Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Current Procedural Terminology

Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) is a standardized, proprietary code set developed and maintained by the to provide a uniform language for describing and reporting medical, surgical, diagnostic, and other services performed by physicians and qualified professionals. First published in 1966, CPT was created to streamline the documentation and billing of procedures amid growing complexity in medical practice and reimbursement systems. The code set comprises over 10,000 five-digit alphanumeric codes organized into three main categories: Category I for established clinical services, Category II for performance measurement and quality reporting, and Category III for emerging technologies and services not yet widely accepted. Updated annually by the AMA's CPT Editorial Panel through a rigorous review process involving expert input, CPT facilitates accurate claims processing for , , and private insurers under HIPAA standards, while enabling data aggregation for research and policy analysis. Its proprietary status generates significant licensing revenue for the —estimated in the hundreds of millions annually—but has prompted debates over accessibility, as mandatory use in U.S. transactions can impose costs on providers and limit alternative coding innovations.

History

Origins in 1966 and Initial Development

The (AMA) published the inaugural edition of Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) in , establishing a standardized system for documenting medical, surgical, and diagnostic services. This initiative responded directly to the legislation passed in 1965, which created an urgent need for uniform procedure reporting to support billing, reimbursement, and across healthcare providers and payers. The system aimed to replace inconsistent with precise, alphanumeric descriptors, thereby improving interoperability in medical records and claims processing. The 1966 edition comprised approximately 3,500 codes, with a primary emphasis on surgical procedures; ancillary sections addressed , , and services in limited scope. Core objectives included fostering consistent terminology for procedure documentation, enabling accurate transmission of service details to insurers, laying groundwork for computerized evaluation of operative practices, and generating foundational data for actuarial, statistical, and epidemiological purposes. Developed through collaboration with leading societies, CPT represented an iterative, physician-led effort to codify clinical practices amid rising administrative demands from federal health programs. Initial refinements occurred rapidly, as the 1970 second edition adopted a uniform five-digit numeric structure—replacing earlier alphanumeric formats—and extended coverage to non-surgical interventions, reflecting evolving medical technologies and broader service reporting needs. These early updates underscored CPT's adaptability, positioning it as a dynamic for capturing procedural while prioritizing clinical accuracy over rigid classification. By the mid-1970s, linkages to emerging relative value scales began integrating CPT with payment methodologies, further solidifying its role in healthcare economics.

Expansions Through the 1970s to 1990s

The second edition of CPT, published in , expanded the coding structure to five digits for greater specificity and introduced the 70000–79999 series dedicated to procedures, reflecting the growing complexity of diagnostic imaging services. In , a new and laboratory section was added, linking CPT codes more closely with the for improved in clinical reporting. The third and fourth editions followed in the mid- to late , with the fourth edition in incorporating significant updates to accommodate advances in medical technology, such as expanded descriptions for surgical and non-surgical interventions, and establishing a for periodic revisions to maintain amid evolving practices. These changes increased the total number of codes and enhanced granularity across specialties, including and , to better capture diverse services. In 1983, the Health Care Financing Administration (predecessor to the ) adopted CPT as Level I of the for physician billing, driving further expansions to standardize for outpatient and services previously underrepresented in earlier editions. This integration necessitated additions in and codes, as well as modifiers for procedure variations, to align with federal payment requirements under the emerging resource-based relative value scale. By the late , annual updates had become routine, incorporating stakeholder input to add codes for minimally invasive techniques and diagnostic tests, resulting in a code set exceeding 5,000 entries by decade's end. The saw accelerated growth with the 1992 introduction of comprehensive evaluation and management (E/M) codes, which standardized reporting for office visits, consultations, and hospital encounters by incorporating time-based and medical decision-making criteria, addressing prior ambiguities in non-procedural services. These revisions, developed through collaboration with federal agencies, expanded the section significantly, adding hierarchical levels (e.g., 99201–99205 for new visits) to reflect varying complexity and resource use. Annual cycles in the further proliferated codes for emerging procedures like laparoscopic surgeries and , with the 1999 edition alone featuring numerous additions, deletions, and revisions, plus new appendices for add-on codes, culminating in over 7,000 active codes by 2000. The 1996 CPT-5 initiative, spurred by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, laid groundwork for enhanced nomenclature to support performance tracking and future digital interoperability.

Modern Revisions and Digital Integration (2000s–2025)

In 2000, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services adopted CPT as the national standard code set for physician, , , radiological, laboratory, and other diagnostic procedures under HIPAA electronic transaction rules, replacing varied local systems with uniform coding for claims processing. This shift enabled widespread digital billing via (EDI), reducing errors in professional service reimbursements and laying groundwork for CPT's role in automated transactions. The 2000s revisions emphasized structural enhancements, including the introduction of Category II codes in May 2000 for tracking performance measures and Category III codes in 2001 for , alongside annual additions for procedures like and wound repairs using adhesives. These updates, guided by the AMA's CPT Editorial Panel's multi-year analysis of code strengths and gaps, expanded the set to over 7,000 codes by mid-decade while clarifying guidelines for evaluation and management services. The HITECH Act of 2009 accelerated CPT's digital integration by incentivizing (EHR) adoption, mandating certified systems use CPT for billing, quality reporting, and interoperability under meaningful use criteria. EHR vendors incorporated CPT data files provided by the , enabling automated code assignment from clinical documentation and seamless EDI submissions to payers like . This integration supported clinical decision tools and reduced manual coding burdens, with CPT embedded in transaction standards like X12 837 for professional claims. From the 2010s onward, revisions prioritized digital health innovations, adding codes for online digital evaluation and management services (99421–99423) in 2019 to capture asynchronous patient interactions via secure portals or EHR messaging. (RPM) codes followed, with 99453 for initial device setup in 2018 and 99454–99458 for data collection, analysis, and treatment management by 2020, accommodating physiologic monitoring via connected devices. expansions, accelerated by waivers, included interprofessional electronic consultations (99446–99449 and 99451) in 2014 and, in the 2025 code set, a new dedicated section (e.g., 98000–98015) for audio-video and audio-only encounters, reflecting permanent pathways. The 2025 CPT edition incorporated 420 total changes—270 additions, 112 deletions, and 38 revisions—focusing on digital therapeutics, artificial intelligence-assisted diagnostics, and remote therapeutic monitoring to align with technological advancements in precision medicine and virtual care. These updates ensure CPT's adaptability in EHR ecosystems, supporting data analytics for population health while maintaining granularity for reimbursement accuracy.

Code Categories and Structure

Category I: Permanent Procedure Codes

Category I codes form the foundational component of the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) system, consisting of permanent, five-digit numeric codes that describe established medical procedures and services performed by physicians and other qualified healthcare professionals. These codes, ranging from 00100 to 99499, enable standardized reporting for purposes such as and , ensuring a uniform nomenclature across healthcare settings. Unlike temporary codes in other categories, Category I codes represent procedures with documented clinical efficacy, widespread adoption in U.S. medical practice, and, where applicable, regulatory approvals such as FDA clearance for associated devices or drugs. The codes are systematically organized into six main sections, each addressing distinct aspects of clinical care, with further subdivisions by procedure type, anatomical site, or service category to facilitate precise selection. These sections include:
  • Evaluation and Management (99202–99499): Codes for office visits, hospital inpatient services, consultations, and preventive , emphasizing physician-patient interactions and decision-making complexity.
  • (00100–01999): Dedicated to anesthesia administration, including time-based and base unit value calculations for surgical and procedural settings.
  • (10021–69990): Encompassing integumentary, musculoskeletal, respiratory, cardiovascular, digestive, urinary, male and female genital, and nervous system procedures, often subdivided by body region.
  • (70000–79999): Covering diagnostic imaging, , and radiation oncology, with subsections for specific modalities like , , MRI, and .
  • and (80047–89398): Including organ- or disease-oriented panels, chemistry, , , anatomic , and .
  • (90281–99199, 99500–99607): Addressing , , , , auditory, cardiovascular, and other non-surgical therapeutic or preventive services.
To qualify for inclusion, proposed Category I code descriptors must meet rigorous criteria established by the (), including uniqueness from existing codes, accurate reflection of typical performance (without fragmentation or bundling of services), consistency with prevailing medical standards, and evidence of frequent use by multiple practitioners nationwide. Procedures must demonstrate clinical efficacy supported by peer-reviewed literature, and services involving new technologies require demonstration of broad implementation rather than experimental status. This ensures codes represent mature, reliable practices rather than unproven innovations. The AMA maintains Category I codes through an annual update cycle, incorporating input from its CPT Editorial Panel, specialty societies, and stakeholders, with electronic releases occurring triannually (April 1, July 1, October 1) for certain subsets like immunizations. For the 2025 edition, the CPT code set saw 420 total updates, predominantly in Category I, including 270 new codes, 112 deletions, and 38 revisions to reflect evolving clinical practices such as advancements in telemedicine and surgical techniques. Immunization-related codes, a specialized subset, may receive expedited additions prior to full FDA approval, denoted by a lightning bolt symbol, to support timely vaccine administration reporting. These updates prevent obsolescence while preserving the system's role in facilitating accurate data for healthcare analytics and policy.

Category II: Performance Tracking Codes

Category II codes serve as optional supplemental tracking mechanisms within the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) framework, specifically designed to capture data on healthcare performance measures. These alphanumeric codes enable the documentation of clinical services, test results, or patient outcomes that align with nationally recognized metrics, facilitating aggregated for improvement and without influencing or mandatory billing requirements. Introduced to support evidence-based , they address gaps in traditional coding by providing granular insights into preventive care, chronic disease management, and protocols. Each Category II code follows a standardized five-character format: four digits followed by the suffix "F," distinguishing them from Category I's numeric structure and Category III's alphanumeric "T" suffix. For example, code 3008F denotes documentation of in patients aged 65 years and older, while 1150F tracks completion of a formal tobacco cessation counseling visit. These codes are not intended for direct financial coding but integrate with electronic health records to streamline reporting for programs like the Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS). Their optional nature ensures flexibility, yet consistent use correlates with enhanced data accuracy in quality reporting, as evidenced by reduced manual audits in participating practices. The codes are systematically grouped into 12 subsections to reflect diverse aspects of care delivery: composite measures (e.g., combining multiple screenings into a single indicator), patient management (e.g., care plans for high-risk conditions), patient history (e.g., documentation of advance directives), (e.g., screening for fall risk), diagnostic/screening interventions (e.g., screening in women), therapeutic interventions (e.g., administration of antenatal steroids), follow-up or other outcomes (e.g., regression of post-treatment), and specialized codes for measures like radiation dose or . This organization aligns with performance standards from entities such as the (NCQA), enabling providers to quantify adherence to guidelines like control in or postpartum depression screening. As of the 2023 CPT update, over 100 active Category II codes existed, with periodic additions reflecting evolving quality priorities, such as expanded tracking for . Maintenance of Category II codes occurs through the American Medical Association's CPT Editorial Panel, which evaluates submissions based on criteria including endorsement by national measurement organizations, feasibility of , and relevance to improving care outcomes. Codes may be retired if measures become obsolete or integrated into Category I, ensuring the set remains current; for instance, updates announced in 2023 incorporated new codes for tracking. While adoption varies—higher in accountable care organizations—their implementation has demonstrably supported value-based payment models by providing verifiable evidence of quality, reducing reliance on claims abstraction alone. Empirical data from integrated systems indicate that routine Category II reporting improves HEDIS scores by 5-10% in targeted metrics, underscoring their role in causal pathways to better and patient outcomes.

Category III: Temporary and Emerging Technology Codes

Category III codes in the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) system represent a temporary classification for , services, procedures, and service paradigms that lack sufficient clinical evidence or widespread utilization to warrant permanent Category I status. These codes facilitate structured data collection on utilization patterns, outcomes, and efficacy, enabling assessment for potential elevation to Category I codes after maturation. Introduced to bridge gaps in coding for innovative medical practices, they address the need for tracking without immediate reimbursement implications, as most payers do not assign relative value units (RVUs) to them, though some may offer conditional coverage based on local policies. The codes follow a distinct alphanumeric format, typically consisting of four digits suffixed by the letter "T" (e.g., 0001T), and are positioned after Category II codes in the CPT codebook. releases updates semiannually via electronic means on its website, with full annual publications integrated into the CPT code set effective January 1. Applications for new Category III codes undergo review by the 's CPT Editorial Panel, which applies less rigorous evidentiary standards than for Category I, emphasizing shorter timelines to expedite tracking of nascent technologies like novel diagnostic assays or minimally invasive devices. Each Category III code carries a standard five-year lifespan from its initial publication date or any approved extension, after which it is either archived—prompting a in the Category III section to a new Category I code if promoted—or deleted if evidence does not support permanence. This sunset mechanism ensures periodic evaluation, preventing indefinite occupancy by unproven entries while gathering longitudinal data through claims submission. For instance, codes tracking procedures such as extracorporeal shock wave therapy (e.g., 0102T) exemplify early-stage interventions monitored for and effectiveness before broader adoption. Critics note that the temporary nature can hinder provider incentives for , as non-reimbursable limits financial viability, yet proponents argue it promotes evidence-based progression over premature permanence.

Governance and Maintenance

American Medical Association's Editorial Panel

The CPT Editorial Panel is the primary body authorized by the (AMA) Board of Trustees to maintain, revise, update, or discontinue codes, descriptors, rules, and guidelines within the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code set, ensuring it accurately reflects evolving medical practices and services. The panel comprises 17 members, including 11 physicians nominated by national medical specialty societies and approved by the Board of Trustees—one of whom specializes in performance measurement—along with one representative each from the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association, America's Health Insurance Plans, the , and the , plus two members from the CPT Health Care Professionals Advisory Committee. These selections aim to incorporate diverse expertise from clinical, payer, and provider perspectives, though the retains ultimate oversight through its nomination and approval process. The panel convenes three times per year, typically addressing over 200 major topics and casting more than 3,000 votes to evaluate applications for new codes, revisions, or deletions submitted by physicians, specialty societies, hospitals, device manufacturers, and other stakeholders. Applications undergo initial AMA staff review for completeness and compliance with CPT criteria, followed by input from the CPT Advisory Committee—comprising representatives from over 100 specialty societies—and compilation of comments into agenda materials distributed 30 days before meetings. Decisions are made by majority vote, resulting in outcomes such as code approval (for Category I, II, or III placement), referral to workgroups for further development, postponement, or rejection, with summaries of actions published post-meeting and a limited window for applicant reconsideration requests. This process facilitates stakeholder input while centralizing authority within the structure, enabling annual CPT updates that integrate approximately 300–400 code changes to support billing, research, and care tracking across public and private payers. The panel's decisions directly influence by defining reportable services, though they require subsequent review by the AMA/Specialty Relative Update Committee (RUC) for valuation recommendations to the .

Annual Update Process and Stakeholder Input

The CPT Editorial Panel, appointed by the (AMA), convenes three times annually—typically in February, late April or May, and September—to review proposed modifications to the code set, culminating in an annual release each fall for implementation on of the following year. For instance, the CPT 2026 code set, incorporating updates such as new codes for services and , was released on September 11, 2025. These meetings facilitate evidence-based deliberations on additions, deletions, and revisions, with applications for changes required to be submitted at least 12 weeks in advance. Stakeholder input drives the process, as physicians, medical specialty societies, hospitals, device manufacturers, and other healthcare entities may submit CPT Code Change Applications detailing proposed procedures, supported by clinical vignettes, utilization data, and peer-reviewed evidence to demonstrate clinical validity and distinction from existing codes. The Panel, comprising expert physician volunteers, evaluates these submissions for uniqueness, frequency of use, and alignment with evolving practices, often consulting CPT Advisors—nominated representatives from specialty societies and the AMA Health Care Professionals Advisory Committee—who provide specialized clinical insights and may advocate for or refine proposals. Approved Category I codes typically undergo subsequent valuation review by the Relative Value Scale Update Committee (RUC) before final publication, while Category III codes for can be fast-tracked with biannual releases, effective July 1 or January 1. This collaborative framework ensures updates reflect real-world advancements, though the full cycle from application to implementation may span up to 24 months, emphasizing rigorous scrutiny over expediency. Recent examples include specialty society input on AI-related codes during dedicated listening sessions and revisions to hearing device services in the 2026 update, replacing prior codes with 12 new treatment descriptors.

Applications and Integration

Role in Medical Billing and Reimbursement

Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes function as a standardized system for healthcare providers to document and report medical, surgical, and diagnostic services on claims submitted to insurers for reimbursement. These five-digit alphanumeric codes, developed and maintained by the American Medical Association (AMA), describe specific procedures and services performed by qualified healthcare professionals, enabling payers—including Medicare, Medicaid, and private insurers—to identify, verify, and process claims uniformly. Without CPT codes, billing would rely on inconsistent narrative descriptions, leading to delays, errors, and disputes in payment determination. In the claims submission process, providers assign the appropriate CPT code to each service based on guidelines, often alongside diagnosis codes to justify medical necessity. Insurers then use these codes to adjudicate claims: for , the (CMS) links CPT codes to the Resource-Based Relative Value Scale (RBRVS), assigning relative value units (RVUs) for work, practice expense, and malpractice components, which are multiplied by a conversion factor to calculate payment amounts under the Physician Fee Schedule. Private payers similarly reference CPT codes in their fee schedules, negotiating reimbursement rates with providers or applying relative values adjusted for regional or contractual factors. Accurate coding is mandatory; mismatches or unsupported codes result in claim denials, audits, or recoupments, with CMS reporting that improper payments due to coding errors exceeded $10 billion annually in recent audits. The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1996 designated CPT as the national standard code set for reporting physician services in electronic transactions effective 2003, mandating its use across federal and most private payers to facilitate and reduce administrative variability in . This supports for utilization review, where payers analyze CPT code frequency and patterns to set coverage policies, detect fraud, and benchmark costs—such as tracking the volume of and codes (e.g., 99201–99215) which comprise over 40% of physician claims. Consequently, CPT codes directly influence revenue cycles, with providers investing in certified coders and software to ensure compliance, as hinges on precise code selection reflecting documented service intensity and complexity.

Compatibility with HCPCS and Other Standards

The (HCPCS), administered by the (CMS), incorporates CPT codes as its Level I component, ensuring direct compatibility for coding physician and certain other professional services. HCPCS Level II, in contrast, consists of alphanumeric codes for non-physician items such as , supplies, injectables, and transportation services not covered by CPT. This structure allows seamless integration in claims processing, where CPT (Level I) codes describe procedures alongside Level II codes for supplementary billable items, particularly under and guidelines. In practice, compatibility is maintained through annual synchronization efforts, with adopting AMA-updated CPT codes into HCPCS Level I each year, typically effective , to align with the CPT code set's revisions. Billing systems and electronic health records (EHRs) often employ crosswalks or mapping tools to pair CPT/HCPCS codes, ensuring with payer requirements; for instance, codes on UB-04 forms must correspond with compatible HCPCS/CPT codes to avoid claim denials. This integration reduces redundancy but requires providers to distinguish Level I procedural codes from Level II product-specific codes, as misuse can lead to reimbursement errors. Beyond HCPCS, CPT interfaces with diagnosis coding standards like under HIPAA-mandated transaction standards (e.g., 5010), where CPT procedure codes link to diagnoses to justify medical necessity on claims. For inpatient settings, ICD-10-PCS serves as an alternative procedural coding system to CPT, though outpatient and physician services predominantly rely on CPT/HCPCS, creating a environment that necessitates mapping tools in integrated systems. Clinical terminology standards such as , which capture detailed clinical concepts, can map to CPT for in EHRs, but CPT's procedural focus limits direct equivalence, often requiring intermediate translations via tools like those from the National Library of Medicine. Overall, these compatibilities enhance data exchange but demand vigilant maintenance to accommodate updates, with and coordinating to minimize disruptions in standardized reporting.

Economic and Systemic Impacts

Standardization Benefits and Efficiency Gains

The adoption of Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) as a standardized system establishes a uniform language for describing medical procedures, surgical interventions, diagnostic services, and other healthcare activities, thereby minimizing discrepancies in documentation and communication among providers, payers, and regulators. This uniformity, mandated as a HIPAA national standard for physician and professional services since 2003, facilitates accurate claims submission and adjudication, reducing denial rates due to ambiguities that plagued earlier ad hoc systems. Efficiency gains manifest in accelerated billing cycles and diminished administrative overhead, as CPT's five-digit alphanumeric structure enables electronic interoperability with systems like electronic health records (EHRs) and payer platforms, supporting automated validation and processing. For example, revisions to evaluation and management (E/M) codes in the 2023 CPT edition simplified history and exam requirements, allowing physicians to focus more on medical decision-making rather than rote recording, which the (AMA) described as a direct effort to alleviate documentation burdens contributing to physician burnout. Beyond billing, standardization through CPT supports aggregated data analysis for management and quality tracking, with Category II codes enabling streamlined reporting of performance measures without additional bespoke documentation. This aids in healthcare utilization trends and outcomes, as evidenced by CPT's role in facilitating value-based payment models that reward efficient, evidence-based care delivery over volume.

Administrative Costs and Operational Burdens

The proprietary nature of CPT codes requires healthcare providers to pay licensing fees to the (AMA) for their use in billing and documentation, contributing to elevated administrative expenses across the U.S. healthcare system. In 2023, the AMA derived over $284 million in from CPT licensing, with fees structured according to the number of users, practice size, and specific terms, such as electronic access or redistribution rights. These costs are borne by physicians, hospitals, and clinics, in addition to purchasing updated code books or subscriptions, effectively embedding a mandatory into routine operational budgeting. Small and solo practices face disproportionate impacts, as fixed licensing expenses amplify per-provider overhead without available to larger entities. Annual CPT updates compound operational burdens by necessitating continuous staff training, software reconfiguration in electronic health records, and internal audits to ensure compliance. The AMA's code set, for instance, incorporated 393 editorial changes, including 225 new codes and 75 deletions, alongside revisions to evaluation and management guidelines intended to streamline . Despite such adjustments, adapting to these modifications—often exceeding 300 alterations yearly—demands substantial time from clinical and administrative personnel, diverting resources from patient care. Billing and coding processes, heavily reliant on CPT accuracy, rank among the foremost contributors to U.S. healthcare's administrative expenditures, which constitute approximately 25-30% of total costs in some analyses. Non-compliance risks, including claim denials, recoupments, and regulatory audits stemming from CPT coding errors, further intensify these burdens. Providers must invest in certified coders, ongoing education, and measures to mitigate financial losses, with tied to CPT codes adding per-submission costs estimated at $20-50 for providers. The complexity of CPT's structure, maintained as , limits free access to training materials and tools, exacerbating inefficiencies for under-resourced practices and contributing to broader systemic friction in reimbursement workflows.

Controversies and Criticisms

The (AMA) holds the to the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code set, which it has enforced through litigation to protect against unauthorized reproduction and distribution. In Practice Management Information Corp. v. American Medical Ass'n (1996), a federal district court upheld the AMA's , rejecting claims that incorporation of CPT into Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) regulations rendered the codes uncopyrightable as "law" under the merger doctrine; the U.S. denied in 1997, affirming the validity of the . The AMA has pursued legal action in cases of alleged misuse, such as when insurers applied CPT codes to non-medical administrative fees, arguing this undermines the code set's integrity and public trust. Licensing fees for CPT access form a substantial revenue stream for the , with users including , hospitals, insurers, and vendors required to pay for official code books, data files, and software integrations due to federal mandates under HIPAA and rules. A estimate pegged annual CPT-related royalties at $71 million, though the AMA does not publicly disclose current figures; critics contend these fees have escalated, burdening small practices and contributing to administrative overhead in care. In 2025, Senate HELP Committee Chairman initiated a review of the AMA's fee structure, accusing it of exploiting a "government-backed " by charging "exorbitant fees" to all stakeholders, including doctors and plans, potentially prioritizing revenue over . Such fees have drawn for fostering , with the 's reliance on CPT royalties—estimated to exceed traditional membership dues—raising questions about conflicts in updates that may favor billing maximization over clinical . Enforcement extends to prohibiting free online dissemination of full sets, prompting debates over accessibility for non-commercial educational use, though the AMA maintains that licensed distribution ensures accuracy and ongoing maintenance funded by fees.

Allegations of Monopoly and Antitrust Issues

The American Medical Association (AMA) maintains proprietary control over Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes through copyright, with federal regulations under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and Medicare requiring their use for standardized medical billing and claims processing, creating a de facto monopoly position. Critics argue this government-endorsed exclusivity enables the AMA to extract licensing fees from mandatory users—including physicians, hospitals, insurers, and electronic health record vendors—without competitive alternatives, potentially violating antitrust principles by restraining trade in coding standards. In October 2025, Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee Chair Bill Cassidy (R-LA) formally accused the AMA of abusing this "government-backed monopoly" by imposing "exorbitant fees" on stakeholders, estimating that CPT-related publishing and services generated hundreds of millions in annual revenue—$281.4 million from "books and digital content" in 2024 alone, comprising over half of the AMA's $513.2 million total revenue. Royalties from CPT licensing, which skyrocketed from $65.8 million in 2011 to $284.8 million in 2023, are passed through to healthcare entities via subscriptions, data files, and software integrations, with minimum annual royalties as low as $100 per product release but scaling to substantial sums for large-scale users. Cassidy contended these fees inflate administrative costs and patient premiums, as providers and payers have no viable substitute for CPT compliance. Legal challenges alleging antitrust violations have largely failed to establish wrongdoing. In Practice Management Information Corp. v. American Medical Ass'n (1996), a competitor claimed the AMA's exclusive arrangement with the Health Care Financing Administration (predecessor to ) constituted copyright misuse and an antitrust violation under the Clayton by blocking alternative coding systems; the Ninth Circuit upheld the AMA's copyright enforcement, finding no proven misuse or restraint of trade. Similarly, in Neotonus Inc. v. American Medical Ass'n (2009), a medical device firm alleged conspiracy between the AMA and American Urological Association to deny CPT codes, harming competition; a federal judge dismissed the antitrust claims, affirming the CPT Editorial Panel's process as fair and impartial. No enforcement actions specifically targeting CPT monopoly practices have succeeded, though historical FTC scrutiny of AMA activities focused on unrelated ethical restrictions rather than coding licensing. Proponents of the allegations, including policy analysts, maintain that the AMA's dependence on CPT—funding and operations over direct representation—prioritizes control over , potentially stifling open-source alternatives and exacerbating healthcare inefficiencies. The AMA counters that licensing sustains annual updates to over 10,000 codes, ensuring accuracy and relevance amid evolving medical practices, with fees reflecting maintenance costs rather than anticompetitive intent. Despite persistent criticism, courts have consistently validated the AMA's rights, leaving reform to legislative action amid ongoing congressional inquiries.

Contributions to Healthcare Cost Inflation

The proprietary nature of CPT codes, maintained exclusively by the (AMA), imposes licensing fees on healthcare providers, payers, and software vendors required to use them for billing and reimbursement, thereby contributing to systemic administrative expenses passed on to patients and insurers. In 2025, Senate HELP Committee Chair criticized the AMA for abusing its government-endorsed monopoly by charging "exorbitant fees" to doctors, hospitals, and health plans based on user volume and licensing terms, arguing these costs exacerbate healthcare inflation. AMA royalties from CPT licensing represent a major revenue stream, with critics estimating that such fees add millions annually to operational burdens across the sector, indirectly inflating overall spending as providers factor them into service pricing. The annual proliferation of CPT codes—such as 170 new codes, 60 revisions, and 82 deletions introduced in 2018 alone—necessitates ongoing staff training, updates, and audits, amplifying administrative costs that account for 25% to 35% of total U.S. healthcare expenditures. This update cycle, driven by the AMA's CPT Editorial Panel, increases coding complexity, leading to higher error rates and audit expenditures for providers navigating over 10,000 active codes. Studies attribute part of this burden to the need for specialized billing expertise, with professional coding costs ranging from $4.22 to $45.55 per , or 3% to 36% of value, further embedding inflationary pressures into operational overhead. CPT's granular structure facilitates upcoding, where providers select higher-reimbursed codes for similar services, contributing significantly to spending growth; for instance, analyses of visits across five states from 2012 to 2019 found upcoding accounted for up to 28% of per-visit cost increases, totaling billions in excess outlays. Part B data similarly show CPT fee differentials incentivizing visit upcoding, with relative value units (RVUs) tied to codes amplifying reimbursements for more complex descriptors, even absent proportional resource use. Critics, including congressional inquiries, contend this dynamic stems from AMA-influenced code creation that prioritizes billable granularity over simplicity, sustaining a of inflated claims and payer scrutiny costs.

References

  1. [1]
    CPT® overview and code approval | American Medical Association
    The Current Procedural Terminology (CPT®) codes offer doctors and health care professionals a uniform language for coding medical services and procedures.
  2. [2]
  3. [3]
    CPT® (Current Procedural Terminology) | CPT® Codes | AMA
    Review the criteria for CPT® Category I, Category II and Category III codes, access applications and read frequently asked questions.CPT Codes · CPT® overview and code... · CPT coding resources · CPT Assistant
  4. [4]
    AMA releases CPT 2026 code set - American Medical Association
    Sep 11, 2025 · The CPT code set allows for the seamless flow of complex medical information across the entire health system and has a foundational role in ...
  5. [5]
    CPT® code set quick reference guide | American Medical Association
    The Current Procedural Terminology (CPT®) codes offer physicians and health care professionals a uniform language for coding medical services and procedures.
  6. [6]
    The purpose of the CPT® coding system & the CPT® Editorial Panel
    The AMA first developed and published CPT in 1966. The 1st edition helped encourage the use of standard terms and descriptors to document procedures in the ...
  7. [7]
    Current Procedural Terminology: History, Structure, and ... - NIH
    In 1966, the American Medical Association first published a set of standard terms and descriptors to document medical procedures, known as Current Procedural ...
  8. [8]
    History of CPT® content
    1966: Current Procedural Terminology codes introduced​​ AMA organizes and publishes the first group of CPT codes in 1966. Later, in 1970, the code format ...
  9. [9]
    The basics of CPT - Applied Policy
    Oct 25, 2023 · Development of CPT. The AMA introduced the first version of CPT, with approximately 3,500 mostly surgery-specific codes, in 1966. It was a ...Missing: edition details
  10. [10]
    CPT®: An Open System That Describes All That You Do
    The first edition of CPT (1966) primarily described surgical procedures, with only small sections allotted for medicine, radiology, and pathology. · Over the ...Missing: origins | Show results with:origins<|separator|>
  11. [11]
    Current procedural terminology; a primer - PubMed
    Mar 3, 2014 · In 1966, The American Medical Association (AMA) working with multiple major medical specialty societies developed an iterative coding system ...Missing: origins initial
  12. [12]
    Background and History of CPT Codes
    Jul 15, 2020 · The American Medical Association (AMA) created and published CPT codes in 1966. The first edition was used as a standard of terms and descriptors of ...
  13. [13]
    How do CPT® Codes Work? - Medwave
    Oct 5, 2024 · The CPT coding system was first developed by the AMA in 1966 to: Standardize medical reporting across the country; Facilitate communication ...
  14. [14]
    The History of Medical Coding - All-things-medical-billing.com
    Apr 9, 2024 · The second edition of the CPT codes occurred in 1970. The procedure coding system developed into a 5 digit format. In 1983 the Centers for ...
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Code and Guideline Changes | AMA - American Medical Association
    Mar 9, 2021 · The inclusion of time as an explicit factor beginning in CPT 1992 was done to assist in selecting the most appropriate level of E/M services.
  16. [16]
    An overview of 1999 CPT code changes | 1999-03-01 - Clinician.com
    The 1999 version of CPT contains additions, deletions, and revised to code descriptions. Two new appendices were added to show which codes are considered "add- ...<|separator|>
  17. [17]
    Frequently Asked Questions About Code Set Standards Adopted ...
    Sep 19, 2000 · What code sets have been adopted as HIPAA standards? · Physician services. · Physical and occupational therapy services. · Radiological procedures.
  18. [18]
    Health Insurance Reform: Standards for Electronic Transactions
    Aug 17, 2000 · SUMMARY: This rule adopts standards for eight electronic transactions and for code sets to be used in those transactions.
  19. [19]
    CPT - Digital Healthcare Research
    CPT codes are used in electronic transaction messages and electronic medical records (EMRs) to accurately identify the procedures performed during a clinical ...
  20. [20]
    Category II codes | American Medical Association
    CPT Category II codes are used for performance measurement. Using them is optional and not required for correct coding. Find the latest changes and additions to ...Category Ii Codes · Cpt® Category Ii Code... · Sign Up For Cpt® News
  21. [21]
    CPT 2000: interventional pain management coding in the new ...
    The CPT 2000 includes a multitude of changes. Those of most important interest to interventional pain management specialists include neural blockade.
  22. [22]
    CPT Changes for 2000 - AAFP
    In particular, CPT now clarifies that the repair codes include wound closure using skin adhesive. HCFA recently established a separate code, G0168, for wound ...
  23. [23]
    CPT : An Open System That Describes All That You Do
    Our AMA reinforces that the CPT Editorial Panel is the proper forum for addressing CPT code set maintenance is- sues and all interested stakeholders should ...
  24. [24]
    6 new digital health CPT codes that you should know about
    Sep 6, 2019 · The 2020 CPT codes and descriptors can be imported straight into existing claims and billing software using the downloadable CPT 2020 Data File.Missing: records | Show results with:records
  25. [25]
    CPT Code 98972: Online Digital Assessment & Management ...
    CPT 98972 can be billed for secure patient portal messaging, electronic health record (EHR) communications, and HIPAA-compliant email exchanges. Can CPT ...
  26. [26]
    2023 Remote Patient Monitoring CPT Codes: 99453, 99454, 99457 ...
    Feb 8, 2023 · Learn 2023 CPT billing codes for remote patient monitoring (RPM) and understand the requirements to maximize the value of 99457, 99458, ...
  27. [27]
    Utilizing Interprofessional Telephone Internet/Electronic Health ...
    Jan 17, 2023 · The Interprofessional Telephone/Internet/Electronic Health Record Consultation CPT codes 99446–99449 and 99451 were created in 2014 to capture the time spent ...Missing: digital | Show results with:digital
  28. [28]
    New 2025 Telehealth CPT Codes - Society for Maternal-Fetal ...
    In the 2025 edition of the CPT code book, an entirely new set of codes were created explicitly to report different forms of telemedicine services.Missing: key 2000-2025<|control11|><|separator|>
  29. [29]
    AMA releases CPT 2025 code set | American Medical Association
    Sep 10, 2024 · There are 420 overall updates in the CPT 2025 code set, including 270 new codes, 112 deletions, and 38 revisions. The CPT code set continues to ...Missing: 2000-2025 | Show results with:2000-2025
  30. [30]
    288 new CPT codes cover digital health, AI and more
    Sep 12, 2025 · Key updates included in the CPT 2026 code set are new codes for digital health services like remote patient monitoring, medical services ...Missing: electronic | Show results with:electronic
  31. [31]
    Category I Codes | American Medical Association
    Oct 1, 2025 · Category I codes range from 00100–99499 and are generally ordered into sub-categories based on procedure/service type and anatomy.
  32. [32]
    Criteria for CPT® Codes - American Medical Association
    The proposed descriptor is unique, well-defined and describes a procedure or service which is clearly identified and distinguished from existing procedures and ...
  33. [33]
    Overview of Coding & Classification Systems - CMS
    Jun 18, 2025 · CPT®-4 codes primarily identify services and procedures and are primarily divided into the following six sections: Evaluation and Management ...
  34. [34]
    Criteria for CPT® Category II codes - American Medical Association
    CPT Category II codes are supplemental tracking codes that can be used for performance measurement. The use of the tracking codes for performance measurement ...
  35. [35]
    [PDF] CPT® Category II Codes Long Descriptors | AMA
    Jun 23, 2023 · The following section of the CPT code set contains a set of supplemental tracking codes that can be used for performance measurement. It is ...
  36. [36]
    [PDF] CPT Category II Codes: Frequently Asked Questions - Medica
    CPT Category II codes are supplemental codes describing clinical components, usually in E&M or clinical services. They are 5-character codes ending with 'F'.<|separator|>
  37. [37]
    Category II Codes: Understanding Their Role in Value-based Care
    Jan 16, 2025 · Category II codes are optional tracking codes for reporting quality of care, not attached to payment, and are a cornerstone of value-based care.
  38. [38]
    Category III Codes | American Medical Association
    This section of CPT codes contains a temporary set of codes for emerging technologies, services and procedures.Missing: explanation | Show results with:explanation
  39. [39]
    [PDF] CPT® Category III Codes | AMA - American Medical Association
    The following CPT codes are an excerpt of the CPT Category III code set, a temporary set of codes for emerging technologies, services, procedures, and service ...
  40. [40]
    LCD - Category III Codes (L35490) - CMS
    The American Medical Association (AMA) develops temporary Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) Category III codes to track the utilization of emerging ...<|separator|>
  41. [41]
    [PDF] All About CPT Codes - NIH's Seed
    Category I CPT codes describe distinct medical procedures or services furnished by. QHPs and are identified by a 5-digit numeric code (e.g., 29580: Unna boot).
  42. [42]
    Article - Billing and Coding: Category III Codes (A56902) - CMS
    The billing and coding information in this article is dependent on the coverage indications, limitations and/or medical necessity described in the associated ...
  43. [43]
    American Medical Association (AMA) CPT & RUC | AASM
    Jul 9, 2024 · The CPT Editorial Panel is responsible for maintaining the AMA CPT code set. The panel is authorized by the AMA Board of Trustees to revise ...<|separator|>
  44. [44]
    The CPT® code process | American Medical Association
    The CPT Editorial Panel meets three times each year. AMA staff prepares agenda materials for each Panel & RUC meeting. Panel members receive agenda material at ...Requests for changes to CPT · The role of the CPT advisors
  45. [45]
    Summary of Panel Actions | American Medical Association
    After each CPT Editorial Panel meeting, a document is prepared summarizing the actions that were taken by the Panel on each of the code applications.
  46. [46]
    CPT® Editorial Panel & RUC meetings & calendar
    Oct 13, 2025 · Find information about the CPT® Editorial Panel process and AMA/Specialty Society RVS update process.
  47. [47]
    September 2025 CPT Editorial Panel Meeting Agenda Analysis
    Jul 15, 2025 · The CPT Editorial Panel is responsible for maintaining the CPT code set, which was developed in 1966 to describe medical, surgical, and ...
  48. [48]
    CPT® Editorial Panel process calendar
    Feb. 5-7, 2026 · Lab application listing posted to AMA website*: Nov. 15, 2025 · Lab interested stakeholder written comments due date: Dec. 1, 2025.
  49. [49]
    How is a New CPT Code “Created”? - ASRM
    Mar 24, 2025 · Creating a new CPT code starts with the American Medical Association (AMA)'s CPT Editorial Panel, which originated over 50 years ago.
  50. [50]
    AMA CPT Editorial Panel Considers AI-Related Codes
    Jun 12, 2025 · ACR is bringing expert input to the AMA CPT Editorial Panel during ongoing listening sessions on AI-related codes.
  51. [51]
  52. [52]
    CPT® Codes - American Medical Association
    The AMA develops and manages CPT codes on a rigorous and transparent process led by the CPT® Editorial Panel, which ensures codes are issued and updated ...CPT coding resources · CPT® licensing frequently... · Catalog of Topics
  53. [53]
    Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) - CMS
    The HCPCS Level II coding system began in the 1980s. · In 2003, under 42 CFR 414.40(a), the HHS Secretary delegated authority to CMS to establish and maintain ...Missing: expansions | Show results with:expansions
  54. [54]
    CPT® Codes: What Are They, Why Are They Necessary, and ... - NIH
    History of Current Procedural Terminology coding development. The first publication, in 1966, of the American Medical Association (AMA) Current Procedural ...
  55. [55]
    Commonly Used CPT Codes | NATA
    The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) uses the CPT coding system to establish reimbursement to Medicare providers. Each CPT code has a relative ...Overview Of Current... · Commonly Used Cpt Codes And... · New And Revised Physical...
  56. [56]
    [PDF] MLN006764 - Evaluation and Management Services - CMS
    Sep 30, 2025 · When you provide 30–74 minutes of critical care services to a patient on a given day, report CPT code 99291. ○ Only use CPT code 99291 once per ...
  57. [57]
    HCPCS vs CPT: Understanding the Healthcare Common Procedure ...
    May 21, 2025 · Note that HCPCS draws from the AMA's Current Procedural Terminology (CPT). These codes assist healthcare workers in reporting different ...
  58. [58]
    [PDF] Revenue Codes Requiring CPT or HCPCS Codes
    Oct 25, 2019 · A revenue code and corresponding HCPCS or CPT code must be compatible. Refer to the current Uniform Billing Editor for appropriate code sets. A ...
  59. [59]
  60. [60]
    Medical Coding Systems: ICD-10-CM, CPT, SNOMED & More
    Oct 15, 2024 · This primer covers four of the most widely used standardized coding systems in the United States: ICD-10-CM, CPT®, SNOMED CT®, and LOINC, along with others ...
  61. [61]
    Coding Systems for Clinical Decision Support: Theoretical and Real ...
    Oct 21, 2020 · SNOMED CT and ICD-10 (International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision) proved to be the most accurate clinical coding systems for most ...
  62. [62]
    Coding Basics - AAFP
    HCPCS Level II: About Codes Not Included in CPT​​ Often pronounced by its acronym as "hick picks," HCPCS is a set of health care procedure codes. Examples: G0008 ...
  63. [63]
    How the 2023 CPT code set will help cut administrative burdens
    Oct 18, 2022 · Next year's CPT code set contains burden-reducing revisions to the codes and guidelines for most E/M services. Learn more with the AMA.
  64. [64]
    AMA's 2023 CPT code set aims to reduce administrative burdens
    Sep 12, 2022 · There are 10,969 codes in the CPT set that describe the medical procedures and services available to patients. Modifications to the evaluation ...
  65. [65]
    How the CPT code set can help speed up value-based care adoption
    Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes help facilitate value-based care payment arrangements, and there are opportunities to do even more.
  66. [66]
    PRACTICE MANAGEMENT INFO. CORP. v. THE AMA - CaseMine
    Practice Management sought a declaratory judgment invalidating the AMA's copyright on the grounds that the CPT became uncopyrightable law when HCFA required its ...
  67. [67]
    AMA: Insurers misused CPT codes to hide administrative costs
    Feb 26, 2020 · The code set is meant to be used for procedures or services that are actually delivered to a patient, and not to describe administrative costs ...
  68. [68]
    [PDF] The American Medical Association and Its Dubious Revenue Streams
    Consequently, every doctor, hospital and clinic billing for these services must pay the AMA a licensing fee in addition to buying the organization's CPT code ...
  69. [69]
    Key Republican Senator Probes Major Source of AMA's Revenue
    Oct 10, 2025 · He further argued that the AMA is "charging exorbitant fees to anyone using the CPT code set, including doctors, hospitals, health plans, and ...
  70. [70]
    AMA's handling of CPT codes enters Congress' crosshairs
    Oct 8, 2025 · Senate HELP Committee Chairman Bill Cassidy has opened a review into the AMA over the "exorbitant fees" it charges for use of the CPT code ...
  71. [71]
    The AMA is not properly representing physicians - STAT News
    Jun 13, 2025 · The AMA's financial reliance on CPT code royalties raises important questions about how effectively it represents the needs of practicing physicians.
  72. [72]
    Case on misuse of CPT code to hide administrative costs can proceed
    Jul 21, 2021 · A recent federal appeals court opinion helps ensure that health care companies don't misuse the AMA Current Professional Terminology (CPT) code set.
  73. [73]
    CPT® licensing frequently asked questions (FAQs)
    Mar 27, 2025 · Any entity using CPT content anywhere worldwide must have a license authorizing the use of CPT code set from the AMA or an authorized distributor.Do I need a license to use the... · What type of CPT license do I...
  74. [74]
    Time to Break the AMA's Billing Code Monopoly - RealClearHealth
    Jul 25, 2025 · The AMA owns the copyright to these codes. Anyone who uses or displays them must pay licensing fees. This includes not only insurance companies ...
  75. [75]
    Chair Cassidy Rebukes AMA for Abusing CPT System, Raising ...
    Oct 8, 2025 · The AMA charges substantial fees for licenses to use its CPT codes, based on the number of users and the terms of the specific licensing ...
  76. [76]
    Internal End User License Agreement Royalty Rates for 2026 and ...
    Jul 24, 2025 · A minimum royalty of $100.00 applies for each annual release of the CPT Standard Data File in Covered Products licensed under the Health Plan ...Missing: revenue | Show results with:revenue
  77. [77]
    Practice Management Information Corporation, a ... - Justia Law
    The AMA argues the copyright misuse defense fails because Practice Management did not establish an antitrust violation. We agree with the Fourth Circuit that a ...
  78. [78]
    AMA, AUA Win Antitrust Challenge Over CPT Codes - Law360
    Neotonus alleged that the AMA and AUA worked together to deprive patients of its technology by refusing to grant it certain codes in the Current Procedural ...Missing: investigation | Show results with:investigation<|control11|><|separator|>
  79. [79]
    Advisory Opinion to Johnson (03-26-96) | Federal Trade Commission
    Mar 26, 1996 · CPT is maintained by the CPT Editorial Panel, a committee appointed by the AMA Board of Trustees. The CPT is updated annually to reflect current ...
  80. [80]
  81. [81]
    8 Critical Challenges Facing Ambulatory Surgery Centers (ASCs) in ...
    Aug 11, 2025 · Healthcare inflation just hit a 23-year high of 4.6%, and you're ... In 2018 alone, you had to track 170 new CPT codes, 60 rewrites, and 82 ...
  82. [82]
    AHA Response to OMB Deregulation RFI
    May 12, 2025 · Research estimates that between 25% and 35% of all health care spending is on administrative tasks, with billing and collections, which include ...
  83. [83]
    Neural Machine Translation–Based Automated Current Procedural ...
    May 26, 2021 · Similarly, professional and hospital billing teams' administrative costs range from US $4.22 to US $45.55 per procedure, accounting for 3%-36% ...Missing: burden | Show results with:burden
  84. [84]
    Price Increases Versus Upcoding As Drivers Of Emergency ...
    Aug 7, 2023 · This study quantified the contributions of price increases and upcoding to the rise in ED spending in five US states between 2012 and 2019
  85. [85]
    Upcoding in medicare: where does it matter most? - PMC
    Jan 2, 2024 · However, our paper focuses on the relative contribution of upcoding ... CPT fee differentials and visit upcoding under Medicare Part B.
  86. [86]
    Changes in Coding Intensity Across Outpatient Settings
    May 14, 2025 · One study analyzing five states found that between 2011 and 2019, increased upcoding in hospital billing resulted in an estimated $14.6B in ...