on sealing and ambient conditions to prevent prolonged distress. In wildlife culling, free projectile firearms deliver humane kills via high-velocity rounds ensuring brain destruction with minimal peripheral wounding, requiring minimum muzzle energies of 1,000 foot-pounds for large ungulates like deer. Technological integrations such as thermal imaging scopes and suppressors enhance precision in aerial or nocturnal operations, reducing escape of injured animals and bystander stress from noise; thermal-assisted helicopter culling for invasive species like feral pigs achieves cull rates exceeding 80% per sortie with one-shot lethality verified by post-mortem examination. These methods prioritize direct neural targeting over indirect poisons, aligning with empirical assessments of instantaneous insensibility over prolonged agonistic behaviors.

Applications in Animal Breeding

Pedigreed and Companion Animals

In pedigreed animal breeding, culling involves the euthanasia or exclusion of individuals failing to meet breed-specific standards for conformation, temperament, or health, thereby preventing the dissemination of suboptimal genetics within closed populations. This practice is particularly emphasized in breeds subjected to intense selection pressures, such as German Shepherds, where breeders employ "ruthless culling" to mitigate the degenerative impacts of close inbreeding and preserve working ability. Puppies exhibiting faults like incorrect limb structure, coat color deviations, or early indicators of hereditary diseases—such as preliminary signs of hip dysplasia—are commonly culled shortly after birth to uphold registry requirements and avoid propagating traits that compromise breed functionality. For companion animals derived from pedigreed lines, culling focuses on traits affecting suitability as pets, including aggression linked to genetic predispositions or poor socialization potential, which breeders remove to prioritize welfare and owner compatibility. In cases of severe congenital anomalies, such as untreatable cardiac defects or neurological impairments evident neonatally, euthanasia is performed when prognosis indicates chronic suffering, guided by veterinary assessments prioritizing minimal distress via methods like sodium pentobarbital injection. Responsible protocols often integrate pre-breeding genetic testing to reduce culling rates, though empirical data from breed clubs indicate that 20-30% of litters may still require intervention to sustain long-term breed viability. Critics from animal welfare organizations argue that such culling exacerbates inbreeding depression, but proponents counter that excluding substandard animals averts larger-scale welfare failures, as evidenced by historical breed improvements through selective removal in working dog populations. In companion contexts, non-lethal alternatives like mandatory sterilization for non-breeding stock have gained traction since the early 2000s, diminishing outright euthanasia while still enforcing standards via contract stipulations with buyers.

Genetic Improvement Strategies

Selective culling constitutes a primary mechanism for genetic enhancement in animal breeding by excising individuals with suboptimal estimated breeding values (EBVs) or phenotypic expressions of low-merit traits, thereby concentrating favorable alleles within the population and amplifying selection differentials. This approach leverages the principles of quantitative genetics, where the realized response to selection depends on trait heritability, selection intensity (heightened by culling inferior candidates), genetic variation, and generation interval. In practice, culling targets traits such as production efficiency, disease resistance, and reproductive fitness, preventing dilution of genetic progress and mitigating inbreeding depression in closed herds. In dairy cattle breeding, routine culling of cows exhibiting low milk yield, poor fertility, or health vulnerabilities—often guided by performance data and EBVs—has underpinned sustained genetic advancements, with improved genetics responsible for at least 50% of the observed increases in milk, fat, and protein production over the last five decades in the United States. For instance, selection programs incorporating culling for longevity and udder health have elevated average herd productivity while reducing involuntary cull rates associated with mastitis or reproductive failure. Genomic evaluations further refine culling decisions by identifying carriers of deleterious mutations, enabling preemptive removal to preserve overall genetic health. Swine breeding employs selective culling to prioritize traits like litter size, growth rate, and lean meat yield, yielding a 50% rise in average litter size from the 1960s to 2005 through targeted removal of sows with inadequate maternal performance or boars with subpar feed efficiency. Culling also addresses robustness, such as eliminating pigs prone to lameness or high mortality, which enhances overall population resilience without compromising production gains; studies in closed herds demonstrate that such practices maintain or boost selection response even under phenotypic or BLUP-based indexing. In poultry, analogous strategies—culling birds with inferior egg-laying rates, body weight, or feed conversion—exploit short generation intervals (1-1.5 years) to achieve rapid annual genetic progress, often exceeding 1% in key commercial traits, as heritability and intense selection differentials compound over cycles. These strategies' efficacy hinges on accurate phenotyping and genetic assessment; for example, in beef and dual-purpose breeds, culling for low carcass quality or adaptability traits supports breed substitution or crossbreeding to accelerate step changes in performance. Empirical data affirm that integrating culling with modern tools like genomic selection doubles genetic gain rates compared to phenotypic-only methods, as seen in net merit indices rising from $40 annually pre-2010 to $79 post-genomic implementation in dairy systems. However, over-reliance on production-focused culling risks antagonistic correlations, such as reduced fertility, necessitating balanced indices to sustain long-term viability.

Culling in Agriculture and Livestock Production

Economic and Productivity Rationales

In livestock production, culling unproductive animals reallocates feed, labor, and space resources to higher-performing individuals, thereby elevating average output per unit input and enhancing farm profitability. This practice targets animals with low growth rates, poor reproductive performance, or suboptimal yields, preventing dilution of herd genetics and minimizing maintenance costs for non-contributors. Empirical analyses indicate that selective removal based on economic thresholds—such as milk production below herd averages in dairy systems—can increase net returns by optimizing replacement strategies and genetic progress. In dairy operations, voluntary culling for low milk production constitutes a primary driver of productivity gains, with studies showing that herds achieving higher rates of such removals often realize superior profitability through elevated average yields and genetic improvement. For instance, larger dairy herds (over 500 cows) culled 28.1% of animals specifically for low production unrelated to disease, enabling faster incorporation of superior genetics and a comparative production advantage over smaller operations with lower voluntary cull rates. Culling decisions incorporate factors like current lactation revenues against lifetime costs, where retaining underperformers beyond their first lactation yields lesser economic returns than early replacement with higher-potential heifers. Beef cattle management similarly employs culling to boost efficiency, particularly by eliminating open (non-pregnant) cows, as economic modeling demonstrates that replacement with bred heifers—even at elevated purchase prices—outperforms retaining non-breeders for another cycle by avoiding lost production and feed expenses. In cow-calf systems, culling rates tied to fertility and weaning weights directly correlate with per-cow profitability, as unproductive animals impose opportunity costs equivalent to forgone calf sales and increased carrying charges. Poultry production benefits from routine culling of slow-maturing or defective birds, which fosters uniform flocks with accelerated growth and reduced feed conversion ratios, thereby lowering overall costs and amplifying meat or egg output per square foot of housing. Targeted removal of low performers in broiler or layer operations enhances genetic selection for traits like feed efficiency, with data from integrated systems showing that optimized culling protocols can minimize waste and support secondary revenue from processed cull birds.

Disease Prevention and Herd Management

Culling infected or exposed livestock is a cornerstone of disease prevention strategies in agriculture, aimed at interrupting transmission chains for highly contagious pathogens that can devastate herds and economies. By removing animals that test positive or reside on contaminated premises, authorities prevent lateral spread via direct contact, aerosols, or fomites, preserving uninfected populations and enabling repopulation with disease-free stock. This approach relies on rapid surveillance, quarantine, and depopulation, often supplemented by movement restrictions and disinfection, as empirical models demonstrate that delays in culling exponentially increase outbreak scale. A prominent example is the control of foot-and-mouth disease (FMD), where pre-emptive culling of surrounding herds limits undetected spread from index cases. During the 2001 United Kingdom epidemic, over 6 million cattle, sheep, and pigs were culled across more than 2,000 premises, including uninfected animals within 3 km radii of outbreaks, which eradicated the virus within months despite initial rapid dissemination via livestock markets and transport. Studies modeling FMD dynamics affirm that such contiguous culling reduces epidemic duration and geographic extent by 20–50% compared to reactive measures alone, though effectiveness hinges on high-capacity implementation exceeding pathogen reproduction rates. In poultry production, culling entire flocks upon avian influenza detection is standard protocol for highly pathogenic strains like H5N1, as partial depopulation risks persistent shedding and environmental contamination. The 2014–2015 United States outbreak prompted the culling of approximately 50 million birds, primarily turkeys and layers, using on-site methods such as composting or foam depopulation, which contained the virus to 21 states and prevented sustained endemicity in commercial flocks. However, ongoing H5N1 incursions since 2022, despite culling over 166 million birds globally, highlight limitations when wild bird reservoirs sustain reintroduction, underscoring the need for integrated biosecurity beyond culling. For chronic diseases like bovine tuberculosis (bTB), culling wildlife vectors such as badgers targets interspecies transmission to cattle herds, with Ireland's nationwide badger removal program from 1997–2003 correlating to a 60% decline in bTB incidence. In England, post-2013 badger culling trials reported 37–56% fewer confirmed bTB herd breakdowns inside cull zones over four years, attributed to reduced badger densities lowering spillover events. Yet, randomized trials reveal perturbation effects, where culling displaces surviving badgers, elevating transmission risks by up to 25% in adjacent areas, and longitudinal data indicate no net reduction in national herd incidence after a decade of widespread implementation. Routine herd management extends culling to subclinical carriers, low performers, or genetically vulnerable animals, fostering resilience through selective retention of robust stock. In dairy operations, culling decisions prioritize reproductive failure (27–40% of cases), mastitis (10–20%), and low milk yield, with higher-producing herds achieving 20–30% annual turnover rates that correlate with lower disease prevalence via improved immunity and hygiene. Risk-based protocols, targeting high-density or high-movement farms, further optimize prevention by preemptively removing suspects before symptoms manifest, as validated in simulations for swine and cattle pathogens. These practices, while economically burdensome, underpin certification schemes like tuberculosis-free status, enabling trade and averting multimillion-dollar losses from quarantines.

Wildlife and Conservation Management

Population Control and Ecosystem Balance

Culling serves as a management tool to regulate overabundant wildlife populations that exceed ecosystem carrying capacities, thereby mitigating disruptions to vegetation structure and biodiversity. In forests lacking sufficient natural predators, herbivores such as white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) can overbrowse understory plants, suppressing tree regeneration and reducing plant species diversity by 48-81% in primary old-growth stands at high densities. This overbrowsing alters forest composition, favors invasive species, and diminishes habitat quality for other taxa, including birds and small mammals dependent on diverse understories. Targeted culling reduces herbivore densities to levels that permit vegetation recovery and ecosystem stabilization. At Catoctin Mountain Park in Maryland, culling initiated in February 2010 increased tree seedling density approximately 11-fold from pre-culling levels (2006-2009) to post-culling monitoring (2014-2017), demonstrating enhanced woody regeneration despite ongoing challenges like invasive species and pests. Similarly, a before-after-control-impact study in Australian peatlands found that culling invasive sambar deer (Rusa unicolor) significantly lowered browsing pressure, preserving endangered vegetation communities. These interventions mimic natural predation dynamics, preventing population irruptions that lead to habitat degradation and subsequent famine in the culled species. Sustained culling efforts have restored forest functions in managed landscapes. In central New Jersey, a 2004 cull combined with ongoing hunting reduced deer densities to about 3.8 per km² within exclosures, enabling native tree recruitment and understory recovery that supported broader biodiversity. Such outcomes underscore culling's role in averting trophic downgrading, where unchecked herbivory cascades to soil erosion, reduced carbon sequestration, and diminished resilience to disturbances like fire. However, efficacy requires maintaining low densities long-term, as partial reductions may fail to fully restore canopy succession. Empirical data from these cases affirm that strategic population control via culling can reinstate ecological equilibria, benefiting multiple trophic levels without relying on less predictable alternatives like fertility control.

Disease Eradication Efforts

Culling of wildlife reservoirs represents a strategy to control zoonotic and livestock diseases by reducing infection prevalence in animal populations that serve as vectors or amplifiers. In the United Kingdom, badger culling has been employed since the early 2000s to mitigate Mycobacterium bovis transmission to cattle, responsible for bovine tuberculosis (bTB). The Randomized Badger Culling Trial (RBCT), conducted from 1998 to 2006, demonstrated that proactive culling reduced bTB incidence in cattle herds within cull zones by approximately 23%, though reactive culling following outbreaks increased incidence by 25% due to badger population disruption and dispersal. Subsequent policy, including supplementary badger control in high-risk areas since 2013, correlated with up to 66% reductions in bTB herd incidents in some regions, as reported by the Animal and Plant Health Agency in 2019, yet neighboring areas experienced elevated risks from badger perturbation. In North America, targeted culling addresses chronic wasting disease (CWD), a prion disorder affecting cervids like white-tailed deer. Illinois implemented intensive culling in endemic zones starting in 2003, stabilizing CWD prevalence at low levels (under 5%) over a decade while minimally impacting overall deer harvest rates. Similarly, Texas's 2018 CWD management plan incorporates localized culling of infected clusters alongside hunter reporting to prevent widespread establishment. Evidence from modeling indicates culling can suppress prevalence long-term if sustained, though short-term spikes may occur as infected animals are selectively removed, leaving susceptible juveniles. A 2025 study further suggested that selective hunting of males, akin to targeted culling, slows CWD spread by disrupting transmission networks. European efforts against African swine fever (ASF) in wild boar, ongoing since 2014, involve density reduction via culling to curb spillover to domestic pigs. Despite culling millions of boar across affected states like Poland and Germany, ASF persists due to the virus's environmental stability and boar's high reproductive rates, with prevalence fluctuating but not eradicated. In Italy, 2023 culls targeted over 40,000 pigs in outbreak zones, yet wild boar monitoring revealed ongoing circulation, underscoring culling's limitations without integrated biosecurity like fencing and carcass removal. Overall, while culling achieves localized control in some cases, full eradication in free-ranging wildlife remains elusive, often requiring complementary vaccination or habitat management, as perturbation effects can exacerbate spread.

Invasive Species Control

Culling serves as a targeted lethal control method for invasive species, which are non-native organisms that proliferate rapidly, outcompeting indigenous flora and fauna, altering habitats, and causing economic losses estimated at over $120 billion annually in the United States alone. By reducing population densities, culling aims to mitigate these impacts, allowing native ecosystems to recover through decreased predation, herbivory, or competition. This approach is often integrated with non-lethal measures like barriers or habitat restoration, but empirical data indicate that sustained, intensive culling can yield measurable ecological benefits in isolated or monitored sites. A prominent example involves invasive lionfish (Pterois volitans and P. miles) in the western Atlantic and Caribbean, introduced via aquarium releases in the 1980s and 1990s. These predatory fish have decimated native reef fish populations by up to 80% in affected areas. Derbies and diver-led spearing campaigns, initiated around 2008, have removed over 200,000 individuals by 2021, locally reducing densities by 50-90% in Bahamian and Floridian reefs and correlating with increased recruitment of native species. Repeated culling events have also induced wariness in survivors, altering foraging behavior and enhancing control efficacy, though immigration from uncullled areas necessitates ongoing efforts. Successful eradications highlight culling's potential in contained environments. On islands and ponds, invasive American bullfrogs (Lithobates catesbeianus), which prey on endemic amphibians and spread chytrid fungus, have been fully removed through trapping and shooting; a 2023 study documented rapid recovery of native frog abundances and diversity post-eradication in Pacific Northwest wetlands, with no reinvasion after three years of monitoring. Similarly, feral swine (Sus scrofa), invasive across the U.S. and responsible for $2.5 billion in annual agricultural damage, face aerial and ground-based culling programs; Texas operations culled over 300,000 hogs in 2022, reducing local densities by 40-60% and crop depredation accordingly, though adaptability and high reproduction rates (up to 12 piglets per litter twice yearly) limit long-term suppression without comprehensive fencing. Challenges persist, as culling's effectiveness varies with species traits and landscape connectivity. Peer-reviewed analyses show that while local reductions occur, population-level declines require addressing source populations and dispersal; for instance, a 2025 PNAS review of invasive predator control found that lethal removal protects natives in 60% of cases but fails when behavioral plasticity or compensatory reproduction offsets losses. Government agencies like the USDA prioritize culling for high-impact invasives based on cost-benefit models, emphasizing empirical monitoring over assumptions of uniform success.

Culling in Captive Settings

Zoos, Aquariums, and Sanctuaries

In zoos, culling—often termed management euthanasia—is implemented to sustain genetic diversity and demographic health within captive breeding programs coordinated by organizations like the European Association of Zoos and Aquaria (EAZA). EAZA guidelines define this practice as the removal of animals for population management purposes when alternatives such as relocation, contraception, or sterilization prove insufficient or counterproductive to long-term conservation goals, such as avoiding inbreeding depression that could reduce population viability. This approach prioritizes maintaining reproductively fit groups over indefinite retention of surplus individuals, which could strain resources and compromise breeding success rates. For example, a 2023 analysis of zoo practices highlighted that selective culling helps counteract the genetic limitations inherent in small, closed populations, enabling sustained contributions to species recovery efforts. In contrast, the Association of Zoos and Aquariums (AZA) in the United States endorses euthanasia only as a last resort after exhausting options like transfer to other facilities or non-lethal interventions, with policies requiring adherence to institutional welfare standards and veterinary oversight. Accredited AZA institutions avoid routine culling of healthy animals for population control, focusing instead on proactive breeding planning to minimize surpluses, though euthanasia may occur for medical reasons or when animals pose unmanageable risks to conspecifics or staff. European zoos have faced public scrutiny for such decisions, as in the 2024 case of a German facility planning to cull excess hamadryas baboons after contraception failures led to overpopulation, illustrating tensions between genetic management imperatives and public perceptions of animal welfare. Aquariums apply culling primarily to fish stocks in breeding or display contexts, selecting against deformities, aggression, or overcrowding to uphold exhibit quality and genetic standards, with humane euthanasia methods like anesthetic overdose recommended for individuals. For marine mammals, such as cetaceans or pinnipeds, euthanasia is restricted to cases of irreversible injury, disease, or poor prognosis in stranded or captive animals, rather than systematic population reduction, as determined by federal guidelines emphasizing suffering alleviation over surplus control. Wildlife sanctuaries, which typically forgo breeding to focus on rescue and rehabilitation, employ culling infrequently, favoring separation, relocation, or lifelong housing for surplus or incompatible animals; euthanasia is reserved for welfare endpoints like untreatable conditions, aligning with non-proliferative mandates that reduce the need for proactive population interventions. This restraint reflects sanctuaries' operational model, which avoids the breeding-driven surpluses common in zoos, though resource constraints may necessitate humane dispatch in extreme overcapacity scenarios.

Empirical Evidence on Effectiveness

Documented Benefits and Success Cases

In New Zealand, sustained culling of brushtail possums (Trichosurus vulpecula), primary wildlife hosts of Mycobacterium bovis, has demonstrably reduced bovine tuberculosis (bTB) prevalence in cattle herds. Intensive culling programs since the 1990s, coordinated by the Animal Health Board, achieved local eradications in over 80% of targeted areas by 2011, correlating with a national decline in infected herds from 7.6% in 1996 to under 1% by 2020, thereby minimizing livestock losses and export restrictions. Preventive culling of livestock during outbreaks of highly contagious diseases, such as classical swine fever (CSF), has proven effective in containing epidemics. In the 1997-1998 Netherlands CSF outbreak, culling approximately 700,000 pigs on affected and adjacent farms within a 1-3 km radius halted transmission chains, eradicating the disease by mid-1998 and averting projected losses exceeding €2 billion in pork production. In wildlife conservation, targeted culling of invasive barred owls (Strix varia) has stabilized populations of the endangered northern spotted owl (Strix occidentalis caurina) in overlapping habitats. A U.S. Geological Survey experiment from 2017-2023 removed about 3,000 barred owls across 1,500 km² in Washington state, resulting in no net decline in spotted owl site occupancy and occupancy rates stabilizing at 60-70% in treatment areas versus continued declines in controls. Eradication-focused culling of invasive mammals on islands has yielded high success rates in restoring native biodiversity. A global review of 15 large-scale programs (islands >10 km²) documented an 84% eradication success rate, with subsequent rebounds in seabird colonies and vegetation cover; for instance, rat (Rattus spp.) removal on Palmyra Atoll (2003-2005) increased native arthropod densities by over 1,000% and supported recovery of 14 seabird species.

Limitations, Failures, and Unintended Consequences

Culling programs often fail to achieve sustained population reductions due to high reproductive rates, immigration from uncull areas, and compensatory mechanisms such as increased survival or fecundity among survivors. For instance, in white-tailed deer management, efforts in Oxford, Ohio, through 2025 demonstrated insufficient impact on overabundant populations despite ongoing interventions, as density remained elevated and vehicle collisions persisted. Similarly, hunting seasons on Catalina Island in 2024 failed to curb invasive axis deer numbers, highlighting logistical limits in achieving removal targets on large scales. The UK's badger culling trials, intended to reduce bovine tuberculosis (bTB) transmission to cattle, provide a prominent case of empirical failure. The Randomised Badger Culling Trial (RBCT), conducted from 1998 to 2006 and involving over 11,000 badgers culled, found that proactive culling reduced bTB in culled areas by about 23% but increased incidence by 25% in surrounding unculled zones due to badger movement perturbations. Independent analyses of government data up to 2022 confirmed no overall decline in cattle bTB attributable to culling, with statistical models showing no detectable link between badger removals and herd incidence rates. Cull operations frequently missed targets, such as the required 70% population reduction within six weeks, as seen in 2013 pilots where only 38-58% were removed, compounded by welfare failures where 7.4-22.8% of badgers suffered prolonged deaths exceeding humane endpoints. Unintended consequences frequently undermine culling efficacy and exacerbate problems. Perturbation effects, where partial culling disrupts social structures and increases dispersal, have been documented in multiple taxa; for example, culling wild geese altered network stability, potentially hindering disease control by promoting wider pathogen spread. In disease contexts, selective removal can drive pathogen evolution toward higher virulence, complicating eradication as modeled in theoretical extensions of wildlife epidemiology. Ecologically, culling predators or pests can trigger trophic cascades, such as elevated prey populations following removals, inverting the intended pest reduction. Broad-host diseases amplify risks, where targeting one reservoir species shifts burdens to others without net control, as analyzed in systemic wildlife disease models. These outcomes underscore culling's limitations in complex systems, where incomplete implementation or overlooked dynamics often yield neutral or counterproductive results.

Ethical and Philosophical Debates

Utilitarian and Pragmatic Justifications

Utilitarian justifications for culling rest on consequentialist principles, positing that actions are morally permissible if they maximize overall welfare by minimizing aggregate suffering across sentient beings. In wildlife contexts, proponents argue that targeted culling averts greater harms from unchecked population growth, such as widespread starvation, heightened disease transmission, and intraspecies conflict, which inflict prolonged distress on larger numbers of animals than humane, selective killing. For instance, culling overabundant herbivores like deer preserves ecosystems essential for broader biodiversity, thereby safeguarding the welfare of dependent species through maintained habitat integrity and forage availability. In disease management, utilitarian calculus weighs the rapid reduction of pathogen reservoirs against individual losses, emphasizing net benefits to human and animal populations alike. During highly pathogenic avian influenza outbreaks, culling infected flocks has prevented transmission cascades costing over US$10 billion globally and the destruction of 250 million birds, averting cascading ecological disruptions and economic fallout that exacerbate animal suffering via habitat loss and intensified farming pressures. Under a One Health framework, which integrates human, animal, and environmental health, such measures promote shared utility by curbing zoonotic risks and sustaining livestock systems that support food security without unduly privileging short-term anthropocentric gains. Pragmatic justifications emphasize culling's efficacy as a swift, resource-efficient tool when non-lethal alternatives prove inadequate or impractical for large-scale population control. Fertility control, for example, demands invasive procedures, high costs, and repeated applications that often fail to achieve rapid density reductions in expansive wild populations, rendering culling a more feasible option for restoring balance in overabundant species. In conservation settings, culling eastern grey kangaroos in Australia's Canberra Nature Park—totaling 15,620 individuals since 2009—has controlled herbivore pressures on native vegetation, with byproducts like meat sales offsetting operational expenses exceeding A$500,000 annually and providing protein sources for human or pet consumption, thus minimizing waste and generating socioeconomic value. Similarly, the culling of 748 bison in Yellowstone National Park during 2016–2017 supplied meat to Indigenous communities, aligning practical management with cultural needs while curbing brucellosis risks to livestock. These approaches underscore culling's role in averting ecosystem collapse, where unchecked growth degrades habitats and precipitates mass mortality events far costlier in welfare terms than regulated interventions. Pragmatically, in urban or agricultural interfaces, culling mitigates human-wildlife conflicts—such as crop depredation or vehicle collisions—more reliably than translocation, which spreads diseases or fails due to homing behaviors, ensuring sustained viability of conservation efforts amid finite resources.

Animal Rights Critiques and Alternatives

Animal rights proponents argue that culling infringes on the fundamental interests of sentient animals, which possess the capacity to experience pain and suffering, rendering lethal control ethically equivalent to unjustified killing. This perspective emphasizes individual animal welfare over collective ecosystem goals, critiquing culling as a failure to address root causes like habitat loss or human encroachment while inflicting unnecessary harm through methods such as shooting or poisoning, which can cause prolonged distress. For instance, in cases involving overabundant deer or elephants, advocates from groups like Born Free USA have opposed proposed culls, asserting that such actions prioritize expediency over humane treatment and ignore animals' intrinsic value independent of utility to humans or other species. Critiques extend to the inefficacy of culling for long-term population regulation, as surviving animals often reproduce at accelerated rates to compensate for losses, potentially exacerbating issues without resolving underlying ecological imbalances. Animal rights organizations highlight that culling programs, such as those targeting invasive species or disease vectors, frequently employ inhumane techniques that violate welfare standards, with public opposition growing due to visible cruelty and perceived alternatives' availability. These views, advanced by entities like the Animal Welfare Institute, frame culling as a symptom of flawed human-animal coexistence rather than a solution, urging a shift from death-centric management to preventive strategies that respect animals' rights to exist without lethal intervention. Proposed alternatives prioritize non-lethal interventions to manage populations and conflicts. Fertility control methods, including immunocontraception vaccines like porcine zona pellucida (PZP), have been tested on deer and wildlife, inducing temporary infertility without killing and showing population stabilization in trials, such as those reducing deer numbers by up to 50% over several years in controlled areas. Habitat modification and exclusion barriers, such as fencing or repellents, prevent access to human areas, as demonstrated in programs protecting livestock from predators with non-invasive deterrents like lights or guard animals, which reduced depredation by 70-90% in some studies. Translocation and behavioral conditioning offer further options, relocating animals to suitable habitats or using aversion training to alter habits, though success depends on site availability and monitoring to avoid disease spread. Advocacy groups advocate integrating these with policy reforms, such as stricter land-use planning to mitigate overpopulation drivers, positioning non-lethal approaches as ethically superior and potentially more sustainable, albeit resource-intensive, for achieving balance without sacrificing individual lives. Empirical evaluations, including those from wildlife fertility initiatives, indicate that while implementation challenges exist—such as vaccine delivery logistics—these methods align better with welfare principles by minimizing suffering compared to recurrent culling cycles.

References

  1. [1]
    Animal Culling - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Culling, the purposeful reduction of animals that are suspected or known to be infected, is a strategy that has been widely used in both domesticated livestock ...
  2. [2]
    NALT: culling (animals) - NAL Agricultural Thesaurus - USDA
    Nov 16, 2018 · Culling is a common strategy with livestock and wildlife, used to control and eradicate diseases or pests, control population size, select ...<|separator|>
  3. [3]
    Is culling an effective solution to the overpopulation of a species?
    Oct 6, 2023 · Culling is done to achieve a sustainable population in an ecosystem. Overpopulation may increase conflicts amongst animals and also with humans.
  4. [4]
    Culling and the Common Good: Re-evaluating Harms and Benefits ...
    May 3, 2016 · The aim of culling is to eradicate a host species, to prevent the pathogen entering and contaminating new individuals and populations.
  5. [5]
    Killing Wildlife: The Pros and Cons of Culling Animals
    Mar 6, 2014 · Recently proposed culling programs that target bison, swans, geese, deer, and badgers have proponents on both sides.
  6. [6]
    When to kill a cull: factors affecting the success of culling wildlife for ...
    Mar 6, 2019 · Population reduction through culling is often used to control disease in wildlife populations, especially when those populations act as a ...
  7. [7]
    Is killing animals an effective way to regulate populations? - PMC - NIH
    Apr 16, 2025 · It's often assumed that reducing the population of one species will help another survive—for instance, killing invasives to protect natives, or ...
  8. [8]
    Culling pest animals can do more harm than good - The Conversation
    May 7, 2015 · Cats and foxes are two of the greatest threats to Australian wildlife. Culling might be one solution, but sometimes culls do more harm than ...
  9. [9]
    Social licence to cull: Examining scepticism toward lethal wildlife ...
    Jul 11, 2023 · The large-scale culling of animals may look cruel and unnecessary, but in addition, mass death also tend to look and smell repugnant, thus ...
  10. [10]
    Cull of the Wild: Killing in the Name of Conservation - Reuben College
    Jun 15, 2023 · In many, but not all, cases of invasive species, culling is probably the most effective and ethical way of preserving biodiversity and ...
  11. [11]
    Culling: Nomenclature, Definitions, and Recommendations
    Culling (exiting) is the departure of cows from the herd because of sale, slaughter, salvage, or death. In most cases the cow that exits is replaced; thus “ ...
  12. [12]
    Understanding “Culling” vs. Conservation | Avula safaris
    Culling refers to the selective removal of animals from a population. This can be done for ecological, genetic, safety, or population control reasons.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  13. [13]
    Culling, Wildlife Management
    Oct 14, 2016 · To cull is to remove an animal, especially a sick or weak one, from a herd or flock. It is a reduction of the numbers of an animal population achieved by ...
  14. [14]
    [PDF] Culling - usda aphis
    Such practices improve overall performance of the herd by replacing poor producing animals with young cows that have high potential. Unfortunately, many ...
  15. [15]
    A systemic approach to assess the potential and risks of wildlife ...
    Jul 7, 2020 · Host culling is a potential control strategy for animal diseases. However, the reduction in biodiversity and increasing public concerns ...
  16. [16]
    The Complexities of Culling: Balancing Ecosystems and Wildlife ...
    Jul 15, 2025 · Culling is the practice where individuals within an overpopulated species are killed based on selective characteristics such as age, genetic material, health, ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  17. [17]
    Cull - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
    Originating mid-14c. from Old French cuiler and Latin colligere, cull means to select or gather the best; also a noun for chosen or inferior animals.
  18. [18]
    CULL Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster
    2025 See All Example Sentences for cull. Word History. Etymology. Verb and Noun. Middle English, from Anglo-French culier, coillir, from Latin colligere to bind ...
  19. [19]
    16 The emergence of livestock husbandry in Early Neolithic Anatolia
    Despite early variation in herd management strategies, the practice of young male culling became widespread in the mid-eighth millennium cal bc to become ...Domestication Histories · The Emergence of Husbandry · The Neolithic Mindset
  20. [20]
    https://oxfordre.com/environmentalscience/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780199389414.001.0001/acrefore-9780199389414-e-548
  21. [21]
    (PDF) Pace and process in the origins of animal husbandry in ...
    Aug 10, 2025 · In this paper we survey a large body of faunal data for the practice of young male culling in Neolithic south-western Asia. Although the ...
  22. [22]
    The Emergence of Animal Management in the Southern Levant
    Jun 18, 2018 · These range from controlling the movements of wild animals to selective culling, and ultimately, the selective breeding of animals in a captive ...
  23. [23]
    Full article: Killing Cattle –Age Selection of Cattle at Iron Age Central ...
    This paper aims to investigate the kill-off patterns of cattle in the first millennium (third–eleventh century) AD at four complex and multifunctional sites in ...
  24. [24]
    Hammers, Axes, Bulls, and Blood: Some Practical Aspects of Roman ...
    May 21, 2014 · The traditional explanation is that the animal was struck on the head with a hammer or an axe to stun it, then had its throat cut.
  25. [25]
    [PDF] Livestock and animal husbandry in early medieval England - CORE
    The autumn-winter death of calves and lambs may represent deliberate culling or loss of stock through disease or hardship, or a little of both. If these early ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  26. [26]
    The 'long' sixteenth century: a key period of animal husbandry ...
    Oct 5, 2018 · In this paper, zooarchaeological evidence dated between the Late Middle Ages and the Early Modern period is analysed to investigate changes in animal husbandry
  27. [27]
    Robert Bakewell | Department of Animal Science
    Bakewell was an agriculturist who revolutionized sheep and cattle breeding in England by methodical selection and inbreeding.
  28. [28]
    Robert Bakewell-a pioneer of modern livestock farming
    Feb 27, 2025 · Robert Bakewell, an agriculturalist whose work in developing breeds was to have national and international influence on methods of raising pedigree livestock.
  29. [29]
    [PDF] From Bakewell to BLUP - Katahdin Hair Sheep International
    Feb 10, 2023 · Many have heard of Robert Bakewell, a farmer known as the father of selective breeding. Bakewell (1725–1795) became famous for transforming his ...
  30. [30]
    Test-and-slaughter technique | pathology - Britannica
    Sep 18, 2025 · United States, for example, the test-and-slaughter technique, in which simple tests are used to confirm the existence of diseased animals that ...
  31. [31]
    [PDF] The North American Model of Wildlife Conservation
    Our profession embarked into the 21st century using a conservation model that matured during the 19th and 20th centuries. The Model faces challenges ...
  32. [32]
    [PDF] The North American Model Decadal Review
    Jun 26, 2024 · The first decades of the twentieth century saw important advances in the development of a robust legal framework for wildlife conservation.
  33. [33]
    [PDF] The Cull
    Modern culling practices are governed by strict legal regulations and ethical standards. Animal welfare considerations demand humane methods, minimizing ...Missing: pre- | Show results with:pre-
  34. [34]
    Basic Animal Breeding Methods | IntechOpen
    The system of selection allows the best animals to act as parents of future generations and culling of undesirable animals from the herd. The animals retained ...
  35. [35]
    Breeding & Genetic Selection
    Proper selection and culling of individual animals within a cow-calf herd is important for genetic improvement and enterprise profitability.
  36. [36]
    Culling and Replacement Rate in the Beef Cow Herd
    Culling rate is 15-20% annually. Replacement is determined by culling rate and calf crop. The number of heifers needed depends on these factors.
  37. [37]
    [PDF] Review on Flock Improvement through Genetic Selection ... - CORE
    ➢ selective culling, when the farmer removes individual unproductive or sick birds. Factors to be considered during Culling of Laying Flock. 1. Value of ...
  38. [38]
    An abundance of replacement heifers: What is the economic impact ...
    Feb 7, 2020 · Selective culling of heifers soon after weaning yielded the best results in both herds, but despite the predicted improvement in lactation ...
  39. [39]
    The effect of culling on breeding values - UC Research Repository
    Culling is inevitable in breeding trials. It removes individuals with undesirable traits but also introduces bias in breeding value estimation.
  40. [40]
    Unintended Effects from Breeding - Safety of Genetically Engineered ...
    Animals in breeding programs initially will be screened for genes that control simple traits, such as horns, which are undesirable in cattle, and halothane ...
  41. [41]
    A systemic approach to assess the potential and risks of wildlife ...
    Jul 7, 2020 · The objective of animal culling is to reduce the rate of infectious contacts below the threshold required for pathogen persistence by decreasing ...
  42. [42]
    Foot and Mouth Disease: The UK Outbreak of 2001
    Jan 25, 2021 · In 2001 the UK went through an epidemic of foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) which led to the slaughter of 6.5 million animals and a cost of £8 billion.
  43. [43]
    Forecasting the 2001 Foot-and-Mouth Disease Epidemic in the UK
    Dec 13, 2017 · Culling infected and “at-risk” farms removed infectious and potentially infectious individuals; preemptive culling decreased the number of ...
  44. [44]
    USDA Reported H5N1 Bird Flu Detections in Poultry - CDC
    H5N1 bird flu has affected 174,804,048 birds in 51 states, 685 counties, and 1,708 outbreaks since January 2022.
  45. [45]
    Economic epidemiology of avian influenza on smallholder poultry ...
    Since 2003, over 400 million birds have been culled worldwide as a direct result of avian influenza outbreaks (FAO, 2012). In most countries, farmers are ...
  46. [46]
    Results and Examples of Urban and Suburban Deer Management
    Locally, the Huron-Clinton Metroparks have been culling deer since 1999. “After reducing the populations to sustainable levels, oaks are growing into trees ...
  47. [47]
    Hunting as a Preferred Management Tool
    In some areas, deer populations have exceeded population management goals, leading to increased deer-related damages in the amount of $2 billion annually.Introduction · History · LanguageMissing: culling | Show results with:culling<|separator|>
  48. [48]
    [PDF] Impact of baiting on feral swine behavior in the presence of culling ...
    We conducted population-wide culling activities, includ- ing trapping, controlled shooting, drive shooting, and aerial gunning, from 3 to 27 April and removed ...
  49. [49]
    Effects and effectiveness of lethal shark hazard management: The ...
    Dec 2, 2019 · Likely effectiveness of netting or other capture programs as a shark hazard mitigation strategy in Western Australia. Report prepared for ...Abstract · INTRODUCTION · METHODOLOGY · RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
  50. [50]
    What is the RSPCA's view on killing sharks to reduce shark incidents?
    Dec 19, 2024 · The available scientific evidence does not convincingly support the claim that killing sharks will reduce the risk to public safety.
  51. [51]
    [PDF] The impact of the Queensland Shark Control Program on local ...
    Since 1962, the Queensland government has employed a shark control program consisting of shark nets and drum lines off the coast of popular beaches.
  52. [52]
    [PDF] A Critical Look at Wild Pig Elimination: Myths and Facts
    Herein, we describe the likely origin of the 70% parameter and the science to support why this metric measuring success of an elimination program is inaccurate.
  53. [53]
    [PDF] AVMA Guidelines for the Humane Slaughter of Animals: 2024 Edition
    Personnel performing humane slaughter must be technically proficient. Periodic professional continuing education on the latest methods, tech- niques, and ...
  54. [54]
    Humane Slaughter: Methods and Importance in Meat Production
    Dec 24, 2023 · The captive bolt pistol is perhaps the most widely recognized stunning method, especially for cattle. This device fires a steel bolt into the ...Missing: culling | Show results with:culling
  55. [55]
    Humane innovation in the slaughter process | 2018-01-29
    Jan 29, 2018 · Knife technology is also being improved to make for a more humane cutting method, Fuller says. Increased automation and robotics during the ...Missing: culling | Show results with:culling
  56. [56]
    Is Humane Slaughter Possible? - PMC - NIH
    May 5, 2020 · These typically involve the use of a stunning method to render the animal unconscious, followed by the actual killing method. There are three ...
  57. [57]
    Controversial culling methods spotlighted in draft guidelines - News
    Jan 21, 2025 · Another form of depopulation introduced in the draft guidelines is water-based foam, which kills by blocking the airway. Unlike foam infused ...
  58. [58]
    [PDF] AVMA Guidelines for the Euthanasia of Animals: 2020 Edition*
    *The AVMA Panel on Euthanasia develops the content of the guidelines, with support from its working groups. The panel is required to do a comprehensive review ...
  59. [59]
    Achieving humane outcomes in killing livestock by free bullet I
    Abattoir design allows for a wide variety of technology to assure humane killing including physical, electrical, and chemical (inhaled gas) methods to be used.
  60. [60]
    Thermal Aerial Culling Enhances Humane Wildlife Management
    Thermal-assisted aerial culling is emerging as an effective and humane tool for managing invasive species like feral pigs and fallow deer, which threaten ...
  61. [61]
    Breeder's Guide - Vdd Gna
    Close breeding (inbreeding) by the inexperienced and without ruthless culling has had its deteriorating effect on many a breed. Close inbreeding will result in ...
  62. [62]
    Breeding for Conformity - Border Collie Rescue
    Current pedigree dog breeding practices that damage welfare cannot be seen as ethical or acceptable. ... The culling of pups that do not make the standard is ...Missing: purebred | Show results with:purebred
  63. [63]
    Selective Breeding Examples: Reasons for Culling Critters - Grit
    Sep 2, 2023 · We offer this rundown of selective breeding examples, and explain why culling is necessary (even though you probably don't want to do it).Missing: ancient | Show results with:ancient<|separator|>
  64. [64]
    When is euthanizing a puppy with severe congenital issues the right ...
    Sep 20, 2024 · If the puppy's defect is untreatable or will cause significant pain and suffering, euthanasia may be the kindest choice. However, for treatable ...
  65. [65]
    [PDF] The Purebred Paradox - WBI Studies Repository
    By addressing one disorder, the breeders had unwittingly amplified another. Instead of repeating past mistakes and culling Fanconi carriers, the club received ...
  66. [66]
    Bad Genes - English Shepherd Club
    Aug 17, 2022 · But the breeding of purebred livestock, including dogs, is not natural or random. It is selective based on the wants and needs of breeders.
  67. [67]
    The Downside of Inbreeding - Australian Shepherd Health ... - ASHGI
    Proponents of inbreeding often point out that mongrels have more genetic problems than purebreds.
  68. [68]
    Effect of culling on selection response using phenotypic selection or ...
    Effect of culling on selection response using phenotypic selection or best linear unbiased prediction of breeding values in small, closed herds of swine. Get ...Missing: heritability pigs
  69. [69]
    AnimalBreedingByGupta - Response to selection
    Swine- 1.5-2 yrs. Chicken- 1- 1.5 yrs. Horse- 8-12 yrs. Accuracy of selection. The accuracy for selection is directly related to the heritability of the trait.
  70. [70]
    US Dairy Progress - CDCB
    Improved genetics account for at least one-half of the gains in milk, fat and protein yield over the last 50 years. Genetic selection also provides tools to ...<|separator|>
  71. [71]
    Genetic Relationship Between Culling, Milk Production, Fertility, and ...
    As much as 66% of the genetic variation in culling in primiparous cows can be explained by genetic variation in protein yield, clinical mastitis, and fertility ...
  72. [72]
    [PDF] Management of genetic defects in dairy cattle populations - CDCB
    Breeders feared the discovery of a new genetic defect in their breed and, more importantly, in their own herd. The culling of afflicted animals was often a ...
  73. [73]
    Genetic Improvement and Sustainability of Animal Industries -
    Apr 25, 2022 · Genetic improvement through selective breeding from the 1960s to 2005 lead to 50% increase in litter size in pigs, 37% increase in lean pork ...
  74. [74]
    [PDF] Selection for production and reproduction traits in pigs - WUR eDepot
    Nov 15, 1989 · Genetic improvement of litter size in pigs. Anim. Prod ... closed pig populations are the response to selection and the rate of inbreeding.<|control11|><|separator|>
  75. [75]
    [PDF] 3 Strategies for Genetic Improvement - CABI Digital Library
    Breed substitution has led to major step changes in genetic improvement in numerous livestock pro- duction systems.
  76. [76]
    Genomic Impact - CDCB
    In 2005 to 2010, the average gain in Net Merit $ was $40.33 per year. That annual gain doubled to $79.20 per year from 2016 to 2020 as the benefits of genomic ...
  77. [77]
    Genetic selection of high-yielding dairy cattle toward sustainable ...
    In this paper, we discuss the role of genetic selection in high-yielding dairy breeding schemes and potential routes toward the development of more sustainable ...
  78. [78]
    Economics Matter in Culling Decisions - World Wide Sires
    Removing below-average animals in their first lactation can enhance economic gains compared to retaining them until subsequent lactations. While this decision ...
  79. [79]
    [PDF] Cow Culling Decisions: Costs or Economic Opportunity?
    Mar 9, 2007 · A dairy operation that increases milk production due to higher culling rates might very well be more profitable than a dairy with lower cull ...
  80. [80]
    [PDF] Economic Opportunities for Dairy Cow Culling Management Options
    production, compared to involuntary culling due to disease, gave these larger herds the opportunity for a comparative advantage of increased genetic gains.
  81. [81]
    Keeping profitable cows in the herd: A lifetime cost-benefit ...
    Lifetime costs and revenues are important to identify profitable cows. · Culling decisions are mostly based only on current lactation costs and revenues. · Cow ...
  82. [82]
    Are You Making “Profitable Culling” Decisions?
    Jan 4, 2023 · Culling decisions definitely impact the profitability of a dairy business. These decisions are not always straight-forward and depend on ...
  83. [83]
    Keep or Cull: Economic Insights for Managing Open Cows - Drovers
    Jul 3, 2025 · Even at a higher purchase price, both replacement options proved to be more profitable than keeping an open cow for another breeding season. “We ...
  84. [84]
    The Role of Culling in Enhancing Poultry Production
    Nov 28, 2023 · Healthy, productive flocks also require fewer antibiotics and treatments, reducing production costs and improving the quality of eggs produced.
  85. [85]
    Maximizing Profits by Managing Cull Birds Efficiently for Secondary ...
    Mar 23, 2025 · By adopting structured cull bird management strategies, poultry farmers can reduce losses, improve farm efficiency, and generate additional ...
  86. [86]
    Risk based culling for highly infectious diseases of livestock
    Jun 29, 2011 · The effectiveness of risk based culling also depends on the culling capacity relative to the spread of disease. If the culling capacity is too ...
  87. [87]
    Modeling target-density-based cull strategies to contain foot-and ...
    Feb 29, 2024 · Although ring culling can be effective at curbing livestock disease ... The role of pre-emptive culling in the control of foot-and-mouth disease.
  88. [88]
    The role of pre-emptive culling in the control of foot-and-mouth disease
    One well-known and much discussed example of culling to control livestock disease occurred during the UK 2001 epidemic of FMD. This was an exceptionally ...Missing: prevention | Show results with:prevention
  89. [89]
    Carcass Management During Avian Influenza Outbreaks | US EPA
    Mar 28, 2025 · Composting was used in the 2014–2015 U.S. HPAI outbreak for 85 percent of the poultry carcasses. It can be performed on-site, either “in-house” ...
  90. [90]
    Killing 166 million birds hasn't helped poultry farmers stop H5N1. Is ...
    Feb 26, 2025 · Poultry producers, infectious disease experts and government officials now concede that H5N1 is likely here to stay. That recognition is ...
  91. [91]
    Can badger vaccination contribute to bovine TB control? A narrative ...
    In Ireland, research has shown that culling badgers is associated with reduced TB incidence in cattle (Griffin et al., 2005), and large-scale culling has been ...
  92. [92]
    Difference in differences analysis evaluates the effects of the badger ...
    Feb 28, 2024 · A badger control policy (BCP) commenced in 2013. Its aim was to decrease TB incidence in cattle by reducing the badger population available to provide a ...
  93. [93]
    Absence of effects of widespread badger culling on tuberculosis in ...
    Jul 15, 2024 · Government policy in England aims for the elimination of bovine tuberculosis (bTB). This policy includes culling of European badger (Meles meles) ...
  94. [94]
    Badgers and bovine tuberculosis: Current Biology - Cell Press
    The Randomised Badger Culling Trial identified reductions in cattle incidents within culling areas, but in areas surrounding the cull areas, where badger ...
  95. [95]
    Dairy Cattle Culling Patterns, Explanations, and Implications
    They found that reproduction was the primary reason for culling, followed by production and mastitis. Higher producing herds were more likely to cull a cow for ...<|separator|>
  96. [96]
    Deer impacts on forest ecosystems: a North American perspective
    Long‐term studies of primary, old‐growth forest stands reveal a 48–81 per cent herb and shrub species loss accompanying increases in deer density.
  97. [97]
    Community-level impacts of white-tailed deer on understorey plants ...
    Using meta-analytical techniques, we show that white-tailed deer have strongly negative impacts on the diversity and abundance of forest understory plant ...
  98. [98]
    [PDF] Effects of culling white-tailed deer on tree regeneration and ...
    Feb 28, 2020 · Reduction of forest regeneration due to overbrowsing by white-tailed deer is a growing concern for land managers. Abundant deer can impede ...
  99. [99]
    A Before‐After Control‐Impact experiment reveals that culling ...
    Aug 29, 2023 · Our study provides experimental evidence that culling invasive sambar deer reduces some of their undesirable impacts on endangered peatlands.
  100. [100]
    Restoring Forests in Central New Jersey through Effective Deer ...
    Aug 6, 2025 · A 2004 deer cull followed by sustained hunting pressure reduced deer densities to 3.8 km–2 inside a 260-ha deer exclosure, and ~14 km–2 outside.
  101. [101]
    Hunting of sika deer over six decades does not restore forest ...
    Dec 6, 2023 · Here, we show that intensive culling beyond that achievable by sport hunting is needed to reduce deer densities enough to assure canopy ...
  102. [102]
    Ecological feedbacks can reduce population‐level efficacy of wildlife ...
    Aug 20, 2013 · Current evidence suggests that population-level management of wildlife using fertility control is more likely to be successful if it is applied ...
  103. [103]
    When to kill a cull: factors affecting the success of culling wildlife for ...
    The Randomized Badger Culling Trial (RBCT) in the UK is the best-documented example of wildlife culling for disease control and investigated the effects of ...
  104. [104]
    [PDF] is-culling-badgers-effective - Bovine TB
    Nov 3, 2023 · A 2019 study by the Animal and Plant Health Agency (APHA) found that badger culling had reduced bTB incidence in cattle by 66% in one area ...
  105. [105]
    Targeted culling of deer controls disease with little effect on hunting
    Oct 21, 2013 · A new study found that the targeted culling of deer prevents the rampant spread of chronic wasting disease to healthy deer.
  106. [106]
    Chronic Wasting Disease Management Plan - CWD - Wildlife
    Strategic localized culling, in addition to traditional hunting, has been shown to stabilize CWD prevalence in Illinois white-tailed deer populations. Similar ...
  107. [107]
    Host culling as an adaptive management tool for chronic wasting ...
    These results demonstrate that CWD prevalence may temporarily increase even when management culling strategies are successfully controlling the disease, and ...Missing: evidence | Show results with:evidence
  108. [108]
    New study finds deer hunting can help keep chronic wasting ...
    Jan 29, 2025 · Hunting greater numbers of male deer can slow the spread of chronic wasting disease, a lethal wildlife disease, according to a new study by the ...Missing: culling | Show results with:culling
  109. [109]
    African Swine Fever in Wild Boar in Europe—A Review - PMC
    African swine fever (ASF) is a devastating disease of domestic pigs and wild boar characterized by hemorrhagic fever that can be up to 100% lethal [1]. Despite ...
  110. [110]
    Italy culls tens of thousands of pigs to contain African swine fever
    Sep 25, 2023 · Italy culls tens of thousands of pigs to contain African swine fever ... Huge pig culls took place last week in Italy in an attempt to contain the ...
  111. [111]
    African Swine Fever: fences alone aren't enough - EFSA
    Dec 4, 2024 · Risk and protective factors for ASF in domestic pigs and wild boar in the EU, and mitigation measures for managing the disease in wild boar ...
  112. [112]
    What Doesn't Kill You Makes You Wary? Effect of Repeated Culling ...
    Apr 4, 2014 · We examined the effects of repeated culling by spearing on the behaviour of invasive predatory lionfish (Pterois volitans/miles) on Bahamian coral reef patches.
  113. [113]
    Successful eradication of invasive American bullfrogs leads to ...
    Jul 10, 2023 · Empirical estimates of the relative success or failure of these efforts for invasive species that occupy both terrestrial and aquatic ...
  114. [114]
    Is killing animals an effective way to regulate populations? - PNAS
    Apr 16, 2025 · It's often assumed that reducing the population of one species will help another survive—for instance, killing invasives to protect natives, or ...
  115. [115]
    [PDF] Invasive Species Control and Resolution of Wildlife Damage Conflicts
    Traditional techniques include host culling, pesticides for vector control, physical barriers between hosts and vectors, vaccination to reduce transmission, or ...
  116. [116]
    [PDF] EAZA Population Management Manual: Standards, procedures and ...
    Jan 1, 2025 · For the purpose of this document EAZA defines management euthanasia/culling as the removal of animals from a population in human care, for ...
  117. [117]
    Towards a Futureproof Zoo - PMC - PubMed Central - NIH
    Mar 9, 2023 · To give an example: ARTIS Zoo has reduced the number of animal species since 1967 from over 1800 to around 500.<|separator|>
  118. [118]
    [PDF] AZA Policy on Responsible Population Management - Assets Service
    Jan 12, 2016 · Humane euthanasia must be performed in accordance with the established euthanasia policy of the institution and follow the recommendations of ...Missing: EAZA | Show results with:EAZA
  119. [119]
    Why Do European Zoos Kill Healthy Animals? - NPR
    Oct 14, 2015 · Culling of animals is one of a range of scientifically valid solutions to the long term genetic and demographic sustainability of animal populations in human ...
  120. [120]
    German zoo sparks outrage with plans to cull some of its 45-strong ...
    Mar 4, 2024 · A German zoo has sparked outrage with plans to cull some of its 45-strong tribe of baboons and feed them to captive predators after contraception failed to ...
  121. [121]
    What is the most humane way to euthanase aquarium fish?
    May 1, 2024 · An overdose of an anaesthetic agent dissolved in water is the most humane method available for the euthanasia of sick or injured aquarium fish.
  122. [122]
    Understanding Marine Mammal Euthanasia | NOAA Fisheries
    Aug 7, 2025 · Euthanasia is considered when a stranded marine mammal cannot be saved, is sick/injured, or has a poor prognosis, to relieve suffering.<|separator|>
  123. [123]
    Why not cull? - ICAM coalition
    Jul 28, 2024 · Culling differs from euthanasia, which focuses on the current and predicted welfare of an individual animal with the goal of ending suffering.
  124. [124]
    The large‐scale removal of mammalian invasive alien species in ...
    Studies describe an 84% success rate of island eradications, based on 338 cases.20 Of the 15 programmes on larger land masses described here, the success rate ...
  125. [125]
    2024 Hunting Season Fails to Curb Invasive Deer Population
    2024 Hunting Season Fails to Curb Invasive Deer Population. Conservation ... The limitations of hunting as a component of deer population control are evident.Missing: culling | Show results with:culling
  126. [126]
    Randomised Badger Culling Trial lacks evidence for proactive ...
    Sep 20, 2024 · The 2006 conclusion of the RBCT that “badger culling is unlikely to contribute positively to the control of cattle TB in Britain” is supported.
  127. [127]
    New scientific study reveals that badger culling has had no effect in ...
    Mar 18, 2022 · A rigorous independent analysis of government data shows mass badger culling is not effective at stamping out bTB in cows.Missing: failures | Show results with:failures
  128. [128]
    Badger culls “ineffective and failed humaneness test”
    Feb 28, 2014 · The removal of at least 70% of the estimated badger population in the six-week licence period was not achieved.
  129. [129]
    Badger cull fail - government throws science on the scrapheap
    Sep 9, 2014 · The 2013 culls also failed to meet their targets for animal welfare. Between 7.4% and 22.8% of badgers were still alive five minutes after ...<|separator|>
  130. [130]
    Culling‐induced perturbation of social networks of wild geese ...
    Nov 13, 2023 · Wildlife populations may be the subject of management interventions for disease control that can have unintended, counterproductive effects.
  131. [131]
    Unexpected consequences of culling on the eradication of wildlife ...
    Unexpected consequences of culling on the eradication of wildlife diseases ... We present an analysis of the effect of virulence evolution on culling by extending ...Missing: studies | Show results with:studies
  132. [132]
    Unwanted and unintended effects of culling: A case for ecologically ...
    Aug 6, 2025 · A greater emphasis on ecologically-based rodent management would assist markedly in reducing the unwanted and unintended effects of culling.
  133. [133]
    [PDF] Environmental Studies and Utilitarian Ethics - ERIC
    A utilitarian environmental ethic would not, however, prohibit culling when the intended purpose is to promote the aggregate welfare of the population in ...
  134. [134]
    [PDF] Methods for Managing Deer in Populated Areas
    Wildlife management agencies primarily limit deer population size by using regulated public hunting to harvest bucks and does. Cities usually have ordinances ...
  135. [135]
    Adopting a utilitarian approach to culling wild animals for ...
    Aug 29, 2019 · Converting land to agriculture and livestock production, drives native wildlife species1 into smaller and smaller ranges, some of which are ...
  136. [136]
    [PDF] Deer Overabundance - NYS Dept. of Environmental Conservation
    Apr 14, 2016 · These permits are issued in situations where adequate population control and damage reduction cannot be achieved through hunting, even with DMAP ...
  137. [137]
    ethical and animal welfare issues arising from the killing of wildlife ...
    Ethical and animal welfare concerns about the destruction of free-living wildlife for disease control and environmental reasons have historically received ...Missing: critiques | Show results with:critiques
  138. [138]
    Protecting Native Species from Culling and Hunting | Born Free USA
    In addition, in 2009, we prevented a proposed bow-and-arrow cull of deer in Sifton Bog, Ontario. We are currently exploring other non-lethal alternatives to ...
  139. [139]
    Humane Wildlife Management - Animal Welfare Institute
    Other types of non-lethal management would include (but are not limited to): immunocontraception (or other methods to control reproduction in wildlife); public ...
  140. [140]
    Non-lethal Methods of Controlling Deer Population Growth - CT.gov
    The two basic methods of controlling female reproduction in deer are by using immunocontraceptives and by using contragestation agents. Before I explain the ...
  141. [141]
    [PDF] Ethical management of wildlife. Lethal versus nonlethal control of ...
    Jan 6, 2020 · Ethical deer management involves considering humane treatment and naturalness. Fertility control may be better for welfare, while lethal ...
  142. [142]
    Effectiveness of non-lethal predator deterrents to reduce livestock ...
    Jul 24, 2020 · We evaluated the response of a non-lethal visual deterrent (ie fox lights) to deter leopard attacks on livestock within a multiple-use landscape of western ...Material & Methods · Study Area · Data Collection And...Missing: alternatives | Show results with:alternatives<|separator|>
  143. [143]
    [PDF] Seeking alternatives to lethal management. A framework to respect ...
    Non-lethal management methods include, for instance, preventive actions (e.g. enclosures to protect farm animals from large carnivores) and fertility control ...