Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Einstein's static universe

Einstein's static universe is a cosmological model proposed by in 1917, representing the first application of to the large-scale structure of the . It describes a finite, closed, and eternally with uniform matter distribution and positive spatial , maintained in through the introduction of a term in the field equations. This model assumed that the universe has no expansion or contraction, aligning with the then-prevailing astronomical observations of relatively low stellar velocities and a fixed cosmic structure. The model emerged from Einstein's efforts to reconcile with a static , influenced by that arises from distant matter and the need for a finite to avoid paradoxes in Newtonian . To achieve staticity, Einstein modified the by adding a term \lambda g_{\mu\nu}, where \lambda is the , providing a repulsive effect that balances the attractive pull of matter density \rho. The resulting geometry is that of a three-sphere with radius R = 1/\sqrt{\lambda}, and the relation \lambda = \kappa \rho / 2 ensures equilibrium, where \kappa is the gravitational constant. Despite its initial appeal as the only relativistic static model with non-zero matter density, the Einstein static universe was later shown to be unstable to perturbations, as demonstrated by Eddington in 1930, meaning small fluctuations in density would lead to either collapse or expansion. Furthermore, Edwin Hubble's 1929 observations of galactic redshifts provided for an expanding universe, prompting Einstein to abandon the model in 1931 and famously call the his "biggest blunder." Nonetheless, the introduction of the proved influential, re-emerging in modern to explain accelerated expansion via .

Historical Context

General Relativity and Early Cosmology

completed the formulation of in November 1915, presenting the final form of the field equations during a series of four papers to the . The equations, known as the , relate the geometry of to the distribution of matter and energy, expressed as R_{\mu\nu} - \frac{1}{2} R g_{\mu\nu} = \frac{8\pi G}{c^4} T_{\mu\nu}, where R_{\mu\nu} is the Ricci curvature tensor, R is the Ricci scalar, g_{\mu\nu} is the , T_{\mu\nu} is the stress-energy tensor, G is the , and c is the . These equations provided a covariant framework for , resolving inconsistencies in earlier attempts and enabling applications beyond solar system scales. Early cosmological efforts using emerged shortly after, with Willem de Sitter proposing in a describing an empty dominated by a positive . This de Sitter featured spatial and represented a to the modified field equations, expanding exponentially without matter. De Sitter's model highlighted the potential for non-static spacetimes in relativity, though it lacked matter and was initially seen as a mathematical curiosity rather than a physical description of the . At the time, the dominant philosophical perspective in favored a static and eternal , rooted in Newtonian traditions where the was envisioned as , unchanging, and in equilibrium. This view was reinforced by Ernst , which emphasized that inertial frames derive from the global distribution of matter in the , influencing Einstein's development of to align with relational notions of space rather than absolute structures. Such ideas shaped early relativistic , prioritizing models that preserved a timeless, finite yet unbounded over dynamic alternatives. In 1922, derived dynamic solutions to Einstein's field equations, demonstrating that homogeneous and isotropic universes could expand or contract depending on initial conditions and . Friedmann's equations permitted parabolic, , or elliptic geometries, with the possibility of a finite lifetime for closed universes, challenging the static paradigm. These solutions were initially overlooked by the , including Einstein, who critiqued them as mathematical errors before later acknowledging their validity.

Einstein's Proposal in 1917

In 1917, published his seminal paper "Kosmologische Betrachtungen zur allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie" (translated as "Cosmological Considerations in the ") in the Sitzungsberichte der Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, marking the first application of to cosmology. The paper was presented on February 8 and appeared in print on February 15, just 11 months after Einstein's foundational 1916 work on . Einstein sought to resolve foundational issues in the theory, particularly the determination of inertial frames, by extending the field equations to the entire universe rather than isolated systems. Einstein's primary motivation was to construct a static cosmological model compatible with , which posits that arises from the distribution of in the , not an absolute . He argued that an , at would violate this by allowing relative to "space" rather than to distant masses, necessitating a finite, closed filled with to define properly. In Einstein's view, the must be a self-contained where all physical properties, including the , are determined solely by . To achieve this static solution, Einstein introduced a new term, the \Lambda, modifying the general field equations to: R_{\mu\nu} - \frac{1}{2} R g_{\mu\nu} + \Lambda g_{\mu\nu} = \frac{8\pi G}{c^4} T_{\mu\nu} This addition allowed for a balance between gravitational attraction and a repulsive effect, enabling a finite, matter-filled in equilibrium. Einstein described the spatial geometry as hyperspherical—a three-dimensional analog of a embedded in —with uniform matter distribution on large scales and no expansion or . In contemporaneous correspondence, he estimated the universe's radius at approximately $10^7 light-years based on an matter density of about $10^{-22} g/cm³, envisioning it as eternal and unchanging.

Mathematical Formulation

Key Assumptions and Modifications

Einstein's static universe model relied on several foundational physical and mathematical assumptions to reconcile with the prevailing view of a non-evolving . Central to the model was the assumption of spatial homogeneity and isotropy on large scales, embodying the that the universe appears the same from any point and in any direction. This led Einstein to adopt a describing a closed, finite spatial geometry, expressed in modern notation as the Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker (FLRW) form with positive curvature:
ds^2 = -c^2 dt^2 + a^2(t) \left[ \frac{dr^2}{1 - kr^2} + r^2 d\Omega^2 \right]
where k = +1 for a closed and the scale factor a(t) is constant to ensure staticity.
The content was modeled as pressureless (p = [0](/page/0)), representing a uniform of non-relativistic with positive average \rho, justified by the observed low velocities of stars relative to their mean positions. This assumption simplified the stress-energy tensor while capturing the dominant gravitational effects of stellar in a static configuration. To prevent the implied by a matter-filled closed or the expansion suggested by alone, Einstein introduced a positive [\Lambda](/page/Lambda) > 0 into the field equations, modifying them to G_{\mu\nu} + [\Lambda](/page/Lambda) g_{\mu\nu} = \kappa T_{\mu\nu}. This term provided a repulsive that balanced the attractive pull of , enabling a finite, static solution with a fixed cosmic . Finally, strict staticity was enforced by the boundary condition of zero spatial velocity for all matter elements in the chosen reference frame, ensuring no expansion or contraction over time and aligning with the era's observational data on stellar motions.

Derivation of the Model

Einstein derived the static universe model by solving the modified Einstein field equations, which incorporate a cosmological constant \Lambda to enable a finite, static solution. The equations take the form G_{\mu\nu} + \Lambda g_{\mu\nu} = \frac{8\pi G}{c^4} T_{\mu\nu}, where G_{\mu\nu} is the Einstein tensor, g_{\mu\nu} is the metric tensor, T_{\mu\nu} is the energy-momentum tensor, G is the gravitational constant, and c is the speed of light. To describe a homogeneous and isotropic universe, he applied the Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker (FLRW) metric with positive spatial curvature (k = +1): ds^2 = -c^2 dt^2 + a(t)^2 \left[ \frac{dr^2}{1 - r^2} + r^2 (d\theta^2 + \sin^2\theta d\phi^2) \right], where a(t) is the scale factor (with r dimensionless, $0 < r < 1), and the spatial part corresponds to a 3-sphere of radius a(t). For a static universe, the scale factor is constant (a(t) = a_0, with \dot{a} = 0 and \ddot{a} = 0), assuming pressureless dust matter (p = 0). Substituting into the field equations yields the static Friedmann equations. The first equation is: \left( \frac{\dot{a}}{a} \right)^2 = \frac{8\pi G}{3} \rho - \frac{k c^2}{a^2} + \frac{\Lambda c^2}{3} = 0, where \rho is the matter density and k = +1. With \dot{a} = 0, this simplifies to: \frac{8\pi G}{3} \rho + \frac{\Lambda c^2}{3} = \frac{c^2}{a^2}. The second Friedmann equation, from the space-space components, is: \frac{\ddot{a}}{a} = -\frac{4\pi G}{3} \left( \rho + \frac{3p}{c^2} \right) + \frac{\Lambda c^2}{3} = 0. For p = 0, it reduces to: $0 = -\frac{4\pi G}{3} \rho + \frac{\Lambda c^2}{3}, or equivalently, \Lambda = \frac{4\pi G \rho}{c^2}. To achieve equilibrium, substitute \Lambda = \frac{4\pi G \rho}{c^2} into the first equation: \frac{8\pi G}{3} \rho + \frac{4\pi G \rho}{3} = \frac{c^2}{a^2}, \frac{12\pi G \rho}{3} = 4\pi G \rho = \frac{c^2}{a^2}, yielding \rho = \frac{c^2}{4\pi G a^2}. These relations ensure both zero expansion rate (\dot{a} = 0)—balancing gravitational attraction from matter against the repulsive effect of \Lambda—and zero acceleration (\ddot{a} = 0), maintaining staticity. Solving for the scale factor produces a finite radius a = \frac{1}{\sqrt{\Lambda}}, confirming the universe's closed, finite extent.

Physical Properties

Geometry and Scale

Einstein's static universe possesses a hyperspherical spatial topology characterized by positive curvature with the parameter k = +1. This closed geometry embeds the three-dimensional space as the hypersurface of a 4-dimensional sphere, ensuring uniform positive curvature throughout. The finite yet boundless nature of this space arises from its total volume, calculated as V = 2\pi^2 a^3, where a denotes the radius of curvature. This volume formula reflects the compact structure of the 3-sphere, confining the universe to a definite scale without edges or boundaries. In this topology, the cosmological horizon lies at a geodesic distance of \pi a from any point, marking the farthest reachable location before spatial identification occurs and the geometry wraps around. Beyond this horizon, paths reconverge, embodying the closed manifold's periodic structure. As a result, light rays emitted from a given point can traverse to the antipodal region in finite time \tau = \pi a / c, allowing photons to effectively circumnavigate the universe's spatial extent within this interval. The value of a itself is set by the interplay of matter density and the cosmological constant \Lambda.

Matter Density and Cosmological Constant

In Einstein's static universe model, the matter density \rho must take a specific value to achieve spatial closure and balance the gravitational attraction, given by the critical density formula \rho = \frac{c^2}{4\pi G a^2}, where a is the radius of curvature of the hyperspherical geometry, c is the speed of light, and G is the gravitational constant. This density corresponds to the mean matter content required to close the universe without expansion or contraction. To maintain static equilibrium, the cosmological constant \Lambda is tuned precisely to provide a repulsive effect that counteracts the attractive gravity of the matter, satisfying the relation \Lambda = \frac{4\pi G \rho}{c^2}. This balance ensures zero expansion rate and zero acceleration in the model. Einstein estimated the universe's radius on the order of $10^7 light-years based on contemporary estimates of stellar densities, yielding a matter density \rho \approx 10^{-19} kg/m³. This is significantly higher than the modern critical density of approximately $10^{-26} kg/m³ observed in the expanding universe. Physically, the cosmological constant can be interpreted as arising from a uniform vacuum energy density \rho_\Lambda = \frac{\Lambda c^2}{8\pi G} = \frac{\rho}{2}, which exactly offsets half of the matter's gravitational pull, resulting in perfect stability for the idealized case.

Stability and Criticisms

Theoretical Instability

In 1930, Arthur Eddington conducted a detailed analysis demonstrating the instability of Einstein's static universe model, treating small density fluctuations as radial oscillations around the equilibrium radius of the hypersphere. Eddington, collaborating with G. C. McVittie, showed that any minor deviation from the static configuration would amplify over time, causing the universe to either expand indefinitely or collapse, as the equilibrium represents a point of unstable balance rather than a stable state. This mathematical treatment revealed that the model could not maintain permanence against even infinitesimal perturbations in density or scale. The arises from the linearized equations derived from the adapted to the static model. For small inhomogeneous in a dust-dominated , the evolution is governed by an of the form \ddot{\Delta}_k = 4\pi [G](/page/G) \rho_0 \Delta_k, where \rho_0 is the and \Delta_k is the . This leads to exponential growth of perturbations, akin to , as there is no to counteract . In general, for an equation-of-state parameter w = p / (\rho c^2) and sound speed c_s, the is \ddot{\Delta}_k = 4\pi [G](/page/G) (1 + w) [1 + 3(1 - k^2) c_s^2] \rho_0 \Delta_k, which for (w = 0, c_s = 0) confirms the runaway growth. Georges Lemaître's earlier and subsequent work further confirmed that neutral equilibrium is impossible in the static model, with any fluctuation growing exponentially rather than oscillating harmlessly. In his 1927 paper, Lemaître introduced dynamic solutions to that encompassed the static case as a special, unstable limit, emphasizing that the universe could not remain static without evolving toward . His 1931 contributions, including discussions in the context of observational data, reinforced that perturbations inevitably destabilize the balance between gravity and the , precluding a truly . The timescale for the growth of these instabilities is on the order of the characteristic dynamical time $1 / \sqrt{4\pi G \rho / 3} \approx 10^{10} years, which is comparable to contemporary estimates of the universe's age at the time, implying that the static model could not have persisted for the inferred cosmic history without collapsing or expanding. This short instability timescale underscores the fragility of the equilibrium, as even primordial fluctuations would have long since driven evolution away from stasis.

Observational Challenges

In the and , spectrographic observations by Vesto Slipher at the revealed significant redshifts in the spectra of spiral nebulae, indicating that many were receding from Earth at high velocities, up to thousands of kilometers per second. These measurements, presented in Slipher's paper on 25 nebulae, provided the first empirical hints of systematic motion away from our , challenging the assumption of a . Edwin Hubble built on Slipher's data in 1929, using Cepheid variable stars to estimate distances to these nebulae and establishing a linear relation between their recession velocity v and distance d, known as v = H d, where H is the Hubble constant. This velocity-distance relation demonstrated that the universe was expanding uniformly, directly contradicting the static model proposed by Einstein, as the observed redshifts could not be reconciled with a non-expanding . Einstein acknowledged the implications of Hubble's findings in his 1931 paper, stating that "new observations by Hubble's and Humason concerning the of distant nebulae make it appear probable that the general contraction of the world postulated in my original article does not exist." This admission marked a pivotal shift, as the rendered the untenable without further modifications. The Einstein static model predicts a closed with positive spatial , characterized by a finite a on the order of the observable universe, which would manifest as detectable deviations from Euclidean geometry over vast distances. However, early astronomical surveys in the 1920s and 1930s, including Hubble's mappings of nebular distributions, showed no evidence of such curvature closure, as the universe appeared flat within observable limits; later cosmic microwave background measurements in the 1990s confirmed near-zero curvature, further favoring dynamic or open models over the static one. Additionally, the model demands an extraordinarily uniform distribution of matter to balance against the , with density variations suppressed to maintain . Observations from the onward, such as Hubble's cataloging of nebular clusters and voids, revealed significant inhomogeneities in matter distribution on large scales, including groupings that indicated clustering rather than the perfect required for staticity.

Legacy and Influence

Role in Cosmological Development

Einstein retracted his model in , following mounting evidence from observations such as those by indicating an expanding cosmos, and instead proposed a dynamic model featuring an initial expansion followed by contraction, though without the . Einstein abandoned the following his 1931 model, favoring Lambda-free expanding cosmologies aligned with Friedmann-Lemaître solutions. The static model inadvertently catalyzed the development of expanding universe theories by and , who demonstrated that Einstein's field equations permitted non-static solutions without assumptions. Friedmann's 1922 work revealed dynamic cosmologies, including expanding universes, prompting Einstein's initial rejection but eventual acceptance after verification. Lemaître's 1927 solution similarly derived an expanding model from Einstein's equations, interpreting it as originating from a "primeval atom" and laying foundational groundwork for , which gained traction with Hubble's 1929 observations of galactic redshifts. Einstein's introduction of the \Lambda endured as a pivotal legacy, providing a repulsive term essential for balancing in his static model but later repurposed in modern . In the prevailing \LambdaCDM framework, \Lambda is interpreted as the of , driving the universe's accelerated expansion and comprising approximately 68% of its total energy content as of 2024 observations. Reflecting on his cosmological endeavors in the 1950s, Einstein reportedly described the cosmological constant as his "biggest blunder," regretting its inclusion amid acceptance of an expanding universe without it. Yet, this element proved prescient when observations in 1998 by the Supernova Cosmology Project and High-Z Supernova Search Team revealed the universe's accelerating expansion, vindicating \Lambda as a key component of contemporary models.

Modern Interpretations

In recent decades, researchers have revisited Einstein's static universe model within modified gravity frameworks and with exotic matter components to explore conditions for stability. Proposals from the 2010s onward, such as those incorporating phantom fields with equation-of-state parameter w < -1, demonstrate that a closed static universe can remain stable against homogeneous perturbations if the phantom energy dominates while satisfying modified energy conditions, unlike the original model's violation of the strong energy condition. Similarly, in f(R,T) gravity theories, where the action includes couplings between the Ricci scalar and trace of the energy-momentum tensor, the Einstein static solution achieves stability for specific functional forms, allowing balance between gravitational attraction and repulsion without invoking a positive cosmological constant alone. These extensions, including works by authors like Aseem Paranjape on vacuum energy effects, highlight how non-standard physics can revive the static model theoretically. The Einstein static universe also draws analogies to as a matter-filled limit, where the static patch—eternally static in certain coordinates—mirrors the closed, balanced geometry but includes dust or radiation contributions. This connection gains relevance in and scenarios, where transient static regions arise as equilibrium states amid ongoing bubble nucleation, providing a framework for avoiding initial singularities without eternal expansion. Such patches transiently resemble Einstein's model before quantum fluctuations drive evolution, underscoring its role in understanding metastable vacua. Numerical investigations in fine-tuned general relativity variants reveal that perturbation growth can proceed slowly, with instability timescales exceeding the observed cosmic age of approximately 13.8 billion years, though these configurations remain incompatible with large-scale structure data. Conceptually, the model endures as a benchmark for closed cosmologies in approaches. In , holonomy corrections stabilize the Einstein static state against scalar perturbations for dust matter, offering insights into bounce transitions and singularity resolution. Likewise, in landscapes, it serves as a testbed for flux compactifications supporting static solutions, probing the tension between and curvature in higher-dimensional setups.

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] Einstein's 1917 Static Model of the Universe: A Centennial Review
    Feb 15, 2025 · We present a historical review of Einstein's 1917 paper 'Cosmological Considerations in the General Theory of Relativity' to mark the ...
  2. [2]
    100 years of mathematical cosmology: Models, theories, and ...
    Einstein's static universe was the first application of general relativity to cosmology, and, in fact, it created such a boost to the study of universes ...
  3. [3]
    [PDF] JOHN NORTON - How Einstein found his field equations: 1912-1915
    It was not until November 1915 that Ein- stein could present the now familiar generally covariant field equations of the theory to the Prussian Academy of ...Missing: primary | Show results with:primary
  4. [4]
    Arch and scaffold: How Einstein found his field equations
    The Einstein field equations first appear in Einstein's 25 November 1915 paper. Here, Gim is the Ricci tensor; gim, the metric tensor; and Tim, the energy ...Missing: primary | Show results with:primary
  5. [5]
    Cosmological constant - Scholarpedia
    Aug 12, 2013 · The attempt proved futile, as shortly thereafter de Sitter (1917) demonstrated an empty universe solution to Einstein's equations (allowing ...
  6. [6]
    The Cosmological Constant and Dark Energy- P.J.E. Peebles and B ...
    ... de Sitter's (1917) empty space solution. To modern tastes this "loitering" model requires incredibly special initial conditions, as will be discussed ...
  7. [7]
    Philosophy of Cosmology
    Sep 26, 2017 · It began as a branch of theoretical physics through Einstein's 1917 static model of the universe (Einstein 1917) and was developed in its early ...
  8. [8]
    [PDF] From Einstein to Schücking: Mach's Principle and Relativistic ...
    Mach's principle states that inertial properties of matter are due to interaction with distant masses, not absolute space or time. Einstein modified his ...Missing: eternal | Show results with:eternal
  9. [9]
    May/June 1922: Friedmann Imagines a Changing Universe
    May 15, 2024 · Alexander Friedmann used Einstein's general theory of relativity to propose a universe that could expand or contract.Missing: dynamic | Show results with:dynamic
  10. [10]
    Alexander Friedmann and the origins of modern cosmology
    Oct 1, 2012 · Already in 1922, Friedmann had set the appropriate framework for a GR cosmology by introducing its most general metric and the “Friedmann ...Missing: overlooked | Show results with:overlooked
  11. [11]
    Einstein's 1917 Static Model of the Universe: A Centennial Review
    Jan 25, 2017 · We present a historical review of Einstein's 1917 paper 'Cosmological Considerations in the General Theory of Relativity' to mark the centenary of a key work.
  12. [12]
    [PDF] Sitzungsberichte der Königlich Preussischen Akademie der ...
    Einstein: Kosmologische Betrachtungen zur allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie. 1 4 < unsere Rechnungen zu der Überzeugung geführt, daß derartige De ...Missing: original paper
  13. [13]
    Vacuum Energy Density, or How Can Nothing Weigh Something?
    May 19, 2012 · g = GM/R2 = (4*pi/3)*G*rho*R but is rather given by g = (4*pi/3)*G*(rho+3P/c2)*R Now Einstein wanted a static model, which means that g = 0 ...
  14. [14]
    On the Instability of Einstein's Spherical World - Oxford Academic
    This content is only available as a PDF. © 1930 Royal Astronomical Society. Provided by the NASA Astrophysics Data System.
  15. [15]
    [PDF] arXiv:gr-qc/0302094v2 9 Apr 2003
    The universe be- comes increasingly unstable as the fluid pressure drops. Clearly, a dust Einstein static universe (c2 s = 0) is always unstable. In that ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Einstein's cosmic model of 1931 revisited - EPJ.org
    Einstein's starting point for his new model is the instability of his former static so- lution. This is of great importance as it renders a universe of time- ...
  17. [17]
  18. [18]
    [PDF] NEBULE. - BY VM SLIPHER, PH.D. - (Read April 13, 1917.)
    I wish to give at this time a brief account of a spectrographic investigation of the spiral nebula which I have been conducting at the Lowell Observatory since ...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] Vesto Slipher and the First Galaxy Redshifts - arXiv
    Jun 27, 2011 · By 1910 Slipher was still experimenting with and improving the Brashear spectrograph aiming to detect spiral nebulae, and he reported to Lowell ...
  20. [20]
    A relation between distance and radial velocity among extra-galactic ...
    The data in the table indicate a linear correlation between distances and velocities, whether the latter are used directly or corrected for solar motion.
  21. [21]
    Hubble's Law and the expanding universe - PNAS
    Mar 17, 2015 · In fact, Einstein introduced a cosmological constant into his equations to keep the universe static, as it was then believed to be. Hubble ...Missing: timescale instability
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Einstein's cosmic model of 1931 - arXiv
    As mentioned in our introduction, it is clear from his reported comments in early 1931 that he viewed Hubble's observations as possible evidence for a universe ...Missing: quote source
  23. [23]
    Historical and philosophical reflections on the Einstein-de Sitter model
    Mar 19, 2021 · We present some historical and philosophical reflections on the paper “On the Relation Between the Expansion and the Mean Density of the Universe”,<|control11|><|separator|>
  24. [24]
    The Expanding Universe (Cosmology: Ideas)
    Einstein expressed the general opinion in 1917 after de Sitter produced equations that could describe a universe that was expanding, a universe with a beginning ...
  25. [25]
    Einstein's cosmic model of 1931 revisited: an analysis and ...
    We present an analysis and translation of Einstein's 1931 paper “Zum kosmologischen Problem ... Article PDF. Download to read the full article text. Similar ...
  26. [26]
    The Influence of the Expansion of Space on the Gravitation Fields ...
    In stockEinstein and Straus's papers represent the first serious attempt to model an inhomogeneous universe. “By the spring of 1945, Einstein and Straus had found a ...
  27. [27]
    Einstein's conversion from his static to an expanding universe - arXiv
    Nov 12, 2013 · This investigation follows Einstein on his hesitating path from a static to the expanding universe. Contrary to an often repeated belief the ...Missing: instability | Show results with:instability
  28. [28]
    [PDF] Einstein, Friedmann, Lemaitre: Discovery of the Big Bang
    Lemaitre obtains the same as Friedmann nonstationary solution of Einste- in's equations with nonzero cosmological constant. The difference is that Friedmann ...
  29. [29]
    On the stability of Einstein static universe in doubly general relativity ...
    Dec 12, 2015 · Then, by looking at the DGR theory from the emergent universe point of view, we studied the stability of the Einstein static universe and the ...
  30. [30]
    Stability of the Einstein static universe in f(R, T) gravity
    Jan 16, 2017 · The Einstein static (ES) universe has played a major role in various emergent scenarios recently proposed in order to cure the problem of ...
  31. [31]
    [0706.4431] The Einstein static universe in Loop Quantum Cosmology
    Jun 29, 2007 · We investigate how LQC corrections affect the stability properties of the Einstein static universe. In General Relativity, the Einstein static ...