Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Patient

![Wounded patients in Red Cross hospital][float-right] A patient is an individual who interacts with a clinician due to real or perceived illness, or for health promotion and disease prevention.^[1] The term originates from the Latin patiens, the present participle of pati meaning "to suffer" or "to endure," reflecting the historical connotation of one bearing illness or pain under medical care.^[2] In healthcare systems, patients typically present with symptoms seeking diagnosis, treatment, or management of conditions, establishing a doctor-patient relationship grounded in trust, informed consent, and professional expertise.^[3] Patients may receive care as inpatients, requiring hospitalization, or outpatients, treated without overnight stays, with the distinction influencing resource allocation and care delivery.^[4] Defining characteristics include vulnerability due to health impairment, reliance on evidence-based interventions, and legal rights such as autonomy in decision-making, where patients retain the capacity to accept or refuse treatments absent incompetence.^[5] This autonomy counters historical paternalism, prioritizing patient preferences alongside clinical efficacy, though empirical data underscores that unguided choices can lead to suboptimal outcomes without professional guidance.^[6] Notable developments include the shift toward patient-centered care models, emphasizing coordination, information sharing, and respect for individual values to enhance outcomes and satisfaction, supported by institutional frameworks like those from the FDA recognizing patients' direct experience with medical interventions.^[7] Controversies arise over terminology implying passivity—"patient" evokes suffering rather than agency—prompting debates on alternatives like "client" or "consumer," yet retain core focus on empirical healing over semantic rebranding.^[8]

Etymology and Historical Context

Etymology

The word "patient" derives from the Latin patiens, the present participle of the verb pati, meaning "to suffer," "to endure," or "to bear."^[9]^[10] This root emphasizes a state of passive endurance or submission to affliction, rather than active resistance, reflecting connotations of long-suffering or tolerance in classical usage.^[11] In English, the term entered via Old French patient during the Middle English period, around the mid-14th century, initially denoting a person who suffers misfortune or pain with fortitude and resignation, often in a moral or religious context of virtuous patience.^[9]^[12] By the late 14th century, it had evolved to specifically designate an individual under medical treatment, shifting from broad existential suffering to clinical dependency on a healer's intervention.^[9] This linguistic trajectory underscores a foundational connotation of vulnerability and reception of care, distinct from ancient Greek terms like nosos, which primarily referred to disease itself rather than the enduring sufferer.^[13]

Evolution of the Patient Concept in Medicine

In the Hippocratic era, circa 400 BCE, the physician's role centered on systematic observation of symptoms, environment, diet, and lifestyle factors to guide treatment, but patients and families retained substantial agency in directing care, often drawing on traditional knowledge and self-remedies rather than deferring unquestioningly to healers.^[14]^[15] This dynamic reflected medicine's nascent status, lacking formal institutional authority, where physicians served as advisors amid a cultural emphasis on individual and communal responsibility for health.^[16] During the medieval period, medical guilds emerged as precursors to professional monopolies, evolving into state-regulated licensing by the 19th century, such as the UK's Medical Act of 1858, which centralized qualification standards and elevated physicians' status.^[17]^[18] This professionalization, coupled with advances in empirical diagnostics like auscultation and microscopy, fostered a paternalistic model wherein patients were positioned as dependent recipients of expert intervention, with limited input into decisions amid the era's guild-like control over practice.^[19] The shift causally stemmed from efforts to standardize competence and exclude unqualified practitioners, reducing patient-directed care in favor of hierarchical authority structures that prioritized scientific rigor over lay involvement. Post-World War II, revelations of unethical human experimentation prompted the Nuremberg Code of 1947, which codified voluntary consent as essential for medical procedures, marking an initial ethical pivot toward recognizing patient agency in research contexts that gradually extended to routine care.^[20]^[21] By the 1970s, escalating litigation and advocacy for autonomy—exemplified by U.S. cases like Canterbury v. Spence (1972), which required physicians to disclose material risks—drove statutory and common-law reforms embedding informed consent, transforming patients from passive subjects to active participants amid evidence-based practice's dominance.^[22]^[23] These developments were propelled by causal factors including wartime ethical reckonings, rising malpractice suits (with U.S. claims surging over 500% from 1960 to 1975), and bioethical frameworks challenging paternalism's unchecked power.^[22]

Definition and Core Attributes

Primary Definition

A patient is a person receiving or registered to receive medical treatment from healthcare professionals.^[24] This definition applies to individuals interacting with clinicians due to actual or perceived illness, injury, or conditions requiring diagnosis, treatment, or management.^[1] In empirical healthcare contexts, patient status arises when a health impairment necessitates professional intervention, as self-management alone cannot adequately address the underlying causal pathology.^[25] The core attributes of a patient include dependency on expert care stemming from a verifiable health deficit, such as physiological dysfunction or injury, which prompts seeking curative or targeted preventive measures beyond routine wellness.^[1] This distinguishes patients from healthy individuals engaging in casual consultations or consumer-like elective services, where no immediate treatment need exists unless the interaction reveals an escalating condition.^[26] Healthcare recipients overwhelmingly prefer the term "patient" in treatment settings, underscoring its association with vulnerability and clinical necessity rather than transactional consumption.^[26] Causally, patient designation reflects a direct link between the individual's compromised state—evidenced by symptoms, diagnostic findings, or risk factors—and the requirement for specialized services to restore function or mitigate harm, excluding scenarios of full self-sufficiency.^[25] This framework aligns with standards from medical institutions, emphasizing active clinical engagement over passive or prophylactic participation without pathology.^[1]

Key Characteristics and Distinctions

Patients exhibit profound vulnerability stemming from information asymmetry in the physician-patient relationship, wherein providers hold specialized expertise that patients generally lack, particularly in evaluating diagnostic uncertainties and therapeutic mechanisms.^[27] This disparity persists despite broader access to health information, as patients remain dependent on professionals for causal interpretation of physiological processes and potential errors in self-assessment.^[28] Such asymmetry heightens risks of exploitation or suboptimal decisions, as patients cannot independently verify the intricate causal pathways underlying medical interventions. A core trait involves patients' limited grasp of probabilistic outcomes in treatments, where presentations of relative risks (e.g., "30% reduction") often inflate perceived benefits and impair comprehension compared to absolute risks, leading to distorted evaluations of expected value.^[29] Empirical data indicate that patients under uncertainty or distress, such as from acute pain or disability, display elevated suggestibility, with randomized controlled trials showing placebo responses accounting for approximately 50% of overall treatment effects through expectation-driven mechanisms rather than direct pharmacological action.^[30] This responsiveness underscores physiological dependencies that amplify contextual influences on outcomes, distinct from volitional choices in non-medical contexts. Patients differ fundamentally from "clients" in elective services, as the former entails involuntary subjection to life-altering physiological stakes—such as irreversible organ damage or mortality risks—governed by biological causal realities beyond personal preference, whereas clients pursue reversible, preference-based transactions without inherent bodily dependency.^[31]^[32] This distinction arises from medicine's foundation in addressing verifiable pathologies with measurable dependencies, requiring structured fiduciary oversight to mitigate errors from incomplete patient agency, unlike commercial models emphasizing consumer sovereignty.^[25]

Patient Classifications

Inpatients

Inpatients are hospital patients who are formally admitted for treatment requiring an overnight stay, generally due to acute or complex conditions that demand continuous medical observation and intervention beyond what outpatient services can provide.^[33] Admission decisions hinge on clinical criteria assessing medical necessity, such as the expectation of a stay spanning at least two midnights or the need for high-intensity services like frequent vital sign monitoring, invasive procedures, or stabilization of life-threatening illnesses.^[34] Common scenarios include post-operative recovery, management of severe infections, or exacerbations of chronic diseases like heart failure, where deterioration risks necessitate bed occupancy and round-the-clock professional oversight.^[35] This care model features 24/7 supervision by physicians, nurses, and specialists, facilitating real-time adjustments to therapy and early detection of complications, though it entails higher resource consumption including dedicated beds, diagnostics, and staffing. In the U.S., hospital expenditures—which largely reflect inpatient services—comprised 31.2% of total national health spending in 2023, totaling around $1.5 trillion amid rising demands from aging populations and complex cases.^[36] Empirical data underscore the value of such monitoring: structured inpatient protocols, including multidisciplinary rounds and evidence-based interventions, correlate with fewer adverse events during hospitalization, setting the stage for safer discharges and reduced 30-day readmission risks for high-acuity patients compared to less supervised alternatives.^[37]^[38] In contrast to outpatients treated via same-day visits, inpatients face temporary restrictions on autonomy—such as limited mobility or scheduled routines—to prioritize safety and treatment adherence, a measure justified by causal links between uninterrupted monitoring and superior control of volatile conditions like sepsis or post-surgical hemorrhage.^[35] Studies indicate this intensity yields tangible benefits, with inpatient environments enabling proactive management that lowers complication rates in severe cases, though overuse for lower-risk admissions has prompted scrutiny over cost-efficiency without proportional outcome gains.^[39]^[40]

Outpatients

Outpatients receive medical care in ambulatory settings, such as clinics or hospital outpatient departments, without requiring overnight hospitalization, enabling same-day discharge following diagnosis, treatment, or procedures.^[41] This category encompasses routine consultations, diagnostic tests, minor interventions, and follow-up for chronic conditions like diabetes or hypertension management, where patients' stability permits home recovery.^[42] Outpatient care yields efficiency gains through lower operational costs and minimized risks compared to inpatient alternatives. Procedures in outpatient facilities cost 45-60% less than hospital equivalents, attributable to reduced overheads including room charges and extended staffing.^[43] Infection rates are also lower, as ambulatory centers serve healthier cohorts with focused protocols, avoiding the higher nosocomial exposure in inpatient units.^[44] Across OECD countries, same-day surgical procedures have risen markedly over recent decades, driven by technological advances enabling minimally invasive options suitable for stable cases.^[45] At least 58.5% of surgeries occur outpatient in some populations, optimizing resource allocation by reserving inpatient capacity for acute needs.^[46] Challenges arise from dependence on patient-initiated compliance, with average no-show rates reaching 23% per systematic reviews, disrupting care continuity and worsening outcomes via treatment delays.^[47] Factors including socioeconomic barriers contribute to these rates, heightening risks for conditions demanding regular monitoring.^[48]

Day Patients and Specialized Categories

Day patients, also known as day-case patients, receive hospital-based treatment or procedures during daytime hours and are discharged on the same calendar day without an overnight stay.^[49] This category applies to interventions requiring more intensive monitoring or recovery than standard outpatient visits but not full inpatient admission, such as minor surgeries, diagnostic procedures, or infusions.^[50] In systems like the UK National Health Service (NHS), day surgery units handle procedures like cataract removal, hernia repairs, and laparoscopic operations, enabling same-day discharge after anesthesia recovery.^[51] For oncology, day patients attend specialized units for chemotherapy administration, where treatment durations of 4-8 hours allow home return while minimizing hospital-acquired risks.^[52] These adaptations balance procedural intensity with resource efficiency, as day-case models have reduced average lengths of stay for elective surgeries by up to 50% in perioperative pathways, freeing beds for complex cases.^[53] Empirical evidence supports day patient approaches for recoverable conditions, showing lower hospital-acquired infection rates and overall morbidity compared to overnight stays, due to shorter exposure to institutional pathogens and controlled pre-discharge assessments.^[54] In NHS contexts, expanded day surgery has cut extended stays for procedures like colonic surgery from 53.1% to 42.3% between 2014-2015 and 2023-2024, optimizing throughput without elevated readmission risks.^[55] This causal efficiency stems from streamlined protocols that prioritize ambulatory recovery, evidenced by comparable 24-hour readmission rates (0.60% for day cases versus 0.64% for overnight) across audited cohorts.^[56] Specialized day patient categories extend to niche adaptations, such as regular attendees at day hospitals for chronic management (e.g., elderly rehabilitation or dialysis sessions) who maintain community living.^[57] Telemedicine-exclusive patients represent a remote hybrid, classified under synchronous or asynchronous telehealth where virtual consultations replace physical admission for follow-ups or monitoring, reducing facility demands while sustaining care continuity.^[58] Emergency department day patients, treated and discharged same-day for non-admit conditions like minor trauma, further illustrate this, with protocols ensuring stability before release to avoid unnecessary overnight holds.^[35] These categories empirically lower system-wide lengths of stay by focusing resources on acute, reversible needs, as seen in digestive surgery reductions of 12.5% post-day protocol implementation.^[59]

Rights and Legal Framework

Established Patient Rights

Core patient rights encompass protections for dignity, privacy, confidentiality, and non-discrimination, formalized through ethical codes and legislation primarily in the post-1940s era amid heightened focus on human rights following World War II atrocities and medical ethics reforms. The American Medical Association's Code of Medical Ethics, first adopted in 1847 and revised extensively thereafter, establishes patients' entitlements to courteous treatment, respect for autonomy in decision-making, confidentiality of disclosures, and continuity of care, positioning these as ethical baselines to prevent abuse without encroaching on professional judgment.^[60] ^[61] In the United States, the right to privacy and access to personal health information received statutory enforcement via the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1996, mandating that covered entities provide individuals with timely access to their protected health information upon request and restricting unauthorized disclosures to foster trust and accurate self-management.^[62] ^[63] Complementing this, non-discrimination protections under Section 1557 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (2010) prohibit bias in health programs receiving federal funds on grounds including race, color, national origin, sex, age, and disability, aiming to ensure equitable treatment delivery.^[64] These rights derive from broader ethical imperatives to uphold human dignity, preserve life, and minimize harm, serving as empirical safeguards against historical abuses like non-consensual experimentation.^[65] While intended to mitigate care disparities through standardized protections, data reveal uneven application; rural areas, for example, exhibit persistent gaps in access due to provider shortages and geographic barriers, with rural residents facing higher uninsurance rates and delayed interventions compared to urban counterparts as of 2023.^[66] ^[67] Enforcement challenges underscore that these rights function as minimal thresholds, subordinate to evidence-based clinical priorities where resource constraints or public health exigencies apply. Informed consent requires healthcare providers to disclose material risks, benefits, alternatives, and the nature of proposed interventions to competent patients, enabling voluntary agreement without coercion. This process upholds patient autonomy by ensuring decisions reflect informed preferences rather than defaults or omissions. The foundational legal principle emerged in Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hospital (1914), where the New York Court of Appeals ruled that "every human being of adult years and sound mind has a right to determine what shall be done with his own body," establishing non-consensual procedures as battery.^[68] Incomplete disclosure causally undermines this by skewing risk assessments, leading patients to select options misaligned with their values or evidence-based probabilities, as uncommunicated adverse events exceed 10-20% in many procedures per procedural data.^[69] Empirical studies reveal systemic gaps in patient comprehension, with meta-analyses indicating that only 52-76% of trial participants grasp core elements like purpose, risks, and voluntariness, despite self-reported understanding often exceeding 80%.^[70] This overestimation stems from cognitive biases, such as optimism bias, where patients undervalue long-term harms, resulting in consent that fails to operationalize true autonomy and increases regret rates by up to 15% in mismatched decisions.^[69] In dire cases, therapeutic privilege permits withholding information if disclosure foreseeably causes severe psychological harm, as in terminal diagnoses where revelation might precipitate suicide; courts apply this narrowly, requiring objective evidence of detriment over paternalistic judgment.^[71] While bolstering autonomy via informed consent correlates with higher satisfaction—randomized controlled trials (RCTs) report 10-20% gains in perceived involvement and reduced decisional conflict—effects on clinical outcomes remain inconsistent, with some RCTs showing no mortality or morbidity improvements and others noting neutral or adverse shifts due to preference misalignments.^[72]^[73] Causally, enhanced satisfaction arises from alignment with self-determination but does not guarantee superior health trajectories, as patient choices under partial information may prioritize short-term comfort over probabilistic long-term benefits, per trial data across chronic conditions.^[72] Thus, autonomy's value lies in ethical integrity rather than assured efficacy, necessitating adjuncts like decision aids to mitigate informational deficits without eroding voluntariness.

Responsibilities and Compliance

Patient Obligations in Treatment

Patients bear specific obligations within the therapeutic alliance formed through mutual consent in the patient-physician relationship, which entails reciprocal duties akin to an implicit contractual agreement.^[74] These include providing complete and accurate medical histories to enable informed diagnosis and treatment planning, adhering to prescribed regimens such as medication schedules and lifestyle modifications, and attending scheduled appointments to facilitate ongoing monitoring and adjustments.^[65] Failure to fulfill these duties undermines the efficacy of interventions, as treatment outcomes depend on patient cooperation beyond mere receipt of care.^[75] Empirical data underscore the causal link between non-adherence and adverse results, with medication non-compliance accounting for 30–50% of treatment failures in chronic conditions like diabetes, hypertension, and heart failure.^[76] In the United States, such lapses contribute to avoidable healthcare expenditures estimated at $100–$300 billion annually, encompassing escalated hospitalizations, emergency visits, and prolonged disease progression.^[77] These figures derive from analyses of morbidity, mortality, and resource utilization tied directly to suboptimal patient engagement, highlighting that systemic factors alone do not explain variances in outcomes—individual agency in regimen compliance remains pivotal.^[78] In traditional and familial care models, patients' obligations extend to involving support networks for reinforcement, such as family oversight of adherence in elder or pediatric cases, which studies link to improved compliance rates without supplanting personal accountability.^[79] Providers may document these expectations in care plans or informed consent processes, reinforcing that therapeutic success hinges on patients acting as informed, proactive participants rather than passive recipients.^[80]

Evidence on Compliance Impacts

Empirical studies demonstrate that patient compliance with prescribed treatments significantly influences health outcomes in chronic conditions, with meta-analyses indicating that adherence rates around 50% in developed countries contribute to suboptimal disease control and elevated morbidity. The World Health Organization's analysis of long-term therapy adherence highlights that non-compliance leads to worsened clinical parameters, increased hospitalizations, and higher mortality across conditions like hypertension, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia.^[81] In the United States, medication non-adherence is linked to approximately 125,000 deaths annually and accounts for about 10% of hospitalizations, underscoring its causal role in preventable adverse events.^[82]^[77] For chronic disease management, higher adherence correlates with markedly improved control rates; for instance, meta-analyses of pharmacotherapy in conditions such as diabetes and cardiovascular disease show that good compliance reduces hospitalization risks by up to 10% and all-cause mortality by 28% compared to poor adherence.^[83] These findings persist across large cohorts, where interventions enhancing patient follow-through—beyond mere access—yield measurable gains in glycemic control, blood pressure stabilization, and lipid management, effectively doubling the likelihood of achieving therapeutic targets in adherent versus non-adherent groups.^[84] Non-adherence, conversely, exacerbates progression, with systematic reviews confirming it as a direct predictor of treatment failure independent of initial disease severity.^[85] In hypertension specifically, cohort-based meta-analyses reveal that poor adherence elevates overall mortality risk by 40-80% and cardiovascular mortality by similar margins, while consistent compliance achieves blood pressure reductions that lower event rates.^[86] Trials and observational data further quantify that adherent patients experience up to a 30% decrease in cardiovascular risks through sustained therapy, with hazard ratios for death ranging from 1.4 to 1.8 in non-compliant subgroups after adjusting for confounders.^[87]^[88] This evidence prioritizes behavioral adherence as a modifiable factor driving outcomes, rather than over-relying on external variables. Patient-related factors, particularly psychological barriers such as denial of illness severity or intentional disregard for regimens, emerge as primary drivers of non-compliance in empirical models, often outweighing socioeconomic predictors when isolated in multivariate analyses.^[89] While lower income and access issues contribute, studies attribute 20-50% of non-adherence variance to volitional patient choices, including forgetfulness or perceived side effects, enabling targeted interventions that emphasize personal accountability to yield superior results over systemic excuses alone.^[90] This causal focus reveals that empowering individual agency in compliance mitigates outcomes more effectively than attributions to immutable externalities.

Models of Doctor-Patient Interaction

Paternalistic and Authoritative Models

The paternalistic model of doctor-patient interaction casts the physician in the role of a benevolent guardian who unilaterally determines and implements treatments deemed optimal for the patient's welfare, akin to a parental figure guiding a dependent child. This framework, rooted in Hippocratic traditions, dominated medical practice from antiquity until the 1970s, with physicians wielding authority based on specialized knowledge while patients deferred to expert judgment.^[91]^[92] During the first half of the 20th century, this approach emphasized physicians' display of authoritative benevolence to foster trust and adherence, particularly in resource-limited eras before advanced diagnostics.^[93] A closely related authoritative variant refines paternalism by grounding directives in empirical evidence and protocols, permitting minimal patient consultation but enforcing compliance to expedite care, especially in time-sensitive contexts. In emergency department triage, for example, this model justifies overriding patient preferences to prioritize cases, as seen in protocols where triage officers allocate resources without consent to avert harm from delays.^[94] Such structures persist in acute settings due to their alignment with ethical imperatives like non-maleficence, where physician-led decisions facilitate faster resolutions amid high-stakes uncertainty.^[95] Empirical advantages of these models include elevated compliance rates during crises, which causal analysis attributes to minimized overrides by patients lacking domain expertise, thereby curtailing errors such as treatment refusal or non-adherence that could amplify morbidity.^[96] In emergencies, this authority reduces decision-making friction, enabling protocols that historically supported public health interventions with near-universal uptake, as physicians' directives leveraged perceived infallibility to override hesitancy.^[97] Overall, these approaches demonstrably lowered risks from patient-driven deviations in scenarios demanding immediate, expertise-driven action.^[98]

Shared Decision-Making and Patient-Centered Models

Shared decision-making emerged as a collaborative process in healthcare during the late 1980s, emphasizing joint communication between physicians and patients to weigh treatment options based on evidence, risks, and individual preferences.^[99] This approach contrasts with earlier paternalistic models by requiring mutual exchange of information and values to reach consensus.^[100] In a seminal 1992 typology, Ezekiel J. Emanuel and Linda L. Emanuel outlined four physician-patient relationship models, including the deliberative model—often equated with shared decision-making—where clinicians and patients deliberate together to determine the best option aligned with the patient's values and medical evidence.^[101] Patient-centered care, formalized by the Institute of Medicine in its 2001 report Crossing the Quality Chasm, is defined as care that is respectful of and responsive to individual patient preferences, needs, and values, with those values guiding all clinical decisions.^[102] This framework integrates patient input into care delivery, prioritizing empathy and customization over standardized protocols.^[103] Following the 2010 Affordable Care Act, adoption accelerated through provisions promoting patient-centered medical homes, which incentivize coordinated, value-driven care models to enhance access and outcomes.^[104] Empirical studies indicate shared decision-making improves patient satisfaction, knowledge, and adherence in elective procedures, such as reducing decisional conflict and enhancing choice quality in surgical contexts.^[105] For instance, interventions facilitate better retention of information and alignment with preferences, leading to higher treatment compliance in non-urgent scenarios.^[106] In life-threatening conditions like cancer, evidence shows benefits in affective outcomes, such as lower decisional regret, but associations with hard health metrics like survival rates remain mixed, with only 25% of studies linking it to improved clinical endpoints.^[107] Cancer trials demonstrate reduced anxiety without clear survival advantages, highlighting gaps in translating collaboration to objective prognostic gains.^[108]

Criticisms and Empirical Realities

Shortcomings of Patient-Centered Care

Patient-centered care, while ideologically promoted, imposes significant time and resource burdens on providers, often without corresponding improvements in clinical outcomes. Studies identify time constraints as a major barrier to effective implementation, with high workloads limiting meaningful patient interactions and contributing to burnout among staff. For example, nursing shortages and elevated demands lead to reduced engagement, as documented in reviews of care delivery challenges. Empirical evaluations reveal variability in outcome measures and inconsistent evidence of benefits, suggesting that extended efforts in personalization do not reliably translate to better health results, potentially due to superficial adoption rather than rigorous application.^[109]^[110] The consumerism inherent in patient-centered approaches treats patients as shoppers, fostering demands for unnecessary interventions that strain systems and inflate costs. This dynamic encourages over-testing and procedures driven by patient expectations or litigation fears, mirroring defensive medicine practices estimated to cost the U.S. healthcare system between $46 billion and $50 billion annually. Such pitfalls prioritize satisfaction over evidence, as critiques note that consumer-driven models can erode physician authority and lead to overtreatment without proven value. Peer-reviewed analyses highlight how this conflates patient empowerment with unchecked preferences, often at the expense of efficient, data-guided care.^[111]^[112]^[113] Equity concerns further undermine patient-centered care, as it disproportionately benefits those with higher socioeconomic status (SES) and education, who possess the literacy and resources to actively participate in decision-making. Lower-SES groups exhibit reduced uptake, with studies showing lower participation rates in related processes like advance care planning due to barriers such as limited health literacy and access. This exacerbates disparities, as empirical data links low SES to poorer engagement and outcomes, revealing how the model's assumptions of informed consumerism fail in diverse populations. Academic sources, potentially influenced by institutional emphases on equity rhetoric over causal evidence, underplay these gaps, but surveys confirm widened inequalities in practice.^[114]^[115]^[116]

Data on Outcomes and Paradoxes

Randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses evaluating patient-centered care (PCC) against traditional paternalistic models have yielded inconsistent results on clinical outcomes. A 2013 systematic review of PCC interventions found improvements in patient satisfaction and adherence but no significant reductions in mortality or major morbidity across diverse settings, including chronic disease management and acute care.^[117] Similarly, analyses of RCTs from the 2010s indicate that shared decision-making enhances perceived involvement without reliably altering survival rates, suggesting that emphasizing autonomy does not consistently outperform directive physician guidance in high-stakes scenarios.^[98] A key paradox emerges in autonomy's effects: while PCC boosts short-term satisfaction, it can induce decision overload in complex medical contexts, leading to regret or deferred care. Patients facing multifaceted choices, such as cancer treatment options, report higher initial empowerment but subsequent psychological burden from information excess, as documented in decision-making studies where expanded options correlate with avoidance behaviors and diminished well-being.^[118] This aligns with broader evidence that autonomy, absent expertise, amplifies inefficiencies; for instance, post-2010 empowerment initiatives via patient portals increased healthcare utilization by 10-15% in some cohorts due to duplicated tests and consultations, without proportional health gains.^[119] Empirical realities underscore expertise asymmetry's role in suboptimal outcomes. PCC models, by de-emphasizing hierarchical guidance, have coincided with poorer choices in public health, exemplified by vaccine hesitancy surges during COVID-19 empowerment drives that encouraged self-directed research. Surveys and longitudinal data link heightened patient agency—via accessible online information—to 10-20% rises in refusal rates, as individuals weighed anecdotal risks over aggregated trial evidence, eroding herd immunity efforts.^[120] Such patterns reveal causal tensions: autonomy fosters perceived control but invites biases like confirmation-seeking, yielding inferior aggregate results compared to trust-based deference to verified data.^[121]

Contemporary Developments

Technological Influences on Patient Roles

The adoption of telemedicine has significantly altered patient roles by prioritizing virtual access over in-person visits, with U.S. telemedicine encounters surging 766% in the initial pandemic period relative to 2019 baselines.^[122] This shift empowers patients, especially those in remote or underserved areas, to engage proactively through self-reported symptoms and remote data sharing via apps and wearables, diminishing reliance on traditional clinic attendance. However, the absence of tactile examinations introduces diagnostic limitations, as telehealth evaluations often yield lower concordance with in-person assessments—around 74% in comparative studies—and heighten risks of overlooking subtle physical cues essential for accurate diagnosis in conditions like musculoskeletal disorders.^[123]^[124] Artificial intelligence tools, including chatbots for symptom triage, further reposition patients as active data generators rather than passive recipients, with 2023-2025 pilots showing operational efficiencies such as rapid preliminary assessments and up to 90% alignment in basic categorization tasks.^[125] These systems streamline initial interactions, allowing patients to input vital signs or queries independently, which can enhance self-efficacy in low-acuity scenarios. Yet empirical evidence on broader clinical impacts remains inconclusive, with reviews indicating no clear improvements in health outcomes and potential for algorithmic biases or oversimplification that erode personalized physician-patient rapport.^[126] Technological integration via hospital-at-home protocols exemplifies how remote monitoring blurs inpatient-outpatient boundaries, enabling patients to receive acute care in familiar settings supported by sensors and video oversight. Early implementations have reduced effective hospital stays and associated costs by 38%, with lower complication rates compared to facility-based care, as patients manage daily routines while clinicians intervene virtually.^[127] This model demands heightened patient compliance in self-reporting and home-based protocols, fostering autonomy but exposing vulnerabilities in technology-dependent populations, such as the elderly or those with limited digital literacy.^[128] Overall, these innovations promote patient-centered efficiency yet challenge traditional dynamics by amplifying self-reliance amid evidence of uneven diagnostic fidelity.

Privacy, Data, and Economic Considerations

In the United States, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1996 governs the privacy of protected health information (PHI), granting patients rights to access, amend, and receive notifications about their data usage, yet it does not confer ownership, leaving control primarily with covered entities like providers and insurers.^[129]^[62] This framework has faced persistent challenges from data breaches, with hacking incidents compromising PHI for 170 million patients in 2024 alone, escalating from 6 million in 2010.^[130] In the first half of 2025, 379 large breaches (affecting 500+ individuals) exposed 31 million records, contributing to over 37.5 million affected year-to-date, often via ransomware targeting vulnerabilities in electronic health records (EHRs).^[131]^[132] Despite HIPAA's Security Rule mandating safeguards, enforcement relies on self-reported incidents to the Office for Civil Rights (OCR), and patients retain limited recourse beyond access requests, as data de-identification under HIPAA standards does not fully eliminate re-identification risks in aggregated datasets.^[133] Economic pressures in patient care have intensified through value-based care models promoted by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) since the Affordable Care Act's expansions, shifting reimbursements from fee-for-service to outcome-linked payments that indirectly incentivize patient compliance to achieve metrics like reduced readmissions.^[134] Post-2020 initiatives, including the Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program, adjust payments based on quality domains such as clinical outcomes and patient experience, where non-compliance with treatment plans correlates with penalties up to 2-3% of Medicare reimbursements for underperforming facilities.^[135]^[136] In these models, providers bear financial risk for avoidable costs tied to patient behaviors, such as adherence in chronic disease management, prompting tools like remote monitoring to enforce protocols, though evidence shows mixed efficacy in altering long-term habits without direct patient financial stakes.^[137] National health expenditures reached $5.3 trillion in 2024, an 8.2% increase from 2023's $4.9 trillion, with chronic conditions accounting for 90% of spending due to persistent interventions often amplified by technological adoption.^[138]^[139] The diffusion of medical technologies, including EHRs and diagnostic imaging, contributes 10-40% to expenditure growth, frequently leading to over-medicalization in chronic cases where incremental benefits diminish relative to costs, as randomized trials indicate limited survival gains from aggressive tech-driven therapies in conditions like advanced diabetes or heart failure.^[140]^[141] This dynamic raises causal questions about necessity, as value-based incentives may prioritize volume over evidence-based restraint, exacerbating fiscal burdens without proportional health returns.^[142]

References

[1]
The New Definition and an Explanation of Terms - NCBI - NIH
Patient means an individual who interacts with a clinician either because of real or perceived illness or for health promotion and disease prevention (see p. 18) ...Patient · Community · Partnership · Integrated
[2]
Ancient origins of the term patient | The Psychiatrist | Cambridge Core
Jan 2, 2018 · The word 'patient' comes from the Latin 'patiens', meaning 'one who suffers', from 'patior' meaning 'I am suffering'.
[3]
Do we need a new word for patients? - PMC - NIH
The word “patient” conjures up a vision of quiet suffering, of someone lying patiently in a bed waiting for the doctor to come by and give of his or her skill.
[4]
Definition of outpatient - NCI Dictionary of Cancer Terms
A patient who visits a health care facility for diagnosis or treatment without spending the night. Sometimes called a day patient.
[5]
Take control of your health care (exert your patient autonomy)
May 7, 2018 · Here's a definition from MedicineNet: Patient autonomy: The right of patients to make decisions about their medical care without their ...
[6]
Patient-Centered Care: Definition and Examples - Tulane University
Apr 14, 2024 · In patient-centered care, the patient and the patient's family play an integral part in making decisions about the patient's care and treatment.
[7]
Patient-Focused Drug Development Glossary - FDA
Jun 8, 2018 · Patients are the individuals who directly experience the benefits and harms associated with medical products. Patient advocate: An individual or ...
[8]
Key characteristics of patient complexity and patient ... - NIH
May 9, 2023 · The primary objective of this scoping review is to identify and map what is known about the key characteristics of patient complexity through multiple database ...
[9]
Patient - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
Originating from mid-14c. Old French and Latin patientem, "patient" means enduring suffering calmly and also refers to a medical patient under care.
[10]
patiens - Wiktionary, the free dictionary
suffering, enduring ; allowing, acquiescing, submitting ; patient; long-suffering ...Latin · Participle
[11]
https://www.latin-dictionary.net/definition/29463/patiens-patientis
[12]
patient, adj. & n. meanings, etymology and more
The earliest known use of the word patient is in the Middle English period (1150—1500). OED's earliest evidence for patient is from around 1350, in Apocalypse ...
[13]
-pathy - Etymology & Meaning of the Suffix
From Greek origin -patheia meaning "feeling, suffering, emotion; disorder, disease," it denotes a system or method of treatment or cure.
[14]
Hippocrates of Kos (460-377 BC): The Founder and Pioneer of ...
Oct 1, 2024 · Hippocrates was the first physician in history to establish medicine as a science and to suggest the boundaries of physicians' behavior towards their patients.
[15]
The Impact of Hippocrates on Medicine - Advantis Medical Staffing
Hippocrates also believed that a patient's diet, lifestyle, psychological state, and stress levels all played a part in their health and their ability to ...
[16]
Greek Medicine and the Hippocratic Oath | Intro to Ancient ... - Fiveable
Hippocratic physicians considered the patient's environment, diet, and lifestyle when diagnosing and treating illnesses · They recognized that factors such as ...
[17]
Professionalism: the historical contract - PMC - PubMed Central - NIH
“The modern professions were established in the mid-nineteenth century, when laws governing licensure granted a monopoly over practice, with a clear ...
[18]
The Ethical Foundations of Professionalism: A Sociologic History
The professions are the offspring of the medieval craft guilds. Since the early 19th century, the medical profession in the United States has sought guild ...
[19]
The History of Medical Credentialing: From Ancient Times to Modern ...
Jan 15, 2025 · The modern system of medical credentialing really started taking shape in the 18th and 19th centuries. This was when medicine began to become ...
[20]
The Nuremberg Code–A critique - PMC - NIH
The Nuremberg Code drafted at the end of the Doctor's trial in Nuremberg 1947 has been hailed as a landmark document in medical and research ethics.
[21]
Fifty Years Later: The Significance of the Nuremberg Code
Nov 13, 1997 · The Nuremberg Code focuses on the human rights of research subjects, the Declaration of Helsinki focuses on the obligations of physician- ...
[22]
[PDF] A National Bill of Patients' Rights
Nov 17, 2021 · The most important of all patients' rights, the right to informed consent, was firmly established in. 1972 in a series of court opinions.3 In ...
[23]
A Modern History of Informed Consent and the Role of Key Information
The concept of informed consent has a relatively short history, beginning with a series of 4 judicial decisions in the early 20th century that laid the ...
[24]
Understanding the Patient Experience: A Conceptual Framework
In this article, we use the dictionary definition of patient: “a person receiving or registered to receive medical treatment” (12). However, the additional ...
[25]
Patient, consumer, client, or customer: what do people want to ... - NIH
Oct 28, 2005 · 'Patient' is defined as 'having or showing patience' and as 'an individual awaiting or under medical care and treatment'. To some, the term also ...
[26]
Patient, client, consumer, survivor or other alternatives? A scoping ...
Mar 7, 2019 · Overall, healthcare recipients appear to prefer the term 'patient', with few preferring 'consumer'. Within general clinical and research ...
[27]
The Persistence of Asymmetries in Doctor-Patient Relationships - NIH
Dec 3, 2020 · Despite increased availability of knowledge for patients, asymmetries of power between patients and doctors persist.
[28]
On the remarkable persistence of asymmetry in doctor/patient ...
We suggest that asymmetry lies at the heart of the medical enterprise: it is, in short, founded in what doctors are there for.
[29]
[PDF] Chapter C: Presenting Probabilities - Patient Decision Aids
Research has shown that relative risk presentations (e.g. “30% lower risk”) tend to magnify risk perceptions and decrease understanding, compared to absolute ...
[30]
Placebo response and effect in randomized clinical trials - NIH
Jul 26, 2021 · Approximately half of the overall treatment effect in RCTs seems attributable to contextual effects rather than to the specific effect of treatments.
[31]
Patients vs. customers: the ethics of health care as a business
Mar 3, 2023 · A patient is someone who receives medical treatment or care for an illness or injury. A customer or client, on the other hand, is someone who buys a product or ...<|separator|>
[32]
Patients are not customers. Here's why - MDLinx
Mar 31, 2023 · The term “patient” assumes a sick role, whereas “client” or “customer” doesn't necessarily mean sick, and carries less shame. In my professional opinion, this ...
[33]
Inpatient vs Outpatient Hospital Status | El Centro Regional Medical ...
An inpatient is a hospital patient who, in most cases, stays in the hospital overnight and meets a set of clinical criteria.
[34]
Understanding Inpatient vs. Observation - Novitas Solutions
Aug 8, 2022 · “An inpatient is a person who has been admitted to a hospital for bed occupancy for purposes of receiving inpatient hospital services. Generally ...<|separator|>
[35]
Inpatient vs Outpatient Care: What Is The Difference? | AUC
Aug 18, 2023 · Patients undergoing inpatient care tend to have serious, sometimes life-threatening, conditions. Depending on the severity of their condition, a ...
[36]
Health Care Costs and Affordability - KFF
In the U.S., hospital spending represented close to a third (31.2%) of overall health spending in 2023, and physicians/clinics represented 20.1% of total ...
[37]
Reducing Hospital Readmissions - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf
Jun 7, 2024 · In this article, we will delve into the importance of reducing hospital readmissions, the underlying causes of readmissions, and the strategies used to tackle ...
[38]
Evidence based processes to prevent readmissions: more is better ...
Mar 1, 2021 · The objective of this study was to examine the relationship between the number of evidence-based transitional care processes used and the risk standardized ...
[39]
Choosing Patient Status with Inpatient vs Observation Criteria
Inpatient status refers to formal admission to the hospital, where the patient receives comprehensive medical care and typically stays over two midnights.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[40]
Readmissions, Observation, and the Hospital Readmissions ...
Feb 24, 2016 · We did not find evidence that changes in observation-unit stays accounted for the decrease in readmissions. Hospital readmissions within 30 ...
[41]
What is outpatient care? - Definitive Healthcare
Outpatient care refers to any healthcare consultation, procedure, treatment, or other service that is administered without an overnight stay at a hospital ...
[42]
What is Inpatient vs Outpatient Care? - Cigna Healthcare
Oct 11, 2025 · As an inpatient: You are under the care of doctors, nurses, and other types of health care professionals within a hospital.Missing: criteria | Show results with:criteria
[43]
Top Benefits Of Outpatient Surgery | Ringgold County Hospital
Oct 7, 2022 · Lower treatment cost – An outpatient surgery center can be 45-60% less expensive than treatment at a hospital, yet the quality of the healthcare ...
[44]
How Outpatient Surgery Centers Reduce Infection Risk Compared ...
Outpatient surgery centers have consistently reported lower infection rates compared to traditional hospitals. Here's why: 1. Healthier Patient Population.
[45]
Ambulatory surgery: Health at a Glance 2023 - OECD
Nov 7, 2023 · Over the past few decades, the number of surgical procedures carried out on a same‑day basis has increased markedly in OECD countries. Advances ...
[46]
Population‐based incidence rate of inpatient and outpatient surgical ...
The incidence rate of surgery exceeded 17 480 operations per 100 000 person‐years, and at least 58·5 per cent of all surgery was performed in an outpatient ...
[47]
To charge or not to charge: reducing patient no-show
Aug 8, 2023 · For example, in a systematic review of 105 papers, average no-show rates were 23%, with African studies showing the highest rate (43.0%) and ...
[48]
Evaluating the Impact of Patient No-Shows on Service Quality - NIH
Jun 4, 2020 · Our results show that the no-shows are high due to multiple factors, such as patient behavior, patients' financial situation, environmental factors and ...
[49]
Outpatients and day patients - NHS
If you have an appointment in a hospital or clinic but do not need to stay overnight, it means you're being treated as an outpatient or a day patient.
[50]
What is the difference between an outpatient, a day case and an ...
Day-case – a patient who comes in for a more involved procedure than an outpatient. You may need some recovery time at the hospital, but you should be able to ...
[51]
Day surgery development and practice: key factors for a successful ...
Patients overwhelmingly endorse day surgery, with smaller waiting times, less risk of cancellation, lower rates of infection, and the preference of their own ...
[52]
Day hospital as an alternative to inpatient care for cancer patients
Eligible patients required: a 4- to 8-hour treatment plan, including chemotherapy and other long-term intravenous (i.v.) treatment; a stable cardiovascular ...
[53]
CPOC releases new poll on how perioperative care can help reduce ...
Increasing day surgery could see the number of elective patients requiring an overnight stay in hospital cut by 50%1, freeing up inpatient beds and helping to ...
[54]
Day Case Surgery - Patient Selection
Jan 14, 2024 · Shorter inpatient stays · Reduced risk of hospital acquired infection · Reduced waiting lists · Reduced hospital costs · Reduced demand for ...
[55]
Hospital length of stay, 30-day emergency readmissions and the ...
Apr 22, 2025 · From 2014–5 to 2023–4, extended stays decreased from 53.1% to 42.3% and from 49.2% to 36.5% for colonic surgery and rectal surgery, respectively ...
[56]
Advantages vs. disadvantages of day case surgery. - ResearchGate
The readmission rate within 24 hours was comparable between the two groups: 0.60 per cent for day surgery and 0.64 per cent for those who stayed overnight in ...
[57]
Day Patient - Search the data dictionary - Public Health Scotland
Definition. A day patient is a patient who attends a day hospital on a regular basis. Notes. The emphasis in the definition is on regular attendance.
[58]
Telehealth Systems - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf - NIH
The 3 types of telemedicine services are synchronous, asynchronous, and remote monitoring. Synchronous Telehealth. Synchronous refers to the delivery of health ...
[59]
Reduction of hospital length of stay through the implementation of ...
Jan 8, 2024 · There was a significant reduction in general/digestive surgery patients' LOS by 12.5%.21 Another study described the implementation of both ...
[60]
Patient Rights - AMA Code of Medical Ethics
Patients have rights to courtesy, respect, information, to ask questions, make decisions, privacy, obtain records, second opinions, and continuity of care.Missing: core | Show results with:core
[61]
The Code of Medical Ethics of the American Medical Association - NIH
Its statements protect the rights of the patient and oblige the physician voluntarily to behave in an altruistic manner towards patients. It was modified in the ...
[62]
Individuals' Right under HIPAA to Access their Health Information
May 30, 2025 · The Privacy Rule provides individuals with a legal, enforceable right to see and receive copies upon request of the information in their medical and other ...Missing: discrimination | Show results with:discrimination
[63]
Patient Rights Under HIPAA - Updated for 2025
Apr 29, 2025 · Patient rights under HIPAA include the right to access their health information, request corrections, and receive a notice of privacy ...
[64]
Nondiscrimination in Health Programs and Activities - Federal Register
May 6, 2024 · Section 1557 prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, age, or disability in certain health programs and activities.
[65]
Patient Rights and Ethics - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf
May 6, 2024 · Patient rights are a subset of human rights, derived from ethical principles, and include valuing dignity, preserving life, and avoiding harm.
[66]
Rural Health Disparities Overview
Sep 24, 2025 · Rural risk factors for health disparities include geographic isolation, lower socioeconomic status, higher rates of health risk behaviors, limited access to ...Resources · Funding & Opportunities · Organizations · Events
[67]
ACCESS TO HEALTHCARE AND DISPARITIES IN ACCESS - NCBI
Measures of access to care tracked in the National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report (NHQDR) include having health insurance, having a usual source of ...<|separator|>
[68]
Schoendorff v. Society of New York Hosp., 105 N.E. 92, 93 (N.Y. 1914)
Consent and Informed Consent · Basic right to consent to medical care - Schoendorff v. Society of New York Hosp., 105 N.E. 92, 93 (N.Y. 1914).
[69]
The reality of informed consent: empirical studies on patient ... - NIH
Jan 14, 2021 · Research on patients' comprehension of an informed consent's basic components shows that their level of understanding is limited.
[70]
Participants' understanding of informed consent in clinical trials
Jan 2, 2024 · This updated meta-analysis aimed to estimate the proportion of participants in clinical trials who understand the different informed consent ...
[71]
Therapeutic privilege - PMC - NIH
[9] No guidelines exist for implementing therapeutic privilege; however, the courts have noted two additional exceptions to informed consent.[8] The first ...
[72]
Systematic review of the effects of shared decision-making on ...
Five RCTs showed no difference between SDM and control, one RCT showed no short-term effects but showed positive longer-term effects, and five RCTs reported a ...
[73]
Shared Decision Making | Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and ...
Nov 1, 2012 · SDM has been demonstrated to result in greater patient knowledge, decisional satisfaction, and value-concordant decision making. SDM may ...
[74]
1.1.1 Patient-Physician Relationships - AMA Policy Finder
A patient-physician relationship exists when a physician serves a patient's medical needs. Generally, the relationship is entered into by mutual consent.Missing: contract | Show results with:contract
[75]
Patient-Physician Relationships - AMA Code of Medical Ethics
The relationship between a patient and a physician is based on trust, which gives rise to physicians' ethical responsibility to place patients' welfare above ...
[76]
Causes, Impacts, and Solutions of Medication Non Compliance
Mar 13, 2023 · This non-adherence has been linked to 30-50% of chronic disease treatment failures and 125,000 annual deaths in the United States. However, the ...<|separator|>
[77]
Medication Nonadherence Increases Health Costs, Hospital ...
Nov 20, 2018 · ... annually that may range as high as $300 billion in potentially avoidable spending. Nonadherence in the United States is associated with ...
[78]
The role of integrated medical and prescription drug plans in ...
Feb 24, 2022 · In 2012 alone, nonadherence was estimated to cost the health care system between $100 billion and $300 billion.<|separator|>
[79]
The Unmet Challenge of Medication Nonadherence - PMC - NIH
Jul 5, 2018 · Yet when this fails, as it does 40% to 50% of the time, it is seen solely as a patient issue, rather than a system or clinician responsibility.
[80]
American College of Physicians Ethics Manual: Seventh Edition
The physician should not release a patient's personal medical information (often termed a “privileged communication”) without that patient's consent. The ...
[81]
https://www.paho.org/sites/default/files/WHO-Adherence-Long-Term-Therapies-Eng-2003.pdf
[82]
Medication Adherence: Taking Your Meds as Directed
Jan 18, 2024 · For instance, not keeping blood pressure in check can lead to heart disease, stroke and kidney failure. Poor medication adherence takes the ...
[83]
Association Between Adherence to Pharmacotherapy and ...
Aug 11, 2017 · This meta-analysis found that individuals with good adherence had a significant 10% lower rate of hospitalization events and a significant 28% ...Research Design And Methods · Results · Conclusions
[84]
CDC Grand Rounds: Improving Medication Adherence for Chronic ...
Nov 17, 2017 · Adherence to prescribed medications is associated with improved clinical outcomes for chronic disease management and reduced mortality from chronic conditions.
[85]
Enhancing Therapy Adherence: Impact on Clinical Outcomes ... - NIH
Jan 17, 2025 · This review highlights the profound influence of adherence on clinical outcomes, healthcare costs, and patient quality of life.
[86]
a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies - PMC - NIH
Mar 3, 2025 · The study found that poor adherence to AHT significantly increases overall and cardiovascular mortality risk, underscoring the need for improved compliance ...
[87]
Medication Adherence and the Risk of Cardiovascular Mortality and ...
Jan 25, 2016 · A meta-analysis reported that patients adherent to antihypertensive medications showed better blood pressure control, compared with those who ...
[88]
Impact of poor medication adherence on clinical outcomes and ...
Poor adherence was also significantly associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular events (HR: 1.1–1.9) and mortality (HR: 1.4–1.8) in patients with ...
[89]
Demographic, socioeconomic, and psychological factors related to ...
Objectives: To explore the relative contributions of demographic, socioeconomic, and psychological factors to medication non-adherence in an ED population.
[90]
Demographic, Socioeconomic, and Psychological Factors Related ...
Objectives: To explore the relative contributions of demographic, socioeconomic, and psychological factors to medication non-adherence in an ED population.
[91]
Doctor-Patient Relationship: Theoretical Models & Clinical Reality
The paternalistic, Priestly Model of the doctor-patient relationship remained dominant from the time of Hippocrates (4th century B.C.) until the 1970s when ...
[92]
The evolution of the doctor-patient relationship - PubMed
The doctor-patient relationship shifted from a paternalistic model where doctors made decisions, to a patient-centered model with more patient control and ...
[93]
The evolution of the doctor-patient relationship | Medical Economics
Sep 28, 2023 · For most of the first half of the 20th century, doctors, mostly White men, were instructed to display an attitude of benevolent paternalism as ...<|separator|>
[94]
Emergency department triage: an ethical analysis
Oct 7, 2011 · The triage officer takes the decision without consent of the patient which can be regarded as the paternalistic approach of decision making. A ...
[95]
Culture of paternalism in the emergency department: a critical ... - NIH
Aug 12, 2025 · This study highlights the persistence of a paternalistic culture in the emergency department, which compromises ethically grounded, patient- ...
[96]
Selective Paternalism - AMA Journal of Ethics
Paternalism—choosing a course of action in the patient's best interest but without the patient's consent—serves as an integral value in ethical decision making ...
[97]
Shared Decision‐making in the Emergency Department: Respecting ...
Jun 25, 2015 · An emergency clinician, for example, might start with a paternalistic model of decision-making when obtaining initial low-risk, ...
[98]
Medical decision making: Paternalism versus patient-centered ...
Aug 6, 2025 · Medical literature has increasingly emphasized the need to observe patients' autonomy; however, not all experts agree with this principle.<|separator|>
[99]
20 years after the start of international Shared Decision-Making ...
We look back on forty years of interest in a rather simple idea: a call to involve people in their individual healthcare decisions.
[100]
Shared decision-making as a method of care - PMC - PubMed Central
Dec 2, 2022 · Shared decision-making (SDM) has been traditionally defined as a collaborative approach by which, in partnership with their clinician, patients are encouraged ...Missing: elective | Show results with:elective
[101]
Four models of the physician-patient relationship - PubMed
Authors. E J Emanuel , L L Emanuel. Affiliation. 1 Division of Cancer ... Decision Making; Disclosure; Female; Humans; Male; Models, Psychological*; Moral ...
[102]
Measuring the quality of patient-centered care - NIH
Patient-centered care is responsive to patients' values and needs and patient preferences guide decision-making. The IOM endorsed six dimensions of patient- ...
[103]
Six Domains of Healthcare Quality - AHRQ
Patient-centered: Providing care that is respectful of and responsive to individual patient ... Institute of Medicine (IOM). Crossing the Quality Chasm: A ...
[104]
How the Affordable Care Act Will Strengthen the Nation's Primary ...
Several provisions in the new reform law seek to strengthen the primary care system by encouraging the widespread adoption of patient-centered medical home ( ...
[105]
Shared decision-making and choice for elective surgical care
SDM reduces decision conflict and improves decision quality for patients making choices about elective surgery.
[106]
Shared decision making in surgery: A scoping review of the literature
Jul 22, 2020 · SDM in surgery decreases decisional conflict, anxiety and surgical intervention rates, while increasing knowledge retained decisional satisfaction, quality and ...
[107]
Where is the evidence? A systematic review of shared decision ...
In total, fifty-four percent of affective-cognitive outcomes were positively associated with SDM, compared to 37% of behavioral, and 25% of health patient ...
[108]
Shared decision making with breast cancer patients – does it work ...
Feb 3, 2024 · Engaging patients in decision making led to less patient-reported decisional conflict without increased fear of cancer recurrence or decision ...
[109]
A literature-based study of patient-centered care and communication ...
Sep 3, 2021 · Limitations in nursing staff, coupled with a high workload, led to fewer interactions between nurses, patients, and caregivers. Similarly, ...Missing: drain | Show results with:drain
[110]
Challenges of Research on Person-Centered Care in General Practice
Limitations are related to the variability in the definition of patient centered care, the outcome measures used, the lack of detail about the actual ...
[111]
Does Defensive Medicine 'Work'? | Harvard Medical School
Nov 4, 2015 · Defensive medicine is estimated to cost the U.S. as much as $50 billion annually.
[112]
The Cost of Defensive Medicine on 3 Hospital Medicine Services
Sep 15, 2014 · ... defensive medicine, is estimated to cost $46 billion annually in the United States, but these costs have been measured only indirectly. We ...
[113]
The Pitfalls of Overtreatment: Why More Care is not Necessarily ...
Aug 19, 2020 · This paper discusses a number of ethical and practical issues arising from overtreatment that doctors and patients should be aware of.
[114]
Essential Advance Care Planning Intervention Features in Low ...
Older adults with low socioeconomic status (SES) participate in advance care planning (ACP) at lower rates than those with higher SES.<|control11|><|separator|>
[115]
Technology access, use, socioeconomic status, and healthcare ...
May 27, 2025 · Individuals with lower SES are more likely to have lower health literacy levels, which can hinder their utilization of healthcare technology.
[116]
Socioeconomic Status and Access to Healthcare - PubMed Central
Jun 18, 2020 · In a variety of contexts, lower SES is associated with reduced access to care, poorer health outcomes, and increased mortality and morbidity as ...
[117]
Is Patient-Centered Care the Same As Person-Focused Care? - NIH
Costs were reduced primarily by reducing hospitalizations and Emergency Department visits. In the studies by Reid et al, specialist visits unexpectedly ...
[118]
Inevitable challenges of autonomy: ethical concerns in personalized ...
Oct 3, 2024 · This article examines these concerns and argues that algorithmic decision-making presents several challenges to user autonomy that are difficult to eliminate.
[119]
(PDF) Does Patient-Centered Care Pay Off? - ResearchGate
Aug 7, 2025 · Hospital units that were more patient centered were associated with statistically significantly better outcomes and higher costs than those that were less ...<|separator|>
[120]
Individual Empowerment, Institutional Confidence, and Vaccination ...
Apr 20, 2023 · By then, vaccine hesitancy—the reluctance or refusal to vaccinate despite the availability of vaccines—had been on WHO's radar for about a ...
[121]
Original article The importance of the patient voice in vaccination ...
Dec 1, 2016 · The public perceives risk differently from experts, and these differences may contribute to increasing vaccine hesitancy. Healthcare ...
[122]
The State of Telehealth Before and After the COVID-19 Pandemic
A national study including 36 million working-age individuals with private insurance claims data showed that telemedicine encounters increased 766% in the first ...
[123]
Diagnostic Concordance of Telemedicine as Compared With Face ...
We observed 74% (77/104) diagnostic concordance and 79.8% (83/104) concordance in the treatment plan between the in-person and remote doctors. No significant ...
[124]
Telemedicine and the Challenge of Diagnostic Accuracy
Jun 23, 2022 · Telemedicine can increase diagnostic errors due to less complete observation, overreliance on technology, and less interaction with other ...
[125]
The Truth About AI Pilot Projects in Healthcare: What No One Tells ...
Jul 6, 2025 · ... AI pilot goals are often set so low that they guarantee success. One hospital claimed its AI triage chatbot had a “90% match rate.” But what ...
[126]
Chatbots in Health Care: Connecting Patients to Information - NCBI
The evidence to support the effectiveness of AI chatbots to change clinical outcomes remains unclear. Chatbots cannot provide health care on their own. They ...Missing: 2023-2025 | Show results with:2023-2025
[127]
Home hospital model reduces costs by 38%, study says
Dec 16, 2019 · They found that for patients who received care at home, total costs were 38 percent lower than for control patients. Home hospital patients had ...
[128]
Hospital at home: emergence of a high-value model of care delivery
Mar 17, 2023 · Conclusions. The median length of stay and the rate of readmissions were lower in people under HaH care. Compared with patients in a hospital ...
[129]
Summary of the HIPAA Privacy Rule - HHS.gov
Mar 14, 2025 · This is a summary of key elements of the Privacy Rule including who is covered, what information is protected, and how protected health information can be used ...Missing: discrimination | Show results with:discrimination
[130]
Ransomware Attacks and Data Breaches in US Health Care Systems
May 14, 2025 · The number of patient records affected by PHI data breaches increased from 6 million in 2010 to 170 million in 2024, with hacking or IT ...<|separator|>
[131]
Biggest Healthcare Data Breaches in H1 2025 - The HIPAA Guide
Jul 17, 2025 · In H1 2025, 379 large healthcare data breaches were reported to OCR, and 31,052,837 individuals had their protected health information exposed ...
[132]
What 2025 Healthcare Data Breaches & Biggest of All Time Reveal ...
Oct 1, 2025 · Over 37.5 million individuals have been affected by healthcare breaches YTD. Healthcare breaches in 2025 have affected 76,000 individuals per ...
[133]
Who owns (or controls) health data? | Scientific Data - Nature
Feb 1, 2024 · It is worth reiterating that de-identification of health data, as is performed to comply with HIPAA, does not necessarily render the data non- ...
[134]
CMS' Value-Based Programs
Sep 25, 2024 · Value-based programs reward health care providers with incentive payments for the quality of care they give to people with Medicare.Other Value-Based Programs · Hospital Value · Hosp. Readmission ReductionMissing: post- | Show results with:post-
[135]
The Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program - CMS
Sep 10, 2024 · The Hospital VBP Program rewards acute care hospitals with incentive payments for the quality of care provided in the inpatient hospital setting.Other Value-Based Programs · Notice · Hospital Quality InitiativeMissing: post- | Show results with:post-
[136]
CMS Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Program Results for Fiscal ...
Oct 29, 2019 · Due to the Hospital VBP Program, the highest performing hospital in FY 2020 will receive a net increase in payments of 2.93 percent, and the ...Missing: compliance | Show results with:compliance
[137]
Pay-for-Performance and Value-Based Care - StatPearls - NCBI - NIH
May 2, 2024 · Value-based care is one of the many alternative payment models to the traditional fee-for-service model, which is still more profitable and less ...
[138]
National Health Expenditure Projections, 2024–33
Jun 25, 2025 · National health spending is projected to have increased by 8.2 percent in 2024, reaching $5.3 trillion (exhibit 1). This follows 7.5 percent ...Abstract · Outlook For Spending And... · Outlook For Major Services...
[139]
Fast Facts: Health and Economic Costs of Chronic Conditions - CDC
Aug 8, 2025 · Ninety percent of the nation's $4.9 trillion in annual health care expenditures are for people with chronic and mental health conditions.12 ...
[140]
The Diffusion of New Technology: Costs and Benefits to Health Care
Empirical evidence from these types of studies suggests that medical technology accounts for about 10 to 40 percent of the increase in health care expenditures ...
[141]
The Medicalization of Chronic Disease and Costs - Annual Reviews
Apr 21, 2012 · U.S. health care spending has increased dramatically in the past several decades, consuming 17.6% percent ($2.6 trillion) of GDP in 2010.Missing: over- | Show results with:over-
[142]
Payment Reform for Better Value and Medical Innovation - NAM
These models aim to incentivize providers to keep their patients healthy, and to treat those with acute or chronic conditions with cost-effective, evidence- ...<|separator|>