Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Monitoring

Monitoring is the systematic and ongoing collection, analysis, and application of measurement data or other information to assess the performance, status, or evolution of systems, processes, projects, or environmental conditions against established standards or objectives.^[1]^[2] This practice enables proactive identification of deviations, optimization of operations, and informed decision-making across diverse fields, including engineering, where it tracks machinery conditions like vibration or temperature to prevent failures; environmental science, for evaluating emissions compliance; and information technology, for real-time oversight of infrastructure performance.^[1]^[3] Key characteristics include periodic data gathering, risk minimization through early anomaly detection, and integration with control mechanisms to enhance reliability and efficiency, though challenges arise in ensuring data accuracy and managing resource demands in complex, large-scale implementations.^[2]^[4]

Fundamentals

Definition and Principles

Monitoring refers to the systematic and continuous—or periodic—collection, analysis, and application of data to evaluate the status of a process, system, or phenomenon, detect deviations or anomalies, and guide corrective actions or decisions.^[5]^[2] This practice relies on empirical observation to establish causal relationships between inputs, system behaviors, and outputs, enabling predictive modeling and verification of expected outcomes through verifiable metrics rather than assumption.^[6] At its core, monitoring prioritizes data-driven feedback to maintain operational integrity, distinguishing it from mere surveillance by incorporating analytical thresholds that trigger responses when predefined conditions are met or exceeded.^[5] Fundamental principles include the choice between real-time continuous tracking, which captures instantaneous changes for immediate intervention, and periodic sampling, which assesses trends over intervals to balance resource use with insight depth.^[7] Quantitative approaches dominate through numerical indicators, such as statistical thresholds (e.g., alerting when a variable exceeds 95% of baseline capacity), while qualitative methods supplement with descriptive insights into contextual factors not easily quantified.^[8] Integration with feedback loops forms a key tenet, where monitoring data iteratively refines models or processes, fostering adaptive management grounded in observed cause-effect patterns rather than static oversight.^[2] Monitoring contrasts with evaluation, which entails retrospective, in-depth analysis of overall outcomes and effectiveness post-implementation, and auditing, which involves independent, episodic verification of compliance against standards.^[2]^[9] For instance, in tracking vital signs, monitoring employs ongoing data streams to flag anomalies like elevated pulse rates against set thresholds in real time, whereas evaluation might later assess long-term health impacts, and auditing could independently review procedural adherence at discrete points.^[7] This ongoing, proactive orientation underscores monitoring's role in preempting failures through causal inference from live data flows.^[6]

Etymology and Conceptual Evolution

The term monitor originates from Latin monitor, denoting "one who warns" or "advises," derived from the verb monēre, meaning "to warn" or "remind."^[10] ^[11] This root traces to Proto-Indo-European *moneie-, implying mental activity related to reminding or advising.^[12] The noun entered English around 1515, initially referring to a person providing oversight or instruction, such as a senior student assisting a teacher in disciplinary roles.^[13] By the 16th century, the concept had broadened to encompass vigilant human observation, evoking roles like sentinels or overseers who issued warnings based on direct scrutiny, emphasizing proactive caution over passive awareness.^[14] This anthropocentric focus on subjective watchfulness persisted into early technical applications, where monitoring implied manual checks for deviations, as in factory gauges introduced during the Industrial Revolution to signal operational anomalies.^[15] Conceptually, monitoring refined toward causal inference through quantifiable observables, shifting from interpretive human judgment to hypothesis-testing via empirical indicators—prioritizing measurable data as the arbiter of system states rather than unverified perceptions.^[16] This progression underscored monitoring's essence as a mechanism for detecting discrepancies against expected norms, enabling predictive warnings grounded in verifiable patterns rather than mere vigilance.^[17]

Historical Development

Pre-Modern and Early Industrial Era

In ancient civilizations, monitoring practices emerged as essential for agricultural and navigational survival, exemplified by Babylonian astronomers who systematically recorded celestial positions around 2000 BCE to develop lunisolar calendars aligning lunar cycles with seasonal events.^[18] These observations, inscribed on clay tablets, tracked planetary motions and eclipses to predict equinoxes and solstices, enabling precise planting and harvest timing amid variable climates.^[19] Similarly, in medicine, Hippocratic practitioners circa 400 BCE emphasized empirical vital signs assessment, including manual pulse palpation to gauge heart rate irregularities and diagnose imbalances in bodily humors, marking an early shift from superstition to observable physiological tracking.^[20] During the medieval period through the Enlightenment, manual vigilance persisted in military and naval contexts, where sentinels—stationed on fortifications and ships—continuously observed horizons for threats, as seen in European fleets from the 13th century onward, relying on visual and auditory cues without mechanical aids.^[21] Concurrently, rudimentary weather monitoring advanced through monastic logs, such as the 1269 English chronicle detailing monthly precipitation and temperature anomalies via qualitative notations of frost, rain, and winds, which informed agrarian planning despite lacking quantification.^[22] The transition to instrumental methods began in the late 16th century, with Galileo Galilei's 1593 thermoscope—a sealed tube with water levels rising or falling with air density changes—providing the first device for relative temperature variation detection, foundational for later meteorological and scientific instrumentation.^[23] In the early Industrial Revolution, monitoring integrated into machinery for operational safety, as James Watt incorporated pressure indicators into his steam engines by the late 1770s, allowing operators to track cylinder vacuum and steam force via mechanical linkages to prevent overstrain.^[24] Factory oversight similarly demanded constant human supervision of textile looms and mills, where foremen visually inspected belt tensions and machine alignments to avert breakdowns. However, inadequate monitoring contributed to frequent boiler failures; between 1816 and the 1850s, steamboat explosions—often from undetected overpressurization due to faulty valves or corrosion—claimed thousands of lives, underscoring causal deficiencies in real-time pressure surveillance before widespread regulatory gauges.^[25]

20th Century Advancements

The development of radar and sonar during the World Wars marked a pivotal shift toward electronic monitoring for large-scale military tracking, enhancing detection reliability over manual methods. Sonar, refined from World War I acoustic techniques, enabled Allied escorts to locate submerged U-boats via active and passive hydrophones, while centimeter-wavelength radar (e.g., Britain's Chain Home system operational by 1937 and ASV radar on aircraft from 1941) allowed surface and aerial detection of surfaced submarines even in poor visibility. These technologies, combined with convoy tactics, contributed to a sharp decline in U-boat effectiveness after May 1943, when Allied shipping losses dropped from 55 vessels per month to 16, though incomplete sensor coverage and signal jamming occasionally permitted breakthroughs, underscoring causal risks from data gaps in dynamic environments.^[26]^[27]^[28] Post-World War II advancements extended analog electronic monitoring to civilian sectors, improving scale and post-event analysis. In aviation, flight data recorders—precursors to modern black boxes—emerged in the 1950s; Australian scientist David Warren prototyped the first integrated device in 1953, capturing parameters like altitude and speed on foil, with commercial adoption accelerating after U.S. and U.K. mandates in the late 1950s amid rising accident rates, though early models' limited parameters (e.g., 5-10 variables) failed to capture full causal chains in complex crashes. In medicine, Willem Einthoven's 1903 string galvanometer for electrocardiography (ECG) saw 1940s refinements, including Rune Elmqvist's inkjet recording in 1948 for clearer traces and Norman Holter's 1947 battery-powered ambulatory prototype, enabling continuous cardiac monitoring beyond hospital settings and revealing arrhythmias missed by intermittent checks, yet analog limitations like signal noise contributed to diagnostic errors from incomplete temporal data.^[29]^[30] Environmental monitoring networks scaled up in the 1960s following smog crises, such as London's 1952 event that killed around 12,000, prompting the U.K.'s Clean Air Act of 1956 and expansion of the National Smoke and Sulfur Dioxide Network by 1961 to measure pollutants at over 1,000 sites using volumetric samplers for black smoke and bubblers for SO2. These analog stations provided empirical baselines for policy, reducing peak concentrations by 80% in monitored urban areas over decades, but sparse spatial coverage and manual data handling led to causal misattributions, as in underestimating episodic peaks from unmonitored sources. In computing, IBM's System/360 mainframes from 1965 introduced structured logging for system health, recording events like I/O errors and CPU utilization to preempt failures in batch processing, achieving high uptime (99%+) in enterprise deployments; however, reliance on operator interpretation of logs contributed to outages, exemplified by ARPANET incidents in the 1970s where protocol flaws and human configuration errors (e.g., 1970 IMP flow control issues) caused network partitions, highlighting vulnerabilities from incomplete automated oversight.^[31]^[32]^[33]

21st Century Innovations and AI Integration

The integration of Internet of Things (IoT) technologies marked a pivotal digital shift in monitoring during the early 2000s, facilitating remote data collection via networked sensors. Wireless sensor networks and radio-frequency identification (RFID) systems expanded between 2000 and 2010, enabling scalable deployment of devices for real-time environmental and operational oversight without constant human intervention.^[34] ^[35] Cloud computing platforms amplified this by centralizing data aggregation; Amazon Web Services introduced CloudWatch in 2009, offering metrics, logs, and alarms for distributed systems to support proactive issue resolution.^[36] Machine learning advancements in the 2010s introduced predictive analytics to monitoring, shifting from reactive thresholds to pattern-based anomaly detection in IT infrastructures. Techniques such as unsupervised algorithms analyzed time-series data to forecast failures, with early applications demonstrating improved accuracy in identifying deviations compared to traditional statistical methods.^[37] This era's developments laid groundwork for AI-enhanced root-cause analysis, though efficacy hinged on high-quality training data to avoid false positives prevalent in nascent implementations.^[38] Adoption of AI-driven observability surged in the 2023–2025 period, with surveys indicating a rise from 42% to 54% in organizations utilizing AI monitoring features for automated diagnostics and alerting.^[39] In manufacturing, AI predictive maintenance models processed sensor inputs to preempt equipment failures, yielding empirical reductions in unplanned downtime of up to 50% across case studies, alongside 10–40% cuts in maintenance costs.^[40] ^[41] Post-2020, wearable devices accelerated real-time biological monitoring, spurred by COVID-19 demands for remote vital sign tracking via integrated sensors like photoplethysmography and accelerometers.^[42] These systems enabled continuous health data streams for early anomaly flagging, with studies validating their role in managing post-acute sequelae through data-driven physiological insights.^[43] In industrial contexts, AI integration extended to autonomous monitoring in robotics and supply chains, where verifiable outcomes included enhanced fault prediction precision, though unproven "smart" ecosystem claims often overstated interoperability without rigorous validation.^[44]

Applications in Science and Technology

Healthcare and Biological Monitoring

In healthcare, biological monitoring encompasses the systematic observation of physiological parameters and molecular indicators to detect deviations from homeostasis, enabling early intervention based on empirical correlations between monitored data and clinical outcomes. Devices and techniques track vital signs such as heart rate, blood pressure, and oxygen saturation, as well as deeper biological processes like neural electrical activity and genetic mutations, providing causal insights into disease mechanisms rather than relying on subjective symptom reports.^[45] Vital signs monitoring has advanced through non-invasive technologies, including pulse oximeters, which measure peripheral oxygen saturation by analyzing light absorption in hemoglobin. Invented in 1974 by Takuo Aoyagi using the ratio of red to infrared light, these devices became integral to perioperative and respiratory care, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic when widespread adoption highlighted their role in detecting hypoxemia early.^[46] Continuous glucose monitors (CGMs), first approved by the FDA in 1999 with the MiniMed system, provide real-time interstitial glucose data via subcutaneous sensors, allowing patients with diabetes to adjust insulin dosing dynamically. Multiple randomized trials demonstrate that CGM use reduces time in hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia, lowering risks of diabetic complications such as retinopathy and neuropathy by improving average glycemic control (HbA1c reductions of 0.5-1.0%).^[47] ^[45] Deeper biological monitoring includes electroencephalography (EEG), pioneered by Hans Berger with the first human recordings in 1924, which captures brain wave patterns to diagnose epilepsy, assess sleep disorders, and monitor neurological progression. EEG identifies epileptiform spikes correlating with seizure risk, guiding antiepileptic therapy adjustments based on frequency and amplitude changes.^[48] Post-completion of the Human Genome Project on April 14, 2003, genomic sequencing has enabled longitudinal monitoring of disease progression, such as tracking somatic mutations in cancer patients via circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) assays. These liquid biopsies detect minimal residual disease with sensitivity down to 0.01% variant allele frequency, informing targeted therapies and predicting relapse earlier than imaging alone.^[49]^[50] Telemedicine integrations, surging from 2020 onward amid regulatory expansions, facilitate remote vital signs and biological data transmission, correlating with reduced in-person healthcare utilization. Studies indicate telemedicine follow-ups post-discharge lower 30-day readmission rates to 15% from overall baselines of 19%, by enabling timely adjustments without hospital returns.^[51] However, consumer wearables often generate false positives—for instance, optical heart rate sensors misclassifying arrhythmias in low-risk users—prompting unnecessary consultations and over-treatment, as evidenced by increased emergency visits for benign alerts. Such inaccuracies, stemming from motion artifacts and skin tone variability, underscore the need for clinical validation before acting on data, with research showing elevated anxiety and preoccupation among frequent users.^[52] ^[53]

Computing and Information Systems

Application performance monitoring (APM) in computing systems focuses on real-time tracking of software application metrics such as latency, error rates, throughput, and resource utilization to maintain operational integrity. Tools like New Relic, launched in 2008, exemplify early APM solutions that provide visibility into application health by instrumenting code to capture transaction traces and database queries.^[54] This approach enables diagnostics grounded in empirical performance data, identifying bottlenecks through first-principles analysis of causal dependencies like slow API calls or inefficient algorithms. By the 2010s, APM evolved into broader observability practices, integrating the "three pillars" of logs for event details, metrics for aggregated summaries, and traces for distributed request flows, allowing teams to infer internal states from external outputs without predefined queries.^[55]^[56] Network and security monitoring complements APM by scrutinizing traffic for anomalies and threats, ensuring information system resilience. Signature-based intrusion detection systems (IDS), such as Snort developed in 1998, analyze packets against rule sets to flag known attack patterns like buffer overflows or SQL injections.^[57] Over time, these systems have incorporated AI-driven behavioral analysis, which models normal user and system behaviors to detect deviations indicative of zero-day exploits or insider threats, a trend accelerating from 2023 to 2025 with machine learning enabling predictive threat hunting.^[58]^[59] Such advancements shift from reactive rule-matching to proactive causal inference, reducing false negatives in complex environments like cloud-native infrastructures. Despite these gains, excessive monitoring generates alert fatigue, where operators overlook critical signals amid noise, with empirical studies in the 2020s documenting up to 90% of security operations centers (SOCs) overwhelmed by false positives and uninvestigated alerts—sometimes 30% ignored—leading to analyst burnout and heightened breach risks.^[60]^[61] This issue underscores the need for tuned thresholds and prioritization, as over-reliance on volume-based alerts dilutes diagnostic focus. Counterbalancing this, machine learning-enhanced root-cause analysis has empirically cut mean time to resolution (MTTR) by up to 78% in incident response and reduced unplanned downtime by 40% through predictive anomaly detection, validating monitoring's net value when causally targeted rather than indiscriminately applied.^[62]^[63]

Environmental and Earth Sciences

Monitoring in environmental and earth sciences employs instrumental networks and remote sensing to quantify changes in natural systems, prioritizing verifiable measurements over speculative forecasts. Ground stations, buoys, and orbital platforms collect data on variables like temperature, seismic waves, and pollutant concentrations, enabling causal attribution of human impacts such as emissions to ecological shifts. This approach has revealed patterns, including vegetation recovery in response to atmospheric CO2 increases, countering projections of inevitable decline without corresponding evidence. Satellite-based climate and weather monitoring began with the Landsat series, launched by NASA in 1972, which has imaged Earth's surface every 16 days to track deforestation, with data showing net forest loss in Indonesia averaging 470,000 hectares annually from 2001 to 2022. Hyperspectral satellites in the 2020s, including the European Space Agency's EnMAP operational since 2022, detect subtle spectral signatures for early warning of drought stress in crops and ecosystems. Seismic networks, expanded by the U.S. Geological Survey after the 1960s establishment of global monitoring under the World-Wide Standardized Seismograph Network, now include over 13,000 stations that locate earthquakes with magnitudes above 2.5 within minutes, aiding precursor analysis like strain accumulation in fault zones. These systems provide empirical baselines, such as satellite altimetry from TOPEX/Poseidon (1992–2006) and successors measuring sea level rise at 3.3 millimeters per year through 2023, often lower than mid-range model predictions from the 1990s. Pollution tracking relies on sensor arrays linking emissions to outcomes, as in the EPA's AirNow network initiated in the 1970s under the Clean Air Act, which monitors six criteria pollutants and correlates fine particulate matter (PM2.5) levels above 12 micrograms per cubic meter with increased cardiovascular hospitalizations. Acid rain monitoring in the 1980s, via networks like the National Acid Precipitation Assessment Program, quantified sulfur dioxide deposition causing lake pH drops to below 5 in the northeastern U.S., prompting regulatory cuts that reduced emissions by 92% from 1990 to 2020 and restored fish populations in affected waters. Oceanic buoys, including over 4,000 Argo profiling floats active since 2000, measure salinity and temperature profiles to depths of 2,000 meters, documenting biodiversity indicators like phytoplankton declines tied to ocean acidification rates of 0.002 pH units per year. These observations emphasize causal mechanisms, such as nutrient runoff driving algal blooms, verified through longitudinal data rather than isolated events. Integrating AI since 2023 enhances anomaly detection, with algorithms processing Landsat and Sentinel-2 imagery to flag ecosystem disruptions, such as insect outbreaks in boreal forests with 95% accuracy in pilot studies. Empirical satellite records have challenged exaggerated model outputs, including a 2016–2023 NASA analysis showing global leaf area increase by 5% per decade due to CO2 effects, contradicting deforestation-dominant narratives in some IPCC scenarios. Similarly, GRACE satellite gravimetry data from 2002 onward indicate groundwater depletion in aquifers like California's Central Valley at 20 cubic kilometers annually, but also recharge successes from managed aquifer programs, underscoring monitoring's role in falsifying ungrounded alarmism. This data-centric method prioritizes observable trends, mitigating biases in projections from institutions prone to overemphasizing worst-case assumptions.

Industrial and Engineering Contexts

In industrial settings, predictive maintenance emerged as a key monitoring strategy in the 1960s and 1970s, utilizing vibration sensors to detect anomalies in rotating machinery such as turbomachinery and gearboxes, enabling early identification of wear or imbalance before catastrophic failure.^[64]^[65] By the 1980s, these sensors became widespread in manufacturing, shifting from periodic manual checks to continuous data collection that correlates vibration patterns with causal degradation mechanisms like misalignment or bearing faults.^[66] Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) systems, introduced in the 1970s alongside programmable logic controllers, extended this approach to pipelines and process industries, allowing remote oversight of flow rates, pressures, and leaks to avert disruptions from corrosion or blockages.^[67] Studies indicate these methods yield 18-25% reductions in maintenance costs and up to 50% less unplanned downtime by prioritizing interventions based on empirical condition data rather than fixed schedules.^[68]^[69] Quality control in engineering contexts relies on real-time monitoring to enforce defect detection during production, particularly in assembly lines where deviations from specifications can cascade into systemic inefficiencies. In the automotive sector, machine vision systems proliferated after 2000, employing cameras and image processing algorithms to inspect welds, paint uniformity, and component alignment at speeds exceeding human capabilities, often achieving defect detection rates above 99% for surface anomalies.^[70] These systems integrate with robotic arms and conveyor feedback loops, causally linking visual data to process adjustments that minimize scrap rates and ensure dimensional accuracy, as evidenced by implementations reducing rework by 20-30% in high-volume plants.^[71] Recent innovations incorporate Internet of Things (IoT) sensors and unmanned aerial vehicles (drones) for infrastructure monitoring, such as bridges, where from the 2010s onward, distributed networks track strain, corrosion, and structural integrity via embedded accelerometers and thermal imaging.^[72] Drones facilitate non-contact inspections, generating 3D models and orthomosaics that quantify crack propagation or erosion with sub-millimeter precision, enhancing causal risk assessment over traditional manual surveys.^[73] However, these deployments face vulnerabilities, including physical tampering of sensors that can falsify data inputs, leading to misguided preventive actions or undetected failures, as highlighted in analyses of industrial IoT ecosystems prone to hardware modifications or firmware exploits.^[74]^[75] Mitigation requires layered verification, such as data integrity checks, to preserve reliability in failure prevention.

Applications in Security and Governance

Surveillance and Law Enforcement

Closed-circuit television (CCTV) systems became widespread in law enforcement following expansions in the 1990s, particularly in urban areas for real-time monitoring of public spaces. In the United Kingdom, estimates placed the number of CCTV cameras at between 4 million and 5.9 million by the early 2010s, concentrated in high-crime locales to deter and detect offenses.^[76]^[77] Systematic reviews of evaluations indicate CCTV is associated with modest crime reductions overall, with stronger effects in structured settings like parking lots (up to 51% decrease in vehicle crimes) and urban streets (around 24-28% in select experiments), though standalone implementations often yield statistically insignificant results without complementary interventions like increased patrols.^[78]^[79] Body-worn cameras, adopted by police forces from the mid-2010s onward, record officer-citizen interactions to enhance accountability and evidentiary collection. Randomized trials demonstrate reductions in use-of-force incidents by 10-17% and citizen complaints by up to 93% in equipped units, facilitating quicker case resolutions through video evidence without broad impacts on overall crime rates.^[80]^[81]^[82] Facial recognition technology, integrated into policing from the 2010s, scans live feeds or databases for suspect matching; deployments in U.S. cities correlated with violent crime drops, including homicides, by enabling rapid identifications in high-risk areas.^[83] Digital tracking tools expanded operational capabilities in the 2000s, including IMSI-catchers (e.g., Stingray devices) that mimic cell towers to capture phone signals for locating suspects during pursuits or investigations, used by agencies across 15 U.S. states by 2014.^[84] Automatic number plate recognition (ANPR) systems, deployed on vehicles and roadways, cross-reference license plates against databases in real time to flag stolen cars or wanted individuals, contributing to detections in localized operations though comprehensive crime-reduction metrics remain limited.^[85] In the 2020s, AI-assisted analysis of surveillance feeds has accelerated suspect identification, reducing manual review time for footage and enabling forensic searches that pinpoint events and persons of interest more efficiently in investigations.^[86] Operational critiques highlight that intensive surveillance demands significant resources for installation, maintenance, and monitoring, potentially yielding diminishing returns in low-crime areas where baseline offenses are sparse and displacement to unmonitored zones occurs without net deterrence.^[87] Studies note that while targeted applications in hotspots enhance resolutions, broad rollouts can strain budgets without proportional gains, as evidenced by modest aggregate effects in meta-analyses prioritizing empirical controls over anecdotal claims.^[78]^[88]

Intelligence and National Security

In national security contexts, monitoring encompasses signals intelligence (SIGINT) operations that intercept electronic communications to detect and preempt threats from foreign adversaries and terrorist networks. Following the September 11, 2001 attacks, the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA) significantly expanded its SIGINT capabilities through legislative measures such as the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001 and subsequent amendments to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), enabling broader collection of foreign-targeted data from U.S. technology providers.^[89] The PRISM program, authorized under Section 702 of FISA and operational since at least 2007 with expansions post-9/11, facilitated the acquisition of internet communications, including emails and online metadata, from companies like Microsoft and Google, primarily aimed at non-U.S. persons abroad involved in terrorism or proliferation activities. These efforts yielded specific operational successes, such as contributions to locating Osama bin Laden in 2011 through integrated SIGINT analysis of courier networks and communications patterns.^[90] Bulk data collection programs, including telephony metadata under Section 215 of the PATRIOT Act from 2006 to 2015, aggregated vast datasets to query for connections to known threats, with U.S. officials initially claiming prevention of over 50 terrorist plots worldwide.^[91] Independent reviews, however, including those by the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board (PCLOB) and nonpartisan analyses, found scant direct evidence of thwarted attacks attributable to bulk telephony metadata, with most cited cases involving traditional targeted surveillance rather than mass collection; for instance, only one plot was peripherally aided by metadata queries amid high signal-to-noise challenges from irrelevant data volumes exceeding actionable intelligence.^[92] In cyber domains, NSA monitoring detected anomalies leading to operations like the 2010 Stuxnet worm, a joint U.S.-Israeli cyber tool that sabotaged Iranian uranium enrichment centrifuges at Natanz by exploiting supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) systems, delaying Tehran's nuclear program by an estimated 1-2 years without kinetic escalation.^[93] Such monitoring highlighted the value of persistent cyber intelligence in disrupting state-sponsored threats, though proliferation of similar malware underscored risks of attribution and retaliation. From 2023 onward, artificial intelligence has augmented pattern recognition in SIGINT datasets, enabling faster anomaly detection in petabyte-scale communications and behavioral signals indicative of terrorist planning or cyber intrusions.^[94] U.S. intelligence agencies, including the NSA and Department of Homeland Security, have deployed AI models to process multimodal data—such as satellite imagery, financial transactions, and encrypted traffic—for predictive threat modeling, as evidenced in enhanced counterterrorism operations against ISIS affiliates through automated link analysis that reduced manual review time by factors of 10-100.^[95] These capabilities address prior inefficiencies in human-led analysis, though empirical validation remains classified, with public assessments emphasizing AI's role in scaling defenses against adaptive adversaries like nation-state hackers.^[96]

Border and Infrastructure Protection

Modern border monitoring employs a combination of physical barriers, sensors, drones, and artificial intelligence to detect and deter unauthorized crossings. The U.S. Secure Border Initiative's SBInet program, initiated in 2005, sought to deploy integrated systems including ground sensors, radars, and cameras along the U.S.-Mexico border, with Boeing awarded a contract exceeding $1 billion for development.^[97] However, persistent technical failures, delays, and cost overruns led to its cancellation in 2011, though elements like improved detection capabilities informed subsequent deployments.^[98] In the 2020s, advancements include AI-enhanced drones equipped with thermal imaging and real-time tracking for surveillance in remote areas, alongside fixed towers integrating radar, infrared sensors, and video feeds to classify threats automatically.^[99] ^[100] To counter subterranean threats, seismic and acoustic sensors detect vibrations from tunneling, footsteps, or vehicle movement, enabling early identification of illegal passages. Systems like Geospace's seismic arrays and fiber-optic distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) analyze ground waves for anomalies, with deployments along borders proving effective in locating activity without surface visibility.^[101] ^[102] U.S. efforts, such as the Border Tunneling Activity Detection System (BTADS-P), combine seismic, acoustic, and electromagnetic methods, originating from military research into underground fortifications.^[103] These technologies address the persistence of over 200 known cross-border tunnels since the 1990s, often used for smuggling.^[104] Infrastructure protection relies on supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) systems for critical assets like power grids, enhanced following the August 14, 2003, Northeast blackout that affected 50 million people across eight U.S. states and Ontario due to inadequate real-time monitoring and alarm failures.^[105] Post-incident reforms mandated improved SCADA telemetry for voltage and load data, reducing outage risks through automated alerts and vegetation management protocols.^[106] For transportation hubs, closed-circuit television (CCTV) networks integrated with biometric access controls secure rail yards and ports; facial recognition at ports verifies credentials, minimizing unauthorized entry, while AI-driven video analytics detect perimeter breaches at railyards.^[107] ^[108] Empirical data indicate these systems correlate with reduced intrusions, as sectors with reinforced barriers and sensors experienced up to 90% fewer successful crossings in targeted zones during the 2010s, with broader U.S. southwest border encounters dropping 55% from June to October 2024 amid expanded tech use.^[109] July 2025 marked the lowest recorded illegal crossings, attributed partly to integrated surveillance deterring migrants toward monitored areas.^[110] Nonetheless, high false positive rates persist, with ground sensors generating extraneous alerts from wildlife or weather, necessitating adjustable thresholds that can strain response resources.^[111] ^[112] Such limitations highlight the need for multi-sensor fusion to enhance accuracy without over-reliance on any single modality.

Applications in Business and Economics

Organizational Performance Tracking

Employee monitoring for organizational performance tracking encompasses the deployment of software to measure individual and team productivity metrics, such as task completion rates and time allocation, directly linking observed behaviors to output metrics like sales volume or project throughput.^[113] These systems emerged prominently in the 2010s with tools like Teramind, which records user activity including application usage and keystroke patterns to quantify efficiency and flag unproductive patterns.^[114] Keystroke logging, a core feature in such software, analyzes typing speed and patterns to infer engagement levels, with implementations showing correlations to reduced idle time in controlled environments.^[115] Key performance indicator (KPI) dashboards, integrated into enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems since the early 2000s, provide real-time visualizations of metrics like order fulfillment rates and resource utilization, enabling managers to tie employee actions to revenue impacts.^[116] Empirical analyses of ERP-adopting firms demonstrate associations with revenue growth through streamlined processes, as dashboards facilitate rapid identification of bottlenecks.^[117] For instance, monitoring via these tools has been linked to a 5% productivity uplift in remote settings by verifying output against expectations.^[118] Advancements from 2023 to 2025 incorporate artificial intelligence for anomaly detection in workflows, scanning for deviations like unusual login times or task delays to preempt inefficiencies.^[119] AI-enhanced monitoring yields net productivity gains, with task-specific increases up to 37% in knowledge work, though meta-analyses reveal slight elevations in stress and minor dips in satisfaction that do not fully offset output improvements.^[120]^[121] These causal mechanisms operate via data-driven interventions, such as reallocating resources based on detected patterns, outweighing morale variances in aggregate firm performance.^[122]

Financial Markets and Compliance

In financial markets, monitoring systems focus on detecting irregularities in trading activities to maintain stability and prevent manipulation. Following the May 6, 2010 Flash Crash, during which the Dow Jones Industrial Average plummeted nearly 1,000 points in minutes before recovering, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) implemented enhanced surveillance measures, including the Consolidated Audit Trail (CAT). Approved in 2016 and operational since 2020, CAT requires exchanges, broker-dealers, and clearing firms to report equity and options trade data in real time, capturing up to 500 billion records daily to enable anomaly detection in high-frequency trading and potential market abuses.^[123]^[124] The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) complements this by deploying hundreds of surveillance algorithms against vast trade datasets to identify patterns indicative of fraud or manipulation, such as spoofing or layering.^[125] Compliance monitoring in financial institutions emphasizes anti-money laundering (AML) protocols, driven by the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001, which expanded requirements for transaction scrutiny to combat terrorist financing and illicit flows. Under Section 314, financial entities must monitor accounts and report suspicious activities via Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs) to FinCEN, with approximately 4.6 million SARs filed in fiscal year 2023, facilitating investigations into over 13,000 related criminal cases.^[126] These systems causally link flagged transactions to enforcement actions, as evidenced by FinCEN's role in disrupting networks tied to predicate crimes like drug trafficking, though effectiveness metrics rely on indirect outcomes such as asset forfeitures rather than comprehensive prevented-loss tallies.^[127] In the cryptocurrency domain during the 2020s, blockchain ledgers have emerged as tools for compliance, offering immutable transaction records that enhance traceability under regulatory frameworks from FinCEN and the SEC. For instance, distributed ledger technology enables automated AML checks by verifying fund origins in real time, aligning with rules treating certain crypto activities as money transmission services.^[128]^[129] This integration supports anomaly detection in volatile crypto markets, where pseudonymous addresses can obscure illicit transfers, but requires firms to adapt surveillance to decentralized structures. While these monitoring regimes have empirically stabilized markets—averting Flash Crash-scale events through proactive interventions—critics contend that escalating compliance burdens, including AML program maintenance, impose asymmetric costs that divert capital and talent from productive innovation. Annual compliance expenditures in the sector often exceed operational needs, fragmenting oversight across regulators and potentially pushing activities to less-monitored jurisdictions, as noted in analyses of post-crisis rules.^[130]^[131] Regulatory bodies like the SEC and FINRA, tasked with enforcement, may underemphasize such trade-offs in their reporting, favoring stability metrics over broader economic impacts.

Ethical, Legal, and Societal Dimensions

Privacy Rights and Civil Liberties Concerns

Critics of expansive monitoring practices argue that mass collection of location and communication data undermines protections akin to the Fourth Amendment against unreasonable searches. In Carpenter v. United States (2018), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that the government's acquisition of historical cell-site location information (CSLI) from wireless carriers constitutes a search requiring a warrant supported by probable cause, as such data provides a comprehensive chronicle of an individual's movements over extended periods, revealing sensitive details of private life without traditional boundaries of physical intrusion.^[132]^[133] This decision highlighted concerns that warrantless access to digital records erodes expectations of privacy in public spaces, where individuals historically assumed less protection, yet aggregate tracking enables pervasive reconstruction of personal associations and habits. Advocacy groups such as the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) promote data minimalism, urging limits on government surveillance to prevent overreach into personal freedoms. The EFF has opposed reauthorizations of programs like Section 702 of the FISA Amendments Act, which enables mass acquisition of communications, arguing that such tools facilitate bulk collection without individualized suspicion, potentially encompassing innocent citizens' data in violation of core privacy principles.^[134] The organization advocates for international human rights frameworks applied to surveillance, emphasizing proportionality and oversight to curb incidental collection of non-target data.^[135] In workplace settings, unauthorized monitoring of personal devices raises consent violations, with reports indicating breaches through undisclosed tracking software. A 2024 survey found that over 56% of employees experienced stress and anxiety from surveillance practices, attributing this to perceived invasions of off-hours privacy.^[136] Ethics analyses note that such monitoring, often lacking explicit agreement, fosters distrust and erodes morale, as 43% of workers reported negative impacts on company culture from internet oversight tools.^[137] Instances of abuse include unauthorized video surveillance in semi-private areas, such as locker rooms, where cameras captured individuals changing clothes, prompting civil liberties challenges over intrusive recording without notice or justification. Advocacy reports cite temptations for personal misuse of footage, including discriminatory targeting or retention beyond legitimate purposes, amplifying fears of arbitrary power in monitoring systems.^[138]

Security Efficacy and Empirical Outcomes

Empirical evaluations of closed-circuit television (CCTV) surveillance demonstrate modest but statistically significant reductions in crime rates within monitored public areas, with meta-analyses aggregating data from multiple randomized controlled trials reporting an overall 16% decrease in criminal incidents compared to control areas without cameras.^[139] These effects are most pronounced for property crimes such as vehicle theft, where reductions can reach 51% in high-risk settings like parking facilities, attributable to the deterrent mechanism of visible monitoring altering potential offenders' risk calculations.^[140] In urban contexts like New York City, the expansion of surveillance infrastructure during the 1990s, integrated with data-driven policing strategies, coincided with a precipitous decline in overall crime rates—dropping over 70% from peak levels in 1990 to 2010—lending causal support to monitoring's role in enhancing deterrence and enabling rapid response.^[141] Such outcomes underscore monitoring's capacity to impose order by increasing perceived risks of detection, countering claims of negligible impact with quantifiable metrics from controlled studies. In counterterrorism and national security domains, post-9/11 intelligence monitoring frameworks have disrupted numerous plots through proactive data aggregation and analysis, with U.S. government assessments attributing the prevention of over 50 potential attacks in the decade following 2001 to enhanced surveillance capabilities, including signals intelligence and financial tracking. These interventions reflect causal efficacy in preempting threats via pattern recognition in communications and movements, as evidenced by declassified case studies of foiled operations, though independent verification remains limited due to classification constraints. Extending to infrastructure protection, real-time grid monitoring systems have averted cascading failures; for instance, advanced sensor networks in modern power systems detect anomalies milliseconds ahead, preventing blackouts as demonstrated in simulations and operational deployments that isolate faults before widespread outages occur.^[142] This resilience is causal: empirical models show that unmonitored grids experience 2-3 times higher outage frequencies during peak loads compared to monitored counterparts equipped with predictive alerts.^[143] Recent advancements in AI-enhanced predictive monitoring, particularly from 2023 to 2025, amplify these effects by forecasting threats with higher precision, achieving up to 82% efficiency gains in security operations through anomaly detection in vast datasets.^[144] Peer-reviewed implementations in cybersecurity and predictive policing report 20-30% improvements in threat interdiction rates, as AI models integrate historical data to prioritize high-risk scenarios, yielding verifiable reductions in incident occurrences beyond traditional reactive methods.^[145] In business contexts, employee performance monitoring correlates with productivity uplifts of 15-22%, derived from longitudinal studies tracking output metrics in surveilled versus non-surveilled teams, where real-time feedback loops enforce accountability and minimize idle time.^[146] These data-driven outcomes affirm monitoring's empirical value in fostering deterrence and efficiency, grounded in causal chains from observation to behavioral adjustment, rather than unsubstantiated narratives of inefficacy.

Major Controversies and Viewpoint Debates

The 2013 revelations by Edward Snowden, beginning with publications in The Guardian on June 5, disclosed extensive U.S. National Security Agency programs involving bulk collection of telephony metadata under Section 215 of the Patriot Act and internet communications via PRISM, igniting debates over the balance between national security imperatives and individual privacy rights. Proponents of such monitoring argue it has thwarted terrorist plots, with U.S. intelligence officials citing contributions to over 50 cases since 2001, though independent reviews like the 2014 Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board report found no instances where bulk telephony metadata collection was uniquely pivotal in preventing attacks. Critics, including civil liberties advocates, contend that these programs induce chilling effects on free expression, evidenced by empirical studies showing a 10-30% drop in Wikipedia searches for terms like "NSA" or "jihad" in the U.S. following the leaks, suggesting self-censorship amid perceived surveillance risks. Mainstream media and academic analyses often emphasize the invasive nature without proportionally weighing data indicating that targeted, warrant-based surveillance yields comparable security outcomes with fewer privacy costs, highlighting a potential bias toward presuming overreach absent rigorous causal attribution of harms. In workplace monitoring, ethical disputes center on whether electronic oversight enhances accountability or paradoxically erodes it, with studies revealing that constant tracking can diminish employees' sense of agency, leading to increased deviance such as corner-cutting or unethical shortcuts to meet metrics. A 2021 behavioral ethics analysis found that monitoring under high-performance goals fosters moral disengagement, as workers prioritize superficial compliance over substantive effort, countering assumptions of straightforward productivity gains. While advocates cite needs for transparency in remote work environments—exemplified by a 2023 Gartner survey indicating 60% of employers using AI tools for performance tracking to combat fraud—empirical data from 2024 Glassdoor polls and psychological research underscore counterproductive effects like heightened stress and eroded trust, which correlate with 20-30% dips in long-term motivation and innovation. This tension underscores debates over whether mandates for productivity metrics justify tools that, per first-principles evaluation, may incentivize gaming systems rather than genuine output improvements, with left-leaning labor critiques often amplifying privacy harms while underplaying verifiable accountability lapses in unmonitored settings. Debates over AI-driven monitoring highlight concerns about algorithmic biases amplifying discriminatory outcomes, such as facial recognition systems exhibiting error rates up to 35% higher for darker-skinned individuals in 2020s deployments, prompting accusations of systemic overreach in policing and security contexts. Yet, evidence from predictive policing trials, including a 2022 National Institute of Justice review, indicates net reductions in crime hotspots by 7-15% through targeted interventions, suggesting biases—while real and requiring mitigation via diverse training data—do not negate overall efficacy when causally linked to threat prevention rather than isolated error anecdotes. Exaggerated "Orwellian" framings in media and advocacy circles lack robust causal proof tying monitoring to totalitarian erosion, as historical surveillance expansions (e.g., post-9/11) correlate more strongly with geopolitical factors than inherent technological determinism; peer-reviewed assessments emphasize that unaddressed biases stem from flawed inputs rather than monitoring per se, with calls for empirical auditing over blanket prohibitions that could forfeit verifiable security dividends.

Regulatory Responses and Future Challenges

The European Union's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), effective May 25, 2018, imposes data minimization requirements on monitoring practices, mandating that personal data collection be limited to what is adequate, relevant, and strictly necessary for specified purposes, thereby constraining indiscriminate surveillance to reduce breach risks and unauthorized access.^[147] In the United States, the USA PATRIOT Act of October 26, 2001, expanded federal surveillance authorities, including roving wiretaps and intelligence-law enforcement information sharing, to address terrorism threats following the September 11 attacks, with provisions enabling delayed notice warrants that prioritized operational security over immediate disclosure.^[148] These frameworks reflect efforts to balance data utility for security with limits on scope, though enforcement relies on verifiable compliance metrics rather than subjective interpretations. Recent adaptations address emerging technologies, such as the EU AI Act, which entered into force on August 1, 2024, and classifies AI-driven monitoring systems as high-risk where they enable real-time biometric identification or workplace inference, requiring transparency, risk assessments, and human oversight to mitigate biases and errors.^[149] In cybersecurity, post-2020 mandates like U.S. Executive Order 14028 of May 12, 2021, compel federal agencies and critical infrastructure operators to implement continuous monitoring, zero-trust architectures, and incident reporting to counter supply-chain vulnerabilities, as evidenced by heightened breach detections following SolarWinds.^[150] Workplace guidelines have evolved to emphasize consent; for instance, EU regulations under GDPR and national laws require explicit employee notification and agreement for video or activity tracking, while U.S. states like Connecticut mandate written consent for electronic monitoring as of 2023 updates, aiming to align productivity tools with evidentiary privacy impacts.^[151] Future challenges include scaling regulations to the proliferation of Internet of Things (IoT) devices and AI analytics, projected to exceed 75 billion connected endpoints by 2025, which amplify surveillance data volumes and introduce unmanageable compliance burdens without standardized interoperability protocols.^[152] Empirical security needs, such as real-time threat detection in distributed networks, risk being undermined by regulatory capture, where privacy advocacy influences favor rigid consent models over adaptive, evidence-based frameworks, potentially increasing vulnerability to state actors or cybercriminals as seen in lagged responses to IoT exploits.^[153] Adaptive enforcement, grounded in measurable outcomes like reduced incident rates, is essential to prevent ideological priors from overriding causal evidence of monitoring's role in averting empirically verified threats.

References

[1]
Basic Information about Air Emissions Monitoring | US EPA
Jul 9, 2025 · Monitoring is a general term for on-going collection and use of measurement data or other information for assessing performance against a standard or status.
[2]
Monitoring | Better Evaluation
Monitoring is a process to periodically collect, analyse and use information to actively manage performance, maximise positive impacts and minimise the risk ...
[3]
What's IT Monitoring? IT Systems Monitoring Explained | Splunk
Nov 29, 2023 · Monitoring enables organizations to define, track, and report on Service Level Indicators (SLIs) and Objectives (SLOs), aligning technical ...
[4]
Smart Monitoring of Manufacturing Systems for Automated Decision ...
Oct 15, 2021 · This study proposes a multi-method framework for the smart monitoring of manufacturing systems and intelligent decision-making.
[5]
[PDF] monitoring | intrac
Monitoring is the systematic and continuous collection and analysis of information about the progress of a development intervention. Monitoring is done to ...
[6]
Monitoring System - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
A monitoring system is defined as a reactive framework that observes and analyzes data from various sources to detect undesirable conditions, ...<|separator|>
[7]
What is monitoring: theory, practice and Interview preparation
6. Key Components of Monitoring. Continuous Data Collection: Monitoring involves the ongoing collection of data to track progress and performance, providing ...
[8]
Qualitative and Quantitative data collection methods in M&E
Jun 17, 2021 · Explore the key differences between qualitative & quantitative data collection approaches and their common tools & methods used in ...
[9]
[PDF] Defining the Meaning of 'Auditing' and 'Monitoring'
The primary defining characteristics distinguishing auditing and monitoring are independence, objectivity and frequency. Auditing represents evaluation ...
[10]
Monitor - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
Originating from Latin monitor, meaning "one who warns or instructs," monitor refers to a senior pupil or to checking quality, observing, or guiding.
[11]
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/monitor
[12]
Monitory - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
From Latin monitorius, meaning "admonishing," derived from monere "to warn," the word means giving admonition or conveying a warning, rooted in PIE *moneie ...
[13]
monitor, n. meanings, etymology and more | Oxford English Dictionary
The earliest known use of the noun monitor is in the early 1500s. OED's earliest evidence for monitor is from 1515. monitor is a borrowing from Latin. Etymons: ...
[14]
monitor noun - Definition, pictures, pronunciation and usage notes
Word Originearly 16th cent. (in sense (3)): from Latin, from monit- 'warned', from the verb monere. Sense (2) dates from the 1930s.
[15]
A Brief History of Analytics - Dataversity
Sep 20, 2021 · The use of analytics by business can be found as far back as the 19th century, when Frederick Winslow Taylor initiated time management exercises ...
[16]
The Evolution of Observability – From Monitoring to Intelligence
A Brief History of Observability ; Rudolf E. Kálmán first introduced observability in the 1960s. In control theory, a system is considered ; observable if its ...
[17]
The history of monitoring tools - Sumo Logic
Apr 2, 2018 · Early monitoring was basic, Unix introduced tools, network monitoring developed, internet tools emerged, and cloud computing radically ...
[18]
Babylonian Calendar -- from Eric Weisstein's World of Astronomy
Around 2000 BC, the Babylonians created the system of the zodiac to describe the positions of the planets. In the 8th century BC, they defined the day as ...
[19]
Babylonian Astronomical Diaries - ATTALUS
The Babylonian astronomical diaries are a large collection of cuneiform clay tablets, which as their name suggests are mostly concerned with astronomical ...
[20]
Hippocrates: timeless still - PMC - PubMed Central - NIH
Between 440 and 360 BC (approximately) Hippocrates wrote a number of medical treatises and his pupils probably wrote many more. Only 60 treatises were saved ...
[21]
War at Sea in the Middle Ages - Medievalists.net
Feb 13, 2021 · Medieval naval warfare was poorly documented, with few dedicated warships. Most ships were for trade, and combat was often commerce raiding, ...
[22]
England's weather in 1269 revealed by medieval report
Aug 22, 2023 · The weather report, which can be found in the British Library manuscript Royal 7 F VIII, is part of a calendar from March 1269 to February 1270.Missing: early logs
[23]
The History of the Thermometer - ThoughtCo
Jan 3, 2021 · In 1593, Galileo Galilei invented a rudimentary water thermoscope, which for the first time allowed temperature variations to be measured.
[24]
Watt Steam Engine Indicator (Replica, 1927) | Smithsonian Institution
This is a replica of the original steam indicator invented in the late 18th Century by James Watt of Scotland. This was the first device intended to measure the ...Missing: 1700s | Show results with:1700s
[25]
[PDF] Gently Down the Stream: How Exploding Steamboat Boilers in the ...
Apr 30, 2002 · Boiler explosions plagued the steamboat industry during the early years of its existence (1816-1852), costing thousands of lives and ...
[26]
Battle of the Atlantic Volume 4 Technical Intelligence From Allied ...
Although Schnorchel was not immune to detection by radar, it was much less susceptible than a surfaced U-boat and permitted boats to operate close to coastal ...
[27]
Radar and the U-Boat | Proceedings - September 1963 Vol. 89/9/727
To say that the Allies' use of radar was the sole cause of the ultimate defeat of the U- boat, or that winning the Battle of the Atlantic was the decisive ...Missing: sonar monitoring
[28]
Ultra and the Campaign Against U-boats in World War II
Many other factors, such as radar, aircraft coverage, sonar, more escorts and better training all had an effect and it is the combination of all of these and ...
[29]
David Warren - Inventor of the black box flight recorder | DST
It was David Warren's interest in the possibility of personally recording music that led to the invention of the world's first flight recorder or 'black box'.
[30]
History in medicine: the road to clinical electrophysiology
Dec 15, 2021 · Norman “Jeff” Holter (1914-1983) invented ambulatory electrocardiography in 1947. This first ECG radio transmitter with batteries weighed more ...
[31]
The impact of the 1952 London smog event and its relevance for ...
In 1952, domestic and industrial coal fires blanketed thick smoke across London for just over four days, contributing up to 12000 deaths in the immediate ...Prior To 1952 · The 1952 London Smog Event · Wood Smoke In Australia<|separator|>
[32]
Measuring and Monitoring Air Pollution in British Cities, 1912-1960
Sep 4, 2023 · This paper examines the origins and development of the first nationwide air pollution monitoring network of its kind.
[33]
[PDF] A History of the ARPANET: The First Decade - DTIC
Apr 1, 1981 · In 1970 major problems with the IMP flow control and storage allocation techniques were demonstrated. It is interesting that even after ...
[34]
The History of IoT: How This Technology Is Evolving - Cogniteq
Feb 9, 2024 · Wireless Sensor Networks and RFID (2000-2010) The introduction of radio frequency identification (RFID) and wireless sensor networks (WSN) ...The beginning of the history of... · Wireless Sensor Networks and...
[35]
History of the Internet of Things: Key Milestones and Trends
Aug 5, 2025 · Early IoT development Between 2000 and 2009, smart devices started to appear, wireless technologies (Wi-Fi, RFID) were actively developed, and ...
[36]
New – Amazon CloudWatch Anomaly Detection | AWS News Blog
Oct 17, 2019 · Amazon CloudWatch launched in early 2009 as part of our desire to (as I said at the time) “make it even easier for you to build ...
[37]
Machine Learning for Anomaly Detection: A Systematic Review
Jun 4, 2021 · In this research paper, we conduct a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) which analyzes ML models that detect anomalies in their application. Our ...<|separator|>
[38]
A Comprehensive Survey of Deep Transfer Learning for Anomaly ...
In these examples, AI-powered anomaly detection integrates the analysis of time series data to detect unusual patterns in the recorded data. By identifying ...
[39]
[PDF] 2025 report - Observability Forecast - New Relic
Sep 16, 2025 · AI monitoring utilization went from 42% in 2024 to 54% in 2025 —a double-digit growth rate year over year—pushing adoption into the majority of ...
[40]
Predictive Maintenance Case Studies: How Companies Are Saving ...
Rating 5.0 (1) Feb 24, 2025 · Studies show that predictive maintenance can reduce unplanned downtime by up to 50% and maintenance costs by 10-40%.
[41]
Artificial Intelligence-Driven Predictive Maintenance In ...
Jan 6, 2025 · Predictive maintenance with AI has transformed manufacturing by improving operating efficiency, reducing downtime, and optimizing resource use.<|control11|><|separator|>
[42]
The Rise of Wearable Devices during the COVID-19 Pandemic
This systematic review provides an extensive overview of wearable systems for the remote management and automated assessment of COVID-19.
[43]
Automatic detection of persistent physiological changes after COVID ...
Aug 11, 2025 · Data-driven criteria, such as specific changes in physiology measured by commercially available off-the-shelf (COTS) wearable devices, may help ...
[44]
Systematic review of predictive maintenance practices in the ...
This in-depth literature review, which follows the PRISMA 2020 framework, examines how PDM is being implemented in several areas of the manufacturing industry.
[45]
Continuous Glucose Monitoring: the achievement of 100 years of ...
Numerous studies have demonstrated use of continuous glucose monitoring confers significant glycemic benefits on individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1DM) and ...
[46]
Takuo Aoyagi—a Tribute to the Brain Behind Pulse Oximetry - PMC
May 20, 2020 · Takuo Aoyagi who invented pulse oximetry to measure the oxygen saturation in the blood in 1974. The importance of pulse oximetry is felt more in ...
[47]
The History, Evolution and Future of Continuous Glucose Monitoring ...
In 1999, the FDA approved the first commercial CGM device, the MiniMed Continuous Glucose Monitoring System (CGMS) [13]. Although it could only be worn for up ...
[48]
Appendix 6. A Brief History of EEG - NCBI - NIH
Hans Berger (1873–1941), a German psychiatrist, recorded the first human EEGs in 1924. In 1934, Fisher and Lowenback first demonstrated epileptiform spikes ...
[49]
Human Genome Project Timeline
Jul 5, 2022 · 2003. On April 14, 2003, the International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium announces the successful completion of the Human Genome Project. ...Missing: monitoring | Show results with:monitoring
[50]
The Human Genome Project: big science transforms biology and ...
Sep 13, 2013 · The Human Genome Project has transformed biology through its integrated big science approach to deciphering a reference human genome sequence.
[51]
Effectiveness of Telemedicine Visits in Reducing 30‐Day ...
Mar 1, 2022 · Overall, the 30‐day readmission rate (19.0%) varied among patients who received telemedicine visits (15.0%), in‐person visits (14.0%), or no ...
[52]
Association of Wearable Device Use With Pulse Rate and Health ...
May 27, 2021 · A looming clinical concern is that wearables may lead to an excessive number of false positives or true positive but nonactionable alerts ...
[53]
Wearable Devices and Psychological Wellbeing—Are We ...
Jul 16, 2024 · They reported a significantly higher rate of symptom monitoring, preoccupation, and anxiety among wearable device users compared with nonusers.
[54]
What is APM (Application Performance Monitoring) - New Relic
Nov 26, 2024 · APM is the practice of using real-time data to track an application's performance and the digital experiences of your end users.Core features of APM solutions · Who uses APM? · How do you get started with...
[55]
From Traditional APM to Enterprise Observability: An Ultimate Guide
Oct 3, 2022 · This article provides an exhaustive take on the evolution of IT monitoring from traditional APM into enterprise observability.
[56]
From Kálmán to Kubernetes: A History of Observability in IT
For the most part, observability was relegated to the domains of signal processing and systems theory until the 2010s, when it became a buzzword in the field of ...
[57]
Snort - Network Intrusion Detection & Prevention System
Snort is an open-source, free and lightweight network intrusion detection system (NIDS) software for Linux and Windows to detect emerging threats.Downloads · Documents · Snort 3 · Snort FAQMissing: 1998 | Show results with:1998
[58]
[PDF] Global Cybersecurity Outlook 2025
Jan 10, 2025 · Advanced threat detection systems using behavioural analysis, network segmentation and machine learning can contain potential breaches and ...
[59]
[PDF] Technology Trends Outlook 2025 - McKinsey
Jul 1, 2025 · AI is increasingly critical as companies integrate AI-driven security tools for threat detection and response, yet talent remains scarce ...
[60]
Alert Fatigue in Cybersecurity: Definition, Causes & Modern Solutions
What is alert fatigue? Discover why 90% of SOCs struggle with overwhelming security alerts and proven strategies to reduce analyst burnout with AI.
[61]
Alert Fatigue: How to Fix SOC Overload - Cymulate
Multiple studies confirm that alert fatigue leads directly to breach risk. Up to 30% of alerts are never investigated, and among the 17,000 malware alerts ...Missing: empirical 2020s<|separator|>
[62]
How Automated Root Cause Analysis Cuts Incident Response Time ...
Mar 28, 2025 · Their mean-time-to-resolution dropped by 78% - from 25 hours to just 5.5 hours per incident. Automated root cause analysis and machine learning ...Missing: statistics | Show results with:statistics
[63]
Cut Factory Downtime by 40% | LLumin Industrial Solutions
Jul 3, 2025 · Every year, according to a report by Siemens, manufacturers lose an estimated $260 billion to unplanned downtime. That's more than a statistic; ...
[64]
History of vibration measurement in predictive maintenance - DMC
At the beginning of the decade 1960, industrial users of turbomachinery have started to experiment with these sensors for measuring vibration. Direct ...
[65]
The History and Evolution of Condition-Based Maintenance | Power-MI
The limitations of PM led to the development of Predictive Maintenance (PdM) in the 1960s and 1970s. PdM focuses on monitoring the condition of equipment to ...
[66]
Vibration Monitoring: The History and Future - Pruftechnik
Jul 29, 2022 · Vibration sensing technology is less than 100 years old. And yet, in that time, it's become a staple in manufacturing and industrial settings.
[67]
What is SCADA? - Enterprise Automation
“SCADA” was coined in the 1970's to describe microprocessors and programmable logic controllers that helped increase enterprises' ability to monitor and control ...
[68]
Predictive Maintenance: Cutting Costs & Downtime Smartly
Feb 14, 2025 · Research demonstrates that predictive maintenance reduces overall maintenance costs by 18–25% while cutting unplanned downtime by up to 50%, reducing costs and ...
[69]
Predictive Maintenance Solutions | Deloitte US
Predictive maintenance aims to empower companies to maximize the useful life of their assets while avoiding unplanned downtime and minimizing planned downtime ...
[70]
Machine Vision for the Automotive Industry
Technological advances have made machine vision systems indispensable for automakers, enabling superior quality control and streamlined manufacturing processes.
[71]
The Evolution and Impact of Machine Vision in Factory Automation
Learn how machine vision systems enhance factory automation with better quality control, increased efficiency, and reduced errors. Explore history, benefits ...Missing: post- | Show results with:post-
[72]
Drone-based bridge inspections: Current practices and future ...
Drones have gained popularity for bridge inspections because they offer enhanced safety, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness compared to traditional methods.
[73]
UAV-Based Remote Sensing Applications for Bridge Condition ...
UAVs are used for bridge monitoring with remote sensing technologies like visual imagery, infrared thermography, and LiDAR, for non-destructive testing.
[74]
Tampered IoT Data: The “Fake News” of Industrial IoT
Jan 2, 2025 · In the Industrial IoT world, tampered data is the digital equivalent of fake news, and its consequences can be far more costly.By integrating ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[75]
Industrial IoT Security Threats: Top Risks and Mitigation Strategies ...
Device tampering can involve hardware modification, firmware replacement, or the insertion of malicious components that create persistent backdoors or ...
[76]
How many CCTV cameras are in London? - Clarion Security Systems
According to a 2013 report by the British Security Industry Association (BSIA), there are between 4 and 5.9 million cameras in the UK. This provided a very ...
[77]
Assessing the impact of CCTV - Open Access Government
May 27, 2015 · With between 4 million and 5.9 million CCTV surveillance cameras in the UK alone, the CCTV industry, both in the UK and globally, is one of the ...
[78]
(PDF) CCTV surveillance for crime prevention: A 40‐year systematic ...
Aug 9, 2025 · The findings show that CCTV is associated with a significant and modest decrease in crime. The largest and most consistent effects of CCTV were observed in car ...
[79]
[PDF] CCTV surveillance for crime prevention. A 40-year systematic review ...
More recently, Alexandrie (2017) reviewed seven randomized and natural experiments of. CCTV, finding crime reductions between 24% and 28% in public streets and ...
[80]
[PDF] New Paper Finds Body-Worn Cameras Can Reduce Police Use-of ...
CHICAGO––The University of Chicago Crime Lab released a paper today demonstrating that body-worn cameras (BWCs) can reduce police use of force incidents by ...
[81]
Research on Body-Worn Cameras and Law Enforcement
Officers wearing cameras had statistically significant reductions in complaints filed against them and made more stop reports. Camera use resulted in a ...
[82]
Body-worn cameras | College of Policing
Jun 10, 2021 · There is some evidence that BWCs have either increased or reduced crime. Overall they have not had a statistically significant effect on crime.
[83]
Police facial recognition applications and violent crime control in ...
Law enforcement's use of facial recognition technology contributed to reductions in violent crime, especially homicides. •. Earlier adoption of facial ...
[84]
Stingray Operations: Are Police Tracking Your Cell-Phone Calls?
Sep 29, 2014 · Law-enforcement agencies in 15 states have acquired devices known as IMSI (International Mobile Subscriber Identity) catchers that collect data ...
[85]
Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) - Police.uk
We use ANPR (Automatic Number Plate Recognition) technology to help detect, deter and disrupt criminal activity at a local, force, regional and national level.
[86]
AI to the Rescue: How Smart Cameras Are Helping Police Solve ...
Jul 14, 2025 · AI cameras detect suspicious activity, use forensic search, and quickly pinpoint events, identify suspects, and speed up investigations.Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
[87]
[PDF] Evaluating the Use of Public Surveillance Cameras for Crime ...
Detractors argued that criminals would just move to new locations, away from cameras, but police anticipated vulnerable areas and placed patrol officers in ...Missing: criticisms drain
[88]
[PDF] Closed-circuit television (CCTV) - View PDF
Feb 19, 2015 · CCTV implemented on its own or alongside one other intervention did not have a statistically significant effect in reducing crime. Reviews one ...
[89]
Reforming Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act ...
Dec 8, 2023 · Ahead of the approaching sunset date of Section 702 of FISA, this report analyzes the statute's history, debates over privacy and civil ...
[90]
How We Found Bin Laden: The Basics of Foreign Signals Intelligence
Sep 5, 2024 · Osama bin Laden helped plan the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 which killed nearly 3000 Americans. To find him, the U.S. government ...Missing: verifiable successes
[91]
https://newamerica.org/future-security/policy-papers/do-nsas-bulk-surveillance-programs-stop-terrorists/
[92]
NSA program stopped no terror attacks, says White House panel ...
Dec 20, 2013 · ... evidence that the bulk collection of telephone call records had thwarted any terrorist attacks ... NSA program stopped no terror attacks ...
[93]
[PDF] The Stuxnet Computer Worm: Harbinger of an Emerging Warfare ...
Dec 9, 2010 · In September 2010, media reports emerged about a new form of cyber attack that appeared to target Iran, although the actual target, if any, ...
[94]
Feature Article: Leveraging AI to Enhance the Nation's Cybersecurity
Oct 17, 2024 · ... AI Institute for Agent-Based Cyber Threat Intelligence and Operation (ACTION). ... security threats. The ultimate goal is to design AI ...
[95]
IBM X-Force 2025 Threat Intelligence Index
Apr 16, 2025 · We share insights about the changing threat landscape and how organizations can transform cyber defense into cyber resilience.
[96]
[PDF] Joint Cybersecurity Information AI Data Security
May 22, 2025 · These assessments should evaluate the AI data security landscape, identify risks, and prioritize actions to minimize security incidents.
[97]
[PDF] SBInet Program - Homeland Security
May 15, 2009 · SBInet is a vital element of the broader DHS Secure Border Initiative (SBI), and its goal is to integrate new and existing border technology ...
[98]
SBInet Officially Bites the Dust - IEEE Spectrum
While it has generated some advances in technology that have improved Border Patrol agents' ability to detect, identify, deter and respond to threats along the ...
[99]
Border Patrol Drone: How Are Drones Used for Border Security?
Jul 25, 2025 · AI-Powered Advancements. The JOUAV drones, with integrated Artificial Intelligence (AI), significantly enhance surveillance capabilities.
[100]
Border Patrol Wants Advanced AI to Spy on American Cities
Jul 23, 2025 · The AI system processes data from radar, infrared sensors, and video surveillance to detect and track suspicious activities along U.S. borders.” ...Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
[101]
Border Security - Geospace Technologies
Unlike visible or aerial surveillance tools, seismic sensors detect vibrations and ground movement associated with footsteps, vehicles, and tunneling activity.
[102]
Find It and Plug It | Homeland Security
Aug 1, 2024 · By analyzing the movement of these waves (sometimes called rays), experts may be able to detect the presence of tunnels that are dug illegally ...
[103]
R2TD: A new tool for an ever-present threat - PEO IEW&S
Oct 27, 2019 · Seismic, acoustic and electromagnetic systems work to help Army find one of the oldest forms of field fortification: tunnels.
[104]
Going Underground The US Governments Hunt for Enemy Tunnels
Jan 2, 2018 · The Engineer Research and Development Center developed the border tunneling activity detection system-point, or BTADS-P. It includes an array of ...
[105]
[PDF] Final Blackout Report Chapter 5
The alarms draw on the information collected by the SCADA real-time monitoring system. Alarms are designed to quickly and appropri- ately attract the power ...
[106]
The 2003 Northeast Blackout--Five Years Later | Scientific American
Aug 13, 2008 · Transmission system operators scattered across some 300 control centers nationwide monitor voltage and current data from SCADA (supervisory ...
[107]
Protecting our ports | Security Magazine
Jan 10, 2022 · Biometrics essentially eliminate non-authorized persons using lost, stolen or borrowed credentials. Controlled access is critical for port ...Protecting Our Ports · Access Control · Video Surveillance
[108]
Enhancing Port and Harbor Operations with Biometric Technology
Biometrics enhance port operations by improving security, access control, workforce management, and operational efficiency, including access control, time and ...<|separator|>
[109]
ICYMI: Border Encounters Hit Lowest Level Since August 2020
Oct 23, 2024 · U.S. Customs and Border Protection reported a 55% decrease in illegal border crossings between ports of entry at the southwest border since June ...
[110]
Another record-setting month at CBP: Border continues to be most ...
Aug 12, 2025 · Illegal crossings in July dropped to the lowest level ever recorded – just a fraction of what they were under the previous administration.
[111]
[PDF] Review of Remote Surveillance Technology Along U.S Land Border
The sensor sensitivity level can be adjusted to help filter false alerts. When activity or movement near a sensor meets sensitivity parameters, a radio signal ...
[112]
A Watchful Eye | U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Jan 4, 2022 · ... false positive. They have day and night cameras that turn and “look” at the area where the item of interest originates. The towers also ...
[113]
The Rise of Employee Analytics: Productivity Dream or ...
Aug 8, 2023 · An emerging field that uses data to study human behavior at work, “people analytics” is beginning to transform the workplace and significantly impact hiring ...
[114]
Teramind: Employee Activity Monitoring & Workforce Analytics
Monitor, analyze, and optimize employee behavior to prevent insider threats, protect data, boost productivity, and streamline business processes.Employee Monitoring Software · Pricing · About Us · Contact Us
[115]
Employee Keylogger Software: Pros, Risks & Should You Use It?
Jan 5, 2022 · In this article, we will weigh the pros and cons of keyloggers, while recommending alternatives to keyloggers that will improve the productivity and security ...What is a Keylogger? · What Are Keyloggers Used For? · Concerns With Keyloggers
[116]
9 Key KPIs for ERP Implementations - NetSuite
Feb 10, 2022 · Five of the most important KPIs for a successful ERP implementation are revenue and sales growth, customer experience (CX), project margin, ...
[117]
Top ERP KPIs to Measure Your ERP Implementation Success
Apr 29, 2025 · Key areas where ERP KPIs deliver impact include: Financial Performance: Monitor cost-to-serve, gross margins, and ERP-driven revenue growth.Missing: studies | Show results with:studies
[118]
Is Productivity Paranoia and Lack of Trust the Real Obstacles to ...
A study using employee monitoring software confirmed that the shift to remote work during COVID improved productivity by 5%.Missing: gains | Show results with:gains
[119]
AI in the workplace: A report for 2025 - McKinsey
Jan 28, 2025 · McKinsey research sizes the long-term AI opportunity at $4.4 trillion in added productivity growth potential from corporate use cases. 2“The ...<|separator|>
[120]
The impact of electronic monitoring on employees' job satisfaction ...
Results indicate that electronic monitoring slightly decreases job satisfaction, r = −0.10, and slightly increases stress, r = .11.
[121]
More complaints, worse performance when AI monitors work
Jul 2, 2024 · Organizations using AI to monitor employees' behavior and productivity can expect them to complain more, be less productive and want to quit more.Missing: gains | Show results with:gains
[122]
Companies Now Have Many Tools to Monitor Employee Productivity ...
Monitoring employee productivity can make companies more efficient—and can benefit employees, too. But the practice, which makes use of a variety of methods ...Missing: studies | Show results with:studies
[123]
[PDF] Findings Regarding the Market Events of May 6, 2010 - SEC.gov
May 6, 2010 · This report builds upon the initial analyses of May 6 performed by the staffs of the. Commissions and released in the May 18, 2010, ...
[124]
Market Surveillance Tool in Jeopardy After Citadel Win (Correct)
Aug 14, 2025 · First proposed after the 2010 “flash crash” wiped out $1 trillion in market value, the CAT collects as many as 500 billion records a day and ...
[125]
Technology - finra
Our technologies run hundreds of surveillance algorithms and patterns against massive amounts ... quickly detect potential fraud; keep investors informed through ...
[126]
FinCEN Releases Year-in-Review for FY 2023: SARs, CTRs and ...
Jun 10, 2024 · This data indicates that, compared to the approximately 4.6 million SARs filed in FY 2023, there were approximately 13,000 cases involving ...
[127]
https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/136/2024-National-Money-Laundering-Risk-Assessment.pdf
[128]
Crypto Assets | FINRA.org
Crypto assets—also known as digital assets—are assets that are issued or transferred using distributed ledger or blockchain technology.Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
[129]
How Banking Is Adapting Blockchain Technology - Investopedia
Blockchain offers banks the potential to reduce transaction costs, improve security, streamline compliance processes, and enable near-instantaneous transaction ...
[130]
Is The Regulatory Environment Stifling Financial Innovation?
Aug 9, 2018 · Financial regulatory oversight in the United States is complex and fragmented, with different rules across multiple regulators at both the federal and state ...
[131]
https://cdhowe.org/publication/good-bad-and-unnecessary-scorecard-financial-regulations-canada
[132]
[PDF] 16-402 Carpenter v. United States (06/22/2018) - Supreme Court
Jun 22, 2018 · The case involves whether obtaining cell-site location information (CSLI) without a warrant supported by probable cause violates the Fourth ...
[133]
Carpenter v. United States | Oyez
Nov 29, 2017 · The government's warrantless acquisition of Carpenter's cell-site records violated his Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable searches and seizures.
[134]
Reauthorizing Mass Surveillance Shouldn't be Tied to Funding the ...
Nov 13, 2023 · EFF has signed onto a letter with a dozen organizations opposing even a short-term reauthorization of a program as dangerous as 702 in a piece ...
[135]
Surveillance and Human Rights | Electronic Frontier Foundation
These 13 Principles articulate how international human rights law should be applied to government surveillance.
[136]
Employee Monitoring Statistics: Shocking Trends in 2025 - Apploye
Over 56% of employees report stress and anxiety due to workplace surveillance. ... However, the deployment of AI in monitoring raises significant privacy issues.
[137]
Internet Surveillance in the Workplace: 43% report having ... - Forbes
Mar 25, 2024 · The data is even more telling when it comes to company morale: 43% feel that surveillance negatively affects the overall spirit and culture ...
[138]
What's Wrong With Public Video Surveillance? - ACLU
Abuse for personal purposes. Powerful surveillance tools also create temptations to abuse them for personal purposes. An investigation by the Detroit Free ...
[139]
Public Area CCTV and Crime Prevention: An Updated Systematic ...
Aug 7, 2025 · The results suggest that CCTV caused a modest (16%) but significant decrease in crime in experimental areas compared with control areas.<|separator|>
[140]
The effect of CCTV on public safety: Research roundup
Summary: This meta-analysis examined 93 studies on surveillance systems to see how effective they are at reducing crime and deemed 44 to be sufficiently ...
[141]
https://media4.manhattan-institute.org/pdf/cr_22.pdf
[142]
Preventing Blackouts: Real-Time Data Processing for Fault Handling
Jun 3, 2025 · Real-time data processing enables instant fault analysis and response to grid conditions, helping prevent blackouts with predictive maintenance ...
[143]
Preventing Blackouts: Building a Smarter Power Grid
Aug 13, 2008 · The most fundamental is real-time monitoring and reaction. An array of sensors would monitor electrical parameters such as voltage and current, ...Missing: examples | Show results with:examples
[144]
[PDF] AI-enhanced predictive analytics for identifying and mitigating critical ...
May 6, 2025 · The companies utilizing AI-Predictive analysis in their organizations have attributed a higher overall efficiency of their security teams at 82% ...
[145]
Leveraging AI for enhanced cybersecurity: a comprehensive review
Jun 1, 2025 · This study focuses on comprehensively examining current literature works dedicated to AI along with its applications in cybersecurity.
[146]
Does Employee Monitoring Increase Productivity? - Apploye
Monitoring tools can increase work output by 22% when used properly, but too much watching can make productivity drop by 10%.Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
[147]
Art. 5 GDPR – Principles relating to processing of personal data
Rating 4.6 (9,855) Personal data shall be: processed lawfully, fairly and in a transparent manner in relation to the data subject ('lawfulness, fairness and transparency'); ...Lawfulness of processing · Recital 39 · Article 89Missing: surveillance | Show results with:surveillance
[148]
[PDF] The USA PATRIOT Act: Preserving Life and Liberty
Before the Patriot Act, courts could permit law enforcement to conduct electronic surveillance to investigate many ordinary, non-terrorism crimes, such as drug.Missing: expansions | Show results with:expansions
[149]
AI Act | Shaping Europe's digital future - European Union
The AI Act sets out a clear set of risk-based rules for AI developers and deployers regarding specific uses of AI. The AI Act is part of a wider package of ...
[150]
https://www.cisa.gov/topics/cybersecurity-best-practices/executive-order-improving-nations-cybersecurity
[151]
Employee monitoring laws in the US and EU explained (2025 guide)
May 19, 2025 · Employers must get written consent before tracking emails, internet usage, or computer activity. Covert surveillance is almost always illegal.Missing: 2024 | Show results with:2024
[152]
Essential IoT Compliance Guidelines for Today's Regulatory ... - Aeris
In fact, research firm Transforma Insights says regulatory compliance has overtaken cost and connectivity as the top challenge in IoT. And it's easy to see why: ...Missing: surveillance | Show results with:surveillance
[153]
Digital privacy and the law: the challenge of regulatory capture
Aug 10, 2024 · In this paper we wish to underline a neglected consequence of people's ignorance of and apathy for digital privacy: their potential to encourage capture by ...