Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Founder effect

The founder effect is a phenomenon in population genetics where a new population is established by a small number of individuals from a larger source population, resulting in reduced genetic diversity and altered allele frequencies in the descendants compared to the original group.^[1] This process, a specific type of genetic drift, occurs because the founding individuals carry only a subset of the genetic variation present in the parent population, leading to a bottleneck that amplifies random sampling effects on gene pools.^[2] Founder effects typically arise during events such as migration, colonization, or population isolation, where the small founding group—often fewer than 100 individuals—does not represent the full genetic spectrum of the source population.^[3] Over generations, this can cause certain alleles, including rare or deleterious ones, to become disproportionately common or even fixed in the new population due to limited gene flow and ongoing drift, rather than natural selection.^[3] For instance, neutral or mildly deleterious mutations present in the founders may reach higher frequencies, potentially increasing the prevalence of genetic disorders.^[2] The consequences of the founder effect extend to evolutionary biology and public health, as reduced genetic variation can limit adaptability to environmental changes and elevate risks for recessive diseases in endogamous communities.^[4] In conservation genetics, it highlights vulnerabilities in small, isolated populations, such as endangered species, where inbreeding further exacerbates diversity loss.^[2] Notable examples include the Amish communities in Pennsylvania, where founder effects have led to elevated rates of conditions like Ellis-van Creveld syndrome (dwarfism with polydactyly) due to shared ancestry from 18th-century European migrants.^[2] Similarly, in Ashkenazi Jewish populations, bottlenecks around A.D. 70 and 1100–1400 amplified alleles for lysosomal storage disorders, such as Tay-Sachs and Gaucher disease, with frequencies like 0.032 for the N370S mutation in Gaucher.^[3] More recently, in Arab populations, cultural practices like consanguinity have intensified founder effects, contributing to over 160 rare syndromes, including Sanjad-Sakati syndrome linked to specific TBCE variants.^[4] These cases underscore the founder effect's role in shaping human genetic diversity and informing targeted genetic screening strategies.^[4]

Definition and Mechanisms

Core Concept

The founder effect is a type of genetic drift that arises when a small group of individuals separates from a larger source population to establish a new population, leading to a reduction in genetic variation and potentially altered allele frequencies in the new group compared to the original population.^[1] This phenomenon results from the random sampling of alleles during the founding event, where the genetic makeup of the founders does not perfectly represent the diversity or frequencies present in the source population, independent of natural selection or other adaptive forces.^[5] The effect is particularly pronounced in small founding groups, as fewer individuals mean a higher likelihood of losing rare alleles or fixating others by chance.^[6] The concept was first fully articulated by evolutionary biologist Ernst Mayr in his 1942 book Systematics and the Origin of Species, where he described it as the "founder principle" in the context of speciation and population establishment on islands or isolated habitats.^[7] Mayr built upon earlier theoretical work on genetic drift by population geneticist Sewall Wright, who in the 1930s developed mathematical models demonstrating how random fluctuations in allele frequencies could occur in finite populations, laying the groundwork for understanding non-adaptive evolutionary changes.^[8] Wright's contributions, particularly in his 1931 paper "Evolution in Mendelian Populations," emphasized the role of stochastic processes in evolution, which Mayr later applied specifically to founder scenarios.^[9] At its core, the founder effect is a specific manifestation of genetic drift, which refers to random changes in allele frequencies within a population due to sampling error in reproduction, rather than deterministic factors like selection.^[10] Unlike broader genetic drift that can affect any population size over generations, the founder effect is tied to the initial colonization event by a small subset, amplifying drift's impact from the outset and often resulting in a gene pool that deviates markedly from the source.^[6] This distinction highlights how the founder effect initiates a trajectory of reduced heterozygosity and potential genetic bottlenecks in the new population. The founder effect is related to but distinct from the bottleneck effect, another form of drift involving a sharp reduction in an existing population's size.^[5] To illustrate, the founder effect resembles drawing a small handful of cards from a large, well-shuffled deck where each card represents an allele in the source population's gene pool; the selected cards may disproportionately include or exclude certain types purely by chance, mirroring how founders can skew allele representation without reflecting the original deck's composition.^[11] This analogy underscores the probabilistic nature of the process, where the smaller the founding group, the greater the deviation from expected frequencies.^[12]

Genetic and Evolutionary Impacts

The founder effect results in a significant reduction in genetic variation within the newly established population compared to the source population, as only a subset of alleles is carried by the small number of founders. This loss occurs because the founding individuals represent a non-random sample of the original gene pool, leading to the exclusion of many alleles that were present in the larger source population. Consequently, heterozygosity decreases, limiting the overall genetic diversity available for future generations.^[1]^[5] This diminished genetic diversity often leads to increased homozygosity, particularly when mating occurs among closely related founders, elevating the potential for inbreeding. In such isolated populations, the limited allele pool heightens the expression of recessive traits, including deleterious ones, thereby increasing the risk of recessive disorders. The combination of low heterozygosity and inbreeding depression can compromise population fitness and resilience to environmental changes.^[13]^[14] Allele frequencies in founder populations undergo random shifts due to the sampling error inherent in small group establishment, which can elevate the proportion of rare alleles or cause others to be lost entirely. Over time, genetic drift amplifies these changes, potentially driving certain alleles to fixation (reaching 100% frequency) or complete elimination from the population. These stochastic fluctuations differ from selective pressures, as they arise purely from chance rather than adaptive advantage.^[6]^[15] From an evolutionary perspective, the founder effect can accelerate speciation by promoting genetic isolation and rapid divergence from the source population, as proposed in peripatric speciation models where small founding groups evolve distinct traits in new environments. Additionally, if the founders happen to carry advantageous variants, these can become disproportionately common, facilitating adaptive evolution in response to novel selective pressures. Such outcomes underscore the founder effect's role in generating evolutionary novelty, though they also heighten extinction risk due to reduced adaptability.^[16]^[17] In comparison to other forms of genetic drift, such as the bottleneck effect, the founder effect specifically involves the initiation of a small, isolated population from a larger one, whereas bottlenecks reduce an existing large population through sudden, drastic declines. Both mechanisms diminish genetic variation via drift, but founder events emphasize the non-representative sampling at colonization, often leading to longer-term isolation and divergence.^[5]

Mathematical Foundations

The founder effect can be quantitatively modeled using adaptations of the Wright-Fisher model, which describes genetic drift in a finite population of constant size N (diploid individuals). In this framework, the expected heterozygosity H_t at generation t decays from the initial value H_0 according to the formula

H_t = H_0 \left(1 - \frac{1}{2N}\right)^t,

reflecting the random sampling of alleles each generation, with the rate of loss proportional to $1/(2N). This adaptation applies directly to founder populations, where the small initial N accelerates the decay compared to larger source populations, leading to rapid loss of genetic diversity under neutral assumptions.^[18] A key parameter in these models is the effective population size N_e, which represents the size of an ideal Wright-Fisher population experiencing the same rate of drift as the actual population; in founder scenarios, N_e is typically much smaller than the census size due to high relatedness among founders. For populations with separate sexes and unequal numbers of breeding males (N_m) and females (N_f), the inbreeding effective size is given by

N_e = \frac{4 N_m N_f}{N_m + N_f},

which reduces N_e when sex ratios are imbalanced, further intensifying drift effects in small founder groups.^[19] For a neutral allele with initial frequency p in a founder population, the probability of eventual fixation remains approximately p, as derived from diffusion approximations to the Wright-Fisher process; however, in small N, the variance of allele frequency trajectories increases, making outcomes more stochastic and elevating the chance of rapid loss or fixation relative to larger populations.^[20] Coalescent theory provides a complementary simulation approach for modeling founder effects, tracing lineages backward in time from the present sample to their common ancestors among the founders; in small populations, this results in rapid coalescence times, often within a few generations, due to the elevated probability that any two lineages merge in the prior generation, scaling as $1/(2N).^[21] This backward perspective efficiently captures the compressed genealogical structure induced by founders, facilitating simulations of diversity loss without forward enumeration of all possible allele histories. Empirical studies of founder-derived populations, such as the Finnish and Hutterite communities, validate these models by demonstrating significant deviations from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, with excess homozygosity attributable to drift and inbreeding rather than selection or genotyping artifacts; for instance, genome-wide analyses in these isolates reveal locus-specific disequilibria consistent with reduced N_e and elevated fixation rates predicted by the adapted Wright-Fisher framework.^[22]^[23]

Variants and Processes

Single Founder Event

The single founder event involves a discrete process where a small subset of individuals migrates or becomes separated from a larger source population, typically comprising a small number of individuals not representative of the original genetic diversity, and establishes a new population in an isolated habitat.^[5]^[6] This initial stage of migration or separation reduces the gene pool through random sampling, leading to immediate loss of alleles and genetic variation compared to the source.^[1] Following establishment, the group undergoes initial reproduction in the new environment, where limited numbers amplify genetic drift and further alter allele frequencies without subsequent gene flow from the original population, solidifying the genetic bottleneck.^[24] Several factors modulate the severity of genetic impacts during a single founder event. The size of the founding group is paramount: smaller propagules experience intensified genetic drift, resulting in greater reductions in heterozygosity and allelic diversity, as the effective population size directly influences the strength of random allele fixation or loss.^[25] Imbalances in the sex ratio among founders can exacerbate this by skewing effective population size and reproductive contributions, leading to uneven transmission of sex-linked or autosomal variation and heightened vulnerability to drift on the underrepresented sex's genome.^[26] Additionally, high relatedness among the founding individuals promotes inbreeding, which accelerates homozygosity and further depletes genetic variation, compounding the founder bottleneck's effects beyond simple drift.^[27] Detection of a single founder event relies on genomic signatures in the derived population, such as elevated linkage disequilibrium across loci due to reduced opportunities for recombination in the small founding group, which persists as a hallmark of recent isolation.^[28] Other indicators include an excess of rare variants relative to neutral expectations under expansion, reflecting post-founding mutation accumulation on a depleted background, alongside overall reduced heterozygosity and allelic richness compared to the source population.^[29] These patterns can be quantified using site frequency spectra or coalescent-based models to infer the timing and intensity of the founding bottleneck.^[30] Laboratory demonstrations have empirically validated the rapid genetic shifts in single founder events. In experimental evolution with Drosophila melanogaster, small founding populations (e.g., derived from 20-50 individuals) exhibit swift allele frequency changes and loss of variation within generations, as shown in founder-flush designs where isolated lines display altered quantitative traits and increased drift compared to large controls.^[31] Similarly, bacterial experiments using Pseudomonas fluorescens or Escherichia coli with bottlenecked founders (e.g., 100-1,000 cells) demonstrate constrained adaptive trajectories, with founder genotypes dominating and limiting diversity, highlighting how initial sampling biases propagate through reproduction without external gene flow.^[32]

Serial Founder Effect

The serial founder effect refers to a process in population genetics where multiple successive founder events occur during range expansions or migrations, each new population being established by a small subset of individuals from the previous one, resulting in cumulative loss of genetic diversity.^[33] This chain of bottlenecks amplifies genetic drift, as alleles are sampled repeatedly from progressively smaller gene pools, leading to a stepwise reduction in variation that exceeds what a single founder event would produce.^[18] For instance, in stepwise migrations, each colonizing group carries only a fraction of the source population's alleles, fostering isolation and differentiation along the expansion axis.^[33] A key signature of the serial founder effect is the establishment of a "serial founder gradient," characterized by progressively decreasing heterozygosity and increasing genetic differentiation, measured as F_{ST}, with distance from the original source population.^[18] Heterozygosity declines linearly or exponentially along this path, reflecting the compounded sampling error, while F_{ST} rises due to allele frequency shifts, often correlating with geographic distance in empirical data.^[33] Mathematically, the serial founder effect extends single-event models through iterative applications, where expected heterozygosity decays cumulatively across generations or steps. In discrete models, heterozygosity at step t+1 is given by H_{t+1} = H_t \left(1 - \frac{1}{2N_f}\right), with N_f as the effective founder population size per step, yielding a steeper overall loss than isolated events; for n steps, this approximates H_n \approx H_0 \left(1 - \frac{1}{2N_f}\right)^n.^[18] Continuous approximations describe an exponential decay, H(d) = H_0 e^{-d / \kappa_e}, where d is distance and \kappa_e scales with propagule size.^[18] Evolutionarily, serial founder effects promote genetic isolation, elevating drift over selection and facilitating local adaptations in peripheral populations through reduced gene flow and fixation of beneficial variants.^[18] They also shape phylogeographic patterns, such as clinal variation in allele frequencies, by enabling "gene surfing" where neutral or mildly deleterious alleles reach high frequencies at expansion fronts.^[33] Recent genomic studies using whole-genome sequencing have confirmed serial founder effects in expanding species ranges. In invasive honey bees (Apis mellifera), populations at range edges show reduced nucleotide diversity (\pi = 2.00 \times 10^{-3} vs. $2.22 \times 10^{-3} in central areas) and elevated F_{ST} (up to 0.095), with secondary bottlenecks increasing genetic load and slowing expansion rates to 7.18 km/year.^[34] Similarly, whole-genome analyses of dingoes (Canis dingo) reveal 36% lower nucleotide diversity than wolves, alongside 1.6–4.7 times more runs of homozygosity, indicating compounded founder effects during colonization of Australia.^[35]

Founder Mutations

A founder mutation refers to a genetic variant that arises in one or more founder individuals of a population and subsequently increases in frequency within the descendant group due to genetic drift, particularly in isolated or bottlenecked populations.^[36]^[37] These mutations are typically inherited along with surrounding chromosomal segments from a common ancestor, leading to their enrichment in geographically or culturally isolated communities.^[38] Founder mutations often carry neutral or deleterious effects, with the latter frequently associated with monogenic disorders due to reduced genetic diversity that limits masking by other alleles.^[39] A key characteristic is the presence of extended shared haplotype blocks around the mutation site, which are identical by descent and reflect the limited recombination events since the founding event.^[15]^[40] These haplotype signatures diminish in length over generations as recombination breaks them down, providing clues to the mutation's origin and age.^[41] Detection of founder mutations relies on haplotype analysis to identify extended regions of similarity among affected individuals, often using dense genotyping or sequencing data to map shared segments.^[42] Identity-by-descent (IBD) mapping further refines this by pinpointing genomic regions inherited from a common ancestor, enhancing resolution in founder populations.^[43] The age of such mutations is estimated through the decay of linkage disequilibrium (LD) surrounding the variant, where the extent of LD erosion correlates with the number of recombination events since origination, typically modeled using coalescent theory or haplotype length distributions.^[44]^[45] A well-documented example is the CCR5-Δ32 deletion, a 32-base-pair frameshift mutation prevalent in northern European populations at frequencies up to 10-15%, which arose once in a single ancestor and confers near-complete resistance to HIV-1 infection in homozygotes by disrupting the CCR5 coreceptor.^[46] Estimates place its origin between 700 and 3,500 years ago, based on LD decay and geographic distribution patterns.^[47] In Finland, the "Finnish disease heritage" encompasses over 35 enriched disorders due to founder effects from historical bottlenecks, including the Fin major mutation (c.1040delG) in the AGA gene causing aspartylglucosaminuria, which accounts for about 98% of cases and originated around 200-800 years ago.^[48]^[49] Another Finnish example is the R133C mutation in NOTCH3, responsible for over 80% of cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL) cases, tracing back to a common ancestor approximately 400 years ago.^[50] The clinical relevance of founder mutations lies in their role in elevating the incidence of rare genetic disorders within specific populations, such as recessive conditions manifesting at higher rates due to consanguinity or isolation.^[38] This enrichment enables cost-effective population-specific screening panels, improving early diagnosis and carrier detection for diseases like those in the Finnish heritage.^[49] In personalized medicine, recognizing founder variants facilitates targeted therapies and pharmacogenomics, as shared genetic backgrounds allow for streamlined variant interpretation and the development of precision interventions tailored to high-risk groups.^[51]^[52]

Ecological and Population Applications

Island Biogeography

The founder effect plays a pivotal role in island biogeography by influencing the initial establishment of species on isolated landmasses, integrating with the MacArthur-Wilson equilibrium theory of island biogeography, which posits that species richness results from a balance between immigration and extinction rates. In this framework, founder events occur during colonization when small numbers of individuals from mainland or nearby source populations arrive on islands, often via rare dispersal events, leading to reduced genetic diversity that shapes subsequent community assembly and evolutionary trajectories.^[53] These stochastic founder processes complement the theory's emphasis on immigration rates, which decrease with increasing isolation, thereby amplifying the genetic bottlenecks inherent in island colonization.^[54] Islands exhibit high levels of endemism largely attributable to repeated founder effects across multiple colonization events, where limited gene flow from source populations results in unique evolutionary lineages confined to specific islands.^[55] For instance, the Hawaiian Drosophila radiation, comprising over 800 endemic species derived from a small number of ancestral colonizers from the Asian mainland, demonstrates how founder events foster speciation through genetic drift and adaptation to novel island habitats. This pattern of elevated endemism is widespread, as oceanic barriers restrict propagule size and frequency, promoting divergence in isolated island populations over time.^[56] Ecological factors such as dispersal limitations, particularly ocean barriers, intensify founder bottlenecks by ensuring that colonizing groups are typically small and unrepresentative of source population diversity, which in turn facilitates adaptive radiations as descendants exploit unoccupied niches.^[57] On remote archipelagos like Hawaii or the Galápagos, these barriers not only limit immigration but also create conditions for rapid morphological and ecological diversification from founder stocks, as seen in the exploitation of varied resources post-colonization.^[58] The single founder event mechanism underlies initial colonization in such systems, where a limited set of genotypes establishes the population base for subsequent radiations.00229-6.pdf) Prominent case studies illustrate these dynamics, including the Galápagos finches (Geospiza spp.), where founder-derived populations on individual islands display significant morphological variation in beak size and shape, attributable to genetic bottlenecks during archipelago colonization that reduced variation and promoted local adaptation.^[59] Recent genomic analyses further confirm founder effects in island lizards; for example, a 2023 study of introduced Podarcis siculus on Pod Mrčaru Island revealed genome-wide differentiation and low neutral genetic diversity consistent with a strong founder bottleneck from the 1971 translocation, despite subsequent adaptive evolution in limb morphology.^[60] The low genetic diversity stemming from founder effects renders island populations particularly vulnerable to conservation threats, including habitat loss, invasive species, and climate change, as reduced variability limits adaptive potential and increases extinction risk.^[61] This vulnerability is exacerbated in small, isolated populations, where further bottlenecks from anthropogenic perturbations can lead to inbreeding depression and diminished resilience, underscoring the need for targeted management strategies like connectivity enhancement or genetic supplementation.^[55]

Human Populations

The founder effect has profoundly shaped human genetic diversity through historical migrations that established isolated populations from small founding groups. During the peopling of the Americas, ancestors of Native Americans migrated from Siberia across the Bering Land Bridge around 15,000–20,000 years ago, resulting in a significant bottleneck that reduced genetic variation and led to the fixation of certain alleles.^[62] Similarly, Polynesian expansions across the Pacific, beginning around 3,000 years ago from Taiwan and involving serial settlements of remote islands, exhibited marked reductions in mitochondrial DNA variability, decreasing from west to east, indicative of repeated founder events.^[63] These migrations created lasting genetic signatures, as small groups carried limited subsets of ancestral diversity, amplifying the frequency of specific variants in descendant populations.^[64] In isolated human groups, founder effects have elevated the frequencies of certain disease-associated alleles, demonstrating genetic homogeneity. Among Ashkenazi Jews, a population bottleneck during medieval migrations in Europe led to the high prevalence of the 1278insTATC mutation causing Tay-Sachs disease, with carrier rates reaching 1 in 27 due to drift in a small founding cohort.^[65] Icelanders trace their origins to Viking settlers around 870 CE, a founding population of roughly 400–800 individuals from Scandinavia and the British Isles, resulting in reduced heterozygosity and increased identity-by-descent segments across the genome.^[66] These patterns highlight how founder events, combined with subsequent isolation, concentrate rare variants that would otherwise remain low-frequency in larger populations.^[67] Advancements in ancient DNA analysis since 2015 have illuminated founder events in human history by sequencing genomes from archaeological remains, revealing serial bottlenecks during expansions. For instance, studies of Native American groups using Y-chromosome and mtDNA data show stepwise reductions in diversity from north to south, consistent with serial founder effects during post-Beringian migrations.^[68] In the Amish community, descended from about 200 Swiss-German founders in the 18th century, the Ellis-van Creveld syndrome mutation in the EVC gene reaches a carrier frequency of 1 in 77, causing dwarfism and polydactyly due to genetic drift in this closed population. Such founder mutations contribute to disease clusters, prompting genetic screening programs that raise ethical concerns, including risks of stigmatization, coerced testing in tight-knit communities, and unequal access to counseling for groups like Ashkenazi Jews and the Amish.^[69]^[70] As of 2025, large-scale genomic databases like gnomAD have integrated data from underrepresented populations, identifying novel founder variants in groups such as those in the Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean region of Quebec and Arab communities, where regional carrier rates for recessive disorders exceed global averages by up to 10-fold.^[71] These resources enhance variant interpretation and reveal how founder effects persist in modern demographics, informing targeted screening while addressing equity in genomic research.^[72]

Non-Human Examples

The founder effect has profoundly shaped the genetic landscape of cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus) populations, stemming from a severe population bottleneck during the late Pleistocene, approximately 10,000–12,000 years ago, which reduced the species' effective population size to as few as 7,000 individuals and resulted in extremely low genetic diversity across nuclear and mitochondrial genomes.^[73] This historical event, akin to a founder bottleneck, led to near-complete monozygosity at many loci, with over 99% of surveyed cheetahs showing identical alleles, contributing to elevated inbreeding and physiological vulnerabilities such as high male infertility rates (up to 70% abnormal sperm morphology) and increased susceptibility to diseases like feline infectious peritonitis.^[74] Similar patterns appear in the Florida panther (Puma concolor coryi), where isolation in southern Florida reduced the population to fewer than 30 individuals by the 1990s, amplifying founder effects through genetic drift and inbreeding that manifested in congenital defects like kinked tails and cardiac abnormalities.^[75] To mitigate these, conservation efforts in 1995 introduced eight female pumas from a Texas population, boosting heterozygosity by 52% and improving fitness metrics, including a 200% increase in sperm motility among admixed males, thereby countering the founder-induced decline.^[76] In plants, the invasive vine kudzu (Pueraria montana var. lobata) exemplifies founder effects following its introduction to the United States from Asia in the late 19th century, where small propagule numbers—often fewer than 100 individuals per site—led to rapid clonal expansion across the Southeast but with markedly reduced genetic variation compared to native ranges.^[77] Despite multiple introductions, invasive populations exhibit only 20–30% of the allelic diversity found in Asian source populations, as measured by inter-simple sequence repeat markers, enabling unchecked spread over 7 million hectares while limiting adaptive potential to new stressors like herbicides.^[78] This low-diversity founder signature underscores how initial colonization bottlenecks can facilitate invasion success through vegetative propagation, though it heightens vulnerability to evolving pathogens. Microbial systems provide controlled insights into founder effects, as demonstrated in Richard Lenski's long-term evolution experiment with Escherichia coli, initiated in 1988 with 12 replicate populations derived from a single clonal ancestor cultured in a glucose-limited medium.^[79] Early mutations in one lineage, arising within the first 2,000 generations, enabled citrate utilization—a novel adaptation absent in the wild-type founder—while parallel replicates diverged due to stochastic founder-driven genetic drift, resulting in distinct evolutionary trajectories despite identical starting conditions and environments.^[80] These founder effects highlight how initial genetic variation, even at the clonal level, influences long-term adaptability, with populations showing up to 37% fitness gains but varying metabolic profiles shaped by historical contingencies. Broader implications of founder effects in non-human taxa inform endangered species management, where interventions like genetic supplementation, as in the Florida panther case, restore diversity and enhance population viability without eradicating local adaptations.^[81] Emerging research in the 2020s, leveraging metagenomics, reveals founder dynamics in coral reef recovery post-bleaching; for instance, the 2023 marine heatwave in Florida caused a 77% loss of genotypic diversity in wild elkhorn coral (Acropora palmata) populations, leaving surviving recruits with bottlenecked microbiomes dominated by heat-tolerant bacterial taxa that may drive recolonization but limit resilience to future events.^[82] Similarly, post-bleaching metagenomic analyses of mountainous star coral (Orbicella faveolata) show shifts in microbial community composition, with founder symbionts influencing host recovery rates and underscoring the need for diverse larval sources in restoration.^[83]

References

[1]
Founder Effect - National Human Genome Research Institute
The founder effect is the reduction in genetic variation that results when a small subset of a large population is used to establish a new colony.Missing: sources | Show results with:sources
[2]
Founder Effect - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Founder effect is defined as the reduction in genetic variability in a population that occurs due to a small number of breeding colonizers, leading to decreased ...
[3]
A Population-Genetic Test of Founder Effects and Implications for ...
A founder effect can account for the presence of an allele at an unusually high frequency in an isolated population if the allele is selectively neutral.
[4]
Founder mutations and rare disease in the Arab world - PMC - NIH
Jun 26, 2024 · The founder effect is the establishment of a new population from a small group of founding individuals with similar genetic characteristics due ...Genetic Mechanisms Of... · Founder Mutations Around The... · Table 1Missing: 2020-2025 | Show results with:2020-2025
[5]
Bottlenecks and founder effects - Understanding Evolution
A founder effect occurs when a new colony is started by a few members of the original population. This small population size means that the colony may have: ...
[6]
Genetic drift (article) | Natural selection - Khan Academy
The founder effect and the bottleneck effect are cases in which a small population is formed from a larger population. These “sampled” populations often do not ...
[7]
Systematics and the Origin of Species from the Viewpoint of a ...
Oct 15, 1999 · This classic study, first published in 1942, helped to revolutionize evolutionary biology by offering a new approach to taxonomic principles.
[8]
EVOLUTION IN MENDELIAN POPULATIONS | Genetics
The mean gene frequencies are simply the ratios of the chances of fixation at each extreme, namely, ve 4Ns /(u+ve 4Ns )Missing: drift | Show results with:drift
[9]
Evolution in Mendelian Populations - PMC - NIH
Evolution in Mendelian Populations ... Sewall Wright. 1University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. Find articles by Sewall Wright. 1. Author information
[10]
Genetic Drift - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Sep 15, 2016 · In short, no: Wright (1932 and elsewhere) makes it clear that he considers drift to encompass both random sampling of gametes and random ...Origins of the Concept of... · Intersection of Genetic Drift...
[11]
Evolution: Library: Genetic Drift and the Founder Effect - PBS
The founder effect is an extreme example of "genetic drift." Genes occurring at a certain frequency in the larger population will occur at a different frequency ...
[12]
20.9.2: Genetic Drift - Biology LibreTexts
Dec 16, 2021 · genetic drift: an overall shift of allele distribution in an isolated population, due to random sampling · founder effect: a decrease in genetic ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[13]
Increased homozygosity due to endogamy results in fitness ... - NIH
Oct 17, 2023 · Because consanguinity or founder effects increase the likelihood that an individual will inherit identical segments from both parents, resulting ...
[14]
Genetic Drift and Founder Effects: Implications for Population ...
Mar 17, 2024 · Genetic drift and founder effects are fundamental processes that shape genetic diversity within isolated populations, such as island populations ...
[15]
Founder Effect - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
The founder effect can increase the frequency of certain rare disorders, while other disease alleles characteristic of the parental population may disappear.
[16]
On the Importance of Being Ernst Mayr | PLOS Biology
Apr 5, 2005 · Mayr called it “peripatric speciation” or “founder-effect speciation.” And it is an idea that Ernst Mayr was particularly fond of. He ...
[17]
The reality and importance of founder speciation in evolution
A founder event occurs when a new population is established from a small number of individuals drawn from a large ancestral population.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[18]
Serial Founder Effects During Range Expansion: A Spatial Analog of ...
Range expansions cause a series of founder events. We show that, in a one-dimensional habitat, these founder events are the spatial analog of genetic drift.
[19]
Estimation of effective number of breeders from molecular ... - NIH
The effective population size, Ne, is one of the most important parameters in population genetics and conservation biology, because this parameter determines ...
[20]
A Unified Treatment of the Probability of Fixation when Population ...
The fixation probability of a single copy of an A allele in a population of census size N is obtained by setting P = 1/(2N) in Equation 2.
[21]
Coalescence-Time Distributions in a Serial Founder Model of ... - NIH
Coalescence times. In this section, we derive the probability density of coalescence times for a pair of lineages sampled under the serial founder model.
[22]
Genome-Wide Association Studies in an Isolated Founder ... - NIH
Feb 6, 2009 · Inbreeding and the historical lack of random mating in a small population violate assumptions such as Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium which underlie ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[23]
Novel Case-Control Test in a Founder Population Identifies P ... - NIH
Apart from genotyping errors, departures from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in isolated populations such as the Hutterites are mainly due to nonnegligible ...
[24]
Impact of founder population, drift and selection on the genetic ...
Aug 18, 2004 · When initial population establishment results in a bottleneck, genetic drift leads to a random change of allelic frequencies and a reduction in ...
[25]
Genetic Drift - American Phytopathological Society
A founder effect occurs when a small number of individuals, representing only a small fraction of the total genetic variation in a species, starts a new ...
[26]
Can a Sex-Biased Human Demography Account for the Reduced ...
Sex-biased demographic events can result in asymmetries in female and male effective population size that can lead to different patterns of genetic variation on ...Missing: relatedness | Show results with:relatedness
[27]
Combining genetic data to identify relatedness among founders in a ...
Aug 6, 2025 · This 'founder effect' is exacerbated when pedigrees are shallow (< 5 generations recorded; Balloux et al. 2004;Pemberton 2004;Rudnick & Lacy ...
[28]
Linkage disequilibrium — understanding the evolutionary past and ...
the nonrandom association of alleles at different loci — is a sensitive indicator of the population genetic forces that structure a ...
[29]
Rare Variation Facilitates Inferences of Fine-Scale Population ...
Nov 21, 2014 · We show that rare variation affords unique insights into patterns of recent population structure. Furthermore, to empirically assess our ...
[30]
Reconstructing the history of founder events using genome-wide ...
Jun 23, 2022 · A founder event occurs when small numbers of ancestral individuals give rise to a large fraction of the population. Founder events reduce ...<|separator|>
[31]
[PDF] LABORATORY EXPERIMENTS ON SPECIATION
The genetic basis for fruit odor discrimination in Rhagoletis flies and its ... Founder-effect speciation theory: Failure of experi- mental corroboration.
[32]
Founder niche constrains evolutionary adaptive radiation - PMC - NIH
Using experimental bacterial populations, we demonstrate that adaptive radiation is constrained by the ecology of the founder.
[33]
Support from the relationship of genetic and geographic distance in ...
Oct 21, 2005 · The equation of the regression line is heterozygosity = 0.7682 - (6.52 × 10-6) × (distance from Addis Ababa). R2 = 0.7630. (B) Simulation ...Missing: formula | Show results with:formula
[34]
Serial founder effects slow range expansion in an invasive social ...
Apr 29, 2024 · Invasive populations often experience founder effects: a loss of genetic diversity relative to the source population, due to a small number ...Missing: relatedness | Show results with:relatedness
[35]
Genomic signatures of bottleneck and founder effects in dingoes
Sep 19, 2023 · In our study, we investigated the genomic evidence for founder effects and bottlenecks in dingo populations by sequencing the whole genomes of three dingoes and ...
[36]
Definition of founder variant - NCI Dictionary of Genetics Terms
A genetic alteration observed with high frequency in a group that is or was geographically or culturally isolated, in which one or more of the ancestors was ...
[37]
BRCA1/2 potential founder variants in the Jordanian population
Jul 3, 2023 · A founder variant is a genetic alteration, that is inherited from a common ancestor together with a surrounding chromosomal segment, ...<|separator|>
[38]
Founder mutations and rare disease in the Arab world
Jun 26, 2024 · Founder mutations are disease-causing variants that occur frequently in geographically or culturally isolated groups whose shared ancestor(s) carried the ...ABSTRACT · Definition of founder mutations · Rare disease and founder...
[39]
Founder mutations among the Dutch | European Journal of Human ...
Mar 10, 2004 · Many genetic disorders demonstrate mutations that can be traced to a founder, sometimes a person who can be identified.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[40]
Expanding the Spectrum of Founder Mutations Causing Isolated ...
Founder mutations reside on haplotypes that are shared by all carriers of the mutation because they are inherited from a common ancestor (12). Haplotypes ...Missing: characteristics | Show results with:characteristics
[41]
Identification and Characterization of Novel Founder Mutations in ...
Aug 21, 2024 · The c.538-1G>A variant resides on a shared haplotype block of 2.4 Mb between the three families (I, II, and IV), shown in ...
[42]
Identity by Descent Mapping of Founder Mutations in Cancer Using ...
A disease-causing mutation inherited from a common founder may thus be detected by searching for a common haplotype signature in a sample population of patients ...
[43]
Identity by descent analysis identifies founder events and links ...
Aug 7, 2020 · A powerful strategy to uncover a familial link is identity-by-descent (IBD) analysis, which detects genomic regions that have been inherited from a common ...
[44]
Dating Mutations - Colombo - Major Reference Works
Dec 21, 2007 · The age of a mutation can be estimated from the decay of linkage disequilibrium with flanking or intragenic polymorphisms because of ...
[45]
Population history and infrequent mutations: how old is a ... - Nature
Aug 8, 2007 · Calculating the age of a mutation is greatly simplified by assuming that all present day haplotypes descended from a single common ancestor, ...Statistical Analysis · Haplotype Core Boundary · Distal Haplotype Boundary
[46]
The evolutionary history of the CCR5-Delta32 HIV-resistance mutation
A deletion mutation (Delta32) confers resistance against HIV by obliterating the expression of the receptor on the cell surface.
[47]
[PDF] Is the European spatial distribution of the HIV-1-resistant CCR5-D32 ...
Feb 17, 2022 · The age of the CCR5-Δ32 allele has been estimated to be between. 700 and 3,500 years BP based on linkage disequilibrium data (Stephens et al., ...
[48]
Molecular Genetics the Finnish Disease Heritage - Oxford Academic
Two major mutations were detected in the Finnish population, named Fin major and Fin minor . Sixty-five percent of the patients are homozygous for the Fin major ...
[49]
[PDF] Finnish Disease Heritage I: characteristics, causes, background
The Finnish Disease Heritage (FDH) is a group of rare hereditary diseases overrepresented in Finland, including at least 36 disorders.<|separator|>
[50]
Detection of the founder effect in Finnish CADASIL families - Nature
Sep 20, 2004 · In 18 out of the 21 Finnish CADASIL families so far identified, the causative mutation is an arginine to cysteine substitution in position 133 (R133C).
[51]
Personalized Medicine and Human Genetic Diversity - PMC - NIH
That means that they have been relatively recently introduced into the population by mutation, and the specific mutations are, therefore, usually geographically ...
[52]
Personalized Medicine in Treating Rare Genetic Disorders: A Review
Apr 29, 2025 · The current therapies using CRISPR-Cas9 and gene therapy methods tend to fix harmful mutations effectively. Biomarker discovery, along with ...
[53]
Island biogeography: Taking the long view of nature's laboratories
Sep 1, 2017 · This work provided a quantitative framework for understanding the ecological processes governing the diversity of species on oceanic islands.
[54]
A generalized model of island biogeography - PubMed
By incorporating speciation and factors influencing it into the MacArthur-Wilson model, we propose a generalized model unifying ecological and evolutionary ...
[55]
founder effects in island species and their genetic signatures - Habel
Oct 18, 2012 · Island populations are mostly characterized by low genetic diversity if compared with their mainland conspecifics. This is often explained as a consequence of ...
[56]
INVITED REVIEW EVOLUTION OF DROSOPHILA ON THE ... - Nature
The high degree of species endemism from one island to the next suggests that, in Hawaiian. Drosophila at least, some sort of founder effect is involved in the ...
[57]
Ancestral polymorphisms shape the adaptive radiation of ... - NIH
Sep 8, 2021 · Some of the most spectacular adaptive radiations begin with founder populations on remote islands. How genetically limited founder populations ...Missing: limitations | Show results with:limitations
[58]
Profuse evolutionary diversification and speciation on volcanic islands
Sep 6, 2016 · Species-rich adaptive radiations arising from rare plant and animal colonizers are common on remote volcanic archipelagoes.
[59]
Darwin's finches: population variation and natural selection. - PNAS
Other factors which may have contributed to the establishment of a difference in variation between Santa Cruz and Daphne populations are the founder effect, ...
[60]
Plastic and genomic change of a newly established lizard ... - PubMed
Dec 22, 2023 · Our results show genome-wide genetic differentiation between ancestral and transplanted population, with weak genetic erosion on Pod Mrčaru Island.Missing: evidence 2020s
[61]
Genetic depletion does not prevent rapid evolution in island ...
Nov 27, 2023 · Using a genomic approach (~82,000 ddRAD loci), we confirmed a founder effect during introduction and very low neutral genetic differentiation ...Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
[62]
Conservation concerns associated with low genetic diversity for K ...
May 4, 2021 · ... low overall population size. Alongside reduced diversity, island populations often diverge genetically from their mainland founder populations.
[63]
Genomic evidence for the Pleistocene and recent population history ...
The consensus view on the peopling of the Americas is that ancestors of modern Native Americans entered the Americas from Siberia via the Bering Land Bridge and ...
[64]
Testing migration patterns and estimating founding population size ...
The hypervariable 1 region of human mtDNA shows markedly reduced variability in Polynesians, and this variability decreases from western to eastern Polynesia.
[65]
Genetic characterization of populations in the Marquesas ... - Nature
Mar 29, 2022 · ... Polynesia whose genetic constitution was shaped by repeated bottleneck and founder effect events that have led to random drift and homozygosity.
[66]
Origin and spread of the 1278insTATC mutation causing Tay-Sachs ...
The founder effect in a rapidly expanding population arising from a bottleneck provides a robust parsimonious hypothesis explaining the spread of ...
[67]
Ancient genomes from Iceland reveal the making of a human ...
Jun 1, 2018 · Using genome sequence data from 27 ancient Icelanders, we demonstrate that they are a combination of Norse, Gaelic, and admixed individuals.
[68]
The composition of the founding population of Iceland - NIH
Feb 8, 2021 · Our study, therefore, strengthens the idea that the founding population was a mix of Scandinavians and people from the British Isles.
[69]
A genomic view of the peopling of the Americas - PMC
Mitochondrial DNA analyses were the first to document that the ancestry of most Native Americans derives from a population that experienced a profound founder ...
[70]
Screening Jews and Genes: A Consideration of the Ethics of
I review the history of genetic screening among Jews and the views from the Jewish tradition ... A screening program for "Jewish genetic diseases" must be.<|control11|><|separator|>
[71]
Carrier screening in individuals of Ashkenazi Jewish descent - PMC
Carrier screening for Ashkenazi Jews includes cystic fibrosis, Canavan, familial dysautonomia, Tay-Sachs, Fanconi anemia, Niemann-Pick, Bloom, mucolipidosis IV ...
[72]
Rare diseases load through the study of a regional population - PMC
Oct 16, 2025 · Founder variants' regional carrier rates and individuals' mutation load. We then compared the carrier rates of founder variants between the SLSJ ...
[73]
Genetic disease risks of under-represented founder populations in ...
We identified seven highly-interrelated founder populations, with 201 likely disease-causing variants with increased frequencies in specific founder ...Missing: underrepresented | Show results with:underrepresented
[74]
Dating the genetic bottleneck of the African cheetah - PMC - NIH
It has been hypothesized that a demographic crash or population bottleneck in the recent history of the species is causal to the observed monomorphic profiles ...Missing: founder | Show results with:founder
[75]
Conservation Genetics of the Cheetah - PubMed Central - NIH
The cumulative results, indicative of reduced genetic diversity in the cheetah, were consistent with a genetic bottleneck or a series of demographic reductions ...
[76]
Genetic restoration of the Florida panther. - Abstract - Europe PMC
The rediscovery of remnant Florida panthers (Puma concolor coryi) in southern Florida swamplands prompted a program to protect and stabilize the population.
[77]
(PDF) Genetic Restoration of the Florida Panther - ResearchGate
In 1995, conservation managers translocated eight female pumas (P. c. stanleyana) from Texas to increase depleted genetic diversity, improve population numbers,
[78]
Low genetic diversity despite multiple introductions of the invasive ...
Aug 20, 2015 · In a newly introduced plant species, genetic differentiation between populations can be expected to be low if mutation, selection and genetic ...
[79]
Heterogeneity of clonal patterns among patches of kudzu, Pueraria ...
Jul 30, 2015 · Depending on the number and genetic similarity of founders, colonization can reduce genetic diversity ... impacts of invasive species over time is ...
[80]
Long-Term Experimental Evolution in Escherichia coli. I. Adaptation ...
Twelve Escherichia coli populations were founded from a single clonal ancestor and allowed to evolve for 2,000 generations. Mean fitness increased by about 37%.
[81]
Historical contingency and the evolution of a key innovation ... - PNAS
F Vasi, M Travisano, RE Lenski, Long-term experimental evolution in Escherichia coli. II. Changes in life-history traits during adaptation to a seasonal ...
[82]
Long-term evaluation of male Florida panther (Puma concolor coryi ...
Apr 7, 2022 · Genetic introgression led to increased genetic heterozygosity and reduced inbreeding traits. Admixed panthers showed improved sperm ...Missing: supplementation | Show results with:supplementation
[83]
All That Remains: Severe Decline in Wild Elkhorn Coral Genetic ...
Aug 14, 2024 · As of fall 2023, only 37 remained after the heat event—a loss of 77 percent of genotypic diversity.Missing: effect post
[84]
Integrated metagenomic and metaproteomic analyses reveal ... - NIH
Oct 26, 2023 · The results demonstrated that coral bleaching significantly affected the composition of symbionts, with bacterial communities dominating in ...Missing: founder 2020s