Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Eight Men Out

Eight Men Out is a 1988 American historical drama film written and directed by John Sayles, adapting Eliot Asinof's 1963 nonfiction book of the same name, which recounts the 1919 Black Sox scandal in Major League Baseball. The film portrays how eight players from the Chicago White Sox, resentful of low salaries and mistreatment by team owner Charles Comiskey, conspired with gamblers to intentionally lose the World Series against the Cincinnati Reds. Despite their acquittal in a 1921 trial due to lack of evidence, all eight players—Chick Gandil, Eddie Cicotte, Shoeless Joe Jackson, Buck Weaver, Fred McMullin, Claude "Lefty" Williams, Arnold "Chick" Gandil, and Swede Risberg—were banned for life from organized baseball by Commissioner Kenesaw Mountain Landis to restore public trust in the sport. Sayles' adaptation emphasizes the players' economic grievances and the predatory role of gamblers, while critiquing the systemic exploitation in early professional baseball, though Asinof's source material has faced scrutiny for relying on unverified interviews and potentially invented details. The movie features a ensemble cast including John Cusack as Weaver, Charlie Sheen as Cicotte, and D.B. Sweeney as Jackson, and received acclaim for its faithful depiction of the era's labor tensions and moral ambiguities, earning Sayles an Academy Award nomination for Best Adapted Screenplay.

Historical Context

The 1919 Black Sox Scandal

The 1919 centered on a conspiracy by eight Chicago players to fix the against the , driven by individual financial grievances amid baseball's entrenched gambling culture. First baseman initiated contact with gamblers in mid-1919, leveraging his connections from prior minor league associations, as players faced stagnant salaries under owner —averaging around $5,000 annually for stars despite the team's dominance—and personal debts from betting losses common in the , where wagering permeated clubhouses and fix attempts dated back decades. The plot coalesced in meetings with underworld figures, including Boston bookmaker Joseph "Sport" Sullivan and intermediaries like , with racketeer later identified in probes as the primary financier backing large wagers on . The best-of-nine World Series began on October 1, 1919, at Redland Field in Cincinnati, where the favored White Sox—winners of the American League by 3½ games—exhibited glaring underperformance from the outset. In Game 1, pitcher Eddie Cicotte, who had received a reported $10,000 bribe, hit Reds leadoff batter Morrie Rath with his first pitch before surrendering five runs in four innings, securing a 9-1 Reds victory amid whispers among spectators of irregularities. Lefty Williams followed in Game 2 on October 2, yielding four runs early in a 4-2 loss despite Chicago's offensive potential. The Sox rebounded to win Games 3-5 in Chicago (October 6-8), narrowing the deficit, but the fix allegedly resumed with losses in Games 6-8 (October 10 and 11 in Cincinnati, plus Game 7 on October 9), including Jackson's subpar fielding and Risberg's errant throws, culminating in a 5-3 Reds series win on October 13—though not every implicated player consistently underperformed, as evidenced by Jackson's .375 batting average. Bribe distributions varied, with most players receiving $5,000 to $10,000 post-agreement, though some like Gandil claimed higher cuts and later disputes arose over non-payments, underscoring the scheme's reliance on personal greed over team loyalty. Rumors of the fix surfaced immediately among gamblers but gained public traction in September 1920 via North American exposés detailing player-gambler ties. On , 1920, Cicotte confessed before a Cook County , admitting to accepting $10,000 and intentionally sabotaging games, followed by Williams and Jackson's testimonies corroborating the plot involving pitchers Cicotte and Williams, infielders Gandil, Risberg, and McMullin, outfielders Jackson and Felsch, and shortstop —who knew but did not fully participate in throwing games. Indictments followed on October 29, 1920, charging nine players and five gamblers with conspiracy to defraud. The July 1921 trial in ended in for all defendants on August 2, 1921, after jurors reportedly deliberated briefly following defense arguments of and stolen grand jury confessions—later traced to a prosecutor's briefcase theft—highlighting procedural lapses rather than exoneration of intent. The next day, August 3, 1921, newly appointed commissioner issued lifetime bans against the eight players, declaring, "Regardless of the verdict of juries, no player who throws a ballgame...will ever play ," prioritizing the sport's integrity over legal outcomes amid evidence of deliberate underperformance rooted in individual choices for illicit gain. This action, drawn from records and player admissions, severed their MLB eligibility despite the acquittal, reflecting causal for actions that eroded public trust in 's competitive purity.

Motivations and Player Responsibilities

The primary motivations for the eight Chicago White Sox players' involvement in the 1919 World Series fix stemmed from personal greed and entrenched habits rather than systemic underpayment or exploitation. First baseman , a known associate of gamblers, initiated contact with Boston bookmaker Joseph "Sport" Sullivan on September 18, 1919, at the Hotel Buckminster in , proposing to assemble a group of players willing to lose games for payments totaling up to $100,000 from betting syndicates. Gandil's actions reflected his own financial pressures from high-stakes losses accumulated during the season, a pattern common among several implicated players who frequented illicit betting circles in and on road trips. Player salaries undermine claims of poverty-driven desperation as a causal factor. earned $6,000 in 1919, exceeding the major league average of $3,423, while received $8,000 including bonuses—among the higher figures for pitchers. The White Sox overall payroll averaged $3,713 per player, above league norms, and ranked third in the at approximately $88,000, countering narratives of owner Charles Comiskey's parsimony as the root cause. analyses emphasize that while restrictions limited bargaining power, players like Cicotte and Jackson had viable alternatives such as holdouts or jumping to , choices they forwent in favor of the fix despite awareness of baseball's informal bans on associations. Individual agency was evident in the players' voluntary participation and inconsistent execution, often attributed to internal conflicts like or fear of detection rather than external . Cicotte, after pitching effectively early in the Series, accepted a $10,000 bribe delivered under his hotel pillow on October 1, 1919, before Game One, then intentionally hit Reds leadoff batter Morrie Rath with his first pitch as a prearranged signal—actions he later confessed to under oath on September 28, 1920, before the Cook County . Jackson, despite confessing to receiving $5,000 and batting .375 (12-for-32 with six RBIs and the Sox's sole ) across eight games, exhibited performance swings suggesting half-hearted commitment, fueling ongoing historical debate over his intent versus opportunistic involvement. Pre-commissioner era laxity in gambling enforcement enabled such schemes but did not absolve player responsibility, as baseball's unwritten code against betting on games was well-known since the , with prior ejections like that of Joe Gedeon in 1919 for wagering on his own team. The players' decisions, amid a culture of pervasive but not universal betting, prioritized short-term gains over professional integrity and team loyalty, as evidenced by their failure to report overtures despite Comiskey's $20,000 reward offer for whistleblowers announced post-Season. This underscores causal primacy of individual failings—gambling addiction and moral lapse—over structural excuses, with scholarship rejecting poverty myths in favor of documented personal debts and syndicate enticements as drivers.

Film Overview

Plot Summary

The film opens in 1919 with the , winners of the pennant, harboring deep resentment toward owner for his miserly treatment, including withholding bonuses and paying subpar salaries despite their dominance. , resentful and opportunistic, connects with gamblers who propose fixing the upcoming against the for substantial payoffs, recruiting a core group of players including pitcher , outfielder "Shoeless" Joe Jackson, and others, while third baseman becomes aware but chooses not to participate actively or report it. The ensemble portrays the players' internal conflicts, with some like Cicotte motivated by denied incentives—such as his forfeited $10,000 bonus for reaching 30 wins—and others driven by financial desperation amid divided loyalties to the game, teammates, and easy money. As the unfolds, the fix manifests in deliberate underperformance: Cicotte intentionally hits batter in Game One, contributing to early losses in Games 1, 2, and 4, interspersed with suspicious wins like Game 3 using an uninvolved pitcher and Cicotte's conflicted victory in Game 7 after pleading for a fair shot. Jackson, torn by guilt, delivers a standout yet fields errors amid the scheme, while threats from gamblers ensure compliance in the decisive Game 8, sealing the Sox's defeat. Post-series, sportswriter notes irregularities and rumors, fueling suspicions that erupt into a grand jury investigation, where confessions from players like Cicotte expose the bribes. The narrative culminates in a where the eight implicated players, including Weaver and Jackson, face charges but secure not-guilty verdicts due to lack of tying them to gamblers. However, newly appointed Judge Kennesaw Mountain Landis imposes lifetime bans on all eight, effectively ending their careers and tarnishing the sport's integrity. In a poignant scene, a boy implores Jackson with the plea, "Say it ain't so, Joe," underscoring the scandal's cultural impact on public faith in .

Cast and Characters

The principal cast of Eight Men Out (1988) portrays the Chicago White Sox players implicated in the scandal, along with gamblers, team officials, and journalists, emphasizing archetypes of opportunism, reluctance, and exploitation to underscore themes of economic disparity and ethical erosion in early . These roles depict a spectrum of involvement: Gandil as a primary instigator motivated by , contrasted with figures like Cicotte and Williams as hesitant participants compelled by grievances over pay and job insecurity. Antagonistic characters, such as (Michael Lerner), embody external predatory influences from gambling syndicates. Supporting ensemble members, including as team owner and as sportswriter , highlight institutional authority and media scrutiny, reinforcing the film's portrayal of systemic pressures on players.

Production

Development and Source Material

The film Eight Men Out is based on Eliot Asinof's 1963 book Eight Men Out: The Black Sox and the , which drew on interviews with surviving players, gamblers, and witnesses to reconstruct the scandal, though later scholarly analysis identified numerous factual errors, unsubstantiated claims, and fabrications in Asinof's narrative, including invented dialogue and misrepresented timelines. , adapting the material into a , first drafted a version in the mid-1970s as a writing sample before establishing his career, which included credits for low-budget films like (1978) under producer . Building on his independent directing experience with (1984), Sayles revised the script to emphasize the players' socioeconomic grievances and the era's labor dynamics, completing the production-ready adaptation by the mid-1980s. Production commenced in 1987 with a budget of $6.1 million, funded through independent sources after initial interest from studios like waned due to the project's niche historical focus and potential sensitivities around depicting Baseball's formative scandal. Sayles' approach prioritized fidelity to primary accounts over commercial gloss, avoiding reliance on league-sanctioned narratives amid baseball's long-standing institutional aversion to revisiting the Black Sox events in unflattering detail, which had prompted legal and promotional hurdles in prior media treatments. This self-financed model allowed Sayles to retain creative control, marking his expansion into period sports drama following labor-themed works like (1987).

Filming and Technical Aspects

Principal photography for Eight Men Out occurred over eight weeks in 1988, with baseball sequences filmed primarily at in , , doubling as . Additional locations included Cincinnati's district and Latonia, , to capture urban and period-specific environments. Cinematographer Robert Richardson utilized natural lighting to evoke a gritty, era-appropriate , employing consistent backlighting for crowd stands and adapting to variable conditions such as blue skies, slight overcast, or poorer weather to maintain visual without artificial supplementation. The production relied on storyboards for coverage and flexible choices (e.g., 50mm or 100mm) based on extra availability, with a predominant except for select two-camera shots like double plays. Mason Daring composed the score, featuring original cues that complemented the post-World War I setting through instrumental tracks emphasizing tension and period mood, such as piano-driven pieces and ensemble arrangements. Set and prioritized working-class 1919 aesthetics, with actors in heavy wool uniforms, clunky wooden bats, and pincushion-style gloves to reflect early equipment limitations; interiors incorporated details like sets while rigorously excluding anachronistic modern items such as digital watches. Gameplay footage demanded up to 1,000 extras to populate stands simulating crowds, with choreography challenges including over 90 setups in a single day to match historical box scores and replicate realistic plays—such as a genuine triple hit by actor —while ensuring seamless integration of "fixed" elements without overt artificiality.

Accuracy and Controversies

Deviations from Historical Events

The film Eight Men Out prominently depicts Chicago White Sox owner Charles Comiskey as miserly, including scenes of withheld bonuses—such as Eddie Cicotte's promised $10,000 for 30 wins—and reduced World Series shares, framing these as primary grievances driving the fix. However, 1919 payroll records reveal the White Sox as the highest-paid team in the majors, with Cicotte earning $7,000 (plus a $3,000 ), pitcher Lefty Williams at $6,000, and outfielder at $7,000, salaries exceeding or matching those of American League stars like ($10,000) and ($7,000). This portrayal inverts historical wage data, which indicate competitive compensation amid the reserve clause's constraints, while downplaying players' documented losses—estimated in thousands for figures like Cicotte—to gamblers as a key causal factor in their vulnerability to bribes. Shoeless Joe Jackson is shown in the film as reluctantly drawn into the conspiracy, batting .375 in the Series with heroic efforts to play clean despite internal conflict, suggesting minimal culpability. In contrast, Jackson's September 28, , grand jury testimony explicitly admitted accepting $5,000 from conspirators (part of a promised $20,000), conversing with fix participants, and underperforming in key moments, such as a critical error in Game 4; subsequent analysis of his Series stats shows anomalies like poor baserunning and fielding despite hits. The film's compression of the timeline—implying early post-Series confessions and exposures—deviates from records, as indictments and admissions surfaced nearly a year later in , after investigative delays and player reticence. Several scenes incorporate fictional elements absent from contemporary accounts or trial evidence, including a courtroom testimony by Comiskey defending his actions in ways not recorded in the 1921 proceedings, and a poignant confrontation where children accost Jackson with "Say it ain't so, Joe," a phrase first publicized years later without primary sourcing. SABR research identifies these as dramatizations derived from Eliot Asinof's source book, which conflated unverified anecdotes with facts, omitting evidence of player-initiated contacts with gamblers predating Comiskey's alleged slights. Such alterations prioritize narrative sympathy for the players over chronological fidelity, as grand jury minutes and affidavits contain no equivalents.

Criticisms of Narrative Bias

The film Eight Men Out, directed by , has been criticized for framing the Black Sox players primarily as victims of owner exploitation, particularly through narratives of inadequate salaries under , which downplays the players' personal agency and moral culpability in accepting bribes. In 1919, the had the American League's highest team payroll at $88,461, with an average player salary of $3,713—above the major league average of $3,423—and several implicated players like earning $8,500 annually, equivalent to roughly $150,000 in 2023 dollars when adjusted for inflation and . Critics argue this portrayal aligns with a class-warfare lens that overlooks the players' voluntary participation in the fix, driven by greed rather than destitution, as evidenced by their demands for sums ranging from $5,000 to $10,000 per player from gamblers—far exceeding typical bonuses—while the , though restrictive, did not preclude holdouts or negotiations by stars like Jackson. The film's reliance on Eliot Asinof's 1963 book Eight Men Out amplifies these issues, as Asinof's work has been exposed for factual inaccuracies and ideological slant, including fabrications of non-witness accounts and an anti-capitalist perspective shaped by the author's communist affiliations in the 1930s. Asinof admitted to inventing details to fit his of systemic , such as attributing motivations and dialogues he could not have verified, which Nathan's 2003 in Saying It's So critiques as prioritizing dramatic sympathy over rigorous history, influencing Sayles' to emphasize owner villainy over player . This bias manifests in the film's minimization of evidence like confessions from and others, who detailed premeditated betrayal for financial gain, framing the instead as a proletarian revolt against baseball's "bosses." Alternative interpretations counter the film's victimhood arc by highlighting the 1921 trial acquittal as procedural—stemming from , evidentiary disputes over coerced confessions, and anti-establishment sentiment—rather than proof of innocence, with admissions of guilt later recanted under pressure. Commissioner ' lifetime ban of the eight players, despite the verdict, was essential to restore public trust in baseball's integrity, as the scandal had eroded fan confidence amid widespread gambling infiltration; Landis prioritized the game's long-term viability over legal technicalities, a decision substantiated by subsequent decades of scandal-free growth under his iron-fisted oversight.

Reception

Critical and Commercial Response

Eight Men Out premiered in limited release on September 2, 1988, and grossed $5,680,515 domestically, underperforming relative to its $6.1 million budget and reflecting its independent status. The film's modest theatrical were attributed to in a crowded fall market and limited marketing as an indie release. Critics delivered mixed-to-positive reviews, with an 87% approval rating on based on 54 assessments, praising the ensemble cast's authenticity and the film's detailed recreation of early 20th-century baseball milieu. Reviewers highlighted strong performances, particularly from as and as , and commended director for illuminating the socioeconomic pressures behind the scandal without overt moralizing. However, some faulted the narrative's deliberate pacing and perceived predictability, with awarding it two out of four stars and describing it as "an oddly unfocused movie made of earth tones, sidelong glances and elliptic conversations." Audience reception leaned positive among enthusiasts, who appreciated the film's historical fidelity and ensemble-driven storytelling, contributing to a through in the late and . The picture's emphasis on player exploitation resonated with fans, though its niche appeal limited broader commercial traction initially.

Accolades and Long-Term Recognition

The film received a nomination for the USC Scripter Award in 1990 for ' screenplay adaptation from Eliot Asinof's book. It garnered no nominations at the , despite its dramatization of a pivotal historical event in American sports. In 2008, the film's release earned a nomination for the Satellite Award in the Best DVD Extras category, recognizing supplemental materials that contextualized the . The has cataloged Eight Men Out as a significant entry in its database of American films, preserving details of its production and release on September 2, 1988. Retrospective discussions marked the film's 30th anniversary in 2018, with publications examining its role in sustaining interest in the fix amid broader '80s cultural outputs. For the 35th anniversary in 2023, commentators praised its fidelity to historical figures like , distinguishing it from more fictionalized treatments. Sustained availability through home media editions, including a 20th anniversary DVD, and digital streaming on platforms such as has supported ongoing viewership.

Legacy

Influence on Baseball Culture

The film Eight Men Out reinforced a sympathetic portrayal of the implicated players as underpaid laborers exploited by ownership, shaping public perceptions of the scandal as a product of systemic inequities rather than individual moral failings. This narrative, drawn from Eliot Asinof's book of the same name, emphasized low salaries under —averaging around $5,000 annually for stars like in —as a primary causal factor in the fixing, despite evidence that players received competitive pay relative to era standards and actively sought bribes from gamblers. Such framing influenced subsequent historiography, prompting defenses of the players in popular works while downplaying their documented confessions and performance anomalies, like Jackson's .375 marred by critical errors in key games. A pivotal cultural imprint was the film's dramatization of the apocryphal ", Joe" exchange, depicted as a young boy confronting Jackson outside a , which cemented the phrase in as emblematic of betrayed . Though no contemporary records confirm the incident—first reported anecdotally in 1942 by sportswriter —the scene's emotional resonance amplified Jackson's folk-hero status, inspiring references in later documentaries and that romanticize his .356 average and banishment as disproportionate punishment. This mythos has endured, influencing fan campaigns for Jackson's Hall of Fame eligibility, yet rigorous analysis reveals it as fabricated sentimentality obscuring the players' agency in a that netted them $5,000 to $10,000 each from gamblers. The film's release spurred renewed scholarly scrutiny of early baseball labor dynamics, evidenced by the ()'s "Eight Myths Out" project launched in 2019, which cataloged over 30 factual distortions in Asinof's account and its adaptation, including overstated owner parsimony and understated player complicity. These critiques highlighted causal accountability: while reserve clauses stifled mobility, the fix stemmed from voluntary pacts with underworld figures like , not inevitable desperation, fostering debates in analytics circles on ethics over victimhood. Director ' low-budget, ensemble-driven approach—produced for $5.4 million without major studio backing—modeled independent filmmaking for sports dramas, prioritizing historical texture over spectacle and influencing later works like Moneyball (2011) in blending with on-field drama. In baseball culture, Eight Men Out indirectly elevated discussions of personal responsibility amid institutional pressures, countering its own sympathetic leanings by galvanizing evidence-based reassessments that prioritize players' choices—such as Eddie Cicotte's premeditated signal to gamblers—over socioeconomic excuses. This tension persists in fan and academic discourse, where the scandal's legacy underscores baseball's self-imposed integrity standards, including Commissioner Kenesaw Mountain Landis's 1921 lifetime bans, as bulwarks against rather than overreach.

Modern Parallels and Reassessments

The film's portrayal of the 1919 Black Sox scandal has drawn parallels to later eras of baseball corruption, particularly gambling violations exemplified by Pete Rose's lifetime ban in 1989 for betting on games while managing the Cincinnati Reds. Rose's case, involving undisclosed wagers totaling thousands of dollars, echoed the White Sox players' acceptance of bribes, though investigations found no evidence he influenced outcomes directly, unlike the fixed series depicted in Eight Men Out. In May 2025, MLB Commissioner Rob Manfred reinstated Rose, Shoeless Joe Jackson, and 14 other deceased players from the ineligible list, citing the passage of time and their inability to benefit from reversal, thereby reopening debates on permanent bans for ethical lapses. This decision underscores the scandal's enduring lesson: while initial punishments aimed to safeguard the game's integrity under Commissioner Kenesaw Mountain Landis, modern reassessments weigh statistical contributions against moral failings, with Rose's 4,256 hits and Jackson's .356 career average now eligible for Hall of Fame consideration by veteran committees. The steroid era of the late 1990s and early 2000s, involving systematic use of performance-enhancing drugs by stars like , invited comparisons to the Black Sox's pursuit of illicit gains, as both eroded trust through concealed advantages over fair play. Rodriguez's 2014 suspension for 211 games after testing positive and evading penalties mirrored the players' covert dealings with gamblers, prompting retrospective reviews of Eight Men Out as a on systemic incentives for cheating amid unequal player compensation. However, unlike the outright fixing in , PED scandals emphasized individual ambition over collective conspiracy, highlighting evolving forms of corruption where empirical data from testing regimes—yielding over 100 suspensions—exposed broader cultural tolerances before reforms like the 2005 . Recent historiography has scrutinized the film's source material, Eliot Asinof's 1963 book Eight Men Out, for factual inaccuracies that shaped its narrative, including fabricated events like a supposed hitman threat against Lefty Williams and overstated player grievances against owner Charles Comiskey. The Society for American Baseball Research (SABR) documented at least eight myths propagated by Asinof, such as erroneous batting averages for Jackson (.351, not .354 in 1919) and unsubstantiated claims of Comiskey's deliberate underpayment, urging reliance on grand jury transcripts over anecdotal reconstructions. Charles Fountain's 2010 book The Betrayal: The 1919 World Series and the Birth of Modern Baseball further critiques these elements, arguing the scandal's murkiness stems from incomplete evidence rather than clear-cut villainy, influencing reassessments that prioritize Landis's decisive lifetime bans as pivotal to baseball's post-scandal institutionalization. A 2024 PBS documentary, Chicago Stories: The Black Sox Scandal, aired on September 27, reaffirmed the event's opacity through archival analysis, noting unresolved questions about the extent of player involvement and gambler influence despite 1919 confessions later recanted. Ongoing debates over Jackson's Hall of Fame exclusion—petitioned unsuccessfully in 2015 before the 2025 reinstatement—illustrate persistent tensions between redemption and accountability, with supporters citing his .375 World Series average as evidence of minimal complicity, while opponents emphasize his acceptance of $5,000 in bribe money as disqualifying. These discussions reinforce the film's themes of irreversible consequences, as even empirical exonerations fail to erase the scandal's role in establishing zero-tolerance policies that define modern baseball governance.

References

  1. [1]
    Eight Men Out (1988) - IMDb
    Rating 7.2/10 (23,538) A dramatization of the Black Sox scandal when the underpaid Chicago White Sox accepted bribes to deliberately lose the 1919 World Series.Full cast & crew · Plot · Parents guide · AwardsMissing: summary | Show results with:summary
  2. [2]
    Eight Men Out: The Black Sox and the 1919 World Series
    A thrilling book about the 1919 World Series scandal, where eight Chicago White Sox players conspired with gamblers to fix the series.
  3. [3]
    Eight Men Out (1988) - Plot - IMDb
    Eight Men Out tells the true story of the infamous 'Black Sox' scandal of 1919, in which the White Sox players deliberately lost the World Series.
  4. [4]
    The Black Sox Scandal - Society for American Baseball Research
    Talented members of that White Sox club conspired with professional gamblers to rig the outcome of the 1919 World Series.
  5. [5]
    The 1919 Chicago "Black Sox" Scandal - U.S. Census Bureau
    Oct 1, 2024 · Eight members of the Chicago White Sox were accused of conspiring with professional gamblers to lose the 1919 World Series against the Cincinnati Reds.
  6. [6]
    Gambling in the Deadball Era | Jacob Pomrenke
    It's impossible to understand the Black Sox Scandal without taking into consideration the intimate relationship between baseball and gambling during that era.Missing: debts | Show results with:debts
  7. [7]
    Guide to the Black Sox Scandal (American League)
    The Black Sox Scandal involved eight White Sox players throwing the 1919 World Series for financial gain. Players were later banned for life.
  8. [8]
  9. [9]
    Timeline: The Black Sox Scandal | Timetoast
    Cicotte, one of the eight men that allegedly threw the series, pitched that game after being allegedly paid $10,000 in cash. Walter Reuther got the win for ...
  10. [10]
    The Black Sox Trial: A Chronology - UMKC School of Law
    09-27-1920, Details of the scandal breaks publicly and appear in newspaper articles across the country. ; 09-28-1920, Eddie Cicotte confesses to the fix. Eight ...
  11. [11]
    1921 Black Sox Trial – Society for American Baseball Research
    After the Black Sox players and gamblers were acquitted by the jury on August 2, 1921, in a verdict that surprised many observers, Landis showed he would rule ...
  12. [12]
    Statement of Commissioner Landis - Famous Trials
    Statement of Commissioner Landis. Details. August 4, 1921. "Regardless of the verdict of juries, no player who throws a ballgame ...
  13. [13]
    Kenesaw Landis - Baseball Hall of Fame
    In his first major act as commissioner, Landis banned eight White Sox players from baseball for life for their involvement with New York gambler Arnold ...
  14. [14]
    Chronology Of The Chicago Black Sox Scandal - Famous Trials
    George “Buck” Weaver, third baseman, Claude “Lefty” Williams, pitcher, Oscar “Happy” Felsch, center fielder, meet with Gandil, Risberg, McMullin and Cicotte to ...
  15. [15]
    Reluctant or Ringleader? Eddie Cicotte's Role in the 1919 World ...
    May 28, 2025 · When the scandal erupted in late September 1920, several other accused players named Cicotte as a co-conspirator, and Cicotte himself admitted ...
  16. [16]
    1919 American League salaries | Jacob Pomrenke
    The White Sox ace earned $8,000 in 1919 – which included a $5,000 base salary and a $3,000 performance bonus that Hoie says was a carryover from his 1918 ...
  17. [17]
    How Cheap was Charles Comiskey? Salaries and the Black Sox
    Dec 9, 2019 · The average MLB salary in 1919 was $3423. The average Sox player earned $3713. As we already know, the Sox were an above average team both on ...
  18. [18]
    1919 World Series - Cincinnati Reds over Chicago White Sox (5-3)
    Series Batting Stats. Cincinnati Reds Batting. Cincinnati Reds Batting Table ... Joe Jackson*, 8, 32, 5, 12, 3, 0, 1, 6, 1, 2 .375 .394 .563 .956, 0, 0, 0.58 ...
  19. [19]
    Kenesaw Mountain Landis - Society for American Baseball Research
    Apr 16, 2020 · Baseball survived the 1919 gambling scandal. While gambling did not cease with the 1919 World Series, the penalties levied on players ...
  20. [20]
    Eight Men Out (Film) Summary - GradeSaver
    Dec 4, 2023 · An investigation is launched culminating with a grand jury indicting eight players including Buck Weaver and Shoeless Joe Jackson—and not one ...
  21. [21]
    Eight Men Out | Rotten Tomatoes
    Rating 87% (54) A group of professional gamblers offers the Sox's best athletes a fortune to throw the series, and the players agree.
  22. [22]
    Eight Men Out (1988) - Full cast & crew - IMDb
    Cast ; Jace Alexander · Dickie Kerr - The Team ; John Cusack · Buck Weaver - The Team ; Gordon Clapp · Ray Schalk - The Team ; Don Harvey · Swede Risberg - The Team.
  23. [23]
    Eight Men Out | Cast and Crew | Rotten Tomatoes
    Discover the cast and crew of Eight Men Out on Rotten Tomatoes. See actors, directors, and more behind the scenes. Explore now!
  24. [24]
    Eight Myths Out: Appendix of errors in 'Eight Men Out' book and film
    Mar 3, 2019 · Here are specific examples of factual errors or misinformation that appear in Eight Men Out, both the 1963 best-selling book written by Eliot Asinof and the ...
  25. [25]
    Eight Men Out: The Baseball Book That Changed My Life
    It's not—and Asinof never intended it to be. In the half-century since the book was first published in 1963, we've learned a lot of new information about the ...
  26. [26]
    AFI|Catalog
    Production notes and a Sep 1988 Box article noted that Sayles had previously written a script based on Eight Men Out in the mid-1970s as a sample screenplay to ...
  27. [27]
    John Sayles - IMDb
    In the late 1970s he worked for renowned low-budget producer Roger Corman as a screenwriter. He saved much of the money he earned from that job, got some ...
  28. [28]
    “We Got Over 90 Setups One Day”: John Sayles on Eight Men Out
    Nov 10, 2015 · When I read Eliot's book I not only got details nobody else had written about (Eliot talked to several of the players just before they died) but ...
  29. [29]
    Eight Men Out (1988) - Box Office and Financial Information
    Financial analysis of Eight Men Out (1988) including production budget, domestic and international box office gross, DVD and Blu-ray sales reports.Missing: film | Show results with:film
  30. [30]
    An Interview With John Sayles
    Feb 1, 2023 · With his 1988 film adaptation of Eliot Asinof's Eight Men Out, novelist-filmmaker John Sayles has crafted the most authentic baseball film ...
  31. [31]
    John Sayles | Biography, Movies, Books, Assessment, & Facts
    Sep 24, 2025 · Eight Men Out (1988). His early screenwriting efforts—several of which were written for Roger Corman, including Piranha (1978) and Battle ...Missing: career | Show results with:career
  32. [32]
    Eight Men Out (1988) - Filming & production - IMDb
    Filming & production. Eight Men Out. Jump to. Filming locations (6), Filming dates (1), Production dates (1). Edit. Filming locations. Bush Stadium - 1501 W.Missing: principal photography
  33. [33]
    The Black Sox Trial: An Account
    Gene Carney, for example, author of Burying the Black Sox, concluded that "the Sox who took the bribes ... Arnold Rothstein. Asinof contends that the idea ...
  34. [34]
    Exposition and Analysis of Shoeless Joe Jackson's Public ...
    Apr 10, 2019 · Felsch now regretted his acceptance of a $5,000 bribe, but offered no excuses for his involvement. ... grand jury probe had produced only scandal ...
  35. [35]
    The Black Sox: Fact vs. Fiction - David Krell
    Dec 30, 2016 · Eight Men Out replaces fact with fiction at several points in the story. During a trial scene, White Sox owner Charles Comiskey testifies ...
  36. [36]
    Baseball's Most Notorious Personalities - Nomos eLibrary
    For many years, Eliot Asinof's Eight Men Out was considered to be the definitive tome on the subject. But Asinof later admitted that he sought to paint ...Missing: critique | Show results with:critique
  37. [37]
    Jury Nullification and the Not Guilty Verdicts in the Black Sox Case
    Jury nullification presents an eminently plausible explanation for the acquittal of the six most seemingly guilty defendants in the Black Sox criminal case.
  38. [38]
    Kenesaw Mountain Landis | Commissioners | About MLB
    Determined to maintain the integrity of the game, he banned eight White Sox players involved in the scandal in one of his first acts as Commissioner. Others ...Missing: necessity | Show results with:necessity
  39. [39]
    Judge Landis and baseball's ban hammer - SABR.org
    Nov 19, 2024 · Buck Weaver was one of eight Chicago White Sox players who were banned for life following the 1919 World Series fixing scandal by baseball commissioner Kenesaw ...
  40. [40]
    Judging the Black Sox: The Baseball Scandal of 1919
    Jun 30, 2020 · Judge Kenesaw Mountain Landis was appointed the first Commissioner of Baseball, with absolute control over the sport to restore its integrity.Missing: necessity | Show results with:necessity
  41. [41]
    Eight Men Out (1988) - Box Office Mojo
    Domestic. Area, Release Date, Opening, Gross. Domestic, Sep 2, 1988, $1,129,491, $5,680,515 ...Missing: film | Show results with:film
  42. [42]
    Eight Men Out | Reviews - Rotten Tomatoes
    Explore critic and audience reviews for Eight Men Out on Rotten Tomatoes. Uncover scores, opinions, and ratings.
  43. [43]
    Eight Men Out movie review & film summary (1988) - Roger Ebert
    Rating 2/4 · Review by Roger EbertIt tells the story of how the stars of the 1919 Chicago White Sox team took payoffs from gamblers to throw the World Series.Missing: plot | Show results with:plot
  44. [44]
    Eight Men Out (1988) - User reviews - IMDb
    Eight Men Out isn't perfect, but it isn't as flawed as Roger Ebert would have you believe. If you a fan of baseball in fact, I'd say its mandatory viewing.
  45. [45]
    Eight Men Out (1988) - Awards - IMDb
    2008 Nominee Satellite Award. Best DVD Extras. USC Scripter Award · John Sayles at an event for Casa de los babys (2003). 1990 Nominee USC Scripter Award.Missing: ACE | Show results with:ACE
  46. [46]
    30 year later, 'Eight Men Out' still playing out '80s legacy
    Aug 27, 2018 · Released Sept. 2, 1988 and so celebrating 30 years, Eight Men Out told the story of the 1919 Chicago White Sox and their World Series scandal.Missing: costume | Show results with:costume
  47. [47]
    Eight Men Out at 35: Getting "Shoeless Joe" right
    Sep 6, 2023 · Part of a glut of baseball movies in the late '80s and early '90s, John Sayles' film was less mystical but more truthful exploration of the legend of Shoeless ...
  48. [48]
    Eight Men Out (20th Anniversary Edition) - Amazon.com
    Disgruntled Chicago White Sox throw the 1919 World Series for mobster Arnold Rothstein. Directed by John Sayles.Missing: 2018 | Show results with:2018
  49. [49]
    Watch Eight Men Out | Prime Video - Amazon.com
    $$6.99 Rating 4.6 (1,171) This dramatization follows the 1919 major league baseball scandal involving the Chicago White Sox who as a team accepted bribes to throw the World Series ...
  50. [50]
    Eight Myths Out: The Black Sox Scandal
    One of the most dramatic scenes in Eight Men Out is when White Sox ace Eddie Cicotte tries to collect a $10,000 bonus he says Charles Comiskey promised him if ...Missing: fictional | Show results with:fictional
  51. [51]
    Eight Men Out and its false Joe Jackson narrative - The Grueling Truth
    Probably the most memorable scene in the film is the one in which a young boy outside the courtroom says to Jackson, “Say it ain't so, Joe, say it ain't so!Missing: popularized | Show results with:popularized
  52. [52]
    'Shoeless' Joe's legacy is complex, 100 years after Black Sox ...
    Oct 14, 2019 · ... Eight Men Out” and “Field of Dreams,” it is generally believed that ... Say it ain't so, Joe” was never uttered by a boy outside the ...
  53. [53]
    Fact vs. Fiction: An Analysis of Baseball in Films
    14. Eight Men Out, Written by John Sayles, Based on the book Eight Men Out by Eliot Asinof, Directed by John Sayles, Orion Pictures, 1988.
  54. [54]
    Everything to know about MLB lifting ban on Pete Rose, more - ESPN
    May 13, 2025 · Here's what a decision to remove deceased players from MLB's ineligible list means for their Hall of Fame eligibility and more.
  55. [55]
    Pete Rose, 'Shoeless' Joe Jackson among players reinstated by MLB
    May 13, 2025 · In a historic, sweeping decision, baseball commissioner Rob Manfred on Tuesday removed Pete Rose, "Shoeless" Joe Jackson and other deceased ...
  56. [56]
    Ranking the Hall of Fame cases of Pete Rose, 'Shoeless' Joe ...
    May 14, 2025 · Breaking News: Pete Rose Removed From MLB's Banned List (0:57). Share ... Black Sox Scandal. Kauff was called the "Ty Cobb of the Feds ...<|separator|>
  57. [57]
    Where Did the Great Hollywood Baseball Movie Go?
    May 23, 2017 · The makers of films like 1989's “Major League” and 1988's “Eight Men Out ... Some mix of skyrocketing salaries, the steroid-era hangover and ...Missing: parallels | Show results with:parallels
  58. [58]
    The Betrayal : The 1919 World Series and the Birth of Modern ...
    Nobody until Eliot Asinof in Eight Men Out ever talked about recruiting Risberg and McMullin; they were an indigenous part of the fix, just like Gandil.Missing: critique | Show results with:critique
  59. [59]
    Chicago Stories | The Black Sox Scandal | Season 4 - PBS
    Sep 27, 2024 · ... Documentaries & Indie Films · Drama · Dr. Henry Louis Gates ... The Black Sox Scandal. 9/27/2024 | 54m 15sVideo has Audio Description, Closed Captions | ...
  60. [60]
    The complicated Hall of Fame cases for Pete Rose, Shoeless Joe ...
    May 15, 2025 · Rod Manfred has removed Pete Rose, Shoeless Joe Jackson and more than a dozen other deceased players from the ineligible list, ...