Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Electronic Product Code

The Electronic Product Code (EPC) is a standardized numbering system and syntax for assigning unique, serialized identifiers to physical objects, trade items, logistics units, locations, and other entities in supply chains, primarily encoded on radio-frequency identification (RFID) tags to enable automatic identification and data capture without line-of-sight reading. Developed in the early 2000s by the MIT Auto-ID Center—a research consortium involving universities and global corporations—EPC was created to extend beyond traditional barcodes by providing item-level granularity for tracking individual instances of products rather than just classes or manufacturers. In 2003, the Auto-ID Center transitioned its work to EPCglobal Inc., a subsidiary of GS1, which formalized and promoted the standard globally, integrating it with GS1's existing identification keys like Global Trade Item Numbers (GTINs). The structure is defined in the GS1 EPC Tag Data Standard (TDS) (version 2.3, October 2025), which specifies how identifiers are encoded in binary format on UHF RFID tags compliant with ISO/IEC 18000-63 (Gen2) protocols, supporting up to 496 bits of data for various schemes such as Serialised Global Trade Item Numbers (SGTINs) or Global Location Numbers (GLNs). This standard ensures across industries by mapping EPCs to human-readable GS1 keys and providing both pure encodings (without application data) and variable-length formats for enhanced flexibility. Key features include hierarchical partitioning for elements like company prefixes, item references, and serial numbers, allowing scalability from individual items to pallets while maintaining privacy through optional filters and partition tables. EPC technology underpins broader GS1 standards like the EPC Information Services (EPCIS) (version 2.0, 2022) for event-based visibility and the Core Business Vocabulary (CBV) for standardized terms and definitions in event data, facilitating applications in , logistics optimization, healthcare , and manufacturing efficiency. Adopted worldwide since its commercialization in the mid-2000s, EPC has driven RFID deployment in sectors handling billions of tagged items annually, improving accuracy, reducing labor costs, and enabling sharing among trading partners while adhering to international guidelines.

Introduction

Definition and Purpose

The Electronic Product Code (EPC) is a GS1-standardized syntax for assigning globally unique identifiers to individual physical objects, trade items, logistics units, locations, documents, and other identifiable entities in supply chains. Unlike traditional barcodes, which provide class-level identification for product types, the EPC enables instance-level uniqueness by incorporating , such as serial numbers, to distinguish specific items within a . This structure is primarily encoded in format on RAIN RFID tags, bridging barcode-based identification keys with technology. The primary purpose of the EPC is to facilitate automated, real-time identification, tracking, authentication, and data sharing across supply chains and (IoT) applications. By encoding object-specific data—derived from keys like Global Trade Item Numbers (GTINs)—into RFID tags, the EPC supports seamless and between trading partners, enabling efficient visibility from production to consumption. For instance, a single EPC can uniquely identify a specific by combining its manufacturer's details, batch information, and , allowing precise tracing without manual intervention. Key benefits of the EPC include enhanced transparency, reduced inventory errors through accurate, non-line-of-sight reading, and support for scalable ecosystems. These advantages stem from the EPC's ability to handle high-volume identifications—up to thousands of objects per second—and integrate with standards like EPC Information Services (EPCIS) for event-based data exchange. Overall, the EPC promotes efficiency by minimizing and enabling data-driven decisions in dynamic environments like and .

Development History

The MIT Auto-ID Center was founded in 1999 by , a brand manager at , along with MIT researchers and , with the goal of advancing (RFID) technology to enable automatic identification of individual items, surpassing the limitations of traditional barcodes like the Universal Product Code (UPC), which primarily identified product classes rather than unique instances. The center, initially sponsored by companies including , , and , focused on developing a global system for tracking physical objects through low-cost RFID tags connected to networked databases. In 2000, the center proposed the initial Electronic Product Code (EPC) as a 96-bit identifier designed for item-level tracking, addressing UPC's inability to serialize individual products and enabling unique identification across supply chains via RFID. Early development involved collaborative pilots by sponsor companies; for instance, and tested EPC-enabled RFID tags on products like razor blades to demonstrate visibility, while participated in field trials to evaluate efficiencies. These efforts built on EPC's potential for scalable, automatic identification. By October 2003, the Auto-ID Center concluded its operations, transferring research to the Auto-ID Labs network while establishing EPCglobal Inc. as an independent, neutral to manage EPC specifications and promote adoption. In 2005, following the merger of EAN International and the Uniform Code Council into , EPCglobal was integrated as a , aligning EPC with GS1's global identification keys. Key milestones under EPCglobal included the ratification of the Tag Data Standard Version 1.0 in 2004, which formalized EPC encoding guidelines, followed by Version 1.3 in 2006 incorporating direct mappings to GS1 keys for broader . The standard has since evolved through the 1.x series, with a major update to in September 2022 introducing EPC+ schemes for improved with barcodes and other enhancements, and Version 2.3 released in October 2025 supporting additional encoding options while maintaining backward compatibility.

Technical Encoding

Binary Structure

The Electronic Product Code (EPC) is encoded as a variable-length designed for storage in RFID tags, with the most common length being 96 bits to align with the capabilities of Gen2 UHF RFID tags compliant with the ISO/IEC 18000-63 protocol. This format ensures efficient transmission over the air interface while supporting in applications. Variants of 64 bits or 128 bits are also supported depending on the tag hardware and application requirements, allowing flexibility for different data densities. The structure is defined in the GS1 EPC Tag Data Standard version 2.3 (as of October 2025), which maintains the core encodings described here while introducing new schemes. The general binary format of an EPC consists of an 8-bit header followed by variable-length type-specific data including filter, , and core components, with optional bits. The header identifies the EPC scheme, enabling readers to parse the subsequent bits correctly. Type-specific data includes fields such as manager number, object class, and , whose lengths are determined by the scheme and any partition values that divide shared bit spaces. Optional bits, such as areas, may pad the structure to meet byte alignment or protocol needs. Encoding rules emphasize a compact representation to minimize tag memory usage, with rules for converting the EPC to a URI format via the GS1 Digital Link standard. For instance, in a typical 96-bit EPC such as the SGTIN-96 variant, the breakdown allocates 8 bits to the header, 3 bits to the , 3 bits to the , 20 to 40 bits to the manager number and 4 to 24 bits to the object (totaling 44 bits based on partition), and 38 bits to the serial number. The total length is calculated as the sum of these fields, ensuring the structure fits within the designated tag memory while adhering to scheme-specific constraints—for example, totaling exactly 96 bits in the SGTIN-96 variant. This binary structure is fully compatible with the ISO/IEC 18000-63 air interface protocol for Gen2 UHF RFID tags, facilitating global readability and data capture in automated systems. The design prioritizes efficiency, with binary fields using pure numbering or variable partitioning to represent hierarchical identifiers without redundancy.

Header and Components

The Electronic Product Code (EPC) binary structure comprises several key fields that enable the encoding of unique in a compact format suitable for RFID tags. These include the header, , , and variable-length components such as the manager number, object class, and . This organization allows for flexibility in representing diverse identification schemes while maintaining a fixed total , typically 96 bits for common implementations. The header is an 8-bit field at the beginning of the EPC encoding that specifies the particular EPC being used, ensuring across systems. For instance, the binary value 00110000 indicates the SGTIN-96 , while other values like 00110001 denote alternative formats. This field is essential for decoders to interpret the subsequent bits correctly. Following the header, the is a 3-bit field that provides control information for and selection, with values ranging from 000 to 111 (0 to 7 in ). These bits help in filtering tags during reads, such as distinguishing between individual items (e.g., filter value ) and larger units like cases or pallets (e.g., 110). The enhances efficiency in applications by allowing selective querying. The field, typically 3 bits in 96-bit encodings, defines how the remaining bits are divided among the core components, using a predefined to allocate lengths dynamically. This mechanism supports varying identifier sizes without altering the overall EPC length; for example, a partition value of 0 might assign more bits to the manager number, while higher values shift allocation toward the object class or . The ensures precise parsing of the variable fields. The primary components of the EPC are the manager number, object class, and , which together form the . The manager number, representing a GS1-assigned company prefix, varies from 20 to 40 bits depending on the , encoding organizational authority over the identifier. The object class, denoting the product or item reference, ranges from 4 to 24 bits and specifies the type of object being identified. Finally, the provides a unique instance identifier, 38 bits, ensuring individuality for each physical object. These components are encoded in pure to maximize compactness. In a standard 96-bit EPC, the structure allocates 8 bits to the header, 3 bits to the , and 3 bits to the , leaving 82 bits for the components as determined by the partition value, with serial fixed at 38 bits and 44 bits shared between manager and object . For example:
FieldBitsExample Allocation (Partition 0)Example Allocation (Partition 6)
Header888
Filter333
Partition333
Manager NumberVariable4020
Object ClassVariable424
Serial Number383838
Total969696
This breakdown illustrates how the partition enables adaptable encoding while preserving the fixed total length.

EPC Schemes

SGTIN Scheme

The Serialized Global Trade Item Number (SGTIN) is an Electronic Product Code (EPC) scheme that encodes a Global Trade Item Number (GTIN) along with a unique serial number to identify individual instances of trade items, such as specific units of consumer products. This scheme enables precise identification at the item level, distinguishing one unit from others sharing the same GTIN, which is essential for applications requiring granularity beyond basic product classification. SGTIN exists in two primary variants to accommodate different serial number lengths and tag capacities: SGTIN-96, which uses a 96-bit encoding and is the most common for standard RFID implementations, and SGTIN-198, which employs a 198-bit encoding to support longer alphanumeric of up to 20 characters. The SGTIN-96 variant limits to numeric values under 2^38 (approximately 274 billion), while SGTIN-198 allows full GS1-compliant alphanumeric without such restrictions. In terms of encoding, the SGTIN structure begins with an 8-bit header identifying the scheme (00110000 for SGTIN-96 and 00110110 for SGTIN-198), followed by a 3-bit filter value for business context, a 3-bit value that determines the allocation of bits between the manager number and object class, the manager number (derived from the Company Prefix portion of the GTIN, ranging 20-40 bits based on partition), the object class (derived from the GTIN's item reference including the indicator digit, 24-44 bits), and the serving as the instance identifier (38 bits for SGTIN-96 or 140 bits for SGTIN-198). The table standardizes these variable lengths; for instance, 000 allocates 40 bits to the manager number and 24 bits to the object class. A practical example of SGTIN encoding involves a specific with GTIN 0123456789056 and 123456789. Assuming a value of 011 (for item-level ) and 001 (for a 28-bit manager number from the prefix 01234567 and a 36-bit object class from the item reference 89056), the resulting SGTIN-96 EPC would pack these elements into 96 bits: header 00110000, 011, 001, manager number (binary equivalent of 01234567), object class (binary of 89056 with indicator), and (38-bit of 123456789 padded as needed). This can then be stored on an RFID tag for automatic identification. The SGTIN scheme's key advantages include enabling product serialization for efficient recalls by pinpointing affected units, combating counterfeiting through unique instance verification, and supporting precise tracking throughout the supply chain to reduce errors and improve visibility.

SSCC and Other Logistic Schemes

The Serial Shipping Container Code (SSCC) is a 96-bit EPC scheme designed to provide a unique, persistent identifier for logistics units, such as pallets, cartons, shipping containers, or trade items, facilitating tracking and tracing throughout the supply chain. It encodes the GS1 SSCC identification key, which consists of an 18-digit number excluding the modulo-10 check digit used in barcodes, resulting in 17 digits represented in the EPC: a single extension digit followed by the GS1 company prefix (6 to 12 digits) and a serial reference (the remaining digits to total 17). The binary structure allocates 8 bits for the header (fixed at binary 00110001), 3 bits for the filter value (used for selective reading, with values such as 110 for unit loads), 3 bits for the partition (determining variable field lengths), a variable-length company prefix (20 to 40 bits), a variable-length serial reference (38 to 18 bits), and 24 reserved bits set to zero. The specifies the length of the company and corresponding bit allocation, ensuring efficient packing within the 96 bits, as shown in the following table:
Partition ValueCompany Prefix DigitsCompany Prefix BitsSerial Reference DigitsSerial Reference Bits
01240518
11137621
21034724
3930828
4827931
57241034
66201138
For example, an SSCC for a might be encoded from the element string (00)106141412345678908, where the EPC pure identity URI is urn:epc:id:sscc:1061414.1234567890 (company prefix 1061414, serial reference 1234567890 including extension digit 1), and the tag URI could be urn:epc:tag:sscc-96:3.1061414.1234567890 with filter value 3 for handling. Other logistic EPC schemes complement SSCC by addressing assets, services, and locations, each using 96-bit encodings with similar header, filter, and partition structures but tailored components for their purposes. The Global Returnable Asset Identifier (GRAI) scheme uniquely identifies returnable assets like reusable pallets or containers, featuring an 8-bit header (binary 00110100), 3-bit filter, 3-bit partition, variable company prefix (20-40 bits for 6-12 digits), a fixed 24-bit asset reference (up to 12 digits), and a 38-bit serial number, prioritizing asset reuse tracking over shipment identification. The Global Service Relation Number (GSRN) scheme assigns identities to service relations or recipients, such as patient admissions in healthcare, with an 8-bit header (binary 00110110), 3-bit filter, 3-bit partition, variable company prefix (20-40 bits), and variable service reference (56-18 bits for 17 total digits with prefix), focusing on non-physical service entities without a dedicated serial field. The Serialised Global Location Number (SGLN) scheme, including the SGLN-96 variant, identifies fixed locations like warehouses or sites, using an 8-bit header (binary 00110010), 3-bit filter, 3-bit partition, variable company prefix (20-40 bits), 24-bit location reference (GLN digits), and up to 41-bit extension or serial for sub-locations, emphasizing spatial hierarchy rather than transport units. These schemes differ from SSCC primarily in their fixed or specialized fields for assets, services, or locations, while maintaining consistent serial reference lengths adjusted by partition to suit unit-load logistics.

GS1 Integration

Relation to GS1 Identification Keys

The Electronic Product Code (EPC) builds upon identification keys to enable unique identification in RFID-enabled supply chains, incorporating established keys such as the (GTIN), which uses 8 to 14 digits to identify classes of trade items like products; the (SSCC), an 18-digit identifier for logistic units such as shipments or pallets; and the (GLN), a 13-digit code for physical locations, legal entities, or functional entities like warehouses. EPC schemes map directly to these GS1 keys for compatibility and extension: the Serialized Global Trade Item Number (SGTIN) combines a with a to identify unique instances of trade items; the SSCC scheme encodes the full 18-digit SSCC key directly without additional ; and class-level EPCs, such as those for generic product classes, omit serial numbers to represent shared identifiers. This mapping ensures that EPCs extend GS1 keys for instance-level tracking while maintaining alignment with barcode-based systems. As detailed in the EPC Schemes section, the SGTIN scheme exemplifies this by appending a serial reference to the GTIN. The EPC framework supports a hierarchical structure that links these elements in a unified identification system, connecting individual items via SGTIN to locations identified by the Serialized Global Location Number (SGLN, based on GLN with an optional extension digit) and to shipments via SSCC, facilitating end-to-end supply chain visibility. EPC identifiers are expressed in GS1 Digital Link URI format for web resolution, such as urn:epc:id:sgtin:0614141.112345.400, where the components represent the GS1 Company Prefix (0614141), item reference (112345), and serial number (400), allowing resolution to online data sources like product details or logistics information through GS1 resolvers. Global uniqueness of EPCs is ensured by GS1 Company Prefixes, unique numeric codes assigned by member organizations to over two million companies worldwide, preventing duplication across the international .

EPCglobal Standards and Network

EPCglobal was established in 2003 as a of , formed as a between and GS1 US to develop and ratify industry-driven standards for the Electronic Product Code (EPC) and related (RFID) technologies. This organization focused on creating an to enable the encoding, capture, and sharing of EPC data across supply chains. Central to the EPCglobal standards is the EPC Tag Data Standard (TDS), which defines the binary encoding formats and URI representations for various EPC schemes, ensuring consistent mapping to GS1 identification keys. The latest version, TDS 2.3 (ratified October 2025), introduces new encoding schemes supporting information with s for improved compatibility. The Application Level Events (ALE) standard provides a software for RFID readers and , allowing applications to receive filtered and consolidated event —such as reads—without managing low-level details. Complementing these, the Information Services () standard enables the capture, storage, and sharing of visibility events, such as an object being observed at a specific or time, facilitating among trading partners. The EPCglobal Network supports the discovery and exchange of EPC-related information through distributed , including the Object Name (ONS), which functions as a root DNS-based lookup mechanism to resolve EPC URIs to endpoints for further access. This framework integrates with existing protocols to create a secure, scalable for event sharing across enterprises. EPCIS has evolved significantly, with version 2.0 ratified by in 2022 to enhance support for and aggregation, replacing older technologies like with modern and for cloud compatibility. This release integrates with the Core Business Vocabulary (CBV), a standard that defines standardized terms and values—such as business transaction types and location references—for in EPCIS documents. As of 2025, the EPC standards are adopted through over 120 member organizations operating in 120 countries, with standards used by companies worldwide including in over 150 countries, with ongoing updates emphasizing convergence with (IoT) ecosystems to enable broader real-time visibility applications.

Applications

Supply Chain Management

The (EPC) plays a pivotal role in logistics by enabling real-time shipment tracking, particularly through the (SSCC), an 18-digit identifier assigned to logistics units such as pallets or containers. In a typical , a manufacturer encodes an SSCC into an EPC-compliant RFID tag on a shipment at the point of origin, allowing automated reads at key checkpoints—including production facilities, transportation hubs, distribution centers, and retailer receiving docks—to capture location and status updates without manual intervention. This process ensures continuous visibility across the , facilitating rapid identification of delays or discrepancies as goods move from manufacturer to retailer. EPC-driven visibility provides significant benefits, including reductions in stockouts by up to 50% through enhanced inventory accuracy and , as demonstrated in a collaborative study by and . Additionally, the granular tracking data supports for , allowing supply chain partners to anticipate shortages and optimize replenishment schedules based on historical movement patterns. Notable case studies illustrate EPC's impact in supply chain management. In 2005, Walmart mandated that its top 100 suppliers apply EPC-enabled RFID tags to high-volume pallets and cases, improving shipment accuracy and reducing manual handling errors across its distribution network. Similarly, the U.S. Drug Supply Chain Security Act (DSCSA) of 2013 required pharmaceutical manufacturers to serialize prescription drugs using the Serialized Global Trade Item Number (SGTIN) encoded in EPC format, enabling end-to-end traceability to combat counterfeiting and ensure product integrity from production to dispensing. EPC integrates seamlessly with (ERP) systems through the EPC Information Services (EPCIS) standard, which captures and shares events such as "ship" and "receive" to automate updates on inventory status and . This allows ERP platforms to process RFID-generated data in , triggering actions like automated alerts or reconciliation without custom . As of 2025, EPC adoption is expanding in the , particularly for tracking returns and processes, where RFID tags provide verifiable data on product lifecycles to support and reduce in sectors like apparel and .

Inventory and Asset Tracking

In management, the (EPC) enables automated counting through fixed RFID readers positioned at key facility points, such as storage areas or conveyor systems, to scan tagged items without manual intervention. This approach captures on stock levels, significantly enhancing accuracy in backrooms where EPC implementation has improved precision to over 95%. For instance, retailers using EPC-encoded RFID tags report near-100% order accuracy by verifying item presence during storage and fulfillment processes. Asset tracking leverages EPC schemes like the Global Returnable Asset Identifier (GRAI) to uniquely identify reusable items such as pallets, crates, , facilitating their monitoring throughout internal operations. GRAI, encoded in RFID tags, supports for tracking and return management, ensuring assets like tools are locatable to minimize operational disruptions. Complementing this, the Serialized Global Location Number (SGLN) associates asset events with specific facility locations, enabling real-time visibility via EPC Information Services (EPCIS) for precise positioning within warehouses or production floors. Key benefits include substantial reductions in cycle counting time, from days to hours, through bulk RFID reads that process thousands of items per hour compared to manual methods limited to hundreds. via also aids loss prevention by allowing unique identification and auditing of high-value stock, reducing shrinkage in controlled environments. In warehouses, standards with yield 20-40% labor savings by automating routine checks and reallocating staff to higher-value tasks. Practical examples illustrate these applications. In healthcare, pharmaceutical providers like Fresenius Kabi employ EPC-enabled RFID tags on medication containers to manage drug inventory with heightened precision, tracking lot numbers and expiration dates to ensure availability and compliance. In manufacturing, EPC supports tool tracking using GRAI or the Global Individual Asset Identifier (GIAI) to locate equipment in , preventing downtime from misplaced items and optimizing production flows.

Implementation

RFID Integration

The integration of Electronic Product Codes (EPCs) with (RFID) technology primarily occurs through the encoding of EPC data into passive UHF Gen2 tags, which adhere to the EPCglobal Class 1 Generation 2 standard for air interface communications at 860-960 MHz. The latest Gen2v3 protocol (2025) adds enhancements for improved filtering, extended read range, and better performance in dense tag environments. These tags feature four memory banks: the EPC bank for storing the identifier (typically allocated 96 bits, equivalent to 12 bytes, though configurable up to 496 bits), the Tag Identifier (TID) bank for unique tag details, the bank for passwords, and the bank for optional data. Encoding involves translating the EPC—such as a Serialized (SGTIN)—from its human-readable form into a binary string using standardized tools like the EPC Encoder/Decoder, which follows the EPC Tag Data Standard Release 2.3 (October 2025) to ensure compliance and avoid errors during programming via RFID writers. Once encoded, EPC data is read by RFID interrogators (readers) that transmit commands over the air to power and query tags within their interrogation zone, capturing the EPC from the tag's backscattered response. The Gen2 supports commands like Query, Acknowledge, and Select to manage multiple tags and reduce collisions, delivering the EPC as a or payload. Middleware software then processes these raw reads, filtering duplicates and aggregating events based on rules such as time windows or location, to produce reliable data streams for applications. System-level integration leverages the Application Level Events (ALE) interface, a standardized from EPCglobal that enables applications to subscribe to filtered EPC observations without directly handling low-level reader communications. ALE aggregates reads from multiple interrogators into ECReports, supporting operations like counting unique EPCs or tracking movements, and is implemented via web services for seamless connectivity with enterprise systems. Hybrid systems combining RFID with barcodes enhance compatibility by using dual-mode readers that scan EPC-printed barcodes for initial setup or fallback, while RFID provides automated bulk reading, as seen in and deployments. Best practices for RFID integration emphasize tag placement to maximize read reliability, such as orienting tags to the reader's plane and avoiding metal surfaces that cause signal . For instance, positioning tags on non-metallic pallets or product exteriors can achieve read rates exceeding 99% at distances up to 10 meters in controlled environments, depending on power output and design. Guidelines from recommend testing placements iteratively to account for environmental factors like liquids or dense packing, ensuring consistent capture without requiring line-of-sight. As of 2025, advancements in low-power RFID tags enable embedding EPCs within sensors for extended applications, such as battery-free operation via from ambient RF signals. Innovations like SenSync transform standard Gen2 tags into sensors that monitor environmental data alongside EPC identifiers, supporting in supply chains by reducing power needs and enabling dense deployments in smart logistics. These tags maintain Gen2 while integrating functions, allowing seamless EPC readout with minimal changes.

Challenges and Adoption

The implementation of Electronic Product Code (EPC) systems faces several significant challenges, including high initial costs associated with RFID tags and infrastructure. Passive UHF RFID tags, commonly used for EPC encoding, typically cost between $0.05 and $0.10 each in bulk, which can accumulate substantially for large-scale deployments across supply chains. Additionally, privacy concerns arise from the potential for unauthorized consumer tracking, as RFID readers could inadvertently capture tag data in public spaces, raising fears of surveillance despite EPC tags not storing personal information. Interoperability issues further complicate adoption, with variations in tag and reader compatibility across vendors leading to inconsistent performance and integration difficulties. Adoption of EPC has progressed steadily, particularly in targeted sectors. As of 2025, leading retailers such as have achieved 100% EPC/RFID tagging for products, enhancing operations from production to checkout. In the , EPC-based serialization is mandatory in major markets, including the under the Drug Supply Chain Security Act (DSCSA) with full enforcement in 2025, and the under the Falsified Medicines Directive (FMD), ensuring traceability to combat counterfeiting. Globally, standards facilitate this compliance, with the RFID in pharmaceuticals market projected to grow from USD 6.2 billion in 2025 to USD 18.0 billion by 2035. Key limitations of EPC systems include variability in RFID read ranges, particularly when tags are applied to metals or liquids, which can detune antennas and reduce effective detection to mere centimeters in challenging environments. Scalability also poses hurdles for tracking billions of items, as high-volume data generation from RFID reads demands robust infrastructure to manage collisions, interference, and processing without bottlenecks. Looking ahead, adoption is expected to converge with , including 5G-enabled for extended connectivity and real-time tracking in s. integration for data analytics will further enhance predictive insights and automation, while projections indicate broader coverage through initiatives like Digital Product Passports, supported by and RFID collaborations. To address these issues, provides guidelines emphasizing privacy protections, such as ensuring no personally identifiable data is encoded in tags and promoting notice-and-choice principles for consumers. Pilot programs often incorporate subsidies to offset initial costs, facilitating testing and gradual rollout in industries like and logistics.

References

  1. [1]
    RFID - GS1
    The Electronic Product Code™ (EPC) is syntax for unique identifiers assigned to physical objects, unit loads, locations, or other identifiable entity ...
  2. [2]
    RFID History: Background, Timeline & More - Peak Technologies
    In the early 2000s, the Electronic Product Code (EPC) numbering system was developed and commercialized, thereby enabling universal identifiers for a vast array ...
  3. [3]
    Introductory Chapter: RFID: A Successful History - IntechOpen
    Nov 29, 2017 · The MIT Auto-ID center became the global Electronic Product Code, an organism in charge of promoting the EPC standard. Some of the biggest ...
  4. [4]
    [PDF] EPC Tag Data Standard - GS1
    Sep 11, 2017 · The EPC Tag Data Standard defines the Electronic Product Code™ and specifies the memory contents of Gen 2 RFID Tags.
  5. [5]
    EPC Tag Data Standard (TDS) - GS1
    GS1's EPC Tag Data Standard (TDS) defines the Electronic Product Code (EPC), including its correspondence to GS1 keys and other codes. Discover it here!
  6. [6]
    [PDF] EPC Tag Data Standard - GS1
    The EPC Tag Data Standard defines the Electronic Product Code™ and specifies the memory contents of Gen 2 RFID Tags.
  7. [7]
    The History of EPC's Future - RFID JOURNAL
    Apr 1, 2006 · The idea of new generations of Electronic Product Code tag standards dates back to the summer of 2002. The Auto-ID Center was wrapping up ...
  8. [8]
    electronic product code - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    An electronic product code (EPC) is a coding scheme used for Gen 2 tags, containing a unique serial number to identify objects in RFID systems.
  9. [9]
    RFID Implementation Resources - What is a Supply Chain - GS1 US
    The GS1© Electronic Product Code (EPC©) is a syntax for unique identifiers assigned to products, unit loads, locations, or other identifiable entities. The ...
  10. [10]
    EPC/RFID - GS1 Sweden
    The Electronic Product Code (EPC) is a GS1 standardized format for uniquely identifying objects, transport units, locations and other important items.
  11. [11]
    What is an Electronic Product Code (EPC)?
    Aug 30, 2024 · The Electronic Product Code, or EPC, forms the bridge between barcode-based use of the GS1 identifiers and the world of RAIN RFID.Missing: origin Auto- ID Center
  12. [12]
    EPC Encoder and Decoder Tool - GS1 US
    Use GS1's Encoder and Decoder tool to run a real time translation between different forms of the EPC from a GEN 2 RFID tag.Missing: origin | Show results with:origin
  13. [13]
    Internet of things: Let the avatars talk to each other - MIT News
    May 30, 2017 · So, Sarma, along with research scientist David Brock of MIT and Kevin Ashton, a visiting researcher from Proctor and Gamble, came up with a ...
  14. [14]
    A Very Short History Of The Internet Of Things - Forbes
    Jun 18, 2014 · 1999 The Auto-ID (for Automatic Identification) Center is established at MIT. Sanjay Sarma, David Brock and Kevin Ashton turned RFID into a ...
  15. [15]
    A Look at RFID 20 Years after First EPC Conference
    Dec 8, 2023 · As some background to all this, in 1999, the MIT Auto-ID Center was launched, under the leadership of Kevin Ashton, David Brock and Sanjay Sarma ...
  16. [16]
    - RFID TECHNOLOGY: WHAT THE FUTURE HOLDS FOR ... - GovInfo
    HOW WAL-MART BECAME INVOLVED Wal-Mart was the first retailer to join MIT's AUTO-ID Center in 1999. We, along with others, funded research on the potential of ...
  17. [17]
    RFID - Six Years Later - Supply Chain Digest
    Oct 8, 2009 · In 1999, the MIT Auto-ID Center ... Parameters were developed for this more simple tag, which came to be known as the Electronic Product Code ...
  18. [18]
    [PDF] None_MIT-AUTOID-WH-001.pdf
    Kevin Ashton is Executive Director of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Auto-ID Center in. Cambridge, Massachusetts, and the Cambridge University Auto- ...
  19. [19]
    Case Study: Wal-Marts Race for RFID - eWeek
    Sep 15, 2003 · For the past two-and-a-half years, Wal-Mart has been working with the Auto-ID Center, a nonprofit research organization based at the ...Missing: involvement early
  20. [20]
    ITEM-LEVEL TEST OF EPC SET TO START - Supermarket News
    Larry Kellam, director, supply network innovation, for Cincinnati-based P&G, said the field test would begin during "the next 30 days" at a Wal-Mart store in ...Missing: involvement | Show results with:involvement
  21. [21]
    RFID in CPG to Retail - What Really Happened?
    Mar 10, 2011 · Companies like Gillette, Procter & Gamble, Kimberly Clark, Unilever and WalMart were the most prominent and active members. CPG companies ...
  22. [22]
    The History of RFID Technology
    Jan 16, 2005 · The Auto-ID Center closed its doors in October 2003, and its research responsibilities were passed on to Auto-ID Labs. Some of the biggest ...
  23. [23]
    [PDF] EPCglobal: A Universal Standard - MIT
    This thesis evaluates the likelihood of EPCglobal becoming the universal RFID standard by presenting a framework of ten factors used to analyze and ...Missing: limitations | Show results with:limitations
  24. [24]
    [PDF] EAN INTERNATIONAL Annual Report 2003/2004 - GS1
    Oct 8, 2004 · The agreement, set up, and launch of EPCglobal. Inc is at the top of the list. This joint venture with GS1 US is our innovative initiative to ...
  25. [25]
    [PDF] EPCglobalTag Data Standards Version 1.3 Ratified Specification
    Mar 8, 2006 · The general structure of EPC encodings is as a string of bits, consisting of a fixed length header followed by a series of value fields, whose ...
  26. [26]
    [PDF] EPC Tag Data Standard
    The EPC Tag Data Standard defines the Electronic Product Code™ and specifies the memory contents of Gen 2 RFID Tags.
  27. [27]
  28. [28]
    GS1 identification keys
    GS1 ID Keys are globally unique identifiers that help companies access and share supply chain information, and are used to assign standard identifiers to  ...Missing: Electronic | Show results with:Electronic
  29. [29]
    [PDF] GS1 Digital Link Standard: URI Syntax
    Jan 2, 2021 · GS1 Digital Link provides a syntax for expressing GS1 identifier keys, key qualifiers and data attributes in a format that can be used on the ...
  30. [30]
    About - GS1
    Over two million are part of GS1—from international household names to small, local businesses. Designed by consensus, our standards are proven, open and ...GS1 Careers · GS1 50th anniversary · 2024/25 GS1 Year in Review · What we do
  31. [31]
    The History of GS1 Barcodes: First Scan to QR Code Future
    Jul 8, 2025 · GS1 celebrates the 50 th anniversary of the barcode together with its family of 116 local GS1 Member Organisations. Over 1 billion products now ...
  32. [32]
    [PDF] The GS1 EPCglobal Architecture Framework
    Many of the standards within the EPCglobal framework are based on network. 1814 protocols that communicate EPC information over existing network technology.
  33. [33]
    Tag Data Standard | GS1
    GS1's EPC Tag Data Standard (TDS) defines the Electronic Product Code (EPC), including its correspondence to GS1 keys and other existing codes.
  34. [34]
    Application Level Events (ALE) Standard - GS1
    The ALE standard provides an interface for clients to obtain filtered, consolidated data for physical events, hiding low-level details and delivering decoded ...Missing: EPCglobal | Show results with:EPCglobal
  35. [35]
    EPCIS & CBV - GS1
    EPCIS is a traceability event messaging standard that enables supply chain visibility through sharing event data using a common language.EPCIS 1.2 Artifacts · EPCIS 1.1 Artifacts · Epcis / cbv 2.0.1
  36. [36]
    [PDF] Object Naming Service (ONS) Version 1.0 - GS1
    The EPCglobal Network architecture provides a method for the inclusion of commercial. 112. (both physical and otherwise) products within a network of ...
  37. [37]
    Core Business Vocabulary - GS1
    The Core Business Vocabulary (CBV) specifies the structure of vocabularies and specific values for the vocabulary elements to be utilized in conjunction ...
  38. [38]
    [PDF] Core Business Vocabulary (CBV) Standard - GS1 Reference
    Where an EPC URI is used as a User Vocabulary Element, both CBV-Compliant and CBV-Compatible documents SHALL use an EPC Pure Identity URI, except as noted below ...
  39. [39]
    [PDF] Auto-ID Labs Research Projects Summary Report - GS1
    As increased adoption of EPC/RFID tags becomes more prevalent, this research will become important to properly process physical world events in Retail and ...
  40. [40]
    Serialized Shipping Container Codes (SSCC) - GS1 US
    Manufacturers use SSCCs to track logistics units from factories to distributors for greater production and shipping efficiency. Retailers monitor shipments ...
  41. [41]
    The Role of EPC in RFID Systems: A Detailed and Informative Guide
    Jul 1, 2025 · Discover how the Electronic Product Code (EPC) enhances RFID systems by enabling item-level tracking, global standardization, and real-time ...Missing: proposal 2000
  42. [42]
    RFID Use in Warehouse Management - GS1 US
    According the GS1® and Auburn University Study, RFID can reduce retail out of stocks by up to 50%. This 50% drop is impressive and can significantly reduce ...Pros Of Rfid In Warehouse... · Limitations Of Using Rfid In... · Implementation CostsMissing: 30-50% | Show results with:30-50%
  43. [43]
    [PDF] Commonly Asked RFID Questions: Dispelling the Myths - GS1
    Sep 30, 2014 · It has been widely publicized that RFID has proven its value for improving inventory accuracy and availability. Further, as RFID deployments ...Missing: stockouts | Show results with:stockouts
  44. [44]
    Walmart Recommits to RFID
    Jan 28, 2022 · Walmart is proceeding with mandates for radio frequency identification technology, requiring its suppliers in some departments to include RFID tags on all ...
  45. [45]
    Drug Supply Chain Security Act (DSCSA) - FDA
    Oct 16, 2025 · The Drug Supply Chain Security Act (DSCSA) outlines steps to achieve an interoperable and electronic way to identify and trace certain prescription drugs.DSCSA Policies · FDA's implementation of... · Pharmacists: Utilize DSCSA...Missing: SGTIN EPC
  46. [46]
    [PDF] Applying GS1 Standards for DSCSA and Traceability - GS1 US
    This guideline applies GS1 standards for DSCSA, covering lot-level management, item-level identification, and item-level traceability.
  47. [47]
    [PDF] EPCIS and CBV Implementation Guideline | GS1
    Note that in the EPC URI, the GS1 Company Prefix is written separately from the other digits of the GTIN and there is no check digit. The EPC Tag Data Standard, ...
  48. [48]
    EPCIS 1.2 – SOM Shipment Event - TraceLink Inc
    Oct 31, 2025 · Integrating with serialization, ERP, and logistics systems to capture shipment events. Transmitting EPCIS 1.2-compliant shipment data to ...
  49. [49]
    Digital Product Passports: unlocking a revolution in textile recycling
    May 22, 2025 · By adopting GS1 standards, apparel companies can modernise their operations and provide recyclers with the accurate data needed to optimise ...
  50. [50]
    GS1 Year in Review 2024/25
    Businesses meet sustainability and regulatory goals while supporting a circular economy. Vision 2030 is shaped by industry leaders and built on three pillars:.
  51. [51]
    RFID Enables Nearly 100% Order Accuracy for Retail
    Using item-level RFID technology, retailers can decrease out-of-stocks, improve loss detection, boost sales margins and expedite returns—just to name a few of ...
  52. [52]
    [PDF] Global Returnable Asset Identifier (GRAI) - GS1
    The Global Returnable Asset Identifier (GRAI) is a GS1 key for identifying reusable transport items, used for tracking and sorting, and can be encoded in ...
  53. [53]
    [PDF] Inventory visibility with EPC-enabled RFID Item Level Tagging (ILT ...
    □ Reduction of inventory cycle counting time by 96%. □ Increase in inventory count rate from 200 to 12,000+ items per hour. □ Reduction in the time used ...
  54. [54]
    Why RFID Warehouse Tracking Fails — And How to Make It Actually ...
    May 28, 2024 · 30–40% Labor Savings, Automated counts via RFID cut labor time by 30–40%. (Deloitte). 20% Shrinkage Reduction, Real-time tracking slashes ...
  55. [55]
    [PDF] Fresenius Kabi | Case Study | GS1 US
    By including RFID technology in the label of our medications, we are helping our customers manage their drug inventory with more precision and accuracy, ...
  56. [56]
    [PDF] An Introduction to the Global Individual Asset Identifier (GIAI) | GS1 US
    A GIAI is a GS1 key to identify individual assets, like a computer, and is used for inventory control. It is comprised of a GS1 Company Prefix and an ...
  57. [57]
    EPC UHF Gen2 Air Interface Protocol - GS1
    GS1's EPC "Gen2" air interface protocol, first published by EPCglobal in 2004, defines the physical and logical requirements for an RFID system.
  58. [58]
  59. [59]
    EPC Encoder/Decoder - GS1
    This interactive application translates between different forms of the Electronic Product Code (EPC), following the EPC Tag Data Standard (TDS) 1.13.
  60. [60]
    [PDF] EPC Radio-Frequency Identity Protocols Generation-2 UHF RFID
    EPC Radio-Frequency Identity Protocols Generation-2 UHF RFID is a specification for RFID Air Interface Protocol for Communications at 860 MHz – 960 MHz.
  61. [61]
    [PDF] The Application Level Events (ALE) Specification, Version 1.0 - GS1
    Feb 8, 2011 · The schema below conforms to EPCglobal standard schema design rules. The schema. 1178 below imports the EPCglobal standard base schema, as ...
  62. [62]
    [PDF] The GS1 EPCglobal Architecture Framework
    Apr 14, 2014 · standards forming the EPCglobal Architecture Framework. 1750. 10.3.1. Network Interfaces. 1751. Many of the standards within the EPCglobal ...
  63. [63]
    RFID vs Barcode: Comparison, Advantages & Disadvantages
    Many organizations adopt a hybrid approach, using RFID and barcode technologies together to take advantage of each system's strengths. This combined setup ...
  64. [64]
  65. [65]
    [PDF] Reliability Techniques for RFID-Based Object Tracking Applications
    tag read reliabilities are equal between the front and back of the box, and between the top and bottom of the box, the average read reliability for all ...
  66. [66]
    Reimagining RFID: UC San Diego Researchers Develop Award ...
    Jun 10, 2025 · Named SenSync, the innovation transforms everyday RFID tags into real-time sensors, unlocking new applications in AR, robotics and sustainability.Missing: IoT EPC advancements
  67. [67]
    The Future of RFID in Industrial Asset Tracking - CPCON Group
    One of the most promising developments in RFID technology is the emergence of battery-free sensor tags. These advanced passive tags harvest energy from the ...The Future Of Rfid In... · Ultra-Wideband (uwb) Rfid · Emerging Rfid Technologies...
  68. [68]
    Is RFID Replacing Barcodes Altogether in Retail?
    Sep 12, 2025 · 3.1 Are Barcodes Still More Cost-Effective? Barcodes cost almost nothing to print compared to $0.05-0.10 for an RFID tag. For low-margin ...
  69. [69]
    RFID Privacy: An Overview of Problems and Proposed Solutions
    Aug 9, 2025 · The paper is to explore the security issues of the RFID EPC Class 1 Generation 2. RFID transmits information wirelessly, and therefore ...
  70. [70]
    Top RFID Implementation Challenges & Solutions for Effective Use
    Sep 2, 2025 · RFID challenges include technical issues like interference, tag/reader compatibility, data collision, and cost-related issues such as initial ...
  71. [71]
    Global Retail Sporting Goods Leader Finishes First with RFID
    100% of Decathlon products carry an EPC-/RFID-enabled tag that powers operations, extending from its production lines to its checkout lines.Missing: statistics | Show results with:statistics
  72. [72]
    The DSCSA Pharmaceutical Serialization Deadline Looms - Datex
    Extended from 2017, the DSCSA mandated pharmaceutical serialization deadline is November 27, 2018 for manufacturers, repackagers and wholesale distributors.Missing: 2013 | Show results with:2013
  73. [73]
    RFID in Pharmaceuticals Market | Global Market Analysis Report
    The RFID in pharmaceuticals market is projected to grow from USD 6.2 billion in 2025 to USD 18.0 billion by 2035, at a CAGR of 11.2%.
  74. [74]
    Passive RFID Tags: Read Range & Types Guide for Enterprise
    Environmental factors: Metal surfaces and liquids can detune antennas, reducing range. Orientation & placement: Tags aligned toward the reader yield longer ...
  75. [75]
    Getting to Trillions of RAIN RFID Tagged Items - Voyantic
    Feb 8, 2023 · Item numbering structures, RF interference, and regulatory constraints are eco-system-wide challenges, that require early mitigation. Simply ...
  76. [76]
    (PDF) 5G and Internet of Things—Integration Trends, Opportunities ...
    May 9, 2025 · Nowadays, the applications of IoT need a fast data transfer to ensure smooth service. 5G has the potential to achieve this function for IoT.
  77. [77]
    Advancing DPPs with GS1 Identifiers and RAIN Technology
    Aug 11, 2025 · RAIN Alliance and GS1 have issued a joint position paper highlighting their collaboration around the upcoming Digital Product Passport (DPP) ...
  78. [78]
    [PDF] GS1/EPCglobal Guidelines on EPC for Consumer Products
    Under the auspices of GS1/EPCglobal. Inc, these Guidelines have been followed since January 1, 2005 and will continue to evolve as advances in EPC and its ...
  79. [79]
    Press Releases - GS1 US
    GS1 US has published a new resource to help brands and retailers leverage GS1 Electronic Product Code (EPC)-based Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) ...Missing: statistics | Show results with:statistics